WEBVTT - Dennis Gartman: Negative Population Growth Is Problem (Audio)

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day. If Bloomberg

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the radio plus mobile last and on your radio.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Palott. Stocks are extended, lost, extending losses amid

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>growing speculation that the Federal Reserve sees firm and off

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>economic growth to raise rates as soon as June. SMP

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>five hundred indecks are racing yesterday's rally. Right now, the

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>SMP down twenty one points, a drop of one percent.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Town Industrials down one ninety four points to decline there

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of one point one percent. Nastack is down sixty points,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a drop of one point three percent. He old on

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the tenure one point seven five percent, Gold up six

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty ounce to twelve eighties seventy a gain of point

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>five percent, and crude oil hired by seventy nine cents

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of arrowy fifty one now on West Texas intermediate crude.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>That is a gain of one point seven percent. I'm

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Palett. That's a Bloomberg Business Flash. Charlie Polla, thank

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you so very much. Time now for the e t

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>F Report, brought to you by Vanack Vector's e t

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>F expect more from your munis target tax exempt income

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>by maturity and credit quality, all with low cost et

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>F s. Visit van k dot com slash Muni vanek

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>access the opportunities for e t F report we return

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>to our own Catherine Cowdery. It's a tough year for

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the e t F industry. That's a word from Bloomberg

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence analyst Eric bel Tunis. He says flows into e

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>t s is slowed. However, some e t F providers

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>are doing better than others. This is the kind of

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>year that Schwab and Vanguard live for. They are taking

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in se of all of the new cash going into

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>e t F s. Val Tunas says that investors who

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>chase performance are selling off in the midst of the

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>market's volatility, but Vanguard and Schwab, those products go in

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like clockwork. The flows go in every month, every day,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>so you have the both of them taking in money

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and all products, even products that are down. So it

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>just shows you the long term power of of these companies.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Bel Tunis says flows this year illustrate the sea change

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's taking place in the financial industry from high price

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to low priced investments. Hedge funds and active mutual funds

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have seen outflows this year, while e t F has

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>seen inflows. That's your Bloomberg ETF report. I'm Katherine Cowdery.

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Taking Stock with Kathleen Hayes and Pimp

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Box on Bloomberg Radio. Imagine if you had invested your

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>money at the beginning of the year in an asset

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that now is higher by more than eighteen percent. I

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was looking at some of the fine print in the

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>fine work done by Dennis Gartman, because Dennis Gartman has

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>been putting together the Gartman Letter uh since nine eight

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>seven that I could not believe. Dennis Gartman, thank you

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for being with us economist publisher the Gartman Letter, joining

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>us from Suffolk, Virginia. How are you old and tired?

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But all right? All right, Well that's le's stop. But

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that's good enough. You know. I I read your commentary,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but I read it back to front um. Tell me

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with gold and precious metals and palladian

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and all that. What's going on with this? They first

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of all, the world suddenly does like gold in dollar terms.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>What's important to understand is that the world liked gold

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in euro terms two years ago, had made its low then,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and the world liked gold in yen denominated terms four

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It's it's been a demonstrative bowld market in

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gold predicated in other currencies, and I think one has

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to understand that gold is nothing more than a currency.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>As an old four X trader, we always used to

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>trade dollar mark against the end yen, against the Swiss frank,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Swiss frank against the old Italian lira. You're always taught

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a spreader of one thing, a buyer of

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing, a seller of something else. And in the

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>world of for in the world of gold trading, I

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>think people are beginning to understand that gold really is

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>simply another currency. And we're beginning to understand that if

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>gold was a bull market in the end terms four

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago, if gold was a bull market in euros

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, gold began to be a bull market

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in the dollar about four months ago, and that's starting

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to engender a little interest on the part of speculators everywhere.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>People tend to think of gold only in dollar terms,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and until you've got a bull market going there, it

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was hard to get a bullish enthusiasm much. But you're

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that, and I think you're starting to

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>see an increase in inflationary expectations. The grains are turning

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for the better, Livestock is turning for the better. Clearly

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the crude oil market has turned for the better. So

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>there's inflationary circumstances prevailing, which is helping to put a

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bit to the gold market. See that's why we've always

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed talking to each other, because we are macro people, right, gold, bonds, currencies, Dennis,

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, the gold going up, but the

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars starting to strengthen. Two, because people are were first

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>working comments from key Feather Reserve officials that hey, we

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we could raise rates, and in fact some people are

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fact that they will and sooner, maybe

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>than the market expects. This has been boosting the dollar

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Does that continue and if it does, what

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>does it mean for this UH dollar rally and goals? Well,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I first of all, I think that people are somewhat surprised.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing weakness in the stock market to day, which

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to develop into something a little

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>more difficult over the course of the next several weeks.

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>But the stock market began to sell off this afternoon

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>following comments by Mr Kaplan, the the the president of

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the Fellow Reserve Bank of Dallas, who, although it's not

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a voter on the f o MC this year, I

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think is one of the better voices given the fact

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that he came out of the trading arena. He's not

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a PhD in economics. He's actually somebody who's had to

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>run a fund, and I think the market tends to

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>pay more attention to him. And he made this to

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the the comment that we might well see a FED

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>funds rate increase at the June meeting, and I suspect

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>that that's probably very likely. So there in lies the

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>problem with the equities market. Equities wanted to see nothing

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but flat rates, rates held lower for longer, and sudden

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>there's on the table once again as an increase in

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>rate in the June meeting. Dennis Scartman as someone that

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe I grew up watching companies leave one by

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>one in there in your neighborhood. I wonder if you

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>could mix a little politics with a little investment in

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the financial perspective for us, well, tis what I grew

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>up in Akron, Ohio, where back in the nineteen forties, fifties,

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and sixties, every tire on every car, literally every tire

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and every car was manufactured. There hasn't been a tire

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing naquenceins ninety four entire industry. The rubber industry left,

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>good Year, good Rich, Firestone, Uniroyal, Cyberling, they were all there.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>Their headquarters are still there, but their production facilities have

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>moved elsewhere. What's interesting is it's all been replaced by

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of other businesses. And therein is the magic of America.

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh And instead of having six companies that had that

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>had twenty thousand employees, there are six hundred companies with

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>two hundred employees, and the unemployment rate and acronism is

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>holding nicely right at the US at average rate. We

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>replaced everything, and that's that's what we do well here.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>The problem that I have and looking forward into this

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>next election, is that we have on the Republicans, and

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm somewhat to the right of Jengis Khan politically and economically,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but the Republican standard there as a protectionist, wants to

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>protect the businesses. The business of America is actually to

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>come up with new businesses, destroy the old, build the new,

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we're great. Well, I'm gonna go too

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>far down that road, because there are some pretty strong

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>voices arguing these days, Dennis. It's an argument that didn't

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>go away. But there's more and more focus being put

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on the dollar and whether or not it is artificially

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>manipulated by our trading partners. And if it is, then

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe Donald Trump has a point that free trade is

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing, but fair trade is what a lot of

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>people are saying we must have in order for this

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to work for everybody, including us workers. Well, Mr Trump

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>takes on the es the reman By. He folks who

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>focuses on the remand as being a manipulated currency. If

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it is being manipulated over the course of the last decade,

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been manipulated against the Chinese, because the reman By

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>has gotten demonstrably stronger. It's written by what from five

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>or sickle of actually from eight years ago. I don't

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have my screen in front of me, but if up dramatically, yes,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the reman b is down relative to the dollar over

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last year and a half, but

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last decade, it is up

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and up dramatically, and if the if the Chinese have

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>been manipulating, then they've got manipulation in the wrong direction.

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Gartman expound on the theme of demographics and Europe

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and what is going on because this is a problem,

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>or is not a problem, but this is a situation

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that may not necessarily be so widely known about. Well,

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>all economics derives from demographics. You cannot have a growing

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>economy if you have a falling population. It's just that simple.

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You need need children, you need to have growth in

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the population. And what's happening the birth rates in Europe UH,

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations, the u N says that unless you

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have two point one children for every woman in in

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a birth age population, the population declines. In Europe, now

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to get down to one point seven children

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for for women. That's not enough to keep the economy

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep the population moving higher. What's interesting is in

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the industrialized world, the only countries that have populations that

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are growing are the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>What do we have in common other than the English language.

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>The thing that we have most in common with is immigration. UH.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You have a problem in in in countries where the

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>population growth is negative, and in places like Japan, for example,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>where the population growth is even more negative than in Europe.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Not only is it growing negative, it is growing older

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>by the hour. There are as I like to say,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>there are entire villages in Japan who have never heard

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of baby in the last fifteen years because there haven't

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>been any born. It's a very serious problem that needs

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to be dealt with. Certainly, we started to see the

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese begin to deal with it when they when they

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ended their ludicrous one child program. At least they have

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on them now allowed to have two children if they

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>ask permission. You need to have population growth, and in

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>most of the industrialized world we have negative growth. And

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's not negative yet, it will be negative in

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>another couple of years. It's a very serious problem that

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>no one talks about. Just about fifteen seconds left, but

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you gold that one thousand, two

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or eighty dollars roughly an ounce would you buy it here? Dennis?

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna move higher this dollar gold rally? Uh?

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Six months from now it will be higher. A year

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>from now, it'll be higher, two years from now, it'll

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be higher how much. I'm not one of those people

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>who thinks it's going to several thousand dollars. It's the

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>trend is from the lower left to the upper right.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It's probably gonna be higher, nicely, probably six seven percent

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>higher a year from now than it is now. Dennis Carbon,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so very much for joining us. It's great

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to have on taking stock here on Bloomberg Radio. Economist,

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>publisher of the Gartman Letter. He's in Suffolk, Virginia. We're

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in Alexandri Alexander, Virginia. Very special broadcast in the Washington

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>metro area on Bloomberg Radio.