1 00:00:01,680 --> 00:00:05,160 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Betting Pros PGA Podcast. I'm Pat Fitzmorris 2 00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: here with Bau mcbrair. The PGA Tour heads from Hawaii 3 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:12,799 Speaker 1: to California. After it took a playoff to settle things 4 00:00:12,880 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 1: at the Sony Open. We'll do a quick recap of 5 00:00:15,680 --> 00:00:18,640 Speaker 1: the Sony offer you a full betting preview of this 6 00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 1: week's tournament the American Express. We'll tell you who we 7 00:00:22,040 --> 00:00:24,119 Speaker 1: personally are betting, and then we will give you our 8 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:26,240 Speaker 1: one and done picks for the week at the end 9 00:00:26,239 --> 00:00:32,280 Speaker 1: of the show. Nick Taylor is in unassuming Canadian professional golfer, 10 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:35,879 Speaker 1: but get him into a playoff bow and he turns 11 00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:40,360 Speaker 1: into a ferocious monster with a taste for flesh and blood. 12 00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:43,800 Speaker 1: Taylor has been on the tour for about a decade 13 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,680 Speaker 1: and has five career wins, the last three of which 14 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:49,640 Speaker 1: have been in playoffs. And twenty twenty three, Taylor rolled 15 00:00:49,640 --> 00:00:52,519 Speaker 1: in a seventy two foot bomb for eagle to be 16 00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 1: Tommy Fleetwood in a playoff at the Canadian Open, becoming 17 00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:58,920 Speaker 1: the first Canadian to win the Canadian Open in sixty 18 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:02,280 Speaker 1: nine years. Last year, Taylor beat Charlie Hoffman in a 19 00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:05,679 Speaker 1: playoff to win the Waste Management Phoenix Open, birdying both 20 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:09,160 Speaker 1: playoff holes to do so, and Sunday at the Sony Open, 21 00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:12,880 Speaker 1: Taylor eagled the par five eighteenth hole to get into 22 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:16,360 Speaker 1: a playoff with Nico at Cheveria, and then one on 23 00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:19,800 Speaker 1: the second playoff hole. He birdied the eighteenth on both 24 00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:22,520 Speaker 1: of the playoff holes. Taylor's approach to the eighteenth on 25 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:25,880 Speaker 1: the second playoff hole came up about fifty yard shorts, 26 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 1: but then he hit just a brilliant little pitch to 27 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:32,640 Speaker 1: within three feet. At Schaveri had hit his second shot 28 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:35,360 Speaker 1: onto the back fringe of the green about thirty nine 29 00:01:35,400 --> 00:01:38,039 Speaker 1: feet from the hole, but he hit a poor putt 30 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,440 Speaker 1: that left him seven feet away, then skirted that put 31 00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:45,360 Speaker 1: by on the right, and Taylor calmly sank his birdie 32 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:49,320 Speaker 1: putt for the victory. Taylor and at Shaveria finished minus sixteen. 33 00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: JJ Spahn and Steven Jaeger both finished one shot back. 34 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:55,320 Speaker 1: They both could have joined the playoff with birdie's on 35 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:58,080 Speaker 1: the par five eighteenth, Spawn couldn't get up and down 36 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:01,480 Speaker 1: from the front right rough, missing a ten foot birdie putt. 37 00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 1: Jaeger curiously put away his big driver on the eighteenth 38 00:02:05,080 --> 00:02:07,760 Speaker 1: tee and proceeded to knock his tee shot into a 39 00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:11,480 Speaker 1: fairweight bunker. Anyway, his hole didn't get any better from there. 40 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:13,919 Speaker 1: He still had almost one hundred and sixty to the 41 00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:16,200 Speaker 1: hall for his third shot hit that one off the 42 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:17,960 Speaker 1: back of the green. Would have needed to make his 43 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 1: little pitch from there to join the playoff, failed to 44 00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:24,639 Speaker 1: do so. Any takeaways from the sony. 45 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:28,200 Speaker 2: Bone Isn't it funny? How during last week? So I 46 00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:30,560 Speaker 2: did mention Nick Taylor, but it was in passing about 47 00:02:30,560 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 2: Adam Hadwin, and Hadwin got off to a great start 48 00:02:34,160 --> 00:02:36,960 Speaker 2: and then fell apart. But it was Nick Taylor who 49 00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:41,520 Speaker 2: also matched up well with Wilight Country Club and got 50 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:43,320 Speaker 2: hot at the right time. He was kind of in 51 00:02:43,360 --> 00:02:45,520 Speaker 2: the middle of the pack most of the week, and 52 00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 2: then his weekend was incredibly efficient. He was making birdies 53 00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:53,440 Speaker 2: in tough conditions and that's what it was. Sixteen hunder 54 00:02:53,480 --> 00:02:58,360 Speaker 2: par for that tournament is a pretty low or high 55 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:04,240 Speaker 2: bad score for historical purposes. The wind was up most 56 00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:08,480 Speaker 2: of the week. Nick Taylor was pretty sharp despite pretty 57 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:11,639 Speaker 2: tough conditions for Wilight Country Club, and that chip in 58 00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 2: for eagle on the seventy second hole. Outstanding short game 59 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 2: and that that's what we know of Nick Taylor. He 60 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:21,800 Speaker 2: reminds me a lot of Mike we are ironically, where 61 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:25,760 Speaker 2: it's just that that bulldog mentality where the as the 62 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,520 Speaker 2: tough gets going this this guy is gonna be there 63 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,440 Speaker 2: staring in the face of it and Nick Taylor get 64 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:35,960 Speaker 2: He got me fired up. Chipping in on eighteen that 65 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:38,480 Speaker 2: was that was as good as it gets because he 66 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 2: needed it. If he didn't make that eagle chip, he 67 00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:42,840 Speaker 2: was going to be out of the playoff and Nico 68 00:03:42,880 --> 00:03:44,240 Speaker 2: Etcheveria would have won. 69 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:48,320 Speaker 1: Not only that chip, but the chip on that that 70 00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:52,920 Speaker 1: he won the tournament on. Knowing that Nico is going 71 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: to probably make Bertie there didn't didn't wind up making Bertie, 72 00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 1: but you you know, you you have to assume. 73 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:00,760 Speaker 2: That or match play type of scenario. 74 00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:04,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, and fifty yards away with a lot of green 75 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 1: to cover off a bare lie, getting it inside three 76 00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:11,640 Speaker 1: feet is a top five percentile outcome and he was 77 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 1: just you know, nails in that way. 78 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:17,159 Speaker 2: That's a nervy type of shot too. That's a shot 79 00:04:17,240 --> 00:04:20,800 Speaker 2: that gives everybody fits at any level. A tight lie 80 00:04:21,160 --> 00:04:24,480 Speaker 2: half weed shot where you're taking something off, you're trying 81 00:04:24,480 --> 00:04:27,599 Speaker 2: to measure the spin. It's so tricky of a shot 82 00:04:27,640 --> 00:04:30,039 Speaker 2: and he made it look like it was nothing. It 83 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:33,280 Speaker 2: was a masterclass in finishing from Nick Taylor. 84 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:35,799 Speaker 1: Yep. Really hard to control the spin on that shot. 85 00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:37,919 Speaker 1: A lot of guys come up way short and he 86 00:04:38,040 --> 00:04:39,000 Speaker 1: just rolled that one out. 87 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:41,480 Speaker 2: Or they skull it over the green and kill somebody. 88 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,800 Speaker 1: That is typically my shot on that kind of chip 89 00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:49,640 Speaker 1: off a bare lie. Now we head to the American Express, 90 00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:52,560 Speaker 1: which will be played in southern California, about one hundred 91 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:55,720 Speaker 1: and thirty miles northeast of San Diego. This event is 92 00:04:55,760 --> 00:04:59,640 Speaker 1: played on three courses. Players rotate between the Pete die 93 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:04,080 Speaker 1: State Course, Lacina Country Club, and the Nicholas Tournament Course 94 00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:06,599 Speaker 1: for their first three rounds, then play the final round 95 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 1: at the Stadium course. Again, there's a fifty four hole cut. 96 00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 1: I could be wrong, but I think this is the 97 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:15,240 Speaker 1: only tour event with a fifty four hole cut. There 98 00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:17,360 Speaker 1: are one hundred and fifty six players in the field 99 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 1: this week. And oh, by the way, it's a pro am, 100 00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:22,880 Speaker 1: So if you want to watch corporate CEOs hit duck 101 00:05:22,920 --> 00:05:25,920 Speaker 1: hooks into the desert, this event is for you. We 102 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 1: won't spend as much time on the course breakdown this 103 00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:31,560 Speaker 1: week because the courses are all pretty similar in how 104 00:05:31,600 --> 00:05:35,000 Speaker 1: they play, and the bottom line for all of them easypasy. 105 00:05:35,880 --> 00:05:40,000 Speaker 1: The Stadium Course is a par seventy two that plays two, seven, 106 00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:42,760 Speaker 1: two and ten yards. There's a lot of water on 107 00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:46,160 Speaker 1: this course. It even has an island par three seventeenth hole, 108 00:05:46,240 --> 00:05:50,279 Speaker 1: much like Pete die'es Sawgrass Course in Florida, but this 109 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,560 Speaker 1: is still one of the ten easiest courses on tour 110 00:05:52,640 --> 00:05:55,400 Speaker 1: despite all the water. The par fours are pretty short 111 00:05:55,440 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 1: by tour standards, as are the two par fives on 112 00:05:58,120 --> 00:06:00,960 Speaker 1: the front nine, which played you five hundred and thirty 113 00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:04,200 Speaker 1: five yards and five hundred and fifty nine yards. Lakina 114 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:07,919 Speaker 1: Country Club, a par seventy two course playing to seven 115 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 1: thousand and sixty yards, might be the shortest course on tour. 116 00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 1: The par three's can be a challenge at Lakina, the 117 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 1: par fours and par five's not so much. The par 118 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,800 Speaker 1: fives here especially have a birdy or better rate north 119 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:24,040 Speaker 1: of forty percent, so you better make hay on those. 120 00:06:24,680 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 1: And The Nicholas Tournament Course is a seven and forty 121 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:31,840 Speaker 1: seven yard par seventy two. Again, there's some challenging par 122 00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:34,680 Speaker 1: threes on the Nicholas course, but the par fours and 123 00:06:34,760 --> 00:06:38,839 Speaker 1: par fives are extremely easy by tour standards. The greens 124 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:42,719 Speaker 1: on all of these courses are bermuda, and the American 125 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:46,520 Speaker 1: Express does often boil down to a putting contest. As 126 00:06:46,640 --> 00:06:50,279 Speaker 1: John Rahm once observed, he used much more colorful language 127 00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:53,560 Speaker 1: than I just did. I don't think Ram loved his 128 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:55,960 Speaker 1: tournament when he was on the tour, even though he 129 00:06:56,040 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 1: won it. The greens, by the way, on the Stadium 130 00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:03,000 Speaker 1: course in Lakita small very small, so wedge play is 131 00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:05,719 Speaker 1: critical in this tourney because of how short most of 132 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:09,359 Speaker 1: the par fours and par fives are. Par five scoring critical, 133 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 1: driving not so much, just to avoid the big miss. 134 00:07:12,640 --> 00:07:16,680 Speaker 1: Accuracy probably more important than length. Nick Dunlap is the 135 00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:19,880 Speaker 1: defending champ. He finished twenty nine under par last year. 136 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 1: John Rahm won here in twenty twenty three, finishing minus 137 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:26,800 Speaker 1: twenty seven. Hudson Swafford finished minus twenty three to win 138 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:29,960 Speaker 1: here in twenty twenty two. See who Kim won in 139 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:33,080 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. He was also minus twenty three, and 140 00:07:33,080 --> 00:07:36,360 Speaker 1: Andrew Landry finished minus twenty six to win in twenty 141 00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:39,600 Speaker 1: twenty The weather for this week predictable for the southern 142 00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:44,160 Speaker 1: California does sunny, temperatures in the low seventies or high sixties, 143 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:47,480 Speaker 1: very light wins bow your thoughts on these courses and 144 00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 1: what we should be emphasizing and looking for players to 145 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:51,200 Speaker 1: bat well. 146 00:07:51,240 --> 00:07:53,840 Speaker 2: I mean, ironically, it's the one week of year where 147 00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:58,760 Speaker 2: you actually want to go to Lakinta, so it's a 148 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:03,240 Speaker 2: really beautiful layout. Winter in the Socow Desert is beautiful. 149 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 2: Any other time of year is just god awful. It's 150 00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:09,160 Speaker 2: one of the worst places on Earth, but golf there 151 00:08:09,400 --> 00:08:13,520 Speaker 2: is king like. There are over one hundred golf courses 152 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 2: in that little tiny Palm Springs Coachella Valley area, and 153 00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:19,360 Speaker 2: a lot of them are very similar to this, where 154 00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 2: it's kind of a resort style. Short by tour standards 155 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:27,680 Speaker 2: par seventy two makes it super accessible on the scorecard, 156 00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:30,840 Speaker 2: making birdies as a must, and John Ram is right, 157 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,160 Speaker 2: it really is a putting contest, assuming that your second 158 00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:36,679 Speaker 2: shots are good. That's where a lot of the birdy 159 00:08:36,720 --> 00:08:40,040 Speaker 2: opportunities come from. And the putting contest reference came from 160 00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:42,280 Speaker 2: just how flat these greens are. They might be on 161 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:46,800 Speaker 2: the small side, but they're very predictable. They roll extremely true. 162 00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 2: A lot of people have said that the greens at 163 00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:52,440 Speaker 2: this tournament are as true as they are anywhere in 164 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:57,640 Speaker 2: the world. So if you're not just crushing pushing puts everywhere, 165 00:08:58,480 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 2: you're gonna make them. If you're lying end up correctly. 166 00:09:01,000 --> 00:09:03,520 Speaker 2: Just reading the greens is super easy. Here. You have 167 00:09:03,559 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 2: to make a ton of birdies. That's really what it 168 00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:08,080 Speaker 2: comes down to is if you make a ton of 169 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:09,920 Speaker 2: birdies here, you might have a chance. 170 00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:13,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, there are times when you'll be watching this tournament 171 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:16,080 Speaker 1: and you'll go five or six minutes without seeing anyone 172 00:09:16,120 --> 00:09:19,599 Speaker 1: miss a pot. Yeah, it's one of those types of events. 173 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:22,199 Speaker 2: So it's like putting into a bucket. 174 00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:26,880 Speaker 1: Now we will get to the odds in just a moment, but. 175 00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:31,960 Speaker 2: First download the free Betting Pros app for iOS and Android. 176 00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 2: With sportsbook Sinc. You can automatically track your bets across 177 00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 2: all major sportsbook in one spot. Easily monitor your bet 178 00:09:41,040 --> 00:09:45,720 Speaker 2: performance by sport and bet type, including game picks, props, 179 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 2: and parlays. Create custom betting systems to find winning trends 180 00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:54,160 Speaker 2: and profitable opportunities. Get a free trial of Betting Pros 181 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,680 Speaker 2: Premium by downloading the app and activating your trial on 182 00:09:57,760 --> 00:09:58,840 Speaker 2: the upgrade screen. 183 00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:03,760 Speaker 1: Now onto the odds for the American Express. All odds 184 00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:07,400 Speaker 1: courtesy of DraftKings as of Monday morning. Let's start by 185 00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:10,280 Speaker 1: looking at some of the favorites. Still know Scottie Scheffler. 186 00:10:10,559 --> 00:10:12,600 Speaker 1: He would have played in this event, but he continues 187 00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:15,760 Speaker 1: to recover from a hand wound sustained in a kitchen 188 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:20,480 Speaker 1: cooking mishap on Christmas. Xander Schoffley is therefore the favorite 189 00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:24,160 Speaker 1: at plus seven hundred. Justin Thomas is plus twelve hundred. 190 00:10:24,559 --> 00:10:28,120 Speaker 1: Sung Jim checks in at plus fourteen hundred, Sam Burns 191 00:10:28,120 --> 00:10:32,160 Speaker 1: and Patrick Cantley plus two thousand, Tony Finow is plus 192 00:10:32,160 --> 00:10:35,160 Speaker 1: twenty two hundred, Wyndham Clark and Tom Kim are plus 193 00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:38,800 Speaker 1: three thousand, Seawoo Kim is plus thirty five hundred, and 194 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:42,400 Speaker 1: at plus four thousand are Max Grazerman, JJ Spahn and 195 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:44,800 Speaker 1: Harry Hall. Do you like any of the favorites? 196 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:49,960 Speaker 2: Bo absolutely. Where A lot of times people say, oh, 197 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:52,520 Speaker 2: look at what Nick Dunlapp did last year, winning as 198 00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:54,840 Speaker 2: an amateur for the first time since Phil Nicholson one 199 00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:57,720 Speaker 2: as an amateur. That was kind of about a left field, 200 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:02,320 Speaker 2: But historically speaking, the favorites do well here. And they 201 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:04,760 Speaker 2: do well here every year, So I'm going to go 202 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:07,480 Speaker 2: right to the top. At Xander Shaffley plus seven hundred, 203 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 2: I think he's going to win this thing going away. 204 00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:12,560 Speaker 2: I think he's going to just obliterate all three of 205 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 2: these golf courses. I think the whole field is going 206 00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:17,400 Speaker 2: to do that. But Xander Shaffley at plus seven hundred, 207 00:11:17,640 --> 00:11:20,079 Speaker 2: he's right where I'm starting off with. Chalk it up. 208 00:11:20,440 --> 00:11:25,040 Speaker 2: I like when it's pretty glaring on my modeling is 209 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:28,480 Speaker 2: Xander Shaffley doesn't have any week spots, so why wouldn't 210 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:31,200 Speaker 2: I play him on a golf course where it's not 211 00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:34,080 Speaker 2: going to expose any week spots anyway, But it's also 212 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:36,400 Speaker 2: going to show how strong he is through the bag, 213 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:40,760 Speaker 2: especially on a second shot basis he's among the best 214 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,440 Speaker 2: in the world. I think Xander Schaffley is a great 215 00:11:43,480 --> 00:11:47,079 Speaker 2: pick here, and I think I'll go with Sam Burns. 216 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:50,800 Speaker 2: I kind of tossed between Sung JM at fourteen. I 217 00:11:50,840 --> 00:11:53,280 Speaker 2: felt that was a little short, and then I kind 218 00:11:53,280 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 2: of wanted to get a little bit of action on 219 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:59,080 Speaker 2: Harry Hall because of how many birdies he makes. But 220 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:00,760 Speaker 2: at the end of the day, I came back to 221 00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:03,959 Speaker 2: Sam Burns because he just makes a ton of birdies. 222 00:12:03,960 --> 00:12:06,600 Speaker 2: He's an aggressive player, even though as a veteran of 223 00:12:06,640 --> 00:12:09,800 Speaker 2: the tour now Sam Burns in my modeling showed up 224 00:12:09,920 --> 00:12:12,040 Speaker 2: right at the top. So at twenty to one, I 225 00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:13,760 Speaker 2: think that's where I'm going to go with my betting 226 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:16,280 Speaker 2: card outright and top. 227 00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:19,079 Speaker 1: Five and Burns is a pretty good track record here. 228 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:22,280 Speaker 1: He's finished top eleven in three of his last four 229 00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:26,760 Speaker 1: AMEX appearances, finished sixth in two of those years. And 230 00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 1: going back to Shoffley, bow I really thought he was 231 00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 1: going to open up at like five to one. To 232 00:12:32,160 --> 00:12:34,080 Speaker 1: get him at seven to one does seem like a 233 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 1: decent value. He's finished third here in each of the 234 00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:40,280 Speaker 1: last two years, terrific on short approach shots, but heck, 235 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:43,360 Speaker 1: he's terrific in pretty much every category as you mentioned, 236 00:12:43,760 --> 00:12:46,720 Speaker 1: So yeah, it's hard not to like him at that price. 237 00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 1: Justin Thomas, he tied for third here last year with Shoffley, 238 00:12:50,480 --> 00:12:53,920 Speaker 1: his first appearance at the AMEX since twenty fifteen, when 239 00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:57,040 Speaker 1: he also finished top ten. He was seventh back then. 240 00:12:57,160 --> 00:12:59,680 Speaker 1: He's an excellent wedge player, so you can make a 241 00:12:59,760 --> 00:13:03,960 Speaker 1: k there, Sung Jim, as you mentioned, maybe not quite 242 00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:06,040 Speaker 1: the price we're looking for at fourteen to one. But 243 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:09,280 Speaker 1: he's finished top twenty five here each of the last 244 00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:13,800 Speaker 1: six years, but then again, his best stretch best finish 245 00:13:13,840 --> 00:13:17,439 Speaker 1: over that stretch was only tenth. Patrick Cantley has shown 246 00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:22,160 Speaker 1: some aptitude here his last five AMX appearances ninth, second, ninth, 247 00:13:22,520 --> 00:13:28,319 Speaker 1: twenty sixth, then fifty second last year. Tom Kim, I 248 00:13:28,360 --> 00:13:30,839 Speaker 1: don't know. It seems like Tom Kim's game could fit here, 249 00:13:30,840 --> 00:13:34,080 Speaker 1: but he's had two missed cuts and a sixth here 250 00:13:34,120 --> 00:13:37,920 Speaker 1: in three previous appearances. And bo I'm a little interested 251 00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:41,440 Speaker 1: in Seewau Kim here just because he won here in 252 00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:44,200 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one and has been really good on Pete 253 00:13:44,240 --> 00:13:48,120 Speaker 1: Die courses. He's actually recorded three straight top twenty fives 254 00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 1: here since his win in twenty twenty one. 255 00:13:51,400 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, his game's a little bipolar. He's either going to 256 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:58,160 Speaker 2: go really really well and run pure and win here 257 00:13:58,360 --> 00:14:00,920 Speaker 2: like he did in twenty one, because he just makes 258 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:02,640 Speaker 2: a ton of birdies when he's on. When he's off, 259 00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:04,880 Speaker 2: he misses a cut and a cloud of dust. So 260 00:14:04,960 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 2: it's just like if you're going to ride Seawoo Kim, 261 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 2: just understand that he's either going to payoff for you 262 00:14:09,920 --> 00:14:12,680 Speaker 2: or you're gonna know by Friday afternoon that it wasn't 263 00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:13,760 Speaker 2: a good choice. 264 00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:18,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's outright or bust for Seawu, and you know 265 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:22,680 Speaker 1: my betting card reflects that appropriately. We'll get to that later. 266 00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 1: Let's now turn our attention to mid range options. At 267 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:30,000 Speaker 1: plus forty five hundred are Cameron Young, Kurt Kitty Yama, 268 00:14:30,120 --> 00:14:33,480 Speaker 1: and Davis Thompson. At plus five thousand are Brian Harmon, 269 00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:38,520 Speaker 1: Patrick Fishburn, Nick Dunlap and Eric cole Nico at Teveria 270 00:14:38,640 --> 00:14:42,480 Speaker 1: and Will zlatorus or plus fifty five hundred, Ben Griffin, JT. 271 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:46,480 Speaker 1: Post In, Denny McCarthy, and Tom Hogy our plus six thousand, 272 00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 1: Sepstraka is plus sixty five hundred, and at plus seven 273 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: thousand are Adam Hadwin, Jason Day, and Daniel Berger. How 274 00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:57,160 Speaker 1: about the mid range plays bo, So. 275 00:14:57,160 --> 00:14:59,440 Speaker 2: Only two of these guys actually popped up in my model? 276 00:14:59,480 --> 00:15:01,880 Speaker 2: Is somebody interested in I don't know if I'm interested 277 00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:04,960 Speaker 2: in betting on them per se, because there are some 278 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 2: weaknesses there. But jj spawn popped up pretty high in 279 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:12,600 Speaker 2: my modeling, despite not being overly good at making birdies. 280 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:15,800 Speaker 2: He's fifty fifth in this field and birdie making but 281 00:15:15,880 --> 00:15:18,600 Speaker 2: everywhere else is pretty solid. He's at forty to one. 282 00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:21,080 Speaker 2: I like that number for him, especially with how he 283 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:23,240 Speaker 2: played last week. Just came up a little bit short. 284 00:15:24,160 --> 00:15:27,240 Speaker 2: Eric Cole is another one where it's like this eric 285 00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:30,280 Speaker 2: Cole guy. Second shot pretty good, he's a great plutter 286 00:15:30,720 --> 00:15:34,040 Speaker 2: off the tea. He's been atrocious. The problem with eric 287 00:15:34,040 --> 00:15:37,560 Speaker 2: Cole is off the tee he's been atrocious, and here 288 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:40,480 Speaker 2: really doesn't come into play. These fairways are very easy 289 00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:43,440 Speaker 2: to hit. There's almost no penalty for a wayverd t shot. 290 00:15:43,800 --> 00:15:45,760 Speaker 2: So eric Cole might be in play here at fifty 291 00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:49,280 Speaker 2: to one. I'm just not sold on his ability to 292 00:15:49,360 --> 00:15:52,520 Speaker 2: cash in when it matters most because I really haven't 293 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:55,240 Speaker 2: seen it in a while. He looked a little bit 294 00:15:55,280 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 2: more encouraging last week, but this is another We're changing 295 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:02,760 Speaker 2: the style of golf course again on this field, So 296 00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:07,680 Speaker 2: going from Wilight to all these three courses here in socals, 297 00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 2: it's quite a different animal. And I just don't know 298 00:16:11,160 --> 00:16:14,400 Speaker 2: if air Cole has the chops in this stronger field 299 00:16:14,760 --> 00:16:15,440 Speaker 2: to pull it off. 300 00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:18,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, and you do worry about the way we're drivers 301 00:16:18,040 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 1: a little here because the big misses can get you 302 00:16:20,760 --> 00:16:23,040 Speaker 1: in trouble. With all the water on the stadium course 303 00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:30,840 Speaker 1: and then yeah, you really blow it offees and exactly 304 00:16:30,880 --> 00:16:34,360 Speaker 1: there is a desert and purple cacti and all that 305 00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:37,080 Speaker 1: sort of thing. But like Cole was twenty first here 306 00:16:37,200 --> 00:16:40,800 Speaker 1: last year, as you said, pretty good on short approaches, 307 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:44,000 Speaker 1: good potter, and he was top five at the Sony 308 00:16:44,080 --> 00:16:47,520 Speaker 1: last week. And when we're looking for winners, traditionally at 309 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:50,840 Speaker 1: the Amex, oftentimes it's guys who left some sort of 310 00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:54,840 Speaker 1: footprint in Hawaii in the two previous weeks. Cole kind 311 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: of fits a lot of those buckets. I like Tom 312 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:01,680 Speaker 1: Hogy this week, Like he led the tour last year 313 00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:04,440 Speaker 1: in proximity on approaches from one hundred and twenty five 314 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:07,640 Speaker 1: to one hundred and fifty yards and was second from 315 00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:09,639 Speaker 1: one hundred to one hundred and twenty five yards, So 316 00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:11,320 Speaker 1: that is a range where you're going to see a 317 00:17:11,320 --> 00:17:15,679 Speaker 1: lot of shots this week, and HOGI excel there. And 318 00:17:16,960 --> 00:17:20,200 Speaker 1: talk about this being a putting contest. Bo Adam hadwin. 319 00:17:20,720 --> 00:17:22,880 Speaker 1: One of the best putters in the world. He's finished 320 00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:26,080 Speaker 1: top six in this tournament in five of his last 321 00:17:26,119 --> 00:17:29,800 Speaker 1: eight appearances here, and in the other three appearances over 322 00:17:29,800 --> 00:17:33,240 Speaker 1: that stretch he was thirty second, twenty fifth, and eighteenth. 323 00:17:33,640 --> 00:17:38,359 Speaker 1: This guy is consistently good in this event. Yeah, I 324 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:41,879 Speaker 1: mean the last calendar year not great for Adam Hadwin. 325 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:45,760 Speaker 1: But he's a guy with that flatstick who could certainly 326 00:17:45,840 --> 00:17:46,520 Speaker 1: rise up here. 327 00:17:46,800 --> 00:17:48,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, and he looked really good last week except for 328 00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:51,360 Speaker 2: when he got up into the wind like he does. 329 00:17:51,400 --> 00:17:53,719 Speaker 2: He's not a very good wind player, we found out 330 00:17:53,480 --> 00:17:57,280 Speaker 2: pretty early on after a really nice opening start in 331 00:17:57,440 --> 00:18:01,320 Speaker 2: at Wili. The problem with Adam had Win is I 332 00:18:01,440 --> 00:18:04,040 Speaker 2: was a week early on him picking him last week. 333 00:18:04,400 --> 00:18:06,760 Speaker 2: I think he actually does have a good chance this week. 334 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:10,800 Speaker 2: With his history here, I think going after Hogi might 335 00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:14,400 Speaker 2: be a week early or two weeks early, since he's 336 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:17,000 Speaker 2: the guy that I have kind of earmarked for Pebble Beach, 337 00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:20,240 Speaker 2: which is the shortest golf course on tour at sixty 338 00:18:20,280 --> 00:18:23,280 Speaker 2: eight hundred and change. So just to answer your question 339 00:18:23,359 --> 00:18:26,440 Speaker 2: that we were close at seven seventy seventy, I it's 340 00:18:26,440 --> 00:18:29,120 Speaker 2: the top five shortest courses on tour with Pebble Beach 341 00:18:29,480 --> 00:18:30,240 Speaker 2: is the shortest. 342 00:18:31,240 --> 00:18:35,399 Speaker 1: Yeah, Hogy is and Hogi is won there before, I believe, 343 00:18:35,520 --> 00:18:39,359 Speaker 1: So yeah, he is a very good play there. Still, 344 00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:42,840 Speaker 1: though might be worthwhile to save him for then, But 345 00:18:43,840 --> 00:18:46,719 Speaker 1: I'm intrigued this week. What about long shots bo anyone 346 00:18:46,720 --> 00:18:48,840 Speaker 1: with odds of seventy five to one or longer? 347 00:18:48,880 --> 00:18:51,600 Speaker 2: We should be looking at funny should ask? I have 348 00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:56,040 Speaker 2: three of them at seventy to one. Daniel Berger rates 349 00:18:56,080 --> 00:18:58,680 Speaker 2: out number one in my model. This is a short 350 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:02,040 Speaker 2: course specialist who makes a lot of bernies, great putter, 351 00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:04,960 Speaker 2: great short approach. He's a guy who gets kind of 352 00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:07,920 Speaker 2: swallowed up by bigger golf courses, so this is where 353 00:19:07,960 --> 00:19:10,639 Speaker 2: he has to make his hay to keep his his 354 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:14,320 Speaker 2: tour momentum going. So I think Daniel Berger seventy to 355 00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:17,400 Speaker 2: one is a really good value, especially with his pedigree. 356 00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:19,679 Speaker 2: I mean going back a couple of years of course, 357 00:19:19,720 --> 00:19:22,680 Speaker 2: but I think he's starting to round back into shape 358 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:25,000 Speaker 2: and this is a really good opportunity for him to 359 00:19:25,080 --> 00:19:28,720 Speaker 2: show the growth he's made in his game. Seventy to 360 00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:32,280 Speaker 2: one for me is great. And then despite his nickname 361 00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:35,199 Speaker 2: as being the willow branch because he finds water no 362 00:19:35,240 --> 00:19:38,240 Speaker 2: matter where he's at, Eric van Royan at one hundred 363 00:19:38,240 --> 00:19:41,760 Speaker 2: and ten to one is an absolute steals. That's one 364 00:19:41,800 --> 00:19:44,600 Speaker 2: of the better golf course golfers I've seen at more 365 00:19:44,600 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 2: than hundred and one odds in a long time. Eric 366 00:19:47,880 --> 00:19:50,400 Speaker 2: Van Royan could do a lot of damage here, especially 367 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:53,879 Speaker 2: with how hot he gets. And then I have a 368 00:19:53,960 --> 00:19:56,080 Speaker 2: really really deep shot that popped up in the top 369 00:19:56,080 --> 00:19:59,080 Speaker 2: five of my model. Look out for the name Chris 370 00:19:59,200 --> 00:20:03,560 Speaker 2: with a K Ventura Ace Ventura's long lost cousin. I 371 00:20:03,560 --> 00:20:08,120 Speaker 2: guess Chris Ventura at plus at four hundred to one 372 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:11,920 Speaker 2: is one of the best birdie makers on tour by 373 00:20:12,040 --> 00:20:15,879 Speaker 2: statistic and he's just a little known name, and so 374 00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:19,440 Speaker 2: he's in his rookie year on tour, but he's put 375 00:20:19,720 --> 00:20:22,840 Speaker 2: put together enough rounds to pop up at number one 376 00:20:22,920 --> 00:20:25,800 Speaker 2: in this field and birdies are better gained and top 377 00:20:25,880 --> 00:20:29,160 Speaker 2: ten on par three's of this distance, and he's also 378 00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:31,560 Speaker 2: top five on strokes gained par four, which is going 379 00:20:31,600 --> 00:20:34,000 Speaker 2: to be a key metric this week. So get me 380 00:20:34,560 --> 00:20:39,080 Speaker 2: Chris Ventura on a little bit of a just a little, 381 00:20:39,280 --> 00:20:43,439 Speaker 2: a little floater, one of those a keied elamine floater 382 00:20:43,520 --> 00:20:47,440 Speaker 2: shots in the paint. Just throw a couple bucks on 383 00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:49,360 Speaker 2: him and see what happens. 384 00:20:49,480 --> 00:20:53,000 Speaker 1: Nice, I'll throw in a few more long shots. Doug 385 00:20:53,040 --> 00:20:56,600 Speaker 1: gam ninety to one. He was among the leaders in 386 00:20:56,800 --> 00:20:59,240 Speaker 1: accuracy last year on approaches from one hundred to one 387 00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:02,440 Speaker 1: hundred and fifty yard, and he's historically played Pete Die 388 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:05,520 Speaker 1: course as well, so the stadium course should suit him. 389 00:21:05,920 --> 00:21:08,399 Speaker 1: Andrew Putnam is one hundred and ten to one. Putnam 390 00:21:08,480 --> 00:21:11,000 Speaker 1: is a short hitter off the tee. This guy can 391 00:21:11,040 --> 00:21:13,280 Speaker 1: barely drive it out of his own shadow, but it 392 00:21:13,320 --> 00:21:17,120 Speaker 1: doesn't really matter here. Accuracy off the tee does matter here, 393 00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:20,480 Speaker 1: and he's pretty straight, He's pretty good on shorter approaches, 394 00:21:20,520 --> 00:21:23,680 Speaker 1: and he's a solid putter. Putnam has finished top forty 395 00:21:23,720 --> 00:21:28,280 Speaker 1: here in six of his last seven appearances. And Joe 396 00:21:28,359 --> 00:21:30,959 Speaker 1: high Smith is one hundred and twenty to one. The 397 00:21:31,000 --> 00:21:33,080 Speaker 1: young guy was thirty first here a year ago. He's 398 00:21:33,119 --> 00:21:35,879 Speaker 1: good on shorter approaches, not a bad putter. I do 399 00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:38,680 Speaker 1: worry about his driving accuracy, but at one hundred and 400 00:21:38,720 --> 00:21:40,800 Speaker 1: twenty to one, I could live with that. Achilles heel. 401 00:21:41,359 --> 00:21:44,160 Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's get to our early betting cards. 402 00:21:44,160 --> 00:21:46,040 Speaker 1: Who is on yours as of now? 403 00:21:46,880 --> 00:21:49,600 Speaker 2: All right? So I have outrights on Xander Schoffley and 404 00:21:49,720 --> 00:21:53,040 Speaker 2: Sam Burns. I have a top five kicker on Sam Burns. 405 00:21:54,080 --> 00:21:56,840 Speaker 2: Daniel Berger seventy to one. I'm doing a top ten 406 00:21:56,960 --> 00:22:01,600 Speaker 2: kicker with him. As well as Van Royan and Chris Vantura. 407 00:22:01,640 --> 00:22:03,520 Speaker 2: I'm going to throw a small outright on them, but 408 00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:06,119 Speaker 2: I'm hitting the top twenty markets heavily on both of 409 00:22:06,160 --> 00:22:08,040 Speaker 2: those because the odds are very favorable. 410 00:22:09,400 --> 00:22:11,760 Speaker 1: Now, Bo is as strong a case as you make 411 00:22:11,800 --> 00:22:15,240 Speaker 1: for Xander Schoffley. I have sworn on this event. I 412 00:22:15,280 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 1: am not eating Choco no matter what. And you are 413 00:22:18,240 --> 00:22:20,440 Speaker 1: one of the better cooks that I know, and even 414 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:22,439 Speaker 1: you could not prepare the chalk in a way that 415 00:22:22,440 --> 00:22:26,919 Speaker 1: would make it appetizing to me. So the lowest odds 416 00:22:26,960 --> 00:22:29,840 Speaker 1: play I am coming up with is Seawoo kim At 417 00:22:29,840 --> 00:22:34,280 Speaker 1: plus yeah plus thirty five hundred outright. That's it, outright only. 418 00:22:34,560 --> 00:22:36,840 Speaker 1: As we talked about, no top fives or top tens 419 00:22:36,880 --> 00:22:41,280 Speaker 1: for Sea Wu, Who's win or bust? Tom Hogy sixty 420 00:22:41,320 --> 00:22:43,400 Speaker 1: to one outright, five to one for a top ten, 421 00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:48,679 Speaker 1: Doug gimm plus fourteen hundred for a top five, Adam Hadwin, 422 00:22:48,800 --> 00:22:52,280 Speaker 1: I am betting plus five point fifty for a top ten. 423 00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:54,800 Speaker 1: I just don't think he can win here, but I 424 00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:56,800 Speaker 1: do think he's going to be in play for that 425 00:22:56,880 --> 00:23:00,760 Speaker 1: top ten. Andrew Putnam plus three twenty for a top twenty, 426 00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:04,159 Speaker 1: and Joe high Smith. I am making a very small 427 00:23:04,160 --> 00:23:06,359 Speaker 1: bat outright at one hundred and twenty to one and 428 00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:09,720 Speaker 1: twenty to one for a top five. Now for the 429 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:13,199 Speaker 1: one and done competition, I took Ben on last week. 430 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:16,240 Speaker 1: He missed the COT. I got off to a pretty 431 00:23:16,240 --> 00:23:20,120 Speaker 1: bad start the last two weeks. In Hawaii. Bo took 432 00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:23,360 Speaker 1: Maverick McNeely. He played pretty well for three days, then 433 00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:26,680 Speaker 1: shot the highest score in the field on Sunday, a seventy. 434 00:23:26,280 --> 00:23:28,320 Speaker 2: Three McNeely a lot of money. 435 00:23:29,480 --> 00:23:33,040 Speaker 1: He finished tied for forty fifth, sliding down the leaderboard 436 00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:35,760 Speaker 1: on Sunday, good for twenty four, three hundred and eighty 437 00:23:35,800 --> 00:23:39,119 Speaker 1: three dollars. Bo, you are up first this week. Who 438 00:23:39,240 --> 00:23:39,640 Speaker 1: you got? 439 00:23:40,760 --> 00:23:42,920 Speaker 2: So? Since I'm leading off, I'm gonna get a little 440 00:23:42,920 --> 00:23:45,680 Speaker 2: more aggressive. If I was following it, following you, I'd 441 00:23:45,720 --> 00:23:48,480 Speaker 2: be a little bit more prudent with going down the board. 442 00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:52,600 Speaker 2: But I'm gonna go with a guy who I just 443 00:23:52,600 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 2: don't see myself playing for the rest of the season, 444 00:23:55,119 --> 00:23:57,080 Speaker 2: as I want un done. But I have a feeling 445 00:23:57,080 --> 00:23:59,200 Speaker 2: he's going to do really well here. And I don't 446 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:02,240 Speaker 2: believe we mentioned his name much more than just a 447 00:24:02,359 --> 00:24:06,159 Speaker 2: name in the odds board. Max Grazerman at forty to 448 00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:08,639 Speaker 2: one is gonna be my one and done this week. 449 00:24:09,359 --> 00:24:12,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, he's a solid play a guy just I didn't 450 00:24:12,280 --> 00:24:15,240 Speaker 1: like him quite enough at that number to bet him, 451 00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:18,520 Speaker 1: But he does check a lot of boxes here, So 452 00:24:19,080 --> 00:24:21,240 Speaker 1: Grazerman is a good play. I'm gonna go all in 453 00:24:21,280 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 1: with Sea Wu Bo. Hope he doesn't have one of 454 00:24:24,040 --> 00:24:28,400 Speaker 1: those errant weeks where he just you know, doesn't make 455 00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:32,920 Speaker 1: the cuts, doesn't finish on Sunday. But yeah, he's definitely 456 00:24:33,000 --> 00:24:36,159 Speaker 1: a guy who could contend. So Seewu Kim for me, 457 00:24:36,800 --> 00:24:39,040 Speaker 1: Max Grazerman for Bow, and that's going to do it 458 00:24:39,080 --> 00:24:42,560 Speaker 1: for this week's Betting Pros. PGA podcast will be back 459 00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:44,760 Speaker 1: next week with a preview of a course that plays 460 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:47,880 Speaker 1: a little bit longer than these courses, the Farmer's Insurance 461 00:24:47,920 --> 00:24:52,520 Speaker 1: Open at Beautiful Tory Pines. Until then, so long everyone. 462 00:24:53,119 --> 00:24:55,760 Speaker 3: Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you 463 00:24:55,800 --> 00:24:58,199 Speaker 3: love the show, the best freeway to support us is 464 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:01,600 Speaker 3: by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. 465 00:25:01,880 --> 00:25:04,520 Speaker 3: Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and 466 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:08,240 Speaker 3: Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube 467 00:25:08,320 --> 00:25:22,320 Speaker 3: channel at YouTube, dot com slash betting pros