WEBVTT - The A&G Replay Thursday Hour Two

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe, Ketty arm.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Strong and Getty and Pee Armstrong and Getty Strong and.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia Zoo announced last week that a pair of nearly

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred year old tortoises recently welcome their first hatchlings.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 3>You may have seen the tortoises on the MTV show

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine.

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Pregnant markets are surging if you're listening to us live,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 4>so the bounce back has begun. And get into that later. Also,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 4>latest polling on the whole tariff thing, get into that

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 4>later also. And oh and I just saw the real

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 4>ID deadline is a month away. This is going to

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 4>be my all time greatest hit screw up because it's

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 4>been I've seen it coming for so long and known

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the entire time for years that at some point I

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 4>will be at an airport ready to get on a

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 4>plane someplace I need to go, yes, and they'll say

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 4>we no longer accept your driver's license, you need your

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 4>real ID, even though I knew it for years, I

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 4>am that is going to happen to me.

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 5>I'll like your high school teacher assigned you a book

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 5>report due in twenty years and you waited until the

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 5>last night and you're up all night, right, that is

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 5>going to happen to me? Yeah, it's funny, Judy, And

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 5>I heard that report, and I have a feeling. I

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 5>spoke for many, many millions of Americans when I said,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 5>do we have real IDs? I've completely lost track? Is

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 5>ours real? She looked at it and said, yeah, yes

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 5>we do. How that happened?

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't recall, but I sure don't have one? Are

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>you sure? I'm positive you might. When did you last

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>for new year license?

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know?

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>So, so your driver's license?

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 5>Is it?

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh it is?

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 5>Well, maybe I did have a real like the updated

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 5>does it have like a hologrammy looking thing on there?

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 4>Or yeah? Yeah, there you go. Maybe I do have.

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>It done and done, sir. That's my point. Nobody has

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 2>any idea. Yeah.

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 5>So, speaking of economics and that sort of thing, which

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people are doing these days in reference

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 5>to the tariffs.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 2>But to this too shall pass, I hope eventually. Uh

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>And and some of.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 5>The support and lack of support are coming from some

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 5>interesting areas for the tariffs, and we can talk about

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that more later, but I'm kind of tariffed out.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 2>We brought this up kind of briefly at the end

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>of the.

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 4>So you see I could talk about tariffs for many

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 4>more hours.

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Well you should feel free. How about one room over anyway?

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 5>I found this so interesting, big survey of America's employers,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 5>especially manufacturers. They cannot find reliable, conscientious workers who can

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 5>pass a drug test. A good worker, like a good man,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 5>can be hard to find these days. And who is

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 5>this writing in the Alicia Finley, who I think is

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 5>a terrific writer, But she says, blame government, which showers

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 5>benefits on able bodied people who don't work well at

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 5>the same time subsidizing college degrees that don't lead to

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 5>productive employment, and the result is millions of idle men

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 5>and millions of unfilled jobs, what an economist would call

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 5>a dead weight loss to society.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 4>So failing the drug test, is it mostly the marijuana,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 4>the Mary Jane, the lettuce, the hippie let?

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't know. I suspect so though. Sure I

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 5>think it's mostly pot. But I think that it's just

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 5>brilliantly simply put, we are showering benefits on able bodied

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 5>people and subsidizing useless college degrees as as a people

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 5>because the government is theoretically doing our work right.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I for one, don't like either end of that anyway.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 5>Forty percent of small business owners and March reported job

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 5>openings they could not fill. Construction companies fifty six percent said, yeah,

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 5>we have unfilled jobs and we can't find anybody. Transportation,

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 5>I have a feeling that's mostly truck drivers fifty three

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 5>percent manufacturing, which the President is, according to many people,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 5>admirably trying to shepherd back inside the country. More forty

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 5>seven percent of manufacturers say, no, we've got openings we

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 5>can't fill.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 5>So, according to the last week's National Federation of Independent

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Business survey, that might.

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Be a flaw in the president's plan that hasn't been

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 4>discussed enough. He wants to bring back the fifties or

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 4>seventies or whatever golden era of manufacturing that we used

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 4>to have.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 2>But back then people would do those jobs.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 4>If half the manufacturing jobs out there or you can't fill.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, what if manufacturing did come.

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Back to the United States, who, in theory is going

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to do those jobs?

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, not illegal immigrants, because thank god, the border has

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 5>been closed and the statistics are astounding.

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Biden was a scoundrel anyway.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 4>Was it going to be the woman who studies major

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 4>from your local university that goes works, They're probably not well.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 5>It could well be the dudes who have no disability

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 5>on disability who are heaved off of that system, but

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 5>that would take some tough love, and that's not very

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 5>popular politically speaking. I mean, if you go into one

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 5>of the districts of the rust Belty places or Appalachia

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 5>or whatever where you have just ludicrous levels of people

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 5>on disability. Happened to read a couple things about this recently.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Didn't flog you with it on the air. But and

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 5>if you go into those places and say we're kicking

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 5>it off everybody on disability who's not like missing a limb,

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 5>you will lose an election by seventy points.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 2>That's even possible.

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 5>Once people are on the toll man, once people have

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 5>a benefit, whether legitimate or perhaps questionable, taking it away

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 5>as political poison as you know, Labor Department's job openings

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 5>and labor turnover survey of businesses tell a similar story.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 5>There are twice as many job openings in manufacturing now

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 5>than in the mid two thousands as a share of employment.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 5>Save for the pandemic, America's workers shortage is the worst

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 5>in fifty years. Decades ago, productivity, enhancing technology and yes,

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 5>inexpensive imports costed men who worked on shop floors to

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 5>lose their jobs and drop out of the workforce. But

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 5>that generation is sailing into the sunset, and there are

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 5>many fewer young Americans who want to work in factories.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 5>Listen to this now, the labor force participation rate among

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 5>young among working age men is now about five percentage

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 5>points lower than in the early eighties. Okay, this is

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 5>not like the nineteen tens. This is the nineteen eighties,

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 5>five points lower. As a result, there are about three

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 5>and a half million fewer men between the ages twenty

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 5>five and fifty four in the workforce, and one point

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 5>three million between the ages of twenty five and thirty

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 5>four in a significantly bigger population than we had in

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 5>the eighties. Right then there would have been were it

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 5>not for this decline. Labor participation among working age women,

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 5>on the other hand, recently hit a record in part

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 5>because they are having fewer children, and then people aren't

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 5>coupling and that sort of thing at the risk of

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 5>stereotyping women are more inclined toward helping professions such as

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 5>services than those that require physical labor.

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's just true. It's undeniable.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 4>So I've not done a manufacturing sort of job before,

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 4>so I don't know what it's like, but I certainly

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 4>feel like there's a social stigma around it that doesn't

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>help true.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Why it is?

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Why there's not a social stigma around having a meaningless,

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 4>soul deadening paper pushing job in a cubicle, I don't

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 4>know why that is. I mean, maybe the other way

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.239
<v Speaker 4>around should be. There shuldn't be any stigma around any jobs.

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Working for a living is considerably better than not whatever

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 4>the hell you're doing.

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 5>So why at least the vestige of the twentieth century

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 5>where a job where you used your brain as opposed

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 5>to your back was seen as a higher status job.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 2>God, I don't know some of these jobs or you

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>use your brain.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 4>That's barely not much, I mean, but they certainly don't

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 4>seem like they'd be much more enjoyable as starter jobs.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, Tedious is tedious.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 5>I had a sort of manufacturing job for one summer,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 5>and it was pretty tedious. Honestly, but I'm sure it is.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 5>You know why I go went ahead and took it

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 5>and kept it. It was because it paid pretty good.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 5>It was my best hop right. So yeah, and well

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 5>you should have to make a living. You got to

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 5>support yourself somehow.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 2>No, you don't. What kind of monster are you listen

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to this? Would you?

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 5>Where have all the good working men gone? Some are

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 5>subsisting on government benefits, are living off their parents. About

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 5>seventeen percent of working age men are on Medicaid, seventeen percent,

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 5>seven and a half percent on food stamps, and six

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 5>point three percent on Social Security, many claiming disability payouts.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>According to the Census Bureau.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 5>Many spend their days playing video games and day trading, well,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 5>day trading hilarious, speculating on meme stocks, or you tell

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 5>somebody your day trading. I don't know how often you're

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 5>actually trading and making any money, because you don't want

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 5>to say I just play video games and live in

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 5>my parents' basement, so you say you're your day trader.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 5>So I don't remember our a good friend, Craig the

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 5>healthcare Genius's statistics. But if I remember correctly, originally Medicaid

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 5>was only supposed to cover like a tiny percentage people period.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Now it's covering percent.

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Now it's covering And that would have been like the

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 4>old and you know people that I got all kinds

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 4>of physical or mental problems.

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Now it's seventeen percent of.

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 4>Working age men, not not like senior citizens.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>That's nice.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a couple more stats. Other missing men are taking

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 5>longer to finish college or pursuing graduate degrees. Only about

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 5>forty one percent amen complete a bachelor's degree in four years,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 5>even though study after study shows they don't teach, you

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 5>don't have to work.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 2>There's great inflation. It's dopey.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Only forty one percent and a quarter take more than

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 5>six years.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Wow, because you're in no hurry to get out of college.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 4>My dad used to comment about perpetual college students, and

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 4>I never really understood what he was talking about. And

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure it was a small number of people back

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 4>when he was in college, but now it is a lot. Apparently,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I'll just stay in college. I'll just keep borrowing money.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 4>And because I'm too young or unwise to understand what

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing, and I'll just keep this game going. Of

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 4>I get to sit around with my friends and discuss

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the world without ever having to engage in it.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I have disability. My thumb hurts on Thursdays.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 5>Final stat Then will I will stop? We're just we

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 5>are a fat, lazy, comfortable society. We're headed to front denial, right,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 5>we are headed straight toward France.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 5>The unemployment rate Jack considered this among recent college grads

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 5>with a sociology degree is about seven percent, and their

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 5>median wage, if they do have a gig, is forty

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 5>five thousand dollars.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 2>According to the Federal Reserve Bank.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 5>Social grads could earn twice as much working on an

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 5>auto assembly line, which pays an average hundred thousand dollars

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 5>a year. Good gig, but not many want it. The

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 5>reality is that masses a young people, writes Alicia Finley, who,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 5>again as a genius, has been taught that capitalism is exploitive.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 5>They don't want to work in factories. They'd rather mooch

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 5>off to their parents. How CHORL Marx is that?

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, some of it is that, I'm sure, But I

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 4>just I think a lot of it is just the

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 4>cultural that would be embarrassing for your parents and for

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 4>you if you worked over at the whatever factory yeah,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 4>more embarrassing in our current society than if you just

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 4>live at home and you know, you say you're a

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 4>day trader. It should be more embarrassing to have a

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 4>job at a plant than to live with your parents,

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 4>but I think it is.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Or having taken six years to get an undergrad degree

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 5>in gender studies, you're now getting a master's degree in

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 5>the theoretical decolonialization of art, or whatever the s.

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Wait they.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes think for soft people. Man, there is no more

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 5>iron law of humanity than that.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 2>The armstrong and getting shot.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 6>So I've waited on more people at this restaurant than

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 6>you have in your goddamn life, say the waiters and

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 6>waitresses of Washington, DC, Jack, where you just were.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 5>The Washingtonian, which is read in the self obsessed Nation's Capital,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 5>has a piece about how DC restaurants have long been

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 5>like politically neutral spaces. Obviously, to cite the cliched example,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 5>you got Reagan coming in, you got Tip O'Neil coming in, right,

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 5>so you treat everybody with respectfully.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>But that changed during the Trump years.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 5>Restaurant owners became much more politically outspoken.

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>They were part of the resistance, and Trump.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 5>Officials became social pariahs when dining out. You remember several

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 5>incidents involving Ted Cruz and Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who got

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 5>kicked out of a restaurant in West Lexington, Virginia. Homeland

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Secretary Kirsten Nielsen's dinner at a DC Mexican resta Mexican

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 5>restaurant was interrupted as.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 2>They yelled shame.

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Steven Miller tossing eighty dollars worth of takeout sushi after

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 5>somebody cursed him and flipped him off at a sushi place,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 5>somebody on the staff. But anyway, in the Washington Washingtonian, anyway,

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 5>you got all these restaurant tours and waiters and bartenders saying,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to be silent, We're not going to

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 5>be quote unquote civil.

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's see, here's this guy.

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 5>What does he do. He's a DC restaurant. He's a

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 5>manager at a club, big club in DC. If you're

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 5>just going out for a nice dinner at your anniversary,

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 5>your birthday, and God forbid, RFK Junior is sitting X

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 5>to you now, you're going to be dealing with whatever

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 5>repercussions happened from that. He's saying all this restaurant staff

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 5>is justified into cursing these people out and yelling at

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 5>him and kicking him out.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, we'll see if this actually happens or not. Like

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 4>I said, bumping around d C, it was quite a

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 4>bit different than the last time I was in DC

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 4>when Trump got elected, he was being treated like a

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 4>regular president. I mean, the number of Trump shirts, hats, pins,

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 4>inauguration forty seventh president stuff that I saw. There was

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 4>nothing like that in twenty seventeen when I was there

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 4>for the inauguration.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 5>In fact, that was my question. I wonder if this

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 5>is just big talk by little people.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I'd be my guess.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Here's a woman who's a server and manager at a

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 5>saloon on Capitol Hill.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 5>People were a lot more motivated the first time around

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 5>to do these kinds of shows of passion. This time around,

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 5>there's kind of a sense of defeat and acceptance. But

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 5>I hope that people will still do stand up to

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 5>this administration and tell them their thoughts on their misbehavior

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 5>as they're trying.

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 2>To get a ham sandwich at lunchtime.

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Here's my biggest question about restaurants DC restaurants, because I

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 4>had this and I tweeted it out and it's the

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 4>most controversial tweet I've ever put out ever. It got

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 4>more responses than anything I've ever tweeted this question. So

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean it in Gordon Ramsey's restaurant, which I wish

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 4>i'd ha spent the time to look into what it

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 4>costs to eat there, because it's the most expensive meal

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 4>I've ever paid for for me and my two kids.

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Partially because.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 4>There was the we've added to twenty percent already thing

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 4>that restaurants are doing sometimes now.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And so service charge is that what they call it?

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Earth It just said, yeah, we've we've added to twenty

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 4>percent service charge to your bill, and then it's got

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 4>the line for the tip, and I thought, do I

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 4>tip on top of this or not? And I tweeted

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 4>that out. I googled it and tweeted it, and same

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 4>result either way. Plenty of people say, absolutely, that's not

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the tip. You need to tip on top of that

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 4>ere screwing your server or one hundred percent that's the tip,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 4>No way you should give any more money. I still

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 4>don't know what the answer is on that, but obviously

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 4>if they add twenty percent, and I didn't know they

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 4>were going to do that, or I wouldn't have gone.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 4>If they add twenty percent and I'm supposed to tip

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent, that's.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Forty percent on top of my meal to no go.

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 4>That's that second group that that is the tip. No

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 4>freaking way I'm eating there. A whole bunch of people

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 4>adamantly said, no, that goes to the restaurant. The server

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 4>will get nothing, and you absolutely need to tip on

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 4>top of that. Maybe that's true, but I'll never eat

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 4>at a restaurant that does that. You can't pay forty

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 4>percent on top of your bill. Nobody's doing that. That's ridiculous.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 4>It is ridiculous. Well, I don't know what the correct

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 4>answer is either, or if it varies from restaurant to restaurant,

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 4>if you know text line four one five two nine

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 4>five KFTC. But what the hell are Strong.

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty shirt?

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 5>So this is so interesting. I came across this the

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 5>other day. A couple of scientists writers commentaries who ran

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 5>into each other after the one published a piece on

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 5>why young men have turned against the Democratic Party, and

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 5>this other guy, this other researcher, said, hey, you know,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 5>I've actually been doing studies in that area, let's get

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 5>together and talk about it and compare notes. And they came,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 5>They've come out with a really, really interesting report. Young

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 5>people in general report fairly miserable mental health, with high

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 5>rates of anxiety and depression. But this is particularly true

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 5>for young women. And they make the point that assumptions

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 5>democrats make about how to attract younger voters may not

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 5>appeal to men for various reasons.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 2>But they point out that this.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 5>That it the one report they looked at very the

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 5>most interesting finding, which is that conservatives have much higher

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 5>self reported mental health than liberals.

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 4>Is this surprising to anyone?

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 5>No, The really interesting part is still to come self

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 5>reporting grain assault, but just a grain, not a shaker.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Why.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know on self reporting on your mental health.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 5>It could be that in certain communities it is taboo

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 5>to be honest about your mental health.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it's more likely the other direction, But yeah,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm just trying to be in there that in more communities,

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 4>it's the greatest prize of all to explain how I

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 4>have anxiety and depression and OCD and all these other things.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you completely, and I'm glad you pointed

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 2>that out.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Blah, blah blah.

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a wide gap.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 5>Too between conservatives and liberals, according to this giant study

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 5>with sixty thousand respondents that provides the opportunity for highly

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 5>detailed democratic demographic analysis. Among people who report excellent mental health,

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 5>conservatives outnumber liberals fifty one to twenty as a ratio,

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 5>but liberals out number conservatives forty five to nineteen among

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 5>those voters who say they have poor mental health. This

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 5>isn't the least bit surprising to me. What's interesting? And

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 5>they assigned points, So one hundred points scale zero is

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 5>poor mental health, twenty five is fair, fifty is good,

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 5>seventy five is very good, one hundred is excellent.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 4>I think i'd go, what would you say for yourself?

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm going I would say very good. Oh, there's might

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 4>disagree with me who know me, but I feel like

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm very good.

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Can we have a round of rating where we

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 5>rate each other too? Even a town full of people

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 5>who are crazy? So that helps me stand out? I

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 5>feel like, are you graded on a curve in this?

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 5>So here's the first thing that popped in on my

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 5>mind is and part of the reason I leapt to

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 5>this thought was because we came across an absolutely fantastic

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 5>quote which I've misplaced, damn it, that women more than men,

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 5>not all women, but women in general, and like effeminate men,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 5>filter information through a process not of is this true?

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 5>But will believing this gain me social currency and acceptance?

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Will the group accept me for adopting this attitude? And

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 5>so the first thing I thought was, Okay, maybe people

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 5>of an unhappy or mentally fragile bent need more support,

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 5>and so they tend toward liberalism. Well, it's funny I

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 5>had that thought, and the guys immediately got to the question.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 5>They said, could this reflect a spurious correlation? In other words,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that voters with characteristics associated with lower happiness tend to

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 5>be attracted to liberalism, but that political attitudes themselves don't

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 5>tell you much on their own. In short, no, they're right,

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 5>or at least probably not. The difference between liberals and

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 5>conservatives is remarkably persistent, even once you control for those factors.

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Then they explain, going to give you a long chart

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 5>with those point values that I talked about. The average

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 5>American self reports at sixty on the scale, somewhere between

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 5>good and very good mental health, but.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 4>That's roughly where I would be.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 5>But liberals report an average score of fifty three and

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 5>conservatives sixty eight.

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Moderates not shockingly right in the middle at fifty eight.

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, they take advantage of that's a moderate for you,

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 5>always moderating anyway, take advantage of the large sample size

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 5>in this CEES study. Let's see how this difference holds

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 5>up against a wide array of demographic and political characteristics.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Let's see gender men tend to be conservative men at

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:59.959
<v Speaker 5>a sixty nine giggity liberal men of fifty six. Conservative

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 5>women up there at sixty six, liberal women way down

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 5>at fifty one. Average mental health score white fault. That's that.

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 4>I realize what you just said about all these things.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 4>But man, because I'm surrounded by this world, you would

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 4>really stand out as like you might be kicked out

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 4>of the herd if you were to say, you know,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm perfectly fine.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Whereas I live in a world of hey, we're

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 5>all here for you. Have a drink, you'll be fine,

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 5>and most people are. Let's see black in his I'm sorry,

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 5>white black and Hispanic and Asian conservatives are virtually.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Tied at sixty eight. Sixty eight sixty five sixty five.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Liberal, White, Black, Hispanic and Asians is fifty two sixty

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 5>fifty one fifty one, like a fairly consistent fourteen point gap.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 5>Young people age gen Z that's ninety seven or later,

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 5>it's fifty six to forty gen Zers. Liberal gen zers

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 5>are among the most miserable people in America. The older

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 5>you get, the highers, the scores get on both ends

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 5>of the scale, and we could get into education that

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 5>sort of gen zers report the most.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's tough to break all this stuff down. And

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 4>I realize they tried to control for all these things,

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 4>But I can't imagine being a twenty year old in

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of your blue cities and telling your parents

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 4>not I think I'm fine. You wouldn't want to disappoint

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 4>your parents like that by telling them you don't have

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 4>anxiety or depression or any of those things.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, your parents are horrified.

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 5>I know several young people, some of whom I may

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 5>be genetically related to, who are seem to be very bright,

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 5>very well adjusted, happy with their lives, but have some

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 5>of these modern emotional problems, and it makes me really curious.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 5>As we've discussed many times through the years, what environmental

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 5>causes are going on. Is that the never ending barrage

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 5>of inputs, that's my greatest suspicion.

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so yeah, we're.

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Never quiet, we're never alone, we're never bored.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 4>You're right in presenting this information, we're kind of or

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 4>I was kind of presenting it like this is all

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 4>somewhat imagined. But we have talked a lot about it,

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 4>and I know, I got one kid who has for

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 4>real anxiety depression OCD all that sort of stuff, and

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 4>it's been struggling with it his whole life and on medication,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 4>and I've seen a gazillion psychiatrist and doctors and blah

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 4>blah blah. So yeah, there's something going on that is

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 4>causing problems, right, Yeah, so separating out that the real

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 4>from the just culturally, you live in a town where

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 4>everybody's supposed to have some of this stuff because life

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 4>is so hard and the world is.

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 5>So bad if you're keeping track at home. Just for

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 5>the record, Jack came to judge, Joe came to understand.

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.479
<v Speaker 2>Damn right, I came to judge and then brag about it.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So let's be fair. I bragged about it anyway.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Uh So this is as I as I mentioned last segment,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 5>the most miserable pastors in America appear to be progressive bisexuals.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 5>If you are bisexual or other, and apparently there are

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 5>some conservatives there are at a fifty nine, which ain't great.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 5>But if you're a progressive bisexual, you're at you selfrate

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 5>yourself at thirty five, which is I mean, like, by

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 5>far the most miserable people in America. I heard one

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 5>prominent lesbian writer. I read her right, well, what do

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 5>you want? These people want everything from the world, both sexes.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, everything goes with a How can the world

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 5>not disappoint them? Hmm?

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I know a lot of baristas that

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 4>meet that description and they look unhappy. I don't know

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 4>that that's our facial expression anyway.

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and their voice buncle fry fizes. Interestingly, people who

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 5>have high interest in news and politics on both sides

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 5>of the aisle tend to be more happy with their

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 5>mental health.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 4>Really.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm somewhat surprised by that, because it's enough to

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 5>make you insane.

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Trust me, I do it for a living.

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Huh.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 5>And it declines low news and political interests significantly lower

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 5>on both sides.

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Wow. Hmm. So they just take in the information about

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 4>the world just kind of the way they hear it

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 4>from people and get despondent over it.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, having more income does seem to make you more

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 5>positive about your mental health.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 2>That could be the other carosation correlation.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, reverse, Yeah, you're much more likely to make more

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 4>money if you're mentally Okay.

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 5>No meaningful difference in mental health between Catholics, Protestants, and

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 5>adherents of other organized religions. The differences between liberalists and

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 5>conservatives persist there, but religious adherence does soften them somewhat.

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad to see there's not a big breakdown between

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Protestants and Catholics.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Married people and people, and well, I know you want

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 5>to start another Holy war.

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 2>You're a big fan of Joan of arc.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 5>But married people and people in domestic partnerships are happier

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 5>than those who are separated, widow, divorced, or who have

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 5>never been married.

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 4>That has been true for as long as we've been

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 4>doing radio and reading these studies that married people tend

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 4>to report being happier more than single people, which is

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 4>interesting given that so much of the single world looks

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 4>at married people. Is like, I'm glad I'm not in

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 4>that prison when statistically that is not born out at all.

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh, not at all.

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting they phrased it as happier when it's self

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 5>reported mental health. I'm not sure those are synonyms, but

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 5>I guess they're close.

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 4>I make they're pretty close.

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, those are the main takeaways. Why are young

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 5>liberals so depressed? Matt Iglesia showed about.

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 4>You'd be depressed to the.

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Part of it, the weird hair color and the thing

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 5>through their nose, old white couple, old white men. I

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 5>can't stand it, and he points out, Jack, you'll be

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 5>gratified by this that there may be a performative axed

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 5>aspect to this. Yes, liberals may express negative sentiment as

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 5>a sign of solidarity with the movement that thinks there

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 5>is profound injustice in the world. How can I act

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 5>happy with all this injustice?

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 4>You shouldn't.

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Everybody will judge me.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 4>You think you could walk into your hipster coffee shop

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 4>where you're a barista and there's like nine other employees

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 4>and be a everything's fine. You know, life is what

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 4>life is. I just I roll with the punches. You

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 4>think you could be that person?

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, good days, bad days. What are you gonna do.

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 5>Let's make some coffee. Right, he's gonna be drummed out.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Let's just see what Trump did.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, it is so clearly a fascist dictatorship.

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Right to live. I've considered moving to Belgium.

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't find a parking spot because of the patriarchy.

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Jack Armstrong and Joe, The Armstrong and Getty Show, The

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getdy Show.

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Here's your freedom living quota today is from a gentleman

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 5>who celebrated his seventy seventh birth day yesterday. And he

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 5>should be a hero to young children, particularly black children,

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 5>all across America.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 2>That's Clarence Thomas.

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 5>But he's been so denigrated in bad mouthed by the

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 5>liberal media.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>He's not, but he was talking.

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 5>He gave a speech not too long ago about the

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 5>importance of standing up for truth, even if you're the

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 5>only one doing so. And here's the quote. You can

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 5>be in the middle of a hurricane, or you can

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 5>be on a calm day. North is still North. You

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 5>could be in a thunderstorm. North is still North. People

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 5>can yell at you. North is still North. It doesn't

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 5>change fundamental things. And in this business right is still

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 5>right even if you stand by yourself. Yeah, different version

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 5>of two plus two equals four.

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 4>No matter what, anybody else is.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Right exactly, Well said Clarence, and happy birthday, sir, mail bag.

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I've got a couple more later in the.

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 5>Week from Clarence Thomas drops a note mail bag at

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong in getty dot com.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Dirk's the German Rights It was a mostly peaceful bombing.

0:31:58.080 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 4>See.

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 5>Iran is a nation of over six hundred one thousand

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 5>square miles. The US bomb three small nuclear sites to

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 5>protest Iran's nuclear ambitions. It was clearly a mostly peaceful protest.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 5>That's fantastic, Well done, Dirk.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 4>How come nobody's commenting on the rest of Iran the

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 4>vast ninety nine percent of Iran that was untouched by bombs.

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 2>It RAN's a very big country.

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 5>It was just downtown Nukeville that had the problems.

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Well play. Dirk uh Don writes.

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 5>If President Trump Wonseranian women's support of regime change, could

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 5>she should offer swapping their burkes and other oppressive head

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 5>coverings for red make around Great again ball caps. Wow,

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 5>just ship cases of those over to Iran. Yeah, my

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 5>hair's covered with this truvy redhead. I just got take

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 5>that secret police. Of course, they've probably got the hell

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 5>beat out.

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Of them for that, and then you'd be tortured and

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 2>then executed.

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's see why I am not stressed out by

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 5>Steve and Everett Washington. Seems to me that two very

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 5>important metrics should be considered whether or not we're at

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 5>peace with the regional conflicts in the Middle East. One

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 5>did oil prices increase or decrease? It decreased significantly more

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 5>than ten bucks in barrel. Two did the Dow Jones

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 5>increase or don't look at the Dow, look at the

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 5>S and P five hundred? Did the S and P

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 5>increase or decrease? It increased the better part of one percent.

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm not one to engage in industrial espionage, but I

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 5>trust the fact that Wall Street has those resources. If

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 5>the market seem to think things have calmed down, I'm

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 5>inclined to agree with them.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Up again today on the ceasepire talks, although might

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 4>have more to do with the FED chair and what

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 4>he said about interest rates.

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 5>I was just reading about how uncertainty affects hiring and

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 5>investment in business, and I find myself wondering whether at

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 5>some point we become just more comfortable with a higher

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 5>level of volatility uncertainty as a culture.

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Get we better get used to it or we're going

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 4>to go crazy.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Poollo with an interesting topic. It looks like Iran

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 5>has at least a fly in the ointment of its

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 5>nuclear ambitions. It's probably only a bump in the road

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 5>for them. But it's not just Iran and nukes. We

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 5>have to worry about the development of technology and learning

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 5>generally is snowballing, and eventually just about everybody will have

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.959
<v Speaker 5>the capacity to do great harm. May take a while,

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 5>I hope, very long while, but it's inevitable. How can

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 5>we avoid it except by our destruction or some sort

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 5>of great reset that sets us back centuries. We'll have

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 5>to hope that we get a lot wiser before our

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 5>knowledge progresses to the point where the power to destroy

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 5>ourselves is ubiquitous and available to just about everyone. JT

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 5>and Livermore makes the point that none of the former

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 5>presidents have come out and said, nice job Donald j getting,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, taking the nuclear capabilities away from Iraq.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 4>That's a decent point considering I saw a montage of

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Clinton Obama, Biden all saying Iran will never get a

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 4>nuclear weapon and doing very little about it, doing very

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 4>little about it in some cases helping them come along.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's see Tim who hates US rights?

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 5>Yay ww three a disgusting escalation guaranteed to give J

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 5>and J little chubbies in their dockers. Wow, that's unnecessarily

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 5>a graphic. And I'm not wearing docers sir as they

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 5>bloviate with that special studio.

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Courage they're known for. Yeah, okay, your type.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 4>So we have less of a chance of World War

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 4>three if Iran has a nuclear weapon. Explain that to me.

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 5>Well in the false arguments and bad faith arguments in

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 5>a very short email.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 2>You know what.

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 5>I respect your ability to cram so many bad faith

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 5>arguments into the sentence and a half.

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>A chubby in my dockers.

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 5>Let's see Byron rights and there have invariations on this

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 5>attempt at humor. Trump's newest golf project is coming together.

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 5>He just established the first three holes of his new

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:50.959
<v Speaker 5>eighteen hole golf CORER.

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 4>There you go.

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 5>That would be the nuclear facility as of Iran. Jack

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 5>the holes in the ground.

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 4>I was tracking instead of yes, okay, It wasn't that

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 4>I didn't laugh, because understand it. I understood how I

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 4>see Armstrong and Getty