WEBVTT - Former St. Louis Fed President Jim Bullard Talks Fed Rates

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Joining US now is former Saint Louis FED President Jim Bullard,

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the potential candidates President Trump is considering for

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 2>FED chair. Jim, great to talk to you, or Dean,

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I should probably address you by your title, Dean of

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the Purdue University School of Business. I got to first

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>ask you your take on rates. Considering the shape the

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 2>United States economy is in, do we need a fifty

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>basis point rate cut at the next meeting.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I've seen one hundred basis points over the next as

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 3>we go into twenty twenty six, so I think you

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 3>could get started on that path. I think fifty sounds panicky,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>sounds like the administration wouldn't be that confident in their

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 3>economic program, which I don't think is the right stance

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 3>to take here. I think they've got a pro business

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>program that will fire up the economy after we get

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 3>through the initial phase of the new tariff policies, which

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>is slowing down the global economy, but eventually very strong

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 3>growth in the US economy, and monetary policy has to

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 3>be looking ahead and anticipating that. I do think the

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>policy rates high, but.

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>The committee is going to probably lower in September.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Here you could speed up the pace of reduction if

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the data cooperates as we go through the rest of

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:34.839
<v Speaker 3>the year and into twenty twenty six.

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, tell us what parts of the economy need a

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>rate cut at this moment. We were just talking with Mike

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>McKee about how FED officials too have been saying that

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>rates look restrictive here. We're not at neutral necessarily when

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we're north of four percent. Where do we really need

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>those rate cuts?

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just think you would want to be at

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>neutral if you felt in play was coming down to

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 3>two percent. That's why I've suggested that we can get

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 3>one hundred basis points lower.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 4>But you know, you're.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Looking through this inflation that's still CPI core is still

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 3>up around three percent.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>You're looking through that.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 3>But still you want to get confirmation that inflation is

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 3>actually coming down to target in the way that you

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>would like. And so you don't want to be too

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>aggressive because you might have to you might get burned

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 3>by the data, as the Committee did last year.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 4>So I think.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>You know you want to get on this pay path

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 3>toward neutral, and you want to keep watching the data,

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 3>especially on inflation, and if inflation comes in, you know,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 3>too high or starts going up again, that would be

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>the main thing that would disrupt the the growth agenda

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>for the US. So I don't think you want to

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 3>get into that hot water if you don't have Well.

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Jim, we're talking to you because you are, of course

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 5>on the list of people being considered to be the

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 5>next FED chair, and you confirmed you had talked to

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 5>folks at Treasury. What else you can tell us about

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 5>the interview process and the process of choosing a new

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 5>FED chair. You've obviously passed the first test, which is

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 5>you say rates need to be cut. What else do

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 5>they want to see in a new chairman?

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 3>I did talk to the Treasury Secretary relatively briefly. We

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>did not go through, you know, ideas about what was

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>required or job requirements or anything like that. I was

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>under the impression that the process is still under construction

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>for interviewing all these candidates, and you know, at that

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 3>point we can discuss in more details. So I just

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>said that I'd be happy to participate in that process.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what the process looks like. Can you tell

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>us any of the details. Have you met with anybody?

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you have meeting scheduled.

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 4>I do not, but that's why I say that.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I think this is all under construction, so we'll see

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 3>how they want to design it, and I'm sure it'll

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 3>be a good process. I would say this is a

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>credible list of candidates. I know almost all these people.

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a very sharp group, and many

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 3>of these people would do a fantastic job.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, a list of heavy hitters there, including yourself. Now,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you said on CNBC this week that you would accept

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the job of leaving the FED if the institution's independence

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is respected. Plenty of people would say that what we're

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now is not respect What did you mean

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>by that? What is respecting the independence of the FED

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>look like to you?

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean the FED is where it is because of

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the Federals IRV Act, and the Committee does what it

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 3>does because of the Federal Reserve Act. So if you know,

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>you have to do all this under existing law, and

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>if you want to change the law, the Congress can

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 3>certainly come in and do that. But Congress has looked

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 3>at the Federal Reserve Act six ways from Sunday, and

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>they keep coming up with the idea that, hey, this

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 3>is this is a pretty good way to do it.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's a complicated system. It is done by committee,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 3>it is at arms length from day to day politics.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>But that's the way it is, and I think that's

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 3>the way it's going to be going forward, because I

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 3>don't think Congress is in the mood to change that.

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think, you know, we have to respect that

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and we have to make these decisions under the law.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, speaking of changes, a number of people on the

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 5>list that the administration is considering have suggested they want

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 5>to make some major changes in the way the FED operates,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 5>and the President has suggested he'd like to see major

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 5>changes in the way the FED operates. If you were

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 5>to become chair, what would you change about the FED?

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've been outspoken over the years about various aspects.

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I do think that the FED is a research powerhouse.

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we could make more use of the various

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 3>ideas that are proposed around the around the nation from

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 3>the FED, and we could you know, break up the

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 3>group think a little bit more than what it has

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>been in the last few years. I think there's a

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of emphasis on Philip's curve. I'm thinking I've often

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 3>said that I think that the evidence for that is

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 3>not very good, or if to the extent there is

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 3>even evidence, it's very muted. And so that story, that

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 3>Phillips curve type story gets emphasized too much in financial

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>markets and too much in policymaker's mind.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 4>I try to break out of that a little bit.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 3>And emphasize the role of expectations a little bit more,

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and so there'd be more forward lookingness than probably what

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 3>we have today.

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And Dean Bullard, does it concern you when you know

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the President and his allies disagree with Jerome Powell's monetary

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 2>policy views, so they start looking into things like renovation

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>costs at the FED, or when the President disagrees with

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the numbers coming out of the Bureau of Labor and

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Statistics and so he simply fires the chief statistician there.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Does that concern you? Yeah?

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I think the President put up a new candidate for

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 3>BLS who's who I think will be pretty credible.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 4>So it looks to me like that issues maybe behind us.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I do think that the nation as a whole does

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>not have as good of economic data as we could,

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>even though we're better than most other countries.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, you think about it.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Omark knows it's one point six million employees or something

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>like that. They know their inventory in real time, They

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 3>know their pricing in real time for all those stores

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>all over the country and all over the world. Why

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 3>are we getting a retail sales report once a month.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of sketchy, you know. Why can't that all

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 4>be done a lot better?

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think I think to the extent that information

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>is important for how financial markets operate and how policy operates,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 3>we could do much better than we do today in

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>making sure that we have the right information available so

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 3>we make good decisions.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 5>If you did end up in the chair, obviously you

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 5>could be the target of the president's truth social account

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 5>when you look at what he has said about J.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 5>Powell and others on the FED, do you think the

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 5>criticism has been fair?

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think the president can espouse his

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 3>views as he often does on monetary policy, just like

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 3>all the other politicians that like to talk about monetary

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 3>policy on both sides of the aisle, and so I

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 3>just don't see any reason why you can say that

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the president can't do that. A lot of presidents haven't

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 3>done that, but I don't think they maybe wanted to

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>take that on, or they didn't feel that they wasn't

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 3>their style, or they didn't feel as confident in talking

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>about the economy as President Trump does know he's got

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of experience in a very intra sensitive industry,

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>and so he thinks and all the people I've ever

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 3>been in real estate always want lower.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Interest rates because that's the way the industry works.

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>It is a little different from public policy perspective because

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 3>you've got the inflation component there they might feed into

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 3>if you go too far, too fast. And so I

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 3>think the role of the FED chair is to guide

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 3>that process and make sure that we've got good outcomes

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 3>for the Call.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Me all right, Dean Bullard, we really appreciate your time.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We're eager to have you back soon. That is Purdue

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>University School of Business dean and former Saint Louis FED

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>President Jim Bullard.