WEBVTT - Talkin’ Cowboys: New Look Birds?

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>The following.

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 2>He is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the Dallas Cowboys.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Football Club.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys.

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>This He's Talking Cowboys Straining live.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 4>From the Dallas Cowboys World Course at the Star in

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Frisco Streets.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Touchdown and now your hosts, Isaiah Standback, Nick Harris, John Mashoda,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Yeomans. It's so wonderful Wednesday edition of Talking

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys presented by Black Rifle Coffee Company. We are live

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>from the Star in Frisco, Texas, in the SWBC studios

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as we continue to break down Cowboys Eagles this week

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Eagles Sunday Night Football from AT and T Stadium.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We've got Isaiah stand Back, John Machoda, Nick Harris, and

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Yeomen's. Gentleman, how we doing today?

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Doing well? Doing well?

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 6>Obviously you're doing very well, Kyle. Why is that you

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 6>have a sea through watch on? Have you ever seen

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 6>something like that?

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 7>James? I have.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>It's like broken on the back end.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 7>I don't wait, don't show the back and show the

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 7>front end that huh? I hate? Yeah?

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I could not care less.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 7>I've never seen nothing like it before. You know what

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm saying. Beamer transparent watches.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>That's just because I couldn't pay for the rest of it.

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 6>Wow, they just unveiled a freaking invisible cloak, and now

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 6>he comes out with invisible cloak.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>There's an invisible cloak.

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you never seen it, like like Harry Potter style.

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 7>You guys didn't see that.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Really, No, it was the same email you get the cyber.

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 7>You know, the United States did not create the technology.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 7>I'll say you that.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely, there's no way beamer you you creepy saw

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 5>it online?

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it was awesome. I just don't know where

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in society that would fit.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 7>Oh, there's plenty of places.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Not in society necessarily, what I'm saying legal society.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying, in a normal legal society. I

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a solid purpose for that.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Kids playing hide and seek?

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Fine, all right, even then that might be terrible. That

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>could be that could disaster.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 7>What would you do with an invisible cloak?

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, uh tracked out sources.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Probably no, I probably work himself into the team meeting.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 8>Probably would probably would have went a grape vine over

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 8>the weekend and try and figure it out how this

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 8>group came up with leaving Florida State out of the copy.

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, like that, just.

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 8>To hear, just to find out who is the most

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 8>against it, and I would tweet all that out.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you would use it for sources. What would

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you do with an invisible cloak? Eight one seven two

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>nine zero This is a dangerous thing. You'll be nice

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.839
<v Speaker 1>eight one seven two nine zero three two nine eight.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a fun question. Invisible cloak?

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 7>What would you do with it? Well, I can't believe

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 7>that it's real actually existence. Yeah, who has.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That much time on their hands to say, look, you

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>know what, let me build an invisible club.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 7>Not the United States, obviously, We've got a lot of others.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, yeah, fact yeah, fair. All right, let's get

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to news and notes. Cowboys of course off yesterday that

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>was the down day of the week and it's back

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>to a normal schedule, which, thank goodness it is. We're

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>done with the short weeks.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 7>It feels weird because of it, though it does.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels like this week is going to drag on forever.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:29.399
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Jam and I were just talking.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't even feel like a game week, Like it

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 6>just feels different because normally we'll be within what almost

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 6>forty eight hour role right now.

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 5>But right now, yeah, yeah, not a ton of news

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 5>and notes obviously coming off of Tuesday. The only thing

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 5>which we mentioned already this week is we will get

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 5>an update today on Peyton Hendershot and his act decision.

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, yeah, if he can, yeah, decision on it.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 5>If he can be activated to the fifty three man

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 5>rosters today. His twenty one day practice window is up,

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 5>So either he gets activated and someone drops down and

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 5>is released on to the practice squad, or he is

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 5>on the IR for the rest of the season.

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 7>So what are you leaning towards?

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 5>I think he ends up on the i R for

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the season. That's I don't know anything there,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 5>but that's that's just kind of like my hunch feeling here.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I agree, same thing I think.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I don't, I don't know for sure, but

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 8>it seems like that's the way it's leaning, kind of

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 8>like how you thought the Jack Leonard thing was leaning

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 8>towards Philadelphia. So I was wrong on that though. I

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 8>thought he was leaning towards the Cowboys. They become the Cowboys,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 8>So hey, what do I know?

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 6>I agree, I think he's probably going towards ir as well.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 6>But I would like to see him utilize on this offense.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 6>I think he would be another huge resource. Only only

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 6>caveat there is if he was on the field, you're

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 6>most likely in a passing situation.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And I don't think that you think.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 6>That less of Ferguson's abilities to take him off the

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 6>field and and replace him with Hindershot.

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 9>And Ferguson excelling at all, Yes, factored in with it

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 9>with you?

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 7>Yes?

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 9>How about with you?

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 5>Do you?

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, just because I mean that's a that's a legitimate

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 5>sig in that you have out there. Schoonmaker is stacking confidence.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 5>And then for me, it boils down to do you

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 5>want another receiving threat out there or do you want

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 5>another or another run blocker in the red zone. I'd

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 5>rather have another run blocker in the red zone, So

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 5>keep Sean McEwan. That's kind of my thought on it.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 5>I feel like this receiving group is doing just fine

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 5>right now. Obviously Dak Prescott's doing just fine right now.

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 5>If the pass offense was a struggle and there was

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 5>you know, Jake Ferguson wasn't playing as well as he

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 5>has been, then maybe I throw Hendershot back in there.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 5>But for me, if I'm making the decision, I'm keeping

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 5>him on ir and rolling with McEwan.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 7>So you're saying that training training camp showdown next.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 5>Year, it's gonna be a fun one. I'm telling you,

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 5>between Hendershot, whatever McEwen can do between now and then

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 5>and then John Stevens Junior, that's gonna be it's gonna

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 5>be a blast. Even Scoonmaker he's involved in that in

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 5>that mix as well, So it's gonna be fun.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe we've put too much stock into what we've

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.119
<v Speaker 1>seen from Peyton Hendershot on the field of training camp

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, because in the game he hasn't

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>necessarily produced. He had eleven receptions last year one hundred

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and three yards. He has one catch for three yards

0:05:58.640 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this year prior to the injury.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 7>It's pretty solid.

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Over twenty games.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 6>You say, twenty tea, how many attempts, how many targets

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 6>you have targets?

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I can give you that.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's still not crazy production. The reason I

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of gave the face was because.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Like eighteen targets, twelve receptions.

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we can say the same thing about be

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 6>Cooks prior to you know, the last few games Unifation.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 7>I get it. I mean, but you have to start somewhere,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 7>get it track.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 8>It would be interesting if John Stevens or Peyton hendershot

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 8>next year elevate themselves to where they're on a level

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 8>where you're like, we can play these guys all the time,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 8>just because I think of schoon Makers clearly the guy

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 8>they look at that way, his second round pick.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 9>Ferguson's clearly there.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 8>And it just makes me think of the rest of

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 8>the NFL, like, how many teams have three tight ends

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 8>that you can really try? I mean, how many teams

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 8>really have even two trucks? I go back to I

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 8>think it was two years ago, I think in free

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 8>agency when the Patriots like that was like their key thing,

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 8>like was to get Hunter Henry and man, I'm Jona

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 8>Blink on the other.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was Don Smith.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 8>It might have been, but it was just like they

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 8>were going to get their two you know, veterans tight

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 8>ends and try and build around it. For the Cowboys

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 8>to possibly have found that and maybe even have a third,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 8>that would be really impressive and obviously be great for

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 8>dak How.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>How imperative is that I caught Isaiah in the middle

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of the yond.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it was. How did it went to the US

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 7>women's National game last night?

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>That was right? But how fun was that?

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 7>It was good? Where was it they played against China?

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that why you're yawning? It was a little late start,

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>little late late night night. It took the kiddos though.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 7>It was awesome.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Nice there you go. Uh, when you have tight ends

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like that to rely on heavily, and we've talked about

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this in the past with Dalton Schultz, how what does

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that do for a quarterback mentally that you have multiple

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>guys that can be that safety net, not just one

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>player specifically, because in the past for the Cowboys it

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>has been one player. First it was Jason Witten, then

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it was Dalton Schultz. Now you feel like there's multiple

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that can do that. And of course the athleticism

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from this tight end room can take the top off

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of a defense as well.

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 6>I think it's huge because, especially in this style of

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 6>offense where you're using two tight end sets a lot,

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 6>you're not as worried about where your primary tight end

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 6>is lined up, Is he attached, is he you know,

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 6>is he had does he have.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 7>To have his hand in the ground.

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 6>Is he on the right side or is he on

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 6>the left side, Like you're less concerned about those things.

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 6>You can come into two tight tight end sets and

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 6>have a tight end on each side and feel good

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 6>about either direction.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 7>If you need to.

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 6>Over over a play, if you need to change the protection,

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 6>if you need to change the route concepts, Like you're

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 6>you're not as concerned about what you're doing there because

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 6>you're not taking away from one's abilities. Right, you feel

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 6>comfortable with both guys. You know they both can block,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 6>they both came run the routes, they both can catch

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 6>the ball. So now I'm like, Okay, now I could

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 6>play this even Steven and go whatever direction is best

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 6>in favor of the team and us and us being

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 6>successful in that particular play instead of being kind of

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 6>catering to what that particular player does best.

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>One last thing, You're done with news.

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 5>And yeah Tuesday, Super super Light have more coming out

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 5>of today.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to hit your Nicked Knight playoff scenarios because

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of things on there that I think

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>would be great for listeners to hear. The Cowboys would

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>take first place with a win on Sunday, However, the

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Eagles would still control their own destiny the rest of

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the way. What are some of the scenarios that fans

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>should probably keep an eye on as we get down

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the stretch. I know there were a lot of different

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>theories out there with the forty nine ers in the

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Eagles game this past Sunday on who would be more

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>beneficial for the Cowboys to see win. A lot of

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>people thought it would go one way or the other

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just based off of seeding come playoff time. But out

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of your scenarios, what are some of the ones you

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>want to highlight?

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so, I think, first off, it's important to highlight

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 5>that this game is the most important game on the

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 5>entire seventeen game schedule and determining playoff implications. If the

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 5>Cowboys lose on Sunday, you may as well play your

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 5>SHARPI out and write them in as the number five

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 5>seed and they are going to go play the NFC

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 5>South winner. Who would be Atlanta, New Orleans or Tampa Bay.

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 5>I wrote a NICKD. Knight that maybe Tampa Bay probably

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 5>the best matchup there, but I feel like you have

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 5>confidence going into any three of those matchups. But if

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 5>the Cowboys were to win, that's when things get a

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 5>little bit interesting. You mentioned, We've talked about it last

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 5>week as well. The first tipebreaker would be that divisional record.

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 5>At the end of the season, if they were to

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 5>win out, Philadelphia has two more games against the Giants.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Cowboys have one more against Commanders. If they were both

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 5>to win out, then they would still be tied in

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 5>that divisional typebreaker. Then it would go to the second

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 5>type breaker, which is common games. And again, if they

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 5>were both to win out, it would be ten and

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 5>two both of them, which would go to the third typebreaker,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 5>which would be conference record, and Philadelphia would have the

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 5>advantage there. They only have two losses against Dallas's three.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 5>So best case scenario, Dallas beats Philadelphia on Sunday, what

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 5>are you rooting for? You're rooting for the Giants to

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 5>beat Philadelphia one of those two games because if they're

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 5>able to do that, Yeah, exactly, Because if they're able

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 5>to do that, not only will Dallas be a game

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 5>above Philadelphia, but they would own the first tiebreakers, so

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 5>that would almost give them two games of flexibility there.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 5>That would be the best path towards winning the NFC East.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 5>So if who knows, maybe Tyrod Taylor comes back and

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 5>gives you a little bit of magic. But I kind

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 5>of mapped out as well what it could look like

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 5>for the Cowboys to get the one seed. It's really

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 5>unlikely because they would need the Niners to drop a

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 5>game at some point, and the way the Niner schedule

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 5>looks right now and the way they're playing, I just

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 5>don't see that happening. But if they're able to do

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 5>that and Dallas wins out, then they have that one seed.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So San Francisco has Seattle, Arizona, Baltimore, Okay, yeah, Washington, Baltimore, Yeah, Washington,

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and then Los Angeles.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 7>So interesting is that Arizona game is really important?

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely? We said it, well, we said it as soon

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 5>as it happened. I feel like I was like, this

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 5>is going to come back to bite them late because

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 5>if they were ten and two right now and they

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.119
<v Speaker 5>would still be tied in that conference tiebreaker with Philadelphia,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 5>this game would be huge. Then they could own the division.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 5>Coming out of this game.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You'd be up by two games with what is it?

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Five to play? Four to play to play?

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 5>Is what it is?

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Is what it is? No, it definitely is what is

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and qut trivia question?

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 5>We were doing this should can you name all five starting

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 5>offensive lineman in the Cardinals game?

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 8>You delete games because you're bringing it up. It makes

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 8>me want to say that when the name started at

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 8>TJ Bass.

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 5>He did start at one of them.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll started left tackle tackle.

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 7>Awesome Richards. No, it was left left.

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 8>Guard Tyler Smith, center Tyler Beatdish. Oh, so then that

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 8>would have been No.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 9>Who is long?

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 5>We had the same thing going on to the meeting.

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what we do in our meetings here.

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 9>He's not even on the team now.

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes he is, he is.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 9>He's on the active roster.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 5>Frock Hoffman, Okay, was the right guard practice Zach?

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 11>Oh?

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 9>No, that was I'm sorry, and that would be Terrence Steele.

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 5>There you go, man, that's it.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you think Dak would be putting up these

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 8>m VP numbers playing behind that offensive line for the

0:12:59.080 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 8>last six seven games.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably that's probably not.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 5>But but yeah, those are the playoff scenarios there, and

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 5>again a lot determines on the outcome of Sunday. If

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 5>they lose, may as well just get your just lights

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 5>ready sharp plan on New Orleans and Tampa.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Bay uh, Philadelphia schedule. Of course, it goes Dallas this week,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Seattle next week, which is Seattle's going to be in

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>desperation mode pretty quickly. They play San Francisco this week,

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they follow up with Philly next week. They

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>need a win pretty badly, and then it goes New York, Arizona,

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>New York down the stretch for Philadelphia. Maybe the one

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that can benefit, like you said, Tyrod Taylor may

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>be finding a little bit of magic there from the

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Giants standpoint, but I think you're gonna see Tommy Cutlets

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and the New York Giants. But the fact that they

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>play him two times in three weeks, maybe that's a benefit.

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to beat the team two times in three weeks.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 5>That's that's the best. That's the look at me, like

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 5>that's the best optimism you could have. But like again,

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.119
<v Speaker 5>it's it's it's highly unlike.

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Trying to see it with the glass half full.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 8>The best you can go to his last year's game

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 8>at Washington. I mean, there's reason that the Cowboys still

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 8>need to win that game. They're at Washington. Washington's not

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 8>very good. You would think nine out of ten times

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 8>they're winning that game and not only did that win it,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 8>that wasn't really even that close.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So do you think it benefits this Cowboys team the

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that they have to kind of go pedal to

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the medal here though? Down the stretch, they can't let

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>up for a game. There's no there's no room for error,

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>even if they get some help outside of it. We're

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about scenarios that include the Cowboys winning out, and

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's unbelievable.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 9>I don't know.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it'd be any different than it has

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 8>been though, because they still needed to win all the

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 8>way to the end last year. And some will argue, okay, well,

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 8>they weren't going to catch the Eagles anyway, so they

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 8>but they played all their started against Washington.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 9>They obviously were playing to win that game.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 8>And I could see it being the same thing, exact

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 8>thing this year, where it's like, we look at that

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 8>right now, but going into that final week at Washington,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 8>Philly might already technically have it locked up. And so

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 8>are you really playing that Washington game like that?

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 7>You know?

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 8>I can see us watching that Detroit game that's the

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 8>last home game, and thinking like, oh, this is gonna

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 8>have so much implications and then Philadelphia takes care of

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 8>business and it doesn't really end up mattering that much.

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 8>So in that case, I don't see it being that

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 8>much different. I mean, this season could be very similar

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 8>to last year, where you could be going to Tampa

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 8>Bay and then you could be going to San Francisco

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 8>or you know so, and then that'll be how this

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 8>team will be.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 9>Judges. Can it get past what it did last year?

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 5>They go to San Francisco again. I might not get

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 5>on the flight.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it was. It was dramatic. That is dramatic, you guys.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 7>Do you guys feel as if they would win out?

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 5>No, so I honestly I do feel like that scenario

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 5>where the Eagles lose a game to the Giants, that's

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 5>that's what you need to happen, because you're going to

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 5>lose one down the stretch. I mean, they're going to

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Buffalo and Miami back to back weeks. If they come

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 5>out of that two and zero, wow, Yeah, and then

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 5>they got to play Detroit on it which week?

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 6>So the remaining schedule outside of this week? Okay, what

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 6>team do you guys feel will be the most challenging

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 6>for Dallas.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 5>I always feel like Miami's the biggest challenge on the schedule. Really, yeah,

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 5>just because their speed is going to be unreal.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 7>That's tough.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 5>It's it's gonna be tough.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 8>Really, if you could tell me the elements of Buffalo,

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 8>that would help. But with me not knowing what it's

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 8>going to be, sure, I would also say Miami. But

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 8>if you tell me it's just like this snowy, awful

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 8>Buffalo type weather, then I would say that that builds

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 8>the game.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Is see, I think it's Detroit. Okay, why is that?

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 7>Because they're more physical. They're very physical, but Dallas. Dallas

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 7>has struggled with physical teams.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think that Detroit would speed. I don't disagree

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 6>with that, but there's things that you can do about that. Sure,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 6>Dallas has struggled with physicality. The forty nine ers beat

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 6>up Dallas multiple years now because of physicality, and.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 7>Detroit beat up Dallas with the physicality.

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Dallas won the game, but they made it dog on

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 6>interesting because they were just beating the crap out of

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 6>them and everybody was getting hit. Yeah, and I foresee

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 6>that being their tenacity, their relentlessness, their physicality, all those

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 6>things about Detroit scared of crap out of me when

0:16:58.320 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 6>I look at it any comparison to Dallas.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, just knowing how Detroit's played for the last I

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 8>don't know, thirty plus years of my life. There's a

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 8>part of you though that anytime that you really get

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 8>up for thinking like this is gonna be a big

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 8>matchup whatever like that, that they've laid a lot of eggs.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 8>So that's the only reason why. And then also they're

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 8>putting Jimmy Johnson the Ring on or halftime that show.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 8>I mean, come on that place, canna be rocket now.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 8>The other thing I just have to bring up because

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 8>sometimes I feel like we gloss over it and maybe

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 8>they lose this weekend and maybe well it'll change the narrative.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 8>But the reason why I would also side with Nick

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 8>on possibly Miami or Buffalo is just because of how

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 8>good the Cowboys have played at home, and if they

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 8>were playing at Detroit, maybe it'd be a little bit

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 8>maybe that would put it there, But just because they've

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 8>played so well at home, I give the edge to

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 8>maybe one of those two road games.

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the conditions were within the ten day

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>forecast on the weather change. Gotcha. Sorry, mainly cloudy, high

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>near thirty five with wins from ten to fifteen miles

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an hour, mostly cloudy skies at night with a low

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nine.

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 7>It's awful. It's less about the temperature, more about the wind.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 7>Win the wind, the.

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 6>Win at thirty five miles, I mean, at thirty five

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 6>degrees at fifteen miles perur wind, that's gonna feel like

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 6>twenty seven twenty eight, Like, that's gonna that's what cuts through.

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Your There is a twenty five percent chance of precipitation.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 5>There's forty five the day before, so maybe that moves up.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 7>That actually helps up.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there's probably a ten percent chance they don't

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 8>even play the game there and they have to move

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 8>into Detroit or somewhere else like they've had to do.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 9>It's snow games awesome.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that Beamer is ready to roll, all right.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>When we come back here on Talking Cowboys, we're going

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at the defensive preview for this

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys team. How do they stack up against Jalen Hurts

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and the weapons on the Philadelphia offense. More Talking Cowboys.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 12>Right after this, Todd thought it would be secure to

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 12>jog in the cheat of Savannah Todd believed the big

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 12>Cat repellent he bought online was reliable, and now Todd

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 12>is trying to be faster than this cheetah that can

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.239
<v Speaker 12>run eight miles per hour. But the good news is

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 12>Todd has AT and T five G. It is fast, reliable,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 12>and secure, and he learned the best thing to do

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 12>is stop running and toss her the backpack with the

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 12>beef stew at and T five G. Fast, reliable, secure,

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 12>It's not complicated.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Five G requires compatable planning device.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 7>Five G may not be available in your area.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 2>See att dot com slash five G for you for details.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 11>Black Rifle Coffee Company serves premium coffee to people who

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 11>love America. When you drink Black Rifle Coffee, you are

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 11>directly supporting veterans, law enforcement, and first responders in your community.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 11>Black Rifles expert roasters love coffee almost as much as

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 11>Texas loves football, so it makes sense that America's coffee

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 11>partner with America's team. Go online at Black Riflecoffee dot

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 11>com and fuel up with the official coffee of the

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 11>Dallas Cowboys. That's Black Riflecoffee dot Com. To fuel up.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Today, Cowboys fans after that move. We've just coined the

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>term rowdy replay. Let's roll back the table.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 3>Okay, there's our mascot rowdy cheering on the boys, and

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 3>now he's on his phone on his base Thank of

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 3>America Mobile Banking.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>App, staying on top of his finances with his virtual

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>financial assistant Erica.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Bank of America's digital tools are so impressive, Cowboys fans

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 3>just can't stop banking. Learn more at Bank of America

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Slash can't Stop Banking.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Everica is only available in the English language. You mut

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>download the latest version of the Mobile bank app, only

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>available on select mobile devices. Message dat rage ma apply

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>number FDIC.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 10>Welcome back into Dear Doctor, the show where I answered

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 10>life's questions with an ice cold can of doctor pepper. Sheila,

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 10>let's hear from my next caller.

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 7>Would you, dear doctor?

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 12>My friend supported me during a tough time. But what's

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 12>the right gift that says thanks for being.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>A shuldier to cry out?

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 10>Okay, this one's easy, I say give her a delicious

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 10>doctor pepper. Nothing says thanks good better than one of

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 10>a kind soda. Yes, any doctor pepper flavor will do. Now,

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 10>just to remind her that I don't need to be

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 10>a real doctor to know that Doctor Pepper is the

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 10>one you deserve.

0:20:52.680 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>To Talking Cowboys. I Care on Talking Cowboys. Presented by

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a Black Rifle Coffee Company. This portion of the show

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Quaker Oates, a super trusted superfood.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Quaker Oats the official oatmeal sponsor of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a look at the defensive matchup.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts, the RPO and all these weapons. They put

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>up some pretty incredible numbers throughout the year, but not

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily scoring off the chart. They've had some struggles in

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the red zone throughout the year. Jalen Hurts and Dak

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Prescott both rank inside the top three of offensive touchdowns,

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>though in twenty twenty three, Hurts his second, Prescott is third.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen is the only one in front of both

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of them. When you look at this offense, Isaiah, and

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>based off of what you've seen, not only this year,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but over the last couple of years, what do they

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>do best as a unit?

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 7>Man?

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 6>I think they're just effective in getting downhill. I believe

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 6>that these guys have a solid running game. I really

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 6>like their running game, whether that comes on the heels

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 6>of Ondre's swift or whether that comes to Jalen Hurts.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 6>Last time Dallas faced the Philadelphia Eagles, Jalen Hurts was injured,

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 6>and I think a lot of people are forgetting that

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 6>or choosing to ignore that he was not whole. I

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 6>think he's more whole now than he was. He's really

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 6>starting to cross the line of screamage like he used to.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 6>He's utilizing his legs to get first downs, getting out

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 6>on the edge, throwing the rock. I think these guys

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 6>obviously have the weapons on the outside. You have the

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 6>big physical receiver, you have the fast receiver, much like

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 6>Dallas face last week in Seattle. You got the big man,

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 6>you got the speed guy. Which one you're gonna put

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 6>your point of emphasis on to try to shut down?

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 6>Can you shut down both? Not really sure. Dallas Goddard,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 6>We've got to see about his availability if he's going

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 6>to be there. But these guys just do a great job.

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.959
<v Speaker 6>They're officing line is solid. I like their old line.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 6>I think their physical I think their tenations. I think

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 6>they try to be nasty. But you know one thing

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 6>that I think in terms of opportunity is you've seen

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 6>these guys before, you know what they do. They don't motion,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 6>they're not trying to trick you. I think in terms

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 6>of just lining up. These guys are thirty first.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 7>In the league.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 6>In terms of shifts and motions, they don't really do

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot of that. So when they when they step

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 6>to the line of scrimmage, you know where these guys

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 6>are going to be at. You're not worried about making

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 6>any adjustments there. It just comes down to communication, and

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 6>then you do have an opportunity to get some turnovers

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 6>against these guys. These guys have I think fourteen takeaways

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 6>this year, so there give they've given the ball up.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 6>Jalen Hurts has coughed the ball up a number of times.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 6>He doesn't like pressure, he doesn't like people all in

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 6>his face. So there is opportunity there. As dangerous as

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 6>these guys are with all their weapons and their system,

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 6>they're not trying to trick you. I'm not going to

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 6>say the second part of that, but they're not trying

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 6>to trick you. But they but they will come downhill

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 6>and if you can't stop the run, like we've talked about,

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 6>they will do it over and over again. There that's

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 6>just who they are at heart, That's who their coach is.

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 6>He's he's that arrogant of a guy where he would

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 6>just take the air out the ball.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 8>It's funny too, Like I think a lot of people

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 8>looked at the way dron Bland played last Thursday, and

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 8>there's concern, you know, because of Mike I said for

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 8>the game. You know, similarities between Philly's receivers and Seattle

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 8>a little bit. And there's the oh DK Metcalf was

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 8>able to do this, what if AJ Brown's able to

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 8>do that? So I'm asking you guys, because I'm fine

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 8>with this, So I'm wondering if you guys agree. So

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 8>that last game against the Cowboys, AJ Brown seven for

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 8>sixty six in a touchdown, Devonte Smith three for fifty

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 8>one in a touchdown. I would be fine if they

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 8>can if that's their production again or do you think

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 8>that that's too much?

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 5>No, I think that's fine. I think if the defense

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 5>does exactly what they did the first time against Philly,

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 5>then I think this offense can win this game. Obviously

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 5>you'd win a little bit more leeway, but I feel

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 5>like if that's the defensive effort that they put across.

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 5>I think this offense has developed more in the last

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 5>five weeks, especially in the running game, to be able

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 5>to score more than twenty eight points against this team.

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this is the part of the year where

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and we saw it against Seattle a little bit. Seattle

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was a good test for this offense as well. But

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to see this offense click. And we've seen

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it over the last five games. Right, It's continuously gotten better.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>You've seen it crescendo up to this point. This is

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the point they I wanted it to peak right here

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Like you said a moment ago in

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the first segment, Nick, that this is the most important

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>game of the regular season. They know that across the hall,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>they know that this is when they want this offense

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to be at its best, other than, of course, a

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>playoff push. But you got to win this game to

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>set you up better for that playoff push. I'm I'm

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>actually excited to see what this offense has in store.

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the defense does very similar to what it

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>did the first time around against Philly, even with the

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>struggle that they had last week against Seattle. It's a

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>different challenge though, because Gino Smith doesn't run as much

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as he used to either. Jalen Hurts leads that the

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>NFL in terms of quarterback rushing touchdowns. I like this

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>that Prescotten Hurts will be the fifth matchup between the

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>outright passing touchdown leader and the outright quarterback rushing touchdown

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>leader in December or later. Since twenty ten five times,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>three of the first four times were won by the

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>quarterback leading the NFL in passing touchdowns.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 5>And that would be press guy is like eight of

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 5>his ten rushing touchdowns from one yard out.

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so, Gosh, that's why.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 7>I actually, that's wow.

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 6>That's yeah, Beamer off the top rope. I don't want

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 6>to sound like Deybbie Downer, but I'm just being you know,

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm a realist.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 7>I just from my perspective.

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like what Mike and New York told you yesterday.

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 7>We know you're picking Philly.

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 6>I just want people to be aware that what you

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 6>saw last time against Philly was a reduced version of

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 6>who they are offensively, Okay, and that's just that's not

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 6>taking away anything from what our defense did, how successful

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 6>they were, but that was a reduced version of what

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 6>they're capable of. And I'm not saying that they're going

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 6>to display what they're capable of this week. I mean,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Dallas has a chance to shut it down. But that

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 6>was taking what your quarterback does best and saying, don't

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 6>get out the pocket because you can't get out the

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 6>pocket right, don't run, don't do RPO, don't do zone

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 6>read option, don't do any of these things that you're

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 6>capable of doing, which makes us more of a threat

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 6>offensively because you didn't have the ability to do so.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 6>Once his knee got compromised, he was he was done.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 6>I think he got out the pocket maybe a handful

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 6>of times, and you saw that he did not want

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 6>to get out of the pocket. He was gimpy as all

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 6>get out. So I'm just saying that to be realistic.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 9>Ran ten times.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but I'm saying like, but you could tell when

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 6>he ran it like it was like, yeah, like let

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 6>me grizz out of bounds, you know what I'm saying,

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 6>Like he was like, give me out of bounds now.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 6>So I just want people to be realistic about that

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.479
<v Speaker 6>in terms of looking back at what they what Dallas

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 6>did and say, oh, we're going to be better this time.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 6>Just just just timper your expectations and be realistic and

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 6>have your office prepared to be able to score some points.

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>They also took away They also in doing that with

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>dialing it back and simplifying their offense, they also took

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>care of the football. They never they didn't have a turnover.

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>They had a couple fumbles of course late in the

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>game that nearly gave probably took your football. Probably on

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the other side of it, Jalen Hurts, whenever he has

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>been healthy, has been giving the football away at a

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>high rate, four team giveaways in fact. So maybe this

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity for the Dallas defense to be aggressive

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and to get after Jalen Hurts to the fact that hey,

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe he wants to play hero ball and that's when

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he turns it over, So he could open up possibilities

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on one end where like I agree with you, Jalen

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Hurts was not okay in that last game against Dallas,

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was pretty painfully obvious. But now that he

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is okay, it just means he has an opportunity.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 9>To MAT's funny.

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 8>It's funny you guys say that though, because so I

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 8>brought off his game log from this year, and yeah,

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 8>he only threw three for two hundred and seven yards.

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 8>Okay against Cowboys the first time, but he was seventeen

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 8>of twenty three, passing two touchdowns, no interceptions. His his

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 8>passer rating was one thirty point two. It's the second

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 8>highest that he's had all season since then. Passer rating

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 8>Hays City Chiefs game sixty four point six, Bills ninety

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 8>six point two, Niners eighty five point two.

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 7>So we're just saying, don't hit him, keep him in

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 7>a pocket.

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 8>I mean, he was just on it. He was on

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 8>a run there. I'm just no, I'm not believe me.

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 8>I think Jalen Hurts is great. I'm just saying that there,

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 8>even though he was banged up at that time. Those

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 8>three games in a row Miami, Washington, Dallas, his passer

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 8>rings like one O nine, one thirty five, one thirty

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 8>and these last three games it has not been on

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 8>that level.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So with that being said, Nick, who do you

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like on the defense has to have their best game?

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 5>I feel like it's those the interior defensive line. Because

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 5>whenever I was going whenever we were going into the

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 5>first game against Philly, the thing that I worried about

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 5>was DeAndre Swift, and if Hurts is a little bit

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 5>more healthy and he's able to get out of the

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 5>pocket and kind of expand the running game a little bit,

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.239
<v Speaker 5>that's going to expand opportunities for DeAndre Swift. And that's

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 5>still a weapon that I fear on that offense because

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't feel like Dallas has really seen the full

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 5>potential of what that weapon can look like against this

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Dallas defense. So yeah, those guys in the middle, Jonathan Hankins,

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 5>Mazzie Smith, Neville Gallimore when he gets in also a Digiezua,

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 5>those guys need to have a really strong outing again.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 5>They've they've been stacking good games in the last couple

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 5>of last couple of weeks, So if they can keep

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 5>that going, then then I feel good about how this

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 5>defense can stop the rushing attack from Philadelphia. And if

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 5>they can do that, then I think we're gonna have

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 5>a similar offensive output from Philadelphia that we had last time.

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>On another part of the defense that maybe hasn't had

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>their best couple of weeks, and if anything has maybe

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>been criticized for it at the safety position, how impreparative

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is their play on Sunday night. Being able to see

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Jay Ron Curse play better, MALIEK. Cooker play better. Donovan Wilson.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Wilson stepped up, made a huge play on fourth downhill.

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>De Lawrence DeMarcus Lawrence kind of have that stop on

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Zach Charbonne at the goal or at the line of

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the game. Can those three guys they'll play a complete game?

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And how bad is that needed for this Dallas defense?

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that would be big because obviously you don't want

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 5>to have these receivers take the top off this defense.

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 5>That would be that would be pretty catastrophic in my

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 5>eyes if they're able to work a downfield passing game

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 5>with the weapons that they have in the receiving core.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, obviously, yeah, these safeties need to play well.

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.959
<v Speaker 5>Mollie Cooker as well. Whenever he's in those single high situations,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 5>He's been up, he's been down, He's had his moments

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 5>this year. I think if he could just stack really

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 5>good reps on Sunday, then they could limit that passing

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 5>attack and keep everything underneath. They can keep everything underneath.

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 5>I feel good about what the second level and what

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 5>these dbs can do to keep everything from letting it,

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 5>letting it kind of lead out. You know, the DK

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Metcalf Gearre at Wilson touchdowns. So we've had this year

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 5>that we've seen this year.

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, I feel like with both these teams, honestly,

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 8>I think the game will be decided by the two

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 8>quarterbacks on who can get outside the pocket and extend

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 8>plays the most, whether it be with their legs or

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 8>to you know, Mike McCarty always talks about the two

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 8>point three extend it beyond that to create bigger plays

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 8>down down the field, and that very well could be

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 8>Jalen Hurts, but that could be Dak Prescott too, especially

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 8>with the way he's been playing lately. So if you

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 8>tell me they keep Hurts in the pocket and they

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 8>are able to contain him a little bit, I really

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 8>like the Cowboys chances. But if he's getting outside running,

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, extending plays for aj Brown stuff down the field, yeah,

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 8>the Cowboys are in trouble then.

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 6>M because something to keep an eye on, something to

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 6>keep eye on. I want to highlight Marky's bell. I

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 6>need Marku's bell to have a heck of a game.

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 6>And yes, I think that, you know what, maybe maybe

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 6>back pedal a little bit talking about the defensive backs.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 7>I don't know the last time that we have been

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 7>in a position to praise the safety trio that we

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 7>have on this roster.

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 6>I think you think in a couple it's been a

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 6>while since we like sung the praises of these of

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 6>these safeties now, prior to contract extensions and things of

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 6>that nature.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 7>Oh, they're balling.

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>They were the talk of training camp.

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 6>It's being kind of quiet, and I'm not sure if

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.479
<v Speaker 6>that's because we're paying less attention. I'm not sure if

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 6>that's because they're not making as many plays. But I

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 6>don't feel as if that trio has been as impactive

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 6>as they have once as they once were, and we

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 6>need a resurgence of that, whether that be from the

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 6>coverage standpoint, whether that be from having hard hits Donald,

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 6>I haven't obviously he made a big tackle. I don't

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 6>know the last time that we saw Donald have a

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 6>big hit right and have that enforcement that he used

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 6>to have near the middle of the middle of this

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 6>of the defense and the line of scrimmage. A couple

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 6>of years ago, this dude was a complete dog up

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 6>there right, being a force to reckon with. Kurs was

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 6>coming up there putting vicescripts on tight ends. You know,

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 6>these are all the things that we were talking about.

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 6>Haven't heard that, so I want to see a resurgence

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 6>of that. But in terms of this game and taking

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 6>away one of the things that this team does very well,

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Markus Bell has to have a heck of a game. Yes,

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 6>that's not taking away the interior defensive line Ohsa Digiezuo.

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Those guys have to do their deal to be able

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 6>to take away the internal rend, the running game, and

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 6>the RPO. But Marku's Bell has a high task and

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 6>that's going to be shadowing Jalen Hurts.

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 7>That's his role.

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 6>I think he's done a great job of that with

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 6>other running backs. That's going to be his role most

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 6>likely this week against Jalen Hurts and preventing him from

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 6>being able to get outside the pocket and applying that pressure,

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 6>forcing him to throw some some air and throws, and

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 6>putting pressure in front of him his face to make

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 6>him fumble even possibly. But I think he's going to

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.239
<v Speaker 6>play a big role in this game. Obviously, it's going

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 6>to be a collective effort at all three levels. But

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 6>in terms of shutting down Jalen Hurts, I'm looking to

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 6>Marcus Bell.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Got to have a big game, and really that safety

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>group in general has to step up in a big

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>way as well. When we come back though here on

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Talking Cowboys, we talked to John Manchoda's national storylines. He's

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of good ones that we're going to

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>hit in a couple moments when we return with more

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Talking Cowboys after this.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 2>They say champions are remembered, but legends are never forgotten.

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 2>United Agon Turf offers a winning lineup of John Deere

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 2>equipment built to tackle any.

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Challenge on and off the field.

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Legendary John Deere Tractors combines residential mowers, commercial mowers, compact

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 2>construction equipments, cater utility vehicles, and a full line of

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>golf and sports turf equipment. United Agon Turf the official

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 2>agonturf equipment supplier of the Dallas Cowboys. Visit United dagonturf

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 2>dot com to find a location near you.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 11>Are you ready to take coffee off your grocery list forever?

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 11>Black Rifle Coffee Club is here to help. As a

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 11>coffee Club member, you'll get your favorite coffees, roasted package

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 11>and ship to your door free of charge on your

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 11>preferred schedule. Set it forget it and never run low

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 11>on coffee again. Members also get exclusive deals on coffee

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 11>products and discounts from partner brands. Ease your mind and

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 11>let Black Rifle worry about your coffee supply. Go to

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 11>Black Rifle Coffee dot com to join the coffee club today.

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the official min's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black, and right now Cowboys fans can get fifteen

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>percent off their seventy five dollars order. Plus Because every

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>deal needs a playmaker, your order will include a free

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>five piece skincare set and free shipping. The Jack Black

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Playmaker is four of Jack's favorites and a full sized

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>intense therapy lipball. Make a play for the playmaker at

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Getjack Black dot com slash Cowboys with the code Cowboys vip.

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>That's get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys with the

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>code Cowboys vip.

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 12>Tod thought it would be secure to jog in the

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 12>cheetah Savannah. Todd believed the big cat repellent he bought

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 12>online was reliable, and now Todd is trying to be

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 12>faster than this cheetah that can run eighty miles per

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 12>But the good news is Todd has at and T

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 12>five G. It is fast, reliable, and secure, and he

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 12>learned the best thing to do is stop running and

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 12>toss her the backpack with the beef stew At and

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 12>T five G. Fast reliable, secure, It's not complicated.

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Five D requires compatible plan and device five G may

0:35:58.880 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 2>not be available in your area.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Att dot com slash bogie for you for.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Details to Talking Cowboys. Welcome back into Talking Cowboys.

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>This segment is brought to you by Visiline, the official

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>smile of the Dallas Cowboys, and we're all smiles as

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>John Machoda reads our national stories.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 7>Let's go, Jayu.

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 8>I'll be honest with you, I think that the national storylines,

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 8>because here's one of them I obviously was going to

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 8>talk about with you guys would be Aaron Rodgers and

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 8>coming back potentially from that Achilles and they're terrible, and

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 8>so I'm like, let's just make this about the Cowboys,

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 8>so that if the season ended today, they would be

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 8>the fifth seed and having to go play the NFC

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 8>South champ right now, that would be the Falcons. But

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 8>the Falcons, Bucks Saints are all kind of in that group.

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 8>I wanted to ask you, guys, if you can pick

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 8>if that ends up being the case for them, you

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 8>can pick.

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 9>Where they go.

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 8>What's the best one of those environments teams whatever for

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 8>the Cowboys to face, and what's the worst one, like

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 8>the one that you absolutely don't want to see.

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 9>Because for me, I'll just start with the best one.

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 9>To me, I think it's Tampa Bay.

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 8>You already went there last year and beat them with

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 8>Tom Brady a ton of Cowboys fans.

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 9>I would expect the same there.

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 8>Again, I wouldn't love the road environment as much of

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 8>those other even though there'd be a ton of Cowboys

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 8>fans either of them. I think that Tampa Bay would

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 8>be the one that you'd want the most. But I

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 8>want to hear your guys takes on this.

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I would.

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with Tampa Bay being the best scenario

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>because they're just not the same. And like you said,

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they Tampa Bay fans are even not as all in

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>as they were whenever Tom Brady was there the TV.

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>The Tampa Brady fans.

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 5>Have left well, I think they're Ravens fans now or something.

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like they're all over everywhere else.

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, give me Atlanta, but okay, give me Atlanta there's

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 6>nobody that I fear out on Atlanta's team Bejon six,

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 6>and there's no I don't fear neither one of those

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 6>guys in terms.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 7>Of what they've done in at least he's there.

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Any j Turell, I.

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 7>Don't fear those guys. There's a Mike Evans.

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I like Mike Evans, and that's who else Kate

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 5>Mike Evans, Kate.

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 7>Oughten, Kay, Tampa has a company, guys.

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I think my least favorite of the bunch would be

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans going on the road and playing in Super

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and and I honest just I just don't trust New

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Orleans and the fact that they're going to find a

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>way to play well in that game, like they're so

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>streaky and.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 7>Car gives you a chance to win plenty of times.

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got Winston who could either throw for

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty picks touchdown.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 8>So Atlanta is four and two at home this year,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 8>Tampa Bay is three and three, and the Saints are

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 8>surprisingly two and three at home.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Selfishly, I'd want to go to New Orleans. Yeah, but

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 5>I think the best the best case scenario.

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is that, Nick? Why would you want to go

0:38:58.000 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to New Orleans?

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 5>Love that place. You to join me on on New

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Year's Day, make a make an early trip out there.

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 5>So I'm already already out of the stadium, real real.

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 9>Quick, enough of that. What is your guys favorite NFL

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 9>road city?

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 9>Because I thought it because a lot of people would

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 9>probably say New Orleans if you're.

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 7>New Orleans.

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 6>Was the craziest road environment that I've ever played in,

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 6>Like rocking, freaking y yang twins, stand up and get

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 6>crunk after every time they score.

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 8>I mean, so that was regardless of the team that

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 8>you were on, you felt like it like there wasn't

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 8>more when you were with the Cowboys.

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:37.240
<v Speaker 7>New England.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, New Orleans is up there. I haven't been there.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've been to Miami. I haven't been as

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 1>like an.

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 7>NFL Miami atmosphere.

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Not the same thing.

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 7>I liked.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm really looking forward to Buffalo.

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 7>That a little cool.

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking forward.

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 7>It feels like a high school stadium.

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah that's the only thing. And they're building that new

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 5>stadium so like here in like five years and you

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 5>know that. But the next time the Cowboys, Buffalo feels

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 5>like high school. Miami feels like eh whatever. Minnesota, Minnesota,

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 5>is nice.

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Kansas City would be up there.

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm not saying it's number one for me, but I'm

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 8>not just saying it because he's sitting here. But Seattle's

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 8>pretty high in there too. Yeah, Like it's a cool city.

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:24.919
<v Speaker 8>It's down the stadium's downtown, walkable stuff, and US an opponent. Yeah,

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 8>stadiums so loud. And that's just a really cool advice.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>You're there as a broadcaster.

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 7>Was there?

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 5>They just have really bad service in the restaurants. That's

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 5>about the only thing that's true.

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 7>That's true.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 9>You at one more, Yeah, let's do one more.

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 8>So again, I want to keep it to a Cowboys

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 8>thing here, and right now everything in the NFC is

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 8>being talked about is forty nine Ers, Cowboys, Eagles, and

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 8>I feel like everyone thinks that that's going to what

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 8>it's going to come down to who wins the NFC.

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 8>So right now, the forty nine Ers, I feel like

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 8>are in the driver's seat. I think they clearly look

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 8>like the best team with what they've done against the

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 8>Eagles and Cowboys this year. So I'll just ask you

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 8>who has a better chance of being the forty nine

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 8>Ers in the playoffs.

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 9>The Cowboys or Eagles.

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 5>Oh, no, gosh, Detroit, that's a trick question.

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 9>I feel like they would both probably be on the road.

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, probably, Yeah. I think San fran Is probably gonna

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>run the table, or at least get close to running

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the table down the stretch, did you I would say

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that they.

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Put Chase Young in in garbage time. I'm watching that

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 6>and I'm like, is garbage time and Chase Young's chasing you?

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Hm? Chasing you?

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>He's what to do there, Chase Young?

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 7>It's crazy? Yeah, yeah, I was literally watching, I'm like,

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 7>what the hell?

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 8>In a way, I kind of like the Cowboys because

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 8>of the fact of I do think if that if

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 8>both of them played at San Francisco, I do think

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 8>that the Philly spread would be smaller. I do think

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 8>that the Cowboys most people would be expecting them to

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 8>lose that game. But I think that there's a little

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 8>bit of There's they've been such a thorn in your side.

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 8>They're thinking they're going to be everybody thinks they're going

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 8>to be you. There's it's like one of those few

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 8>places where the Dallas Cowboys can be an unequivocal underdog,

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 8>And so because of that, I don't know that there's

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 8>that same feeling with Philly where I think people might

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 8>look at is you know, if they had their quarterback

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 8>last year, this game would have been different or maybe not.

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 9>I don't know.

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 8>There's a little bit more debate there where I think

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people just look at as like, oh, well,

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, San Francisco is gonna beat the Cowboys. And

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 8>anytime in sports where you just think it's like this

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 8>foregun conclusion, that's usually when wild stuff happens, you know.

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 5>I think I'm looking at the Cowboys there just because

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 5>they're a much different team than when they went up

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 5>there on Week five. Yeah, offense is different. Defense has

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 5>found a little bit more chemistry with a couple of

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 5>pieces that are out and a couple of pieces that

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 5>have kind of fit in. I think they are a

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 5>different team than they were in Week five. So I

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 5>would say the Cowboys.

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I liked your reasoning.

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 5>I do.

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I would probably say from a roster standpoint, Philadelphia is better. Yeah,

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just because of the trenches and what they can do

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>from a defensive line standpoint to try and stop the run.

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>They didn't do a great job of it on Sunday

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 1>against San fran The thing that Dallas would have there

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is You're right, it's they're written off in that game immediately.

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody would really, with a clean conscience

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 1>pick the Dallas Cowboys to win that game. If it's

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and forty nine Ers, or even whenever they've met

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days, somebody would do it, but

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be with a clean conscience. You would pick

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys to win over the forty nine.

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Ers in San Francisco if it happened tomorrow.

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 7>Yes?

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 4>Why?

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 7>Why?

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 7>Because I don't trust Brock Party.

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Okay, I think the past Rush MVP favorite Brock Party

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 6>that I don't trust Brock Party, and I think that

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 6>Brock Party will lay down when pressure is put on him,

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 6>and I.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Think that the first.

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 7>I think Dallas presents the first.

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 6>I think Dallas presents a greater opportunity to apply pressure

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 6>at Brock Party than the Philadelphia Eagles defensive front.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Does I disagree? I disagree.

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 7>That just happened.

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I like it.

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 5>I'll let you have it.

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I like it. You agree, I'm happy disagree, But

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 7>it's just not convinced of party and it's.

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Not going to be a foregone conclusion when you walk

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>into that building, because there's gonna be plenty of Cowboys fans.

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>There would be a chance to be on the road

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and to finally take care of business against the team

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:11.439
<v Speaker 1>that's knocked you out the last couple of years. There's

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a pride factor into it.

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 5>I do y'all feel like there's any team in the

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 5>AFC that is like in the same tier as Philadelphia

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 5>and San Francisco in the AFC.

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Baltimore, Baltimore, Kansas City, Miami, Kansas City. I'm not

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not counting.

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 8>Out Kansas if it was like the AFC, yeah, sure,

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 8>but the Kansas City been there, done that. Kansas City

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 8>would scare me more than the Dolphins. Okay, yeah, not me,

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 8>Like who just comes out of nowhere like that.

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 11>I know.

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 8>I said this earlier in the year, like the Dolphins

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 8>would to just be this team where oh, yeah, this one,

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 8>you're boom boom boom, put it all together.

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 9>Super Bowl Like, I mean, it's possible.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 5>But Miami feels like the Detroit of the AFC for me. Yeah,

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 5>they're nine to three, hadn't really been anybody. They're dangerous, yes,

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 5>and they could you know, win a big playoff game,

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 5>but like, I don't feel like they'll reach the super Bowl.

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.240
<v Speaker 9>Baltimore Baltimore cases Baltimore.

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I was probably ranked Baltimore one, Kansas City to Miami three.

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 9>And for me, it's not even Kansas City.

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 8>Like as in the Chiefs organization, it's like what team

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.439
<v Speaker 8>is Patrick Mahomes exactly? You just don't want it because

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 8>he can just have this huge game in boom.

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 7>You're how many first round receivers are they going to

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 7>get this year?

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Reading a different receiver every week after a Chiefs game

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 5>would be like, so a Roma Dune say, they're going

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 5>to get.

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Those guys looking pretty good, SMU prospect is pretty good.

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 7>They're going to get any more?

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>All Right? That does it for us here on national

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>storylines and for talking Cowboys. We've got to get out

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of here. Nick Eatman coming up with Cowboys storyline. You

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 1>can get on the phone line right now, eight at

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>eight eight, five to five to to really quick.

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.479
<v Speaker 5>We had a fun text in about the invisibility Cloak

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 5>guy said I would get on the field during the

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 5>game and just knock people down, trip the other team's quarterback,

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:50.760
<v Speaker 5>et cetera.

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 7>That's the best response. That's best response.

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if this Philadelphia sideline has already invested in

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>an avilable invisibility cloak for their security officers. Big Dom,

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Big Dom, you be an XXL cloak? All right?

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 7>That does it for us? Here on talking about for

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 7>Chris Bean.

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>We do have cable for Isaiah standback John Machoda, Nick Harris,

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kyle Yoman saying so long from Talking Cowboys. We'll

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:18.720
<v Speaker 1>see you tomorrow.

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 4>This has been a production of Dallascowboys dot Com and

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 4>the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.