WEBVTT - East Clintwood

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, and

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 2>whatever stupid stuff they decide to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 2>here's your host, Paul Chargion.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchian. My

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>co hosts have for a long absence, abnormally long absence.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson, Welcome back. It's been a couple of months,

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it has.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>But uh, understandably so I've been off the show because

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 3>it's been Thoris.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It's sad. It was really Thor season, absolutely.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>And uh, no one can break down the rookies in

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the business better than Thor. And we're gonna mention some

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 3>rookies on this episode at some point, but I'm not

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 3>gonna I'm not gonna dive into it. People just go

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>back and listen to those episodes if they want to. Yeah,

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>get a real breakdown of the rookies, because no one

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>does it better than Thor again, the in the whole industry.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's he's He's become one of the best already

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and our listeners have already already been paid on a

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of thors insight last year, and I think he's

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>had a great officers. We'll find out. I mean, if

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>JJ McCarthy bombs that alone, will we'll end up either

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that'll move him down a peg. But if JJ hits,

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna look brilliant. I mean he had he had

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>JJ's his number three quarterback overall.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 3>He was right on JJ. And this is we don't

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 3>know that yet, We don't know that, we don't know yet. Well,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 3>he was right that his stock was way too low at.

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The beginning of the guess at the beginning of the process.

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but now JJ in my mind, and again this

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>is no knock on JJ McCarthy. And I don't want

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>to get too into the weeds on this, but he's

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna have to wait a little bit because Sam Darnold

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 3>is going to turn some heads chart.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>See, I know you believe that, and there are a

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in Minnesota who do right. Briefly, make

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>your case.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is his first real shot. That's basically

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 3>it at a at a real no one if you

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 3>put any quarterback in a time machine forward put him

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 3>on the jets with Adam Gasee as his head coach,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>a twenty year old kid going to the Jets, Like,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>who's going to succeed in that environment? And then they

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 3>go to and he goes to Carolina. I'm blanket on

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 3>the head coach there, but I mean it was just

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>a disaster. But you know, Shanahan, Mike Shanahan, the head

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>coach of the forty nine ers, and trust that Donald

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 3>is the backup. And there's a good shot that you know,

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 3>brock Purty wasn't going to be ready to start the

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 3>season last year with the elbow injury, and he was

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>ready to roll with Donald. The Vikings are ready to

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 3>roll with Donald. They weren't guaranteed to get a quarterback.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 3>They have faith in him, and hey, he's an athlete,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 3>he's twenty six years old, He's got Justin Jefferson and

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of other weapons we know about. So I

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>want to I'm excited to see what he can do.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 3>And if you can't do it, then it's JJ time. Obviously.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Sam, Sam will be the first one up. I

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>believe he'll start the season week one for the Vikings,

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know he gets to throw to Justin Jefferson,

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>probably not TJ. Howkins, in Week one, probably not, but

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Addison we're gonna see a little more. We're gonna

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>see some more throws of the running back in Minnesota.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones can catch in a way that the Viking

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>seven had in a long time. Sam Darnold's had fifty

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>six games started. I mean, it's not like we don't

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>know anything about him, but this is the best spot

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that he's ever been in by a wide margin, for

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of ancillary talent, for sure. But this is

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a Sam Donald related show. Let's jump. Let's

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>get into the topic of the day, which is, you know,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>draft is over. We now from a fantasy standpoint, in particular,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine percent of what we need to know in

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of the rosters are now set going into at

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>least training camp and in many ways all the way

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>into the beginning of the season. So we're gonna start

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>highlighting every NFL team beginning this week. We're gonna do

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the AFC and NFC East Today. We'll talk about some

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of the key differences from last year on each of

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>these AFC and NFC East teams till you think they're

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get better or worse, And we begin with the

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills. Brian Let's break down the Bills offseason. It

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>was a tumultuous one.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, lots of changes in Buffalo. Let's dive right

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 3>into the passing game as most No gone is Stefan

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Diggs and to a lesser extent of fantasy relevance, Gabe Davis,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 3>who's now in Jacksonville. Diggs in Houston, of course, so

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 3>incomes Curtis Samuel from Washington. They drafted rookie Keon Coleman

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>pretty high in the draft, I believe late first round,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 3>if not, no early second round. Second ye yeah, like

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the first pick in the second round. Yep. Khalil Shakir

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 3>remains from last year. Buffalo also signed Marquez Valdez Scantling.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 3>We're not too interested there, which leaves really so there's

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>no alpha wide receiver in Buffalo anymore by any means.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Curtis Samuel right now in early drafts wide receiver forty nine,

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 3>rookie Keon Coleman wide receiver forty. Shakira is wide receiver

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 3>fifty five. So a very stack friendly team. If you're

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>looking to stack the Bills in best ball, you know,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 3>if you get.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>You can certainly do it if you want to, right.

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely. Josh Allen Clearcut quarterback one. He was finished.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Last year's QB one is getting drafted as QB one.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't see that changing. But I mean the alpha

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 3>dog in the passing game is tight end Dalton Kincaid. Yeah,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm must be a top wide receiver.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>YEP. I was wondering if you were going to go there.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>He could be sitting on eighty ninety catch season for

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Kincaid.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was. He was solid last year as a rookie.

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Of course, you don't see a lot of Brookies have

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>success at the tight end position, but he's really more

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 3>of a hybrid wide receiver in the line of you know,

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelcey, by boy Kyle Pitts. But right now, Dalton Kincaid,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 3>he's getting drafted head of Mark Andrews. He's going his

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 3>tight end four inside the top fifty picks overall, So

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's one of the I'm not I think

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 3>the price tags on guys like Sam Laporta, he's tight

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>end one, Travis Kelcey are pretty high. I would bypass

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>those guys for guys like Kincaid, and I'm just gonna

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>focus on Kinkaid. I like trade McBride a lot until

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 3>they drafted Marvin Harrison junior. But right now I think

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 3>Dalton Kinkaid has the highest prospects of all the tight

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>ends based on him being the top receiver A on

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the team and he can get him his tight end

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 3>for so but really, you know, this passing game, it's

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 3>it's all about Josh Allen. He's gonna be spreading the

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>ball around. I will I'm not going out of my

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 3>way to draft Samuel Coleman or Shakir because right now,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 3>based on their ADPs, they're not their flex guys at best.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 3>It's all about Kincaid and Allen in the passing game.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Over to the running game, things have changed there in

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 3>terms of backups, leaving James Cook still remains. He is

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 3>the lead back. He's going off the board as RB

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 3>thirteen right now. That's early fifth round. A little too

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>early for me considering Buffalo had twenty two rushing touchdowns

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 3>last year. But you want to take a guess how

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>many James Cook account at four those twenty two rushing

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns four close half of that two Jeez thought rushing

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns with James probably there's no I don't know. Uh yeah,

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>so James Cook way over valued at RB thirteen. I'm

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>passing on him there. I'd rather go for his backup,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 3>which will presumably be rookie Ray Davis, who is selected

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth round. Davis a very intriguing he can

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 3>prospect out of Kentucky. Again, if you want to learn

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>more about Ray Davis, go back and listen to the

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Rookie running Back episode with Thor. I'm sure he'll break

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>he breaks it down much.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, we did talk about ray Davis and we like,

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we both like ray Davis. Thor feels like his he

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a high ceiling, but we also we think

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he comes in with NFL ready traits and that he

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>can be an immediate starter. It just Thor doesn't feel

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like Ray Davis has got high upside in his game

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and that may ultimately limit him. But right now he's

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>going off the borders running back fifty four in a

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>backfield that has traditionally been a shared backfield, and I'm

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of intrigued by that.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, me too, for sure. I mean he's a guy

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I would be looking to draft even if I didn't

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>draft James Cook. And again I'm not actively looking to

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 3>draft James Cook. I think he's overvalued. But yeah, Davis

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>an injury away from being the starter and bull buffalo.

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 3>But again, you know, whether it's Cook or Davis, it's

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 3>all about Josh Allen at the goal line mainly, so

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>he's Alan and Kincaid are the you know, the flashy

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>toys in this offense. So in terms of this offense

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 3>getting better or worse than last year, even though he

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 3>faltered towards the end, you know, the loss of Stefan

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Diggs is gonna overall, right, so I'm gonna go slightly worse.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>But I really I think Josh Allen might have a

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 3>better year just because they lean on his legs a

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>little more or they'll need to, and I think he

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 3>has adequate enough support around him, you know, to spread

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 3>the ball around and put up pretty good passing numbers. Still,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 3>so uh, again, it's not gonna be a better offense

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 3>even at best you know, lateral move, but I'm leaning

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>slightly worse, but it'll still be a high powered offense

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 3>with Allen at the helm.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So I looked up Dalton Kincaid's numbers last year just

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to get refamiliarized and hit seventy three receptions last year,

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he's got one hundred reception upside now if

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>assuming that Dalton Knox is going to fade into the

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>background here, which is not necessarily a valid assumption, but

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>if he does, no, you know, Kincaid could easily see

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a you know, thirty percent up tick and end up

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>getting himself into the one hundred reception range, which for

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a tight end would be fantastic. Kinkaid just the two

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns last year. All right, let's switch over to the

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>new England Patriots passing game. Well, obviously you've got a

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>new coaching staff. I think a whole new breath of

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>fresh air in the room, which is great. The quarterback

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>position obviously big change here. Only Bailey's appey remains from

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. Drake May Jacoby Brissett come in. It's not

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a certainty that Drake May starts the season because Jacoby

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Brissett is a proven quality NFL backup who can start

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in pinches, and they may decide to take their time

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on Drake May. It's not clear that Drake May starts

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Week one, but almost no matter what, the passing game

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>gets better, because anything is an uptick from what they

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>had last year with Mac Jones, Bailey Zappy disaster scenarios

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>unfolding for the Patriots. I think, do you remember how

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>many times Mac Jones got benched.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Six?

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was four. I think get four different

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>benchings in one season, which is which is pretty tough

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back from the wide receiver room. You have

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>some returning vets like Kendrick Bourne and Damario Douglas, who

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of nice moments. I don't know why

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they've hung on to Juju Smith, Schuster and Jalen Rager,

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but they have. They added free agent kg Osbourne who

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>will run from the slot, but Douglas is already there.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>They drafted Jalyn Polk in round two and Javon Baker

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and Thor and I talked about these two just last week.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Thor likes Baker, doesn't like Polk, so you can go

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to last week's if you want to

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>hear more details on how why he feels that way.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>But those guys are now there, but overall, this is

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 1>still a wide receiver group that feels like you want

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to avoid unless you do want to throw some darts

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>around at a guy like Javon Baker, who you can

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>get basically for free if you want to. He's wide

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>receiver eighty one. Right now, Hunter Henry remains like Koseki left.

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>He gets replaced by Austin Hooper, who coming out just

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>call Austin Hooper a journeyman.

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I would say, I think he's more than that. I

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know what would be beyond a journey, and he's.

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Like super elite. Super journey was something like that.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 3>Five teams, six teams.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Something like that. Former first rounder, if I recall correctly

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on Austin Hooper obviously hasn't worked out. So does the

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>passing game get better in New England? It basically can't

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>get worse. It was totally non functional last year, so

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>you know it will get better. But your big payoff

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on this, on this passing offense is probably in seasons

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to come for the running game. I want to start

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>by talking just a little bit about new offensive coordinator

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Alex van Pelt. He was Kevin Stefanski's offensive coordinator for

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>four years and Stefanski was the primary offensive mine behind

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the Browns offense, not Van Pelt. But if we assume

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that Van Pelt has been taking his cues from Stefanski,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you could suggest that he's going to carry over some

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of Stefanski's tendencies towards running the ball. So with the Browns,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last four years when Alex van Pelt was there,

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the team finished in run play percentage, The Browns finished fourth, sixth, eighth,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and then last year when Nick Chubb got hurt, they

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped down to seventeenth, but still four, six and eighth.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it tells you this is a This was

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a run first, power running team when they had Nick Chubb.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's what happens with Romandre Stevenson here, which

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting. Stevenson returns, but he fell off badly

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, and maybe it was just because he was

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>getting no help from the passing game, but he failed

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>to Pro Football focuses running back twenty six. He had

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>typically been inside the top ten. He was down to

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>four yards per carry, which was down a full yard

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>from five yards per carry the weird year before for Stevenson.

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>And worse, the receptions just completely dried up, cut in half,

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>down to just thirty eight receptions last year. And he's

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ideally built for goal line used, but the dude just

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>hasn't reliably scored touchdowns, but again, there is reason to

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think it could change under Alex van Pelt and maybe

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Stevenson's going to be that guy they brought in Antonio Gibson,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian to me. That to me, I just don't think

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Gibson's all that good. And maybe he I think he

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>could see I could see him a pass catching role,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think he's gonna take a lot of

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>carries from Rmando Stevenson. What do you think?

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with you there. This is the year to

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 3>even though the Patriots are going nowhere, Stevenson deserves just

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 3>a shot at being the bell cow. And I know

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 3>we fell off last year. I believe he did suffer

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 3>a somewhat serious ankle injury that caused him to miss

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 3>some time, didn't come back as strong. But Antonio Gibson,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>he might be the best wide receiver on that team

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>right now. Former college wide receiver Antonio Gibson.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you hope.

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, overall, the Patriots. If you had to

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 3>pick one team where you just were disallowed from drafting

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 3>anyone in fantasy football, it's the Patriots. With a bullet

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 3>For me, this is probably the least exciting offense and

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 3>all the football and all these teams.

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that might be our queue to sort of

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>move along. They didn't, unfortunately. You know, they did put

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>some draft picks into offensive line, third and fourth rounders,

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that'll improve an offensive line that didn't help

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So well, the Patriots running game get better. Yeah,

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it probably will, because it fell off hard. And I

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>just think through if we think that Alex van Pelt

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a run first orientation and protect

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>his young quarterback, assuming Drake May gets reps at some point. Yeah,

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of intrigued right now. Ramandra. Stevenson going off

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the board is running back nineteen. Not bad. If I

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>can get a work horse what I hope I think

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>will be a workhorse running back running back now.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's one of the one of the first candidates.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 3>If you deployed the do the opposite strategy, it will

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>be there round round five, round six. I like him

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot more than the aforementioned James Cook, who is

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>going six seven spots in terms of running backs ahead

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 3>of Stevenson. I take Stevenson all day over James Cook.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Stevenson really the only guy won on New England. Yeah,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm really looking.

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much, let's go to a much better offense. Let's

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>talk Miami. Now here's here's some offense.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Definitely some offense. But here's something to keep in mind

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 3>when you're going to draft Dolphins this year. As we

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>all know, this schedule has come out and a lot

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 3>of people tend to look at the bye weeks and

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 3>then they look at the playoff schedule, the fantasy playoff schedule.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Miami's playoff schedule sucks. Here it is starting in week

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>thirteen at green Bay. We know Miami does not like

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 3>cold weather. Green Bay decent enough defense, so starts off

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 3>a little rocky there. Then week fourteen they have the

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Jets at home. Jets, great defense. Week fifteen at Texans,

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>shootout potential there indoors with Texans.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Texans past defense has been has been good, Yeah.

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Very good. And Week sixteen they're at home. That's good

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 3>against the forty nine ers, though presumably gonna be a

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 3>bad matchup defensively. And then week seventeen, here's here's the

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 3>cherry on top per se at Cleveland in week seventeen.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>That's like it's a it's a tough road right there.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Bench everyone, but there's a long way to go till

0:16:58.160 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 3>we get there.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, you know I I don't put a

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of weight in the playoffs schedule. And here's why.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times, if that playoff schedule's hard, the

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season is pretty easy. If I'm if

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>i get to the halfway point of the season and

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm motoring with my Dolphins and I'm already projecting ahead.

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's week nine and I'm seven to two

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm already starting to look at the playoffs, and

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm still worried about those defenses. If those four defenses

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>are still really good, okay, then maybe I'm making a

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>change and ide I can make a trade at that

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>point if I need to. So I don't know, I don't.

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't let that bother me so too much. No,

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you.

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I shouldn't say I'm not like fading the Dolphins in drafts,

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 3>but the schedule is not even Keep in mind for scenario,

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 3>like you said, you get your money's worth out of them,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>then you you know, you flip them for something better,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 3>knowing that the road gets a lot tougher for him

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 3>later in the season. But just keep that schedule in

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 3>mind for sure, But by no means are you fading

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 3>any of the Dolphins. Starting with Tyreek Hill, who's going

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 3>off the board is wide receiver too right now, his

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 3>running mate or counterpart, Jalen Waddle wide receiver nineteen. We

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>both kind of know what we get with those two guys.

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Tyreek Hill can be the best wide receiver in the

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 3>league on any given day something happens to him. Jalen

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 3>Waddle sees a major uptick and volume, but Waddle is

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 3>certainly the robin to Tyreek Hill's batman. The question here

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 3>is the wide receiver three role, where we have two

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 3>very different options in the very old Odell Beckham Junior

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and then rookie Maleek Washington. Both are dirt cheap and

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 3>for good reason, they have a well they both have

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.239
<v Speaker 3>very low floors. We know that if Odell Beckham can

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 3>somehow rekindle his magic his youth, he takes the job.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 3>But leak Washington and intriguing and intriguing prospects here. If

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 3>something were to happen to either Hill or Waddle and

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 3>or Beckham, Washington could get some run in a high

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 3>octane offense. So he's a wide receiver I'm targeting late

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 3>in redraft, not just dynasty, especially if I'm looking to

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 3>stay Dolphins. And if you're stacking Dolphins, you're looking at quarterback.

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Their quarterback tu Tungo Viola. I haven't said the last

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 3>name in a while. I took cat us right.

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>It takes a minute. If you haven't, you haven't practiced it.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Right now, I was a little you know, Tuas going

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 3>off the board as QB fourteen right now, and I'm like, man,

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 3>that seems like kind of a good deal. He must

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.239
<v Speaker 3>have been a top ten quarterback last year. I went

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 3>back and looked. He finished as QB seventeen in points

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 3>per game, which is not very good for an offense

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 3>that was as high powered as the Dolphins. To to

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 3>threw for three touchdowns in Week eight against New England,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and that was the last time he hit that milestone

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 3>all season. It was in Week eight. Yeah, from that

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 3>point on, he threw for multiple scores, meaning two touchdowns

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 3>in just three games post Week eight.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that hurts.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Zero zero rushing touchdowns all season for Tua. So right now,

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that QB fourteen price tag maybe seems a little overvalued now,

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>So you think you think Tyreek Hill you think Jalen Waller,

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 3>You're like, oh, I gotta have Tua. But Tua did

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>not post the numbers that you that I remembered last year,

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 3>and uh, he's probably gonna fall in line with the

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 3>same kind of production. Unless I cannot go to the

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 3>running game without mentioning the new tight end in Miami,

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>John u John who baby John?

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he's your starting tight end. It's you know,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>he's been locked into these dual roles where he's had

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to fight for fight for starting time. John Hu Smith

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>is your probable starting Week one tight end. And talking

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about der cheap you can get John Hu Smith, I mean,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>name your price, right, you know who's gonna take him.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>He's tight end twenty three off the board. He's the

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins starting tight end, and he's a crazy athlete. He

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>fits the profile you know of no doubt of what

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you of what the Dolphins want with these crazy athletes.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, John Whu Smith is all about athleticism.

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 3>The problem though, is like the Dolphins do not involve

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 3>their tight ends a whole lot, like I said, they

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 3>might have not they haven't had an athlete like John

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Hu Jho. So we'll see how that changes. He's worth

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 3>a he's worth a dark throw in the later rounds

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 3>or not the later rounds like.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>The last round. Yes, going off the board player one

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty three right now.

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Now over to the running game. This is where it

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>gets really really messy. We'll start with Devin A. Chan

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 3>going off the board as RB eight.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a big price to pay.

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 3>It's a big price to pay. I mean, he was

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 3>he has some monster games. That's why he was fourth

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 3>in Fantasy points per game among running backs last year,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 3>but he only played eleven games due to injury. That

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 3>led paved the way for Raheem Moster, who led the

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>league in rushing touchdowns with eighteen, second in overall in

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 3>overall points among running backs. He's going off the board

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 3>is RB twenty nine right now.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I don't understand the differential between those two.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Sure eight, Chan's your highlight machine, but Moster was the

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>more consistent back. And the fact that there's twenty running

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>back spots You're put twenty running backs between those two

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>feels weird.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Definitely feels weird. I mean, if you have to pick one,

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 3>I know, in the one of the first you know,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 3>if our regular season shows that start in August, we

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 3>do the which teammate would you rather draft? I think

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>we could put this one in the books already that

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 3>it's Moster.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Always the lower ranked to guy too as that as

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that bit usually plays out.

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is most are a guy I think in

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>dynasty leagues, if you're if you're in win now mode,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.239
<v Speaker 3>go see who has Raheem Moster if anyone's in any

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of He's just had eighteen touchdowns last year and

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 3>he's going RB thirty and in dynasty he's gonna be

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>way undervalued. So if you're in win now mode in dynasty,

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 3>he's a guy I'd be looking at, but a great

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 3>discount on Moster. But Miami really threw a wrench in

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 3>the mix when they drafted rookie Jalen Wright, who a

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of people are excited about, I know after the

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 3>war was he He's going off the boards RB forty four.

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>That's it's only fifteen spots behind Raheem Moster, which is insane. Again,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 3>not an ideal landing spot for fantasy perpose.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>If they're injury.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 3>If there's an injury, he will certainly become relevant. But

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 3>uh yeah, it's a loaded backfield. So this is almost

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 3>and if I had to pick one of the three,

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably go with right, Just go with the cheapest

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>one there because uh, you know, he has a similar

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 3>athletic profile to a chan So but again it's a

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 3>loaded backfield. Most are the most intriguing to me is

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 3>RB twenty nine of the leading touchdown scorer, again among

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 3>running backs on the ground. And when we talk will

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 3>this offense get better or worse this year, it's really

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 3>just a I don't see how it gets any worse.

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's a ton better, Jalen writes,

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 3>A nice ad adds a little depth to the backfield.

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 3>If OBJ can rekindle some magic, I'll say better. But

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 3>overall it's about the same for me.

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>All Right, let's go to the Jets. Will note that

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they put a first round pick into the offensive line,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>which is going to ultimately be helpful here. And obviously

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they get back Aaron Rodgers, who's kind of like a

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>new face, all right. I mean they got four plays

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>out of him last year, so Aaron Rodgers comes back. Notably,

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>they did not draft tight end Brock Bowers. They passed

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on him, which I you know, some people may view

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately as a mistake, they went with Olufashanu instead.

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>They they jettisoned almost every wide out from last year

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>aside from Garrett Wilson, which makes sense, and keeping Allan Lazard,

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>which does not make any sense. I assume it's just

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for contractual reasons. They added Chargers free agent Mike Williams

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Williams, you know, you know what you're

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>getting out of Williams. You get those periodic big plays

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>downfield or uses his big bodied box out defenders wedd

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>He's healthy, which is you know, all bit a continuing

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>problem for Mike Williams, but you know, healthy at least

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to start the season. They also drafted Malachi Corley in

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the third round. Is really interesting. It's a pure slot receiver,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>incredibly slippery after the catch, and in twenty twenty two,

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so two seasons ago, he led the FBS in yards

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>after catch and for and forced missed tackles, which is

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive. He's he's got a little Deebo Samuel to

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>his game. Malachi Corley just keep you know, keep your

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.239
<v Speaker 1>eyes on him and in in Dynasty, Like you know,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going roughly round four of Dynasty drafts.

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>That's rookie Doney Straw. That's kind of interesting to me.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>You know this, this whole passing offense for the Jets

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly gets better. Obviously obviously gets better with Aaron Rodgers,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it goes, It goes without saying Tyrod Taylor's you knew

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>backup there by the way as well. And you know,

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson presumably gets on track in a big way,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>has the kind of season that we all thought he

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>was going to have last year. He still remains a

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>great receiver, and I think just I think a little

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>bit underappreciated right now, because you know, we were all

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>excited about his his year two last year didn't all

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>come together the way we thought it would. I think

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>some people might be a little down on him. But

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he's going off the board at wide receiver eight, which

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>feels to me to be about about right for Garrett Wilson.

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So obviously passing game gets better for the Jets. We'll

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>flip over to the running game for a second. Breeshall

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>remains really impressive here last year despite coming off the

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>ACL and getting zero help in the passing game at

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>all behind him, though, the backup situation is worth watching,

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and Thorn and I talked about it last week. You know,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they drafted the two rookie running backs Alan and Davis

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in rounds four and five, and that really makes the

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>backup situation here pretty muddy, especially with Izzy Abanacondo there

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from last year, although he really did nothing last season,

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>only twenty two carries, and didn't do anything with those

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty two carries, so maybe they won't even factor in.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But just the fact that Alan and Davis are both there,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're both stylistically very similar, means I don't see

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where I'm going to run the risk of

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>drafting either one of those guys and hoping, you know,

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he ends up being the winner winner should anything happen

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to Brice Hall, who clearly they're they're very comfortable pounding

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the rock to like they did last year. But because

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole Jets offense is going to get a lot better,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the running game will be more balanced and it'll be

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>better as well. So we've got strong betters on both

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the Jets passing game and the Jets rushing game.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the fantasy community not happy with the double the

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 3>double tap of running backs by the Jets draft.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely not Brisall going off the board. By the way,

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>running back two running back too off the board behind

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>only Christian McCaffrey. So a lot of optimism with Breece Hall.

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And honestly he's my running back two as well. So

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally on board with that. Zero problem with that.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 3>People people flipping a coin between Hall and Bjeon Robinson

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 3>basically for RB two RB three, I.

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Want the guy who's going to get the ball at

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the stripe. I don't know that that's b Jhon Robinson.

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's not to me, it isn't that close.

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, they're being drafted very right by each other.

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So there is that. Let's take a break when we

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>come back, let's flip over to the NFC East. The

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Giants have got a variety of new parts. We'll talk

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about that when we come back. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchi and Brian Johnson with you Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You can follow Brian on Twitter, BTXJ and I am

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>at Paul Charcie. We encourage you to follow on also

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>join our discord. We got a lot of great conversations

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>happening on discord. Look In the show notes, you'll get

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a link to our brand new Discord channel. Happy to

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>invite you into that and have a discussion with us.

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Giants of Brian where there was

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of offseason thoughts that maybe the Giants would

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>make a change a quarter back, and they ultimately decided

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Daniel Jones one more time. Let's

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>see if he can crack the fifteen touchdown mark, something

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he has not done since his rookie year.

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not too optimistic that Daniel Jones breaches that milestone,

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 3>and the drafting community isn't either. As of right now,

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones is went off the board. Is quarterback thirty?

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, there might be some backups going before him

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 3>at that range. Just last year he was like a

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 3>top ten quarterback. I mean, everyone believed in the in

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones, especially the Giants who gave him like a

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>quarter billion dollars.

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 1>It was not that much. I think it was like

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred and twenty million or something.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 3>That was exaggerating, but that's that's feel. It feels like

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 3>a hundred for him. It's like one hundred billion dollars

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 3>and Daniel Jones terms.

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That is true. That is true, So.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Not a lot to be excited about in the passing game.

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 3>The only thing to be excited about is rookie Molik

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Neighbors sixth overall pick in the NFL draft. He's think

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 3>drafted his wide receiver twenty right now. An amazing talent

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.719
<v Speaker 3>in college. The sky's the limit for him, but he

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 3>might be held back by Danny Dimes and his counterparts

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 3>at wide receiver because no one is really too concerned

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>with Wandale Robinson or Jalen Hyatt, who are just kind

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 3>of gimmicky slock guys. They're going off the board as

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers eighty and ninety four, respectively, so they're pretty

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>much dead in fantasy terms, at least in redraft. And

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Darren Waller's career might be dead as well. He's on

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the verge of retirement. Supposedly, maybe he comes back. I

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 3>really don't care if he does. The days of elite

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Darren Waller are long gone and they were short lived

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 3>sadly as well. If Waller does retire, we're looking at

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 3>rookie Theo Johnson or Daniel Bellinger. There's there's nothing here

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 3>outside of Malik Neighbors basically, and my hopes aren't very

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 3>high that he has a successful rookie year. I like

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.239
<v Speaker 3>how he called off. I think it was Neighbors who

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>made the bet with Jaden Daniels, like who's gonna win

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 3>offensive Rookie of the Year or something that for ten

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars. Yeah, and then the league stepped in and

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Neighbors was probably thank god. He looked around like I

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 3>got no shot at this. Playing for the Giants and

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 3>going over the running game, it only gets worse because,

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 3>as everyone should know, gone as Saquon Barkley.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that a second.

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, hit the Jersey Turnpike, headed down to Philly.

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 3>So in comes Devin Singletary from Houston. He is their

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 3>presumed starter. Worth noting Singletary has averaged four point six

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 3>yards per carry in each of the last two seasons,

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 3>great in pass protection. The Giants guaranteed him almost ten

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 3>million dollars this season, so I think they're going to

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 3>get their money out of him. And at RB thirty five,

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 3>another very viable due the opposite candidate. If you're bypassing

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 3>running backs in the early rounds and if you go

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Devin Singletary or even if you don't, I'm intrigued by

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 3>rookie Tyrone Tracy Junior. He's not going much later, He's

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 3>going off the board as RB fifty six. I think

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna want to see what he has to offer.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 3>He will push Singletary for some playing time, but I

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 3>think Singletary does see the bulk of touches to start

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the season, and so again a good to the opposite

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 3>back to target, uh you know, seven, round seven, round eight,

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 3>somewhere around there. And lastly, will the offense get better

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 3>or worse this year? I don't know if he can

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 3>get worse than last year.

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>No, probably, I.

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Mean Dan Daniel Jones was hurt, as we all know.

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 3>It was a total disaster. You know, Tommy DeVito. I

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 3>almost said Danny DeVito there. Danny DeVito might have been

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a better option than Tommy Dvito. We had a couple

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of fun weeks there, but it's it'll be the same

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 3>at best. I don't think it's gonna get much better

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 3>unless Malik Neighbors turns out to be the next coming

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of Randy Moss. But again, I don't trust Daniel Jones

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 3>to get the ball to them. Enough so there's not

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot to love in New York, especially their new

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 3>throwback uniforms. If you've seen those that are absolutely hideous.

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 4>They're gonna the ones of those ones of those people

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 4>will love them are Giants, Burner accounts on Twitter, owner

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 4>shut those are the only people that love him.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Going over to the Eagles, Kellen Moore is your new

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator, replacing the lesser Brian Johnson who got swept

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>out of town and are observedly so based on how

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he tanked that offense last year.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Did he get a new job Brian Johnson?

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's in the NFL T I don't remember exactly

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>where he wound up. Let me let me let me

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>see if I can say.

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I hope it is nothing against my fellow Brian Johnson.

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>But watching them is Washington now watching Eagles games last year,

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 3>they would say his name like I felt like a.

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Hundred and you turn into the TV.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Huh what Yeah, nothing more tilting than sitting there watching

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 3>a game and they keep saying your name over and

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 3>over again.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't even imagine what that's like. I mean, you

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and I have got the opposite names in terms of frequency.

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm literally the only Paul Charcion on the planet. And

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>there's like one million variations of Brian Johnson.

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, pretty much. There haven't been many successful Brian Johnson athletes, sadly,

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 3>and you can throw me in that next at least

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the pros. But there was a

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 3>place kicker Brian Johnson, I believe.

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, the most notable Brian Johnson is the ac

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>DC version for sure.

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 3>Right. Oh, I thought you're gonna say me, but yeah,

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess so to version and the Breakfast Club version.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh was he It was his name, Brian Johnson.

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 3>His name was Brian Johnson. I didn't know that, okay,

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Anthony Michael.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Hall, Yeah, yeah, which is you know? They they played

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>him up as being a dorky dweeb, right, but they

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't give him a dorky name like they did like

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Revenge of the Nerds. All the guys in Revenge of

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the Nerds have got super nerdy names, right Revenge to

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the I'm gonna look it up right now for Revenge

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Nerds, unlike Brian Johnson. So they were names

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>like Poindexter, wormser Gilbert Lewis, Booker, Lamar. Those were your

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>core Nerds. In Revenge of the Nerds, they got nerdy names,

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but not breakfast club Brian Johnson.

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Not the coolest name ever. They really messed that up.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Drop the ball there in the Eagles passing game, no

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>notable changes except at slot receiver, where Paris Campbell's going

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to get another shot to make good on his lofty

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>draft position of the second round for the Colts, but

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>injuries derailed him there. Then he did nothing in a

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>totally broken Giants offense. So maybe it all comes together

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>here and Paris Campbell, you know, this is the presuming

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>he stays healthy, this is gonna be by far the

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>best offense he's ever been in. Devonte Parker showed up

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Eagles, but he's not even notable, and he

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 1>signed a one year VET minimum deal and I think

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>he gets cut in the preseason. Howie Roseman threw Day

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>three picks at Annias Smith and the Elephantine Johnny Wilson.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Wilson totally logjammed for playing time behind DeVante Smith and

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>AJ Brown. But Smith, Brian he played slot in college

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and he could beat out Campbell, but that's still unclear,

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and he projects is more of a special team er.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>An occasional gadget guy, and I don't think Anaya Smith

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is gonna really make much of an impact here, but

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you know you could watch that they but this is

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>an offense that's got nothing reliable out of their slot

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>position all year. The new backup quarterback behind Jalen Hurts

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is Kenny Pickett for those looking for a deep handcuff.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Hurts passing dipped badly in the second half of last year,

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>along with the really the fortunes of the entire team,

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but his rushing production production kept fantasy outcomes very high

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>for Jalen Hurts really all season long, and that likely

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>repeats here and so really no change for this Eagles

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Running game, though big changes. Saquon Barkley enters

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the new lead runner. He replaces DeAndre Swift who went

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>off to Chicago. Barkley to me Brian, he feels old.

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.919
<v Speaker 1>He's twenty seven, which is not that bad, and he's

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:02.959
<v Speaker 1>got one two hundred career carries, which also not as

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bad as you would think considering he's been a bell

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>coow back for five years. So I think I think

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a little tread left on that tire. And Kenneth

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Gainwell has done nothing to suggest that he should have

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a larger role here. They put a fourth round pick

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>into Will Shipley, who looks like a change of pace

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.919
<v Speaker 1>guy with a broad skill set. But I don't think

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he is a much of a factor this season unless

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>there's some injuries ahead of him. I look through Kellen

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Moore's track record with Bell cow Backs Brian and it

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>was really mixed. You know, last year, Austin Eckler was

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>only getting thirteen carries per game. But if you go

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>back to when Kellen Moore was in Dallas during Zeke's

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>workhorse years, Zeke was averaging nineteen touches a game. So,

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the hope here is that we're gonna see

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that version of Kellen Moore. If we can get nineteen

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>touches a game. Heading to Saquon Barkley, his fantasy viability

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>goes up quite a bit. You know, Barkley's lost just

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his game. I think it was sapped

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>by the l the constant ankle injuries that he's had,

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and the guy was unbelievable in his rookie year. Year

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>after and it just everything's gone downhill. Last year he

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>dropped all the way to RB fifty one in Pro

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus's elusiveness ranking. And this has been a guy

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>who was, you know, pre acl he was somebody that

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>was elusive as any running back in the league. And then,

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of course the limiting factor on all the Eagles runners, Brian,

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the tush push Jalen Hurts just cannibalizing the easy

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns from inside the five and that just to me,

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that puts a hard cap on all of the Eagles runners.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It just the ceiling on all of them, to me,

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is just very, very high. Saquon Barkley going up the

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>board right now at what I feel is an inexplicable

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and unsustainable running back six, A borderline first round for

0:38:56.680 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Saquon Barkley. I don't I don't under stand how people

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>can how people can justify that that high of a

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>spot for Saquon Barkley when you know he's not going

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to get touchdowns from inside the five yard line and

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.959
<v Speaker 1>you also have to worry about the diminishing ability. Why

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>did the Giants just you know, walk away from him

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and give good money to somebody else, you know, what

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do they know? So I feel like that's a that's

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad spot for Saquon Barkley. How do you feel.

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not touching Barkley. At that price tag. You

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 3>can get most drafts, and I've got a fair amount

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 3>under my belt. You can get Jonathan Taylor, Kyron Williams,

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 3>who stock is plumbting by the way, Kyraen Williams all.

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:38.919
<v Speaker 1>The draft that one got from him.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, but still yeah, Barkley way over price. Do

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 3>you think the Tush push, the effectiveness of the Toush

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 3>push is going to be dinged by the retirement of

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Jason Kelsey? Was he the real catalyst behind the toushplus,

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean.

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It was awfully important because the Toush push, it only

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>goes a gap and right, you know, directly behind center,

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>so you know it probably he will not help to

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>have him gone. Nevertheless, I'll take my chances. I think

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it until teams prove they can stop it. You know,

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not too worried. You know, they they've got they've

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>got Cam Jurgens, a second round pick to be the replacement.

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, in terms of draft equity, they've got

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a they've got a center that they think is gonna

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>be is gonna be pretty good. So yeah, I'm not

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that worried about hurts.

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, Kelsey seems like the guy Jason Kelsey would come

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 3>in and just coaching him up for free for a

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit too. He loves his former team that much.

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the Dallas throw a few beers back,

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 3>show up at practice, some.

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Flip flop spears. Yeah, that sounds about right. I'll's go

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>over to the Cowboys.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.879
<v Speaker 3>All right, Dallas Cowboys. Worth noting they used the first

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 3>round pick on offensive tackle Tyler Geiton to bolster the

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 3>O line that has been on the decline in recent years.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Was elite several years ago, so that should hopefully offer

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 3>a little more protection for Dak and helped the running game,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 3>which we'll get into a minute. But let's get back

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to the passing game and Dak Prescott and uh, well,

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna start with Dak's top target and he quite

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 3>literally was the top target in the league last year.

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 3>That CD lamb wide receiver one right now with the

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 3>bullet and drafts, basically the first guy off the board

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 3>after Christian McCaffrey and virtually every draft I've done. CD

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 3>led the league in targets, receptions, yards. Last year. He

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 3>was second in touchdowns with twelve just an absolute stud.

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 3>And I will never let the Denver Broncos forget that

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 3>they drafted Judy for Cede Lamb, who you and I

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 3>were both laughing at them mercilessly for doing so all

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 3>in that.

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And Rugs Let's not forget that. Henry Ruggs went.

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, Rugs so bad. And and of course

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson went after all those guys. But at the

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 3>time the hype wasn't it wasn't what it should have

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 3>been for Justin Jefferson.

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I had Lamb one and Jefferson two that year.

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, did you good? I didn't have Jefferson that hig.

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember, but I definitely liked Lamb a lot.

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, that's the past. The Cowboys benefits benefited from

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 3>that mistake by Denver, of course, but not a lot

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 3>of uh benefits coming from the other wide receivers on Dallas.

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 3>In my mind, we're talking Brandon Cooks. He's going off

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the boards wide receiver sixty one.

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Which, by the way, I mean, okay, hold on, just

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 1>stop them. Wide receiver sixty one for Brandon Cooks, is

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know, we're talking pick one hundred and

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>forty something. That's you know, that's pretty good value for

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy that sure is Brandon Cook's special. No, but

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, is he good compared to that relative draft position?

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? You know.

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm kind of interested. Got scored eight touchdowns last year.

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 3>He's more of a best ball target to me, where

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, he's hard to predict when his production's

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:03.919
<v Speaker 3>gonna come. It's almost like you need something to happen

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to CD Lamb. I guess there's good value in Cooks.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm just personally not very interested in either Cooks or Tolbert.

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 3>If I'm going to target another pass catcher on the

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys outside of CD Lamb, it's it's tight end. Jake Ferguson,

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 3>who was one of seven tight ends to see one

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred plus targets last year. Right now, he's going off

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the board is tight end nine. That's great value for

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a guy who finishes a top seven tight end. He's

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.959
<v Speaker 3>going twenty to twenty five picks after guys like Kyle

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Pitts and George Kittle, who he outperformed last year. So

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, Dallas, even after they lost Kellen Morris OC

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 3>last year, they still heavily utilized their tight end, and

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Jake Ferguson improved. He can get the job done. So

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 3>a great value on Jake Ferguson if you're going to

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 3>bypass the elite tight ends, he is a borderline elite

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 3>tight end available much later in drafts. Love love Jake Ferguson.

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he could still get he could still get better.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's still young, twenty five years old, so

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, for Ferguson, there's you know, there's a real

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>opportunity as really he'll be entering his third year starting

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tight ends to the big uptick in

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>year three. I'm really interested in Jake Ferguson. That's a

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a strong play, and he should be going

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 1>off the board earlier than what'd you say is tight

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>end eight, end nine, tight end nine, tight end nine.

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 3>George Kittle twenty picks twenty twenty five picks ahead of him,

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 3>which is that's too big of a delta for me.

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 3>They're virtually the same player in terms of production, I feel,

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 3>fantasy wise, so because Ferguson's the second option, Kittle is

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.879
<v Speaker 3>yeah fourth sometimes four, yeah, well sometimes one and then

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 3>sometimes fourth, and it's really hard to know.

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You know which game you're going to get out of

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:47.879
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle at any given time.

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Over to the running game, it's is pretty ugly. Dallas

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 3>claimed to be all in. They did not go all

0:44:56.400 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 3>in in the draft. They did not draft any offensive weapons,

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 3>including running back, which a lot of people thought they

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 3>would target in the draft. Instead, they brought back Ezekiel Elliott,

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:10.919
<v Speaker 3>who is forty years old in football terms, he's RB

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.760
<v Speaker 3>forty as well in drafts, just go on a few

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:17.800
<v Speaker 3>picks ahead in terms of running backs of Rico Dowdell,

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 3>who showed flashes last year. I liked what I saw

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 3>out of Dowdell. He arguably it was a better fantasy

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 3>player than Tony Pollard, who some people pegged as a

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 3>a guy who's gonna finish his RB one in the

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 3>last year's preseason. But Pollard gone, he's in Tennessee. So

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 3>but this is clearly are surely going to be a

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:42.919
<v Speaker 3>running back by committee for Dallas with Zeke and Rico Dowdell. Surprisingly,

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Zeke caught thirteen or I'm sorry, fifty one passes last year.

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 3>That was thirteenth among running.

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Backs as a backup primarily Yeah, so some sneaky PPR

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>production from Zeke.

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 3>But again, this kind of feels it's like a fifty

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 3>to fifty split. If I have to pick one, I'll

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 3>take the chief for guy and Dowdell, but it's not

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 3>much of a discount off of Zeke. Just we talked about,

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 3>do the opposite candidates, I don't really see him here.

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Dowdell is RB forty three, that's that's virtually the same

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:18.720
<v Speaker 3>ADP as Dead and Singletary, who we talked about earlier,

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and Zeke going around the same range. I would reach

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 3>half around for Singletary all day over either of these guys.

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 3>And in terms of the offense as a whole getting

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 3>better or worse, it's another I feel like I'm getting

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 3>all the lateral lateral movements here. I don't think they

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 3>get worse. I don't think they get a whole lot better.

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 3>I think we're just looking at the same offense as

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 3>last year, which means Dak Prescott in line for a

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 3>safe you know, QB eight to ten outcome range outcome.

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I would saying nothing on the ground, not anymore.

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 3>He's got the best, arguably the best wide receiver in

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:54.279
<v Speaker 3>the NFL, and Cedee lamb, and you got to like

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 3>whoever is throwing the ball to him, and that's Dak Prescott.

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Washington Command. There's there was talk

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that they could change their name. Can we hates sen

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that they command? It's the worst name in the Big

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>four sports outside of the Cleveland Guardians, which is even worse.

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're gonna, we're gonna, we're gonna, We're gonna

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>go like clean slate on the post Snyder era in Washington.

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Can we just dump the dumb commander's name? Please?

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you gotta erase everything from Daniel Snyder's exactly. That's

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:31.760
<v Speaker 3>the last thing lingering. It stinks.

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It is, which brings us to the whole new coaching

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>staff that's in place. Dan Quinn's your head coach. Cliff

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury is your offensive coordinator. Quinn's a defensive guy, so

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury's gonna have mostly controls at his disposal for the offense.

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Offensive line is a huge problem in Washington. Last year

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>they got some middling upgrades on low dollar deals on

0:47:54.800 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>former Cowboy center Taylor beyaz Dish and former Chiefs Guarden Algaretti.

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But those aren't big upgrades. But they're better what they had,

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so optimistic that this offensive line will get a little

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>bit better. The passing game now led presumably by Jade

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and Daniels, I gotta believe he's gonna start Week one

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:17.800
<v Speaker 1>or shortly thereafter. They've also got Marcus Mariota, Jeff Driscoll.

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think those guys are compelling starts in week one.

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll go right to Daniels, the second overall

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>pick in the draft. Kingsbury's experience with these similarly mobile

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray is encouraging, But as we've always cautioned with

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Murray on Fantasy Football Weekly when we're doing our our

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in game stuff, he just he's not much of a

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>goal line carrier, and or at least wasn't for Kingsbury.

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So Kingsbury did not deploy his mobile quarterback at the stripe.

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think there's gonna be a case to

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 1>be made where they're gonna do that here either for

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Jaden Daniels, because you know, Daniels is very slight of build.

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is nothing like Jalen Hurts getting the

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>tush push. He's so thin. I just I don't see

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>him getting goal line work. Kyler Murray averaged just five

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>carries per season from inside the five yard line with

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury, and I don't even know if you're going

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to get the five per season on Jadeen Daniels.

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Jayden Daniels not not built like a Josh Allen or

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 3>even a Jalen Hurts. I saw we'll call it a

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 3>highlight reel of him running the ball in college, and

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:31.359
<v Speaker 3>he's very reckless, like leaving his feet just taking bo

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 3>nasty hits, and those hits hit you a lot harder

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL. So I'm a little worried about him.

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna have to I mean, we saw Anthony Richardson

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 3>go down last year, and Anthony Richardson probably weighs fifty

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 3>more pounds for Jaden Daniels. So Jadeen Daniels is going

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to have to learn to get down or he's going

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 3>to be going on IR sooner than later.

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Rice rookie Luke McCaffrey, the other McCaffrey joins the receiving car,

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know he could walk into the slot roll

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>vacated by Curtis Samuel, but slow receivers under Cliff Kingsbury

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and Arizona were very unreliable fantasy producers, and many of them,

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like Rondell Moore, had much higher draft equity and NFL

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>prospects than McCaffrey. Many people think McCaffrey went too early

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in this draft where he was selected, so I don't

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of optimism there. I'll mention former first

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:23.399
<v Speaker 1>round pick Johan Dotson, who was an epic failed last year.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I had like five really bad takes last year. One

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of them was Johan Dotson stepping up last year did

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not take at all. But you know where, let me

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>quick up, look where he's going off the board. Now,

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta believe he's basically for free John Dotson sixty

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:45.320
<v Speaker 1>three wide receiver sixty three right now at that price,

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit interested. And here's why he's the

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Commander's best downfield threat. Jaden Daniels got the big arm.

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So maybe there's gonna be some big plays to be

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>had for Johan Dotson. You probably won't know when they're coming.

0:50:57.000 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be maybe much more of a best ball scenario,

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>uh for John Dotson. But for where he's getting selected,

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm still a little bit intrigued there. Thorn Nystrom favorite

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is rookie tight end Ben Sennett. He's gonna need to

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>get past zach Ertz, which may take a while and

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe even all year. Maybe it's next year we're talking about. Ben.

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Senate is a reliable fantasy starter, but certainly somebody to

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>watch here. They put real draft equity into him, and

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't take a lot to get by zach Ertz

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:24.879
<v Speaker 1>at this stage of his career. So I do think

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the Washington passing game gets better if if only for

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>some deep ball connections from Daniels based on what they

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.080
<v Speaker 1>had last year for the.

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Running people do not expect sorry to cut you off,

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:37.839
<v Speaker 3>youple do not expect to send it to wait long.

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Not saying he won't. But he's getting drafted aggressively right now,

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 3>like he's getting paid like people are pegging him as

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:47.320
<v Speaker 3>like this year, Sam Laporta, that's the hype that's building

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:50.280
<v Speaker 3>around Senate. The price tag is getting a little little

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 3>hefty for me. Yeah, thanks, Thor swim Ertza. Thorn moves

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the market yet again.

0:51:57.400 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The Commanders let Antonio Gibson walk. As we mentioned earlier

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in the show, they signed Austin Eckler to an eight

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollar deal over two years, which is you know,

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:10.360
<v Speaker 1>middling money, I guess for a guy of his pedigree.

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Brian Robinson just isn't good. You know,

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he ranked his Pro Football running Pro Football Focus is

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>running back forty three last year, including ranking twenty second

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>in yards after contact, which is what Brian Robinson was

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be great at, and he didn't come through

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that way at all. Chris Rodriguez got a few nice

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>moments at the end of last year and they ramped

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.360
<v Speaker 1>up his usage, but it looks like it's going to

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:36.320
<v Speaker 1>be Eckler at if nothing else, Eckler's going to be

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 1>very reliable from a past catching standpoint. I'm just not

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>sure how much of a how good he is as

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a runner anymore. He was Pro Football Focus his fifty

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>first ranked runner. He dipped all the way down to

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty third in elusiveness and down to forty fifth and

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 1>yards after the contact. So I'm nervous about what Eckler

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>brings as a running back. And I don't like Robinson either.

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Just don't like this running game very much. But I

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 1>think Eckler's still going to have a spot as a

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>receiving back. Just don't obviously, you know, nothing like what

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>he's given us. In years past, Chargers were Pro football focuses.

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>There's the Chargers where obviously Eckler was Last year, Chargers

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>were Pro football focuses. Bottom ranked run blocking line last

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>year and Washington was ninth. So hopefully Washington gets you know,

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>provides him with better blocking, and maybe we get better

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 1>running performances from Eckler. But I don't I can't tell

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 1>you for sure that that's going to be the case.

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And Eckler's going off the board running back twenty seven.

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 1>So where how do you feel? I feel like that's

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:43.879
<v Speaker 1>about right for Eckler. How do you feel about that spot?

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's worth taking a flyer on him

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 3>there because again or not again. But for those who forgot,

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty two, Austin Eckler was essentially Fantasy's top

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:56.800
<v Speaker 3>player right points scorer outside of quarter One year removed

0:53:56.800 --> 0:53:59.240
<v Speaker 3>from that, Yeah, one year removed from that. So hopefully

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 3>it was more situation last year than skill set. Like

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 3>you said that, the Chargers were the worst run blocking

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:09.880
<v Speaker 3>line in the league, So hopefully behind a better line,

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:13.319
<v Speaker 3>he's probably gonna be a little a little motivated to

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 3>stick to some people. I think you probably wanted to

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 3>go to a contender, right yeah, in the twilight of

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 3>his career, and you didn't get much interest on the

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:24.399
<v Speaker 3>market outside of Washington. So I think he wants to

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 3>give a little fu to the whole league. So yeah,

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm buying at that price right now.

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Love it, love it all. Right, Well, there you go,

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the AFC and NFC East. It's a lot of teams

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:37.919
<v Speaker 1>to get through. But you know, we pack everything into

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:39.919
<v Speaker 1>just a little longer show than we normally have, which

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is fine. We get to do that here.

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 3>We only talked about Brian Johnson's for like ten minutes.

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 1>There is that some of it's on us, for sure.

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening, everybody. We appreciate those of you

0:54:50.840 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that take the time to subscribe listen every week. Thank

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you so much joining our discord. Follow us on Twitter

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at BTXJ, at Paul Charcian and at gl Chop for

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>all your Kuillotine League goodness. We'll talk to you to

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you next week, everybody, Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:16.399
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows,