WEBVTT - #323 Packers Unscripted: What will it take

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Hi, everybody, Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, joined alongside my trusted colleague West

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Hodkoits were coming to you here from our studios at

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>lambeau Field and West Week two Packers Vikings noon Sunday

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>kickoff at lambeau Field. It is almost here our final

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>show of the week in which we focus on Keys

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>to Victory for Green Bay. Where do you want to

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>start with this one? Well, there's a quarterback that we

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really have an update on right now. I mean,

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just to get out of the way, you know, Mike

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy mentioned Friday morning, did not have an update on him.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>As you wrote on Packers dot Com. Looks like he'll

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be taking this thing all the way up until game

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>time on Sunday. He sounds like he continues to make

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>progress us and trying to come back from that knee.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought the biggest thing that probably came out

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of that was McCarthy's believing that if there are no setbacks,

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this could be something that clears itself up that he

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily have to play through the rest of the season.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Um be that as it may, everything's about Sunday right now.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You and I talked about it so many times. Mike

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Packers Vikings, especially the recency between that rivalry with Mike

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Zimmer and that defense. Aaron Rodgers a big piece of

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle. Depending on how it all shakes out. Yeah,

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it all starts, and I personally believe Rogers

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>is going to play. But even if he doesn't, and

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if it is Deshaun Kaiser, I think it all starts

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with protecting the quarterback. But this this Minnesota Vikings defense,

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this defensive front, and I'm talking about not only the

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>front four but also the linebackers, Bar and Kendricks and

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>all of that. These guys can get after quarterbacks. They've

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>done it time and time again. Harrison Smith will come

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>blitzing from the safety position and you know a lot

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of times finds his way to the quarterback a clear

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>path as well. We saw what was happening last week

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>when Khalil Mack was kind of a one man wrecking girl,

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>though Achiem Hicks was also doing his share of wrecking

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>things in the first half for the Packers. But once

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the past protection settled down, Rogers lack of mobility or

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not when the past protection settled down, the Packers offense

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>found its rhythm founded screw to score twenty four points

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in a second half in the NFL. That's a lot.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>That's that that's that's big time production. So the Packers

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>know that whichever quarterback is back there, he needs to

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he needs to have room to operate. And I think

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where the scheme starts. Yeah, and and you look historically,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Vic Fangio's defense isn't one that gives up a lot

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of those opportunities, either whether he was in San Francisco

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>or during his time in Chicago. For him to give

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 1>up that much production, I think shows you just how

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in the zone Rogers was in that contest. And the

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>other thing I'm gonna add to that again, depending on

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>who the quarterback is and and how this all you

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Know lays out on Sunday. But I mentioned our final

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts video to this week, Mike. Really, if they can

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have that similar production, I'm not saying they need to

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have two and fifty two receiving yards out of Davante Adams,

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb and Geronimo Allison, but just being able to

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>spread out the passing game like that. It's the mismatch

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked about throughout the off season and being able

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to also have Jimmy Graham involved their Lance Kendricks as

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>an h back type tight end and having a multitude

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of different ways that the quarterback can go with the

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>football in addition to however you want to utilize time

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery potentially splitting him out the second half. I thought

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the big key to what the Packers were able to

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>do was the fact that one drive belonged to Gerontom

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Wills and one drive happened to belong to Davantae Addams,

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously Randall Cobb doing what Randall Cobb does

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in the final you know moments of that game to

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to pull out the victory. There's only so many guys

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you can cover, and if you decide to go to

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>shell against it, well then that's going to leave you

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>some opportunities underneath with the run and and whatnot. So

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that chess match between what Mike Zimmer wants to do

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and how he believes he wants to dictate the game

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>versus what the Packers are going to do to build

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>off of how they finished last week, to me, is

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest storyline in this game. Absent the quarterback. Yeah.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing I'm going to keep an eye

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on two is the penalties. And I want to mention

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things on both sides of the ball here,

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>because in continuing with the theme of protecting the quarterback

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and establishing the pocket, there was an intentional grounding penalty

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>against Rogers in the second half that could have been

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>really really debilitating for that comeback. Packers were able to

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>overcome that penalty. But if he's not able to get

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>completely outside of the pocket in order to throw the

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ball away, he needs to have enough time, you know,

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>even if somebody's not open, to find a receiver to

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>get rid of the ball to avoid the sack and

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>avoid the intentional grounding. And then on the other side,

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the roughing the passer penalties, three of them against the Packers.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Usually a team that would have that

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>many personal fouls in a game does not come out

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on top. I mean, those those penalties are are really punitive.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>And two of them, as we talked about earlier in

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the week, I thought were really dubious calls. The one

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>on Clay Matthews at the end of the game I

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>thought was legitimate but the Packers can't. You can't continue that.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You're the pass rushers have to be on notice here

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because you can't be giving free fifteen yards and free

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>first downs, especially on third and fourth down plays as

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what happened at the end of the ball game. Absolutely,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one thing too, is Clay Matthews

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>has kind of gone on throughout the week, you know,

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>and admitting and atoning for what he'd done and understanding

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that you in this day and age, you can't have

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>those type of those type of hits with the quarterback.

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>He steps in front of that. But I thought he

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>made an important message and in talking about that to

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>also bring up how you know him personally. He didn't

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>believe the unnecessary roughness penalties on Mohamed Wilkerson and Nick

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>mcperry were maybe warranted. Um, I don't think they worried.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really it's a tough problem. We talked about it

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week. These guys having to try to understand

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to take their pass rushing skills, go

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>after the quarterback and do what they're paying to do,

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>but also not have a bad effect to it, because honestly, Mike,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that might as well just be a fifteen yard completion.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It might as well be just as much of a

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>momentum change and kind of play. So that I agree

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with you, It's gonna be interesting to watch. And I'll

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you too, I'm gonna be following Anthony Barr. Still,

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to just keep beating that horse. But seriously,

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that to me, that's one of the reasons why we

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>have this role. So, I mean, it's seeing how those

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>type of players react to it as well. It's it's

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Uh, it's gonna be a major storyline, not

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>only this week but this whole season. Yeah. The other

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thing I see from the defensive side, and I know

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this is something we could say every single week, but

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly in this game with the potential limitations of Rogers,

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with what's at stake here against the Minnesota Vikings and everything,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and how last week's game unfolded, I think the Packers

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>defense needs to get a turnover too for the Packers

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to win this game. And when the

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Packers were down twenty to nothing against the Bears, I

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>kept every time the Bears got the ball, I would tweet, Okay,

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>it's time for a turnover. I I just didn't think,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>honestly that the Packers could win that game, would complete

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that comeback without the defense make getting a turnover and

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>making one of those game changing type of plays. Now,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>they ended up getting one on the final play on

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the fourth down, but they actually did complete the comeback.

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>We're ahead or twenty three without the defense getting the turnover.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure you're gonna be able to beat the

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings unless you unless you force a mistake from

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, or maybe you strip the ball from Dalvin Cook.

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>He did cough one up last week against the San

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty Niners. But um, this is uh, this is

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the type of This is the type of game where

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the defense needs to create a big momentum swing at

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some point in the game. I think in order for

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the Packers to win and to get to two and

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>oh and uh. And you know, I guess the timing

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of the turnover obviously could be crucial, but I think

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the Packers need one or two. I give you a

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred credit. I'm not saying you're wrong. I will say

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a great equalizer though that people don't often

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about. It's the reason why the Packers won that

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>game against the Bears. They got off the field, they

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>got stops on third down, they got stops on fourth down.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The Packers don't do that, they don't win because you're

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>not getting the ball back here and Rodgers fast enough,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna run out of time at some point. There

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>were what was that I believe it was five possessions

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears where they did not have a first

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>doubt in the span of six possessions. And you if

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna have turnovers, if you're gonna lose the

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>turnover margin, and you're also gonna, you know, have some

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>issues with some personal follows there, you have to do something.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And Mike Patton's defense in those instances didn't give an inch.

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Long term, You're absolutely right, though, you have to be

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>able to get turn over the football. You have to

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to get those type of plays. I'm really

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>eager to see all of this start to play out

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>on a week to week basis. I don't think, and

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I've said this earlier this week, I don't think we're

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>just going to see a carbon copy of the game

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>plan that we saw against the Bears now be implemented

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings. I think you're gonna shifting off of that.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna see a lot of different things.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>But I thought the three main message as we got

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the first game, where one they have full

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>confidence in Blake Martinez to run the defense. And if

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they need to go soul inside linebacker for half the game,

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>three courters the game, they're gonna do that. The defensive front,

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>as we said all offseason, the defensive line is going

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a huge impact in this thing. They're gonna

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>run three defensive linemen and sub packages. They're gonna run

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>them in base packages. They're gonna have base packages where

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's one defensive lineman. They're gonna have dime packages where

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>there's one defensive lineman. There's it's indiscriminate there. Mike Patton

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go with whatever he feels the flow of

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the game is like. And lastly, I wrote about it

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier week. We talked about it. Defensive back secondary is

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be a hallmark of this team. They will

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>go as far as they take them this season. Josh

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Jr. Alexander Mike McCarthy said it. Both of those

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>guys earned the reps there on the field. Kevin King

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>played every single snap last week. I don't think that's

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a big enough storyline, given the fact that he had

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>missed the amount of time he did with the shoulder,

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that he had sat on the off

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>season with the other shoulder surgery. The fact that he

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>played all seventy defensive snaps and was a full participate

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in practice this week A very good thing for a

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that didn't actually play into preseason game until the finale,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>no question. And lastly, Trumont Williams, what else can you

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>say about him? Seventy defensive snaps. He's gonna be a

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>pig part of this thing. He's another one of those

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>orchestrators in the defense. The Packers secondary as a whole, Mike,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's gonna be guys that get Nixon bruises over

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the course of this season. But that group right now

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>appears to have the potential to be special this year. Yeah,

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned a different type of game plan here against

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings, and I agree with you because I was surprised.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>As I had mentioned earlier in the week, I was

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>surprised at how the Packers really, in essence, they dared

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bears to run the ball with Howard and Cohen,

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they did not really counter the Bears run personnel on

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>offense with run personnel on defense. Now, at the end

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Cohen and Howard collectively they averaged better

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>than five yards per carry, but yet the Bears running

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>game did not control the football game. Now, Dalvin Cook,

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that could that could change. I think. I think this

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>guy is a really potentially a really really special player,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>both in how he runs the ball and and how

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they use him as a receiver out of the backfield.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that could change how Petton, you know,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>puts the defensive fronts out there, because you can't let

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings, especially with as as accomplished a quarterback as

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins is, with all the four thousand yards seasons

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.599
<v Speaker 1>and all that kind of stuff, you can't let the

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Vikings control the game on the ground because then that

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just changes all those matchups in the secondary that Kirk

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Cousins has the experience then to take advantage of that.

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps Mitch Robinsky not quite there yet. Yeah, you're you're right.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason why the Packers traded for Antonio Morrison.

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to have that Jake Ryan type run stuff

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>for next to Blake Martinez. They wanted to have him

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the pipeline. I think the big thing for this

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>game too, and at the time in which we're taping,

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>as we haven't had the injury report yet, but seeing

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>where n Burke's is at the fact that he was

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>actually able to appear to He's still limited, but appeared

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do more in practice this week.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Looks like he's putting that shoulder injury behind him. Burke's

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is an important piece to this equation because he seems

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the merger there between going lighter in the

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>secondary but still having a guy that can stand up

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the run. Uh. And you saw what he did

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>during preseason throughout training camp. He's a young guy, but

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>he's a bright guy, and I think with him and

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Blake Martinez working against each other, that's a really good

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>battery there for the Packers and in that in that

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the fame, that that facet of the defense

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>um and the sooner they get him on the field, obviously,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:35.599
<v Speaker 1>the better it's going to be for that group in

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the long run. Yeah. Well, just to touch on special

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>teams briefly, we know we've been told Randall Cobb will

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>remain the punt returner for the Packers. How long before

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you think he breaks one? I think it might not

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:47.599
<v Speaker 1>take too long. I thought he was gonna do it

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>last week, to be honest with you, on that seventeen

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>yard And this is a guy that did not return

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a punt in the two thousand seventeen seasoned wasn't asked

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to do that at all. I I wrote about this

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for the website on Friday, Mike, I just he's missed

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>or consistency. He's always been that way. He doesn't get

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>too high or too low in the locker room and

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on the field very quietly. I mean, you look at

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>his sixty yard seasons and how he's kind of put

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>these together and what he's fought through to do that. Yeah,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a very fitting way for the

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Packers to open the season a hundred forty two yards

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>from Randall Cobb when we've all we've talked about is

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham and rookie receivers and new offenses for him

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to play the way he did offensively. And then, oh,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Trevor Davis's hamstring flares up. We need

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you on special teams as well, he said it. I'm

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>sure you remember these these interviews Mike, going back to

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, twelve and thirt team when he was starting

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to break out, looked like he was just gonna need

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to be an offensive only player. He said, He's always

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>open to doing special teams if he needs that. He

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>he embraces that role. Yeah, He's never batted an eyelash

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>at getting extra duty thrown at him. Yeah, and the

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Packers want to get the ball in his hands. It's

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>one more way to do that, especially if they're going

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be without Davis for half for you know, the

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>whole season. We'll see how that works out. Yeah, all right. Well,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>one other thing we always like to do on our

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>final show that week, take a look at some other

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>games going on around the league that have some significant implications. Obviously,

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC North, this Packers Vikings game is where

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it's at. One team is going to be too and

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>oh and will be on top of the division all

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>by its lonesome after two weeks. So there are a

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>couple other games in the NFC that I think are

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. One is Carolina at Atlanta the first of

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>two NFC South showdowns between those two teams. The other

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>one that I don't think before Week one we would

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have thought would be an intriguing game, but it is now,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's Philadelphia, the defending Super Bowl champions going to

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay with Ryan Fitzpatrick coming off of the four

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventeen yards and four touchdowns against the New

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints in the Buccaneers upset in their opening NFC

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>South matchup. This one cross divisions the South versus the East.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Which one of these do you think is more intriguing?

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>The Carolina Atlanta or Philly Tampa. I love Philly Tampa

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we see the NFC South against each

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>other and that there's so much parody in that division.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It always seems like they're they're going to be important

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>games down the stretch. But I mean, you want to

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Buccaneers, I mean Dirk Cutters, I mean,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this is where they got to make hay this season.

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Regardless of where Jamis Winston is at and Ryan Fitzpatrick,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>they've expressed a lot of confidence in him going back

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to last year. If you watched Hard Knocks at all,

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know everyone talks so much about Aaron Rodgers

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and him falling to the two thousand five draft. What

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>about Ryan Fitzpatrick falling to the seventh round in that

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>same draft. In the career that he's made for himself,

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like every time this league wants to

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, spit him out and move on,

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he finds another way to hang on. And this is

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a supreme challenge for him though against the Eagles.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>To me, that that's a matchup I'm looking forward to.

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, every time Atlanta and Carolina play, it's

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>always gonna fireworks. Yeah. Well, it's interesting because I was

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>really high on Dirt Cutter's Buccaneers team last year. I

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>thought they were a team on the rise in the NFC,

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and then things didn't work out, they didn't come together.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And now this year you're dealing with Jamis Winston being

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>suspended at the beginning of the year, and all of

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, they go out there with Ryan Fitzpatrick and

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>light up New Orleans the way they did, get a

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>big win. Now they're hosting the defending Super Bowl champs. Maybe,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>just maybe I was a year too early on Cutter

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and his Buccaneers, But and we don't talk often a

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>lot about a f C games because we're always looking

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>at the NFC North and the NFC and how that

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>shakes out. But you do have the rematch of the

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a f C Championship this week with New England, this

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>one being at Jacksonville, believe correct. So what do you

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of this matchup? Obviously a lot

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of people are pointing to Jacksonville, this is their opportunity

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Patriots. They get him at home, they're

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>getting him early in the season, all that kind of stuff.

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you see this one playing out? I my

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>every time I watched the Patriots now is my eyes

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are always glued on Tom Brady because he's forty one

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>years old now, uh, and you're always kind of looking

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to see win. Not necessarily you're going to see the

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>athletic dip because it's not like he's ever been like

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this huge, scrambling quarterback, but the arm strength and by

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>all accounts, I mean, he's still Tom Brady. But you know,

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>when you look on the other side of it, can Jacksonville,

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>after appearing like they were trying and clawing and getting

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.239
<v Speaker 1>closer to closing that gap, can they finally do it

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this year. So many resources have gone into that side

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. I think these are probably what the

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say is the highest expectations they've probably had

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for one of their teams since what maybe the Mark

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Brunel era. Yeah, I mean, I'm talking about, like, you know,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more than just division titles, more than playoffs, and this

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is a team that wants to contend for a Super Bowl.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>They they felt they should have beaten the Patriots in

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>New England for that a f C title last year.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>They had the lead, they were they were in, but

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>they were in control of the game for a large

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>portion of it, and they let it get away at

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the end, and they got it Round two here for them,

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And you can pick up a win here against New

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>England that propels you to the season that changes the narrative.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You lose that again, and you're gonna be answering that

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>question for another month or so. Yeah. Another interesting game

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think in the a f C, Kansas City is

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>at Pittsburgh. Are we potentially I know pitt Sburg is

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>always really tough at home, but could Pittsburgh actually start

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the season Oh one and one, they could start the

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>season oh and two that's possible if they want to

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>go running the table another way, another another overtime tie

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes. People, we gotta get whatever credit is given

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to Andy Reid and that coaching staff for whatever happens

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>with him. I'm always going to have the John Dorsey

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Astrix next to that because Dorsey made such a gutsy

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>move going up and getting this guy when I don't

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think many people had him at ten. Now people were

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>scratching their heads at that move, like like, wait a minute,

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are trading up, like who do they want?

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And then it's like they traded up for Patrick Mahomes

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and then, yeah, you're right that that was That was

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a very bold move by John Dorsey, and he may

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have set up the Kansas City Chiefs for a lot

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of sixty. It's one game. You never know what can happen.

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can look like an m v P in one game,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but the kid looks like he belongs. And in addition

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to that, the fact that they had Alex Smith because

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of John Dorsey and then he goes to Wash I mean,

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just he set that franch up up really well.

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I know there was some things that happened there at

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of it, but they're in a good place.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Can I throw one more out at you? Yeah, I

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>actually think the biggest game of the week. You don't

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>even touch on it. Okay, okay, sorry, No, it's all right.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Chicago not necessarily from like implications, but Seattle had

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff happened this offseason. They start the

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>season oh and two, where does your season go from there?

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>In Chicago just traded for Khalil Mack. Now you're getting

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks at home on Monday Night football. You kind

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of need to show up. Whatever team ends up being

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>oh and two out of that one, I think that's

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna not necessarily be an insurmountable hole to get out of,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but not the start you're looking for. So that's Monday nights.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday Night football. Okay, well yeah, I mean weeks

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that then. But I'm really no. No.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I hear you though, because because you we're going to

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>hear the stats with regards to that game about the

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>percentage of teams that make the playoffs when they start

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>oh and two and one of those two teams that

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they both have some high hopes. One of the two

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>teams is going to be and too. There's a bunch

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of stat people out there, probably some in Bristol, Connecticut

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and Los Angeles just waiting to unveil all those wint

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see those on the TV screen Monday night.

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's a that's a big game. No, you're right.

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>That depends on who's going to really be in contention

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in those divisions. Yeah, you're right, that is a significant one.

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>With that, we will call it a rap on this

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all of

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>our coverage of the team and of Sunday's big game

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings on Packers dot com. On Twitter, He's

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>at west Hot I'm at Mike Spofford at Packers for

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the team account. Thanks for tuning in, everybody, See you

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>next time.