WEBVTT - Pensions Are Another Reason to Worry About the UK Budget

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Welcome to Maren Talk

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to Your Money, the personal finance edition of Maren Talks Money.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>In these bonus podcasts, we talk about the best strategies

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>for making the most of your money. Hi marin sum

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Set Web and with me today senior reporter of Money

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Dessert author John Steppeck Hi John, Hi, maam. So this

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>week we are answering a question about pension drawdown from Mike. Hi.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>My name's Mike.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm from Suffolk and my question is about pension draw down. Basically,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>what's it all about?

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>And most importantly, how do I avoid getting ripped off?

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Great question, Mike, but do you know what? John and

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.639
<v Speaker 1>I were not quite good enough to answer that one,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so we have ordered some extra help. Tom McPhail of

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the lang Cat for eighteen years, he was head of

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Policy and lead pension spokesman from the investment platform Landsdown.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That's where we first came across each other, isn't it Tom.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty one he conducted an external review of

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>money and pension service on behalf of the DWP, and

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>he has now worked for the Langcat since twenty twenty one. Right, Tom,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>brought down, complicated, frightening. But before we get to it,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you if you don't mind a

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the budget. We know that all governments

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>want to take more money out of people's pensions because

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that is where the money is. There's a lot of

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>money tied up and pensions in the UK and if

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you were a government looking for something to tax, you'd

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>look at that big pile of money and go oh

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>like some of that. And this government is no different.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>And of course a lot of people think that pension

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>tax relief is already too generous, so there may be

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>some changes coming. What might those changes be and how

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>much should we worry?

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, really good question, and we probably should worry. There

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 3>In Rachel Reeves and Clear Starmer have been channeling there

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 3>inn at George Osbourne with a suits on of eel

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>mixed in there as well. It's all miserable, doom and gloom.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, we need your money because the last lot

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>messed everything up. We can't take it off the workers,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 3>so we're coming for the rich people with their big

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 3>pension pots. That's the narrative. So yeah, we should be worried.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 3>I think there are four known unknowns around pension taxation

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 3>and the budgets. I'm just going to quickly run through those.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 3>So the obvious ones are incotax relief. They can monkey

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 3>around with that. It all all the money goes to

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>higher earners at the moment, and so we need to

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 3>do something about that. But it's really complicated and difficult

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>and messy, and George Osborne looked at this in twenty

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>sixteen and backed off because it was too difficult to messy.

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 3>There's lots of money available there, but you'll burn up

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of political capital if you start messing with

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>you incotax relief, so maybe, but also quite possibly maybe not.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>A much easier one to tack on. My second option

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>would be the employer's relief on National Insurance on pension contributions.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 3>Much easier to get rid of, would raise less money

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 3>but still decent five to ten billion pounds a year,

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>not nothing by any mean, and much easier to implement.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 3>So both of those would be very difficult to do immediately.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 3>You'd have to say we're going to do this, and

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 3>you'll start from next April. Because there's payroll and systems

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 3>changes would all have to be made. But there are

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>those two. Third option of my known unknowns would be

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 3>death taxes on pensions, and this is probably my strongest contender. Hear,

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>really easy to do. You just stand up on the

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>budget then and you say, as of midnight last night,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>anyone that dies from then on, we're going to take

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 3>some tax off the residual funds on death unless you

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>pass it to your spouse, and we'll make a spousal exemption.

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>But if you pass at your kids, we're going to

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>take some of it off you, and we can put

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>in a thresholder path a million or something like that,

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and really simple to do, very different to avoid other

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>than you know, drastics measures like going to Switzerland Dignitas

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>or something. And that seems to be a case of

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 3>the extreme case of the tax tail wagging the lifestyle dog.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 3>So there's that. My fourth option and the one that's

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>really got everybody anxious, and the known unknowns is pension

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>tax freelom sum quite easy to tackle. You could say, well,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>really to go for the really rich people with million

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>pound pension pots. Currently the maximum amount you can take

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 3>is two hundred and sixty eight seven hundred and twenty

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 3>five pounds. How about we just turn that dial down

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>a little bit easy enough to do, it'll only upset

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 3>the rich people. Problems with that though, One died to

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 3>upset the public sector workers again and they don't want

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to do that. Two, it's retrospective taxation and that upsets people.

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 3>And three the tax free lump sum is about the

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>only element of pension taxation that people actually understand. So

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 3>if you mess with that, you've got another slew of

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>bad headlines about how the government's coming after your pensions again.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>So you could feed it in gently and slowly, but

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 3>then you wouldn't raise enough money. Now, this is the

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 3>most difficult and myt for because it's the one thing

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>you could do something about. You could just take the

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 3>tax free lumps on out of your pension now if

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>you're already over the age of fifty five. But what

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>if they don't change the rules at the end of budget,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the month. You know, you're then

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 3>sitting there with a big bag of money that's no

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>longer in the tax exempt pension fund and you're wondering

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 3>what to do with it. So no easy answers. There

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 3>are also finally, probably some unknown unknowns, but I don't

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>know what they.

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Are well, that's both extremely helpful and extremely unhelpful. Tom.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Indeed, I mean well, I'm just

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>going to pick you up on one thing. When you

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>said at the beginning that it makes sense to go

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>after the rich because they get nearly all the pension

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>tax relief, they get sixty three, sixty four percent of

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the pension tax relief something like that, I do feel

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I must point out that the reason they get the

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>most pension tax relief is because they pay the most tax.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So that group in the higher and additional rate bounds

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>also pay something like sixty nine to seventy percent of

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all income tax, and that's why they get more pension

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>tax relief. It's not some special algorithm that fun funnels

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>free money to the rich. It's not that I.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't disagree with you. You're absolutely right in your analysis.

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing I think we should point out

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is about the twenty five percent. Well, it used to

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be that you could take twenty five per cent of

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>your pension tax free, right, and that was great because

0:05:58.080 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't taxed on the win, and it wasn't taxed

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on the way out. Tachically, one of the only pieces

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of cash available anywhere in any system in the West

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that involves money that isn't actively taxed all the time.

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>So that was kind of nice. On the other hand,

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're a government, you could look at that and say, whoa,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>hang on, totally untaxed money. That's not right. So it

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me that a government of the type

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you suggest kist armas Is would go for that first.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's the bit I would worry about, luckily

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or unluckily whatever. I'm not quite old enough to access

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>mine yet, so it's not on my own mind, but

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I bet it's on the minds of lot as well listeners.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>As someone in the late fifties, I can tell you

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 3>it is something I've given a lot of thought to. Marin.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, maybe maybe we'll do a Twitter poll on that.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out how many people are worried about that,

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>how many people are more worried about that than they

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are about to see a couple of game sacks, which

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the thing that people are mostly worried

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>about at the moment. Johny, you were going to interrupt

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and say something even more helpful than the stuff that

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Thomas said.

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, the one I saying it strikes me is being

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 2>politically easy, if not easy for everyone else, and I

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 2>se very frustrating, but very stealthy the employer. Next I

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>think is is you know, because they announced that one

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 2>of the day, half of the ninety percent of the

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>journalists covernment don't even know what they're talking about, so

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>it never gets into the paper until the end of

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the week. You can hide the fact that this would

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 2>technically affect affect public sector workers too, but you can

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>exempt that in a much less overt way than the

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>tax free lump sum or then come tax relief, and

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>all that happens is that basically either our auto enrollment

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>pensions get worse or you know, our private sector employers

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>pay more. So that I can see that being very appealing,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>and it is quite a big chunk of change, you know,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty ten billion, because the problem is also if you

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>exclude the dB workers from the lump sum of the

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>tax relief, the other thing, but the tax relief is

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>like a huge amount of income tax relief saving, if

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>you like, actually comes from the dB side, not the

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>DC side. So if you want to make the sums

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>add up there, then you have to include the dB

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>workhouse or else is basically okay, maybe it's maybe was

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 2>doing there, certainly nowhere near, you know, because the pension actually,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>if it is constantly quoted, has been worth about fifty

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>five billion or something like that. But actually, whenever you

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 2>boil it down, if you start excluding lots of different

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 2>groups from that, then the actual amounts that are sort

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of politically easily targetable are much much smaller. So I

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 2>think that's the other interesting thing about this. It sounds

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>like the sort of thing, Oh, why haven't they done

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>it already, and then you realize, well, they haven't done

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>it already because actually this is a massive, massive mainfield.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Well I bet my bottom dollar that if any of

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>these so called reforms come into play, most of the

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.239
<v Speaker 1>public sect will be exempt.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna have to revisit this conversation in a few

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 3>weeks time.

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>We are definitely revisiting this conversation, Tom. I look forward

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to having you back on anyway, back to poor old Mike. Mike,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we have neglected you. I'm sorry. This is about you,

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>not about or worries about or twenty five percent so

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>pension draw down, Tom, what's that all about? And how

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>does Mike avoid getting ripped off.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 3>So let's just briefly rivisit the bad old days. Before

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifteen, draw down existed, but it was much more restricted,

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.599
<v Speaker 3>and typically people when they got to retirement would have

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to take their accumulated for retirement savings and hand it

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>over to an insurance company in exchange for guaranteed incan

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 3>for life. It gave you certainty this annuity, but you

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 3>lost your capital. So George Osborne decided in twenty fifteen

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 3>no one should have to buy annunities anymore. Instead, everyone

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>was free to just leave their money in their retirement

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 3>savings pot what we now call draw down, and just

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 3>draw money out of those retirement savings as and when

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>they choose. Through the remainder of their lives. They're still

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 3>entitled to take up twenty five percent of their pot

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 3>tax free, either upfront in one lump sum or as

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 3>a slice of whatever income withdrawals they take. See you

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>take one hundred pounds out, twenty five percent is tax free,

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 3>seventy five pounds to tax. And you can keep doing

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 3>that up to the current tax freedom some which we've

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>just been discussing in the budget context, which is currently

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 3>capped out at two hundred and sixty eight thousand, seven

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty five pounds or twenty five percent of

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 3>the pot, whichever is the lower. So the joy of

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 3>drawdown is you have control over your money. It remains invested,

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 3>it's growing, You draw on it as much or as

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 3>little as you need for your retirement. The problem with

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 3>draw down is it's complicated. It's really difficult to know

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 3>how much to take out on where to invest your money,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and how to manage that decumulation of your retirement savings,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 3>such as you optimize your sound of living through your

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 3>retirement without running out of money before you die, given

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 3>that you don't know when you're going to die. And

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 3>to be honest, most people are not investment experts, So

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 3>where do they put the money to minimize the risk

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 3>and maximize returns and avoid unpleasant things happening. When you're

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>accumulating your retirement savings, you're happily sake investment risk, and

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 3>if it goes down a bit, well it doesn't really matter.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Once you're retired, your perspective changes. You really don't want

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 3>to take investment risk beause when the money's gone, it's gone.

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>You've got no more income coming in so it's all

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 3>together a lot more complicated.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you've got all those complications, and then you've

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>got this added complication of not really knowing how much

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>of your twenty five percent to take ween. I mean,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you suggested you could just go through your entire retirement

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>taking every time you take something out seventy five percent

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of it. Depending on the amount on your pot, obviously

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent of it is taxed and twenty five

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of it isn't tax. But a lot of people

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>think they'd really like to take something out of the beginning,

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they want to pay off a morga, do' give some

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>money to their children or whatever it is from this

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>tax free lumps on, and then they're down to well,

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're taking out ninety percent tax and ten percent

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not tax, and I even I find that kind of confusing.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely agree with you. And look, I'm probably more

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 3>familiar with this than most people are. I'm still using

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 3>a financial advisor to help me plan all of this,

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 3>partly because I've got better things to do with my life,

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 3>but also because it's really helpful to have an external

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>objective person helping me to optimize my tax strategy and

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 3>so on, and I'm not drawing my money yet, but

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 3>I will do one day soon. For me, I find

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 3>it easier to use a financial advisor to do that,

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 3>but they cost money, and not everyone wants to pay

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>a financial advisor to manage their money for them in retirement.

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 3>So then you're into realms of Okay, who's going to

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 3>actually look after my money for me? And then you're

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>you're into the realms of an investment platform such as

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the guys I used to work with at Harbury's Landsdown.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Other platforms are available, quite a few of them are

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 3>cheaper as well. And then you're going to decide where

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 3>you're going to invest your money on the platform, and

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>you're going to use active managers, you're going to use

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 3>passive managers. How do how do you optimize your returns

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 3>forst minimizing your risk because you don't want to particularly

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 3>volatile investments. You want consistency of income stream to pay

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 3>you that income you're drawing from your retirement savings. And

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>you know you've talked a bit about the tax strategy

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and how you minimize the amount of tax you're paying.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not pretending any of this is simple. There are

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 3>tools out there you can use. We're starting to see

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 3>FinTechs coming to the fore and offering services to help

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 3>people do this. As a company called Guide with two

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Eyes in the middle for some reason, they've got some

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>quite nice technology that helps you do all this kind

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of thing. And the FAA is trying to help those

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>platforms the likes of Hardbrea's fans that are mentioned twice.

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Now we've got to stop doing that and others who

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 3>are going to bring in more kind of guidance to

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 3>help customers as they manage their money through this process.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think it's ever going to be simple.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, do you have to move your money? I mean,

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say, for example, your DC pension is with a

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>VIVA with one of the big life insurance or something

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. I have a variety of mini dcs all

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>over the place. One of them, I'm pretty sure it's

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>with a Viva, possibly one of the worst, who knows,

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll check later. But once you get to retirement age,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>will they just keep that for you and manage it

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>for you? Do you have to go off to a

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>platform or can I just say to a Viva? This

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is really making my head hurt, just give me some

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>money every month.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure they would be delighted to help you with that.

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 3>And Viva is one of the other financial institutions that

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 3>definitely does offer a drawdown service, so so yeah, you could.

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 3>They would manage that transition for you and help you

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>just draw income from your retirement savings as you wish.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>So most of the big life insurance companies and the

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 3>investment platforms they offer these kind of drawdown is And

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 3>in fact, the DWP has just noticed the fact that

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 3>all the big occupational pension schemes, the master trusts and

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the schemes run by employers, don't do this. And their

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 3>approach hitherto has been to say, look, Mary, you've got

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 3>to retirement. Well done, here's your bag of money, off

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 3>you go, don't spend it all at once. And they've

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of woken up to the fact that it's a

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>suboptimal real situation, and so they're now looking at bringing

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 3>legislation to require all pension schemes to offer what they

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 3>call guided to cumulation sort of default retirement income solutions,

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 3>but no one's got as far as yet working out

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>exactly what that will look like.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You see, that makes me feel a tiny bit uncomfortable, actually, Tom,

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>because one of the pros of the DC pension system,

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the New Order and ROMA DC pension system, is that

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>people are at least at one point forced to engage.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you talked about the old days earlier,

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and in the old days, your pension accumulated somewhere vaguely

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>out of sight. It wasn't really anything to do with you.

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And then you got to the point of retirement and

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you had a sort of one and a half hour

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>meeting with someone or you look, you received a letter

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and you ticked a box and someone provided you with

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>an annuity, and you were You didn't have to engage, right,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it was all done for you by big, faceless financial organizations.

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And if we get back to the point where you

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have an auto enrollment pension, which you really don't have

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>very much to do with, I mean you could, but

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>most people don't. It just happens out of sight. And

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>then there are default options for draw down instead of

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>having the you know, the new marvelous world of fully

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>engaged financial semi. I was going to say, semi experts.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely not true. People who understand what's going on

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>with their money are engaging with the financial industry. We're

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>back to the old days any day now and the

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>government will be requiring everyone to buy an annuity.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Well well, and don't joke about that, Merin, because I

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 3>think this government would be quite relaxed about introducing what

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>they would call guardrails or controls or bumpers down the

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 3>lane to help guide people in their retirement income strategy

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and avoid the risk of them all running out of money.

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think there was a legitimate public policy concerned

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 3>that too many people will take too much money out,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 3>spend it all and then become a liability on the

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 3>welfare state. And as you know, taxpayers, we might have

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>feelings about that. So I think I think this government

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 3>is looking in that direction and maybe reintroducing a degree

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 3>of control around us. We haven't heard it yet, but

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm waiting for that. So about that could happen. But

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 3>in the meantime, I think if they do introduce sort

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of guided default decumulation time strategies, they will always I

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>think it's done with the intention of Look, when you

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 3>knock on the door and say I need my money now,

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 3>but I don't know what I'm doing, they will say, okay, well,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 3>let's walk you through a decision making process. Let's funnel

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 3>you down to an outcome based on maybe a degree

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 3>of questioning and a bit of interaction and a bit

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 3>of people like you tend to do. This kind of

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 3>process is rather than just put you know, one day

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 3>a letter arrived saying, Hi, Mary, We've sorted your retirement

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 3>income out for you, and here it.

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Is, and don't you worry about the charges. We've got

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that all under control thing. Okay. So a bit of

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>just in time, education and a.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Bit of nudge, you've got it.

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, So what is our final advice to Mike?

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 3>My final advice to Mike would be one talk to

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 3>pension Wise. It's a free government service that's really helpful

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 3>at walking people through the decision making process. It will

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 3>empower you to have more informed conversations with your pension providers,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>and it is free. So so what's not to like

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 3>about that other than you lose about forty five minutes

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>of your life and it will probably be time well spent.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 3>So I'd encourage you to do that. Think about think

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 3>about your standard of living. I think one of the

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 3>biggest challenges people find as they approach retirement is knowing

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 3>what income they need to live on and how to

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>build in wriggle room around unexpected costs, and then think

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 3>about how much certain income you want? You know, what's

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 3>your what's your capacity for variability around all of that?

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 3>And then from their start to think about, Okay, do

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I need some guaranteed income? Do I need an innuity?

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 3>When does my state pension kick in? If I'm going

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 3>to go into draw down? What's my tolerance for challenges?

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Who's offing good service? What are the investment choices? How

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 3>active do I want to be with managing all of that?

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Take your time. This needs to run up at it.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 3>You can't all this in an afternoon.

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>And that is why we get in the experts every

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>now and then. Tom, thank you so much for joining us.

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 3>My pleasure, Thank you, thanks.

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>For listening to this week's Meren Talks Money. John, if

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you like to say thanks again, I talked over you.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>No, I cannot I do anything to the expert opinion there.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was comprehensive and marvelous.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Meren Talks Money. If

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you like us, show Rage, review and subscribe wherever you

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts and keep sending questions or comments to

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Merriorn Money at Bloomberg dot nuts. You can also follow

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>me and John on Twitter or X. I'm Maren, I'm

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as marins W and John is John Underscore STUFFECT. This

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>episode was hosted by me Marren zum zep Web. It

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Summersidi, production support by Isabella Ward and

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sound designed by Blake Naples. A special thanks to Tom

0:18:53.960 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>McPhail and of course John