Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, let make
Speaker 1: sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Will Barack Obama face
Speaker 1: charges of conspiracy to overthrow the United States government? Seditious conspiracy, treason,
Speaker 1: any of the above? Will Barack Obama, the former president
Speaker 1: for two terms of the United States, face federal criminal charges? Period?
Speaker 1: It would have seemed absolutely impossible a day ago that
Speaker 1: that would happen, right, But now we have the Trump
Speaker 1: administration coming forward suggesting that it should happen. But will
Speaker 1: it happen? Now we get into the gears and the
Speaker 1: machinery of the Justice Department, the system, if you will.
Speaker 1: But let's first start with how this all came about.
Speaker 1: We know because of Tulsey Gabbert, the Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 1: at the press conference, the White House pread conference, announcing
Speaker 1: that a criminal referral has been made to the DOJ
Speaker 1: for Barack Obama's conduct in the twenty sixteen to twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen handover period. Right, So, essentially, Barack Obama was the
Speaker 1: soft coup leader. And here you have Tulsi Gabbard in
Speaker 1: no uncertain terms explaining what.
Speaker 2: That means when you look at the intent behind creating
Speaker 2: a fake, manufactured intelligence document that directly contradicts multiple assessments
Speaker 2: that were created by the intelligence community, the expressed intent
Speaker 2: and what followed afterward can only be described as a
Speaker 2: year's long coup and tries in this conspiracy.
Speaker 1: She is quite serious about this manufacturing intelligence coming together
Speaker 1: with a fake narrative story that the intelligence community had
Speaker 1: to do, had to know was untrue at the time,
Speaker 1: and doing so in order to destroy an incoming administration.
Speaker 1: This is incredibly serious stuff. I've always thought it was.
Speaker 1: I was among the loudest voices calling out the Russia
Speaker 1: hoax in the earliest days of its inception. So I'm
Speaker 1: quite aware of what the stakes are here, and I'm
Speaker 1: quite aware that there can be no way forward for
Speaker 1: this country without some accountability. There has to at least
Speaker 1: be a full accounting publicly of what has gone on here.
Speaker 1: We need this information about the extent of the coup
Speaker 1: attempt to be in the public domain, the real, hard
Speaker 1: information from inside the intelligence community. It also implicates, of course,
Speaker 1: a lot of media members in all of this.
Speaker 2: They worked with their partners in the to promote this lie,
Speaker 2: ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump and launching
Speaker 2: what would be a year's long coup against him and
Speaker 2: his administration.
Speaker 1: You see, that's why they don't want this. Well, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of reasons why they don't want this to
Speaker 1: come forward or to become more a part of our
Speaker 1: national discussion about this. It was all laundered through national
Speaker 1: media outlets who completely lied and were a part of
Speaker 1: an effort to overthrow a duly elected president of the
Speaker 1: United States. And I understand people can say, oh, but
Speaker 1: this was so many years ago. Yes, but now we
Speaker 1: have new information to further what we thought and knew
Speaker 1: depending then about what a coup attempt this really was.
Speaker 1: How clearly this was an attempt to overthrow the United
Speaker 1: States government, to undermine the legitimacy of a president. Look,
Speaker 1: the coup attempt didn't quite work, but it almost worked.
Speaker 1: And everyone has to be I think, reminded of that.
Speaker 1: It's not like this just was some idea that never
Speaker 1: came to fruition. The Hillary Clinton campaign, the Steele dossier,
Speaker 1: the intelligence community under Brennan and Clapper, the Obama administration
Speaker 1: White House all worked together and with of course media
Speaker 1: to push the stories out there. They all work together
Speaker 1: in order to convince the American people that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: was an illegitimate president, and then got a special Council
Speaker 1: going and created all of these booby traps, all of
Speaker 1: these trip wires and ambushes for the Trump administration. It's
Speaker 1: outrageous what they did. It's outrageous, and there has been
Speaker 1: no accountability, and there should be accountability for this. So
Speaker 1: I think that this is a step in the right direction.
Speaker 1: I think this is something that we need to see
Speaker 1: pushed further and let's get all the information out there.
Speaker 1: What they're releasing, whether it's the House Intel Report, TULSI,
Speaker 1: from the DNI, all of the stuff that's coming out
Speaker 1: now is what we need for the public to have
Speaker 1: a full understanding of just what went on here. And
Speaker 1: now we can get into a little bit of the process.
Speaker 1: I think it'll be For example, in the case of
Speaker 1: Barack Obama, he's a former president. I don't think you're
Speaker 1: going to be able to get a conviction, even if
Speaker 1: charges are brought against Barack Obama. Just telling me what
Speaker 1: I think. I'm making predictions here. I could be wrong.
Speaker 1: I think the chance of a conviction is almost almost zero.
Speaker 1: I think the chance of actual federal charges brought against
Speaker 1: Obama are quite slim, but not almost zero, maybe you know,
Speaker 1: one to ten. The likeliest outcome with Obama, because he's
Speaker 1: a former president, in my mind, is that the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice will review the DNA's criminal referral and come
Speaker 1: forward with a statement that they believe there was criminal conduct.
Speaker 1: But in this case, the would be defendant, Barack Obama
Speaker 1: was president, and as we know, because of what they
Speaker 1: tried to do to Trump, the Supreme Court has weighed
Speaker 1: in and Barack Obama cannot be prosecuted for acts in
Speaker 1: his official capacity as president, no matter how vile and
Speaker 1: dishonest they may have been. That is what I think
Speaker 1: is likely to happen here. Now, what about Brendan, What
Speaker 1: about Clapper? They have no presidential immunity? What about anyone
Speaker 1: else in the government who is implicated in this? At
Speaker 1: the highest level there, you'd have to find what the
Speaker 1: specific statute is under which charges could be brought. Seditious conspiracy,
Speaker 1: as I understand, it has to involve use of force.
Speaker 1: I don't know that they'll be able to clear that
Speaker 1: bar I think that if they were going to do
Speaker 1: deprivation of rights they might be on more solid ground,
Speaker 1: but that may be time barred by the Statute of limitations.
Speaker 1: So there are some procedural challenges here that could affect prosecutions.
Speaker 1: The member. There's the decision to bring the charges, there's
Speaker 1: the decision to see the case through, and then there's
Speaker 1: the decision of the jury, and then there's a decision
Speaker 1: of the joke with sentencing. So there's all these different layers,
Speaker 1: and at anyone this whole thing could come apart. It's
Speaker 1: a challenge for there to be any justice here. But
Speaker 1: I thought this, I'm going to get into something really
Speaker 1: interesting here in just a second. I did think that
Speaker 1: it was quite fascinating to see that there's some information
Speaker 1: about Hillary Clinton that has come out in this DNI
Speaker 1: press conference as well. I'm sure the Democrats aren't going
Speaker 1: to like that. I'll get to it in a second.
Speaker 1: Preborn is a nonprofit established to save the lives of
Speaker 1: unborn babies susceptible to abortions. Their single goal convinced the
Speaker 1: mother of that unborn baby that there's a better plan.
Speaker 1: God has a plan for that child life. Preborn operates
Speaker 1: in so many states across the country. Thanks to your
Speaker 1: generous support, and last year they saved the lives of
Speaker 1: sixty seven thousand babies in this country. Preborn sees the
Speaker 1: easy availability of abortion clinics. They see how pervasive the
Speaker 1: so called abortion pill is. That's often what they're up against.
Speaker 1: So Preborn is there providing love, support and that gift
Speaker 1: of a free ultra sound to a mother to be.
Speaker 1: They want that mom to meet the tiny baby growing
Speaker 1: in that in growing in her womb. And they only
Speaker 1: need twenty eight dollars to cover that expense. So can
Speaker 1: you donate twenty eight dollars? And for some of you,
Speaker 1: could you donate twenty eight dollars a monthly that would
Speaker 1: be every month. You just have it automatically deducted twenty
Speaker 1: eight dollars and it would go toward helping save a
Speaker 1: tiny baby in the womb tax deductible one hundred percent
Speaker 1: tax deductible contributions. By the way, Preborn is doing such
Speaker 1: important work. Three hundred and thirty thousand plus live save
Speaker 1: to date. To donate securely, dial pound two fifty say
Speaker 1: the keyword baby. That's pound two five zero say baby,
Speaker 1: or go to preborn dot com, slash buck, preborn dot com,
Speaker 1: slash b U c K sponsored by Preborn, So I
Speaker 1: wasn't expecting this to be a part of the press converce.
Speaker 1: Really interesting Hillary Clinton. Derogatory information about Hillary Clinton, high
Speaker 1: level DNC emails. Oh, here we go. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: what we learned about Hillary.
Speaker 2: There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of
Speaker 2: Hillary quote psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression,
Speaker 2: and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on
Speaker 2: a daily regiment of heavy tranquilizers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there you have it, fits of anger, aggression, psycho
Speaker 1: emotional problems. So they knew that Hillary had health problems.
Speaker 1: How could anybody doubt that the Democrats would hide even
Speaker 1: the most extreme health concerns and problems of it would
Speaker 1: be candidate from the American people, given they just did
Speaker 1: that exact thing with Joe Biden. They hit his dementia
Speaker 1: and we all knew it was there, but they hit
Speaker 1: it anyway. It was an outrage. It still is an outrage.
Speaker 1: So we'll continue to look at this. But I just
Speaker 1: think when you have more transparency, but the twenty sixteen election,
Speaker 1: you can see it all put in motion, the madness,
Speaker 1: the anti Trump madness. It has completely consumed and destroyed
Speaker 1: the Democrat Whatever sense of ethics or fair play that
Speaker 1: they had, it's all gone now, has been gone for
Speaker 1: a long time. They just play pure power politics. Raw
Speaker 1: power is all the Democrats care about, and these revelations
Speaker 1: from D and I Gabbard all go to exactly that point.
Speaker 1: The Democrats will do anything. They are absolutely ruthless in
Speaker 1: their pursuit of power, and there needs to be greater
Speaker 1: accountability now. Is taking this back and forth approach the
Speaker 1: tit for tat if you will, eye for an eye,
Speaker 1: is this the way forward? Well, I'd ask the question
Speaker 1: this way, How can we have accountability If the Democrats
Speaker 1: always know they can get away with absolutely anything like this,
Speaker 1: what will ever make them stop? Unless there are consequences,
Speaker 1: they won't stop, So pursuing consequences does seem to be
Speaker 1: a necessary first step in that process. Continue to follow
Speaker 1: us closely. Thanks for hanging out Shield time.