WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2018 NFL MegaPod Week 13 Preview

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom check it on Man Now Down Now Thursday morning,

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>November Beating the Book Podcast Megapod Times Gil Alexander thanks

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody for tuning in. You know how this works. Week

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in the NFL. We will tackle it as always

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the show brought you by the score x dot com

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>th h E S C O r e x dot com.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Remember if you win the pool of beating the book listeners,

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>if you put in the promo code GIL G I

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>L L, you are qualified for the Beating the Book pool.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The winner at the end of the regular season will

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>beat on the Megapod with Me, Marco and Ace wild

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Card week. So I am here to update the standings

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>currently with five weeks left in the season. The leader

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>right now is profitable gentlemen profitable plus he has indeed

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>been profitable. Number two topsch left, not top shell off,

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>mind you. He misspelled top shelf perhaps and called himself

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>topsch left, So we could have a guy who misspelled

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>top shelf as our guest here on the Megapod Well

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Car week. He's up Dieto the Greek is up twenty

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>six percent, the Wick up percent. Those guys tied for

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>third and then Vitamin g up so whoever wins it,

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in that group or someone lurking right behind

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>that top five, whoever's at the top. After week seventeen,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you will be on the magupod with this wild card week.

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>We look forward to it and pumped that you've been

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>score X and all year long. Once again, it's th

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>h E S c O R e X the score

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.839
<v Speaker 1>X dot com on the show today. You heard that laugh.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>That is the recognizable laugh of one of the pillars

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of the show. Thirty nine years in the business. That

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>like goes back to the Eisenhower administration. No, not quite,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>not quite that far back, ladies and gentlemen. It is

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Marco to Angelo. Good morning, Marco, good morning. I'm doing

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>very well. I can't wait for the Derby. When I

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>introduce you for the Derby as a man who's seen

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all Kentucky Derbys live, that's always fun. It's always fun

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for you. Maybe that's more accurate. You're right and on

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>my left out of the sports betting diaspora. Ace, good morning, Ace,

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, thanks for having me brother. Nice to be

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>back after the break. Yeah, I got a request. Yeah,

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, thanks to everybody I know. We had

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple who were like, not a little more than

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of people who are like, where's the megapod?

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>We never do one Thanksgiving week? Marco, we never do

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one Thanksgiving week? And when's the other time we never

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>do one? Wee I did, we had, we had gone

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>away from it. And then for some cockamami reason I

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>got in my head, I was like, let's do a

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>week seventeen pods. You're like, why we never do one.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, let's try it. And it was stupid.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Um Ace, I gotten requests about you this week. Uh,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody wants a blah blah blah from you at some

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>point on the show. And then they also want a

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 1>they want a Patrick Mahomes member update, which I can't

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>even believe that came out of my mouth. But a

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Ace is not a fan of the Chiefs and that

0:02:58.000 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>has not worked out so far for him. And on

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the show today, Ladies and Gentlemen, our esteemed guest, as always,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had Teddy on in a while, and that

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is my mistake and nobody else's. From Sports Memo, Ladies

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and Gentlemen, the Great Teddy covers Good morning, Teddy, Gentlemen.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. Thanks for being are I appreciate

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you doing this. Always fun having you, Hey, the pleasures

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>all mine and hopefully this time. There was one pod

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that I remember just being vehement and arguing against all

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys, and then I was completely wrong when Monday

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Night you guys mocked me, and I think maybe that's

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>why I wasn't on from Oh No, if we have

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>being in arguments, I'll try to be on the right

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>side of them. Teddy, we mock everyone, We mock each other.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of what we do. All right, Let's start

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>as we always do in reverse. Will start with Monday Night.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It is a NFC East. I hesitate to use the

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>word clash, but basically, if the Cowboys lose tonight on

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night Football to the Saints, which might be the

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>highest rated Thursday night football game of all time, we

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>shall see. But if the Cowboys lose that game and

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles end up beating the Redskins, we will have

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a three way tie on top of the NFC East

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>at six and six Cowboys Eagles at Redskins. We'll see

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if it pans out. As it is for this game,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are six six and a half point favorite.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Consensus in this game on Monday Night, it will be

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Colt McCoy again for the Redskins. Redskins on extra rest

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>here having lost to the Cowboys last Thursday and Thanksgiving

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>refs refusing to make some calls on the Cowboys, man

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>just say, as a Redskins fan, kind of a p

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I rapage that wasn't called, kind of a targeting that

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>was heard up in the booth that wasn't called. But

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you get the idea. The Redskins didn't win the game.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Didn't cover unless you got it early. On guessing lines.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I said eight and a half was ridiculous. If you

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>got it early enough, you were you want on the Redskins.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But most people did not win on the Redskins. Anyway,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they lose that game. Offense is just decimated really, Besides

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Read and their starting center, everybody's different than was

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the case from the beginning of the season, although Trent

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Morgan Moses get in and out of the

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lineup at tackle. And then there's the Eagles, defending Super

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Bowl champions, who have just not looked anywhere near the

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>way they did last year. Much of that the fact

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're not having the same success on third down conversions,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>which they were just lights out on last year. A

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of injuries in that secondary. But they come back

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>from a nineteen to three deficit against the Giants last

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Sunday win at twenty five to twenty two. So again

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>a chance if things go break their way here on

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night as well, to be in a tie after

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>all that twelve games of the season atop the NFC East, Teddy,

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about this game? So, you know,

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rescues were a team that when they got off

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to that hot start, it really felt real like Washington

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>was going to be there for the full race. But

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when your offensive line gets decimated with injuries and you

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>were talking about it, you know, uh yeah, puts a

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>real damper on everything that you're capable of doing. You know,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>last week you talked about all the key plays except

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the one that actually what's the point spred difference maker

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, the missed extra point for the Ridskins having

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>enormous betting occasions here in Las Vegas. Uh, with the

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>eight point victory in the game that closed seven seven

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half. The missed extra point was the difference

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>maker there. And obviously when you're talking about this stage

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of the season, it's not unusual to see games land

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>right around the number. Every half point can and does matter,

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of those games where as we talk,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at six and a half. I expect this

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>game to go to seven by the time that you know,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>at least at some books, by the time we're looking

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>at kickoff, simply because Philadelphia saved their season last week

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and Washington had another National TV loss, and we know

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles aren't anywhere near what they were a year ago. Uh.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of it, in my mind, has

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to do with the brain trust. You know, look at

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Colts with Frank Greig right now, and boy, their

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>game plans are unique and difficult to defend every week. Huh.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen that in Philadelphia. We've seen John to

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Philippo up in Minnesota have success as the offerensive coordinator

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the QB coach for Carson Wentz last year when

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Wentz was an MVP candidate. Clearly he's not an MVP

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>candidate this season. Of course, the Eagles do have all

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of those injuries in the secondary secondary last week that

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had nary a healthy starter in the mix. That's a

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>problem in this point spread range. All that being said,

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia is the better of these two teams moving forward.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about upside, the Redskins with a backup

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who's not you know, a playmaker in Colt McCoy

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>got who made a lot of mistakes last week and

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is going up against a strong pass rush here. Boy,

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust McCoy to avoid the mistakes this week.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Philly more likely to get the job done.

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Philly more likely to get the job done. And you're right.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Colte McCoy first start for the Redskins in place of

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the injured Alex Smith, thirty eight for two touchdowns, three

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>picks among his passes, more than his share of ducks.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>He was sacked three times. Colte McCoy gets a second

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>start of the Sea in this one. Zach Ertz the

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>go to guy for Carson Wentz this year. Seven catches

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for ninety one yards and a touchdown against the Giants

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>last week. Uh, Teddy just mentioned Frank Reich in that

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Frank Reich is the common thread. The Eagles were the

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>best team on third downs last year. Frank Reich was there, O,

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>c what do you know Indianapolis Colts this year the

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>only team over fifty conversion rate on third downs. That's

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously been a huge differentiator among so many for the

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Eagles thus far this year. Marco, any thoughts on this

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>ball game? Yeah, Washington, Uh use a VR's favorite line

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or the pony is a three dollar bill. You know

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>when they had that four in one run, uh, prior

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to losing the last two. If you go back and

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>look at that four in one run, they enjoyed a

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve to two turnover edge. I'm sorry. Whenever you have

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a twelve to two turnover edge over five game period,

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna win some ballgames. That's how they won the

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina game. They were plus three in turnovers. Beat Carolina

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to seventeen. Plus three in turnovers, you're supposed

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to win bigger than six points. Um. We all talked

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about that Tampa Bay game. That was another one. Uh.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>They beat Tampa Bay sixteen to three with Tampa Bay

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>having like five hundred yards of offense and no points

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to show for it. Well, it was plus four in

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the turnover margin in Philadelphia last week. As bad as

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia has been, and we've seen it all year. The

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>way they were able to pull last week's game out.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>That is the type of game that can save someone's

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>season and start them on a run. And I think

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's where you're gonna be with Philadelphia. The injuries to

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Washington has been well documented. UM, asked Alex Smith. That's

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably why Uh, you know he got hurt

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with the poor offensive line play. I'll take Philadelphia here. Uh,

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a game that, like you said, Gil, if

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we get a loss tonight by the Cowboys against the Saints,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this sets up, you know, if you're a conspiracy theories,

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be on Philadelphia at least for a teaser anyways,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>to just win the game. Because what better way to

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have the NFC least other than having three mediocre teams

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>at six and six. Yeah. I was gonna ask you

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if this had teas written all over it on the Eagles,

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and you answered the question. Uh. Normally when you speak

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>poorly of the Redskins, I always go, how dare you, Marco?

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>How dare you say such things? But you are you

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>are completely correct in the in this in this case, Um,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and yes, the Tampa Bay game four nine eight or

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>four hundred nine nine yards of offense. Can't remember the

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>exact number, but it's right there, and the Buccaneers managed

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>three points. That just doesn't happen. Doesn't happen. Ridskins won

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that game. In that Carolina game you referenced, Redskins went

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>up seventeen and nothing, and you're right to DJ more

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>turnovers for the Panthers. That was huge into the Redskins

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>getting steaked to a seventeen and nothing lead. Panthers came

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>all the way back, got the ball all the way

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to the fifteen yard line with it as to win it,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and then Cam just had this Cam like horrific sequence

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>where the Redskins escaped and you're like, what was Cam doing? So, yeah,

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of escape jobs for the Redskins. ACE totals

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>at forty five. Any thoughts on this game? Yeah, I mean, listen, obviously,

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins haven't looked good to the last four weeks

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>except for that win at Tampa Bay. But with that said,

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they they've been decimated by injuries of late um not

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>giving him a pass, but I mean you gotta factor

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>that in. Personally, I thought this line was a little high.

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't like what I see out of Philadelphia Um.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you look at the matchups that they've

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>had against solid teams, they just can't get it done.

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean against Dallas at home, a very big game.

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>The way this division is lined up, I couldn't get

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that win as seven and a half point favorites. Against

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Carolina at home, fine point favorites, another big game. Can't

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>get that win. Against Minnesota at home three and a

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites, can't get that win. Ohly did they

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not cover these games? They even win the game straight up.

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't see anything to get excited for with Philadelphia,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>um let alone laying a touchdown. This is going off

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of last year. I mean, their their reputation this entire

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>season is going off last year. Um. That's why they're

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>burning through money. If you're betting them there three and

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>eight against the spread, that's not by an accident. Um.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I just can't lay close to a

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdown with Philadelphia, And the fact that they're three and

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>three at home gives me no confidence to even tease them.

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I could see if they, you know, were

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a five and six, six and five team, but they

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>were getting their winds at home and just having trouble

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>on the road. But this team is a coin toss

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>at home and on the road, so they have confidence.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see it. I mean, for me, it's

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a dog or pass situation. UM. But I think there's

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.719
<v Speaker 1>value in the over here. I mean it sets up

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>as that NFC East playoff aspirations called what you will

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for both these teams fighting for that top spot. And

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's that NFC East I think perception of that

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>defensive game, and then you factor in, you know, the

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Eagles have been in on their team. Four of their

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>last five games have gone under. UM. Again, it's it's

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>at the primetime game. UM. Usually that the biases towards

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the over, and I not want to quickly jump on

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that over, but I did last Monday night and it

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>worked out for me, and I liked the over again

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this Monday night as well. If there's one thing I

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>saw out of Washington, as much as McCoy makes those

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>mistakes and they had five turnovers the last two weeks,

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the offense moves okay, and I think they'll be able

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to get some points against Philly, and Philly will do

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the same, So give me the over. They scored forty

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>seven and and fifty eight when they played last year.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>In those two games, I think they could go over

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>forty four and a half forty five. Last thing on

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this game, because we do we do sort of gloss over,

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when a team gets estimated by injuries. But

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the Skins on offense, man, my god, both starting guard

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Laval and Brandon Schriff out for the season. Trent

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Morgan was their their tackles in and out

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the lineup. Jamison Crowder, their slot receiver, has been

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>out for two months. Chris Thompson, the best player on

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that offense, been out for almost two months. Who else

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul Richardson and yeah, Paul Richardson out for the year,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course Alex Smith now done for the year

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's incredible how how many injuries they have.

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see, still got a shot. Redskins right now

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>six and a half point dogs on the road at

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Philly on Monday night, Sunday night, guys, game that was

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>flexed in good matchup Chargers at the Steelers. Steelers right

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>now are three and a half point favorites consensus, though

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you will see some threes out there with extra Juice, Marco,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it is fitting that we start with you, not only

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's the Steelers, funny how that always works out,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but because you absolutely rabbit footed up your ass your

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>way to a Denver win last week. If I may

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be blunt, how many things had to happen in that

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>game for Denver to to cover and win it out right?

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Denver wins it by a touchdown. Pittsburgh

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>won only five teams that didn't hit on the tease

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>last week, twenty five and thirty on teaser sides. Big Ben, though,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in that game against the Broncos forty one of fifty

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>six for four sixty two, one touchdown, two picks. That's

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a six four hundred and fifty yard plus game of

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>his career, juju is ridiculous. Thirteen catches for nine and

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. Steelers had five hundred twenty seven total yards

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of offense, controlled the ball for thirty five minutes. However,

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>let's run down the list. Blocked field goal a fumble

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>through the back of the end zone. By the way,

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I cannot stand that rule. Ben misses the wide open

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the third quarter that was headed to the house.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>James Conner fumbling just inside the red zone, and of

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>course the final interception from Big Ben at the end.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Steelers first loss since September. And then there's the Chargers

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>who come in this game off a huge victory over

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, really coasting easy victory after they spotted Arizona

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>ten points. But Melvin Gordon gone because Anthony le Lynn,

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>when they were up by like a thousand points, decided

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep him in the game. He's gone now with

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the knee injury. He'll be out this week and maybe

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple subsequent weeks. Four. The Chargers Pittsburgh again three

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>point favorites. It's called three and a half consensus right now,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>total at fifty one and a half. Marco, Well, that's

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>set up with the horseshoe and everything else. Sounds like

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody had. Somebody had Pittsburgh last week. Did No? I

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>did not. I did not have any action in that game,

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, But yeah I did. I had Denver and

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it was the luckiest win. And this is what's humbling

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>about the NFL. As you like to throw out your

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>plink oh and coin flips and everything else, till I

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>went one and one on Sunday in the NFL the

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>game I lost, I never show lost in the game

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I won, I never should have won. That's the beauty

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL. I had Carolina that went up and

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>down the Seattle last week, and you know I would

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have gladly traded that one and one the other way around.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Um obviously because of you know, my loyalty to the Steelers.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.479
<v Speaker 1>But you know it was a bad spot for Pittsburgh

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>last week, and it's why that I put me on Denver.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>They were coming off that Jacksonville game. Playing back to

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>back road games, UM is always tough, and especially the

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>way the Steelers had to come from behind to win

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville game. And as we all know, that was

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge revenge game for Pittsburgh. But did I think

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers were gonna put up the numbers they did

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>last week? Offensively? I mean, they went up and down

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the field and kept shooting themselves in the foot. And

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>how often do we see this though throughout Mike Tomlin's career,

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>For whatever reason, when the Steelers play a sub five

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred team, they played to the level of the competitions.

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>It's frustrating. And uh, Denver stole a game, pure and simple,

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and now we've got the Chargers in Pittsburgh. They got

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>something in common. These two teams both gave games away

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to Denver in the last two weeks. UM, so they're

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the same on that aspect. But you talk about Juju,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I just want to highlight for a

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>second what he's doing right now. And Gil, if you

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>remember back right now, what we're seeing with Juju is

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>what we saw with Antonio Brown, uh in his first

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and second year in Pittsburgh, and that was you know,

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown was not the guy. It was Mike Wallace,

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, and Mike Wallace was getting all of the

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the double teams, and Antonio Brown, because he

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is such a good, you know talent, you know, was

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the unknown factor and not getting you know, the coverage.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that Antonio Brown, you know that Wallace was getting.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>And now that's what's happening to Juju. And he is

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>emerging as a superstar. If you don't get him immediately

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>when he makes the catch, his yards after the catch,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>um is insane. I mean, just look at last week's

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, ninety seven yard touchdown. You know this guy

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>when he gets into the open field, Uh, the speed

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and elusiveness uh. And then you know you got a

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>B on the other side getting the double team. He

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>got juju And if you somehow manage to cover those two,

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>you gotta worry about Connor out of the backfield, and

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you gotta worry about Vance McDonald, who is emerging is

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the best tight ends in the NFL. He's

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>having a breakout season with the Steelers. So this offense

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is just, you know, right now, unstoppable unless Ben throws

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>it to the wrong colored jerseys. Um. I look at

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, and everybody's gonna point out where all the

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Steelers are going against a good defense. The Chargers don't

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>give up any points. Let's just stop with that for

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a second. Look at who the Chargers have played, uh

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks in which you know, they've had a

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>stretch here now of seven games where only one team

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>is top twenty points. That one team was Denver. Uh.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You look at the other teams that they played. They

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>played Oakland, who is absolute trash. They played Cleveland when

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the clown show was still there of Hugh Jackson and

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Tied Haley, And we noticed Baker Mayfield's numbers the minute

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Ti Hayley cut replaced and he got replaced my head

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>coach at the defensive coach, and the offensive numbers are

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>off the charts. With Baker's last three games, Um Tennessee,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not an offensive Jugger, not UM Seattle. Okay, they held

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>them to seventeen, but then they played Oakland a second

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>time and then Denver in Arizona. They haven't faced an

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>explosive offense. We'll see what the Chargers defense is really

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>made of going against a good offense and explosive offense.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.479
<v Speaker 1>And we know the Steelers home off of the loss,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>how good they are. They're a different team at home.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>They averaged seven points a game more at home. And

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>now this game is flexed into the Sunday night game

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. Uh, this just doesn't look good for the Chargers.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And this one, uh, no Gordon, and this one for

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers that's gonna hurt them. And I am gonna

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>actually finish this analysis with yes, I'm on Pittsburgh and

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I went the entire analysis without calling the Chargers the

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>San Diego Chargers. How about back well done? That that's

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the big upset of the day right here, plus eight

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred cashes on that. Uh it's so true though, like

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I could totally see Pittsburgh just rolling in this game,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because Pittsburgh always seems to have one horrific out of

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the blue road loss every year. It's kind of what

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they do. And I think Denver is that this year. Yeah,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just just in your mind's eye picturing Ben

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to get hold of the turf by Joey Bosa

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and just managing to get it out in a big

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh playing this one. By the way, anecdotally, if you

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>talk to any Chargers fan, they're such defeatist fans, by

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, Chargers fans, they're like, yeah, this is the

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>game where we get absolutely destroyed. Yeah. I mean, listen,

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I had Denver last week also, and I get it.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Four turn minus born turnovers for Pittsburgh. You're not going

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to cover games. You're not gonna win games like that,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so call it what you will. I I like, I

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>thought we had the right side. We got a little

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of lucky plays, but regardless, Um, listen, they snapped

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>their six game wins. Now they return home, Um, this

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is the to be their only excuse me home game

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in like a four weeks. Threat. Um, I could definitely

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>see the Steelers showing up, and I agree with Marco.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I don't like is not sure the

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>market's reaction based on the Gordon situation. You know, I

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I as soon as a key player goes down like that,

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>usually the market overreacts and thinks he's worth more to

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the betting line than than he truly is. And for me,

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm always cautious there. Um. I do like the under though, um.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And I know it's scary because you've got the Chargers

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>team that's definitely gonna try to throw on these Steelers.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You know they're they're gonna have trouble running the ball,

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>especially now. Um, But I don't think they would have

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 1>had all that much success anyway. They were gonna come

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and throw in the football against the Steelers defense. And

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>when you think of two teams that are gonna be

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>throwing the football, you think points and over. But but

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this line is just way too high. I mean, listen,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we've seen total us that we've never seen before this season.

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we saw the unprecedented one two Monday nights ago, um,

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>where they scored a hundred five points and went over.

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Um, it's a it's a change the

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL and you have to approach it a little differently.

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But with that said, UM, the NFL betting market is

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the most efficient on the planet. UM

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and none evolve and uh quicker than the NFL. And

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that you're starting to see these totals high

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in games that it's not warranted. I mean, you look

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on the board now and you're seeing four, five, six

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>games in or around the fifties, UM, and I just

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's more of what we've seen, uh this sample

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>size of this year than it really being warranted. So

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for me, I think this total is too high. I'm

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and bet the under. I don't think

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a two way shootout. I could see

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it turn into a one sided game on the Pittsburgh side,

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So I do like that a little bit as well.

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But I just think this total is way too high.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Give me that under, all, right, under fifty one and

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a half. I am contractually obligated gentlemen to mention that

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers last week against the Cardinals in that blowout

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>forty five to ten blowout, twenty eight of twenty nine

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>had twenty five consecutive completions to start that game, uh

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ties in NFL record Ryan Tannehill's mark for but it

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is a record for completions to start a game. But

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight of twenty nine, that's nineties six point eight

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>percent is the greatest completion percentage in the history of

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League. And let me just say this,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen and Mike Williams were making just unbelievably amazing

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>catches with their tiptoeing just inside the sidelines. Those receivers

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>helped Rivers out so much too. It's just an impressive performance.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But a last the Cardinals, they ain't the Steelers, Teddy,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? So? Now, did you notice that

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers left the game after completing twenty nine Then

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Gino Smith came in and through three strading completes. I

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>did notice that, Yeso Smith. Gino Smith, by the way, Teddy,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite scouting report lines ever when he

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>was coming out of college. It's a Geno Smith slow eyes.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that slow eyes and Gino I mean to

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>watch his NFL career is absolutely no surprise and Nione

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that watched him in college and the fact that the

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Jet has been a first round draft choice on him,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that he's lasted this long in the league,

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him credit. What it speaks volume about the

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>football organization in New York. A couple of things we

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about right off the bat. First, of course,

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>is the weather. When we're talking about l A traveling

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to Pittsburgh for a night game, tempi are supposed to

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be in the fifties. Is a chance of light rain,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's not going to be one of these cold,

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>nasty nights at the Hinesfield. So advantage in that regard

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>probably l A. Of course, when you start talking about

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler instead of Melvin Gordon, that's not necessarily an

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>advantage l A. And by the way, their third leaning,

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the third leading rusher this year is Keenan Allen. They

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>do not really have a decent backup for Atli who

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, Lynn's talking the talks and oh he can

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>be an every down back, no problem. You know, you

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>see all the yards after after contact that he gets. Okay,

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy's got seventy carries on the season. And this

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is a game where l a's game plan has to

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be run the football, keep big ban off the field.

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>That's likely to be a problem with their backup running back,

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I'm not a running back guy. I

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>tend to think of them as being interchangeable. Now Gordon

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is not interchangeable, and his absence will be fetting. Note

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that the note that the markets have pretty much been like, yeah, whatever,

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon doesn't matter the threes and a half getting

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>back down? Are you Are you surprised by that, Teddy,

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>because I was a little surprised by that. I mean,

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I get it, these guys don't mean that much, much

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 1>less than the public perceives. But in Gordon's case, I

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe some movement, none really none, none whatsoever. And

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it has to do with, again, what

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw last week. What we see last week? We

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>saw the Chargers blow out a bad team, and we

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers lose straight up uh to a mediocre team.

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Hence the I think that has something to do with

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the lack of market support for Pittsburgh here and the

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>lack of enthusiasm for Melvin Gordon, and the fact that

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>both of these teams, I mean, what the Steelers did

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>against Denver, you guys setting nailed it. You know, Pittsburgh

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>does this not once. That's why they do it a

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, three or four times. It's like every season

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>they have games where, yeah, they should have won, but

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. Um. Of course, the Chargers have more than

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>their fair share of special teams misc used. No surprise

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>here if the Chargers end up losing this game at

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>s because somebody misses an extra point or somebody this

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is a field goal. It's what they do. But with

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>one team coming off the blowout win, the other team

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>coming off a bad loss where they were minus four

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>in turnovers a prior, you have to look at the

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh side here at three. I'm a buyer on the Steelers.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>All right. It's such a good point about the Charges too.

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>If you're friends with any Chargers fans, they will tell

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you this. It's just that there's cursed with place kickers.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Like it's an amazing how a franchise can't get together.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You know who has a little of that. The Vikings. Like,

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, Dan Bailey is not Dan Bailey

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>anymore in Minnesota. So it's like a Blair Walsh lost

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, I lost on a Super Bowl because

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they both accurate kicker in NFL history at the time.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>The Jip John Field, Gary Anderson, that's right, and then

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>of course there's the Blair Walsh kick against the Seahawks.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Kai for Bath Daniel Carlson had moved on to other teams. Sam,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, alright, gentlemen, we get Sunday DIBs now from

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Ace your choice of Sunday games, sir, all right, a

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of good games to choose from. I'm gonna go

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.479
<v Speaker 1>ahead and and save some people some money because this

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be one of the most tease teams, um,

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>come Sunday, and and it even just falls into that

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>advantage teaser number as well. And that's going to be

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Raven. Stay away from that team this Sunday

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>going into Atlanta. UM, it's we're at that time of

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the year where you start the ad that must win

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Moniker and nothing to play for Moniker on teams, UM,

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and rest assured that's been factored into the betting line,

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and once it is discussing, it becomes meaningless. Is blah

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>blah blah for nothing? Um, And they're going to tell

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you this, we're at that point of the season where

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone's quit on Atlanta. They've now lost three straight games. UM.

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Listening except for that loss at Cleveland, which was ugly.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Losing the Dallas and losing at New Orleans aren't really

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the two worst losses you can possibly have. On the

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>flip side of that same coin, what Dome I seem

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>from Baltimore. This is a team that's lost to Cleveland,

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lost to that Saint Saints team, lost to Carolina, lost

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to Pittsburgh, and they they looked good the last two weeks,

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>beating Cincinnati, beating Oakland. I mean, I don't get it.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And then you talk about the Lamar Jackson experiment. I

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be good, but this is his first

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>road game and he's not going up as as granted,

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this the Atlanta isn't the eight I Bears defense, but

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>still now all of a sudden, you're you're going on

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the road, um, and it's not Oakland or Cincinnati and Atlanta.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>If anything, I think this is a team with with pride.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, coming into the season the last couple of years,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a team that was focused on making the playoffs

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and making a run in the playoffs. And I get

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it with teams like that, when when the playoffs, when

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>they're eliminated, you want to be cautious how motivated they are.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But listen, they're not mathematically eliminated. And as long as

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a sliver of hope, I expect players to show up.

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And if Atlanta shows up Sunday at home on in

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty much pick them situation, my money's on him.

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I like Atlanta Sunday. All the nonsense about the you know,

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>must win in Baltimore in the playoff hunt, they can't

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>afford losses. Yeah, well that's great what you can and

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>can't afford? Um, what's gonna happen to a different story?

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Give me Atlanta, I'll l a one to three. I

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is. Save your money on the teasers,

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>don't take them up the eight nine. They're gonna lose

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>by double digits, Atlanta one and a half point in

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>since his favorites now in that game. On Guessing Lines,

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for those who listened to Guessing Lines, whether on Visa

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on a Numbers Game Monday through Friday, Marco seven and

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nine am Pacific, uh Tenda Doon Eastern, or on the

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Beating of the Book podcast a couple of weeks ago.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I was outraged when Vinny, who was sitting in for Chrissy.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>When Vinny said that the Redskins were eight and a

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>half points, I was like, what eight and a half

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>against the Cowboys? And again, if you got it right there,

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you did it land on the Redskins as a winner.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And the other one that week where I was incredulous

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>about was I was like, how are the Colts nine

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>point favorites hosting the Dolphins? Nine? What? Like? What is that? Like?

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Where did that spread come from? And that proved to

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be an easy winner for the Dolphins on the line

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this week. The two that I was outraged by, and

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, there are weeks where I'm not outraged

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>by anything, but it's funny that back to back weeks

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had to where I'm just like, what is that?

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And one of them was the fact that the Titans.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>This was before the Titans even played. He saw that.

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>He saw that one had the Titans posted as a

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>nine point favorite hosting the Jets, and I'm like, what, like,

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>how are the Titans nine point favorites against anybody? The

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>other one was the fact that the Ravens were favored

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>against the Falcons at Atlanta, and I was I couldn't

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>believe it. I was like I was, like, we gotta

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about some of these NFL teams. We talk

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about home road splits in baseball a lot, but we

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>don't ever in the NFL think about these teams in

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL this year that our home road splittish. The Packers,

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they haven't won a game on the road yet.

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys are very home road splitty. We'll see what

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>happens tonight. We'll talk about that momentarily. Atlanta is one

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of these teams. Also for me, there's such a different

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>team at home than they are on the road. Everything

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I said about Lamar Jackson and his first road game

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, I'm with you there, Ace. Right now, the

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are the team that's favored one and a half.

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Is the numbers? All right? When you agree with me,

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been good results. We may be gone for the

0:32:52.720 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>third straight winner for the listeners last week and we

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>got that post. I just want to repeat this is

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>want to repeat what he said. He's on a two

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>game winning streak. I just want to point out what

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just highlighting. That's awesome. Uh, Teddy, what do you got?

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've lost since now, since the start

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of November long, since before the mid term, since before

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the Midtermat okay, Teddy, what do you got on Saturday?

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna take a look at two teams whose

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>full season long stats are telling nothing but lies right now.

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>That's Indianapolis and Jacksonville. The Jags first was of the

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>season that they were good. They were the same team

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that were last year. We saw them blow out in

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>New England. The offense was clicking, everything was just fine.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we're talking about a Jags team that still has

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that first month of this season on their stat list.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But they've also lost seven in a row, just got

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>beat by Buffalo at home, and they have had a

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty rough go of it obviously over the course of

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the last two months. There's Indy with the one in

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>five start. They were awful, god awful both sides of

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the football for extended stretches. Darius Leonard, who has been

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>as impressive as any rookie defensively this season, was banged

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>up luck took a while to find his rhythm. The

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Colts over the last month have been that again. The

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>competition has been relatively weak, but Indie has been pretty good.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>And no, they weren't good enough to cover a big

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>number last week against Miami. They came back and won

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>that game, though, and that's what I expect him to do. Here.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason that Cody Kessler has been on the

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>bench behind Blake Bortles all this time. There's a reason

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Jags coaching staff said, no, Bortles is our

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>best option. Okay. Cody Kessler was a starter in Cleveland

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Parade games in the year where the Calves of the

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>kil the Browns won sixteen. And yeah, he threw six

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes in eight games. All right, if you watched

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>him last week, if you watched him in preseason, Cody

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Kessler is a downgrade from Blake Bordles. Oh my god,

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that's hard to be, man, that's very hard to do. Okay,

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you bring your fire, Nathaniel Hackett, and you the QB

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>coach gets promoted. Okay, great. The defense still thinks whatever

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Jacks defense was supposed to be, it isn't. The

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>two teams are headed in opposite directions, and yet we're

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing a tick of Jacksonville money. They can't be this bad. Yes,

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they can give me the Colts minus the spot in Jacksonville.

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Two teams at an opposite direction, and I was I

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>was worried that you were going to take Jacksonville there,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to which I was going to say, because I agree

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>with you. Jacksonville is almost at the point, Marco. We've

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about this for years too. They're almost at the

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>point now where how can you, how can you in

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>any right mind put your actual harder and money behind

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that football team they like the Pittsburgh loss was so

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>gut wrenching, like even if you thought they had any

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>motivation at that point, the fact that they were up

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and nothing, they lost twenty to sixteen, like that

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is just a season in killing whatever they had left

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, season killing game. And then they doubled down

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.919
<v Speaker 1>on that last week, would come back from fourteen down

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to Buffalo have the ball on the doorstep of the

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 1>end zone at the one yard line, and then Leonard

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Leonard four Nette goes all sugarade Leonard on Shack Lawson

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>uh and then a sequence of events that ends up

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in a Shank field goal and then Buffalo matriculating the

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>ball down the field and taking lead, like just how

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>many stomach punches can you take if you're the Jaguars

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and care anymore? You know, it's just amazing. And yeah,

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll see Nathaniel Hackett. As you point out, Eddie, the

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator, he's the guy who ends up paying the price,

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and he deserves some of the blame. But there's a

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of blame to go around there in Jacksonville, starting

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with Blake Bortles, who will be on the bench. As

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you point out, Marco, which way you going here on Sunday? Yeah,

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one last thing on Jacksonvill. Don't you always love whenever

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a coach that you know is going to be

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>gone at the end of the year. He throws one

0:36:55.760 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of the coordinators under the bus, kills me and you

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and I we should we should say this, Marco, because

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I talked about a conversation I had with you with

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Michael lombardion air at Vesta, which is, if this is

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an interesting year with coaches. When you and

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I were driving back from our Monday night game the

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>other night, we were talking about how the worst teams

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in the league this year, those coaches are all gonna

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>stay right like Oakland's not firing Gruden, San Francisco is

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not firing Shanahan. The Giants are gonna gonna fire Schirmer

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>after year one. You know, I don't know does Arizona

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 1>get Wilkes pass after year one? Probably? Right? All these

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>guys that are in these awful teams, it's these mid

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>tier guys, McCarthy and Rivera and Horrorball. It's gonna be

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting year for who gets fired. And it's

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be the worst teams anyway. I just want

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to point that out. Yeah, I agree with is gonna

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be a fun off season, that's for sure. Marvin Lewis, Yeah, yeah,

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>if he if I'll think what what if he survives again?

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>We have to we have to see the pictures that

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>he has of whoever is trying and firing him that

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't fired him yet, because they've got to be

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>really good, because I don't know how he is still there.

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm sorry. I'm gonna go back to the

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>scene of the crime. If last week my my team

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that let me down last week, I'm going to give

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>them a chance to redeem themselves. Carolina went up and

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>down the field on on Seattle last week, and Rivera

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just stop with the gambling already, Okay, the opening drive,

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they go all the way down the field they got.

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not fourth and one, it's fourth and three.

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You have a five six minute drive in which you

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just have Seattle on their hills, and then you make

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>it all go away by gambling on fourth and three

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>and not taking the three points, not coming away with

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.399
<v Speaker 1>something at the end of that drive. And oh, by

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, what does three points have come in handy

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at some point in that game? Yeah? Final score? Yeah,

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you lose by three. You're an idiot, And I'm gonna

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>come back with You know, we've got Tampa Bay. This

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 1>is a team that finally got a win last week.

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>They go back to Jamis Winston, who has a good game.

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>When was the last time Jameis Winston has had two

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>good games in a row. Florida State Okay, probably, Uh,

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a spot where I'm gonna go with Carolina.

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>You look at the defense of Tampa Bay. How are

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they going to stop Carolina? And when Cam's running the

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>football like he was last week and throwing the football,

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean he had a huge day too. You know,

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they had two yards underground. McCaffrey an absolute beast. What

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a weapon. This guy is running the football and out

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield catching the ball, and then when you

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>throw Cam in there with the red option. I don't

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>see how tamp but base stops them. Uh. Does it

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>become a track meet and they have to outscore one another.

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Carolina's defense is solid enough to put the

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>clamps down onto Jamis Winston. I'll go with Carolina here.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I think we're getting a short number because we got

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the three game losing streak of Carolina, and they should

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>have won two of those three that they lost. The

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>only game they got drilled on was the Pittsburgh game. Uh,

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Detroit again, he gambles, doesn't go for the overtime, Take

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the extra point and go into overtime. You're the better

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>team and you've got all the momentum. Why make the

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>game come down to a coin flip on a two

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.760
<v Speaker 1>point conversion? Go into overtime. You've got the better team.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's just like when you have the better team

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>and you're looking at overtime. It's the same way I

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the house. Uh in Vegas, the longer you play,

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the edge goes to the house. If you're the better team,

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the longer you play, the edge goes to you go

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to over time. Just stupid I'm on Carolina. If they

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>blow this one, this might be a theme then the seasons,

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the season's gone, because then they're gonna lose four in

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a row and they're out of it. And this is

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a tough spot for them. They've got three of their

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>last four games they played on the road. They play

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on the road again next week, and all of a sudden,

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland's not a cupcake. And after that you've got the

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Saints Atlanta and the Saints again. You better take care

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of business right here if you want to keep your

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>season alive. I thought you're gonna sing for Carolina. Unbettable,

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what you are. They are, they are, They are

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so frustrated. I'm sorry, sorry about that. I apologize to everybody,

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so so unbettable. I think Ron Rivera, to your point,

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>has turned into Dusty Baker, Like you know how Dusty

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Baker would just make all the wrong calls, and then

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes even when he would start to make the right calls,

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they would just not go his way. Like Ron Rivera

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just seems to make the wrong choice at every go

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of it now. And I think at that game against

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Detroit that you were referencing two weeks ago, when all

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he had to do is keep the extra point force

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>overtime and not do this stupid like, you know, hey,

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>let me be macho and try to win it. Right here,

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we're playing for the win, like I hate brain dead

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>coaches to do that. Like I almost wonder if Riverboat

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Roun if his nickname made him do that, you know

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like, oh, I gotta live up to

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>my nick Yeah. It is just like the people you

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>expect things from. That's how they act, you know. I mean,

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the class clowned this that if once you get that

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>like name stock or what people expect people, you usually

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 1>act that way, you know what I mean. It's more

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like subconsciously you do it. And that dudes just the

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>moron because he believes he's Riverboat rons who you are.

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It's funny if you know, when we get to the

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>question of which game do you want no part of? Though, Mark,

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I might have picked this game because Carolina scares me

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa Bay's offense, Man, you never know what those

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>guys um, but that is your call. You're taking one

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>last stab on the Panthers. As he holds his breath

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the final two questions, Gentlemen and

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday Night game. As always a reminder that support

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for today's show is brought to you by Bookmaker dot eu.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot eu and industry leader for close to thirty

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>years now, and professional players consider them a must because

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and here are all the reasons, and I want you

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to listen. Their first to post odds. They take the

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>highest limits and pride themselves on never having kicked out

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a winning player. That is the key such a rare

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>commodity these days, never having kicked out a winning player.

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Bookmakers are high volume sports book best suited for sophisticated

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>players who understand sports betting as well as large recreational

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>players alike. And their motto is where the lines originate.

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what it's always been, because chances are your sports

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>book follows their line. And once again, if you visit

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot eu slash gil slash g I l L today,

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you can join claiming exclusive welcome bonus of up to

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars. Once again, Bookmaker dot eu slash gil

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>g I l L to join now and claim you're

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 1>welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars. Bookmaker dot

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>eu kei kag My Betting Arsenal. It should be in

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>yours too. You will thank me later, all right, before

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we get to the final two questions, And gentlemen, Thursday

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Night game tonight, Ralph Michael's your boy, Marco. He had

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a great little stat on this about the about the Saints,

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>rather New Orleans Saints. They've one un covered nine straight

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>games since nineteen eighty nine. Only five other teams have

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>covered and one nine straight games, and since eighty nine,

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>no NFL team has made it to the tenth one.

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So the Saints are trying to be the first team

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to go ten and oh straight up in a t s.

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>We shall see if it happens tonight again. They are

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>seven point favorites on the road against the Cowboys. Teddy

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>will start with you here. Any thoughts, brief thoughts on

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>tonight's Thursday Night game? Will you be betting it? And

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>if so, how I'm not involved in tonight's gaming. And

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a story where I'm not willing to step

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in front of New Orleans. I've learned that lesson. And

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>yet it feels like the value is clearly on the

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Dallas side of the equation. But when you get your

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>teeth kicked in betting against the team more than once,

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 1>try to learn your lesson. I have at least an

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>enter to the Saints. I got the Saints power raiters

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>three points better than anyone else in the NFL right now,

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and if Dallas falls behind, it worries me about their

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to catch up. So I'll be sitting on the

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 1>sidelines here with the slightest of leans home Dog. I

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>honestly think that what you just said there reflects the

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling of many people tonight. Like there's a lot of people,

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who are like, oh, seven

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>point home dog. I mean like they they almost like

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>instinctively go to and then they're like, I'm not getting

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in front of that train, you know, Like there's like

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:37.760
<v Speaker 1>why am I going to do that? There's no reason

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:42.399
<v Speaker 1>for brave points here, so stay away for Teddy Marco anything. Well,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>my question to you before I give you mine is

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I know your teeth in this game tonight, but I

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know about that. You know, like road road, seven

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>point favorites is a six proposition that's like below break even.

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 1>So by the math, I wouldn't, but yeah, I might,

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I might, I might. Where do you feel where do

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>you feel more comfortable taking the Saints to just win

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the game or taking the Cowboys and getting that thing

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>up to two touchdowns sat the win. Yeah, I know

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you do that. I'm on I'm on Dallas here and

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the Saints, I know, the freight train and stepping in

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>front of it's not a wise thing to do. But

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:25.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, they ruined my fourth played a Turkey um

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>last week on the night game because I had Atlanta,

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sitting there with the you know, my fourth meal,

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and I watched Atlanta turn the ball over not once,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:41.399
<v Speaker 1>but twice inside to five, a third time inside the twenty,

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and then just to you know, for extra major or

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>fourth time. I forget where that one was. But four

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>turnovers and I've got and I'm holding a ticket at

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>plus thirteen and a half and lose by fourteen. That's

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a little frustrating, you know, But I know you guys

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 1>are all worried. I did get that fourth plate down, Okay,

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I powered through. I'm taking I'm taking the Cowboys here.

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>They're different team the last three games. And you know,

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as much as we made fun of the Cowboys for

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 1>once again, you know, blundering and paying too much for

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper giving away you know, a number one draft choice. Guys,

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Look what he's done instantly to this team. They now

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have a legitimate deep threat. What's that done? You still

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta have Dak get him the football. Well, what it's

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:35.439
<v Speaker 1>done is opened up the running game again for Zeke

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>because teams are not cheating and coming up and trying

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to stack the line, you know, daring Dak to throw

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the football, and with him spreading the defenses out when

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooper goes downfield, if Zeke runs the football and he

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.760
<v Speaker 1>breaks that first line and containment, then all of a sudden,

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what would have been a five yard rush turns into

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen or twenty yard you know, explosive play, and

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you started getting chunk plays, and all of a sudden,

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Dack's got confidence because he's got a threat to throw too,

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's opening up the passing routes for the underneath guys.

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And let's not ignore the fact that the Cowboys very

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>quietly have emerged as one of the best defenses. Uh.

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>This defense has improved tremendously. I've got him, I'm gonna

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>go with the points. I'll take the seven, and you

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>shop around. There's still a couple seven and a half's

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>out there, and I think as we get close to

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>game time, you're gonna see the old flip flop. The

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>public is gonna take the Saints ticket to seven and

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a half. Soon as it hits seven and a half,

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the sharps will take the Cowboys and it will keep

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth. So you should be able to

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>grab a seven and a half, not to douse cold

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>water on your passion there, but no Tyrone Smith tonight

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys. He is out Cowboys standout offensive linement,

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:55.720
<v Speaker 1>so he will not be in the lineup for the Cowboys.

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think your analysis on a Marii Cooper is dead on.

0:48:58.280 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So for the people who are like, oh, he showed

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>up again. The Skins too touchdowns, Yeah, Quentin Dunbar slipped

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and ha ha, Clinton Dix needs a pro tractor. He

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:09.240
<v Speaker 1>took an awful angle. But I think your analysis is great,

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.439
<v Speaker 1>which is just forget that he even scored those two.

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Just him being on the field spreads it out for

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>DAC and just having that thread is such a big deal.

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Dallas also rediscovers Zekiel Lli in

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the process, which is awfully kind of them to their

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:25.439
<v Speaker 1>fans and their backers as well. So New Orleans seven

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>point favorites against Dallas. Marco's taking a bite on Dallas.

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, when you were eating that fourth plate

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:34.319
<v Speaker 1>of turkey, do like other people at the table look

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at you and disgust and they're like, dude, like, could

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 1>you leave some food for us? Stop eating? Do they do?

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you get those works? You're at my house. I

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>bought the turkey. You're lucky. Jeez. Do you at least

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>have good stuffing? Are you one of these people who

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like put raisins and nuts in their stuffing and jack

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing up, or like, do you have like

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>simple stuffy well or puts uh? She puts the cran

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>rais and then come on, LORI with the some man

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Laurie got her fifteen seconds on the show. It did

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>not go well. It did not go well. I'll let

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>her know yet here. Yeah, listen. Fewers high on the

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Saints as I am. And it has nothing to do

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:27.800
<v Speaker 1>with the bias. I like them coming into the season,

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and after that one and one every chance I got,

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was saying, go bet that future. Now

0:50:33.200 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 1>this is still one of the best teams in the nfl. Um.

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But the spreads the great equalizer and this line is

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too high. Again, I don't want to

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>stand in front of New Orleans either. You know you're

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get rich doing that. Um. But with that said,

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I like what I've seen from Dallas of late, not

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>just them running the football, but the fact that they

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>could stop the other team from running the football. That's

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting thing about this game. That you have

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>too good rushing off that is, against two really good

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Russian defenses. Um, I think you're going to force both

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>these teams to kind of become one dimensional if they're

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:10.280
<v Speaker 1>able to run, and when that's the case, you usually

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>get lower scoring that's than is expected. I see value

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas. I see value on the under as well. Um.

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, again, you didn't get Rich Betton against New

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Orleans this year, so I'm in no rush to jump

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>out ahead of them. But I'm not gonna lay the

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>points with them on the road. Just no chance of

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:31.800
<v Speaker 1>laying that many of Dallas. And let's not forget the

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 1>last time New Orleans had a streak like this, they

0:51:35.000 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>had one thirteen in a row, and who stopped it?

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Tony Romo in Dallas when they went to Dallas. So, uh,

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, deja vu. Who knows. We'll find out tonight.

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But this isn't unprecedented territory. This strikes me as one

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>of those games where Dallas beckers, like five minutes into

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the game, they're like, Oh God, what was I doing?

0:51:53.960 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>What did I do? How did I bet against? Yeah? Exactly, yeah,

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>no way, I'm putting money on Dallas, No way. Al Right, gentlemen,

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>final two questions, the first of which is always which

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 1>are the big favorites? Do you think is the most

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose? Outright? We will bend this to six

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:16.840
<v Speaker 1>point favorites are greater, so the candidates are New Orleans,

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 1>as we just talked about, seven point favorites on the

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>road against Dallas tonight, the Rams ten point favorites on

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the road against the Lions on Sunday morning, Green Bay

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown favorites at home against the Packers. Houston six

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home against the Cleveland Browns. Then Sunday afternoon, Tennessee,

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this is down to seven and a half at home

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.919
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets. Kansas City, which still gets to play

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Oakland at home. By the way, later in the season,

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what that line is, although I think it's

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>week seventeen, so it might be squirreling. Yeah, that sucks.

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City's fifteen point favorites consensus right now on the

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:58.000
<v Speaker 1>road against Oakland, Seattle, ten point favorites consensus at home

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>against San Francisco, and then Monday night we talked about it.

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles six and a half point favorites at home

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>against the Skinnies. Teddy, which of those big favorites do

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you think is the most likely to lose? Outright? But

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give I'm not gonna say the most likely

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose outright. I apologize for not answering the questions specifically,

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but I kicked the Lions, and if there's one of

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>those favorites I want to bet against, it beat the Rams.

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The Rams coming off the by in Detroit, and I

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>think the Lions are capable of giving them a game

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and potentially pulling off the outright upset. And it has

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>everything to do with you know, how much more fat

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and happy can you be for l A. You know,

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you score fifty four points on Monday night football, you

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 1>go on your buy we get more. Tell you how

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>great you are, and now you gotta go to the

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Motor City and play a team, but you're not really

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:45.040
<v Speaker 1>excited about It's not a step up spot, uh for

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>l A. And you know, for as bad as the

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Lions have been, I be competitive, and they've particularly been

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>competitive at home, you know, last week losing on a

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:55.959
<v Speaker 1>defensive score against the Bears as possible here, but rams

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 1>defense isn't getting I mean I didn't against k C admittedly,

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's not a defense that I trust to get

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 1>scores on a weekend, week out basis. So maybe take

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a shower with the Lions if you're looking for a

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>big dog on the money. Wow, did not expect that game.

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Marco, I think Teddy meant fatt and sassy.

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Didn't He not fat and happy? Isn't that correct? You know?

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Fatt and sassy? Is it? You know? He didn't. He

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>would have had to send me, you know, permission, disclaim

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to use it and everything and all that. So he

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just didn't want to go through all that and he

0:54:24.120 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>just you know, how did you Neric one? Ace and

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I are still waiting for Barstool to pay us money

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for sprinkle me. Oh my god? Alright, what do you

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>got here, Marco, same question. Uh, when you were running

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>down the list there, did you include Houston and that

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I did? Okay, all right, I'm I'm there with Houston,

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you why. Because one, first of all,

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:52.359
<v Speaker 1>this Cleveland team is playing with a newfound Uh it's

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>just like a different team. I mean you Jackson's gone,

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Todd Haley's gone, Baker Mayfield's had his three best games

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of his career in the NFL. After he was looking

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like he hit the rookie wall um four weeks ago.

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was declining game after game. Uh, you

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>look like a deer. Cotton Headlights was having a happy feet,

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:16.319
<v Speaker 1>was taking bad sacks, and all of a sudden, he's

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>put up big numbers three games in a row. That's one.

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But the other part of it is this is a

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:26.680
<v Speaker 1>bad spot for Houston. They're coming off of a Monday

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:30.680
<v Speaker 1>night game, short week, an emotional Monday night game on

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>several different fronts. One, you had the you know, the

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:36.760
<v Speaker 1>death of the owner, Um, you know over the weekend.

0:55:37.400 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh there that caused you know, uh something probably should

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.879
<v Speaker 1>have factored into the Monday night handicapping. You know the team, Uh,

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you know get that fired up, you know, win for

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the uh the owner uh mentality, plus the fact that

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>win over Tennessee basically gives them the division. I mean,

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the closest team to them right now was indiana Apolis,

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and they already beat Indianapolis thanks to the the frank

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>right uh you know bonehead decision when he kicked the

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 1>long field goal and missed and then gave them the

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:15.399
<v Speaker 1>short field uh in that game or no, I'm sorry

0:56:15.480 --> 0:56:19.879
<v Speaker 1>went forward? Yeah, and uh that game in the game.

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So they already have a two game lead and we're

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>having the tide breaker. It's basically a three game lead.

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:29.919
<v Speaker 1>With the emotional, the short week, and the satisfying win

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that gives them the division. They are filling fat sassy.

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Cleveland's a live, live dog that Mike go

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:39.439
<v Speaker 1>in there and pull the upset. I have an over

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>ticket on Houston at eight and a half, which obviously

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>looks great, but more importantly, I have an Indianapolis Colts

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to win the a f C South at eight to one. Man,

0:56:47.560 --> 0:56:49.479
<v Speaker 1>would I like Houston a trip up at some point?

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:52.399
<v Speaker 1>As it is Houston, They're gonna be favored in four

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 1>at other last five games. New England's got them in

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the rear view for that number two position in the

0:56:57.520 --> 0:56:59.439
<v Speaker 1>a f C, and the by like New England better

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not stump because Houston. There's a scenario where Houston actually

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:06.479
<v Speaker 1>gets there. But you like Cleveland here as a live

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:09.279
<v Speaker 1>dog getting six and Baker Mayfield throwing shade at Hugh

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson after that game. Uh the other day was just phenomenal. Uh.

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And then my second favorite rumor, second highest favorite rumor

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of the week is, uh, did you see that report

0:57:20.280 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where Cincinnati was like, yeah, if we fire Marvin Lewis,

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they may be interested in Hugh Jackson, who's on their staff.

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm like, wait, what what? Why would you? Why

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is that your go to He's kryptonite? Bring? Yeah? Why not?

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>My favorite rumor, by the way, thanks for asking. My

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite rumor is this new one where Jason Witten is

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>so bad in the Monday Night Booth and Dallas has

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>an injury at tight end that he's gonna come out

0:57:47.240 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of retirement and play for the Cowboys. That's my favorite

0:57:50.160 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one because it's so that's a win win for everybody

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:57.240
<v Speaker 1>if that happens. We'll see Ace which is the big

0:57:57.240 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite you think is the most likely to lose that right.

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree with both those gentlemen. I think Detroit is

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 1>live as as as you can get, especially getting ten points.

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And I always say, if I'm gonna bet a dog,

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sprinkle a little something something as well. And

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Marco also, um, but I'm gonna give

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stick with Dallas. Man. And again this is

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:22.600
<v Speaker 1>me telling you against the Saints because usually, man, there's

0:58:22.600 --> 0:58:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a spot of team slips up. I mean, this is

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, um, and Dallas is that team that's not

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 1>out of all those teams you the matchups you gave us,

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas is that team on the other side, except for

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland that seems to be playing motivated ball. That's not

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a junkie team, you know what I mean? Like, Dallas

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually a pretty good football team, even at six

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and five, and especially at home. I mean they've won

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:46.760
<v Speaker 1>four of their five games there um and outscored their

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 1>opponents by a touchdown. So I mean they're very capable

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of winning this game at home. So for me, I

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:54.920
<v Speaker 1>think that one. And let's not forget prior to the

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>season startmin and granted, Saints are a lot better than

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>most people think, not better than I most people. Um

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas was minus two and a half in this game.

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:08.000
<v Speaker 1>They were favored two and a half point favor Now, granted,

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a lots transpired since the first week of September, but

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>still I think this is a possible slip up for

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Saints. All Right, guys, no buys this week

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Everybody from here on out is playing

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:25.160
<v Speaker 1>every week, so we have sixteen games. If you had

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to play fifteen of them, Let's say we lived in

0:59:27.560 --> 0:59:29.959
<v Speaker 1>a bizarro world, Teddy, you had to play a side

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on every single one of these, but you were allowed

0:59:31.880 --> 0:59:34.720
<v Speaker 1>one free pass. What's the game you want no part of?

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And and there are multiple choices here, try to debate

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>which one was the one that I really liked the

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>absolute movie, and that would probably be Arizona Green Bay.

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Do I trust the Cardinals to do anything? No, I

0:59:50.080 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 1>don't you know. My powertyings have them right with Oakland

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:55.960
<v Speaker 1>as the worst team, the worst two teams in the NFL.

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Trip to Lambo in December is not anything the Cardinals need.

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But do I trusting Green Beta bounce back off what

1:00:02.240 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they've been through over the last month? No, assertainly not

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>by Margins So to me, that's that's probably the easiest

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>pass in the board, although there are some other real

1:00:11.480 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>good options for those looking to pass the game. You're right,

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of choices here, Marco. What do

1:00:16.440 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you like the least? Denver Cincinnati? Do you want to

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>lay points on the road with the Broncos, which needed

1:00:24.520 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>needed for all of those interceptions by Ben and fumbles

1:00:28.280 --> 1:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>through the end zone? Um? But yet do you want

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to take Cincinnati with Triscoll? Come on? You know dead

1:00:35.040 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Man rocking Marvin Lewis that whole situation there? I can't,

1:00:39.880 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't be involved in this game. God, you could

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>make a case for at least at least five or

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>six of these Ace What do you want no part of? Here?

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's simple because I actually love all these games. Um.

1:00:50.200 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Only one really jumped out at me that that I

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just crossed it right off. Um, and that's going to

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be Kansas City at Oakland. To me, that's just a

1:00:59.480 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>meaningless game, Kansas City coming in off that loss against

1:01:02.800 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. Um. We know how bad Oakland is. You know,

1:01:06.400 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is Kansas City warranted to be a two touchdown road

1:01:09.960 --> 1:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>favored in the divisional game? Probably? Um? But do I

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>want to lay it. Absolutely not, even though they you know,

1:01:16.000 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they're capable of going out there and beating them like

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they did Cincinnati. But at the end of the day,

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we know what they are about. When they face on

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>New England or Rams, they get slapped back into reality

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they got two losses. So they'll keep

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>beating up on the oaklands of the world and then

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll run into the wrong New England or RAMS team. Yeah,

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of points too many to lay from me,

1:01:39.360 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be in Missouri getting changed for those three

1:01:42.160 --> 1:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar bills real soon. It's Seattle over again. It's just

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he refuses, will tell I will tell you what we

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>will know sooner than not. So they don't win the

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, than you're right somehow on this. Of course,

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if they get knocked out of the playoffs their first game,

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>absolute they can't win a playoff game. Yeah, if you're

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that good and you're you, you got a home playoff

1:02:09.680 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>game and you've been crushing everyone and scoring forty points

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a game, and then some team that had the had

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the win wild card weekend comes in there and beats you.

1:02:18.480 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>But when I say, you'd say race was right, that

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the three great wait, un tilt it your direction. But

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>what if they lose the Super Bowl by a field goal?

1:02:27.240 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The are you right? No, I'd say, you know what, No, No,

1:02:31.240 --> 1:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I I would and I'd be honest and say, yeah,

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they were legit, they got it a big game. And

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>then because you lose by field goal, man, that was

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a very winnable game. And I give them that. The

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>games that they did lose, that they lost at New England,

1:02:44.760 --> 1:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which was on the road, and the Rams game again

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on the road. So you got to give them that.

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Both their losses came on the road. So again, when

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs come, you're playing at home, you've got to

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>win those games. You should be able to get to

1:02:57.040 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. That's that's what you're telling me. You're

1:02:59.200 --> 1:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that good. So until I let me see it, you've

1:03:02.120 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>done talking about Patrick mahomes private parts. You've done with that. God, yeah, yeah, yeah, honestly,

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>thank god. I'm just glad, honestly that they lost that game,

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, And more importantly than five turnovers, next to it,

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>five turnovers, that's the best, the best five turnover. There's

1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of candidates for games I want no part

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of Carolina, Tampa Bay, which I know you like, Marco,

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I would not touch that game. Chase Daniel is the

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback for the Bears, their four point favorites at

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. People really liked Chase Daniel on Thursday. I

1:03:34.480 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, he was terrible to me, Like he held

1:03:36.560 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball forever. So he does not inspire confidence in

1:03:40.080 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>me in that game, though I think the Bears probably

1:03:42.280 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>win it with that defense. Uh, Tennessee seven and a

1:03:45.880 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>half against the Jets. That scares me a whole bunch

1:03:47.960 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of anyway, what was your by the way, before we go, Marco,

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>before you guys came on the air, he came on

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like a few seconds before you did, and he said,

1:03:54.200 --> 1:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you and Teddy Ace Teddy, you guys got into a

1:03:56.720 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>feisty Minnesota New England video battle. What was you What

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>were you guys talking about? Oh no, I was just

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it was simply stating that they know they're gonna get

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>New England money, they know there's gonna come some sharp

1:04:11.680 --> 1:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>money against them, and yet New England once again is

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>eight and three straight up and seven and four against

1:04:17.560 --> 1:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the spread. And I say, instead of sitting there and

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>crying every week about how New England beats you put

1:04:23.320 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>up a fucking bigger number. Let the wise guys get

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the best of it. Who gives this ship, they're gonna

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>take the good number. And and they're not the ones

1:04:32.240 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that are betting it all the way down. They're the

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>ones that I said, instead of putting it up at

1:04:37.000 --> 1:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>at six, put it up at eight, put it up

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>at eight and a half. So what those guys aren't

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna bet it all the way down the flour they're

1:04:43.000 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're the guys are gonna take the eighth, the

1:04:44.880 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half, maybe some seven and a half,

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be the rest. They're gonna be the

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>piggybackers and everyone else that's willing to take the third, fourth,

1:04:52.880 --> 1:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>fifth numbers take the worst of it. And then that's fine.

1:04:56.200 --> 1:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Let them do that. But you know you're gonna get

1:04:58.200 --> 1:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>all the public money coming in on New England in

1:05:00.240 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>any way. So why did you let one team continue

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to beat you against the spread? That's all I was

1:05:07.840 --> 1:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to explain that that why is Alabama keenan oh?

1:05:11.360 --> 1:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And yet not even against the spread because they did

1:05:14.240 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a good job with it. Can I hear from Teddy

1:05:17.680 --> 1:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Ace is mad at the betting marketplace. He's like, yes,

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of giving us, they said, letting all the wise

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>guys we have six with New England, let him if

1:05:26.160 --> 1:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we have make with New England instead, and that's the

1:05:27.960 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>better choice for the bookmakers. And I'm like, that's that's insane.

1:05:31.400 --> 1:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>The betting market is what it is. It's not them

1:05:33.920 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or ust, it's not wise guys or sharpers. It's a

1:05:36.680 --> 1:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>betting marketplace. You buy a stock, that's what the price is.

1:05:40.040 --> 1:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You buy a game, it's not the people who list

1:05:42.400 --> 1:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the stock that says what the price is. It's the

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>market that says what the price is. It's the same

1:05:46.480 --> 1:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>story in the NFL. Guess what New England opened six

1:05:49.160 --> 1:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and got pounded down. That wasn't public money, that's wise

1:05:53.040 --> 1:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>guy money. So just say that this is where the

1:05:56.000 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>line should be in the books are idiots because the

1:05:59.000 --> 1:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Patriots keep beating every year. It's not the books, it's

1:06:03.280 --> 1:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the markets. So obviously you have a disagreement on that

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>was certainly a fun video. I'm glad that's settled. Teddy,

1:06:13.440 --> 1:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you for coming on, man, really appreciate it. Always

1:06:15.960 --> 1:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. Thank you so much for having me. Gil

1:06:17.800 --> 1:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a Marco, Best of luck to all of you this

1:06:20.560 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>week too, About Too for Marco and a skill Alexander

1:06:24.640 --> 1:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is always good luck with all your bets and for

1:06:26.760 --> 1:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Teddy covers as well. From Sports Memo, thank you so

1:06:29.000 --> 1:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>much for listening.