WEBVTT - Happiness, Part 1: What Really Makes Us Happy?

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Science Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio. I'm

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Horey Champ and today we are tackling a question that

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is very personal to me and that I imagine is

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>very personal to you as well. And the question is

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>what really makes us happy?

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Is it money? Is it love? Is it a sense

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>of purpose? Or is it random? Believe it or not.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Science has studied this question and it has come up

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>with some pretty definitive answers. So we're going to talk

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to two scientists today. One is a psychologist who's running

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest and most unique experiments on human

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>happiness in history. And we're going to talk to a

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientist who's going to tell us what he thinks is

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>happening in your brain when you feel happy.

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the first in a two part series, so

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>be sure to also check out part two. Okay, get

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ready to experience the joy of science as we answer

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the question it really makes us happy? Hey everyone, Okay,

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>before we get started, I want you to take a

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>second and ask yourself this question, Am I happy? I'll

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>take a pause so you can think about it.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>If you're a skeptical person, you might be thinking, well,

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Orge what do you mean by being happy? Or you

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>might be thinking, well, sometimes I feel happy and sometimes

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Happiness is a pretty tricky.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Subject, which is what inspired our first guest here today,

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>doctor Matt Killingsworth, to start as a graduate student at

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Harvard something called Track Your Happiness dot Org. Well, thank you,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor Killingsworth for joining us.

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Glad to be here.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Please tell us who you are and what you do.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Sure, my name is Matt Killingsworth. I'm at the University

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>of Pennsylvania at the Wharton School of Business, and I'm

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 3>a researcher who studies human happiness.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic, so tell us about Track Yourhappiness dot org.

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>So this is a project that I started more than

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>a decade ago. Track Your Happiness really aims to be

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the world's biggest happiness study to try to figure out

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>the recipe for human happiness and how to spread it

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 3>into people's lives. Since this project's been started, hundreds of

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>thousands of people from around the world have joined across

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 3>its different versions. I created it because I wanted to

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 3>understand how happy people really feel as they actually go

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 3>about their daily lives. What makes our lives enjoyable, fulfilling, interesting, satisfying, Okay.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pilling's Worth study uses a very specific method called

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.399
<v Speaker 1>experience sampling, which is based on the idea that how

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we answer the question are you happy kind of changes

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout the day, and it depends on what's happening to

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>us on any given moment. We'll get to how it works,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but first I wanted to know how he got this idea.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I really, you know, especially before and during my PhD training,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I really read the scientific literature, hundreds and hundreds and

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 3>thousands of papers, so I had a pretty good sense

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 3>of all of the things that we discovered up to

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that point.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So what were the things that you learn from the literature?

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 3>Lots of different things. So the idea that happiness might

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 3>be important, I mean, you can go back to Aristotle,

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>you can certainly go back to Jeremy Mintham and John

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Stuart Mill and other people kind of arguing some version

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>of happiness is kind of like the reason we do

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>everything else. It's the metric or the construct that all

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 3>this other stuff that humanity is pursuing is ultimately trying

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 3>to achieve. But it really wasn't until you know, the

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>second half of the twentieth century at least, and even

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>more so in the last few decades that it's become

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>quite clear that we can measure happiness pretty well, not perfectly,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 3>but well enough to do really good science. I mean,

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>that's probably the most essential thing that research is documented,

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 3>because if you can't measure it, you can't really do

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 3>science with it. But once you measure it, you could

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>be wrong about basically everything. But if you keep measuring, observing,

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, refining your thinking, oh, you'll get closer and

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>closer and closer to the truth.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>What Decker Killingsworth is saying is that happiness, or the

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of it, in a way, kind of defines what

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it means to be human. I mean, it's in the

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>founding Document of the United States that it's one of

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>our unalienable rights. It's the thing we all strive for

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and hope to achieve. And yet it wasn't until the

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties that we started studying it scientifically. That's what

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>psychologist started to look into it.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, a lot of the past research really focused on

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>what are the characteristics of happy people? Like who is happy?

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 3>We knew something about relationship between age and happiness, and

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 3>income and happiness, and how different countries differ in their

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 3>levels of happiness. You know, lots of these things that

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 3>you might collect on a big government survey or you

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>know personality as well, how to things like the Big

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 3>five personality dimensions relate to happiness. And one of the

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 3>things that was really missing, I think was trying to

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 3>understand like when people are happy.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>So all of these studies since the nineteen fifties made

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of progress.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>And trying to figure out the general.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Factors that affect your happiness, like personality, how much money

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you have, what culture or country you live in. But

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>according to doctor Killingsworth, the data was always a little fuzzy.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That's because of something I think we all know about happiness,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>which is said it sort of depends on when you

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>ask me if I'm happy or not. In other words,

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is happiness how I feel in the moment, or is

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>happiness how I feel when I take a step back

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and consider my life in general. If you ask me

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>if I'm happy in a particularly stressful moment, like if

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm frustrated with my job, or my kids or my relationships,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I might answer one way.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you ask me while I'm on.

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Vacation, sitting in a beach thinking about my life, I

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>might answer a different way, not to mention. Sometimes there

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are trade offs in life. Sometimes you have to put

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>up with unpleasant moments or do things we don't really

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>want to do that might help us in the long run,

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like cleaning your COI lit Or exercising or most jobs

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for most people. Now, this is something scientists knew, but

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know quite what to do about it. Nobody

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.559
<v Speaker 1>had thought to think that houseone responds to the question

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>are you happy? Depends on when you ask them the question.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying they never thought of it. I think

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 3>people were certainly aware those things could be important, but

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 3>we really lacked the ability to do it. So, Like

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 3>this method of experience sampling that's really the cornerstone of

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>my research, you know, was invented by a guy Mehi

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>chicksit me Hai back in like the late nineteen seventies.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 3>But he did it with like radio pages clipped to

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>someone's belt and then a little paper booklet they filled

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>out when the beeper went off. Well you can study

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 3>like eight people at a time. Later, there were you know,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 3>studies using like pomp pilot for those of us who

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 3>are old enough to remember that technology. But literally before

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I started this project, I looked in you know, the

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>flagship journals of the discipline of psychology, and they would

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 3>have twenty studies that ever use experience sampling, and they

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>would have ten or twenty people in them a most.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, now I've had hundreds of thousands of people

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 3>in the study, and you know, a gigantic number of

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 3>variables too.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's get to how Doctor Killing Sports project works.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>If you go to track your Happiness dot org, you

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>can sign up with your phone or your email, and

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>once you sign up, you become part of the study.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 3>So you'll first answer some questions about your life, like

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 3>your demographics and your personality and kind of your expectations

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 3>of how you think you experienced different facets of life.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>And then from there, I really want to follow up

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 3>in the course of daily life. So you know, maybe

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 3>you did that on Monday, and now it's Tuesday. You're

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>going to start getting some pings from me, some kind

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>of notifications by email or SMS or or something else,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 3>and hopefully you'll answer one or a few surveys each day.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>So I might ask you questions like how do you

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>feel right now, are you interacting with anyone else? Are

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 3>you thinking about something other than what you're doing? You know,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>have you exercised in the last twenty four hours? A

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>bunch of factors, And I'm basically taking the answers to

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 3>all of those questions, combining with the signals on happiness,

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>both in the moment happiness and these longer term measures

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 3>of happiness, and trying to sort of figure out, well,

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>what is the right equation for human happiness in general.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So the big innovation here is that we all carry

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>our phones with us all the time, and that gives

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>doctor Killingsworth a chance to basically pop into your life

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and see how happy you are in any moment, because

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>if someone were to ask you later, your answer might change,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>or you might not remember how you felt, or your

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>memory might get distorted with time.

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, we all experience those things. We're kind of

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 3>aware of what happening in the moment, but it's surprisingly

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 3>hard later to remember what occurred. And that's why tracking

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 3>and measuring are so powerful. So the sort of premise

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 3>behind this is that if I can watch and see

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>how happiness goes up and down during people's daily life

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 3>across a whole bunch of different people and then put

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 3>all that data together to try to understand what drivers

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>of happiness might explain those shifts up and down. We

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 3>might discover some new insights into what really makes the

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 3>experience of human life better.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And what makes people give you an answer at the time, Like,

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>if I'm in the middle of a difficult moment or

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a super happy moment, why would I interrupt it and

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>answer it.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>It's partly is that it's going to contribute to the

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 3>quality of your insight into yourself. So if you're selective

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 3>about when you choose to respond, you're going to end

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>up with an incomplete picture of your own life. You're

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 3>not going to understand what your best moments look like,

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 3>what your worst moments look like, if you're kind of

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>leaving those out. So it's not necessarily great for you.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it requires a certain openness, But I imagine

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it could also be very therapeutic to kind of be

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>open and to confide in your system.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I think so, and I mean, honestly, I think there's

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 3>real value in kind of the happiness report that people

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 3>get back and seeing their data.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I forgot to mention when you sign out

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of the study. You also get

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a report on your daily happiness. Okay, when we come back,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to find out what doctor Killingsworth found in

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this study that, as he mentioned, hundreds of thousands of

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>people from across the world have participated in. We're going

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to find out what affects your happiness the most, and

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to find out if money is one of them.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So stay with us, we'll be right back.

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're answering the question what makes you happy? And

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so far we'fer from the scientists who's been running one

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>of the largest and most unique studies on people's happiness

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ever done. The study, led by doctor Matt Killingsworth, thanks

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>participants at random times during the day and ask them

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing, how they feel, and many other questions

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to get a sense of what happiness is

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and what are the factors that determine whether you're happy

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>or not.

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 3>It's at random times, and that's the idea. So you

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 3>can kind of think of, you know, ordinary like political surveys,

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to get a representative sample of a population. Well,

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 3>my job as a scientist is to get a representative

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 3>sample of your moments, and so I'm gonna sort of

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>ping you at a bunch of random moments, and you know,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 3>sometimes those will feel like odd times.

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So might be washing my dishes and I'll get a

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>pink from you to ask me how I'm feeling. Or

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>i might be in the middle of like a frustrating

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>moment with my kids and I'll still get a pin

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>from you.

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, It'll happen a bunch of times, and collectively that

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 3>kind of gives us this representative series of snapshots of

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>what do you actually do in your life, how do

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 3>you spend your time, what are you thinking about, how

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 3>do you feel, and lots of other factors.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Killingsworth, hundreds of thousands of people have

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>signed up for the study over the years, generating a

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of data on basically how humans live their lives.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So now the question is what does all this data

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you about happiness? Well, as it turns out, doctor

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Killingsworth has studied the data and he's identified several key

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>factors seem to matter the most when it comes to

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>your happiness. So at this point you have hundreds of

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people who have signed up for this So

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>in your studies, What are the factors that contribute to

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>people's happiness.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll tell you some big ones. One of the

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 3>first ones that I published from this project was from

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>a paper called The Wandering Mind is an Unhappy Mind,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 3>And so I just added this question that said, are

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>you thinking about something other than what you're currently doing?

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 3>And people could either say no, I'm just focused on

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the present moment on what I'm doing, or yes, I'm

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 3>thinking about something else. And then I asked, if you

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 3>are thinking about something else, are those thoughts pleasant, neutral,

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 3>or unpleasant? And it turned out that people were engaging

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 3>in mind wandering almost half the time, and that turns

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 3>out to be very robustly correlated with lower happiness.

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, the first thing doctor Killingsworth found when you pink

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>people at random throughout their day is that many of

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>us are not really living in the present. About half

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the time people were thinking about something other than what

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they were doing. And you find that the people that

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>were distracted tended to be the people that also reported

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>being unhappy, especially the ones that were distracted thinking about

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant or unpleasant things. In other words, living in the

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>moment and not letting your mind wonder makes you happier.

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Half the time our mind is wondering, and when our

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>mind is wonder it tends to pull down our experience exactly.

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Partly it's because some of the time we think about

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>negative things, but I think it also impedes our ability

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 3>to enjoy what we're doing. Like, you know, if we're

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 3>having this conversation, like, the more the energy and attention

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm bringing to that, the more I'm probably going to

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 3>enjoy it. If you kind of disengage and you're just

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of partially doing things, You're probably not going to

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 3>enjoy it that much either.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 4>I see.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>There's something inherently pleasurable about being in the moment.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>That seems to be the case even when people are

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 3>like cleaning their house, they're much happier when they're just

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 3>focused on what they're doing than when they let their

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>attention stray elsewhere.

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so living in the moment is scientifically proven to

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>make you happier. It's not just something taught by Buddhist Okay,

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>what else did doctor Killingsworth find in all this data?

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, so what are some of the other factors

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you found?

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 3>So things like what percentage of your life are you

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>interacting in person with other humans.

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>How social you're being in your life.

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 3>How social you really are in person? Exactly. So someone

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 3>that spends a lot of their leisure time really engaging

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>with other people versus folks that get off work and

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 3>they go and sit at home alone or you know,

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>watching television or scrolling on their phone or something.

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe explain to us for work some of the questions

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you would ask people.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I might ask them are you talking or

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 3>interacting with someone right now? And they could say yes

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>or no? And I might say is that in person?

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Over video, over text? Which people are those? Friend, spouse, acquaintance, stranger, coworker, boss, child, grandparent,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. So it turns out interacting in person with

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>other people is really good.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow. So the more you're interacting with people in person,

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>greater the happiness in your life.

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So if you just look at different people's

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 3>lives and say, you know, this person interacts ten percent

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 3>of the time, this person as interacts forty percent, this

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 3>person seventy percent, that percentage is also a very good

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 3>predictor of how happy they tend to be. So you

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 3>will be transiently happier relative to your own average moment

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 3>when you're interacting versus not and the more you accumulate

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>those moments, the better your life tends to be in

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>terms of how you feel, in terms of how satisfied

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 3>and fulfilled you are.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I should tell that to my kids, my teenage

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>son for sure.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 2>All right. The second big.

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Factor, like doctor Killingsworth found in all the data that

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>affects your happiness is interacting with other people. Being social

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>makes you happier, although there are a few caveats. This

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>interaction has to be in person. Online doesn't count, and

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to really engage in it. You can't just

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sit at a party and be on your phone the

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>whole time. Also, the context in which you interact with

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>people matters. For example, talking with co workers at work helps,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>but not that much. Okay, And you said that kind

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of how we interact with those people in what context

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is important?

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So during leisure time is when it seems to

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>matter the most. So kind of in your free time,

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 3>engaging with other people is especially beneficial. So like working

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 3>on your own versus with other people, it's somewhat better

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 3>with other people, but that's a smaller difference versus like

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:09.719
<v Speaker 3>going out and hanging out with your friends versus like

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 3>sitting at home alone. That's extremely different.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>In other words, people who spend more time having meaningful

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>interactions with other people on their free time in person

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>tend to report being happier. Now, I think, I know

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of you out there are thinking right now.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean introverts are a little unhappier?

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 3>Introverts are a bit less happy? So I think my

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 3>data also reveal a kind of trap, which is introverts

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 3>think they don't benefit much, or some even think that

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>they're harmed by interacting with other people. But that isn't

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 3>actually the reality. The reality is, despite your best intuitions,

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 3>speaking as an introvert myself, like, you would actually be

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 3>happier if you went out and interacted with other people.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazing, Yes, sorry, introverts, you would be a lot happier

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if you make the effort to talk to people for fun.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Science says, so okay, And then there is a third

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>big factor that doctor Kingsworth's found that has a huge

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>impact on your happiness. So tell me what are some

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the other factors.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Then, yeah, so we talked about mental factors, we talked

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>about social factors, another one or what I would call

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 3>like physical factors. Particularly, the biggest one by far is

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 3>just being physically active. The number of days of the

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>week that someone is exercising is a surprisingly strong predictor

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>of their level of happiness across all these different outcomes.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sorry to you too, couch potatoes, but sitting around

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and doing nothing is also making you unhappy. The good

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>news is that physical activity doesn't have to mean exercise,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and it.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't just have to be exercised simply like, the level

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 3>of physical activation in your body is a very strong

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 3>predictor of happiness. Being more physically in gauge in whatever

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 3>is going on is a really good predictor of happiness.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean physically engaged?

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Like? Literally, how energized is your body right now? Are

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 3>you sitting down and not moving or are you standing

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 3>up and moving around? Are you walking? Are you moving

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 3>with energy? Kind of the more energy you're expending, the

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 3>happier you tend to be.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>What what kinds of questions would you ask people in

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this case?

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 3>I literally ask them at this moment, are you lying down, sitting, standing, walking, jogging, running,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, being intensely physically active in some other way

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and there's basically just a straight line upward. The more

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 3>they're kind of physically activated, the better they feel in

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the moment and in their lives.

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>To wecap, these are the three main factors that affect

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>your happiness, according to an analysis of data from hundreds

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of people that look into their daily lives

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and how they feel. Number one live in the moment,

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Number two have meaningful in person non work interactions with

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>other people. And three stay physically active. Now, of course

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not the full picture of happiness, but as doctor

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Killyesworth says, focusing on these three things can go a

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>long way to making you happier.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 3>So the way that I kind of think about those

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 3>three factors, you know, there's so many other things going

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 3>on with happiness. It's not like this is the total story,

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's a set of things that's pretty important.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>You can kind of think about a happy life as

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>a function of being like mentally engaged, socially engaged, and

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>physically engaged, sort of a life of engagement across those

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of three pillars. If you're doing pretty well and

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 3>all three of those things, you're doing really well, And

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 3>if you're really not doing very well in all of

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 3>those things.

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 3>Probably not doing so great. Like that doesn't get us

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 3>all the way from the most miserable person to the

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 3>most happy person. But that's going to be a big

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 3>set of exponatory factors. Again my data correlation, but I

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 3>think it seems likely that if you're able to kind

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 3>of flip those levers in your life, that would make

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 3>a big difference in your happiness.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, when we come back, we're going to talk

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to a neuroscientist to learn what he thinks about all

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of this and what exactly is going on inside of

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a happy brain. Stay with us, you're listening to sign

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>stuff and we're back. We're answering the question what really

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>makes us happy? And we learn there are three factors

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that have a big impact on how happy we are,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>living in the present, having in person interactions with other people,

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and staying physically active.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 2>So is that it okay?

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask doctor Killingsworth more about what these

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>other factors are, including the ageless question of whether money

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>makes us happy. But first I wanted to check in

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>with my friend, neuroscientist Duane Godwin. I wrote a book

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>called Out of your Mind, in which we talk about

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the brain science of everyday phenomena, including what makes us happy.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's my conversation with doctor Godwin. So, first question, Dwayne,

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are you happy?

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Well? You know, Hora, that's a complicated question, but I'm

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 4>doing well and my cork is floating.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, are you happy that you finally are

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>regular on my podcast?

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I'm just scared that somehow I'll destroy your ratings,

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 4>but otherwise I'm pretty happy to be here.

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>How do we think of happiness in terms of how

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the brain works?

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, when I think about happiness and the things that

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 4>contribute to happiness, I think about a number of different

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 4>areas of the brain. The first, everyone talks about your

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 4>brain's pleasure circuitry, So aart of that has to do

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 4>with release of dopamine and the perception and feeling of

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 4>pleasure you get when that happens. But this idea of

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 4>happiness a little more complicated because that has to do

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.479
<v Speaker 4>with your assessment that you make about how content you

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 4>are about your life. And when we talk about those,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 4>we then have to bring in your frontal lobes, because

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 4>that's the place where what is good, what feels good,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 4>what is emotionally satisfying or calculated, and that information then

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 4>feeds back into this pleasure circuitry and affects your sense

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 4>of well being.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Right what doctor Godwin is saying is that there is

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a part of your brain that basically makes you feel good,

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and that can be activated by what we're doing in

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the moment, if you're eating a good meal, if you're

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>having a positive interaction with someone, or if you're having

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a good workout, but it can also be activated by

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>your own thoughts and you use the front part of

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>your brain to step back and assess your life and

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, that can also trigger the brain areas

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that make you feel good, and that has big implications

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>for our happiness. First of all, it means that what

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you think, and more important, how you think about the

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>things that are going on in your life can affect

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>how you feel or how happy you are. We'll talk

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>more about things like stoicism and cognitive therapy a little later,

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that happiness is rooted in the brain

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>means that how easy it is to be happy can

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>change from person to person.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, there is a certain baseline level of happiness

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 4>that can be attributed to just how genetically predisposed you

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 4>are to feeling happy. And what we know about genes

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 4>is that genes become proteins. Proteins become the structure of

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the brain, and the structure of the brain houses the

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 4>activity of the brain. So it's not a very hard

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 4>line to draw between a genetic predisposition and the actual

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 4>activity that generates these complex emotional states.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>In other words, some brains might be happier than others,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is all because of genetics. How do genetics

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>affect our ability to be happy?

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Sure? You know. One of the studies that we do

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 4>cover in some detail in the book is the study

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 4>of the Minnesota Twins. And when I say Minnesota Twins,

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't mean the baseball team. I mean an enormous

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 4>study of twins that followed identical twins who have been

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 4>raised apart. It was really kind of a natural experiment

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 4>in the question of whether happiness is hardwired. One example

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 4>of this involved twins that were separated at birth, who,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 4>despite the fact that they never met each other, they

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 4>both reported similar levels of happiness, their optimism, and even

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 4>overall life satisfaction.

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is a pretty cool study. Starting in nineteen

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine, psychologist at the University of Minnesota were able

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to survey over one hundred sets of twins that were

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>separated at birth. These are twins that were born together,

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but for some reason we're split apart and raised under

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>different circumstances. Have you seen the movie The Trapp or

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>heard the story The Prince and the Popper. These are

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>real life examples of those stories. It's almost like the

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect experiment, right, Like if you had a copy of yourself,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>which is what identical twin is, and you had one

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of you lead one kind of life and the other

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>lead another kind of life, and then you check them

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with yourself and your twin later. You could see whether

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>life affects your happiness or whether it's something sort of

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>inherent to your genes.

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in a way, it's like the perfect experiment because

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 4>you can of count for a lot of the other

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 4>confounds and variability that happens in a life.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, But here is a super cool part of

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the experiment. The scientist didn't just look at identical twins

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that were separated at birth. They also looked at for

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>eternal twins that were separated at birth. That is, twins

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that are basically just siblings and not genetically identical. So

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they looked at genetically identical twins basically clones were separated

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at birth, and they looked at non genetically identical twins

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>that were also separated at birth, which is like the

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect control. Now, the scientists looked into all kinds of

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>things about these twins, what their personalities ended up being,

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>how smart they are, what kind of jobs they had,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and they also asked them basically how happy they were

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and what did they find.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 4>What they found was the fifty percent of the areas

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 4>and their baseline level of happiness could be attributed to

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 4>genetic factors.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Then, how much of their happiness was correlated with being

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fans of the Minnesota Twins?

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Possibly?

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know how they've they've been doing,

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like something that might affect your happiness. Yeah.

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 4>I think the major idea here is that twins studies

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 4>provide a really important natural experiment.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>What they found was that sets of identical twins would

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of both report being the same level of happiness

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>even though they were raised apart, but the fraternal twins

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the non identical ones wouldn't always be the same It's

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like if you had a clone that led a totally

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>different life than you, and that clone was happy, chances

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>are that you would be happy too, Or if your

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>clone was unhappy, you would probably be unhappy as well.

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>In other words, about fifty percent of how happy you are,

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the scientists found, is due to your genes. That is,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>some people are just born to be a little happier

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>than others. Now, the thing to note here is that

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this means some of your happiness is already determined for you,

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but it also means a lot of it is not.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 4>But you know, I think the other thing that's really

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 4>important about this is you could look at that and say,

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 4>oh my gosh, I really don't have control of how

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 4>happy I am. But I think that's the wrong way

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>to think about it. I think the correct way to

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 4>think about it is that, hey, you've got fifty percent

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 4>to play with. You know that other half of it

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 4>is really stuff that's under your control, circumstances that you

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 4>know you may have say over.

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I still have a lot of questions about happiness,

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>questions like how does having a purpose in life affect

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.479
<v Speaker 1>your happiness? Or how important is money? And how happy

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel and it's being on your phone all day

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>making you unhappy. We're going to tackle all these questions

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in the second part of this series, so make sure

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe and listen to the second episode next week.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's a sneak peak.

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>So if you go back to kind of the state

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 3>of the scientific literature, the kind of common narrative amongst

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 3>happiness researchers is that money doesn't really matter very much

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>for happiness. I think we actually got that kind of.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Wrong, all right, Tune in next week for part two

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of What Really makes This Happy?

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 2>See then you've been listening to Science Stuff production.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Of iHeartRadio, written and produced by me or hitchm pndedate

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>by Rose Seguda, executive producer Jerry Rowland, and audio engineer

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and mixer Ksey Pepperm. And you can follow me on

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>social media. Just search for PhD Comics and the name

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of your favorite platform. Be sure to subscribe to Sign

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, and please tell your friends. We'll be

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>back next Wednesday with another episode.