WEBVTT - Preseason Q&A: Part 1

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm a man, I'm for I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for dake Edo State?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Is that? Woo whoom? And then and Tye, welcome back

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 4>to the solid verbal boys and girls, name is Ty

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 4>hilde Brand joining me as always mind Dan Rubinstein over

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 4>there in the NYC, Sir, how goes it?

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Not that well?

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Ty? What?

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not that good? I think it's good is what

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>No, it's.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten used to I've gotten accustomed to a certain lifestyle, okay,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and that lifestyle is getting great feedback from a live

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>audience when we do this show. Okay, and now I'm

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just speaking into a wall with soundproofing, and it's not

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 1>as fun. I don't get to see you, I don't

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>get to sit next to you, I don't get to

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>meet for ballers, I don't get to see people's faces

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as they continuously ask Nate Stanley questions ironic. So it's

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>just different, Ty, and I'm getting used to it.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, to that point, Dan, we did do our show

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 4>in Chicago. That show that we did in Chicago will

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 4>be released on August the twenty second, So a whip

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 4>from this evening. A great show, great crowd at the

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 4>historic Videom Theater in beautiful Chicago, and had a chance

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 4>to go out meet other folks during the Tenders with

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Tie segment of the evening. If you listen to the

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 4>broadcast when we push it out, you'll get to hear

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more. I'm sure we'll provide some context

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 4>for what I did during our unrecorded Q and A

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 4>segment in order to make good on something I said

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>a year ago. But all in all, a really good show,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 4>definitely the kind that gives us the itch to do

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 4>more of them, so naturally that is something we're going

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 4>to explore moving forward.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>But I thought just an awesome time.

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Beautiful weekend in Chicago, and great to meet some ofverballers

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 4>real quick.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Himmickcane wants to know how many tenders is ty hilden

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Brandt official did Tilting officially consume?

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I believe the answer is two and a half. And

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>can I be honest with you here, Yeah, wasn't too

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 4>enamored with the tenders, Dan.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>They were fine.

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 4>They were very dry, extremely dry, and two and a

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 4>half is all I could all I could force down.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 4>How are the tots though that I ordered a lot

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 4>of tots are very good. We were sitting at a

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>table with some Notre damers and also some others who

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 4>were at the show, and as I was turning to

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>talk to other people, they were surreptitiously stealing the tots.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>That's how that happens. And then I heard difficult.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I caught them and they looked at me as if

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 4>they were deer in headlights, and I said, that's okay.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 4>You could just don't eat them all, because I knew

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 4>you wanted some too. But of course the tots were

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 4>very good in a popular attraction at the table.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>When you order tots, there is a tot tax that

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>has to be paid, and I don't know if you

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>fall under if you're a progressive taught tax or tie

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're a more conservative fiscal taught tax or I

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but there is a toat tax that must

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>be paid when tots appear at tables. Wow, I said

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that all correctly.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 4>You just came up with that on the flight, didn't you.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 4>I did, just Yeah, that was pretty good.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Think about I think about time. There's also fry taxes

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and taught taxes, whatever, great time in Chicago. As you mentioned,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the show will be up next week. Going to be

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>doing more shows. We're going to look into doing some

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 1>shows maybe at smaller venues, not full on theaters during

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the season, at bars and places where we can drink

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with everybody while everybody else is drinking. But certainly just

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>encouraging in a magnificent time. So thanks to everybody who

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>came out, quick, quick, before we get into the Q.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And a couple things. Yeah, I am now doing videos

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and writing pieces and appearing on TV ish what for

0:03:53.400 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the Action Network breaking news? Okay, so I'm doing a

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>couple different things from what I have been doing these

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>past few years. This coming fall in the video realm

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and one of those things I am pleased, excited, pumped,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>jazz enthused to be doing things for the Action Network,

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a sports gambling website network platform started by

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>former editor in chief of ESPN dot com Chadmilman. They

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>might be familiar and the altar of Dan is now

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in the central most point of the college football gambling discussion.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You're really putting this to the test here. Am I

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>going to lose people money? But no, I'm mostly been

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>doing video, but I'll also be writing a couple columns,

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and they have a nightly show called I'll Take That

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Bet on the ESPN Plus app So that's something that

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you already have because you plan on watching college football

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>games on there because they're streaming a bunch of them,

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or other shows. Friend Ariel Ariel Hawani does his MMA

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>show on there, among a bunch of other things. I'm

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>not selling ESPN Plus right now. I'm just telling you

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>where I'm going to appear. The first one is up

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>tonight as we record this Wednesday late afternoon with our

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 1>pal Jeff Schwartz.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Awesome, Well, congratulations, sir. I know it's been a long

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 4>time coming. I know you do good work. Obviously, I've

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 4>been here for quite some time with you, so I know,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 4>yeh elber of what you're doing.

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>Looking forward to seeing it.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 2>That's great.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Other housekeeping which is definitely not shouldn't be classified

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as housekeeping. Tie. So while we were in Chicago, news

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>broke about Maryland. Yeah, and the Maryland program, which, in

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>the wake of an offensive lineman's tragic death a few

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>months ago, Jordan McNair first placed strength and conditioning staff

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on leave. Has since they've since fired or at least

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.119
<v Speaker 1>reached a separation agreement with their strength and conditioning coach

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and coach dj Dirkin is on leave not just because

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Jordan McNair tragedy, but also because of a

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>number of stories and cultural and systemic issues that have

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>been brought to light in an ESPN piece that are

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>now being investigated. Some horrifically ugly situations, obviously none more

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>serious than the Jordan McNair one. And it has been

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty ugly all all around.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, Dan sort of caught us a bit by surprise,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 4>but I suppose we're going to have to wait and

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 4>see what happens here.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think the most important thing is to react,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's media, whether it's fans, whether it's whoever, to

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>react within the context of, Hey, a person died needlessly

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because of overtraining, because warning signs were not heated or

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>even seen, and people have been quick, not the least

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of which is Will Muschamp, who understands how this all works,

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>both from a coaching perspective and a media perspective, who

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was quick to say something sort of smart. We criticized

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the performance, not the performer. That seems to make sense,

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and then went on to criticize stories with anonymous sources,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>which obviously the the anonymous Maryland staffer staffers who brought

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this to light did so because of a fear of

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>retribution and wanted to make sure that whatever whistle blowing

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.679
<v Speaker 1>was going on was heard and verified and vetted, which

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you know ESPN has has pretty stringent standards for that.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So it brought out some ugliness at least in him

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and some people willing to attack attack the concept of

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>anonymous sources, who, by the way, Will Muschamp has one

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent been an anonymous source. And I understand you know,

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Will Muschamp worked with DJ Dirkin, and you know his instinct,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>as it is the coach's instincts in a lot of

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>cases to come to the defense of fellow coaches, whether

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>or not they've worked with them or not. There is

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a fraternity situation in that world, you see,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Like when an NBA coach gets fired, Greg Popovich will

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>say something like, you know, it's always the coach's fault.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not the one out there shooting threes and missing them,

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you know. But it did strike me as very easy

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for Will Mussham to have a human reaction to say

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened was tragic. If these allegations are true, I

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd be really disappointed. The DJ Dirk and

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I know is not somebody who would be involved in

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So I'm hoping for the best for

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>him and the program, even though it's, you know, a

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit generic. Whatever. You have to as a person

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in a responsibility position, a responsible position, you have to

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to say things like a grown up. And

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the disappointing thing that we have, these people that

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>are tasked with being grown ups, and there's just a

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>failure to do that. Jordan McNair should be alive, and

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>should be alive for another sixty seventy years. He's gone.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we've got a couple questions in our Q

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:10.599
<v Speaker 1>and A that are more serious things like how do

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you root for Maryland if you're a Maryland fan given

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the allegations? And at my first thought like how do

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you root for South Carolina now that your coach has

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, been an idiot about the whole thing. The

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>players don't have really anything to do with this, like

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson has nothing to do with the alleged atrocities

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>at Maryland and whoever it is. You know, I just

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I want the Maryland players to succeed in spite of

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the crappy thing. So it's a very strange situation. And

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>hopefully everywhere, you know, as we've had these strengthen you know,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this conditioning stuff over the past few years at a

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>school I love the University of Oregon last year with

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the rabdough Iowa, a couple of years ago with the

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>rabdo whatever. These things keep popping up. Hopefully there's more oversight,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a better understanding, there's better training, there's better indicators

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>when players are struggling and how to deal with situations.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, football is tough. You know, to sort

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of craft really good football players, you have to instill

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of toughness and stamina in them. And

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the guys that are tasked with doing this need to

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to know lines and that I think is

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a problem.

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 4>All right, Well, we'll see what comes of this, Dan,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 4>There's no doubt more coming. We heard from Maryland within

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of days about the status of its

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 4>strength coach, and my guess is that we'll be hearing

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 4>more we'll do our best to try and keep everyone

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>up to date with what's going on, at least as

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 4>best we can here on the podcast. As for the

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 4>rest of the content, tonight, we are doing a mega

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Q and A show, Dan, and by mega I.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Do mean mega Congratulations there it is.

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>You've got mail.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got mail on the solid ruble.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 4>So what we've been trying to do all off season

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 4>is one of these shows per month. We haven't done

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 4>one in a while because we've been busy doing conference

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 4>previews in the light. But now as we've got some

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 4>open air here where we can really catch our breath

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 4>and get down to the heart of the matter, we've

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 4>decided that tonight will be part one of our Q

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 4>and A show, and Sunday will be part two. We

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 4>wanted to make sure we had a chance to feel

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 4>the number of questions before we actually get into start

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 4>picking games, which we're gonna do.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess two three weeks now that sounds reasonable.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 4>So with that being said, Dan, what is our first question?

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Who's our first caller?

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to It's always funny looking at the names

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>because we ask on Facebook and then we get people's

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>real names. We ask on Twitter, and sometimes we get

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>people's real names, and then we ask on Reddit and

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there are no name, no names. So let's start here

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's a good question. We some possum. Yeah, okay,

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>who is your quote perfect storm team? A school who

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>parendally fields a good team, but due to a number

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of factors, there's reasona believe this year is going to

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be their year to do something big before things perhaps

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>calm down and return back to normal. So who is

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>above average essentially that could win double digits, perhaps flirt

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with the playoff, or even go to the playoff, you know,

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in November, December, et cetera. So that's sort of leap. Okay,

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>so I've got a few. Okay, who are yours? So

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as we go across college football, you first have to

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>look at well, we're looking at Power five conferences unfortunately,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't really apply the way the system is

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>built right now to a group of five teams. But

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have anybody in the ACC. I

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>think it would not be a surprise.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I guess Miami, Well, Miami might qualify here. I don't

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 4>think I believe in them as a perfect storm team.

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But MII Miami is a national championship program.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 4>The only team that I really believe in in the

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 4>ACC is Clemson at this point.

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's not a surprise.

0:12:58.440 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Sing.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking like a perennial nine point two win team

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>suddenly becoming eleven point two.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't believe in eleven point two? Is my

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 4>point for Clemson, No for Miami. Oh, okay, that's fine.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 4>I have a couple I think in the Big Twelve.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think West Virginia has the defense, even though

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they qualify under the first like seven to eight win

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>every year kind of team. I'd probably lean into Oklahoma

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>State and TCU.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 4>TCU, I could see. Oklahoma State scares me a little bit.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>They're both quarterback de Pennant with Nuke starting quarterbacks this year.

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I like the experience Oklahoma State has on both sides

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. TCU has continuity on both sides. I

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>love their skill talent. Their quarterbacks seems if he's even

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, should be pretty plug and play. They've had

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>success against top teams in the conference, perhaps outside of Oklahoma,

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>who they themselves have a new quarterback. So schedule wise,

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>TCU has both Oklahoma schools at home, which it's love.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think TCU is the answer in the Big twelve.

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>In the Big ten, I don't know if there's a

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>team that qualifies that I could see making that.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Was there a Michigan State that we could put in here.

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess it would be Penn State.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 4>It could be Penn State, could be Michigan State, one

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 4>of the two.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Penn State has not won a national championship in the

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>modern era, hasn't been really that close. I mean, they've

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>flirted with playoff stuff the past couple of years, but

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, they weren't really in and at the end.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>But you don't according to the.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Question here, you don't need to have won a national championship.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 4>He says, a school who has perennially fielded a good.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Team, good but not great is how I interpreted that. Okay,

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think Penn State could qualify. I like their

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>schedule a good amount. I think they have a bye

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>week between Michigan State and Ohio State. They have Michigan

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on the road, but they have Wisconsin at home in

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>consecutive weeks, and they have what I consider to be

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a national championship. But that playoff duo of

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>really good quarterback, really good defense, potentially really good defense.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Got a bit of a blow today, which I suppose

0:14:58.040 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 4>we could have mentioned at the top. But Ryan Buckle

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 4>it's retiring due to injury concerns, which is I didn't

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 4>see that. Yeah, it's going to affect Penn State's depth

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 4>along the defensive front a bit unexpected and unfortunate. We

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 4>wish him well, but Penn State's got some holes to

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 4>plug on that defensive side of the ball. I think

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 4>they'd be a good answer. I also think Michigan State's

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 4>a good answer. Michigan State brings so many back.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>They've been to the they've at least been to the playoff.

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Though they've they've made that lead again. You're making up

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>prerequisites here, Dan, I am because I'm interpreting.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying perfect storm Michigan State. I could feel it

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 4>this year. That's what I'm interpreting.

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It says, who should be looking to surprise us and

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pop off a few more wins than usual and maybe

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>land themselves in the New York six or excuse New

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Year six or possible playoff game or the New York six.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State has been to the Rose Bowl a few

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>times recently they've been to the playoff. I'm not I'm

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>excluding your actor can disagree, stricken from the record, even

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>though I'm right.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>You're wrong.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. Where we go? What's name like? One more team,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>one more team that has been pretty good recently, that

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>could make the lead to very good. I don't know,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that's all I mean it. If Stanford has a much

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>better defense than what at least I think they'll have,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that would probably Notre Dame could be an answer. Here

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>went to the National championship game six years ago. Again,

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>not a prerequisite in the question. Now my interpretation tie again,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm right here. This is carrying at the fabric of

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the pot some apossum and I go way back. All right,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the next question. Next question, biggest quarterback

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>controversy to watch for. So my interpretation of Patrick's question, okay,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is which quarterback situation will most dramatically go back and forth?

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Who has a short hook? Who?

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Once they look a little bit shaky, gets pulled, but

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>then the new guy doesn't look great, and so then

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they're flopping all over the place like fish in the wild. Tie,

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>who is what is the quarterback controversy, not battle, but

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>controversy controversy. Huh.

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Well, I looked at this and my initial thought

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 4>was the Clemson situation as a whole, because Kelly Bryant

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 4>started every game last year and got Clemson pretty damn far,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 4>got him to the playoff. Right now, you've got Trevor

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Lawrence breathing down his neck, and I could definitely see

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 4>a scenario in which Trevor Lawrence gets the call at

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 4>some point a couple games into the year and as

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 4>a true freshman, maybe he isn't fully ready for primetime,

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 4>and all of a sudden, Dabosweeney has created a controversy

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 4>where if he just went with Kelly Bryant from the start,

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 4>he wouldn't have had one, or at least not to

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 4>the same degree.

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right, But there is an element to

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that of Trevor Lawrence being a true freshman. Sure, and

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>so the expectations on Trevor Lawrence, even though they are

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>super high because of the hype he comes in with,

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>there is that element that they're not going to immediately

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>give him a tough to shoulder.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>My answer, my answer is probably Alabama, and it's an

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>easy answer, but allow me to explain. It's the biggest

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>magnifying glass in college football, coached by the most well

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>known and perhaps most successful college football coach of all time. Dramatically.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The stage has already been said dramatically with the National

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Championship Game transfer rumors, Jalen Hurts saying that you never

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>heard from coaches and he doesn't like necessarily how he

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>was treated as a leader of the team. Tua comes

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in is obviously magnificent in the second half, in overtime

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of that game. But here's the thing. Jalen Hurts has

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>been successful, two has been in small sample sizes successful,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's this looming transfer. Can I make up a term?

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that came into my head the first

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>thing I saw this question, Sure, Jalen Hurts feels like

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a plans for a plan, Okay, a plan to transfer right,

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Like he is sort of a lame duck here. And

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>so there is an element of Jalen Hurts knowing he

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>has had huge success only getting on the field. Perhaps

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>situationally he's unhappy we've got a new offensive coordinator. Situation

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at Alabama. There's there's a ton of variables with Alabama.

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna tear apart the fabric of

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tide, but I think you can get into some

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>dramatic back and forth here. I think that's probably. I

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's Michigan shape Patterson, Brandon Peters. I don't

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's UCLA with Wilton Spade and whoever the freshman

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>or Devin Modster. I think it's still probably in terms

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of spiked blood pressure, people getting talk shows excited, I

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>think it's still Jalen Hurts Intua.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I could see how you'd make that case. I

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 4>think he's got whoever the quarterback is more around him.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 4>That takes a little bit of pressure off that quarter

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 4>of situation. So yes, if there's a reason to think

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 4>it's not Alabama, that could be it Also second consecutive

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 4>question where the answer could be Notre Dame throwing that

0:19:58.440 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>out there as well.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>No, that's a huge magnifying glass. And Brandon Wimbush the

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>way he ended the season. I know you are throwing

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>a third name after Ian Book into the mix.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not officially throwing Filger Kovic in there. I think

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 4>you like saying the words filter COVID. You know what

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm proud of myself. I figured out how to say

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 4>his name a couple months ago, and now I just

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 4>enjoy injecting him into the conversation, even though I know

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 4>sure practically speaking, he's not going to be a candidate

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 4>for that role, at least until halfway through the year.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Ty, Yeah, Dylan wants to know. Yeah, what are Ed

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa McCaffrey feeding their children to have four college

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>slash pro football players? Well, how does it look on

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the Colorado schools that they can't recruit them? Well, obviously

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the answer is not good on those schools. I listen,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible, and I think it's a lot of this

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is on the mother. You know, you see these guys

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>who have or these women that have pro athlete parents.

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the time it's because both parents are

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>excellent athletes. Here's my question to you. I assume at

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>this point you and solid wife Kate have had discussions

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>about children in the future, as have Jody with an

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I and myself. Do you have a number of children

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you'd like? Ty, I'm not doing this to put you

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on the spot in a familial sense.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 4>There have been discussions, but none that I will divulge here.

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>On the podcast. Do you have an upper number? Would

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you have more than three?

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>God, no, okay, no, so we're talking one or two?

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe three?

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 4>No, No offense to anybody who's in that category, but

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 4>that's you're speaking for yourself.

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Too rich for my blood. Yeah, I'm on the same page.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Probably not more than two. We'll see if I gave

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>us collectively, the host of the solid verbal an over

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>under of zero point five children progeny becoming Division I athletes,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not football Convision one athletes. Where is your money?

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Probably under it's Kate a good athlete. I'm just gonna say,

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 4>probably under Dan.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>That is the I can tell you right now. Jody

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>with and I is not a good athlete. Yeah, And

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that's why I brought up the mother element of this.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 4>So if in fact it happens, it's because a hilden

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 4>Brandt child inherits my defensive specialist jeens as it relates

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 4>to baseball or my golf swing.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you are there any hilden brand Calarusso's formerly Division

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>one athletes. I have one distant cousin who actually played

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>tennis at Maryland, so I have that. I'm trying to

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>think about of any others and I don't believe I do.

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Actually, there is a history in the solid Wies family.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh, cret Ty. The gene pool while shallow swimmable, very swimmable, indeed, okay,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>good to know. Yeah, I'd probably put you ahead in

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that possibility. So this is going to be a twenty

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to twenty eight year to follow.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Alongst the long con that we're playing here on the

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 4>podcast this evening.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>This year, we're looking to see if cal is elite

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>every week and if certain coaches are sexier than Randy Edsel.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>The long con is whether or not a hilden Brandt

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Rubinstein child makes the minor leagues. Here we go, Jeff

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to know, although there's still some time left in camp,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the consensus to win the quarterback job at USC as JT. Daniels.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is a positive or negative for

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>their season? Is this a reflection on how good he

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>truly is or can bey or does it point to

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the mediocrity of Sears and Fink, which, by the way,

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>all of my money is tied up with Sears and

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Fink right the mutual funds they are producing year and

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in year out. The yields are tremendous. Continue.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's either a positive or a negative.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>For the season.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know is there a reason to look at

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 4>it one way or the other.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>JT. Daniels comes in with a lot of acclaim well

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that he's so young and with no experience in practice

0:23:58.280 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond this fall and summer work.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 4>But if he's the guy, if he's got the higher upside,

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 4>I think it would be more of a longer term

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 4>positive for USC to go that direction, get him some

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 4>meaningful experience now and build on that later. USC is

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 4>going to have a really good team again. But I

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 4>don't know if we're under any illusions that they're going

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 4>to win the Pac twelve and go to the playoff,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 4>They're gonna go to a bowl game. They'll be just fine.

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 4>But if JT. Daniels is the starting quarterback, I don't

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 4>view that as a negative thing. I view that as

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 4>him being the best guy for the job.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and so early reports out of USC are that

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that the other quarterbacks aren't good. I

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't really seen anything about that in what limited stuff

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I've read, it's that J. T. Daniels has been really,

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>really good, which is and should be super encouraging for

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>USC fans, like Jeff has formed a really good bit

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of chemistry with Get Ready for This one, Tie Aimon

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Ross Saint Brown, yep eqes little brother's right causing trouble,

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and that is that should be scary to everybody in

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the PAC twelve South and beyond in the conference because

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>when you have a sensational true freshman quarterback and a

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>top level incoming receiver and they have a couple of

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>really good receivers, I think it's more of a situation

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that Sears and Fink are more on the Cody Kessler level,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 1>which is fine and serviceable but not game changing. So

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if JT. Daniel starts and goes down, I don't think

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>USC will be dramatically worse, just not as good, if

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes any sense.

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 4>All Right, So we got a random question emailed into

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 4>us here, not specific, but Dan, what is the worst

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 4>injury you have ever suffered?

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The worst injury I have suffered. I've sprained a couple

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of ankles playing basketball. The only time I've broken a bone,

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think I've told this story on the show,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is when I have the growth plate in my left

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>pinky shattered and it has not grown at the rate

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it should have since seventh grade.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 4>And that was due to a friend of yours at

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 4>the time, right.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Due to a friend of mine. I've also when I

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was like four years old, I jumped head first into

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a glass coffee table and split my head open. That's

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>probably the answer.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Man, this is a good question here. I've got a

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 4>bunch of really good ones.

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was like leading to an injury question

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>with college football, but I like this. I'll curious about

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>our bodies.

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Actually I can't go somewhere with it, but oh, the

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 4>question here. To answer the question here, I blew out

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 4>my shoulder twice, needed reconstructive shoulder surgery, so that's probably

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 4>the winner. But I've done all sorts of crazy stuff

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 4>in hyper extending elbows and nearly tearing ligaments elsewhere in

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 4>the body. I guess reconstructive shoulder surgery would probably take

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 4>the cake.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Care.

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's pretty good. I think that's pretty good. I

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>think that wins.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 4>And actually I didn't mean to go here with this,

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 4>but you know, we've been talking a lot about the athletic.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So smooth over the last couple of weeks. I swear

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to God, I didn't mean to go here with them,

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but I know it's just in your bones. It jogged

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>my memory. You're reconstructed bones.

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.239
<v Speaker 4>We've been talking a lot about the athletic here, and

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 4>I saw a really fascinating article this week from Seth Emerson,

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 4>noted Georgia writer about how the process of repairing an

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 4>ACL has evolved over the course of time. And while

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 4>the thing was right, yeah, we've talked about it on

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 4>the show before, right, and we'll I'm sure give out

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 4>the URL here for how people can jump on in

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 4>if you're interested. But one of the most interesting things

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 4>that I found in that article is how repetition just

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 4>doing the surgery, going through that procedure of repairing an

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 4>ACL over the course of many years has drastically reduced

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 4>the recovery time. Initially you got out of the ACL,

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 4>you're out like eighteen months. Now there are guys on

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 4>the Georgia roster who are looking at like eight months

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 4>and they're able to practice without restrictions, which is really

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 4>a feat of modern science to know that we're at

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 4>this point now where again you get out of an ACL.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a problem.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 4>But the level of detail in this story talk talking

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 4>about how they've evolved that process to the point now

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 4>where recovery is much better now than it used to be.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 4>The process itself is so much better than it used

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 4>to be. That to me was quite illuminating. So I'd

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 4>encourage everyone to go on out there and check that

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 4>out from Seth Emerson.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad I did not see this in early

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight after Jeremiah Johnson tour is need

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Dennis diickxonaur is the like at the ACL because it's

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 1>amazing and this is you know, even well who was it.

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It was Adrian Peterson who came back even stronger. And

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>what is incredible is how these guys figure out the

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>rehab element. It's not as much and the surgery I

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>think has obviously come a long way. But what's set

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>did a really good job of because a lot of

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>times when you have a quarterback who has a big injury,

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>or you have any player who has a big injury,

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and let's say the injury happens in November and they're like, well,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they should be good to come back by fall camp

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>next year, and it's just sort of out of sight,

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>out of mind. And I really like the human element

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of this piece that like, okay, there's hydrotherapy here. They

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>wait ten days to actually operate on the knee crazy

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to show the players that they'll still have range of motion,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to like give them confidence, psychological stuff that goes into it. Yeah,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it was super interesting. It was plain, it was easy

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to read, it was clean. There are pictures for dumb

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>people like me. Also, I should note knee talk with

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Seth dot Com is available if you're listening Seth Emerson.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Knee talk with Seth dot com. If you want dot club,

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want dot org, if you want dot biz.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>You can probably get dot triple x if you really

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to costume war. But yeah, it's there, Knee Talk

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with Seth dot Com twelve ninety nine right now. So no,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a very cool thing because I know Georgia fans

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are very curious losing a couple running backs. Zamir White

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>comes in the number one running back is practicing as

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, without any hesitation or any limitation, and Seth

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>does a good job about how guys like Zamir Whites,

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>who could play a role this season, how they're getting

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>from point A to point BE physically, and that is

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a difference maker. And to your point,

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>if you've been waiting to pull the trigger, you're Georgia fans.

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I swear to you, I didn't intend on going here

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with it, but I love it ty. It just it

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>just kind of rolled out the tongue.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Theathletic dot Com slash Solidverbal is still the RL where

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 4>you can get that forty percent off. It'll cost you

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 4>about two ninety nine a month for your first year.

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Had a lot of good feedback from the live show

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 4>from people who have jumped in. Just go to the

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Athletic dot Com slash Solid Verbal. Jump on in. It's

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 4>good stuff. You get articles like the one we just discussed,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 4>and many Manny Moore from a bunch of friends of

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 4>the verbal.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a college football podcast, which means your

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>media consumption habits are futuristic. That's right, it just makes sense.

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the if you're a college football podcast fan,

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get it on the Athletic move to the future with us.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just wonderful to ninety nine a month. It's

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>please you're paying how much for Spotify? How much for coffee?

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Every day? Come on, it's no pull that trigger. You're

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be glad you did. We'll pause Ty, you and

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I right now just for a second. Welcome back. See

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you should be so happy you subscribed. Come on the

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Athletic dot com slash solid verbal. Where are we going

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>next year? Dan, were already in the future tie, so

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you should already know if we're talking about the athletic.

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Drew. Hello, do you have any advice

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for a first football season with a new girlfriend?

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Boy?

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>For some background, we are both fans of preseason top

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ten teams that are in different conferences. That's good, that's

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>very power couple. Yeah, a little humble brag there from Drew.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Our teams have no national rivalry and would only play

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in a bowl game or the playoffs this year. However,

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>her team is a team that I have historically strongly disliked.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So he is dating a noted AIME fan noted noted.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>To make things more complicated, her best friend is related

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to her school's head coach. She is best friends with Brian.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kelly's daughter.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 4>So you're assuming that Notre Dame's a preseason top ten team,

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 4>which is giving?

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Are they not? I don't think so. I haven't seen

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the top. Okay yet, but they want Jim Harbaugh one

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of Jim Harbaugh's kids. Okay, I think they might be

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>too young. Okay, any advice, ty, this is they're a

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>power couple. I don't understand.

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Like, I don't think there's any trouble here at all.

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>No, there's a good life.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 4>There's definitely like a flirtatious angle for your significant other

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 4>rooting for a team either that could play yours in

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 4>the playoff or you know that you've historically hated. You

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 4>could definitely spin that to your advantage, just in a

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 4>romantic sense.

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, I think this is this is a

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>great situation. Obviously, both teams are good here. You can

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>watch football together. It's great that you share a hobby. Yeah,

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that you share a passion. And if you do end

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>up playing each other in the playoff or some sort

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of national championship situation this year, next year, whatever, that's

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's great too that that that builds the bonds tie. Yeah,

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to have animus like if like, here's

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the here's the instance I have Oregon in Michigan. Right,

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I am you are you are not married to a

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Power five alumnus?

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it does get pretty heated in here

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 4>when Notre Dame plays Lee High. But aside Lee High

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 4>from that, Yeah, but Oregon did play Michigan in the

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 4>NCAA tournament last year, and Jody loves for Michigan Wolverines.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 4>I love my Oregon Ducks. And at one point late

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 4>in the game it was a close game, Jody said,

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm really nervous.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Hold my hand and I said, no, Wow, I am

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not supportable in that. I'm not mean. I just said,

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we're going to have to rejoin after

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this tense end. Husband of the Year over there.

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So what I would say is lean lean into this.

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing to worry about. Life is good.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I agree with that. Where are we going next?

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll stay on that relative topic. Andrew asked, like forty

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>four questions, We're going to answer a couple of them. Okay,

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is Jordan Toamu to Amu to AHM a significant downgrade

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback from shape Patterson. I'm gonna say no, maybe.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 4>I I that was part of the point that we

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 4>brought up earlier in the year.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Andrew, we kind of don't know, do we. Jordan to

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Amu lit up not great teams in the SEC, and

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what they kind of had from Shape Patterson. He wasn't.

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>He was okay, he wasn't. Not that accurate in the

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>egg bowl, you know, losing effort. But I I think

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>he's fine. I think he's more than fine. I don't.

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it as a downgrade really at all,

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if any maybe slightly.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 4>The second part here is is Shaye Patterson going to

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 4>be an impact player from Michigan, to which I'd say, yes,

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 4>he will be an impact player. The second part of

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 4>his two part question is whether or not Shaye Patterson

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 4>will allow Michigan to take that leap to national type

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 4>I'll contender, to which I would answer again, I don't know.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he could be. If he is nearly give me

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 4>a good cake, give if he's nearly as good as

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Michigan people would hope, then the answer is yes, because

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 4>all the other pieces are around him to do pretty well.

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 4>He's going to have a cradle to nurture him hopefully

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 4>to success and maybe the playoff at a minimum, the

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 4>Big Tennis. But I don't know if we have enough

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 4>data on Shape Patterson to really definitively say yes or no.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I am sitting at the table. I have a place, Matt,

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I have silverware, I have a nice glass of wine.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a plate. You don't have my last wine

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 1>shot on my plate. Okay, sorry, I have iced teak.

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>My plate is empty, and all my appetite is telling

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 1>me is you gotta get some takes in your belly,

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>all right, and I need you. You're serving me Ti.

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 4>The last time I gave a take, I had to

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 4>wear a Pilgrim outfit at live show.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't wow. Okay, so you reveal that. Sorry, I

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 1>need to just give me your Shape Patterson limited data.

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you envision a situation in which if Shape Patterson

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>is very good, if he has one of the best

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>say twelve, you know, QB ratings in the country or

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and it is completing sixty five percent of

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>his passes, that would be very good for Michigan, then

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>they're a title contender.

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:18.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. Thank I'm getting full tie. Oh,

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>belly's getting roundered.

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 4>You know, I feel like you and I got a

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 4>little bit of a little bit of animosity here today,

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 4>and I kind of like it.

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Dan.

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 4>The season's about to start, kind of like it. This

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 4>is what they're going for on the TV nowadays.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Who is this year's Royce Freeman type back? A guy

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in his third or fourth year that has been well

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>above average for his career, but for some reason doesn't

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>get the national media attention he deserves. I'm going to

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>give such a boring answer and say, Damien Harris. Yeah,

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>because he has been so consistently very good. But aside,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we had a really good crop of freshman and red

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>shirt freshman running backs last year. Are there any backs

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Miles Gaskin? I think is Anhing Miles to stay Miles Gaskin?

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>It's probably Northwest. Yeah, I would say that that falls

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>under it as well. I'm gonna stick with running backs here.

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Ty Thomas wants to know what does David Montgomery's stat

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>line starting running back Iowa State can be very good,

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>need to look like his stat line need to look

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like to get an invite to New York at the

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the season on a three, four or five

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:35.439
<v Speaker 1>loss Iowa State team. Man, he's any answers? Two thousand yards?

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 4>I was to say two thousand yards and like twenty

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 4>two touchdowns something crazy.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the touchdowns are as important. I think

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>they are important. But two thousand yards gets you to

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Andre Williams and Andre Williams and I want to stay

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen played for a BC team that went to

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a bowl game. Theybe the eight and four or seven

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and five or something like that. Two thousand is an

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>unignorable number, and I think that's the answer. Yeah, okay,

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>does that makes sense? Sure? Yeah, two thousand. Uh. Next,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Michael wants to know how can we

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>get a ring tone of the doodle alert SoundBite? Can

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we isolate that and just post it? Sorry if that

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>came through very loud for you, Dan, No, that was good. Y.

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>We could probably post that somewhere. Let's post that and

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 1>doodle alert shirt we should. I don't think Suburban Legends

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>has a copyright on dood alerts. No, those are two

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>words that I think we can we can print with

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the siren and maybe one of those emojis of a

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>finger pointing straight up. Yeah, so we have dood alert

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy. Okay, how many group of five teams do

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you think threaten the status quo like UCF did last year?

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 1>If any one or two that's what I see.

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Probably Boise State and the Troy Trojans baby boyd Trojans

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 4>yehist Bois State is Oklahoma State, so they can make

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 4>that big impact early on.

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>If they're able to beat the Cowboys.

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 4>FA, you could be interesting. They've got an early game

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 4>against Oklahoma.

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I think FAU is a good at San Diego State

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>has Stanford. Yeah, while on the West Coast and the

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Mountain West Pac twelve matchup is not going to create

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as much buzz beating Stanford again two years in a row.

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>San Diego State beating Stanford, and if they are to

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>run the table this year, that I think is cause

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for concern if you are a power five person intent

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on keeping attention for a group of five schools down.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, Josh Hernandez wrote in to ask

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 4>about the best power five versus group of five games,

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 4>I think we sort of answered that question.

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Killing two week one has a great one. Well, it

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>has a couple you said, FAU Oklahoma. I I don't

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>know if I should go out on a limb. I

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>don't even think it's going out on a limb.

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:53.919
<v Speaker 2>Tie.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Do I even have the sound ready at this point?

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you do. I'm not locking anything up,

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm trapping anything I'm just telling you, I am just

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>if you can picture the eyeball emojis and this non

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>visual medium. Sure, Northern Illinois, Iowa week one just as

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>much as I like Nate Stanley and Iowa oo could

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be spicy. Nathan wants to know, and I don't think

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't specify a year here, So I think we

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>can talk big picture. Will Paul Christ lead Wisconsin to

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a national title? Hmmm? Well, the very binary answer with

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of variables. But you what does your gut say, ty.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 4>Take take plate MEA sure, Yeah. I think that Paul

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Christ is going to be there for a while. So,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 4>unlike some other situations that might be a little bit

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 4>more prone to coaching turnover, I think Wisconsin is somewhat

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 4>immune to that because Paul Chris is probably stay input

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 4>so by virtue of that and also them recruiting very well,

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to say, over the course of his career,

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 4>the answer is yes. Hell yeah, the answer is yes,

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 4>over the course of his career.

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I am going to agree, yeah, and this is why,

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're right, But I think it needs

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to be thought of like this. There are going to

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be years. Nick Saban's not going to be in Tuscaloosa forever.

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Dabbo's not going to be in Clemson forever. There are

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be year over year changes that are unexpected,

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and there are going to be years where all of

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the perceived blue chip elite teams that are not Wisconsin

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all beat each other up, lose two or three times,

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and the one loss team is not a team that

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>has a demonstrable talent advantage over Wisconsin. And I'm not

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>going to directly compare it to the Cam Newton Auburn team,

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>but in a way that Auburn team did not have

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>a good defense. They had Nick Fairley, but in terms

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of how productive they were, they relied on a single

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>entity on offense. Really good coaching, which I think Wisconsin

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>will continue to develop even if they lose guys. They've

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>already started losing guys a little bit. There is something

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>about Wisconsin just positioning itself to be there. We're going

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to be eleven in one, We're going to win the

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Big Ten. People are falling around the wayside, and we

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>are positioned to be the sort of solid ship in

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the storm. Okay, and so I'm going to say, with

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>how well Wisconsin does keeping players there developing them, how

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>deep they become because of that, with the lack of

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>player attrition, if they can develop a couple of playmakers,

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if they can keep developing speed and attracting speed on defense.

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.359
<v Speaker 1>We saw that as the sort of tiny difference maker

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>against Ohio State last year. The margin by which Ohio

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>State won that game was not great. Nope, So it

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to me points out that Wisconsin is just they are

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that switch flip away from becoming that national championship contender.

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Now that we've talked about Wisconsin in since I know

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 4>that there are more Wisconsin questions out there, I want

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 4>to pivot momentarily to a special guest that we're going

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 4>to bring on to answer some questions. But before we do,

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.319
<v Speaker 4>just want to throw this out there. Hiring used to

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 4>be hard because you have multiple job sites and stacks

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 4>of resumes that you got to go through perhaps a

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 4>confusing resume process. Today, hiring can be easy thanks to

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 4>our good friends over at zip recruiter, which you can

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 4>try for free by going to ZipRecruiter dot com slash

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 4>solid Dan. They've got something called matching technology, which means

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 4>that zip recruiter is going to send your job to

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 4>over one hundred of the web's leading job boards and

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 4>scans thousands of resumes to find people with the right

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 4>experience to apply. And as applications come in, zip Recruiters

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 4>just going to analyze them, pick out the ones, and

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 4>recommend top candidates so you never miss a match. I

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 4>know people who have used it through this podcast. They've

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 4>been very satisfied. ZipRecruiter is one of the highest rated

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 4>hiring sites in all of the good old US of A. Again,

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 4>our listeners can try it for free by going to

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 4>the exclusive url of ZipRecruiter dot com slash solid one

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 4>more time, that is ZipRecruiter dot com slash solid. All right, Dan,

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 4>as promised I said, we're gonna have a special guest

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:26.399
<v Speaker 4>on to discuss topics. We were just talking about Wisconsin

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 4>and here to help us break down a little bit

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 4>more about the Wisconsin offensive line. Let's start at a

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 4>very familiar place. It is former NFL player, the star

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 4>of the Ross Tucker family of podcasts. He's also on

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 4>CBS Sports Network. Mister Ross Tucker, Welcome to the Solid

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 4>Verbal Fellas.

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me, ty Dan, I appreciate it.

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 3>You guys obviously have a great thing going I've heard

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 3>a lot about it. Got a chance to listen from

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 3>time to time, and it's awesome to be on.

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Everything you guys produce is great. Yeah, man, I've got.

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 3>A I've got five podcasts myself from my continued quest

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 3>to avoid a real job as long as possible.

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm thirty nine and a half now.

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 3>As my daughters would say, so so far, so good.

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I've got the Ross Tucker Football Podcast is kind of

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:24.320
<v Speaker 3>the flagship that's NFL and that's daily once the season starts,

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 3>and then you know, I kind of have offshoots of that,

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 3>like Fantasy Feast for fantasy football and even money for gambling.

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 3>And then the one that's that you guys would would

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 3>be most interested in, the one that Dan came on recently,

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 3>is the college Draft. It's kind of cool because we

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 3>go year round talking about college football, but really only

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 3>from the standpoint of the top players, the top prospects.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 3>So we we preview more of just who are the studs,

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 3>who are the up and coming guys, and once the

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 3>season gets going, we'll just focus on, you know, for

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 3>people that are really into the draft, really into the NFL,

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 3>we'll say, okay, like for the first weekend, right Labor

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Day weekend. That Monday night, I'll be calling the Virginia

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Tech Florida State game for Westwood One. So so we'll

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 3>break down that game and say, Okay, here's the two dudes.

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 3>When you're watching that game or listening, but when you're

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 3>watching that game that you will need to watch for

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Virginia Tech, here's the guys Florida State you will need

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to watch. So even if someone's not like a gigantic

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 3>college football fan, it's almost like it gives them a

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 3>reason to watch and guys to check out.

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's been really, really fun.

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 3>It always gives me a leg up, you know, once

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the NFL season's over and we get into the draft stuff.

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, I've already been talking about these guys for

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, six seven months.

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's one of the things that we've been pretty

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 4>tuned into here as we've gone through our conference previews,

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 4>giving people a reason to care. Right, everyone's busy. What

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 4>are the reasons that you should care about some of

0:46:57.640 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 4>these teams? In particular, one of the ones that I

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 4>know that that Dan and I were pretty jazzed up

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 4>about was Wisconsin because Wisconsin brings a lot back, and

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 4>especially along the line. There's just a beef equality to

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 4>it that should propel Jonathan Taylor tailback and Alex Hornybrook

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 4>and really the offense as a whole move them forward.

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Now into the Big Ten season schedule is a little

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 4>bit more difficult than it was last year, but I

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 4>know you're pretty keen on the offensive line and where

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 4>that's going to take the Badgers this year.

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 3>And can I just say this, because I know you

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 3>guys talk about stuff like this.

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 2>I freaking love Wisconsin. I mean, yeah, I.

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Love everything about those guys in that place. My wife

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 3>actually got her NBA from Kellogg and Northwestern, and so,

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, one weekend we drove up there to Madison

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 3>because I just wanted to see what it was like.

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 3>They've got that main street, that road you know that

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 3>no cars can go on.

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, you walk up and down.

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 3>It's all kinds of bars drinking spotted cal beer and stuff.

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Then they even at this ice cream place where it

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 3>says like nutritional information, It's like, don't ask.

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to know.

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 3>This is one hundred percent Wisconsin milk fat ice cream.

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's amazing. Then I don't know if you

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 3>guys have been there. But their student union okay, is

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 3>on a lake and the sell and they sell beer

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 3>and brats. Like zero percent chance I ever would have

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 3>gone to class even one time if I went to Wisconsin.

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 3>I love that place. And then I love the way

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 3>their team plays. You know, I've been studying their offensive line.

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 3>They've got three like legit, legit dudes that should all

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 3>be top two or three round picks, which.

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Is not easy to do.

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 3>And they all almost look like carbon copies of each other.

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing. I mean, they're all like six six and

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 3>a half three hundred and twenty five pounds. It's it's

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 3>a beautiful thing. I love the way they play football

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 3>in a world in which everybody seemingly runs very similar offenses.

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I love like Wisconsin to Stanford. I mean, as a

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 3>former offensive lineman, those are my teams. Those are my dudes.

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I would love to play for them. I think the

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 3>most athletic of the group is Michael Dieter, you know

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:20.439
<v Speaker 3>who played left tackle last year, number sixty three.

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:21.879
<v Speaker 2>He did a really nice job.

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Even like watching the Big Ten championship game going against

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Nick Bosa, he did a really nice job. You know,

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he's quite long enough or quite

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the athlete that they would want as an ideal left tackle.

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 3>He might be a guy that the NFL would bump

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 3>over to right or move into guard, where I think

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 3>he would excel.

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 2>But he's he was good enough to me with his

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 2>feet and hands.

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 3>But I would start him at left tackle, and I

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 3>would give him that opportunity because I think he could

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 3>do it on the other side.

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 2>David Edwards, the big red shirt junior.

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of a right tackle all the way or

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe even get bumped inside despite how tall he is.

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 2>He's not as athletic as Deeter was.

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 3>He was a little bit stiffer, but still kind of

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 3>your classic Wisconsin guy. All these guys were pretty good finishers.

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 3>They all have real good pop in the run game

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 3>and great size.

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Obviously. My favorite one, though, is bo Ben.

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Schwazzle or however you say his last name. First of all,

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I love the guy. I mean I love last names

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 3>like that, So I don't even know if Ben Schwazzle's

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the way, but I love that, and that dude is

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:37.479
<v Speaker 3>a total badass. Like watching him, he plays the way

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I tried to play, and the way I wanted to play.

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean he's out there now. He's playing guard. He's

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 3>playing right guard rather than tackle. So usually you think, okay,

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 3>he's maybe not going to be as athletic as the tackles.

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:54.720
<v Speaker 3>He's a real good athlete. He's the feistiest of the bunch.

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:57.919
<v Speaker 3>He's the finisher of the bunch. If you ever want

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 3>to just be entertained, walk offensive lineman out of the

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 3>group I've watched so far this year, he's the most entertaining.

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.799
<v Speaker 2>He's the one out there. He's really trying to do guys.

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's really trying to physically punish guys, which

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate because you know, blocking people is not really fun.

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Trying to kill dudes? Is that's what's enjoyable?

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>What let me ask you this though, what is the

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the secret sauce? What is the situation with

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin where year over a year you can say Wisconsin

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.240
<v Speaker 1>should have a good offensive line and it's true sight unseen.

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you develop that reputation? Is it just because

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they keep putting guys in the pros where you know

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of begets more high school offensive lineman, top

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:45.359
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman wanting to go to Wisconsin. What is it

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about an offensive line factory like Wisconsin that separates it

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:52.719
<v Speaker 1>from other schools? What are other schools missing that Wisconsin

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is able to do to year over year constantly churn

0:51:56.280 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman to it to a super high level.

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:01.800
<v Speaker 3>So it actually goes all the way back to Barry

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Alvarez because I've asked people about this and when he

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I think he was like the decoordinator at nerd A

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe when he got the Wisconsin job. And when he

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 3>got the Wisconsin job, he asked a bunch of people.

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 3>He's like, Okay, what do we have in Wisconsin? Like

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 3>what like?

0:52:17.040 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 2>What what do we have in our own state?

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 3>And he basically was told, Okay, you don't have a

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of speed, you don't have a lot of skill, guys,

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 3>but we've got really really big people.

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:30.880
<v Speaker 2>And he looked at that and said, Okay, that's what

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be.

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Everybody else is kind of starting to spread things out

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 3>and you know, get the.

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Ball, throw the ball a lot.

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 3>What we have in our state is big people and

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 3>we're going to use that to advantage.

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 2>So it started with that.

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 3>It started with getting really big people, and then they

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:50.799
<v Speaker 3>got the run game, going and they just majored. That mean,

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 3>I've taught the guys that played there, their practices were

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 3>a blood bath. I mean they would just go inside,

0:52:56.760 --> 0:53:00.319
<v Speaker 3>run like thirty plays in a row. The time they

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:04.439
<v Speaker 3>got the games, it was easy. And they had run

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 3>those plays so many times that they were like a

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:10.880
<v Speaker 3>machine and they had a lot of success doing it.

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:13.879
<v Speaker 3>So then it became the second part of what you said, Dan,

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 3>which is success, beget success.

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Then you start to have guys going high in the draft.

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, you can go back to Chris McIntosh and

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Gibson to you know, obviously Travis Frederick more recently

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Joe Thoms. So it's kind of like, I don't want

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 3>to call it necessarily O line, you but it's about

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 3>as close as they have. So now if you're an

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 3>offensive lineman, that's a cool place to go. That's a

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 3>place where you want to go. It's a pro style system,

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:44.759
<v Speaker 3>even though they run the ball a lot, it's pro

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 3>style more than the spread. And it's cool to be

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 3>an offensive lineman there, Like, there aren't that many schools

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 3>where you go and it's like cool to be an

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 3>old lineman. But a Wisconsin it's almost like you're respected.

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 3>They probably get more girls than the average offensive.

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Lineman gets, you know. I mean, it's just it's cool

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:04.359
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 3>An O lineman there, So I think I think that's

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 3>a big reason why they go there. Plus, pass blocking

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:13.360
<v Speaker 3>is not fun like coming off the ball. Like you know,

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't eat all that food to get to be

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and twenty five pounds to be passive. I

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 3>did it because I wanted to be aggressive and I

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 3>wanted to knock human beings backwards and down on the ground.

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 2>And a wisconsinent they let you do that. Ross.

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:28.439
<v Speaker 4>We'll get you out of here on this. Let's talk

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:31.479
<v Speaker 4>more about again why people should care about this coming

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 4>football season. I know you're pretty attuned to all things

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:39.479
<v Speaker 4>Big Ten. Give me two guys in the Big Ten

0:54:39.600 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 4>conference that you are excited to watch and our listeners

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:44.320
<v Speaker 4>should care about.

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 3>So I'll give you one for sure, And everybody already

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 3>knows about him, so it's not like it's a secret.

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 3>But I'm gonna go with Tracey McSorley. Okay, the quarterback

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:57.760
<v Speaker 3>at Penn State. Guys, it feels like it's been thirty

0:54:57.800 --> 0:55:00.600
<v Speaker 3>games in a row or I can't tell if he's

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 3>lucky or just good.

0:55:02.160 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 2>But whatever keeps working, it is working, man.

0:55:07.280 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean when he first the thing it's crazy about

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:12.680
<v Speaker 3>it is he got the job after like the most

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:18.719
<v Speaker 3>prototypical franchised quarterback looking dude you've ever seen in Christian Hackenberg.

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, we don't say his name on this podcast anymore.

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:27.800
<v Speaker 3>And then in comes Tracey McSorley, who I remember watching

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 3>his high school video and I thought he would be

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:30.799
<v Speaker 3>pretty good.

0:55:30.840 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 2>I believely liked it.

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I thought he had a better arm than he got

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 3>credit for, and I thought we were coming into this

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 3>age where height was not as important. But his video

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:41.880
<v Speaker 3>like he could have been a big time college safety.

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 3>I think watching him in high school in northern Virginia,

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 3>you know where the Redskins practice, That's where he's from, Ashbourne, Virginia.

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:55.240
<v Speaker 3>He has been so good and so clutch and somehow

0:55:55.440 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 3>so durable for Penn State. You know, it's very rare

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 3>even when they've lost games, that he's been the reason

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 3>for them losing. I mean, you know last year they

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 3>had some issues against Ohio State and Michigan State.

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 2>But I just he might not be a.

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Great pro prospect, and I still think he's gonna end

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 3>up sticking in the NFL. But I think we need

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:24.240
<v Speaker 3>to do a better job of appreciating fantastic college football

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 3>players like Trace McSorley and not getting all caught up

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 3>in the fact that, you know, maybe he's not gonna

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 3>go ahead and be an NFL star. Although you know what,

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 3>what were people saying about Baker Mayfield at this time.

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Trace is that accurate. But if he

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 3>has another great year and and rewrites every record even

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:48.640
<v Speaker 3>more and has three straight years of outstanding production, I

0:56:48.640 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I don't know how you go against that.

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 3>The other two guys I would tell you to watch.

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:58.919
<v Speaker 3>I already mentioned Bosa, who's unbelievable technician for how young

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 3>he is. But for Michigan, watched their defensive ends Rashaan

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Gary and Chase Winovich, if only because the contrast between

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:14.600
<v Speaker 3>those two is remarkable. Rashan Gary is as rare of

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 3>an athlete as we've seen in college football since, like

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Jadeveon Clowney, Like there's no way a three hundred pound

0:57:21.880 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 3>dude should move the way he does. You know, he's

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:29.000
<v Speaker 3>getting offered in eighth grade, running like four fives at

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 3>football camps when he was two hundred ninety five pounds

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 3>in eighth grade.

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Like he is a rare bird, but his motor's.

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Not always running and he still hasn't really figured it out,

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:43.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, like you can't just have one move, you

0:57:43.760 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 3>have to have counter moved. You have to watch the

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 3>tape and know how to set up offensive lineman. So

0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 3>he's unique to watch just because he's a freak athlete

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 3>that hasn't totally figured out. Meanwhile, on the other side,

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Chase Winovich, who's a Western Pa guy. He is like

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 3>a bat at a hell, rows an assortment of moves

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 3>and is absolutely relentless, but doesn't quite have Gary's size

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 3>speed combination. So when you watch those guys, it's just

0:58:10.840 --> 0:58:13.600
<v Speaker 3>interesting because it shows you, even though they play the

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 3>same position, that there really are you know, two ways

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 3>different ways to skin a cat and still be productive

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:21.040
<v Speaker 3>at that position.

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Good stuff, man, All right, Ross Tucker again, you can

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:29.439
<v Speaker 4>find Ross on five different podcasts. He does work for

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 4>CBS Sports Network. He'll be all over no doubt this

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 4>football season one more time.

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Ross. Where could people find you?

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, you know you can always just go to

0:58:39.680 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Ross Tucker dot com. That's where all my podcasts are

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:44.520
<v Speaker 3>and then we've got the feeds for you for you know,

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:48.919
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts or Stitch or whatever whatever app you use,

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 3>or you can just follow me on Twitter at Ross

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Tucker NFL because I post all of the stuff there.

0:58:54.800 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 3>And we're almost there, fellas. Yeah, stuff better, we are

0:58:58.440 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 3>almost there.

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Good stuff man. Great to have you on the podcast.

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 4>We'll have to, uh have to have you back sometime soon,

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:05.200
<v Speaker 4>all right.

0:59:05.720 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I would love to.

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:09.440
<v Speaker 3>And I gotta get tied get you on the College

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Draft podcast sometime as well. We're gonna talk some uh,

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:14.760
<v Speaker 3>we gotta go deep on Pennsylvania stuff.

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. That's all I want to hear. I

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just want to. I want to hear you guys rank

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:22.160
<v Speaker 1>your favorite Pennsylvania things. That's all I want out of it.

0:59:23.120 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think Ty's just upset that, you know, reading

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:28.560
<v Speaker 3>and Burkes County are now better at football than the

0:59:28.640 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Lehigh Valley is ooh wow?

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Fight?

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Who do you have?

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Who?

0:59:34.560 --> 0:59:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Who do you have to claim in the Lehigh Valley?

0:59:36.560 --> 0:59:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Who is your big name?

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Are you? Is it? Dan?

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:39.920
<v Speaker 1>What's his name? From Florida State?

0:59:40.000 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Dan Kendaquon Barkley went to Whitehall. I could throw Jim

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 4>drucken Miller in there from my high school.

0:59:50.400 --> 0:59:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Matt Millan Matt Millan's Whitehall as well.

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Matt Millan, sure on any time you talk Jim

0:59:56.360 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Drunken Miller on a college football podcast in twenty eighteen.

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we just got to just find an entire

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast to talk about weird PA things with Ross Tucker

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and Ty Hildenbrand. There you go. Ross Tucker, thank you

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for giving us some of your time. We'll talk to

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you soon.

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:12.600
<v Speaker 2>My pleasure. Thanks for having me guys.

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, Dan, good stuff. Ross Tucker check him out.

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Was kind enough to invite us on his podcast. We

1:00:19.360 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 4>wanted to do the Home and Home and bring him

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 4>on ours as well.

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I love nerding out about offensive lineman.

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>That's just we've we've had Jeff Schwartz on. We've had

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of scheme stuff on. I love nerding about,

1:00:31.720 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>nerding out about large people talking about other large people.

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>If that makes sense, it doesn't sound weird, which it

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>probably does. It probably does.

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 4>But you know what, here, here's what we do on

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:42.920
<v Speaker 4>the Celverbo. Yeah, we cultivate that kind of thinking. We're

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:45.520
<v Speaker 4>all about that show here. We celebrate got a bunch

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 4>of crazy questions here, so many in fact, that we're

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 4>going to do a two parter here. So whatever we

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 4>couldn't get to on this first show, we're going to

1:00:54.440 --> 1:00:56.760
<v Speaker 4>do our best to address on the Sunday show, which

1:00:56.800 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 4>is forthcoming. We'll post it in a couple of days. Again,

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 4>a man if two part Q and a show that

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.919
<v Speaker 4>we're going to try and you know, use to help

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:07.080
<v Speaker 4>you get ready for the season. But we're not done yet.

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's do like, can we do like four or five

1:01:09.960 --> 1:01:11.120
<v Speaker 4>more rapid fire.

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Buck Hogan, great name. You have ten dollars to see

1:01:14.640 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>one Power five versus Power five game this season? What

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>game do you go to? And so, what I think

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he's referring to is the fact that if you go

1:01:22.120 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on ESPN dot com, they tell you the get in

1:01:24.200 --> 1:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>price for each game, right, and there were a few

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>group of five Power five that I highlighted. But you

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>can get into Duke at Northwestern three dollars three dollars.

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you something. This is early September.

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Evanston's going to be very nice. It's right on the lake.

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the students are in town yet, which

1:01:43.440 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is why I think there are a lot of tickets available.

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's fully my answer. You can

1:01:48.360 --> 1:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>go to Boston College Perdue for under ten dollars, a

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>couple other options, Georgia Tech Pit under ten dollars. BC

1:01:56.120 --> 1:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Wake is under ten dollars. A couple other options involving

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>group of five schools, Ohio at Virginia if you want

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to go see Nathan Rourke UTSA at Kansas State Kansas State,

1:02:08.360 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>excuse me. You can see Minnesota at Maryland, which feels

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like it could be a totally legit so look, hold on.

1:02:14.800 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>That was going to be my answer. Okay, Now, I

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 4>don't know where things are headed now given what we

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:24.080
<v Speaker 4>discussed at the top of the show, but Minnesota and

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Maryland were two teams that I was pretty bullish on

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:29.080
<v Speaker 4>when we did our Big ten previews, so that was

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:30.040
<v Speaker 4>going to be my answer.

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, those teams are both on your pluckiness rankings, so

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not a bad answer. I would go see North

1:02:35.680 --> 1:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas at Arkansas for under ten dollars again, group of

1:02:38.880 --> 1:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>five school I know, Temple at Maryland. Jeff Collins finished

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong there for the owls, and my final one

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is Wyoming at Missouri under ten dollars. As of right now.

1:02:49.240 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are the getting prices.

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Bargain basement prices right there.

1:02:52.720 --> 1:02:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:02:54.040 --> 1:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Next question, who will be further along in twenty twenty

1:02:56.800 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of winning the Big Ten? West Purdue or Nebraska.

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>My answer, and that comes to us by a tyler.

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>My answer is Nebraska because I am positive their coach

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>will be there in twenty twenty. Are you now, yes,

1:03:09.080 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>my positive Scott Frost and me the coach of Nebraska

1:03:11.280 --> 1:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in two years.

1:03:11.960 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think that's probably a fair bet. I am

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:17.360
<v Speaker 4>not positive to your point about Jeff Bram, whether or

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 4>not he's going to be at Purdue. Also, I think

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:25.360
<v Speaker 4>that Nebraska is starting from a much different point than Purdue.

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:28.320
<v Speaker 4>They're really trying to rebuild the talent pool in westlof

1:03:28.400 --> 1:03:30.720
<v Speaker 4>yet in a way that I don't think they quite

1:03:30.840 --> 1:03:32.080
<v Speaker 4>have to in Nebraska.

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Nate wants to know who do you think is the

1:03:35.160 --> 1:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>player or team for that matter, most likely to earn

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the quote in a losing effort Moniker this season? And

1:03:41.680 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this is where I editorialize it's either Manny Wilkins or

1:03:45.200 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Khalil Tape and they're both in the same state. No,

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>there are other answers I have, but so correct me

1:03:51.480 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong Ti, because this is my interpretation of

1:03:53.720 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a thing. I don't know if we invented, but we

1:03:55.960 --> 1:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely celebrate harder than anybody. Sure, an offensive player who

1:04:00.320 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>puts up a productive game to the point where you

1:04:03.800 --> 1:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have to mention it, even though that team lost in

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the vein of Nick Foles and what he did at Arizona.

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, So Khalil Tate very much carrying on that tradition

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 4>carrying the torch.

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And Tucson, Yes, I would say of the Pac twelve,

1:04:16.400 --> 1:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>those are the two teams. McLain Carter I think is

1:04:20.920 --> 1:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>going to start a quarterback for Texas Tech. And that's

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>always a pretty good guess about somebody who could put

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>up a bunch of yards in impressive fashion in a

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>losing efforts. I don't know if i'd necessarily have somebody.

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Ty Johnson at Maryland.

1:04:35.880 --> 1:04:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Ty Johnson could be in there. I mean, I think

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Drew Locks an obvious answer.

1:04:39.960 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, great answer.

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 4>I also think you can make a pretty good case

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:45.120
<v Speaker 4>for Will Greer at Well. Yeah, I know you've been

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 4>down on the West Virginia defense, so I don't know

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:50.480
<v Speaker 4>if they're going two and ten, but if the defense

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:52.680
<v Speaker 4>goes south, you could see five and seven, six and

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:56.400
<v Speaker 4>six with a huge performance all year by Greer, provided

1:04:56.440 --> 1:04:57.080
<v Speaker 4>he stays.

1:04:56.800 --> 1:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Healthy, given that he's got David Sills coming back. Wild

1:04:59.680 --> 1:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>card to Puma pass Okay, yeah, sure at Louisville with

1:05:03.440 --> 1:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the BVG defense, Yeah yeah, Oh god, I feel pretty good.

1:05:07.640 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>If Puma pass is good, Juwan pass is good. There's

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>some some pretty striking potential there. Gardner Minshew the presumed

1:05:16.400 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>starters at State Washington State. I know their defense actually

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>should be pretty good, but I think they're gonna lose

1:05:21.040 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a few. I don't think they're making a bowl game

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, so I think those are a few decent ones. Okay,

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>where we go next? Next, let's go to as I scroll.

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We got like seventeen pages of questions here. This question

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. I don't know if we want to save it.

1:05:36.560 --> 1:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>About a TV is getting locked on a channel? Oh,

1:05:39.280 --> 1:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>let's say that for Sunday, all right, Which transfer, graduate

1:05:43.200 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise has the best chance to have a big season.

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that the duo at FAU is a good answer.

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe von Durant, the West Virginia transfer and Chris Robison,

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback who will be throwing to Durant transfer from Oklahoma.

1:05:56.440 --> 1:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's possible. I mentioned Gardner Minshew. I don't

1:05:58.760 --> 1:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's the answer. Across college football. I'm trying to

1:06:03.040 --> 1:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>shape Patterson Shaye. Patterson's the obvious one. Oh, I got

1:06:08.240 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a duo that I think, could you know, just we'll

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>stay on the duo uh tick. Jonathan Giles receiver formerly

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of Texas tex stepping in at LSU. Joe Burrow's any good.

1:06:20.200 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Brendan Branden Feyjoko, also of Texas

1:06:24.680 --> 1:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Tech coming to LSU. I think those two are are

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting and maybe actually this could qualify as in

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a losing effort as well. kJ Cartis Samuel's a Colorado

1:06:35.640 --> 1:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>state and that Mike Bobo offense I think could put

1:06:37.720 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>up some pretty big numbers even without Michael Gallup there

1:06:40.040 --> 1:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to catch those passes. So there's there's some pretty good

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>options across the country. And by the way, that question

1:06:47.640 --> 1:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to us, and let's just we can finish with

1:06:50.080 --> 1:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that question if you'd like.

1:06:51.600 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

1:06:51.920 --> 1:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>That question comes to us from Reddit user lasagna Fiend, whoa.

1:06:58.080 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Ty Yes, we can't do any better than that.

1:07:00.800 --> 1:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>We cannot do better than Lasagna Fiend, and we were

1:07:02.600 --> 1:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to honor his or her taste in Italian food,

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to ask you this very controversial question. Please, Actually,

1:07:10.840 --> 1:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of lasagna questions. I have pro ricatta

1:07:14.440 --> 1:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>anti ricotta. I'm pro. I don't think lasagna needs ricada,

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>though I believe that's the authentic way to make it,

1:07:21.560 --> 1:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>though it is authentically at least Italian American. That's right.

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's already a good gooiness richness factor

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>without it.

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:34.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a I'm not a racata fan on its own,

1:07:34.960 --> 1:07:37.120
<v Speaker 4>but in lasagna, I think it adds a little bit

1:07:37.160 --> 1:07:38.800
<v Speaker 4>of necessary texture.

1:07:39.920 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Middle side or corner.

1:07:43.600 --> 1:07:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Ah, I usually like side or corner. I like getting

1:07:49.360 --> 1:07:52.640
<v Speaker 4>I like part of that crusty noodle at the edge.

1:07:52.760 --> 1:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>A.

1:07:54.520 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Corner. All day meat, ground meat or sausage or both.

1:08:03.200 --> 1:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I prefer the ground meat. I think I prefer ground

1:08:06.000 --> 1:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>meat as well. Yeah, maybe some kind of like veal

1:08:08.160 --> 1:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>pork beef mixture. Yeah, that's right, that seems right to me.

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>A spicy or a regular marin ea regular marinea, regular

1:08:16.360 --> 1:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is right? Yeah, I think regular is right. I think

1:08:18.920 --> 1:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>spicy turns it into something that it doesn't necessarily have

1:08:21.720 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to be. In distracts. Yeah, do you make your own

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>lasagna or do you just rely on mama age?

1:08:28.720 --> 1:08:31.720
<v Speaker 4>I haven't made my own lasagne, But you've never made

1:08:31.720 --> 1:08:34.799
<v Speaker 4>your own lasagna. I haven't, No, No, but I could.

1:08:35.120 --> 1:08:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I have Grandma's recipe, and I'm sure I could make that.

1:08:39.080 --> 1:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I just haven't. No, I haven't.

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I love lasagna and I have not had it in

1:08:45.040 --> 1:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time because you when you commit to lasagna, lasagna,

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially the pancakes of Italian food. That seems right

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>stacking you're dents. You're not doing much after no, But

1:08:57.960 --> 1:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, lasagna is way better than a stack of

1:08:59.800 --> 1:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>pank All right.

1:09:00.920 --> 1:09:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, for that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein,

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 4>for myself, Ty Hildebrand, thank you for sending your questions

1:09:06.160 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 4>into solid verbal at gmail dot com and Facebook, on

1:09:09.000 --> 1:09:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Twitter and Instagram, and lord knows wherever else. We've got

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:16.000
<v Speaker 4>a whole other show coming your way here on Sunday,

1:09:16.360 --> 1:09:19.919
<v Speaker 4>where we're gonna pull from the same pool and address

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:24.599
<v Speaker 4>more pressing topics in the world of college football and beyond. Also,

1:09:24.600 --> 1:09:26.599
<v Speaker 4>a big thank you to our friend Ross Tucker, who

1:09:26.680 --> 1:09:28.360
<v Speaker 4>was kind enough to give us some of his time

1:09:28.400 --> 1:09:31.760
<v Speaker 4>and break down the Wisconsin offensive line, and some other

1:09:31.800 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 4>guys in the Big Ten that are worthy of your care.

1:09:35.160 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 4>As we now enter the last couple of weeks before

1:09:38.439 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 4>college football season begins, dan Ah, enjoy the rest of

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:47.880
<v Speaker 4>your week and weekend. Okay, absolutely, we'll do for that

1:09:47.920 --> 1:09:50.480
<v Speaker 4>guy over there again, Dan Rubenstein and myself Ty Hildebrand,

1:09:50.520 --> 1:09:52.400
<v Speaker 4>thank you for tuning in. We'll catch you all in

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:55.559
<v Speaker 4>a few days. In the meantime, it stays peace.