WEBVTT - Qualcomm Shares Pop and FTX Trial Update

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard. We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Love Love.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heinderlumberg's world headquarters in New York and I

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>met Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 5>Full earnings coverage ahead.

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>We've got Qualcom, the ches popping after chip maker is

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>providing an upbeat forecast, singing the mobile phone slump.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 4>It's easing and sticking with smartphones. We'll push your head

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 4>to earnings from Apple, which a duo to come out

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 4>after the bell today.

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>And we'll have the latest in the trial of Sam

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Magunfried as Jura's begin deliberations today.

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 5>But first, let's check in on these markets and.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 3>The feel good music after the Federal Reserve and that

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>feeling that the Fed is basically perhaps done with the

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>real fast and few pace of rate heights really dials

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 3>into a desire to buy these stocks in the particularly

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>in the tech space. We're up five straight days on then,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>now's that one hundred best winning streets since we sinceince

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 3>about August of last year.

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 5>And indeed we're seeing.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred having its best day since

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 3>August on the day, so overall at one point three percent.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing All country World Index basically European stocks pushed higher,

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>so tooed in Asia we're having our best day in

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 3>one months, it would seen. We're up one point six percent,

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>best day on the All Country World Index since the

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the year. And I'm looking at the US

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>thirty year as we see that sort of desire to

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 3>be buying into bond markets because yields are likely falling

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>because maybe the Federal Reserve doesn't have to keep on

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 3>hiking into this particular macro economy. We're down some nine

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>basis points on the longer end. We were down much

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>further earlier on today, And love quick look at what's

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 3>happening in the world of crypto, because this is.

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 5>An interesting one.

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>The dollar is down because we're not anticipating such a

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>hawkish FED, but those bitcoins, so that just shows that

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>there's really some pulling away from this particular risk asset.

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>At the moment, we're off by some two percent, so

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>thirty four thousand still heading above that all important sort

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 3>of thirty four thousand dollars level, but notable that we've

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 3>got a little bit of caution in that particular space.

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 5>What are you looking at in the micro.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 4>There are many many technology earnings to pass over, and

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 4>the first is Peloton interesting because they gave a guidance

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 4>for revenue for the rest of the year there was

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 4>pretty weak. They're having trouble converting free users of their

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 4>app into paid subscribers. They were really down after Earning's hit.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Now they're up significantly eleven percent. Growth is coming, they

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 4>say in the market, clearly buying it another p Palenteer

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 4>also upgrading its profit outlook for the full year twenty three,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>also slightly upgrading its revenue expectations. The story AI Palenteer's

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 4>and AI sorry you and I've hit all year long.

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Now the financials are starting to show that four straight

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 4>quarter of profit also up eighteen percent. Then after market

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 4>we get Apple. We know what's coming. Four straight quarter

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 4>of sales declined. You have to go about two decades

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 4>for Apple to have a slump like that. But we

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 4>get some insight into how the iPhone fifteen is doing,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 4>so we get about nine days worth of sales in

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 4>that September quarter. The main one I'm looking at right

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>now is quite forecast for the current period of revenue

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 4>nine point one to nine point nine billion dollars a

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 4>big range, but at the midpoint of that range you're

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 4>well above analyst expectations. Is for sales. The thinking it

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 4>signals that things were recovering in the smartphone market. So

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 4>let's get more on that cloud coom story and bring

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 4>in congen Sibani or Bloomberg intelligence. That's the guidance. What

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>do you read into that congent about the smartphone market globally?

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 6>Thanks Ed, I mean, coming into the quarter, it was

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 6>pretty clear that the smartt phone market had hit its bottom.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 6>Customers have been clearing out inventory for a few weeks now,

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 6>but what was not clear was what to expect in

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 6>terms of the speed and size of the market snapback,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 6>especially in the Android market in China, which is sort

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 6>of which was sort of holding back the start of

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 6>the recovery for Qualcom, and there was this build up

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 6>anxiety around if we are going to have brace for

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 6>another disappointment. So it was a sile of relief to

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 6>see signs of green shoots over there, especially from their

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 6>better one Q guidance and a couple of data points

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 6>to valid it was the twenty five percent sequential revenue

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 6>growth from the Chinese Android OEMs, and them confirming that

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 6>they will keep the majority share at Samsung twenty four launch.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 3>All of this, though, is at a time where Christiana

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Armon is trying to diversify away from really the all

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 3>in on the mobile space.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 5>How is that working?

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>How is that bearing fruit when you're looking at connected devices,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 3>when you're looking at automotive for example.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Look, the a PC is really a call option for them.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 6>Specifically in terms of street estimates, the numbers right now

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 6>don't even attribute much revenue coming from this business, and

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 6>even by Qualcom's own commentary, they don't expect PC revenue

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 6>to start contributing significantly under twenty twenty five. So the

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 6>discussion right now around PC is more related to adding

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 6>to the sentiment around this rather than the fundamentals.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>The good thing for them, though, is if they have any.

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 6>Success, no matter what the size, it will all be

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 6>upside from the current numbers.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Can general want to take into some of your analysis

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 4>you published last night that's about China. The landscape for

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 4>smartphones in China has changed in terms of where the

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 4>chips are coming from and also planning for the future.

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Based on what Qualcom told us, what do you read

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 4>into the Chinese market for that name?

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean again, like I said, it was the

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 6>one thing that was holding back the strong recovery like

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing in PCs versus not seeing in smartphone. So

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 6>there is good signs that the Chinese android OEMs are

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 6>now pulling in and building on that inventory.

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's good for Qualcomm.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 6>The other factor there is the uncertainty about Huave possibly

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 6>gaining share, So we still have to wait and see

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 6>how this plays out. But right now with them getting

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 6>Apple back and again getting a lot more content and

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 6>Android OEMs, as long as this market keeps coming back,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be a double tail wind for Qualcomm.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 3>Conjohn Savani and we thank you so much for Blue

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 3>meg Intelligence and all things Qualcom and indeed China. Perfect

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 3>segue there for in to our next discussion because he

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>just mentioned Apple there, he mentioned Huawei. That's talking about

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Apple's reporting results after the battle. Well, he hate to

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 3>walk us through what to expect is Bloomberg's Mark German

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 3>and Mark a lot of people anticipating that China is

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>going to play a big role in this set of numbers.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to really focus in.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 7>I wish we had a replay of something Kunjan said

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 7>when he first started the discussion. He noted that the

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 7>Qualcom expectation for sales from Chinese handset makers our way up.

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I was preparing for Apple earning yesterday.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 7>And a headlined cross on the terminal during the pual

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 7>foam RaaS that said, Chinese phonemaker sales connected to Qualcom

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 7>are anticipated to be up a third in the current

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 7>quarter where they were just up a third. That's good

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 7>news for Qualcomb if you think about it, that's not

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 7>very good news for Apple. To answer your question, obviously,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 7>Qualcomm makes a lot of the CPUs and chips that

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 7>go into Android phones, a lot of the ones developed

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 7>by Chinese manufacturers.

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But Apple makes their own chips. Right, If Qualtcom sales are.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 7>Going way up in China the handset makers there, something's

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 7>got to give, right, So that answer here's your question.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 7>I think about what's going on with Apple in China.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 7>We may be in for a little bit of a

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 7>dip there because Hawkom is taking share from somewhere, right,

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 7>So I think that's something to look out for.

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 4>There's the financials backward looking at what happened in the

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 4>fiscal court had just gone and then you listen to

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 4>what Tim Cook and Eddie Q will say about the future.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 4>The iPhone fifteen went on sale September twenty second, Right,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.559
<v Speaker 4>that gives about nine days of sales in the quarter

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 4>that they'll book. But in that time they've raised services prices.

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 4>We had all those details on the next generation Mac

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 4>and M three chips. What moves the needle mark outside

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 4>of iPhone towards the end of the year and into

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty four.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's wearables.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 7>I think it's stocking stoppers potentially like the lower end

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 7>Apple watches in the AirPods.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that is going to probably.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 7>Result in a lot of the momentum you're going to

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 7>see from Apple in the holiday quarter. Obviously, the iPhone

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 7>fifteen pro is going to do exceptionally well. You know,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 7>Apple has a pretty easy cart for the iPhone fifteen, Right,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 7>this is a redesigned phone, titanium, that new look, that

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 7>new material, that new three and animator chip. That's what

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 7>sells consumers. And the good news for Apple is it

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 7>doesn't seem that they have any major production hiccups this

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 7>time around last year you had a minor iPhone update

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 7>with the iPhone fourteen, right, you had major shipment delays

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 7>and major shipment constraints that you don't have this year.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 7>So you should see some nice growth on the iPhone

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 7>despite the situation potentially occurring in China. So I'm looking

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 7>for positivity for sure on the iPhone. In fact, if

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 7>you look at Wall Street expectations for the previous quarter,

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 7>the iPhone is one of the only business from Apple

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 7>that we're expecting growth in the other two and this

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 7>is very surprising given everything.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>We just discussed. Is Greater China.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 7>Wall Street is anticipating two billion dollars of year over

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 7>year growth in the China business, right, going from about

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 7>fifteen billion and change to about seventeen billion in just

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 7>that Greater China region. So you know, it appears even

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 7>if the iPhone does slow down in China, they're they're

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 7>going to make up for the iPhone sales and other regions,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 7>and they're going to make up for.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The iPhone China with other products.

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 7>The Apple Watch is certainly growing in popularity in China.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 7>It's become a really big deal there. Even the Mac right,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 7>these higher priced, more luxurious Macs those are becoming bigger

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 7>sellers in China. So no matter what's happening to the iPhone,

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 7>I think based on what Wall Street is saying that

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 7>they are going to make.

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 8>Up for it.

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 3>So we want to thank you Marghum and all things

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Apple as we anticipate those numbers off the bell. I

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>mean while coming up, Look, Canadian e commerce firm Shopify

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>talking earning there two beating estimates for the third quarter.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 5>Shares they rally hard.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 3>A conversation with the president Harley Finkelstein, that's coming up next.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 3>This is Bluemberg technology, discipline, cost cutting, that's just one

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 3>of the factors that helps Shopify see positive results in

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 3>their third quarter. The Canadian based e commerce platform shop

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 3>says it's report showcase the durability of its business model, revenue,

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 3>earnings per share, they beat estimates and then some joining

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 3>us now on how the strategy is playing out. Harley Finkelstein,

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 3>president of Shopify, And look, clearly investors love the numbers today.

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing the shares rally hard. Harley, how sustainable is that?

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 3>That level of discipline but also showing growth into the

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 3>next fiscal quarter.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, thanks for having me on the show.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Caroline and Ed look.

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 9>We later at a very deliberate vision to balance both

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 9>operational ambition, which we certainly have a lot of, but

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 9>also the financial discipline. And the results speak for themselves.

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 9>We are delivering top land growth and profitability. Q three GMV,

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 9>which of course is the proxy for how well the

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 9>merchants are doing on Shopify, was up twenty two percent

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 9>to fifty six billion, Revenue was up to twenty five

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 9>percent to one point seven billion, and as you pointed out,

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 9>we have cash flow of north of two hundred and

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 9>seventy million now with every quarter ticking up. That cash

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 9>flow is a percentage of revenue, and Q four is

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 9>expected to keep this trend going. One of the other

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 9>things that I don't think is getting covered, but is

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 9>very exciting to us, is that more of the largest

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 9>and most hord and brands on the planet are joining Shopify,

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 9>like Ted Baker and Tom's and LVMH's, Puuci and Quicksilver

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 9>and Billabong.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's a really great for us.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 9>It's a great story, but it's a story of balancing

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 9>both growth and profitability simultaneously. And that's because we have

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 9>a new shape of the company, which is far more

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 9>focused on our main quest and things that are most important.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Highly on that new shape and those brands that you're

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 4>talking about. How much of that focuses into the outlook.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 4>There's an accusation out there from some on the street

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 4>that you guys are a little bit conservative with the

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 4>outlook and maybe you could do a bit more.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, look, I think we are as a company

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 9>firing up all cylinders, both horizontally and vertically. On the

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 9>vertical side, obviously, Shopify is known to be the entrepreneurship company,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 9>the place where millions of small businesses go to start

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 9>businesses and grow those businesses. But we also have this

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 9>incredible effort around enterprise commerce whereby some of the largest

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 9>companies some of those I mentioned, but you know, companies

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 9>like Spanks for example, and Glossier for example, and the

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 9>Mars Company for example, and Blackenedncker.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 4>All come into Shopify as well.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 9>At the same time, one of the other metrics that

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 9>we really think a lot about is our product attach rate,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 9>and that really is a proxy for the usage of

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 9>our products and platform buyer merchants. That's over three percent,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 9>so that means more merchants are taking more of our products,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 9>whether that's things like capital or shipping, or payments or

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 9>even audiences for example. We like that, we like being

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 9>the center of the business for these millions of stores, and.

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 3>You managed this way bigger players and keep those smaller

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 3>players at the same time as increasing pricing. I'm interested

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 3>in how you are thinking about monetization going forward.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 5>Holly.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, montation is something that we certainly in the last

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 9>year and a half or so, I have been spending

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot more time thinking about. I've been at Shopify

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 9>now for over a third of my life, almost fourteen

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 9>years now, and we really never change pricing. We made

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 9>our first change last year to our basic plan, which

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 9>most merchants are using. We increased it by about a third,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 9>by but thirty three percent, and we saw very little pushback.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 9>And that sort of suggests to us that the value

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 9>to cost ratio of Shopify is so far in the

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 9>side of value, and so as we think about changing

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 9>pricing across other products or even other plans, we want

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 9>to be deliberate about it, but we believe that we

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 9>still have an opportunity to increase pricing in the future.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Holly, quickly, what's the AI story for Shopify?

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Well, look, I think we are actually uniquely positioned

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 9>to harness the power of AI. We think that particularly

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 9>small businesses and entrepreneurs will really benefit from these tools.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 9>But unlike other generator of AI products, are AI product

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 9>which is called Shopify Magic One. It's designed specifically for

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 9>commerce and retail. But also it's not just one feature,

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 9>one product. What we've done is we've embedded across all

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 9>of our features and all of our workflows so that

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 9>more people can start businesses and more people can be

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 9>a lot more successful. And merchants are finding it to

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 9>be really valuable. They spend more time making their products

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 9>and less time doing some of the administrative tasks, which frankly,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 9>AI is really good at.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Holly Finklestein, president of Shop five, Always greats. Catch up,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline had in New

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 3>York and.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. Carra quit check in

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 4>on the markets, and as you know, this week we're

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 4>checking in on the European close. Given the time difference,

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 4>the stock six hundred Europe, which is our main gauge

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 4>of European equities, on track for a fourth straight gain

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 4>or has closed now and hit a four straight day

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 4>of gains, which is its longest streak of winds going

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 4>back to July. A lot of the trading was around

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 4>what was happening with the Fed last night, even though

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 4>that's a different jurisdiction. Also the BOE, the Bank of England,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 4>keeping rates are unchanged and really talking down the prospect

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 4>of further cuts. We just heard, of course on Bloomberg

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Television our interview with the Bank of England's governor. This

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 4>is what the foot see one hundred looks like, up

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 4>one point four percent on the day, Serling GBPUSD up

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 4>to ten to four percent, and UK ten year yield

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 4>soft for a little bit eleven basis points four point

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 4>three eight percent. One more day in the week. We'll

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 4>review that European market close update, Caroline.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, let's just check in on how the US is performing.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>And I have to say it was rallying in the

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 3>UK and we've been rallying worldwide today on the back

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 3>of macropolicy. The Federal of course looking like it's done,

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>perhaps with its really hawkish viewpoint on where rates have

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 3>to go. Now sack at one point three percent. I'm

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>shining a light, and what on earth is happening with Peloton,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 3>because of course it is, you know, a volatile stock.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Nowaday is only worth five dollars when you're looking at

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 3>it's per share price point twelve dollars, a twelve percent

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 3>rally when we had been sinking hard after their numbers.

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 5>This is all is really.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 3>They actually managed to beat in their fiscal first quart

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to revenue, when it comes to a

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 3>bit darm when it comes to margin.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 5>But there is a slightly weak look ahead in.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Terms of signaling what Bernstein is saying basically zero growth.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 5>So there's a bare narrative there.

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>However, the first called Martin first quarter margins were particularly strong,

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 3>says Bernstein.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 5>Nevertheless, kind of co ingenuity.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>For example of that particular analyst downgrading the stock to

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>a price target of five versus eight dollars and cuts

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>from a hold to a hold from a by So

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 3>interesting narrative coming from Peloton. Bitcoin under pressure today even

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 3>with the dollar weaker, So interesting selling of that particular

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 3>with scasid d.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 4>All Right, another earnings one. We're watching Airbnb. Let's bring

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 4>in more, get more with Bloomberg's Natali learning Natalie, I'm

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 4>looking at shares with down more than three percent. This

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 4>is the story of the world economy catching up with

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Airbnb a little bit in terms of the outlook that

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 4>they gave us.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 8>Yes, So, in their fourth quarter outlook statement, they mentioned

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 8>they saw some early volatility in the quarter. On their

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 8>earnings call, they mentioned it was hard to pinpoint what

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 8>exactly it was, but they pointed it to macro economic

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 8>factors as well as political tensions.

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Leslie, we sit here in New York and what's been

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 3>so interesting is the regulatory pressure that Airbnb is coming

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>under in this particular city. Do they speak to that

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 3>narrative just how much the business model is kind of

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 3>being uphended at the moment right.

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 8>Their take is that New York is like a smaller

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 8>market right now for them, like around one percent of

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 8>their revenue before the regulations kicked in. And their take

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 8>is that over eighty percent of their top markets have

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 8>been regulated. So they're still confident that with their business model,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 8>with supply of the listing still growing at a double

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 8>digit rate.

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 3>What was interesting also about Airbnb and its leadership was

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 3>they didn't have to sort of make those painful announcements

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 3>of job cuts when everyone else was they managed to

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 3>steer the business remain lean. Are they going to have

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to think about that a little bit more with macroeconomic headwinds,

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 3>with geopolitical tensions, with the old regulatory headwind here in

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the US.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 8>Right, a lot of analysts who have It's serrating at

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 8>the highest number right now, and a lot of her

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 8>are looking for long term growth catalysts, and this is

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 8>why they are coming up with product updates to try

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 8>to make the platform more reliable, getting continue hosting with

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 8>them and also gets to continue booking with them.

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 4>So the response is really key here. You know, the

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 4>pandemic era, that behavior of consumers has changed. Stays of

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight days or more in focus. But next week

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 4>we think we're going to get all kinds of new products.

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 4>What does the future look like for Airbnb and Natalie.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 8>Right CEO Brian Cheskey says, they're laying the foundation for

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the new services that are coming out,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 8>whether it's using AI as a better matching service. All

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 8>these updates are to you know, tell guests and hosts

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 8>to keep you know, booking and using their platforms.

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Won't keep an eye on how those product anounments do

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 3>you transpond Natalie Lung, We thank you for the inside

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 3>track on Airbnb. Meanwhile, we've got more on earnings, etc.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Of course came out.

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 5>We want to bring in Punham, Gil from Bluebeg Intelligence

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 5>and Punham.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm so fascinated with ETC's numbers because we just spoke

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>with the president of Shopify feeling very resilient about where

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a consumer is managing to be and really show path

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>to growth.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 5>Why is etc.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 3>Not managing to mimic that sort of consumer strength.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 2>I think it's it's a little bit of a different

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 2>story because we are seeing consumer spending slow down, consumers

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>are making trade offs, so I think it's about more

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>where are you finding what you want? We saw a

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.239
<v Speaker 2>good result out of Amazon, so you can't say that

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the consumer is down everywhere. But I think with Etsy.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you think of Etsy, you think about

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 2>gift giving, right, you think about what can you get

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that's unique and different? But Etsy offers so much more

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 2>than that that there just is an awareness for so

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's about them continuing to build that awareness

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>that's going to get more buyers onto the platform. They

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>saw a really nice increase in sellers in the quarter.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 2>They were up about nineteen percent, which is encouraging. So

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>people want to sell on Etsy. Small businesses want to

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 2>sell on Etsy, but they still need.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 5>The buyer growth.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 2>We need to see more buyer growth. We need to

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 2>see buyers want different things from Etsy, not.

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 4>Just the gifts Panama. I was reading your outlook on

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Etsy last night, and one of the things you talk

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 4>about is something Caroline and I have discussed with every

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 4>commerce company in the world, which is personalization. Why will

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 4>that help them address the issues you just outlined Because.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 2>When you go online, you have an endless aisle. You

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>go to a store, you walked the aisle where you

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 2>know you'll find what you want. But when you go online,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 2>list goes on and on and on forever. So the

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 2>ability to personalize for any company and really give the

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 2>consumer more of what they want than just everything, is

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>going to help drive conversion. Online conversion is just low

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 2>single digits, so people browse more online than they buy,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 2>and the ability to personalize, the ability to cater to

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>their needs is really going to help drive that conversion higher.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm kind of amazed that people don't realize

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the breadth of things you can get on Etsy.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm just thinking producers.

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Reminding us of the Taylor Swift and the Beyonce getting

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 3>your glitter and your silver ahead of time. Everyone was

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 3>turning to an Etsy at that particular moment. I think

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 3>of how much Halloween must be a push forward for

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 3>makers on Etsy.

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 5>What do you think?

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 3>What do you want to see from leadership here? Basically

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 3>to market themselves.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they need to just invest in marketing. They

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 2>need to get the word out there that Etsy has

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot more. You know, think about the home category

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>that they talked about. We are seeing people invest back

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>in their homes. You know, they took a pause after

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic, but now you're thinking, you know, can I

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 2>upgrade something in my home because it's too expensive to

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 2>upgrade out of my home into a new one. So

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing stuff like that plan and at C sells

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of home but that's not where you go

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>for your home stuff. Right now, You've got a Wayfair,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 2>you got to Amazon, You've got to target Walmart.

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 5>Et cetera.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, it's saying that Shopers are focused on essentials less

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 3>on discretionary. That's the macro impact. Punam Goyle love speaking

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 3>with you. Thank you from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, coming up, we'll get the latest from the trial

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 5>and Juan sam magmuin Freed. DURAS they're beginning their deliberations today.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be joined by a rock Change Association

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>CEO Chris Smith about well the overall impact on the

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 3>cryptospace ed.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 4>YEP more earnings as well paypower as a mover to

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 4>the upside boosted its profit outlook. Remember this is the

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 4>first earnings that Alex Chris is overseeing as CEO. They

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 4>announcement you see FO Jamie Miller who joins from ERTs

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 4>and Young. They also received a subpoena from the SEC

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 4>relating to their work in dollar denominated stable coin and

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 4>in the regulatory filing say they're complying with the SEC.

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 4>So that's going to be a story track which shares

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 4>up almost five percent. This is Bloombog Technology. With the

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 4>FTX trial now wrapped up, DURAS are beginning deliberation on

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.239
<v Speaker 4>Sam Bankman Freed's fate right now today. What does it

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 4>mean for the crypto industry? What does it mean for

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Sam Bankman Free. That's bringing Kristensen Air, CEO of the

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Blockchain Association for kind of the bigger picture on what's

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 4>going on here? But first of all, okay, the jury

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 4>is away deliberating. Yes, the closing argument from Sam Bankman,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Freed's attorney was that he has been painted unjustifiably so

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 4>as a villain. And Bloomberg has this piece today that

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 4>there were six opportunities where he was given a choice

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 4>tell the truth or double down, and the prosecution says

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 4>he doubled down. What are you makable of that?

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think the evidence is incredibly compelling. It

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 10>seemed that every time Sam got in trouble, instead of

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 10>confronting that trouble, he was like a gambler in Vegas

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 10>and ended up doubling down again. And unfortunately he was

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 10>apparently getting that money from customer fund.

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, very interesting.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 10>I think, a dramatic trial. I'm very curious to see

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 10>what verdict the jury returns. It sounds like some speculate

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 10>that could happen even as soon as today. But you know,

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 10>I think from the crypto industry perspective, we're very eager

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 10>to see this chapter closed. We feel like people are

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 10>unfairly conflating the entire industry with one man in one company,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 10>when really this is a story about a krook, not

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 10>a story about crypto, and so we're excited to move forward.

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 10>But yes, certainly been an entertaining, an interesting trial, something

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 10>I think they'll make movies on.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 4>This is very much an innocent until proven guilty situation.

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 4>It is a jury trial after rule, but in the

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 4>event survivor outcome. Has this series been damaging to the

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 4>goals of the Blockchain Association because you essentially want the

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 4>underlying technology that supports crypto to be mainstream globally.

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 10>Yes, absolutely, and we're trying to get public policy makers

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 10>in Washington to understand the technology so that we can

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 10>get the appropriate regulatory framework in place. And I think absolutely,

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 10>without question, this case and this trial has been damaging

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 10>to the industry. I think the good news though, is

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 10>in the past year since these events went down, we

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 10>have seen leaders across the crypto industry from other leading companies,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 10>We've seen entrepreneurs, we've seen individual members of the community.

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 10>They've really taken an interest in working in Washington and

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 10>talking with policymakers, and so what used to be just

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 10>sort of Sam Bateman free going around and taking up

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 10>a lot of the time that has been replaced with

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 10>a much broader, more diverse set of individuals in the

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 10>crypto ecosystem, and those actually have the right values, that

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 10>are building things, that believe in the power of decentralization,

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 10>and they aren't just here to make a bunch of money.

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 4>So they can give it away.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 10>At least that's a sam stated motive.

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 5>Some of the.

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Voices that are now speaking to regulators, well, one of

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 3>them might be over at PayPal at the moment. We understand,

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 3>of course, that the SEC is looking into their view

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 3>on stable coins in particular.

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 5>How are you seeing that sort of discussion bear out

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 5>at the moment.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 3>We know that Gary Gensler is pretty well cynical, shall

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 3>we say, about the space, But what are the other

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 3>people in the room at the moment saying?

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, No, that's an interesting question, Caroline. I mean, we

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 10>don't know a whole lot about what the SEC is

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 10>asking PayPal about its new stable coin business, only that

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 10>they are asking questions, so it's a little bit unclear.

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 10>You know, typically the SEC does not have jurisdiction over

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 10>stable coins because stable coins are not securities. But we

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 10>are seeing right now is a lot of discussion on

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 10>Capitol Hill about what is the right regulatory framework for

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 10>stable coins. Both in the Trump administration and in the

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 10>Biden administration, we had reports from the President's Working Group

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 10>that recommended ideas for regulatory framework. This summer, we saw

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 10>Patrick McHenry pass a bill through his committee that would

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 10>provide a regulatory framework for stable coins. And I do

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 10>think there's a very good chance that before perhaps not

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 10>the end of this year, but before the end of

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 10>this Congress, that we do see stable coin legislation move forward,

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 10>because this is an issue that everyone agrees needs to

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 10>be addressed. But it's not the role of Gary Gensler

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 10>to regulate stable coins. He's a securities regulator and stable

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 10>coins are not securities.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Wow Hill debate that CFPB, the Consumer Financial Protections Bureau,

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 3>also overlooking these sorts of movements from big companies towards

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 3>accessing crypto at large by a consumer base. What about

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the ETF's conversation as well. I mean, ultimately that's what's

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of been driving bitcoin the og of the crypto space.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Are we anticipating as soon as this end of this

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 3>year that we will get US sport bitcoin ETF? And

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 3>how much do you think that will be like loathed

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 3>when we still have this slightly colouled over the whole space.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 10>No, I mean I think we're already starting to see

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 10>some price action in the markets on anticipation of a

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 10>bitcoin ETF. You know, we had a very important moment

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 10>over the summer where the SEC lost a case that

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 10>it acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner by not

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 10>moving forward with a spot bitcoin ETF. You know, much

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 10>thanks to Gray Scale and our legal team for all

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 10>of the hard work that they put in to get

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 10>to get that ruling. And so I think what we

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 10>have now are multiple applications. These applications have deadlines where

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 10>the SEC has an opportunity to extend them, but most

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 10>of these deadlines are coming up in January. So I

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 10>think it's highly likely in the next couple of months

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 10>that we will get a Bitcoin spot a spot bitcoin

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 10>ETF approved, And I think that there are a lot

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 10>of investors that are eager to be able to access

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 10>exposure to bitcoin through their typical brokerage platform.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 4>There was one tangible example of blockchain technology use out

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 4>of London this morning, HSB A frankly one of the

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 4>biggest billion banks in the world, using distribute distributed ledger

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 4>excuse me to to prove that tokenizing ownership of gold works.

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 4>Did you see that and if so, how does that

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 4>make you feel?

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 10>Is it really I didn't see that particular story, but

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 10>I know there are a lot of people looking right

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 10>now to figure out how can we tie these real

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 10>world assets to blockchains, because they can be an incredibly

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 10>efficient way for tracking information. And so the key kind

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 10>of becomes, how do you connect that asset, the digital

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 10>asset to the real world asset. But there are a

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 10>lot of people that are exploring exploring this place right now,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 10>and I think there are a lot of opportunities for

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 10>upgrading the infrastructure for tracking a lot of things we

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 10>do in the traditional investment space.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people still talking about that underlying technology.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Blockchain Association CEO Christma Smith, thank you so much for

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 3>joining us on this day.

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, and you're sticking with a crypto.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we got some news sticking with crypto sentiment around coinbase,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 4>which is rising with the long anticipated debut of a

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin etf appearing in ant This has been fueling expectations

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 4>for a widespread increase in demand and prompting some investors

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 4>to disregard the uncertainty which we've been talking about surrounding

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 4>the largest US crypto exchange, even as the SEC lawsuit

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 4>filed earlier this year continues to clown coinbases out look

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 4>time for Talking Tech and first up into It is

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 4>winding down personal finance app Mint and pushing users to

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 4>shift to credit Karma, a similar service that the company

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 4>acquired in twenty twenty. Mint will no longer be available

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 4>at the start of twenty twenty four, and its team

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 4>and product features are being moved within Credit Karma. And

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Google's vice president of Search testified about the company's AI

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 4>efforts that the Justice Department's antitrust trial against the search

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 4>giant and disputed suggestions that the company rushed to release

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 4>its AI chatbot Bard earlier this year in order to

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 4>beat Microsoft's offering. Plus, the UK Summit on AI Safety

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 4>is wrapping up, with AI leaders debating over how much

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 4>to focus on the supposed existential risks of AI, highlighting

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 4>those broader tensions in the tech community as lawmakers propose

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 4>regulation and safeguards. Prime Minister Richie Sunak will be leading

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 4>talks on the final day of the summit before a

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 4>conversation with Elon Musk later today gosh, that was a

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 4>lot to take on board.

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Carolina, and let's get more from the AI summit. Mark

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Bergen joins US now from London, and there has been

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 3>this tension about immediate threats of AI versus long term

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and many they're trying to say, look, it's not actually

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 3>about the risks, it's about the models that are in

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>development and analyzing where they go in the next year.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, what are some of the takeaways from this summer?

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 5>What have they actually progressed on.

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 11>I mean, one of the major takeaways we saw yesterday

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 11>the speech from the Karma US Commerce Secretary followed by

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 11>Vice Minister of China sharing the same stage, agreeing on

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 11>very broad terms with the kind of that all the

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 11>countries put out around these catastrophic harms. But at least

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 11>that's a symbolic and sort of diplomatic victory here for

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 11>the UK and for the summit, the fact that they

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 11>could bring together the US and China where they have

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 11>clearly desperate views on the geopolitics involved with AI and

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 11>the US and certainly has has talked about China's AI

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 11>development as being a sort of military threat.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting we're going to debate a little bit more

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>about who was there and whether or not they were

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 3>being mobbed or not. It seems as though there's some

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 3>talk that Ranning in a musk was mobbed and he

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 3>held court with delegates, but also.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 5>And other times were sitting and listening and taking all.

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 3>In some of the discussions around AI and the control

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 3>of AI. How how has basically the corporate side of

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 3>the conversation gone.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Mark, It's funny, I meationed Elin.

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean you said, like the UK has put him

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 11>out as a as an interesting figurehead and sort of

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 11>the shining big CEO that they got. I mean there's

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 11>a debatable certainly his company is involved artificial intelligence, but

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 11>he's definitely not one of the leaders building these large

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 11>language models that were all paying attention to, and that

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 11>frankly is sort of this frontier AI that the conference

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 11>is meant to be about. And then we saw, you know,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 11>the benefit here is they get the Elon halo attached

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 11>to that and a lot of attention, and then the

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 11>side is that, you know, the the other side of

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 11>Elon is his tweet that he put out I think

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 11>it is less than an hour ago, right, this sort

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 11>of cartoon that was I only interpreted as a criticism

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 11>of the conference itself.

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:48.719
<v Speaker 4>Well must tweeting a meme shock there is some mechanics

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 4>of things to come. This evening Musk and Prime Minister

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 4>sun Act just quickly woke us through what we're expecting.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you know, Elon has talked a lot about

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 11>sort of what we what we've paraphrases is the doom

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 11>doomsayer version of AI or at the existential risk. He

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 11>was one of the notable signatories on this letter earlier

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 11>this year about slowing down the advancement. I do and

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 11>very curious to seeing one of the conversations that's happening

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 11>kind of on the fringes of the event and even

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 11>at the event itself.

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Meta has made this claim. This their chief scientist.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 11>And then we had a really fascinating interview with with

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 11>Google's deep Minds demos about this idea that there's this

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 11>regulatory capture that the biggest companies are basically saying, regulate

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 11>us and only us, so the smaller companies can compete.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 11>And I imagine that Elin will have and certainly have

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 11>an opinion on that, and probably likely I would say

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 11>that there is some regulatory capture involved Bergen.

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you'll be tuning in some of those conversations

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 3>going on on X in a minute, and we thank

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Mark can I. Meanwhile, we've got news relating to musks

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 3>other ventures, Ryan.

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and also via social media posts. Starlink, the space

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 4>based internet service offered by SpaceX, has it cash flow

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 4>break even. According to Elon muscle Man and SpaceX CEO

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 4>posted the financial update to his social media platform chs

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 4>for meerly known as Swiss, who also shares this. Starlink

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 4>has launched a majority of all the satellites cumulatively from

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Earth by next year, Kara, And this just shows the

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 4>proyus they've made. But investors want to know, a are

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 4>they going to make money on Starlink? Apparently so when

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 4>will they spin it off in an ipo?

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 3>And still what the most valuable private company out there?

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 4>Big time? Yes, still the most valuable, and we've been

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 4>reporting based on these tender rounds the valuation edging above

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and fifty billion, which is crazy quite a lot.

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we have the podcast wherever you get your podcasts

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 4>on all the Bloomberg platforms but also on Apple, Spotify,

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 4>and iHeart. We really appreciate all of you that listen

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 4>in from New York and SF. This is Bloomberg