WEBVTT - Money Talks

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to game Plan, a show about our lives at work.

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Francesco Leavie, editor of the game Plan section at

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and I'm Rebecca Greenfield, a reporter at Bloomberg,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>where I cover workplace culture. This week, we're talking about money,

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>how we make it, and what we do with it. Later,

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to Sally Crotcheck, co founder of la vest,

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a service that helps women invest their money. But first,

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about our salaries. How much do you make? Becca,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to talk about that, whyever or not?

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't know. We live in a society, man. Yeah, people,

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>people including myself, and I'm guilty of this. We don't

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like talking about our salaries. It's like talking about politics

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and religion. It's like if you bring it up with

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody you don't know that, well, it's pretty likely that

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody is going to get offended. And I just want

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to avoid the uncomfortable situation. But that's just me to

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>see what some other people think. I decided to ask

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>some of our coworkers if they would tell me their salaries.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Would you tell me your salary? Yeah? Really? Yeah? Why not?

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>What is it? It's WHOA, I can't believe you just

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>told me that. Would you tell me your salary? No?

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Why not? It just seems taboo and like culturally unacceptable

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to tell people your salary. Would you tell me your salary? Yeah? Okay?

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>What is it I make? I think employees should share

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their salaries. I think it's a way for employees like

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>banned together and extract more money for their labor. Would

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you tell me your salary? Yes? Okay? What is it?

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Would you tell me your salary? It's not something that

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I discussed often with strangers or even coworkers, but like

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>my close network of like friends and family, that would

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>be something that I would discuss with them. Probably not,

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd be a little hesitant because I've been somewhere where

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>employees have shared, and then I've seemed like there was

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like a tension almost. It makes people feel less valued

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>if they know someone else doing similar work is making more.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So I was surprised by how many people told me

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what they make, But there were still some people who were,

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like me, uncomfortable with sharing for what I thought were

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>some pretty legitimate reasons. And yet there have been arguments

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>right that salary transparency, which is sort of a buzzworthy

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>phrase these days, is great. If everybody knew what everybody

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>else made, there would be a lot more fairness and

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>parity between men and women, right and when you I think,

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>especially with negotiating, which is something that's particularly hard for

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>women to do already, not having any information just makes

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it a hard conversation. Even if you are making the

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>exact right amount of money, or more than your coworker,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you you might not assume that. And then, of course,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>on the darkest end of this, if you're actually being

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>discriminated against for a variety of reasons and not being

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>paid just because you are a woman or minority, then

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you might not You won't know that unless there is transparency,

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and transparency has has helped people. So there is this

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>movement for more transparency which comes in a few different flavors.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And there are companies now where everybody knows what everyone

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>else makes. Right. There's one very high profile example in

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the company is called Buffer. What does Buffer do? They're

0:03:54.680 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a social media platform? Okay, and at first the most

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>extreme example because they post everyone's salary online, so it's

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>not just public within the organization, it's public to everybody

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the outside world. And they post the salaries and

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>then they have this calculator where they show kind of

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>how the salary where it comes from. So various factors

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>go into salaries, such as the cost of living of

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a place, how many years experience someone has, what their

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>job title is, and that all makes the salary, and

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that's all completely public. And they started this experiment some

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>time ago. Yeah, it's been a few years, you know.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>They did it for fairness in general, and and it

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>should close the wage gap. But they did a study

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>recently this year that they found that there was still

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a wage gap, right because there were specific factors going

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.799
<v Speaker 1>into each person's salary that was resulting in a gender

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>based wage gap. Yeah, things that they couldn't really control.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>For example, they just happened to hire women for job

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>types that paid less. So an engineer will make more

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>than a community manager UM and women and senior roles

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and community management, but that makes less than a man

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and a senior role in engineering, And knowing where the

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>salaries come from doesn't change that, sure, but it would

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>be useful to know if you were a woman and

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>engineering and you were making less than So that wasn't happening,

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>But that kind of discrimination did go away. That's good,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's also we're talking about private companies or

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>public companies that don't have to post this information online.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's some there's some industries where you actually do

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.679
<v Speaker 1>have full salary transparency. I mean most city and state

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>employees have public salaries, and that means that it's the

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>public's right to know how much you're elected officials are making,

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>or your local you know, city government employees or whatever.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>And then in those cases there is a very narrow

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>range of what you would be making. You just hit

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks and you make a certain amount of money and

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>there are caps, and it can't really be an other

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>way because everybody knows what you're paid. Yeah, and I've

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>talked to some people who work for public universities who

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>have had salary transparency their whole career, and they do

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>have a really different relationship and outlook on their salary

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>being transparent, and I think it's it's a little bit

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they knew what they signed up for. And also, if

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going into public service, you're probably not doing it

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for the money. It's not the same kind of cutthroat

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you judge each other based on what you make. Environment

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>so it is a little different. Okay, so fixing the

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>wage gap is obviously more nuanced and complex than just

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>making everybody's salaries known to everybody else. And maybe that's

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the first step, but there's obviously a lot more going on.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's say everybody was getting paid perfectly fair salary,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>what the world? The next question is what do you

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>do with that money? And are there actually ways that

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>women are handicapping themselves by not investing that money in

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the same way that men do. That's exactly what we

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are here to talk to our guest about. Sally Crawcheck is,

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>apart from being the co founder of l Vest, which

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>helps women invest their money, is a wealth management expert

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who worked her way up the financial services ladder at

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>places like Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, and in

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>recent years she's dedicated her career to helping women in business.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that I'm like, you're a feminist for the capital

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>f these days. Yes, that's correct. I love that intro.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Lately your talking points has been the investing gap. The

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we hear a lot about the wealth gap or the

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>wage gap between men and women, but you are drawing

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>attention to another aspect of difference between men and women

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and how they invest. So so we talk a lot

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about the gender pay gap, and let me say something

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to start off with, closing the gender pay gap is

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a great thing for everybody. If we could close the

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>gender pay gap, we could actually research shows closed the

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>retirement savings gap by nearly a third, so it's a

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>big deal. It puts money into the economy, it helps

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>families be better off, it's all good. There's another gender

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>gap that we don't talk about at all, which is

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the gender investing gap. Men invest to a greater extent

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>than women do, and the gender investing gap can cost

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>some women more, in some cases quite a bit more

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>over the course of their lives, and the gender pay

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>gap does, but we haven't talked about it. Again, for

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your listeners who aren't women, who are saying I don't know,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>why do I care? You care because closing that gap

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>will drive capital into the markets um and will also

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>help close the retirement savings gap. And it's good for

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>all of us to have these gaps closed. So one

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>question I have and other people might have, is our

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>men and women not investing as much because women don't

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>have as much money. That no, that is a reason,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the reason. And in fact, what really

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>really really bothers me is when the research will come

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>out and they'll say, oh, women and retire with two

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>thirds of money of men and some personal finance journalists,

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>none of whom work at this company. I'm sure. Well,

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>then say well, yeah, women should invest more, But that's

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>not the real issue. It's the gender pay gap. It's

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like saying, oh, my gosh, I broke my

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>arm and I broke my leg, but until I can

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>fix my leg, I'm not going to fix my arm. Right, So, yes,

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is some of it that it's they don't have as

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>much money, sure, but that's not the whole of the issue.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And stopping there and saying well, we'll wait till the

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>gender pay gap is fixed, is I think very shortsighted.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So what are and done? Yeah? Okay, so not to

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>be dumb about it, but what are the differences in

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the characteristics of or the investing styles of men vers Well,

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question because there are so many articles

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>out there about mistakes people make when they invest, and

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they typically are around overtrading, falling in love with your winners,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>selling your losers too, quickly paying too high fees. But

0:09:58.440 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>da da da da da, And it's sort of sort

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>as activity based mistakes. Wait a minute, those are mistakes

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>men make. Women make different mistakes. Those mistakes women make

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>our first and foremost not investing enough. The other mistake

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>women make, and this is gonna sound counterintuitive, is they

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>wait until they believe that they are fully financially educated.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So almost every women we know, I see your head nodding,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to invest. In fact, I was in Silicon

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Valley a handful of weeks ago and heard from a

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>fellow venture capital partner his girlfriend was going to take

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks off this summer so she could

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>learn to invest. Right, it doesn't take that long, but

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a view of I need to get smarter. And

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>so all these women that we know have stacks of

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>books next to the desk and they don't invest, and

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it costs them a fortune. So an example, if you're

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>making call it eight dollars a year, you are putting

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of your income in the bank, which is what experts

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>recommend us a lot. But let's go with it for

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a second. You're putting in the bank instead of investing,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and you wait ten years. Right, Oh, I've busy. I

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>waited years. I hear it all the time, people waited

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty years. That costs you an average of a

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars a day. That wait, right, a hundred dollars

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a day. And so we underestimate the cost of waiting

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and the cost of not investing substantially. I loved reading

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>about the thing about waiting until you're fully educated, or

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>waiting until you feel like you are done learning everything

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to know before you start doing something, because

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that that seems to be something that can stim me

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>women in other areas. They say women as opposed to

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>men will only apply to jobs if they have a

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of the qualifications, or you know, just tend

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to sort of wait to do things until they feel

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>completely confident in their own abilities. And it's almost like

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you're saying a little bit of fool hardiness here, like

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of jumping in without I wouldn't call

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>it full hardiness. But but look, Francesca, did you love

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>getting a's at school? Of course you did right back,

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and you loved getting right absolutely, And so we we wait.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And so here's the example. When I was running Smith

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Barney back in the day of our clients did not

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:03.719
<v Speaker 1>know what a managed account was, even though it was

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>our largest product. Neither gender would ask. When you ask

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the guys, why won't you ask it, essentially was I'm

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy, I don't ask for directions. That's what we do.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And when you ask the women, they'd say, I'm a gal,

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to bother. That's what we do. The

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>difference was the men would buy it and the women wouldn't.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Now that full so neither knew either NW. So both

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>were almost I don't want to say equally, but neither

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>were as financially educated as they quote should have been.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But the gentleman and biding the women wouldn't. And then

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you go, okay, who just made the mistake? Given that,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and as women sometimes we were like, oh, it's the guys, right,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>because they bought something they didn't know. But the truth is,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>even without having full financial knowledge, they were getting the

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>returns over time as a result of it. So because

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they were starting earlier as well, that's right, because they

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>were doing it. And so I think the biggest red

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>herring out there for women is we we buy into

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the we need more financial education. But then we're so

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>busy we never get it and so we don't invest. Now,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I've built elvest, which is a digital investment platform for women,

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and part of what we do is we try to

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>take away the jargon that we women will try to

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>understand and just have you make decisions about things that

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you can control. Yeah, So hearing you talk about the

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that men make and the way women act, I

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>completely relate to it. And also hearing about the men

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>really stresses me out because I don't want to be

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in that position, probably because I'm a woman. You know.

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>In addition to lves, what are some ways that women

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>can get into investing in a way that makes them

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable? Well, look, do it, um, I would say,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you use elves or not, whatever, but buying diversified,

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>low cost investments, you know, in a diversified managed et

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>F portfolio, that's the way to go. Go to whatever

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>your broker is, whatever your financial advisor, who you're comfortable

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>with us, and say, look, just put me an inexpensive,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>highly diversified investments. To my opinion, you have to start there.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>If you want to, then listen to Bloomberg all day

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and figure out you know, the euro is going to

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>outperform the end, etcetera, etcetera. You can do that, but

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>by not starting with something, you're giving up too much ground.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I would say is Wall Street is

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty mail, actually, and we should keep that in mind.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty mail in that the majority of the employees

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the financial advisor segment or male, about eighty five

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>percent male financial advisors. The terms and the words we

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>use are very war and sports. That's one of my

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>big pet peeves that I talk about the sports metaphor

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and and and you know, Bloomberg isn't as much as

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>some but the sports it looks like sports programming sometimes

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>right the rara, this section segment is winning, this is outperforming,

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this is beating, this is we're picking this winner. And

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>so there's sort of a very male orientation war and sports.

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, the symbol of Wall Street is

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>as it's above. Didn't know, you're absolutely correct. In fact,

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the business I used to run, Marriledge, it's able. What's

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a ball. It's a phallic symbol. Yes, oh we went there,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we went there. Okay, that's podcast later, But you know,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't. I haven't talked to many women who have

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>said you know that industry just speaks to me just

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's me. It's me, And so the advice I would

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>give his, look, we're not going to change the whole

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>industry overnight, but we should recognize there's a male orientation.

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It's talking to them more and sort of fight through that.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>It's true. It sort of reminds me of this sounds

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>fairly beside the point, But I just went shopping for

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a car with my partner recently, and in classic car

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>dealership style, basically all of the sales people, male or female,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>addressed only him and not me. And I was furious

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about it, of course, But then I realized that the

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>questions that he was asking and the things that he

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>was talking about, we're not particularly educated. You know. He

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, I want a leather and taster, and

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I want and I want, you know, like a sun roof.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And I would have felt embarrassed walking in and saying

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>those things because I would have felt like I had

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to do months of research on chassis and whatever to

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>sound smart. And he didn't worry about sounding smart because

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>he could just be a guy and go in there

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and say whatever he wants. That sort of made me

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>realize that like, it isn't about them having a shared language.

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's also about just being free to talk without

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>worrying too much about sounding down. But we hear that

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in the financial services industry again and again that even

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>when when we used to ask our financial advisors, they'd

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>meet with couples and we'd say how much time did

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you spend talking to each of them, they'd think, no,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>one quite fifty fifty because the guy and I we

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about the football game. But it's and we would

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>tape them and then we'd play it back and it

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>would be like and so of no wonder then that

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what we saw was that men would leave their financial

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>advisor at a very low rate. I mean, if the

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>client didn't die, I'd leave less than two percent of

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the time, I mean very low rate. But in the

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>year after his death, the husband's death, the woman would

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>leave at a rate of grader than seventy zero because

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>she needed to find somebody that spoke to her exactly

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because the research tells you she says that he didn't

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to you know, he the financial advisor didn't talk

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>to me for twenty years, forty years, played golf with

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>my husband, didn't play golf with me, talked about sports,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk to me about what I'm interested in, you know,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever that is. Um just you know, just I feel

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I felt dissed. We're doing options trading strategies. I never

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>understood it. No one ever took me to lunch and

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>explained it, and the financial advisors would typically be sort

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of surprised by this um and then forget it once

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it went from her to the next generation. We used

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep the assets less than two percent of the time.

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>So starting early, finding people that you can relate to,

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether or not they relate to your husband

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're a woman. Those are all great tips for women.

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But I have to ask, since starting early is so important,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>many people entering the job force or the workforce are

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>starting out with a negative net worth because they have

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>student debt and not much else. What is the correct

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of money to have before you start investing? And

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. And what do you do if

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 1>if you're so broke that paying off your debt is

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the only thing you can think about, Well, you should

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>pay off your debt, is the answer. Another question I

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>think young people debt have is that they wonder if

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they should put any money in there for a one

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>k or just like you said, pay off your debt. Yeah,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it looks for oh one k

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is tax deferred savings. So it's fantastic and oh my goodness,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>whoa if you happen to work for an employer who

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>does a match, that is called free money. If they're

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>given away free money, take free money. And so you're

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna wanna look at that and say, Okay, the four

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>oh one K if I'm young, should be mostly in

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>equities if there's a match. That's you know, the stock

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>markets have returned on average over the past many decades

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and and a half percent a year. I'm not projecting

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>any means that it will do that again, but jeez,

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if you could put that into equities and have a match,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, one for one match, holl of ason you're

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, if it does as well as

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it did historically, you know, close return any that's not bad, right,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>So that would overcome a student loan that can be

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a lower single digit rate type of cost for you.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I also wondering if somebody so you paid off your

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>student loans and now you're someone like me, a young

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>professional who's making money, doesn't I don't have any debt?

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>What should I be doing? Very lucky? I really relate

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to so many of the things you said, Like I

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>do have money sitting in a savings account? Is that dumb? Right?

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's some advice that you can get that

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of So do you have three months of your

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>salary set aside in a savings account in case of

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an emergency? That's the second thing you do. Because stuff happens.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Stuff happens. I really did not think I was going

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to get fired from my jobs. I mean, I don't

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>know my business that I was running was I had

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>a plan and it was the only one that was

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>growing at the company, and you know, you just sort

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of feel like you're okay, and then they re orged

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>me out. Likewise, I don't know. I was married to

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the man I loved, and I really thought he loved

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>me too, But he loved my friend more than he

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>loved me. So that was awkward. Those things happened to me,

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And actually I would say, I know, I I I've

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>been trying to make the argument for so freaking long

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that if, oh if my husband would cheat on me,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>your husband might cheat on you or your girlfriend or

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>your partner whoever, and most people like whatever, But you know,

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>jay Z cheated on Beyonce, and if jay Z is

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>going to cheat on Beyonce, just all better have an

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>emergency fund, is all I'm saying. Right, all I'm saying

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>has a pretty big emergency fund. Well, I feel like

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that's why we don't feel sorry for because that woman

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>was like, hey, JC, I'm going to make it like

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing about gonna make a lot of money

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>off of you. I tried that did work anyway, So okay,

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>back to the to the topic. Obviously she's got a

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. But look, we we all know folks

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>who have ended up in relationships they don't want to

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>be in because they didn't have the financial with wherewithal

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to leave or jobs. So get that emergency fund because

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff happens. Okay, so this is all fantastic advice. Just

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a final but well, let's say, as a final question

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for you, if you had a magic wand and could

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>change one thing, if there was one thing you could

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>get all young women to do differently with their money,

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>what you know would be to invest, right, so it

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>would be to go into their boss's office, ask for

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the raise, negotiate for the ays because we're we are

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>we're making less than the guys are on average, and

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>so on average, we all deserve a raise. And by

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the way, if the boss says no, to have the

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>six other things that you will take instead of a

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>raise that matter and overseas assignment, working with the hot shots,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>star in management, time and marketing, flexible, whatever those things are.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>To go in there and be confident of your value, assuming,

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you don't suck at your job. If

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you suck at your job, don't listen anything I just said.

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But assuming you don't suck at your job, walking in

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>getting that raise and taking that raise and not spending

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it but investing it, those two things I gotta tell you,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Francesca aren't just important, their life changing love, their life changing.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>You cheated a little because you said two things instead

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>of one of that. We'll give you a pass. Come on.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a compound thing, compounds very very well. But

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>here's what I would say. We're already doing of the

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>hard work, right, we go to war Ark, we turn

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in our projects on time, we bring in the new client.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But if we're not getting paid, what the gentlemen are,

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're not investing like the gentlemen are. Literally, we're

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of our careers, left with about a

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>third the money that we would otherwise have. It's freaking nuts.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It's nuts. So it's a compound dancer. Well, thank you

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for your answer, and thanks for coming in, Sally. It

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>was fantastic to talk to user anytime goes. Thanks. Before

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we go, I'd like to introduce a new segment that

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we are premiering called half big Takes Half fake Takes.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What is a half big take? A half big take

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>is something that you feel A half by take is

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a really good point that you have that is not

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>substantive enough to justify a signing or writing an article

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>about it, or even a rant, or even a blood post,

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even a tweet. Less than a tweet. It

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>might be a tweet, okay, but it's something that I

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>want a platform for. Do you want to go first

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>this week? Yes. My half bag take is that my

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite temperature, both inside and outside at all times, is

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>when you cannot feel the air. Say more so, there's

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this theory, that theory, there's this thing where sixty eight

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>degrees is room temperature. And that you have to have

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like a cool breeze blowing on you at all times,

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is uncomfortable for me, like a nice cool

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>breeze outside. The idea of like cold air rubbing up

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>against my body is so uncomfortable. I want to like

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the temperature to be like seventy seven and not humid,

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like you can't feel the air. So you're framing this

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is a temperature thing, but really what you're saying is

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you just don't like being touched by the breeze. Well, yeah,

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because that makes me cold. Well, I don't understand the

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>cool breeze. I think the appeal of a cool breeze

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>is that it comes after you've been warmer than is comfortable.

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So then that's like in the office the air conditioning

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>is blasting. You shouldn't need a cool breeze in the

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>office because you should have a steady type. But it's

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>basic idea that we're like coming in from the hot

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>outside and need the cool breeze. And it does feel

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>good for one second maybe, but I will say all

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>day I'm very uncomfortable with the feeling of fans on

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>my skin. They tickle me. Okay, what's yours? My half

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>big take is about shutting down your computer properly. Here's

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the headline, folks, people, stop doing it. Stop shutting down

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>your computer properly. First of all, you're supposed to shut

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 1>it down, right, You're not. You're not supposed to just

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>like leave it on all the time, which everybody does.

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But your computer will accuse you of not shutting it

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>down properly kind of no matter what. And when you do,

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>take the time to respect company property and close all

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of the applications you've been using. Something will interrupt shut

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>down you know it, well, some program that's running, and

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>then you're wasting your own precious time. You could be

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>spending leaving work trying to do your company a solid

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>by shutting down properly, when there's no evidence that that

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>even matters. Show the computer repair person who says, I

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>know why this computer has got smoke coming out of

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the back because it wasn't shut down properly. Furthermore, well, here,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not my computer, by a lot of computers. This

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is what I do at the end of every day.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I press the power button and I hold it down,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and that computer shuts the heck down. I'm gonna try it, Yeah,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it feels really good, like you're really sticking into the

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>man when you do it. If we all get together

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and just press the off button instead of properly shutting down,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we can change the world. And this has been half

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>big takes, half baked takes. And that's it for another

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>episode of game Plan. For more, you can find me

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at francesco Today and I'm at rs Greenfield

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and our guest this week, Sally Crawcheck, is at Sally Crawchuck.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>See you next week, Hi, And now it's time for

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>half baked takes, Y