WEBVTT - Will we ever Travel Faster than Light Speed?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, Mango? What's that? Will? So, have you seen

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the Last Jedi yet? I have. I was going to

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you a question about it, but we have to

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>keep this spoiler free here, so I'm honestly kind of

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>scared to say anything. Uh do you want to say

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it in pick laden? No? No, I'm just I'm too nervous.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>But I will say this. So it seems fair to

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>say that light speed plays a pretty big role in

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Star Wars films. That's what you wanted to say.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's true, but well, you know, as I

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>sat there in the theater, my mind started wandering again.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, not because it isn't a great movie. I

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>really liked it, but I started thinking again about the

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of traveling at or beyond light speed. And it's

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the age old questions, you know, will anything

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ever travel beyond light speed? Well it's a good thing.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We have a brilliant author here today is to answer

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest questions about the universe, and only

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>one of them is about Star Wars. Yeah, but the

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>book that he's written is called We Have No Idea.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, we should give him a shot anyway.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's dive in m he their podcast listeners, Welcome

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to Part Time Genius. I'm Will Pearson and as always

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by my good friend man guest Tic and

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the man on the other side of the soundproof glass

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>sporting an impressive coral saken hair part. That's our friend

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and producer Tristan McNeil, who knew his hair could even

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>part like that. So that's not what we're here to

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about, or is it maybe another episode? I don't

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's anyway. So I know you and I have

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>recently been talking about the fact that over the past

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>few years there have been all these big signs events

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that have just gotten so much attention and people have

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten really excited about. We had the discovery of the

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson a few years ago. We had that big

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.639
<v Speaker 1>eclipse that you and I and our families all traveled

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out to see. There was um quantum teleportation and all

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this x excitement and confusion surrounding it, and so much more.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It's fun with events like these capture the world's attention.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>But but sometimes these events and the science around them

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>can be very difficult to communicate. But today we've got

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to truly give the communicator and one of the co

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>authors of a book called We Have No Idea Daniel Whites,

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to part Time Genius. Hello, and thank you

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>very much for having me on now. Daniel, this is

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting partnership for this book. You know, you're

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a particle physicist that you see Irvine doing a lot

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of your research over it cern and and you've partnered

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with a terrific cartoonist and Jorge cham And It's been

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun getting to know you guys over

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of months. Now. Jorge also has a

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>PhD and robotics. So I have to ask, how did

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys meet and then decide to take on a

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>project like We Have No Idea? Well, we met on

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Tinder first. Oh good, it's a great way to get going,

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, like most modern couples that we did meet

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. It was maybe ten years ago now,

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was thinking about other ways we could communicate

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>physics to the general public because I felt like there's

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of exciting questions we're asking with physics, but

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not always doing a great job of expressing that

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>excitement and the basic ideas to the general public. And

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was an opening there to communicate some

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff using cartoons. Actually, I saw a really

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>awesome technical comic put up by Google when they put

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>out their latest browser, the Chrome Browser, and Scott McCloud

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>made a technical comic about the Chrome browser, and like,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're not into writing browsers, you might not be

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>into reading comics about browsers. Because they had a great

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>job of making this seem interesting, and I thought, wow,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>if they can make browser development sound fun, and maybe

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>cartoons are a good way to show other things like physics.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have any artistic skills myself, and so

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't draw these cartoons myself. Um, but of course

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I was aware of Jorge and his amazing work PhD comics.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's some think of an Internet celebrity. In academia.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows him, and his comics are really captured the

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>restoration of research and academic life. Anyway, my wife suggested

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>she's also an academic and she's a big fan of

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because she said, why don't you email or him and

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>asked him to do it, And I thought, yeah, right,

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that's just like emailing Brad Pitt and asking about the

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>movie that's that's pretty awesome. And the project that resulted

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>from that a few years later, obviously is is we

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>have no idea, So can you tell us a little

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>bit about the the idea behind this book. Yeah. I

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>thought that there's a lot of great science communication that's happening,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but most of it was focused on what we do

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>know about the universe, all the amazing things that science

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>has learned, and it's important to show people what we

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>figured out. But I thought something was missing that. I

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>felt like people had a misunderstanding of how much we

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>knew about the universe. So we thought, let's instead write

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a book showing people all the huge but very basic

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>open questions to the universe, really simple stuff that we

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet figured out, stuff like how big is the universe?

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And how did it start? And how will it end?

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought there must be an appetite for people who

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are really interested in this basic stuff and excited to

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>learn that we haven't yet figured it out. Because to me,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>ignorance is an opportunity. It's a possibility of things you

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>could discover in the future. And when I was a kid,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I was always excited about that possibility of exploring the unknown.

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>And figuring out something new, discovering that the world was

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>different from the way we thought it might be and

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be completely uh counterintuitive, like the discoveries

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of quantum mechanics and relativity. I wanted to give people

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the sense that such discoveries discoveries, that that basic scale

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>might still be ahead of us, that there are still

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>really big, basic questions that we haven't answered. So that

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was the idea behind writing this book. And do you

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>tell us just a little bit about you know, I

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>know you're a particle physicist, that's certain, but what does

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean exactly? And what are you doing in the lab?

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's certain we collide protons together. We take the

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>protons and speed them up to nearly the speed of light,

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and then the particles inside the protons collide and turn

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.799
<v Speaker 1>into little balls of energy. Temporarily, they lose their form

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of matter and turn into pure energy. And then that

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>energy has this amazing feature which it can turn into

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>any kind of particle in the universe as long as

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's enough energy budget there. So if you've poured enough

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>energy into your collisions, you can make any kind of

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>particle there is, which means you can discover new kinds

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of matter even if you didn't know it existed. So

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of awesome. It's a it's a way to

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>explore the universe. And that's the thing that got me

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>excited about particle physics is exploring what the universe has

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>made out of How is it work at its smallest levels,

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>what is the organizational principle for this whole ridiculous, beautiful

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>universe we find ourselves in. And the fascinating thing about

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that is that it used to be the particle physics,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>which looks at the very very small told disconnected from cosmology,

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>which looks at like the very big history of the

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>universe the future of the universe. These days, these two

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>fields have kind of converged because we're asking a lot

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of similar questions. Like one of the big questions and

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>cosmology is what is all the dark matter? Right? Where

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is all this missing invisible matter in the universe. Well,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's certain what we're trying to do is make dark matter.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to collide those particles together to make a

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>new kind of matter, and we might produce dark matter

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in the laboratory, giving this insight into what's happening at

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the very very big scale. I love that there's so

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>many fascinating things in that statement and also so many

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>questions I have coming out of it. And I also

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just love that like it starts with such a simple idea,

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like the joy of crashing things together and creating all

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>these new things that it's stunning. But um, I know,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Will general crushing things together is a good way to

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>start the scientific experiment. Well. Will was asking at the

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the f So it about the last Jedi.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to have said anyone with spoilers, but

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>he talked about how the speed of light does come

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>up in it, and is it possible or will it

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be possible for anything to travel faster than light speed?

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So I just saw that movie and I was thinking

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>about the same stuff when I was watching it. I

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>thought they did it without spoilers. I thought they did

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.559
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job of bringing some real physics into

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that situation. Um. But your question was will we ever

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>travel faster than the speed of light? Um? Of all

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the things we don't know about the universe, this is

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one we're pretty sure we know that nothing can move

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>through space faster than the speed of light. Now, I

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't answer your question directly, I changed it a little

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>bit so I could be more more definitive. That is,

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>nothing can move through space faster than the speed of light,

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>so an object flying through space can't ever go faster

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>than lighthood. However, that's a really important copy moving through

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>space because recently we discovered in the last few decades

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that space is a weird thing. Space can do things

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't understand. If you think space is just

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>like the emptiness in the universe, the backdrop on which

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>everything happens, and then you need to get caught up

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>with some modern physics, because space does really weird things

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>like thend and expand and ripple. So if your goal

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily to move faster than light through space,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but just to get somewhere fast, like you want to

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>go from you know, your rebel base to wherever you

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>need to go, and you want to not spend a

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>million years getting there, then instead of moving through space

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fast from the speed of light, you might want to

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>just compress space itself. Right, so you can bring these

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>two locations, which ostensibly are very very far apart, if

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you can bring them closer together by by shrinking space,

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>by compressing space, then you can get there rapidly without

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going faster than the speed of light. And that's the

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>actual idea behind developing actual work drives. So while you

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>can't move through space faster than the speed of light,

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we might actually technically be able to eventually construct warp

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>drives that can get us to distant places faster than

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>light traveling through normal space. That's just it's as simple

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>as that. Really, that's all there is to it. I

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>assume that we're pretty close to this whole space compression thing,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like with the next five to ten years, we should

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to do this. Is that right, Daniel? I

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>would not invest in those companies, but you know there's

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating transition there, right. Anytime, if something is just

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>totally impossible, it's totally impossible. But now we've moved warp

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>drives from totally impossible to completely impractical and very very

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, which means, yeah, in ten years it will

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>probably just be an app on your iPhone, right because

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>now we just handed it from physicists to engineers, and

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in current calculations, you know, the energy to run a

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>warp drive, even go to like Alpha Centauri would require

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>more energy than is contained in like the planet Jube,

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all the massive planet Jupiter. Okay, so vast incredible quantities

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of energy we can't even imagine. However, you know, it's

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just become an efficiency problem. Now somebody can

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>build a better one and build a more effective one.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Right And of course, for your listeners, nobody's actually constructed

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>any sort of functioning warp drive. But theoretically it's not

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>impossible to compress space to travel places faster than light

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>could um. And that's what I liked about in that movie.

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, they don't just go places instantly in the

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>last They don't just disappear from one place and appear

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. They have to get there. And even though

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they're moving through hyperspace, right, there's still a speed they're

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>moving through hyperspace and a maximum this limitation there. And

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>so that's where the physics comes in, right, is in

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>providing plot points and the limitations. Well, I have a

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>follow up question to that in terms of headlines from

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year that dealt with traveling through space, and

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about that. But before we

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>do that, let's take a quick break. Welcome back to

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Part time Genius we're talking to Daniel Whites, and one

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>of the co authors of We Have No Idea, this

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>awesome book that talks about all of the things in

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe, not necessarily that we do know, but the

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>many big questions that we don't know. And we're putting

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Daniel on the spot today and asking him to answer

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>every single big question about the universe that seems reasonable

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to me. Think, So what do you think? So? Yeah? So,

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So before the break, I mentioned that I had another

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>question that related to headlines that we saw everywhere earlier

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this year. There was a headline that said, first object

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>teleported from Earth, and I have to be honest, Daniel,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I struggled with the way the media was covering this

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>event that happened, this quantum teleportation, and I wanted to

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>see if you could talk to us a little bit

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>about that and does it relate to what we were

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier, this idea of you know, being able

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to travel through space at faster than the speed of light.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Can you just talk to us a little bit about

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this event and and how the media may have struggled

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to communicate what actually happened in that experiment. Yeah,

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I read those headlines, and I was pretty excited object

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>teleported into space. I thought, Wow, we're gonna be beaming

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>up to space stations in the next few years. Right,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.599
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, the media totally failed to invade that

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>accurately because no object was teleported into space. Um. Instead,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>information was sent into space. And that's much less exciting

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's essentially just beaming a message. Right. So you can,

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we know already how to send information from one place

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to another. We have lots of techniques for that radio

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>laser or some of these things moving the speed of light. Right. Um,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this was more interesting because it's quantum teleportation. Right. That's

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a process by which quantum information like the state of

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>an atom or a photon, can be transmitted exactly from

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>one location to another. Right. And it involves like entangling

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>particles and using their quantum relationships to send that information.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's a new way to send information. But it's

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>not teleportation, right. It's not like your concept where something

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>disappears and is reappeared somewhere else, resembled there um. And

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's also does not move faster than the speed of light.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people think quantum entanglement is a way

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>around uh sending information is a way around the maximum

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>speedling for information. Unfortunately it's not. So this headline describes them,

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>which would have been exciting if it was accurate, but

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>instead it was a cool technical achievement. They had transmitted

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>information using this new quantum technique further than anybody ever had,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and they sent it out into space, which nobody had

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>done before. But it doesn't break the speed limited the universe.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>It's still limited to the speed of light, and it

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually send anything anywhere than information. So it's sort

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of deflating, and I think it gets to a larger

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>point of how this stuff happens, Like how do you

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>do an interesting experiment and then some journalists writes it

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>up as if it's something different, as if it's something

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>much more dramatic. You know. There's another example of that,

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of days ago, when the Pentagon released

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>all of its footage from this UFO program, and of

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>course they saw nothing there to indicate the presence of

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>aliens on Earth. But I've been watching the news and

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been everywhere. All this stuff has been covered as

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>if we're now just discovered that the that the Pentagon

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>has been talking to aliens and the headlines headlines or

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>things like summary of human encounters with um, you know,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a summary of human and counters of a third kind,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's all totally misleading click base. But I think

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the problems with science journalism these days,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is that in the crowded media community to have to

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of scream for attention by touting even modest research

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>achievements as incredible events in human history. So unfortunately, nothing

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was teleported into space. Otherwise I would be in line

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'd like to get up there. I do wish

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we had talked to you about the whole alien thing,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>because we're we're actually recording this from a bunker right now,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so it would have been useful information. Yeah, yeah, I

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>wish you had quantum teleported that information to us before

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunker. I would expect you guys to be on

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a mountaintop with flags and come talk to us actually

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on the quantum teleportation before we move on to another topic.

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is one of those things, like you said,

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>should have been a celebrated achievement because it is something

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that had been done in a way that had never

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>been done before, and at that distance can you talk

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about what the implications are

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>if we are speaking of out it accurately, of what

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>this could mean for us. Well, it's an improved way

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to send information. So quantum teleportation is just a copying

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of quantum information like the electron spin or photon state

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>um that can be transmitted in principle exactly from one

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>location to another. And the cool thing about that is

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just sending information without noise over that information loss right,

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And of course in a an actual practically built system

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>there is always information loss because you can't isolate these

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>particles from their environment. But the hope is if we

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>perfect this kind of technology, you could send information with

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>less noise, with less information loss over longer distances. So

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's always good to have several technologies being developed in

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>order to send information. So this is another one that

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>could could in principle in the future give us information

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>transmission with less power and less less noise and less

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>data loss. So, Daniel, I know we've chat a little

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>bit about dark matter in the in the past, and

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that conversation was so fascinating, But I

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want you to share some of that with our listeners,

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just something that's out there, but it's

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually something that's all around us. Right. Can you talk

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that. Yeah, this is one of

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.719
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things about physics is when it reveals to

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>us that the world we thought we lived in is

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>actually totally different if you look at it using a

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>new tool or a new perspective. And that's what we've

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>discovered with dark matter. We discovered that most of the

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>universe is not the kind of matter that you're familiar with,

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the kind of matter that makes up the chair you're

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>sitting on, the air you're breathing, or the coffee you're sipping,

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or stars or gases or planets or dust. That most

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, the matter in the universe is something else,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>something invisible, this thing called dark matter. And most people,

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if they hear about dark matter, they think, oh, maybe

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that's some weird kind of matter out there in space.

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But the thing about dark matter is that it's it

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>has gravity, It attracts everything with mass to it, and

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it clusters it a lessons together, indeed, into these big blobs.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>And those big blobs line up perfectly with where normal

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>matter is, like galaxies and stars and gas and dust.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Most of the dark matter and universe is distributed where

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the normal matter is because they attract each other gravitationally.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what that means is that very likely we

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are sitting in a soup of dark matter. Like can

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>you imagine all the air in the room around you, Right,

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the matter that we understand, but it's invisible, and

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you're cool with being surrounded by invisible matter most of

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the time. But you didn't realize is that there's also

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>five times as much matter in the form of dark

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>matter that you weren't even aware of, and it's here

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>with us. You hold out your hands and you close

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>them together. You're enclosing some dark matter. You're holding dark

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>matter in your hands. Now, you can't interact with dark

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>matter and call it dark, but really it should be

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>called invisible or in transible, intransible. What's the word for

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>something you can't touch. It should be called an untouched

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>What matter sounds right? Unjudgable matter because you pass right

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>through it, right, You can't feel it and it can't

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>feel you. So, um, it's everywhere all around us. And

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think most people don't realize that. Every day when

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they go to school or go to work, or get

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>in the car whatever they're moving through this invisible ocean

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of dark matter. Yeah, that's unbelievable to think about. So

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>how do we know that it's there? Or how did

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>astro physicists figure out that dark matter was was out there.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a great story how dark matter was discovered. It's

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of a classic science story where somebody was just

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>dotting the eyes and crossing the teas and saying, well,

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we understand how this works. Let's just make

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sure and do some double checks. And then those double

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>checks revealed that something was very, very wrong with our

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the universe. So the double check was looking

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at how galaxies rotate. Um. You know, galaxies are these

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>big swarms of stars and galaxies are spinning. Now, if

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>you imagine the galaxy spinning, you think of it like

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a merry go round. Or you might wonder like, why

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>are the stars not getting thrown out into intergalactic space?

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>If you spin a merry go round and you put

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ping pong balls on it, those ping pong balls will

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>fly out into space. So why are the stars not

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>flying out into space? The answer is is gravity in

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy that's holding those stars, that keeping them from

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>getting thrown out into the universe. So then you can

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do something cool, which is cross check your numbers. You

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>can say, if I know how fast the galaxy is spinning,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>then I can calculate how much gravity I need to

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hold the stars in place. But then I can add

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>up all the stars and ask is there enough gravity

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to hold those stars in place? So you add up

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>all the mass of the galaxy you can see, calculate

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the gravity from that, compare it to how fast things

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are spinning. So they went they sent some grad student

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to double check these numbers and said, we think we

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>understand this, just go double check. And the grad students

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>when made this measurements decades ago, and it turns out

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work like at all. Of galaxies were spending

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>way way too fast. There wasn't nearly enough gravity in

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>these galaxies to hold the stars in So we didn't understand.

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Was there some gravity coming from some invisible sort of

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we couldn't see. Why weren't the stars getting

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>thrown out into space? Was there some other force to

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>gravity work differently than we imagined. So there's something basically

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand, and people had to think big about the

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of ideas they could explain it, because this is

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>not a small discrepancy. And one of my favorite things

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about dark matter is we still know very little about it.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And the name of the theory itself is sort of

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a description of the question, right, Like, we don't know

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>why galaxies are spinning, we don't know what's what's giving

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>us extra gravity, so we just come up with a

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>theory dark meaning we can't see it, matter meaning it

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>gives gravity. So it's like dark matter is the theory

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of some invisible gravity giving thing, right. It's just like,

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>take the question what's the new invisible source of gravity

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that explains this rotation and answer it with will maybe

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>some invisible gravity giving thing, right? But instead, in physics

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you just tend to give it a fancy name, called

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it dark matter, because then it sounds more like an answer.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But the truth is we don't really know very much

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>about dark matter. We know that it's there, you've seen

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it because it causes these galaxies to rota, But we

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is made out of, particles, is

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it made out of something else? What kind of particles

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is it made out of? But we know very little

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>about dark manner and I love hearing the way you

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>guys talk about these sorts of discoveries or at least

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>an understanding that this must be in existence. That you know,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years ago, we had no idea to even

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>question this kind of thing or even think about this

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. We thought we had a general understanding

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of how the universe was structured in some way. And

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>then as we learn more and more, the main thing

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're doing is exposing all of the many things

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that we have no idea about. And I love the

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>way you guys talk about that exactly, And to me,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the excitement. You know, is that scientific come up

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and right the universe says you thought you understood something.

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>You guys are such idiots like and you know we're

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>doing the best we can. But we continue as humans

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to make this mistake of over generalizing. We have a

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of examples from our experience and we say, maybe

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>everything works this way, right, We say, oh, life on

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Earth works this way, maybe everything in the universe operates

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>under the same rules. But we continue to discover that

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>our experience is parochial, that it's just one slice of

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the kind of physics you could have. You know, the

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>life that we leave is sort of large on the

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>scale of like tiny particles, and it's sort of slow

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on the scale of astronomical objects. So you know, before

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Newton and before Einstein, you might have thought, oh, we

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have most of physics figured out, but then quantum mechanics

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and relativity show us that actually we didn't understand anything

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about the way the universe works at its lowest level.

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is a continuous process, right, And so another

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>point we want to make in this book is that

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>huge fraction in the universe is not understood, which means

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>not only that there are questions we've identified that we

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>mean the answers to, like how did the universe begin?

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And what is the universe made out of? But there

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>might be basic things that we think we understand that

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>will be revealed to be wrong in two hundred years.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>People might look back at our understanding of physics and

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>laugh at us, right, and say, those guys understood nothing.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the case. I mean that means that that you know,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy revelations and new ways of looking at the universe

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are ahead of us, and I hope they happen in

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>my lifetime. Well, I I think one of the things

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that was also encouraging to me to hear was how

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you said there's so much room for philosophy in this

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>not understanding the world right like that there's there's stuff

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then space to speculate and think and

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>think big. I found that really poetic. Yeah. Well, one

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>of the fun things about science is that it's so

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>philosophically important, right. Um. I love when people talk about,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, is philosophy important? There is science the only

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>useful thing when you know, you need philosophy even to

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>understand why science is important. And um, there's this counterplay

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>between science and philosophy. There are things that you can test, right,

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>experiments we can do to measure things and understand things,

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and there are things we can't yet test. You know,

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we can't understand what's beyond the edge of our observable universe, right, Um,

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there's the universe is a certain age. It's almost fourteen

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>billion years old, and we can't see anything that's beyond

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a certain horizon because life just hasn't had time to

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>get to us yet. So what's beyond their purely the

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>realm of philosophy, because no science experiment can tell you

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just an invisible, impierceable veil beyond which we cannot see,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>which means there's lots of room for people to speculate,

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>right and speculation wild ideas totally fun um. I think

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of room for that. But I also

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to draw a bright line between the

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>science and the philosophy, because there are some things that

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we can test. So one of my favorite examples is

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the multiverse. You hear this idea a lot, maybe our

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>universe it is part of a set of other universes

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>which are all weird and different, and that's a fun idea,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But in my view it falls squarely in the philosophy

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>camp because we can never test it right. These other universes.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>By construction, that being another universe means it's the place

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we can't interact with. You can't send a probe there

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to discover it, you can't see its effects on electrons,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you can't do any sort of experiment to interact with

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that universe, which means you could never prove those other

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>universes exist, which means it will forever be philosophy. I

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>don't say that in any sort of negative sense. Right,

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>forever being philosophy means forever the speculation um by theorists

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and philosophers, which is wonderful, you know, smoking in appeals

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and have a lot of fun. It's important, I think,

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to draw that line to say here our ideas we have,

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's certainly not scientific proven. Yeah, I like some

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>science communicators sometimes fuzz that line a little bit more

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>than I'm comfortable with. I like that. We recently did

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>an episode on trash talking, and you just describe philosophers

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>as smoking banana peals and having a lot of fun.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that. Maybe maybe we'll have them

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on to be like, hey, so what do you think

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about particle physicists? Now, I'm just kidding that that's terrific. Well,

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of other big questions for you

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that you must answer before we let you go. But

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>before we do that, why don't we take a quick break.

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Part time Genius. Now we are talking

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to day you Whites and co author of We Have

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>No Idea, this terrific, terrific book, and we have a

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of other big questions before we let him go. So, Daniel,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I did want to talk a little bit more about

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>some of your work at cern and specifically about the

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>big discovery a few years ago of the Higgs boson,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 1>something that we all knew we were looking for, and

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>until we found it, you know, obviously we couldn't get

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>too too excited about it. But can you talk a

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that process one helping us understand the

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>significance of the Higgs boson, but two also just what

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like to be somewhere, you know, like where you're working,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and when a discovery that you know you've been looking

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for for so long is finally there. What that must

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like. I think the discovery the Higgs boson is

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>really an amazing feat in human intellectual history because it

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>proves the power of maths and patterns. You know, the

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>origin of it is fifty years ago a bunch of theorists,

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>including a guy named Higgs. We're looking at what you

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>knew about particles, and it just couldn't really make sense

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. You know, the mathematics were just sort of ugly.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>They didn't understand how can all these particles fit together?

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And what why do some of these particles have mass

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and some of these particles don't have mass. It just

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't really make sense of them it wasn't beautiful. And

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>there's this interesting push in theoretical physics to say that

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe should be simple, and our theory of it

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>should be beautiful. There should be some elegance, some symmetry

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to it, which is sort of fascinating, and I think

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a whole other topics we could explore. But this desire

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for simplicity and elegance and beauty pushed them to think,

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is there another way we could look at these particles?

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And so this guy, Peter Higgs and several other people

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>came up with this theory. They said, you know what

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you add one more particle to this mix, and

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that particle has this special property I'll tell you about

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the moment, then everything just clicks together and it's

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>so much simpler and more beautiful. And so maybe this

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is the way the universe works. Since is an idea

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of something I have fifty years ago. And the incredible

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is that he was right. You know, this particle

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>does exist and it does do the things that he

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>suspected that it did, and it suggests that you know,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this desire for simplicity, this desire to see the universe

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and in an aesthetically simple and beautiful and elegant way

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>might be a good way to look at things, right,

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that we the universe at its core is not a

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>messy jumble of rules, but a simple set of lessons

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>out of which emerge complex fascinating phenomenon, right, like particles

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and ice cream and hamsters and podcasts and all that

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. You know. The idea that the universe

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can be explained from a few small set of rules

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is very to me attractive philosophically, right, and the game

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we're back into philosophy. And so the question is why

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>did this particle make things simpler? What about this particle

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>made our understanding of how the universe worked at its

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>smaller scale more simple, or more beautiful or more elegant. Well,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the question they were trying to understand is why are

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>some particles have this mass and other particles don't. For example,

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the photon photon flies through space that has no mass,

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just energy moving at the speed of light. Other

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>particles like the z boson or the w boson, these

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>other particles are very similar to the photon, very similar

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>properties and play similar rules, but they're really heavy. They

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of mass. So people who aren't trying

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand why is that um? What controls what has

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>mass and what doesn't have mass? And before we answer that,

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about what is mass. If you

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think about a particle, you're probably thinking about a tiny,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>little spinning ball of stuff, right. And if you think

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about a particle that has mass, probably envisioning it has

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>like a little serving of some stuff to it and

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what gives it mass. Right, But in our theory

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. In our theory, these particles are

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>all point particles. They're all tiny dots in space with

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>zero volume. So when we think about mass, actually we

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think of up stuff or it's no room in

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the particle for any stuff. It's not like something that

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>has mass has a bigger serving of universe stuff or

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>or more of its squeezed into a little space. They

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all have the zero volume. So instead of thinking about

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>mass as an amount of stuff you need to think

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of It's sort of the way you think about electric charge.

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a label we put on points in space,

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all right. You don't think about when you think about

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the electron. You don't think where is the negative charge

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of the electron? Is there room for the negative charge.

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Does it fit in there? Right? You just think, oh,

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>electron has the negative charge. So you should think about

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>particles the same way. Some of them have this mass property,

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>other ones don't. And that's the question that we're trying

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to answer, and that's where the Higgs does. The Higgs

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is this crazy idea. It says that maybe there's this

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>field that fills the entire universe, literally, the whole universe

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>filled with this new kind of field called the Higgs field,

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a field like in a electric field or a magnetic field,

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but now a new kind of field, a Higgs field.

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And this field interacts with particles, and some particles it

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:11.959
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder for them to speed up and slow down,

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and other particles it ignores. So if the Higgs field

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>interacts with your particle, like the W the z boson

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that it makes it hard for that particle to speed

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>up and hard for it to slow down. That means

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it has inertia, which is another way of saying it

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>has mass. So the idea is the mass of these

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>particles comes from the way they interact with this new

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy field. And photons just don't interact with that field.

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>They fly right through without even noticing. That was the idea,

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and if this field existed, it explained why some particles

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>got mass and some particles didn't get mass. And then

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the prediction of that field that says, if that field exists,

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>then sometimes it would get excited, and in certain spots

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it would get excited enough to create out of the

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>vacuum this particle called the Higgs boson on. So the

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson and the Higgs field are two different things,

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>but one sort of proof of the existence of the other.

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we looked for at the Hadron Collider.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>We tried to create enough localized energy using our collider

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to create a Higgs boson so we could spot it,

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>which would be proof of the existence of the Higgs field,

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>which would explain why particles have mass. So what was

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that experience like as it was discovered. I'm sure there

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was just a huge celebration. Uh, it was sort of

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like running a marathon. Honestly, it's such a long process.

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We've been looking for the Higgs for decades. When I

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>started in particle physics in about it was the top

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>priority for particle physics, and then we discovered it, you know,

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twelve, and along the way there

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>were times we thought we might have hints of it,

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>and times we thought we'll never see it, or you know,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>will we even have the power to discover it um,

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But it sort of happened gradually. We started to see

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the hints, little bits of evidence here, a little bit

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to Theavean's there, started to build up, slowly, slowly, slowly,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>until eventually we crossed the official threshold for having enough

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 1>data to convince ourselves and decide say, yes, we can

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>say that we've discovered it. But it's sort of like

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>when you get to mile twenty two of your marathon.

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>At that point you're pretty sure you're gonna finish, you

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just sort of got to stumble across the finish line.

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no like real moment there where we said, okay,

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>we've discovered it. I mean, there was a public announcement,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but by that point everybody inside the community had already

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>been convinced that it was real. It was there, so

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really like a It's not like some late

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>night moment where the experiment concluded and we saw the

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>results pop up on the screen and nature tells us

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the answer. More of a slow accumulation of results. And

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I think a lot of people don't

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize is this was done by massive teams of people,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>or maybe ten tho people were involved intimately in this process.

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, it's not like you're maybe your romantic view

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of a physicist or you know, grad student late at

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>night alone in the lab seeing the answer for the

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>first time and having that experience of knowing something about

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the universe that nobody else knows. Right, That's that's an

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>exciting idea. It was like meetings and discussions and long

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>conversations and more meetings and millions of power points slides.

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I don't mean to undermine the glamorous

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>nature or particle physics or anything, but you asked what

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was it like? And you know it was a long slog.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is. It is funny because I think we

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>do all imagine it is like, everybody, get in here.

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerry saw it. Jerry pushed the big red button boom

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>who discovered the Higgs boson? You know, the thing is

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Higgs is pretty rare. Even if you focus

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>your particle beams and give them a lot of energy,

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you're producing one every few seconds. Whereas you have, you know,

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>billions of collisions and seconds, so you have to sift

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of collisions, and then you have to

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do it for a long time to accumulate enough examples

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that you statistically can say we're pretty sure it exists.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's, uh, it's a long game. It's like, you know,

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you're putting a puzzle pieces together, and before you get

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the last piece in, you're pretty sure you knew what

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle looks like, but you know you still have

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to go through the work of putting all the finding

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>those little edged pieces and filling in the sky and

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>all those pieces. You know, I've heard you talk about

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>those numbers of collisions and numbers of experiments that you

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>have to do. When you say a lot, it's actually

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty mind blowing. Can you talk about what that

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>is when you're doing these experiments to find something that

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you know is pretty rare. What frequency of experiments are

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you doing? And then and and then how many of them? Right,

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking for rare stuff. Most of the time

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>when you collide to protons together, not much happens to

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>protons come out. Occasionally, you know, one in a million

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>or one in a billion times, something different will happen.

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to see a lot of examples

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the rare stuff, you've got to sift through a

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>huge number of examples of the boring stuff. So that's

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>why we do as many collisions as we can, so

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we do it every twenty five nanoseconds. So we have

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>these huge detectors at certain which are focused around this

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 1>collision points, and then the accelerator runs through the heart

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of the detector and it delivers two beams which cross

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>right at that collision point. And the beams are not

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>like let's shoot one particle at one other particle. You

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>shoot like a bunch of particles like ten to the

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen protons at another bunch, tend of tending the thirteen

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>protons and hope to get some collisions. And then you

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have these bunches staggered through your accelerator. Accelerators a big circle.

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So you imagine all these little bunches zooming through the

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>accelerator in perfect coincidence. They overlap right at these collision points,

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and you get these collisions every twenty five nanoseconds. And

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>every time there's a collision, we take this massive digital

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>picture and then we had this enormous fire hose the

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>data that pours out of the detector, and we have

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to somehow try to capture that and analyze it and

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>simplify and reduce it so that we can boil it

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>all down to answer an actual physics question like does

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this particle exist? To me, that's one of the fun parts.

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of a statistics and data processing, machine learning

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy, data science, and so for me, it's

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a really fun puzzles how to drink from this massive

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>fire hose of information and answer very high level questions

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>about the universe. That's pretty amazing. So so Mega, we've

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten a chance to talk about traveling at light speed,

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum teleportation, the Higgs boson. I don't know if achieve it.

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I still have a thousand more questions I could ask. Yeah,

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure we're gonna have to have you back

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on Daniel sometime. But I do hope that all of

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>our listeners will check out your awesome book that you

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge have worked on together. We have no idea,

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but Daniel, thanks so much for joining us on parts.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm genius. Thank you very much a lot of fun

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>guys and I'd love to be back anytime every Thanks

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>again for listening. Part Time Genius is a production of

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works and wouldn't be possible without several brilliant

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>people who do the important things we couldn't even begin

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand. Tristan McNeil does the editing thing. Noel Brown

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>made the theme song and does the MIXI mixy sound thing.

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Rowland does the exact producer thing. Gave Louesier is

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>our lead researcher, with support from the research Army including

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Austin Thompson, Nolan Brown and Lucas Adams and Eve. Jeff

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Cook gets the show to your ears. Good job, Eves.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>If you like what you heard, we hope you'll subscribe,

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you really really like what you've heard, maybe

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you could leave a good review for us. Did you

0:41:48.520 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>forget James Jason who