WEBVTT - Record-Breaking Black Friday Sales, Despite Pandemic

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEO, market pros and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well, I think I just

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>figured out why Tom Keene was not in today. He

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is home with his computer online shopping, and I'm sure

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he's got a lot of other folks they're joining him.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be a record cyber Monday here is

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more and more people shop online, abandonedents stores and go online.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>John Copeland, VP of Marketing and Customer Insights at Adobe

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>UH he joins US Adobes based in San Jose, California.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>So John, give us the early early read here of

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a Black Friday going into a cyber Monday, leading us

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.959
<v Speaker 1>to the final weeks of holiday shopping. Yeah. So it's

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>been a record breaking Thanksgiving weekend already with over twenty

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>three and a half billion dollars in online sales. That's

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a increase over last year. Today, Cyber Monday, we are

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 1>expecting a day to break all previous records for US

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>online sales, coming in somewhere between ten point eight and

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve point seven billion dollars. That will be somewhere between

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen and increase over last year. So it's interesting, Um,

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you think about those numbers that you

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned, John, in terms of you know, the overall

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers and in some of the growth rates and so on,

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just extraordinary given what's going on in the world,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>given uh, the tough times that many consumers find themselves

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in here as a result of the pandemic and unemployment.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Seems like a lot of this unemployment is now chronic unemployment.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it? Yeah, you know what,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>part of what we're seeing is really people trying to

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>have as much of a kind of normal Christmas and

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>celebration as as possible, right, I mean, I've I've seen

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stories about people setting up their Christmas

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>decorations even before Thanksgiving. In fact, we we did that

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in our house this year, trying to have more of

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of traditional end of your holiday spirit in

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the context of this really really challenging year. And so

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>people are doing what they can to try and bring

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as much of a normal end of your holiday home

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>as they can. All Right, So, John, we already saw

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously even before the pandemic, UH a year's long trend

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of more and more share of retail sales going to online.

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It seems to have been dramatically accelerated here during the pandemic.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there any reason to think that post pandemic it's

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of ebb and maybe go the other way?

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Or is or is some of these market shifts that

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, are they more permanent? Yeah, you know, that's

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the question everybody is really asking and interested in. We

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>expect that, you know, a good chunk of this new

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>digital behavior will probably stick around. Is consumers are finding

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>out that you know, the convenience of online ordering and

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>either having it delivered to their home or being able

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to pick up in the store. Um, even through contactlets

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>delivery is just become so convenient for them. It will

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>probably bounce back, and you know, people will be doing

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot offline as soon as they can and as

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>soon as they feel safe and comfortable doing that. But um,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we've continued to see this digital increase,

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly during the holidays, for example, a good thirteen to

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent a year this year is really like two

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>years of growth packed into a single year um and

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that's really going to be hard for people to to

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>step away from, even when they can. So that kind

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of goes to the question, you know, when you talk

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about retail, when you ever you have a discussion, maybe

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>even with the last decade or so, it comes to

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the question of to what extent is the US retail

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>footprint overstored? And then when you get you know, a

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>period that we're going through right now where we're seeing

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>um so many people going over to e commerce, it

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of brings that question to the four Yet again,

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what's your thought about that as you look at the

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>US retail landscape. Yeah, I think this year has really

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.559
<v Speaker 1>shown that, I don't know, it's so much about being overstored,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but certainly maybe under digital if you want um And

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the things that we see a

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of businesses pushing into accelerating the digital transformations this year.

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Retail as well as other sectors of the economy really

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>pushing hard into digital. And as that happens, we expect

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to see even more kind of fundamental disruptions to the

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>way you know, business models work, and if you're not

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in a digital channel, it's going to be really, really difficult.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>So John, give us a sense of what's hot this

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>holiday season from a product perspective, and maybe what's not. Yeah,

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so one of the well instead of the what's not,

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I can I can definitely tell you, for example, the

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>electronic game platforms you know, PS five, Xbox and and

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the games that go with them. So NBA

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>two K one, Madden, NFL twenty one. Just it's really

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>hot right now. Um. In terms of toys more generally,

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars toys are really big. Nerve is really big

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. Control right, Um, we expect to see a

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>lot with you know, even still continuing successes of like

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>L O L Surprise UH and hatch Amoles will continue

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to be strong this holiday season. So John, you know,

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the beginning of the pandemic some of

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>these retailers, pair of retailers fought for bankruptcy. Ever, we

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>can see more of that. That's really tough to say.

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I think as as retailers are figuring out how to

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>make digital work, and they're pushing harder to get more

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:52.119
<v Speaker 1>sales through their Hopefully that will tide them over while

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy, you know, begins to get back to normal

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>as we start to see you know, light at the

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>end of the tunnel and the vaccines become available and hopefully,

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, things can begin to turn around in it. John,

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciated. We

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 1>know you're busy this time of the year. John Copeland,

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>VP of Marketing and Customer Insights at Adobe, based in

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>San Jose, California. You know, generally a what we're hearing

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>here is retail sales here during US a Black Friday,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Cyber Monday, generally pretty healthy when given everything that we

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with. So there's that for the consumer. Let's

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>switch gears right now and talk about commodities, particularly UH

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>crude oil. And there's really no one better to do

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that with than Ellen Walled, President of Transversal Consulting. She

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is also Bloomberg Opinion contributor. So Ellen, love to talk

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to you about OPEK. What do you expect for their

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>upcoming meeting? Here, I'm looking at w t I cruded

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at forty five dollars seems kind of range bound here.

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking for? Yeah, so thank you. We're

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 1>looking for at this point, we're not looking for any

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>big resolution, and today it seems like the OPEC group

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to push that off until tomorrow when larger

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>OPAQ plus group including Russia meets, But the expectation is

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to have agreed to extend their

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>current quotas for another three months, so into the first

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter of one, and that will be a change. Right now,

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>they're actually scheduled to increase production by two million barrels

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>per day come January one. And it's interesting because oil

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>has trended upwards uh recently, mostly on positive vaccine news,

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but there are a lot of fears in terms of demand.

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>There's really a lot of demand weakness in Europe and

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States that doesn't look like it's going to

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>resolve itself anytime soon, and so there's a lot of

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>fears that if OPEC doesn't come through with this three

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>month extension, that um, we could be seeing an end

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to this oil rally. Yeah, it's inter I'm glad you

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>brought up kind of kind of where the oil is

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>trading here. You take a look at the equa markets

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, and there you know, as in the month

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of November all time highs, tremendous records for performance within

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a month. A lot of that based upon the expectations

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that the vaccines in fact are coming, the economies will

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in fact open up next year, and you need to

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>make your bets today. Are you surprised that oil hasn't

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>traded better. I'm not deprised that oil hasn't traded better.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually surprised that that this rally has been sustained

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>for as long as it has, because the fundamentals are

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>really not very good when you're looking at demand and

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>also when you're looking at supply. We've got libbyan oil

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>production coming back on the market, and so that's adding

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>could add another million barrels a day, regardless of what

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Opaque decides. So we've got lagging demand. These vaccines aren't

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>really going to be uh, you know, in the general

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>available to people all over the world until well into

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think oil is really looking at um kind

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of a shorter term than the markets are. But so

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that the rally we saw around the initial

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>vaccine news has been maintained, and it does seem like

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's up to opeque a bit to keep or sustain

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>or kind of put a floor on oil prices. So, Ellen,

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you think or what's what are you hearing

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>from the folks you talk to in the global energy space?

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>What does a Biden administration mean and what does it

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>mean for kind of global oil supply? How do you

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think about that? Yeah, this is this is a big

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>question on everyone's mind. It definitely means more support for

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>alternative energies, But the big question is what does it

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>mean for US production because that's really been a game

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>changer in the oil industry over the past few years.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the US has backed off of its production highs,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but that really was was expected even before the COVID

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen pandemic kind of demolished a lot of production in

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>uh the shale industry. But I think what we're looking

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at our further consolidation in the shale oil industry. There

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>are big companies out there that are doing production, and

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they will fare fairly well under a Biden

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>administration because a lot of the new regulations that he's

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at will actually be beneficial to them and will

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>help keep smaller producers from really getting into the game.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But what about shale in general. Here it seems like

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been, as you mentioned, kind of real game changer

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for global supply as the US has become an actually

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>a net exporter. Here is the expectation that the best

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>days of the U s shell patch are in the

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>rear view mirror. I do think that they the production

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>heydays are definitely in the rear view mirror. But remember

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was actually under the Obama administration that the

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>us UH finally ended the oil export ban and became

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a player in the global oil market. So I don't

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think we're looking to see a reversal of that in

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>any case. I do think the big question, though, is

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen with China. Because the Trump administrations

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to succeed in getting China to agree to purchase a

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>fairly large amount of oil and energy products from the

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>United States. They haven't quite followed through on that, but

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>they have made a very significant um mark towards that goal.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that everyone is going to be

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>really wondering where's the Biden administration going to go with this.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to to see more? Is he gonna

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>hold China to this promise or is that kind of

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the window. So as it relates to China, Ellen,

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>we've seen them, you know, whether the pandemic. They are

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of of the pandemic. We're starting

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>to see the economy put up some decent growth numbers

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as the economy opens up. Have we seen that in

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the global energy markets? Have the Chinese been stepping up

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>their purchases on the global crude market? Yeah? Absolutely, China

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>is really I think where a lot in China is

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of the big um national oil producers,

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia, you are really focusing their attention because um,

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they issued new quotas for the independent refineries, So that

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>means that those refineries are going to be drawing down

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>oil stocks, They're going to be taking in more crude oil, refining,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>making more products and shipping that out. And um, they're

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>really looking at China to kind of be a bright

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>spot in the oil demand picture. So where where do

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we see that, Like, do we see that in just

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil? Do we track shipments? And if

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we track shipments, do we track them from certain suppliers?

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>How how do you track that? Yeah, so we definitely

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>look at um at loadings that go to Asia to

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>China and how that's going, but also the number of

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>ships that are actually sitting waiting UH in ports in

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Asia to unload their product. Sometimes that can be really

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>backed up when um, you know, when refineries aren't taking

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are aren't taking coil in and so as we see

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>those stocks decline, that's an education and then usually oil

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>prices do respond when we get word that these uh

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>these ships are actually onloading their oil. Hey, Ellen, thanks

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We appreciate that. At interesting

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>times in the global energy space. Ellen Wild, president of

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Transversal Consulting and a Bloomberg Opinion contributor, we appreciate her thoughts.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>As always, we've been hearing from the good folks like

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson Sarah Ponza this morning about what a record

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>setting month it was for equity markets in the month

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of November. That's all well and good, but the cynic

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in me says, Okay, now what do I do well?

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Matt MAILEI chief market strategists at Miller Tebeck, and I

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>found over the mail report. Hopefully he'll have some answers

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for me. So, Matt, We've had an extraordinary run here

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in November, driven in large part by some really positive

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>news on the vaccine front, and we had some more

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>good news today. Um, what is your thought for the

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>remainder of the year heading into one, given that whether's

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>pandemic numbers are just getting worse and worse. Yeah, I

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that's certainly something to be concerned about, no question.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually more a little bit more concerned about it

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>next year than I am this year. And from the

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>main the main reason, Well, first of all, today's pull

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>back is no big surprise. I mean, we've had this

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>great run and I mean especially the Russell two thousand,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean as up over UH in just a month.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that it's down in almost about percent

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half today is not a big deal and

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to digest those gains in the overall market and

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>may have to do that for a couple of days.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But the liquidity situation is still very strong, and it's

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird. I mean what we went back whatever

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is six or eight years ago and people were talking about, hey,

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know if the if, if the economy starts to

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>slow down, the FED will add more stimulus or do

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>more QUI so we don't have to worry if the

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>economy does better well, that's good. We don't have to

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about that. So it was kind of a win win.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Now we're looking at that with and it's oddly as

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it sounds, the virus UH and the lockdowns that are

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>going with it, and the concerns about the slowing growth

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>will I believe ENTI see the FED to keep their

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>liquidity spick. It's wide open through the end of the

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>year and into the early next year. Uh, much like

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>they did last year. For a very different reason. They

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>did it last year because if we had remember we

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>had the big repot problem in the fall of last year,

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and they needed to keep the liquidity speakers open then.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think both will lead into a very similar

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>year continued here in rally. So, Matt, what we've certainly see,

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not just in the month in November, but really since

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know our September ish or so, is that that

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>rotation trade people kind of lightening up a little bit,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>some of those tried and true big tech names, whether

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an Amazon or an Apple uh, and kind of

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>rotating into the names that will benefit with the rebounding

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Presumably sometime in cyclical small caps so on

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So is that a trade you like.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>If so, do you still like it here? Heading into

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I do, but maybe not as much as I think

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are. And the reason for this

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is is that I think a lot of people seem

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to be wanting to throw the baby out with the

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>bathwater when it comes to tech. I certainly understand why. Technically,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these technology stocks that megacap names, um, you know,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>without that kind of you know, with the vaccine and such,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not saying, well, Jesus, lockdown, stay at home is

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna stay, is gonna stay with us for a long time.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not gonna be willing to pay the huge

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>valuations for these megacap names. But boy, the some of

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, especially the chip stocks, they act very

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>very well, making new highs. You have other stocks away

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>from a check to sorry the chip names, like a

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Cgate Technologies, Western Digital, things like that. So my point

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is tech is not dead by any minute, specially the imagination.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So do some rotating into value, but also do some

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>rotating within technology. I think that will bode well as

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we go into into next year. Um, you know, I'll

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>bring up the dreaded E word energy. We've got w

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>t I credit forty five dollars a barrel um. One

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>could argue that if the economy is primed to open

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>up on a global scale sometime mid next year, as

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>these vaccines become more widely available, that perhaps that bodes

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>well for the energy infrastructure, and it's certainly been beaten

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>down over the last several years. Is that a sector

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you have some courage for I do? I mean, obviously

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's had a huge run here over the last you

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>know to really two months now, uh, particularly in the

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>last month, but also really for two months. And the

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>x l E which is the energy E t F,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and of course the XOP which also includes some of

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the uh uh sorry uh drilling names. But the point

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is that they are overbought. They could pull back a

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit over a near term, but they're also still

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>very cheap. And you think about rotation, I mean, people

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>are gonna need is if this group moves up, especially

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>institutional players, they're gonna they they are so underweight this

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>group as it rallies, especially into the new year, if

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they're very underweighted, they're gonna have to rewait their their

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>their holdings. But more importantly, on a fundamental basis, the

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>last time oil UH, the the x l E, and

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>the x OP we're trading at these levels. Oil was

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>at thirty two dollars. Now it's at forty five, even

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>if it comes in a little bit still chief to

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>their underlying UH commodity. So I think this is a

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>group that on both a rewaiting play UH and on

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental basis, is going to do a lot better

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>than a lot of people think. And if oil can

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hold up in the mid forties, it doesn't have to

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>take off, but it holds up in the in the

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>mid forties, and especially if it rallies more, it's really

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna move because the institutions have to pile into the group.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a lot more bullish on this group than

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people who need to be careful

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and not saying jump in like you went to tech group.

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's a nice play. You have just about

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds Banks, Big Banks here again another unloved group.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it time to take a look at them on

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in the anticipation of a better one. Well, it's, you know,

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>again the very cheap group. So it's I think it's

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a good play that the key is what's going to

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>happen in interest rates. To me, to be honest with you,

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for short term traders, I think this thing can to

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>continue to rally because I think rates will hold up

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think the YO curve will continue to steep in.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>But as we move in the next year and we

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>get to some of the I think we get a

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit less stimulant send a lot of people are

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>hoping for from both the Fed and the and the Congress.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>UH that will cause those banks to take a little

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of hiccup. So long term players that want to

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>be a little careful short term traders, I think you

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>can ride the way for for a couple more months.

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Manley, thank you so much for joining us. Really

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Matt Mailey, chief market strategist at Miller Tabeck

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and founder of the Mainly Report. There's time for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>We're joined today by Chris Hughes, Deals columnists for Bloomberg

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Opinion and what deal you may ask, Well, it is

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>merger Monday, and we've got a big one. SMP Global,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the data company buying another data company I h S

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Market for about thirty nine billion dollars in Chris, Thanks

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. This is a big deal.

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about this deal. What's kind of the strategy

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>be putting these two big global data players together? And

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I should note before you go on that Bloomberg LP

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>does compete both against SMP UH and I h S market. So, Chris,

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is real drivers behind this this deal?

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's for two or three things. I mean,

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>one is that this industry is consolidating. We've already seen

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>some quite interesting combinations already, So think about the combination

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of London Stock Exchange UH and Refinitive UH and UM.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So there have been deals happening already, so that the

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>trend is towards insolidation. And then if you think about

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>what this combination does, it brings together the SMP brand

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>which is very strong, with I h S is other

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>data services. So you end up with a combination which

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>has got more offer, more to offer and to more customers,

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so you can cross fairly offering between the two customer

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>bases UM and with that scale you've become a much

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>stronger company, and then presumingly you can do more deals

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>after that. It's interesting, you know, I've when I was

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a research channel. So I spent some time looking at

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this industry and for a long time, uh, it was

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>a very sleepy industry. Investors didn't pay much attention to it.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't a lot of value assigned to it. But

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like in the last decade, as you mentioned,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of consolidation. It's really taken off.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And the valuations we're seeing here just extraordinary. What are

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the new businesses that these companies are generating

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>off of their UM this this data that they have

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>in the analytics that they have and Y scale might

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be important. There's a whole plethora of new products. I

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>mean one of them, of course is in Y s

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>G environmental, social and governance research and analytics. And you know,

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw a deal UM the other day in Europe

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>with Deutsche Burza and I S S. So uh, there

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is a whole array of new data points. If you

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>think about where UH, I H S markets started off,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where markets started off, UM, you know, way about when

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it was really just looking at UM. You know, TRID

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is in the credit market and that has obviously now

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>become a much much bigger business. Now. Who say the

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>valuations put on these companies are much bigger. As it happens. Actually,

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>these two UM has seen their valuations converge, so they're

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they're emerging from a point of parity. But the increase

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>both in the in the evaluation multiples and the and

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the and the site of these companies has been quite

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>tremendous over the last few years. So, Chris, it seems

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know you you mentioned that there's been a

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of consolidation in this space, so fewer and fewer players.

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>It suggests to me that the regulatory risk here is

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not insubstantial. UM. What's what's the view on the street. Yeah, Like,

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that you have to play

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that into consideration because you know that the sheer size

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of this combination, complexity of it does is going to

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>attract regulatory scrutiny, and that in turn, obviously will adds

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>time and uncertainty to whether it actually completes. Now the

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>market is giving a cautious welcome to the combination. With

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the other possible risk, obviously, is of a counter bid

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for I H S markets. So on the one hand,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>regulators we want to have a look, but on the

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>other hand, maybe alternative transactions may emerge, especially as the

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>price being paid for I S, even though it's a

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>big number of around about four billion on a debt

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>free basis, is actually quite a low premium on where

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I was trading last week. So that could be in

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>an invitation to somebody to come in and try and

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>break it up. So there are indeed quite a few

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>uncertainties around whether this will actually go from announcement to

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to full completion. So, Chris, if I'm an M and

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a banker in the space, am I just dialing for

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars here today telling all my clients, Hey, this industry

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to get bigger or you to get out.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>You expect to see even more deals. Are there more

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to be done or is this Are we coming towards

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the later innings of consolidating the global

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>data business. I think you're probably closer to the mark

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>um with a former than the latter. Even though we

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are now seeing the emergence of some really really large players,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like you know this is completely done yet.

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And as you say, if you if you pass on

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the consolidation, the risk is that you end up being

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>or are the small local player and you don't really

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>get that scale that enables you to go truly global,

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that might be what we're seeing

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in Europe actually, where you know, Europe hasn't really seen

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>truly global scale operator in this in this industry emerge.

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>How far does it go? Well, if you think about

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the naturally deals that them and going on, hey, we've

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>seen more and more diversifications, so deals that it would

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have raised an eye you just thought, well, that's not

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>not a logical combination. Now pere logical in terms of

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just offering more and more by specification and great variety

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of data to a larger pool of end customers. Seems

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to be what is driving dealmakers and CEOs in the space,

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>which means that you could easily see combinations, certainly among

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges. I mean you think about intercomplinental exchange. It

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>will be very interesting to see how they react to

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this combination. So I don't think we're in any way

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>done yet. Hey, Chris Hughes, thank you so much for

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Christie's Bloomberg Opinion Deals column is talking

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>about the S and p I h S deal again,

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a huge deal on that data analytic space enterprise value

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>forty four billion dollars. Just an extraordinary kind of multiples

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>there that we're seeing and we should know that. Again,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP compete. It's with both S and P as

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>well as I H S market in the global data

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and analytics business. But again it looks like more consolidation

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in that space. Data becoming more and more valuable going

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>forward in a digital world, and it seems to be

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of markets, it's all about scale. Thanks

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Boomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio