WEBVTT - Spot the Bot

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, either you want and Welcome to Forward Thinking,

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says, one

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>more robot learns to be something more than a machine.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick, and I've got

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a question for y'all. Would you like to ask it?

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>How how unusual? Please ask your question? Have you ever

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>noticed how any time there's a human being who follows

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you on Twitter or favorites one of your tweets, and

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you click through to their profile, and then you click

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>on their website, it's just some spam page with a

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>bunch of pop up ads. I will say that I

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>am not unfamiliar with what you are saying. I try

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not to click through to the website. Yeah, that's a

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>smart move, Lauren, because no, I don't notice the as

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pervasively as I was just leading you to believe. But

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a certain phenomenon that I think we are

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>all somewhat familiar with now, the fact that there are

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>let's call them agents loose on the web that are

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not human beings and and not like subhuman beings. We're

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>not being elitist in some kind of way. This isn't

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>an episode about the future of trolls. Yeah, there there

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are people who lack humanity, but we we would probably

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>say that they possess consciousness and like a brain and

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>probably some kind of flesh body. Yeah. Yeah, there are

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>many agents indeed on the Internet that are not possessed

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of a flesh body. Yeah. This isn't a new thing either, No, no, no, no.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we've talked plenty of times on this podcast

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Turing Test, about artificial intelligence, about ways of

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>creating piece of software, robots, computer programs, apps, all kinds

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of things that are designed to try to lull you

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>into the sense that you're interacting with another conscious agent,

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>like a human, even if you're just interacting with the machine. Yeah,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and that that might have some very sophisticated kind of

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>simulation of intelligence, or it might just have a small

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>collection of a few clever tricks, right, And it may

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>not even be intended to fool you into thinking you're

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>talking to a human. It may just be that this

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>was an attempt to create a more naturalistic means of

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of addressing an issue, and it wasn't an attempt to

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, deceive you. However, there are some UH agents

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that were specifically engineered as a means of deception in

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>one way or another. Yea, So today we want to

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about bots, specifically bots on the web, what the

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>bots are, how to spot them, what some characteristics are,

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe have a little discussion about what we

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think about the future of bots. Yeah, so we so

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should start this off by going back to

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>an old favorite of ours, which is the Turing test. Right,

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So the Turing test. This was something that was kind

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of proposed by Alan Turing, and it wasn't really a

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>test that he was proposing. Yeah, it was more a

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>thought experiment. Yeah. He was just kind of saying that

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if you were to design a computer program that could

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>fool a human judge a certain percentage of the time.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's it's related to being around thirty or third

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of the time, that you could argue that this machine

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is at least simulating the appearance of intelligence. And if

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it can do that reliably, why would you not just

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and extended the courtesy saying it is intelligent?

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>After all, when I have a conversation with another human being,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I assume that human being is intelligent because of my

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>interactions with previous human beings and because of my own experience,

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>why would I not extend that same courtesy to a machine.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, what you might be thinking is the no,

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't assume that the humans I interact with our intelligence,

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in which case you're mean, Well, we should observe a

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of phenomenal difference between the interactions we typically have

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with humans, or at least the majority of our interactions

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with humans, and the kinds of tests that we now

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>would call Turing tests, because typically the Turing test as

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's imagined today is a text based affair. It's talking

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>about communication that's carried out entirely through words written text communication. Right,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not talking about looking at a person and and

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing their face. That that's a whole different kind of

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>We would probably still call that like life simulation or

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, like the mimicking of say, human facial movements

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. And there's been tons of studies

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and robotics to do exactly that, to design robots that

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>won't creep people out by having more kind of a

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>human interaction and yet having to avoid the uncanny Valley problem,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>where if you get too good actually gets creepy here, right,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's too good and yet not perfect. So

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's that gap between too good and perfect, are good

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and perfect, where if you make a robot that's good,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>then it doesn't seem creepy. If you make a robot

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that's perfect, it might not seem creepy. No one's done

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that yet, so it's hard to say. But if it's

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>really close but not quite perfect, it is unnerving. And

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the Turing test, the various programs that have been said

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to pass the Touring Test in almost every single case,

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about lowered expectations of what the the bar

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>would be, right, right, We're talking about text communication via

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>computer with a bot that would purport to be say

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a child whose first language wasn't English, or someone else

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>who would be uh, culturally or grammatically hampered in normal conversation, right,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Or they've just got some clever tricks for changing the

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>subject whenever they're not sure that they understand you, right, right,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, purporting to have some kind of psychological condition

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.239
<v Speaker 1>that makes them act really shady. Yeah, that's a yea perfectly.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>All of these are real world examples. Were alluding to right.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>But of course when we talk about these these programs

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that are said to you know, there's there's an article

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you see where they say, oh, we passed the Turing tests.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>These are sort of like staged experiments, right. People set

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>up the test on purpose and that they have somebody

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>who's trying to determine if they're chatting on some kind

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of instant messenger program with a real person or with

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a computer program. But we actually encounter pretty much this

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>scenario in real life in the wild all the time.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>No celebrity judges. Yeah, because bots, let's face it, on

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the web, they are everywhere, and sometimes they are again

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we're aware of it, and it's not a problem. Like

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it might be an automated response to a helpline for

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>or some service or product that you use, So you

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>might go to a website, and really it's just a

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>way of filtering you down so that you either end

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>up getting the information you want because it's somewhere buried

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in a help file, but it's way easier if you

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>go through a very conversational approach to narrow down what

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the problem is, or it then directs you to the

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>person who would presumably have the actual answer you need those,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's one type of butt. But we're really kind of

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the kind that you're not necessarily supposed to

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>know was being run by a machine. Right, So I've

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>got a question for you, ask away, how much web

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>traffic do you think is a real human sitting at

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a browser looking for something because they want or need

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to know. See. If you had asked me this question

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like two weeks ago, I would have said, clearly, all

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the traffic on the web, aside from maybe like

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a few researchers that like send stuff out to go

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>look it stuff just just to see what happens, I

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>would have said that like cent of all web traffic

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was actual humans, because why why Joe and Jonathan would

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone ever create a robot that looks at websites? Robots

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>don't need websites. Pennies, nickels, dollar bills, hundred dollar bills. Yeah,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking money, money, money. Wow. I didn't expect we

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>were going to get to hear that today, Prince Charles, Yeah,

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I busted out when I have to know you got

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear these these projected numbers. This is pretty eye

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>opening from last year. Yeah, this, uh, there was one

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>figure that came from the Interactive and Advertising Bureau that

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>suggested that around thirty six of all web traffic is

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote fake, meaning that it was actual bots, it

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>was it was non humans surfing to websites. And uh.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>The reason for this is pretty easy to under stand

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>when you realize how a lot of funding for websites happens.

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You have advertising displayed on web pages, and the more

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>often people are going to your web page, the more

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>valuable that real estate is. It's kind of the same

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>as if you want to buy a billboard next to

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the major highway running through your city versus the tiny

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>little side street that hardly anyone goes down. The billboard

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>next to the highway is probably going to be more

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive to use than the one on a little sites,

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>and therefore is going to generate more revenue for whoever

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>owns the highway or the advertising space right right right,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you own that advertising space, what you should

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>actually do is buy up a bunch of autonomous vehicles

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and spend day and night just driving them back and

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>forth along that stretch of road. And that sounds crazy,

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but this is what human people are doing right just

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, not on actual streets as far as

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. So, so this is this is actually a problem.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>This is not This is not just something where you're like, oh, well,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>that's weird that that more than a third of all traffic.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way that the conservative is right, there were

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>some experts who are saying that as much as fifty

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of traffic on the web was actually generated by

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>non human entities. Now, it's worth saying that these probably

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't the forward the same forward facing bots you're going

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>to interact with the ones that you see in comments

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sections and on social media. We'll get to those in

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute, but they're probably not Also on Twitter, bots

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 1>don't usually diversify that. This is essentially algorithms are pretty

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>simple exactly. This is. This is an algorithm that that

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>navigates a browser to a particular web page, uh and

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>stays there for a given length of time. That's another

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that you guys may not know is that the

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of time spent on a web page can also

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>impact how valuable that web pages. So if it's just

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a hit, if that's all they're looking at, well that's

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that's easy. But if it's more than that, if it's

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>how much time was spent on that web page, because

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>if it was a fraction of a second, then clearly

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have enough time to view whatever advertisements might

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have been on that page. But as the Bureau has

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, it is a serious problem because it ends

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up devaluing digital experiences. If advertisers come to a website

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, we want to advertise on your page,

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but we happen to know that more than a third

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>of all the traffic going to your page is not

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>from actual human beings. We're not gonna pay you the

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>amount you think this page is worth because it's not

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>really worth that. It's not actual human eyes that are

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing the stuff we want to put on your page. Right,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm not a digital marketing expert, but from

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>my understanding, the way this works is it's not typically

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be that you know, let's say you operate

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a web page. It's probably not that one third a

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>half of your traffic is fraudulent. It's that there are

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of sort of spammy, kind of shady

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>sites out there that are funneling tons and tons of

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fake traffic to themselves. That's that's sort of changing the average.

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>There's either I don't know if you saw this. There's

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>even speculation that it can sometimes be a rival advertising

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>firm sending huge amounts of traffic to bankrupt their opponent,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>their their competitors by saying, well, our competitor will pay

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>out a certain amount of money every time this website

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is viewed. If we flood that website with tons of traffic,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to pay out tons of money as

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a result because of this agreement they're in, And we'll

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>end up hurting our competitor this way, I know. Yeah.

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that some advertisers do is use bots to

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>purchase ads, like software that can identify sites that fit

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>within the advertiser's plan and then place ads on those

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>sites automatically at high speed. Wow. So sometimes it's bots

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>showing ads to bots that were placed by bots. Yeah. Yeah.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>All I can imagine is all the Amazon robots going crazy,

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like we have to deliver no way that the delivery

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was canceled the way we got to deliver, just like

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>an insane activity inside the Amazon warehouse. And and according

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to numbers that I read, it's only about four per

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>cent of bots that I purchased that of ads that

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>are purchased by bots as of but media marketing folks

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>think that that could boom to in the next ten years,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that it is an enormous growth. I think that might

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>be helpful. I'm not sure. So if you are like

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>an advertiser trying to advertise on a website and you're

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out if it's traffic is real or fake. Again,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, in a lot of cases, this

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is pretty easy to do. Like you can look at

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>some certain metrics and kind of say, okay, well, if

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the access to the metrics, right, yeah. See,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing is that actually it behooves the the

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are running the website to keep an eye

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on those metrics to make sure that they are in

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>fact legitimate, because if it were ever discovered that they aren't,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>whether whether ultimately the owner of that website was at fault,

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to negatively impact that owner. Right, So, if

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the owner is employing bots essentially to visit the website

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to drive up numbers, if that ever gets public, that's

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge black mark against that that website and that owner.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>If in fact someone else is doing it and the

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>web owner is completely innocent of it, it can still

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be a black mark. So it's one of those things

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that now, honestly, if you really look at the long term,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't want this happening because it ends up hurting

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the long run. It's only the short term

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>where it seems to have some gains. Right. But let's

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>if you are one of these people who's trying to

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>use one of these sneaky tricks to like generate a

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>bunch of fake traffic. Obviously, the artificial intelligence capabilities are

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>getting better, and this is an interesting variant on the

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>type of artificial intelligence we usually talk about. Usually we

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about a kind of um single agent oriented artificial

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>intelligence simulation, Like when you're doing our official intelligence, you're

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to create a program that can talk like a

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>single person or behave like a single person. This would

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be artificial swarm intelligence, like it's trying to behave the

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>way massive groups of people actually look in statistics. Yeah,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can imagine, like, if you want to get

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>super clever with this one, you could try and design

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm that would surf to a page as if

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it had been human, in other words, to follow a

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>trail as opposed to just directly navigate to a site

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>so that if someone were looking into it, it would

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>look as if it was an actual person. And if

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you really wanted to be tricky, you could look for

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>times when it's the most advantageous to initiate a swarm

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>activity at a website. For example, let's say that there

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>was a big press release. Then that ends up naturally

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>saying well, curiosity would be raised because we've they've got

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>some thing new to announce. Therefore you would expect an

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>increase in traffic. We're just artificially boosting that increase. So

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it gets super like super secret spy type stuff going on.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is all on the corporate end, right. But

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're not involved in any kind of web

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>advertising or anything like that. You're just a normal Internet user.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You use some social media occasionally, you look at the comments.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>You know you shouldn't, but you do. Yeah. I'm pretty

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>much with you, except for the normal parts. So go ahead.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I haven't figured it out. Well, it turns out

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>normal is encountering tons of bots all the time. Yeah,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we are all going to be encountering lots of bots

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>all the time. So you're gonna find bots on Twitter

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>if you use online dating, you're going to find bots

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>on their trying to scam you body accounts. Uh. There

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is their bots on Facebook. Their bots in the comments

0:16:55.640 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>section of almost any article or anything you look at. Yeah,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they're everywhere. Whenever you see a like you go to

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>an article or a video, anything really that allow has

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>a comment section. And whenever you see someone who is

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>posting a link to something that is truly unrelated to

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever the content is, that's more likely than not a

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>bot account. Sure, And even if it's posting a link

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to something that is related, that can still be about account.

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>And even if it's just seeming to participate in the

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation like a human would, it can be about account. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it can be. Yeah, we're going from the the easy

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to detect to the more difficult to detect. Sometimes, depending

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>upon the interaction, it may be really hard to detect.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get into that. Okay, So just for the record,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>what do we mean when we say butt, Like, what

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>what distinguishes a bot from you know, a full fledged

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence program or something. Complexity is a big part

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of it, right for for a truly like depending upon

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>why you're talking about, when you say AI, because, as

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed before, AI covers a wide variety of of

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>disciplined behaviors, that sort of thing like you could argue

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that having a sensor that sends a message to a

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>program that then has a reaction based upon the information

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the sensor is gathered, that's the type of AI. But

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it probably it might be a reach. You could even

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>argue that, like a robot that successfully squirts ketch up

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>on your plate or on your hot dog has some

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of well yeah, because it has to detect where

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the hot dog is and then detect you know, how

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>much pressure it needs to use. There is some there's

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>intelligence involved in catch up. Yeah. No, if you ever

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>see the way that I end up trying to put

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>ketch up on something, you realize I lack that intelligence.

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>It does we I thought we agreed we weren't going

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the lunch meeting at the podcast, but yeah, so.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, if we're talking about the type

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of artificial intelligence that is meant to maintain a prolonged

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation or the type that is supposed to at least

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>simulate UH intelligence on a more general level, what we

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>would start to look at as potentially being strong AI,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least simulating the appearance of what we would

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>consider strong AI. Strong AI being a machine that can

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>truly think, right, a machine that is capable of thinking

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and making decisions, perhaps even having consciousness, Although that there's

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>an argument over whether or not that would be necessary

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to truly be strong AI. We're still talking about weak AI.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>In that sense. Bots can be even simpler than that.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Bots can be so simple as to really be uh,

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, closer to that that model of a sensor

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that sends information and then the computer reacts in a

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>specific way. It may be as simple as that. Yeah.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Typically it's thought of as something that's very simple. It

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>automates a task on the internet. So you can have

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like hacker bots a that's another kind of thing that

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we're probably not really going to talk about today. If

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody might create a bot army of a bunch of

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>computers with with programs secretly installed the hijack those computers

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to do what the hacker wants, and some of the

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>butts we're talking about here may in fact be the

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>result of that, because it means that the person who

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately responsible for creating the butts has a level

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of protection because if it gets traced back, it's traced

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the victims computer, not to the hackers computer. Right.

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But then also a lot of bots on the web

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that we interact with our they're so simple that they're

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>not even really like artificial intelligence. I mean, they're they're

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a collection of tricks. They might have like three tricks,

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and they just do them over and over and most

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of the time they're not going to fool anybody, but

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>every now and then they do, and they're so cheap

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you might as well use them. It's a shotgun approach

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of just like, well, these aren't going to fool everyone

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>all time, obviously, but like if that one or two

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>get through, then same same same philosophy strategy as as

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>people who send out or create networks to send out

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>spam emails, right, the idea being that, sure, the people

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>who get this are never going to respond to it. Yeah, yeah,

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to say, I believe you Nigerian Prince,

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you for this information exactly. That one

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>percent that does respond, however, if you're sending it to

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a large enough group of people is still a significant number.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's the same kind of strategy there. In fact,

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>if we want to give an example to explain this

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>simple behavior, you could use Twitter. It's a very easy

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>platform to describe. Let's say that you set up an

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>algorithm that does a search for certain keywords. Whenever those

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>keywords pop up, it identifies the person that sent the

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>tweet that contained those keywords and sends an apt reply

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to that person with a link attached. Uh, the goal

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>being for that person to end up clicking through that link. Hey,

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned lunch, are you interested in weight loss? Right

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>through to the spam page? Right? And it may it

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>may even be more more um uh, you know, subtle

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>than that. It maybe like I think you meant and

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>then the link or that's cool, have you seen this

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the link? You know, something so that it's

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>harder for you to initially identify that as a sales pitch. Yeah,

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them work by i would say, limiting

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>interaction or information. Yeah, it's just it's a pretty simple trick,

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes it works. Another thing is I think a

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of times Twitter bots overcome their simplicity by hiding

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in plain sight, like they don't seem to care all

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that much if they look like a real human they're

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>just enough of them working in tandem that they can

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>blend in with a mixed crowd of real humans and

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>other bots, especially for certain kinds of uses. And one

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of those that I would identify is swaying public opinion. Sure,

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so have you all heard about propaga into bots? Yeah,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I've heard about these, and uh it's incredibly upsetting. So

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>there are political bots out there, It's a phenomenon on

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>comments sections on social media. Uh. And they typically work

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>by like polluting political conversations with garbage or propaganda or

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>even sometimes perhaps attempts it straight up intimidation. Just one

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>example is that, according to some sources, it looks like

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the Kremlin has created a Russian Twitter bot army to

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of like shout down criticism on the web with

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>pro government messages. Again, this is this allegations. But and

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and we have seen in the past it doesn't even

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be a an officially state sponsored project, right

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>because there can there can at times be people who

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have the capability of pulling something like this off who

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>sympathize with the state and i'd eological faction. Yeah, it

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>could be like and and the challenges finding out whether

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or not in fact finding out whether or not a

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>state sponsor tends to be incredibly difficult unless someone has

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>made a poor life decision, right someone has, or someone right,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or someone is a whistleblower, which can also be a

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>poor life decision depending upon the regime you're talking about. Um,

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it could be a valuable service, but it can, depending

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>upon the state, be really dangerous as well. Yeah, one

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>incident I was reading about earlier was that people have

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>been referring to this thing that I was talking about

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier that the Kremlins supposed Russian troll army, so they

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>show up, which just on the phrasing of that, sounds

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like Tolkien. Yeah, I like think of like all these

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>giant Tolken esque trolls wearing fur hats marching through Siberia,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of awesome. But that's not what we're

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Know. What these do is that. So let's

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>let's let's say that your comments section in or your

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook feed is Helm's deep, Okay, So you're speaking. They

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.719
<v Speaker 1>show up in droves to leave comments and post on

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>social media, trying to rally public opinion to a pro

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>government position on issues like Russia's alleged involvement in the

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine UH in the February murder of the Russian dissident

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Boris Nimistov h so I found an interesting post on

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a blog network called Global Voices Online by a guy

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>named Lawrence Alexander and if he's correct, he claims that

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he used some open source tools to analyze the Twitter

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>activity of these accounts that were tweeting the same pro

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>government messages after the murder of Nemstov, and he he

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>came to the conclusion that by analyzing their activity, this

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was a bot army. These were bought accounts that were

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>created to sort of like shout uh, you know, political

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>pro government messages. And I don't know, I think that's

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting and kind of worrying development, and like,

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>what what does that mean? Yeah, it's it's tricky too,

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>because when we're talking about Twitter, when you know how

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Twitter works, you realize that this is something that only

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>only works in specific ways. So for example, if I

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>tweet out something that would trigger this sort of bought attack, uh,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>when I tweet that out, the people who see that

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>tweet are going to be the folks who follow me, right,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the people who the the bots that respond to me.

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>The only people who would see the responses would have

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to be people that are already following those bots, because

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>otherwise they and they'd have to be following me if

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a direct at reply, because that's the way Twitter works,

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>right If if people want to see what I tweet,

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>they have to follow me um or they end up

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>having to search a term that I have used, and

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 1>then my tweet, assuming that I'm tweeting publicly, will pop up.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>So uh, using Twitter as this platform is difficult in

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that if you're trying to sway public opinion, you have

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to hope that it's because people are searching certain terms

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and because you're using a massive bot army, most of

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the conversation ends up being from your perspective. Then that works.

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But if if you're talking about just the public discourse

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>in Twitter, you know you have to first get people

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to follow your bots if they're going to even see

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what you have to say. Well, I would say that

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in order if you're just looking to to sway opinion,

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to cause some kind of doubt in someone's mind about

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the the opinion that they currently hold, having what appears

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to be another human person, send you what appears to

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>be an earnest tweet response to something that you've said,

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>going like, hey, have you thought about this other thing?

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Like should like have you considered this? Have you read

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this article? Something like that? That could be enough to

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>start sewing those seeds and different ideas. So in that is,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about on a case by case basis on

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the actual people if you're trying to change their minds,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to changing everyone's mind at once. Your your

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pinpointing the the quote unquote trouble spots and addressing those sure,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and furthermore, the the way that the general public uses

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the metadata, the the big data of Twitter is that

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of researchers will go in and and search

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of terms and kind of get a reading

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on overall public opinion based on the number of people

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that are tweeting and right a thing, and and so

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that could be stilting journalism or or research point to

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>political parties. Yeah, that's that's a very good point. Also,

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I thought about how even if it's not

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>necessarily convincing you of the correctness of the pro government position,

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is the like effect on your emotions

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of if you say something critical of a government and

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>suddenly like five Twitter accounts starts shouting at you, and

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could have an intimidation effect exactly. Of course,

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you realize that it's a bout and

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you suspect that your government has sent this. I mean,

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>even if it's just one or two people or accounts

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that are tweeting this kind of thing at you, like,

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely an intimidation fact, right if you if you

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know it's about, then it's intimidation simply because you're

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.239
<v Speaker 1>getting people who are disagreeing with your perspective, and that

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>can if there are enough of them, you can start

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to question whether or not your point is. It would

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>depend on the tone of the tweets and stuff like, right,

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if if it was you, like, if you do realize

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they are boughts, then you're thinking, oh, now I've got

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the attention of a state that's not good. Uh necessarily,

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, it's you could even Joe and I were

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, you could even make the argument that

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>this is an indirect form of censorship because you start

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to intimidate people into being silent. Sure, if used in

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the right way, I think it could be something like that.

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Another thing is that this obviously isn't limited just to Twitter.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is sort of what we're focusing on because it

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most open kind of ways to

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>look at this, because you know, Twitter is generally it's

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>easy to retrieve a lot of data, and it's specifically

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what Alexander was looking at when when he was analyzing that.

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's also the easiest to automate um of any of

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the social media platforms because it's it's very simple too

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that there are very few checks and balances in creating

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>accounts and sending out tweets, right, But you could also

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the activity of bots on Facebook and stuff

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>like that. But sticking with Twitter for a minute, I

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 1>think we should drill down and look at what it

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like to be a Twitter bot. What what is

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that existence like and how do you know him when

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you see Well, I mean, this one is really super

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>tricky for Twitter in particular because like we were talking

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>about with the Turing test, where you had that lowered

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>set of expectations because of whatever, like like the the

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>supposed entity you are speaking to is a thirteen year

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>old boy who does not speak English as his first language,

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>then you have a difference of expectations. You know, you

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>realize that that entity is not going to have the

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>world experience of an adult. They are not going to

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>have the linguistic sophistication in English of someone who is

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a native English speaker, presumably anyway, depending upon your your

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>past experiences. But the same sort of thing applies with

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter because you have the hard limit of one forty

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>characters to get your point across, which means a lot

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of us, even as being like, even even the people

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>who are masters of the English language, people other than myself,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, uh, they would find it challenging sometimes to

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>express a particular thought within those hundred forty characters, and

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>often we end up having to take various shortcuts or

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to, uh, you know, take we have to

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>make compromises in the way we're trying to communicate our

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>our message, particularly really if we want to share a

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>link within that as well. For example, I would want

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to share a link of a forward thinking video episode

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>where I have the idea of what I want to communicate,

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but I realize I can't say it and share the

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>link within forty characters, so I have to start making cuts,

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>which means sometimes what I communicate ends up not sounding

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>entirely human. You say, watch or suffer like something like

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>something along those lines, uh, or you will be assimilated

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Um So. In other words, because Twitter places

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this limitation, because we have all encountered it, and because

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we have all made those compromises, it lowers our bar

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for what we expect when we encountered that. And it's

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>also a pretty casual medium, and and people are not

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>always using it in order to compose poetry dissertation level tweets.

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, people will just be like, like you obey,

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>watch this, Like I will not click. I realized that

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I have just invited a ton of those messages to

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>come at me. But I will not click on those links.

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what the link goes to. If you write, yo, bai,

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>watch this, it is not happening. I don't get it.

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't get it. Well, when it starts, when they

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>start getting the flood, Yeah, then you'll get it. Yeah. Well,

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes Twitter bots can be harmless or even delightful.

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, I'm sure. I have to admit I get

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>intense pleasure from the old favorite horse e books. Sometimes

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I just revisit that when I need a laugh. Uh

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the if you're not familiar there, it was an automated

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter account, or at least at some point I think

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it was automated. At another point I think it was

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.479
<v Speaker 1>actually taken over by a human user maybe, but it

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was a Twitter account that was famous for tweeting out

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>these lines of garbled you know, garbage text that from

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>somewhere yeah, beauty full things right. It was sold in

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven to an alternate reality game A K

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>A and a r G. These are those. Have you

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ever played an Energy? Yeah? I participated a little bit

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in a I Love Bees Halo two campaign from Circo.

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh what was that play? As many years ago? Something

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>like that. It was a game where you use your

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>smartphone camera to shoot swarms of bees at your coworkers

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 1>did not have smartphone cameras. I didn't right now though.

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>An ERG is one of those games that has a

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>real world component to it, where you have to do

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>certain actions within the real world or certain things happened

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to you within the real world that also carry over

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>into a virtual world, and you progress through the game

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that way. They usually they almost always have a very

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>defined beginning, middle, and end because they employ lots of

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>people to run the back end, and you can't perpetually

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>do that. So anyway, in this case, they thought, here's

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter account that already has a dedicated number of followers,

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and end up using this for a

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>viral marketing approach. Idea. Yeah, it's a clever idea. It

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes work. Um, it doesn't always work. And there

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>were other ones too, Like I remember there there were

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>certain chat uh like like Twitter butts that would respond

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>if you use certain phrases to grammatically correct you, well,

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>actually you probably meant this rather than what you actually wrote. Um.

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 1>How often were they wrong? It depends, It depends. I can't.

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to say. There's one that um that Bernie

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Burns of of Rooster Teeth has talked about before because

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a particular uh phrase or word that he

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>hated seeing because he knew that that people either were

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>using autocomplete or they were mistakenly using this one word

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>when they in fact meant a totally different word. And

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could tell you what it was, but

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember what it is off the top of

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>my head. If I do remember, I'll make sure to

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>tweet it out. With this episode goes live. But but yeah,

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>so there's some bots that are out there for for

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>fun entertainment reasons like those, or or to just tweet

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>like big Lebowski quotes at you. If you quote big

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Lebowski on Twitter. I've had that happen. There are a

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of others that are maybe a little less helpful,

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a little less delightful. There there for lots of purposes,

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not just trying to sway public opinion in terms of propaganda,

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but also maybe for marketing and advertising, or we might

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>say spamming, for trying to trick you into downloading malware.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Those are the worst, trying to funnel you into some

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>place where you can be taken advantage of on the web.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of research that's going into how

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to identify these spots. And I mean Twitter has a

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>has a policy that if it finds a bot that

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you're using that is malicious, it will shut it down.

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>So let's go way back to the early Twitter times,

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>not that early, but well when did atter start? About

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven? So yeah, like so around two it

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 1>was that some researchers from Texas A and M came

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>up with a scheme for catching bots on Twitter. So

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a phenomenon back then too, and they took

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>an advantage of some observable facts about Twitter bot behavior.

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, twitter bots like to follow and they like

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to retweet, and this is sort of part of the

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Twitter bots strategy, right, you need people to follow you,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but normally people don't want to follow a bot because

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not friends with them and whatever. So they'll take

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the fact that a lot of people just

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 1>automatically follow back. Right, they'll follow you hoping you don't

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.919
<v Speaker 1>really investigate and you just follow them back and now

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on their span. Well, especially if they if a

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>bot retweets you, then it's also you know, trying to flattering, Yeah, exactly,

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it's trying to to to stroke your ego and hope

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that you will also either follow or you'll click on

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>something that the that's in the message. Right, So that's

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>a sort of observable fact about the Twitter bots. They

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 1>like to follow, they like to retweet, but they don't

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 1>have very good taste in friends, if any at all.

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So the researchers set up these boring, garbage filled bait

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 1>accounts that no real human should be interested in as

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>far as they were concerned, only hipsters and bots follow them. Well,

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 1>apparently then they waited for the non discriminating bought love

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to pour in, and using about sixty bot bait accounts,

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they identified thirty six thousand candidate bought accounts. Back then,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that seemed like a lot how young we were. Yeah,

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I I you know there are tools that you can

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>use that uh, that will supposedly go through your your

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter followers and alert you to the accounts that appear

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to be butts. I'm going to talk about one in

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a second. Yeah, So I don't want to use one

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of those simply because I'm afraid of seeing that I have.

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>You have three h human followers and six thousand non

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 1>human followers. Well as as of twelve, you could buy

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the follows of twenty five thousand bots for just two

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty seven dollars. Yeah, this was from a

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>company that was called by Real Marketing Buy. It does

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>not appear to be operational anymore. Um, but but big

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>companies and celebrities are purported to have purchased follows like

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of cheap way to puff up

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>their online image. Right then, the idea of being able

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to to say, look how important I am because this

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>many people are interested in what I have to say.

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I had a conversation with somebody I won't name the

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>person I talked to, but another online personality who at

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one point had said, Hey, I'm not saying that this

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>is what you should do, but this is something you

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>could do where if you want, you know, if if

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>your value as an employee is somewhat based upon the

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>number of people who follow your account, you should just

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>on the down load, go and buy these because if

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the metric, then here's how you

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can gain the system. So that way you can, you know,

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 1>have that metric hit the goal. And I was thinking

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the whole time, I was like, I could never do

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that personally because I couldn't live with myself, but I

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.919
<v Speaker 1>could totally see how if that's if that's how you're

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>being judged, well, I mean it's There were news stories

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>at back when cloud was was more popular, when it

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>first came out of marketing people and and and public

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>persona type people being hired based on partially their cloud score, right,

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and that might end up getting a little bit of

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a boost if you suddenly have you know, twenty people

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>following you. Yeah, but then that also ends up encouraging

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 1>services like clout to build in elements of their algorithm

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to look for red flags like that. So one of

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the interesting byproducts that is happening with this is that

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see improvements in both the detection systems

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to try and find bots and the systems used to

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>create bots so that they are harder to detect, which

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is very similar to what we see with security systems,

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's it ultimately means improvements and artificial intelligence, which

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is which generally a good thing, but the actual particulars

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>might be really irritating. Yeah. And in one advantage of

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>having this large of a sample size of this kind

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of data is that people can study it pretty well.

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Right Well, you can, for one thing, compare them to

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the accounts of suspected real humans, suspected real humans, right,

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>suspected bots and suspected real humans there, and what's what's

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.399
<v Speaker 1>different between them? That that would be an interesting thing

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>to know. Well, people have studied that. Just one was

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a group from Indiana University in Bloomington's they did the

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>analysis on I think it was based on the sample

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>set create aided by the Texas A and M researchers,

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and they did the analysis on that, and they came

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>up with this little web app you can check called

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Bot or Not, which will evaluate a Twitter account and

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>let you know if it's a bout And in fact,

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it gives some kind of interesting feedback on bought probability,

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not just like probably a bot. It gives

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you these different like metrics of of human nous. Have

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you have you tried this? Did? It said? I was

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>probably not a bot? But it wasn't real Sure? Now

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I gotta try it on me. Yeah, you gotta try

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it on yourself. It's sort of like a void comp

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>test for Twitter, like I imagined it. Tweeting that leon

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is like the tortoises on its back hashtag you're not helping?

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? Oh? Man? Uh? This is this is both.

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you about my mother. Sorry anyway, So we

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>discovered some things about body account. It here a few

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>They retweet others more often than humans. Makes sense. Um,

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they've typically been Twitter users for shorter periods of time.

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They typically have longer user names. Uh. There was another

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>study that I found it. It was published in plus

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>one back in that looked solely at tweet times and patterns,

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and according to it, u bots tweet randomly at all

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 1>hours of the day and night, whereas humans are more

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>likely to tweet from like like a in bursts and

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be from the hours of like seven am to midnight. Obviously,

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>depending on the human at hand, it could also things

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like that. I mean, obviously, if you're using something like

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>tweet deck where you can schedule out tweets, then that

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>might end up making you look more botish than than

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>other human beings. But let's face it, if you're using

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 1>tweet deck, you really are sort of a robot tweet

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>tech all the time. I have it up right now.

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I'm sorry, I'm just kidding, but no, it's um,

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's fair beautiful. But another thing is that, like,

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and again this isn't a dead giveaway, but it is

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those flags is how many people does the

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>bot follow? Right, Because if you are a human being

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and you really do wish to use Twitter in some

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of useful way, you're probably limiting how many accounts

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you're following, because otherwise you can't keep up with what's happening.

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just a fire hose of content and it's constantly updating,

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and you will never be able to see anything from

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone you're actually interested in following. So if you're following

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like I follow, I think it's between two hundred and

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>three hundred people, and you know, occasionally I'll add folks

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to it, or I might drop people off if I

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>realize that I haven't seen a tweet from them in

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a really long time. Um, but that tends to be

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.720
<v Speaker 1>my comfort zone because that's what I'm interested in seeing.

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But some of these bought accounts, you look in, like

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty six thousand people follow, and you

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>think there's no way anyone could ever follow a hundred

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty six thousand people and actually have an idea of

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>what is going on. So well, you can use you

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>can use filtering options to only follow, to only immediately

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 1>follow certain lists. But even so, I mean, it's it's

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>one of some. In some cases, if it's a celebrity

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>who wants to end up encouraging as much interaction with

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fans as possible, it may very well be completely legitimate.

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But if it's some, if it's a name, like just

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a long string of of of numbers after a noun

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of some sort or a name of some sort, and

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you don't recognize that person at all. It's an

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>indication that it could be not necessarily is, but could

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>be a butt. Yeah, there's another sort of statistically informed

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that you still shouldn't use too much, because this

0:45:56.000 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>fact is that bots more often create a sort of

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>persona for themselves that is female gendered. Right, And that's because,

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>according to research, female gendered social bots get more attention. Uh.

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>This is basically because gender bias exists in our society.

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But this this was a study that was out of Brazil.

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>It released a hundred and twenty boats on Twitter for

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty days. These boats could post tweets generated by algorithm

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>um and also retweet things, and Twitter caught and deactivated

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>less than a third of them. Uh. Twitter users themselves

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't always catch on or maybe care that these were

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bought accounts. The body accounts received a total of just

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>one shy of five thousand followers during that month. Five

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:48.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand followers. Uh, some some boughts. Some of some of

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the accounts had like repeat followers from from the other

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>body accounts that the follows came from a total of

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>one thifty two users. I wonder how many of those

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 1>were bots? Good question. I'm not sure. Yeah, it could

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be that's it's a bot followed by bots, but we

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know sure. But but over twenty of these bot

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>accounts received over a hundred followers, which puts them in

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like the forty six percentile of the most popular Twitter users.

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:16.879
<v Speaker 1>That's more followers than I got, right, so I'm kind

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of I'm kind of a low engagement Twitter user. You are, yeah,

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you you're under the radar for a lot of people.

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Then we can get you more than a hundred just

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the show alone, if we were sharing your your Twitter handle.

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>The researchers also checked these bots cloud scores and and Joe,

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you you were actually the one who originally

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>quoted this at me, So if you would like to

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>say it out loud because you were so tickled by it, No, well,

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I wrote it down, but now I can't remember where

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the quote came from. Well, the quote came from the researchers. Okay, okay,

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 1>so their cloud scores were the same or higher than

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>quote several well known academicsions and social network researchers. Uh, well,

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know from my horse then again, who wants

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to follow an active mission? From my own experience, like,

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, I don't get I don't notice

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 1>follows from Twitter accounts usually, I mean, I don't notice

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like bots following me. By definitely notice bots tweeting at me,

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>so they're not always following users. Sometimes it's just an

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:20.440
<v Speaker 1>apt reply uh, and I can I can usually detect

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it pretty early on if I don't notice it directly

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>from that tweet. What I tend to do if I

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.879
<v Speaker 1>see a weird tweet from somebody, I will click through

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>their name to look at their most recent tweets, but

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>don't click through to their website. I don't do that.

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I just look to see their Twitter feed to see

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>what kind of tweets they've been sending out. And usually

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just a line of apt replies to various people,

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>often with the identical phrasing. Sometimes it ends up being

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>um uh, peppered in between nonsensical tweets that clearly have

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.439
<v Speaker 1>been scraped from some other Twitter account or have been

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>formed seemingly at random. Because you'll read it and you

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:01.359
<v Speaker 1>think all the words in that sentence makes sense, but

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>collectively it doesn't mean anything. You know, the like made

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 1>up tweets that these bots tweet. I feel like very

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 1>often a characteristic of them is you can't tell what

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about, but they sound like they really mean it.

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:17.919
<v Speaker 1>You could you could probably end up making a very

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:23.760
<v Speaker 1>successful book of nonsensical butt tweets where it's one per page.

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>You could totally yeah, but at any rate that you know,

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing I always do is I always flag those

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>accounts of spam accounts every single time I encounter one.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>For two reasons. Well, no, I don't not for not

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for spam. I I don't mind marketing if it's done properly,

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want spam. Uh. And two, it means

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it automatically blocks that from you know, I won't see

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>tweets from that that entity anymore. Says the two reasons

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>why I do it. And it's not like Twitter is

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:58.359
<v Speaker 1>going to pounce on an account if it gets one

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 1>flag for being a butt. So it may be that,

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'll take a certain threshold of of reports.

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 1>But I always encourage people who use Twitter. If you

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 1>encounter this, go ahead and flag that account for for

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing, you won't see anything else from that account again.

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you're curious, you can always go and use

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>bot or not. That's true, you could get although I

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>find that just looking at the again the past few

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>tweets usually gives you an indication. You know, there's one

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>other place other than than social media and comments sections

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that you very often might encounter bots on the internet,

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and that would be in online gaming. Yeah, and in

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 1>this case, it may not be the purpose of the

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>bot to fool other players into thinking it's a human.

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>It's more to fool the game into thinking it's a human.

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Because generally speaking, most games have policies against automated UH

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>player behavior. They don't want players to use bots to

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>play the game. I mean really, depending on the game

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.399
<v Speaker 1>they the owners might not care because if it means

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that someone is paying the account for that bot to

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 1>do the thing it's doing, yeah, they're like, hey, you know,

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you're paying the same amount whether you're human or a robot.

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, sure. But but in a more responsible

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 1>concept of game ownership, they might care about the user

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>experience of their real players and not want people to

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be automating processes that either make the game unfair. Exactly,

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>if they are being responsible, they don't want an unbalanced

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:35.359
<v Speaker 1>experience from their players, and they don't want people to uh,

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to end up having an unfair advantage because they purchased

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a an account from someone who had just set this

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>bot this automated behavior, so that this this automated player

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:52.760
<v Speaker 1>account ends up doing a specific task so many times

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that it builds up the character in some way or form,

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:58.239
<v Speaker 1>usually through experience. So it's a bot that's seeking out

0:51:58.400 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>very low level mobs or monsters. Uh. And you know,

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 1>if you were to grind that way to build up

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:05.959
<v Speaker 1>your character as a human, it would get very boring

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. But bots don't get bored. They just keep

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>doing what they were programmed to do. Well, we don't

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:12.720
<v Speaker 1>know that they don't get bored, Well, they don't complain.

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So or that you might have it where it's mining

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gold or the equivalent within whatever game so that you

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>get a massive amount of gold that you know it

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>may take. Let's say that it takes four hours to

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.879
<v Speaker 1>get a significant amount of golds. So therefore the the

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>most players aren't going to bother doing that because it's

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>such a huge time commitment. But again, a bot's going

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to keep doing it until it's told not to do it. Anymore. UM.

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>These are the sort of things that that game systems

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have to look for, and it's not usually up to players,

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>although if a player sees it and reports it, then

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:49.240
<v Speaker 1>an administrator might take a look at it. It's usually

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>something that requires UM software on the game side, the

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>back end, maybe on the server side, to look at

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this behavior. Uh. But uh, you know they're and they're

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>even UM competitions to build bots that are really really

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>good at doing what they do without being detected, so

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>they're not always massively multiplayer online role playing games. That's

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that I'm most familiar with as far as

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bots go. But these can even be in first person shooters. Uh.

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>And there are competitions to build convincing bots in first

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>person shooters. So you could, in theory, build a bot

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that navigates through a first person shooter map and targets

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people in the head and shoots them with unerring accuracy.

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Because it's a boat, not a human, this particular approach

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:42.240
<v Speaker 1>would end up giving it away that's not in fact

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a robot. It is in fact or it is not

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.279
<v Speaker 1>in fact a human. Rather, it is in fact a

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 1>robot because it's so accurate that no human being could

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 1>do that. It's able to react in uh split second

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of a time of time as opposed to a humans

0:53:56.640 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 1>reaction time. So you're saying that every time that I

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 1>suspected that's one was it go Ram Cheater and Halo

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:06.359
<v Speaker 1>it was probably right. Um, I'm going to go ahead

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:09.319
<v Speaker 1>and say yes, because frankly, I'm scared of you and

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to suggest that you are not a

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>good Halo player. I did just clenchman. I mean I

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>honestly like, there have been times where I have been

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>in online games where I thought, Wow, that person, that

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 1>person is so good I can't even imagine what they're

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>playing like. And to be fair, people who play on

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a professional level play there there they seem inhuman, but

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:35.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there really are in human entities in these games.

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And there was a competition in two thousand twelve called

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bot Prize that was the challenge was for teams

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to try and build a convincing bot that would play

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Unreal Tournament at a level that was similar to how

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a human would play. So so it's the Turing Test

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for violent video games exactly. Yeah. The idea being that, Okay,

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:00.760
<v Speaker 1>here's a robot that is essentially a robot. This control rolling, this,

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this game character, but you don't want it to be

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a dead giveaway that's a robot. So it has to

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:09.759
<v Speaker 1>play more like a human would play. It has to

0:55:09.800 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to make mistakes. It has to have a

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>delay in the time when it detects an enemy and

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>when it can aim at that enemy and shoot at

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that enemy. It has to have all this built into it,

0:55:21.000 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>so it seems fallible like a human is, rather than

0:55:24.800 --> 0:55:28.839
<v Speaker 1>having machine precision like a robot does. And uh, there

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was a bot called ut to the Power of two

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that convinced enough judges that was actually a human player

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in Unreal tournament that it won the prize. Uh, there

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be one in two thousand fourteen, although

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I did not see anything about that, so maybe the

0:55:42.800 --> 0:55:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it might have been that the competition fell apart after

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand twelve one. But uh, it's it's pretty fascinating,

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>which means that ultimately, as a player, you might not

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell if another entity within that game

0:55:57.160 --> 0:55:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is in fact controlled by human or controlled by a butt.

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:03.879
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, if it's controlled by a butt, it needs

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a butt that's bad enough that you could

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:09.480
<v Speaker 1>beat it. Anyway, if it's always beating you, then you

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 1>might at least suspect that something hinky is going on. Sure, well,

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's kind of fascinating though. It's it's another area

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 1>in which your your interaction with a human person would

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 1>be limited enough. Uh, and you might make assumptions about

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that human person that they're distracted or that I mean,

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're you're probably not talking to them of

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a headset because that would be a really advanced bot, right,

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>but they probably all use that irritating robo voice that

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was an optional Xbox Live that I hated so much.

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, it's another situation in which you're making

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 1>assumptions about the people that you're playing with, and so

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you could perhaps be more easily fooled by basically your

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:52.080
<v Speaker 1>expectation for human is lowering, rather than your expectation for

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:56.319
<v Speaker 1>robots being improved. And of course this isn't always used

0:56:56.360 --> 0:56:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to give someone an unfair advantage or to frustrate other players.

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes times we are using bots and video games for

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.000
<v Speaker 1>entertainment purposes. You guys have heard about the bought tournament

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going on in Civilization. Okay, it is a guy

0:57:10.640 --> 0:57:14.279
<v Speaker 1>who has installed all these different mods and civilization and

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is having a game of forty two computer controlled players

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 1>set on Earth. All of the starting positions are a

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>correlative to where the starting positions should be for all

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the civilizations, all of them set to deity level ability,

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and the only way to win is to destroy everybody

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 1>else on the plant. That's the parameters they've set just

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to see who would win at the end with those, uh,

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that criteria and uh, that's still going on right now.

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you all right? Knowing that we're talking about both

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 1>historical civilizations and current ones. The two uh civilizations that

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:03.000
<v Speaker 1>were eliminated at approximately the same time shocked me. It

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was Germany under the control of Hitler that was the

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>That was the first one, and North Korea was the

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 1>second one. And it turns out pressing people doesn't really

0:58:13.680 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>work out. So the question right now is will Gandhi

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>last long enough to go totally nuclear on everybody? Because

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when civilization was developed, Gandhi was set so that he

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>would be the most peaceful. And the way they had

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>said that the piece meter was that it was a

0:58:31.480 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a a number that went from like zero to two

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty six. But Gandhi, if enough conditions happened to make

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>him more peaceful, like like you had built the United

0:58:42.600 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Nations and it would lower everyone's k And to the

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:49.439
<v Speaker 1>other end, yes, he would go from instead of going

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>from one to zero and staying there, he go from

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 1>zero to two fifty six and go as as aggressive

0:58:55.960 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>as you possibly could. It was an error that was made,

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and in everyone identified Gandhi as being the most insanely

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:08.800
<v Speaker 1>aggressive player and they kept it on purpose from that

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:14.120
<v Speaker 1>point forward. They discovered the bug and decided it was funny. Yeah,

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, that's that's example. I can only hope that

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that Gandhi will eventually actually we'll have to see if

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he lasts long enough to develop what nuclear weapons. But

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:26.960
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, that's just an example of of body

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>behavior being used for entertainment purposes as oppose to these

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 1>other irritating means. Yeah. Yeah, And we we need to remember,

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, that creating simulated behavior, simulated and automated behaviors

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for these environments is not always malicious or inconvenient or

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's sometimes it's for fun, sometimes it's benign or

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for greater research, which is yeah, yeah, that's cool too.

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for creating bots to research bots. Yeah, But

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so I'm wondering what do you all think as just

0:59:59.240 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>citizens of the internet. You know, as a web user,

1:00:02.240 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you're on social media sometimes you look at the comments.

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you see as the future of our relationship

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>with bots? I mean, because there's sort of an arms race, right,

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like the spam filters and the bot detectors that are

1:00:16.440 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>automated or getting better. We're we're sort of evolving too,

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like we're all learning just personally how better to spot

1:00:24.120 --> 1:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>bots as web users, but also the bots are getting better.

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think is gonna happen? Well, I

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think I mean, if I had to guess, I would

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>say that we would see the bots get sophisticated enough

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>where upon, at least casual observation, you would not be

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>able to tell the difference easily between a bot and

1:00:42.280 --> 1:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a real person, and that it will reach a saturation

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>point until there is some form of collapse, not necessarily

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a collapse of the platform, but maybe collapse of confidence

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in that platform, and that as a result, the bots

1:00:56.520 --> 1:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>will lose their value because no one will be no

1:00:59.360 --> 1:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>one will care or about it anymore. And then we'll

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>see kind of a cycle where the bots will get

1:01:04.160 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of not used so much, that's my guess. Or

1:01:07.200 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what if, and this might be kind of outlandish to suggest,

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but what if bots, by becoming so sophisticated that it's

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell them apart from real people, become worthy

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of our attention. I mean, what, you know, a very

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>very sophisticated bot that can easily trick a human observer

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>into thinking it's a human operating a Twitter account? Do

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you mind interacting with them on Twitter? Yeah, that's what

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of just thinking about. And I mean,

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>if I were to find out that someone that I've

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>had conversations with on Twitter is actually a bot, I

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be mad at it. You know, like like

1:01:46.240 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at that point, I would kind of want to talk

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to the person who had written the program and and

1:01:51.000 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd like like come to interview them on

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:54.919
<v Speaker 1>a show and be like, hey, you did this really

1:01:54.920 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>cool thing. You totally fooled me at any rate, So

1:01:57.120 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty rad. But yeah, like I would be impressed

1:02:00.880 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than upset, as long as it wasn't threatening to

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>turn me into Mother Russia. Yeah, and then again, I

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think if it weren't malicious, I would definitely be impressed

1:02:10.440 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, we would be impressed. I think to counter this, perhaps,

1:02:14.200 --> 1:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you would be impressed by the novelty of it.

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So what if we live in an age where bots

1:02:20.560 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>like this you can, you know, buy a million of

1:02:23.160 --> 1:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>them for a penny, and they're just they're everywhere. Well,

1:02:27.120 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're already everywhere, but like really really good

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>bots are everywhere. You're you're talking at that point about

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the potential collapse of entire industries because they're collapse of

1:02:39.320 --> 1:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet society basically, which would be incredibly destructive. So here's

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>hoping that we never reached. I mean, I assume we'll

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>probably reach some semblance of that and then get through it.

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It'll just be the point where that happens will be

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>really ugly and it'll take some time. It'll it'll I

1:02:57.800 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>would assume it'd be similar to something like a Dot

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Calm crash, where you know, the consequences would be pretty

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>grim at least for a while, and we would eventually

1:03:07.840 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>get through that. Um So I think that would happen

1:03:11.080 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, I hate to be kind of doom

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and gloom about it, but ultimately, bought behavior on a

1:03:16.560 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>wide scale basis can be pretty dangerous. You know, I

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:23.439
<v Speaker 1>wonder if and this might not be doable just because

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the way, um, the way bots are incorporated into

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the sources through which we access them, like social media

1:03:29.480 --> 1:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms and stuff. But if we could end up we're

1:03:32.160 --> 1:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>with browsers that have bought blockers in the same way

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we now have ad blockers, maybe I mean that would

1:03:39.320 --> 1:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>probably be more like a virus blocker in this kind

1:03:42.680 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of like an ad blocker, because we probably have a

1:03:44.160 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>database that would have to depend upon and it wouldn't

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily automatically detect whether something was a bot, but if

1:03:50.080 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it fit in a database that would say, all right,

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this is we're just blocking this interaction. And I suspect

1:03:55.720 --> 1:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that kind of countermeasure is going to I mean, it's

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>still going to be an arm sprace, but I but

1:04:00.760 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I picture it more or less evening itself out at

1:04:03.240 --> 1:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a certain way. I don't I don't foresee a collapse

1:04:06.440 --> 1:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter as we know. I would hope not. And

1:04:08.480 --> 1:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I also think that, you know, bots can potentially be

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>very helpful. What if I go on Twitter and I

1:04:14.320 --> 1:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>expressed that I need a certain thing, like there's something

1:04:17.360 --> 1:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking for that I haven't been able to find.

1:04:19.600 --> 1:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But then there's a Twitter bot that totally can point

1:04:22.280 --> 1:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>me in the right direction at John Strickland. Your keys

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>are in your front left pocket. Thanks so much. Now now,

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>now my Twitter handle is out there for everybody. No,

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I have self promote all the time. I'm not gad

1:04:32.040 --> 1:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. I'm just glad you said and I didn't

1:04:34.040 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>have to, uh but no, no, I mean that it

1:04:36.320 --> 1:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>could really be very useful depending upon what it is

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for. Like, there are times where people complain

1:04:42.440 --> 1:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>about their experiences with a brand, and then the brand

1:04:44.880 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>will get in touch with them, especially if they have

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of followers, uh, to to try and resolve that. Well.

1:04:50.920 --> 1:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Bots could make that happen much more easily for a

1:04:54.400 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more people. So it's not just the folks who

1:04:57.240 --> 1:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have fifty thousand followers who get, you know, sponse from

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a brand that they've had some issue with. It's everybody.

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And it may be that we see more problems resolved

1:05:06.360 --> 1:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>because of that. So I see a lot of potentially

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>good things coming out of bought interactions. But again, those

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of interactions tend to be more on the Hey,

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm aware that this is a bot that's that

1:05:18.360 --> 1:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I've encountered. But that's okay because it's getting me to

1:05:21.400 --> 1:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what I need stuff because I'm upset or or at

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>least addressing whatever the problem is. Yeah. Um, as opposed

1:05:31.280 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to a bot that's designed specifically to fool you into

1:05:34.280 --> 1:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking it's a person, I mean, that's always gonna be

1:05:36.840 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a little more because you've been tricked, right, right. Nobody

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>likes to be right unless you're unless you're specifically going

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to a stage magic show where you're like I want

1:05:49.320 --> 1:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to see amazing allusions where I don't know how he

1:05:51.560 --> 1:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>did it or she did it. This is not something

1:05:55.520 --> 1:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that you generally seek out. I think the takeaway of

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this episode is that the future of social media is

1:06:00.720 --> 1:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a stage magic show. I can only hope. Yeah, I

1:06:05.560 --> 1:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>can make a coin disappear into a vending machine, which

1:06:09.320 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>we did that episode about those previously. I know you

1:06:12.640 --> 1:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>can't jump. Thanks, well, uh, you know, this has been

1:06:16.120 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a really fun conversation. We had talked about how this

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be a super short episode, and of course

1:06:21.160 --> 1:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we found so much to talk about. It was a

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>really long one, but it was so much fun to

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about. So we want to encourage our listeners if

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys have ideas for for topics we can tackle

1:06:31.600 --> 1:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in future episodes, or you have your own thoughts about

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what we have said in this episode. We want to

1:06:37.040 --> 1:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>hear from you, so send us an email. The address

1:06:39.560 --> 1:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is FW Thinking at how Stuff Works dot com. Or

1:06:42.640 --> 1:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us on social platforms and let

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>us know you're not a bot or that you are

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a bot. We don't really discriminate. You can get in

1:06:50.560 --> 1:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>touch with us on Twitter, Google Plus, and Facebook. At

1:06:53.240 --> 1:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Google Plus, we are f w thinking. Just

1:06:57.000 --> 1:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>search for FW thinking on Facebook. We will pop up,

1:06:59.840 --> 1:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>leave us a message, and we'll talk to you again

1:07:02.320 --> 1:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>really soon. For more on this topic in the future

1:07:09.680 --> 1:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of technology, visit forward thinking dot com brought to you

1:07:22.680 --> 1:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>by Toyota. Let's Go Places,