1
00:00:02,120 --> 00:00:05,320
Speaker 1: It's disconcerting to realize that it was only nine years

2
00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:08,399
Speaker 1: after the two Suites were murdered that the first DNA

3
00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:13,160
Speaker 1: evidence was presented at a criminal trial. Somehow, it seems

4
00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:16,239
Speaker 1: tantalizingly close to the case, even though it was still

5
00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:20,040
Speaker 1: almost a decade before the astonishing world first breakthrough that

6
00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:25,720
Speaker 1: followed an accidental scientific discovery in a nutshell. In nineteen

7
00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:30,040
Speaker 1: eighty four, UK geneticist Alex Jeffries uncovered something remarkable as

8
00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:34,519
Speaker 1: he studied inherited illnesses. He had extracted DNA from cells

9
00:00:34,560 --> 00:00:38,680
Speaker 1: and attached it to photographic film. Once developed, that film

10
00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:41,640
Speaker 1: showed a row of bars, and the scientists realized that

11
00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:44,080
Speaker 1: every person whose cells had been used in his study

12
00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:49,240
Speaker 1: could be identified by those bars. The process could also

13
00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:52,559
Speaker 1: determine kinship, so life as we knew it, as far

14
00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:57,600
Speaker 1: as identity was concerned, was forever changed. Within two years,

15
00:00:57,680 --> 00:01:02,200
Speaker 1: Jeffrey's DNA fingerprinting helped exonerator man arrested for murder in

16
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:06,920
Speaker 1: Leicestershire and convict the actual killer. That same year, the

17
00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:09,520
Speaker 1: first DNA evidence was used in a rate case in

18
00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:12,880
Speaker 1: the US. It took another three years before it was

19
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:16,520
Speaker 1: used in Australia. In a sexual assault case in Melbourne.

20
00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:21,200
Speaker 1: What's almost as extraordinary is how there came to be

21
00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:25,000
Speaker 1: any DNA to test in that INITIALSI case. It was

22
00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:28,240
Speaker 1: due to the extraordinary foresight of the late Tony Raymond,

23
00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:32,880
Speaker 1: then the director of the Forensic Services Center with Victoria Police.

24
00:01:32,959 --> 00:01:35,920
Speaker 1: In nineteen eighty two, he ordered hundreds of samples from

25
00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:38,959
Speaker 1: unsolved crime scenes to be stored in a special freezer

26
00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:43,520
Speaker 1: at minus seventy degree celsius. Samples including hair, clothing and

27
00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:48,560
Speaker 1: seamen collected by Victorian police. Such was Raymond's faith in

28
00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:51,880
Speaker 1: the advances forensic science would make that when the technology

29
00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:55,400
Speaker 1: to test samples became available in Australia a few years later,

30
00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:59,400
Speaker 1: authorities had much to work with, but it took a while.

31
00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:03,760
Speaker 1: Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton only became aware of the special

32
00:02:03,800 --> 00:02:06,800
Speaker 1: freezer when he was appointed the lab's director in two

33
00:02:06,880 --> 00:02:10,280
Speaker 1: thousand and nine. At that stage there were nearly two

34
00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:15,280
Speaker 1: thousand samples from about six hundred unsolved crimes. Was any

35
00:02:15,320 --> 00:02:19,280
Speaker 1: evidence collected at Easy Street part of this cachet. More importantly,

36
00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:23,080
Speaker 1: was a seaman found near Suzanne's body secured in this freezer,

37
00:02:23,360 --> 00:02:28,840
Speaker 1: or perhaps a similar one at a different temperature. Then

38
00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:31,840
Speaker 1: there's the crucial question that really should be addressed first,

39
00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:35,600
Speaker 1: How was that sample, especially as well as blood collected

40
00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:39,040
Speaker 1: at the scene, stored before Tony Raymond made his visionary

41
00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:43,239
Speaker 1: decision to free certain pieces of evidence, And how secure

42
00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:45,679
Speaker 1: has the evidence taken from the house in collingwould been

43
00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:50,960
Speaker 1: in the past forty six years. Victoria Police refused to

44
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,679
Speaker 1: shed any light on any of this. All we know

45
00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:56,760
Speaker 1: for sure is that Senior Detective Ron Iddols felt there

46
00:02:56,800 --> 00:02:59,480
Speaker 1: was enough DNA material to work with to reopen the

47
00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:02,520
Speaker 1: easy Stree case when he took over cold cases in

48
00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:07,320
Speaker 1: twenty eleven. After evaluating which of the states two hundred

49
00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:10,200
Speaker 1: and eighty unsolved homicides were worth his new team's attention,

50
00:03:10,720 --> 00:03:12,840
Speaker 1: he gave them each a color code according to their

51
00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:16,760
Speaker 1: chances of being solved. Red indicated cases that were probably

52
00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:19,480
Speaker 1: never going to be solved, yellow for those that needed

53
00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:22,200
Speaker 1: a total overhaul, and green for the ones they could

54
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:25,920
Speaker 1: probably solve. The Easy Street file was one of just

55
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:28,920
Speaker 1: thirty on this list, given the green tick due to

56
00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:32,200
Speaker 1: the fact that there was DNA to work with, Yet

57
00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:35,119
Speaker 1: even the detective with the ninety five percent conviction rate

58
00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:39,200
Speaker 1: couldn't find this killer. Again, there were no DNA matches

59
00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:42,240
Speaker 1: between any of the men tested and the evidence taken

60
00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:47,080
Speaker 1: from the house. But should this necessarily raise concerns about

61
00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:50,200
Speaker 1: the way materials were held in those pre DNA years.

62
00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:54,480
Speaker 1: Some scuttle butt suggests they weren't as secure as they

63
00:03:54,520 --> 00:04:33,000
Speaker 1: would be now. Years ago, former detective Peter Hiscock was

64
00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:36,760
Speaker 1: told off the record naturally that the Easy Street exhibit

65
00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:40,200
Speaker 1: box went missing for nearly two decades now.

66
00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:42,680
Speaker 2: There was a situation for about seventeen years. I think

67
00:04:42,880 --> 00:04:45,840
Speaker 2: that those exhibits were misplaced down at Collingwood where they

68
00:04:45,960 --> 00:04:46,479
Speaker 2: be stored.

69
00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:48,640
Speaker 1: So what's happened to those exhibits in the time.

70
00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:49,120
Speaker 3: I've got them?

71
00:04:49,320 --> 00:04:49,839
Speaker 4: Who knows?

72
00:04:49,960 --> 00:04:53,320
Speaker 2: They just been sitting in a box another area. They've

73
00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:55,440
Speaker 2: got a facility down at Collingwood.

74
00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:56,520
Speaker 1: So when did they go missing?

75
00:04:56,800 --> 00:04:59,240
Speaker 2: That's I said. I don't know when they went missing.

76
00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,800
Speaker 2: But this detectives spoke to me, oh quite a few

77
00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:06,000
Speaker 2: years ago and said that they've just refound them. He

78
00:05:06,120 --> 00:05:08,880
Speaker 2: actually worked out what had happened, whether they put them

79
00:05:09,560 --> 00:05:10,760
Speaker 2: these with the aids.

80
00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:11,560
Speaker 5: I'm not sure.

81
00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:14,919
Speaker 2: It's a very high level system down there. Knowing the

82
00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:15,680
Speaker 2: police department.

83
00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:22,560
Speaker 1: That's a forty year old case and the exhibits have

84
00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:26,080
Speaker 1: been missing for seventeen years. That's scary in terms of

85
00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:26,560
Speaker 1: solving it.

86
00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:29,440
Speaker 2: Well, you need to check that for sure, tell me, but.

87
00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:31,920
Speaker 4: Of course it is.

88
00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:38,840
Speaker 1: Again. Victoria Police won't confirm or deny this happened, and

89
00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:41,560
Speaker 1: it might not matter as long as the DNA samples

90
00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:46,640
Speaker 1: were securely stored. Dad Na Hartman manages the molecular biology

91
00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:50,440
Speaker 1: lab at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine and she

92
00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:52,920
Speaker 1: knows a great deal about the science the rest of

93
00:05:53,040 --> 00:05:55,000
Speaker 1: us like to think we understand.

94
00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:58,760
Speaker 5: To me, DNA is it's a living thing. It's a

95
00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:01,839
Speaker 5: biological so we have to remember that it's a finite

96
00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:07,520
Speaker 5: that it has properties that make it prone to degradation decomposition.

97
00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:12,320
Speaker 5: So it's something that while holds the bootprint and tells

98
00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:15,680
Speaker 5: us who we are, it's not something that lives on forever,

99
00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:19,240
Speaker 5: and it's something that while we can recover, it is

100
00:06:19,360 --> 00:06:22,080
Speaker 5: quite precious and we have to treat it with the

101
00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:27,080
Speaker 5: utmost respect. For most part, our task is to help

102
00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:32,240
Speaker 5: identify coronial cases. So where people have been reported to

103
00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:35,039
Speaker 5: the coroner and they are not able to be identified

104
00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:38,279
Speaker 5: by family members, then we might apply scientific means of

105
00:06:38,279 --> 00:06:43,680
Speaker 5: identification such as DNA fingerprints dental records. For me in particular,

106
00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:46,919
Speaker 5: I'm interested in being able to use DNA capabilities to

107
00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:48,560
Speaker 5: help identify people.

108
00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:52,080
Speaker 1: And so in a sense, it has our imprint, if

109
00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:56,279
Speaker 1: you like, and everyone's imprint is individual, very unique.

110
00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:59,080
Speaker 5: Yes, while we share a lot of things in common,

111
00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:03,360
Speaker 5: there will be parts of OURNA that are unique to us.

112
00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:07,200
Speaker 5: And from the purposes of identification, what we're targeting are

113
00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:09,720
Speaker 5: those parts of the DNA that are unique to us

114
00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:11,920
Speaker 5: so that we can build what is known as our

115
00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:15,120
Speaker 5: DNA profile. So when we say we obtain your DNA

116
00:07:15,520 --> 00:07:18,520
Speaker 5: or do a DNA profile really is we're looking at

117
00:07:18,520 --> 00:07:21,880
Speaker 5: a subset of very small number of markers within your

118
00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:24,560
Speaker 5: DNA that are unique and that we can then compare

119
00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:27,559
Speaker 5: to the DNA profile of others. So we're not looking

120
00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:31,200
Speaker 5: at all of your DNA. We're only targeting very specific

121
00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:33,520
Speaker 5: regions that help us with identification.

122
00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:36,000
Speaker 1: And when we say markers, what do you mean by that?

123
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:38,760
Speaker 5: But do you look sort of fragments of DNA that

124
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,920
Speaker 5: reside in different parts of your DNA. So DNA is

125
00:07:42,120 --> 00:07:46,280
Speaker 5: arranged into chromosomes, we would target different DNA markers at

126
00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:50,800
Speaker 5: various regions in those chromosomes. But those markers, as I said,

127
00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:55,640
Speaker 5: useful for identification. There are other DNA markers that might

128
00:07:55,640 --> 00:08:00,400
Speaker 5: be useful for let's say, genetic predisposition to disease, or

129
00:08:00,440 --> 00:08:04,040
Speaker 5: important for you know, biological processes in our body. But

130
00:08:04,120 --> 00:08:06,840
Speaker 5: we're targeting those that are useful for identification.

131
00:08:14,640 --> 00:08:18,320
Speaker 1: Despite her obvious expertise, Dad and A Hartman can't comment

132
00:08:18,360 --> 00:08:21,760
Speaker 1: specifically about the investigation into the murders on Easy Street,

133
00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:25,000
Speaker 1: but I asked her if the sample of seamen found

134
00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:28,360
Speaker 1: on Suzanne's bedroom floor could survive for three nights and

135
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:33,360
Speaker 1: two days in the summer of nineteen seventy seven, Yes, we.

136
00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:38,240
Speaker 5: Should, I guess if collected appropriately and stored appropriately, we

137
00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:39,839
Speaker 5: would hope to be able to go back to those

138
00:08:39,880 --> 00:08:42,520
Speaker 5: sample types and extract DNA. Now, you may not be

139
00:08:42,520 --> 00:08:46,840
Speaker 5: able to extract a lot, or it may be highly degraded.

140
00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:50,360
Speaker 5: Here are the conditions the time that's passed, but we

141
00:08:50,440 --> 00:08:52,599
Speaker 5: don't need a lot for what they're sort of analysis

142
00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:55,880
Speaker 5: that we complete. Therefore, if you can just recover, as

143
00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:58,920
Speaker 5: you know what I said, a smidgen of DNA, that

144
00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:01,640
Speaker 5: might be sufficient to be able to develop a dnair

145
00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:05,600
Speaker 5: profile for comparison. But that's dependent again on the sample

146
00:09:05,640 --> 00:09:10,959
Speaker 5: being collected in an appropriate manner and stored appropriately as well. Now,

147
00:09:11,120 --> 00:09:14,240
Speaker 5: I guess, going back that period of time when perhaps

148
00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:17,680
Speaker 5: we went thinking about DNA, those people that were collecting

149
00:09:17,679 --> 00:09:20,839
Speaker 5: those samples that probably were not wearing their appropriate pipe

150
00:09:21,559 --> 00:09:25,439
Speaker 5: that we would do now, you know, wearing gloves, masks,

151
00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:31,679
Speaker 5: ensuring that we ourselves don't contaminate those samples. How having

152
00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:35,280
Speaker 5: said that, there are instances where we've been able to

153
00:09:35,280 --> 00:09:39,560
Speaker 5: go back to cases, you know, cold cases where samples

154
00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:41,920
Speaker 5: have been collected in a manner that was appropriate at

155
00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:46,280
Speaker 5: the time, and we still successfully recover DNA profiles. From

156
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:48,480
Speaker 5: our point of view, it's kind of you just have

157
00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:50,800
Speaker 5: to give it a go. You know, you can't say, well,

158
00:09:51,040 --> 00:09:53,040
Speaker 5: you might be too old, or it might be degraded.

159
00:09:53,480 --> 00:09:54,520
Speaker 5: You just have to give it a go.

160
00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:57,400
Speaker 1: I think it's some stage someone has suggested they were

161
00:09:57,440 --> 00:09:59,360
Speaker 1: put in paper bags. Is that is that okay?

162
00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:04,679
Speaker 5: Yes, that's fine. And again provided that they're sealed appropriately

163
00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:06,760
Speaker 5: and have been, there's a chain of custody to be

164
00:10:06,840 --> 00:10:08,440
Speaker 5: able to then go back and say, yes, these are

165
00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:11,439
Speaker 5: the appropriate samples that belong to that case, then the

166
00:10:11,480 --> 00:10:12,840
Speaker 5: ship be fine.

167
00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:16,640
Speaker 1: Now, dad Na Hartman hasn't worked on the Easy Street case.

168
00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:19,880
Speaker 1: That's all been done at the police forensics lab. But

169
00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:22,120
Speaker 1: she knows what's next in a case if there's no

170
00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:26,280
Speaker 1: hits on our national criminal database and familial searchers have

171
00:10:26,400 --> 00:10:30,040
Speaker 1: hit a wall. And here's where past science really gets

172
00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:36,360
Speaker 1: overtaken by contemporary scholarship. Forensic investigative genetic genealogy FIGG.

173
00:10:37,480 --> 00:10:42,239
Speaker 5: Again, once you've looked at all your current avenues of inquiries,

174
00:10:42,679 --> 00:10:45,640
Speaker 5: it might be that you might submit your sample for

175
00:10:45,800 --> 00:10:50,800
Speaker 5: this application that would require you to generate a profile

176
00:10:50,880 --> 00:10:55,120
Speaker 5: that's suitable for comparison to commercial databases where people have

177
00:10:55,679 --> 00:10:59,800
Speaker 5: themselves have an interest in their genealogy and have provided

178
00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:04,280
Speaker 5: can sent to have law enforcement be able to compare

179
00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:07,720
Speaker 5: against their data. And what you're doing is you're not

180
00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:12,720
Speaker 5: actually getting their DNA from the database. You're uploading the unknown,

181
00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:15,679
Speaker 5: and you're asking whether you've got any people in the

182
00:11:15,760 --> 00:11:18,880
Speaker 5: database that are closely related. And what you get back

183
00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:24,120
Speaker 5: is a list of people who share potentially some DNA

184
00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:27,239
Speaker 5: with your unknown. And then you've got to build genealogy

185
00:11:27,280 --> 00:11:30,040
Speaker 5: trees and see whether you can narrow down and potentially

186
00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:33,240
Speaker 5: identify your unknown. Now that takes a lot of work.

187
00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:36,080
Speaker 5: And there's no guarantees that you will find people that

188
00:11:36,120 --> 00:11:39,280
Speaker 5: are closely related to your unknown on those databases, but

189
00:11:39,360 --> 00:11:42,679
Speaker 5: I guess it would be potentially another step that you

190
00:11:42,679 --> 00:11:46,319
Speaker 5: could take in the investigation if your current modes of

191
00:11:46,400 --> 00:11:48,040
Speaker 5: analysis don't pan out.

192
00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:52,040
Speaker 1: This has been slow to take off in Australia do

193
00:11:52,200 --> 00:11:56,200
Speaker 1: to privacy issues involving the use of commercially available databases

194
00:11:56,480 --> 00:12:00,400
Speaker 1: like ancestry dot com. Yet, while legal legals take all that,

195
00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:03,720
Speaker 1: Dardner warns against using up too much of the original

196
00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:06,840
Speaker 1: DNA samples in historic cases.

197
00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:11,360
Speaker 5: I think it's important to particularly for these finite samples

198
00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:16,760
Speaker 5: where you can't keep testing them indefinitely. Well, eventually you're

199
00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:18,240
Speaker 5: going to run out. You know, you might have an

200
00:12:18,280 --> 00:12:20,320
Speaker 5: extract of DNA and you're using a little bit at

201
00:12:20,320 --> 00:12:23,679
Speaker 5: a time for the different tests. Eventually that extract you're

202
00:12:23,720 --> 00:12:26,520
Speaker 5: going to use it all up. So it's important to

203
00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:30,000
Speaker 5: safeguard that material, and I guess make those decisions as

204
00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:33,600
Speaker 5: to what would be the best tool to apply. And

205
00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:36,680
Speaker 5: if that's not today, then let's wait six or twelve

206
00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:40,400
Speaker 5: months and again review and see whether there's now an

207
00:12:40,440 --> 00:12:44,719
Speaker 5: opportunity to use a different methodology, whether that be FIGG

208
00:12:45,000 --> 00:12:47,400
Speaker 5: or something else, and they make the decision.

209
00:12:47,440 --> 00:12:50,960
Speaker 1: Again, if we accept that one hundred people have been

210
00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:53,839
Speaker 1: tested against this sample that was found in Easy Street

211
00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:58,880
Speaker 1: in the bedroom, that doesn't necessarily mean that one hundred

212
00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:00,000
Speaker 1: little extracts came out.

213
00:13:00,600 --> 00:13:04,720
Speaker 5: No, So what would have happened is a DNA profile

214
00:13:04,760 --> 00:13:07,760
Speaker 5: would have been developed from that sample. Now that DNA

215
00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:11,679
Speaker 5: profile itself can be compared to the DNA profiles of

216
00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:15,800
Speaker 5: four hundred persons of interest, so it's the data that

217
00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:19,400
Speaker 5: you're comparing, not the extract. So I would hope that

218
00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:23,320
Speaker 5: there would have used a small portion of that DNA

219
00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:27,000
Speaker 5: extract to develop that DNA profile, that there's some DNA

220
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:31,240
Speaker 5: extract remaining and that's been stored appropriately, and that's what

221
00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:36,080
Speaker 5: could be tapped in the future to develop more DNA information.

222
00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:41,680
Speaker 1: While we await this debate, a former federal MP Reckons

223
00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:45,360
Speaker 1: is an even broader political cultural concern, the dog's cold

224
00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:49,840
Speaker 1: cases involving women. He's come to understand this from distressing

225
00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:54,880
Speaker 1: personal experience. Bill Clear's sister, Vicki, was fatally stabbed in

226
00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,000
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty seven. Her killer was found not guilty of

227
00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:02,040
Speaker 1: murder after running the notorious provocation defense, and sentenced to

228
00:14:02,200 --> 00:14:06,120
Speaker 1: just three years and eleven months in jail to Cleary.

229
00:14:06,480 --> 00:14:10,080
Speaker 1: The way detectives investigated both cases reeks of the same

230
00:14:10,280 --> 00:14:11,520
Speaker 1: old fashioned framework.

231
00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:16,880
Speaker 3: Here two young women, one who has a child and

232
00:14:16,920 --> 00:14:21,760
Speaker 3: of course is declared to be as a pejorative an

233
00:14:21,840 --> 00:14:26,920
Speaker 3: unmarried mother because she's had the Greek daliance. Of course,

234
00:14:26,960 --> 00:14:30,400
Speaker 3: that's Suzanne Armstrong. And there you have Sue Bartlett, who's

235
00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:34,400
Speaker 3: the teacher. And isn't it interesting to talk about Sue.

236
00:14:34,520 --> 00:14:37,560
Speaker 3: She was a big woman, but thankfully she had a

237
00:14:37,560 --> 00:14:41,880
Speaker 3: beautiful face. But all the while the discussion about them

238
00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:48,680
Speaker 3: was about their social activities, their relationship with men. And

239
00:14:48,800 --> 00:14:53,280
Speaker 3: so from the moment they were murdered, we know that

240
00:14:53,360 --> 00:14:58,400
Speaker 3: the police adopted the attitude that they had practices that

241
00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,680
Speaker 3: put them at risk in that they came to know men.

242
00:15:02,280 --> 00:15:06,400
Speaker 3: Now the police kind of knew that. But at the

243
00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:09,960
Speaker 3: same time there was a counter story, which was that

244
00:15:10,200 --> 00:15:12,880
Speaker 3: this bloke that killed them was a monster.

245
00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:17,720
Speaker 1: Now this is a perspective Phil Cleary has thought about

246
00:15:17,840 --> 00:15:21,840
Speaker 1: a lot. His sister's killer, Peter Ko was declared a

247
00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:25,360
Speaker 1: person of interest in Melbourne so called bookshop murder, where

248
00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:28,400
Speaker 1: Maria James was fatally stabbed in nineteen eighty.

249
00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:32,280
Speaker 3: And of course, if I put my lens on that

250
00:15:32,520 --> 00:15:36,480
Speaker 3: story based on what I know about the killing of women,

251
00:15:37,400 --> 00:15:40,600
Speaker 3: I don't look to that monster who they don't know.

252
00:15:41,280 --> 00:15:44,640
Speaker 3: The man who kills them is a monster, but he's

253
00:15:44,680 --> 00:15:47,760
Speaker 3: an ordinary bloke as well. But you know, we can

254
00:15:47,840 --> 00:15:50,640
Speaker 3: say that these men are monsters, but they're on a

255
00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:54,000
Speaker 3: continuum in that they're a monster at the point that

256
00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:57,840
Speaker 3: they kill. They have monstrous ideas in that they are

257
00:15:57,920 --> 00:16:04,320
Speaker 3: riddled with misogyny andtriarchal assumptions about women, and so in essence,

258
00:16:05,040 --> 00:16:08,200
Speaker 3: this is the major problem. If we had a police

259
00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:12,440
Speaker 3: force at the time that was thinking really smart about this,

260
00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:16,840
Speaker 3: they would have solved the crime. I don't believe, based

261
00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:22,440
Speaker 3: on all of the empirical evidence around historical killing of women,

262
00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:26,240
Speaker 3: that this bloke has wandered in off the street and

263
00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:31,640
Speaker 3: knocked on the door and then killed Suzanne Armstrong. I

264
00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:35,760
Speaker 3: believe he knew her. He may have tried it on

265
00:16:35,920 --> 00:16:40,960
Speaker 3: with her before and been knocked back. But she has

266
00:16:41,080 --> 00:16:45,080
Speaker 3: been killed because she did what so many women have

267
00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:50,440
Speaker 3: done historically before they've been murdered. She said no to

268
00:16:51,560 --> 00:17:01,160
Speaker 3: a Dalian's a relationship or she ended a relationship with him.

269
00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:06,679
Speaker 1: Certainly the late Brian Murphy believed the double homicide was

270
00:17:06,720 --> 00:17:10,920
Speaker 1: planned to some extent in advance. The former detective didn't

271
00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:12,480
Speaker 1: beat around the bush.

272
00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:12,720
Speaker 3: No.

273
00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:16,679
Speaker 4: I think fellows that commit those kind of murders have

274
00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:19,600
Speaker 4: got it on their mind all the time. Most of

275
00:17:19,640 --> 00:17:24,720
Speaker 4: those things are pre planned. You's either seen that both

276
00:17:24,760 --> 00:17:27,200
Speaker 4: of them going in if they had a k might

277
00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:30,480
Speaker 4: have put petrol in one time or another and thought,

278
00:17:30,520 --> 00:17:33,439
Speaker 4: I wonder where they live. You know, there's a million

279
00:17:33,560 --> 00:17:36,800
Speaker 4: reasons why they do it, But I think that they're

280
00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:39,000
Speaker 4: well planned when they do it like that. And like

281
00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:42,200
Speaker 4: the lady that was killed in the booksher, I think

282
00:17:42,240 --> 00:17:46,439
Speaker 4: that was planned and it's just not on off the cuff.

283
00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:50,720
Speaker 3: Theee, how is it that Maria James was murdered in

284
00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:56,280
Speaker 3: nineteen eighty and Peter cho who kills my sister seven

285
00:17:56,400 --> 00:18:01,640
Speaker 3: years later is not properly interviewed at the time and afterwards.

286
00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:06,199
Speaker 3: Do you see a connection between that and easy Street?

287
00:18:06,680 --> 00:18:07,880
Speaker 3: Of course you do.

288
00:18:08,560 --> 00:18:08,639
Speaker 2: So.

289
00:18:09,640 --> 00:18:16,600
Speaker 3: The upshot is surely that the institutional preconceptions about the

290
00:18:16,760 --> 00:18:19,919
Speaker 3: place of women in the world, the blaming of women,

291
00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:24,680
Speaker 3: afflicts every investigation unwittingly.

292
00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:30,719
Speaker 1: Prominent Melbourne lawyer Liz Dowling remembers this cultural political prism

293
00:18:31,359 --> 00:18:34,280
Speaker 1: and jury calls the impact that Sue and Suzanne's deaths

294
00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:35,080
Speaker 1: had in the city.

295
00:18:36,800 --> 00:18:39,160
Speaker 6: Everybody was talking about it, you know, everybody knew about

296
00:18:39,200 --> 00:18:41,639
Speaker 6: easy strait, that write our bikes down there, had a

297
00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:44,199
Speaker 6: look call, all of that sort of stuff. But I

298
00:18:44,240 --> 00:18:47,480
Speaker 6: guess sense that it was always in such a way

299
00:18:47,480 --> 00:18:49,639
Speaker 6: as even though the media were talking about it being

300
00:18:49,680 --> 00:18:52,800
Speaker 6: a madman that was walking around doing it, there was

301
00:18:52,840 --> 00:18:55,840
Speaker 6: also this other aspect of it being somebody that they,

302
00:18:56,040 --> 00:18:58,359
Speaker 6: the women knew, And also there was all that such

303
00:18:58,359 --> 00:19:00,439
Speaker 6: shaming that they had brought it on themselves, that the

304
00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:02,479
Speaker 6: doors were open. And I mean even though they were

305
00:19:02,480 --> 00:19:04,520
Speaker 6: supposed to have been a sexual revolution, I mean there

306
00:19:04,600 --> 00:19:07,199
Speaker 6: was still there was still very much the ethos of

307
00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:10,600
Speaker 6: You've got to remember also, Helen, that that period of time,

308
00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:13,800
Speaker 6: of course, was between the contraceptive pill and aides, and

309
00:19:14,320 --> 00:19:16,760
Speaker 6: it was huge up evils that had happened. I mean,

310
00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:19,600
Speaker 6: women didn't have to worry about contraceptive and men didn't

311
00:19:19,640 --> 00:19:22,680
Speaker 6: have to worry about the women worrying about contraception either,

312
00:19:23,320 --> 00:19:24,960
Speaker 6: and it was a bit of a free for all,

313
00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:29,560
Speaker 6: certainly as far as casual sex was concerned. The women

314
00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:34,680
Speaker 6: that engaged in casual sex by certain groups. And I'd

315
00:19:34,680 --> 00:19:39,680
Speaker 6: also say quite generally still had the old tags given

316
00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:41,800
Speaker 6: to them about it. And I think that the women

317
00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:44,040
Speaker 6: in easy Strait, certainly it was that view. She was

318
00:19:44,080 --> 00:19:47,200
Speaker 6: a single mother, she wasn't married. And also the stories

319
00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:49,360
Speaker 6: about you know, there were three blokes that had come

320
00:19:49,400 --> 00:19:50,879
Speaker 6: in and out of the house when the bodies were

321
00:19:50,880 --> 00:19:52,720
Speaker 6: on the floor and the child was even in the bedroom,

322
00:19:53,119 --> 00:19:55,760
Speaker 6: giving an indication of the traffic that did go through

323
00:19:55,800 --> 00:19:58,400
Speaker 6: those houses. But that happened in all the group houses.

324
00:19:58,520 --> 00:20:01,280
Speaker 1: And do you think this in form this view of

325
00:20:01,880 --> 00:20:06,479
Speaker 1: women informed not just the detectives themselves, but also their

326
00:20:06,480 --> 00:20:07,959
Speaker 1: way they went about the investigation.

327
00:20:08,920 --> 00:20:12,439
Speaker 6: I think the police generally at that time came from well,

328
00:20:12,440 --> 00:20:14,760
Speaker 6: they hadn't they hadn't gone to university, They left school

329
00:20:14,760 --> 00:20:17,280
Speaker 6: at form five. The people that would being the police,

330
00:20:17,320 --> 00:20:20,399
Speaker 6: I mean, they weren't living in the shit holes in

331
00:20:20,480 --> 00:20:23,840
Speaker 6: group houses. So there were two completely different classes of people.

332
00:20:24,000 --> 00:20:26,000
Speaker 6: They had probably been married at twenty two or twenty

333
00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:27,199
Speaker 6: three and had a couple of children. I mean, I

334
00:20:27,240 --> 00:20:30,520
Speaker 6: know I'm generalizing here, and they would have had their parents'

335
00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:33,240
Speaker 6: values that women that had casual sex were sluts.

336
00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:38,240
Speaker 1: Those perceptions aside this, Dowling says the suggestion that the

337
00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:42,160
Speaker 1: killer was known to either Suzanne or Susan obviously helps

338
00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:45,760
Speaker 1: explain how he entered the house and maybe how he's

339
00:20:45,760 --> 00:20:48,720
Speaker 1: evaded investigators for almost half a century.

340
00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:52,240
Speaker 6: I think there was the perception that they knew who

341
00:20:52,240 --> 00:20:54,800
Speaker 6: the killer was, that the girls knew who the killer was.

342
00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:58,760
Speaker 6: This wasn't somebody that had someone had broken into a

343
00:20:58,800 --> 00:21:01,840
Speaker 6: house in South Yarra, some married woman you know, whose

344
00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:05,960
Speaker 6: husband had been overseas had been raped and killed with

345
00:21:05,960 --> 00:21:07,960
Speaker 6: her friend in the house. I think that there was

346
00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:11,280
Speaker 6: a very an attitude of its time that this person

347
00:21:11,400 --> 00:21:14,560
Speaker 6: was known to them. I'm just a little curious about

348
00:21:14,760 --> 00:21:17,600
Speaker 6: the person with the knife, and maybe the person with

349
00:21:17,640 --> 00:21:22,359
Speaker 6: the knife meant that they were no one, maybe no

350
00:21:22,440 --> 00:21:26,320
Speaker 6: one to her, but not in the circle of people

351
00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:29,719
Speaker 6: that she would have considered having sex with. Or so

352
00:21:29,880 --> 00:21:31,480
Speaker 6: did someone decide that they were going to come a

353
00:21:31,560 --> 00:21:35,199
Speaker 6: kniver or did the killing happen after there was a

354
00:21:35,240 --> 00:21:37,000
Speaker 6: rejection of her? But why would you come in with

355
00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:38,960
Speaker 6: a knife in the first.

356
00:21:38,680 --> 00:21:39,920
Speaker 1: Place, unless to do harm?

357
00:21:40,080 --> 00:21:42,120
Speaker 6: Unless to do harm?

358
00:21:42,160 --> 00:21:45,119
Speaker 1: But like journalist Andrew Ruhle and others who've been trying

359
00:21:45,160 --> 00:21:48,920
Speaker 1: to crack this conundrum for so long. Liz also worries

360
00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:51,440
Speaker 1: that all the time spent trying to get a DNA

361
00:21:51,560 --> 00:21:55,480
Speaker 1: match might have just been following a DNA bunny down

362
00:21:55,480 --> 00:21:56,120
Speaker 1: a rabbit hole.

363
00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:58,639
Speaker 6: And I was also interested in your book about the

364
00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:02,040
Speaker 6: DNA as far as the DNA was concerned and where

365
00:22:02,040 --> 00:22:04,560
Speaker 6: the DNA was found, because I think the conundrum has

366
00:22:04,560 --> 00:22:08,400
Speaker 6: been if somebody did this, unless they dropped dead, it's

367
00:22:08,480 --> 00:22:11,360
Speaker 6: unlikely statistically they would have led a blameless last since

368
00:22:11,400 --> 00:22:16,359
Speaker 6: that period of time. So if you take the DNA

369
00:22:16,359 --> 00:22:18,119
Speaker 6: out of the equation and say, well, we don't have

370
00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:21,520
Speaker 6: anything about linking the DNA to the person and testing

371
00:22:21,520 --> 00:22:24,360
Speaker 6: the person with the DNA, so I'm being an amateur detective,

372
00:22:25,040 --> 00:22:27,199
Speaker 6: then maybe that does broaden the group of people that

373
00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:28,480
Speaker 6: could have done it within their group.

374
00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:32,440
Speaker 1: For this lawyer, the next step in this call case,

375
00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:37,359
Speaker 1: nearly fifty years down the track, is a second coronial inquiry.

376
00:22:38,600 --> 00:22:41,240
Speaker 6: The savagery of it, the savagery of it is not

377
00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:44,760
Speaker 6: sex gone bad, and the savagery of it looks like

378
00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:48,199
Speaker 6: it's something that's been planned. There's two women that have

379
00:22:48,320 --> 00:22:52,760
Speaker 6: been extensively stabbed, and it didn't seem to be clear

380
00:22:52,800 --> 00:22:56,480
Speaker 6: at the time, about how deep the wounds were, how

381
00:22:56,520 --> 00:23:00,239
Speaker 6: they actually died, whether they were already dead when and that,

382
00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:03,000
Speaker 6: like a lot of the stabbing went on, that just

383
00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:04,840
Speaker 6: all didn't seem to be quite clear. So our crinal

384
00:23:04,880 --> 00:23:07,120
Speaker 6: inquests could possibly explore those issues.

385
00:23:10,160 --> 00:23:12,640
Speaker 1: Next time on the Easy Street murders.

386
00:23:13,240 --> 00:23:17,240
Speaker 3: We should go back and revisit how DNA was used.

387
00:23:17,280 --> 00:23:20,760
Speaker 4: This was a huge event for Melbourne for Collingwood.

388
00:23:20,280 --> 00:23:25,639
Speaker 3: Contemporary inquests are so critical to our understanding on the

389
00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:26,840
Speaker 3: failings of the past.

390
00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:28,240
Speaker 4: What have you got to those