WEBVTT - Behind the Scenes

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't think, so you don't thinking what you said?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Why doesn't she have Gail? Maybe Gail doesn't care you

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>doing We open the form forgive to go there though,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so now we open a conversation for Gil because people,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but because she may not have wanted to go. But

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you made this. Say what you said, what y'all are saying,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>or you and your friend and people on your thing,

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all there's an agenda. Why don't you go in

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there just like you going but you are you with

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody else? You are you everybody else? You're going there

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if somebody say something to you, if somebody goes in

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there and saying even if somebody goes in there and says, oh,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>my son, you're wrong and you just don't like women

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and you this is that in the third or whatever.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just let me finish my point. You're going there,

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and you got all these things to say. But when

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>men is in their car and them bitches more, when

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>men are in there saying other things like oh, well

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that's because they got in the gender you

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>ain't going there one time. It's saying no, don't talk

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about these women like that. But you don't respond to no,

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>comments either be either do one thing or because you

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>said because you But why are you saying okay, sending?

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Why you argue with people? Why are you making up sunny?

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you just leave it at that? Why are

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you in there arguing with people who are saying things

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that might support Because every time somebody, every time somebody

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>says something that might be like you're wrong, you argue

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with them. But what I'm asking you with but I'm

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>asking you is why don't you go in your comments

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and say when they're men in there who are like, oh,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's because them bitches all got they all together, Fuck

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>them bitches, they got some type of plan. Why you

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>don't go in there say they call it snoop type

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of okay. But she would provide a space that made

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it seem like, Jada, No, that's not what you didn't

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>need to have gar No, you didn't. You said, why

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>won't why you say what I said? I have a

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>question what I want to know? We need you want

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>to go that listen to me, But we're not gonna

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>make it seem like it's not It's not an option

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that people don't want to hear that. It's any question

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that you asked, it's not everybody don't want to do whatever,

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>but people want to know why she ain't up there.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>She created the turmoil, She created this. He was reacting

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Why you wasn't hurt that she said that about a

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>black man, why he was dead? Why it didn't hurt you.

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you watch the whole thing? Did you watch the

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>whole thing? Because today the piece that they put out,

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing speaking on something but saying that happen.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Did you watch the whole episode? How can you be

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a journalist well or be an influencer that makes a

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>statement based upon what if she went on? Nan said,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I asked Gail to come and she said no. What

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if she went on? Nan said, what if she went

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on there? Because it was a it's a piece that

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>came out today where she's sitting there and snoop and

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 1>saying it was her and that's and she's like, yes,

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that's right, I understand. So what if she went on?

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>What if she land bast to Gail? What if she

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>tore Gail's after You don't even know because you made

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a comment being fast, but you didn't take you didn't

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>take the time to look at the entire thing to

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to say. Maybe she said, I'm gonna have

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Gail on next Maybe she said, I asked Gail, Gail

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>said no, Maybe she said, we'll see when Gail gets

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>back to us. And then if that's the case, then

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>what you would have been saying, and that thing is

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you asked Gail, Jada and next time, you know.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I can't wait till she come on. We should

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>all be asking Gail, why won't you go on Red

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Table Talk? But instead the what what? What? How? Been?

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that it made it seem like it's not it's

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not happening, like it's not possive. You just you keep

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>making up your own facts. What's going on? Y'all? Ship boy,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>my son and this is Street Politicians, the place with

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the streets of politics. Me and I'm Tamika Mallory and

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us for another episode. It's been

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a little fiery around here. Maybe you've been privy to

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the dialogue that was going on before we

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>started the show. Lots happening in the news all the time,

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, my son and I sometimes we

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>just don't agree, don't agree, and you know, and this

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of those times, so you had a little preview.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>You've probably got some of the little fire crackers. So

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>y'all been following us, and you know, we've been going

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>back and forth about this whole Gil and Kobe situation

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and that a little behind the scenes is us, you know, disagreeing.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>So there's been some r there's been some new developments.

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>J the Pinkett just did an interview with Snoop Dogs

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>based on his comments to Gil King, and you know,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people on social media have backlash. There

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of different, you know comments, and I've

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>seen the clip that I've seen, so I listened to

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the clip and I commended it. I thought it made sense,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I understood Snoop's position, or understood Jade's position,

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and she talked about how his comments heard her and

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>how she felt really harmed, and he came up there

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and in full transparency. I haven't seen the whole episode yet,

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but based on what I saw, he was basically explaining how,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, he didn't want every black woman in America

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to be angry with him, but he was angry at

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what she said, and his statements was out of that

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>anger and frustration. So you know, I listened to it,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and I commended it. I went on my social media

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>page and I did a little video based on the clip,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and I and I commanded everybody. I said, Snoop, you

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>did a hell of a job you. I love the

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Red Table talk. Jada is dope. The way that y'all

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>bring up real topics and you're talking. You come from

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a place that's really so passionate and wrong, you know.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And I said, everybody should agree with with Snoop Dead,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and I saluted him. But then I said, now, it

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>would be dope if you said, if you think it

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>would be fair, I think it would be fair because

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Gail was the person who created the situation. Snoop Dog

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was reacting to what Gail said. Why is it not

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a representation of black men, just that a black man

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>decided to go talk to some black women about his

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>feelings or something that he said or and did in

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>his career, overhit his timespan living here on this great earth,

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he did something. Forget about Gail King. He's saying that

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>as a man, even when I'm angry about something, I

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>should never speak to or about a woman like this.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's a that's a that's a point, that's five

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>ten shows by itself. That doesn't require Gail King. You're

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that doesn't happen if you never talked to Gail

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>about anything, that doesn't matter. It does, my son. Here's

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>what I'm telling you. I'm saying that what Snoop is

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>doing is important for black men and black women, right.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm saying that I appreciate his movement, with or

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>without Gail ever doing anything. In fact, it is actually

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>making Kobe's legacy and Snoop and those people who have

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>challenged what Gail King did look better. But I don't

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>want it's moving them into a better light because people

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are seeing that we're doing the real work together. There

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is an obvious division. I understand that, and this is

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>where the problem is. And when the division division keeps happening,

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>when it looks one side, it's not about what I'm getting.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>What I'm trying to tell you what it looks. It's

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>not about whether it is if it looks, if looks

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if Snoop has apologized, Snoop goes on and he apologized again,

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and these platforms tell him how he harmed them. But

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the original harm, the original harm was done before he

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>said a word, and there's no one to attach that

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>person who did that harm. No want to hold that

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>person accountable, no one to sit there and tell that

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>person how what you did harm to us? How it

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>say black Howard separated black people, black and male and

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>women are already seen. I haven't seen it. I'm saying

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you do. Everybody has from the beginning, looks Snoop, this

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm trying to tell you. Everybody told you.

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Michael Ridson came out, Um Tammy came up. Everybody told Snoop,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>how those negative? Is it not? It wasn't negative, but

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 1>she said she was. She just said you must have

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>been thinking that all that was not regardless of white. Okay,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to tell you what everybody expressed to

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>us Black men, black woman. Everybody went to Snoop and

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>expressed to him how his words made them feel. Okay,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody has gone. Who is the nobody? Tell me somebody

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm fell about what Gail did. What she said. I

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have said it, I've said it weird, I've said it

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on my social media, I've written it. What do you

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>think that you're looking for somebody to say? Because I'm

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>looking for you I'm looking for to me, I'm looking

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for the same thing that the same thing that Michael

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Rick Diyson did. I'm looking for that you do. I

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>watched the words that you said to me, and it

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>took power for me and my daughter and my mom

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and I said no, not snoop and listen to me

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that and it was heartfeld. The man he looked like

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to cry because these are people that he loved,

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>These are people that he valued their opinion, and they

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>told him that he said something and did something that

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>harmed them in a way that made him feel like

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>he needed to clarify if that was Tupac, right, listen

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to me, if somebody had asked her those questions about Tupac,

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>she probably have punched him in the face. And if

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody was up there talking about interviewing somebody about Tupac,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>she would have felt the same. We realized the difference. No,

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I tell me the difference. The difference is that Tupac

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is a man that she was in a relationship with

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and his friend. Okay, so what so what I'm saying that?

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And guess what if she would have done that, she

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>still may have need to go out and said you

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>know what, I was angry and I didn't said some

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>things that I wasn't supposed to say, but I'm still

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I was. I'm still angry about it. What I'm saying

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to you, my son, is that what Jada basically did right,

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>she space for Snoop to clarify and be one and

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hold back with black women so they didn't feel like

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>he was at them. I guess where I'm coming from

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>here and what I'm dealing with that I spoke about

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last show that we did. I'm ruggling with

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand why it is that black men cannot

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>just be accountable on their own without having to bring

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>what the woman did and said. You know what, I'm

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>just trying to figure out. You know the problem. The

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>problem is there's a chain of events. You understand what

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. The chain of events started with Gail because everybody,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what I hear what you're saying. But you can't

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>say somebody being held accountable because she got a co defendant.

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 1>You can't be held accountable with something that you're did

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with somebody else. You can't solely be held and me

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and you did a crime together, and it's a black

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>man and the black woman, and he said, no, you

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just need to go away. No, we got a co

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>defend we've done. But we as black women have covered

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>many times and dealt with the accountability and the responsibility

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for the family, for the black men, for everybody. And

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know why, you know what, if we don't force

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>black men to have to always be a part of that,

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we take the ship. We take the beating for how

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we take the beating and the whipping and the responsibility

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of our community and our families all the

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>damn time. And you know what, it's okay if Snoop

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>passed to go and sit there and have a conversation

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with black women by himself. And guess what, I hope

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that Gil does do it, But I don't need her

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to do it for me to feel good about what

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>happened in that show on at that table. I think

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that what Jada and and Snoop did is the most

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>powerful expression of what black love needs to look like

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>in our community. It was accountability, that was honesty that

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was loved, and I would not taint it by trying

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to force on it superimposed that somebody else needs to

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>also be so that's just how at this point you

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>can feel how you feel. But my request for her

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there takes nothing away from what she did. I commended it.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it was needed. But I also believe that

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>produced a network who's got a thousand lawyers that are

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>telling her what she can and cannot do. Kenny, But

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>people don't. People want to know why she asked the

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>question at all. That's it. You can't even that, you can't.

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of journalists. There are a bunch

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of journalists cat that have come up publicly and said

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>just certain questions that I wouldn't ask, not right now

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like that until he was actually buried. That conversation was

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it was too early because people and it's not that

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he was He wasn't convicted of rape. So you you

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>want to have a conversation about an accusation that came

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>up in his history right now when him and his

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>daughter just blew up in a plane, this was I

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think if you you're talking about accusations and you're having

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with people that weren't there, they have no

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>idea about what happened in that room. None of them

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have anything. They just coming to have a conversation about

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>their friend that they love, and you asked them about

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>accusations that they have no information. Well, I don't even

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think it makes sense. I think it does nothing more

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>than tink the viewer's opinion of that individual. It's not

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's classless. You understand I'm saying, it's not like.

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if you're saying, well, we have to

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that Kobe was convicted of something, then maybe we

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>could we what we could do is say damn, I

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.479
<v Speaker 1>don't think you should have. But it makes sense. There's

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that that is part of his history, that is part

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of his legacy. Was found guilty. There was enough evidence

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to say that this man did something that was wrong.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted we want to talk about him in

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>full bloom that we got to talk about the thing

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that we acknowledge that we know he did wrong. But

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about something that an accusation that has not

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that he was cleared up, it's classless. I don't see

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it at all. But I and I also think I

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think I agree with everything you just said, and I

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>also think that we do have an expectation of black

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>folks not to be a part of the destruction of

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>black men and women and and and people, and our

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>legacies we do have. We feel that when you go

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to work, you need to know that you also are

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>part of this community and not just do what you're

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>paid to do and what you're told to do. And

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a better way maybe to go about it

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>would have been to say, and perhaps in this unedited

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>clip that Gail is speaking of, you could say, you know,

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>there are folks who want to talk about this, and

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's early for us to be discussing it,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I'm gonna ask you about blah blah

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, and to ask a question, whatever the

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>question may be, but to go back and say, you

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>know what, she just didn't want to testify him, but

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>what are you thinking? And then and then she said

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and then finally when when when when Lisa Leslie said,

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't I didn't see that in him.

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you're like, well, you wouldn't see it as his friend. Okay,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you're you're going real far. You're not just checking

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the box and making sure that you state it because

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be done just for your job and

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for journalism and fairness and all of that you're covering

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the issue, but now you're pushing the issue. And I

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>think the reason why I agree with what my son

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is saying, although I don't agree with anything else that

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he has said here today, But the reason why I

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>agree with that one point is that if she was talking,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if she was talking to Kobe, then yeah, push him

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>all the way. And she was like she was talking

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to r Kelly. Nobody gave a damn about what she

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>said to R Kelly. Push him all the way, because

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you're speaking directly to the person. But when me and

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>if me and my child, God forbid my child and

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I die, I would hope that until I'm in the grave,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't go pushing my friends who are also hurting

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to have to answer questions about an accusation that was

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty something. He is like, it doesn't make sense, and

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and and and just to ot it. The journalist who

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>when Charles Barkley said the dumbness, you know what I'm saying,

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>he decided he wanted to get let the journalist said

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing and say, hey, you know we're just gonna ask.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>He asked one question, Charles Brockley, volunteer, What was the

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 1>question that he asked, was I forgot what he was?

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But he was like, you know, some people are saying,

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>should he being celebrated based right that he's a king?

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Should we talk about it? Is there something you wanted?

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He gave him an opportunity, and they went into the bullshit,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the same I'm saying, that's that to me?

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>What what do you what do you mean, Charles? People

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know exactly to comment Charles Barkley.

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Charles Barkley started to say that we're not trying to

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>make Kobe a haro. We know what he did, we

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>know what happened in Colorado. He got a blemish on

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>his record and and all this and and that was false.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But I'm talking about the journalists. The journalist who did

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the interview just asked a question, Hey, what do you

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think if you think it's something that should be discussed

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>or should we just like, that's a question that in journalism,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>ok has been people been talking about it. Let me

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>act to see is it and nobody else discussed it?

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else moves going past it. That man decided to

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about that, And I think that also the bigger

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>issue is that with Charles Barkley. Then the reason why

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>people piste off about what he said is because he

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>has a history of he has a history of saying

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>things and and and and and and and doing things

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that that black folks in general feel is very disrespectful.

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>We feel, like, you know, he always is contrary to

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>our opinion or to the culture's opinion about our issues.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It seems like he's always siding with people who are

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>not in our communities, and he doesn't really ever represent

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>or speak well to the concerns that we have. And

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I think that with Gail, I don't know that she

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>has that same type of history. Of course I would

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>never say that, but what I do understand is that

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 1>because of the relationship between her and the Harvey Weinstein

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>piece and how people want to see him be challenged

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and other situations, Charlie rose and to not and for

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>her to do what she did, it makes people feel

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>like this is a repeat offense. So some of it

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is not just the moment. It's the it's the it's

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the it's a it's a it's a fool spectrum, if

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you will. And I think she's got to deal with

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that period, like you know, and it's not And again

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I said many times, I think Gail is a darling woman.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think she's smart, and I think she does have

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a heart for the people. But at the same time,

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a responsibility with all the hell that black

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>people catch every single day, to be to to be

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>aware of how we can sometimes be used as tools

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>and an agenda that is harmful to the very people

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that you come from. So what people want are gonna

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>want to say outside is looking in? Is that you

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>know there's no that that their different opinions. Charles Barkley

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>has an opinion. Gil may feel that question needs to

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>be asked. Everybody feels a different way, and there's freedom

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of speech and just like sometimes I don't agree with

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>what you have to say, but that doesn't mean that

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't still say it, and vice versa. So is

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>then when when should people speak and not speak? When?

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>When is the right time in the wrong time? I

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the question that outsiders will ask us as

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>black folks. What is our expectation for the code within

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>our communities? Well, I think I think it's it's um,

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it's visible. I think when you outside the code then

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>people will let you know. I think there's a moral

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>compass that most people have that when they hear that

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you go against that moral compass, when they're hearing you

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>attacking the same things that go against what they believe

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is morally right, that goes against what they believe a

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>code should be had. Because I feel that most other

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>ethnicities follow this code. They don't publicly defame each other.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>They just don't even don't publicly talk about each other.

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't really see it. I mean, I really don't

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>see it unless they unless they morally conflict, like there's

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a moral confidence. Okay, that's what I'm trying to tell you.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>If you look at if you even look at in

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>in in office, and you know in the politics the Republicans,

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they half of them don't agree with Trump, but they're

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>not coming out saying they're gonna like what we're doing

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>what he says because they just stayed on code. They

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just figure it out. Like one person goes against the code,

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they got them out. They don't want you here. So

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm trying to say. Blacks don't have the

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Blacks have to have a level of understanding of what

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is detrimental to us. So freedom of speech, you get

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to say what you want, but when you're saying something

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that is gonna be detrimental to the way they view

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>my kids, you understand I'm saying when we know it's

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a history, Like I said before, there's a history of

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>rape and black men and white women. There's a history

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of most of our leaders, our kids are anything being

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the being killed, being demonized, being everything. Behind those accusations

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and merely accusations. You bring that to the forefront again,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like we have to understand, Well, okay, are we gonna

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>wrap this up? But I do want us to be

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>careful saying merely accusations because I have made not accusations,

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>but told my truth about things that have happened to me.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't go to court and I didn't do

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>all of that, but it wasn't merely an accusation. It

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was my truth in this situation. The fact that the

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>accusation was unfounded. I agreed that this is not It

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely is not time to discuss it before the man

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was buried. I agree with that, But I would say

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>that this code that we're supposed to be living by

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>is very one sided because that code has not existed

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the hip hop community, disrespecting black women,

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about drugs, feeding our children things that are not

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>good for their minds. So now of a sudden and

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we want the colde to exist at a certain time,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't cover all times. It hasn't existed when

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>black women have been out there. You know, when we

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have the twirk culture, the uh what is it? Get

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you a man? Know I'm saying, I'm saying, get you

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a man. Anyway you gotta do it doesn't matter what.

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Get that money. Like, we also have things that we've

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 1>done in our community that if we want to be

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>on code, then we need to be on a total code.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>If we weren't about protecting our children, then let's all

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. But don't start when people have freedom of

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>speech to have the code. I understand what. I think

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's too different, you know, I think it's two different topics.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just like when people say police brutality and then

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>black on black crown, they're too completely different times. It's

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is the same because I think that's true. You just

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>spoke about. What you're talking about is black on black crowd.

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the exact exact because that black is talking about blacks.

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>We just so maybe it was black on black crime crime.

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>What happened in this situation, maybe with Charles Barkley said

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in your mind was a form of black on black crime.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I I it was a black a black man lending

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>his boys to the same and some people would say

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's criminal, but I was joking. Anyway, That's

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>been a full conversation, and you know, I still stand

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>by like four or five things that I said today

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that weren't just about this show, but was also about

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>our leadership. So I agree with your leadership comes in

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>different forms, and everybody leadership looks different. Some people have

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>um lines in the sand. You know, certain things to

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the eminently you can't know you can't not just no,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>M not about no. I'm just saying that certain things

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that I'm willing to on across the boat, and I

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 1>hope that certain people as leaders that's what people respect,

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the leadership from me dialing across but not in the fire.

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And all right, we're wrapping it up another episode to

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>treat politicians once again, we're not gonna always be right,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and we definitely I can always agree, but we're always

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be right. That's how we owned it.