Speaker 1: You don't think, so you don't thinking what you said?
Speaker 1: Why doesn't she have Gail? Maybe Gail doesn't care you
Speaker 1: doing We open the form forgive to go there though,
Speaker 1: so now we open a conversation for Gil because people,
Speaker 1: but because she may not have wanted to go. But
Speaker 1: you made this. Say what you said, what y'all are saying,
Speaker 1: or you and your friend and people on your thing,
Speaker 1: it's all there's an agenda. Why don't you go in
Speaker 1: there just like you going but you are you with
Speaker 1: everybody else? You are you everybody else? You're going there
Speaker 1: if somebody say something to you, if somebody goes in
Speaker 1: there and saying even if somebody goes in there and says, oh,
Speaker 1: my son, you're wrong and you just don't like women
Speaker 1: and you this is that in the third or whatever.
Speaker 1: I'm just let me finish my point. You're going there,
Speaker 1: and you got all these things to say. But when
Speaker 1: men is in their car and them bitches more, when
Speaker 1: men are in there saying other things like oh, well
Speaker 1: you know that's because they got in the gender you
Speaker 1: ain't going there one time. It's saying no, don't talk
Speaker 1: about these women like that. But you don't respond to no,
Speaker 1: comments either be either do one thing or because you
Speaker 1: said because you But why are you saying okay, sending?
Speaker 1: Why you argue with people? Why are you making up sunny?
Speaker 1: Why don't you just leave it at that? Why are
Speaker 1: you in there arguing with people who are saying things
Speaker 1: that might support Because every time somebody, every time somebody
Speaker 1: says something that might be like you're wrong, you argue
Speaker 1: with them. But what I'm asking you with but I'm
Speaker 1: asking you is why don't you go in your comments
Speaker 1: and say when they're men in there who are like, oh,
Speaker 1: that's because them bitches all got they all together, Fuck
Speaker 1: them bitches, they got some type of plan. Why you
Speaker 1: don't go in there say they call it snoop type
Speaker 1: of okay. But she would provide a space that made
Speaker 1: it seem like, Jada, No, that's not what you didn't
Speaker 1: need to have gar No, you didn't. You said, why
Speaker 1: won't why you say what I said? I have a
Speaker 1: question what I want to know? We need you want
Speaker 1: to go that listen to me, But we're not gonna
Speaker 1: make it seem like it's not It's not an option
Speaker 1: that people don't want to hear that. It's any question
Speaker 1: that you asked, it's not everybody don't want to do whatever,
Speaker 1: but people want to know why she ain't up there.
Speaker 1: She created the turmoil, She created this. He was reacting
Speaker 1: Why you wasn't hurt that she said that about a
Speaker 1: black man, why he was dead? Why it didn't hurt you.
Speaker 1: Did you watch the whole thing? Did you watch the
Speaker 1: whole thing? Because today the piece that they put out,
Speaker 1: that's another thing speaking on something but saying that happen.
Speaker 1: Did you watch the whole episode? How can you be
Speaker 1: a journalist well or be an influencer that makes a
Speaker 1: statement based upon what if she went on? Nan said,
Speaker 1: I asked Gail to come and she said no. What
Speaker 1: if she went on? Nan said, what if she went
Speaker 1: on there? Because it was a it's a piece that
Speaker 1: came out today where she's sitting there and snoop and
Speaker 1: saying it was her and that's and she's like, yes,
Speaker 1: that's right, I understand. So what if she went on?
Speaker 1: What if she land bast to Gail? What if she
Speaker 1: tore Gail's after You don't even know because you made
Speaker 1: a comment being fast, but you didn't take you didn't
Speaker 1: take the time to look at the entire thing to
Speaker 1: be able to say. Maybe she said, I'm gonna have
Speaker 1: Gail on next Maybe she said, I asked Gail, Gail
Speaker 1: said no, Maybe she said, we'll see when Gail gets
Speaker 1: back to us. And then if that's the case, then
Speaker 1: what you would have been saying, and that thing is
Speaker 1: I'm glad you asked Gail, Jada and next time, you know.
Speaker 1: And I can't wait till she come on. We should
Speaker 1: all be asking Gail, why won't you go on Red
Speaker 1: Table Talk? But instead the what what? What? How? Been?
Speaker 1: Is that it made it seem like it's not it's
Speaker 1: not happening, like it's not possive. You just you keep
Speaker 1: making up your own facts. What's going on? Y'all? Ship boy,
Speaker 1: my son and this is Street Politicians, the place with
Speaker 1: the streets of politics. Me and I'm Tamika Mallory and
Speaker 1: thank you for joining us for another episode. It's been
Speaker 1: a little fiery around here. Maybe you've been privy to
Speaker 1: some of the dialogue that was going on before we
Speaker 1: started the show. Lots happening in the news all the time,
Speaker 1: and you know what, my son and I sometimes we
Speaker 1: just don't agree, don't agree, and you know, and this
Speaker 1: is one of those times, so you had a little preview.
Speaker 1: You've probably got some of the little fire crackers. So
Speaker 1: y'all been following us, and you know, we've been going
Speaker 1: back and forth about this whole Gil and Kobe situation
Speaker 1: and that a little behind the scenes is us, you know, disagreeing.
Speaker 1: So there's been some r there's been some new developments.
Speaker 1: J the Pinkett just did an interview with Snoop Dogs
Speaker 1: based on his comments to Gil King, and you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of people on social media have backlash. There
Speaker 1: was a lot of different, you know comments, and I've
Speaker 1: seen the clip that I've seen, so I listened to
Speaker 1: the clip and I commended it. I thought it made sense,
Speaker 1: you know, I understood Snoop's position, or understood Jade's position,
Speaker 1: and she talked about how his comments heard her and
Speaker 1: how she felt really harmed, and he came up there
Speaker 1: and in full transparency. I haven't seen the whole episode yet,
Speaker 1: but based on what I saw, he was basically explaining how,
Speaker 1: you know, he didn't want every black woman in America
Speaker 1: to be angry with him, but he was angry at
Speaker 1: what she said, and his statements was out of that
Speaker 1: anger and frustration. So you know, I listened to it,
Speaker 1: and I commended it. I went on my social media
Speaker 1: page and I did a little video based on the clip,
Speaker 1: and I and I commanded everybody. I said, Snoop, you
Speaker 1: did a hell of a job you. I love the
Speaker 1: Red Table talk. Jada is dope. The way that y'all
Speaker 1: bring up real topics and you're talking. You come from
Speaker 1: a place that's really so passionate and wrong, you know.
Speaker 1: And I said, everybody should agree with with Snoop Dead,
Speaker 1: and I saluted him. But then I said, now, it
Speaker 1: would be dope if you said, if you think it
Speaker 1: would be fair, I think it would be fair because
Speaker 1: Gail was the person who created the situation. Snoop Dog
Speaker 1: was reacting to what Gail said. Why is it not
Speaker 1: a representation of black men, just that a black man
Speaker 1: decided to go talk to some black women about his
Speaker 1: feelings or something that he said or and did in
Speaker 1: his career, overhit his timespan living here on this great earth,
Speaker 1: he did something. Forget about Gail King. He's saying that
Speaker 1: as a man, even when I'm angry about something, I
Speaker 1: should never speak to or about a woman like this.
Speaker 1: And that's a that's a that's a point, that's five
Speaker 1: ten shows by itself. That doesn't require Gail King. You're
Speaker 1: saying that doesn't happen if you never talked to Gail
Speaker 1: about anything, that doesn't matter. It does, my son. Here's
Speaker 1: what I'm telling you. I'm saying that what Snoop is
Speaker 1: doing is important for black men and black women, right.
Speaker 1: And I'm saying that I appreciate his movement, with or
Speaker 1: without Gail ever doing anything. In fact, it is actually
Speaker 1: making Kobe's legacy and Snoop and those people who have
Speaker 1: challenged what Gail King did look better. But I don't
Speaker 1: want it's moving them into a better light because people
Speaker 1: are seeing that we're doing the real work together. There
Speaker 1: is an obvious division. I understand that, and this is
Speaker 1: where the problem is. And when the division division keeps happening,
Speaker 1: when it looks one side, it's not about what I'm getting.
Speaker 1: What I'm trying to tell you what it looks. It's
Speaker 1: not about whether it is if it looks, if looks
Speaker 1: if Snoop has apologized, Snoop goes on and he apologized again,
Speaker 1: and these platforms tell him how he harmed them. But
Speaker 1: the original harm, the original harm was done before he
Speaker 1: said a word, and there's no one to attach that
Speaker 1: person who did that harm. No want to hold that
Speaker 1: person accountable, no one to sit there and tell that
Speaker 1: person how what you did harm to us? How it
Speaker 1: say black Howard separated black people, black and male and
Speaker 1: women are already seen. I haven't seen it. I'm saying
Speaker 1: you do. Everybody has from the beginning, looks Snoop, this
Speaker 1: is what I'm trying to tell you. Everybody told you.
Speaker 1: Michael Ridson came out, Um Tammy came up. Everybody told Snoop,
Speaker 1: how those negative? Is it not? It wasn't negative, but
Speaker 1: she said she was. She just said you must have
Speaker 1: been thinking that all that was not regardless of white. Okay,
Speaker 1: what I'm trying to tell you what everybody expressed to
Speaker 1: us Black men, black woman. Everybody went to Snoop and
Speaker 1: expressed to him how his words made them feel. Okay,
Speaker 1: nobody has gone. Who is the nobody? Tell me somebody
Speaker 1: I'm fell about what Gail did. What she said. I
Speaker 1: have said it, I've said it weird, I've said it
Speaker 1: on my social media, I've written it. What do you
Speaker 1: think that you're looking for somebody to say? Because I'm
Speaker 1: looking for you I'm looking for to me, I'm looking
Speaker 1: for the same thing that the same thing that Michael
Speaker 1: Rick Diyson did. I'm looking for that you do. I
Speaker 1: watched the words that you said to me, and it
Speaker 1: took power for me and my daughter and my mom
Speaker 1: and I said no, not snoop and listen to me
Speaker 1: that and it was heartfeld. The man he looked like
Speaker 1: he wanted to cry because these are people that he loved,
Speaker 1: These are people that he valued their opinion, and they
Speaker 1: told him that he said something and did something that
Speaker 1: harmed them in a way that made him feel like
Speaker 1: he needed to clarify if that was Tupac, right, listen
Speaker 1: to me, if somebody had asked her those questions about Tupac,
Speaker 1: she probably have punched him in the face. And if
Speaker 1: somebody was up there talking about interviewing somebody about Tupac,
Speaker 1: she would have felt the same. We realized the difference. No,
Speaker 1: I tell me the difference. The difference is that Tupac
Speaker 1: is a man that she was in a relationship with
Speaker 1: and his friend. Okay, so what so what I'm saying that?
Speaker 1: And guess what if she would have done that, she
Speaker 1: still may have need to go out and said you
Speaker 1: know what, I was angry and I didn't said some
Speaker 1: things that I wasn't supposed to say, but I'm still
Speaker 1: I was. I'm still angry about it. What I'm saying
Speaker 1: to you, my son, is that what Jada basically did right,
Speaker 1: she space for Snoop to clarify and be one and
Speaker 1: hold back with black women so they didn't feel like
Speaker 1: he was at them. I guess where I'm coming from
Speaker 1: here and what I'm dealing with that I spoke about
Speaker 1: in the last show that we did. I'm ruggling with
Speaker 1: trying to understand why it is that black men cannot
Speaker 1: just be accountable on their own without having to bring
Speaker 1: what the woman did and said. You know what, I'm
Speaker 1: just trying to figure out. You know the problem. The
Speaker 1: problem is there's a chain of events. You understand what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. The chain of events started with Gail because everybody,
Speaker 1: that's what I hear what you're saying. But you can't
Speaker 1: say somebody being held accountable because she got a co defendant.
Speaker 1: You can't be held accountable with something that you're did
Speaker 1: with somebody else. You can't solely be held and me
Speaker 1: and you did a crime together, and it's a black
Speaker 1: man and the black woman, and he said, no, you
Speaker 1: just need to go away. No, we got a co
Speaker 1: defend we've done. But we as black women have covered
Speaker 1: many times and dealt with the accountability and the responsibility
Speaker 1: for the family, for the black men, for everybody. And
Speaker 1: you know why, you know what, if we don't force
Speaker 1: black men to have to always be a part of that,
Speaker 1: we take the ship. We take the beating for how
Speaker 1: we take the beating and the whipping and the responsibility
Speaker 1: on behalf of our community and our families all the
Speaker 1: damn time. And you know what, it's okay if Snoop
Speaker 1: passed to go and sit there and have a conversation
Speaker 1: with black women by himself. And guess what, I hope
Speaker 1: that Gil does do it, But I don't need her
Speaker 1: to do it for me to feel good about what
Speaker 1: happened in that show on at that table. I think
Speaker 1: that what Jada and and Snoop did is the most
Speaker 1: powerful expression of what black love needs to look like
Speaker 1: in our community. It was accountability, that was honesty that
Speaker 1: was loved, and I would not taint it by trying
Speaker 1: to force on it superimposed that somebody else needs to
Speaker 1: also be so that's just how at this point you
Speaker 1: can feel how you feel. But my request for her
Speaker 1: there takes nothing away from what she did. I commended it.
Speaker 1: I think it was needed. But I also believe that
Speaker 1: produced a network who's got a thousand lawyers that are
Speaker 1: telling her what she can and cannot do. Kenny, But
Speaker 1: people don't. People want to know why she asked the
Speaker 1: question at all. That's it. You can't even that, you can't.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of journalists. There are a bunch
Speaker 1: of journalists cat that have come up publicly and said
Speaker 1: just certain questions that I wouldn't ask, not right now
Speaker 1: like that until he was actually buried. That conversation was
Speaker 1: it was too early because people and it's not that
Speaker 1: he was He wasn't convicted of rape. So you you
Speaker 1: want to have a conversation about an accusation that came
Speaker 1: up in his history right now when him and his
Speaker 1: daughter just blew up in a plane, this was I
Speaker 1: think if you you're talking about accusations and you're having
Speaker 1: a conversation with people that weren't there, they have no
Speaker 1: idea about what happened in that room. None of them
Speaker 1: have anything. They just coming to have a conversation about
Speaker 1: their friend that they love, and you asked them about
Speaker 1: accusations that they have no information. Well, I don't even
Speaker 1: think it makes sense. I think it does nothing more
Speaker 1: than tink the viewer's opinion of that individual. It's not
Speaker 1: I think it's classless. You understand I'm saying, it's not like.
Speaker 1: It's not as if you're saying, well, we have to
Speaker 1: acknowledge that Kobe was convicted of something, then maybe we
Speaker 1: could we what we could do is say damn, I
Speaker 1: don't think you should have. But it makes sense. There's
Speaker 1: that that is part of his history, that is part
Speaker 1: of his legacy. Was found guilty. There was enough evidence
Speaker 1: to say that this man did something that was wrong.
Speaker 1: So we wanted we want to talk about him in
Speaker 1: full bloom that we got to talk about the thing
Speaker 1: that we acknowledge that we know he did wrong. But
Speaker 1: to talk about something that an accusation that has not
Speaker 1: that he was cleared up, it's classless. I don't see
Speaker 1: it at all. But I and I also think I
Speaker 1: think I agree with everything you just said, and I
Speaker 1: also think that we do have an expectation of black
Speaker 1: folks not to be a part of the destruction of
Speaker 1: black men and women and and and people, and our
Speaker 1: legacies we do have. We feel that when you go
Speaker 1: to work, you need to know that you also are
Speaker 1: part of this community and not just do what you're
Speaker 1: paid to do and what you're told to do. And
Speaker 1: I think a better way maybe to go about it
Speaker 1: would have been to say, and perhaps in this unedited
Speaker 1: clip that Gail is speaking of, you could say, you know,
Speaker 1: there are folks who want to talk about this, and
Speaker 1: I think it's early for us to be discussing it,
Speaker 1: but you know, I'm gonna ask you about blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah blah, and to ask a question, whatever the
Speaker 1: question may be, but to go back and say, you
Speaker 1: know what, she just didn't want to testify him, but
Speaker 1: what are you thinking? And then and then she said
Speaker 1: and then finally when when when when Lisa Leslie said,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't I didn't see that in him.
Speaker 1: Now you're like, well, you wouldn't see it as his friend. Okay,
Speaker 1: Now you're you're going real far. You're not just checking
Speaker 1: the box and making sure that you state it because
Speaker 1: it needs to be done just for your job and
Speaker 1: for journalism and fairness and all of that you're covering
Speaker 1: the issue, but now you're pushing the issue. And I
Speaker 1: think the reason why I agree with what my son
Speaker 1: is saying, although I don't agree with anything else that
Speaker 1: he has said here today, But the reason why I
Speaker 1: agree with that one point is that if she was talking,
Speaker 1: if she was talking to Kobe, then yeah, push him
Speaker 1: all the way. And she was like she was talking
Speaker 1: to r Kelly. Nobody gave a damn about what she
Speaker 1: said to R Kelly. Push him all the way, because
Speaker 1: you're speaking directly to the person. But when me and
Speaker 1: if me and my child, God forbid my child and
Speaker 1: I die, I would hope that until I'm in the grave,
Speaker 1: you wouldn't go pushing my friends who are also hurting
Speaker 1: to have to answer questions about an accusation that was
Speaker 1: twenty something. He is like, it doesn't make sense, and
Speaker 1: and and and just to ot it. The journalist who
Speaker 1: when Charles Barkley said the dumbness, you know what I'm saying,
Speaker 1: he decided he wanted to get let the journalist said
Speaker 1: one thing and say, hey, you know we're just gonna ask.
Speaker 1: He asked one question, Charles Brockley, volunteer, What was the
Speaker 1: question that he asked, was I forgot what he was?
Speaker 1: But he was like, you know, some people are saying,
Speaker 1: should he being celebrated based right that he's a king?
Speaker 1: Should we talk about it? Is there something you wanted?
Speaker 1: He gave him an opportunity, and they went into the bullshit,
Speaker 1: you know, the same I'm saying, that's that to me?
Speaker 1: What what do you what do you mean, Charles? People
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't know exactly to comment Charles Barkley.
Speaker 1: Charles Barkley started to say that we're not trying to
Speaker 1: make Kobe a haro. We know what he did, we
Speaker 1: know what happened in Colorado. He got a blemish on
Speaker 1: his record and and all this and and that was false.
Speaker 1: But I'm talking about the journalists. The journalist who did
Speaker 1: the interview just asked a question, Hey, what do you
Speaker 1: think if you think it's something that should be discussed
Speaker 1: or should we just like, that's a question that in journalism,
Speaker 1: ok has been people been talking about it. Let me
Speaker 1: act to see is it and nobody else discussed it?
Speaker 1: Everybody else moves going past it. That man decided to
Speaker 1: talk about that, And I think that also the bigger
Speaker 1: issue is that with Charles Barkley. Then the reason why
Speaker 1: people piste off about what he said is because he
Speaker 1: has a history of he has a history of saying
Speaker 1: things and and and and and and and doing things
Speaker 1: that that black folks in general feel is very disrespectful.
Speaker 1: We feel, like, you know, he always is contrary to
Speaker 1: our opinion or to the culture's opinion about our issues.
Speaker 1: It seems like he's always siding with people who are
Speaker 1: not in our communities, and he doesn't really ever represent
Speaker 1: or speak well to the concerns that we have. And
Speaker 1: I think that with Gail, I don't know that she
Speaker 1: has that same type of history. Of course I would
Speaker 1: never say that, but what I do understand is that
Speaker 1: because of the relationship between her and the Harvey Weinstein
Speaker 1: piece and how people want to see him be challenged
Speaker 1: and other situations, Charlie rose and to not and for
Speaker 1: her to do what she did, it makes people feel
Speaker 1: like this is a repeat offense. So some of it
Speaker 1: is not just the moment. It's the it's the it's
Speaker 1: the it's a it's a it's a fool spectrum, if
Speaker 1: you will. And I think she's got to deal with
Speaker 1: that period, like you know, and it's not And again
Speaker 1: I said many times, I think Gail is a darling woman.
Speaker 1: I think she's smart, and I think she does have
Speaker 1: a heart for the people. But at the same time,
Speaker 1: we have a responsibility with all the hell that black
Speaker 1: people catch every single day, to be to to be
Speaker 1: aware of how we can sometimes be used as tools
Speaker 1: and an agenda that is harmful to the very people
Speaker 1: that you come from. So what people want are gonna
Speaker 1: want to say outside is looking in? Is that you
Speaker 1: know there's no that that their different opinions. Charles Barkley
Speaker 1: has an opinion. Gil may feel that question needs to
Speaker 1: be asked. Everybody feels a different way, and there's freedom
Speaker 1: of speech and just like sometimes I don't agree with
Speaker 1: what you have to say, but that doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: you don't still say it, and vice versa. So is
Speaker 1: then when when should people speak and not speak? When?
Speaker 1: When is the right time in the wrong time? I
Speaker 1: mean that's the question that outsiders will ask us as
Speaker 1: black folks. What is our expectation for the code within
Speaker 1: our communities? Well, I think I think it's it's um,
Speaker 1: it's visible. I think when you outside the code then
Speaker 1: people will let you know. I think there's a moral
Speaker 1: compass that most people have that when they hear that
Speaker 1: you go against that moral compass, when they're hearing you
Speaker 1: attacking the same things that go against what they believe
Speaker 1: is morally right, that goes against what they believe a
Speaker 1: code should be had. Because I feel that most other
Speaker 1: ethnicities follow this code. They don't publicly defame each other.
Speaker 1: They just don't even don't publicly talk about each other.
Speaker 1: I don't really see it. I mean, I really don't
Speaker 1: see it unless they unless they morally conflict, like there's
Speaker 1: a moral confidence. Okay, that's what I'm trying to tell you.
Speaker 1: If you look at if you even look at in
Speaker 1: in in office, and you know in the politics the Republicans,
Speaker 1: they half of them don't agree with Trump, but they're
Speaker 1: not coming out saying they're gonna like what we're doing
Speaker 1: what he says because they just stayed on code. They
Speaker 1: just figure it out. Like one person goes against the code,
Speaker 1: they got them out. They don't want you here. So
Speaker 1: that's what I'm trying to say. Blacks don't have the
Speaker 1: Blacks have to have a level of understanding of what
Speaker 1: is detrimental to us. So freedom of speech, you get
Speaker 1: to say what you want, but when you're saying something
Speaker 1: that is gonna be detrimental to the way they view
Speaker 1: my kids, you understand I'm saying when we know it's
Speaker 1: a history, Like I said before, there's a history of
Speaker 1: rape and black men and white women. There's a history
Speaker 1: of most of our leaders, our kids are anything being
Speaker 1: the being killed, being demonized, being everything. Behind those accusations
Speaker 1: and merely accusations. You bring that to the forefront again,
Speaker 1: like we have to understand, Well, okay, are we gonna
Speaker 1: wrap this up? But I do want us to be
Speaker 1: careful saying merely accusations because I have made not accusations,
Speaker 1: but told my truth about things that have happened to me.
Speaker 1: And I didn't go to court and I didn't do
Speaker 1: all of that, but it wasn't merely an accusation. It
Speaker 1: was my truth in this situation. The fact that the
Speaker 1: accusation was unfounded. I agreed that this is not It
Speaker 1: definitely is not time to discuss it before the man
Speaker 1: was buried. I agree with that, But I would say
Speaker 1: that this code that we're supposed to be living by
Speaker 1: is very one sided because that code has not existed
Speaker 1: when it comes to the hip hop community, disrespecting black women,
Speaker 1: talking about drugs, feeding our children things that are not
Speaker 1: good for their minds. So now of a sudden and
Speaker 1: we want the colde to exist at a certain time,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't cover all times. It hasn't existed when
Speaker 1: black women have been out there. You know, when we
Speaker 1: have the twirk culture, the uh what is it? Get
Speaker 1: you a man? Know I'm saying, I'm saying, get you
Speaker 1: a man. Anyway you gotta do it doesn't matter what.
Speaker 1: Get that money. Like, we also have things that we've
Speaker 1: done in our community that if we want to be
Speaker 1: on code, then we need to be on a total code.
Speaker 1: If we weren't about protecting our children, then let's all
Speaker 1: do that. But don't start when people have freedom of
Speaker 1: speech to have the code. I understand what. I think
Speaker 1: it's too different, you know, I think it's two different topics.
Speaker 1: It's just like when people say police brutality and then
Speaker 1: black on black crown, they're too completely different times. It's
Speaker 1: is the same because I think that's true. You just
Speaker 1: spoke about. What you're talking about is black on black crowd.
Speaker 1: That's the exact exact because that black is talking about blacks.
Speaker 1: We just so maybe it was black on black crime crime.
Speaker 1: What happened in this situation, maybe with Charles Barkley said
Speaker 1: in your mind was a form of black on black crime.
Speaker 1: I I it was a black a black man lending
Speaker 1: his boys to the same and some people would say
Speaker 1: that that's that's criminal, but I was joking. Anyway, That's
Speaker 1: been a full conversation, and you know, I still stand
Speaker 1: by like four or five things that I said today
Speaker 1: that weren't just about this show, but was also about
Speaker 1: our leadership. So I agree with your leadership comes in
Speaker 1: different forms, and everybody leadership looks different. Some people have
Speaker 1: um lines in the sand. You know, certain things to
Speaker 1: the eminently you can't know you can't not just no,
Speaker 1: M not about no. I'm just saying that certain things
Speaker 1: that I'm willing to on across the boat, and I
Speaker 1: hope that certain people as leaders that's what people respect,
Speaker 1: the leadership from me dialing across but not in the fire.
Speaker 1: And all right, we're wrapping it up another episode to
Speaker 1: treat politicians once again, we're not gonna always be right,
Speaker 1: and we definitely I can always agree, but we're always
Speaker 1: gonna be right. That's how we owned it.