WEBVTT - Obstacles to Trump's Mass Deportation Plan

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The day I take the.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Oath of office, the migrant invasion of our country ends,

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 2>and the restoration of our country begins. Donald Trump energized

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany of

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>anti immigrant statements and promises of securing the border and

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>carrying out the largest mass deportations in US history. His

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>election sets the stage for a crackdown on undocumented immigrants

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and a rollback of measures that allow some to remain

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>in the country legally, but his plans face legal, logistical,

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and financial obstacles. Joining me is an expert in immigration law,

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight and the

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 2>former head of the Office of Immigration Litigation at the

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice during the Obama administration. Let's start with

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>his pledge to carry out the largest nass deportations in

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>US history. Just how would he carry that out and

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>what would some of the obstacles be.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a multi stage process, and it's

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>going to require an all hands on that governmental approach,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>because this is not just a matter of the Department

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security or ICE or the border. It's going

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to require the State Department, it's going to require the

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>entire diplomatic core, negotiating with all of the countries in

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>South America, in the Middle East, and in China that

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to actually deport people too. And so this

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be a very simple first step.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>There's the first issue, which is identifying people to deport.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So how does one do that. There is some belief,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and you've heard Tom Homan, who's the person now appointed

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to lead this operation, was the former ICE director, say

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in various contexts that this isn't going to just be

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a grab bag where individuals are simply apprehended for no reason,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but that there's going to be a targeted effort here.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So the first targeted effort would obviously be criminal non citizens.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So anybody with a criminal record is going to be

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the number one top priority for removal. So the question is, well,

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>when you apprehend those individuals, where do you put them?

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>There's about forty to forty five thousand beds that are

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.119
<v Speaker 1>available right now for such a purpose. Obviously, if you're

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>doing the largest deportation program in history, you're going to

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>need a lot more beds. Where are those beds coming from.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>We've heard the idea that that could be a military basis,

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that there would be barrack for that purpose. So fine,

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you place people in those military barracks, you have them

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in detention, you put them in detention proceeding, and the

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>question is will there be a place to actually deport

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>those people to when this is all said and done.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Will there be countries that are willing to actually accept

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>these individuals? So that's where again, the State Department is

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have to play in. Secondly, are you going

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to need to do a whole due process deportation hearing

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>where these hearings are currently backed up by seven years

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the immigration court? Or will Trump be able to

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>get away with using what's called the Alien Enemies Act,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>which is a law that's been around since the late

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hundred which allows deportation without due process. But you

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have to show that a country is specifically trying to

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>infiltrate the United States with people designed to destabilize the

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>United States. So will that be reviewable in a court

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of law because courts have said that things like that

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in the past are political questions that are not reviewable.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Will they be reviewable, and if they are reviewable, will

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>courts actually say that any country people are from is

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>actually doing this on purpose, is actually sending criminal foreign

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>national into the United States for the purpose of destabilizing

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the country. So all of those are questions that are

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have to be grappled with pretty early on

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to determine whether such an operation could be successful.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>According to the Pew Research Center, eleven million immigrants were

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>living illegally in the country in twenty twenty two, and

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>more than two million have entered illegally since then. I mean,

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>will it be difficult for ICE to find those who

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>are here illegally?

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, believe it or not, that's actually the easy part

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>these days. With all of the artificial intelligence that ICE

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>has procured in the last several years and databases and documents,

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anyone who's left any kind of digital footprint,

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>ICE knows where they are, either from their cell phone,

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>their car, whether they ordered a pizza, anything of this nature.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So unless you've been living in the middle of the

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>woods as a hermit, ICE will be able to find

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you if it wants to find you, relatively quickly, So

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of a twentieth century concern. At this point,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the finding is the easy part. The question is what

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do you do when you find the person? Where do

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you literally detain the person and where do you actually

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>deport the person? And that's where the Trump administration is

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>going to have their work cut out for them.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Which countries have not agreed to receive deportation flights, So right.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Now it's almost impossible to deport anyone to China, which

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>is a big source of our removal orders. We have

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of not over one hundred thousand removal

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>orders for people who can be deported to China, but

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>China won't accept those individuals. Cuba is another big one. Cuba.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>There's probably hundreds of thousands of Cubans who can be

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>deported to Cuba, but Cuba has not and probably will

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not accept people. Given the country is almost in complete ruins,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and there's another hurricane potentially coming there and who knows,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and so the country has so destabilized, accepting hundreds of

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people is likely not an option there. Venezuela

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>has not accepted recently people to be deported back to Venezuela.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Haiti basically has no government they just today fired their

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>prime minister, and the question is what do you do

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Visa vi Haiti and how do you deport people there.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Nicaragua is another country that doesn't let people get deported

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>back to Nicaragua from the United States. And so those

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>are just some examples, but pretty much any country, if

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to start doing large numbers of people may

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>start objecting to that as saying, look, you're going to

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>destabilize our country. Because United States is a big country

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>with three hundred and fifty million people, but countries with

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a million people, if you suddenly put in fifty thousand

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>deportees who are all criminals, that could lead to quite

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the de stabilization in those countries. And so they may

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>do everything possible to try to thwart these deportations. Not

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Trump administration will think that that's

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>something to be sympathetic about, but it becomes a challenge

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>if they actually can't deport people to these countries.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>First of all, Trump said on NBC, I think that

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>there's no price tag on this, but I saw estimates

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>that put the cost at more than three hundred billion dollars.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it depends what kinds of cost you're incorporating into this.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, there's the normal cost that everyone

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>would agree to include, which are the cost of detention,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>which include obviously care and feeding and medicine and all

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of that for the people while they're in custody, the

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>cost of the actual removal itself, the planes that many

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>times ICE use as chartered planes to do this, all

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. But then they talk about the cost of

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens then to the economy, because interestingly, an undocumented

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>person when they're working in the United States is a

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>net positive to the US federal budget because what's happening

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is they're paying taxes and they're not getting any benefits

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>because they don't qualify for any benefits. And so this

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually something that the Congressional Budget Office talks about

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time. It's only when people get status and

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>can get benefits that they become potentially a net negative

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to the budget. But when you remove all these undocumented

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>workers from the economy, you actually create a larger budget

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>deficit hole, and so that's also being counted toward those

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>three hundred billion dollars.

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>There are some immigration policies that Trump wants to put

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 2>in place. Again, why does the remain in Mexico policy.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Explain what that is and tell us how difficult it

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>would be to restore it well.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Under the remain in Mexico policy, the way that would

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>work is that an individual enters the United States and

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>asks for asylum. Their asylum application is put into the

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>system and is put in line. But where you wait

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>is in Mexico. You don't wait in the United States.

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And so that was finally allowed by the Supreme Court

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>as legal in twenty nineteen and was about to be

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>implemented in earnest by the Trump administration until COVID happened,

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And then that didn't end up happening because what happened

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was instead of putting the cases in the line, the

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration simply just rejected people. And that actually continued

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>into the Biden administration, and, believe it or not, as

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>happening now. So the remain in Mexico policy will only

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be needed if the ban that is currently in place,

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>which the Biden administration has in place at the moment,

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is overturned by the courts. Now it is likely to

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>be overturned by the courts. That case has sort of

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>been slow locked because of the election. I don't think

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that the people suing wanted to destabilize the border situation

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>right before the election. But now that the election has happened,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that case is back up in the forefront. And if

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the Biden border policy is enjoined, which is essentially a

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>band nobody can apply for asylum right now who entered

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I legally into the United States. If that van is

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>taken away by the courts and said that that ban

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is illegal, that's when the Trump administration will need to

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>use remain in Mexico. And the obstacle there is that

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Mexico has to agree to do this, and a couple

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of things have happened since the last Trump administration. The

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court of Mexico has said that that's not possible

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's not legal. But the question will be what

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>does that mean if Trump threatens Mexico with fifty percent

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on their cars unless they do this, does the

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>new president of Mexico, Miss Shinbaum, actually then say, well,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to figure something out with our Supreme

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Court and everything else to make this a possibility, because

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't want fifty percent tariffs on our cars. So

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>all of these levers are in play. To try to

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether remain in Mexico needs to be placed

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>back into place and can it be played back at

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the place.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Next, let's discuss humanitarian parole, which gives immigrants from certain

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 2>countries temporary permission to live and work in the US,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and Biden has made sweeping use of this status. How

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 2>many immigrants are here, would you say under humanitarian parole?

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, between Ukraine and Cuba and Haiti and Nicaragua and Venezuela,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we're probably talking about several hundred thousand people. You know,

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>two to three hundred thousand people have been let in

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with these humanitarian paroles that when they expire they will

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not have lawful status anymore.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>So that would be pretty easy for Trump to get

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>rid of them.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Correct. There's a couple of things there, which is that

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>when those paroles expire, he will not renew them. And

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>then the question is what will those people do? Will

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they apply for asylum? Will some of them be eldest?

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, for the Ukrainians, for instance, what does an

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>asylum system look like? Because if the war's over, then

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they can go back to Ukraine. There's nobody persecuting them.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And if the war's not over, what is the status

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of those planes still because they're still not technically being

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>persecuted in Ukraine, they would just be evading a war,

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not clear what would happen to those

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>asylum planes. And then with regard to Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and Venezuela, I mean, asylum planes are possible from those countries.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>But will all those people apply for asylum. One would

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>assume they would just to slow things down. How many

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of those will ultimately be meritorious? Will the government place

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>those cases in the front of the line to get

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>them out or will they be placed in the back

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>of a seven and they hear current line? Those are

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>all questions left to be answered.

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Coming up next, I'll continue this conversation with Leon Fresco. Well,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 2>immigration officials in the second Trump administration avoid some of

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the problems in the first. This is Bloomberg. Donald Trump

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>has pledged to crack down swiftly on illegal immigration, including

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>by curbing asylum, supporting millillions of immigrants in the United

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>States illegally, and even restarting construction of the Wall. I've

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 2>been talking to immigration law expert Leon Fresco about some

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>of the challenges Trump will face both legal, logistical and financial.

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Leon can Trump just say eh, we're not doing asylum anymore.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>They can for the people crossing the border, but once

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you're inside the United States, you can apply for asylum,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's nothing that the government can do to stop that.

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And so all of these people who have been parolled

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 1>in I have every right to ask for asylum. And

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the question will be whether those cases get prioritized so

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that they get moved along first, or whether they get

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>placed in the back of the line because they want

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep the border crossing cases first, and these people

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>have already crossed the border, and so that's going to

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be a very complicated challenge for the Trump administration to

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>try to determine.

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Biden has also used something called temper Very Protected Status,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 2>which is another program that provides work permits and a

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>deportation shield for immigrants from certain countries like Haiti.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Correct there's also hundreds of thousands of people here on

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>temporary protected status from over a dozen countries at this point.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And here again, when Trump was president between twenty seventeen

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and twenty twenty, he tried to cancel them all. There

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was lawsuits, and those lawsuits ended up getting settled during

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration. They didn't end up getting resolved during

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration, and so he will have to again

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>try to circumvent the moustrom of these TPS litigation and

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits to try to see if he can do it.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.119
<v Speaker 1>But if he can do it and allow them to expire,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>then that's going to be another few hundred thousand people

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that simply lose their status when that expires. That includes

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the famous Asians in Springfield, Ohio that were of such

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a note during the election. And if all of those

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>folks lose their status again, they'll probably all end up

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>applying for asylum and hoping that they can survive the

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>four years of the Trump administration without their cases being heard.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to be very interesting to see now.

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the Trump administration may try to circumvent that

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Alien Enemies Act, but again will of course

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>allow them to use the Alien Enemies Act for some

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of these countries where it's clear that those countries probably

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't order a migration for the purposes of destabilizing the

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. Now, the Trump administration will try as hard

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as it can to build such a record, but their

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>best hope will be that the court view this as

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>unreviewable political questions that can even be reviewed, in which case,

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>if that happens, even if the Trump administration was wrong

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>about why it invoked the Alien Enemies Act, if an

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>invocation of the Alien Enemies Act can't actually be reviewed

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as a political question, then it will be able to

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>place millions of people into deportation quite quickly. Now, again,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they will have to be able to execute those orders

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to these countries. If they decide that, fine, what we'll

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>do is we'll just detain people in the middle of

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>nowhere in military barracks until they get thick enough that

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they leave on their own. And so these are all

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>potential options that will have to just wait and see

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>how it plays us.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 2>From what we've been talking about leon, it seems like

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be difficult for him to carry out

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>these mass deportations.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>There will be the issue of placing people in final

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>order status, will they be able to do that? And

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>then there will be the question of actually moving people

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>outside the United States, which is a separate, hard question.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So yes, it's going to have to be the top

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>priority of the State Department, the Justice Department, and the

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security Department in order for that to happen. Probably

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it will be, there's no doubt, but it's going to

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>require a whole of government approach that we've never seen before.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the real situation that will happen is

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that as these stories start to get out in the media,

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it starts to derail the momentum for this especially everyone

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>knows their person that they know that's not one of

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the bad ones that needs to be deported, but that's

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote one of the good ones. Why is the

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>government going after this person? They should be going after

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the bad people. But it turns out most of the

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>people won't qualify as the bad people because they'll have

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one or two people who say no, no, no, no, no,

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's my nanny or that's my person who takes care

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of my parents, my family, et cetera. And it's going

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to be very interesting to see how that plays out.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Will you explain the public charge definition under Biden? What

0:17:58.680 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that is?

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>All that goes all the way back to the late

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred called the public charge ground of an admissibility,

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>which says that if you're trying to get legal status

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in America, you can be precluded from doing so by

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the government if the government thinks you're going to be

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon the taxpayers and that's self sufficient. And so

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a rule that was put in place during

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the prior Trump administration to really strengthen that and to

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>say if anyone hadn't gotten basically a history of employment

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in their home country and a history of speaking English,

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they could be subject to this public charge ground. And

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>so that had actually been allowed by the Supreme Court

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>until it was rescinded by the Biden administration. So it

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>should be relatively quick for them to put back this

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>public charge ground and to really make it difficult for

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>anybody who doesn't speak English, or has any history at

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>all of getting any kind of government benefits, or is

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a single person that's completely unemployed and doesn't have a relative,

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so for instance, there's not some sort of homemaker where

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there's another spouse who's making the money. Those people would

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be fine, but they're just an individual who's one person

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>without a job. All of those people would be subject

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>now to this public charge ground that would not let

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>them get legal status in the United States.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So during his first term, Trump's immigration actions were repeatedly

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 2>stymied in court because they bypassed federal rulemaking requirements under

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 2>the Administrative Procedures Act. Do you think that in a

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 2>second term, You know, they'll know better and they'll go

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 2>buy the Administrative Procedures Act.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So the second term is going to look a lot

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>different than the first for a couple of reasons. First,

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the court has shrunk significantly who has standing to file

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>these lawsuits. So a lot of times the states, for instance,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>when there was a travel ban, rival ban was actually

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>filed by the state of Hawaii and the State of Washington.

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>States are going to have a lot less ability to

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>have standing than before, although it's not fully precluded, but

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been shrunk. So that's number one, and then number two.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>The courts also have dramatically reduced when injunctive relief is available.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>So what the courts have been doing is they've been

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>saying injunctive relief is only going to be available on

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a case by case basis, and there won't be this

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>programmatic nationwide injunction that you can just go and get

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in one district court and that'll be it. You'll actually

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have to go through a process where a bunch of

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>individuals get injunctive relief and then maybe that stops the policy.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And so because of that, that's all going to strengthen

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump's hands while he's doing this deportation.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of Trump making Tom Homan the

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 2>borders are He's the official behind the family separations during

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the first Trump administration.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, So I'm personally a bit conflicted because I've

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>worked with Tom Holman when I was a Department of Justice,

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's a very nice man, and him

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and I get along very well and have a wonderful relationship.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>So just for me, a question of whether you agree

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with the policy that's going to be put in place

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because Tom Holman, the thing I can say about him

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>is he has always been, under many different presidents, a

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>public servant who salutes the flag, and when people have

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>given him a lawful order, he has executed the lawful order,

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it be prosecutorial discretion or whether it be deportation. Now,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>while he has gone off on his own as a

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>private citizen, he has taken a very restrictionist talking point.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And so this is what he's being charged to do now,

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is to lead the largest deportation program in history. To

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be fair to him and to President Trump, they did

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>campaign on that, so it's not a secret. Anybody who

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted that to be avoided should not have voted for

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. But now that President Trump has won and

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he campaigned on that promise, this is what Tom Holman

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>is going to be doing now. The one thing I

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>will say is because he comes from Ice and because

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he has lived this for several decades, he understands the

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>actual challenges from a legal and logistical standpoint in a

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>way that appointing somebody who's a more political person but

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>less of a detail oriented person wouldn't know. And that's

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>why I've heard Tom Holman say things like, look, we're

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna have priorities, We're going to have certain people that

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we look at first, because at the end of the day,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that's actually how you have to do this. You can't

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>just willy nearly round up millions of people. That's not

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be operationally possible.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Here, let me ask you the big question, leon which

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 2>you have addressed in different ways in our conversation. Will

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Trump be able to carry out the largest deportation of

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 2>immigrants in our history?

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Here is what I said. I think because people don't

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>remember what happened in two thousand and seven. Two thousand

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and seven was the last time there was actually any

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>significant robust immigration enforcement in the middle of the streets.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Even Trump, to his credit, actually from twenty seventeen to

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty didn't have these sort of large scale rays

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of work fits or anything like that. That didn't actually

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>happen a lot during the Trump administration. And so the

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>point is when that last happened, which was in two

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven under George W. Bush, that puts such

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>fear in the immigrant community that people stopped going to work,

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>people were hiding. It was very complicated, and so what

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they're actually trying to accomplish more than anything,

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is like what you're seeing in all these other areas

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>with foreign policy and with tariffs and where everything else

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you saw laid down a marker that this is going

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the worst thing you've ever seen. And what

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you're hoping it does is it incentivizes enough people to

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>self support that you're actually getting banged for the buck

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>from that. So I think that's what you're gonna see.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>You are going to see a more robust effort to

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>remove people. But I think at the end of the day,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if four hundred thousand people end up getting removed in

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five. That might be ambitious based on where

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure is now, and so we're not talking about

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 1>ten million, twenty million, whatever million people we'd be talking about.

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>But the hope is that if it's done in a

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>way that creates enough nervousness in the community, that individuals

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>will decide that they can't live with this level of

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>nervousness and they would take matters into their own hands

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and leave the country a lot of moving parts.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>That's for sure. Thanks so much, Leon. That's Leon Fresco,

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>a partner at Honda Knight. Donald Trump enters his second

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 2>term having appointed three members of the Supreme Court, an

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 2>achievement that led to the current conservative supermajority, which eliminated

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 2>the constitutional right to abortion and slashed the power of

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>federal agencies. Trump's campaign pledges, including tariffs, mass deportations, and

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>environmental rollbacks, will face legal challenges, and the Court transformed

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>by Trump now sits as one of the few potential

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 2>checks on his authority as he returns to the White House.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Joining me is Bloomberg new Supreme Court reporter Greg Storr,

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>who's written about the possible implications. So, Greg, as you write,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump and the Court have had a complicated relationship in

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 2>the past, tell us about it.

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, this is a Supreme Court that, of course,

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 3>four years ago, refused to intervene in the twenty twenty

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 3>election when he very much wanted them to try to

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 3>overturn Joe Biden's victory. It's also courte that during his

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 3>time as president gave him somewhat mixed results. You know,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 3>if you look just like an immigration sphere. They upheld

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 3>this so called travel band that's restricted entry into the

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 3>country from certain countries, many of them predominantly Muslim. But

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 3>they also ruled against them on putting a citizenship question

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>on the census. And I'm trying to end Barack Obama's

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 3>so called DACA program. So it's not a court that

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 3>has given him the sort of knee jerk we side

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 3>with you sort of rulings that he has suggested he wants.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Now, this surprised me. According to a database compiled by

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>professors at Washington University in Saint Louis and Penn State University,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 2>his previous administration had the lowest win rate at the

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court in modern history.

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it surprises me every time I look at it.

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>The researchers include Lee Epstein at Washington University of Saint Louis,

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and it shows that four years Donald Trump succeeded only

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 3>forty two percent of the time. Those are cases where

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 3>either he or his administration were a party, and just

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 3>throw out a few other numbers. Barack Obama sixty eighty

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent of the time, Joe Biden so far fifty

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 3>four percent of the time, and then you go further

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 3>back and presidents do much much better. So it's pretty striking.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 3>And of course not all those cases are hugely important.

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Ones are ones that we might talk about. But in

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 3>terms of sort of the run of the mill cases,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 3>it is a court that is not, as I said,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 3>necessarily going to need your side with Donald Trump.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Of course, there is a difference. In his first term,

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>he didn't have this conservative super majority that he has now.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that is an excellent point that I probably should

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 3>have mentioned earlier as a qualification. So when I talked

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 3>about a couple of those immigration cases, the citizenship question

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 3>on the twenty twenty census, the case involving the so

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 3>called DOCA program, which allows one hundreds of thousands of

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 3>young people who came into the country as children let

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 3>them stay in the country. So when the Court said

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump can't block that. Both of those decisions were

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 3>with a five justice of his majority and with John

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Roberts casting the key vote siding with the liberal in

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 3>those cases. Since then, the Court has shifted even further

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 3>to the right. When Bitter Ginsburgh died and Trump replaced

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 3>her with Amy Coney Barrett, we got a six conservative.

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 3>So the dynamic has changed and Trump will have perhaps

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of an easier path on some of

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>these closely divided cases going forward.

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, you never know, So let's talk about some of

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 2>the areas that could test the Supreme Court in Trump's

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 2>second term. So Trump has vowed to impose a ten

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>to twenty percent tariff on all imported goods. Remind us

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 2>about what happened during his first term with his steal tariffs.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 3>So during his first term, Donald Trump imposed a twenty

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 3>five percent tariff on imported steel. Lower Court said that

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>was within his authority under something known as Section two

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty two of the US Trade Laws, and that says

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the president has broad discretion to impose teriffs for national

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>security reasons, and the Supreme Court let those decisions stands.

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 3>It didn't question those tariffs, So you know, one might

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 3>be inclined to say, oh, the Supreme Court is going

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>to defer to down Trump on tariffs, But now he's

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 3>talking about imposing across the board terriffs ten to twenty

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>percent on everything that comes into the country, and that's

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be harder to justify as a national security measure. Now,

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>there are other provisions of the trade laws, but the

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 3>bottom line is that it's not something where it's clear

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 3>that the Supreme Court is going to be comfortable with

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the president having that much discretion, either because it reads

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>the law as limiting his discression or because there's a

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 3>constitutional matter. The Court doesn't think Congress can give the

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 3>president quite that much discrestion to just impose on his

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 3>own these sweeping tariffs.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 2>One of the key points in his run for office

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 2>was that he was going to crack down on immigration,

0:29:55.200 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and Trump actually promised mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. But

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 2>might he face some legal problems with those mass deportations.

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Nay, sure might. The nation's immigration laws, the Immigration Natralization Act,

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 3>says that there are certain things the executive branch can do,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and certain things it doesn't authorize the executive branch to do.

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>So he's going to have to make his case under

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 3>those laws, and then he also will have the Constitution

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>that he has to deal with and the due process clause.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Under established law, the president can't just pluck somebody, or

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 3>the executive branch can't just pluck somebody and immediately shift

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 3>them out of the country. They have a right to

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 3>certain process. And so when you're talking about supporting millions

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 3>and millions of people, those are going to be real

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 3>legal constraints. And given the mixed record he had at

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court previously on immigration, it's fair to think

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 3>that it won't be a rubber staff at the Supreme Court.

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 3>There may be some real limit on what he can do.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Now. I don't know where in his lineup of importance

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 2>this is. But he's also said that he wants to

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 2>end birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants. I'm

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 2>not even sure you know what that entails.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so with all these things, Donald Trump has

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 3>said a lot of things, and we'll have to wait

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 3>and see exactly what he tries to do. The problem

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 3>is that there's a constitutional provision that has long but

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 3>understood as meaning that if you're born on US soil,

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 3>you are an American citizen. Now, that long standing understanding

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 3>is not universal. There are folks who argue that there's

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 3>a different way to interpret that provision to borrow people

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 3>who come in intentionally to have a baby in the country.

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 3>But in any event, that one may be especially big

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 3>uphill climb that Donald Trump does pursue.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 2>That energy in the environment, he's expected to have almost

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 2>diametrically opposed views from Biden. And what's interesting you point

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>this out is that you know, the Supreme Court has

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.479
<v Speaker 2>been for the last few years attacking and trying to

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 2>dismantle federal regisulatory power. So how does that help or

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 2>hurt him?

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it could come back to bite him. Let's start

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 3>with that big decision known as Low for Dry at

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court just handed down that says that it's

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 3>no longer going to defer to agencies on the meaning

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 3>of ambiguous statute. That is a ruling that toanents of

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 3>regulation generally liked. But it's also a ruling that could

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 3>come back and bte a conservative administration a deregulatory administration

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 3>if what the Trump administration says, either through the EPA

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 3>or some other agency that says, here's how we interpret

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 3>this law. It means we're going to have less regulation

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 3>than we used to the Supreme Court under this ruling

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 3>will say, you know, we're actually going to be the

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 3>one that determine what that law means and what you

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 3>can and cannot do. So it may mean, ironically, perhaps

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 3>closer scrutiny of what the Trump administration is trying to

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 3>do at its administrative agencies.

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 2>So now let's just discuss some of the the cases

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 2>that the Court rejected today, one involving New York City's

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 2>rent control system, which has been up at the Court before.

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 3>It has the Court has turned away on three different

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>occasions now appeals that challenge the rent control restrictions as

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 3>being unconstitutional, and today the Court turned away two appeals,

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 3>one from property owners in New York City and Yonkers,

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 3>another by landmards in Westchester County. They were challenging various

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 3>aspects of New York's sweeping rent control rules, including the

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 3>restrictions on landlords we want to reclaim units for personal

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 3>use or want to convert them to condos or co

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 3>ops to the court as is usually the case when

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 3>it denies a petition. Made no comment, gave me no explanation,

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 3>but one Justice Neil Gorsich said that he would have

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 3>heard the appeals, so I strongly suspected we will see

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 3>future challenges and ultimately it's possible the court will agree

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 3>to take them up. This is an issue whether these

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 3>restrictions unconstitutionally take private property without just compensation. It's an

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 3>issue that many people feel very strongly about, and I

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 3>would be surprised if we don't see more appeals challenging

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the system now.

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 2>still facing that Georgia election interference case, and he got

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 2>turned down by the Supreme Court today as well.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and a preface by saying the prosecution is on

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 3>hold for unrelated reasons. Appeals court in Georgia is considering

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 3>whether the prosecutor finding Willis needs to be removed because

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 3>of a romantic relationship she had with one of the prosecutors.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 3>But what the Supreme Court dealt with is Mark Meadows

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>was trying to move the prosecution from state court in

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the federal court that potentially would give Meadows a better

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 3>jury pool. If this case were to go to trial,

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 3>he was invoking with known as federal officer removal, which

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 3>basically means if you're a federal officer, you might be

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 3>able to say, hey, this case against me should be

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 3>in federal court. And a lower court said, now you're

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 3>no longer a government employee and the stuff you would

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 3>allegedly did was not official business, so you can't use

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 3>this federal officer removal power to shift the federal court.

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 3>The Supreme Court today said we're not going to take

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 3>your appeal, Mark Meadows. One thing just to note, because

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 3>this is a state law prosecution, this is not a

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 3>case where Donald Trump, when it becomes president, can make

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 3>it go away. You can't order prosecutors to drop it.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 3>It's at least possible that this case will go forward,

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 3>perhaps not against Donald Trump, but against other defendants in

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 3>this case. They are all accused of taking part in

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 3>this scheme to overturn the twenty twenty election results, and

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Georgia prosecutors say they violated a state racketeering law.

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 2>The Supreme Court also turned down a lot of turndowns today,

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 2>a case that curbs the Justice Department's ability to prosecute

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 2>people and companies.

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 3>For bid rigging is basically what it sounds like, which is,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 3>if companies that are bidding for sane government contract agree

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 3>that one of the two of them is going to

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 3>get the low bid, that can violate the anti trust laws.

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 3>And the long standing understanding, at least according to the

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department, was if you do that, if you agree

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 3>with a competitor on what your bids are going to be,

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 3>that is basically automatically in anti trust violation, and we

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 3>will prosecute you criminally for that. And a federal appeals

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 3>court in this case coming out of North Carolina said no,

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 3>it's not automatically an anti trust violation. You have to

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 3>look at whether there were potentially pro competitive justifications. So

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this is a case where the two companies also had

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 3>supply or arrangements, so they were bidding for these construction contracts,

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 3>and one of the companies, in addition to bidding on

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 3>the contract, would also supply the needed aluminum to the

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 3>other company. And so what the Fourth Circuit said was

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 3>you have to look at all that stuff to figure

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 3>out whether the agreements on what the bids were going

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 3>to be was actually an anti trust violation. The Justice

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 3>Department went to the Supreme Court and said that's a

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 3>big deal and it's going to make it much harder

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 3>for us to press these criminal price fixing, criminal bid

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 3>rigging prosecutions. And the Supreme Court said, sorry, we're not

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 3>going to hear your appeal, so that tougher standards and

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 3>the Justice Department to meet is now for the foreseeable

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 3>feature in place in five minute Atlantic States. It's something

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 3>to watch because it could be an issue that crops

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 3>up in other circuits and eventually the Supreme Court may

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 3>have to decide it.

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much, Greg, always a pleasure. That's Bloomberg Supreme

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Court Reporter Greg Store And that's it for this edition

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 2>of the Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can always get

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law podcast. You

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 2>can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and at www

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast Slash Law, and remember

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to tune into The Bloomberg Las Show every weeknight at

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 2>ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso and you're

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 2>listening to Bloomberg