1
00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:03,800
Speaker 1: You might have known boas Weinstein back in the day

2
00:00:04,080 --> 00:00:07,680
Speaker 1: for taking on the JP Morgan London whale, And of

3
00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,200
Speaker 1: course he's been known for many many years out of

4
00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:13,000
Speaker 1: the credit world because of course he invests in very

5
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:17,239
Speaker 1: complicated credit assets. But more recently he's been known as

6
00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:20,840
Speaker 1: an activist investor. You have been most recently after for

7
00:00:20,880 --> 00:00:24,160
Speaker 1: a while targeting a series of clothes down funds, very

8
00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:27,920
Speaker 1: let's say, aggressively going after Black Rock. There have been lawsuits,

9
00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:30,880
Speaker 1: and of course proxy battles. Were actually in the center

10
00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:35,080
Speaker 1: of a proxy battle right now with certain funds actually

11
00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,280
Speaker 1: have already been voted on over the last couple of weeks.

12
00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:42,080
Speaker 1: What we don't know and what is a very important thing.

13
00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:45,640
Speaker 1: You've been very vocal on Twitter usually on how these

14
00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:50,640
Speaker 1: battles are going. You've been pretty quiet. How have the

15
00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:52,360
Speaker 1: meetings gone? Have you won anything?

16
00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:56,279
Speaker 2: So it's always nice to aspire to break news.

17
00:00:56,080 --> 00:00:58,200
Speaker 3: On at a conference like this, and it so happens

18
00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:00,720
Speaker 3: that the fund that has gotten the most most of my.

19
00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:02,120
Speaker 2: Attention, which is called big Z.

20
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:06,240
Speaker 3: BIGZ, just had the voting closed at eleven o'clock. So

21
00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:09,360
Speaker 3: I can say preliminarily I didn't count the votes, but

22
00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:12,560
Speaker 3: they've announced it that actually all the Sauba nominees there

23
00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:15,760
Speaker 3: were seven got more votes than all of the Blackrock nominees,

24
00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:19,080
Speaker 3: and four of our nominees got more than two times

25
00:01:19,120 --> 00:01:21,120
Speaker 3: as many votes as black Rock, so more than two

26
00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:23,600
Speaker 3: to one. And when you win an election by two

27
00:01:23,680 --> 00:01:26,240
Speaker 3: to one, the voters have spoken. You know, we all

28
00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:29,440
Speaker 3: know landslide is like sixty forty fifty eight to forty two.

29
00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:32,039
Speaker 3: If more than two thirds voted one way, you know,

30
00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:35,280
Speaker 3: Blackrock can no longer say and that they purport to

31
00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:37,760
Speaker 3: speak for the shareholder and try to create some divisions.

32
00:01:37,760 --> 00:01:41,040
Speaker 3: The shareholder is spoken, we won, and what we The

33
00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:44,160
Speaker 3: reason that there's been litigation, it's been outward. It's us

34
00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:46,600
Speaker 3: to them is because they have put in place election

35
00:01:46,720 --> 00:01:49,120
Speaker 3: rules that would make Vladimir Putin blush.

36
00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:54,240
Speaker 1: So let's step back, big step back. This is one

37
00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:57,320
Speaker 1: fund you said you will voting for today, but they're

38
00:01:57,320 --> 00:02:00,280
Speaker 1: ten funds. Ultimately, what is it that you want want

39
00:02:00,400 --> 00:02:02,640
Speaker 1: out of this strategy? These are closed in funds, so

40
00:02:02,680 --> 00:02:05,520
Speaker 1: you're locking up or Blackrock has locked up capital for

41
00:02:05,640 --> 00:02:08,320
Speaker 1: a longer period of time forever right in many of

42
00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:11,280
Speaker 1: these funds. So what is it that you're trying to

43
00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:14,360
Speaker 1: accomplish by targeting them. I understand that you target them

44
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:17,160
Speaker 1: when they're trading below their net asset value. You want

45
00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:21,239
Speaker 1: them to bring investors whole. But what's the endgame here?

46
00:02:21,320 --> 00:02:23,680
Speaker 1: You won at one fund, what else do you want?

47
00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:24,239
Speaker 2: Yeah?

48
00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,920
Speaker 3: So ETFs, as we all know, can be sold in

49
00:02:26,960 --> 00:02:29,639
Speaker 3: net acid value, or the market maker can redeem them

50
00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:32,400
Speaker 3: for net asset value, and then the manager Blackrock will

51
00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:34,960
Speaker 3: go instell the assets and give back net asset value.

52
00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,880
Speaker 3: Closed in funds, you're trapped. Many of these funds have

53
00:02:37,919 --> 00:02:39,880
Speaker 3: no maturity. They could be around for one hundred years,

54
00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:42,920
Speaker 3: two hundred years, and so there are periods where the

55
00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:46,160
Speaker 3: investors don't want them. And for some reason, there isn't

56
00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:49,240
Speaker 3: a manager more than Blackrock that the investors don't want.

57
00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:52,359
Speaker 3: It's something personal. I'm not looking to not be besties

58
00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:54,160
Speaker 3: with Larry Fink. I'm not looking to be besties with

59
00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:54,639
Speaker 3: Larry Fink.

60
00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:54,800
Speaker 2: You know.

61
00:02:54,919 --> 00:02:58,040
Speaker 3: I basically am just looking to make my investors money.

62
00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:01,160
Speaker 3: And if the discounts are persons, and they're there year

63
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:03,200
Speaker 3: after year, and you can buy it a literal dollar

64
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,240
Speaker 3: for eighty five cents, you have the power, unlike in

65
00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,400
Speaker 3: normal activism, to turn that back into a dollar, because

66
00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:12,000
Speaker 3: if you change the fund structure to being an open

67
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:14,680
Speaker 3: fund like an ETF or a mutual fund, or the

68
00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:17,920
Speaker 3: manager agrees to buy back shares a net asset value,

69
00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:22,040
Speaker 3: just like Franklin Templeton did this month in three energy funds,

70
00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:24,720
Speaker 3: the investor has a chance to go from eighty five

71
00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:26,880
Speaker 3: to one hundred. And as you all know, that's not

72
00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:29,560
Speaker 3: even just fifteen percent, because it's fifteen over eighty five.

73
00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:31,000
Speaker 2: That's an eighteen percent return.

74
00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:34,679
Speaker 3: Big Z today is at greater than a fifteen percent discount,

75
00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:38,080
Speaker 3: and it's a fund that lit its investors' money on fire.

76
00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:40,680
Speaker 3: Now I say that it sounds dramatic. The last three

77
00:03:40,760 --> 00:03:43,520
Speaker 3: years we've been in more or lessible market, not for everything,

78
00:03:43,840 --> 00:03:47,240
Speaker 3: but Big Z has lost more than fifty percent of

79
00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:51,600
Speaker 3: its capital from the stock prices going down and from

80
00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:54,760
Speaker 3: the discounts going up, and so it's lost billions of dollars.

81
00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:59,000
Speaker 3: And here we have investors resoundingly saying we want change

82
00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:01,280
Speaker 3: at the board level. But the part that many of

83
00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:03,160
Speaker 3: you would be shocked to hear. Why I mentioned that

84
00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:06,920
Speaker 3: quip about Putin is that they've decided to set election

85
00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,880
Speaker 3: rules such that in order to replace their board, you

86
00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:13,120
Speaker 3: have to actually get fifty percent of all the shares

87
00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:16,240
Speaker 3: now in big z preliminarily they got about fifty one

88
00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:18,359
Speaker 3: to vote, so we would have needed fifty out of

89
00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:22,760
Speaker 3: fifty one. Okay, winning thirty five to fifteen wasn't good enough,

90
00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:25,839
Speaker 3: and so that kind of math makes it literally impossible.

91
00:04:25,839 --> 00:04:28,920
Speaker 3: But ironically it makes it impossible for them to put

92
00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:31,120
Speaker 3: anyone else on the board because they would have to

93
00:04:31,120 --> 00:04:33,960
Speaker 3: go through their own arcane rules. And so as a

94
00:04:33,960 --> 00:04:37,360
Speaker 3: result to the black Rock nominees each sit on approximately

95
00:04:37,440 --> 00:04:40,599
Speaker 3: seventy boards, seventy different boards. How can they do their

96
00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,839
Speaker 3: job at seventy boards At JP Morgan, each nominee sits

97
00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:47,480
Speaker 3: on one board. It's horrific governance from a firm that's

98
00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:50,839
Speaker 3: an incredible firm that actually prides itself in raising money

99
00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:52,279
Speaker 3: to invest in good governance.

100
00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,080
Speaker 1: Now, I think importantly, as we've mentioned, this is one

101
00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:57,159
Speaker 1: fund that you know the outcome far. Yes, it's a

102
00:04:57,160 --> 00:04:59,960
Speaker 1: big fund for you to be investing in a large discount,

103
00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:02,240
Speaker 1: But what about the rest of them? If you were

104
00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:06,000
Speaker 1: to be on course to lose, how would you react? Right?

105
00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:07,640
Speaker 1: Know anything about those votes?

106
00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:08,080
Speaker 2: Right?

107
00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:09,960
Speaker 3: So I can't announce what's going to happen for the

108
00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,359
Speaker 3: other big funds. Big Z is something like a billion seven.

109
00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:16,040
Speaker 3: It's really large, and that's also why this has captivated

110
00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:18,920
Speaker 3: the media's attention and also individual investors. There's a lot

111
00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:21,640
Speaker 3: of money at stake. Going to NAV just a few

112
00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:24,040
Speaker 3: weeks ago was worth one point four billion dollars to

113
00:05:24,279 --> 00:05:27,039
Speaker 3: mostly mom and pop investors and to our investors who.

114
00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:27,839
Speaker 2: Include mom and pop.

115
00:05:27,880 --> 00:05:30,599
Speaker 3: We manage money in these very strategies for three different

116
00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:36,680
Speaker 3: state pensions millions of pensioneers. So the results are in

117
00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:39,240
Speaker 3: limbo even if we win, because it depends what the

118
00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:41,840
Speaker 3: judge says. We've taken them to court this year for

119
00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:46,160
Speaker 3: this election, this election scheme, and last year we did

120
00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:48,159
Speaker 3: it for a different election scheme, and we won in

121
00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:51,400
Speaker 3: summary judgment against Blackrock against Neuveen, and I have a

122
00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:54,200
Speaker 3: lot of respect for our former our panelist from the

123
00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:57,360
Speaker 3: last session from New Veene, but it's Blackrock, to be fair,

124
00:05:57,480 --> 00:05:59,200
Speaker 3: is not the only one, but they are by far

125
00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,560
Speaker 3: the worst. And it's those legal victories that have helped

126
00:06:02,640 --> 00:06:06,280
Speaker 3: us in order to get good results with other managers

127
00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:08,159
Speaker 3: who don't want to be on the wrong side of

128
00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:08,479
Speaker 3: the law.

129
00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:10,000
Speaker 2: And so that's why this year.

130
00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:13,000
Speaker 3: I was very proud that we won Institutional Investor Activist

131
00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:15,719
Speaker 3: of the Year back to back years and no closed

132
00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:17,520
Speaker 3: in fund activist has ever won it before, and we

133
00:06:17,560 --> 00:06:20,760
Speaker 3: were voted the best activists according to Institutional You're.

134
00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:23,400
Speaker 1: No longer just a closed end fund activist. You're also

135
00:06:23,440 --> 00:06:25,920
Speaker 1: a close and fund manager, given that you've taken over

136
00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:29,400
Speaker 1: some funds and those funds are actually not trading at

137
00:06:29,440 --> 00:06:33,720
Speaker 1: asset value. So how then do you turn around and

138
00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:37,720
Speaker 1: attack black Rock when your own funds are trading at

139
00:06:37,760 --> 00:06:38,360
Speaker 1: a discount.

140
00:06:38,600 --> 00:06:42,160
Speaker 3: So firstly, there's two measures. Let's say there's how they performed.

141
00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:44,839
Speaker 3: How much money did investors make or lose? In not

142
00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:46,719
Speaker 3: you mentioned there's a lot of Blackrock funds where we

143
00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:49,400
Speaker 3: went after There are ten, nine of them the last

144
00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:52,720
Speaker 3: three years have lost investors money. Nine out of ten.

145
00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:54,520
Speaker 3: Think about the market we're in, where the SMP is,

146
00:06:54,520 --> 00:06:56,800
Speaker 3: even where the Russell is. Nine out of ten are

147
00:06:56,880 --> 00:06:59,520
Speaker 3: in the red our fund that we've been managing for

148
00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:02,960
Speaker 3: two and a half years. That fund has actually made

149
00:07:03,040 --> 00:07:04,800
Speaker 3: quite a bit of money, and in twenty twenty two,

150
00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:07,080
Speaker 3: the first year we managed it, it was ranked number

151
00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:09,720
Speaker 3: one out of two hundred and fifty seven funds. Who's

152
00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:13,240
Speaker 3: in where the motive was income income based funds, and

153
00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:16,000
Speaker 3: we were We came in first. So Blackrock can say, well,

154
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:17,920
Speaker 3: their fund trades at a discount too. But what they

155
00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:21,320
Speaker 3: leave aside, this is the rub sonali, is that we

156
00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:24,120
Speaker 3: when we took it over, said to the investors, if

157
00:07:24,120 --> 00:07:25,920
Speaker 3: you want to get out at any V or close

158
00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:27,760
Speaker 3: to any V, we will let you. We conducted a

159
00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:30,280
Speaker 3: tender and then there was there were more people that

160
00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:32,280
Speaker 3: wanted to get out, kind of like you know, looking

161
00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:34,440
Speaker 3: at it from capturing that discount, and we did a

162
00:07:34,520 --> 00:07:37,800
Speaker 3: second tender, so we let investors out of forty five percent.

163
00:07:38,640 --> 00:07:41,000
Speaker 3: Forty five percent of the capital exited and we let

164
00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:43,640
Speaker 3: them out of anyv Blackrock is not willing to do

165
00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:44,400
Speaker 3: anything like that.

166
00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:46,920
Speaker 1: One critique I've heard you make is the idea of

167
00:07:46,960 --> 00:07:51,720
Speaker 1: lowering fees here to attract more investment. But for these funds,

168
00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:54,560
Speaker 1: they tend to run at higher fees in the ETF structure.

169
00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:57,280
Speaker 1: Would you consider lowering fees for your own funds?

170
00:07:57,480 --> 00:07:57,680
Speaker 2: Right?

171
00:07:57,800 --> 00:08:00,160
Speaker 3: So, our fund that we took over in January, the

172
00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:03,080
Speaker 3: tickers SABA, is one of the lowest fee funds in

173
00:08:03,360 --> 00:08:06,440
Speaker 3: the marketplace. It only charges seventy five basis points. The

174
00:08:06,520 --> 00:08:09,320
Speaker 3: other funds is more normal. It charges around right around

175
00:08:09,320 --> 00:08:11,440
Speaker 3: one percent, but it's also you get what you pay for,

176
00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:14,160
Speaker 3: you know. I think most investors appreciate that if the

177
00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:16,800
Speaker 3: fund is going to do interesting things. You mentioned Preditor

178
00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:19,280
Speaker 3: of Wizardry or whatever you said in the beginning, and

179
00:08:19,600 --> 00:08:21,960
Speaker 3: we are doing really neat things in those funds. We're

180
00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:24,920
Speaker 3: not just putting together a long portfolio and letting it sit.

181
00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:28,000
Speaker 3: And so I think our fees are actually very modest.

182
00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:30,760
Speaker 3: It's not for me to say, it's for the investors

183
00:08:30,760 --> 00:08:31,560
Speaker 3: to say, when you look at.

184
00:08:31,520 --> 00:08:34,160
Speaker 1: What you're getting now, I want to read you Blackrock statement,

185
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:35,960
Speaker 1: because of course they have fought back. They have not

186
00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:39,360
Speaker 1: let you jes attize their funds. They said that Blackrock

187
00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:41,880
Speaker 1: and the funds boards remained focused on delivering value for

188
00:08:41,960 --> 00:08:45,640
Speaker 1: all shareholders through concrete actions such as increased distributions and

189
00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:49,200
Speaker 1: discount management programs. SABA is an activist hedge fund looking

190
00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:53,040
Speaker 1: to arbitrage funds to capture quick profits. This attack is

191
00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:57,360
Speaker 1: not about government's performance or discounts. It is about executing

192
00:08:57,440 --> 00:09:01,760
Speaker 1: saba's well known playbook buying can, rolling positions, and forcing

193
00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:05,280
Speaker 1: short term changes that harm retail investors to benefit SABA

194
00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:08,400
Speaker 1: and at touch fund investors. What is your response to

195
00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:13,839
Speaker 1: that and what what do you do after these campaigns?

196
00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:16,680
Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, when I sit here and think, throw

197
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:18,800
Speaker 3: your best at me, Shali, Like they send you a question,

198
00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:21,560
Speaker 3: just please, like give me your toughest question. There's no,

199
00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:23,800
Speaker 3: there's no, we're not We're not. I'm not here to

200
00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:26,439
Speaker 3: be to be, we don't have some friendly arrangement. Ask

201
00:09:26,520 --> 00:09:29,280
Speaker 3: me anything you want. I fear none of their questions

202
00:09:29,280 --> 00:09:32,800
Speaker 3: because they're so absurd. Okay, when they say that we're

203
00:09:32,880 --> 00:09:36,600
Speaker 3: using some purported playbook to help investors in the short term,

204
00:09:36,679 --> 00:09:39,319
Speaker 3: where is the long term pain of making investors money?

205
00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:41,280
Speaker 3: Usually when you say you have a short term motive,

206
00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:44,960
Speaker 3: there's a long term consequence having the funds, have investors

207
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:45,960
Speaker 3: have a chance to get out.

208
00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:48,360
Speaker 2: At full value. Where is where is the negative in that?

209
00:09:48,400 --> 00:09:50,280
Speaker 3: And I'm not going to use my words, Okay, I

210
00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:52,120
Speaker 3: assess which is independent?

211
00:09:52,280 --> 00:09:52,679
Speaker 2: Okay?

212
00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:56,760
Speaker 3: Which stands to tell the small investor how they should

213
00:09:56,840 --> 00:09:59,560
Speaker 3: view this kind of rough contest that you know that

214
00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:03,160
Speaker 3: that we're having. Here's what ISS said about this year. Okay,

215
00:10:03,640 --> 00:10:07,800
Speaker 3: the board is deeply entrenched. A direct intervention remains necessary.

216
00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:10,920
Speaker 3: It is rare to witness a board so brazenly flout

217
00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:14,320
Speaker 3: the most basic of shareholder rights in furtherance of their

218
00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:15,000
Speaker 3: own enrichment.

219
00:10:15,080 --> 00:10:15,959
Speaker 2: I'll read one more.

220
00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:19,160
Speaker 3: The board actions are so grave that they would warrant

221
00:10:19,240 --> 00:10:23,400
Speaker 3: adverse vote for incumbents in an uncontested election. What Isss

222
00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:25,600
Speaker 3: said is that even if we didn't run against Blackrock,

223
00:10:25,800 --> 00:10:28,600
Speaker 3: they would have recommended against their nominees. That is literally

224
00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 3: how bad it is. And I want to just say,

225
00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:33,200
Speaker 3: BlackRock's an amazing firm. They managed ten and a half

226
00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:35,920
Speaker 3: trillion dollars by last account. This might be big to us,

227
00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:38,760
Speaker 3: This might be very big to our investors. This is tiny,

228
00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:41,320
Speaker 3: small potatoes, and it will someday be a case study

229
00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:45,240
Speaker 3: at HBS of a strategy failure that for five billion

230
00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:47,840
Speaker 3: dollars of action of buying back funds at a discount,

231
00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:51,160
Speaker 3: including their own employees who would get to make that money,

232
00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:53,680
Speaker 3: including their shareholders, that they would say, look, we actually

233
00:10:53,679 --> 00:10:55,559
Speaker 3: care about you. We're going to treat you the way

234
00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:57,400
Speaker 3: other managers are treating their shareholders.

235
00:10:57,559 --> 00:10:59,200
Speaker 2: They wouldn't have this problem on their hands.

236
00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:02,840
Speaker 3: They have amazing but for closed end funds, they basically

237
00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:04,959
Speaker 3: have taken the position no one is going to tell

238
00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:07,360
Speaker 3: us what to do, and we're willing to do whatever

239
00:11:07,400 --> 00:11:11,240
Speaker 3: it takes to squash share the rights of the shareholder,

240
00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:13,560
Speaker 3: which is enshrined in the forty Act. The forty Act

241
00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:16,760
Speaker 3: is there, the nineteen forty Act, the Investment Company Act

242
00:11:16,760 --> 00:11:19,480
Speaker 3: is there to protect small investors. They don't need the

243
00:11:19,520 --> 00:11:22,280
Speaker 3: same protections in ETFs because you can vote with your feet,

244
00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:24,080
Speaker 3: you can redeem a mutual fund, you can sell an

245
00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:26,360
Speaker 3: ETF at a ne EV. But they are violating the

246
00:11:26,400 --> 00:11:29,600
Speaker 3: Investment Company Act. Don't trust my words. A judge said

247
00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:31,320
Speaker 3: it last year and we won our case.

248
00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,240
Speaker 1: What is your endgame here, because in addition to yes,

249
00:11:34,280 --> 00:11:37,240
Speaker 1: they did support you on the director push, but they

250
00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:40,720
Speaker 1: did not support you iss that is to terminate black

251
00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:44,240
Speaker 1: Rock as the investment advisor. Is your ultimate end game

252
00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:45,640
Speaker 1: to take over these funds.

253
00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:48,760
Speaker 3: So we've been in this is not my first rodeo.

254
00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,760
Speaker 3: We've been in about I don't know eighty campaigns, and

255
00:11:51,960 --> 00:11:55,640
Speaker 3: across eighty campaigns, only two times did the end result

256
00:11:55,720 --> 00:11:57,199
Speaker 3: come that we took it over. In the first case,

257
00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:59,240
Speaker 3: actually the manager resigned. They said we'll stay on as

258
00:11:59,320 --> 00:12:02,680
Speaker 3: manager until you can find a new manager. So we

259
00:12:02,720 --> 00:12:04,400
Speaker 3: don't come into it with that goal. We come into

260
00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:06,400
Speaker 3: it with the goal of making our investors' money, and

261
00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:08,800
Speaker 3: it turns out all shareholders get to make the same

262
00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:10,720
Speaker 3: amount of money. They don't have to pay the legal

263
00:12:10,720 --> 00:12:13,040
Speaker 3: fees that we're paying. And by the way, Blackrock has

264
00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:15,760
Speaker 3: sent tons of mailers. You saw the chiron and you

265
00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:18,640
Speaker 3: saw the graphic SABA is trying to destroy your fund.

266
00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:21,960
Speaker 3: That mailer went out four or five times. Robo calls

267
00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:23,679
Speaker 3: on and on. I actually receive them because I'm a

268
00:12:23,920 --> 00:12:27,160
Speaker 3: personal shareholder. I receive these these robo calls and these mailers.

269
00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:29,240
Speaker 3: And what's amazing in the case of Big Z is

270
00:12:29,240 --> 00:12:31,200
Speaker 3: the only one I can talk about. They only got

271
00:12:31,240 --> 00:12:33,000
Speaker 3: one out of seven shareholders to.

272
00:12:33,040 --> 00:12:33,560
Speaker 2: Vote for them.

273
00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:35,959
Speaker 3: I mean, it's just it's just incredible. That's despite the

274
00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:38,000
Speaker 3: So what is my end goal? My end goal is

275
00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:40,120
Speaker 3: to turn these funds back to an ev and make

276
00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:42,960
Speaker 3: everyone a billion three not because I'm some sort of

277
00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:46,760
Speaker 3: management McKinsey wizard, because NAV is a billion three away.

278
00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:48,800
Speaker 1: Has this gotten personal?

279
00:12:53,720 --> 00:12:56,280
Speaker 3: I mean I definitely, you know, I definitely a feeling

280
00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:58,680
Speaker 3: it on the stage right, But no, it's really you

281
00:12:58,679 --> 00:13:01,280
Speaker 3: know what it is. I have a pet, my pet, Peeve,

282
00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:05,080
Speaker 3: is this is going to sound a little corny. Is injustice? Okay,

283
00:13:05,160 --> 00:13:08,200
Speaker 3: it's everyone has their own. It's it's abusive. And and

284
00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:10,480
Speaker 3: so I just, having been doing this, having been in

285
00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:13,400
Speaker 3: eighty campaigns before, I just haven't seen it. We actually

286
00:13:13,960 --> 00:13:16,800
Speaker 3: decided this past year and year two of this craziness

287
00:13:16,920 --> 00:13:20,600
Speaker 3: to launch a fund dedicated to the closed in funds

288
00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:23,000
Speaker 3: of a single manager. Okay, we didn't say we're going

289
00:13:23,080 --> 00:13:25,480
Speaker 3: to pick black Rock. We looked at the attributes. What

290
00:13:25,520 --> 00:13:27,360
Speaker 3: are the funds that are at the biggest discounts, What

291
00:13:27,400 --> 00:13:29,439
Speaker 3: are the funds that have the worst governance? I should

292
00:13:29,440 --> 00:13:31,480
Speaker 3: say those two funds you mentioned that we run, we

293
00:13:31,559 --> 00:13:33,080
Speaker 3: put in place the best governance.

294
00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:34,360
Speaker 2: ISS agrees.

295
00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:36,680
Speaker 3: We put in place governance where you count the number

296
00:13:36,720 --> 00:13:39,440
Speaker 3: of votes, not the number of whatever that you know.

297
00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:41,520
Speaker 3: I don't even know how to describe the You know

298
00:13:41,720 --> 00:13:43,720
Speaker 3: that you need half of all the shares to be

299
00:13:43,880 --> 00:13:46,080
Speaker 3: voted in your favor, even if half don't even show up.

300
00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:49,320
Speaker 3: So all of those things annual elections instead of staggered elections.

301
00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:52,320
Speaker 3: It is it is only personal in the sense that

302
00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:54,960
Speaker 3: it is it to me violates. We're so lucky in

303
00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:57,839
Speaker 3: this business. The amount of money that managers management firms

304
00:13:57,840 --> 00:13:59,760
Speaker 3: make they have ten and a half trillion dollars to

305
00:13:59,840 --> 00:14:01,400
Speaker 3: do this because they want.

306
00:14:01,280 --> 00:14:02,600
Speaker 2: To trap capital.

307
00:14:03,720 --> 00:14:06,640
Speaker 3: They're basically blinded by this being long term capital that

308
00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:08,959
Speaker 3: cannot be redeemed and they want to hold on to it.

309
00:14:09,200 --> 00:14:11,520
Speaker 3: And so it to me, it's it's like a very

310
00:14:11,559 --> 00:14:14,480
Speaker 3: noble fight. And we've received you can just look on Twitter,

311
00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:17,640
Speaker 3: hundreds and hundreds of positive comments and basically not one

312
00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:23,600
Speaker 3: negative comment. So I do enjoy the retail coming along

313
00:14:23,640 --> 00:14:24,120
Speaker 3: for the ride.

314
00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:25,760
Speaker 2: Yes, in that sense, it's personal.

315
00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:29,280
Speaker 1: So also to be clear, this is an investment strategy.

316
00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:31,920
Speaker 1: This is a strategy that is meant to return money

317
00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:35,280
Speaker 1: to shareholders. It's not just on concept. How profitable is

318
00:14:35,320 --> 00:14:37,600
Speaker 1: it and how big of a strategy has it become.

319
00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:40,720
Speaker 1: Has SABA really pivoted from becoming a tail fund to

320
00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:41,680
Speaker 1: an activist fund?

321
00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:43,760
Speaker 3: Well, give me a tail event and I'll be I'll

322
00:14:43,760 --> 00:14:45,840
Speaker 3: be a tail fund manager again. But we've had what

323
00:14:45,880 --> 00:14:47,640
Speaker 3: have we had like forty straight days of the S

324
00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:50,080
Speaker 3: and P not going down even three quarters of a percent?

325
00:14:50,760 --> 00:14:53,400
Speaker 3: I am it is a It is a big business

326
00:14:53,400 --> 00:14:55,240
Speaker 3: for us. We own six billion of closed end funds,

327
00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:57,280
Speaker 3: a full third of them or just this single manager

328
00:14:57,280 --> 00:14:59,720
Speaker 3: black Rock and and many of them we think have

329
00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:02,360
Speaker 3: good governance, they just are at discounts. We don't have

330
00:15:02,400 --> 00:15:05,120
Speaker 3: a governance issue. So it's it's it is quite a

331
00:15:05,120 --> 00:15:07,280
Speaker 3: big business for us, and I can't really on this

332
00:15:07,320 --> 00:15:09,440
Speaker 3: stage speak to the returns. But we have an ETF,

333
00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:12,440
Speaker 3: for example, the ticker is CEFS. It's been around for

334
00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:14,840
Speaker 3: more than seven years, and people can plug in how

335
00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:18,000
Speaker 3: that did versus the three other ETFs that own closed

336
00:15:18,040 --> 00:15:21,000
Speaker 3: in funds. It's done, It's done very well.

337
00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:21,520
Speaker 1: How well?

338
00:15:23,080 --> 00:15:23,440
Speaker 2: All right?

339
00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:25,400
Speaker 3: Well, if someone were to plug it into Bloomberg and

340
00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:28,160
Speaker 3: they put CFS and then they put the invesco version

341
00:15:28,280 --> 00:15:30,880
Speaker 3: or the first trust version, I think for the last

342
00:15:30,880 --> 00:15:33,280
Speaker 3: three years, and it's held a lot of it, it's

343
00:15:33,320 --> 00:15:34,920
Speaker 3: been in fixed income, which is you know, had a

344
00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:37,880
Speaker 3: tough time. Those other funds have made between zero and

345
00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:39,440
Speaker 3: two percent and we've made ten percent.

346
00:15:39,880 --> 00:15:43,680
Speaker 1: So let's broaden out here again, because you know, people

347
00:15:43,720 --> 00:15:45,800
Speaker 1: have looked at you for credit markets for a long time.

348
00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:48,960
Speaker 1: When we talk about the closed un funds strategy, there's

349
00:15:49,040 --> 00:15:52,240
Speaker 1: a deeper question. It's not really just about closed on funds.

350
00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:55,280
Speaker 1: There's a whole push by the private acset industry to

351
00:15:56,080 --> 00:15:59,000
Speaker 1: push into retail, to push into interval funds to find

352
00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:02,760
Speaker 1: new strategies to bring money in. Are all of those

353
00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:04,800
Speaker 1: funds vulnerable to activists?

354
00:16:05,480 --> 00:16:10,000
Speaker 3: So by the laws of depending on the structure, some are,

355
00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:12,320
Speaker 3: some are not. You know, in the interval fund you

356
00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:14,520
Speaker 3: generally you only have the right to redeem five percent,

357
00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:17,440
Speaker 3: so you're getting five percent back per quarter, but you can't.

358
00:16:18,560 --> 00:16:21,200
Speaker 3: They also invest generally in deeply liquid assets, so you

359
00:16:21,200 --> 00:16:24,320
Speaker 3: couldn't just sell Microsoft or IBM and raise the cash.

360
00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:27,640
Speaker 3: So it is interesting for me as having been in

361
00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,040
Speaker 3: credit at the forefront of all the innovation that came

362
00:16:30,120 --> 00:16:34,240
Speaker 3: after nineteen ninety eight, with with credit derivatives and synthetic

363
00:16:34,280 --> 00:16:36,960
Speaker 3: securitization and all of this sort of stuff. And back

364
00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:39,400
Speaker 3: then retail investors were redeemed.

365
00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:40,440
Speaker 2: Unsuitable to own these things.

366
00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:42,320
Speaker 3: You couldn't own high yields really if you were not

367
00:16:42,400 --> 00:16:45,680
Speaker 3: a qualified investor. And now whether it's Colo tranches, you know,

368
00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:49,720
Speaker 3: alphabet soup, and so this has been an amazing boom

369
00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:53,240
Speaker 3: for the largest asset managers, the amazing managers like in

370
00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:56,520
Speaker 3: Aries or Apollo that can bring these products their reputations

371
00:16:56,960 --> 00:16:59,560
Speaker 3: and good governance, I should say, because we also see

372
00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:02,440
Speaker 3: a lot of good governance JP Morgan has great governance

373
00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:03,840
Speaker 3: on their closed in funds.

374
00:17:03,760 --> 00:17:07,920
Speaker 2: And we see that. You know, there is huge investor demand.

375
00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:10,840
Speaker 3: The private credit space was a cottage industry a decade

376
00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:13,120
Speaker 3: ago at less than a quarter trillion dollars. Now it's

377
00:17:13,119 --> 00:17:15,600
Speaker 3: one and a half trillion, and it's growing like gangbusters.

378
00:17:15,600 --> 00:17:19,320
Speaker 3: So this kind of liquid credit investing that you're referring

379
00:17:19,320 --> 00:17:21,639
Speaker 3: to allows the manager to lock up for many years.

380
00:17:21,880 --> 00:17:24,480
Speaker 3: It's great for their stock price, it may be great

381
00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:26,560
Speaker 3: for their investors, but you know, we are in a

382
00:17:26,560 --> 00:17:28,840
Speaker 3: little bit of a zero sum world. Like if making

383
00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:31,800
Speaker 3: loans that are secured that are safe, that of you know,

384
00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:34,560
Speaker 3: a lot of acid coverage at twelve percent or thirteen

385
00:17:34,600 --> 00:17:38,600
Speaker 3: percent is great for areas, it probably ain't great for

386
00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:43,280
Speaker 3: the for the borrower, especially in this higher for longer world.

387
00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:44,840
Speaker 3: So just to close on that, just to say, I

388
00:17:44,880 --> 00:17:47,480
Speaker 3: think people just even three months ago, we're really expecting

389
00:17:47,560 --> 00:17:49,800
Speaker 3: rates to come down and that thirteen to go to

390
00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:52,720
Speaker 3: twelve eleven ten and really alleviate that pressure. But I

391
00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:55,119
Speaker 3: think higher for longer we're headed for some sort of

392
00:17:55,119 --> 00:17:59,520
Speaker 3: collision course between If we have that in conjunction with

393
00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:01,240
Speaker 3: an economic slowdown, we are going.

394
00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:02,080
Speaker 2: To have a default cycle.

395
00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:04,880
Speaker 3: We are going to see which firms were good at

396
00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:07,760
Speaker 3: private credit and which we're not, because private credit has

397
00:18:07,800 --> 00:18:11,840
Speaker 3: been touted as this like amazing thing, almost like NFTs

398
00:18:12,040 --> 00:18:14,960
Speaker 3: or you know, chatch ept. I mean, what is private credit?

399
00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:18,080
Speaker 3: You're you're making loans to smaller companies. I mean, how

400
00:18:18,200 --> 00:18:21,520
Speaker 3: is that sexy? No, you know so, but it's very

401
00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:24,719
Speaker 3: sexy for Aris and Apollo and and I look at

402
00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:28,600
Speaker 3: it like this amazing force that will have hiccups in

403
00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:29,360
Speaker 3: the years to come.

404
00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:32,040
Speaker 1: Now, one more question before you before I let you go,

405
00:18:32,440 --> 00:18:35,879
Speaker 1: is you know we have a major catalyst around the corner,

406
00:18:35,920 --> 00:18:40,720
Speaker 1: that is the US presidential election. As a massive investor

407
00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:43,680
Speaker 1: in credit and also as somebody who looks at volatility

408
00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:47,119
Speaker 1: very closely, what are you thinking about headed into that

409
00:18:47,240 --> 00:18:49,600
Speaker 1: election cycle and what comes out of it? How to position?

410
00:18:50,240 --> 00:18:53,520
Speaker 3: Yeah, so you know, it's it's coming closer every day,

411
00:18:53,520 --> 00:18:56,520
Speaker 3: and it warn't our attention. And we'll also if there

412
00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:59,600
Speaker 3: is a change in the presidency, you'll have a president

413
00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:04,440
Speaker 3: that people consider as someone that will be less will

414
00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:06,600
Speaker 3: be more unfettered, let's say, and maybe have scores to

415
00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:09,040
Speaker 3: settle and have views about how to undo things. And

416
00:19:09,080 --> 00:19:13,040
Speaker 3: so change generally means volatility. So it's really reflexive to think, Okay,

417
00:19:13,080 --> 00:19:15,400
Speaker 3: if Trump is elected, there'll be a lot of volatility. Now,

418
00:19:15,720 --> 00:19:18,240
Speaker 3: he also is very interested in the stock market going up,

419
00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:20,920
Speaker 3: which you know usually think about in conjunction with lower volatility.

420
00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:23,640
Speaker 3: So you know, so, but might might the ways he

421
00:19:23,760 --> 00:19:27,400
Speaker 3: does that, whether it's a new Fed governor cause.

422
00:19:27,400 --> 00:19:30,639
Speaker 2: Some short term short term gain for actual long term pain.

423
00:19:30,520 --> 00:19:32,439
Speaker 3: Where interest rates and the front end come down but

424
00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,119
Speaker 3: in the back end go up, and and you know

425
00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:38,160
Speaker 3: certain firms are affected that way. As when I think

426
00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:41,320
Speaker 3: through that Trump means volatility. I also the other side

427
00:19:41,359 --> 00:19:44,719
Speaker 3: of me thinks back to twenty seventeen. We had Trump

428
00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:47,160
Speaker 3: and we had Kim jongun and he was calling him

429
00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:49,119
Speaker 3: rocket Man. He was kind of taunting him, and I

430
00:19:49,119 --> 00:19:52,640
Speaker 3: remember during Rocketman, it wasn't an Elton John reference. Right

431
00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:56,240
Speaker 3: at that moment, the Vics hit single digits. The VIX

432
00:19:56,359 --> 00:19:57,960
Speaker 3: was the all time, it was at nine. I like,

433
00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:00,240
Speaker 3: I was crying because I'm a long volatility matter. During

434
00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:02,320
Speaker 3: the VICK is literally at nine, and so you know,

435
00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:06,520
Speaker 3: the Trump presidency is, if it happens, is going to

436
00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:09,119
Speaker 3: be in many ways unpredictable, So you think they'll be

437
00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:11,760
Speaker 3: volatility but let's also remember there was also a lot

438
00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:15,000
Speaker 3: of economic stability. Though maybe because we're in a zero

439
00:20:15,000 --> 00:20:17,720
Speaker 3: percent interest rate world and now having seen the excess

440
00:20:17,760 --> 00:20:21,200
Speaker 3: of that and the inflation, maybe we're not going to

441
00:20:21,440 --> 00:20:23,440
Speaker 3: go back to that world, and they'll be volatility whether

442
00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:25,400
Speaker 3: Trump is elected or Biden is reelected.

443
00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:26,640
Speaker 1: Who's better for the bond market?

444
00:20:27,640 --> 00:20:28,000
Speaker 2: Biden?

445
00:20:28,359 --> 00:20:34,920
Speaker 3: Why he's well, because I think he's less motivated by

446
00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:37,440
Speaker 3: the stock market and more motivated by what's good for America.

447
00:20:38,359 --> 00:20:40,760
Speaker 3: On the subject of bonds, I'm not getting that political.

448
00:20:41,080 --> 00:20:41,600
Speaker 2: Just bonds.

449
00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:45,359
Speaker 1: We will leave it there, Boaz, thank you so much

450
00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:47,400
Speaker 1: for taking all our questions. That as BoA's mind set

451
00:20:47,400 --> 00:20:48,159
Speaker 1: of SABA Capital