WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: 0-3 Preseason a Cause for Concern?

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a break? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely ready

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>for a break. Yeah, and so much for that. It's

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>time for the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com with

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a Monday. It's Monday, two August twenty seventh,

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen, Season fourteen, episode number bettage two. Welcome

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Break. I'm Derrek keep thirty two. Thank you.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Why you didn't understand what I said? No, I ain't

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>hear it. I wanted to make sure I was on

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the same page of what I keep up. I do

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>keep us Scandric episode, It is a scandridas grumpy. Oh well,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>do you have to ask for that? I'm a Lumba,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Lumba. Welcome to the s WBC Mortgage Studios. We're

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>coming off a game Cowboys lose last night, twenty seven

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to nothing. No, no, no, no, you're just gonna short

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>change Brett Marr like that. Oh sorry, right, No I did,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I did. I don't even remember those last three points

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to three. All right, so twenty seven to three, Yeah,

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get picked out. Friends, Okay, maybe they didn't

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>get shut out, But we're gonna talk. We're gonna put

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>that all in perspective today because I've seen all kinds

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of stuff on social media, which of course social media

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>always goes a little crazy with things. But we're gonna

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>put it in perspective today. We're gonna talk to you

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>guys about what we think that all means, if it

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>means anything with it being a preseason game and with

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the guys that the Cowboys had out there, but I

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>do throughout the show, I want to hear from you, guys.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I want you to give us a call and let

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think, what maybe you're concerned about

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>as as you watch that game last night, as we

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have one more preseason game this week and then next

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>week it all turns to the regular season. I want

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to know what fans are concerned about. What are the

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>things that that you coming off this preseason are are

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>wondering if the Cowboys are gonna be able to get

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>better at and be able to be able to compete

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in those areas call us eight eight eight eight five

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>five two two nine seven, So you can chime into

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. How's everybody doing today. We're good, I'm awesome, Yeah, good, perfect,

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's let's get into Let's get into

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the conversation on the game. I guess as a big

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>picture thing, I'd like you guys to tell me first

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>how dismissive or not you are of what happened last night. Obviously,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the starters on offense primarily didn't play. The veteran starters

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for the most part didn't play. There were a couple

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>of defensive starters that didn't play. Although the first team

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>defense did get a chance to get out there, Cowboys

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>just look completely out of it from from the word go, and,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as we said, end up losing twenty seven two three.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Tell me how dismissive you are or not of what

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you saw last night and what it means for the future.

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Nick Well, I thought, you know, let's let's look at

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the positives. I mean, the defense. First team

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>defense did play and they played really well. They I

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>think they posted a shut out, you would say in

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the first half. A couple of touchdowns were not on

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the defense. I thought they've looked good all preseason, they

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>very fast. Uh, there's some very positive things to point

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to for that defense. They were trying to play. They

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>had their starters out there, and they look really good.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's the positive thing that came out. I'll let

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>someone else talk about maybe the flip side of it,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the difference talk about the negative. Whoative the one negative?

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of negative. I mean, I get I get

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>upset a little bit of the people that just kind

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of go off on Twitter and get so upset about

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys losing the game. And you gotta remember, these

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>are not your first team guys. So there's a big

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>difference there. And someone sent me a comment out like, oh,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>are you saying they didn't make any effort. They weren't

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>putting an effort out there. It's not about effort. Obviously.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a big difference between backup guys and the starters

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>now as far as death goes, and that has been

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a concern right now. Who the backup guys are at

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this point is very important, and clearly what we saw

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday last night was not very promising at all as

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>far as backup guys. I guess there's also a difference

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>when you combine several starters and then you have maybe

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.679
<v Speaker 1>a one backup guy that we shouldn't be seeing something

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>as bad as we saw last night. But this does

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>raise a lot of questions. If I'm calling it a wash,

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a complete and like, I don't view it particularly

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>good or bad one way or the other for either

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball, honestly. And the reason why is

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you can look at this across a variety of spectrums.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Defense looked really, really good. I think we would all

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>agree that they did, and they have, to their credit,

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald and David Johnson didn't play in this game

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the same way that Zack Martin and Travis Frederick didn't.

0:04:56.240 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>The offense looked pretty awful pathetic. They were going against

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Jones and Patrick Peterson. I mean, it's it's hard

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to do a full evaluation with the way this is

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>all mismatched. I think the best way to look at

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this is just to literally individually pick things out, Like

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe the most encouraging thing from the whole game for

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>me is that I thought Joe Looney looked like he

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>played pretty well going against who he went against. Playing

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with Lyle Collins and Connor Williams, obviously Zack and Tyron

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>weren't out there. I thought he played really well. I thought, obviously, again,

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>you gotta keep the personnel in mind with the defense.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But that is an encouraging trend over the course of

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>three preseason games that you feel good about what they've done.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, again, just kind of a wash, and

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, I'll even I'll own it. I didn't

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>want to see good players out there, and that's what

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you get when you don't put good players out there.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>It was boring and ugly, but it's better than the alternative,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>which is talking about somebody not being available right now

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>because they got hurt. So we know Dave how Dave

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>falls on that for YouTube. You think that was the

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>right decision, not letting some of the a lot of

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>those veterans play last night, because when you think about

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it in the grand scheme of things, I think Dave

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>has made a point that you know, at the end

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of the day, doesn't really matter you still these guys

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>are still going to be ready to play when the

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>season begins. But if you're one of the people that

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>believes you gotta play football to be ready to play football,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you're running back is not going to play a preseason snap.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Your middle line, I mean, you're your best linebacker's gonna

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>play what a few snaps had he gotten in the

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>second week of preseason. Your quarterback won't play for this

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>week or next week probably, So there's a ton of

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>guys that just won't get if you believe in that,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>won't get that kind of seasoning heading into the season. Yeah,

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that this is the first time

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen Zeke nine to get any carries at

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>all in the preseason. But it's not like he got

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton. I mean, this is like down from like

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>six or seven to zero. And I think in that

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Seattle game is rookie year, he had a few there

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and he you know, he hasn't actually started out the

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>seasons that great. Um. Anyways, the first two games, I

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>think for the first of us two seasons, he hasn't

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>been that effective. The second game last year was one

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of the worst games we've ever seen from him. So

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's different theories on exactly, you know, how

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he gets ready to play. He's had an outstanding Zeke

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>He's had an outstanding training camp, and I think that

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>he'll he'll be fine, But I would have liked to

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit. Sorry to answer your question so long,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think the domino effect of Zach then Travis

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>led to you know what, not tiring, so not Dak,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>so not Zeke, And it just makes sense that way

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that that was the best decision. And I don't think

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>those guys, I mean, they're not going to really improved

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the spam of like a week and a half.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know what you're getting with Zee, you know

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting with Dak and all those guys there.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So this time, I would say this is the right

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>time and the time that he's needed to see the

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>guys that we did get to see last night, and

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>crucial time for them. I was expecting to see a

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>little more that made you feel better, especially let's say

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the backup quarterback position. That was pretty disappointing, but it's

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess this is where we're at right now.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But yes, to answer your question, I think it was

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the best decision to keep them out. Speaking of the

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterbacks, four of the eight turnovers last night came

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>from those two quarterbacks, Cooper Rush Mike White eight eight

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>eight turnovers eight eight turnovers. When was the last time

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw a game with eight turnovers like preseason, regular season.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, like any any level of football, Like

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's stuff like where you're from, Like when you

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>watch a high school team where the center can't snap

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball, Like yeah, anyway, And the worst part is

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a minus eight in the you know ratio.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't get any in return about that. You would

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think if you have you would think that if you

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have eight turnovers, you'll at least be like minus six,

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like maybe your defense gets you too. Did

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you hear minus eight? I asked Jason, I asked Jason

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Garrett. Yeah, the Garrett. I asked him in the

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>press conference about these turnovers, and he just went down

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the line and he was just like, well this one, this,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, this play was bad. Then this interception, he's

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta do this. So there's two. What else? He's like, oh,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you know Rod Smith did, there's three, there's four.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's getting all the way. He's like, how

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>many are we had? Seven? It was like, yeah, he

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>went through them all. This is like a little while.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>This is like yeah, I kind of well, here's the thing.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>A guy that We've been talking about Lance Lenore and

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in his role here and if he does make the team,

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it last week and when you see

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>these are the this is the time that he needs

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to show up and prove that he can do that,

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and especially especially in special teams. And again, that is

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that he messed up last year

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as far as when he was given a chance, we

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>saw that Again clearly there was not really an improvement there.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>So that was disappointing. And the tough part for him

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is that that isn't even a job he probably was

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to win as a returner. Yet it could be

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing that might get him keep him off this team,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>which it is tragic because I think he's had a

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>really good preseason, really good training camp as a receiver

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>and that may have been undone a bit we'll only

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>see that, but it may have been undone. You know,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I hear your point about, well, he wasn't making these

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>plays a special teams. You know, of why he was

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy candidate to make the team because of what

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he was doing at receiver. However, you get the opportunity

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>when whenever it is and the lights come on and

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we've said this for years now. These receivers aren't going

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to make the team out how they catch, how they block,

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>how they tackle, how they play on special teams. So

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to perform, and you know he did. He

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>did have one bad play. The other one, you know,

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>the other one's kind of a there was a real

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>bad play on Byron Jones. He's got to be a

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit more aware of that. Yeah, So when you

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>look at those those four in those four turnovers that

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>came from the quarterbacks specifically, how concerned you more concerned

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>today than you were three days go about the backup

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position. I have a hard time articulating how I

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>feel about that because I don't think Cooper Rush is

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>bad by any stretch. But I don't think at any

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>point in either of these two seasons have I been

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>convinced that he's like the answer at backup quarterback. Even

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>when he was killing it last year. I mean, he

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>played really well, but I would have had not much

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>more confidence in him to lead this team for a

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>prolonged period of time than Kellen Moore. You know, I mean,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's a little bit better than Kellen Moore, but

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>he's not you know, he's not going to go Kurt

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Warner on you and like guide your team to the

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl or anything like that. And so I'm kind

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of I'm like, I don't think he's good enough, but

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think most backup quarterbacks are good enough, and honestly,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and then in the back of my head you think

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>about Nick Foles and what he did for the Eagles,

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and I know that's the that's the ready made answer

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>anybody's gonna have for you. Is if I say a

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback doesn't really matter anyway, that's that's a great point.

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It can we can, and I'm not. I'm just I'm

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not sure that anybody on this roster is the guy

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to be this team's backup. But I don't think the

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are going to go shopping for one. But the

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting part there is, can't he get to the point

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>where he's good enough now be Nick Foles? No? Right, No,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. And the reason why I can

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>say that it is with those two throws that I saw.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>You cannot play in this league if you can't make

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>all of the throws like that. Now you can be

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a good backup. Jason Garrett did it for years. Jason

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Garrett could not make all the throws, I mean, and

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a different game plan when Akeman came out.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's just the way that it is. That's okay, there

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are some quarterbacks that are that way. But you just

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>look at that out throw. Peterson was sitting all over it.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Now a little bit different knowing that he's not gonna

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get beat deep, they're not going to test them and

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>all that. But the one in the red zone, same thing.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It was late, it was not it was it was

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not on a rope. It needed to be there. But

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't that more about or at least could that be

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>more about decision making? That number one, he was in

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>decisive can get it out as soon as he should have,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>and then it was probably a bad decision on the comeback.

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a bad decision to throw that ball in

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the first place because of the tight coverage there, and

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>he was he basically was coming back like he the

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>defenders saw that there was an opportunity there. He's gonna

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>bite on that, And so to me, I think of

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that more as bad decision making, not decisive enough to

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>get the ball out when it was when the player

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was when the receiver was open, then I do that

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have the arm string to make the throw well.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>And the question was, do you think that he's a

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>guy that could develop into that? And I don't really

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>think so because of because of the arm string. Now

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you can get better at some of those other things

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that the decision making and all that. These quarterbacks do

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>get better. But I think he either have those tools

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or you don't. It doesn't mean he can't go and

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>win games for your two or three weeks. It doesn't

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>mean that because it got quarterbacks can do that. But

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>I just don't. I don't mean I don't think he's

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>one that's going to develop into a starter for some

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>other team one year. I don't think that. You said

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>right there that a cornerback is going to bite on

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that play, and you're right. But the thing that concerns

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>me is like bite implies that it was a gamble,

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Like Patrick Peterson diagnosed that place so well and was

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>so much better than Cooper Rush in that moment that

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like SloMo, like it wasn't a gamble. He

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was like, I'm taking this to the house and he

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>knew it. Yeah, if I gave that impression that was

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not the impression. You're right, Patrick Peterson knew from the

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>beginning what was happening in ideally that is a gamble,

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>where like there was the cornerbacks got to make that choice.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's how much better Patrick Peterson was in that

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>moment that that play was just on a platter for him.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And much of what you want to see, right, much

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of what we've seen from Cooper Rush though, has been

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>against backup. Yeah, he's never seen, so he's now starting

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to see. He last night he got to see there's

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a big difference between the backups and the start. You know,

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this offense though, I'll say this, if Scott Lanahan is

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to run this type of offense, there's

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot more pick sixes because you have

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to you have to show that this dink and dunk

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff will work every now and again. But if you

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have the threat of a deep ball, then you know,

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason why Patrick Peterson should be one hundred

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>percent convinced that Tavon Austin is not going to run

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>by him, but he was because they're not gonna throw

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it deep like that. They're not going to do that. Well,

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they tried Michael Gallup and not and and Cooper rush

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>overthrew Beasley, which I love that play. No, it was

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a good that was a good play design. But but

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that to me, was that the play design at the

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>watch that again? Or did it kind of develop into that?

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Did he kind of break off? I mean, was he

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>running deep or was it kind of a breakdown? I

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>was like a double move type of situation. But I

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's funny because we Jerry Jones talked about

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it after the game, and he kind of talked out

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of both sides of his mouth. He was like, I'm

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not ready to say that we're gonna look for guys,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not ready to say that I feel great

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about these two either, which that's kind of how I

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>feel where. I'm like, if Dak Prescott for whatever reason,

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>were to be unavailable for a period of lengthy period

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of time, like more than a game, I would be

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty worried. But I don't know how realistic it is

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to think that you're going to drastically upgrade this position.

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I know buddy at home is yelling about teddy Bridge

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater right now too much. I was gonna say, what

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are you giving up for that, which and again, if

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Nick Voles hadn't just won the Super Bowl for the Eagles,

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I would just be like, everybody's screwed at backup quarterback.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't completely discount that, Like, you can be better

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>off at backup quarterback than this team is, clearly, but

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're gonna do about it right now.

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>They could go get your him idol drew on a blank.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Who's my idol? I don't even know if he's been

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>hellable or not. Jay Cutler, Oh god, no please, I

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>mean he is my idol, but he's a reality TV star.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Now they don't need that. You know what I would

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have liked to see and touchdown, Yes, that would be yeah, no,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>but in the two first games. I mean, the preseason

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to me is the perfect time to try out different

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>things and not worry about the outcome of the game

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. Obviously, but I would have liked to see

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>them give some revs or like, maybe I don't know,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>few snaps to Cooper Rush and even Mike White behind

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole first team offense and just kind of get

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a taste of what your backup quarterback could look like

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>when and if that time comes, but with all the

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>right guys around him, because again, we know Dak Prescott

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>as a quarterback. Yes he's good, but he's not at

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that greatness level. A lot of his good things about

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>him comes along from the online and what they are

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>able to do in the time they're able to buy him.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So I would have loved to see that happening. Obviously,

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>what isn't going to happen last night's game, but the

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>first two games, when you're still kind of unsure of

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>these two backup guys, why not give them a try,

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit, to get a quick little taste.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>The tough part about that is, though, then you got

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to make those decisions of are you going to take

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Dak off the field while your first team is still

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>out there? And that means that that he's not getting

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>those opportunities to get himself ready for the season. H

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And does that or does that mean you're going to

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>take him out the normal time you would, but you're

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep those other guys tying Zach, you know, out

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there longer to be able to give this guy a

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>look behind. That's the tough part. And I'm not saying

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you're right or wrong. I'm just saying that's too serious.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But that is just that's what you got to think about.

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>That's what the coaches have to think about, is we

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are exposing our guys a little bit longer, or we're

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>not giving Dak the time that maybe he might need

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to get ready for the season. That's the hard part,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. And this could always be famous last words,

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, you're young at quarterback. Dak is six two,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>two thirty and twenty four years old. This could be,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, knock on wood, but I'm I'm way more

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>worried about other aspects of this team than your depth

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. Because da Dak, well, I mean, don't do it,

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>don't do it, don't do it, don't do it. I

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>mean injuries happening football. But Dak has given me no

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>reason to be fearful for his health. Again, I can

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hear people screaming at me. I'm sorry, but I just

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>don't understand that logic because college football players get hurt

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>all the time, so to high school kids. I wasn't

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about Travis Frederick, but again, look what happened. It's

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the same logic y'all always use with me when

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to play for people in the preseason.

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>They're like, injuries happen. Yeah, I mean obviously something terrible

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>could happen to anybody playing, but at some point you

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>just gotta do what you gotta do. Like, am I

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna give up a third round pick for Teddy Bridgewater

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm afraid Dak's gonna get hurt? I don't really

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. You have one, because you're gonna

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have to give it up for something I'd rather. I'd

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>rather give that up for safety. Who can help me

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>right now than a guy who I hope well actually

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>about to go to break. When we come back from break,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we do have to talk about the defense. They played

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>really well, but they did sustain another injury at the

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>safety position, and what does that mean. Let's do that

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. Cowboys fans know that the second best of

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>anything simply won't cut it, and your skincare should be

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>no different. A long time locker room favorite of the

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>players and the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Dallas based Jack Black is the number one best selling

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>men's skincare brand in the country because we make products

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that help guys look, smell and feel better. Visit get

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys to get ten dollars

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>off your first order of fifty dollars or more. Jack

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Black Look Good, Smell good, Feel good, official men's skincare

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>brand of the Dallas Cowboys. Star Sports Tours is the

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>only official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline access and photo

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.959
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk x's and os with Senior Director

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>truly me, Brian broad Us. You can trust the official

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys travel dot com

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to book your travel package today. Before there was a draft.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You get sized up a cowboy by three simple factors.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Decrease at his hat, the bend of his brim, and

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>his unbending attitude a man. Stetson didn't just protect him

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>from what life through at him. It projected a rugged,

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American made with pride.

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Right here in Texas, there's still the unofficial crowd of

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is proud to be

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Find a retailer nearest

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to you at Stetson dot com slash Cowboys. What does

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan? It means

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got the passion and the heart to do your

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's why when

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the game's on the line, you're on your feet, whether

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're more

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation.

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And so is AT and T doing their part to

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season law AT

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to the Brink, Welcome Back. It's the second segment of

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The Break live from the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you guys take its time with us today

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>we're dissecting that game from last night. I think that

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the crew kind of feels like it was much ado

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about nothing, literally and figuratively. But let's get into the defense.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought Dave you mentioned earlier in the first segment

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that the defense, you thought the defense, first team defense

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>played really well. That's now three games where all we've

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>seen of this first team defense is really good football.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>How much are you buying into into that kind of

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>hype and do you think that this team really has

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the ability maybe to make this defense not just pretty good,

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but maybe possibly elite. I'm buying everything I'm seeing so far,

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>which is like, it's really promising. It's still preseason. I

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>thought Sean Lee had a great quote last night. I'm paraphrasing,

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but he essentially said, we gotta we gotta put the

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>stats and the wins and the takeaways and this performance

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on paper for real before we can really talk about anything.

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And as of right now, we've proven nothing. And I

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's true. They the early returns are fantastic, Like

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the linebackers are active, Randy Gregory

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>looked fantastic last night. The whole pass rush really and

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>that's even without Malie Collins playing. The cornerbacks not I mean,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Cheeto and Byron have been good all training camp, but

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the guys on the back end of the depth chart

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>really rebounded. I thought Jordan Lewis played great last night.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Char Various Ward made two or three really nice plays

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>before he got hurt. Cavon Frasier was flying around a

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>lot to like, I gotta see it when it matters before.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting here trying to convince anybody that this is

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a dominant because every time I think about I agree

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>with that everything he's saying. Every time I think about

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>how good this defense is looking, and it has looked really,

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>really good. Can't you just see Christian McCaffrey just kind

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of going off in that first game, you know, in

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina and break down and the linebacker wasn't there, and

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, these forty five yards you don't

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>see it. I don't, and maybe I should. The reason

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>why I don't is because I think maybe for I

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say the first time, but maybe first time in

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I think they got the kind of

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>linebackers that can run. I mean, I've seen they've had

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>some linebackers that are pretty good. These linebackers can run.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody's running away from these guys. They can,

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>they can move, and I think from that standpoint, like

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe a receiver does that. A guy like Christian McCaffrey,

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>though I'm not certain he can do that against this team.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Well he can run, Yeah, he can run, he can run. Yeah.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And then they have another guy too, Samuel. I think

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>we're not Samuel. Oh yeah. I'm just my my thing is.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And I thought about that because you know, it's classic.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It's fan one oh one to be like, whoa, we

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't have Tyrant and Zach. Of course we weren't any

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>good Dackinzie. Of course they were bad. But then Cardinals

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>fans are over there saying like, well, yeah, David Johnson

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't play. Who's Larry Fitzgerald didn't play? And so I'm

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>racking my brain. Who's the baddest ass that has gone

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>against this defense this preseason? Yeah? Probably aj Green? Yeah

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>he had a nice I mean he had some nice games.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>In that game, he got behind the uh he and

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he caught at least one or two passes for some yards.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he beat um was it cheetoh? Am? I

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>making that up? I gotta but I'm again, I've been

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>very impressed with what I've seen. But that's that's all

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you can say. I can't take that into the regular

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>season and say this is what it will be very

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>encouraging start, but it's still preseason football now. The big

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the big question mark now is they had another safety

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>go down and Cavon Frasier he heard his shoulder. Um

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us the status of that injury and kind of

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>where he is right now, or at least what they

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>know at this point, not necessarily that they know everything

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point this morning. Um, I'm not seen yet

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the results are Am I missing that? No, I haven't

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>seen anything. I mean, Cavon told everybody. Cavan and Jerry

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>both said he'll probably be fine again. File this under

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>football players are crazy, because he was saying he was like,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to slam it back into place on

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the field so I wouldn't have to come off. And

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like I would be weeping in in the

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fetal position if that were me. That's why you don't play.

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I know. No, you're right. Um, he says he's gonna

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>be fine. He says, yeah, among other things. Um, that

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>broke my heart. He says he was coming off and

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>then he's trying to come off and then just falls

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>down to the ground. I'm just glad it wasn't worse. Yeah,

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>down goes Frazier really hood type. Oh I didn't even know. Wow,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even put that footype. That nice. Not you,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>not me. Wow, that's an upset. That's a good Hopefully

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the only time we ever used that. Yeah, yeah,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't. Oh yeah, that's good. Nice And the best

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>part about that is that reference is still like forty

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>years before Kent was even born. No doubt it was

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a good um. He said he would come back in

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if it was a regular season game. I don't know

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if that's true. That's you can never hundred percent take

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a player's word for it, because they're going to try

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to play. They're you know, they are trying to downplay

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it so they can get back on. They're wanting to

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>play with the blood clot exactly for sure. So whatever

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was going on, Yeah, he's like, I think he's fine,

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but that bears monitoring because the player's assessment of himself

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is usually a little more optimistic than the one hundred

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>percent truth. But just from talking to him last night,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he said he wasn't even really in any pain, So

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's okay. Especially he's probably not a guy

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that would play on Thursday anyway, so I think, you know,

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with ten or twelve days whatever it is to get ready,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be Okay. That would have been an iffy.

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, with with let's say Xavier Woods

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was healthy, I think Frasier might have played. I mean

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, possible, But now I think I agree with

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the injury, plus the situation that they have to count

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>on him to be a starters, they don't do anything.

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I wrote that last week is like not that I

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>thought Cavan Frasier was making this team from day one,

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>but if for some reason there was doubt, it's gone.

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like he's yeah, you got to think of

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>him as your starter for the time being, unless something

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>happens in the next week. I'll tell you who I

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>did not like out of there really was Marqueston huff.

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was a couple of plays where he

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>just looked like a guy that hadn't played in a while.

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Angles weren't good, and that you have to have good

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>angles at safe that touchdown his a little bit of

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>his work. Yeah, it was all his, yes, all right,

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not all I mean it was a lot of guys.

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>He had a shot he made took back where you

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>go to school, Wyoming, maybe Marqueston, No, maybe not Wyoming.

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember something like that. Wherever it was like

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>high school college of like, Oh, I'm faster, I can

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>go get this guy and next thing you know, he's

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>just That would have been like a nine yard game

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>if he had taken a better angle or gotten there quicker. Yeah.

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>So do you think the Cowboys have to at this

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>point go out and try to find more bodies because

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that obviously Xavier Woods is injured and

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>now you don't know, I mean you think, but even

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>if he's fine with a dislocated shoulder, does that make

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you nervous or it should it make the Cowboys nervous

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>enough to where they need to find more bodies just

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to have going into the season. I'll say this, and

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this is just my perception. M I feel that Chris

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Richard he's a very front guy and he doesn't really

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>dance around his answers or hesitate when answering. He's very direct.

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Last night during the locker room, when the media was

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>talking to him and asked him about the safety position

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and concerns there, he didn't, as he said, he didn't

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>really know the severity of Cavon's injury, but when asked

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening with safety, I felt that his answer

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.959
<v Speaker 1>he still gave somewhat of you know, what you expect

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to hear, but the way he answered it wasn't as

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>confident and direct as he usually is. It was more

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, um, trying words to say what he

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to say, but fighting off. I guess what he's

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>feeling inside, you know, exactly exactly. So I'm like, Okay,

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this is getting a little out of hand. I mean,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point, you know, he's he's like I mean

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>even he's probably the most optimistic person there is, But

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point it's like, all right, well, what else

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has to happen here? I mean, we've got to do something.

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's not the guy that everybody wants or

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that I want, but I mean it's got to be

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody else. Um. I think when that when that waiver

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>wire hits on Saturday, Um, there's gonna it's gonna be

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of trades. It's gonna be

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a really crazy Saturday and Sunday. I hope it doesn't

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>bleed into the Sunday night game. Yeah, it'd be nice.

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I won't get all that stuff done before

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. I'm gonna I'll need an assist if that's

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens, because I won't be in any condition. Yeah

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about I don't know if I even want you writing

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>anything coming Sunday night. That's probably a bad idea. LSU

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Miami at the stadium. I'll be there. That's awesome you going.

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll see I might be the one having to write

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody stories, might be the one that gets tagged in. Yeah,

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to write that night a team where you are believing

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Dave has done it for on the other side more

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>times than than I had not even that. It just

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>does all the all the time. So hopefully though it'll

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be because and we're speaking like this because we've we've

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>seen it too often. The cuts will be made five

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>three o'clock, five o'clock on Saturday, something like that. Um,

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they changed that rule a couple of years ago, or

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>change the time, but it'll be Saturday afternoon. Don't make

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the cuts. Somebody, probably even on our staff, we'll say

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>something stupid than say final cuts when nothing is really final.

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And then and then the waiver we're wire, we'll start it.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It'll be weird. Yeah. Uh. Then twenty four hours from that,

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some guy thinks he's made the team. He's gonna get cut.

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna pick up a claiming the guy off waiver,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna make a trade. I feel for that guy

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>even more than I feel fairy the first wave, because

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if you think, you know, they call home, tell the

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>family I made it on the team. And then they

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>get that phone call a day later, and it's just like, yeah,

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you who I don't feel bead for. I

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>don't feel bad for the guy who makes the team

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on that Saturday and then goes to watch his college

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>football team play. And then it gets told by a teammate, hey,

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>come on, we better make it for this eight am meeting,

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and he says, nah, I'll be fine, I'll get there later,

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and then doesn't show up, and then it gets cut.

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Who would do that? Anybody would do that? And then

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>never plays in the league again. Don't do that? All right? Um,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk about Randy Gregory who got a sack

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>last night, played pretty well, continues to play really well, um,

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and then after the game, some report comes up to

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you. Wait, wait, Clarence Hill and the press.

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry sorry to cut you off, but Clarence Hill

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and a veteran sportswriter in the press, products actually cut

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody off or saying, that's the same thing about report,

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and he says, no, that's not a report, is an

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>actual story. That is a rumor. Yeah, that's a rum

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. And that's where I was going with it.

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, I should correct that and say it better.

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And I told you this this morning in my office.

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Anytime I see one person, one person that says something

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter that's that big and no one corroborates it.

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't hear any of the national guys, the Schefters,

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Mortenson's, nobody was out there saying I'm hearing it too.

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That makes me question the validity of the tweet. And

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly there hasn't been anything else that's come out about it.

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Last night, it seemed to be everywhere and everybody was

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about it, but nobody could corroborate it. And that

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean to say that maybe something comes out later.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. All I'm saying is at this point, and

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I assume you guys can can chime in on this.

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>At this point, it doesn't seem like there's much to this.

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The tweet said, I expect, but I'm hearing there might

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>be more trouble on the horizon for Randy Gray. This

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is a former NFL writer, Yes, former NFL. He's now

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>with Yahoo. I think I thought he was a CBS.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe c couldn't even tell you for sure. Um, yeah, No,

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I'm at At best it's reckless and at

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>worst it's malicious. Honestly, Wow, No, I mean that's true. No,

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but that would be really that Really

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's best it's reckless speak. I mean, give me something

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>follow up or wait to get you put somebody's name

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.719
<v Speaker 1>out there like that without having more than just absolutely

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing, and I don't really believe this. I work

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in media. I understand the way it works too well

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to think that it's genuinely malicious, But like you could

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>convince me that it is in a worst case scenario,

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's so just brazenly outside of what you would

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>consider like ethical or respond consible journalism. And the thing

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that sucks for Randy Gregory. And we asked Jerry Jones

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>last night Randy didn't talk. We asked Jerry Jones, he said,

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard anything other than that we know that

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a daily battle where Randy's

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>always going to have to worry about this, which is

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>he said that more times than I can count. He said, Yeah,

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>why would we be playing if we didn't expect him

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to be ready for the start of the season. Stephen

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Jones follows that up today by saying, we haven't heard anything,

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but the club is not part of the league's process,

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so we would be the last people to know if

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>there was anything. Which if you're listening at home and

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you kind of don't understand the way this works is

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these national reporters have sources within the

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>league office, Like they're not hearing this from Cowboys sources,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>which is where we get most of our information. It's

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>very plausible that he that there could be a source

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in the league office in New York that told him something.

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>That was primarily the reason. Also though that I said

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was curious to me that you didn't have

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>other national guys chime because they also have sources at

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the league and sense then I mean, I think every

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>reporter in the Dallas area has has gotten in touch

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with a Cowboys source who says we haven't heard anything.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I've heard other things from people who have sources in

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the league office who are like, we don't know what

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that's about. So as of right now, like I'm tempted

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to say it's bs. But the thing that sucks is, well,

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it's such a fine it's going to remain such a

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>fine line for Randy Gregory for the foreseeable future. Is

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it, forget a failed drug test. A

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>missed drug test is game over. You know, it's so

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>season over. He could he could very well be right,

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>just because Randy has such a fine line to walk.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But as of right now, I haven't heard anything that

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>suggests there's anything to that, which to circle back, why

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are you quote unquote reporting it if you don't have

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>anything else to go on. It's reckless. And I just

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it sucked. And then the thing that's sucks even

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 1>more about it is that you want to be excited

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>about it for him, You want you want to pull

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for him, and you watch him on the field and

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Arizona was trying to block him

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with a left tackle and a running back and he

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on the sack that he made And I know I

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>said this to you in the press box, but everything

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you want out of a pass rusher, he gave it

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to you right there. He gave I mean he was

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the first off the line. I mean he burst off

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the line, the left tackle had no shot. Then then

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.359
<v Speaker 1>he like bull rushed him back. The running back tried

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to get in the way. He spun through that, and

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>then the awareness to find the quarterback and then bring

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>him down. I mean, the only thing you didn't do

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was was stripped the ball for a fumble. I mean,

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like it was an outstanding play. I know it was

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>one play, but it was a really an outstanding play

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that showed, man, this guy's got all the tools and

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>look kind of real quick. I can't if you can

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>play that, Clay. You just played the clip of it,

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>play it back, because I want fans to see how

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 1>quickly he got off the ball. And it wasn't an

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>off size penalty. He got off the ball. He was

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>already running before the offensive line even moved. I mean,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it was just and that shows you just how athletic,

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>how quick this guy is. Like when he showed the

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>when you showed the view that was from the end zone,

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you could see it really well. It was just it's

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>amazing how fast, how quick he gets off the ball

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh and was into into the offensive lineman before

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he even was out of his stance. And that's that's

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty remarkable. It's pretty remarkable. It's amazing. I mean, a

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>full beat before anybody even moves. That wasn't much of

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:34.439
<v Speaker 1>a chip there. No, we probably and we've we're talking

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about it. We've talked a lot about it. We're still

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>probably not talking enough about how amazing it is that

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he's made as much progress as he has. And who

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>knows if it carries forward to the regular season. Who

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>knows for sure if he even plays in the regular season, apparently,

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's remarkable how much he has done. I mean,

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he missed the first two weeks of camp because they

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>were being careful with him, and he's just been it's

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>been a freight train since. It's been crazy. Yeah, let's

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>take our final break, will come back. I want to

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>hear from you guys. You guys, give us a call.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>The numbers eight eight eight eight five five two two

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>nine seven. We're talking big picture. What things are you

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>concerned about here heading into the season, Heading into the

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>final preseason game and then getting ready for the opening

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Will do that when we come right back.

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. It can be

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to find the right resource for learning about important

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>financial matters. You search how to build savings, you end

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>up reading about the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>can make you taller. That's why Bank of America build

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Better Moneyhabits dot com, a safe little corner of the

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Internet for answering your financial questions. Full of simple videos

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and tips, and Better Money Habits can show you how

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to make the most of your money without resorting to

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>random searches that always seem to lead to unbelievable photos

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 1>of childhood stars grown up. To learn more, visit Better

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Money Habits dot com. I definitely have an Instagram foody thing,

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but the low light camera on my new Samsung Galaxy

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>S nine from ATNT is getting me a whole new

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>world of likes and shares. Baskets of bread by candlelight,

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>colorful fruit plates in full sun. Even a dimly lit

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>cobb salad was recently hailed as a masterpiece. Come in

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>now and ask how to get half off the new

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Samsung Galaxy s nine from AT and T AT and

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>T won't for your thing, that's our thing, MI many

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>time only see store for details. Are att dot com

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Slash Samsung fifty duo laperature supports F one five mode

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and F two four mode. Two laperatur is installed on

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the veer camera. Oh I am craving a Doctor Pepper.

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I got some soda. I asked nut for soda. I

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>asked for ice cold. Cravable Doctor Pepper. Its flavor is

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>more one of a kind. Been a four told sloth

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with a thirst for speed. Stop settling for soda and

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>start demanding doctor Pepper. I love sloths. When you crave

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a doctor Pepper, nothing else will do. Grab an ice

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 1>cold twenty ounce of doctor Pepper today, Doctor Pepper, the

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>one you crave. To work this big land. You need

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>equipment with values rooted as deep in texts as soil

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as you are. Like John Dear compact tractors with a

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>six year power training Warren to in big features that

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>help you work less so you have more time to

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>do what you love. John Deer was first in the

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Texas fields, and we're proud to be on the field

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>as the official agg and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Find Texas sized deals and my John Deer Dealer dot

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>com slash Football Terms, conditions, exclusions, and warranty limitations apply

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>so he can be love for details. Back to the break.

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys did not make it to the end zone

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>last night, but that doesn't mean you should ignore yours.

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Put Tommy John on your end zone underwear that's guaranteed

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to never write up. Trust me, I wear it. It's

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>like nothing you've ever worn before. It's back for the

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>best pair you'll ever wear. Or it's free. Shop exclusive

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys underwear at Tommy John dot com Forward slash Cowboys.

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You get twenty percent off your first order. That's Tommy

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>John dot com Forward slash Cowboys. Thank you. Get your

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John two day called the front end zone. Huh

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>on your end zone because he's got an ass, right

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.399
<v Speaker 1>damn right? Yeah right, all right? Open up that debate

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>again and who I was talking about? Yeah, we want

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>some questions. Give us a call eight eight eight five

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>two two nine seven. Again it is eight eight eight

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>eight five five two two nine seven. We are going

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to start with a call from Al in Pennsylvania. Al,

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what up here's up, guys. What's up? Hi? Amber? How

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>are you? Just a few things? Have a lot. Since

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I've done the roster about four times, forty three minute

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>roster and the Steve go with seven wide receivers, I

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>would go all four of our halfbacks. Since the identity

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of our team is running, I would take all of them.

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>In regards to Rico Gathers, I'm sick of him. He

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>blew a hot read last night. And my idea is this,

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you are drafted and you miss all

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of last year, are you putting? Is he putting in

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of time that Sean Lee was putting

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in when he was injured. I don't think he is,

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think he's committed. And in regards to

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>why are we saving a nice chair on top of

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the game last night? For us, positively we have been

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Dan Bailly kicking a field goal, not some guys gonna

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>get cut. I didn't like Austin's effort level. When mister

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Peterson's running down the sidelines, he could at least try

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and tag called the guy like Zeke last year in Denver.

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>And to answer your questions, Derek, real quick, I'm an

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>old School Cowboys fan, I would like to say, you know,

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you know, preseason at least get a few

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a few series to, you know, to get ready for

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the series, to get ready for the season. Because when

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Zeke fumbles, like he has the second game of the

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>second week his rookie year at Washington and last year

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>when he got off to a slow start, is coach

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Jones going to raise his hand say sorry, I sabotaged

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett and preseason game three. Thanks. Okay, I don't

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>know the last apartment, but I don't know either man

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that that is He's take a breath. That was brought

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 1>his first point. I actually thought like that has some

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>merit to it. I love it he got to it first.

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>But but no, let's let's let's talk about that first point.

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Because his point was, look, you have a team that

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is built around the running game, why wouldn't you carry

0:42:56.800 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more running backs than carrying more receivers? And I heard

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Brian even further that point a little bit earlier, and

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he was saying, especially when you got a bunch of

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>receivers that are very much the same from the standpoint

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of their level of expected production, Like there's not a

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 1>big difference between these guys. So if that's the case,

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you try to maybe carry an additional running

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>back or two additional running backs and only go five

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Listen, because you have the best running back

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL arguably. I mean, if he's not here,

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he's in Pittsburgh or LA. I mean, like, this is

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the top three backs in the league. So

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>what is four running backs going to do for you?

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>What is Darius Jackson or an Scarborough going to do

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>for you when you don't really want to give either

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them to football? I don't under I mean,

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I get the point about the running team, and if

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>you had a bunch of running backs that were kind

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of all the same, that makes sense. But you know,

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like New England can carry four running backs because none

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are that much different than each other. But

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's the case here. Not only that,

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and y'all know I'm a fan of both of those guys.

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I love Darius Jackson, and I've said before how unique

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Bo's skill set is. You're still I mean,

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're in dire straits, like they're not giving you

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 1>anything that you can't find around the NFL, like I mean,

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>can go back to the draft day debate if you

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:14.720
<v Speaker 1>want to about the nature of the running back position,

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if you have a good offensive line, it's easily filled.

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, if you get to that point

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>where you need both of those guys, somebody's on a

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>practice squad or on the street. Even so, that doesn't

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>worry me. I will. I mean, I have made the

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>argument that you could keep seven receivers before. I certainly

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like that's necessary as we sit here today.

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Six still feels realistic to me. But even if you

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 1>want to go five, that's fine. But I would use

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 1>that roster spot on something like safety or offensive line

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>before I worried about running back. There was one of

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>his points I was like, in the middle, I can't

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Rico was a second point that he made. He was

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>saying that he's tired of Rico. He says it he

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't think Rico puts in the amount of work necessary.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what, if you're starting to compare people's efforts

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with Sean Lee and the film, you're gonna have fifty

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 1>two guys that need to be cut because nobody does

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 1>what Sean Lee does. And I understand the point about

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're hurt and you're banged up and all that,

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think that you might be or might be forgetting.

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think all of us aren't really sure what happened.

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really knows what happened last year with Rico. Not

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 1>on the outside. There's a weird thing. I've never seen

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:27.479
<v Speaker 1>it before. Concussion in the middle of the training camp

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden he's out for the

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>whole season. I think there's more to it than that.

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know about his effort and all that stuff.

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that that was a two way street. I

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 1>know he's here, he's committed, he's playing. Yes, he has

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>some busts, whatever, But you also can't ignore the fact

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that he makes more play. He's making plays out there

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>when he's getting the opportunity. He catches the ball just

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>about every time. He's got big, strong hands. I mean,

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>there are things that are correctable, in my opinion, that

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you can do with him. I think he's in every

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>day every game inactive That's what I think. I think

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he'll be the highest paid practice quad player in the

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 1>league because I think he'll be on the team inactive

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a waste. If they put him

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on this roster and they don't find a way to

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>use him, if for nothing else then to give you

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>another option in the red zone, I think that's a

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>waste and it's not worth maybe keeping him on this roster.

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Just look, I mean, just look at where he is

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and what he's continuing to get better. He's going to

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to learn. Now, if this thing goes bad and

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a new offense and all that stuff, that could

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be a huge setback. But I just think you know

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 1>this is you want him to If you could get

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 1>him on the practice squad, you would do it. I

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>don't just don't know if you can. You might, I

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can. I want to address the last

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thing and talk about a player who's actually gonna make

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a difference for the Cowboys this year. Sorry, I don't

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:45.239
<v Speaker 1>know why. I don't know why I felt the need

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>to take a shot like that, but okay, there's no

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it. Week two against the Broncos is the

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 1>worst game of Ezekiel Elliott's career to this point, and

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.319
<v Speaker 1>in his second game against the Redskins in his rookie year,

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he had fumble problems. We talk about him playing poorly

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants in twenty sixteen, he had eighty three

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>yards in a touchdown in his first nflme that was

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a really good defense, and miss me with that. He

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>ran for one hundred and four yards on twenty four carries,

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>averaged four yards four point three per carry, and had

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>five receptions for thirty six in the season opener last year.

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>If that's a bad game, it's not great by the

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:22.799
<v Speaker 1>standard that we've gotten used to from Zeke. If that's

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad game, miss me with that too. So basically

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is by not getting a lot of

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>work in the preseason, Zeke plays solid in the opener

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and then forgets how to play in Week two. That No,

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's craps got to give then in Week two because

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not a good Week two player, But he's pretty

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.280
<v Speaker 1>good against the Giants. So it's pretty good against the Giants.

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give there, that's true. I think. No, yeah,

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>those are better stats than I thought at a Week one. Yeah,

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it was Week two both of those years. Week two

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>was I mean, yeah, he fumbled twice against the Redskins

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and everybody was ready to set him. Yeah he did,

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying they remember Week three against the Bears,

0:47:58.160 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>was like Morris needs to play, and then Zeke ran

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for one forty five or something, hurdling people. Um, I

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just Zeke is on that level. He is. If he's

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 1>not the best back in the game, he's in the conversation,

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't think he needs to be out

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>there in the preseason. Yeah, you mentioned the New York

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants agree real quick, got your boy got paid? Yeah,

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>got paid five years, ninety five million dollars sixty five

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>million guaranteed for a wide receiver, and the Cowboys are

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>going the opposite way. That's the interesting part is the

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:31.760
<v Speaker 1>strategy of the Cowboys is, hey, we're not gonna necessarily

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.319
<v Speaker 1>go with the high paid wide receiver. We're gonna kind

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of mix what if they had that blond haired guy

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>running around. I get I get that, but but their strategy,

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:47.359
<v Speaker 1>like they let DEAs walk, and their strategy was, we're

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna go the route of really focusing on our passing

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>game and we on our running game, and we think

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>we can use receivers at a little more middle level

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get the story. Now that may

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>change next year if they're if if all the wheels

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>fall off and they're drafting in the top five and

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 1>there's this really really great wide receiver, then strategy shift

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, now we're gonna get a

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>high party. I mean a high you know, a high

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 1>draft choice wide receiver. But right now, it's just interesting

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the difference in strategy in forty seven career games from

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. He's played forty seven career games in the

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 1>past fifteen years. No wide out in the NFL has

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:24.439
<v Speaker 1>more catches, yards or touchdowns to this point in his career.

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's pretty damn good. You know, when you think

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>about athletically of the running backs in the league, I

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 1>know he hasn't played a snap, but I know se

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Quon Barkley athletically does things that a lot of running

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>backs really can't do. We'll see how he goes to

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the field athletically. I don't know if there's anyone that's

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>really better than him than O'Dell. Maybe Antonio Brown, but

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 1>he's not as I mean, it's not the same type

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of athletic player tight end. I mean, Evan Ingram is

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the more athletic tight ends. So they've got

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from a skill set standpoint, and they got a quarterback

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't miss that many. He doesn't miss any games if

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 1>if he's not, you know, if there's own team, that's

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>their big question mark. Now, how are they gonna pay one? Yeah,

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>although which they drafted one, right or two? I mean

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they drafted Flowers and he's I know, I know, I know,

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>but no, you're right, they think they drafted first or

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 1>second round. They drafted they drafted Will Hernandez. That's right, right, Yeah, Actually, well,

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I know we're not into the we're not into the

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>week by week, you know, routine of the season yet.

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But Olivier Vernon twisted his ankle pretty seriously and it

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it's gonna be dicey if he's there for

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the season opener, which if it's dicey for the opener,

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's dicey for week two. Also, we'll see that

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.720
<v Speaker 1>defense is really good. Remember last year when the Beckham

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 1>thing went out and was it was it you that

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:49.320
<v Speaker 1>were like, he's not playing and I was like, definitely

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he's playing, And you said I saw him his eyes

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, he's not playing. I don't remember that. Yeah,

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I was totally awful on that one. Was right, she

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>saw it in his eyes that that was maybe I'm

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking of upthing different. It was. It's funny though, I

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:06.479
<v Speaker 1>mean I remember there's what Odell's probably played six games

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:08.800
<v Speaker 1>against the Cowboys at this point, because I know he missed.

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:10.960
<v Speaker 1>If he didn't miss both games last year, then he

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>missed at least one. Like he's back. He obviously had

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the amazing game in fourteen with the one hander. That

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>was when he hit the scene like nably so um,

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and he caught two touchdowns in his first game against

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>them that year. But like other than those two, really

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>he hadn't He has not killed the cow There was

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a game, Was it the same game with the one hander?

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. There was a game that was

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>really close and he caught a slant over the middle

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 1>just broke away from Church. It was that was the

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 1>That was the second game that the Cowboys or the

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the ten seven was the ten seven game? Yeah,

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it was the only play he made. It was only

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 1>play anybody made in that crytastic game. Yeah, you're right, okay,

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 1>so that was that was one I remember of him,

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 1>just like you know, hey, Brenda car has been playing

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. That's right, you know, so he but I

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>mean he's had eight possible chances to play the Cowboys,

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and all things considered, he has not just crushed them

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the way that some other rival players good. But you

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:13.400
<v Speaker 1>know the interesting part of that, that seems to be

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the way good. That seems to be the way it

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of times though, in divisions where you

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>know you have a really great player and they're good

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>against the rest of the league, and where they find

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:23.959
<v Speaker 1>their struggles a lot of times will happen against division teams,

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's because they know him so well

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 1>they know how to take away some of the things

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they like that. It doesn't mean they're not gonna be

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 1>great still, But sometimes division if you go and look

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:34.879
<v Speaker 1>at like stats of really great players, usually you'll find

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a game or two every season where they're in the

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>division where it's not that great absolutely and your division

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>opponents are gonna know you better. But like ask Giants

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fans about Jason Witt and I bet you they'll they

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>feel some type of way about that. Or Fletcher Cox

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind, like he always seems like he shows

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>up when he plays the Cowboys. So I don't know,

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:53.879
<v Speaker 1>just something to keep an eye on. Now that I've

0:52:53.920 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>said this, Odell's gonna catch ten for two. Yeah, crazy Sunday,

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>but he is a rich man. Now is a very

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:04.720
<v Speaker 1>time forty one million guaranteed. Yeah, all right, We appreciate

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you guys joining us. We'll be back tomorrow. Check the

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>website for the time. We don't know exactly what time yet.

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of stuff moving parts over here, but

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:13.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll let you know sometime later this afternoon. Until then.

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>For Nick Eatman, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia, I'm Derek Eagleton.

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:19.359
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.