WEBVTT - Do Personality Tests Work?

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess what will? What's that mango? So I was

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Harry Potter audio books with my kids

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and reliving how much I love those stories. But do

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>you know what scenes still gives me anxiety all these

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>years later. It's when Harry sits under the sorting hat.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So there are I don't know what seven or eight

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>battle scenes with Voldemart, and it's the sorting hat that

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>makes you anxious. It is, I mean, to me, there's

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>something so palpable about his anxiety and that sorting hat scene,

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like this dumb, fidgety hat determines your fate in front

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of your whole school, and Harry is so nervous about it,

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>like he's sitting there, sweating, desperately trying to outthink this

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>test and trying to convince a dumb hat that he

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>should be sorted into Griffin Door instead of Slytherin. And

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you're gonna apply for a transfer from

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>one house to another, like once you're in your sorted

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>for life. But what's terrifying to me is that your

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>destiny is all wrapped up in that single moment, which

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love to organize people using the sorting

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>hat system, Like my dad is very clearly a raven claw,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>my mom's a huffle poff, my sister is obviously a Slytherin,

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>totally a sin. But as I started to think about

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it more, I realized why I feel that anxiety, and

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's from taking aptitude tests as a kid. Like in

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sixth grade, my whole class was forced to take a

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>test that was supposed to give us a better sense

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of what careers we should pursue. But as I was

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>taking it, I actually remember thinking, well, if I answered

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>this question this way, does that mean I can't be

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a mechanical engineer or would this answer stop me from

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>being a teacher? Like I wanted options. I didn't want

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to be boxed in by an exam, But revisiting that

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>experience through the Harry Potter sorting hat made me wonder

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>how accurate our personality tests then, how much stock should

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we put in them? And is my sister really a Slytherin?

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Because she sure seems Slytherin to me. So that's what

0:01:47.480 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this episode is all about. Right, Welcome to Part Time Genius.

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Will Pearson, and as always I'm joined by my

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>good friend Man Gueshot Ticketer, and today we're going to

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about personality tests and whether they really work. But

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>before we do that, I'm just gonna place this marshmallow

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>right here, Mango, right here in the middle of the table. Come.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>You know you're trolling me, And if you don't eat

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it for fifteen minutes, there might just be another marshmallow

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for you. Here it is. You know how much I

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>hate the marshmallow self control experiment? I do, but I

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand. Why. Is it because you hate marshmallows? No,

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's because I don't understand how it can be

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a good test. Like people always talk about how a

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>kid who has self control is going to be successful,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And I get how if someone tells a kid to

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sit and behave and not eat the marshmallow and they

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>wait and delay their gratification, that it may be an

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>indicator of a successful future for a certain type of kids.

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But what if that kid comes from a rough background,

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>what if there isn't food security in his or her home,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>or what if they come from a home where the

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>adults lie to you. Isn't a hungry kid from that

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>background going to rely on their experience and be more

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>successful by eating the marshmallow in hand instead of waiting

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for two in the bush. Just for the record, no

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one's hiding marshmallows and bushes. But I do agree with you,

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly, the test creator, Walter Michelle himself agrees

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>with you. How's that? Well, you know that wonderful podcast

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in Visibilia. So they had Walter Michelle on recently where

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he was voicing his frustration with the study. He was

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that it was totally misinterpreted. His feeling was that

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a kid's destiny and success can't be predicted by a

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>single marshmallow. I mean, he thought that was just as

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous as we do. So I've gotten this wrong for

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a long time. What's the study actually about. Well, it's

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>really about how personality is actually this flexible thing. Like

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>if you take a kid who can't wait to eat

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a chocolate chip cookie. And to be clear, these children

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>were basically cookie moms with zero self control. But if

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you sit a cookie monster down and you encourage them

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to ignore the treat in front of them and pretend

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it isn't there, suddenly they can increase their willpower from

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a few seconds to up to fifteen minutes, So that

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>actually feels like a totally different study, or at least

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>very different from how I've always heard it talked about,

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of amazing. Also, I I just hearing

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>about marshmallows makes me wanted to take this on a

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>tangent about peets and how marshmallow birds used to have

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>wings like, But since we're talking about self control, I'm

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna get this back on track, and Press is the

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>king of tangents, I'm gona pressed with that self control.

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So well, we're gonna talk today about personality tests and

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>whether they really work. And we've got an incredible guest

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>on today is Jonathan Cats from the cult comedy show

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You and I love so much, Doctor Cats, and we've

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>got two other very special guests on as well. That's right,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll be talking to our sisters, who are both super smart,

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and oddly, they both have PhDs in psychology, so we'll

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.119
<v Speaker 1>get them to analyze us a little later. How weird

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>is that that both of our sisters or PhDs in

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>psychology brought up? But that'll be a lot of fun. Now.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons I like the story of Michelle's

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>marshmallow tests and how it's been extrapolated over the years.

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that historically speaking, there seems to be this innate

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>desire to predict our futures through tests and different experiments, like,

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>if we only know this one thing about ourselves, we

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>can figure out how to be a success. And it's

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of incredible how big the field is. So in

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve, personality testing was a five hundred million

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar industry with well over tests on the market, and

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it's only grown since then. Yeah, business is clearly booming.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>For decades, workplaces have used personality tests to groom management,

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>colleges have used them to pair roommates. You know, dating

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sites use them. I mean, there are Myers Briggs variations

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>all over the internet. But before we get into those,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>why don't we talk a little about the first personality

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>tests that really took America by storm and inspired one

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of America's greatest poets along the way, and that's Phrenology.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for it. But back, before we do that,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I do want to let our listeners know that we

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>really started thinking about this topic and reading the book

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>by Annie Murphy Paul called Cult of Personality. But anyway

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you were saying, yeah, I was talking about phrenology. So

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this happens to you, but I

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.559
<v Speaker 1>feel like periodically I'll be in like a thrift store,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a vintage shop, and I'll see one of those skulls

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that it is all mapped out with a particular ridge

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on the noggin, like something that shows like this is

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>where courage comes from, or anger or whatever. And I've

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>always been curious how this skull mapping got its start,

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out it's all rooted in jealousy. Jealousy

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>how so it goes back to this guy, Franz Joseph

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>gall who was studying medicine in Vienna in the seventeen

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>eighties and he wasn't measuring up to his classmates. Basically,

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Gall knew he was smarter than his peers, or thought

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he was, but he found himself scoring lower on tests.

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So we tried to puzzle out how these inferior minds

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>were beating him on exams, and then he noticed a pattern.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>They all had beady bulging eye was yeah, well, that's

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>what he thought. So he took note and theorized that

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>their aptitude for cramming verbal information was causing their eyes

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to protrude, like, yeah, their mind was supposedly pushing on

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>their brains and making certain features more prominent on their heads.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And once he got a degree, he started collecting data

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to support his theory, Like he started with beggars and criminals,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out where the telltale signs of pickpockets are.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Then he moved to studying lower class working folk, like

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he lured them into chatting with some good wine and

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>get them to spill their secrets, and then he tried

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to map their heads against those traits. And he gradually

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>moved up to high society, and along the way he

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>started charting various bumpy areas that could determine cowardice or quarrelsomeness.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And along with things like mechanical aptitude, it all seems

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like a very weird recipe for stereotyping people. I mean,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he actually, you know what it reminds me of just

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a little. And I know this isn't quite the same,

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but I remember seeing this story on society pages about

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Jews and how they used to dominate basketball in the

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen thirties. So in trying to explain why Jews

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.119
<v Speaker 1>were so good at basketball, the new York Daily News

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>said this the game places a premium on an alert

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>scheming mind, flashy trickiness, artful dodging, and general smart alecness.

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It's explaining away their wins on the court with these

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>horrible stereotypes. But it's almost like when you don't understand

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>how someone could be better than you. In Gall's case,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it was exams, and in this case it was basketball.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You just find a stereotype and explain the whole thing away.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>That's so weird, but you know, this idea that you

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>could divine someone's full nature by examining their skulls, bumps.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It was really captivating to the public. So it moved

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>from Europe to America, where it really took off, partially

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>because practitioners moved from just identifying criminals and keeping the

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>working class in their place to really flattering people. They

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>needed to believe in it, and it was bolstered by

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it all truly felt rooted in science,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like phrenologists had painstakingly mapped over thirty areas of personality.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But the real genius of selling it to the public

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was perfected by these two brothers, Orson and Lorenzo Fowler,

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and their partner Samuel Wells, like together they promised this

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>mental photograph of your strengths and your weaknesses, which is

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>basically what personality tests still do. I mean, as the

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>author Annie Murphy Paul points out future presidents James Garfield

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and John Tyler, they were thoroughly impressed and convinced by

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>their readings, and Claire Bardon took courses in it. I mean,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>businesses were putting stock in it for assessing their hires,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and this trend from the eighteen hundreds it continued well

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>into the nineteen thirties. But the person it seems to

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have the most impact on, and this is the part

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I love about personality tests. Is it truly affected Walt

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Whitman Like as a wandering soul, he couldn't quite figure

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>out what his career paths should be, and his readings

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>basically gave him the confidence to believe in his genius

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and actually push the boundaries of poetry and oddly some

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of the vocabulary and his poems that comes straight from phrenology.

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Jur Well, you know, I was reading up on the

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Foulers and they were such pop personalities at the time

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that they also have the ability to launch some interesting

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>trends like orson Fowler and his quote. Scientific research determined

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that circles were the most efficient design in nature, so

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>he proposed that circular houses would make more efficient homes.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But since circles are hard to recreate, he suggested people

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>build octagonal homes made of concrete, and the trend kind

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of took off. I mean, he advocated for some other

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>modern ideas to like central heating and door plumbing, big

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>glass windows, all of which he claimed would make for

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>healthier living. But it's still kind of amazing that he

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>was so respected that he could just say the words

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>octagonal houses and snap people would be all in. Speaking

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>of all in, I'm gonna take these marshmallows and put

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>them onto my mouth while we break for a quick

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a great idea. So who do we have on

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the line today, a mango? Well, we've got two very

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>special us, your sister and mine, Doctor Bama Hagar and

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Dr Shant Way. To emphasize that, doctor, that's right. A

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fun fact about them is that they're both way smarter

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>than us, which not only have they told us repeatedly

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>over the years, but they both have PhDs in psychology

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to prove it. How weird is that? So welcome Bama

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and Shanta. Thank you now, Mango, I have to say

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>my childhood, as you know, I've talked about this before

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and gone to therapy for this as well, was not

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>always easy. Having an older sister that um was so

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>interested in psychology that I kind of became a guinea pick.

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And she uh figured out that I had O c

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>D pretty early on and would set up these little

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>experiments around the house and would wait for me to

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>walk into a room when she'd moved the salt and

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>pepper shaker a little off center from the kitchen table,

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and I would walk in and correct them, and of

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>course she would jump out and be like, ah, I

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>knew it, You're weird. So Um, So that's that's what

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>life was like for me as a kid. But Bama,

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so I have to ask you here this part of

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>your inspiration for going on to become a psychologist, no question.

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I really didn't think about clinical child psychology until I

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>got to watch you develop will, which was a lot

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of fun. Um. The O c D thing definitely did

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not try to pick on you, but that is kind

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of current. So I still sort of move things around

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if I visit your house to you know, just put

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>something a jar in the kitchen, or you know, maybe

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>something that just shouldn't be there, like a potholder on

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the counter. That's that's just not right. And I just

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of try to leave those things after I visit,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's much appreciated. Now, currently you're working with the

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Autism Society of Alabama. Do you want to talk a

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the work you guys have been involved

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in very recently? Oh? Sure, I'm an autism advocate, so

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I have clinical child psychology, but my son, who is

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>now seventeen, has bought in spectrum disorder, So I'm an

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>autism advocate and I don't currently practice. But just recently

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Alabama, we passed a autism insurance

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>law so that UM private insurance will cover autism therapy.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And that law has been passed or similar law has

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>been passed in forty five days and we were the

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>forty six so we were thrilled to get that done

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're hoping that it will help thousands of Alabama

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>families as they pay for autism therapies and you know,

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>try to help their child to let developed to their potential,

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>which is amazing. Just watching that from a distance was incredible.

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is I wanted to say something about my sister.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that's popular in our family law

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is just how bossy and what a know it all

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>she was when she was a kid. And there's a

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>story about how we just moved into our neighborhood and

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Delaware and our mom looked out the window and there

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>was a circle of neighbors just gossiping in front of

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>our driveway, and when she went to inquire what was

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going on, she found Shanta in the center explaining all

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the day's gossip to everyone. And so Shanta, I wanted

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, like, why do you think you're so

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in psychology? Do you think any of that's rooted

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in wanting to know what's going on with other people? Oh? Absolutely, Yeah.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I always wanted to know everyone's business, know what was

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>going on. In fact, I think there's another story when

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we went to the zoo and instead of looking at

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the animals, I was turned around looking at the people. Yeah.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I've always been interested in in people and getting to know,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, what makes them tick. You currently teach Shanta

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Temple in Philadelphia. But I heard you actually did

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>your master's thesis on the equal sign. Now it feels

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like the equal sign has been around for a while,

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>so what sort of new discoveries are there to be

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>made about it? Uh? Yeah, the equals SIGNE has been

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>around for a little while, um, But it turns out

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that kids still don't really understand it very well. UM.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, back when I was doing my masters, we

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>were looking at UM what kids thought of the equal sign.

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, when you ask kids what the equal

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sign means, oftentimes they'll tell you what we call an

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>operational definition that really thinks about what you do with

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>equal sign. So they'll say things like you put the

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>answer after, or you total up all of the numbers,

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or you know, you put whatever. Um. Uh, some you

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>get in the blank after because kids are used to

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing um equal sign and then a blank sign right after.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out that those kids who actually do

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>their homework more often UM, and who get more practice

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with equal sign UM followed by a blank, they actually

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more difficulty when they get to

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>algebra UM and can't really understand the idea that it's

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a relational definition they need, which is really the idea

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that you have um the same quantity on both sides. Uh. Yeah,

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>she is part of it, kind of figure out how

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to really help kids learn that they have the wrong

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>understanding of equal plign Well, let's get to the quiz here, Mango,

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the name of the game we're playing with our

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>sisters today. It's a little game called Oh brother where

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>every answer pays tribute to the wonderful set of brothers.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>All Right, so if we were to say Groucho, Harpo

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and Zeppo, you'd say Mark's brothers. Right, this is going

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty rapid fire. So we're going to put

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty seconds on the clock and see how many you

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can get. And you're playing as a team, so we'll

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>take whatever answer gets blurted out first. So let's get

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that clock ready, all right, you guys ready, I'm ready. Okay,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>here we go, Question number one. Pioneers in Flight, Wilbur

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and Orville were known as Yes h G TV show

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>where twins Jonathan Now, wait, wait, wait wait? Should we stop?

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Should we stop? What? Because we got that one? Right?

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Should we stop? We just say we won? No, that's

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>not how this works. Yeah, they did they way, good job, guys.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, has the clock on their Okay, here we go, alright.

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Question number two h G t V brothers were twins

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan and Drew people transform fixer Uppers. I'm not going

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to know that. This is where I don't property brothers.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>You got it all right? Question number three, I like

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate over everyone, all right. Filmmakers. Filmmakers behind Fargo

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and The Big Lebowski. Yes, nineteen eighty movie featuring SNL

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>stars John Belushi and dan Ackroyd. Alright you question number five.

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Comedic brothers that include Sean, Marlon, Damon and Keenan Ivory,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Wayne's brother You got it all right? Production company that

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>made Batman and Wonder Woman also used to be a

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>TV network called w B. Yes, you got it all right?

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>The bonus question the last one American. Yes we didn't.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>We didn't celebrate that one. All right, Here we go.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The bonus question American pop psychologist and talk show personality

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>who wrote a daily newspaper advice column from nineteen sixty

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand thirteen. And these are brothers. No, it's

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a trick question. Dr joy Yes, Dr Joyce brothers. Well,

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they flew through this and amazing John so Chanton Vema

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you did incredibly well, and for that you win our

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>grand prize, which is a note to your mother from

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>us singing your praises, which is especially poignant because it's

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>our mother too. That's right. Congratulations you two, and thanks

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Thank goods. Welcome back to

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Part Time Genius. Today, we're talking about personality tests. Now,

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:01.479
<v Speaker 1>my ago, I know you and I both took an

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>online Myers Briggs knockoff tests. So how do you do?

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I aced it nice now. I got an I N

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>t J, which means I'm introverted, intuitive, thinking and judging,

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>which actually kind of makes sense to me. I mean

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Myers Briggs. As you know, charts for binaries, like you

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>could be introverted or extroverted. You could be intuitive or sensing,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just thinking or feeling and perceiving or judging, and those

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>combinations yield sixteen different personality types. But as an I

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>N t J, I just want to let you know

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm in really good company like Arnold Schwarzenegger's there, Jane Austen,

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Newton, also Jay z and Angela Lansbury Landsbury. Now

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that now it makes sense, you're totally a Landsbury. I

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>mean we're all pretty much the same person, like wrapping

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bars and solving murders every week. Yep, that sounds about right. Okay,

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Well I'm an e n f J. Okay, so that

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>means you're extroverted and intuitive and feeling and judging, which

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is great because we're both judgy. But that puts you

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>in good company too. You get Oprah Winfrey, Barack Obama,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Nelson Mendel, okay, Martin Luther King. All right, I think

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>every important black figure is in the n f J. Yeah,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>that's that's pretty much always been my goal. Oh and

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>also bono, yep, that's all. That's all important black figures.

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Well done. So I'm always in two minds about this stuff,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>like I feel the same way about astrology. I'm happy

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to be a tourist when it means I'm just like

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Wes Anderson, who you know shares my birthday, or William

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare because we're all talented and born in spring. But

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>when it suggests I'm a Hitler or like a Genghis Khan,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>who are also apparently born in spring, I get a

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>little more suspicious. Yeah yeah, well, I mean I tend

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to put a little more stock and personality tests than astrology,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and one of the geniuses of Myers Briggs is that

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>there aren't any bad types. Of course, it's also one

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of the criticisms. But part of the reason it really

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>took off is because it was one of the first

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>personality tests truly designed to understand health. The end of

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it jewels. But before we get into that, let's go

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>back a little and chat about one of its predecessors,

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the m m p I, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, It is a little bit of a mouthful,

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but as you can guess, the test was developed in Minnesota.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It was the work of a neuroscientist, J. Charlie McKinley

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and the psychologist Stark Hathaway, and the test was designed

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand and diagnose patients. And it's interesting because the

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>questions are so drastically different from the test before it.

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So in prior data sheets, the questions were ridiculously transparent,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and they would ask things like are you happy most

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of the time, which it was obviously easy to gain.

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So the pair did something completely different. Instead of assuming

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they knew how patients would answer the questions, they surveyed

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a massive number of what they called Minnesota normals. But

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>they also surveyed a number of patients, and if the

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>majority of the normals answered a true false question one way,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>while say, schizophrenics patients answered another, they use that as

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a question that could indicate schizophrenia. You know, I kind

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of want to support the Minnesota normal sports team, that's right. Yeah.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>So was this all like revolutionary for the time? Oh? Absolutely,

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was surprisingly effective. But that's not the best part.

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's truly fascinating is the strange mix of

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>questions that came out of trying to understand and split

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>up these populations. Let me just read you a few

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of the five four questions on the list. So these

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are all things you can either agree with or disagree

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with in this in this survey. So the first one

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is I think Lincoln was greater than Washington, or women

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>should not be allowed in cocktail bars, or so good

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if the money were right, I would like to work

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for a circus or a carnival. I don't know how

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to answer that, partially because they've lumped circus and carnival together.

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'd be so in my head about

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>what's the right thing to say. Yeah, and there were

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>gross bodily ones too, Like I've never had any black,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>tarry looking bowel movement. It's so gross. But the test

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>took off with psychologists and psychiatrists across the country partially

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 1>because it was pretty scientific. I mean a number of

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the other exams of the time, like the roor shock

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>ink blot test, which we've all seen samples of, they

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>either overpathologized so called normal patients, assigning them conditions they

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't have, or the test needed too much fuzzy interpretation.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>But with the m m p I there were numbers

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to back up every conclusion, and half away included all

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sorts of really smart trick questions that would raise red

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>flags if a patient, you know, try to outsmart the

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>test or something. So by the mid nineteen fifties it

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>was the most widely used test of its kind, used

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to diagnosed illness in prisons, doctor's offices, and mental wards

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>even which is interesting, but how did it transition into

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a personality test? I mean, it seems like it was

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>being used to identify pathological extremes for the most part.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was, but it's more and more quote normal

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>people took the test, and more and more data was gathered.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Grad students started seeing these patterns and individual profiles, and

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>so they started sorting these by strengths and weaknesses. So

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it became more of a personality test over time. But

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't an easy road for the m m p I.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>According to the Cult of Personality. After the era of McCarthy,

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>m had passed, the test was on the ropes because

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>senators were wary of any exam that forced people to

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>answer really prying questions. You know the fact that it

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>was used by government organizations and employers that really bothered

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>some representatives. But it squeaked past the congressional hearing on

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>life support and then remained in pretty wide use. Then

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen nineties it took another serious blow. What

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>happened then, it was and Renaissenter told its employees that

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't pass the test, they couldn't be promoted

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>into management roles. And when employees were forced to spend

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>five hours answering what they felt were pretty irrelevant through

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>false questions like I would like to be a florist

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or I guess I know some pretty undesirable life, they

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>filed a class action. I mean, who doesn't know some

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty undesirable type an you're really apparently one of them.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Read I'm a special agent of God, which sounds maybe

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>appropriate for psychiatric evaluation, but kind of troubling in the

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>context of determining whether someone could sell furniture, although I'm

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>guessing a special agent of God could sell furniture, probably,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so probably. What's crazy to me is just how popular

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the exam is around the globe. Like, I know, it's

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>been translated into a monk and Urdu and Norwegian, which

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>honestly feels so strange when you consider some of the

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>questions that are getting asked, like I'm curious how the

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>monk feel about whether Lincoln is a greater president than

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Washington and what that could possibly indicate other than the

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>love of like small change. Well, it's interesting to see

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that while the m mp I had a second life

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>as a personality test, Hathaway, who co created it, was

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>disillusioned by the end of his life about its value.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>He even said, I often have serious doubts about whether

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it is meaningful to expect that we can develop tests

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to measure or analyze personality. Of course, Isabel Myers and

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Briggs felt a little differently, but why don't we

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about that after a little break, So, Mango, as

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty much every day during college, right around lunchtime,

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we'd get together and watch our favorite show, Doctor Cats

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Professional Therapist. It was on Comedy Central. It was a

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>show where he'd get comedians to come on and play

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves as they would be his patients for him as

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>he was playing this role of Doctor Cats. And this

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was around the time that we were starting Mental Flaws. Now,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think this may have had some inspiration or

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have been some influence on us starting Mental Flaws? Probably not,

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, But it was a good show. It made

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>us laugh and it was a lot of fun. Well.

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Audible actually is releasing a new season. It's been over

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a decade since Dr Cats was on TV, and the

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>first several episodes are out in audio form on Audible.

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll hear guests such as Ray Romano, Sarah Silverman, dom Irrera,

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>weird Al, and several others. And we are so happy

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to have him on the line with us today. Jonathan

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Kat's welcome to Part Time Genius. Thank you, Jonathan. How

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>much do you rewatch the original show and did you

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>rewatch any of it? For the new Audible series I did,

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't really the helpful because we're creating new

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>episodes and um, it took me down the long, wonderful path.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do love to watch the show, but

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this was not the education. You know, speaking of watching

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>or rewatching the show, It's hard to remember how novel

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the squiggle vision was when it first came on, and

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to hear why the decision was made to

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>go with that style of animation. Well, two reasons. One

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the motion of the characters represents their emotional

0:27:53.440 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>turmoil and it's cheap, right. Yeah, maybe one of those

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is to prior Actually these were those things are true. Actually,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>anibitions and my patients were not internal when this showed up.

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things I love when I, you know,

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 1>either read interviews or have heard interviews with you, is

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're always so generous and crediting others, Like I

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like you talk about learning from Tom Snyder, how

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>John Benjamin helped you break out of a rot and

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what fun it was to work together. Um, and I

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's such a rare thing, but it also comes

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>up in your comedy. I feel like your position as

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a comedian on the show is is kind of a

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>generous one. Do you talk about how hard it is

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to maybe be funny and facilitate a conversation like that?

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the early days of the show, was

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>made my actual interest in their lives and how they felt,

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>because I do care about people, oddly enough, and that's

0:28:54.000 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>interfered with the comedy. Mum, it's just like, because there's

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing funny but the way they feel. No. I mean,

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I happened to care, but people in general inculdn't comedians.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But we discovered pretty early on that that wasn't working comedically,

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't certainly wasn't making anybody feel better, right right,

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious about that format. Then the the idea

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for having you know, guests come on and be your patients,

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it would be a way, even though

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you're acting, it seems like it would be a way

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of maybe getting them to open up a little bit more.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Did you did you find that to be the case?

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>They did, and it actually made one woman cry and

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one guy feel better. And this is this is after

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty one episodes. It's not not a great record, right

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>right throw Now, did you find yourself pulling anything from

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>actual therapy sessions, maybe your visits to a therapist and

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to the show in any way, Yeah, I did. But

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly is that I haven't spend hundreds of

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars trying to make my own therapists laugh. Whis just

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a total waste of money. Yeah, it seems like, I mean,

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>she would have a good time and then I and

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>then I give her a check and I leave. Yeah,

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I can see how that might be problematic. But did

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you did you feel any better? I actually benefited from therapy.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>A couple comes in my life, and I'm a believer.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>We loved Carry Shandling so much, and and the fact

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that he was on your show. I was curious if

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>if you went back and watched that episode after she

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>passed away. I did. I did because I was hoping

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that they would show some of that footage at his

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>memorial service. Um so I was kind of put together

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a fair will using footage of from the show and

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just my own. When last conversations with the guy was

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>so uh so much the character characterization of who he was,

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because I reminded him that every time had laughed at

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one of his jokes, he said it sounds like I've

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>been shot. And then I when I told her, when

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I reminded Garry that he said, I think I said

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>wounded so much like him, just to fine tune my memory.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty terrific. All these incredible comedians I feel like

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I got to see more of through your show, and

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason I love the In addition

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to liking the storylines, I think when you guys were

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in college, most stand up shows had to do with

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the brick wall, yeah, and somebody sitting in front of

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a tone jokes. M hmm. It's a really nice departure

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Cans from that format. And and like mangoing, some

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>things didn't work unless unless they were animated. Look, a

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>friend of my, Lucien Iighter, who is a comedian and

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>worked for Raymond, talks about how when he came to

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts to do the show, he discovers it to things

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that would could never tell on stage, but would we

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>work in animation And if I could think of one

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of those, would be very waiting to hear what that was. Well, Jonathan,

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. Aren't you

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>going to ask me any questions that might reveal my

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>personality type. That's actually have we done the route have you? Yeah?

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll assess that after this. Have you heard any

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of the just out of curiosity? Um, not really part

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of this interview. Have you heard any of Paula pound

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Stones new show? Oh? Just a minute of it. I'm

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>so happy she's doing a new show. She's one of

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>my heroes, Paula Poundson. Yeah, but they do that on

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>on her show. She's one of that. She's one of

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>three people, three comedians who have made me lie down

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on the floor because I can't walk anywhere because I'm laughing.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So who were the other two? Well, John Benjamin actually

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>has maybe faint twice, it's the whole other time. And

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>then the combination of Laura and Sarah Silverman made me

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>lie down on in traffic in Los Angeles. Didn't just hard? Jonathan,

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for being on part time Genius. Hope

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone will check out the newest season of Dr Kat's

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Professional Therapist on Audible. Thanks so much, Jonathan, Thank you.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's time to talk about the big one, the

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>mother daughter of all personality tests Myers Briggs, Myers Briggs. Right,

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So most people know at least a little of the

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>origin story Myers Briggs was developed by this very close

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>mother daughter pair, Katherine Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers and

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Catherine was fascinated with people and understanding them, and she

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>craved time in her study like she put her kids

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>to bed, then she'd be reading and scrawling notes through

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the night. And for birthdays or anniversaries, all she wanted

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>was more filing cabinets to store her papers. She sounds

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty organized. Yeah, she was super passionate about it, but

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>she really dug in when she met her future son

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in law and couldn't quite understand him. Like she'd been

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>reading Young and realized Young's rough observances on personalities could

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be useful in sorting people, and together with her daughter,

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>she added the judging perception letter to the personality scheme

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and it just took off. I mean that's the very

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>abridged version. Well, and she was so good about making

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>her ideas appealing from the start, Like in the mid

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties, Briggs wrote on an article for the New

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Republic called Meets Yourself using the Personality paint Box, which

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really sound that much different from What Color is

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Your Parachute? Or other books that would come out in

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>later years. Exactly she was like this born Marketer and

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Isabelle too, like she managed to build off of the scheme.

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>She used these distinct personality types as characters in a

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>detective novel and want a big deal publishing contests, like

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>partially based on the idea that different personality types working

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>together would be really more efficient and together. They really

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>developed this test not just to understand others, but to

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>help women find the best and most efficient jobs during

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>wartime when men were away. It's pretty amazing, actually, like

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 1>these two educated women were forced into life as housewives,

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and they were determined to do important work and have

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a larger impact on society. But what's interesting is that

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Young didn't love the test. For instance, while he was

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>happy for the fangirl attention they gave him, he warned

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Briggs from the get go that it was dangerous to

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>use his untested ideas and to apply them to things

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like child rearing or sorting personalities. And he even wrote

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>every individual is an exception to the rule. Wow, which

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>seems kind of odd, right, Like he wasn't flattered by

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they were built on his ideas. He

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't you know, he didn't believe in a pure

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>binary of things, like a pure extrovert or a pure introvert,

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>even said such a man would be in the lunatic asylum.

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But that didn't stop the Myers Briggs ascendency. By the

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>mid twentieth century, the test was so popular it was

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>being licensed by the Educational Testing Service Well and today

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a behemous so Vox reported that over two million

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>people still take the official test annually and that company

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>nets over twenty million dollars a year plus. It's basically

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>spawned this cottage industry of knockoffs, right like some of

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the which Sex and the City character are you? Or

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>which Game of Thrones character are you? There basically reporting

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're a Miranda because you're an I N T J,

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or you're a Tyrian Lanister because you're an E N

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>T P. But by the way, you're a total Miranda.

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Jay Z and I both take that as a compliment.

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So you're right. The company is extremely healthy, but there

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is petition, and over the years, Myers Briggs has come

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>under some criticism for being too sunny like because there

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are no bad types, it might not be accurately reflecting

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>your weaknesses or sorting for those Slytherin qualities. As Young

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>points out, it gets criticism for being all black and

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>white with little gray. If introversion and extra version are

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>actually a bell curve, which is what psychiatrists seemed to

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:23.959
<v Speaker 1>think it is, there's a lot of space in there

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.959
<v Speaker 1>for people to share both qualities, and none of that's

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>actually reflected in the results. Well. Also, Myers Briggs is

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>frequently cited for inspiring the Barnum effect, which is basically,

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>if you say anything vague and complimentary enough, kind of

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like horoscopes, people will think it applies to them. Well,

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>not to like pile on them. But one more criticism

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 1>is that it's been called classist in the past. And

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the site the Conversation pointed to some of

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the questions in the test, like do you like to

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>chat with clerks, hairdressers, porters, et cetera, which is, and

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm quoting the site, a test of introversion extra vision,

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:00.919
<v Speaker 1>but it rather presumes that the people taking the test

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>will not be the one serving, carrying bags or cutting hair. Yeah. Yeah,

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we've spent a good bit of time on this

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>episode pointing out the flaws of personality test. Phrenology is

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously quackery and something like the mmp I was initially

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>created as this mental diagnostic test for specific conditions, which

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>made sense, but then it was applied to understand full

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:25.720
<v Speaker 1>personalities and Myers Briggs is too optimistic and horoscopy at times.

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>But back to the original question, why do we use

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>personality test and what's the real worth of them? You know,

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we did so much reading on the topic and I

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>had the same question. It's funny. Malcolm Gladwell had this

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>old great piece where he was talking about the ineptness

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of personality tests and he came up with his own

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>binary test to analyze people. Oh yeah, I know, I

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>saw this. So he made up his own version of

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the Myers Briggs with categories like are you a gobbler

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or a nibbler of information? Are you more of a

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 1>canine or a feline in a relationship? Which I love

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>because like do you meet your partner at the door

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>with a wagging tail? Or do you fly hard to

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>get in? Are you all moody? So I get Gladwell's

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>point about the ridiculousness is of this, but think about

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that Walt Whitman example. I mean his personality test, however fraudulent,

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it might have been convinced one of America's greatest poets

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to follow his passion. And if you're getting a sunny

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>diagnosis that encourages you to believe you're great and that

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you can do great things and that there's a place

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for you in this big, confusing world, there's worth in that, right,

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like the original it gets better campaign. Well, definitely.

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, on the other hand, you wouldn't want someone

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>boxed into a professional or emotional corner, right, Like your

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>friend you were talking about that went to an Indian astrologer. Yeah,

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he sent his chart off and he's this brilliant PhD

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>computer scientist, and the astrologer studied his times and came

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>back and told him his only viable option in life

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was to be a farmer. But speaking of these tests,

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I called up a PhD Bindu methic column whose assistant

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>director of Clinical Training at Chestnut Hill College, and I

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>asked her about the worth of personality tests in the

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>studies personality, and specifically she studies perfectionism. But when I

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>asked her about the popularity of the tests and the

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>potential for misuse. I was just kind of expecting her

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to validate what we're saying and say they're all hocum.

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But here's been the talking on the subject. Looking at

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>personality and psychology, you're looking at the individual differences of

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a person UM. So if you think about even the

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>origins of what personality means, you know comes from persona,

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 1>which in Latin means masks, right, and so you're not

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just looking at what the person where the individuals showing

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>other people, but what's underneath, right? What what doesn't get shown? UM?

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And so it's more complex and it's influenced by a

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>variety of different factors. So you know, for example, childhood experiences,

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 1>family system, culture, socio political climate, UM. All these factors

0:40:55.280 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>can influence one's personality. And personality tests are used UM

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>to get more information about the individual to help with

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe treatment goals, maybe to clarify a particular question or

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>an issue so you can see what will be helpful

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for the person in treatment. UM. It is a part

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of what is used to get more thorough holistic look

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>at the person UM and it's you know used, Uh,

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>these tests have been normed and validated. You don't want

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to just take it and think that that is the

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>end result. Right. You want to use it in conjunction

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with therapy, or you want to use it in conjunction

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>with maybe other tasks to give you a broader sense

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening. Right, And if you take it, you know,

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>during one point in your life, you might have different

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>experiences the versus you know, another time in your life.

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I know personally, you know my training and my experience.

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>UM I've used uh the Myers Briggs and m M

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>p I um you know, for for example, I think

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the Myers Briggs has used a lot in career counseling. Um.

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>If so it's used to as as one way to

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>think about what might be a good career fit for

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>an individual. And UM, I know it's used a lot

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>now in schools to help of you know, students decide

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on majors and what, you know, what might be a

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>good fit for them in terms of uh course of

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>study for them. Well that's really interesting. So we've been

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about it like personality tests are comprehensive, but really

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they're just one tool and an arsenal exactly like we

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>as humans in this golden age of convenience, Like we

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 1>want a quick, one test life hack for complete understanding

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of ourselves. And it would be great if there was

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a marshmallow that could tell us if and how we

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>were going to be successful. But I think part of

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the danger is trying to take these things too seriously

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on your own, Like it's almost like self diagnosing yourself

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on web m D. You might have some success rate,

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>but it's better to visit someone who looks at this

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for a profession. And obviously these tests are also evolving

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and have evolved over the years, right I mean, And

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there are newer tests to like the ones that measure

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 1>for the five personality types, which supposedly give you more

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of an honest analysis of your traits and may even

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>evolve to a test on a sixth trade, which, according

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>to new scientists, will shed light on how much of

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a schemer you are and how machiavellian your personality is

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a Slytherin scale, And of course, like Walter Michelle was saying,

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>your personality has room to change. According to New scientists,

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>one US study showed that divorce can make women more

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>extroverted and open to new experiences, and big life changes

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't the only thing. Like exposure to just four to

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks of psychotherapy has been shown to decrease neuroticism

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and increase extra version. That said, I know now we

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.879
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be reading too much into these personality tests without

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the help of a professional, but I do think there's

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing we can manage safely on our own, the

0:43:47.920 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>part time genius fact off. Yeah yeah, all right, Well

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>here's one to kick this off. One of the most

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>curious psychology tests, the rorschak, actually has a surprisingly strange origin.

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Before it was used as a psychiatric evaluation tool, it

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.919
<v Speaker 1>was a parlor game used for people's amusement. In fact,

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it predates the roar shock by about a hundred years.

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And get this, the ink blots were used for fortune

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>telling and to inspire menacing poetry. So, speaking of rorshok,

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.720
<v Speaker 1>did you know that after World War two, two American

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>psychologists got access to prominent Nazis like Rudolf Hess and

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Hermann Goring actually in their cells in Nuremberg, and when

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they showed ink blots to them, the Nazis obliged with

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>these incredibly vivid responses. In one in plot, Hess saw

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>quote two men talking about a crime with blood on

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>their mind. God Another prisoner claimed that he saw a

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:56.280
<v Speaker 1>bear with teeth and legs and shadows, which represents Bullshevism

0:44:56.320 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>overrunning Europe. Like, that's so specific. And of course these

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>answers probably gave the roor Shock more credence than it

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>deserved in deciphering people's traits and their tendencies. And some

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>psychologists actually refer to the test as Dracula because no

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>one's been able to drive a stake through the curse

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>thing's heart. That's pretty crazy. So all right, so here's

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>one you might remember from the mental Flaws days, but

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I'd completely forgotten about it. Did you know that from

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the forties to the sixties, at most ivy League schools

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and top tier colleges, freshmen were required to pose naked

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 1>their nude portraits somewhere of people like George Bush and

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Diane Sawyer because the psychologist named William Herbert Sheldon believed

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you could decipher a person's intelligence and potential success based

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>on their body types. The Nine Life did a cover

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>story on the project, and the tobacco industry use the

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 1>pictures to study men and masculinity. Okay, so one last

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Roar Shock fact, because I can't help myself. As Annie

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Murphy Paul points out, when psychologists asked what might this be,

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the only truly logical answer is an ink plot, But

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>according to her, generally only severely mentally ill people give it.

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's what I think you'll like. While classical

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 1>music and heavy metals seem completely dissimilar, according to Adrian North,

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the professor in Edinburgh, the psychological profiles of people who

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to classical or heavy metal are almost identical. Obviously

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they tend to be for different age groups, but partially

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's about the music itself. Both are very grand and

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>emotionally dramatic, and also take a certain amount of mental

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 1>openness to embrace and appreciate. That's crazy and so good.

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give you this round. And I really

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>hope no one's analyzing my personality based on my Spotify

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>playlist because my kids have run wild with that thing.

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we haven't given anyone a part time

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.879
<v Speaker 1>genius award this episode. All right. Well, I've actually been

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this one, and I think we should give

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it to Walter the marshmallow Man. Michelle, Oh, I actually

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 1>love that. I've been talking badly about his marshmallow experiment

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>forever and to realize that his test actually embraces the

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that people can learn and change like that totally

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>made my day wonderful. All right, well, Walter, you'll be

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>added to our official Hall of Genius and we'll be

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>sending you a certificate in the mail, and if you

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>wait two weeks to open it, maybe we'll send you

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>another one. That's it for today's show. Thanks so much

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for listening. You know what's amazing to look at is

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>how people analyze handwriting for personality. Apparently, if you place

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the dot on your eyes too high, you're too Optimus

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>one to watch out for that. Thanks again for listening.

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Part Time Genius is a production of how stuff works

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and wouldn't be possible without several brilliant people who do

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the important things we couldn't even again to understand. Christa

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 1>McNeil does the editing thing. Noel Brown made the theme

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:51.720
<v Speaker 1>song and does the mixy mixy sound thing. Gary Rowland

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>does the exact producer thing. Gay Bluesier is our lead researcher,

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>with support from the Research Army including Austin Thompson, Nolan

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Lucas Adams and he's Jeff Coo gets the

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.440
<v Speaker 1>show to your ears. Good job, Eves. If you like

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 1>what you heard, we hope you'll subscribe. And if you

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:06.399
<v Speaker 1>really really like what you've heard, maybe you could leave

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a good review for us. Do we do we forget Jason?

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Jason who