WEBVTT - Decoding the UK’s Property Market ‘Standoff’

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.079
<v Speaker 1>So here we are talking about the UK property market.

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Yet again, what we're trying to figure out, because let's

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>face it, it's a national obsession, much like the weather,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is where house prices from here go, and also trying

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what happens to commercial real estate. Welcome

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to in the City of Bloomberg's podcast, connecting you to

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the conversations at the heart of the City of London.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Francine Laquana. This week Temperature Check on really where

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>things stand for both houses and offices across Britain and

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>exactly how scary are things looking. For that, we bring

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in the experts, senior reporters Jack Sitters and John Steppeck

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and Sue London, a senior property analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. John,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you've been to Barcelona, so you're basically not that happy

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>about being back because the weather is not as good

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as it could be and house prices are probably highed.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you do any property porn looking?

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd say, did? Did you did? I'm sort of embarrased

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 2>met that, because you know, I should be above these things.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Were staying in a really nice bit of Barcelona and

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>it's like one of these nice kind of like town

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 2>flats and I was thinking, oh, wondering much this is,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 2>and then when I realized it was two million years,

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it was like, what, No.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>John, I only trust people that do that. I mean,

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if you go on holiday and have a nice time,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>why would you not, you know, pop by the estate

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>agent to have a look at how much prices are.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 2>It's true, it's just I like to try and be

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 2>zen about these things. I was just enjoying my holiday,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 2>take a break from worrying about property prices.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Your newsletter is a bit scary, right because it talks

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>about the UK housing market once again being in the

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>balance to a bad well.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean it depends like if you're looking to buy

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 2>a house then that's probably for better. But I mean

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 2>overall too, I think the UK economy is too driven

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 2>by kind of the property market, not even driven by

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a bit. It's kind of held back a bit by

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the perception that basically that's the only asset that spot

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>investing in in this country, and from a retail investor

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>point of view, saying that that's a that's a bad

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>thing overall terms, better to be hard with the housing market.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a kind of standoff. So on the

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>one hand, like if you told I think everyone in

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>this room the interest rates would go from one percent

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to over five percent and eighteen months this time last year,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>you would think a probably would be in a big

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>recession and b house prices would have created and that

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>hasn't happened. Like, house prices are down about four three

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 2>four percent from the peak in August, more like twelve

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>percent if you'd take inflation into account. But you know,

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 2>they haven't crashed. The only thing that has kind of

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>crashed it is transactions or so sellers don't want to

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 2>pay and buyers don't want to sell out the prices

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 2>that sellers can afford now, and that's basically because obviously

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 2>mortgage courts have gone up, so sellers just simply can't

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 2>raise as much money to buy houses. And really what

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 2>happens next kind depends on if the labor market stays firm,

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and obviously wages were very strong today's we're recording this,

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>then that means there probably won't be any forced sellers.

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 2>But the longer this goes on for you know, or

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the longer you have to expect, well, something's got to give.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And presuming the interest rates stay at least where they

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>are for a long period of time, which they is

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>very hard to see how they wouldn't. The thing that's

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 2>got to give is buyers to say, well, okay, maybe

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 2>we have to knock a bit off prices now because

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>otherwise we're not going to be able to move. So

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of how we'd see it unfolding.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of house prices and you know house

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>price dynamics, I guess in support of higher prices or

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a cratering, there's also this funny supply and

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>demand than in the UK. You know, we just don't

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have enough supply out there, and you're right, if wage

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>prices go up, then you feel comfortable that you can,

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe spend a little bit more.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, well this is the other This is

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the kind of the things important prices as well, as

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>long as jobs stay firm. Then some early London particularly

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and obviously I think probably London looms large over the

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>general perception. But if it's a choice to be renting

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 2>for a ridiculous mind payment, then most people are going

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to sit down and say, well, how can I turn

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 2>my ridiculous rental payment into a ridiculous mortgage payment? And

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>at least then I get the sense that I'm actually

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>going to own a place at some point, and that

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>perception is not necessarily always. The case is kind of complicated,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>and you need to think about your personal circumstances. But

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.119
<v Speaker 2>I can see that there's a pressure there because people

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>fael caught between a rock and a hard place. I mean,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 2>physical supplying demand questions are really interesting. One. My view

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>tends to be that interest rates are the main factor

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 2>driving property prices simply because it's basically it's kind of

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>like a bond. You know, obviously it's meant to yield

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a certain amount, and when interest rates go up, you

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>need it to yield more. There for the capital values

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 2>should come down. But obviously in certain places that simply

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 2>aren't enough houses, because you know, everybody wants to live,

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, everybody likes leaving its own one, you know exactly.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And you say rent prices are creat I mean they've

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>gone up some thirty percent right into place in central London.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in London. I mean, the one thing I pointed

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 2>with London is the prices did also kind of collapse

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 2>and during the pandemic. So although you know, the last

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>two years have been terrible for renters. Twenty twenty and

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one were great. I mean, I knew quite

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a few people from my own experience who ended up,

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, either moving a much nicer property for the

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>same price, or you know, getting a much better deal

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 2>on their rent. Because during the pandemic the city emptied out.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>So one reason's bounced back so much and so aggressively

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 2>is because of that. But also landlords are selling up.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So you have this as a mortgage, it is because

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>mortgages are.

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because the thing the landlord mortgages is that if

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>you've got a mortgage as a landlord, it's an interest

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 2>only loan, and so as interest rates go up, your

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 2>mortgage kind of goes up at the same pace as them.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>But as if it's a repayment loan, you don't go

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>up by as much. So like you know, if you

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>don't if you had a by to let mortgage at

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>two percent and it's now six percent, your monthly payment

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>has trebled in that time. So a lot of landlords

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 2>are finding that their cash flow negative basically by the

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>end of the month, and that's being reflected and actually

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the repossession figures and also and the sales figure is

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>one of our colleagues, Damien, just wrote a piece about

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 2>landlords selling up at a much more faster rate than

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 2>people expected. The problem is it's not first time buyers

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>who end up getting those properties necessarily a lot of time,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 2>whither be either cash rich landlords or it will be

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 2>possibly first time buyers. But then you're talking about these

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>properties might have been multiple occupancy ones, so you've still

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>get that kind of bottleneck there, which means that the

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>supplier rental property falls and you still have a large

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>number of renters who want to rent. In fact, the

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 2>number of renters who want to rent goes up because

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>people think, well, I'm going to hold off buy and

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 2>in case prices fault. So that is kind of Horribleally,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>if you're in that situation, can.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I ask you a question about the landlords and renting,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>because obviously they're the new EPC standards coming through, And

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 3>at what point you think maybe the landlords, when they're

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 3>making the decision on that six percent is looking pretty tough,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 3>do they sort of think, well, I've actually got to

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 3>put quite a lot more capital into my property as well.

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>For us, your mordals, what is EBC?

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, that's the environmental controls that the government is putting on.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>The first phase of that came in in April, and

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>it phases up so that you've got to be an

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>A or a B, which is quite environmentally friendly by

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty. So it's only going to escalate. I mean,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 3>it's affecting commercial real estate. But I just wondered if

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>it was also a trigger potentially for land laws moving

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 3>out of the market because they're a bit scared. Some

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 3>of those buildings that are rented out really do need

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 3>some upgrades, don't they.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I definitely know, and you're absolutely right. In fact, it

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>was interesting because Damien's piece that I mentioned earlier, they

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of going back to the HMRC starts. They found

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>that the by to sale off if you like, actually

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>started and can I early twenty twenty one, so before

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the interest rates became such a big issue, and I

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>think at least part of that is driven by the

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>environmental standards because the art haven't the upgrade and those

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>also obviously there's a general I feel like regulatory hostility

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>to the small landlord. Now, I mean that started wee

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>bike with George Osbond's tax changes, so we all have

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>to be absolutely honest, my sympathies for landlords are not

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 2>high because there's an awful lot of bad actors in

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the sector. It is not absolutely not the tame it

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>can be in howmateur landlord, what we think they're getting then,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and no, I think you're absolutely through. The EPC's definitely

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>an issue as well.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But in commercial real estate, I guess the way that

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the deals are structured, there's so much more leverage, they'll

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>be much more sensitive to interest rate increases.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there is a broad span of that, and the

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 3>listed arena the shareholders have been on and on about

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 3>being highly leveraged for the UK roats for some time now.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 3>So even though you would be allowed to have normally

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>on a loan coven into sixty percent loan to the

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 3>value of the property. A lot of the main routes

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that were down in the twenties ahead of going into

0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 3>this period and now they're creeping up to the thirties

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 3>isn't moving into the forties. And it's the commercial real

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 3>estate companies that had sort of forty percent or more

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 3>going into this that are the ones where the stress

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>is really showing. In the private markets, quite often they

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 3>would go to that covenant. So I think that there

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 3>is going to be signs of distress, and certainly the

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 3>routes are starting to say that, you know, there's some

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 3>of that coming out. But I think Jack, you'll probably

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 3>agree with me. On the operational side. You know, the

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>properties which have got the good EPC ratings, that are

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 3>environmentally friendly, that are brand spanking new, they're filling up.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But seventy percent of what's vacant at the moment across

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Central London, for example, where vacancy's eight point five percent

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I think, and three point eight in the West End

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 3>and about twelve percent in the city. I think there's

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the numbers you know that's all concentrated in the second

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>hand property that hasn't been upgrade and it's looking a

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 3>bit down at heel.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And second hand property basically, Jack just means where you've

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>had a lease and you're what the second tenants.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>It could be.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 5>Anything that isn't the sort of the best newest space,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 5>So you know, probably and that definition of what is

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 5>the best space is getting narrower and narrow and narrower.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 5>So what location so very centralized locations. So if you

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 5>look at some of the big companies that have moved

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 5>recently HSBC for example, they've gone from Canary Wharf. They've

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 5>chosen to come into the city, so you know, more

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 5>central location. Similar for Clifford Chance, huge law firm who

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 5>are Wharf, they've come into the city as well. You

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 5>see a bunch of companies coming from sort of West London.

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, if you have a drive out of London

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 5>on the M four, you see all those great big

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 5>office buildings. A lot of the companies that use that

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 5>type of space they've started to move in as well.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 5>And that's it's I think there's a number of different

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 5>factors here on the sort of occupational side. I guess

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 5>one of the realizations that companies have had after the

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 5>pandemic and this whole experiment with more flexible working is well.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Why don't if people are going to be in the building.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Less, Maybe we need less space, but therefore we can

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 5>afford to spend more on better space that will attract

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 5>people in so more and amenities, you know, in easier

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 5>to get to location, trying to incentivize people to come

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 5>in and overall your cost probably doesn't change that much.

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's also a very long term trend that's

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 5>always worth bearing in mind, is forty or fifty years ago,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 5>rent would have been a lot of business's highest cost.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Now it's tiny relative to labor costs. I mean, I

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 5>think in the city it used to be something like

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 5>forty or fifty percent that the average business costs would

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 5>be on rent. Now it's more like five percent. So actually,

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 5>in terms of sort of staff recruitment and retention, spending

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 5>a bit more to get a better office can be

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 5>quite a good investment for businesses, you know, because if

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 5>it means you lose fewer staff ultimately that's that's pretty

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 5>good for your bottom line.

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But Jack, that's a crazy number. So from forty percent

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>cost it's gone down to five percent? Is this because

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>everything else has become more expensive? H or rents in

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>London also have come down.

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 5>In real terms, they've come down, I mean, rents are

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 5>very cyclical. To come back to something talking about earlier,

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 5>it's it's been a really interesting year covering commercial estake

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 5>because this time last year you could start to see,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 5>you know, the writing was potentially on all rates starting

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 5>to ratch it up pretty quickly, And I remember hitting

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 5>the phones calling various people who've seen plenty of cycles

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 5>and speaking to senior private equity real estate investor, and

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 5>he was like, look, you know, every real estate crash,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 5>every commercial real estate crash, is typically defined by a

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 5>surfit of cranes or a surfit of credit, and we

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen that this time, so I'm not too concerned.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 5>But we've also never seen a modertary policy shift as

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 5>rapid as we have this time. And so actually in

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 5>the UK, the repricing, the sort of correction that we

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 5>had particularly in Q four last year, but that did

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 5>continue into Q one this year is the fastest we've

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 5>ever seen. It's more vitiginous than the GFC, not as deep,

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 5>but the rate of decline has been more quick. But

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 5>at the same time, as soon mentioned, the operational kind

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 5>of fundamentals are actually pretty good. There isn't that much

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 5>excess supply. That hasn't been that much building. You Brexit

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 5>put people off, developing been a whole, and then the

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 5>pandemic as well, so there isn't loads and loads of

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 5>kind of excess new space coming to my ow and

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 5>the UK. On the public side, the UK reads have

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 5>kind of learned their lessons in the GFC. Most of

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 5>them came into this cycle with relatively low leverage. I mean,

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 5>it's quite different when you compare it to the continental

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 5>public landlords. A lot of them have come into this

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 5>with you know, forty or fifty percent leverage, and that's

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 5>going to get much uglier, I think. But I think

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 5>the uk reaates broadly, certainly on the office side of

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 5>been quite well behaved when it comes to leverage actually though.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 3>But I've just been looking at some of the stats

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 3>for Central London that Derwert London, one of the big

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>London uts, put out in their presentation for their results

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 3>last week, and it is quite scary if you look

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 3>at the take up and you look at the new starts.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>New starts on site in the second quarter of this

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 3>year were really strong, and we've got a supply situation

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>where there is forty five percent more space than the

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.239
<v Speaker 3>normal average being.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Completed this year to what Central London.

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 3>This is Central London offices for percent more and a

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 3>lot of that has not yet been let Is that.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Why I'm seeing like twenty five cranes out the office window.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 3>It could be reach many questions, all sorts of things,

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's probably smaller properties, but there's a

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of land also obviously put some money into that.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Now the new starts this year, you can see, Okay,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 3>well that will be delivered in twenty twenty five. If

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I've got the funding for it, then I'm going to

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 3>be delivering into perhaps a better market. That's what they're thinking.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure I entirely agree with them, because I

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>think this might actually go along. But in terms of

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>take up in the first half of the year it's

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>thirty five percent below for normal level, So you've got

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 3>disappearing on both sides. Rent in the city stayed flat

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>about seventy pounds a square foot a year, and in

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the West End it's been creeping up. So you've got

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>all these different things going on and it's really hard

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>to see how it's going to go.

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 5>Also, on those sort of capital market side, the fact

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 5>that the UK and London in particular is corrected so

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 5>quickly is a good thing because what you're seeing in

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 5>content Europe, where prices haven't adjusted to interest rates and

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 5>kind of everyone knows where they're going but nobody's admitting

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 5>it yet, means you've just got this total stand off

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 5>between buyers and sellers. Where in the UK, because prices

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 5>have corrected and that was sort of probably aided and

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 5>avetted by what happened last autumn with the mini budget

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 5>and all the rest of it. There is a sort

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 5>of pool of buyers who are sat on the sidelines,

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 5>and we've had a few false storms this year where

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 5>everyone thinks that rates are peaked, you know, and then

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 5>you get a hot CPI print and suddenly expectations move

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 5>out a bit. But as soon as there is a

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 5>bit more certainty, a bit more confidence that you know,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 5>THEO has gone as far as it's going to go,

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 5>I think you'll see quite a few buyers jump back in.

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 5>And to your point around the increase in construction start

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 5>to Looyte put out surveyed twice a year on called

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 5>the Crane survey, you know, literally you know, measuring it up, Yeah, exactly.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I count demise that coming into the office every day.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 5>And the striking thing from looking at the most recent

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 5>one of those is that it's massively all those new

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 5>starts are massively driven by refurbishments. And I think a

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 5>lot of that is the PC thing that we were

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 5>talking about earlier. So same for offices, You're not going

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 5>to be able to rent them out at all unless

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 5>they're this ALB by twenty thirty. Now whether the government

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 5>sticks with that is another question. But so there's loads

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 5>of landlords who are sitting on properties that you know,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 5>with leases that are coming to the end of their life,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 5>have just come to the end of life that are

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 5>cory rated CD or an E, and so they're like, well,

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to be able to rent this unless

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 5>we improve it.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So what happens to these massive buildings and projects. I

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>know HSBC got a lot of people talking because first,

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was seen as kind of the great

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>hybrid project of people coming into work, so as Jack said,

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you need less offare space. But also it's a huge tower,

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Like what happens to the HSBC tower? Who's going to

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>rent that?

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Those are really difficult questions. The way that it's structured

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 3>for an office and the size of the floor plates

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 3>means that it's very difficult to convert that into residential

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 3>that you know, you're used to having all the wires

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 3>under the you know, in between the floors. And I'm

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 3>not an architect, I don't know all the construction details,

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 3>but my understanding that you know, it's very difficult. So

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 3>it's almost more economical to put the whole thing down

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and build something else. But on top of that, you've

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 3>got to get the planning for it too, so it

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 3>will take quite a long time. So you've got a

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 3>long period where your money isn't going to be generating

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>any cash. So you know, there are quite a big

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 3>constraints towards that. And I'm a bit worried about Canary Wharf.

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that that's just a very particular case,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 5>or in fact not just Warf but those types of

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 5>very deh nineties early two thousand sort of banking towers

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 5>are kind of white elephants, I think. On the conversion thing,

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 5>if you think about big deep trading floor, you just

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.239
<v Speaker 5>can't really convert it in the flat because everybody needs

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 5>a window unless you had a whole load of like

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 5>very very narrow, long flats by the back.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Of the foot of the children.

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, really dark, So that doesn't really work. I mean,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 5>in Canary Wharf Group's case, they're very well capitalized. It's

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 5>owned by Brookfield and Qatar, They've got a lot of

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 5>real estate acupant. Yeah, they will, and they've seen this

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 5>coming for a long time, so they are gradually repositioning

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 5>that state.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 4>I think they'll they'll be okay.

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 5>But you've got some indivial dual you know, overseas investors

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 5>who came in and bought what they thought was a

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 5>trophy asset that maybe had ten years on the lease

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 5>to Moody's or S and P or whoever it was,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 5>and now it's got five years on the lease and

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 5>they don't necessarily have the skills to reposition that. And

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 5>that's where you're seeing starting to see those pockets of distress. Ye,

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 5>there's a couple of big buildings in Canary Wharf that

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 5>are owned were owned by a Chinese investor, that are

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 5>now in the hands of receivers. And I think it'll

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 5>be those investors who bought just for the income who

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 5>don't really have the skill set to reposition those where

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 5>that'll be more difficult.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Think.

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 5>I think the solutions, you know, there'll be some life

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 5>science space. That's one area where the UK is doing well.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 5>There's a big shortage of lab space. Again, there's a

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 5>whole load of technical issues around which buildings you can

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 5>change into lab space and which ones you can't anoun

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 5>to do with floor to ceiling heights and loading and

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 5>all this sort of stuff, but some of them that

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 5>will work. Some of them will work for residential conversion.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, the big skyscrapers like HSBC's, that's going to

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 5>be really interesting. My understanding is some of the options

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 5>that katar are looking at. There are things like putting

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 5>in a huge auditorium so that all the tenants on

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Wolf State could share some lab space, some flexible office

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 5>space would be a kind of a bit of a mixture,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a vertical village type thing. But it's

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 5>not easy. And there's a lot of big towers out

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 5>there that are not fully occupied. You know, they might

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 5>have somebody that currently pays the rent for the whole building,

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 5>but they're not using the whole building. And when those

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 5>leaders expire, there's going to be a question about who

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 5>takes them on.

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>If you will get interest rates if they go out,

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Does it make a huge difference to residential if interest

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>rates go to five point five or six percent and above,

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>or is that really the kind of stress that we'd

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>see in commercial more than residential.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 2>It's probably not as quick for residential. And I said,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>one thing I thought was really interesting was the point

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of itut creams and credit because the other thing about

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the residential market is it is a similar story. And

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, obviously there's never enough supply in the UK,

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of the cret that see the things

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 2>you know on late two thousand and eight, the borders

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>will not over stretched going into this spotillically. So one

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 2>of the interesting things about how Britain obviously was kind

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>of at this center of the two for nine talk cases.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of meant that we spent the last fifteen

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 2>years deal average and the law always and it's mainly

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 2>only the government that's leveled up and the behalf of

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. So I mean, the consumers are in the

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 2>businesses on the bills, the comminent of this, so on

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the funny ken of we that's why we haven't had

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the sort of the demolition you would have expected from

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 2>reach's moving so quickly.

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 4>And on the supply side, I mean, I totally agree

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 4>with you.

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 5>I think it's rates are definitely the kind of fundamental

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 5>driver for house prices, but the supply is part of

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 5>the picture. And when you look at the listed housebuilders,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 5>they've all massively taken their foot off the accelerator in

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 5>terms of you know, how much they're planning to build

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 5>and get The proportion of homes in this country that

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 5>are built by the big four house builders is really

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 5>unhealthily high.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 4>So when those.

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Guys say, right, you know, we're risk off, then that'll

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 5>have a very quick impact in terms of overall new supply.

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean that the idea that we've got a three

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 5>hundred thousand has a year target, we're not going to

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 5>We haven't we.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Haven't been hitting that anywhere.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 5>We're going to get so far off that over the

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 5>next few years because they really have you know, again,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 5>they were very badly burned in two thousand and eight.

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 5>They had these huge landbanks, so they had to write

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 5>down massively and that was really ugly. Again like the

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 5>read so I think the house build has largely learned

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 5>their lessons. They've had, you know, smaller landbanks. They've been

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 5>more quick to slow down on new land acquisitions. But

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 5>yet the upshot will be that you'll have the added

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 5>impact of lower supply that'll just helps prop up prices

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 5>even more.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I have ten million to give away to

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>each of you. Where do you ten I'm so generous,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe twenty million?

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Where do you put it?

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Would you invest it in real estate? Right now?

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 3>John not.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Because one thing I was going to see is the

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>other good thing is that all the listed stuff so

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>whose bill does created and you know, like and still

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 2>very law and the reds also kind of ups and

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>that's one of these things about the equity market and

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 2>that obviously there's counts or the carvage and then when

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the car hasn't quit material. I mean, this is not

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 2>personal advice thought the building.

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You're not buying that, you're not buying a property, You're

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you're investing property.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 5>This is the way I most regretted being restricted, like

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 5>you've seen where the it's like, you know, fifty percent

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 5>plus discounts to n a V in order prices would

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 5>have to fall so far in order for that to

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 5>not be a good deal. But public markets are public markets,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 5>and there's that same argument has been there for months

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 5>and months. It has been but at some point the

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 5>will and you know, people who are brave and willing

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 5>to go and buy some property stocks now will probably

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:53.479
<v Speaker 5>again not not investment.

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 4>There's potentially a lot of upside there.

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you answered all of that seriously. I mean,

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>someone say I'm making for a second in Scotland because

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of climate changeable. Thank you all, thanks for listening to

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this week's in the City. We'll be back next week

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime. If you like our show, please head

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on over to Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, rate, review,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe. This episode was hosted by me Francin Laqua.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It was produced by Summersati with help from Jil Namazzi.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Additional editing by Blake Maples. Special thanks to Jack Sitters,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Sue Munden, and John Steppeck.