WEBVTT - What does Web 2.0 mean?

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology with

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Polette.

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor here at how stuff works dot com,

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and sitting across from me, as he always does, is

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>senior writer Jonathan Strickland. The only way to win is

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>not to play. You know, I really enjoy our our

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>new studio. This is so much nicer than I'm glad. Uh.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The only thing is the pool. We have to kind

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of stay out of the pool because it makes a

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of noise when we're trying to uh, trying to

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>record a podcasts really stir Josh and Chuck and the

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>electricity incident. We really don't want to get in net

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>pool anyway. So let's talk a little bit about a

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>subject that I find endlessly entertaining. Sure, Web two point oh?

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>The heck is it? Is it? What we think it is?

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean anything? Where am I? Where do I live? What?

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry? I just I kind of get off on

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a whole series of questions there. Web two point oh

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>can mean a lot of things. But I can tell

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you what it meant when it was coined, and the

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>person you have to think or blame, depending on how

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, I think in general, probably think

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>would be O'Riley, the publisher, O'Riley vice president Dale Doherty,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>who came up with the idea, uh, basically back in

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a retreat that they were talking about different things, and

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially what he meant at the time was these websites

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>survived the dot com crash, and this is why because

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>they had they sort of had a common set of

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>characteristics that people still wanted to use, right right. What

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of qualities set those companies apart from the ones

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that collapsed dot com crash? Sorry I'm interrupting. These guys

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>had a business model in a lot of cases, and

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>some of them didn't, which helped them along. Let's talk

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about the dot com crash a little bit before we

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>get into web two point. Oh so, let's let's cast

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>our minds back to the mid nineties. Okay, but I

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 1>can't throw very far. I've kind of a wimpy arm. Right, Well,

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>your brain doesn't weigh that much, so I think you'll

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to get some more distance than you think

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the back in the mid nineties. The web is relatively new.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, the web really started coming out in the

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, UM, and companies were just starting to kind

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of get a presence on the web, and we started

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing companies that with existence that existed outside the web

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>make an entry first, right right, So, like you know,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be some recognizable brand creating a website as

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a way of marketing that brand. Now, at the time,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>no one really knew the most effective way of doing

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it because it was so brand new, right right. And

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in addition to a lot of a lot of companies

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>thought it was just a flash in the hand. They

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't see a whole lot of value in even bothering

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with it in the first place. Well, and I can

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of understand why, because at the time it was

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>really a niche thing that at that time. Again, college

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>students were probably the number one consumers of the web

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>when it first came out. UM and then people in

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>research facilities think people who are using it as a

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>means of actually communicating their their work to one another. Uh.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And so in those early days, you might have thought,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>if you were if you were a corporate executive that, uh,

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>why would we market directly to these people. We can

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>use television and print marketing the way we've always used it. Um,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this web thing is never going to go anywhere. Of course,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that was not the case. The web exploded, and during

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that explosion, a lot of people got this kind of

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>cool idea, like, what if we built a company that

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was founded upon the web. Web itself was the face

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of the company, the interface between company and customer, and

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>will provide either a product or a service, and the

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>web will be the way that we uh that we

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>present that to to the average customer. And a lot

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of different companies sprung up using this idea. Everyone's thinking,

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the future. Everyone's gonna buy

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>everything online, um and uh. And before you knew it,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>companies were popping up in in the dozens every single day,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>and you had lots of investors interested in this idea

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>pouring money into these these companies um that had either

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>no business model, an unproven business model, or at least

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at the very least no proven revenue, right, I mean

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they I've heard more than one person referred to the

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>early days of the web as sort of a wild

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>West scene. You know, to overuse a cliche, but um,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially, you know, it kind of was like

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>that people were in such a hurry to to to

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>claim their territory, to to come to the web with

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a brand new idea or at least, you know, one

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that they could take ownership off before everyone else got

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to it, that they didn't really think through things very

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>well well. And and these a lot of these little

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>companies did not need the massive amount of investment that

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they received, and in a way that actually ended up

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hurting them. You get a company that what might need

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say a hundred thousand dollars investment in order to

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to really get off the ground and work, and what's

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>instead get a million dollars of investment. And so the

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>person righting the company be like, well, great, now I

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>can hire tons and tons of people. And you ramp

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>up faster that before you've even built an infrastructure, So

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>before you've built the basic structure for your your business

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to rest on, you are going into full swing. And

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these companies could not maintain that momentum.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, you got to hear stories about how

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>people were going to be paid in in stock options

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>because these companies were doing crazy amounts of of you know,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the the amount of money being invested into into them. UM.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Some of the ones that went public, their stocks rose

0:05:55.080 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>dramatically overnight because everyone was interested in it. I mean,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the initial public offering or i p OH for some

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of these companies was massive, and and in the weeks

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>immediately following UM, some of the people who had stock options,

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and some of the very early pioneers of the Internet,

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the ones that are still around, especially the

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ones who've had real staying power, they made quite a

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of money just on the stock options that they

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>were granted as part of their UH incentive packages. Right now,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>if you were if you were to make a ton

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of money off this initial UM Internet boom, this initial

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>web boom, the best way for you to have made

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>money off this would be to get tons and tons

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of stock and then almost immediately sell it off because

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>because the real problem was that as the reality set

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in that these companies were not generating revenue and therefore

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>not making a return on the investment that had been

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>poured into them, the companies began to collapse. Now the

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>stock became worthless, and so people who were paid in

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>stock essentially made nothing. UM or or close to nothing,

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of these companies went away and only

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>a few, uh by relative means anyway, survived. Now, those

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>companies that did survive were the ones that that Dougherty said,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we're web two point o companies. These were the ones

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that did something differently than the ones who died out,

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they were able to stick around. So

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the the task at hand at this this conference was

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>let's look at these companies, see what sort of things

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they did differently, and then that is what we will

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>now define as being what is required to be successful

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a successful company on the web. Yeah, and uh, over

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the years, I think people didn't necessarily understand what what

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>he meant, um because web two point out of the

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>term web two point I was kind of gotten hijacked

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and almost now is synonymous with social networking. Yeah, and

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's simply because, Um, their earliest websites were basically

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>one way websites. The publisher would put them up on

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the web, and I mean about the most interaction you

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>had with it was, you know, if there was an

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>email address on there for you to reply to, you

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>could you know, send the author an email and let

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>them know what was going on but there were really

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't any embedded interaction of any kind, and the content

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on that site in general tended to be static. So

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you had an animated gif alright, But the what I

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>mean by static is that it did not change. In

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>other words, if you visited it in May of nine

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you went back in March of of and

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the web page was essentially the same page because there

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was no you know, it wasn't dynamic at all. It

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would just stay the same. There wasn't really any incentive

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to go back to that web page, right, And a

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies hadn't really figured out how to leverage

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>the web in such a way where you were providing

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>useful information and a useful way for customers to interact

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>beyond just saying, hey, this is who we are and

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what we do, especially not in a way

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that they could monetize and and try to make a

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>business out of. So let's talk about you could put

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>anything you wanted to on there, but if people weren't

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>coming back and they weren't buying something from you, you

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>really weren't getting anything from it. A matter of fact,

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if you were paying for hosting, then you are paying

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>money to read your content. For them to read your

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>content and not getting anything in returns, that really isn't

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a particularly practical business model. Now that's that's what we

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>call a bad business model. Let's talk about one that

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>actually ended up being a good business model, although it

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>took years for it to turn around. And I'm talking

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon dot Com. Yes. Now, Amazon was one of

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the companies that Alerty would point to and say, this

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is an example of web two point oh, and I

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>would agree, even though it was a company that took

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>years for it to really start making enough money to

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to start and being a return on investment UM. One

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of the things that Amazon did that really helped out

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>early on was Amazon allowed its users to post reviews

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of products. Yes, and this was a an interactive way

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>where customers could get involved in the process and it

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it it added value to Amazon dot COM's service, and

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>because of that, it was able to survive the dot

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>com crash, or that's part of why it was able

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to survive. The fact that it that customers valued that

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>particular part of the service, as well as the fact

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that they could use it to to shop for whatever

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it is they wanted UM meant that they would come

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>back to Amazon dot Com and actually use the service,

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to some of these others where you visit

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>once and then you're like, well that was cool, but

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to ever come back. Another thing that

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon had in its favor is the algorithm on the

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>back end that enables uh, the software running the site

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to identify not only what you have bought, but it

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>helps you It helps match up customers that have bought

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the same thing and make recommendations to you. So suddenly

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason to go back and shop because you go, yeah,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I really like this one book, but you know,

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't really know what I want

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to read next. And Amazon dot Com could say, well,

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what, other people who bought this book bought

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this book too, and you you know, read the description

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of it and read some of the reviews, and you know,

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what, that really does look good. And of

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>course they expanded into many many other markets as well.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, just it's an experience where you go

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to shop, you get an idea of what people think

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>about the product, you get an idea of other things

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that you could buy along with it. That's, you know,

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the add on sale and retail terms. Um, oh, hey,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you're buying this, other people like this one, why don't

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you buy both for especially discounted rate. Um. You know

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that that really helped them survive and and thrive really

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in the in the post dot com crash market. Um.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 1>And it also sort of spawned what Wired um editor

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Chris Anderson called the long tail, because suddenly you were

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>finding items in the back catalog, things that may have

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>even been published years ago, um, that other people liked,

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly those items were starting to sell. And it

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just the top ten of of you know, just

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the best sellers, it was pretty much anything that that

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon carried, and um, suddenly they were able to compete

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with the brick and mortar stores the world, which basically

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>were just carrying stuff that they knew they could sell

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. So UM, that was definitely a good example

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah, and uh, getting back to the dynamic

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>ver sycstatic, this is also when we started seeing things

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like trends like blogging really start to take off. Blogging

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is another good example, and that it's if you go

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to a blog, then that that content changes sometimes on

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>an hourly basis, depending on the blogger, but at least

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like if you visit a blog a couple of times

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a week, you'll notice that there's new content up. Um

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>blogging was one of those things that really attracted people

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to different websites. Again, it gives you a reason to

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>return to the same site over an over again. It's

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not just that you know you don't you don't go

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there just whenever you need something specific. You go there

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because you're interested in the bloggers point of view and

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to see the latest information that that person

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has to offer. Um also the whole Wisdom of the

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>crowds notion. This is another one of those things that

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>came out of the whole web two point o. And

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we touched on it with the Amazon dot Com stuff

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and the user reviews. But another, of course, another great

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>example of that would be all the wikis, including Wikipedia,

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and these are websites that have become successful because they

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>build a community of users and they rely upon the

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>users to provide content. So you're no longer just creating

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>content and serving it to people and telling them that's

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what they want. That's the Steve Jobs method. What you're

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>doing is you're allowing the community of users to create

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the content that they do want and that they're all

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>providing their own point of view and their own expertise

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to kind of to build it up over time. Now,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this is not always success. Well, there are problems that

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>come up because we're people, and people tend to have

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>different ideas of what's best for any given situation, and

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>some of them have agendas and you know that can

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>come into play too, But the basic idea is pretty sound. Yeah, no,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, the idea of user generated content

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>folksonomy's crowdsourcing, you know, getting everybody into the act instead

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of just the content producers. Um. Again, Anderson said, you know,

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>computers democratized the act of creating content, and the Internet

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>basically democratized the act of, uh of distributing that content,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly everybody's you know, creating videos to share on

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and taking other items and mashing them together to

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>make new things. Um. Then you have you know, the

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>interactivity sites where there are you know, games and and

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>things that you can do ajax and the other a

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>p I s that allow you to, uh to make

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>individual sites much more interactive and and functional than they

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>used to be for the user. And you can customize things,

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, portals, um, where you really have control over

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the content RSS feeds to bring to incorporate your blogs

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>into a reader. Yeah, you can syndicate your blog feeds

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and aggregate them in one place, um, along with weather

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and traffic and stock reports and all that stuff. You know.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it just makes those sites interactive, you know, and

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to the point where, uh, you can you have a

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>reason to come back to them every day, and there

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a way to keep you there. Um. You know,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook certainly has found a way to do that. Yeah,

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you've actually touched on something else that I thought I

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>would mention about Web two point oh, and that part

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of the whole idea is that you can access the

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>web through multiple um means not just sitting at your computer,

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but on say a cell phone or smartphone right or

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>tablet device or whatever. Um. That's another important part of

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>web two point oh. A good web two point site

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>would be accessible through multiple forms of electronic devices, so

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that way a person can consume that product or service

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever however you wanted to find it, um in

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the way that he or she prefers. So you might

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have certain people who for example, Twitter is a great

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>example okay. Some people prefer to use Twitter just by

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>going to the Twitter website, reading the updates, and occasionally

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>updating from there. Some people prefer to download a client

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to their computers so they can keep up with Twitter

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>updates throughout the day. Some people prefer to only interact

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter through some sort of handheld device like a phone,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>where they've either got a Twitter client on there, or

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they're actually using the Twitter Phone API where they can uh,

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I can update through text messages. UM. I don't know

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone who does that specifically because it tends to eat

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>up your text messages pretty quickly. But I'm sure there

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>are people out there who do use that. I have

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>done that on occasion, but that's it's a good example there.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has really got the right idea as far as

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>giving users the most flexibility to to access that service

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>as possible, or Twitter kind of is still you know,

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>questionable as the whole business model angle. Um. Some of

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>these companies have great business models where they are clearly

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>making plenty of revenue. UM. There are other companies where

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the business model is either emerging or still kind of murky,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>where we're not really sure if they figured out a

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>way to monetize what they do. Uh, that's one of

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the downsides of some of the folks who are on

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the web is that they've got these great ideas of

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>ways of providing really compelling services or websites or whatever,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have the business expertise to find a

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>way of actually leveraging leveraging that to make money beyond

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the initial investment. Sure, so I can get investors to

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pour money into it, but again, when we look back

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at the dot com crash, if you don't find a

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>way to generate revenue so that you can repay those investors,

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.959
<v Speaker 1>then it just becomes a borrowing game until people are

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>no longer willing to lend you money. And once they've

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>figured out that you don't have a viable business model

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're not making money, all you're do is spending

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars, they're not exactly likely to continue funding.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It becomes kind of like a pyramid scheme. You have

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep asking more people to pay money so you

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>can pay back the investors from the previous round as

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>well as keep going. Yeah. Yeah, that that gets scary

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>really really fast. And in fact, a lot of us

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have felt that Twitter was kind of on that path, because, um,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone recognizes that Twitter provides a very valuable service. But

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>until Twitter finds out a way of making money from

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that valuable service, it's a question of how long are

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people willing to pay money in the hope that eventually

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter will get its act together and pay back investments.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that everybody knows for sure that that's

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>very well vluable service. I'm sure that all the people

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>who have used Twitter and quit very early on in

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter does have quite a few of them. We call

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>them losers users. We don't call them that. I call

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>them users. Um, but no, I mean not everyone agrees

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on that. But that's that's one of the things about

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>web two point. Now, there are plenty, plenty, plenty of

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>sites that offer variations of different things, and there's generally

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a flavor that people will eventually hit on when they go,

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>oh wait, I like this one a little better because

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's got it's it's orange instead of green. Um, So

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's always somebody popping up with with a

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>new site these days, but the trick is to get

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>them to to stay on. And then of course people

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>ask about web three point Oh right, Well, I think

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the big winner of web two point oh out of

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone is the whole idea of the social network, although

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you can say that the big winner is really Facebook,

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>at least for the United States. Um yeah, almost every

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>other social network at this point in the United States

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't also ran, even my Space, which was ahead of

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Facebook for a really long time. And then there were

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a Friends too. Yeah, let's yeah, it's barely warranted a mention. Um,

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there's my yearbook dot com. Don't go there, so they

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>But no, the this Facebook really definitely one out in

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the long run. But the social networking idea, the whole

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>idea of connecting people together so that they can communicate

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and participating games and that kind of thing, that really

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>took off, especially after like no, I'd say two thousand four,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>two five, Um, that's when you really start seeing the

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>social networks start to ramp up. And then once Facebook

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>at the scene and that was what two thou seven

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>when they went public with everybody, Uh yeah, then it

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>really exploded. So yeah, moving on to web three point

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what could that be? Well, the question is whether or

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>not it's even a meaningful term. I I honestly think

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that at this point um. I think to some degree,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>web two point oh is a valid term, especially if

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you keep it in the concept of, uh what Dale

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Doherty was thinking of. You know, these survived because they're viable,

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that they can they can support themselves to that end,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure there's ever really going to be a

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Web three point I mean, we've made so many improvements

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>since the dot com bust, but those you know, improvements

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>have come gradually one by one. People sort of had

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>their head screwed on straight, both venture capitalists and the

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>people who create most of the uh, you know, the websites,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the new style websites with interactivity and and and that

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. I'm trying deliberately not trying to call

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it web two point out. I mean, generally, it seems

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like most most websites have an idea of what they're

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the group of people that are trying

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to reach, the business model they're going to do used

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 1>to sustain themselves, and you know, how they're going to

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>achieve their goals. And I'm not sure that there's a leap,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>a significant leap, where there's a demarcation between web two

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>point oh and Web three point out that people are

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>going to point back and go, oh, this this is

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>actually when everything really changed and it's now web three

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>point out. I can think of a couple of possibilities,

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>although both are well really I can think of one possibility,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's really kind of a uh, you know, orwell again,

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>fat chance kind of thing, which is that Web three

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>point oh becomes Facebook is synonymous with web, or Google

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is synonymous with Web. The idea being that you have

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>one company that is so good at defining the web

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>experience that it becomes the de facto definition of the

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 1>web experience and slowly eats up everything else until anything

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>else you would encounter on the web has to play

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>ball with that particular corporation. So, in the example of Facebook,

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of having web pages that you would go and visit,

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have all these ferent Facebook apps or Facebook

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>fan pages or whatever you want to call it, uh

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>to interact with different brands. Now, that would take years

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for that to actually happen, but I could see it

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>happening if if, in fact, trends continued the way they do.

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>For example, the idea being that people are relying more

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on sites like Facebook to find information they want and

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>ask their friends questions then they would going to a

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>traditional search engine. They also have to beat out Google

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to get to that rule. Yeah, so Google and Facebook

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>might eventually face off against one another, or one might

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>try to buy the other one. Uh, that would be interesting.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I do have a different concept of what three point

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>oh might be. What's that the semantic web, that's a

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>great point. Yeah. Semantic web is where you start having

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>some artificial intelligence in the network so that the web

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>itself is respond ending very specifically to what you want

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to see, so that it's it's kind of learning about

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you as you use the web. It relies on a

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>technology called Resource Description Framework or RDF and UM and XML,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>which is by a lot of people's terms successor to HTML,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>although HTML five will probably call that into question. But basically, uh,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty in turning things turning the current web into

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the semantic web is it requires people creating additional markup

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for each page. Because what the semantic web is trying

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to do is um it takes two different items and

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>puts them into a context, and that basically will help

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you match up your interests to the interests of other

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people and it makes connections very quickly or can but

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 1>it also requires people to learn this new technology and

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>implement this new technology. It will probably require new browser

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>technology in order to make that work. So it's not

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a pure, in simple, as we know it right now,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>web technology something that we can just throw into a

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>website and make it work. It's going to take quite

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit of infrastructure managing in the back end. But

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>it is something I mean, you know, it's Tim Berners

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Lee helps come up with it. So, I mean, it's

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a really neat idea that it would make the web

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>more personal and more usable for a lot of people.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways there are some web two point

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>oh websites that sort of incorporate the concept behind it,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's not as efficient as purely what is described

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>as the semantic web, which requires again a lot of

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>markup on the back end. Right, So, first of all,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Tim Burners Lee for those of you who don't remember

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as the guy who invented the World Wide Web. Yeah,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's why why Chris was a name dropping there.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But the yeah, the the whole um concept does require

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of work by human beings to make

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the websites smarter. For lack of a better term, it's

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>smarter than quotes here right, so that you when you

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are searching for something, the well quote unquote knows what

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>it is you're searching for. UM, as opposed to you know,

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the old search engines. You would put in some keywords

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and you would get a bunch of results, and the

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>quality of your results would largely depend upon the quality

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of the keywords you used. So if you didn't use

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the right keywords, or if used very generic keywords, you

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>might get tons and tons of responses, but only a

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>few of them would be relevant to what you actually wanted,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and you'd have to sort through them all. With the

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>semantic web, theoretically your search engine would be able to

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 1>figure out exactly what it was you were looking for

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and return the things you wanted, and maybe even return

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>some stuff that you didn't know about but it has

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>determined you would also be interested in based upon those keywords. Yeah,

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it would be uh, it would be a nice leap

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>forward or something very useful I think for most people.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But um, and nobody is just racing to get on

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that bandwagon. Yeah, just to kind of them. Well maybe

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not nobody, but few people are are racing it on

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that bandwag and I've seen some other predictions, things like

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the web three point o type thing would be more

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of a three D experience where you have an avatar

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>wandering through the web. I honestly don't think that's gonna happen.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's as efficient as using just very

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>simple links. Um. It's much more time consuming, and while

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I can understand the science fiction appeal of it, uh,

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in practice, I just don't see it being very useful.

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think Second Life is a good example of that.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>The Second Life was adopted by a lot of people

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and then abandoned by a lot of people. There's still

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>people who use it and who still find value in it,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but um, but for the most part, I think people

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>realize that it's just not the most efficient way to

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>navigate through the web, and even though it's kind of

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>cool if you need to get something done, it's not

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the route to go. Yeah. Yeah, I think it's one

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of those things where there are just too many people

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>with too many different kinds of interests, and if there's

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>no money in it for people, then they're not going

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to pursue it as a viable technology. And things follow

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way sign, right, right, But We'll keep our

0:27:57.920 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>eyes open so if we do figure out what Web

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>three I know it's going to be. If anything, we'll

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>let you know and hopefully will be making money on it. Now,

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>if you have any ideas of what you think the

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>future of the web is going to be, right, let

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>us know. Are just as tech stuff at how stuff

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>boards dot com. Remember you can also follow us on

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter. Just look for text Stuff h s

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>W on either of those services and interact with us

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>because we enjoy that and we will talk to you

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. If you're a tech stuff and be

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sure to check us out on Twitter text Stuff hs

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>W as r handle, and you can also find us

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook at Facebook dot com slash tech Stuff h

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>s W. For more on this and thousands of other topics,

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>does it how stuff works dot com and be sure

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to check out the new tech stuff blog now on

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the how Stuff Works homepage. Brought to you by the

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you