WEBVTT - Inside the 5

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>advice League dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to another

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>edition of Fantasy Football Weekly. We are in the heart

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of draft season, getting you ready to dominate your draft,

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>your auction, however you like to play. We're here to

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>support you, and by we, I mean myself, Paul Charchy

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and my co host today are Scott Fish and Brian Johnson. Hello, guys,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? What boys? Nice to talk to you.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>We begin each show by taking a tour around the

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>training camps and letting people know what's happening with each

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty two teams. But we will also tell

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of other things of the course of

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the show, including what are every team's tendencies inside the

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>five yard line? And why you should care and you

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>should We'll play our usual three tough questions. We've got

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>our blacklist guys that we will not draft, Guys we

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>never end up with. Guys we don't like that are

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>household names that are potentially sitting on your roster, and

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll make our case for why we won't draft these guys.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll also talk about the traits of a running back bust,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and we will unveil our sleepers. Lots of stuff to

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>get to over the remaining better part of two hours

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>this very media show. It's gonna be fun. It's gonna

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of fun. Let's start with our training

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>camp information for me each of the teams in the league,

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>beginning with the Carolina Panthers. Brian, not a lot of

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>major news coming out of Carolina. I'm not gonna talk

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about Dan Arnold, believe it or not. Either. Robbie and

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Anderson did sign a two year, twenty nine point five

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>million dollar contract extension. People were writing off Robbie Anderson

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>based on terrorist Fish's boy Terris Marshall's strong camp. But

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Robbie's not going anywhere a little, a little undervalued in

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>drafts right now. I think that's I think that's accurate. Scott.

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Las Vegas Raiders. Yeah. So Waller,

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>after missing Darren Waller, after missing a ton of prexes,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>like nine or ten in a row, he is back.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>He's making plays. You can stuff those worries in a sack.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>He's all fine. But also Brian Edwards appears to be

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cars go to among the wide receivers. So maybe for

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a late round in a deep, deep draft. Yeah, um

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>My Sack was never worried about about Waller, Just to

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be just to be clear about that, I think that's

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>an old George Costanza thing, right, stuff him in a stack?

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that is, I don't know. Uh, let's go to

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Packers. A J. Dillon look good in the preseason

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and is expected to see a wildly expanded role this year. Interestingly,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>he was targeted three times in last Weekend's preseason game.

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He was only targeted three times all last year, and

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so it maybe that he's gonna be a little more

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of a pass catching threat than he was allowed to

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be last year. And a lot of times it takes

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of faith in the coaching staff from

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>the coaching staff in order for a player to get

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>passes thrown to them to be allowed to be on

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the field for pass blocking duties, and maybe a A J.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Dillon is expanding into that role. Let's go over to

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team. Brian Curtis Samuel has basically missed

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all of camp. He's been hampered by a growing issue

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in COVID. But Ron Rivera says, uh, he's pretty optimistic

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that Samuel returns quote unquote sometime next week. Sounds real promising.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. So Samuel's running out of time to

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>get ready for the season. So yeah, new team too now. Granted,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>old system, he knows the system and the terminology and

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>everything else. But still and also real quick out of Washington.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Stu Beard not officially named the week one starter yet.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Church that's up, sir. How's your sack feeling about that one?

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I have sad sack. Alright, let's go to the Let's

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the Buffalo Bills. Uh. So in the Singletary

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>versus Zack Moss, lovely battle that we love. Uh. Singletary

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>started and played eighteen of the first twenty snaps but

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>only touched the ball three times, and then Zack Moss

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>came in for the next twenty or so and touch

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball four times. So man, it's really tough to

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>love this. Might it might be a lose lose, which

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>should be disappointing for the Texans. Media reports say that

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they will keep Deshaun Watson on their fifty three man roster.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>He's working with the third and fourth team in practice,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which indicates the team does not likely plan to use him.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>They can't release Watson, they can't I R Watson, So

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of in a jam here, and they'll almost

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.559
<v Speaker 1>certainly try to put him on the Commissioner's exemption list,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think he can by the but because

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we can go in yes, and so it sounds like

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not eligible for it, and so hughs it might

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be a jam. They might have to waste one of

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>their precious fifty three man roster spots on Deshaun Watson

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe hopefully ultimately trade him. Let's go to the

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Kind of a quiet camp for the

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>defending champs as well the starters. The big names have

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>combined to play the six offensive snaps so far this preseason.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But all the household names for Tampa Bay should a

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>full half on Saturday night, so we'll get to see,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>uh how rusty they are. But it seems like they're

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's been partying this whole time since well, I

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but we'll see him on Saturday night, all right.

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Scott uh Cleveland Browns Cleveland Brown's, uh, Donovan People's Jones

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>working with the first team, maybe a late round guy.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think the only thing I want to note

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>here is this is the first year Baker Mayfield is

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the same coach and coordinators in back to

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>back seasons. So and last year he had his best

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown interception ratio. You know, you gotta imagine it improves.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe there's upset. I'm so glad you brought him up,

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's going off the board is roughly quarterback like

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighteen. If you take out those monsoon cold weather

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like late October early November quasi blizzard condition stuff.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>He's actually really consistent fantasy producer. And I think Kevin

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Stefanski's goal last year was to just build confidence in

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, not ask him to do too much. Lean

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>heavily I'm running game. I think Stefancy's gonna loosen up

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the reins a bit here. Odell Beckham returns. There's some

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>real tangible upside in bas. Let's go to the Indianapolis Colts.

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz returned to practice and looks increasingly like he

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>will be the team's Week one starter. He's already practicing

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with the first team and kicker Rodrigo blanket Chip won

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the kicking job over Eddie Pinero, although I think Paniere

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>may surface somewhere else. He was actually really good too.

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh So right now, signs pointing up on on Carson

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Wentz in this offense. Next up the Detroit Lions. That

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>was way too much kicker talk for this show, just

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that one. If I'm gonna bring up more head coach

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Dan Campbell. Dan Campbell very concerned about DeAndre Swift's availability

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for Week one against the forty Niners. Swift has missed

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time this month nursing a groin issue.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, fire up here, Jamal Williams shares and keeping

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>on Jermar Jefferson to rookie running back for Detroit and shocker.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Also a groin issue for Tyrrelle Williams already, but he's

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>expected back next week. But he'll he's ex acted to

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be out again the following week. I'm sure you're just

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>projecting Tim to be out then. Alright, Scott, let's head

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>over to the New York Jets. All right, So Michael

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Carter right now, who we we seem to like on

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this show, is currently listed as the third running back

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on the depth chart, and he came in the game

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>as the fourth running back way deep in the game

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, even after Michael p Ryan, Uh Coleman,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and ty Jansen Johnson appeared to be the starters. Beat

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>reporters have stated they believe it's going to be a

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>three headed monster this season. It's not. We might start

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that way, yes, but it's not going to end that way. Yes,

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we fantasy analysts all assumed that Carter is going to emerge,

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, we've seen these time shares linger far

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>longer than they shed in Kansas City. I know I'm

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the only guy in the universe talking about Byron Pringle,

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and I won't give me the opportunity to talk about

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Byron Pringle, and I'll bend your ear for a long time.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>He's looked good, including leading the Chiefs and receptions in

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the last preseason game. He's also been a camp stand

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>out at various times. Somebody he's gonna walk into the

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>starting job left behind by Sammy Watkins, I think. And

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Mikole Hardman has already been roster. If you've already had

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you draft, Micle Hardman's already been roster. And maybe it's

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be him, or maybe Nicole Hardman just does exactly

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>what he's been doing, and Byron Pringle wins that number

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>two job. Consider picking him up or drafting him with

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the last the last pick, especially if he takes over

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins week one role. Well, yeah, exactly, you can

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>start him for one week. Byron Pringle, let's head next

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Seahawks reports out of Seahawks camp or that

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>tight end Gerald Everett is becoming a favorite target of

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, and Wilson has kind of always leaned on

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>his tight ends, but it's kind of been a revolving

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>door of players. He's never had a guy at tight end,

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and that might be Gerald Everett, who right now is

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>going off the board roughly as tight endive. He's essentially

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>free a lot of a lot of tight ends out

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>there this season. Scott, I think I know what you're

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna say about the Denver Broncos. Uh, we've got the

0:08:55.840 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong quarterback. Yeah, yeah, Teddy is the starter right for duty,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>less so for Sutton, but Sutton still seems hurt and

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit hesitant in camp. Um Gordon's also alien

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fantas alien. But everybody should be ready for Week one.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's it's Teddy. It's Teddy. One touchdown passed

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a game across his career. One. Yeah, I like that.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>The coaching staff said Locke had improved greatly, and I'm like,

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>improved so much that he's not quite as good as

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bradgewater. That's how you feel about an improved Drew Lock.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't the Broncos draft justin phasis? If Teddy wins

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl, guaranteed he gets a Hollywood biopic picture

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>about right, Probably the Rams. Sean McVeigh clarified that Darrell

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Henderson remains the lead back, even after acquiring Sony Michelle

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>so shortly after Camp Acres injury. McVeigh did say that

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he he had to be cautious about Henderson's usage, and

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this move reflects that. Let's head to the

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Eagles next. Quaes Watkins wide receiver running with the first

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>team offense as the slot receiver. Have a s folgum

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>was everyone's you know, he was the hot pickup last year,

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's essentially on the bubble. But Quaes Watkins fantasy relevant.

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>He is fantasy relevant. I added him to the the

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Gaillotine League cheat sheet, and there's hways Watkins on Radars

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins Scott. Yeah, so Gascon is getting a ton

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of work, including receiving work. He only played nineteen snaps

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all with the first team in the last preseason game,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ten touches, seventy one yards, four catches, two touchdowns. He

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>was all over everything. Uh. And it also sounds like

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Waddle has a great connection with two will impact

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>right away. He's been the only healthy receiver though, so

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>people concerned with the platoon there in Miami, they're out

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of their minds. It's all gas for the Vikings. Adam

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Heland's got this thigh injury that happened early in the

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>second preseason game. It's kept him out of the third

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>preseason game, and it's not a given he's going to

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be available for Week one. So just keep this on

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>your radar that you need to watch this the deep

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>thigh brews. We've seen guys get sidelined for months on

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this injury, and you know, the Vikings have no obligation

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to disclose anything about the severity of it, so we

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know for sure, so hopefully it's nothing, but just

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on Adam feeling and the status of

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>his injury. Next up the Cowboys, Dak Prescott supposedly a

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>full go with the ankle and the shoulder issues, are

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the kiddy gloves off at DAC. I'm still

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 1>a little concerned about Prescott. We'll talk about him a

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>little more later in the show. Sounds good, Scott. How

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>about New England? There's so many things here. We've got

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the palindrome QB battle, the Mac versus Cam MCVI CAM. Yeah.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I never thought about that. Yeah, neither and I until

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this last week, I realized that they were backwards of

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>each other. But yeah, mc v cam. Uh, seems like

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Mac has started to take the lead, especially after five

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>days of h CAM Newton missing practices. Bell Belichick didn't

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>deny a platoon at quarterback, maybe like a Winston taste

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of deal, which will be gross for everybody. Um,

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but my main thing is the Michelle Tree opens up

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the door for uh Ron j. Stevenson taking the second

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>snaps after, you know, after Harris, Yeah it could. Stevenson's

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>look good. Let's go to the Saints. Jamis Winston has

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>officially moved ahead of Taysom Hill and he is expected

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to be your starter. Winston's a dramatically better passer, and

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>this is good news for fantasy owners for sure. Last

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>weekend's connection with Marquez Callaway looked very promising. Callaway looks

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like the starter currently unclear of Tray Kwon Smith's undisclosed

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>injury will allow him to play in the opener. And

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>then also we're monitoring Adam Troutman's foot injury that is

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that is I think more likely to keep him out.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>So there's still a lot of moving parts here, but

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they got the right guy. Unlike the Broncos, they got

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the right guy as the starter in New Orleans. Next

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>up the Giants. Yeah, Dave Gedtleman's House of horrors. Kenny

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>golladay hamstring issue went down days ago, roughly five days ago.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>That's beyond his two to three week timetable. Many hamstrings

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>not looking likely that he's gonna be a full go

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for week one. So yeah, Kenny Golladay fallen down. Draftwards

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd going way too cheap. The one Giant I

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty much trust this year based on ADP Sterling Shepherd.

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Titans next. Not much here, mostly

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>just that Julio and A. J. Brown have been you know,

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>banged up, but they should be ready to go for

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the season. Julio banged up no Steelers Rookie tight end

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Pat Friarmouth has impressed and was used in the red

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>zone in the last preseason game. He's got this big

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>six ft five frame that makes him a potential end

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>zone target throughout his career. Although mostly I think you're

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>aiming in dynasty and keeper leagues. You're aiming Empire leagues.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>You're aiming for twenty two with friar Muth. After Eric

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Ebron's contract expires, he's gonna be gone next year, and

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that friar mouths your full time starter. But good early

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>signs for Pat Friarmouth. Let's go to the Falcons next.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Running back jav And Hawkins was let go. He was

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a sleeper favorite to me, you win the

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>backup job. That's clearly going to go to quadre Alison

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>now is he's the RB two behind Mike Davis that is,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>until Atlanta signs Latavius Murray. That's just the prediction of mine.

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But uh, I think that is what you're saying. And

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen, still in the league, signed as the backup

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in Atlanta as well. Might as well throw that

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. I know some people are holding on him

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in dynasty leagues. Deep dynasty leagues. Just deepen up. Let's

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>head over to the Bengals. Next. Rumors surface this week

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of on Tap seeing more work early in the season

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as Chase gets used to things. Jamar Chase, who struggled

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>so far in camp. Uh, you gotta remember he hasn't

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>played football in twenty months. You know, he's knocking some

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>rust off. So I'm not too worried about him. But

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I do love te Higgins a lot more. Right now.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Te Higgins I think is going underdraft. He really is,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think when they as soon as Chase

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hit the roster, people like I'm done on t Higgins.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Higgins is sitting on. He's actually a very one of

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>those big second year wide receiver jumps. He was very

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>good with Burrow, very good. Yes he was forty nine.

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Is Kyle Shanahan is opening the notion of rotating quarterbacks

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance and Jimmy Garoppolo. They both got first team

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>reps in practice this week. Lance could be used like

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Taysom Hill was used last year. Still expect Jimmy Garoppolo

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to start, but Lance could be eased into the NFL

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in this fashion with spot duty and perhaps closer to

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the goal line, which would be bad for fantasy owners, frankly,

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>because that that would make both of them unstartable. Next

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>up the Cardinals. Cardinals activated Andy Isabella from the reserve

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>COVID list, but who really cares at this point he

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>might not even make the team. A former second round

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>pick a couple of years ago by Arizona clearly behind

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously behind Hopkins, with a j Green, rond Elmore and

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk all well ahead of Andy Isabella, who's on

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the roster bubble, Okay Scott the Jags, Trevor Lawrence has

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>been named the starter, so Gardner Minshew can finally go

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to the bathroom. Uh et n uh. Injury opens the

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>door for Chennault to get work, and maybe that harvn

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>roll that Urban had had planned for e t n

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>might be some extra work there for Chennault. I hope,

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>so he he has slipped quite a bit in drafts.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Baltimore Ravens, where Marquis Brown is

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>still not practicing four weeks after his hamstring injury. His

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>status for the openers unclear. At this point, we already

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>know where Shod Bateman is gonna miss week one. Sammy

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Watkins missed practice this week with an undisclosed injury. Miles

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Boykin has missed weeks of practice with his own hamstring injury.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been bad lamar Jackson, and practice is taking first

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>team reps with Devin DuVernay and Thailand Wallace. I don't

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>know who that is, and I do this for a living.

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>What yeah, Thailand Wallace? Okay, some people pronounce a tilling.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it is Till. He'll be tilling your fantasy team.

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Bears. That's sorry, that is me.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go to the Bears because they're

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>making the most moronic move of all time by not

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>starting Justin Fields in week one. They've already decided that

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>will be Andy Dalton the end. I mean, how long

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>until we see Justin Fields? Though? Well, we do, hopefully

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hopefully quarter two Week one, he's going off the board

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>too late. Let's go to our final team, Los Angeles Chargers,

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and possibly one of the more important ones. According to

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>reports from a ton of sources, CBS Athletic Sports illustrated

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of beat reporters. This is how the backfield

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is looking. Eckler is the starter, Justin Jackson is his

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>main backup. Kelly and round Tree will be used in

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>short yardage and goal line for the team. We don't

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>want it. We do not want to hear anybody but

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler getting used at that very much tracks with

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>their skill sets in history too. Unfortunately, I was hoping

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a new coaching staff would see it differently. Austin Ekeler,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you've seen it. You've seen him, shirtless, dude built, he

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>can run at the stripe. Dam I'll believe it when

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I see it or don't see it. With them using

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a healthy at the goal line, we'll just see about that.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>When we come back inside the five yard line, we'll

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>go through we just ran through two teams, or run

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>through thirty two teams again and tell you what you

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>need to know about what your teams do inside the

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>five yard line. When we returned to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul charge In, Scott Fish

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson with you. If you would like to

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>use my personal cheat sheet at your draft, it's free

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>at Guilloteen Leagues dot Com. Gentlemen, As you know, for

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>years I have done deep dives on team tendencies from

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line and canitual listeners may not

0:18:55.560 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>realize just how crucial this information is. Why should you

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>care about what happens inside the five yard line? After

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all the other yards in those count two? Here's why

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you should care. Thank for a moment about how many

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns you think were scored in the NFL from inside

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line last year? We call this the

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>infra red zone too? Do we like to call this

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the infrared zone? So put a number in your head.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>How many touchdowns were scored from inside the five yard

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>line last year? Do you think it was more than

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred? Yes? Do you think it was more than

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred? Yes? Do you think it could be more

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>than three hundred touchdowns scored in the NFL from inside

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line last year? Because I've been a

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>training camp year over year, Yes I do. Last year,

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>six hundred twenty nine touchdowns first scored from its at

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line. See, I would even take that

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 1>many touchdowns scored in the NFL, right, I know, it's crazy.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>You need to have a part of those These are

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the easy touchdowns the inside the five of the easy ones,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>guys who have to score from distance, and maybe we're

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just talking about Austin Neckler last segment. If Austin Ekeler

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>has to score from distance, that materially hurts his fantasy

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>production six twenty eight touchdowns. We care, So we're gonna

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>give you the one thing you need to know from

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>each of the teams from inside the five yard line,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>based a lot on what the tendencies are from last season.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin with Brian and the Carolina Panthers. Well, as

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we all remember, Carolina basically sands Christian McCaffrey last year

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>played to two or three games, which still Caroline had

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the third highest rushing ratio inside the five last year,

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater only attempted three passes from inside. Only throw

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>three passes inside the five year um and Teddy can

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>throw that far as he can. But of course a

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>new quarterback and Sam Donald, a new uh ends own weapon,

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>and d Arnold Dan Arnold and uh Terris Marshall as

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>well as a serious threat in the red zone, so

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe Carolina throws a little more. But last year very

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>run heavy, and of course, as of right now, Christian

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey back, So lots of opportunities for CMC was like,

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they are on the horizon, So I think you should

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>take him high in your drafts this year, Scott, guys,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>think of that. How about the Las Vegas Raiders from

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line? This one's really interesting because Jacobs,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>uh and Drake were both top five and carries inside

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the five and inside the ten last year, but on

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>different teams. Jacobs has the better build for for that

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of role, but Drake was much more effective than

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>then Jacobs was last year. UM, I think we're gonna

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>see how it shakes out. I would expect Jacobs to

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep that role because he's been in that role

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in that offense already, but I guess we'll find out. Jacobs,

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I think convertedent of his carries inside the five were touchdowns.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>You want to be at You want to know what

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Jacob was. That was Drake. Yeah, that's better. Maybe it's better.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not great, but it's better. Okay, let's go to

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. Aaron Rodgers through the most passes from inside

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the five. Get this. We just talked about Teddy through

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>three passes from inside the five. Aaron Rodgers through thirty

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>times from inside the five and scored twenty touchdowns. He

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>had more touchdowns from inside the five than Teddy Bridgewater had. Period.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams let all receivers and targets, receptions and touchdowns

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five. Let's head to Washington next, and Washington,

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson scored on half of his carries inside the

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>five last year and very very good rate. And Washington

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>had the fourth highest rush rate from inside the five.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>That is very good when it comes to uh rostering

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson, you can't get a lot of opportunities inside

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the five. Next up, let's go to Buffalo. So the

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>carries inside the five were split very evenly between uh

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Moss and Alan god Singletary. Let's keep him out of

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the equation. Moss and Ellen Allen with a much higher

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>conversion rate. But with that new two million dollar deal,

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the question now becomes do the bills continue to allow

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>those runs? Do they allow him to run the in

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>seven eight times? Or do they try or be or

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>do they know, do they allow him because that's what

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they paid him to do, that's what works, or do they,

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, try to protect their investment I'd like to

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think they'll try Zach Moss early in the season and

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>see if Zach Moss can be effective at the goal line,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and if he is, keep using him that way and

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>keep the miles and all the all of the tackles

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and all the hits off of their star and now

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>very expensive quarterback for the Texans. Deshaun Watson's probably out

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the mix. He takes seven inside the five rushes

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>with him, And so you ask will will runners get

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>more chances? Then, well, David Johnson was really bad last year.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>He turned to twelve carries into just four scores. Since

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>not David Johnson, Philip Lindsay is not really built for

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>goal line you, So does it go to mark Ingram?

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that possible? Could he be a dark horse to

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>come out of this thing with gold line carries? The

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Houston backfield just doesn't exist in my mind. I'm just

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to acknowledge any of those. Let's instead acknowledged

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. That's another frustrating backfield. Yeah, is it Ronald

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Jones or Leonard Fournette at the goal line? So let's

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>look at last year's data. They both had eight carries

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five. They both scored five touchdowns. Alright,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>no help there, no help there at all. Gio Bernard

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>now in talent, unlikely a goal line threat though. So

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know take your poison between Rojo and Leo.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But you see what you do is you take your

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five Anniverse three uh Fantasy Football Weekly you definitely

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>should have purchased if you did, and flip that thing.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Figure it out, Scott, Let's try Cleveland. What do we

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>need to about know about their tendencies inside the five? Yeah,

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>let's let's keep that coin out. Yeah, all right, let's

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>talk about how Nick Chop and Cream Hunt within a

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>couple carries of each other, and they had almost exactly

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of carries and conversion rate. So and

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any change. I don't see any change

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there at all. It's gonna slightly lean Chubb, but that's

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what it's gonna be. If Chubb marches down the field,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they need he needs to break Hunts. They think Hunt

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is perfectly capable, and he is. Yeah for the Colts.

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Niheim Hines got a depressing seven carries inside the five

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, which is inexplicable, but he only scored two

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>times from inside the five, and once Jonathan Taylor went

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>on his December run, Nahem Hines got no carries inside

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the five, so hopefully that was all mirrage and we're

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to see niahem Hins there, and Jonathan Taylor

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>is gonna just house all those inside the five carries.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go next to the Detroit Lions, Brian Adrian Peterson

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and carry on. Johnson now gone from Detroit, they have

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>vacated eighteen carries from inside the five years. Lots of

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a what for sure, right and DeAndre Swift was very

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>successful last year, scoring on six of his nine runs

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five last year, but as we talked

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>about last segment, he's looking very iffy for Week one, May,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>week two and beyond. So again, Jamal Williams, je Mark

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson even bump them up your your boards, all right, Scott,

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Jets next, can we not? Uh

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>just kidding? The Jets only had fourteen total carries inside

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the five last year, which is a little bit hilarious.

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>There's only one team worse, and I'll talk about them

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in a bit, but Ty Johnson is the only running

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>back on the team who had a single carry inside

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the five. Last year was back with the team. He's

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>currently running is the top back, but I would expect

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Michael Carter to be able to take that role. For

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, they're all of their runners together, all of

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the runners on roster combined for two touchdowns from inside

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line. You know hard it is to

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>do that when you are the highest us They were

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the second highest scoring team last year. That's insane. That's

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the change it's has. It has to change, right, But

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>will it change via Clyde Edwards, Hilaire or somebody else.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Seahawks Brian. Chris Carson since eighteen

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>has accumulated thirty three carries from inside the five for

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. All other Seattle runners during that time span

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have combined for twenty two. Al Right, Carson is the guy.

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>He just needs. Maybe if Chris Carson, maybe, if they

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>had Chris Carson instead of Marshawn Lynch in that Super Bowl,

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they would have give Hi Chris Carson the ball the

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>goal line instead of deciding to lose the game instead.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>But again, Carson only six carries from the side to

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>five last year, only played twelve games. He's got to

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy. But if he does, he is the guy

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>for Seattle Scott. Next up the Broncos. Much like the Jets,

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos only ran it thirteen times inside the five

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. They just did not get down to the

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>stripe for to run the ball that much. Melvin Gordon

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>had over half of them. He's still there. Javonte Williams

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is very well suited for that role. That's perfect for him. UM.

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I would expect possibly a split early on, but if

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Javonte Williams proves effective, he could take that, let's hope.

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So for the Rams, since Sean McVeigh took over in

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams have the most rushing plays and the most

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns from inside the five. That bodes well for

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Henderson. We're going to talk maybe Sony Michelle. I

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.719
<v Speaker 1>don't want to tip my hand yet, but that's that's topics.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Gonna come up again later. Next up Brian the Eagles.

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Sort of a small sample size for Jalen Hurts last year,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>but he only had one carry from inside the five

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>for negative two yards, so he doesn't seem like a

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>huge threat to his running backs, primarily Miles Sanders. As

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know how Josh Allen is a threat to Zack

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Moss or something along those lines. Miles Sanders only had

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>four carries inside the five last year. He was banged

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>up for a good amount of the season, which scored twice.

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Clip he should be the guy inside the five and again,

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>not too worried about hurts taking those goal line touches.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It's an important from Sanders, Scott. Let's go to the

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins next. So last year Miami really used a one

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>back approach. When it was achmed In, he got almost

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all the goal line work. When it was Gasking, he

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>got almost all the goal line work. And when you

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>say and you mean who is the lead back, that

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.959
<v Speaker 1>it was exact lead back, the healthy lead back. They

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>took a one back approach. The lead back of that

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>game was the one they used at this stripe. And

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it appears to be Gaskin's job right now. Both Gaskin

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and Acment are getting work with the first team, but

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it really does appear to be Gaskin's job. In Minnesota

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>last year, no team ran the ball more than the

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings thirty eight carries from inside the five yard

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>line last year, and that's a lot of why Dalvin

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Cook is so safe in fantasy leagues. I'll note Adam

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Feeling get this. He scored on seven of eight targets

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five. That's an amazing rate, and it

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>goes to show that they continue can continue to use

0:29:55.120 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Theeling that way. Next up, let's go to the Dallas Cowboys. Brian,

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna look into too much what happened inside

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the five last year because the Cowboys offensive line was

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>basically non existent. They were all gone, all the regulars

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not playing for the most part. But they all

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>make their return this year. Left tackle Tyron Smith comes

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>back after playing just a hundred fifty four snaps. Right

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle Ill Collins missed all due to hip surgery. He

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is back. It will still be Zeke at the stripe.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>He he didn't have the most success last year, but again,

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the line was not in full form. Tony Pollard not

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so much a concern at the goal line, and I

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think they want Dak Prescott to handle many goal

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>line touches coming off shoulder injury. So I'm sleeping on

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Zeke a little too much. Maybe well we'll see, But alright,

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>final one for this segment, Scott tell people about what

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are like inside the five yard line? What's

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the one thing they need to know? The Patriots are

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>very much Cam Newton based. So if he doesn't get

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the start, I would expect the big bulldozing Romandre Stevenson

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to get it if unless Amien Harry's just built for

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that too. He he is. He got some work there

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>last year. But it could be a split, and it

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>could be gross, but it could be even grosser. Bill

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Belichick decides he wants to bring Cam Newton in that area.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that be a disaster if he brings in Cam

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at the goal line? Oh, that'd be so frust Cam

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>had last year twenty two carries from inside the five.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Only two players, both running backs, had more carries from

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the five than the Patriots quarter. It was basically

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>all Camps. Yes, it was all Cam last year. Let's

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>hope he is a total non factor this year. When

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we'll continue telling you the one thing

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to know about team tendencies from inside the

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>five as Fantasy Football Weekly continues. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Charge and Gaillotine Leagues dot Com. Brian

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Johnson Gaillotine Leagues dot Um and Scott Fish is our

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>third co host today. This is segment number two of

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>What's Happening Inside the five yard Line? What is the

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing you need to know from every team from

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>inside the five? There were a whopping six touchdowns scored

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five last year. You need to know

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>because we love easy touchdowns and those are easy touchdowns

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>breaking news. We like touchdowns and fantasy football. I know,

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe. Right before we jump into jump into

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the final set of teams that we want to talk

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about from inside the five, reminder that it's a perfect

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>time to join a Guillotine League. As you probably know,

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>eight teen teams start the season. There's no head to

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>head and instead of teams playing each other, the low

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>team that scores each week gets cut and all their

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>players go to the waiver wire and there everybody else

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sits pandemonium as you're feasting on an entire draft of players.

0:32:54.320 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Might be Alan Camara, Josh Allen, Mike Evans, Chris Carson,

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay, all hitting the waiver wire in one week.

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. That's the premise of the Guillotine League. All

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is not be last in any

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>given week, and the last team standing wins the whole thing.

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You can go to guillotine leagues dot com to find

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>private league's, public leagues, or whatever prize level you want

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to play for, all available at guillotine leagues dot com.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about the new super chop format very quickly? Sure,

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>let's do it real quick. You said a smaller league,

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve team league, do your draft, and you survive through

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.719
<v Speaker 1>week eleven, and then you advanced to the playoffs against

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven other finalists, and you do a brand new draft

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for the playoff period in November, which is pretty sweet. Weeah,

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a hundred dollar super Chop contest in the lobby

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and I highly suggest six thousand dollar grand prize. That's

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>our high stakes version of Guillotine Leagues. Let's go to

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe the team we left off on was the

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants from inside the five yard line. Scott,

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's me, It's Brian, Sorry, Brian, Unfortunately I gotta talk

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Giants again. Only only the Jets through fewer

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>passes inside the five than the Giants did last year,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course Kwan Barkley basically missed the whole season.

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Um but there was success and success inside the five

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Giants. Evan Ingram one carry for a touchdown,

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Tavonta Freeman one carry for a touchdown, Dion Lewis three

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>carries for two touchdowns, Alfred Morris one carry for a touchdown.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So if Barkley stays healthy or gets healthy, all of

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that work, you could be looking at a nice season.

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.399
<v Speaker 1>But another guy I'm very worried about. We'll talk about

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>him a little later as well. All right, next tyn

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to see Titans Scott. The Titans are easy. Henry got

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>over seventy of the carries converted over fifty of those.

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It's all him. It's all him. How do you not

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 1>have like we was getting him? That's why. Yeah, John

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Smith did get some. I don't think Darring Ted Evans

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 1>got any. No Nick Nichols or something. The Saints from

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>inside the five, we still have to sweat Taysom Hill.

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Even though Jamis Winston is going to be the starter.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Even when he wasn't starting, he was still getting carries

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. And last year Taysom Hill had nine

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>carries inside the five, he scored six times. That's a

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>good return, good efficiency, and unfortunately that's what we're stuck

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>with with Taysom Hill, and that might continue to be

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a problem for Jamis Winston owners. Next up Brian the

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons. Last year, Todd Gurley had the seventh most

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>rushes inside the five seventeen. UH scored just six times.

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Though that's one of the reasons he's not in town

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>anymore in Atlanta. Will Mike Davis have more success? I

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think so, because now Kyle Pittss in town, all

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:53.399
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna do is throw to him inside the five

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all day long. It's my prediction. Scott Cincinnati Bengals. Yeah.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So on the Bengals, Geoe Actually Gio Bernard actually led

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a team in red zone carries. But remember still most

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of the season, UH that the year before mixing had

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>like nearly twenty carries inside the five. I assume that

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>comes back. They drafted three alignment, they added Riley Reef.

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>The offense should be better, he should have more opportunities.

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be the main guy for the Steelers.

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 1>James Connor and Benny Snell combined for twenty six carries.

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That is a lot. Twenty six carries would have led

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire league last year. In carries inside the five

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>yard line, Connor is gone. Snell stinks if Nagy Harris

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 1>gets those same twenties six carries and he converts on

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on the number, we we what we like to use

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the number, which is you're trying to get that's thirteen

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns just from inside the five. It feels like a

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>good amount, and that's would be a very good amount

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>for Naji Harris. Next up the Arizona Cardinals Brian so

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake last year with the Cardinals had twenty two

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 1>carries from inside the five. He's no longer in town,

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, so so they're all gonna go to Chase Edmonds, right,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>who we'll see Edmonds had one carry last year, so

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they clearly favored Drake over Edmonds. Now James right, I guess,

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but James Connor is not very much of a threat

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>in any regard anymore. So, a lot of opportunities there

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>for Arizona, and there's there's eno Benjamin who's still go

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But hopefully Edmonds gets a little some some chances and

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I can convert on some, but a lot of opportunity.

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say that Chase Edmonds, that was

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>actually his only carry in his career inside the five

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was the one last last year James no and James

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he got minus one yard. James Conner with Pittsburgh was

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in historically great short yardage and inside the five. Ro

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>on her, he's like tough last year? Probably yes for

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners, Brandon I, you tied among all receivers

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>for the second most targets and he scored the third

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>most times. Inexplicably. As a side note, George Kittle, get this,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for everything that George Kittle is his entire career, they've

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>thrown to him nine times inside the five. That's it,

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>which is that you know if they decide to use

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Kittle that way many a lot more upside how many times? Geez,

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to do it, because I'm pretty sure

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he had a couple tis called back. He may have,

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he may it's it's it's a horrible misuse of George Kittle.

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But nevertheless, the bigger point here, Brandon, I could give

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of safety if they continue using him

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at the at the goal line. You know who's really

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>safe at the goal line. Tell me James Robinson for

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the Jakes, I bet he is of his of the

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>carries inside the five for Jacksonville last year, where James

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Robinson's that's way more than Derek Travisy. T N is out.

0:38:57.480 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Who's gonna get him? Carlos Hide? And here's the fun fact,

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson scored on every single one of his carries

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>inside the five last year of them. I probably have

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>him under ranked now that ETN is out right now? Uh,

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in in standard non guillotine league's haven't ranked seventeen. He

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>should probably be ahead of guys like Clyde Edwards, A

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Laire Barkley. Yeah maybe, I mean that's in the guillotine league.

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah league, Yes, Uh, let's see, Brian, I believe you

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>were up next with the Bears, your final team. What

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:35.959
<v Speaker 1>are they doing inside the five yard line? Last year?

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery got fourteen of the fifteen running back carries

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the five for Chicago only converted them into four

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns al though, so not a lot of success for Montgomery.

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not too worried about Damien Williams stealing goal line

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:54.479
<v Speaker 1>touches from uh Montgomery, though perhaps justin fields, though when

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>once he becomes a starter could be a problem. He

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>could have that Josh Allen vulture like effect on Montgome

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and keeping your eye on Khalil Herbert, rookie running back

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>who has impressed in camp and it's kind of built

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for for goal line work, so he could be a

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>vulture in the making as well. Cleil Herbert's looked good.

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>He just looked really good. And you know, it's looked

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>really bad. That Bears offensive line awful. And remember they

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>put a high second round pick. They had a second

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>round pick into Tevin Jenkins. He was a dominating right tackle.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 1>They were going to play him at left tackle, but

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.280
<v Speaker 1>now he's had surgery and he might miss the whole season.

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It's this offensive line is not good, and ultimately that's

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a contributor to getting justin fields on

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the field sooner. So I mean, that'll be the upside,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm nervous about I'm nervous about Montgomery and others

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in that offense because of that line. Scott, your final

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>team is the Los Angeles Chargers. Yes, you mentioned how

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>before nahem Hinz had only had two conversions out of

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>seven attempts. Austin Ekeler has converted two out of his

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>last nine attempts over the last two years. Though not

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>very good um last year he was only given two attempts.

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Kelly had five, Blage had six, had seven. We mentioned

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>before the reporters have stated it's likely going to be

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and round Trees roll at least that's where we're

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>sitting right now. So this round Tree guy look good

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>too in preseason action. And you know, I'm trying to

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>balance this. You know, we're not trying to go crazy

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>over all these depth chart guys who have big games

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:27.760
<v Speaker 1>against third and four stringers. Round Tree looks like a player.

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, well I'm watching that game. My

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>wife's sitting on the couch next to me. She decided

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to look up the entomology of round tree and it

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is a British term for like a a tree that

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is out like in the middle of nowhere in the field.

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.439
<v Speaker 1>And but that's like the tree that's around and people

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>would point at the tree and you know you already

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>knew that tree back in the ye olden days. Is

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:54.479
<v Speaker 1>that without the D though, without the D that's because

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that was part of why we looked it up, like

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>round tree and with no D it's like Terris Marshall.

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we looked it up and there you go,

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the will Full Factory in round tree. Last team is

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. Many believe Lamar Jackson steals touchdown runs, but

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.839
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. Last year, from inside the five yard line,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore running backs ran the ball twenty three times.

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson ran three times. That's it, just three times.

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>And that brings me back to Gus Edwards, my guy

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for this season, my favorite sleeper, and this is part

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why double digit touches from inside the

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>five yard line built for goal line use. Yes, j

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>K Dobbins is going to get worked there too, and

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 1>yes I'd rather have JK Dobbins, But j K Dobbins

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>cost you a second rounder, and I'm not even saying

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>don't pay that. But Gus Edwards right now, eleventh round

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>average draft position. He finished his running back twenty seven

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>last year, going up the board right now as running back,

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's no reason mark Ingram's gone. It's a two

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>headed backfield, not a three at the backfield now, there

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.479
<v Speaker 1>is no reason not to take Gus outwards where he's going,

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>if not earlier. Lamar Jackson does not steal as much

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff as you might be inclined to think that he does. Um, Scott,

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we've got about one minute left. Sure, tell me about

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>some ideas for spicing up a live draft now that

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>we're drafting Inerson again. Yeah. So, my my wife sent

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>me a picture of this league that that started just

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>to head a live draft the other week, called the

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Mounds View Boys, and they're like fourteen year old kids.

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>They got all dressed up and see that picture. I

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>love it because there it's a bunch of kids playing

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>with us, which is awesome. Yeah, and it made me think,

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what can you do to spice up your draft? You

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>can you can like have walk up music, have a

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>commissioner announced the picks. You can do right. You can

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>have a rivalry draft and choose rivals. Um, get a

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>live auctioneer if it's if it's an auctioneer auction draft,

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>um a hundred yard rush dot com. You can do

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the draft order. You can little characters run across the

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>fun and root for it, or any other kind of

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>contest for your draft order, like a poker tournament beforehand,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at golf tournament, video games we could have a video

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>games tournament, anything like that. Those are simple, simple things

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you can do, all right. I love it. All great

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.439
<v Speaker 1>ideas to bring to your live draft. Fantasy Football Weekly

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Our number two comes back in a second. Welcome back

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>our number two of Fantasy Football Weekly and Paul Charge

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in Diatine Leagues dot Com. Bryan Johnson also Guillotine Leagues

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.840
<v Speaker 1>dot Com are associated. Podcast is called Chop at Guillotine

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>League Podcast, available wherever you love to get your podcasts

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and especially the I Heart Radio app up. Scott Fish

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>joins as well. It is time for a segment we

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like to call three tough questions, and as is the tradition,

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we start with tough question number one. How much does

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle's arrival impact Darryl Henderson? None, some, or a lot?

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>We start with Scott. So my my initial thought here

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was some. I mean, they watched Henderson for a year,

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they had him on the team, McVeigh had him on

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the team for a year. Then they decided, you know what,

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>after watching this guy, we're gonna draft a running back

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in the second round and we're gonna give him the

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lead role late in the season. Uh, they may have

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>tried to see what they could do, but then you know,

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>he broke his thumb and and and so they felt

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>new England had an access, they made a safe play.

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is some. But then Sony Michelle

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>took number fourteen as a running back, which so now

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking there's really no concern at all. I guess

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stick with some. But that number choice is terrible. Okay,

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that that isn't I'm not used to the numbers yet.

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It is weird. Brian, how much does Sony Michelle's arrival

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:07.399
<v Speaker 1>impact Darryl Henderson? None, some, or a lot. I'm gonna

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>go with none because that's basically basically what Sean McVeigh

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 1>just said recently, that it has no effect on Darren

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and Henderson's usage. I'm more conservative Xavier Jones when it

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to taking the world from Darryl Henderson. We've seen

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:23.879
<v Speaker 1>what Sony Michelle has to offer. First off, he's kind

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of injury plagued, so only played one full season out

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of his three. Uh. He doesn't catch the ball. He

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>has twenty six catches across three seasons, so no so

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>no threat. Uh third down work and he's like a

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:38.760
<v Speaker 1>four yards carry just met runner. That Uh. I'm quite

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>shocked that the Rams traded for him. I think the

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are probably gonna cut them. They're so loaded at

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.800
<v Speaker 1>running back. But no effect for me. Uh, Sony Michelle

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in town. Now Sony walk Many, Walkman, black Manjelis walk Man, Jelis,

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I like Sony Walkman, Thank you. I think that's I

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think we can we have we already had it perfect.

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.320
<v Speaker 1>The correct answer is none. The some the thumb injury

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that Darrell Henderson has ultimately will not be a factor,

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>even if it is at the very beginning of the season.

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 1>And let's remember that Darryl Henderson wasn't going to be

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a workhorse anyway. You know, right when Cam Akers went down,

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Sean McVeigh said, we gotta really monitor his workload. He

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was not going to be the work He was not

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a workload work course guy anyhow. And

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>here comes Sony Walkman, a marginal talent who doesn't catch

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and gets hurt constantly. The guy he really hurts his

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Davier Jones and maybe to a lesser extent, Jake Funk,

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>if he was Jake Funk was going to be in

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the mix here at some point. That's it, you know. Now,

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say Sony Walkman will have no fantasy value.

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>He may be a spot starter. But I still think

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna shape up like fourteen to sixteen touches

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a game for Darryl Henderson Sony Michelle's gonna be like

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 1>six eight. It'll still be like a two to one ratio.

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I believe they'll get those three touchdown games that will

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:02.439
<v Speaker 1>just piss all Henderson. I hope not. I hope not. Tough.

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Question number two, Carson Wentz is trending towards a week

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:10.439
<v Speaker 1>one start. Does he belong in rosters in a one

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback league? Brian so Chart, You and I just did

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty man twenty team live auction. You can only

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>have one quarterback on roster, and it's a team quarterback.

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to get into that. But the Colts

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback was not selected. No, it's not one of the

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 1>among Now, in a standard one quarterback league, you're your

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>odds are you're gonna have a backup quarterback, and that's

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>where Wentz would fall. He was going right around quarterback

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:42.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty before the injury. Then he got hurt. Adp plummeted. Uh.

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>It's on the rise a little bit, but I'm not

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 1>wasting a roster spot on Wentz is a backup. He's

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not a starter in a one quarterback league. We're not

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down that path. But but the offense is

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not very exciting and it's gonna revolve around Jonathan Taylor

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna play good defense. So for me, no,

0:48:58.200 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll stream someone when I need to back up on.

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Gonna sit on Wentz because I just don't see a

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 1>ceiling there at all. Okay, Scott, No, no, no, I'll

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just say no. Even fully healthy, uh he was, he

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 1>was barely a streaming option in one QB league's Carson Wentz.

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't care that he's trending for the week one start.

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>He does not belong on one quarterback league rosters. I

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>do a ton of one quarterback mocks and drafts. I

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was in the draft last night with A. J. Dillon

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:29.759
<v Speaker 1>of the Green Bay Packers. By the way, Brian, he

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>took Kyle Pitts. Just he's already one of the best.

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Just let me but in that in that draft, twelve

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 1>teamer nobody took Carson Wentz. I don't even think he

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>was on anyone's radar. It's it's he's he's not rosterable

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>at that point. It needs to be super flex. Well,

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just in a I was just in a

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>draft with Tom Cruise, and Tom Cruise said he loved

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>my team and great about a team. In a plus,

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz is I'm good. Even though you're probably right,

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong. In many metrics, the Colts have the easiest

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>passing schedule from October through the rest of the year, uh,

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:13.359
<v Speaker 1>including Warren Sharp acknowledging as much talking about as much

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on a recent tweet. Once it is surrounded by viable targets.

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>You can throw to Pittman, Hilton Campbell tight ends, you

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>can catch running backs to catch. He's got a ton

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of targets. He'll enjoy the best pass blocking of his

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:25.439
<v Speaker 1>entire career, other than maybe when his very very first

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia. And that offensive line is good, unlike the

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>jail breaks he was subjected to last year, He's still

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>got good mobility and always has. Now. The foot injury

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>might tamp tamper that, damp damp in that a bit

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, but the if the mobility comes back, he

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>helps you out more than I think people realize that

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:46.840
<v Speaker 1>way too. I think he does belong on one quarterback

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:49.320
<v Speaker 1>league rosters. Am I gonna start him? Every week. Nope,

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but I get the feeling when I hit those bye weeks.

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>He's the exactly the kind of guy I'm gonna want

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to inject or from my quarterback goes down, I'll be

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 1>glad I have him. I mean, I was with what

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I was in on Wentz early in the He's going

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 1>back to Reich who he had his m v P

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know caliber season up until he got injured for the

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the last four weeks. I was very in on that.

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just as I watched these drafts play out. You know,

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:12.799
<v Speaker 1>when I want to grab my second quarterback, I wanted

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to be Lands or Fields or guys like that. Those

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 1>guys do. But who says you're only drafting two quarterbacks?

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Who's drafting three quarterbacks in the one quarterback league? You're

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the one who loves your like twenty three in super Flex.

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 1>In super Flex, they love your big roster. Question number three,

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>who is the single most valuable receiver in dynasty or

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Empire formats? I think we're on me on me, let's

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>start here. I'm gonna go with Ceedee Lamb him growing

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in that offense with Dak for many years. I'm I'm

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of I've always been a big fan

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of the young wide receiver growing with it, you know,

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the young stud quarterback. Most Dynasty ranks have Jefferson and

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Metcalf above them. But who's going to be

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson's quarterback in a couple of years. We don't know.

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't know who that's gonna be. Is Ruscoe to

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 1>stay elite and efficient? As efficient as he's been in

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 1>decays has disappeared at times. Speaking of efficiency, Brown has

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>not not just Brown, but both Brown. A J. Brown

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan Tanneh have been insanely efficient on low passing volume.

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 1>What if that goes away? Um, And here's another thing

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to note. What if Zeke starts to decline and they

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>have to pass more over the next couple of years

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and Zeke goes away? I'm I'm taking Ceedee Lamb in that. Okay, Brian,

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>who is the single most valuable receiver in dynasty or

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Empire format? I had to go with A J. Brown.

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think of a Ceede Lamb too. But A J.

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown just turned twenty four in June. Last year, played

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:43.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve or thirteen full healthy games, only saw a hundred

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>targets like a hundred and two targets, still had over

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a thousand yards and eleven touchdowns. Theoretically he could see

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>twice as many targets somewhere two target year. It could happen. Well,

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>now there's an extra game. It certainly again. Uh So

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>basically a J. Brown, we haven't. He's just ratching the

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 1>surface and he gets fifty targets. That is way more feasible, right,

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>charge you can get with me on this, I can.

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We are talking. We are we are talking touchdown range

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns for a J. Brown in full healthy season

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Decorrect answer. The player I would not

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 1>trade in a dynasty or Empire league for any other

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver is Ceedee Lamb twenty two years old, two years young,

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and I love a J. Brown by the way, I

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 1>love a J. Brown with lamp twenty two years old.

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>You hit on the single biggest point. He has an

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>excellent young quarterback in Dak Prescott, who, let's remember, just

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 1>signed a four year deal, so we know you've got

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 1>four years of Dak Prescott quarterbacking. That is a long

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:45.720
<v Speaker 1>time in your dynasty or Empire league. Um, he's already

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 1>flashing greatness. He did it last year. He's you're seeing

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it on a hard knocks if you're watching hard docks,

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Gallup has gone next year, and that's another big consideration

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:57.600
<v Speaker 1>for me. Gallops can take a hundred targets with him,

0:53:57.880 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and they'll probably just some move like Cedric Wilson up

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:03.239
<v Speaker 1>as odd. I don't think whoever goes there next. I

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:05.720
<v Speaker 1>just think they're gonna there's gonna be enough vacated targets

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to move Ceedee Lamb into a top five position on

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>my cheat sheet at this time next year. Now, you

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>asked the single most valuable receiver receiver. He did it. Now.

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say Kyle Pits, but I'm so concerned

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that he gets designated as a wide receiver in future years.

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go that way, but that that that is

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>really my answer to Gallup was my last my last

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>line there. But also cite Lamb stats with doc five

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>games five for fifty nine six for one oh six

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>five or sixty five five or seventy nine eight four

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and that was the first five games of NFL pace. Yes,

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders should have taken Ceedee Lamb over Henry Rugs.

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>There gonna graphic or justin Jefferson and you can spell

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>his name with emojisus C D and a lamb and

0:54:57.320 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so cute. That counts as well. I'm I rarely talked

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:03.799
<v Speaker 1>about my own leagues, but I'm in a Dinasa league right.

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I was able to get Justin Jefferson and Ceedee Lamb

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. Last year, I traded away Justin Jefferson

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and kept Ceedee Lamb just because they didn't get a

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>log on and say again, when we come back the

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>blacklist guys, I will not draft in our other co

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>hosts as well. We're the guys were avoiding in our draft,

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and you should too. When we come back to Fantasy

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. If you haven't

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>tried to Quilloteen League, we encourage you to learn a

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more at kioteen leagues dot com. Eighteen teams

0:55:54.280 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>start the season no head to head the low scoring team.

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Each week it's cut and all their players go to

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire where pneumonium ensues and all the players

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>were about to mention are going to be the one

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:08.360
<v Speaker 1>could be? Because this whole segment is geared around the

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>players we don't like and aren't drafting, So these are

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the guys we think that are gonna get you chopped early.

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:16.960
<v Speaker 1>In the guillotine format, all you have to do every

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 1>week is not finished last. You don't have to be best,

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but can you not be last every week? That's it.

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Last team standing wins the whole thing. If you ain't

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 1>last your first, that's it. Last your first. If that

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is the kits in league. Right there, Let's talk about

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the blacklist, the guys that we will not draft. We're

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna will each give a quarterback, a running back, a

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, and a tight end. Some cases we may

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>actually disagree on these things, but it's personal preference. Let's

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:47.920
<v Speaker 1>begin at the quarterback position. Scott, who's your first player

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you will not draft? Quarterback position. I'm going to go

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 1>with Russell Wilson going is QB six in the mid fifth.

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's mostly price tag. It's I I understand him being

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>ranked there in the QB six, seven eight range. I

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>personally I think I have ranked as my QB eight.

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's fine. I'm fine with that. My problem is

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that team wants to run a lot. He's been he's

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 1>been solid because of his efficiency, and he falls off

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:14.839
<v Speaker 1>for half the season seemingly every year. Uh, He's only

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>topped four yards rushing twice in the last five years,

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and that declines and running quarterbacks as they get older,

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:22.479
<v Speaker 1>so don't expect that to come up. But he didn't

0:57:22.520 --> 0:57:24.760
<v Speaker 1>top two hundred fifty yards in his final eight games

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>last year, UM. Sixteen touchdowns in those eight games total,

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and four we're against the Jets, so most of the

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 1>games you're not getting a lot of points from in

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the second half. That happened the year before, where he

0:57:35.440 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>only to top two hundred and fifty yards once in

0:57:38.160 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 1>his final seven and through just nine touchdowns UM. And weirdly,

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier in his career, he was a notorious slow starter

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for the first half of the year. So he's a

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>half year starter. I just I can't take that there. H.

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm with Russell Wilson and no rosters either, not one.

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Brian dak Prescott going way too high for me at

0:57:58.920 --> 0:58:01.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback five right about now. I know he's been fully

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>cleared now by the Dallas medical staff, but I don't

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 1>really trust the Dallas medical staff. Jerry Jones seems like

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy who would throw his grandchildren into a volcano

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sacrificed him into a volcano to win another Super Bowl.

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 1>The Russian Dak back who is not going to be

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking of rushing, not many rush attempts. Uh. In the

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>future for Dak Prescott, I don't think. I think he's

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a different quarterback in that regard, and uh,

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I can get he's just gonna be more of a

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>pure passers. He's a great passer. He's got great weapons,

0:58:28.440 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I can get pure pastors with great

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 1>weapons later in my draft, like Aaron Rodgers just an

0:58:33.160 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>air bear, uh, Tom Brady, Matthew Stafford even later. So

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 1>daks certainly pay off that QB five a DP, but

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 1>just too much risk from me there. And one of

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the deepest quarterback classes and fantasy football that I can

0:58:48.720 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 1>remember in many many years. You guys picked um high

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:55.320
<v Speaker 1>end quarterbacks that you won't take and part be and

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure eventually if they were available in your draft

0:58:57.760 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you would take both of those guys. The guy that

0:58:59.800 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I have not ended up in with any draft, in

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>any draft is Ben Roethlisberger, and the the overriding premises

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather get out a year too early on a

0:59:09.680 --> 0:59:12.720
<v Speaker 1>player in at the very very bitter end of his

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>career than a year too late now in fairness to Ben,

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>he's I think he's looked fine in the preseason, but

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's his eighteenth year. He's teetering uncooked. He played badly

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for stretches of last year, and the arm was clearly

0:59:27.200 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 1>degraded from earlier versions of what we had seen from Ben.

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>He didn't throw deep like he used to. He had

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the fifth shortest average intended air yards last year. When

0:59:38.160 --> 0:59:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we think of Ben, we think of the big statue

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the pocket, maybe sliding a little bit, and

0:59:44.040 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>then throwing lasers downfield. That's not who Ben ruzz at

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>least not last year. He had the shortest time to

0:59:52.760 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>pass last season, and the offensive line is worse this year.

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm very worried about that. So for me, there's just up.

1:00:01.600 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of worry about where Ben is

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in his career arc and where he is in this offense,

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>even though surrounded by receiving weapons. I love the addition

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of Naji Harris. It will take a heat off of Ben.

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying he's gonna have a bad year, but I'm,

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, for where he's getting taken. I'm rolling the

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>dice on other guys. Let's continue with the blacklist guys

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we will not draft. Let's move to the running back position, Scott,

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:27.959
<v Speaker 1>who won't you draft? Similar to your Ben picked. David

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is just a guy I will not have on

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a single team. If Philip Lindsay is running as the starter,

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay and mark Ingram are listed as the starters, Yet

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson is going as RB thirty nine in the

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ninth rout and people are drafting him as the starter

1:00:42.560 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>just because name value. Maybe I guess, I don't know, laziness. Yeah,

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that's Philip Lindsay. I'm okay with taking Philip Lindsay four

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>rounds later because he's going in the thirteenth. I don't

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>even love that because we don't know what the goal

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>line work is gonna be. That team is gonna always

1:00:57.480 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>be in a negative game script. But David Johnson in

1:00:59.880 --> 1:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the ninth is just crazy. Just don't take any Texas

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>really really or Texans also known as Texas. I like

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks, alright, that's fair. I reached around on Brandon

1:01:10.920 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Cook's list. Nico Collins, I'm interested in coins. They'll they'll

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>be throwing. We just don't know who's gonna be throwing.

1:01:19.720 --> 1:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But they'll be throwing down in Texas. You'll go Nico Collins.

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll go Byron Pringle by draft to bring him back

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>up again, because apparently I've got to be the only

1:01:28.880 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>guy talking about Byron Pringle. All right, who's the running back?

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You will not draft Bryan even though a couple of

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>months ago he was basically going as a top five,

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>top six overall pick, and now is his stock is

1:01:39.960 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>pummeted to the mid second round. I'm still not taking

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>se Kwon Barkley there, Uh, in the mid second. I

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I take him, even if he came

1:01:47.400 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>back to me in the third. I just don't trust

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>him at this point. I don't trust the knee. Unlikely

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna start the season at least, certainly don't trust

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line in New Jersey for the Giants going

1:01:59.720 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>into this year, Pro Football Focus has them ranked thirty

1:02:03.040 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>second dead last among all units. And uh, there's no

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing to keep opposing defensive defense is honest. It's certainly

1:02:11.520 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not Daniel Jones. They signed Kenny Galladay. He's not looking

1:02:14.360 --> 1:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna be ready to go. Uh week going,

1:02:16.520 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>He's probably be banged up all year. I'm just I'm

1:02:18.880 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just out on se Kwon Barkley entirely, uh for this year,

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>terrible offensive line in New York and into at least

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they've tried to fix it right. They've thrown draft picks

1:02:27.520 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>at it, they've thrown expensive free agents at it. None

1:02:30.400 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of it's worked. And that's been an ongoing concern of

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>mine with say Kawon Barkley, and I'm with you on that.

1:02:36.200 --> 1:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>The running back I have rostered in none of my

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>leagues to this point is Josh Jacobs. I want my

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>running backs to excel at some component of the game.

1:02:47.000 --> 1:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I want you to be good at something right, and

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted ideally to like match my scoring system in

1:02:52.960 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some way, you know, catch a lot of passes in

1:02:55.000 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a PPR league, score touchdowns in a touchdown heavy league.

1:02:58.920 --> 1:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs don't do any thing that matches any scoring

1:03:01.200 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>system that I'm in. He's average just two catches per

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>game last year. He converted just six of twenty one

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>carries from inside the five yard line. We touched on

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this earlier in the show. That's a wolf percent efficiency mark,

1:03:15.160 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and it opens up the door for Kenyan Drake. I

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have to sweat that backfield. I want

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>no part of Josh Jacobs. Let's move over to the

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver position. Scott, who is the wide receiver you

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>will not draft? Yeah, it's it's Tyler Lockett. I just

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can't do it. He's he's just too inconsistent. Last year

1:03:33.960 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he had four games over seventy yards. That's it. Eight

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of his ten touchdowns came in three games. Uh, going

1:03:40.240 --> 1:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in the same round as a bunch of guys I

1:03:41.920 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>would rather have like Cup and Woods and d J.

1:03:45.000 --> 1:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Moore and Auke and Higgins and even around later at

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Claypool Um the year before. Even in twin four of

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>his games made up forty nine point eight percent of

1:03:55.560 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>his fantasy points, nearly half his fantasy points in just

1:03:58.520 --> 1:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>four games. That means he's killing knew the rest of

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the games. I can't have that. No, you're right, that's

1:04:04.360 --> 1:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that is a that is a disaster. When Tyler Lockett

1:04:06.960 --> 1:04:10.479
<v Speaker 1>does not score, he kills your team. And by the way,

1:04:10.520 --> 1:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in a guillotine league, they kill your team. Part is

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>very literal. He will kill your team that way. I God,

1:04:16.760 --> 1:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna see if I can quick pull this up.

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I've got a Tyler Lockett stat for you

1:04:20.480 --> 1:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to back this up. They also added Dwayne Scretch is

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a better third option than they've had over the last

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>few years, and pet Pete Sunshine wants to run more.

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>He always wants to run more, so unfortunately don't have

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it his non I believe I'm gonna off top my head.

1:04:37.240 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is not perfect. Tyler Lockett's non touchdown games

1:04:40.080 --> 1:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>average like three catches thirty yards. That's not really bad.

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's bad. Brian, who's the wide receiver you will not draft.

1:04:47.160 --> 1:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bend the rules a little bit here and

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>give you a two for a two for one. I'm

1:04:51.040 --> 1:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>not taking Seedee Lamb or a Marii Cooper this year

1:04:54.320 --> 1:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>because they're essentially going off the board at the same spot.

1:04:56.760 --> 1:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You'll see see Lamb usually going first around a wider

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>ever twelve thirteen, then Cooper. I've seen Cooper go and

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the pick right after Ceedee Lamb, and just to me,

1:05:06.480 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys cannot live up to that a DP.

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>One of them is gonna falter, and I don't know

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>which one it is. This yere, we we all love

1:05:14.080 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamb more moving forward in the future, of course, we

1:05:16.880 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just talked about that in the last segment, but for

1:05:19.160 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. You know, I just mentioned I'm a little

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>if you on Doc as well, and we also talked

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about Michael Gallup still in town. He's gonna steal targets

1:05:27.040 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from both of those guys. I just don't see how

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>both of them could live up to such a high

1:05:31.920 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a DPS. So I'm just gonna avoid that coin flip entirely,

1:05:35.720 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not drafting either in redrafts. Here on our

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>button bar for sounds, we have a peacock, a bear,

1:05:43.240 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>an art vark, a mongoose, a horse, a crow, a turkey,

1:05:47.360 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a duck, and tree. And we don't have a lamb.

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's a player called ceedee lamb. It's a beat,

1:05:58.800 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a bleat. Is that a lamb? That's also a lamb?

1:06:01.800 --> 1:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the That's a nice tim Next show, we need

1:06:05.560 --> 1:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a lamb. Thank you, new producer. Guys like what the

1:06:12.880 --> 1:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver that I am not drafting is Juju Smith Schuster.

1:06:16.120 --> 1:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>This was I made the strong case against him last year,

1:06:18.760 --> 1:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>got validated. I'm going back to the well this The

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>issue for Juju is his lack of depth of target

1:06:24.520 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and his yards after the catch. He catches short passes

1:06:27.520 --> 1:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and then gets tackled quickly. He has the second shortest

1:06:30.880 --> 1:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>average depth of target last year, just five point eight

1:06:33.840 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>yards according to next Gen Stats. He turned one hundred

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight targets last year into eight hundred yards. That's it.

1:06:42.560 --> 1:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a major reversal for Juju Smith Schuster. Remember

1:06:45.160 --> 1:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>those first couple of years, dude was just like he was.

1:06:50.440 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>He was slicing through the middle of the field. The

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>big then big arm to bend was sending these lasers

1:06:56.960 --> 1:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>down field to him. And hey god, it's just not

1:06:59.200 --> 1:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that way anymore. And what's more, when jud Smith Srster

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>does not score his average line over the last two years,

1:07:05.880 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>when he does not score three catches thirty two yards

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and no score, I mean destroying your team him. Unlock it.

1:07:12.560 --> 1:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Yes, we all picked quarterback wide

1:07:15.120 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver combos. Yeah we did. Actually didn't intentionally do that.

1:07:18.240 --> 1:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't either. Um let's go to the tight end position.

1:07:20.920 --> 1:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's a tight end? Scott you will not draft It's

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be Dallas Goddard. He's currently going to

1:07:25.800 --> 1:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>his tight end eight end of the eighth round, which

1:07:28.320 --> 1:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is just it's insane. I mean, he might get a

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>time he might get a decent amount of volume, but

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that was his price when everybody thought Earth's was gonna

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>go away. And Earth hasn't left, and that price has

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not changed yet. He's going ahead of or in the

1:07:41.640 --> 1:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>same range as guys that I like a lot, more

1:07:44.160 --> 1:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like Logan Thomas or Noah Fan or Robert Tonyan. He's

1:07:47.360 --> 1:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>going way ahead of John new Smith. I had a Higbie.

1:07:50.320 --> 1:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>There are guys that just rather have than Goddard and

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>his you know, his role in that offense, at least

1:07:55.520 --> 1:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with Earth's there makes sense. Bryan, who's the tight end

1:07:59.160 --> 1:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you will not draft? Well? I love the guy, probably

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the best all around tight end in the NFL. Uh,

1:08:05.440 --> 1:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's George Kittle, But I can't take him in fantasy football.

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy football this year as tight end three. Really going

1:08:12.480 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>late second, early third round. Uh, for a guy that's

1:08:15.800 --> 1:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>only played one full season in his four year career.

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>He's just so good at everything blocking. He's just such

1:08:23.240 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a violent player that it's it's hard for him to

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy. Uh. He's just going way too early for me.

1:08:28.240 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And now Brandon Iuke and Deebo Samuel are emerging stars

1:08:32.200 --> 1:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>at the wide receiver position. The three of them have

1:08:34.920 --> 1:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>never really played together when fully healthy and now with

1:08:38.439 --> 1:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback, and yeah, there's gonna be a change

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>of quarterback at some point. They're gonna go from Jimmy

1:08:42.640 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>g To to Trey Lance. So I'm just Kittle's going

1:08:46.439 --> 1:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>way too high. I can get uh my boy Kyle

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Pitts around later. And I have a feelings someone's about

1:08:52.800 --> 1:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to poopoo on this. I take, but uh fading Kittle

1:08:56.200 --> 1:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>all in on Pits. It's a battle that will last

1:08:58.880 --> 1:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>this year for sure. My co host Brian Johnson shares

1:09:02.600 --> 1:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the opinion of most fantasy analysts that Kyle Pitts. They

1:09:06.600 --> 1:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>should be carving the bust in Canton right now for

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts and that he will have a historic rookie

1:09:14.400 --> 1:09:18.519
<v Speaker 1>tight end year. I will be more reason than that.

1:09:19.680 --> 1:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Kyle Pitts storyline nobody wants to hear and

1:09:23.280 --> 1:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody is talking about. There is way more variation impossible

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>outcomes than most people are willing to acknowledge. Even though

1:09:30.800 --> 1:09:33.639
<v Speaker 1>he's a great talent, if he lines up outside as

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a standing wide receiver for the entirety of this year,

1:09:36.080 --> 1:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I like his prospects to have a fine rookie season.

1:09:39.560 --> 1:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But if he doesn't do that, or only does that sometime,

1:09:44.479 --> 1:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that. I don't think he can perform

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>nearly to the level people expect as a true tight end.

1:09:50.360 --> 1:09:52.639
<v Speaker 1>This thing gets very complicated. Hayden Hurst is a good

1:09:52.640 --> 1:09:55.759
<v Speaker 1>player who the team acquired at a sizeable cost second

1:09:55.760 --> 1:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifth round picks just one year ago. Hurst will

1:09:58.240 --> 1:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>likely frustrate fantasy owners with a playing time, especially in

1:10:01.080 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the season. And Hurst is a

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>good pass blocker. They will want to keep Hurst in

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to keep Matt Ryan upright. You can trust his blocking.

1:10:09.200 --> 1:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>They may not know that they can do that with

1:10:10.800 --> 1:10:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts. And we know from years with playing fantasy

1:10:14.960 --> 1:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>we love our rookies. We love the shiny new toys

1:10:17.680 --> 1:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>more than the coaches do. The coaches are always way

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>slower to bring guys on the field than we want

1:10:22.160 --> 1:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>them to. Also, there's the long history of tight end

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>rookie failures. And I know, if you've heard this show before,

1:10:31.320 --> 1:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you've heard these stats before, but I'm rolling them out

1:10:33.680 --> 1:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>anyway because it's awfully important. Over the last two decades,

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the average first round rookie tight end has finished as

1:10:43.920 --> 1:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end thirty two thirty catches, fifty yards and two

1:10:48.960 --> 1:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>scores for the season, three hundred fifty yards and two

1:10:52.200 --> 1:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>scores for the season. Then if we isolate it down

1:10:56.040 --> 1:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to the primo tight ends guys taken in the first

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>ten picks of the draft over the last two decades,

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:05.639
<v Speaker 1>these are the best of the best tight ends. There's

1:11:05.680 --> 1:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>somehow worse averaging is tight end fifty with twenty catches

1:11:09.960 --> 1:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and two hundred thirty yards and one touchdown. That's it.

1:11:14.800 --> 1:11:16.599
<v Speaker 1>He's got a buck, a lot of trends and maybe

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>he'll do it. And Brian Johnson, you're gonna have every

1:11:18.560 --> 1:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to prove me wrong over the course of this season. Now,

1:11:23.840 --> 1:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just showing, being the voice of reason. I do

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>think those are a lot of tight end trends. I

1:11:30.439 --> 1:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>think the way a Cole Pitts truth can justified as

1:11:34.120 --> 1:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>make him a receiver. And Russell Gauge last year was

1:11:36.920 --> 1:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>the third receiving option in that offense. His stat line

1:11:40.560 --> 1:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>would have been good for tight end three last year.

1:11:43.320 --> 1:11:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Does Russell Gauge play tight end? That No, That's why

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. That's what I'm saying. He doesn't play receiving

1:11:50.360 --> 1:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>options I'm just saying Pitts will be the second receiving

1:11:53.400 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>option in that offense. It's possible he's the new Julio,

1:11:57.240 --> 1:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but one that will be utilized in the red zone.

1:11:59.360 --> 1:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, the running back traits of a

1:12:02.680 --> 1:12:04.919
<v Speaker 1>bust What do you have to look for to idea

1:12:05.000 --> 1:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>bust running back before it happens? We'll tell you that

1:12:07.760 --> 1:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and unleash our sleepers of the week. Stay tuned Fantasy

1:12:12.000 --> 1:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. If you

1:12:37.840 --> 1:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>would like to download my free cheating the same one

1:12:41.479 --> 1:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I use when I walk into my drafts, my personal

1:12:43.760 --> 1:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>cheat sheet available at Guillotine leagues dot com. You can

1:12:47.160 --> 1:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>also join a Guilloting league available at whatever prize level

1:12:50.880 --> 1:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you want, or play with your friends. We support private

1:12:53.200 --> 1:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>leagues from eight to eighteen owners in your Guillotine league

1:12:59.720 --> 1:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this segment, final segment, The Traits of a bust running

1:13:04.000 --> 1:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>back Brian and then we'll do we'll hit on our

1:13:05.880 --> 1:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>sleepers of the week as well. Um a couple of

1:13:08.920 --> 1:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>shows ago, and it was two shows ago, or maybe

1:13:10.920 --> 1:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just last week, we talked about the traits of

1:13:13.280 --> 1:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a sleeper running back. Now we're gonna flip it over

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:18.799
<v Speaker 1>what are the what are the things that tie together

1:13:18.920 --> 1:13:22.599
<v Speaker 1>some of the bust running backs. Yeah, we came up

1:13:22.640 --> 1:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>with with three traits, and we'll get to them all

1:13:24.800 --> 1:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, But to kick it off, we we went

1:13:27.400 --> 1:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>back and looked at six years of data running back data,

1:13:31.320 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and by data, we looked at uh running backs that

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:37.519
<v Speaker 1>were drafted in the first three rounds of fantasy drafts

1:13:37.560 --> 1:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>but did not return value. And by that I mean

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't not finish as a top twenty four running back.

1:13:43.800 --> 1:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're drafted the first three rounds but did not

1:13:46.880 --> 1:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>return top twenty four. I think it's a very fair

1:13:50.040 --> 1:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>metric for a bust because you're drafting in the top

1:13:52.479 --> 1:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>three rounds, you're getting you're hoping to get, you're expecting

1:13:55.040 --> 1:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to get RB one or RB two performance, you know,

1:13:57.520 --> 1:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a starters performance, and you didn't get that. You gotta

1:14:00.040 --> 1:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>best of flax or maybe worse. Now, over the last

1:14:03.200 --> 1:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>six years, as I mentioned, we found thirty five instances

1:14:06.240 --> 1:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of this happening. Running backs busting after being picked in

1:14:10.200 --> 1:14:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the top three rounds. Of those thirty five bus were

1:14:14.479 --> 1:14:17.519
<v Speaker 1>mostly due to injury. But that happens, and that that's

1:14:17.560 --> 1:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that's something we'll talk about for sure, but the other

1:14:20.400 --> 1:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>ten were due to non injury circumstances. So we're gonna

1:14:24.439 --> 1:14:27.599
<v Speaker 1>go through these traits and hopefully avoid uh those running

1:14:27.600 --> 1:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>backs this year. We don't want to bust at running

1:14:30.320 --> 1:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>back um first bus I'm sorry, first trade of a

1:14:34.200 --> 1:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>bus running back mileage of course. Yeah, running backs that

1:14:38.600 --> 1:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I've had over career carries get injured at a significantly

1:14:43.960 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>higher rate UM over the last six years. Uh. Five

1:14:47.360 --> 1:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the injured runners in question um, although five the

1:14:51.080 --> 1:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>injured runners about to talk about have over career carry

1:14:54.120 --> 1:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>so so let's get to these guys. I'm not so

1:14:56.240 --> 1:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>sure people are targeting mark Ingram so much this year,

1:15:00.680 --> 1:15:03.719
<v Speaker 1>but he's in the mix. He has almost sixteen hundred

1:15:03.760 --> 1:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>career carries, which is kind of surprising because he's always

1:15:06.240 --> 1:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of been in a shared backfield situation. That seems

1:15:09.080 --> 1:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like with the Ravens um mark Ingram with with the Texans. Now,

1:15:14.040 --> 1:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh they have who knows what to make

1:15:17.200 --> 1:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of this Texans depth charted running back Fish alluded earlier

1:15:21.240 --> 1:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that Lindsay's on top of it might be Yeah, he's

1:15:28.080 --> 1:15:30.559
<v Speaker 1>not a bus, He's not even asleep. Reason is entire

1:15:30.560 --> 1:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bus entirely you don't you don't want mark Ingram this year?

1:15:33.040 --> 1:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Is Zekiel Elliott? Now now we're talking. Now, we're talking.

1:15:36.439 --> 1:15:38.639
<v Speaker 1>So when you're gonna draft early on in your drafts,

1:15:38.680 --> 1:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>almost sixteen hundred carries for Zeke, that's a lot of

1:15:43.720 --> 1:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>use and only what four five years? UH mentioned last

1:15:48.360 --> 1:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>year offensive line very uh decimated that they should be

1:15:52.000 --> 1:15:55.559
<v Speaker 1>back to full form, But I don't know. Fourteen hundred

1:15:55.600 --> 1:16:00.479
<v Speaker 1>carries for Zeke Tony Pollard? You are excited about Tony

1:16:00.520 --> 1:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Pollard that charge. So right there, Zeke straight one of

1:16:06.640 --> 1:16:10.519
<v Speaker 1>a running back bust, as does Melvin Gordon. Um not

1:16:10.560 --> 1:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>really going in the first three rounds, but some people

1:16:13.080 --> 1:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>believe he'll be the starter for the Broncos. Probably start

1:16:16.000 --> 1:16:20.439
<v Speaker 1>with almost carries for Melvin Gordon, though well over that

1:16:22.000 --> 1:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>threshold in Javonte Williams, rookie out of North Carolina, more

1:16:25.880 --> 1:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>than ready to take that job from Melvin Gordon. So

1:16:28.240 --> 1:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, Gordon is a guy I'm completely fading. I'll

1:16:32.200 --> 1:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>target Javonte Williams later on, but it's not like I

1:16:34.640 --> 1:16:37.439
<v Speaker 1>want to get Melvin Gordon and Javonte Williams. I'm just

1:16:37.439 --> 1:16:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm all out on Gordon. I know where you guys stand.

1:16:40.520 --> 1:16:42.559
<v Speaker 1>On that, and then I like that you spoke up

1:16:42.600 --> 1:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. I know you, I know you. You're out Now.

1:16:46.560 --> 1:16:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is concerned about when Derrick Henry is gonna fall

1:16:50.520 --> 1:16:53.479
<v Speaker 1>off the cliff. Some think it's this year. It's not right.

1:16:53.840 --> 1:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But he's only had eleven eighty two carries. He hasn't

1:16:57.240 --> 1:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>hit that twelve hundred car a watermark. So can I

1:17:01.720 --> 1:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>make a counterpoint on him? No running back that hit

1:17:04.960 --> 1:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand yards his top hundred the following year and

1:17:08.000 --> 1:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>most of them are way way below that. He doesn't

1:17:11.200 --> 1:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>get receptions. Adrian Peterson's two thousand yard year, he you

1:17:14.720 --> 1:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>know where his year or whatever after that, he lost

1:17:18.840 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 1>like seven hundred yards the next year. Yeah. Darrington Evans

1:17:22.600 --> 1:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy we've mentioned on the show a lot. I

1:17:24.280 --> 1:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>think he didn't really get any work last year. No

1:17:26.840 --> 1:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>one really did at the running back position outside of

1:17:29.120 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry. But that kind of feels like they're gonna

1:17:31.600 --> 1:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>change that philosophy and in Tennessee and uh, keep Henry

1:17:35.240 --> 1:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>healthy a little longer, especially for an expected playoff run,

1:17:38.520 --> 1:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>deep playoff run that they have in Tennessee. So that's

1:17:41.160 --> 1:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>it for trade number one mileage now trade number two

1:17:44.240 --> 1:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for a running backbust is players on a new team,

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:50.719
<v Speaker 1>either moving in the off season or traded during camp

1:17:50.800 --> 1:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or the season. Uh. Once these players go to a

1:17:53.640 --> 1:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>new team, the fantasy industry misidentifies them as lead running back.

1:17:58.160 --> 1:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's see if we can find any running backs

1:18:00.920 --> 1:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll fit. Uh. These trades and guys in the past

1:18:04.600 --> 1:18:07.599
<v Speaker 1>big names, we were expected them to be RB one's,

1:18:07.680 --> 1:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>r B two's Levian Bell when he went to the Jets,

1:18:11.120 --> 1:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, even when he went to the Fountains, people

1:18:13.800 --> 1:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>still had some belief with Todd Gurley. Leonard Fournette everyone

1:18:17.200 --> 1:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>thought he was gonna be the lead back for Tampa

1:18:18.920 --> 1:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Bay was kind of in a time share there. So

1:18:21.040 --> 1:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the guys on new teams this year.

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>The first one, the most glaring example, is Mike Davis

1:18:26.360 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta UM taking over for Todd Gurley. Uh. Davis

1:18:30.240 --> 1:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is in his seventh season, kind of a journeyman, UM,

1:18:33.320 --> 1:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>but as of now, he looks like the lead guy

1:18:35.560 --> 1:18:38.759
<v Speaker 1>we talked about. In the inside the five segment, Gurley

1:18:38.760 --> 1:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>had seventeen rushes inside the five, which is a lot.

1:18:43.200 --> 1:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So they all like they're going to Mike Davis as

1:18:45.439 --> 1:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of right now. But if they bring in another back,

1:18:47.120 --> 1:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that would uh certainly lean to uh Mike Davis busting.

1:18:50.960 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know where you guys stand on Davis.

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not going super high or super late. But do

1:18:54.720 --> 1:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you think he returns RB two value, which is what

1:18:58.240 --> 1:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>people are expecting? I think so yes. I feel like

1:19:01.720 --> 1:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>there's just nobody else that's gonna that's gonna interrupt him

1:19:04.800 --> 1:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>getting a fair amount of work here, even if he's

1:19:07.120 --> 1:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>not a special player. Uh. As we know, fantasy football

1:19:10.360 --> 1:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>is more about opportunity than talent. The next guy at

1:19:14.520 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the new next running back in a new place. James

1:19:16.560 --> 1:19:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Conner was one was two of the thirty five names

1:19:19.600 --> 1:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>on the overall list of BUS in the last six

1:19:21.840 --> 1:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>years already, so he's already hit this criteria and other

1:19:25.160 --> 1:19:28.839
<v Speaker 1>other areas. But now he's on in the new team trade.

1:19:29.120 --> 1:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the Cardinals inside the five earlier in

1:19:31.960 --> 1:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the in the show where um Kenyan Drake had twenty

1:19:35.680 --> 1:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>two carries inside the five yard line to chase Edmonds one.

1:19:39.560 --> 1:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So will they all go to James Conner. We'll see, uh,

1:19:43.160 --> 1:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>But the writing is on the wall sort of. Connor

1:19:45.360 --> 1:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>has had an injury history in the past, there's some

1:19:48.120 --> 1:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>mileage there. That's trade number one. Trade number two. He's

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on a new team, So people expecting Connor to be

1:19:53.960 --> 1:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the RB one in Arizona not so sure. I think

1:19:56.040 --> 1:19:58.519
<v Speaker 1>I would still lean Chase Edmonds even though he's going

1:19:58.520 --> 1:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a little earlier in draft. So there's trade number two.

1:20:01.160 --> 1:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Players on a new team. You might want to avoid

1:20:03.240 --> 1:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>any running back on a new team this year because

1:20:05.200 --> 1:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it generally does not work out well. And now the

1:20:07.880 --> 1:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>last trade identified by our Matt Harrison is the running

1:20:11.280 --> 1:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>back is just not a proven good player just because happens.

1:20:17.320 --> 1:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>We think a guy's a good player, but he hasn't

1:20:19.960 --> 1:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>proven it and we're wrong. That happens a lot. Yeah,

1:20:23.320 --> 1:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you see limited work, then the door opens up to

1:20:26.840 --> 1:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially a full time gig and we all make the

1:20:29.080 --> 1:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>assumption this guy is gonna be a bell cow back

1:20:31.479 --> 1:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm getting him to steal at an RV two rates.

1:20:34.400 --> 1:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's look at UH guys that look to be

1:20:37.000 --> 1:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>lead backs, but they're not proven to be good players yet.

1:20:40.320 --> 1:20:42.519
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna go back to to Darryl Henderson with

1:20:42.520 --> 1:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. UH last year lost significant touches to Malcolm

1:20:46.200 --> 1:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown the last two years. Really UH primarily at the

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>stripe two, which is concerning for Henderson. You want him

1:20:52.960 --> 1:20:55.559
<v Speaker 1>to be getting those goal line carries. They did draft

1:20:55.640 --> 1:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Cam Akers to be the lead back last year. Of course,

1:20:59.400 --> 1:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Acres is out this year, so they lost belief in

1:21:02.680 --> 1:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Henderson pretty much. It seemed like they did bring

1:21:05.040 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>in Sony Michelle. We're all not too concerned with Sony Michelle.

1:21:08.520 --> 1:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But again, Darryl Henderson not a proven guy. They can

1:21:11.800 --> 1:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>handle a ton of work, and just not proven elite

1:21:14.640 --> 1:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>good running back, so time will tell with him. Now,

1:21:17.760 --> 1:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>another guy on the list here, and I'm gonna throw

1:21:19.960 --> 1:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>him at under the bus because I don't agree with

1:21:21.840 --> 1:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this one and I don't think Fish will. But Miles

1:21:24.320 --> 1:21:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Gaskin looks to be the lead running back in Miami. Granted,

1:21:28.640 --> 1:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>not a proven good player yet, but he's looked good

1:21:31.120 --> 1:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on tape. But he's a seventh round pick. A former

1:21:34.160 --> 1:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>seventh round pick um only average four point one yards

1:21:37.680 --> 1:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>per carry last year. So we need to see a

1:21:40.280 --> 1:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>full season out of Miles gas and he does fit

1:21:42.320 --> 1:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the and he's he's going in the third late third round.

1:21:47.439 --> 1:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>He's getting drafted as an RB two started running back

1:21:50.280 --> 1:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of most teams, So a guy you want to be

1:21:52.040 --> 1:21:55.759
<v Speaker 1>a little worried about. Miles Gaskin and uh, lastly, Michael

1:21:55.800 --> 1:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Carter for the Jets, rookie running back. That look it's

1:22:00.160 --> 1:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like uh, full on three man platoon to me, some

1:22:02.800 --> 1:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>people think Carter runs away. I think because because the

1:22:06.200 --> 1:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>guy everybody else has no talent and he might be talented.

1:22:09.960 --> 1:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>He might be, but he just might just be a

1:22:11.800 --> 1:22:14.559
<v Speaker 1>warm body. He was a fourth round pick. He wasn't,

1:22:14.760 --> 1:22:17.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, highly touted coming out of college. There's a

1:22:17.600 --> 1:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback for the Jets, as we all know, new

1:22:21.000 --> 1:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff. So Michael Carter, unproven rookie, not a proven

1:22:26.040 --> 1:22:30.479
<v Speaker 1>good player, might have opportunity, but he he fits the

1:22:30.520 --> 1:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>third trade of a running back busts. So all right, guy,

1:22:33.160 --> 1:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>we're not too excited about. Thank you, Brian. And it's

1:22:35.479 --> 1:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just a Matt Harrison who put together a lot of

1:22:37.160 --> 1:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that data for us. The you mentioned the Jets and

1:22:39.920 --> 1:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the rookie quarterback. Zach Wilson looks good. He looks good.

1:22:43.320 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you get rid of Adam Gates, you put

1:22:45.080 --> 1:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>two first round picks on an offensive line, you add

1:22:47.280 --> 1:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>in Zach Wilson. He's got capable targets to throw too.

1:22:51.160 --> 1:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Jets are going to be an ascending offense, which is,

1:22:53.920 --> 1:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were the worst offensive league last year.

1:22:55.720 --> 1:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not saying a lot. Obviously they'll get better, um,

1:22:58.320 --> 1:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think people have just you know, we're so

1:23:01.479 --> 1:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>used to the Jets being so bad for so long

1:23:04.080 --> 1:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that I think some people are missing the boat on

1:23:05.920 --> 1:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>how on how this, how quickly this offense could return

1:23:09.280 --> 1:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to competency. I saw something interesting where a couple of

1:23:13.600 --> 1:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>months ago, if you haven't heard by now, Corey Davis

1:23:16.680 --> 1:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and Zach Wilson are like BFFs. All of a sudden,

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Lake Wilson is just locking on Corey Davis. But you

1:23:22.080 --> 1:23:25.519
<v Speaker 1>were getting people were drafting Elijah More in the ninth

1:23:25.600 --> 1:23:28.559
<v Speaker 1>round and Corey Davis and like the fifteenth round a

1:23:28.560 --> 1:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago that is completely flip flopped. Now

1:23:30.720 --> 1:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he was seeing Corey Davis go eighth, ninth round and

1:23:33.439 --> 1:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Elijah More. So yeah, it's crazy. Let's go to our

1:23:36.520 --> 1:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>sleepers for this week, beginning with Scott Fish who you

1:23:39.200 --> 1:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>who are you unveiling? Let's just stick with what we're

1:23:42.160 --> 1:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about, because my guy is Elijah More. I think

1:23:46.080 --> 1:23:48.519
<v Speaker 1>he's paired up with I did not mean to do that.

1:23:49.040 --> 1:23:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Sending quarterback and ascending offense has been lighting up camp.

1:23:56.760 --> 1:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He had he had a slight injury for a little bit,

1:23:59.200 --> 1:24:02.559
<v Speaker 1>and then he came back at lightning up camp again. Um,

1:24:02.640 --> 1:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that quad injury didn't slow him down. And really, who's

1:24:05.920 --> 1:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch passes there? It's gonna be Corey Davis, and

1:24:08.720 --> 1:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Elijah Moore in a lot of negot

1:24:11.040 --> 1:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Crowder did. My worry is that Jamison crowd is

1:24:13.720 --> 1:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a slot guy and Eliza Moore is a slot guy.

1:24:16.240 --> 1:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's why I've been That's why I've been

1:24:18.360 --> 1:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>lukewarm on Elijah Moore here, that he's been playing all

1:24:21.320 --> 1:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>over so far as I need him to play outside,

1:24:24.000 --> 1:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and obviously Corey Davis plays outside, so I'm not worried

1:24:26.200 --> 1:24:28.599
<v Speaker 1>about that part. I assume at some point Denzel Mims

1:24:28.600 --> 1:24:31.519
<v Speaker 1>will play outside. I just I don't know Denzel stays

1:24:31.520 --> 1:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>on the team. He's like, he's like he's way behind

1:24:34.720 --> 1:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in the fact in order. Now, my sleeper this week

1:24:37.320 --> 1:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is Will Fuller, the player nobody wants slumping to wide

1:24:43.760 --> 1:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>receiver fifty one straff position. Well, probably not. He's out

1:24:50.160 --> 1:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Week one with the he's out, he's still out Week one.

1:24:53.439 --> 1:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>He's going off the board in Round twelve. Wide receiver

1:24:56.000 --> 1:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty one. How come, Well, there's injury history and a

1:25:00.000 --> 1:25:01.559
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago he did have his foot foot

1:25:01.600 --> 1:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>injury dinged up. But he's return to practice. He's got

1:25:03.520 --> 1:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the week one suspension stemming from last year's p e

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>D bust. But let's just rewind the clock to last year.

1:25:11.200 --> 1:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>It's week twelve, right before the pe D bust happens.

1:25:15.479 --> 1:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller is wide receiver ten when his season ends. Ten.

1:25:21.240 --> 1:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>He's ahead of Keenan, Allen, Tyler Lockett, Allen Robinson, Calvin Ridley,

1:25:25.160 --> 1:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup, Robert Woods, and Adam Feeling. It was finally

1:25:28.400 --> 1:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the year. It was finally the year. This year, well, no, look,

1:25:33.439 --> 1:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I just wide receiver fifty one. He was again. He

1:25:36.960 --> 1:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>was wide receiver ten last year. Now he had scored

1:25:39.920 --> 1:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>eight times in eleven games. He led the NFL and

1:25:43.000 --> 1:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>yards per target last year. And jose Canseco was a

1:25:47.439 --> 1:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>great baseball player too when he was right. I'd like

1:25:51.760 --> 1:25:53.559
<v Speaker 1>to think that's not a factor here. Now he does

1:25:53.640 --> 1:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>get a downgraded quarterback from Deshaun Watson to Tah but

1:25:57.240 --> 1:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>nevertheless to a probably gets better in year two. Jay

1:26:00.080 --> 1:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Waddle probably needs a full year before he's a major threat.

1:26:03.080 --> 1:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>The Miami running game is middling, as we've talked about before,

1:26:06.439 --> 1:26:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and for a guy who was tarnished by the injury

1:26:08.800 --> 1:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>prone tag, Fuller didn't miss a game last year with injury.

1:26:12.400 --> 1:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>He missed the games eventually with the p D suspension,

1:26:14.880 --> 1:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but he had played the full season to that point.

1:26:17.080 --> 1:26:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I just think wide receiver fifty one and round twelve

1:26:19.960 --> 1:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is just too late for will Fuller. Bryan, who is

1:26:23.040 --> 1:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>your sleeper this week? You know I love me some

1:26:25.320 --> 1:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>tight ends and I gotta I gotta pump Donald Parham

1:26:29.400 --> 1:26:32.759
<v Speaker 1>tight end for the San Diego I'm sorry, Los Angeles

1:26:32.960 --> 1:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Chargers now technically the backup tight end to Jared Cook,

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>who is acquired by the Chargers in the off season,

1:26:38.960 --> 1:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but reports at a camp are they're utilizing Cook and

1:26:42.280 --> 1:26:44.479
<v Speaker 1>bar him on the field at the same time and

1:26:44.560 --> 1:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>part him is kind of getting the poor man's Kyle

1:26:47.240 --> 1:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Pets usage, whether they're lining him up on the outside

1:26:50.280 --> 1:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>uh end in the slot primarily within the inside the

1:26:53.720 --> 1:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty yard line. And speaking of injury prone, Mike Williams

1:26:57.600 --> 1:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>never stays healthy for the Chargers. Keenan Allen, I'm not

1:27:02.120 --> 1:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>wishing anything bad on these guys. Two misses a gamer two.

1:27:05.560 --> 1:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>He also lied to us about whether or not we

1:27:07.120 --> 1:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>could start him in our fantasy leagues. And Donald Parham

1:27:09.520 --> 1:27:11.559
<v Speaker 1>on the up and he's an up and coming star

1:27:11.840 --> 1:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>x former XFL star, six ft eight nuts. How do

1:27:17.000 --> 1:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you cover that in the end zone? He justin air

1:27:19.880 --> 1:27:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Bear is gonna be looking Donald Parham's way more often

1:27:22.760 --> 1:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>than not, more often than you think, uh this year.

1:27:25.280 --> 1:27:28.599
<v Speaker 1>So he's a deep sleeper that's gonna He's gonna bubble

1:27:28.680 --> 1:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>up to the top two. Keen Brown's only missed two

1:27:31.360 --> 1:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>games the last four years. It feels like feel It

1:27:33.439 --> 1:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>does feel like a lot of weekends questionable. He's always

1:27:37.439 --> 1:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on the injury report though. We're all trying to find

1:27:40.520 --> 1:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Chargers with value, right because we all want charges. So

1:27:43.160 --> 1:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to be part of this off. I had

1:27:44.479 --> 1:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Tyron Johnson last week was my sleeper. There's one guy

1:27:47.760 --> 1:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody's talking about, Michael Badgeley, And I know we almost

1:27:52.280 --> 1:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>never talked kickers. Michael Badgeley, who was He was wildely inaccurate.

1:27:57.040 --> 1:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>He missed he two years ago. We didn't finish the

1:27:59.360 --> 1:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>season he got her and then this last year twenty

1:28:01.960 --> 1:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he was inaccurate. But he's pretty much wrapped up that

1:28:05.280 --> 1:28:09.719
<v Speaker 1>competition there to stay. He might be somebody and kicker

1:28:09.840 --> 1:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>leagues that you want to you know, if you're trying

1:28:11.640 --> 1:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to you want a piece of the chargers, you don't

1:28:13.280 --> 1:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have to pay the heavy price that they're all going

1:28:15.080 --> 1:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for right now. That might be a guy you could consider. Uh.

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:20.759
<v Speaker 1>If you'd like to try Guillotine League, please do Guillotine

1:28:20.920 --> 1:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. We've got all kinds of leagues available

1:28:24.320 --> 1:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for you to peruse and learn about the hottest new

1:28:27.240 --> 1:28:30.479
<v Speaker 1>format in fantasy football. We will be back next week

1:28:30.840 --> 1:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>with more Fantasy Football Weekly in the heart of draft season.

1:28:35.000 --> 1:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Talk to you that everybody, Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly

1:28:58.240 --> 1:29:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts

1:29:00.840 --> 1:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

1:29:03.240 --> 1:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.