WEBVTT - A Massacre Of Mormons In Mexico

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the Freedom Hunch, a massacre of Americans

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico at the hands of the vicious cartels. We'll

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about where that stands right now. Also, the transcript

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>is out of at least one impeachment witness against Trump.

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We know the Democrats are cheating on the process. Baseball's

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>kurts Zuki was at the White House and he did

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>something that upsets some folks. Also, has Jack Ryan been ruined?

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And is Aunt Becky going to prison for forty years?

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>That and more coming up. This is the buck Sexton Show,

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>where the mission or mission is to decode what really

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, You're a

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>great American. Again the buck Sexton Show begins, Remember the

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>nimpd buck Sexton. Welcome to the buck Sex and the Show. Everybody,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being here. We have a

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>lot to get to today. As is our custom, I

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>did want to start off though, with an absolutely gut punch,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a gut punching, heart wrenching, really horrific story that I think,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately is a harbinger of some further violence and instability

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.639
<v Speaker 1>on our southern border to come. Here's where it stands

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. Cartel gunmen have killed at least nine US citizens,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>including six children, who were in the Mexican border state

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of Sonora. This is not far from the US Mexico

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>border with Arizona where this attack took place. Ranita Maria

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>LeBaron died along with her six month old twins and

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>her two other children aged ten and twelve. Christina at

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Langford Johnson, Donna Langford and two of Donna's children, aged

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>three and eleven, were also killed. The victims here belonged

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to the LeBaron family. They are US citizens, dual citizens

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with Mexico who live who live in a Mormon breakaway

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>community in this part of northern rural northern Mexico. The stories,

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the details that we have so far about this coordinated

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>ambush are horrific, beyond imagining. There were children who died

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>as these cars were on fire. They were strapped in

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles unable to escape. Children were reportedly executed while

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to run away from this three suv convoy after

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>it had been attacked. There's also some early reports and

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>indications that some of the women who were captured, they

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>believe members of the family may have been captured or

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>being held. We're sexually assaulted in this whole process too,

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as vicious and awful in ambush as you could imagine

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>murdering children. A lot of people are going to see

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this and say, wait a second, you mean that Mexico

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is in a really bad place. This will be something

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of a surprise to them, not people who watch and

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to this show. However, you will recall that we

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have done in recent weeks stories on what happened in

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Kuliya Khan, Mexico, where you had cartel gunman on behalf

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of Chapo Guzman's son O video shut down essentially an

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>entire city, a major city in Mexico, and have the

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>national government back off. You know, when the national government

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>backs off of a gunfight with the bad guys, with

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the thugs, you're in a very bad place. I've also

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>been telling you now for the last two years that

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Mexico has the highest murder rate that it has had

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in history. Right now, that Mexico is seeing more violence

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>internally than at any time since they have been counting homicides.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>How much of this do you see getting attention in

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the news media. There are reasons for that, my friends,

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>This is not an oversight, This is not an accident.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And I will get into why this doesn't fit the

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>narrative for the mainstream meeting in a second. But going

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>back into this, this ambush of women and children, defenseless

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.559
<v Speaker 1>women and children in a convoy on a dirt road,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe. And this is now assessment. This

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is not reporting. This is not based on anything other

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>than me looking through the details. But I used to

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>do this quite a bit at the CIA and then

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at the NYPD Intelligence Division, look at the early signs

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to understand what the indicators are. People who

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are saying that this is an accident, meaning they thought

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that they were attacking a rival cartel, I don't believe that.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong. I don't believe it. People who

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>are referring to this as being caught in the crossfire, well,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that suggests that there were people on the other side

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>firing and this convoy somehow got in the middle, which

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence to support that either. I think there's

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a real effort here and some people from some people

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in our media, in the US media, to find an

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>explanation for this that's not The cartels basically run Mexico,

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that the cartels are now more powerful than any politician,

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>more powerful than the central government in a day to

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>day way, and that they're just covering this up, and

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that Lopez Obrador has been with his hugs not bullets

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>policy that's actually a thing, by the way, trying to

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>find ways to do development and to not go to

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>war with the cartels. The cartels have gone to war

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with Mexico, and what they show us now is that

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>they have no problem engaging in the worst atrocities, not

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:10.559
<v Speaker 1>just against cartel rivals and innocent Mexicans, to the tune

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of tens of thousands of people a year, about thirty

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to thirty five thousand murders in Mexico every year. That's

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot for a country that's less than half the

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>size of the United States and has about double our

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>murder rate, perhaps even more like two and a half times.

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>So there's a big problem here. But that the cartel

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>would do this, this could be something of a turning point.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You would think that perhaps this would get attention. These

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>were Americans. These were at least nine perhaps more killed

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps more captured. Now and who knows what's going on. Unthinkable, unthinkable,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>atrocities in captivity. But these are our people. These are Americans. Yes,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>they're dual citizens, they're American citizens too, and they are

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>down there in Mexico and they were just slaughter by cartels.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I appreciate that President Trump has taken the position

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he has on this. He says that a wonderful family,

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this was on Twitter this morning, A wonderful family and

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>friends from Utah got caught between two vicious drug cartels

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>who were shooting at each other, with the result being

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>many great American people killed, including young children, and some missing.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>If Mexico needs a request help in cleaning out these monsters,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States stands ready, willing and able to get

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>involved and do the job quickly and effectively. The great

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>new president of Mexico has made this a big issue.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But that cartels have become so large and powerful. You

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>need sometimes an army to defeat an army. So the

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>President is saying here himself that they were caught in

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the crossfire. I can't understand how that would work though.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And if they're caught on the crossfire, why would children

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>running away from the convoy be specifically executed. They couldn't

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about these kids ide and cartel gunmen from

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Afar and those are that's already in the reporting. So

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that in the initial assessment here there are

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that are being made. I'll update this as we

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>find out, as we find out more. That seemed to

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>me to be a first take on the issue, unless

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the other eyewitness accounts that we're hearing about are incorrect.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It's also noteworthy that Mexican authorities were not particularly helpful

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in this, and that family members of those who had

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been murdered had to swarm the hills around this attack

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>site themselves looking for survivors. So the Mexican government does

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not have this well in hand. They will also, of

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>course not invite in at least not openly direct American

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>kinnetic Assistant show. We say, at least not something that

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll talk about publicly. We have a real problem here.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Even if let's assume for a moment that the initial

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>reporting about this being a caught in the crossfire moment

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>is true, well, then that would mean that the cartels

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are still willing to execute women and children in the

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>midst of a gun battle with their opponents knowing that

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be I mean even in Mexico.

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>This incident was going to get a lot of attention.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't care. They're not worried about the bad press.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Particularly there's been so many there have been so many

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>murders and so many atrocities in Mexico. They have police

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>convoys that are ambushed with I think it was recently

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>nine officers in one instance murdered by cartel gunmen. Why

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>does this come as a surprise to so many Americans?

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Why does this come as a surprise to people in

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this country. Well, we are led to believe by the press,

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>by the Democratic Party, by the open borders movement here,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that Mexico is not a security concern for us, when

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the amount of heroine that is

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pouring into this country as well as opioids, the number

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of people that are dying from those heroin and opioid overdoses,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and who controls that trade, it is almost entirely the

0:09:54.920 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Mexican drug cartels. Mexican drug cartels are poisoning American city.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Thousands and thousands of people now are dying every year,

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 1>over seventy thousand in one of our particularly bad recent years.

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 1>And I know that the press likes to beat up

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on pharmaceutical companies, and there were some pharmer companies that

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>engaged in unethical practices for which they have now been

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>financially annihilated, and perhaps they will also be further criminal

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>sanction against individuals involved, including doctors prescribing drugs. But keep

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in mind that the way our laws work in this

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>country right now, if someone sells opioids to a person

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>who overdoses, they don't get charged with just selling a

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled substance. They are charged with manslaughter or murder. They

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are held responsible for that homicide. So, based on that

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>very same legal approach, which is a day to day

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>reality here in America, the drug cartels a response, well,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for killing thousands and thousands of Americans every year, who

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>knows how many. It's very tough to actually get this data.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I've asked around for it. I even asked somebody, a

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>contact of the DA say, well, it's hard to know

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>where the drugs come from. So we know most of

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the drugs come from Mexico. We know about sixty to

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy thousand people are dying from these drug overdoses every year.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We know Big Pharma has been put on notice, and

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>doctors know They risk not just their license, but their

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>freedom for decades if they overprescribe on purpose or illicitly

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>prescribe these drugs. So what is the most likely scenario here,

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's put all of us together, that the drug cartels

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that are now multibillion dollars international criminal syndicates are responsible

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>for poisoning our cities and causing just unimaginable social destruction.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And yet we are told that Mexico is not a

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>national security concern for us. We're told that the fact

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that there's a country right next door that has organized

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>crime more powerful than the central government and can even

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>outgun them in a major city is not something that

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to be worried about. Those syndicates. By the way,

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>those cartels, they have connections, They have tentacles that stretch

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>into every major US city and in fact a lot

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of mid size and small US cities too. Sometimes they

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>try to keep a low profile here because thank god,

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>our law enforcement has not yet been outgunned by cartels,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and they still have to operate with some degree of

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>discretion and fear of law enforcement in America. Not so

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico. And trust me, the history of that country.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>It's corruption its inability to have durable institutions that will

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>root out corruption. That all indicates to me that what's

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>going on there right now there are people going all

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the way up the chain of the Mexican government who

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are not who are either not willing to fight against

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the cartels or are on the cartel's payroll. The hotels

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>have something on them. The cartels have threatened their family,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>The cartels are in some way exerting leverage on them.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>How is this not one of the biggest stories in

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the country. I ask you that question. How is it

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>possible that we have seventy thousand or so Americans dying

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>every year, overwhelmingly from poison being poured into our cities

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>by our neighbor to the south, by the organized crime

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>groups there that are killing Americans on our side and

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>killing tens of thousands of Mexicans, people who are just

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>caught on the crossfire day in and day out. Why

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>can't they get control of this. Why aren't there law

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>enforcement and judicial systems strong enough to finally root this out?

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>These are questions that we should ask much more than

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we do, and it's also something that I think should

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>get a whole lot more attention at not just in

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>our media, but also from our own government. We've heard

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how we need to treat the opioid

0:13:55.360 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>epidemic by putting more facilities in place. That's all well

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and good, but how about stopping the poison from entering

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>our cities. People are not growing heroin in their backyard

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in Vermont or in Utah. It's coming in from south

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of our border, and it's being grown in Mexico. There's

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>been an enormous shift. Heroin used to be overwhelmingly from Afghanistan.

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a big cash crop for the Taliban. UN

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>estimates back even a decade ago or that over ninety

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>percent of the world's heroin market was grown in essentially

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>southern and eastern Afghanistan. Now about ninety percent of the

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>heroin and opioids coming into this country that are on

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the street illegally are coming from Mexico and they are

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>made in or grown in Mexico. Oh, but the fact

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that we have a porous border, the fact that we

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>have millions and millions of illegal aliens in the country who, yes,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a very small percentage of whom are involved directly in

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the cartel trade. But there's still a percentage of them

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who are, and that percentage, by the way, is responsible

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>for thousands and thousands of US deaths. You can read

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Canone as his book Dreamland. He goes into this

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in details. An LA Time Supporter's not a conservative's a liberal.

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>The cartels made inroads into US cities at just the

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>same time that there was this surge in prescription painkillers,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and they capitalized on it and murdered countless Americans in

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the process, addicted people and put them in a position

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>where the likelihood of an overdose was overwhelming. Mexico's a

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>big problem. How much time, I ask you this, have

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you heard the media wailing about the Kurds in the

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks versus how much time have you heard

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>them talking about the gunfight in Kuliya Khan. How much

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think they'll spend on this mass assassination, of

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this ambush and slaughter of nine Americans? The numbers probably

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>going to grow in Mexico. What's a bigger threat? Who?

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Who has killed more Americans in the last thirty days?

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Cartels in Mexico, which are right on our border and

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>can come and go as they please, largely across our border,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>or isis in Syria. Who should we be more concerned

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about A lot of people giving weighty speeches about the

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>threat of ertiwan, What about the threat of the Sinaloa cartel,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>which one's more likely to be a problem for you

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in your community wherever you are in the country, by

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, from coastal California to Appalachia, north and south

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>everything in between. The cartels have tentacles all over the place.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>People in your town, your city are dying because of

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>what they do. Where's the media focus on this? Where's

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the CNN, the MSNBC town hall on cartels in the

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>opioid epidemic? Oh? You mean that, It's almost like it

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fit the narrative. None of us are surprised here

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Freedom hud are we just an update on

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this ambush as I was taking a moment here to

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers. Nine killed, seven injured. Children are

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>now in the United States and they were part of

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this this Mormon sect that had left the United States

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>decades ago and settled in Mexico because of a schism

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>over the practice of polygamy. This group also just as

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a as a side note of the history of it

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>involved at one point to George Romney. Mitt Romney's father

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>lived in in this part of Mexico as as a

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>member of this member of this sect. I believe he

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was born there. So they're also had There's some additional

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers here. Last last year I said thirty to thirty

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>five thousands, thirty three thousand murders in Mexico last year

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. So far, he's going to break that thought.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We had about thirty five thousand murders in this country

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico, and the authorities are just hoping that they

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. I think they just don't want to

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>lift the lid off and see what's what's underneath here

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the cartels. They don't want to deal

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with it. They're just hoping it goes away. But it's

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to go away. This is a powder keg.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>This could go at any point. We also now know

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the name of the worst blower. The whistleblower needs to

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>come before Congress as a material witness because he worked

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>getting money from corrupt oligarchs. I say tonight to the media,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>do your job and print his name. Why is the

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower's name sacrosanct? Who said that that's the case? Who? Who?

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>And where? Show me the statute or show me the

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>regulation that claims that an internal federal government, federal agency

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower who decides to blow the whistle on something that's

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>not even within the purview of his or her agency

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>has a guarantee of anonymity for as long as that

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>person wants it. Huh does an anybody want to explain

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that one to me? But the problem here, and we're

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>going to keep running in circles around this, is that

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the process is largely whatever the Democrats decide, because they're

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>in the majority of the House. Whatever they decide the

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>process is, that's what it will be. So they'll make

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it as fair as unfair as they want and claim

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that they have the power for this process to be

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>what it is. And Republicans are right to point out

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the glaring imbalances and all this, but it's

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>not going to change anything. Ultimately, it's going to continue

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to be more or less what it is, which is

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a get Trump, destroy Trump, do what you can see

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just they're really just in a lot of ways shaking

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the tree to see what falls out. I mean, they

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what the end result of this whole

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>impeachment process will be. They just know that it's bad

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>for the president, and as we know from dealing with

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the left, anything that is bad for the president must

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be good. That's their approach, that's how they see all

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of this. Rand Paul also went a little further here,

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and this is something and I'm just noting that a

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of what you're here now from the administration, from

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>officials defending it, is where the buckster was in the beginning,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>which is we already know Hunter Biden is what he

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>did is unethical and gross. We already know that this

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was pay to play. It might not have been illegal,

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but the appearance of corruption is clearly there. That's that's

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in the facts, which also means that the basis for

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>an investigation is there, Which means that the president of

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States asking a foreign counterpart to look into

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>something is completely within his purview. Is it bare knuckle politics? Yeah?

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Is Trump allowed to do that in response to what

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing to him? Yes, in my opinion, sure, people

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>disagree with me. You know what they can do vote

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>against him. That's what this is. All a political question.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are trying to morphit into some legalistic process. But

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not a legal process. It's not legal. It's not

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a criminal justice proceeding. But people got all into this

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quote and all the stuff. I'm like, look,

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't even see what's wrong with it. You can

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>go back, go to tape, listen to earlier week we

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>got him the episodes on iTunes on the iHeart Up,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which you can subscribe to. But go back, listen to

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>what I was saying when the first thing, when this broke.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll see, yes, look, I don't understand what the big

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>problem is here. And some conservatives that I really like,

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we're very worried about it at first, but I know

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this game before I know how, I know how the

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia collusion hoax was run. They get all frenzied, they

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>get all fired up about how this is the worst

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that anyone's ever done. It's worse than Nixon. And

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>then when you look at it and you deal with

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the facts, you say, but hold on a second, why

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly is this worse than Nixon? Why is this worse

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>than Watergate? It's always important to take a breath when

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>liberals tell you that the republic is about to sink

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're all doomed. That's when it's worthwhile the step

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>outside gets some fresh air and think, do I trust

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>these people? The answer is no. So since I don't

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>trust them, should to listen to them about this? The

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>answer is also no. Rant Paul understands that the Hunter

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Biden thing. Democrats are sensitive about it because it looks gross.

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>There's no question about a play club five. If you

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>would hunter Biden made fifty thousand dollars a month. That's

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the definition of corruption. We know he got it only

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>because of his family connections. And I say to my colleagues,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if shifty Shift will not let Hunter Biden come, and

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>if you will not bring the whistleblower for every Republican

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in Congress should take a walk and say this is

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a farce. I think that at some point Republican nullification

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of the process, or at least refusal to behave or

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to behave maybe to be a part of the process.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what this is heading to. I do think at

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>some point Republicans should probably just say we're not gonna

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna do this, We're not gonna show up

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what are they gonna They're gonna send a sergeant in

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>arms to arrest all the Republicans for not wanting to

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>sit through Adam shifts bizarre inquisition Hunter Biden, which we

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>all have to goes back to the Democrat debate where

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Anderson Cooper's like whatever his question was, it's basically, you know, hey,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask you about Ukraine, Joe Biden, but

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to make sure that there's no evidence

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>against you and there's no evidence you didn't anything wrong,

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm gonna ask my question. Well, I mean

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that all depends on what the meaning of wrong is,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because to me, it is quite clearly wrong for someone

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:22.959
<v Speaker 1>to get fifty thousand dollars a month when their fathers

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on board. Because remember, even if see this is if

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you really think this through, you understand why the Democrats

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>are so sensitive about this. Let's say for a second

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that what Hunter and Joe Biden have told us all

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>along is true, which is a leap I will have

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that I'm not willing to make. But but

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that they made this or they did

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not discuss anything Ukraine related, and that Hunter never even

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>promised the Ukrainians who were sending him these big checks

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>every month that he was going to be their guy

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>with the administration, with the Obama administration. And let's assume

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden's telling the truth. And remember, I'm not

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it this is true, but I just

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>even if we go to that level where we say

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>everything had told us so far as true, the Ukrainian

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>company Bisma was paying Hunter Biden to be on the

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>board as an insurance policy. Right's something that we know

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the left, the Democrats know about. Remember the discussion about

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 1>the insurance policy in Andy McCabe's office, off what if

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump gets elected. Yeah, they try to pretend that we're

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to remember that, but we do remember. So

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the insurance policy is an issue here. The way that

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you can see this is that if Hunter Biden's on

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the board of Barisma, wouldn't that even without anyone being

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>told anything in Ukraine, which is very dependent on US

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>eight at this point in time, the Obama aministration is

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>heavily engaged in Ukraine as a foreign policy issue, wouldn't

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just without being told Let's not get too

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy with this Bearismo investigation. And if you were the

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>person making the decisions or the group making decisions about

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>who's on the Barizma board. You would know that too,

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't matter. Right, Why why is it a

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>problem for somebody in you know? Why is nepotism an

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>issue in general? You know? Why is it a problem

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in government for a father? You know, if if Trump

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>were too And you guys know that I disagree with

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the nepotism that this administration engages in. I just I do.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's wrong. And people can tell me all

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>day that the best people are the people he trusts

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're around him. But let's be honest about this.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>First second, folks, look at a lot of the decisions

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump has made about who to put around him, you know,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>like the mooch, we're gonna this isn't This is an

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>area where you know, if you're not willing to criticize

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the president, I gotta say, I think it's starting to

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>come pretty close to where are you willing to criticize

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>this president? And I'm a big supporter, as you know,

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's a different thing supporting somebody and saying

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>everything I do is brilliant is not this? That's not

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>those are not equivalent. But why is nepotism an issue

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Well, because if I'm the president

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, let's make it President Buck, which

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>would be amazing, by the way, but it's not gonna happen.

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I like getting sleep and relaxing and going for walks

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:11.959
<v Speaker 1>anonymously in New York. Let's say that there was President

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Buck and I had a son who was great, and

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to make my son's secretary of State. How

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>could anybody have confidence that I wasn't picking my son

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Because whether I ever tell anybody or not where, whether

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I ever write it down or make it a quid

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>pro quo or make it official or not, the fact

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>of the matter is that I have a personal relationship

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to that person, and that will affect my decision making.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The same is true about Drew Biden on the board

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of Barisma. When his dad is running policy in that country.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>There doesn't have to be a discussion about it. The

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>point is that it makes it look like nobody could

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>touch Burisma because Hunter Biden's there, so there, so the

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, oh, but there's no there's no smoking gun,

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>we have no it doesn't matter. We've already established that

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>this was gross. We've already established that this is wrong.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You never should have done it. Of course, it's why

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>did Joe Biden say to him, I hope you know

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. I mean, Joe Biden's kind of a moron,

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but he's smart enough to figure out that having his

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>song on the board of a company when he's running

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration policy in that country is a problem. Doesn't

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>look good. Media has no interest in this whatsoever, and

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they're certain by the way that there's no further investigation needed.

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've had the Mullard probe, We've had every

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>media organization in the country that's anti Trump, which is

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of them digging into Russia collusion as though

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>their lives depended on it. Same thing, over and over,

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>same witnesses, the same storyline, everything. But in the case

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>of Breeze. But with Hunter Biden, we know everything. We

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>need to know. Nothing to see here, Move on or

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>else you're a conspiracy theorist. Sorry, not going to play

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the game the way they want me to, because I

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>know what the other side's really all about. I know

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>what matters to them. Let's also, though, talk about this.

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Javanovich testimony. The good news here, folks, is I read

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the Javanov testimony. It's already been I don't know if

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they've I think they leaked it or maybe it's out officially.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't keep up with all the shenanigans going home

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>with this committee. But I read the Yevanovich testimony, and

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you it is. It is not exactly

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>riveting stuff. All these State Department people have the same

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've just been doing all the best I

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>can for US foreign policy, and I'm a selfless public

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>servant and i have no politics, and right, we get it, Okay, fine,

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them are some of them aren't. You know,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like any large organization. There are go to the

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>university of some big school, and you know they'll be

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>brilliant people, though they'll be idiots there. That's like the

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>State Department. That's like the CIA, that's like the FBI.

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got a mix. But Yevanovich's testimony. There

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>are a few things that are worth noting from this,

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>which I'll tell you, but just just in case you

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>happen to flip on the TV and you see Shifty

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Shift trying to lie to you about it. I want

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to I want to give you some of what really

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>happens or what really is clear from the testimony, and

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, I mean on the process. We have a

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>problem here though, because the Democrats can set and are

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>setting the process. It's deeply unfair, but they're allowed to

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.479
<v Speaker 1>make it deeply unfair. You know what the check is

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on the unfair process. The Democrats in this House impeachment

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>inquiry are doing you, the voter. That's why this is

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>political ambassadory. Ivanovitch had a well earned reputation as a

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>fighter of corruption, and she was working with Ukraine to

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>get Ukraine to fight corruption. And so what does this

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>irregular back channel, sanctioned by the president do. It seeks

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to remove someone fighting corruption in Ukraine by employing a

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>vicious smear campaign in which the state department at the

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>highest levels that acknowledged had no merit whatsoever. That smear campaign,

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>orchestrated by this irregular channel was successful in removing a

0:29:56.120 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 1>US ambassador and taring her reputation. Of course, see the

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>President's comments about the ambassador in the call record. All right,

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>some notes of caution here. What does he see Ivanovitch?

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's Conna. I can never get these names right.

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I was saying Yavanovitch, Ivanovitch, tomato, tomato. You know, I'm

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to get it right. So of course it's tomato,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not tomato. What are we on, like

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.239
<v Speaker 1>faulty towers? Ridiculous? Do you even know? You don't even

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>know what faulty towers is? Do you producing? This is

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just like? Nah? I just old I just old manned

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>myself here, didn't I You have no idea? Next Thingain,

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll be talking you about Mash. I at least know

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what Mash was. Well, that's good. I have a clue.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing, no clue, no clue. Yeah, So

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a few things about this one my notes of caution here.

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Do I think that it's possible that perhaps the presidence

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>personal layer Rue Giuliani might have been a bit over zealous,

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I know the mayor. I like the mayor,

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>so I would have a very hard time without heart

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence just be ever speaking ill of them. What does

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it possible theoretically that maybe he had some bad information

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on this ambassador and there was a smear campaign against

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>her that was not meant to be a smear campaign,

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but they really thought she was working against Trump administration

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>wishes in some way, I could say, I don't know, right,

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we're working with very imperfect information here. But but a

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>few things that I would note the State Department. Careers

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to the State Department are politically in line with the

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Oberlin Women's and Gender Studies Faculty Lounge. Okay, they are

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>politically in line with the far left of America. Three

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, I'd say two out of three or three

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>out of four, right, so you're looking at a healthy majority.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Aren't even just democrat their leftists, they're internationalists. I've spent

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time and a lot of people dated

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody a long time ago from the State Department. I

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>know the State Department, Okay, not not super well. I

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't work there, but I know enough about it, having

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>interacted with it and being around that enough to know

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's a and there were back in the day

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of actual When I say commies, I mean communists.

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>There were Communist penetrations of the State Department at a

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>very high level. And to this day people pretend that

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that did not happen. Don't even get me started on

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>an Alger Hiss and the pumpkin papers and everything else

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's real. Though, read Witness Whittaker Chambers fantastic, fantastic book.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Really one of the people that got National Review up

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and running, along with William F. Buckley. You should read

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Whitaker Chambers Witness. The left still pretends that there weren't

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>commy infiltrations of this country, and specifically of the highest

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>levels of the United States government, because the Left always

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit of a soft spot for commies.

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that's but I'm just giving you the numbers. I

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if she is an anti Trumper or not.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I would just note that it's very possible that she

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was so based on what you usually see for people

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that work for the State Department. That's one aspect of this. Also,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that Adam Schiff is telling you nothing but the most

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the most praising or praise worthy sweeping statements of how

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>wonderful is That just puts me a little bit on edge.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And the Obama administration has great fighters of corruption in Ukraine.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Play clip nine if you would please. Ambassador Ivanovitch had

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a well earned reputation as a fighter of corruption, and

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>she was working with Ukraine to get Ukraine to fight corruption.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And so what does this irregular back channel sanctioned by

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the president do. It seeks to remove someone fighting corruption

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine? Right, But he is he saying that she

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>was being removed because she was fighting corruption Ukraine or

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>she being removed because it was believed that she was

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>opposed to President Trump or did not like President Trump

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>at some level. I mean, is now the storyline that

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump wants Ukraine corruption? That's new, that would be

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a new addition into this whole thing. Keep in mind

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats do not allow House Minority Republicans or

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the House Republicans or in the minority to pull their

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.479
<v Speaker 1>own witnesses. They're not allowed to ask questions, so they're

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just there to watch the show, so to speak. So

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that then the Democrats can do whatever they want in

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the show and pretend that this is bipartisan, but it

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is clearly not bipartisan. Democrats also have threatened, I believe,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to withhold pay of State Department officials who show up

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and want there to be a State Department lawyer present

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>with them during this testimony. Why would the State Department

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lawyer present with them? Well, to protect executive

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>branch equities in all of this to make sure that

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch, which is a coequal branch with the Congress,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is not having its prerogatives run roughshod over. I don't

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>know if that's really the way you'd say that, but

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. But no, you're not allowed

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to or else they'll hold your pay. I think I

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>read that today, which seemed just absolutely outrageous. I think

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that the whistleblower gave a lot of false information, and

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to see who the whistleblower is. Once I

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>released the transcript, which was almost immediately, the whistleblower's report

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was very wrong because, as you know, the whistleblower covered

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>mostly my transcript, myall Michael with the President of Ukraine.

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 1>So once I released that call, I released a very

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>detailed version of that call. All of a sudden, the

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers report was incorrect, and the whistleblower seems to have disappeared.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And I also wonder what happened to the second whistle

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>blower and what happened to the informant. The President has

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>targeted some of the folks who have testified, including Lieutenant

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Colonel Vinman. He has called for unmasking the name or

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>revealing the identity of the whistle blower, which is protected

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>by the law. How much do you take this seriously

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and how much do you think it's actually a sort

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of concrete threat to these proceedings. So we know that

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the whistle blower's identity is no longer relevant because everything

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>he said has now been corroborated by other witnesses, and

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the White House's release they're called transcript the summarized version

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of it. We don't need to have a whistable over

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us what was on that phone call, because American

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>people already know. In addition, the Trump's President Trump's attacks

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on Colonel Vinman or a very unfortunate ten Colonel Vinman

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>served in Iraq, he shut his blood, he had got

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a prople heart. He is an American hero, and he

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>told his story to Congress. He should not be attacked.

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of very important things going on

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>here from the Democrat side with this whole impeachment effort.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to just walk it through a little bit

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. Yeah, I can never remember the Ambassadory Ivanovitch,

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I think is why I'm supposed to say it, right,

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador Yvanovitch, there was there were no bombshells. She gave

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the usual I'm a sort of State Department, long time bureaucrat.

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I think, blah blah. They shouldn't have fired me,

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they shouldn't know. I can't you know, the

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>administration if if they have any evidence or real proof

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:58.919
<v Speaker 1>that she was working against Trump, we should We should

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 1>see that at some point. We have not seen that yet.

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But I would note that this desire to protect the

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower's identity at all costs. Hold on a second, why

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can't the whistle blower testify behind closed doors because Republicans

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and Congress can't be trusted with the identity. Now, keep

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in mind there's already reports circling all over the place

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about the name of somebody who is a reportedly a

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>CIA analyst who was detailed to the NSC. Who is

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the person behind this? I can neither confirm nor deny.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the name is swirling around. But until

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we have confirmation of this from the government, we don't

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>really know what we're dealing with. But let's understand also

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>what the president here would be A person working for

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the federal government going forward, any person working for the

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>federal government could, upon learning of any meeting that the

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>president has, including a highly classified discussion that the president has,

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:02.879
<v Speaker 1>file a complaint through allies in Congress, and then use

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that complaint as the basis for a make it up

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>as you go along impeachment inquiry. That's an entirely political exercise,

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is meant to defame the president while in

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>office and also perhaps even set the stage for not

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>just a Senate trial, but removal from office of the

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States, thwarting the will of the

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>American people as evidence in the twenty sixteen election, and

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>showing us that the deep state really runs things. That's

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the precedent that would be set here. Think about this,

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Why did we have all these hearings about Benghazi, for example,

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Obama administration when what they really should have done,

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>apparently is have one person from within the There are

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of them, by the way. I've spoken to people

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>who were involved in Benghazi who would have loved the

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to talk about the terrible malfeasance by the Hillary

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Clinton State Department, the lack of action by the White

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>House under President Obama during the hours the thirteen hours

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was of that assault and gun battle.

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>But instead of just having hearings, we could find out

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>what happened, and hearings of the the American people were allowed

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to see. I suppose they should have just had one

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>person who really didn't like President Obama go meet with

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in the Congress and say that Obama was guilty

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of dereliction of duty. Oh, but that person's a whistleblower. See,

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>so nobody can know who it is, what their politics are,

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what their motivations may be. Keep that identity secret. Then

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>convene a congressional majority, a congressional group like the House

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>permanenc left Committee on Intelligence that just goes and subpoenas

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>every Obama administration official they want to, threatens to hold

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>people in contempt. Doesn't allow Democrats. I mean, that's that's

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>what could have happened. I suppose if Republicans were willing

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to just go scorched earth and just just play really dirty.

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Democrats are playing here, that's what this is.

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>You'll notice that now they're saying, well, we know it's

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in the transcripts, so we don't need to hear from

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the whistleblower more. Well, then why did we hear from

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a whistle blower in the first place. Whistle blower wasn't

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>even there when the call was had, and there was

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a second witness, where's that second witness?

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And what is that witness really going to tell us?

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 1>These are all the questions we were not supposed We're

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to get answers to anymore. We're supposed to

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>just believe Ted lou and Adam Schiff and various other

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrat hyperpartisans who represent incredibly blue districts, and all they

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have to do to get reelected, and they know it

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is constantly prove their Trump hatred. That's all they have

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. That's all that has to happen. So that

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>makes it a pretty straightforward proposition for them. I've been

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>telling you this, I'm seeing others have been catching on,

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and I would be writing some articles about this, but

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm writing the book. The book's coming along. I'm in

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a chapter right now about college for all. I'm going

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to be writing about modern monetary theory soon, and I'm

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just the buckster is is a little overworked and under

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>slept lately. So I'm trying. I'm trying, but this show

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is obviously priority number one, So this show will always

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. But I can't write as much for the

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Hill in other places as I have been in the past,

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>because I got to write the book that all said

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>my defense of the basic right just a right of fairness,

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>never mind just a right of law to confront your accusers.

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Where is the willingness to stand up for this. There's

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a reason why that's not something that's just kind of

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>thrown in there at the very you know, at the

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>very end. Now this goes back to English common law.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>If someone is going to accuse you of a serious crime,

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you should have the right or your lawyers, your defense team,

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the people that are representing your side of the story

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>should have the right to question that individual story and yes,

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>character and trustworthiness and all the rest of it. That's

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>an essential component of justice. Otherwise people have first of all,

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:01.720
<v Speaker 1>as much less likely that we'll get to the truth

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of an accusation. And also think about the incentive then

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to just lob bombs at somebody from safe quarters and

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>know that you're never going to receive incoming yourself. You're

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>just going to be able to say whatever you want

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>about a person and you can lie about it as

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you see fit. That's a problem, folks. That's a problem,

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they're doing right now to President Trump.

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It's disgusting. And yet the media seems to have no

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>problem with this whatsoever. The process is whatever the Democrats

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>say it is, unfortunately, but that doesn't mean that we

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>have to say the process is okay. It also goes

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>to show you that there's nothing fair minded about any

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of this. Right, if the Democrats were serious, if they

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>had a real case, wouldn't they make more of a

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>show of Sure Republicans can cross examine, Sure Republicans are

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 1>going to get an equal say in how these hearings

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are conducted, They're going to be able to ask questions

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of witnesses to all these things. No, they're not going

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to do any of that. They have to cheat, They

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have to stack the deck in their favor because they

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have a strong case and they know it. And

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they also have to protect the identity of the whistleblower

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because if we found out who this person was, for sure,

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we already kind of know, And if it's

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the person that's being reported as the whistle blower, then yeah,

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a Democrat hack part is in working inside the

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>intelligence community, who saw an opportunity here to work with

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>his buddies and defend Joe Biden in the process, to

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>work with Adam shift in the Democrats and try to

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>take down a president that he obviously hates in a

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.720
<v Speaker 1>way that only the same shrill lunatics who basically cry

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>even though they're adults when a baseball player puts on

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a maga hat, that same mentality, those same individuals, Yeah,

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they do work for the federal government. Sometimes, the kind

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of people who would boo the Commander in chief the

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>same day or than twenty four hours of arrayed the

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>commander in chief order to take out Abubakhara bug Daddy

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to boo him. Those same lunatics work for the federal government.

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them, not a few of them. Mostly

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the federal government is full of trump paters, because people

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>who go to work for the federal leviathan who want

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>jobs where the minimum is all that is ever expected

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.760
<v Speaker 1>or required of you, and where you cannot be fired,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and where all you do and I know this because

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I was one is complained about how underpaid you are,

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>when in fact you're overpaid. That's going to be a

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>place where you find a lot of Democrats, a lot

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of leftists, and so it's unsurprising that some of them

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>come forward and try to take out the President of

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>the United States politically in this way, which reminds me

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>also of the anonymous book. This is going to be interesting.

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>You remember the anonymous op ed writer who claimed that

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the steady state was doing everything possible to try and

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>stop the president from getting his way. Ah, we must

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>stop President Trump from being able to do what he

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to do as president because he's so crazy, and

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so we pull papers away from him. The steady state, well,

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>really deep state, anonymous op ed author said, we frustrate

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>his will for the benefit of the American people, and

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>then they make fun of us when we say so,

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>there is a deep state, right. We understand this because

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what this person is describing. What this person is

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>laying out for us is the deep state. That's what

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it is. But they don't like to think of it

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that but they don't like to hear about it in

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.919
<v Speaker 1>those terms. Isn't that interesting? So this person is coming

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>out with a book. I believe it hits mid November,

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and the book will be I'm sure, one large collection

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of look at how crazy and stupid Trump is behind

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>closed doors ps vote Democrat the end, that's what the

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>book will be. How can we judge the authenticity of

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the author? How can we judge their motivations, their truthfulness

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when we don't know who the person is. Democrats are

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>normalizing cowardice in a way that's fascinating to watch. Oh,

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 1>we can have a whistleblower, but the whistleblower can't come forward. Really,

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we have men and women in uniform across the country

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and around the world risking their lives every day out

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of love for this country. You're gonna tell me this

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>whistle blower, such a patriot, can't take the heat, the

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 1>heat of being on the speaker's tour, getting paid one

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>d one hundred thousand dollars to speak look at Combe.

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he's he's suffered a terrible amount for his

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 1>opposition to the president. If by suffering you mean getting

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a book deal, being on TV all the time, getting

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>paid to give speeches all over the country about how

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>awful Trump is. There's no bravery here. This whistleblower is

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>not brave, and there's no bravery in writing this. Anonymous book,

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>which we're told the person's going to give some degree

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the money, I think to charity or something. But

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:33.759
<v Speaker 1>that's until they decided to come forward, and then they

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>start collecting the big paychecks for giving the anti Trump

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>speeches as the author of anonymous all across the country.

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>This is appalling. Why can't this person come forward? I

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 1>think it's because we would recognize that one, he or

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>she is not nearly I believe it's he, he is

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as senior as he would want us to believe.

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And two probably find out that this person has a

0:46:55.480 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>background just like the whistleblower. Reportedly of Democrats support an

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>anti trumpism. So this would be like, you know, I

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>could go back to work for the federal government and

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the next time we have a Heaven forbid, but we

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>might have a Biden or a Warrant or a Buddha

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>judge administration. All of a sudden, I'm a whistleblower. And

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>people say, wait a second. This guy has been a Republican,

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>he's been a right winger his whole life. Maybe his

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>opinion on this isn't just so objective. Well, of course,

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of course it's not objective. It's the opinion of somebody

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that is opposed to the administration. That's exactly what we

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>have here. The issue with the anonymous book right now,

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the issue with the anonymous book is that they are

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>going to look into The Justice Department is looking into

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:45.239
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there was a binding nondisclosure agreement signed here,

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 1>especially if the person had access to classified information. You're

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot of people that I think

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have trouble here. If this person was senior

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:57.919
<v Speaker 1>and had access to classified information, which is you would

0:47:57.960 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 1>have to be if you're a senior enough in this

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>White House, there is a review process for writing a

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 1>book of the stature about your work. It does not

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>matter if you think you are a patriot. It does

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 1>not matter if you think that you are saving the

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 1>democracy or the republic or whatever they're calling it today.

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You have a legal obligation to submit that for review.

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And I am pretty sure, although I can't speak to

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it quite yet, we'll have to find out what the

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>final facts are. I'm quite sure that this person did

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not submit this for review and so therefore would be

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in violation of their secrecy agreement. Now, violation of the

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:39.479
<v Speaker 1>secrecy agreement itself without spilling classified information is punishable only

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 1>by seizure of the profits of the book, and so

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the profits of the book that are going to go

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to charity, I'm not sure the White House would care

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to seize those, assuming that it's really just going to charity.

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But then there's the issue of, well, if you're going

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to have a court proceeding here, guess what you have

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to find out who in fact is the author of

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this book, Hatchet or Hashette Hachett. However you say Hatchet,

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of the publishers. A Chet is

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that they have no legal obligation to the federal governments,

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:06.439
<v Speaker 1>so they're not going to yet, but they have legal

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>obligation to a federal judge, who may say, guess what,

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to know who this author is because we

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have to know if they signed a classified NDA. This

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is the process we have, This is the way the

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:18.919
<v Speaker 1>law works. Get ready for it now, because at this fight,

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.439
<v Speaker 1>if the White House pursues this fight, you will see

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>people who are alleged legal experts going on TV pretending

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that this is not very straightforward, when it is. The

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>federal government has a legitimate interest in preventing the disclosure

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of classified and sensitive information. If you go work for

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, you sign something a contract that is

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>legally binding that says that for books about your work

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in the government, you will submit them for prepublication review.

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>If you are unwilling to do that, you are in

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 1>breach of contract to the federal government. How can we

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>know if this person is in breach of contract to

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the federal government or not if we don't know who

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the person is? Oh, there we go. That's when a

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:57.959
<v Speaker 1>federal judge gets to say who is this person? Federal

0:49:58.040 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>judges deal with classified all the time. They can deal

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this inclosed proceedings. But we get to know, or rather

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the federal government gets to know. Just remember that now,

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>because I think you're going to see, Oh but the

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:14.439
<v Speaker 1>first amendment in the you know, whatever is Trump is bad.

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And then you're gonna hear people legal experts go on

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 1>TV make jackasses of themselves because anything for hashtag resistance.

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>We should probably some of these predictions, we should mark

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>them down because I just am always right, and I

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:27.280
<v Speaker 1>mean it's fun to always be right. I mean sometimes

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 1>producer Mark is like, you're occasionally wrong. I don't have

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to tell him see this is where you're wrong, producer, Mark.

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:33.439
<v Speaker 1>But I'm basically always right, and this is one where

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>assuming they pursue this, you will see people making arguments

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that are completely ridiculous on TV about how that there's

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>no legal basis to find out who the author of

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this book is. There absolutely is a federal government basis

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>to find out who the author of this book is.

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And they're going to try to hide this from us too.

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Why the person is not as senior as they pretend

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in the op ed doesn't have the access

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're letting people believe that he or she believed.

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll see he does, and probably has a history of

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>being kind of a if not a wishywashy Republican, a

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 1>straight up stealth Democrat. We'll see. But one of the

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons we wanted mister Eisenberg to come in is to

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>find out what his role was, what the role of

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 1>others was, and why a transcript that plainly did not

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>belong in a classified system that is meant for some

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of the most secret of intelligence activities, that is, covert

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>action activities. Why would a call record that the president

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>would have the country believe was perfect, Why would it

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>be hidden in this classified system. So clearly the White

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 1>House does not want him to testify. They do not

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:49.280
<v Speaker 1>want the American people to know why mister Eisenberger others

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>made that decision. And I think we can infer that

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason they don't want the public to hear from

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>mister Eisenberg is that it would tend to corroborate allegations

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>against the president anything. Where Adam Shift says you should

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 1>infer you probably want to do the opposite, because he's

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>lying to you. Think about the way that this is

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>being constructed. Why would the transcript of the Zelenski Trump

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 1>phone call be removed to a classified server? Why would

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that happen? First of all, any conversation between the president

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and another head of state is going to be considered

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>sensitive and classified. Okay, that's so start with that. But

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>why would it be removed specifically to a server would

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be even more secure. Oh you mean, why would they

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>try to prevent the leak of a conversation between the

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>president and a counterpart that was basically leaked that they

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that as soon as possible, there was this effort to

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:42.439
<v Speaker 1>try to get it out into public view. Oh gee,

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe because they understood that the second

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there was an opening for people who hated the president

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>try to take this and turn it into something that

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. They would do it, But shifty shift never

0:52:55.120 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>stops being shifty. Let's talk about how journalism, big journos,

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how do they really do what they do? How does

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:07.319
<v Speaker 1>this business work, this business of informing the public but

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>also shaping perception of fitting propaganda in certain ways so

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that it is more easily disseminated, making sure that narratives

0:53:20.880 --> 0:53:23.760
<v Speaker 1>take hold in the public mind that are in line

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 1>with what the activist intentions of most journalisms actually are. Right,

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>That's all the part of how do they do it?

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And how do we have evidence or do we have

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 1>evidence of them doing it? Project Veritas strikes again, And

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got to tell you this is a pretty interesting one.

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You may have seen the memes out there now, there's

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them. Some of them are pretty pretty

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 1>funny about how it has become a cultural phenomenon right

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>now to just blurt out or write in an unexpected

0:53:58.719 --> 0:54:03.719
<v Speaker 1>place that Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself. This is a

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a meme. Now, this is a thing that's happening.

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 1>You'll see this in different places, and people will try

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to find more and more creative ways to put this

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>out there. Here. I'll actually give a shout out to

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles over at the Daily Wire. He had one

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:25.839
<v Speaker 1>today that was that was particularly funny. It was on

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this day six hundred and eight years ago Khalil Sultan,

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the Timorhood ruler of Transaxania, died at the age of

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven. Shortly thereafter, his wife committed suicide, which distinguishes

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:40.479
<v Speaker 1>her from Jeffrey Epstein, who did not kill himself. That's

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the that's the kind of stuff that you are are seeing,

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:49.239
<v Speaker 1>uh these days. That's the that's the the memes, the

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>meme creation. Because there are a lot of people who

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 1>are are looking at the Epstein case and are saying, well,

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>hold on a minute, here, hold on a second. Why

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is it that doctor Boden, who was paid by Epstein's

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>brother to look into this, But I don't believe that

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>he would light his credibility on fire for no reason.

0:55:08.360 --> 0:55:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Who's involved in some of the highest level autopsies of

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>any in terms of the cases that he's dealt with

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of anyone. Why would he say it is highly highly,

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>highly unlikely that he's never seen. And I think it

0:55:17.960 --> 0:55:24.440
<v Speaker 1>was forty years of medical examination, an autopsy, the circumstances

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that Epstein died under, and that being a suicide. So

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.799
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to believe that the highest Let's just add

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 1>up the coincidences. Here, the highest profile prisoner at the

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>time in the United States Bureau of Prisons custody was

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:47.240
<v Speaker 1>able to commit suicide weeks after an alleged other suicide attempt.

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:51.280
<v Speaker 1>He was able to commit suicide with two guards falling

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:56.960
<v Speaker 1>asleep while he was committing suicide, two guards with cameras

0:55:57.000 --> 0:56:04.719
<v Speaker 1>malfunctioning near the cells, and the medical report shows breakages

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:07.959
<v Speaker 1>of around his throat that are more consistent with being

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:12.920
<v Speaker 1>strangled than killing one's self. There's a lot of Oh,

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and he was the first prisoner, I believe, in the

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.479
<v Speaker 1>history of the Manhattan Correctional Facility to commit suicide when

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 1>held in similar circumstances in a cell that was specifically

0:56:23.719 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 1>designed to prevent suicide. And oh, by the way, doctor

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Boden hasn't seen this in forty years of examining dead

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bodies and homicide situations. That's I mean, look, that's all possible.

0:56:35.960 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Crazy stuff happens. It's a lot though, right, Am I

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:45.040
<v Speaker 1>missing something? That's a lot of lots, a lot of coincidences.

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of coincidences. But let's put that aside

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. So I don't plan on just sitting

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 1>here on the show and yelling Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>himself at random, although I know people will be doing

0:56:56.480 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that on their shows, because I'm not sure. I think

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's still very much an open question what happened

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to Epstein. But here's what I don't think is an

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 1>open question. And this brings me back to or rather,

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:12.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what I am certain of, and this brings me

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:16.040
<v Speaker 1>back to Project faretas there's a lot about Epstein that

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is being suppressed, still actively suppressed by people who were

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 1>around around Epstein, knew what was going on, and there

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was a conspiracy of silence that ran all the way

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>through the media because of the people that Epstein was

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:35.440
<v Speaker 1>involved with, and that there was pressure brought to bear

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to shut these stories down, no question about that, And

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that there are people right now who pretend to be brave,

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 1>who pretend to be the journals out there who are

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 1>doing the hard work of speaking truth to power. I

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>do not know many journals at all who speak truth

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to power. I know a lot of journals who do

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:59.400
<v Speaker 1>powers bidding, who do what they think their audience wants

0:57:59.400 --> 0:58:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to see and what their paymasters in the executive suite

0:58:04.000 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>want to see, and what their peer group in the

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:11.919
<v Speaker 1>elite echelon of opinion and tastemakers in American media want

0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to see. That's what they report on, and if it

0:58:15.120 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>fits into those categories, that's what they'll do. But if

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to rock the boat too much, particularly, they'll

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>sell out their audience. Usually journalis long before they'll sell

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 1>out the executives who signed their paychecks or the people

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that they socialize with after hours. We've seen this with

0:58:33.640 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Harvey Weinstein, with Matt Lauer, with numerous high level cases

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of people who were serial abusers of women at organizations

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that give a lot of lip service to being all

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about women's empowerment and feminists, and it turned out that no,

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they were much more concerned with powerful people, their relationships

0:58:54.920 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and the bottom line, their financial interests. That it brings

0:59:00.360 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>me this project very toss video about Jeffrey Epstein's case

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and what Amy Roeboch, who is an ABC News anchor,

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I never. I'm always amazed that there are

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 1>there are still millions of people who watch ABC, many

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>more than watch cable news. By the way, ABC News

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>has a much bigger audience for its one new show

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:26.480
<v Speaker 1>than any cable news show does. I just can't imagine

0:59:26.480 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>watching this water down, worthless news broadcast that it's not

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 1>really opinion, it's not really news. It's just kind of like,

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. To me, it's it's like CBSCA News

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with Dan rather, these are these are old models that

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm amazed they still have any audience at all. But

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>put that aside for a moment here, So I never.

0:59:47.680 --> 0:59:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know who Amy Roebock was, but I'm

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sure she's got millions of people that watch her, even

0:59:52.120 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>though I work in news and I don't even know

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>who she is. But there's an important, an important reality

0:59:58.560 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, and that is reducer. Mark has to

1:00:00.680 --> 1:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>remind me of this sometimes when I'm in the Freedom

1:00:02.480 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Hunt in the language is getting a little salty. What

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is that when you have microphones and cameras around you. Yeah,

1:00:07.960 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're not on air, you can let it loose

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit sometimes, and there's a different presentation that

1:00:13.760 --> 1:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we all have when we are presenting in front of

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>an audience versus when we're just talking off mike. But

1:00:19.560 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you gotta always assume that maybe it's being recorded and

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it will you know, for those who don't remember,

1:00:25.560 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>What'll Do It Live? We'll Do It Live. One of

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the greatest moments, and I really think one of the

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>greatest bods in TV history. It's amazing, and I like

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I like Bill O'Reilly. I think he's a great TV talent.

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just one of the funniest things. It's just one

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of the funniest things I've ever seen, and it's just

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>really funny. So no disrespect ment to the big man.

1:00:46.960 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I just think that that clip is pretty hilarious. But

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you gott always remember that people are recording these things,

1:00:54.640 --> 1:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know that there's the possibility that it will leak.

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And this one day Amy Roeboch talked was talking kind

1:01:04.840 --> 1:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of off mike, or rather not thinking this would air

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about how well, let me let's just let her to

1:01:10.560 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>This is about the Epstein case. Here is what a

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>big time ABC News anchor had to say when she

1:01:16.480 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't think people were listening play it. I've had the

1:01:19.720 --> 1:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>story of three years I've had this interview with for

1:01:21.560 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Jinny Roberts. We would not put it on the air.

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I was told, who's Jeffrey Epstein? No

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>one knows who that is. This is a stupid story.

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Then the Palace found out that we had her whole

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways.

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We were so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview

1:01:40.240 --> 1:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Kate will that that also quashed the story. And then

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in because of

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the planes. She told me everything, she had, pictures, she had, everything,

1:01:53.360 --> 1:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>She wasn't hiding for twelve years. We convinced her to

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>come out. We convinced her to talk to us. It

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>was unbelievable what we had, Clinton, we have everything. I

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>tried for three years to get it on to no avail,

1:02:06.880 --> 1:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and now it's all coming out and it's like these

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>new relevant revelations and I freaking had all of it.

1:02:12.480 --> 1:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm so pissed right now, Like every day, I get

1:02:15.760 --> 1:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>more and more pissed because I'm just like, oh my god,

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it was what we had was unreal. Other women backing

1:02:22.920 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it up, Hey yep, Bright Edwards the attorney three years

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>ago saying like like we there will come a day

1:02:31.200 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>when we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>pedophile this country has ever known. And I had it

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>all three years ago. Now, the good news for Amy

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Robock is that she actually comes out of its looking

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. The people who don't look good are the

1:02:49.240 --> 1:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>executives at ABC who and she just ran down all

1:02:53.280 --> 1:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the stuff here. And this is why, you know what

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying that there was a conspiracy of silence

1:02:56.440 --> 1:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>around Epstein. Of course there was. They're very powerful people,

1:03:01.120 --> 1:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>very powerful Democrats by the way. You notice Dershowitz, Clanton,

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the royal family in the UK, which I'm not think

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not Democrats, but what the heck is going on there?

1:03:16.400 --> 1:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Who is Epstein? Well, that's why you break a major

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>national news store and you tell, you tell people who

1:03:21.200 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Epstein is? Right? What you what? Here's what's clear about this?

1:03:24.920 --> 1:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And you see this, You constantly see this happening in

1:03:28.400 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>major news rooms. You saw this with NBC with Matt Lauer.

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, they haven't brought in an independent investigator

1:03:33.880 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>yet to look at what was really happening at NBC

1:03:37.240 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>News with Matt Lauer, who had the sketchy button installed

1:03:41.640 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>under his desk for security reasons. I love this like

1:03:44.600 --> 1:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we're all a bunch of morons. Yeah, sure, because that

1:03:47.440 --> 1:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was going to save him. If somebody came into the

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>office to harming he has a button on his desk,

1:03:51.000 --> 1:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he'd hit the lock the door. We know what that

1:03:53.520 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>button was all about, all right, and we know that

1:03:55.320 --> 1:03:57.919
<v Speaker 1>they know that it was installed in his office. And

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been hearing shady rumors about Matt Low and I'm

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just a little dude in media that no one even

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>pays attention to in the mainstream. I had known stuff

1:04:06.200 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about him for years. I mean heard rumors, I should say,

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:10.479
<v Speaker 1>and the rumors turn out to be true. I didn't

1:04:10.480 --> 1:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>know the names and stuff, but I knew that he

1:04:11.840 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was doing stuff with young women while he's a married guy.

1:04:14.560 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>At his place, and people who work for him, they

1:04:17.520 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>won't bring an independent investigator because they'll find out is

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that the NBC executive some of them knew about it

1:04:23.480 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and didn't do anything about it. I'd also like to

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:28.959
<v Speaker 1>know what years was Jeff Zucker, a senior executive at NBC,

1:04:28.960 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>because I'm prettyure Matt Lauer was there when Jeff Zucker

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was at the same time. I just think that would

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting thing for someone to look into. What

1:04:36.440 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a surprise, But they didn't do what they should have done.

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They weren't acting ethically because of the money involved and

1:04:46.080 --> 1:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>because of the powerful relationships involved, and for ABC News too.

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Does anyone think for a second that what Roebox says

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>here is untrue that when you look at the pressure

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of the royal family saying the note Kate and Will interviews.

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Americans, I beg you, all right, I

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>love I love my fellow Americans more than any people

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Stop giving a crap about the royal family.

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It's worthless. It doesn't matter. It's weird, okay, we need

1:05:13.560 --> 1:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to not I don't know what I mean, like the Billbergs,

1:05:15.840 --> 1:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Illuminati and the Queen of England and

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>forget about all that stuff. I just mean, what is this?

1:05:21.240 --> 1:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Why do we care? It's not a fairy tale. It's

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird. We are anti We fought a war

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>about not having the deal with monarchy. I don't really

1:05:30.560 --> 1:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>want the monarchy to invade our space because of media,

1:05:34.600 --> 1:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all right. I think the monarchy thing is bizarre. I

1:05:36.440 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think they're a bunch of entitled brats. I don't get it.

1:05:38.640 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. And i'd say about any country,

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>although we only seem to have this fascination with the

1:05:43.760 --> 1:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>British royal family, Like the doesn't even even know there's

1:05:45.760 --> 1:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a Danish I think there's a Danish king. There's a

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Swedish king that these places all have. But they're like

1:05:50.280 --> 1:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they're like socialist kings, now, you know what I mean.

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>They show up, they their their palaces have lots of

1:05:54.840 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Ikea furniture. It's a little bit of a different vibe.

1:05:58.600 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But Kate and Will, they're going to deny that, you know,

1:06:01.920 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>access to the royal family, and the royal family I'm

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sure threatened to sue. Look, I mean, I'm a guy, okay,

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen I've seen a lot of photos of a

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. And you know, if you're a guy,

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you've spent left time on social media, you always can

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of tell when someone's holding your girlfriend a little

1:06:21.800 --> 1:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>too close, or somebody's trying to And I'm just gonna

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>say it. You see that photo that Prince Andrew has

1:06:27.840 --> 1:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with one of the one of the victims, who's when

1:06:30.240 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>she was a very young girl, I think fifteen or

1:06:31.680 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>sixteen at the time. I mean, he's holding a way

1:06:35.120 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>where if that were my daughter, I would lose my

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>mind that that old British dude. I mean, because you

1:06:42.120 --> 1:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can just you look at the photo. There's something sketchy

1:06:44.360 --> 1:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going on. There's something sketchy going on. So they had

1:06:47.480 --> 1:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. There was proof. ABC had evidence. Roebock is saying,

1:06:52.440 --> 1:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we had the girls. She's gonna come forward. She had photos,

1:06:54.680 --> 1:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>she had everything, she had names, manifests of flights would

1:06:57.920 --> 1:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have proven that these guys would fly. They didn't want

1:07:00.920 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to rom with this story. This isn't this is an

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>incredible story. They still haven't figured out how this guy

1:07:07.480 --> 1:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>made all of his money, by the way, they still

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't really and they and everyone's reporting on Epstein. I mean,

1:07:12.880 --> 1:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>now I started to get into this Epstein zone where

1:07:14.440 --> 1:07:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I lose my mind. Everyone reports on Epstein about how

1:07:17.960 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>he had surveillance equipment and it was all set up

1:07:21.120 --> 1:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>so that they could blackmail, that he could blackmail people.

1:07:24.800 --> 1:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Who was he blackmailing? No names? No names, wait, wait,

1:07:29.880 --> 1:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we have no No one has been accused, or rather,

1:07:32.400 --> 1:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>no one has been brought into this because of the

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the blackmail that Epstein was supposedly preparing to use or

1:07:39.040 --> 1:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>using against them. No one has been indicted who was

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in epstein enabler or somebody else that Epstein was inflicting

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>upon these these young girls. No charges. The statutes on

1:07:54.080 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that stuff would be very lengthy. I mean, I'd have

1:07:56.400 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at the specifics, but I mean trafficking and

1:07:58.240 --> 1:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>underaged girls. And I think the statute you're look if

1:08:00.560 --> 1:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>there might not be any statute of limitations depends on

1:08:02.880 --> 1:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're talking about, state or federal. So no charge, nothing,

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>nearly Epstein's dead case closed. That's what we're supposed to

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>accept from this. When you have ABC News making it

1:08:15.040 --> 1:08:17.439
<v Speaker 1>quite clear that the ABC brass was ABC News brass

1:08:17.520 --> 1:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, Nope, not touching this. And my friends, these

1:08:21.320 --> 1:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>are people, these are all they're all incredibly well paid.

1:08:25.200 --> 1:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about millionaires with tremendous connections. But unfortunately a

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people who are in that category in

1:08:33.040 --> 1:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this country in the media are cowards. They really on

1:08:38.040 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this will sound like a cliche. They want to be

1:08:40.120 --> 1:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>invited to the fancy parties in the Hamptons. They don't

1:08:42.600 --> 1:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>want to rock the boat. They want to be considered

1:08:45.040 --> 1:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>among the elite. They want to be welcome at parties.

1:08:48.479 --> 1:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not looking to speak truth to power, they just

1:08:51.000 --> 1:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be near power. They're sycophants. They're not patriots.

1:08:55.080 --> 1:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>They're not truthtellers. An ABC News just showed us exactly

1:09:00.000 --> 1:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a rather robot is telling us exactly what ABC News

1:09:02.400 --> 1:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>is all about. Young girls are being trafficked and violated

1:09:04.720 --> 1:09:09.519
<v Speaker 1>by this Epstein maniac. Nobody wanted to do anything about it. Rich,

1:09:09.800 --> 1:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>multi millionaire media celebrities knew about this. Executives knew about this,

1:09:15.920 --> 1:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't do anything. I hope you're all enjoying the Buck

1:09:17.880 --> 1:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show today. Thank you for hanging out with me.

1:09:19.960 --> 1:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to watch on Pluto TV channel two

1:09:24.439 --> 1:09:27.519
<v Speaker 1>forty eight, right, producer Mark, that's how you like to

1:09:27.520 --> 1:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>watch on the Pluto TV. Yes, all day on my

1:09:30.320 --> 1:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>television at home is Buck Sexton and Jesse Kelly. That's right.

1:09:33.360 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>He's just got bucks. He's responsible for just upping our

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers over here. But checkout Pluto TV app if you

1:09:38.720 --> 1:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't already downloaded, watch it wherever you want on your phone,

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so easy. It's a great way to check out what's

1:09:45.240 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>going on. The Freedom Huder in the Jesse Kelly world,

1:09:47.720 --> 1:09:50.519
<v Speaker 1>So thank you very much for that. Is Aunt Becky

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>really going to prison for forty five years? All right?

1:09:54.280 --> 1:09:57.519
<v Speaker 1>For those who don't know, Aunt Becky's better known as

1:09:57.560 --> 1:10:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Laurie Laughlin. That's her real name. She was the much

1:10:02.600 --> 1:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>beloved and in her day quite lovely aunt on the

1:10:06.400 --> 1:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>show Full House. Who was the girlfriend or white? I

1:10:11.400 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think she was the girlfriend of right, wasn't the wife

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of John? Eventually she was the wife? Yeah, eventually they

1:10:16.439 --> 1:10:18.719
<v Speaker 1>got married, right, But originally Aunt Becky was the girlfriend

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>on the show Full House, which was just a beloved

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I watched her growing up. I mean I grew up

1:10:24.760 --> 1:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>watching Candice Cameron and what was the other one's name?

1:10:29.400 --> 1:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't even remember now, Kirk Kirk Cameron. That's the

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>right show, right, or is that? Yeah? No? Is Kirk

1:10:35.960 --> 1:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Cameron full House? No? No, no, I got I've got

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>my shows. Whatever, doesn't Who cares? He was on one

1:10:43.000 --> 1:10:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of those shows where people are nice to each other,

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's like a like an intact family or close

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:48.519
<v Speaker 1>to it, where people are being nice to each other.

1:10:49.000 --> 1:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>You think of Bob Sackett. No, No, that's the dad. Yeah, No,

1:10:52.600 --> 1:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think he's in I think he's the

1:10:54.160 --> 1:10:56.759
<v Speaker 1>older brother. Anyway, the neither here nor there full house

1:10:56.800 --> 1:11:00.479
<v Speaker 1>aunt Becky. I'd kind of a crushed it at Becky

1:11:00.520 --> 1:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. She had great hair, which I respect.

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And here's the problem for him, Becky now and her

1:11:07.240 --> 1:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and her husband Massimo Giannouli, which is a great name

1:11:11.880 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for a fashion designer, which is what he is, a Massimo.

1:11:15.920 --> 1:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So they bribed some coaches at USC, using that this

1:11:21.040 --> 1:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is all Operation Varsity Blues, right, this has became a

1:11:23.200 --> 1:11:26.639
<v Speaker 1>big story. I was like, oh my gosh. They bribed

1:11:26.680 --> 1:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>some coaches to say that their daughters were on the

1:11:30.160 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>crew team. Their daughters were not on the crew team,

1:11:32.960 --> 1:11:37.479
<v Speaker 1>or rather there were crew recruits. And having been someone

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>who actually rote crew in college, I can tell you

1:11:39.439 --> 1:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that those girls are not on the crew team. Okay,

1:11:41.439 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna put that out there. I've seen photos.

1:11:44.040 --> 1:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>They're not ladies who rowe. You know, they row. But

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I digress. So they bribe these coaches and this is

1:11:56.760 --> 1:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>still a big store. Why is the big story Because

1:11:58.720 --> 1:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they're facing now additional federal prosecution. They want to take

1:12:02.880 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it to a jury. They're going to fight this all

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the way. But if they get convicted. If Massimo and

1:12:06.800 --> 1:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>aunt Becky get convicted on all I'm gonna keep calling

1:12:08.800 --> 1:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>me aunt Becky because that's how I know of her.

1:12:10.080 --> 1:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>But that's Laurie Laughlin, the actress. If they get convicted

1:12:13.720 --> 1:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on all accounts, they could get forty five years in

1:12:16.640 --> 1:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>federal prison. All right, forty five years. Now, the way

1:12:22.640 --> 1:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the guidelines work, they wouldn't get forty five years. But

1:12:26.439 --> 1:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you something. If they take this to

1:12:30.360 --> 1:12:32.639
<v Speaker 1>a jury and the jury says, sorry, you broke the law.

1:12:32.640 --> 1:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And technically, even though the money laundering statutes you violated

1:12:36.120 --> 1:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>are meant to go after drug kingpins and people doing

1:12:39.400 --> 1:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>really bad things, not people bribing their kids into college,

1:12:44.000 --> 1:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you did break the law and it is kind of

1:12:45.800 --> 1:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what you did, and you know, that's kind of where

1:12:48.280 --> 1:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. They could go to prison for a few years.

1:12:52.280 --> 1:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would not be surprised if Aunt aunt Becky,

1:12:56.360 --> 1:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I had to look at the specifics of

1:12:58.320 --> 1:13:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the charges. But if she asistant takes it to a jury, uh,

1:13:03.520 --> 1:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they and they find them guilty on

1:13:05.560 --> 1:13:07.639
<v Speaker 1>some of these counts, they're going to prison for a while.

1:13:07.680 --> 1:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And remember in federal in a federal system, you'd serve

1:13:09.960 --> 1:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. So whatever the judge says you get,

1:13:13.120 --> 1:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what you get, and you serve it. There's no parole.

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I would note that Felicity Huffman from Desperate Housewives has

1:13:18.840 --> 1:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>already served her time. She got fourteen days but was

1:13:21.880 --> 1:13:24.639
<v Speaker 1>released after twelve because there was a weekend or something,

1:13:24.680 --> 1:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>so she wasn't exactly wasn't exactly shawshank, you know, she was.

1:13:28.320 --> 1:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>She was able to get out. It was okay. It

1:13:29.720 --> 1:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that bad. She you know. It also reminds me

1:13:34.640 --> 1:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Vandem movie. I think it's death Warrant where

1:13:38.120 --> 1:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they get this guy. If you think about this, this

1:13:40.120 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is an idea. They send an undercover police officer into

1:13:43.400 --> 1:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>like the scariest prison ever to go after the guy

1:13:46.160 --> 1:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>who's the meanest, badest, scariest guy in the prison as

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>an inmate. I'm like, who woulds? Who would? But he

1:13:52.160 --> 1:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>does many good fly kick he has many spinning kick

1:13:55.400 --> 1:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>vandam yes, who would sign up for that? I gotta

1:14:01.000 --> 1:14:02.719
<v Speaker 1>tell you, I think that's that's a bit of a stretch.

1:14:04.040 --> 1:14:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Producer Razuto, who's watching this, he's probably he's probably almost

1:14:06.800 --> 1:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as much of a Van damn aficionado as I am.

1:14:09.040 --> 1:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, we have where was I? We have law?

1:14:14.760 --> 1:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean Huffman, not Laughlin. Hufflin has pleaded guilty, she

1:14:17.680 --> 1:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>got to twelve days, but Laurie Laughlin's taken this all

1:14:21.640 --> 1:14:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the way. Now, why why are the fens making such

1:14:24.439 --> 1:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a big deal in to this? This is clearly federal overreach.

1:14:29.160 --> 1:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying that from the beginning. Bribing your way

1:14:32.680 --> 1:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>into college. I mean, this should not even be a

1:14:34.000 --> 1:14:36.639
<v Speaker 1>criminal really a criminal offense. If it is a criminal offense,

1:14:36.640 --> 1:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it should be you pay a very large you should

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:42.519
<v Speaker 1>pay a large fine. Remember, there's already been consequences for this.

1:14:42.560 --> 1:14:46.519
<v Speaker 1>The daughters had to leave USC, and no offense to USC.

1:14:46.680 --> 1:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's not usually the kind of place you think

1:14:48.400 --> 1:14:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of when people are bribing to get their kids in.

1:14:50.520 --> 1:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to be school snobby here, but it's

1:14:54.720 --> 1:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not Stanford. But anyway, they they bribe their kids to

1:14:58.439 --> 1:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>get them into USC. I'm sorry, they bribed the administered,

1:15:02.160 --> 1:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they brought the coaches to get their kids in the USC.

1:15:04.800 --> 1:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But the kids have had to withdraw and you obviously

1:15:06.960 --> 1:15:11.479
<v Speaker 1>suffered some humiliation. Laughlin has already been cut from I

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:14.599
<v Speaker 1>think Netflix, a Netflix series, as well as the Fuller House,

1:15:14.600 --> 1:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>which I've heard is terrible, which is the spinoff or

1:15:17.280 --> 1:15:21.479
<v Speaker 1>addition to the original Full House. So there are bad

1:15:21.479 --> 1:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>things that have happened to these people already because of

1:15:24.080 --> 1:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>their decision to bribe bribe these officials. And this is

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:34.479
<v Speaker 1>where I want to just point out that unfortunately, envy

1:15:34.560 --> 1:15:39.479
<v Speaker 1>is very powerful politics, and prosecutors are often politicians, and

1:15:39.640 --> 1:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>finding a very well to do, attractive white female celebrity

1:15:47.680 --> 1:15:50.559
<v Speaker 1>like this and making an example of her in this

1:15:50.600 --> 1:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>way in our current environment is attractive politics to a

1:15:55.960 --> 1:16:01.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, particularly on the left. This is where

1:16:02.200 --> 1:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the federal overreach component gets really scary. When you see

1:16:05.040 --> 1:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>people that are being made an example of because of

1:16:09.040 --> 1:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>who they are, not what they did. We should all

1:16:11.760 --> 1:16:14.759
<v Speaker 1>be worried about that. I can tell you from friends

1:16:14.760 --> 1:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>who have worked in US attorney's offices across the country.

1:16:20.360 --> 1:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>There is always a there's a premium put on prosecutions

1:16:24.760 --> 1:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of corruption of public officials, which I understand keeping trust

1:16:28.080 --> 1:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in the system or whatever, but you know, they sometimes

1:16:29.880 --> 1:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>look where they did to Bligoevich. I mean, sometimes they

1:16:31.720 --> 1:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>go after these guys really really aggressively because of it

1:16:38.880 --> 1:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>looks good, right, politician speaking truth to power. There's that

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:46.559
<v Speaker 1>speaking truth to power again. But also for white collar crimes,

1:16:47.080 --> 1:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>there are people who believe that it is an issue

1:16:49.120 --> 1:16:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of fairness that someone who is engaged in insider training

1:16:54.680 --> 1:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and makes you a million dollars illicitly should serve a

1:16:59.320 --> 1:17:02.559
<v Speaker 1>really stiff prison sentence along the lines of somebody who

1:17:03.000 --> 1:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>went into a convenience store with a gun and stole

1:17:05.680 --> 1:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollars. I think that's crazy, but there are

1:17:09.120 --> 1:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>people who will make that argument. There are people who

1:17:12.000 --> 1:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>will say that they're that part of the racial injustice

1:17:17.160 --> 1:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in our system is that there are certain crimes that

1:17:20.479 --> 1:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are disproportionately committed by non by people who are either

1:17:26.200 --> 1:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>well white or Asian, and that those crimes are more

1:17:30.880 --> 1:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lightly punished, and there's a racial component of that. I

1:17:33.600 --> 1:17:36.799
<v Speaker 1>mean to that, I just say, well, that's because stealing

1:17:36.800 --> 1:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>money through a stock fraud is far less of a

1:17:40.960 --> 1:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of an imminent social harm and risk and risk to

1:17:43.680 --> 1:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>life and limb than threatening somebody with a gun. I

1:17:45.840 --> 1:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>don't care what someone's skin color is. If they threatened

1:17:47.840 --> 1:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody with a gun, that's a really serious crime. I

1:17:49.560 --> 1:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>don't care what someone's skin color is if they are

1:17:52.400 --> 1:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>engaged in medicare fraud, Yeah, they should be punished. But

1:17:55.920 --> 1:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried to guy engaged in medicare fraud is

1:17:58.760 --> 1:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get out of prison and kill somebody, right,

1:18:01.760 --> 1:18:04.599
<v Speaker 1>So this is but there there is this argument you'll

1:18:04.640 --> 1:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>see for especially for the criminal justice reform type. Some

1:18:07.800 --> 1:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of them will say that, you know, we need to

1:18:10.120 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>really punish. There's this impetus to really punish non violent crimes,

1:18:15.880 --> 1:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>especially if they affect the elites. Right, So I think

1:18:19.360 --> 1:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's some of that mentality at work here with Yeah,

1:18:23.080 --> 1:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>people cheating to get their kids into school, and you know,

1:18:27.320 --> 1:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>this for me also forces a whole discussion about I mean,

1:18:31.680 --> 1:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that the way that people get into school

1:18:33.840 --> 1:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in a whole variety of context is really gross and

1:18:35.920 --> 1:18:39.559
<v Speaker 1>bad and wrong. And now is where everyone starts booing.

1:18:39.600 --> 1:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that athletic recruiting for colleges overwhelmingly

1:18:42.800 --> 1:18:45.719
<v Speaker 1>is strange and bizarre. I think that Title nine shouldn't

1:18:45.760 --> 1:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>exist the way that it does for women's and men's

1:18:47.720 --> 1:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>athletics teams, as though we're supposed to assume that women

1:18:51.120 --> 1:18:53.599
<v Speaker 1>want to play sports at the same levels as men

1:18:53.640 --> 1:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in schools, and we have to allocate funds the exact

1:18:55.840 --> 1:18:58.479
<v Speaker 1>same way. I think that that's bizarre. I think it's wrong.

1:18:59.520 --> 1:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that people getting into schools because their parents

1:19:03.280 --> 1:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>went there legacy is a problem. It's just financial issue

1:19:06.960 --> 1:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>because legacy donations are very important to these schools. But

1:19:10.280 --> 1:19:12.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gross. I should say I think affirmative

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>action is wrong. I think it's discrimination by race. And

1:19:15.000 --> 1:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to stop discriminating by race, the best

1:19:16.920 --> 1:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>way to do it is to stop discriminating by race.

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:22.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of complexity in the college admissions world,

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>and then there's also just the advancement office. Right. This

1:19:26.600 --> 1:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>is remember that where they described this in the initial

1:19:29.920 --> 1:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Varsity Blues, which is what they call this whole college

1:19:31.920 --> 1:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>admissions thing. You can go in the front door, which

1:19:34.120 --> 1:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is normal admissions. The backdoor is write a huge check.

1:19:36.400 --> 1:19:38.519
<v Speaker 1>The side door is right, a small check to somebody

1:19:38.560 --> 1:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>who can insert you in the process, coaches, etc. Who

1:19:42.200 --> 1:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>can get you into the school in this way that is,

1:19:46.840 --> 1:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, not in keeping with the rules. I mean

1:19:49.400 --> 1:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to this, I just say so, it's not a bribe

1:19:52.479 --> 1:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that sends you to federal prison if you give it

1:19:54.920 --> 1:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to the administrators. But it is a bribe that'll get

1:19:58.000 --> 1:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>you sent to federal prison if you give it to

1:19:59.479 --> 1:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a coach. People could say, oh, but buck, the admission

1:20:04.760 --> 1:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>spots are a thing of value, and that thing of

1:20:08.320 --> 1:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>value is to be allocated by the administration of the school,

1:20:12.280 --> 1:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>not by any individual coaching. To that, I say, well,

1:20:14.200 --> 1:20:18.519
<v Speaker 1>that's not even really true, because coaches do get to

1:20:18.560 --> 1:20:22.360
<v Speaker 1>pick people as they see fit for their teams and

1:20:22.400 --> 1:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>get through the admission process. That's why they have the

1:20:25.200 --> 1:20:28.719
<v Speaker 1>value they do. And so, in what way is paying

1:20:28.760 --> 1:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>off a coach a federal crime? Gross unseemly sure a

1:20:34.439 --> 1:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>federal crime. I spoke to some DOJ contacts when I

1:20:38.160 --> 1:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>was in DC when this case first broke, and they

1:20:40.000 --> 1:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>were like, yeah, this is this is way because remember

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that's this is being handled by the US Attorney's Office

1:20:45.720 --> 1:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles. Guess what. I'm sure there's a lot

1:20:48.000 --> 1:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of libs, but they they agreed. I mean, my friends

1:20:52.920 --> 1:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in DC and the Department of Justice they agreed that

1:20:55.000 --> 1:20:57.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of overreach and there's some there's kind

1:20:57.520 --> 1:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of some headhunting going on here. I mean, there's some

1:20:59.760 --> 1:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>going for scalps, there's some trying to make a political

1:21:03.280 --> 1:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>point here. But yeah, privilege and wealth and access. We're

1:21:07.200 --> 1:21:11.599
<v Speaker 1>going to really stick it to those people. Forty five

1:21:11.680 --> 1:21:13.559
<v Speaker 1>years in federal prison for Aunt Becky. I know it's

1:21:13.600 --> 1:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be, but the fact that she even

1:21:15.000 --> 1:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>faces that, I mean, when they look at the charges,

1:21:17.200 --> 1:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it'll be enough for senator prison for forty five years.

1:21:20.320 --> 1:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Who is who is egregiously harmed in this process? Isn't

1:21:25.160 --> 1:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it enough that the students have been that her daughters

1:21:26.880 --> 1:21:30.519
<v Speaker 1>have been expelled, humiliated, She's lost a lot of money

1:21:30.600 --> 1:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>from her career. You know, Have her do some I mean,

1:21:33.400 --> 1:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Bill McGurn in the Wall Street Journal.

1:21:35.439 --> 1:21:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Have her do some community service, pay a pretty hefty fine,

1:21:39.320 --> 1:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and go about her life. You sent to prison for

1:21:42.280 --> 1:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this insane But you know, another part of this is

1:21:44.120 --> 1:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that the incentive for the federal government to have you

1:21:48.880 --> 1:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>plead guilty way too high. And they'd say, but but

1:21:53.000 --> 1:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a benefit. That's why you plead guilty, because

1:21:55.040 --> 1:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you get the benefit. But our systems shouldn't really be

1:21:57.760 --> 1:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what it is right now, where it's apt what the

1:22:00.680 --> 1:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>federal government says about you. By the way, this comes

1:22:02.920 --> 1:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>into play with General Flynn as well, where they forced

1:22:06.280 --> 1:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to plea I think really illicitly by hiding things that

1:22:09.320 --> 1:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>were exculpatory, but they forced to plea, and now they say, sorry,

1:22:12.479 --> 1:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you took the plea. It doesn't matter how we got

1:22:14.040 --> 1:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you to take it. That's the position of the federal

1:22:16.160 --> 1:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>government with General Flynn right now. But it's not in

1:22:20.560 --> 1:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the interests of justice to say, accept our allegation of

1:22:24.840 --> 1:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>guilt against you as true and you'll live to fight

1:22:29.400 --> 1:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>another day. Fight against our allegation of you as truth,

1:22:32.240 --> 1:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and we will annihilate your life and send you a

1:22:34.120 --> 1:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>prison for decades. That's not justice. I know, it's the

1:22:39.640 --> 1:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>system we have right now, but that's not the same

1:22:41.680 --> 1:22:46.519
<v Speaker 1>thing as justice. So you know, free Aunt Becky, that's

1:22:46.520 --> 1:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>what I say, Free Aunt Becky. And there, well, I

1:22:50.640 --> 1:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>was Felicity. Huffin's already out. I never watched Desperate Housewives,

1:22:53.280 --> 1:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>so I don't have I don't get it excited about

1:22:55.920 --> 1:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that one. I can't really pretend that I care all

1:22:57.800 --> 1:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that much. But I don't know Aunt Becky. I grew

1:22:59.760 --> 1:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>up with Becky. Man. Come on, all they need those one?

1:23:02.320 --> 1:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is the game they're playing. Maybe this is

1:23:04.400 --> 1:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>all they need on that jury is one millennial or

1:23:09.600 --> 1:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>gen X or y person. I guess that'd be the

1:23:13.520 --> 1:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>right age who grew up watching Full House and and

1:23:18.880 --> 1:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Becky's gonna walk. That's what I think. The truth is

1:23:22.000 --> 1:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>what I what. I send that Becky to prison? Of

1:23:24.760 --> 1:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>course not, I'm not a monster. Tell everything they're gonna do. Like,

1:23:28.920 --> 1:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna take people's guns away, wait till you

1:23:31.080 --> 1:23:36.599
<v Speaker 1>get elected, then take the guns of time. If you're

1:23:36.600 --> 1:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna take that guns away, don't tell them ahead of time.

1:23:41.200 --> 1:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Gotta make sure you get elected and then you can

1:23:43.360 --> 1:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fool them, you can bamboozle them. Joy beiha. A woman

1:23:50.160 --> 1:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>makes millions of dollars doing TV. Folks. I don't know

1:23:53.360 --> 1:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>what to say other than what a country we live in.

1:23:57.720 --> 1:23:59.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure Mark how I talked about how Beto's

1:23:59.600 --> 1:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the By the way, did I get to

1:24:01.200 --> 1:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this at all? Oh see, That's why I was thinking

1:24:03.120 --> 1:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about this, because like, oh, I was just really feel

1:24:06.160 --> 1:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like I was leaning into my my better own personation

1:24:09.000 --> 1:24:12.799
<v Speaker 1>about how this country is so racist and so terrible,

1:24:13.479 --> 1:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and I felt like I was getting Bettos cadence down

1:24:17.800 --> 1:24:21.599
<v Speaker 1>where he would just accept whatever you said about him

1:24:22.040 --> 1:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and his privilege and how he's like super rich and

1:24:25.400 --> 1:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>white and that's like terrible and he's really should be

1:24:28.400 --> 1:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>ashamed of it, And I was so excited. I was like,

1:24:31.760 --> 1:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy's got all He's out. He bailed on Friday, Man,

1:24:36.600 --> 1:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Beto is done zo. I didn't even get to talk

1:24:39.400 --> 1:24:41.559
<v Speaker 1>about it because the way he announced it over the weekend,

1:24:41.560 --> 1:24:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess he was hoping people like me wouldn't spend

1:24:43.560 --> 1:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a whole day just making fun of how terrible his

1:24:45.920 --> 1:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>campaign was. But there was something particularly, is hubristic a word?

1:24:51.200 --> 1:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's assume it is, because I want to say it

1:24:53.439 --> 1:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>full of hubrists. I think hubristics should be a word.

1:24:56.000 --> 1:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>If it's not, I'll do like a I'll like the

1:24:58.680 --> 1:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>bush thing, misunderestimate him, make it up. But there was

1:25:01.240 --> 1:25:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hubrists coming from Beto O'Rourke all along,

1:25:05.360 --> 1:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>not just the Vanity Fair cover based on what why

1:25:08.840 --> 1:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was he on the cover of Vanity Fair? There was

1:25:11.880 --> 1:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a hero worship of him from the left because he

1:25:13.960 --> 1:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was willing to be the guy who was supposed to

1:25:19.320 --> 1:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>well take Texas from Ted Cruz and turn the state blue.

1:25:24.080 --> 1:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The most expensive senate race terms of dollars in in history,

1:25:29.120 --> 1:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>more more money for better o'rouric the most expensive senate campaign. Ever,

1:25:32.120 --> 1:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>he lost, and then they wanted him to be president

1:25:35.479 --> 1:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and this guy would go around saying, yeah,

1:25:39.080 --> 1:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just gonna take your guns, and I

1:25:41.760 --> 1:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>just think that when the law changes, like we'll take

1:25:44.200 --> 1:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>all of your guns, and if you don't like that,

1:25:47.160 --> 1:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>well then like clearly you're like bad and we're just

1:25:50.320 --> 1:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>going to take the guns anyway, not understanding the constitutional

1:25:54.720 --> 1:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as well as logistical hurdles of just seizing firearms from

1:25:57.960 --> 1:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>people because you have a really weak argument about how

1:26:02.000 --> 1:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it will make them safer. But you're Beto O'Rourke and

1:26:05.040 --> 1:26:08.559
<v Speaker 1>you're on the cover of Vanity Fair but taking guns

1:26:08.600 --> 1:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and so that's what the joy behar there is a

1:26:14.800 --> 1:26:19.519
<v Speaker 1>more savvy observer of politics than Betto is, because she

1:26:19.560 --> 1:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at least understands that Betto's problems that he started telling

1:26:22.040 --> 1:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>us what he really thinks. He was taking the most

1:26:24.800 --> 1:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>far left wing position on issue after issue, but specifically

1:26:28.320 --> 1:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>on guns. He was saying what Democrats think to themselves

1:26:32.040 --> 1:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but don't say aloud, not understanding that there's a reason

1:26:36.040 --> 1:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't say that alloud. There are reasons why they

1:26:39.880 --> 1:26:43.559
<v Speaker 1>don't just let it rip and tell Republicans what they're

1:26:43.560 --> 1:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>really planning to do in this whole process. So Beto

1:26:49.439 --> 1:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>is no longer running for president, which makes me a

1:26:51.479 --> 1:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit sad. We've lost the Blasio, We've lost beto've

1:26:57.080 --> 1:27:01.559
<v Speaker 1>we're about to lose. I think we're about to lose.

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>When did Castro already stop? I think he might have

1:27:03.800 --> 1:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>already stopped. If he hasn't, it's ridiculous that he hasn't.

1:27:06.520 --> 1:27:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Tom Styre is not gonna stop. He's a billionaire, so

1:27:08.520 --> 1:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he can just waste money on whatever he wants. He's

1:27:10.240 --> 1:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>wasting money annoying the American people with his climate change lunacy.

1:27:15.000 --> 1:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'd say that there's some stuff here. There's

1:27:18.479 --> 1:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>some things, some things to look at going forward about

1:27:21.280 --> 1:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>how it is that Democrats were even in any way,

1:27:24.400 --> 1:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at any point in time, we willing to get behind

1:27:26.000 --> 1:27:29.479
<v Speaker 1>this guy Bette Aroor. It's like, yeah, I agree, you

1:27:29.479 --> 1:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>should make me president because I just think that I'm

1:27:32.560 --> 1:27:35.519
<v Speaker 1>terrible because I'm rich and I'm a white guy, and

1:27:35.560 --> 1:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I've so much privilege and I'm just drowning in my

1:27:37.640 --> 1:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>privilege all the time. But because I admit it, you

1:27:40.120 --> 1:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>should make me president. Nope, not gonna happen. As Tucker

1:27:46.120 --> 1:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>calls him Betteau. This is a president who is trying

1:27:52.640 --> 1:27:57.479
<v Speaker 1>to divide us up based on the color of our skin,

1:28:01.120 --> 1:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>where we were born, our sexual orientation, or our religion.

1:28:14.400 --> 1:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Who is really doing the dividing in this country? Trump

1:28:19.280 --> 1:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>or the Democratic Party. I think it's an important question.

1:28:23.479 --> 1:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something that we have to ask here.

1:28:25.920 --> 1:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Who is really in charge of making sure that the

1:28:29.840 --> 1:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>American people do not unify around our shared americanness? In fact,

1:28:35.960 --> 1:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>who has an entire ideology devoted to the study of oppression,

1:28:40.680 --> 1:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not just between one dominant group and all the other groups,

1:28:43.000 --> 1:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>although that's certainly a part of it, but the oppression

1:28:45.400 --> 1:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>among oppressed groups, intersectionality, which is central to the left

1:28:50.439 --> 1:28:52.479
<v Speaker 1>thesis of how America works these is So, I just

1:28:52.520 --> 1:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>want to know which side of the aisle is really

1:28:55.120 --> 1:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with all this stuff. Who cares about identity politics.

1:29:00.000 --> 1:29:01.599
<v Speaker 1>By the way, producer Marcus told me that I cannot

1:29:01.640 --> 1:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>scratch my beard where I'm doing the show, which has

1:29:04.000 --> 1:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>become a habit of mind because you can actually hear it,

1:29:05.680 --> 1:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which is it's like this rustling sound, this rustling sound

1:29:08.880 --> 1:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of manly beard being shifted around. Well deepened sonorous words

1:29:15.880 --> 1:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are being spoken, he's producing marks about to vomit. But

1:29:20.479 --> 1:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the point here is that Bernie Sanders is talking about

1:29:25.200 --> 1:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>how Trump divides us all the time, and Trump is

1:29:28.040 --> 1:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a is a racist, and I keep coming back to

1:29:31.120 --> 1:29:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I wish they would give me the examples of Trump

1:29:34.920 --> 1:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>being a racist, and I would also you know that

1:29:37.760 --> 1:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>that are real examples of him being a racist, not

1:29:39.640 --> 1:29:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the lie about what he said. They lied about what

1:29:41.479 --> 1:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he said. Charltt's well, they lied. And I even saw

1:29:43.840 --> 1:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>some I remember, and I've not forgotten who they were.

1:29:45.920 --> 1:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>There were some conservatives who came after me because I

1:29:47.880 --> 1:29:49.479
<v Speaker 1>was like, why are they all pretending? Like he said?

1:29:49.479 --> 1:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't say, oh, books are there good people

1:29:52.200 --> 1:29:54.559
<v Speaker 1>on both sides? No, of course there aren't good people

1:29:54.560 --> 1:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on both sides when you're talking about neo Nazis on

1:29:56.920 --> 1:30:00.599
<v Speaker 1>one side. Trump didn't say that. There's a T and script.

1:30:01.720 --> 1:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of focus on transcripts these days. There's a transcript,

1:30:04.160 --> 1:30:08.599
<v Speaker 1>to be sure, but calling out the president for being racist.

1:30:08.680 --> 1:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet here we have a president who has gotten

1:30:12.040 --> 1:30:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Criminal Justice Reformed pass, which disproportionately has positive impact on

1:30:18.600 --> 1:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>minority particularly black and Latino communities. It gets no credit

1:30:22.080 --> 1:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for whatsoever. None a president of the United States, who

1:30:26.240 --> 1:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a certain respect that a lot.

1:30:30.960 --> 1:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at least some of the minorities that I've

1:30:33.000 --> 1:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>talked to you about their support for Trump. I can

1:30:35.040 --> 1:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>speak to that because I know a number. I know

1:30:37.160 --> 1:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of minorities personally who are Trump supporters, whether

1:30:40.960 --> 1:30:45.799
<v Speaker 1>they're Black, Asian, Latino, and they appreciate that when Trump

1:30:45.880 --> 1:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>speaks to those communities, he's speaking about how he wants

1:30:49.760 --> 1:30:53.919
<v Speaker 1>prosperity for them, how he wants people in any community,

1:30:53.960 --> 1:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>including minority communities in this country, to be in the

1:30:56.640 --> 1:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>best spot possible, to have the most prosperous future, make

1:31:01.800 --> 1:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the most money, be the most successful they can be.

1:31:05.080 --> 1:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a level of respect there. It's Democrats

1:31:07.800 --> 1:31:11.599
<v Speaker 1>who often take this position of, well, we need a

1:31:11.600 --> 1:31:15.759
<v Speaker 1>bigger welfare state, we need more government handouts for people,

1:31:16.000 --> 1:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and if you oppose that, you must be racist. Well,

1:31:18.200 --> 1:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what are the implications that the Democrats are making there?

1:31:22.560 --> 1:31:25.439
<v Speaker 1>The Trump position to me seems to be to have

1:31:26.240 --> 1:31:29.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot of faith in the black and Latino and

1:31:29.800 --> 1:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>other minority communities in this country that without the government

1:31:33.960 --> 1:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in their way, without the government creating reverse incentives for

1:31:37.680 --> 1:31:40.759
<v Speaker 1>them to do what is best for them to pursue

1:31:40.760 --> 1:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>their own dreams that with the government out of the

1:31:42.840 --> 1:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>way and with lower taxes, with more jobs, those communities

1:31:47.280 --> 1:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>will thrive. Those communities will the ingenuity and the skills

1:31:52.320 --> 1:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and the intelligence and the work ethic within minority communities

1:31:55.600 --> 1:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>will be in even better position without the government doing these.

1:32:00.560 --> 1:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So Trump's positions, let us, let us make it easier

1:32:04.320 --> 1:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for minority communities across the country to become wealthier, more prosperous,

1:32:09.439 --> 1:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have more, you know, economic security and freedom. And the

1:32:12.760 --> 1:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrat position to me always seems to be, well, we

1:32:16.320 --> 1:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>need you know, we need more, we need more handouts.

1:32:19.800 --> 1:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you oppose handouts, there's something you're greedy and

1:32:23.360 --> 1:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you're probably racist. So I talk to minorities who appreciate that.

1:32:28.120 --> 1:32:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Trump's position is that he speaks to minority communities as

1:32:34.320 --> 1:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as people that are striving for the same things as

1:32:37.800 --> 1:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody else and have the same abilities and the same

1:32:40.439 --> 1:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dreams and the same aspirations as everybody else, and is

1:32:43.640 --> 1:32:52.479
<v Speaker 1>not pandering Democrats, especially white liberal democrats like Peto O'Rourke.

1:32:53.320 --> 1:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>All they do is pander, constantly, pander, constantly talking about

1:32:59.439 --> 1:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>how even if you were to look at specific troubled

1:33:03.400 --> 1:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>minority communities, like the poor areas of Baltimore, like the

1:33:06.720 --> 1:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>South Side of Chicago. I believe the West Side actually

1:33:08.920 --> 1:33:10.799
<v Speaker 1>has some violence to it, but the South Side of Chicago,

1:33:11.120 --> 1:33:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and try to have a conversation about what could be

1:33:13.640 --> 1:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>done there to make those communities less and have less

1:33:18.840 --> 1:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>violence and be in better shape economically. Instead of having

1:33:23.200 --> 1:33:28.879
<v Speaker 1>that very worthwhile, sophisticated and respectful discussion, the Beato Arourics

1:33:28.920 --> 1:33:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of the world just say, it's because of systemic racism.

1:33:32.520 --> 1:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why there's all this violence in Baltimore. It's because

1:33:34.960 --> 1:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of systemic racism. And when you would point to other places,

1:33:38.240 --> 1:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd say, well, why is it that there are other

1:33:39.920 --> 1:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>minority communities across the country where there's almost no violence.

1:33:43.640 --> 1:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there not systemic racism there? Or is Can we

1:33:46.240 --> 1:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>look at specific communities and try to address criminal justice,

1:33:49.320 --> 1:33:53.439
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement issues, economic issues and do so on a

1:33:53.439 --> 1:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>plane of respect for everybody? There No Democrats, it's white

1:33:58.360 --> 1:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>liberal Democrats have one move when it comes to talking

1:34:01.479 --> 1:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to minority communities, a least when they're trying to get

1:34:03.880 --> 1:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>them to vote for them, and that is pandering a

1:34:07.080 --> 1:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of pandering. So I think it's and by the way,

1:34:10.120 --> 1:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders resonance with minority communities is a big question

1:34:17.360 --> 1:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mark so far continues to be not as much as

1:34:20.680 --> 1:34:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Pete Buddha judge who I mean, as African American support,

1:34:24.680 --> 1:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it is almost zero in this primary.

1:34:28.680 --> 1:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting that Bernie Sanders, he's probably trying to

1:34:34.439 --> 1:34:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, establish them bonafit is with the minority community,

1:34:37.280 --> 1:34:39.760
<v Speaker 1>minority communities across the country by attacking Trump on this

1:34:39.800 --> 1:34:42.639
<v Speaker 1>issue of race. But you know, Ilhan Omar, for example,

1:34:42.720 --> 1:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>also says that Trump is doing He's the one who's dividing.

1:34:45.880 --> 1:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>He's the one who's separating us by race play a

1:34:48.200 --> 1:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>fourteen place. The current occupant of the White House likes

1:34:52.760 --> 1:34:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk about making American degree, But every action and

1:34:59.000 --> 1:35:02.320
<v Speaker 1>virtually ever we warn out of his mouth is an

1:35:02.320 --> 1:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>attack on the very values and ideals that make this

1:35:06.360 --> 1:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>country a peakin of hope for me and the people

1:35:09.400 --> 1:35:13.559
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Every action Trump's take, a Trump takes,

1:35:13.560 --> 1:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>she says, is an attack on the ideals of this

1:35:17.720 --> 1:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>count really, so it was if we had a real

1:35:21.200 --> 1:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>journalist in this country, they'd probably ask, okay, so was

1:35:24.200 --> 1:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>criminal justice reform meant to help the disproportionately incarcerated minority community.

1:35:29.760 --> 1:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Was that was that an attack on our values? I

1:35:34.760 --> 1:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, she says every action. I'm just I'm asking

1:35:36.880 --> 1:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>her based on the words that she uses here. So

1:35:39.040 --> 1:35:43.679
<v Speaker 1>was that an attack on our values? Huh? Is always

1:35:43.760 --> 1:35:48.280
<v Speaker 1>touting the Black and Hispanic unemployment rate which is at

1:35:48.400 --> 1:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>record lows, and the pride that President Trump has when

1:35:52.240 --> 1:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he speaks of that issue, the sense of accomplishment and

1:35:55.320 --> 1:35:58.559
<v Speaker 1>joy he has for those communities. Is that antithetical to her?

1:35:58.680 --> 1:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Because there's all these things that you can talk about

1:36:00.400 --> 1:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump, you'd say, well, hold on a second.

1:36:02.760 --> 1:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But she says that it's all against our values. She

1:36:05.640 --> 1:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even pick issues here or there, just like Bernie

1:36:08.160 --> 1:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Sanders says he's dividing us by race. At what point

1:36:12.400 --> 1:36:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is this not exaggeration or even overstatement? At what point

1:36:15.880 --> 1:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is this just propaganda? Is this just lies, lies meant

1:36:18.840 --> 1:36:20.679
<v Speaker 1>not just to smear the president, but to smear any

1:36:20.680 --> 1:36:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of his supporters, to make it seem politically I'm sorry,

1:36:24.439 --> 1:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to make it seem socially, never mind politically unpalatable, unacceptable

1:36:28.160 --> 1:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to support this man. This is why they keep throwing

1:36:31.040 --> 1:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>out these allegations of racism. This is why they keep

1:36:33.240 --> 1:36:36.519
<v Speaker 1>telling us that President Trump is more or less a

1:36:36.560 --> 1:36:40.559
<v Speaker 1>white nationalist, because they're hoping that, even though there's no

1:36:40.640 --> 1:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>basis for these charges, that there's no real way to

1:36:44.439 --> 1:36:46.559
<v Speaker 1>prove any of this or even to make a fair

1:36:46.560 --> 1:36:49.679
<v Speaker 1>minded case about it, people will just hear the charge

1:36:49.680 --> 1:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and be scared to support the man. The show ain't

1:36:55.000 --> 1:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>over yet, folks keeping it. It's time for roll call. Indeed,

1:37:13.960 --> 1:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it is roll call time everybody, which is exciting for

1:37:18.760 --> 1:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>all of us. We've got a lot of stuff coming

1:37:21.080 --> 1:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in here now and let's see. Oh wait, nope, First,

1:37:24.960 --> 1:37:26.559
<v Speaker 1>I gotta got to Facebook because we got to load

1:37:26.640 --> 1:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>up the emails. I gotta figure out how to do

1:37:29.400 --> 1:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit better. All right, inbox your Facebook

1:37:32.960 --> 1:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Buck Sexton to be in on the

1:37:36.960 --> 1:37:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Facebook roll call, Teenbucket, iHeartMedia dot com if you want

1:37:39.640 --> 1:37:45.519
<v Speaker 1>to just send us thoughts elsewhere. Let's see. We have

1:37:46.000 --> 1:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom who rights. Hey, Buck, I was just listening to

1:37:51.360 --> 1:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast of yesterday's show, and I'm surprised you missed

1:37:56.160 --> 1:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>an important key detail about the Fox News poll when

1:37:58.160 --> 1:38:00.559
<v Speaker 1>you're reporting on it. Don't feel bad at Glenn and

1:38:00.600 --> 1:38:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Rush also missed it. The poll is absolute garbage. To

1:38:03.800 --> 1:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be more specific, the breakdown a poll was forty five

1:38:06.080 --> 1:38:10.280
<v Speaker 1>percent Democrat, thirty nine percent Republican, and sixteen percent independent.

1:38:10.680 --> 1:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>The breakdown for the country is thirty nine or thirty

1:38:13.240 --> 1:38:16.639
<v Speaker 1>one percent Democrat, twenty nine percent Republican, and thirty nine

1:38:16.680 --> 1:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>percent independent. The polsters oversampled Democrats by six percent over

1:38:21.320 --> 1:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and by whopping fourteen percent over their average breakdown

1:38:25.840 --> 1:38:30.479
<v Speaker 1>for the country. They also undersampled independence by an insanely

1:38:30.560 --> 1:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>huge amount. With this level of crappy polling, they can

1:38:33.160 --> 1:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get any results they want. It's actually surprising they only

1:38:36.080 --> 1:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>got forty nine percent to approve removing President Trump from office.

1:38:39.080 --> 1:38:41.479
<v Speaker 1>This does not speak well for the Democrats, either with

1:38:41.520 --> 1:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>impeachment or next November. And yes, I intentionally did not

1:38:44.640 --> 1:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>capitalize Democrats to take care of Tom. Yeah. Tom, Well,

1:38:47.040 --> 1:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you're crunching the numbers on this. But I kind of

1:38:49.200 --> 1:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>got there just by my gut. I got there just

1:38:52.240 --> 1:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>by figuring out that there's no way that what they

1:38:55.479 --> 1:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>are trying to tell us is true. And it's just

1:39:00.479 --> 1:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>not surprising that there's a lot of nonsense going I remember,

1:39:02.800 --> 1:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>poles are a way of shaping perception. And shaping perception,

1:39:05.880 --> 1:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>especially popularity on any specific issue, is a very powerful tool.

1:39:09.720 --> 1:39:12.479
<v Speaker 1>So do we think that the people that are in

1:39:12.600 --> 1:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>positions to shape those things? Are they angels beyond reproach

1:39:17.880 --> 1:39:20.559
<v Speaker 1>or do they sometimes, maybe perhaps just a little bit,

1:39:20.600 --> 1:39:23.519
<v Speaker 1>decide that they're going to stack the deck for one

1:39:23.560 --> 1:39:27.919
<v Speaker 1>side or another. I think we all know that answer.

1:39:28.479 --> 1:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Bride in hold on a second, Buck, I've got a

1:39:33.920 --> 1:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>way of circumventing the attempts for Democrats to hide behind children,

1:39:39.360 --> 1:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>decorated veterans, and bad arguments. Simply get the person you're

1:39:43.360 --> 1:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>speaking with, degree with the so called protected person, then

1:39:47.160 --> 1:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kindly inform them that your argument is now against their stance.

1:39:52.479 --> 1:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>The protected person isn't okay. This is kind of complicated.

1:39:55.200 --> 1:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Also help you out, Like soft butter and warm toast,

1:39:57.680 --> 1:40:00.439
<v Speaker 1>time to spread some freedom. Coast to coast. Toast is

1:40:00.479 --> 1:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and the butter is freedom. You spread

1:40:03.040 --> 1:40:05.519
<v Speaker 1>that stuff everywhere. It's also a good analogy because your

1:40:05.200 --> 1:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>roll call participants are from everywhere. Thank you so much, Brian.

1:40:09.200 --> 1:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate your writing him a man, it was great,

1:40:11.160 --> 1:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>too great to get your stuff in the roll call here.

1:40:16.040 --> 1:40:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Richard hi Buck love your show. You explain everything and

1:40:21.360 --> 1:40:23.599
<v Speaker 1>seem to analyze events the way that I would. Thank

1:40:23.600 --> 1:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you for your service. I heard Don Junior say Mitt

1:40:27.080 --> 1:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Romney was his favorite Democrat. Ha ha, Richard, thanks for

1:40:30.720 --> 1:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>writing him, man, thank you for your kind words. I

1:40:33.240 --> 1:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>think we'll have Don Junior on the show sometime this week,

1:40:35.280 --> 1:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so I've been in contact with him. It is very

1:40:38.120 --> 1:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>likely we'll have mister Don Junior on. So there is

1:40:42.200 --> 1:40:48.599
<v Speaker 1>that we got. Bradly, He writes Buck, I'm a new listener. Yes,

1:40:48.920 --> 1:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>someone told someone to listen to the show. See it

1:40:52.840 --> 1:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>can happen. It can happen. It can be a day

1:40:55.080 --> 1:40:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to day thing. People just say, oh, yeah, you hear

1:40:56.560 --> 1:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>about the Bucks Action show. I love the Bucks actual show.

1:40:58.760 --> 1:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing. Oh you're listening. Yeah, I should listen to

1:41:01.040 --> 1:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>other people. But Bucks way funnier and smarter. That's all

1:41:04.040 --> 1:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it takes. It's really easy. Just tell us about Oh

1:41:06.000 --> 1:41:07.760
<v Speaker 1>where do you get it? All iTunes? Wherever you listen

1:41:07.760 --> 1:41:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts, how do you find it? Type in the

1:41:10.280 --> 1:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Buck sex and show. It'll come up. There's only one

1:41:12.040 --> 1:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexingers doing a podcast right now at least, so

1:41:14.160 --> 1:41:17.599
<v Speaker 1>that's the good news. Sonia Bradley. Sorry, I got excited

1:41:17.600 --> 1:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I get excited about new podcast listeners. I love you

1:41:20.439 --> 1:41:22.720
<v Speaker 1>old podcast listeners too. Don't worry you guys are you

1:41:22.760 --> 1:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>guys are awesome? You guys are a fan. Hey Buck,

1:41:25.400 --> 1:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a new listener. Sorry, we already said that, and

1:41:27.160 --> 1:41:28.720
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy what I'm hearing from you. You've become my

1:41:28.800 --> 1:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>primary podcast only after only a couple of weeks. Yes,

1:41:33.040 --> 1:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>my question for you is why is no one talking

1:41:35.200 --> 1:41:40.879
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility of weaponizing a program like Medicare for All.

1:41:41.280 --> 1:41:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure our voter registrations are accessible. Could you foresee

1:41:45.240 --> 1:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a situation where registered Republicans are given lower priority to

1:41:49.080 --> 1:41:52.720
<v Speaker 1>rationed during ration care from behind enemy lines in California?

1:41:52.800 --> 1:41:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Brad Um, I mean, Brad, you know, never say never,

1:41:58.400 --> 1:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but that does seem a little bit extreme to me.

1:42:02.200 --> 1:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for All as a function of you know, there

1:42:06.479 --> 1:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>will be tears within it, and there will definitely be

1:42:09.479 --> 1:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>rationing that occurs, and then how that rationing is doled

1:42:13.080 --> 1:42:16.720
<v Speaker 1>out will become a fight for sure, and people will

1:42:16.760 --> 1:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>then be arguing with each other over the over the

1:42:19.080 --> 1:42:23.280
<v Speaker 1>way the government deploys the resources that are scared made

1:42:23.320 --> 1:42:28.559
<v Speaker 1>scarce by government intervention. Intervention in the healthcare marketplace. So

1:42:28.920 --> 1:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't I don't think we're going to see

1:42:30.760 --> 1:42:33.720
<v Speaker 1>anything with Republican registration used to deny people care. I

1:42:33.760 --> 1:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>can't say I see that being because there's there are

1:42:36.240 --> 1:42:37.559
<v Speaker 1>still The good news is there's still a lot of

1:42:37.560 --> 1:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and they would be pretty upset understandably about that.

1:42:41.160 --> 1:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we need to worry about that

1:42:44.960 --> 1:42:51.559
<v Speaker 1>one quite yet. Hold on, wait a second. We gotta

1:42:51.640 --> 1:42:56.679
<v Speaker 1>go to and that's that's when I have to take

1:42:56.720 --> 1:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a moment here, Michael Rites, can you tell me more

1:43:00.680 --> 1:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>about yourself? Where are you located? I'm located in New

1:43:04.000 --> 1:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>York City, So that's where I'm located, New York, New York, Randy.

1:43:13.520 --> 1:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Hold on a second here, hey, buck Love the show

1:43:15.479 --> 1:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>shields high. So Elizabeth Warren released the cause for her

1:43:18.720 --> 1:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for All no private medical insurance plan and so

1:43:21.040 --> 1:43:22.679
<v Speaker 1>she won't have to raise taxes in the middle class

1:43:22.680 --> 1:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>by one penny. She previously thought that her DNA tests

1:43:25.120 --> 1:43:27.439
<v Speaker 1>would show that she was one one and twenty fourth

1:43:27.560 --> 1:43:31.800
<v Speaker 1>native American, proved that she was part cheric Key, so

1:43:31.920 --> 1:43:33.800
<v Speaker 1>she has already proven that she has no concept of math.

1:43:33.800 --> 1:43:36.559
<v Speaker 1>Why would we believe her now? Just saying Randy, Well, Randy,

1:43:36.600 --> 1:43:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you on that, my man. She is

1:43:38.320 --> 1:43:46.240
<v Speaker 1>not someone whose judgment I particularly respect or care to hear. Skip,

1:43:46.880 --> 1:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>my man. Skip the new Netflix The King was excellent.

1:43:50.680 --> 1:43:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought tears watching the battle. Really, I might have a

1:43:55.880 --> 1:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>check that one out. You know what else, I gotta

1:43:57.040 --> 1:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>check out this little teaser for the show later this week.

1:43:58.640 --> 1:44:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm a former CIA and with a cooler name

1:44:01.520 --> 1:44:06.599
<v Speaker 1>than Jack Ryan buck Sexton the Jack Ryan Show on Amazon.

1:44:07.200 --> 1:44:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing some troubling things, friends. I'm hearing that there

1:44:10.720 --> 1:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of social justice nonsense going on. I'm

1:44:15.000 --> 1:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>hearing that they're rewriting stuff to appeal to the left

1:44:17.960 --> 1:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>wing set in Hollywood. I don't like it, and I'm

1:44:21.960 --> 1:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to take it to task, I think because

1:44:25.080 --> 1:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>CIA analysts should be depicted a certain way in the

1:44:27.479 --> 1:44:33.799
<v Speaker 1>media as people of above average reading ability who dress

1:44:34.040 --> 1:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in semi slovenly fashioned, drink a lot of coffee, and

1:44:37.160 --> 1:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>go to a lot of meetings. So I'm gonna make

1:44:39.160 --> 1:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sure we keep it real with the CIA analyst. That's

1:44:41.920 --> 1:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be it for today's show. We have a fantastic

1:44:44.000 --> 1:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>show coming your way tomorrow and every day this week

1:44:46.800 --> 1:44:49.479
<v Speaker 1>because you know how we roll shields high