WEBVTT - Takeaways from the 2022 PGA Championship

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Gooder. Gooder Mikes

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars active sunglasses for anyone. So it was

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty sunny in Tulsa for the first couple of days

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the tournament, and I definitely relied on my Gooder

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sunglasses to avoid getting too much of a heat headache.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>My pair is called just Knock It On, and they're

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>really great. They're large size to suit my large head,

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and they have a golf specific lens that works really well.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It makes things look kind of precise and sharp. Not

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly sure how it works anyway. Gooders are comfortable, stylish,

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and lightweight, and they are one hundred percent UV protective

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and one hundred percent polarized in all styles. So try

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>them out and treat yourself to a pair or two.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>They are affordable. Gooder is going to give you fifteen

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order. Go to Gooder dot com.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That's good R dot com slash TFE and get fifteen

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>percent off when you use code tf E at checkout.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>All orders over fifty dollars get free shipping in the US. Again,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fifteen percent off with code TFE at g oo

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>d R dot com slash tf e look good golf gooder, I.

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Miss a green?

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>For example, I'm already upset.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 3>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 3>And when I find my.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Ball in a bride egg Frida egg, the dreaded Frida Egg,

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg, Frida Egg, Brian Egg, Frida Egg, bride egg Lie,

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:52.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm about ready to run off of the hump. Hello,

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the Frida Egg Podcast. My name is

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Morrison, and today we have takeaways from the twenty

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two PGA champ Chip. So it was a somewhat

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>sleepy tournament at Southern Hills for the first three and

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a half days. Roy McElroy caught fire on Thursday, then

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>fell back. Tiger Woods made an incredible effort to sneak

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>under the cut line on Friday, but by Saturday evening

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he had withdrawn from the tournament because if body simply

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't hold up. And on Sunday the top of the

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 1>leader board was occupied by names like Mito Pereira, will

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Zalatoris and Cameron Young and Matt Fitzpatrick. It seemed like

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the stars of the game had pulled a no show.

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But then the leaders faltered and Justin Thomas took advantage.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He closed with a sixty seven and ultimately beat Zalatoris

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in a playoff. It's Thomas's second major and second PGA Championship.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>To cover all of that and more, I have three

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>shortish interviews for you. The first is with Bendan Quinn,

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a senior writer at The Athletic who was on site

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>at Southern Hills this week. Next up is the Friday

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Zone Andy Johnson to talk about the course. And finally

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear from Stephen Brittain, a golf course superintendent, about

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the issue of sand. You may have heard that the

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>pros were not big fans of the large, grained, somewhat

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>heavily sand in Southern Hills bunkers, so I thought we'd

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>get an experts perspective on that. All right, let's do it.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Here are takeaways from the twenty twenty two PGA Championship.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, I am here with Brendan Quinn. He is

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a senior writer at The Athletic. He covers college hoops

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as golf, so those are two excellent beats.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But we are here to talk about golf. You can

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you can also talk about college hoops if you'd like,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, but you have been. You have been at

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Championship this week on site covering the tournament,

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and so for you when you're thinking about Big ten

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>takeaways this week, what comes to mind?

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>First, Well, it was so interesting because everyone here, they

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of the conversation that was just ongoing basically for

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the last like four days, was like, Hey, is anything

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of gonna happen? Like it just had this whole

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 3>flat vibe for basically after Rory got through fifteen on Thursday.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>From then that point onward, this thing just I didn't

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>think it had a lot of juice. It was just

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of waiting for something to happen. And then you know,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Mito Perrero just comes out of nowhere, and everyone's kind

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 3>of like, is this actually gonna go down this way?

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Where he basically if he had shot even parr, it

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>would it's been fine today, and it would have kind

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 3>of been a lifeless ending to a tournament that I

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 3>thought kind of overall was a little flat. And then instead,

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, ninety minutes to go in the tournament itself,

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of doors start opening and things start happening, and

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 3>now I'm running around on the back nine and it's mate, wait,

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's this is gonna get really interesting really quick.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 3>And that's kind of how it went down, obviously, with

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>with JT making that move. You know when he when

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>he buried that that long birdie put on eleven, the

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>day really changed. And it was so early. I don't

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 3>think anyone really realized in the moment what what that

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 3>putt meant. But you know, he had shanked the shot

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 3>what two holes earlier, and yeah, he came back with

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>a with a beautiful five iron on ten that which

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 3>was the same clubby shanked, but he missed that short

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 3>BIRDI putt, and he was at that point still like

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of trying to just get going. But then you know,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 3>he dropped that whatever it was, sixty foot right off

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the front of eleven and off and running. He was

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 3>four under on his last eight holes of the day.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 3>To you know, I think a lot of people will

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 3>be able to say that Praira lost his tournament, and

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 3>he did, but you can also say JT went and

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.119
<v Speaker 3>won the tournament. Both things I think can be true.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, he shot sixty seven on the day.

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what you need to do in order to win

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a tournament, but typically you need to do more than

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that to come from seven shots back, which is what

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>he did. So there is that doubleness to it where, yeah,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>he certainly did well enough on the last day, but

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a few things needed to happen. There needed to be

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of guys who shot over par rounds, which

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is what happened to basically every guy who was ahead

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of him in order for him to have that opportunity.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>But to his credit, he seized it. So all that

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>happened kind of you're describing this tournament that there was there.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a sort of lethargic feel to it for

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a while. The weather was kind of weird and slow.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>The greens were a bit slow because the wind was high.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want to get out of control. You know,

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>everything about the tournament just didn't quite have that fire.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And then all of a sudden, in the last couple

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of hours of the tournament, it just came alive. And

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so I W I guess the big question is it

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a good tournament? Now? Do we remember this as a

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>good tournament?

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Man, that's a good question.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Like if there's a basketball game that has an amazing

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>ending to it right, but it's really boring and horrible

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:29.239
<v Speaker 1>up until that point.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 3>And I've been to a number of those.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I don't.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it was a good tournament at

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 3>a at a good to great course. I will you

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 3>ask ask five years from now, you know, I feel

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>like j T will probably have a couple more majors

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 3>at that point, you know nothing. I'm not sayingthing crazy like,

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, but I could five years from now he

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>probably has two more something like that, you know.

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would be amazing for him.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think this will be remembered as you know,

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the one that you know, winning the second one so hard,

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 3>so we'll have that piece to it. And then it

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 3>was also a really interesting look in at Southern Hills

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 3>I think, which you guys have covered, you know as

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>well as anyone what what this course presented. It's gonna

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>take a lot for me to say this was a

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>great tournament, though, But I feel as I feel as

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>bad for the guy that lost as I do for

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>anything else in the tournament. That's like an empty, hollow

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>feeling that comes with I guess being a compassionate human being.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean talk about the talk about the

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>misery of Meadow a little bit. Something that Andy Johnson

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>uh noticed on that last hole is that Medow was

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>really quick between his shots. You know, he looked like

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>everything was sped up.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>So here's something that I think it's gonna probably make

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 3>its way into my story. But there was just hitting

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 3>on that, like justin Thomas So on the so I

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 3>think it was, yeah, eighteen T. It might not have

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 3>been eighteen ten. Now I'm second guessing myself, of course,

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>but it was one of the one of the closing holes.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 3>He's on the T box, he's addressing the ball. Back

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>behind me. One of the women working the concession stands

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 3>yelled last call one minute, and like, like JT was

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 3>pretty far away, but like he definitely heard like a

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>hair of it right, Like it was not close to him,

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 3>but he heard it, and he backed away from his

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 3>shot and he went all the way back through his

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 3>preshot routine again. He went up and he stripped it. It

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 3>was eighteen sorry, so it was definitely a teen and

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>we know how that how that ends. He hit a

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 3>great approach, you know, he could have made a birdie

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>in one outright, but made a great part in a

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 3>clutch spot. And then in the playoff on seventeen, as

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Xalatorus is standing over the ball, a siren went off

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 3>in the distance and it was loud. It was legit loud,

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 3>and there's in my mind, I didn't get chance to

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>asking about it. I wasn't in his press conference, but I

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 3>think there's zero chance he did not hear that siren

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and and he stayed put and he pulled the trigger

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 3>and it was a poor T shot and that ended

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 3>up being a birdie for j T, a par for

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 3>xala Taurus. And you know, I'm not saying that, I'm

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 3>not saying that siren costs him, you know, a major,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think it was also a guy in in

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 3>this position for one of the first times in his

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 3>career versus a guy in JT who's done this more

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>years and has you know, more reps and maybe just

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>a little I don't know, competitive and emotional maturity in

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 3>that moment that like he backed off zal Taurus didn't.

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 3>And then you see a guy like Meido, who you know,

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 3>he went up, rushed through his whole routine, took that

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 3>swing and and lost the tournament. So, you know, three

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 3>very different moments that I think kind of showed a

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 3>guy who was ready to win the second major of

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 3>his career, and that was Justin Thomas.

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So what did you see from Justin Thomas between when

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he finished on eighteen and when he started to play off?

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that you kind of followed him.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I saw a guy who just wanted a chance

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 3>to like get back in the arena right Like he

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 3>just wanting desperately to keep playing, because I think he

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 3>felt like he was ready to go make the shots

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 3>to win this thing. Like there was no there was

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 3>no flinching in him. There was It wasn't a look

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 3>of like concern or dread. It was just like drive,

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Like get me back on this freaking golf course right

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 3>now so I can go win this thing. It was

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of that energy. When zal Torres came back onto

0:11:55.320 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 3>the practice green as they were waiting for the finish,

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I am ninety nine percent sure I don't think JT

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>looked at him at all. When he walked onto the

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 3>practice green and they both went through their routines. They

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 3>both went to you know, their bags were stacked or

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 3>standing right next to each other. After they went through

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>their their putting or their practice putts and JT did

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 3>not look at him once and then got on the

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 3>back of a golf cart and drove off like he

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 3>was very much just kind of tunneled off, and I

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>think like that tournament ended, his round ended, but for him,

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the tournament had not ended yet, right, Like he was

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 3>just still kind of totally in that competitive mode that

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 3>you know. I mean, that's that was some alpha stuff there,

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>just the whole way that he carried himself. And then

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, I don't know if the broadcast picked up

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>on it, but when he went back through the tunnel

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 3>and got up toward eighteen Green to take a cart

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 3>ride over to thirteen t for the first hole of

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the playoff, they drove by the fans and I mean

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>it was like a parade, Like he's sitting on the

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 3>back and people were just just going wild, and you know,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 3>he kind of flashed the thumbs up and it was

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>like you could tell that the like this was sports,

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, like it was kind of one of those

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 3>moments that it was very much a like just high

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 3>energy and to be able to keep your composure. Now,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>obviously he pumped his right a little bit, but you

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 3>could feel a guy who was very much present in

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the moment.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>That is that approach is so indicative of experience because

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it's so easy in those situations to speed up and

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>do things too fast without even realizing it. And so

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it takes a little bit of experience to know, if

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I just take this at what I think is a

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>normal pace, I'm gonna go too fast. So I've got

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>to take a breath, I've got to slow down. And

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like that's what Justin Thomas was doing in

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that situation. And it's something that we've seen Tiger Woods

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>do in many different scenarios in his career when he's

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to win majors. It's something that we saw Phil

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Mickelson do last year throughout the entire round. As Brendan

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Poorath chronicled for our site, he was so slow that

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it actually annoyed Brooks Koepka. And it seemed like today

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Justin Thomas was taking his time. He was very serious,

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>very focused and intentional about what he was doing.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And you know, if you talk to Bones about it,

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 3>like Bones likes to say that he has every shot

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 3>in the bag, you know, JT has every shot out

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 3>there left right, low, high. He can do every the

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>soft hands around the green. He has every shot you

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 3>could want, and he just has to trust it and

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 3>not be so hard on himself. And if they did

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>like today was very much That back nine specifically, was

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I think kind of the culmination of like those types

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 3>of thoughts where you can hit any shot in the book, man,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 3>like just kind of go out there and just just

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>do your best and it'll it'll happen for you, right,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, I mean talk about left, right, low high.

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean he hit all of those on on on

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the back nine, and some of the other shots that

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>he just kind of casually executed were just just ridiculous.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.359
<v Speaker 3>Those back to back bunker shots he hit were insane.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 3>And that that the the bunker shot he hit on

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 3>uh on six. After he hit that, just the shank

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 3>dead right, then put his second one off a tree.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>And now it's time where it's okay, other guys, that's

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the end of their tournament, right, They're gonna hit another

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 3>poor shot they're gonna take They're gonna make a number

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>that you can't make when you're trying to win a

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 3>major in the fourth round. You can't take a double

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 3>in that spot. It's over and it would have been

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>over if he had taken a double, and instead he

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 3>pulled pitching wedge from one hundred yards out in a

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 3>bunker and hit this little cutty pitching wedge to eighteen feet.

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 3>He went up and he makes the putt right. That's

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 3>that's how you do it, and not a lot of

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 3>people can. So you know, he's got he's got the

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>stuff two certainly be you know, the right at the

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 3>top of the world rankings and and be a multi

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 3>time winner. And I'm kind of curious to see what

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 3>this does for him in terms of some juice momentum.

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>You get freed up after me, he waited a long time.

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>This is not low key. We all talk about Spieth

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 3>and Rory and them waiting to win their next major.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Like he was getting into that conversation, like he was

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of there at that at this point, and now

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>now it's off, and uh, you know, I think he's

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>got the personality I think to be a real like

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 3>fan favorite type of guy. You know, the way that

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 3>he plays the Ryder Cup. He's by far the most

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 3>fiery guy on the team. You know, he gets interacted

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 3>with fans. He's fist pump and he's slamming beers. He's

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>he's in it in that type of stuff, and you know,

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 3>maybe he could he can kind of carve his his

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>place as a I think maybe a bigger kind of personality.

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree, Yeah, the sport needs another kind of superstar

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>to emerge. Yeah, someone who is going to kind of

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>stay consistent at the top level of the game for sure. Now,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues that I think JT's persona is

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is a whole different matter in this. You know, one

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the issues with him so far as far as

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>his the way he comes across in public is concerned,

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>is that sometimes he does seem a little bit needy

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or a little bit thirsty, as as Andy and Brendan

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>would put it on the Shotguns start. And maybe winning

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a second major will give him some more of that

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>quiet confidence that tends to read a little bit better

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in public than this kind of eagerness that he's conveyed

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>so far. But that's kind of a separate issue. What's

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>really interesting about JT's playing career is that he has

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>taken so much more of like a traditional route to success.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it took him a while to break out,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really because Speith was obviously his same, you know, I

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're exactly the same age, but they're

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>around that, and Speith broke out way earlier and had

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>success way earlier. It took Justin Thomas a while to

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>get established on the PGA Tour, then to win his

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>first major, and then it took him a while five years.

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was twenty seventeen when he won the

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>PGA at Quail Hollow, five years to win his second major.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>And what we're seeing from him is this kind of

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>more traditional path to a great career that we've seen

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>stars in the past take when careers were long, and

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they tended to peak in when players were in their thirds.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>What we've seen recently is players seeming to kind of

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>peak in their twenties. Rory has done this, Speeth has

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>done this, and then kind of drop off after that.

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the path that JT is on is

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more traditional, and maybe it'll turn out

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to be more sustainable, that he'll win another major when

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>he's thirty three, and he'll win another one when he's

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, and he'll have more of that kind of

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like Phil Mickelson type career. I guess that's the hope

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, you know how Phil Micholson won

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>more on the PGA two or I think than j

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>T has to this.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Point, like eighteen wins, doesn't he something like that.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot of wins. Yeah, so he's got

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weird amount of wins and he could

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>add it. But his game is going to age well.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And just remember like Phil Mickelson didn't win his majors

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>until he was mature, and so we could possibly see

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a really exciting next phase of JT's career. But the

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is we always get caught in this, right we

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>see a player win a major and we say he's

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely gonna win three Moore, and so we don't know

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>if that's what happened. In this case. It just seems

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>like is different. It just seems like, you know, it's

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a little more old school.

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 3>There's the thing that really sticks out to me is

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 3>he seems like there's like so little variance in his game,

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, like like there is the full package, a

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 3>like his short game is there is everything else is there.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't seem like he didn't win this major cause

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 3>he's on a heater right now, like he just went

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 3>out and won the Major. Like that's it, you know,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 3>when we go back and like think of h DJ

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 3>winning the Masters in the fall a while ago, Like

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 3>he won that in the window of being on just

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>a ridiculous heater if you go back and look at

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 3>like the FedEx playoffs on right, I mean, he was

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>just killing it. He was the best player in the

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 3>world for a six month window and then the other guys.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And Scheffler was the same right where Shefflerfer.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Was, John Rahm was. John Rahm was on a ridiculous year. Yes,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>last year when he wonted Tory Pines. Like I don't

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 3>JT's been playing well and all that, but like he's

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 3>not just crushing it coming into this thing, Like he

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 3>was not a trendy pick on other than unless you

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 3>read the Athletic, But uh, I do feel like his game,

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 3>like he just won this tournament because he just shot,

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 3>He just made shots and he won and he found

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 3>a way to win it. And like you could make

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 3>a case, I mean, this is just totally narrative nonsense,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 3>but like you can make a case that that's kind

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of like more impressive way to win a major than

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 3>when you're just kind of you're just feeling it and

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 3>you everything though timing works out in your favor.

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, he won this major from the bad side of

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the draw. He got a bad weather draw on Thursday

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and Friday. He played during the windy sessions on those days,

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>played brilliantly, and then had a bad round on Saturday

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>around that had everybody, I mean most everybody and myself included,

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>saying JT has kind of blown this one. When is

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>he going to finally close one of these out? And

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>then he manages to just squeak out a sixty seven today.

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't quite know how he did that because for

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the round it didn't seem like he

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>was playing that well. It seemed like there were a

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of missed opportunities. And so, yeah, as you're saying,

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>this is a major win where he wasn't exactly lights

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>out and he didn't get every good break going his way,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and that is impressive. You know, we've heard Tiger Woods

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about this before, being able to win when you

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have your best stuff, or you know, a corollary

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to that is when you don't get the best breaks.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Being able to win in those situations is an indicator

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>of somebody who has a kind of sustainable version of

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>success in them, and so maybe we'll see that from JT.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Who knows.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it's a what's your take on having

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 3>his father still is his coach and this close to

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 3>him all this time later. I've never seen Justin Thomas

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 3>more than five feet away from his father, and he's

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 3>now like, yeah.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>They're very close. Yeah, I mean, you know, it seems

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to work for him. Obviously, he hasn't made a big

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>change to his swing technique since he has come on tour.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>He's had basically the same swing, and it seems to

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>be a very kind of versatible, versatible, versatile and malleable.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I can't find those two words, like a versatile and

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>valuable swing that works in a number of different conditions

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and can hit a number of different types of shots.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a kind of natural grace to it, and so

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be concerning if he suddenly went to another coach.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of players get caught up

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Tiger Woods model of I've got to make

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a big spectacular swing change, you know, go hire Butch

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Harmon or Hank Haney or you know, the next coach

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild my swing and get myself to the next level.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>When players who are not Tiger Woods try that, they

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>don't tend to do very well. And so it seems

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like Justin Thomas is sticking with what he knows in

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a pretty radical way by literally sticking with the swing

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>coach who raised him, and so who can question it

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point? I'm you know, I think for him

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be a concern if he went away from that. Yeah,

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean, there's no one formula. It's a

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>different things work for different people. Obviously.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the interesting aspects that there are in

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>this hunt for a major that he's been on since seventeen.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder, like how many other guys would have

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 3>or three or four years of that been like we're

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>changing this up here, you know, point you need to

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 3>back off, maybe I'm bringing in a coach whatever. Like

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 3>they obviously made the Caddy change, which has paid dividends,

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 3>but they just stuck with it, which is hard. That's

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 3>almost as hard as changing it is believing that what

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>you're doing is the right move, because you know, even

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 3>without the majors he finished all of those years since

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 3>twenty seventeen, still ranked in the top ten in the

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>world at the end of every year. It was, uh,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 3>he finished third, fourth, fourth, third, seventh in the last

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 3>at the at the year end since winning at Kuil Hollow,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 3>But he just forgot to raise a major championship, you know.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 3>So there's kind of been this like weird dicotomy there

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 3>of like, yeah, Jordan, Justin Thomas is elite, But is

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 3>he elite? You know, like where's the big payoff that

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 3>we all measure these things by. But he's never really

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 3>changed five years. He hasn't won one of these that's it.

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, he's stuck with it. And yeah, you're right

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that a less patient player might have might have changed

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>course in the middle of it. And you know, Jordan

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Speed might be a good example of that, though those

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Beeth has stuck with the same swing, coach, he certainly

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't stuck with the same swing. And yeah, and Justin

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is an example of how, you know, just kind

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of being committed to a style of play and knowing

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>what's right for you will kind of pay off in

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the end, at least for now. Maybe he'll go into

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the wilderness for the next five years and we'll be

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>having an entirely different discussion about this. That's that's kind

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of how golf goes. But today Justin Thomas is riding high,

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>as is Mike Thomas. So all right, Brendan, I've kept

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you for longer than I said I would. Thank you

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so much. I'll let you get back to your real

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>journalistic work. People can find your work at the Athletic

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, and work about call troops as well as golf.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Excellent stuff about golf that you write. Brendan a true

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>journalist and reporter out there, So keep doing what you're doing.

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it.

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Garrett. This was a pleasure and an honor,

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and I am a big fan and I look forward

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 3>to Grand Rapids. If any listeners are out there, be

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 3>sure to come by and say hi, because I am

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing. I will be there with my boys check

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 3>everyone else. I can't wait.

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Gooder. Gooder makes

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars active sunglasses for anyone. So it was

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty sunny in Tulsa for the first couple of days

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of the tournament, and I definitely relied on my Gooder

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sunglasses to avoid getting too much of a heat. Headache.

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>My parents called just knock it on, and they're really great.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>They're large size to suit my large head, and they

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have a golf specific lens that works really well, makes

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>things look kind of precise and sharp. I'm not exactly

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sure how it works anyway. Gooders are comfortable, style and lightweight,

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and they are one hundred percent UV protective and one

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent polarized in all styles. So try them out

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and treat yourself to a pair or to They are affordable.

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Gooder is going to give you fifteen percent off your

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>entire order. Go to Gooder dot com. That's good R

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash TFE and get fifteen percent off when

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you use code TFE at checkout. All orders over fifty

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars get free shipping in the US. Again, that's fifteen

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>percent off with code TFE at goodr dot com slash

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tf E. Look good Golf, Gooder. All right, So what

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this podcast needs is some takeaways from Southern Hills Country

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Club itself, the venue of the PGA Championship. And who

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>better to offer some of those takeaways than Andy Johnson himself. Andy,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>could you tell me some of your main takeaways from

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what you saw out of the course this week.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought, you know, when you look at the

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>golf course, I was thinking this really all weekend. I

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>can't think of a golf course that presents a better

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 2>test for the modern game than Southern Hills At this point,

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it lacks a little pop on the screen

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>just because it doesn't have an ocean and it doesn't

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 2>have like jaw dropping features that really you can glom

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 2>onto with TV and you can make an argument that's

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>an essential part. But when you're talking about a pure

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 2>championship test, this golf course is right there at the

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>top of American venues in terms of you know it.

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was very democratic. I thought it allowed

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of different styles of play to thrive. But

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.479
<v Speaker 2>it also did a wonderful job of testing all the

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 2>fastest fastest of the golf game, and I think it

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:00.719
<v Speaker 2>exposed when players had weak points in their game. Really,

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>what I thought was interesting was, you know, what we've

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 2>seen recently is they obviously got great weather in terms

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 2>of challenging weather with the wind, But I think that's

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of the norm in May and Tulsa, Like you're

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna get that kind of wind, unpredictable weather, So without

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 2>narrowing fairways, without having the greens absurdly firm, without using

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the back tee on every single hole as far back

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 2>as they could go. You know, they moved teas around,

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>They made seventeen driveable when they was into the wind.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 2>They moved sixteen t up when they you know, they

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 2>moved thirteen tea ups so people could get home in two.

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Like.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>They did not try to curb scoring, They did not

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 2>try to manipulate a number. And yet the golf course

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 2>really held its own. I mean, it was a it

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 2>was a stern test, and I think it doesn't have

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the pop on TV, but when you look at the

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 2>substance of what it challenged, how it challenges players, I

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know if there's a better spot. I think like

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Shinnacock's the one that comes to mind. And you know,

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>they obviously had pretty absurd conditions, like they pushed it

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 2>to the brink at that US Open recently, but that

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 2>this golf course really holds up.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. And I was struck by the cautiousness

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of the setup this week, you know, because they there

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was one day when they didn't even cut the greens

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and so the greens were running quite a bit slower

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 1>than they normally are at major championships or even at

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>regular PGA Tour events, and yet five under one, and

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so this course was still clearly challenging for players, even

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>though the greens were not kept at really really high speeds.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's usually how courses like this can defend themselves

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is through keeping the greens ultra firm, so that a

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the challenge comes around there. But it seemed

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>like throughout the week with the elements shifting around, the

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>holes that were hard also shifted around, and so that

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was like a big thing where you know, on the weekend,

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance, sixteen, the part four was really really hard

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>because it was all of a sudden kind of into

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the wind. You know, it's really a crosswind, but it

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>was more or less into the wind. On the first

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of days, that hole wasn't nearly as difficult, but

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>number eight, which travels in the other direction, was incredibly

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>difficult on those days. And so because of the shifting

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>elements and because the setup was kind of like smart

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to know where the edge was in terms of

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what was too challenging or what was too easy, we

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>got to see different holes standing out as some of

0:32:58.000 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the more challenging on the course.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Haven't done this, and i'd, you know, I'd be really

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>curious to look at weekend scoring versus week weekday scoring,

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 2>because I think what you saw was really two completely

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 2>different golf courses. And there might have been players where

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 2>that north wind really fit their game and they thrived

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe on the weekend, and then there were players that

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 2>that south wind really fit their game. And and you know,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 2>everybody's been piling on Rory, but maybe he just the

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 2>golf course fit his eye a little bit more with

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>that south wind or you know, and obviously he played

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of a mediocre around at each of those wins.

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 2>But that I think is one of the compelling things

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 2>about the golf course was how how it changed and everything.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 2>And I think like if we go through every facet

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of the game, you could see why Southern Hills stood

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 2>up and provided such a wonderful full examination. So on

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the green, it has very undulating green and it has

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 2>small targets, you know, at the green, and that that

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 2>makes approach play really challenging, but it also gives a

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>huge you know, it tests you're putting, you have to

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>play a significant about a break you have to be

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 2>a really good lag putter. If you're if you have

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a forty footer it you know, it is a wonderful

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 2>test at the green, you know, and you saw players

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 2>like Cam Smith is one of the best putters in

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the world. He had an amazing ball striking week. He

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 2>finished first in strokes game tee to green. I think

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 2>he was second in strokes, gained approach, and his putter

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 2>let him down and he finished like he putted really

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 2>poorly and he finished fifteenth. He couldn't just get by

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 2>with a with one club holding him back. Now, if

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>you look around the green, that short grass and it's impact,

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you know it sent balls further away. But where I

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 2>really like one of my big takeaways was Mito Pereira

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>on the final day. He missed a lot of greens.

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 2>He was pretty spotty with the chipping. What I noticed

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 2>was when he was in the rough he was very good.

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>You know that extra cushion, that's an easier shot, it's

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a more comfortable shot. He was really nervous. He talked

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 2>about this in his press conference. He got more nervous

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 2>every day, and you know where he was really really

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 2>bad on Sunday all day on Sunday, chipping from short

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>grass and having been nervous in golf situations when you

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>have to hit that perfect, that short grass really separates

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>mediocrity from greatness and insure like people will look at

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and be like, well, it makes that shot easier. It

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>makes the shot easier if you hit it perfect. If

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you hit it perfect, you're going to end up two

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 2>feet away. But what Mito Perreira was doing all day

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 2>was hitting really clunky chips and he was leaving himself

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 2>fifteen feet regularly for par or fifteen for birdie on seventeen,

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Like everybody's gonna talk, Oh, that putt finished a half

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 2>revolution short Well, it was a really bad chip, you know,

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 2>given the situation, given you're leading a major championship, like

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 2>your everything's clicking on all cylinders. But that was a

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 2>microcosm of the entire day. If he was on short grass,

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 2>that chip, those chip shots were clunky all day and

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>it started on the first hole, if I if I

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 2>recall correctly, he ended up short of the bunker and

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 2>he had a really bad chip to like fifteen feet.

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 2>He might have been in the buck, but neither all

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 2>those chips off of that short grass were really really

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 2>shaky for Mito Pereira, and it's because the margin for

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 2>error is so much smaller when it's short grass versus rough.

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 1>And if you're nervous, that's when that comes to the four.

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, like, these guys are good enough so that

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, under normal circumstances, hitting a chip

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:55.479
<v Speaker 1>off his short grass is not going to go wrong

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>very often.

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, go watch them, Go watch them around a practice screen.

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 2>It's it's unbelievable.

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And so this is not to say that these

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are like fifteen handicaps who can't properly execute any

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>variety of chip off of short grass. It's just that

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>when you get to Sunday at a major championship, funny

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>things start to happen when you're on short grass because

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>that is just a little bit uncomfortable. When you have

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that cushion of rough, or when you have that cushion

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of fluffy white sand, then you just feel like there's

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more that you can play with there.

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You can swing a little bit harder, you can put

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>your club further under the ball and you're not gonna

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>chunk it, and so you just have that margin to

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>play with and we could see that with Mito Pereira

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday when he was just he seemed really uncomfortable

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with those chips on short grass and high pressure situations.

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And he that drive you you know, you mentioned seventeen,

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that poor chip you hit on seventeen. That was the

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>decise moment of the tournament. I mean, we can't emphasize

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this enough. He had a great drive there. He put

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>himself in an excellent position on that hole, but he

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of duffed the chip and he ended up missing

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the putt. But he shouldn't have been expected to make

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that putt because it was like a fifteen footer. He's

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to make that putt most of the time.

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And so then he goes to the eighteenth tee, he

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.479
<v Speaker 1>has a one shot lead instead of a two shot lead,

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course he double Bogie's eighteen. Super challenging closing hole.

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>And so the short gass really played a significant role

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this week for sure.

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so further pushing back, right, you know, the

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 2>other thing around the green was the bunker sand. And

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure I know you talked to Steve Britten.

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably there'll be a segment later in this podcast on

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the bunker sand. Yeah, but that not on this specific

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>bunker sand, but on bunker sand in general.

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 2>That bunker sand that wasn't to tour spec made it

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 2>more difficult. It it challenged, it rewarded better bunker play.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It made them, It.

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Made it a hazard, and it also had an impact

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 2>when you pushed back to approach what tested you know,

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 2>it made a more of an emphasis on approach play

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and driving the golf ball and getting the ball into

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 2>play off the tee. And like that, that bunker sand

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 2>had an impact all the way back to the tee

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 2>because the bunkers weren't good spots to bail out. Like

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 2>you see pros bail into bunkers because they know it's

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 2>an easy up and down. It wasn't necessarily an easy

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>up and down this week. The other thing was bunkers

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 2>really captured a lot of balls. I felt like with

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the short grass and the bunkers, what you saw was

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 2>balls rolling into the bunkers, which were and unadvantageous spots

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to play from. But then when you go back to approach,

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 2>it was a challenging approach blay course because you're constantly

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 2>hitting up or down from from side hill lies flat lies,

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 2>different lies. I thought sixteen on Sunday was great. Everybody

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 2>hitting to that long iron into a green from an upslope.

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a really hard shot not to hang right, and

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 2>we saw so many players hang it right end up

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 2>in that right bunker. That's where Cameron Young made his

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 2>double bogie from. It was rarely stock shots with the wind,

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 2>so it challenged the approach play very, very significantly whether

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 2>you were in the fairway, and then when you were

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 2>in the rough, it was very unpredictable. You saw a

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 2>lot of flyer lies. You saw balls that came out

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 2>dead when they thought they were flying. So the rough

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>wasn't predictable and just hack it out rough it was

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how this ball is gonna come out again.

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 2>A full examination of approach play. And then when you

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 2>go back to the tee, thirty yard wide fairways allow

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 2>people to hit good T shots and be rewarded for

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 2>TE shots. When you get down to what we'll see

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in three weeks, twenty yard wide fairways at the country club,

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 2>you can hit a great T shot and hit it

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 2>in the rough, and that's kind of silly in my opinion.

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 2>You want to see these guys be able to hit.

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, you go down those faraway statistics, you saw

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 2>guys that hit twelve thirteen fairaways and if you're driving

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the ball great, if you're having a great week with

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 2>a driver, that seems to me like something that should

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 2>be achievable. You should be able to hit eighty percent

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 2>of the fairways if you're driving the ball well. And

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that's I think one of the great things that this

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 2>golf course did was it allowed people to excel. And

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 2>that's why you saw some variety on the lead. Like

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 2>you saw a B answer was in the mix because

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 2>he's a very accurate driver the golf ball.

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Now if you take pay well.

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you take a B answer and you put

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 2>them in those faraways are twenty yards wide. Instead of

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 2>hitting like I think one day hit thirteen or fourteen fairaways,

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 2>he might hit nine, and all of a sudden, those

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 2>four fairways that he would have hit that he didn't

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 2>hit turn probably into from birdie hole into bogie holes.

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 2>And that was the thing that I thought as a whole,

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 2>it was really hard to go around that golf course

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 2>without making bogies. But it was feasible to go around

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 2>that golf course and make five or six birdies because

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 2>you were often approaching greens from short grass. It gave

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 2>people the opportunity to hit great shots gate. It was

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 2>achievable to score, but it was very, very very difficult

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 2>to avoid mistakes.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and things can go sideways quickly. You know. We

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>saw guys shoot sixty five one day and shoot seventy

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>five the next day, and so if you were a

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit off, you could just kind of get rolling

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong direction at the course. Now, one thing

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to call out as well. You know, you

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about the with the fairways, you talked about the

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>short grass, you talked about the challenge of the bunkers.

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think of a piece with all of that is

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the way they have approached the trees at Southern Hills.

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>They haven't gone for like whole a removal. They haven't

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>gone with the Oakmont program or the Inverness program where

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>most of the trees have been removed. Maybe most of

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>them have been removed because there were a lot of

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>them there before, but there are still a significant number

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of trees at Southern Hills along the fairways, but there

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are gaps between them. And so what this means is

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that when guys miss the fairway by a substantial amount.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 1>They often have a route to recovery, but that route

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to recovery is frequently over under around They have to

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>manufacture some kind of great recovery shot, but they can

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>do it, and they see that little space where they

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>can get to the green and they're like, you know what,

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I can pull that off. I'm going to

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:53.879
<v Speaker 1>go for that. And what that means is we get

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to see exciting shots. We get to see guys fail

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to pull off those shots, and we get to see

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>them success in pulling off those shots. Both of those

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are more exciting scenarios than just chipping out sideways from

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a forest, which is what happened at Southern Hills before.

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we heard Brandal Chamblie complaining about this dynamic on

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the telecast, not on the telecast, but on Life from

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and that baffles me, because why do you want to

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:25.760
<v Speaker 1>watch players chipping out sideways just because it's more difficult

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>when you get to see this wonderful array of escape shots.

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we saw this week because of the

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>way they've approached tree removal. They haven't taken out all

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of them, but they've taken out enough so that there

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are significant playing gaps between them.

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think like the eighteenth hole is a

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 2>perfect example of tree removal and fairaway expansion, and we

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:53.760
<v Speaker 2>saw it play out so pivotally with the closing groups.

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, justin Thomas in regulation hits the perfect drive.

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, he puts himself into position and gives himself

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 2>a legitimate chance at Bertie because he played the hole excellently.

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Will's Alataurus gets pretty lucky, hits a tree, kind of

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 2>spits him out and ends up you know where he

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 2>has a shot. You know, granted he's in the fairway,

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 2>he's in the short grass, but he has trees in

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 2>front of him. He had to hit a big cut.

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 2>But by it being so many people would be like

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 2>why is that short grass there? By it being short grass,

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 2>it allowed him to try to hit a thirty yard cut.

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 2>If he was in rough there, it would have been

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 2>impossible to move the ball that much.

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:40.239
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't have been able to get the spin on it.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you wouldn't have been able to manufacture the spin

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 2>to get that cut to hit that cut shot. And

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 2>it also by having a short grass there, it makes

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 2>that creek so much more relevant and that was a

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>spot where that creek had been kind of diminished, and

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 2>sure enough, one group later we saw the impact of

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 2>short grass not being trees. You know, if there were

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 2>trees still there, there's a good chance that Mita Pereira's ball,

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 2>if it's thick rough in trees, Mito Pereira's ball is

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 2>stopped short of that creek, and he could still probably

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 2>have a good chance at making four. But because of

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that short grass and bringing the creek and how many

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.320
<v Speaker 2>shots did we just see that creek and the short

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 2>grass really play an impact on that hole and on

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.399
<v Speaker 2>other holes where you know, it's just accentuated when you

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.800
<v Speaker 2>bring the short grass to the hazards, just like the bunkers,

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 2>just like the creeks, bringing that short grass to them

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 2>so that balls can get to it and not have

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 2>them stop on the way in.

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agreed, And I was really glad that the

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>playoff highlighted thirteen, seventeen and eighteen because I think those

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>holes show a lot of what Southern Hills has to offer.

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.359
<v Speaker 2>While we're talking, we've been talking about good things. I

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 2>do want to touch on something that I also was

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>thinking about, and I think you wrote a piece about

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the tea box on thirteen, and the complexity and the

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 2>challenge and how awkward championship golf has become at historic

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 2>venues because of distance and how far these guys are

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.439
<v Speaker 2>hitting it. And I thought Southern Hills did so many

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 2>things well it. It was an astounding test, but it

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:27.760
<v Speaker 2>also illuminated just how awkward championship golf is at historic

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 2>venues and the lengths that you have to go to

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 2>make it relevant. You have to have, Like Southern Hills

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 2>is a big ballpark, but they needed to make it bigger,

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 2>and they found these places that made for really awkward

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 2>green to tea transitions, awkward flow for spectators, all this stuff.

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 2>And you also saw holes where there isn't an option

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 2>to go back, like the twelfth at Southern Hills, which

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>is one of the course's most dramatic, most you know,

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 2>historically great golf holes. You saw reduced to driver wedge,

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 2>a four hundred and seventy yard par four that just

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 2>has this great topography that just you know, it just

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 2>drapes over this hill and it was reduced to nothing.

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 2>It was reduced to a nothing burger.

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It was driver lob wedge for Rory. It was a

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy slip wedge. He absolutely ate that hole up, and

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>there's just no way, there's nothing, there's nothing you can.

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Do there there it's on the property line, the t

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 2>box is on the property line, and and it just

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 2>this is a historically great hole. It's a hole that

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Ben Hogan talked about. It's a whole like it is

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 2>one of the golf court golf holes out there that

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 2>has you know, you know Southern Hills. You know, that's

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:47.319
<v Speaker 2>a bonafide Southern Hills hole that was reduced to a

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 2>nothing burger in the round, which I thought was alarming.

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, this these are things that like, you know,

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 2>it did so so many things so well. Where they

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 2>could add the distance, where they could make the you know,

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 2>thirteen played great because they could add the back tea.

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 2>Sixteen played great because they turned a par five into

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 2>a par four, you know, and they were able to

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 2>have flexibility. But the reality is that if the game

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:18.399
<v Speaker 2>keeps going in the direction that it's going, holes become irrelevant.

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 2>More and more holes become irrelevant. It's really easy to

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 2>go up, as we saw with sixteen and thirteen. When

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 2>you have the hole built the way you need it

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to be, it's easy to move up, but it's impossible

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.319
<v Speaker 2>to move back in certain situations. And you see this

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 2>with historic golf courses all over the place. And you know,

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I had my cousin who's a casual golf fan, who's

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 2>a you know, he's coaches high school baseball. He's a

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 2>baseball nut, and he texted me about how awkward that

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:50.760
<v Speaker 2>thirteenth Tea it was. He's like, it's just really strange.

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And I go, yeah, like, where would you have to

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 2>put home plate at Wrigley if you were using aluminum bats?

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 2>And he goes, that's a great point. He goes that,

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 2>and he this is somebody that's not a golf course

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 2>architecture person. He said, you know, it would be really

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 2>cool to see pros play with wooden clubs.

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Again. You converted somebody. That's a That's a good sign

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>right there. Yeah. I mean, it's it's clear that something

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to change because you know, this week, the places

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that I saw these players hitting the ball in these

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>fair ways, it was inconceivable to me. And I think

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that there has been a change in the past five

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>years in terms of the ceiling that players have, you know,

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the links that they can hit the ball, the you know,

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the governor has just been taken off,

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and in certain situations they can hit it almost as

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>far as they want to, just hit a three hundred

0:50:56.000 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five yard drive in particular conditions without really

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>breaking a sweat. And when you start to get to.

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.760
<v Speaker 2>That point plus yards drives were there this week.

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>A ton And on the first hole when that was

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:14.240
<v Speaker 1>playing down wind, they turned that hole into mincemeat as well.

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>That's another par four that's supposed to be somewhat brutish.

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.800
<v Speaker 1>That was, you know, taken down to a driver pitch

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hole on the first two days. Now when it played

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>into the wind, it was a little bit closer to

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>how it was intended to play. But it was stunning

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this week how far players were hitting the ball on

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 1>certain holes. And and you know, when when you're hitting

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 1>the ball four hundred yards a par four, what is

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a par four anymore? Is a par four seven hundred

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>yards all of a sudden?

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 2>So so here's the thing. What was what was sixteen

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 2>playing like five point fifty five.

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Point forty Yeah, in that range five thirty okay.

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:55.919
<v Speaker 2>So sixteen and thirteen I think are like perfect examples.

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 2>So if you want a par five to be a

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:04.320
<v Speaker 2>risk reward hole at this point six hundred and sixty yards.

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 1>So five was six sixty from its back tee and

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:10.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen was six thirty.

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Those holes presented risk reward holes, and it just shows

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 2>like you have to have that space for it to

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.439
<v Speaker 2>play like a you know, somewhat of a par five

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 2>that you have to think about, and then when the

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 2>winds into it, you have the ability to move forward.

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 2>So like if you start to think expand out on

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:32.880
<v Speaker 2>this footprint. Idea from this is that I think like

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 2>you could take away the par fives played like par

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:37.919
<v Speaker 2>fives this week, and that was one thing that really

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 2>helps curb scoring. They weren't auto birdies. You had to

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 2>play them well. So you need six hundred and fifty

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 2>issh yards and you can adjust up and back based

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:54.479
<v Speaker 2>off of weather. Now for par fours like a long

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 2>par four. I thought sixteen played really well as a

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 2>long part four, but it was adjusted from five thirty

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and up and you start to do the math, and

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 2>it's just inconceivable for any historic course to keep up

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:13.160
<v Speaker 2>with this, because if you wanted to do the same

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 2>exercise with one, your tea box would be on the

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:18.879
<v Speaker 2>other side of the clubhouse effectively.

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sometimes I think about what they'd have to do

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to Cyprus Point to make it play properly for a

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>field like this, and yeah, it's just ridiculous to think

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. Something needs to be done because courses for

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:39.279
<v Speaker 1>pros right now need to be so much bigger than

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>courses that are intended for members or amateurs that it's

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just going to be completely unreasonable for clubs to host championships.

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 1>They're going to need to build new courses, a set

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of new courses that you only play professional tournaments on

0:53:56.120 --> 0:54:00.880
<v Speaker 1>unless there's some kind of bifurcation. So you know, that's

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 1>apparently what the USGA has its eye on right now,

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and let's hope they act quickly. All right, So we

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>have gone twice as long as we intended to go. Andy,

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your course takeaways. This was really interesting.

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate it. Good luck with the move all right. I

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.879
<v Speaker 1>am here with Stephen Britton. Steven is the golf course

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 1>superintendent at the Chevy Chase Club and he also used

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to work at TPC Potomac. He has been on the

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast before. A friend and supporter of the pod. Thanks

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for being here, Steven. We were going to talk about

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 1>bunker sand today because it was a big topic of

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:53.040
<v Speaker 1>discussion during the PGA Championship. There were quite a few

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>players who were unhappy with the state of the bunker

0:54:56.400 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>sand at Southern Hills. Now, having played Southern Hills, I

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that the bunker sand is just fine.

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But I thought we would have a discussion about how

0:55:05.760 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>superintendents go about choosing bunker sand, what goes into the

0:55:10.200 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>preparation of bunkers for tournaments, and some of the expectations

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that players might bring to this when they come to

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 1>play a course. So, first of all, Steven, what does

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 1>go into choosing bunker stand, what different types are available,

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and how do you kind of come to a decision

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>about what to use.

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, thanks for having me, Garrett. Absolutely, there is a

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of testing that goes into testing bunker sandes for superintendents.

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 4>So when superintendents might be doing a bunker project where

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be purchasing a large quantity of bunker

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 4>sand to rebuild their bunkers, say they will go through

0:55:55.840 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 4>extensive testing to make sure they pick the right bunker sand. Cares.

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:04.319
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you're doing a million dollar plus project,

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 4>you want to make sure you pick the right sand,

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 4>because once it's in, that's challenging to remove and switch

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:15.240
<v Speaker 4>out and expensive. So there's several different tests without going

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 4>into all of them, but some of the most important

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 4>ones are obviously a particle science test. So in a nutshell,

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 4>for bunker sands, you want angular sub angular sand. So

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 4>the way to think of that is almost like broken glass,

0:56:32.320 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 4>because that sand locks together and bridges and binds together

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 4>really well, which will make the sand firmer, as opposed

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 4>to sand that's rounded. That might be like having a

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 4>gazillion marbles and a bunker and that's never going to

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:51.440
<v Speaker 4>lock up, never going to bind together, and that will

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:56.279
<v Speaker 4>produce soft bunkers and then subsequently result in lots of

0:56:56.520 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 4>plug Friday g lies. Right, So sand tests are really important.

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Infiltration rate tests, so that's how much water the sand

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:14.280
<v Speaker 4>can take and drain away. So USGA guidelines are usually

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 4>nothing lower than twenty inches an hour. It's kind of

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 4>what they're looking for for a standard for bunker sands.

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 4>But one of the most important one is the pentrometer test.

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 4>So a pentrometer is a handheld instrument with a golf

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 4>ball on the end, and what you would do is

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 4>you would take a sample of a sceand that you

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 4>were thinking of using, and you would put it in

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 4>a container or a tube, and then you press down

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 4>with the penttrometer and it will compress the scene and

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 4>push into the sand and test how firm that sand

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 4>can be. Right, And there's lots of labs that have

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 4>come up with guidelines and specs on what the ideal

0:57:59.400 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 4>results are to have the least amount of Frida egg

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 4>lies as you can have. So that's measured in kilograms

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:13.200
<v Speaker 4>per centimeter squared. So for example, anything less than one

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 4>point eight kilograms per centimeter squared fails, and anything kind

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:20.640
<v Speaker 4>of one point eight to two point four is acceptable,

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 4>and then anything over two point four kilograms per centimeter

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 4>squared that's desirable. That's that's a good scend, right, So

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be a firm stand that's going to

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 4>give you the least amount of chance for plug balls

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 4>in your bunkers. So that's always a hot topic, right

0:58:38.920 --> 0:58:42.280
<v Speaker 4>for bunker sands. So that's one that guys will look

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:44.400
<v Speaker 4>at a lot, is that.

0:58:44.520 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>The basic goal of these tests is to determine how

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 1>likely it is that there will be a Frida egg

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>lie is that the main goal of the tests.

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's an important one because that's obviously one

0:58:56.720 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 4>that rubs people the wrong way. So the last thing

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:00.760
<v Speaker 4>you'd want to do is a pride where you've spent

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 4>million dollars plus to rebuild all your bunkers and then

0:59:04.360 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 4>the members go out and play and there's plug balls

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 4>in all the bunkers and every shot they're hitting in there, right,

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 4>So obviously that's a sand that's failing and maybe you've

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 4>chosen the wrong sand. So these are all the tests

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:19.080
<v Speaker 4>that you do to try to get the best sand

0:59:19.160 --> 0:59:25.720
<v Speaker 4>that you can. And so you know, there's lots of

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:28.640
<v Speaker 4>other different ones that go into angle of repose, So

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 4>that's where you have a flashed bunker face and the

0:59:34.080 --> 0:59:36.480
<v Speaker 4>ability of the sand to stay up on the face

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 4>and not slide down, and and so there's all kinds

0:59:40.200 --> 0:59:45.120
<v Speaker 4>of different data and specs that labs are through lab

0:59:45.240 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 4>testing that they've come up with that you need to

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 4>meet to minimize sand sliding down a bunker face. So

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot that goes into it. When when you're

0:59:57.840 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 4>picking a sand, it's not just the cheapest, most readily

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:05.840
<v Speaker 4>available sand in your area, and some of these tests

1:00:05.880 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 4>you can even do. It's not just for new sands.

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 4>If you're doing a project, you can do some of

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 4>these tests on your existing sand and bunkers to kind

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 4>of see where you're at today, right, because they evolve

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 4>and sand gets dirty and organics get into sand as

1:00:21.280 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 4>storms go through and destroy your bunkers, and different silts

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 4>and fines get into the bunkers and so they change

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:31.840
<v Speaker 4>over time. So some of these tests you can also

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 4>do to your existing sands to see what you need

1:00:34.040 --> 1:00:37.360
<v Speaker 4>to do to maybe improve the bunkers that you currently have.

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So you have worked at a TPC course, a course

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that has hosted PGA Tour tournaments, and in fact hosted

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a PGA Tournament Tour tournament just a couple of months ago,

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>TPC Potomac. So could you give me an idea of

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>what goes into preparing the sand for a PGA Tour

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>level event. That's that process like.

1:01:02.600 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 4>A lot. I mean, obviously it varies from club to club, right,

1:01:06.880 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 4>because some clubs have bigger staffs and they can just

1:01:11.200 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 4>get more done, right, And other clubs at different parts

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 4>of the country might have a smaller staff and they

1:01:17.160 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 4>just can't do the same amount of detail. Work to

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>a bunker that others can't. But at my club, when

1:01:24.360 --> 1:01:28.120
<v Speaker 4>we were hosting tournaments, we did a lot. We were

1:01:28.360 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we were hand watering bunkers in the evening

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 4>after play so that you would wet the bunker faces

1:01:35.760 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 4>up and then they would kind of dry down through

1:01:38.040 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 4>the night, and then in the morning they were almost

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:44.880
<v Speaker 4>that nice level of moisture or dampness where they raked

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 4>up just not wet, but just not too dry and fluffy, right,

1:01:50.600 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 4>And that's kind of when bunkers almost feel the best, right,

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 4>everybody's played out of that kind of consistency of sand.

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 4>But that's you know, that was seven or eight staff

1:02:01.360 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>members hand watering bunkers in the evening. We were smoothing

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 4>the faces. Some clubs go around with a whack a

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:11.520
<v Speaker 4>plate and they'll whack a plate their faces to get

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 4>the sand firm to mitigate Friday lines. A heck of

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:20.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot goes into it. And again when you're hosting

1:02:20.960 --> 1:02:23.440
<v Speaker 4>a tour event, especially when you work at a TPC

1:02:23.600 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 4>and they're owned by the PGA Tour and they haven't

1:02:25.520 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 4>a gronomy department. That sand testing that I was just

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:35.360
<v Speaker 4>talking about, they really analyze a lot, because if the

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 4>bunkers aren't performing correctly and they get feedback from players

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:41.640
<v Speaker 4>that might be a little bit negative, they want to

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 4>be able to have the data to go back and say, well, hey,

1:02:43.600 --> 1:02:46.439
<v Speaker 4>look we've done our work. This is how the sand

1:02:46.520 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 4>tested out. Here's the pentrometer meetings. They were within the guidelines,

1:02:50.760 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 4>acceptable guidelines. Here's the infiltration rate, here's the particle size.

1:02:55.760 --> 1:02:57.880
<v Speaker 4>So it's almost like a bit of an insurance policy

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>that Okay, you know, we did everything we could to

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 4>get the best bonker sand in the bunkers. So they

1:03:06.240 --> 1:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>really analyze that data a lot. But yeah, it's a

1:03:10.680 --> 1:03:14.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of work to get them perfect, and it just

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>depends on how much stuff you have available.

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly right. And certainly this is not a realistic

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>thing for every course out there, but at tour hosting

1:03:24.280 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>courses this seems to be pretty common practice. Do you

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have a notion of what tour players are often looking

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>for when they look at a bunker sand, What are

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of feedback that they give and what are

1:03:40.520 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the standards that you think they generally have for their

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>experience and a bunker.

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh well, they want them perfect and I don't think

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 4>they care about the data or the sands. They just

1:03:53.920 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>want the bold and never plug and they want the

1:03:57.360 --> 1:03:58.880
<v Speaker 4>ball to roll at the bottom of the bunker and

1:03:58.960 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 4>the flatter spot so they can get up and down right. Everybody,

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:06.040
<v Speaker 4>we've heard about it before where they sometimes intentionally miss

1:04:06.080 --> 1:04:08.280
<v Speaker 4>into a bunker because it's easier up and down. So

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how many of them get stuck into

1:04:11.120 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the data of the scene, but they want it as

1:04:13.640 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 4>easy as possible. Everybody knows that, and it's it would

1:04:17.760 --> 1:04:20.160
<v Speaker 4>bother me when I was at TPC, I'll be honest,

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 4>because we would try to make every bunker the same,

1:04:23.400 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>whether it was down in a hole in the shade

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:29.880
<v Speaker 4>all day next to a pond where it's always wet,

1:04:30.040 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>or up on a hill in full sun in the wind.

1:04:32.480 --> 1:04:37.080
<v Speaker 4>We tried to get every bunker playing the same, which

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:41.240
<v Speaker 4>I think is kind of nonsense, right, Like some bunkers,

1:04:42.200 --> 1:04:44.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, like little inconsistencies are kind of cool and

1:04:45.960 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 4>make golf cooler. And I use the last time I

1:04:50.280 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 4>was on a podcast, I use this analogy. I won't

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 4>go into it too much, but at the club I

1:04:54.240 --> 1:04:59.120
<v Speaker 4>worked out Australia, there's a great path for there in

1:04:59.160 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the sixth West Hole, Melbourne, and the front bunker when

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>I worked there in the nineties was always boggy and

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:08.640
<v Speaker 4>always really soft scened, and the back left bunker behind

1:05:08.680 --> 1:05:11.360
<v Speaker 4>the green was always rock hard and you just knew

1:05:12.520 --> 1:05:14.160
<v Speaker 4>and if you were playing in an event there, you

1:05:14.200 --> 1:05:16.640
<v Speaker 4>would hope that a good caddy would say, we're in

1:05:16.720 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 4>the middle of fair way, like, hey, if you hit

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>it in the short left one, that is probably going

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:23.400
<v Speaker 4>to plug and it's going to be a really boggy shot.

1:05:23.920 --> 1:05:24.720
<v Speaker 3>And if you hit it in the.

1:05:24.720 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Back left one, that's like hitting off cement on a downhill,

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:31.560
<v Speaker 4>rock hard, fast green that's the hardest up and down

1:05:31.600 --> 1:05:34.800
<v Speaker 4>in Australia. So like, be cognizant of that when you're

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:39.439
<v Speaker 4>hitting your second shot in. But on a PG tour

1:05:40.120 --> 1:05:42.440
<v Speaker 4>they don't want that. They want it. Hey, no matter

1:05:42.440 --> 1:05:44.120
<v Speaker 4>what bunker you hit it in from the first hole

1:05:44.200 --> 1:05:46.040
<v Speaker 4>of the eighteenth hole, they're all going to be exactly

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 4>the same. You know, Mike Clayton hit the nail on

1:05:48.680 --> 1:05:52.120
<v Speaker 4>the head, he tweeted out last week. You know, the

1:05:52.240 --> 1:05:55.960
<v Speaker 4>game's never been easier for professional golfers right now. The

1:05:56.040 --> 1:05:59.919
<v Speaker 4>equipment is the easiest it's ever been to hit ball.

1:06:00.200 --> 1:06:04.240
<v Speaker 4>The easiest they've ever been to play play with. But

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:07.160
<v Speaker 4>the grass is always is also the best it's been

1:06:07.800 --> 1:06:10.360
<v Speaker 4>in the history of the game. The grass is the

1:06:10.760 --> 1:06:13.920
<v Speaker 4>best today it's ever been. And the same goes for bunkers.

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:18.440
<v Speaker 4>They're good probably almost everywhere they go and play. So

1:06:18.720 --> 1:06:24.240
<v Speaker 4>for anyone to comment on bunker inconsistencies or them not

1:06:24.360 --> 1:06:27.320
<v Speaker 4>being perfect in today's day and age, like, it's a

1:06:27.760 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>it's a little far fett, right, It's.

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They're they're better than they ever have been. That that's

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But could you give me a sense of,

1:06:36.400 --> 1:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like the the costs of keeping bunkers perfectly consistent? You

1:06:41.760 --> 1:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>know what? What what is that? What are the consequences

1:06:44.760 --> 1:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of that in terms of the budget the maintenance budget

1:06:47.680 --> 1:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of of course.

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Well all of that comes down to what different staff

1:06:52.400 --> 1:06:54.960
<v Speaker 4>members are making per hour, and that varies all over

1:06:55.040 --> 1:06:57.439
<v Speaker 4>the country, right, so hard to put a dollar figure

1:06:57.520 --> 1:07:01.880
<v Speaker 4>on it. But I think every superintendent you would talk

1:07:01.920 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 4>to if you said to them, what part of the

1:07:03.880 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 4>golf course you spend the most amount of man hours

1:07:06.120 --> 1:07:12.120
<v Speaker 4>on is the bunkers everywhere, because that's the place where

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 4>they typically get the most negative comments. You know, bunkers

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:19.760
<v Speaker 4>get destroyed depending on what part of the country you're

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:22.680
<v Speaker 4>working in. We just got two inches of rain last night,

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:25.640
<v Speaker 4>and my bunkers are full of water and totally destroyed

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:28.040
<v Speaker 4>this morning, and there's twelve workers out trying to put

1:07:28.080 --> 1:07:31.640
<v Speaker 4>them all together now. And we might get another th

1:07:31.680 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 4>thunderstorm on Wednesday and it happens all over again. I've

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 4>got to go and fix them all again. So hard

1:07:37.760 --> 1:07:40.200
<v Speaker 4>to put a dollar amount on, but definitely the most

1:07:40.200 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 4>amount of most superintendents would tell you the most amount

1:07:44.560 --> 1:07:46.240
<v Speaker 4>of man hours are going in the bunkers.

1:07:47.600 --> 1:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think this is something that people should

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind whenever they hear player complaints about bunkers

1:07:54.320 --> 1:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at a major championship venue like Southern Hills, that you know,

1:07:58.240 --> 1:08:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the costs of keeping bunkers perfectly consistent and the same

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at every single course, no matter where it is, and

1:08:07.440 --> 1:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>no matter what they're trying to achieve at that particular course,

1:08:10.720 --> 1:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that the costs of that are are pretty profound. But

1:08:15.280 --> 1:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in any case, thank you for this perspective, Steven. This

1:08:19.280 --> 1:08:21.439
<v Speaker 1>was really informative. I appreciate it.

1:08:22.600 --> 1:08:23.719
<v Speaker 4>No problem anyti