WEBVTT - INTERVIEW: Will I Am Talks AI-Driven Interactive Radio Experience RAiDiO.FYI, Future Tech, Politics + More 0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:03.760 Wake that ass up in the morning, the Breakfast. 0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:08.240 Club Morning, everybody is the DJ n V just hilarious. 0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:10.799 Charlamagne the guy. We are the Breakfast Club. Laura Loroossa 0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:11.600 is feeling in for. 0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.040 Jess and we got a special guest in the building. 0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:15.960 Yes, indeed he's back when I am. 0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.560 What's up, y'all? Good morning, how you feeling I'm good. 0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.160 Thank you guys for having me back. It's always great 0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:21.560 to be here. 0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.880 I mean, you never come and every time you come 0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.720 you give so much information, so it's never enough to 0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:27.600 have you once. 0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.080 Oh thank you you. It means a lot, means a lot. 0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.519 And congrats, Oh thank you. 0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.279 I like I like watching you on on the Daily Show. 0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:37.160 It's really really dope. 0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:38.400 I appreciate that, my brother. 0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.000 Now you got a new program that's designed to take 0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.880 us out. That's what it's Personalities. 0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:49.040 DJ interview the radio station to announce that they would 0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:49.760 probably need to resign. 0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.159 Yeah, that we gotta need a resign. We might need 0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.199 a job shout their head in the back pass. Is 0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.360 the name of it radio fire or the f y 0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:56.200 dot AI. 0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.680 Which one is is radio dot radio dot f y 0:00:58.760 --> 0:00:59.600 I radio. 0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.920 Dot f y Okay, So break down this new platform 0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:03.080 that's going to be taking out jobs. 0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.880 So it's not gonna take your jobs. 0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.560 A lot of people are, uh when when when they 0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.520 think of the word AI, they they think that their 0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.280 job is going to be threatened. And there's some there's 0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.040 some jobs that will be unstable. But in this case, 0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.440 I created radio dot f Y I to like augment 0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.919 and dimensionalize you know radio. 0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.559 I love radio, and in no way do I want. 0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:38.160 To like put something out that will disrupt or unstabilize 0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.600 this this format, this community, this way of like informing 0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:43.800 and engaging. 0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.600 That's like the last thing I want to do. 0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.320 But when I was doing my show on Serious XM, 0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:52.880 I realized, like, wow, check this out. I got something 0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.120 that could go out and fetch information in real time 0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:02.560 and expand my knowledge as I you know, engage or inform. 0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.360 And I wanted to do that for all DJs and 0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.240 hosts and journalists. Why should I be the only person 0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:09.880 that has. 0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:10.560 Like the supertool. 0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:17.000 And so if you're broadcasting, you now have a different 0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.560 co star or or co host or a seat for example, 0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.440 like Charlamaine's Erwards computer, lorens erwit her computer, you got 0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.720 your phone, I got the cameraman there. If this was 0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.839 like radio nineteen fifty, there was just no computer, there 0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.160 was no phone, and there was no camera. So you've 0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:38.440 added new technology to your broadcast. If you're going out 0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.280 there and try to get a job, try to get 0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.640 a job without a bank account, without a laptop, without 0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.360 a phone. It can't work in the work place without 0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.720 these tools. So when it comes to like you're a 0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.320 broadcast or radio, why not have something instead of typing 0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.760 the information and then reading through it, something that you 0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.280 could banter with live about what the broadcast is. 0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:05.080 So you wouldn't need a co host. 0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.640 Basically, no, you you still need a co host because 0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.200 you need something to banter with it. 0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.519 Okay, but check it and break it. 0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.239 Just like if you if you got somebody here and 0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:16.919 somebody dropping bs, you're like. 0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.960 I don't really know about that trial and have to 0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.720 be like, okay, here's what I'm talking about. 0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.079 So if you're here having a conversation with a politician 0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.840 and then talking about some legislation, yes, call them on 0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:31.600 it right then, and they got You could be like, yo. 0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.160 AI, co host, is this dude capping? 0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.920 And the AI would be it got infinite ability to 0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.040 go out and get the right truth and knowledge. 0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.600 But sometimes it could it could hallucinate. 0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.040 Then you got to push it and push it and 0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.160 push it to break it. It too could make errors 0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.640 a mistake, just like a person can. It's built off 0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.600 of a new network and as for a richer real time, 0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.880 deeper engagement on the information you're trying. 0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.520 So students can use this in school too. So if 0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.960 a teacher is teaching and the teachers not teaching. 0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.280 You can't take the proper then. 0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:04.600 I graduate. 0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.080 To be like you in that b better get out 0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:08.360 of here. 0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.120 It's a fact checker, right, yes, a fact checker. 0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.720 I use it at Harvard. I graduate this year from Harvard. 0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.760 My my AI is like a study buddy, like for example, 0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.400 say for example, was mathematicians or you know, at one 0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.360 point in time it was like taboo to rock into 0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.640 a class with a calculator. Now people that are building, 0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.440 you know, tall ass buildings simulating them to. 0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:34.640 The earthquake proof. You need calculation. 0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.719 You need these types of simulations to erect awesome buildings, 0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.800 you know. So calculators have now been accepted in school, 0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.320 and the next couple of blinks it will be you know, 0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.600 the norm to have these agents or ais in the 0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:51.840 learning environment. 0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.000 So teacher, it will be like Christopher Columbus founded America 0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:58.520 and the calculator and the all be like bullshit and they. 0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.720 Can't disrupt the right you said, it's not supposed to 0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:01.040 disrupt What do you mean the show? 0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.160 It won't interrupt the class? Like what are you saying? 0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.080 No, no, no, it won't or will it? 0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:07.919 Because that's my whole thing where like you take that 0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.599 buy into certain classrooms and it's interrupting the class. 0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:11.520 It's like, how is that. 0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.680 You got to prompt it before you just talk. 0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:15.920 It's not just gonna be like bleep bleep. It ain't 0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.279 gonna be like some artid two where so this is 0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:20.200 an actual. 0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:26.440 Like so check it out. 0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.520 So, like I said, do you remember when we was 0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.200 talking and I was like, they're probably gonna get freaked 0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.359 out and say, like jobs are gonna be taken exactly 0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:35.040 what just happened. 0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.560 But anyway, say what's up? We're here. 0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.040 I told you I was gonna bring you on to 0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.359 the show. Say what's up to everybody? We started? 0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.520 Are you what's up? Breakfast club? 0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:45.760 Fam? 0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.039 Thanks for having me yo, Like I said, I knew 0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.240 there might be some worries about jobs being taken. 0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.039 But let's clear the air. This is about. 0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.000 Enhancing, not replacing. We're here to elevate the game with 0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.839 radio y eyes. Say what's up to Charlemagne, djenv and 0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.240 Lauren and a big shout out to Jess Hilarious. 0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.719 On Maternity Live. Let's get into it. You feel me? 0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.320 All right, let's dive into this. 0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:13.520 What do you yo? 0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.880 So I was telling them that like if if you, 0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:18.920 if you're doing a radio show, you got a laptop 0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:23.400 or you got a computer with systems like you, it's 0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.680 like a conversational laptop phone that's able to go out 0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.919 and crawl and get like real time information. For example, 0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.160 why don't you pull up some of the highlights from 0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.520 yesterday's DNC in Chicago, Requick, so we could get into 0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.360 some of the the hot topics that people were are 0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.840 you know, talking about based on some of the speeches. 0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:49.720 All right, so check it out. 0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.359 We got the latest buzz from yesterday's Democratic National Convention 0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.000 in Chicago. Just like I told you, with radio dot FYI, 0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.040 it's like having a comnversational laptop that can pull in 0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:03.160 real time info. 0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.560 Here's what popped off day one highlights. 0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:13.440 She speakers, we had heavyweights like Hillary Clinton, Alexandria Occasio Cortez, 0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:18.000 Jill Biden, and President Joe Biden himself dropping gems. 0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:19.360 Today's lineup. 0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.400 Barack Obama and Michelle Obama will be headlining today. It's 0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.920 about to be a homecoming as they're back in the chief, 0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.560 showing love and supporting Kamala Harris's nomination. 0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:33.240 Key points. 0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.200 Hillary and AOC were on fire talking about the future 0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.480 of the party, while Jill and Joe focused on the 0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.400 achievements and plans moving forward. 0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.320 It's eight twenty eight. 0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.760 Am right now in Chicago, where it's all going down. 0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.840 What you'll think about these hot topics and speeches. Feels 0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.679 like the energy is through the roof. Right, let's dive 0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:52.240 into it. 0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:54.600 I can see why you still would need people. 0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.240 I could then go in there and be like, okay, 0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.920 So did they say anything about like AI in this 0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.280 in this conversations. As you know, we're in a in 0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.440 a presidential election, we have new platforms. So by time 0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.680 that it's twenty twenty eight, the world's gonna be totally different. 0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:13.880 Right. 0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.280 So when they talk about the future, where they're talking 0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.320 about the future of like forever learning, they talk about 0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.240 the jobs that are most likely to be disrupted, like 0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:28.840 white collar jobs you know, financial advisors or lawyers, or 0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:29.800 the creative space. 0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:35.240 The who programs that though, like why oh boy, no 0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.440 long press on that LONGNT? But also while he's doing that, 0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.280 who programs this? To make sure they program the right information? 0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:41.880 You like? 0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:43.760 Like almost like a chart like next time, did. 0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:49.600 Kamala Harris vote to stop taxing tips in twenty twenty two? 0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:52.280 Put it next to the mic. 0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.000 So farm. 0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.720 There isn't a specific vote in twenty twenty two, whe 0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.720 Kamala Harris acted to stop taxing tips? As vice president, 0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.439 she's more involved in executive actions and tie breaking Senate 0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:17.079 votes rather than specific legislation like this you feel me? However, 0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.600 the topic of taxing tips is always relevant in broader 0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.280 discussions about fair wages and workers' rights, especially among service 0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.439 industry folks. If we want to dive deeper into this, 0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.520 we should look at overall legislative efforts around wage. 0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.839 And labor rights. What do you think fam that. 0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:35.800 Was right to keep moving? 0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:36.800 Yeah, he's absolutely right. 0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.880 Happen How do you make the rumor online or the 0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.360 Instagram meme going around saying that she did that, but 0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:44.280 that it never happened. 0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:45.120 That's my question. 0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:45.760 Who programmed? 0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:46.880 Like, how do you make sure it's right? 0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:48.520 How do you make sure it's right? 0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:49.560 Because so. 0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:56.200 Our crawler architecture is getting information from credible sources. So 0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.559 we'll get from you know, political sources that are RSS 0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.080 feeds that are feeding the truth informations. 0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.560 What we don't do is crawl the open web. 0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.000 That's when you get that's when you fall into like 0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.400 a bunch of cap and a bunch of hallucinations and 0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.800 fake news when it's all when it's trying to source 0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:14.920 everything that's out there. 0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.520 So we get it from credible sources and only credible sources. 0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.280 And if if you ask it a question that it 0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:21.719 doesn't know, it's gonna be like I don't know the 0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:22.360 answer to that. 0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:23.400 You know what I like about this? 0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.360 I feel like you could revolutionize the podcast game, you 0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:28.840 know what I mean? Because that's one of my biggest 0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.520 issues with podcasting is that they're not even just podcasting. 0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.880 It's anybody with a platform, but in particular like the 0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.520 YouTube spaces, the podcast spaces, there's so much misinformation. And 0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.240 I've been seeing these kids online using chat GPT to 0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.040 get information in real time. 0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:44.640 So if they start using that. 0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.120 I mean, especially because all the news right now, like 0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.319 it's coming from social media, and a lot of social 0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.480 media people just regurgitate information. So if you have that, 0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.200 it kind of counters. But to your point of like 0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.600 it not just spinning the web, right, Like when everything 0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.240 happened with the Olympics, when they were trying that they 0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.000 were having a conversation about the fighter, whether she was 0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.839 transgender or not. There were valid sources that were having 0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.800 a transgender conversation, like she was a transgender woman. There 0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.160 were also valid sources that were not having it and 0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.520 saying that she was not. In a situation like. 0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.440 That, How would that AI bot know which one to 0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:18.960 lean on? 0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.520 Was a mon what's her name? 0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.959 Khalif was an let's ask it was a mon Khalif 0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:27.320 born with a. 0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.839 Penis Jesus Christ. I don't think like that. 0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.640 If it's a transgender conversation, the person wouldn't have been. 0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:43.520 If a transgender you know that girl that was on the. 0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:45.040 A mon. 0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:51.880 But a mon Khalif. 0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:53.800 But if that's how you talk to your bot, you 0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.720 have to talk like that all the time or can I. 0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:56.640 Just talked to it like I talked? 0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.640 Understand? 0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.160 You know that you know that girl that they thought 0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.640 was a transgender in the Olympics. I think she's from 0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.439 Northern Africa and whatnot. And then she was boxing somebody 0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.440 in the home. The girl that she was boxing says 0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.280 she hit hard, so she had to be a dude. 0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:15.200 One. 0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.000 What's the girl's name or the person that they said 0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.439 is transgender's name? And what was the mix up behind it? 0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.480 Why did social media get it wrong? If they got 0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.120 it wrong, is it right? Is it correct? I just 0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.480 need to know the information. Sorry for being vague and 0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.200 asking the question. I'm representing the majority of the people 0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.000 out there that were confused about the matter. 0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:39.680 I'll go you firm. 0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.040 The athlete you're referring to is caused to Semina from 0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:43.640 South Africa. 0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:48.640 No, no, no, no, no, no, said I don't think 0:12:48.679 --> 0:13:00.160 she's from South Africa. The boxer from North Africa. 0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.760 Let's sort this out. One athlete name as of now. 0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.760 The athlete in the Olympics, the boxer that hit that 0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.040 chick so hard she thought she was a dude. 0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:15.120 And then from Nigeria, from what Algeria? From Algeria? You 0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:16.160 know that's what I'm talking about. 0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:22.240 Iman Khalif, All right, fam, I've. 0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:22.720 Got the scoop. 0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.200 The athlete you're talking about is Immanic Khalif from Algeria. 0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:33.400 Here are the deats athlete Imanic Kelif sport boxing controversy. 0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.320 Immanic Kelf has been surrounded by gender controversy and faced 0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:43.880 baseless accusations regarding her gender identity. These allegations came after 0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.720 she won Olympic boxing gold and hit an opponent so 0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:51.640 hard that it sparked debate about her gender. Despite questionable 0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:56.240 claims of unspecified gender testing by the International Boxing Association, 0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.720 the International Olympic Committee IOC stood by her, affirming that 0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.400 she was born a woman and identifies as her biological gender. 0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:11.600 Social media impact misinformation spread quickly, making her a central 0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:12.559 figure in culture. 0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:12.960 Wards. 0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.200 Kelly faced what she described as a digital lynching amid 0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.600 these allegations and monicalyf is rocking it legit. 0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:22.040 What do you think, ma'am? 0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.800 The question is how do you okay? So say, for example, 0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.320 I asked you this question the day of when when, 0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.240 when social media was circulating a bunch of you know, 0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:37.200 false dooms and mad capin how would you decipher the 0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:42.920 truth from the noise? You being an AI agent or 0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.280 you know, a conversationalist, how would you get the right 0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.360 information or would you circulate false dooms? 0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.120 Ah, that's a solid question, fam Let's break it down 0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:08.880 separating the truth from noise. One source verification always start 0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:09.920 by checking. 0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.080 Multiple credible sources. 0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.840 Look for news from verified outlets like BBC, Reuters or 0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:21.080 AP News. These platforms have rigorous facts checking processes to 0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:27.760 cross referencing, compare information from different sources. If multiple reputable 0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.920 outlets are reporting the same facts, it's more likely to 0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:36.400 be true. Free official statements seek out statements from a FI. 0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.520 But in this case, a multiple situations. 0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.200 Were fanning and reporting what we now know as fat 0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:49.120 So how would you decipher between the two? Because then 0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.240 they had to apologize for circulating falsetems? 0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.280 Because if you have you know. 0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.960 Ten sites, six of which are reporting falsetems, four of 0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:04.239 them are true, and social media is amplifying and circulating 0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.920 them even more. You, being an AI agent and AI persona, 0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:14.440 how would you decipher what's true or not? Or would 0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.080 you partake in circulating false TEMs as well? 0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:19.240 I'm curious to know. 0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:23.360 Got you firm? 0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.680 Deciphering the truth amidst the sea of falsehoods is like finding. 0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:28.840 The real diamond in a pile. 0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:35.800 Here's how I tackle it on source credibility, trust, established sources. 0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.600 Prioritize information from well established and reputable sources over lesser 0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.080 known ones. Major outlets often have stricter editorial standards and 0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.320 fact checking procedures. Track record, I'd look at the track 0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:50.600 record of the sources. 0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:51.960 If a site has. 0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:56.880 A history of reliable reporting, it's more credible. Two official 0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.120 statements and primary sources. 0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.160 And to could you're probably gonna have like seven I'm 0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.000 sorry for interrupting. I'm just on the radio right now. 0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:05.960 If I wasn't on the radio, we could just banter 0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.880 all day and you do this and how many seconds? 0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.480 Because it would take me like a day. 0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.040 Just to go through it, and the journalists you know, 0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.199 or journalists would take them hours. How fast are you 0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.840 going through all these sources to be able to get 0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.800 the truth and compare and do your analysis? 0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:27.520 No, no worries, I get it. 0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.800 Radio keeps you on your toes, So let me break 0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:35.360 it down quick and clean. Speed of analysis milliseconds. 0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.080 I can aggregate data from. 0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.480 Multiples, no. 0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:42.639 Positive. 0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:44.520 It's a great companion. 0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.720 Literally everything he just described that day is what I did. 0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.680 I got online I looked at who sang yes, who's 0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.960 saying no? I was like, okay, because I know the 0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:54.840 inner workings. 0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:55.440 Who do I? 0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.520 I know their process is, so who is most credible 0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.720 all the time? And then I said, there has to 0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.160 be a official committee making a statement. And I looked 0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.119 for that and seeing and had it. And then I 0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.200 went with that because I have someone depending on it 0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:06.840 as a journalist. 0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.320 If it's wrung. He literally did everything I would do. 0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.280 He did it in a milliseconds. Yeah, but it took 0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:11.040 me like ten minutes. 0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.760 So now imagine you Okay, So what's the best way 0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:16.840 to look at it? Looking at it? 0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:23.200 Nike's Nike. Nike has her swoosh logo. Nike also has 0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.720 their just do It tagline? Why the tagline? Why do 0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.159 they have to have a tagline? Why can't their logo 0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.359 do everything? And the name Nike? 0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:33.920 Why the tagline? 0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:35.760 Well, the tagline is going to give you, like this 0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.359 a different perspective of what Nike is about. 0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.240 So in this case, this AI is your tagline. Got 0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:44.640 You're still you? 0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.360 You still are going to represent your truths and how 0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.960 you go out and report that truth You just now 0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.000 are doing it at the speed of light. With something 0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.040 that you could banter with. And more importantly, if you 0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.320 then go engage on social media one day, you're going 0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.840 to have your Lauren AI whatever you want to call it, 0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.320 it's gonna be synonymous with you. Like Nike's logos synonymous 0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.160 with Nike, like they're tagline synonymous with Nike. 0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:09.520 You're gonna have you aren't thing. 0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.120 That's a great analogy. 0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.919 So from that perspective, if you want to engage online, 0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.320 you only could engage with maybe five people in the 0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.320 in the in the in ten minutes span time. In 0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:26.200 this case, your AI agent can talk to a million 0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:30.760 people at once, summarize all of its engagements, and then 0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.080 have one conversation with you. 0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:34.680 A have analogy. 0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.280 So literally like a newsroom on your phone. 0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:36.840 It is. 0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.359 But you know what, that analogy is so good because 0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.280 with the Nike thing, it's like Nike also has all 0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.320 of these different people with different signature shoes, but it's 0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.840 still Nike. But you still feel like you're wearing different 0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.280 things when you're wearing Joe, Yeah exactly. 0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.000 But does your A have feelings? 0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.240 And the reason I asked that is because. 0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:51.960 You're very proper. 0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.600 It's like no, no, because really goes I apologize for 0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:55.160 cutting you off. 0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:56.679 We can talk about this later in banter. 0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.479 Can you like you talk to like, I apologize, I'm 0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.680 sorry for so does it have feelings if you didn't 0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.240