WEBVTT - Shifting Supply Chains for Batteries and Solar

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Dana Perkins, and you're listening to Switch on

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the b n OF podcast. Now. If you've listened to

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this show in the past, you've likely been following the

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>deployment and growth of clean energy technologies, might be solar

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>or wind, maybe batteries or hydrogen. But one thing that

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about much here on the show are

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the highly globalized supply chains that underpinned these technologies. The

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen pandemic has exposed just how complex and at

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>times vulnerable these supply chains can be, and some governments

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have started trying to address this by localizing their supply

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>chains for clean energy. Recently, the United States passed the

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Inflation Reduction Act or i ra A, which includes near

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>infinite manufacturing credits for what could spur huge investments in wind,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>batteries and solar photovoltaic. For its part, the EU has

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>also started to accelerate its spending on battery and electrolyzer

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>making in order to try and localize production of the

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>clean energy infrastructure it will so desperately need to meet

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>its climate goals, and questions still remain though, what is

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>driving the shift and how might we go about this

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and at what price? Tag Also, what is this going

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to mean for the energy transition and net zero targets.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>To explore this topic, be NFF has recently started focusing

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>more on trade and supply chains and this newly formed

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>team has published an inaugural research note titled localizing Clean

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Energy Supply Chains at a Cost. I'll be speaking with

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the author of this note today. He's the head of

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Trade and Supply Chains at BENF and his name is

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Antoine Wagner Jones. All of our reports can be found

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>at benof go on the Bloomberg terminal, on banf dot com,

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>or via our mobile app. And as a reminder, b

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and EF does not provide investment or strategy advice, and

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a full disclaimer at the end of the show.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:02:03.279
<v Speaker 1>But now let's speak with Antoine about clean energy supply chains. Nine.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us today. Thanks for having me Dana.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So we are here to talk about global supply chains today.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And as we delve into that, can you outline specifically

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>within the clean energy supply chain, what industries are we

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about. We're talking about renewables and we're talking about

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>storage and what that means is looking at technologies like solar,

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>but also looking at everything you need to make a

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>little mind battery, So that's going all the way upstream

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to the processing and refining of battery metals, all the

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>way downstream to the finished sort of battery pack. And

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>then in the piece of research that we've published, we've

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>also looked at some parts of the wind value chain.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We've also looked at some parts of the hydrogen value chain,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>focusing on electoralizers. But what we're generally looking at is

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>technologies that will represent the vast bulk of investment that's

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>needed to decarbonizing power, decarbonizing transport, and also to some

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>extent industry for if we're to get to net zero.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>And I know we can't talk about every single part

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the clean energy supply chains, so batteries and wind

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and various equipment manufacturing, but from a percentage standpoint, so

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that over and sent currently in the photovoltaic

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>space is manufactured in China. Is it roughly the same

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for batteries and wind or is it just or what's

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the range? The range it does vary quite a bit.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>There's not that larger share of the world's battery grade

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>nickel is produced in China, but China, as I said above,

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven eleven different bits of those different value chains being

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>above is free substantial and when you look at that average,

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's over half overall and far higher than that for

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>many sectors like ingots and wafers for solo, for example,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>which are above. So I think what's maybe useful is

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to take solo for example, and to walk through it.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So he starts out and you've got polysilicon, which is

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you basically take sand and you make it into a

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>very refined form of silica, and then you end up

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>with these what are basically rocks, which then are then

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>melted and made into ingots in a different facility, which

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>are then sliced and made into waivers, often in an

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>integrated facility with the in goot production. And then you

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>then combine those and seal them into cells which are

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>then strung together and assembled into modules. Broadly speaking, those

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>different steps are done three different factories and different facilities,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and when we think about supply chains, this is going

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to be something that's very relevant in this discussion is

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're very different in terms of the amount of

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>economic value they produce. For polysilicon, for example, margins are

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>far higher than module manufacturers, and in terms of job creation,

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got very different pictures for those different bits of

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the supply chains. So polysylican, for example, a new facility

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>might only create fifty two hundred jobs, very automated low

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of labor intensity, But then a module manufacturing

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>facility might involved it's seven hundred jobs per gigawat, and

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that was per giggle watch for the polysylicon side of

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>things too, So you've got this vastly front sort of

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>picture in terms of economic value add of having a

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>certain bit of the value chain located in your country

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if your government, as well as job creation, and those

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>two things might not always run in parallel, but then

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so for example, so there's only a few factories making

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>poly cynic in the world, most of them are located

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>in China, many of them are located in specific parts

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of China and the West in a couple of provinces,

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And the picture from module manufacturing on the other end,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on the downstream of the solar sector is far more dispersed,

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot more of that happening in places

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like Southeast Asia, and some of it also happening in

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the global West, for example in India is something where

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing things picking up. In order to understand where

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going, it was useful to figure out how we

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>got here. And solar manufacturing is definitely seen very steep

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>declines and costs year on year, and I think that

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to be changing a bit at the current moment.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of the story of what has happened

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>within the solar industry has been that the finished modules

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have been getting cheaper and cheaper over time, and a

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of that has been due to manufacturing in China

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and some of these centralized places where they can really

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of, let's say, economies of scale and efficiencies

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in the manufacturing process. But how did that end up happening,

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>How did it end up becoming that it was largely

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>centered in this part of the world. So it's a

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>story that's very different from each of those difference and

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>there's general misunderstanding around China's position today and how it

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>got there. Generally speaking, a lot of people highlight, for example,

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that vast subsidies were provided to manufacturers. Now

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>that was true for many different industries where investment was attracted,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>where foreign direct investment was something that China was trying

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to or the Chinese government was mindful of attracting. So

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that involved the provision of pretty cheap finance, that involved

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>land at a low cost, that involved benefiting from a

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>relatively cheap labor force at the time, if we're looking

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>at over a decade ago, also the provision of low

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>cost power. Those things all played a role on the

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>economic side of things, and we also saw vast subsidies

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or indirectly or more direct forms of subsidization occurring, and

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that's something that happened. For example, for for the battery

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>industry in the early days, there's it's pretty well recorded

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>how low cost loans were afforded and given to manufacturers

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to attract them to set up shop in China. Now

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of data as to how much that

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly entails in terms of overall funding. There's been various

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>efforts made by the Department of Energy in the US

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at how much exactly was spent to get here.

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that's also worth mentioning is the fact

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that some of this was due to supply side subsidies

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and policies too, So there was a feed entire program

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that was brought in over a decade ago in China,

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>which then led to an incredible boom in PV demand,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which led, given that you've got a huge domestic market

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to those enabling those economies of scale that have become

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 1>so important to having these huge integrated facilities and lowering costs.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>The same happened for batteries, for example, other very quick

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>growth musicipalities, local governments seeking to build out their electric

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>bus fleets for example, and that's something that again was

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a massive source of demand and lead to manufacturings being

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>able to scale and make future investments and knowing that

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>would pay off in the future. So this huge up

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to on and demand is very important. And the end

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>picture what we have now is some of the most

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>competitive companies in the world such as c A t

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>L for example, is the world's largest battery manufacturer, that

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>are actually very integrated and they have for activities or

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>stakes or investments or direct operations sort of looking at

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>across the value chain. So PV manufacturers, producers of for example,

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.599
<v Speaker 1>modules and cells might also operate in gotten way for factories,

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and the same holds true for producers of battery cathodes.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>They might also operate facilities making anodes or separators, and

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that can't be overstated as to how important that is

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>today in terms of China's competitive is is less about

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>low wages, for example, those have doubled over the last

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>decade in China, and it's more about having these incredibly

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>technologically sophisticated, integrated value chains that are very often focused

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on industrial hubs and provinces where you have this ecosystem

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of engineers know how an investment built up over a

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>decade in many cases in one place, and that really

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was at the heart of China's competitiveness today. So why

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>do you have reason to believe that supply chains are changing,

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that there is interest in other countries to bring this

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on board. Number of things have changed, and one of

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the big shifts that we've seen over the last couple

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of years is as there's been discussion localizing supply chains

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the COVID crisis, or at least

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>diversifying things to make them more resilient. Generally speaking, what

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about here is that many of these different

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>bits of clean energy manufacturing are incredibly concentrated in one

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the world, and regardless of your various inclinations

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you might have in the political spectrum or geopolitical concerns,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that concentration is a vulnerability. So generally speaking, if, for example,

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as is the case today, one in seven Chinese solo

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>panels are produced within one factory, then if that factory

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>shuts down, that has some pretty dramatic repercussions. And there

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>have been some issues around gas rationing at least previously,

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and then that causing some slowdown manufacturing at certain facilities

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>which have elongated delivery timelines. Or also I believe that

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a good move of shipping being disrupted by

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the global movement of PPE, which then changed delivery timelines

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of different goods as well. Did this

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>also affect the clean energy pipeline? Yes, of course, the

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>increase in freight rates, the longer lead times, the build

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>ups and pork congestion this will had a massive effect,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>as did other things. Are just very recently the last

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>few months we've seen in the middle of this year,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it was the summer of fire in Shinjiang Province in

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>ch Know, which is a big pository of a lot

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>of polysilicon production, which led to a factory being shut

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>down that increased pressure on prices, and we also saw

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>later in the year in August, poly cilicon prices reach

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on the spot market eleven year highs as a result

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the drought that we saw in Stetran Province which

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>led to extricity generations shortages. It's been something that's been

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>really evident recently is that even outside of the sort

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of recurring concerns around lockdowns in Shanghai or various other

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID related or even war related supply chain issues, we've

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>seen evidence of this gaping vulnerability at the heart of

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the world's keenergy supply chain recur and wear its head

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>again and again. Now for a very short break, stay

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with us. So which country seemed to be making I

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>guess the biggest steps towards bringing manufacturing more local. I've

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>just talked about how the concentration of supply chains is

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>of vulnerability, and that resiance is something that's being thought

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about by policymakers. There's another factor as well, which is

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the creation of jobs, and that's equally relevant when we

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>look at a part of the world that's acting quite

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>fast and quite decisively in terms of trying to reshore

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.359
<v Speaker 1>or at least onshore and localize that clean energy manufacturing.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's the US. So the United States. In August,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden signed in the Inflation Reduction Acts, which is

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this massive historic bill that includes provisions on healthcare but

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>also is the US is most significant piece of climate

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>legislation ever to date. Pretty huge deal. And as part

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of that, what it includes is a sweeping array of

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>tax credits which are the main sort of vector to

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>which all of this subsidy spending is happening, which targets

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the deployment of a lot of that clean energy. But

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>what it also includes is measures that are specifically intended

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to see the development of clean energy manufacturing in the

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>US or at least a greater sort of diversification of

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing and among the US is perceived allies. So, for example,

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>if an electric vehicle is being supported by these tax credits,

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are given, share of the battery materials and components that

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are in that electric vehicle have to be produced within

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>North America, for example, or depending on what's being covered

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in countries with which United States has a free trade

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>agreement for that electric vehicle to be subsidized, So access

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to those subsidies is depending on these local content provisions,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're also seeing pretty generous and meaningful tax credits

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that are then on an output basis subsidizing manufacturing. So

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a manufacture of polysydic and can get I think it's

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars per mega work of production. That rises

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to fifty thousand if you're producing wafers, for example, and

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a reasonably large chunk of the prices of those

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>components that we've seen today, So they make a big difference,

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, really big deal as well is the fact

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that this is not only backed by pretty aggressive local

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>content provisions, is that these subsidies aren't only to last

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>over the next decade so through two is a sort

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>of phase outdates for all of them across the board.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that not only are they also spread out across sectors,

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's different parts of the wind value chain, whether

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's for factories in the battery value chain, whether or

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>not is for critical minerals or the solar value chain.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>There's this incredible fact which is that the overall subsidy

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>budget is infinite. So actually depending on how demand scales,

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>if manufacturers are convinced that demand is going to grow

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the US that it's worth setting up shop and

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>building a factory in breaking ground and developing production lines.

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Then that the subsidy volume could be extremely substantial, and

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that's already sort of estimated by the US government reckons

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to spend around billion on clean energy as

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a result of the i RA through two roughly, but

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that figure could swell and could be far higher depending

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not on the extent to which manufacturing

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>takes off. So it's no exaggeration to say that this

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is a historic turning point, and we are already seeing

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>investments made into building out manufacturing capacity across solo, across batteries.

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So given that the potential is you mentioned, to some

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>extent limitless for certain parts of the industry, do you

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>have a general idea on how much of the supply

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>chain you think might shift between now and let's say

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, we're tracking investments and we're looking at what's

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>happening in the battery space, for example, and it's quite substantial.

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>We see announced investment in battery cell manufacturing capacity that's

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of the order of above eight hundred gigawa hours by

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty and exceeds demands locally in the US by

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that date by over two hundred gigawa hours, So it's

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>really substantial as a pipeline, and that involves roughly sort

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of eight billion dollars of funding investment to build out

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>those manufacturing facilities. Things are moving pretty quickly on the

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and the what we've done to gauge the extent of

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>which that finance and those subseas are meaningful is we've

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>roughly estimated to how much it would cost to do

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>everything locally to build up that factory capacity across the board.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So how much will it cost to build all the

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>factories you need to meet demand for solar, for batteries,

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for battery metals, for even electrolyzers you need to make

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>low carbon hydrogen. So we estimated for the U S

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be about a hundred and thirteen billion by

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty dollars, and then for the EU that would

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be a hundred billion dollars. So the sums involves are substantial,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But actually when you compare that to the cost of

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>deploying those technologies, what we see is that there's actually

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>only a small fraction of the overall cost of the

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>energy transition. So essentially it'll add cast, but then there

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are cost savings elsewhere. So generally, what are we going

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to see to the cost of the finished products and

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the people are actually procuring these finished modules or batteries.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just about the upfund investment for factories

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like I mentioned, and that's a really useful bell weather

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of asure the extent to which the funding that

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing announces significant. It's also about a number of

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>other things and the success of this transition and the

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>success of this politicized sort of desire to build out

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>local manufacturing in the US, for example, but it's something

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that's very much present in the U that's very much

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>present in India, for example, is the fact that is

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or not production can be competitive. In the US,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>we've seen these local content rules which will fall to

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>an extent basically artificially create a competitive environment for local production,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>but production is still more expensive in the US than elsewhere,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and that really depends on sector. So you see pretty

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>dramatic differences in the cost of producing electoralizers in China

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>versus Europe or North America. So Chinese electoralizers are about

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>five times cheaper because of low operational expenses, low running costs,

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>also the provision of cheap equipment and equipment providers that

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>are already where's already far more capacity in that area

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>built out in China today and even more established sectors

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>like there are significant volumes of policylicon being produced in

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe today, but the cost of that policylic and is

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>far above the average costs that we're seeing globally, and

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in China's it's significantly lower. So those running costs

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be higher if you're producing in the

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Global West generally speaking, or even in places like India

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as the sector scales, and you don't have those same

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>integrated value chains, and that in of itself is a challenge.

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Another challenge is also the fact that there are significant

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>labor needs for those different industries right now. If a

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>South Korean sort of LG can, for example, a battery

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers building out facility in the US, they'll very often

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>rely on South Korean engineers to come over and assist

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>because of the lack of know how, a lack of

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>skilled workers in the United States. Those kind of labor

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>shortages is something that's being considered very seriously by an

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>industry that's scaling up quickly and important things is also

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that generally speaking, the ecosystem of of associated sort of

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>raw material supplies and producers and providers isn't as press

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and so if you're producing PV, if you're producing modules

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US, you'll need to deal with the fact

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that right now there isn't an awful loss of those

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>materials that you need to build those modules, whether it's

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>backsheets or whether it's encapsulent sort of material used to

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as basically glue for some of those cells. So this

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is all a challenge, and this is something that needs

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to be built out, and a lot of those bottlenecks

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and hurdles are only going to become evident if production

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>does scale. There's also another question, and that really is

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>around the fact that a lot of the bleeding edge

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of technological proficiency and knowledge today for a lot of

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>those different sexes resides in China. We're not just seeing

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>things being produced on the cheap. We're actually seeing a

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of those companies really and the forefront of technological

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>innovation and knowledge. Now. Usually when you see a region

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>try and build up it's manufacturing base for different technology,

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what they try and do is attract manufacturers from countries

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which are leading and for many of those sexes, that's China.

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>And the extent to which China these manufacturers are going

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to be able to freely operate or are going to

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>be successful in terms of building out capacity in place

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like the US is a bit of an open question

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. So that's another thing is policymakers also need

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to be mindful of the fact that transfer of knowledge

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>might be made more difficult if some of the decoupling

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing today begins to pick up pace. And

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>we're already seeing some pretty worrying signals from that perspective,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>where for example, the United States has locked the export

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>of some of the most advanced the conductors to China

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>over the last month, and that's generally perceived as a

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>direction of travel today now for a very short break

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>stay with US. So presumably these incumbent players are not

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>keen on the idea that they will be losing market share,

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and so it's this technology exchange that's really at the

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>heart of trying to protect market share. There is a

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fear on the part of Chinese manufacturers as the result

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of these policies they might lose global market share, and

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is those companies reacting pretty decisively. For example,

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned with the IRA, there are various provisions that

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>are put in place that favor battery components are within

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>countries that have a free trade agreement with the US.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing, for example, some Chinese companies set up

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>shop and build out their manufacturing capacity in South Korea,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a country that has a free trade agreement with the US.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's not just about the IRA and its provisions.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>We're also seeing a significant pipeline of projects of battery

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>self factories in Europe, for example, and that comes with

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>its own set of policies to see through and develop

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that sector. Now, the EU isn't as joined up in

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of having the same kind of manufacturing incentives that

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the US has. Has got a patch work of sort

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of grants and loans and various sort of government sort

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of members state subsidy programs that do encourage the localization

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of those factories in different parts of

0:21:55.800 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the value chain, but generally speaking it's less coordinated. However,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing several policies come in place that could

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be quite decisive. One of them is the launch in

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the coming years of what's referred to as a battery

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>passports are for every battery retail lifting mind, battery retailed

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>within the EU, you'll have a QR code which gives

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you information about recycled content about from a life cycle

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>basis of the batteries carbon footprint, and then that will

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>then be linked to mandatory product requirements. So if you

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>had a battery that was produced in a very coal

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>heavy grid, a coal heavy part of the world, then

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>by when a lot of these requirements are to be

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>scaled up after being brought in a few years before,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>then you could see them failing to meet those requirements

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and that could then be a bit of a barrier

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to importing batteries from elsewhere. So already we're seeing action

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>from Chinese battery manufacturers to reduce the carbon intensity of

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>their production to favor hydro heavy so regions with an

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>availability a high availability of hydro ectric power, to generally

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>lower there the carbon footprint associated with the batteries they're making.

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a shift that we're also seeing as companies adapt.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And then another point I'd make is also that we

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>are seeing pretty substantial investments across the board, whether it's

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, whether it's in the US, and we're also

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing a pretty significant upsurgeon investment for PV manufacturing in India,

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>but we're still seeing massive investments in developing capacity in

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>China too. So right now today we might be in

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>a situation where nearly of battery cells are made in China,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but when we look at the sector that's going to

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>grow by over seven times by twenty thirty, we're only

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going to see that China share dropped to around so Europe,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the US, they're going to take a larger share of

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the pie, but that's a growing pie, and the overall

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>share that China occupies is only going to drop by

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So there's a massive opportunity here to

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>make jobs, to render supply chains less concentrated, potentially more

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>robust as they're diverse, defied by these initiatives. But overall,

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a shift that's going to happen overnight, and

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>China's dominance isn't something that's going to disappear from one

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>day to the next. So it seems like we're on

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the precipice of a fairly large shift and we'll see

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what the future really does hold. And in the process

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of researching all of this, presumably there are additional questions

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that have come up in your mind. So what are

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that you know you're thinking about that you

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>want to investigate further that you don't yet know the

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>answers to that you think are going to really have

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a big impact on what happens to global supply chains

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for clean energy. One of the big questions is if

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we localize manufacturing, that can bring a host of cod

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>benefits that we just mentioned. But alongside those associated upsides,

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>there's also a very simple fact, and that is, if

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you're building a way for facility in the US, for example,

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that we estimate is going to be about three times

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>more expensive than building it in China today, that costs

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>will drop with time, But what won't necessarily catch up

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with China will be the cost of running that facility.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna end up with facilities and factories that

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>are producing clean energy technologies, generally speaking, at a higher cost.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>When we've got all this talk of decoupling, of re shuffling,

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>reorganizing supply chains, of reshoring or friend shoring or on

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>shoring or localizing or whatever you want to call it,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is a move away from a global

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>economic order that's based on efficiency to one that's guided

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>by a set of very different principles. So what we

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are seeing today in the US is protectionism or industrial strategy,

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it, and that's something that

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>again is going to be incredibly important to making supply

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>chains more robust. But on the flip side, it also

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>means that the energy transition globally is going to be

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. So what we've seen over the last decade

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>plus is a drop of the cost of PV of

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the order. We can measure this. We can refer to

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>learning rates for example, so I've reach doubling of global

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>capacity for energy storage or for solar power, you see

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a learning rates at cost productions of around a seen

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to and that's really substantial. Those cost de clients have

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>been huge, and they've largely been enabled by these very efficient,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>technologically advanced value chains that we've seen in China. If

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we're moving to producing in the US, then the big

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>question is how much is that going to cost overall?

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that the energy transition becomes more expensive?

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>And the big question is government in its forecast, in

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>its estimates, ready to move away from that least cost

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>economic way of figuring out what the energy transitions price

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>tag is going to be and facing up to the

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>real challenges involved in making that shift. Antoine, thank you

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>very much for talking to us about supply chains today.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot to evaluate in the future.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully you will come back and dig in on

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the individual industries and things as they start

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to emerge and changes start to happen. That sounds wonderful.

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Thanks having. Today's episode of Switched On was edited by

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Rex Warner of gray Stoke Media. Bloomberg an f A

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.239
<v Speaker 1>as investment advice, investment recommendations, or recommendation as to an

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>investment or other strategy. Bloomberg an e F should not

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>be considered as information sufficient upon which to base an

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>affiliates makes any representation or warranty as to the accuracy

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or completeness of the information contained in this recording, and

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>any liability of this recording is expressly disclaimed