Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe, Ketty arm.
Speaker 2: Strong and Kattie and he Armstrong and Yetty.
Speaker 1: So we're sending quite a few marines and sailors and
Speaker 1: all the gear you need to, like if you're going
Speaker 1: to do a little like land invasion to try to
Speaker 1: take that island there in the straight of horror moves
Speaker 1: and maybe clear out the straight of horror moves. So
Speaker 1: we might have a full on marines with guns taking
Speaker 1: ground situation here soon. But more on that later this hour.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the pattern has certainly been if the forces are
Speaker 3: moved into your area, I would assume they're going to
Speaker 3: be used against you. Ask Madoro for his opinion. Anyway,
Speaker 3: we'll get to that in a few minutes. Right now,
Speaker 3: it's a gender bending madness update.
Speaker 2: I kept hearing about this thing called by the loco
Speaker 2: We're a Brave World. An intro is really good. That
Speaker 2: is good. That's one of our better things. Yeah, well done, Hanson.
Speaker 3: First, I want to pay tribute to some very brave
Speaker 3: and persuasive people. The fact that they need to be
Speaker 3: brave is bizarre to me. But advocates for protecting girls'
Speaker 3: sports gathered the other day outside the Sacramento headquarters of
Speaker 3: the California Interscholastic Federation that runs girls sports essentially in California,
Speaker 3: before attending the Executive committee meeting, where they delivered public
Speaker 3: comments urging the CIF to return to protected sex based
Speaker 3: categories for California's high school sports and The group included
Speaker 3: former school board members, teachers, parents, and student athletes. It
Speaker 3: was organized by Cause Californians United for Sex Based Evidence
Speaker 3: in Policy and Law, which is a good name. And
Speaker 3: listen to some of this stuff and contemplate if you will.
Speaker 2: How truly bizarre it is that it needs to be said. So.
Speaker 3: Participants told the Executive committee the Title nine was enacted
Speaker 3: to ensure equal opportunities for female students and education and
Speaker 3: athletics right, and that policies allowing males to compete in
Speaker 3: fly female categories due to acclaim gender identity undermine those protections,
Speaker 3: said Janet Barbieri, former California school board member and advocate
Speaker 3: for girls athletics.
Speaker 2: Quote, it is not possible to.
Speaker 3: Have a sex based law that denies the very idea
Speaker 3: of sex. Uh true, We'll play you the counter argument
Speaker 3: in a moment, but there is no counter argument. It
Speaker 3: is not possible to have a sex based law that
Speaker 3: denies the very idea of sex. California's female athletes are
Speaker 3: being systematically erased. What matters is that they are bold,
Speaker 3: and the way we identify boys is obvious. They have
Speaker 3: a penis at birth. They have reproductive organs that produce
Speaker 3: small mobile game meats. That is sperm. That is science,
Speaker 3: That is the truth. There's no being born in the
Speaker 3: wrong body. That was Jean Pagnon, board president of the
Speaker 3: Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District.
Speaker 2: Way to go, Jean.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's specifically true, that there's no
Speaker 1: such thing as being born in the wrong body, but
Speaker 1: it's very, very very rare. It's not like a tenth
Speaker 1: of the population.
Speaker 3: A school administrator, Jody Buddha said, and I quote as
Speaker 3: a mother of a female athlete and a former school administrator,
Speaker 3: I believe protecting girls' sports means honoring the promise of
Speaker 3: Title nine, fair competition, safety, and equal opportunity for every
Speaker 3: female athlete. Here's Heidi Moore, mother of three Elk Grove
Speaker 3: and former I'm sorry, oh, she is an Elkgrove Unified
Speaker 3: School District Board trustee.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 3: At a board meeting in my district, a mom reported
Speaker 3: her daughter had been forced to undress in.
Speaker 2: Front of three boys. Let me be.
Speaker 3: Clear, this is a civil rights issue. Stop being sexist,
Speaker 3: protect our girls, and stop erasing women.
Speaker 2: How do women not come to the rescue on that boy?
Speaker 2: We could get into that. It's complicated. It's complicated.
Speaker 1: The whole hierarchy of intersectionality is weird.
Speaker 2: Oh it's crazy.
Speaker 3: And so many women, partly because of the way women
Speaker 3: tend to be, have been convinced, browbeaten into you must
Speaker 3: go along with this to be a good person, and
Speaker 3: if you don't, you're being a hateful, bad person and
Speaker 3: we won't accept you.
Speaker 2: So go along with this.
Speaker 3: And a number of women, particularly in blue states, have
Speaker 3: said yes, okay, I will, yes, Yes, that's not a boy,
Speaker 3: that's a girl, because he says he's a girl. Here
Speaker 3: is Michael, let's clip eleven. Here's an assistant professor at California.
Speaker 2: State University of was It.
Speaker 3: I can't remember which CSU, San Bernardino, San Berdoo. Right,
Speaker 3: you'd expect more common sense from the inland empire, but
Speaker 3: we're talking about a California professor testifying it that very
Speaker 3: title nine hearing, and.
Speaker 4: The idea that I have to get up here and
Speaker 4: say that trans women are women and that's what I
Speaker 4: have to use my time to do is absurd. Shame
Speaker 4: on you, Shame on all of you, and shame on
Speaker 4: you for using lesbian politics as a front for your transphobia,
Speaker 4: because this lesbian has had plenty of girlfriends with penises.
Speaker 2: All right, How blank and crazy is she?
Speaker 3: It's an insult that you have to get up and
Speaker 3: claim hilariously that quote unquote trans women are women.
Speaker 2: Yeah, hot dogs are dogs? And how how insane are
Speaker 2: the people that roared with applause to that comment?
Speaker 1: This list has lots of female penis penis, Yes, No,
Speaker 1: those are men, you see, Professor Jesse O'Quinn.
Speaker 3: Men, And it's easy to tell. I can repeat what
Speaker 3: I read earlier if you like, from the nice lady
Speaker 3: who testified. How nuts are these people?
Speaker 1: I gotta I can inject this in here. I got
Speaker 1: this text from a friend of mine the other day.
Speaker 1: Went to get my first massage over the weekend. She wrote,
Speaker 1: there was a dude with boobs at the front desk.
Speaker 1: He walked me back to the ladies' locker room and
Speaker 1: came in with me and lingered tidying up right next
Speaker 1: to the locker that he had assigned me. I had
Speaker 1: to wait several minutes to get undressed for the man to.
Speaker 2: Leave the room. This was insane, woman Jack, that was
Speaker 2: a woman.
Speaker 1: There were a couple of guys who had an appointment
Speaker 1: at the same time I did.
Speaker 2: The desk.
Speaker 1: Dude walked us as a group to the men's locker
Speaker 1: room first and then just dropped off the men, didn't
Speaker 1: hold the door or anything. Then walked me the lone woman,
Speaker 1: to the ladies' locker room and held the door and
Speaker 1: then entered with me.
Speaker 2: Good lord, Michael, play a lot. That's wild. Play eleven again.
Speaker 4: And the idea that I have to get up here
Speaker 4: and say that trans women are women and that's what
Speaker 4: I have to use my time to do is absurd.
Speaker 4: Shame on you, Shame on all of you, and shame
Speaker 4: on you for using lesbian politics as a front for
Speaker 4: your transphobia. Because this lesbian has had plenty of girlfriends
Speaker 4: with penises.
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: What is using lesbian politics as a front for your transphobia? Oh?
Speaker 3: There are a lot of gay people who believe, quite
Speaker 3: correctly that to tell a butcher woman, for instance, or
Speaker 3: an effeminate guy that they're in the wrong body and
Speaker 3: they need powerful chemicals and surgery to fix them is sick.
Speaker 3: It is, it is sick. Yeah, And somebody probably made
Speaker 3: some sort of reference after.
Speaker 1: The gay community had to fight for so long to
Speaker 1: be able to be and an effeminate dude or a
Speaker 1: butcher chick, right, and just you know, be that that's
Speaker 1: what I am except men.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, then the trans world came along and told you
Speaker 1: you're wrong for that.
Speaker 3: Right, and we got to carve you up or feed
Speaker 3: you powerful chemicals to make you write again. And where
Speaker 3: the uh the quote unquote transphobs.
Speaker 1: Okay, this this lesbian has lots of girlfriends with penises lots.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, wow, good for you. You're sick and so are they.
Speaker 3: Uh this is a bit of good news.
Speaker 2: Number one.
Speaker 3: The world is waking up and realizing, you know, not
Speaker 3: only is that clearly insane, I should have said it
Speaker 3: was insane from the beginning, and I'm sorry I went
Speaker 3: around or I'm sorry I went along with it, and
Speaker 3: you should be sorry.
Speaker 2: Anyway, there here's a little bit of good news.
Speaker 3: A case involving a main student given a check binder
Speaker 3: at school may be headed to the Supreme Court and
Speaker 3: our friends at the Goldwater Institute, including Tim Sanderfer right
Speaker 3: in the middle of this. While cleaning her thirteen year
Speaker 3: old daughter's room in twenty twenty two, Amber Levine found
Speaker 3: a chest binder. A social worker at the eighth graders
Speaker 3: eighth graders school in Maine had given the child the device, which,
Speaker 3: if you don't know, flatten's breasts to facilitate a masculine appearance.
Speaker 3: Unknown to mom at school or daughter was using masculine pronouns,
Speaker 3: and the Goldwater Institute and eighteen states so far have
Speaker 3: joined an amicust brief supporting her petition.
Speaker 2: Asked the Supreme Court to hear her.
Speaker 3: Challenge to the supposed policy of this community school board.
Speaker 3: That policy is fictitious. And here's this is important. It
Speaker 3: almost seems like a tangent, but it's not. It's really important.
Speaker 3: The board's written guidelines for quote, addressing the needs of
Speaker 3: transgender students requires parental involvement. So the school board says
Speaker 3: there's no constitutional violation here, But my mom is arguing
Speaker 3: that the actual policy is to withhold information from parents.
Speaker 3: So these people, like so many neo Marxists and people
Speaker 3: who have been swayed by them, they.
Speaker 2: Lie, They just flat lie.
Speaker 3: Even after Levine had objected to the school sneakiness, no
Speaker 3: school employee was disciplined, and the school board unanimously voted
Speaker 3: to award a new contract to the social worker who
Speaker 3: taught Levine's daughter how to use the binder and who
Speaker 3: told her he would not inform her mother. So the
Speaker 3: advertised guidelines as they write might as well be written
Speaker 3: in smoke on water. Last year, in a case from
Speaker 3: hyper progressive Montgomery County, Maryland, Supreme Court held that parental
Speaker 3: rights can be violated by a school's policy about what
Speaker 3: and how children are taught. The court sight of the
Speaker 3: First Amendment guarantee you free exercise of religion upheld the
Speaker 3: right of pearans to withdraw students elementary schools, students from
Speaker 3: your LBGTQ plus RBF.
Speaker 2: Stuff.
Speaker 3: Let's see, that's the most important part though, that the
Speaker 3: school board departed from its written policy, lied about it,
Speaker 3: wouldn't wouldn't discipline the staffer who violated it, and are
Speaker 3: just doubling down.
Speaker 2: And these people are dishonest. Keep that in mind.
Speaker 3: They do not talk, bargain, teach in good faith, not
Speaker 3: even close. It's gender bending madness.
Speaker 1: So are we sending a bunch of marines to take
Speaker 1: card Island like its ewo jima to quote Lindsey Graham. Maybe, So,
Speaker 1: among other things we're going to talk about this hour
Speaker 1: stay too.
Speaker 2: I think people more and more think, oh no, they
Speaker 2: are smarter.
Speaker 5: Well, they're more effective at achieving an outcome. But again,
Speaker 5: if this leads to a place where people can't put
Speaker 5: food on the table because you don't have a way
Speaker 5: to make ends meet, that's an outcome.
Speaker 2: That's an anti human future.
Speaker 5: If everybody saw that, if everybody saw that, we would
Speaker 5: have to say we got to put our hand in
Speaker 5: the steering wheel into something else. The world we're heading
Speaker 5: towards is good for a handful of soon to be trillionaires,
Speaker 5: it's not good for regular people. And I think there
Speaker 5: needs to be something the human movement basically of humanity
Speaker 5: fighting back against the encroachment of technology. We saw it
Speaker 5: with social media. When you have India, Australia, Spain, France
Speaker 5: bans social media for kids under sixteen, that's the human movement.
Speaker 1: Yeah, man, it all breaks down if you just say,
Speaker 1: but what about China? Right, how are you going to
Speaker 1: stop China from doing it?
Speaker 3: There's never been a nobility we have as a species
Speaker 3: that hasn't been used, you know, if it's useful. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I just I don't think that's realistic. I agree with
Speaker 3: them in spirit.
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Yeah, so here's something. Maybe I also don't know what
Speaker 1: it means, and maybe you can explain to you. Do
Speaker 1: you know what it means when people say are we
Speaker 1: living in a simulation?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I don't know that I do, but maybe you can
Speaker 1: explain that here in a second. So Elon Musk tweeted
Speaker 1: this out over the weekend. Any that also reminds me.
Speaker 1: Somebody did a thing online of like, what's the most
Speaker 1: important tweet of all time? I think it was based
Speaker 1: on some of the things Trump had said, and somebody
Speaker 1: had one to Elon. It was a tweet of Elon
Speaker 1: tweeted something about Twitter, about well, how great it is,
Speaker 1: but it's flawed, and somebody tweeted at Elon, you should
Speaker 1: buy it, and he said how much do they want
Speaker 1: for it?
Speaker 2: That might be the most.
Speaker 1: Important tweet of all time? Anyway, Elon tweeted this out
Speaker 1: over the weekend. He said, I had dinner once with
Speaker 1: a top physicist and a top computer scientist and asked
Speaker 1: what they thought the probability was that we are living
Speaker 1: in a simulation or we are in a simulation. They
Speaker 1: answered simultaneously, zero percent and one hundred percent, respectively. The
Speaker 1: physicists said zero percent chance. The computer scientists said one
Speaker 1: hundred percent. We're living in a simulation.
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: I hear people my son says that every none. What
Speaker 1: does that mean?
Speaker 2: We're living in a simulation?
Speaker 3: Well, straight out of movies like the Matrix were everything
Speaker 3: you think you've foreseen a matrix? Oh, it's fantastic. Everything
Speaker 3: you see and hear an experience has been simulated for
Speaker 3: you by our overlords. It's not what it seems to
Speaker 3: be at all. It's all it's all a fake. And
Speaker 3: when would this have occurred? Like a long long time ago?
Speaker 2: Or burn.
Speaker 1: Told like that it switched from reality to a simulation.
Speaker 3: Well it doesn't matter in effect, Jack, because you could
Speaker 3: ask your dad, Hey, dad, did you grow up in
Speaker 3: a simulation? But he's part of the simulation. Ah, so
Speaker 3: he would tell.
Speaker 2: You no, son, and stop asking such silly questions.
Speaker 1: This is sort of like the joke that my son
Speaker 1: really loved. If life is a simulation video game, the
Speaker 1: graphics are amazing, but a lot of the characters suck.
Speaker 2: That's so good, so good.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know if I fully understoodn't know if
Speaker 1: I fully understand it.
Speaker 3: And then one of course the tricks is speaking of
Speaker 3: cultural references that people use all the time. That's the us,
Speaker 3: the basis of being red pilled or black pilled or
Speaker 3: whatever it was, and waking up to what's actual reality.
Speaker 1: And then why do you suppose the computer expert said
Speaker 1: it's one hundred percent likely we're living in a simulation.
Speaker 2: They're weirdos.
Speaker 1: Okay, I thought i'd hit you with this. Chuck Norris
Speaker 1: died on Friday. This is from Variety Magazine. It's the
Speaker 1: it's mostly a website. I called their magazines, but it's
Speaker 1: a website magazine for U the entertainment set in Los Angeles.
Speaker 2: But what do he used to call it? The Bible
Speaker 2: of show Business?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: When Rob Reiner died not long ago, the headline was
Speaker 1: his life and work in photos from All in the
Speaker 1: Family to the Princess Bride and the Bear. When Chuck
Speaker 1: Norris died big giant TV star. Chuck Norris was a
Speaker 1: great action star, but politics may may overshadow his legacy.
Speaker 2: No mention of.
Speaker 1: Politics in the headline with Rob Reiner, who might be
Speaker 1: the most political person that's ever been in Hollywood. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but for him, it's just his life and work in
Speaker 1: photos and all the TV shows and movies he was in.
Speaker 1: For Chuck Norris, politics may have overshadowed his legacy. Do
Speaker 1: you see do you see a difference there? I know
Speaker 1: they don't think that they do that.
Speaker 2: They don't they're biased, correct, Yeah?
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, Rob Reiner was political, but I mean he
Speaker 3: had the politics.
Speaker 2: That people agree with.
Speaker 3: Normal politics is good people, Yeah, moral people.
Speaker 2: He wasn't a radical like Chuck Norris. And that's something.
Speaker 2: And you wonder why we hate you or don't trust you?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 2: I hate him. I have new favorite. I'll tell you
Speaker 2: about that next time.
Speaker 1: Who wouldn't stick around to hear about Joe's new favorite Canadian?
Speaker 2: I'd like to recommend a Canadian to you.
Speaker 1: And are we about to have a Marines taken an
Speaker 1: island situation in Iran?
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty?
Speaker 6: This administration has totally lost touch with reality. This war
Speaker 6: is spinning out of control. Prices are spiking for millions
Speaker 6: of Americans. There's a new war breaking out between Israel
Speaker 6: and Lebanon. Oil assets of our allies are continuing to
Speaker 6: be hit in the region.
Speaker 2: There's no end in sight.
Speaker 1: That is the worst of our one hundred senators Chris Murphy.
Speaker 1: Once you become aware of that name, you'll recognize him regularly.
Speaker 1: He gets a lot of FaceTime because he says extraordinary things.
Speaker 1: And that's why our system is currently set up. If
Speaker 1: you just say really over the top things, you get
Speaker 1: on a lot of TV shows, you get retweeted a lot,
Speaker 1: and you raise a lot of money. But in addition,
Speaker 1: that is like the main drum beat on a lot
Speaker 1: of your mainstream leftish news media, that this is clearly
Speaker 1: a disaster spinning out of control was a bad idea
Speaker 1: from the start. Most of my favorite pundits who even
Speaker 1: you know, lean anti Trump, like Ian Bremer, has had
Speaker 1: lots of comments about how clearly we needed to take
Speaker 1: out their missile making operation, given the fact that they
Speaker 1: show over the weekend that they got one that'll go
Speaker 1: twenty five hundred miles, et cetera, et cetera. But things
Speaker 1: are in a dicey place. So this is from the
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal. This is an opinion piece from a
Speaker 1: guy I don't know on the Wall Street Journal. The
Speaker 1: Trump administration finds itself in a larger war than an
Speaker 1: expected that's true. Facing a profoundly hard decision, President Trump
Speaker 1: must put boots on the ground to open the strait
Speaker 1: of horror moves and demonstrate the unquestionable supremacy of American power.
Speaker 1: If he fails, his legacy will be one of America collapse.
Speaker 1: If he succeeds, he'll prepared the US for an intense
Speaker 1: period of competition.
Speaker 2: Over the next decade.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's one hundred percent true or not,
Speaker 1: but well, if we can't, we can't leave with the
Speaker 1: straight of horror moves closed.
Speaker 2: That's not an option. I mean that that'd be that
Speaker 2: would be biden.
Speaker 1: Esque and just I mean, there'd be the what it
Speaker 1: looks like problem. And then the reality of twenty percent
Speaker 1: of the oil being shipped around the world is now
Speaker 1: under control of the Iranians.
Speaker 2: Can't have that and.
Speaker 3: All the other commerce because there's a hell of a
Speaker 3: lot of commerce that goes through there.
Speaker 1: And that's why Lindsey Graham, Republican Senator from South Carolina,
Speaker 1: is talking about the Marines going and also here he
Speaker 1: was on one of the talk shows yesterday.
Speaker 7: Is this going to though take Carg Island? Is it
Speaker 7: going to involve US troops on the ground. Let me
Speaker 7: let me just read you something from the Atlantic does
Speaker 7: an assessment on that. They say US troops may well
Speaker 7: take Carg Island. We believe their ability to do so,
Speaker 7: but only too endurabalistic missile strikes, drone attacks, petrochemical smoke,
Speaker 7: all without a reliable means of obtaining logistical support. The
Speaker 7: result could be a grinding war of attrition. They talk
Speaker 7: about how far away they would be from.
Speaker 8: Recent sort of tired of all this armchair quarterback. And
Speaker 8: this has been amazing military operation. God bless the fallen.
Speaker 2: But it's a difference. Let me talk about troops on
Speaker 2: the I trust the Marines, not that guy.
Speaker 8: I trust DoD We got two marine expeditionary units sailing
Speaker 8: to this island. We did Eeojima, We can do this
Speaker 8: the Marines. My money is always on the Marines. I
Speaker 8: don't know if you take the island or you blockade
Speaker 8: the Allen, but I know this. The day we control
Speaker 8: that island, this regime, this terrorist regime, has been weakened.
Speaker 8: It will down Eventine.
Speaker 1: Throwing around at Ewojima like that is some pretty hardcore talk.
Speaker 1: We lost thousands of guys take an Eogima.
Speaker 2: Is this.
Speaker 1: What if we lost ninety marines taking carg Island? How
Speaker 1: would the country react to that.
Speaker 2: In the modern day? Very badly.
Speaker 3: I think that actually brings up I thought I had
Speaker 3: when you're introducing the topic, which was.
Speaker 2: If the message we.
Speaker 3: Send is that, look, even in a cause this big
Speaker 3: and important, it's wort of Maybe we could replay Mark Ruta,
Speaker 3: the head of NATO, saying, look, this had to happen,
Speaker 3: had to happen. So even in a cause this big
Speaker 3: and righteous, Americans aren't willing to put guys in. They
Speaker 3: just bomb you then leave. That would be a terrible
Speaker 3: message to send, even Trump.
Speaker 2: And look, I'm no.
Speaker 3: You know, gung ho warhawk type guy. I get, you know,
Speaker 3: those are real people who get hurt or die, and
Speaker 3: you know that easy to be an armchair patriot blah
Speaker 3: blah blah. All that having been said, chicken hawk they
Speaker 3: call them, right, Yeah, you can't you can't do it
Speaker 3: halfway and then say, well, the one thing we're not
Speaker 3: going to do is have any guys with rifles on
Speaker 3: their shoulders get involved, So.
Speaker 2: I guess we're done here. That would just be a
Speaker 2: miserable message to send.
Speaker 1: I can't find the quote I just came across somewhere
Speaker 1: on Twitter from whoever runs the UAE saying we can't
Speaker 1: have any more ceasepires. We need to finish this now
Speaker 1: that it has started. Yeah, the Gulf countries are on
Speaker 1: board with finishing this off. Is anybody going to have
Speaker 1: any blood or treasure involved other than.
Speaker 2: The United States and Israel?
Speaker 1: Well, because so far it's just that you got all
Speaker 1: the European nations in Japan that signed onto that letter
Speaker 1: on Friday about helping helping open the straight of horror moves.
Speaker 1: But the language is something like, you know, in an
Speaker 1: appropriate way or something like that, whatever that means. And
Speaker 1: what appropriate way is Europe and Japan going to help
Speaker 1: us open that thing up?
Speaker 2: Yeah? You know it's funny.
Speaker 3: I had the I sometimes I hate the way this
Speaker 3: browser works. I had the casualties on Eojima, and they
Speaker 3: were enormous, as you indicated.
Speaker 1: In Israel, disappeared I'm reading from David Ignatio's Washington Post
Speaker 1: column today. In Israel, Trump's online threats of raised expectations
Speaker 1: that a new phase of the war could soon get
Speaker 1: underway with the arrival of additional US firepower. A contingent
Speaker 1: of forty five hundred US sailors and Marines is heading
Speaker 1: to the Middle East, including an infantry battalion landing team
Speaker 1: backed by a helicopters, F thirty five fighter jets and
Speaker 1: armored landing vehicles. He told us about that last week.
Speaker 1: When you when you have ground troops, you have all
Speaker 1: this stuff that goes with it. The Pentagon also sped
Speaker 1: up the deployment of a similar unit, the eleventh Marine
Speaker 1: Expeditionary Unit from San Diego. Defense officials said last week
Speaker 1: those Marines aren't coming for decoration, said an Israeli official,
Speaker 1: one of several people who spoke on the condition of
Speaker 1: anonymity to discuss sensitive military and intelligence issues. The new
Speaker 1: US deployment signals a plan to take the island and
Speaker 1: the Strait, the Israeli official said, referring to carg Island.
Speaker 1: Doing so could enable the United States and Israel to
Speaker 1: starve Taran of oil revenue and provide a political offer
Speaker 1: for the president, who needs to show that the Strait
Speaker 1: is open, according to the Israeli official, But that would
Speaker 1: do it. You take carg Island and the Strait.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Now, Iran's not making any money off of it.
Speaker 2: They got no leverage, now what right? But we might
Speaker 2: lose the chunk of guys doing that.
Speaker 3: For the record, twenty six thousand US casualties on EOGM,
Speaker 3: including sixty eight hundred dead.
Speaker 2: That's a hell of a lot of guys.
Speaker 3: You know, it's a grim thought, but a true one
Speaker 3: Warrior Foundation Freedom Station might be seeing more new business
Speaker 3: soon of the wounded.
Speaker 1: But depending on how you ask the question, a majority
Speaker 1: of Americans though or against this war.
Speaker 2: That's without quite a few casualties.
Speaker 3: Although that's I never used this expression. I hear it
Speaker 3: all the time among the intelligency. I'm about to use
Speaker 3: it for the first time. Jack, Depending how you ask
Speaker 3: the question, is doing a lot of work in that sentence, Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's I've seen. In fact, we talked about it on
Speaker 3: the air. Questions that are worded that include to prevent
Speaker 3: her on from getting a nuclear weapon and a couple
Speaker 3: of other things. Then it's overwhelmingly positive. So boy, it's
Speaker 3: hard to get a sense, particularly when it's mostly media
Speaker 3: organizations doing the polling and they are congenitally dishonest.
Speaker 1: And everything polls better if you take Trump's name out
Speaker 1: of it. Huh that too if you say, should the
Speaker 1: United States as opposed to do you support Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: blah blah blah?
Speaker 2: Right? Right, But you can't be going to war as
Speaker 2: a grown up.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't be going to war without thinking there's a
Speaker 1: possibility you're going to lose one hundred guys on a
Speaker 1: war with a country and ninety million people. You win
Speaker 1: that war, I think you would consider, you know, in
Speaker 1: the overall arc of history, that an incredible success.
Speaker 3: Given the incredibly high stakes, which again are dishonest. Media
Speaker 3: always deny or you're just pieces of crap like Senator
Speaker 3: Chris Murphy who we played earlier. You would never even
Speaker 3: concede that point, even though it's utterly undeniable. I mean,
Speaker 3: if Ian Bremer is saying, no, Trump's right about this one,
Speaker 3: it's because he's right about this one.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: They were lying about their missile program, their rocket program.
Speaker 1: They shot one over the weekend though in twenty five
Speaker 1: hundred miles or had the capacity to go to twenty
Speaker 1: five hundred miles. They'd been claiming they didn't have anything
Speaker 1: close to that, because they lie about that sort of stuff.
Speaker 3: And a lot of them are actual religious fanatics.
Speaker 1: And you're gonna let him have a nuclear weapon rather
Speaker 1: than have gas go up a dollar and a half
Speaker 1: a gallon for a while. Seems like a crazy bit.
Speaker 1: I'm just watching up on TV, a young Chuck Norris
Speaker 1: fighting Bruce Lee.
Speaker 3: Oh that was his claim to fame and enter the
Speaker 3: dragon or exit the dragon? Or hey, how about that dragon?
Speaker 3: I can't remember what the name of the movie was.
Speaker 2: You know a dragon? What's up? How to train your dragon? Now?
Speaker 2: That was totally different.
Speaker 1: A pre beard Chuck Norris, Yes, the young karate expert,
Speaker 1: but shirtless. Nonetheless, Oh ripped, he get his foot way
Speaker 1: up high. I can't get my foot that high age.
Speaker 2: It's a bitch. I'd have to be in a motorcycle
Speaker 2: wrecker or something to get my foot up out.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, my foot goes up that high. There's been surgeries,
Speaker 3: or there's about to be a surgery.
Speaker 2: Something's gone wrong.
Speaker 1: We will finish wrong next.
Speaker 3: No foul skin down comes to dollars, three seconds, two seconds,
Speaker 3: COVID all the time to the ramp.
Speaker 2: Play up is God, lay up is good? Saint seouns,
Speaker 2: when's it?
Speaker 3: Sixty seven sixty five, the Saint Shahn's Red Storm storm
Speaker 3: into the Sweet sixty.
Speaker 1: Things about that Saint John's gets way too much attention
Speaker 1: because they're a school in the New York area and
Speaker 1: so everybody acts like everybody in the country. But here's
Speaker 1: that play. That kid he hadn't scored a basket the
Speaker 1: entire game. He's one of the stars of the team,
Speaker 1: and he told the coach they got, you know, two
Speaker 1: seconds left to try to win the game.
Speaker 2: He tels coach, run this play. I'm gonna make the basket.
Speaker 2: It's like straight out of Hoosiers. Wow.
Speaker 3: Wow, he's got it. Yeah, yeah, whatever it is, he's
Speaker 3: got it. Well, Jack, you've got it. Can I have
Speaker 3: a second take of that? Michael, do we have time?
Speaker 3: You've got to have it. To become my favorite Canadian,
Speaker 3: it was Gordie Howe for a long time, on Wayne Gretzky,
Speaker 3: then John Candy.
Speaker 1: Wow, Michael J. Fox made an appearance.
Speaker 3: He was definitely up there among Canadians. Yes, and then
Speaker 3: obviously it was the guys in Rush for many, many years.
Speaker 3: But now it is Doug Ford, the premiere of Ontario,
Speaker 3: who has had words with our potus in the past
Speaker 3: because he's a somewhat Trumpian character. Remember Doug Ford's late brother, Yeah,
Speaker 3: he was, he the mayor of Toronto RPS. She was
Speaker 3: so kooky, hard drinking coke, snorton cuckoo bird. This is
Speaker 3: like the sane brother. But he's also a tough guy.
Speaker 3: So there's a Now keep in mind Canada very strong
Speaker 3: gun laws, very woke in a lot of ways, way
Speaker 3: too woke, disturbingly woke. And we'll talk about that maybe tomorrow.
Speaker 3: But there's a home invasion of this couple's home. Armed
Speaker 3: robbers busted in and uh and the homeowner shot one
Speaker 3: of the guys dead and here and of course the
Speaker 3: lefty is up in arms. Here's what doug Ford.
Speaker 9: Said, congratulations, Yeah, I'm glad you shot the guy. He
Speaker 9: teaches the rest of these robbers that encourage everyone out
Speaker 9: there that's a legal gun owner. Someone's going to come
Speaker 9: in and try to kill you and kill your family.
Speaker 9: Remember it was just last week, Jamie. One guy got
Speaker 9: shot because he was trying to protect his kids. Well,
Speaker 9: you know these guys, they need to be shot. As
Speaker 9: far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 3: Wow, oh, we didn't have the key phrase. The key
Speaker 3: phrase was he said he should have shot him a
Speaker 3: couple more times. As far as I'm concerned, Why don't more.
Speaker 1: People say that out loud? I think that's where the
Speaker 1: majority of people are.
Speaker 2: Oh, I think so.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't know why more politicians don't have the guts
Speaker 1: to say that out loud.
Speaker 2: Hey, you don't want to get shot breaking people's houses?
Speaker 2: The end of discussion, No kidding. And that's how he
Speaker 2: pushed Mark Short off the list. Neil Young, he was
Speaker 2: a condender there for a minute. The other high ranking
Speaker 2: Canadians that I can't think of.
Speaker 3: Racking now, it's not going to be on my list
Speaker 3: of Canadian best Canadians.
Speaker 2: The band Chili Whack.
Speaker 3: Now, you're too obscure, handsome, way too obscure. Chili Whack
Speaker 3: nobody knows, jeez, my second favorite Canadian.
Speaker 2: Let me think for a minute.
Speaker 3: No good for Doug Ford. I agree with you completely
Speaker 3: say that stuff out loud. I'm not blood thirsty. I
Speaker 3: don't want to hurt anybody. You threaten my family. You're
Speaker 3: getting a bullet.
Speaker 1: I hope I never have to in my life. Really
Speaker 1: really hope I never have to. But if somebody breaks
Speaker 1: in my house and I'm feeling threatened, I'm going to
Speaker 1: shoot them.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Who's that tough talking sheriff in uh in Florida.
Speaker 2: Who heford pos had his moment.
Speaker 3: No, I can picture the guy, but I can't think
Speaker 3: of his name. That might be it, I think, yeah,
Speaker 3: you're my god, good poem.
Speaker 2: Why do you know that?
Speaker 3: I don't know he's Michelangelo National Treasure Anyway, where was it?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 3: Yeah, as he said, we don't have that stuff around here,
Speaker 3: because you break into a home in my county, you'll
Speaker 3: get shot.
Speaker 2: I love that.
Speaker 1: I'll but that works too as a deterrent. Yeah, oh yeah.
Speaker 1: I thought we're gonna have one hell of a day
Speaker 1: to day with that deadline looming that Trump laid out
Speaker 1: there for forty eight hours of opening the straight of
Speaker 1: Horror moves, which Iran was not going to do. And
Speaker 1: then I thought we were gonna say, holy crap, how
Speaker 1: what does this look like? But Trump gave them five
Speaker 1: more days, says negotiations are going well. I'm sure we'll
Speaker 1: have a lot of news on that by tomorrow to
Speaker 1: what extent that negotiation is real.
Speaker 2: Unlike some of.
Speaker 3: The limp wrists who've occupied the Oval office in recent years,
Speaker 3: Trump is absolutely willing to be the one to escalate,
Speaker 3: which you need to be. You must be that occasionally.
Speaker 3: But I'm glad that there were other cards they're thinking
Speaker 3: about playing. And let's see, is there another maneuver that
Speaker 3: has lower costs that.
Speaker 2: Gets us to the same place. That's good, I think.
Speaker 2: Hey kids, it's that time again with Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 2: Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.
Speaker 3: Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew.
Speaker 3: Wouldn't that be delightful? Hey, Michael Angelo, latest off final thought?
Speaker 3: A lot of funny Canadians, John Candy, Martin short.
Speaker 2: And wasn't Norm MacDonald was a Canadian? Yep? Yeah, Canada
Speaker 2: comes from Canada.
Speaker 3: Second City TV Crew, Yeah, fabulous Poops Creek, Katie Green
Speaker 3: or a Steve Newswoman As a final thought, Katie, since
Speaker 3: you guys mentioned Sheriff Grady Jed.
Speaker 2: My favorite clip of him. He's in a press conference.
Speaker 3: They just busted a drug dealer and he's wearing this
Speaker 3: big chain.
Speaker 2: He goes, I got their drip.
Speaker 3: Oh wow, that's awesome show business Jack A final thought
Speaker 3: for us.
Speaker 1: Spent the weekend me and one of my kids. I
Speaker 1: am I'm not a fan, not a fan of to.
Speaker 1: Being sick really takes some.
Speaker 2: Fun out of life. Not a lot upside. Sure makes
Speaker 2: you happy for when you're not sick. Did you figure
Speaker 2: out what you had? So there's all sorts of stuff
Speaker 2: kicking around, those damn things going around. Yeah, it's a
Speaker 2: bird flu could be cool. Yeah. My final thought, it's funny.
Speaker 2: Just flit it out of my head. I was thinking
Speaker 2: about something else. What was I gonna say? It had
Speaker 2: something to do with Well.
Speaker 3: I'll just go with some If you don't subscribe to
Speaker 3: our podcast Armstrong and Getdy on demand, do it wherever
Speaker 3: you like to get podcasts and automatically downloads.
Speaker 2: You'll never miss a segment. Listen when convenient.
Speaker 1: Armstrong in Getty wrapping up another ruling four hour workday.
Speaker 3: Oh no, I remember it was gonna be uh. I
Speaker 3: have a plenty of girl friends with penises. I was
Speaker 3: nominating it for the Clip of the Year. Wow, you
Speaker 3: didn't hear that? Grab the podcast we talked about at
Speaker 3: this hour. Armstrong and Getty on demand.
Speaker 1: I think the clip of Joe saying it might have
Speaker 1: to make the list too. We'll see tomorrow. God bless America.
Speaker 1: I'm strong and catchy.
Speaker 3: There's a fantastic podcast that you got to listen to
Speaker 3: every day. It's got Jack and Joe, Katie and Michael Langelo.
Speaker 7: It's called arm Strong and Geddy on Demand.
Speaker 3: Subscribe now wherever you download your podcast.
Speaker 2: Arm Strong and Geddy on the end, Armstrong and Getty