WEBVTT - Cardinal Robert Prevost Becomes First US Pope; US-UK Trade Framework

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, we start today with the news out of Vatican City.

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Cardinal Robert Francis Privos was elected to the head of

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the Catholic Church. It was the second day of voting

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 2>in the Vatican. It was the first It is the

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>first US national ever to take the role. He's sixty

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>nine years old. He was born in Chicago. He spent

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 2>much of his life outside the US, mostly in Peru

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and Rome. Leo the fourteenth is the name that he

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>has taken. He spoke for about ten minutes last hour

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>in Italian, Spanish and Latin as well. For more, we

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>bring in Natalia Imparatory Lee Professor and Chair of Religious

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Studies at Manhattan College. Professor, good to have you with

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>us this afternoon. We are sort of slowly learning details

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>of the new pope. The big question I have is

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>what direction do you think he will take the church in?

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me. Yeah, I think this is a

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>really interesting choice. We can tell a lot from him

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 3>by the choice of name. In choosing Leo the fourteenth,

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I think he's indicating that he wants to continue the

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 3>work of one of the most consequential popes on the

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 3>topic of social justice. So Leo the thirteenth wrote a

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 3>huge encyclical called Reream Navarum, and it basically set the

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 3>agenda for the social work of the church. And so

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I think this American pope is signaling to us that

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 3>he will be on this sort of maybe a little

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>bit kind of on the progressive vein that you saw

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Francis in.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it does look like that is an insane clicole

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 4>that was aimed at the working class. And of course

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Pope Francis was first and foremost concerned with helping the poor.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 4>What about immigration? This is obviously the divisive issue on

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 4>which the Catholic Church under Francis and the United States

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 4>government under President Trump have had the most disagreement.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's going to be really interesting because

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>this is not a typical kind of US based Bishop

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that we're getting as the pope right now. This is

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 3>a man who's lived all over Latin America. He's done

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of diplomacy, he's done a lot of church

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>building and bridge building in other places. You heard a

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of that actually in his opening speech about building

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 3>bridges and walking together. And I think that he, with

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 3>his experience, especially in poor areas in Peru, he understands

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 3>what's going on with migrants and the sort of needs

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 3>of people who aren't in desperate situations. And so I

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 3>don't anticipate that he and the current president of this

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 3>country will be on the same page necessarily when it

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to migration.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>What is the significance of a pope born in the

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>United States, the first American born pope, the first US

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>born pope, especially following the first South American pope.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>It is wild. None of us thought that this was

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. No one that I know in the

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Catholic universe thought that we would get an American, and

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 3>so it's pretty crazy to have two Americans, you know,

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>broadly understood, back to back. I think it signals a

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of move away from a European centered church to

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>a more global reality and so you have this guy who, yes,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 3>is from a global superpower, the United States and Chicago

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>a superpower city, but nevertheless is someone who was very

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>immersed in Latin American culture and then in the culture

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>of the Vatican. So you can see this sort of

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>global preference that the cardinals are starting to show that

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>they want to show that they have an openness to

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>not just a European Church, but really a more global reality.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 4>What's the likelihood that he can heal the rift between

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the Vatican and American Catholics because it definitely had developed

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 4>and you mentioned this isn't the typical American cardinal, those

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 4>who had spoken out openly against Pope Francis. Can he

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 4>bring the kind of al Smith Catholics back to the church?

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's my sincere hope that that is the case.

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>The question is can the al Smith Catholics get on

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 3>board with the papacy. I mean, the whole point of

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of this sort of disagreement is who is

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 3>really in charge, who should really set the agenda for

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Catholic Church. And it's important for us, I mean,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>as Americans, I know, we feel a lot of like

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 3>patriotism and everything right now, especially because he's an American pope,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>but he's going to be the pope of the whole

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 3>global church, and so well, sometimes we can be a

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>little bit shortsighted and think, oh, well, he's not responding

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 3>to the things that we care about the most. But

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>he is trying to steer this ship that's kind of enormous.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Four billion people. We should remind everyone one point four

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 4>billion people, right, the longest standing institution in the Western world.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 4>And do Catholics believe that the pope, the leader of

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 4>the church is chosen by divine intervention, that essentially God

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 4>has picked this pope.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean yes, but let me give you a caveat right.

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 3>God works through human beings. It's not that God whispered

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 3>the name Prevost in the ear of every cardinal elector,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's how it happened. Right, It's not Harry Potter.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 3>It's very much real life. And so we believe that

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 3>the God doesn't let the church fall completely into error.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 3>That we believe or we trust that God is somehow

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 3>in control of this church. And that is very much

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 3>what sort of is we see happening in a conclave.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Nobody knows what goes on inside you sort of really

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 3>have to trust, and even the men who are in

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 3>there are in a sense putting their trust in you know,

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 3>we don't really know how this is going to turn out.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>We're going to sort of lay it at the feet

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 3>of God. And that's that's how Catholics think God works

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 3>in the world.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I was pretty shocked to emerge from a meeting just

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 2>after noon here in New York and see white smoke

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 2>up on the Bloomberg television screen, given that the conclave

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>just started yesterday in Vatican City, and you know, yeah,

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 2>but looking into this a little more, that's not necessarily

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that unusual, at least in modern times. They're not necessarily

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be holed up for weeks historical context, for

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 2>just the duration of this conclave. Is it surprising to

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>you or is it pretty quick?

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean it felt quick, I feel like, because like you,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like they just started yesterday and what's the deal.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>But it's usually four to five ballots, right, That's pretty

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 3>much what it's taken the last three times, four or

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 3>five ballots they do. They're very efficient with their voting.

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 3>I wish I definitely didn't think it was going to

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 3>be prevost this quickly. So I was in a meeting

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 3>with a student and I had to sort of break

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>out and cancel it and move away from it. But yeah,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the white smoke came quickly, and it was a surprise

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>that it was prevous. Now I will say this, he

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>is the guy who was advising Pope Francis on who

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>to appoint as bishops, and it's really significant that he

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 3>is now the new Pope. It tells us that Francis's

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>vision for who should be in leadership in the church,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>which is like people who were pastors, that's what Francis

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 3>really wanted. That this Leo the fourteenth is going to

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>continue that sort of vision.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 4>He actually started off quoting Pope Francis's Easter Sunday.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Words.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you expect him to carry on Francis's work not

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 4>only in terms of, you know, helping poverty, working class,

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 4>but also in terms of women in the church in leadership,

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 4>in terms of LGBTQ, bringing a sense of inclusiveness to

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 4>this Catholic church that traditionally, at least in leadership, only

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 4>relies on men.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I hope. So, I don't know. I don't

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 3>know where he stands on the issue of women. I

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 3>can only rely on what he said from the balcony,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of that was echoing so much of

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 3>what Francis was saying. So you heard him hit all

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the greatest hits. Right. He talked about peace one hundred times.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>He talked about building bridges one hundred times. He talked

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>about walking together to the Promised Land. He kept saying

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 3>tutti tuti, which was like it means everyone, which was

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 3>a refrain of Francis's He talked about a church that

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 3>was open to all, that needed to dialogue, that needed

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 3>to do encounter, and that I think signals that he

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 3>wants to continue the legacy of Francis. Now as for

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the specifics, right, will he continue to appoint women to

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 3>decision making positions in the Vatican? I hope. So that's

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>not some toothpaste. I think that I'll go back into

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the tube very easily, but you won't know.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>This is again where Catholics are like, come, Holy Spirit,

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 3>let's do this.

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Professor, really appreciate you joining us on Bloomberg Business Week

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Daily this afternoon. Professor Natalia Imparatory, Professor and Chair of

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 2>Religious Studies at Manhattan College.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch US

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 6>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 6>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 6>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Well a hard pivot from Vatican City and from What's

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>going on with the Pope too. The other big story

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>of today, and that of course, has to do with trade.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>President Trump announced a trade framework with the UK, hailing

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>it is a quote breakthrough that will bring down barriers

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and expand market access for American imports. The President said

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>final details of the pact would still be negotiated in

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the coming weeks, but under the agreement, the UK would

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>fast track American goods through their customs process and reduce

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>barriers on ag, chemical, energy, and industrial exports. Here's what

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>he said a little earlier today.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Both countries have agreed that the economic security is national secured,

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 5>and we'll be working together as allies to ensure that

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 5>we have a strong industrial base, appropriate export controls and protections.

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 5>Were key technologies and industries like steel. Steel is a

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 5>big factor. Both countries will become stronger with steel.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 2>That was President Trump earlier in the day from the

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Oval Office for more we bring in Bloomberg News, UK

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Government porter Joe Mays and Bloomberg Economics and US economist

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 2>start Paul Joe's in London stored us here in the studio. Joe,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I do want to start with you and just can

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>textualize the framework or at least the details with what

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 2>we know in the framework between what was there before

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Liberation Day so called Liberation Day, and what is the

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>status now after this framework was announced. What are the

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>big differences there?

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, the context is that the US brought in these

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 7>quite putative tariffs, particularly on the car sector, steel's aluminium,

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 7>in excess of twenty five per sent for those industries

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 7>and that was very damaging to the UK economy. And

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 7>after the deal today there is relief for those industries.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 7>So on cars the tariff going down from twenty seven

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 7>point five percent to ten percent for a quotch of

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 7>one hundred thousand vehicles, which the privacy case DALM was

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 7>hailing as a victory for companies like Jaguar Landrover. The

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 7>steel tariff has gone from twenty five percent to zero.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 7>Similar for aluminium. So those are the real big tariff

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 7>wins that the UK wants to talk about But nevertheless

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 7>there are still these ten percent baseline tariffs on the

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 7>arrest of goods that the UK tries with the US.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 7>So it's still a weaker position for the UK than

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 7>before Donald Trump became present, but it's better than things

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 7>were yesterday. That's how kiss Dalwin was framing it. So

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 7>it's a limited polisical win for the UK whilst still

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 7>suffering effectively from the remaining tariffs.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 4>What about US access to the UK market? And one

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 4>of the things Donald Trump has talked about for a

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 4>long time is that, you know, Europeans and I suppose

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:01.359
<v Speaker 4>he includes the Brits in that don't buy American products,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and of course he's talking about cars. Is the UK

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 4>market going to be far more open to US goods

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 4>than it was before this agreements?

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 7>There was included in this agreement provisions to liberalize access

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 7>to UK market for food products for example, for example,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 7>beef exports can now come into the UK from the

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 7>US and why they couldn't before.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 8>So that was hell as.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 7>A victory by President Trump. A tariff on ethanol exports

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 7>in the UK they're also now being removed, So yes,

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 7>there was a liberalization here. It wasn't an enormous liberalization that,

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 7>for example, on food standards, the UK is still saying

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 7>that it won't, for example, accept hormone treated beef into Britain.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 7>So that's a a kind of limitation on that liberalization,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 7>but still extreme limitation.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Start, Yeah, I want to bring Start Paul in

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg Economics he joined us here in the Bloomberg

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Business Week studio. Equity markets certainly cheering this, and we

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>should note that the fact that the President did make

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 2>comments about buying US equities earlier in the day as

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 2>well when he was in the Oval office earlier. Stuart,

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>what is the view from your per Bloomberg Economics of

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 2>what this means for the US and sort of how

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 2>it could illuminate maybe a framework moving forward for deals.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 9>Just we know that we're on a de escalatory path.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 9>This concretizes some of it. It gives some sort of

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 9>shape to what we could expect from deals going forward.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 9>It might be a piecemeal approach, and this can be

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 9>something that takes a long time to develop. As we

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 9>heard from Secretary Bessant, there are seventeen key trading partners

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 9>that the US is approaching deals with. If they all

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 9>take this shape, They're all going to have a relatively

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 9>dull sort of impact on US economic activity. What will

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 9>really shift most is sentiment around US engagement in the world. So,

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 9>just recognizing that we're on this sort of de escalatory

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 9>trend and that there's not going to be just a

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 9>full retreat from the global stage.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 4>What would be the best for US economic activity? I mean,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't seem like the President's going to lower at

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 4>least the baseline tariffs billow ten percent for any country,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 4>won't do it for the UK.

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So even if he doesn't lower the baseline tariff,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 9>creating enough car vouds does open up, so it does

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 9>sort of generate additional economic activity, and it brings the

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 9>average effective tarif rate significantly below what that ten percent

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 9>baseline is. So if we think about what the average

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 9>effective tarif rate was on the UK, it was just

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 9>a touch above ten percent. Now with these carveouts, the

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 9>average effective tarifrate in the UK drops down to about

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 9>seven percent. So what does that means, Let's say for

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 9>the UK in terms of economic activity and growth, where

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 9>there was about about thirty basis points of drag on

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 9>real GDP growth for the UK, now it'll just be

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 9>about twenty basis points of drag, so that'll keep GDP

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 9>growth just a touch under one percent for the full year.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 9>That's that's according to our UK forecast.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Joe, on that point, based on your reporting and

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>what you've learned about this deal, does it seem like

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>it's a better deal for the US, it's a better

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>deal for the UK? Or are they kind of when's

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the table here?

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 8>When?

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 10>When?

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean it feels like a better deal for the

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 7>US if your reference point is the day Donal Trump

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 7>becomes president, because compared to that day, the US has

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 7>gained a fair amounts here agriculture access for many products,

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 7>the ethne thing I mentioned, and still has these ten

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 7>per cent tariffs on the UK, and the UK is

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 7>in damaged limitation mode with this deal, so better than yesterday,

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 7>but clearly not as good as it was when Don

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 7>Trump first became president. So yeah, I think it's the

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 7>US is I think coming out of this slightly stronger

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 7>or the UK also is trying to claim that the

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 7>wins are on their side.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>As we mentioned, Joe, this is a framework right now.

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Some of the details continue the need to be hashed

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>out in the coming weeks. What questions do you have,

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 2>like what's the fine print here that we don't really

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 2>know yet.

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 7>So the UK said that this for them is really

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 7>a starting point. If anything, there's still much more to

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 7>happen when it comes to negotiations. That are things like

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 7>the digital services tax, which the US wants to see

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 7>regime used. It's dislikes by the likes of Facebook, Google,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 7>the evil musk Rey dislikes that tax. That could form

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 7>part of a digital agreement that's still to be negotiated.

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 7>The UK has said there's also other tariff lines which

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 7>the UK would like to see removed, but that subject

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 7>further negotiation. The pharmaceutical sector, for example, very important to

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 7>the UK. There wasn't explicit reference to that in the

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 7>agreement today, so what happens there on tariff So there's

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 7>still much more to come bent President Trump was trying

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 7>to say this is full comprehensive, We've maxed it out,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 7>and the UK was saying, well, actually there's a lot

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 7>we still wanted to talk about here, but you know,

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 7>we'll play nicely for today.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Joe, I wonder about the the importance of automotive to

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 4>the UK economy. It's been become clear. I think to

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people over the past few weeks, certainly

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 4>since April second, that global trade is car trade?

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 8>Really?

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 4>How big is it in the UK, especially when you're

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 4>just looking at exports to the US, right, because I

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 4>only can think of very high end you know, Gordon

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Murray Automobiles, McMurtry, McLaren, Range, Rover, Rolls, Royce Bentley. It's

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 4>not the mass production vehicles as Tim was mentioning, like

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Toyota and Nissan. Even though you make them there, you

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 4>don't make them there for our market.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's right. It's premium cars that the UK tends

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 7>to sell into the US, and exports of UK cars

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 7>the US were about one hundred thousand of the last counts,

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 7>which is basically covered by this quota that's been announced today,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 7>one hundred thousand quota at ten percent. So you can

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 7>see why the UK is happy with that arrangement. I

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 7>think the UK carnistry has been broadly speaking, in decline

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 7>in recent decades, but nevertheless it has carved out this

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 7>niche in high end luxury vehicles and the US worst

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 7>important market. So there's a kind of symbolic win here

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 7>for the UK. It won't have massive impacts on the

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 7>UK comedy Ritt large. It's still a very small part

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 7>of the UK comedy. But nevertheless it's a kind of

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 7>nice symbolic political win for Kirstamer to say, look, I

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 7>have masage to reduce these tarers and he was saying

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 7>today this preserves jobs across the UK, so that's something

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 7>to be celebrated.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 2>We're having this conversation, Stuart, in context of a United

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 2>States that has essentially said now is the time to

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>come and negotiate. We know that the Treasury Secretary is

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 2>headed to Switzerland this weekend to meet with representatives from

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese government. We're not talking about China here, though.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Does any of this matter without a deal with China?

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 9>China, of course matters. Most accounts for about what fourteen

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 9>to fifteen percent of our total imports were running a

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 9>trade surplus with the UK. It really doesn't matter a

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 9>ton to the US if the average effective tariff rate

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 9>on UK goods is somewhat higher. Once you start creating

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 9>carve outs for things like pharmaceuticals and everything else under

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 9>the sun, we're gonna drop from probably a current effective

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 9>tarifrate of seven percent on UK imports to something closer

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 9>to three percent. Not really material. What I do think

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 9>is the most material is this idea that when Trump

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 9>took office, the outward expression was one of an interest

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 9>in withdrawing from the global stage. Now directionally we're moving

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 9>in the opposite direction. We have had public statements from

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 9>folks like Besant and everybody else saying that one hundred

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 9>and forty five percent effective rate on China is not

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 9>something that sustainable or that can stay, that can remain

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 9>in perpetuity. And so again the direction is towards de escalation,

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 9>and I think that that's what matters most. This is

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 9>not going to be just the complete crackup of the

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 9>global commercial order that was threatened. There will be a

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 9>turning of the tide, in a bit of a shifting.

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 9>But we knew that that was going to be the case,

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 9>with friend shoring and on shoring as opposed to you know,

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 9>retaliatory or reciprocal tariffs being the terminology of the day.

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 9>We knew this was going to be the direction under Trump.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 11>By the way, I forgot to.

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 4>I forgot to tell everyone Happy v Day because it

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 4>is May eighth, right, It's victory in Europe Day. Joe,

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Happy ve Day. Well, what do we know about the

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 4>European Union? I mean, the US UK agreement has been

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 4>the main headline, but we've got another flurry of trade

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 4>headlines with golf, sovereign wealth funds, with a critical minerals

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 4>deal in Ukraine, and the EU talking about tariffs on

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 4>ninety five billion dollars of US exports. What do we

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 4>know about the EU deal?

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 7>And what we know is that clearly it's a big

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 7>priority for both sides to get some kind of agreement done.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 7>And we're all kind of reading the tea leaves today

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 7>on the UK agreement to say, Okay, clearly the US

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 7>is willing to do this entree, so might they be

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 7>willing for the same on the EU. But clearly it's

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 7>different when it comes to the scope of those kinds

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 7>of deals. Obviously much larger economies, much more trade at stake.

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 7>It's really a watching brief at this point, trying to see,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, will there be movement in these coming weeks. Clearly,

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 7>as we've just been discussing, the direction of travel from

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 7>the US side is towards wanting that engagement. But the EU,

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 7>we know, strikes very hard bargains. These negotiations, and it

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 7>is unlikely to kind of concede too much in those

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 7>kinds of talks. So, yeah, it's still a watching brief, Joe.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 2>A lot of questions about this status of American beef

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>going to the UK. What can you tell us just

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>about American agriculture and access to the UK market and

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>how that could potentially change under this framework.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so this has been one of the biggest sticking

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 7>points in the UK US trade talks historically. It's one

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 7>of the reasons why it's been difficult to get a

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 7>kind of big, comprehensive free trade agreement in recent years.

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 7>And what's happened here is that the UK has said, yes,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 7>we will allow for the import of US beef, but

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 7>on the condition that it reaches UK food standards. Now,

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 7>those food standards are standards that the US has long

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 7>criticized has been a scientific and unnecessary, but in the

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 7>UK they are seen as exceptionally politically important, and we're

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 7>talking here about things like hormone traded beef, hormone treated beef.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 7>And indeed, for the UK it's for important to maintain

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 7>their standards if they want to deal with the EU,

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 7>because the EU is particularly hot on having those standards upheld.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 7>So what the UK is done here is can walk

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 7>that tightrope and kept open the option for deals with

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 7>the EU by keeping that restriction in place. Benethless, given

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 7>the US a win by saying you can import some

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 7>beef into the UK now which tariffs and so on

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 7>under a quota, but just not hormone treated beef. So

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 7>you can see why it's kind of a halfway house.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to give Stewart the last word. One of

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the reasons we love getting you on, Stuart is because

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 2>you're able to make these quick calculations about economic impact

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of certain events. And I'm going to put you on

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the spot here and just give us your view on

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the pope and what it means for the US economy

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>that he is actually the first US born pope to

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 2>lead the Catholic Church. Do we have numbers here, sure?

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 9>So what really matters is if he's going to come

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 9>and visit the United States. Right, famously, post Francis wouldn't

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 9>really return to Argentina. But if we were to see

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 9>now Pope Leo the fourteenth coming to the United States,

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 9>it could mean a material increase in spending. If we're

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 9>just extrapolating based on the economic activity boost from let's

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 9>say Francis's visit to Philadelphia or Soul in twenty fourteen

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 9>and fifty, and just adjusting for inflation and accounting for

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 9>what the impact to be. If the Pope visited, say Chicago,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 9>his hometown, you could expect about a billion dollars an

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 9>additional economic activity. That's about five basis points of additional

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 9>spending growth in any given month. A four city tour

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 9>or five city tour like that is a pretty big

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 9>papal pop in economic activity from a tour coming from

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 9>the pope.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so maybe not Taylor Swift, maybe not Beyonce, but

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the Pope certainly a huge economic impact.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 4>If he does a whole tour, it would be a

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 4>different story, right. He wouldn't likely just go to Chicago.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 4>He would bring over the his whole entourage, probably at

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 4>least one Pope mobile. So I imagine he would go

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, New York, DC, Chicago.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean the travel expenses, the security expenses for

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 9>each city visit, that's probably close to about fifty million dollars.

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 9>But yeah, this is not quite Taylor Swift, but they're

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 9>still talking about filling Wrigley feel. Yeah, it's a a

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 9>good amount of economic activity that generated.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, a big thank you to both of

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 2>you who covered a lot here. We went around the world.

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Joe mays Our, Bloomberg News UK Government reporter, joining us

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 2>from London. Bloomberg Economics US economists store Paul.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 8>Here.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five East. During

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 11>I'm Carol Massard. We're at the Principal Asset real Estate

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 11>conference here in Pleasant Valley, Arizona. We're going to continue

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 11>our coverage here. I want to throw out one little

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 11>stat as we continue. Nearly half of family offices say

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 11>they plan to increase allocations to real estate in the

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 11>coming months, with an emphasis on residential industrial sectors. This

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 11>is according to some research out from night Frank, So

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 11>let's get to it. I'm curious what rich Hill has

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 11>to say about it. He's Senior managing director, Global head

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 11>of real Estate Research and Strategy at Principal Asset Management.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 11>Here at the conference in Arizona, rich. Good to have

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 11>you here with us. How are you.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 8>I'm great, Thanks for having me on today.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 11>It's great to have you here. I love folks who

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 11>have seen some different cycles. How do you make sense

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 11>of this cycle right now?

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Hey?

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 8>Look, every cycle's different.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 12>I like to begin by saying commercial real estate valuations

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 12>are down more than twenty percent from their peak in

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty two. That's a generational decline in private real

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 12>estate valuations. We've only seen that two times before and

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 12>aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis and in the early

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 12>nineteen nineties post this SNEL crisis. So heading into this year,

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 12>commercial real estate valuations felt like they were on pretty

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 12>good footing. Then April came and tear us through a

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 12>little wrench in that equation, leading to some questions amongst investors.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's interesting too when I think about miss priced assets,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.239
<v Speaker 11>So how mispriced are they then today in terms of

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 11>lower too low in terms of valuation, Which are some

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 11>assets that maybe still need a little bit of work here?

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah? Great, that is a really interesting question because as

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 12>you think about what's miss priced, you can think about

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 12>that on absolute basis or a relative basis, where we

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 12>think about assets that are mispriced. It's that are actually

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 12>going to grow very strongly over the next three, five

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 12>or ten years. Those are, in many cases alternative sectors

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 12>that many people don't think are what could be considered

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 12>traditional commercial real estate asset classes, right, things like data centers, right,

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 12>or cell dours or seniors housing or single family rentals.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 12>These were asset classes that didn't exist in the commercial

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.959
<v Speaker 12>real estate sector twenty years ago, but are now a

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 12>big portion of the commercial real estate market.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 11>I love that you go there. There's also variations I'm

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 11>assuming in terms of geography, right, when you look at

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 11>what's miss priced what's not for sure?

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 12>As we think about what has done really well over

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 12>the past five years, it's been driven by population migrations, right,

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 12>So many of the Sun Belt markets boomed in valuations,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 12>and you're beginning to see some actual growing pains in

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 12>the Sun Belt market.

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:50.479
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 11>One of the things I love that you said longevity.

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 11>Deborah Cafaro Aventis was on this panel I did at

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 11>Milkin and just you know, she's been you know, obviously

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 11>when it comes to senior living centers, obviously the healthcare

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 11>sign of it, but that longevity play, especially when it

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 11>comes to real estate. That's one that's going to stick

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 11>with us for a while.

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 8>It is.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 12>What I don't think a lot of people may understand

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 12>is that the aging demographic has lived in their houses

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 12>for longer periods of time. That's actually created some structural

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 12>and balances in.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 8>The single family home market.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 12>But we think this aging demographic will ultimately move into

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 12>seniors housing, whether it be limited service senior housing, all

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 12>sorts of different seniors housing, and this is going to

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 12>be a long term structural shift that's here to stay.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 11>That's a global That is a global trend. It is,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 11>it's not specific in terms of different markets. One of

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 11>the things I wanted to say, I mean, looking at

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 11>how US reads are performing as a group, they're up

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 11>about one percent year to date. They've bounced back along

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 11>with the rest of the US market. They're nearly up

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 11>twelve percent since early April. You look at European reads,

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 11>they've bounced nearly seventeen percents since then. What does the

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 11>trend tell you about investor sentiment and the willingness to

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.239
<v Speaker 11>maybe go back into the market. Is it just the

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 11>overall okay bounce back or is it something more substantial.

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 12>We think it's something much more substantial.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 8>Reads.

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 12>While they've had good years in the past couple of years,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 12>on an absolute basis, they haven't been a favorite sector

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 12>in the S and P five hundred or the global

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 12>stock market. But we think the listed public markets are

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 12>a leading indicator on both downturns and recoveries. So the

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 12>public markets are sending a signal that commercial real estate

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 12>might be a relative winner in this new backdrop of

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 12>higher interest rates and higher inflation. It's a really fascinating

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 12>topic that I don't think is getting enough attention. List

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 12>reads in the United States. Real estate in the United States,

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 12>that's the fourth best sector of the S and P

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 12>five hundred. Despite all the headlines you see about what's

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 12>happening with tariffs, what's happening with growth, what's happening with

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 12>interest rates, the public markets are telling you that you

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 12>should be focusing on the commercial real.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 11>Lill how do you make sense of that in terms

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 11>of a higher for maybe longer rate environment. Certainly in

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 11>the United States, it's not fair to say, I mean

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 11>the ECB we saw, you know, certainly has been cutting rates.

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 11>Was at the Bank of England cut it. It's not

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 11>all the same rate strategy when it comes to global

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 11>central banks, how do you make sense of that? Though

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 11>in the United States.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 12>I'm often asked, what do I think about this new

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 12>normal environment of higher inflation and higher interest rates? I

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 12>reject the premise of the question. What was abnormal was

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 12>the last ten years of low interest rates and low inflation.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.719
<v Speaker 12>Commercial real estate actually doesn't do that well in that environment,

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 12>at least on a relative basis. Where commercial real estate

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 12>actually does well is what happened prior to the GFC.

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 12>A higherst higher inflation regime exlicit for decades, and that's

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 12>actually fairly accommodative for commercial real estate because guess what,

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 12>it's a growth sector.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 11>What about office? I just want to go there. I

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 11>feel like we've been talking about it since the pandemic.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 11>Here we are, what five years out, and I don't

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 11>know whether the big shoe has yet to drop expectations

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 11>in terms of that within the real estate sector.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 12>If you're going to ask me, is office going to

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 12>be an attractive sector over the next ten years or beyond, yeah,

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 12>I have to tell you yes, it's going to be. Why,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 12>there's a couple different reasons. First of all, last cycles

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 12>winners are rarely next cycles winners. Office properties have been

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 12>beaten down so much and they're redlined by much of

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 12>the investor race right now, right that they're beginning to

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 12>screen at an attract evaluation, especially for the high quality,

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 12>well positioned properties. I would consider myself office curious right now.

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 12>I think it is an attractive asset class over the medium.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 8>To long term.

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 12>The signal that you should be looking for is an

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 12>opening up of lending to the office sector, and I

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 12>think we're in the cusp of seeing that in twenty twenty.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 11>Five, coming from the private markets more so than the

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 11>big banks.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 12>That is correct, people like Prince Alassat Management. One of

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 12>the themes that we heard on our panel earlier today

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 12>is well, is there an opportunity to begin lending on

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 12>high quality office at a reset lower basis. I think

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 12>that might make a lot of sense.

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 11>I am curious. You know, as you guys have conversations

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 11>here at the conference, You've got some really big clients,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 11>big investors here, what is top of mind for them

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 11>when it comes to real estate? And I hate to

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 11>keep putting it all into one bucket, because it's, as

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 11>we know, there's different verticals, there's different geographies, and I

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 11>think it's an important distinction, but I am curious what

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 11>they're asking you.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, what's happened over the past twenty thirty years is

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 12>that commercial real estate has benefited from a secular decline

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 12>in tenure treasure rates. Right, borrowers have been or investors

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 12>have been able to refinance and lower lower interest rates,

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 12>which has helped valuations. I think a really big theme

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 12>coming out of this conference is back to basics, what

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 12>property type and what market will drive long term growth.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 12>That's really refreshing to me because financial engineering has driven

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 12>returns for the past decades, so rightkaid, Plus we're now

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 12>getting back to all right, fine, what property type do

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 12>I think I'm going to get three percent net operating

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 12>income growth revenue minus expenses?

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 11>Where can I.

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 12>Actually generate the high attractive unlevered IRRs. You actually don't

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 12>need that much growth relative to history to get there.

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 12>So I think there's a lot of investors acutely focused

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 12>on what property types and what markets to buy.

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 11>Which it's more like being back to normal, right. I mean, well,

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 11>I know everybody kind of forgets that what we saw

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 11>for such a long time where there was basically no

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 11>cost to money. Right, that was the unusual point.

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 12>Called back to the future, call it back to normal,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 12>whatever you want to. This is a really refreshing environment

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 12>where you can actually block and tackle if you will.

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 11>I want to ask you variations US, Europe, Asian, Middle East,

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 11>you know, the supply chain as it moves around geographies

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 11>that maybe didn't get a lot of attention that are

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 11>now getting attention. Like I keep bringing up this idea

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 11>that Disney's not going to build a theme park in

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 11>the Middle East. You know, I talked to a lot

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 11>of folks at Milkin who were like, we opened up

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 11>in an office somewhere in the Middle East. So I am

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 11>curious when you look around the world, you know, where

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 11>is it all of a sudden getting a lot of

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 11>investor intention when it comes to the real estate play.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 12>We think one of the most significant trends of the

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 12>next five to ten years might be the European continent

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 12>and specifically Europe. Yeah, and specifically building logistics on the

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 12>European continent. Why is that the case, Well, the European

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 12>countries might have to trade more with each other, and

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 12>most warehouse facilities on the European continent are actually relatively old,

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 12>call it ten fifteen, twenty years old, right, That does

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 12>not accommodate new modern trade.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 8>So to be able to build new.

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 12>Logistics facilities on the continent could be a really interesting

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 12>theme that's coming out of the next evolution of where

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 12>we go post era?

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 11>Does that also include ports like ports all of a sudden,

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 11>Like one of the things that came out of the

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 11>discussions at Milkin too is like that West coast port

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 11>one of you know that maybe it'll be busy, but

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 11>maybe not as busy as it used to be. So

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 11>I'm just curious when you think about that as well,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 11>the infrastructure build for that.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely you have to find these right ports on the

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 12>European continent and maybe even the UK that will change

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 12>the shipment of goods. Maybe in the US. One of

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 12>the ports that I think is most interesting in Savannah.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 12>Just to sort of levey off of what you were talking.

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 11>About, We've got a lot of family down in South Carolinina,

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 11>not Savannah, But nonetheless there's so much activity just to

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 11>wrap up here. Where do you think is the biggest

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 11>opportunity when you look out Again, real estate's a longer

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 11>term play, so I think it's either three, five, ten years,

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 11>where do you think will really present some really unique

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 11>opportunities for investors.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so I'd just conclude commercial real estate is actually

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 12>eighteen different sectors that fall under a broad umbrella. They

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.959
<v Speaker 12>were always opportunities someplace in the world for some property type.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 12>I do think European logistics is a really big opportunity.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 12>We think senior's housing is a really big.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 11>Opportunity globally, right globally.

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 12>One of the themes that I've been really surprised about

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 12>to hear because it's a relatively nichee sector, but levers

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 12>off of senior's housing is medical office buildings. I've been

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 12>hearing a lot of investors talk about medical office buildings.

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 12>So there's going to be some really interesting opportunities that

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 12>come out from the shakeup. And I'll come back to

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 12>the question you asked about office. I'd be remiss if

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 12>I said over the next ten or twenty years, it

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 12>sort of feels like it's ready for a rebound.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 11>At some point, people are actually going back to the office,

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 11>aren't they.

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 12>My train into New York City is at ninety seven

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 12>percent of capacity.

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 11>It's happening. It's happening, really great stuff. Thank you so much.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 8>It's great meeting you. Yeah. Same.

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 11>Here. Rich Hill, Senior Managing Director, Global ahead of real

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 11>Estate Research and Strategy at Principal Asset Management. Here at

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 11>the Principal of Real Estate Conference.

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 6>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 6>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 6>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 11>Jim's back in New York. I'm here in Arizona, and

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 11>I'm here at the Principal real Estate conference that's been underway.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 11>I want to jump right in and get to our

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 11>next guest's Kamal Bati's President CEO of Principal Asset Management. Kamal,

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 11>it's been really fun talking with your team because I think,

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 11>amid uncertainty volatility, you know, when you think about some

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 11>of these asset classes, like real estate, investors are in

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 11>it for the long term, so there is a sense

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 11>of calm and understanding that we're going to go through cycles.

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 11>Talk to us a little bit about, you know, your

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 11>check ins with your team on a regular basis, A

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 11>mid kind of the backdrop.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 10>That we've had absolutely First of all, Carol, thank you

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 10>for being here in Arizona. It's it's an honor. You know,

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 10>real estate is the heart of our business. We have

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 10>one of the biggest managers in the world, and it's

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 10>great to have Bloomberg join us at our premier conference,

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 10>So thank you for that.

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 11>Adom Becaus been doing it for a quarter of a century.

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 10>We have been we have some experience from market cycles,

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 10>which which probably matters more than ever before. So to

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 10>your question, I think, you know, sort of uncertainty seems

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 10>to be the most commonly used word these days, and

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 10>I would say probably the world I want to focus

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 10>on is clarity because as investors, I think that probably

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 10>is the more important word to focus on. What you

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 10>can get clarity on and what you can get clarity on,

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 10>In fact, one of the things when you really think

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 10>about long term trends, because there's a lot of short

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 10>term noise. The two things I think we can have

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 10>absolute clarity on is the world is aging and there

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 10>is money in motion in retirement. And I think if

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 10>you really think about the needs of those investors in retirement,

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 10>which we are a premier manager, almost three and twenty

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 10>billion of our assets in retirement. The needs for those

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 10>investors are like only getting more important. And if you

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 10>really bring that act to an investing landscape with what

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 10>we have noise in the trade, trade wars, de globalization,

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 10>the one thing that is clear to us is you

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 10>have to have local knowledge and footprint as you navigate

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 10>this environment. You can run portfolios just with a US mindset.

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 10>You've got to have intelligence on the ground, right if

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 10>you're trying to do something in Asia, you're trying to

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 10>do something in Europe. And that's been the key thing

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 10>that I would tell investors need to focus more and

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 10>more on local knowledge and clarity on what's happening in

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 10>the local geographies is going to be way more important

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 10>than it's.

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 11>Been in the part. I think that is so smart

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 11>because I do think you know, we throw out global

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 11>real estate said this a couple of times in the

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 11>conversations today as a bucket, but there's just so many

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 11>different dices and slicing of it, if you will, in

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 11>terms of the different types that are out there. You know,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 11>one of the things I am also curious, you know,

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 11>you guys have been doing this for a long time

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 11>and it just felt so uncomfortable, But you think of

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 11>something like the Great Financial Crisis. This is nothing like

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 11>what we start are the GFC right when it comes

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 11>to real estate and just in general market volatility.

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 10>Correct, correct, And look, you know, I think we've had

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 10>such ultimate calm on what I would call political policy.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, we over post GFC, so much of our

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 10>attention went to fiscal and monetary policy. I would say

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 10>monetary policy more than anything else, right, And fysical policy

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 10>comes into work on and off, but it was really

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 10>monetary policy was the driver of what all investors thought about.

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 10>And now I think we are entering an era where

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 10>I would say political policy and fiscal policy are going

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 10>to be the driving forces of markets moving forward.

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 8>And it's sort of you have to recalibrate your.

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 11>Bettering your view.

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a different thing. Okay, I wouldn't call

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 10>it a better thing. I think we have gotten used to.

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 10>I go back to this word around clarity. Central bankers

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 10>became very very good at providing clarity. Yeah, if you

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 10>look at the history of how ins have reacted, such

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 10>attention gets paid to interest rates, what central bankers say,

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 10>and that sort of became the words they chose and

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 10>how they said. It allowed investors to build a framework

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 10>and invest around it. While we can rely on that,

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 10>it is you can get the same level of clarity

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 10>from the political policy today, not just in US but

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 10>across the world, and the fiscal policy is much more

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 10>in control of government organizations, and so you have to

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 10>do a lot of individual work and incremental work as

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 10>an investor if you want to see clarity. And I

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 10>think it's going to be good for markets. Why it

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 10>is going to be good for markets, in my mind

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 10>is we've had sort of a collective viewpoint where markets

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 10>are going, and I think there's a bigger dispersion in

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 10>investors who think where the world is going.

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 11>It's interesting that dispersion. I feel like that is a

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.359
<v Speaker 11>word I'm hearing more and more often in terms of

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 11>just the variations, and you've really got to kind of

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 11>do your homework. I want to go back to what

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 11>you talked a little bit about longevity, retirement, the democratization

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 11>especially the private market. Is that going to increasingly whether

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 11>it's exposure to real estate or other important for ultimately

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 11>folks really hitting their targets when it comes to retirement.

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 11>And what do you want to see in terms of policies.

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely great question. So I was just earlier this week

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 10>at Milkin and that was a big topic.

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, private markets.

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 10>Before that, I'm on the ICI board, Carolyn, that has

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 10>become a topic there. So this notion of retirement and

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.720
<v Speaker 10>private markets overall is a big topic.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 8>But I would say the three big.

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 10>Trends in the retirement space are, in addition to private markets,

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 10>there is innovation, and innovation is not just investment innovation.

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 10>There is technological innovation that play a role for these

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 10>products to deliver their outcome. And then the last piece

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:55.760
<v Speaker 10>is I go back to policy. These markets are highly

0:40:55.800 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 10>dependent on where regulatory policy evolves, and I would say

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 10>the retirement investor is absolutely not participating in private markets today.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.879
<v Speaker 10>They're almost like sitting on the sideline stuck because there's

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 10>no clarity on the regulatory policy front of how they

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 10>should access is and while there is innovation of how

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 10>to do it, it is not there yet. Going back to

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 10>real estate, I would say it is probably the first

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:22.959
<v Speaker 10>door you have to enter if you want to allow

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 10>private markets, and as an investor, it should be really

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 10>easy to.

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 8>Understand why why exactly?

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 10>I would say of all the asset classes, real estate

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 10>is probably the most different from bonds and stocks. You know,

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 10>people talk about private equity, people talk about private credit.

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 10>They are different, but they're not that different. Real Estate

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 10>at the core is different, and so why are we

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 10>going to do this. It's all about outcomes, So you

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 10>want to add things that diversify you further. So real

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.720
<v Speaker 10>estate a makes the first logical argument, and academic literature

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 10>even says that you've got to pick the most diversifying

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 10>asset first, So that one makes sense. Two, it is

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 10>deeply global, and it is wide and deep realistic exist

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 10>all across the world.

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, we have read markets.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 10>And so the second thing you want to have is

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 10>if you want to do it in retirement portfolios, you

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 10>want to have public and private proxies for doing something.

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, real estate is one of those asset classes.

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 10>You could buy direct or you could do reads, you

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 10>could buy bonds, or you could do equity. It is

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 10>a complete three sixty asset class. And at the end

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 10>of the day, the saverer, which is really mom and

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 10>pops who are saving for retirement, want to have an

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:36.760
<v Speaker 10>asset class that's deep and you can implement your views

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 10>across the world in.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 8>A good way. That's probably the best reason I would argue, you.

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 11>Know, it's funny at Milkin and one of the guests,

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:43.240
<v Speaker 11>I said, you know, it's going to be a period

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 11>where like we don't really care about the public markets anymore,

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 11>and like they looked at me like I was black.

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 11>You know, what are you saying? But it just increasingly

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 11>the shift private markets has certainly been a topic, as

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 11>you know it looking for a long time, whether it's

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 11>real estate like pick your thing, and I just wonder,

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, how are the majority of investors for one

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 11>cage like your mom and pop, what they are missing

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 11>out on?

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so I would say what they're really missing on

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 10>is having access to all asset classes. And as you said,

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 10>they're largely in publics. But public will have.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 8>To be the core of the portfolio.

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 10>You know, you need to manage liquidity in these portfolios,

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 10>and it is by far the biggest component of market

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 10>access today is in public market.

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 11>I just got about thirty seconds left here real quickly.

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 11>Secretary of Besent kicked off Milkin talking about American exceptionalism

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 11>basically best place for the US. How do you see it?

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 11>Because you look at real estate from a global perspective.

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 10>So here's what I would say, I think just quickly, yes,

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 10>just quickly, America will remain exceptional in technology. Not sure

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 10>about every sector of the economy.

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 11>All right, you are quick, you know how to take cues.

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 11>Really really appreciate it. And it feels like a lot

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 11>more optimism, a lot more open than some of the

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 11>uncertainty and concerns come out. Perfect way for us to

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 11>wrap up.

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 8>Our coverage today.

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.439
<v Speaker 11>Thank you so much for inviting us. Really enjoy the conversations.

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 6>This is the Bloomberg Busy This Week daily podcast, available

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 6>on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 6>Listen live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 6>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 6>the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 6>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.