WEBVTT - On Background: The Political Spender America Deserves

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:23.236
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. You might remember back in December twenty twenty two,

0:00:23.396 --> 0:00:26.076
<v Speaker 1>right around the time crypto founder Sam Bankman Freed was

0:00:26.156 --> 0:00:29.956
<v Speaker 1>arrested in the Bahamas. He was charged with various financial crimes,

0:00:30.236 --> 0:00:32.036
<v Speaker 1>and we also saw a lot of headlines about his

0:00:32.116 --> 0:00:36.276
<v Speaker 1>political donations, headlines with very large numbers attached to them.

0:00:37.156 --> 0:00:41.716
<v Speaker 1>CBS News reported one of those stories, the crypto entrepreneur

0:00:41.796 --> 0:00:45.196
<v Speaker 1>made about forty million dollars in political donations in the

0:00:45.236 --> 0:00:48.196
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two election cycle. So why do I care

0:00:48.196 --> 0:00:51.396
<v Speaker 1>about this now? I spent an awful lot of time

0:00:51.436 --> 0:00:53.756
<v Speaker 1>with Sam Bankman Freed, as I reported my next book,

0:00:53.756 --> 0:00:55.796
<v Speaker 1>because he sits right in the middle of it. And

0:00:55.876 --> 0:00:58.476
<v Speaker 1>whatever you think about how he made his money, his

0:00:58.556 --> 0:01:01.356
<v Speaker 1>eagerness to give large chunks of it away was fascinating.

0:01:01.836 --> 0:01:05.356
<v Speaker 1>But the contributions to political causes and candidates is turning

0:01:05.356 --> 0:01:08.236
<v Speaker 1>out to be yet another area where he's now in trouble.

0:01:08.916 --> 0:01:12.636
<v Speaker 1>And all those politicians he gave money to they might

0:01:12.716 --> 0:01:20.076
<v Speaker 1>have to give it back from against the rules. This

0:01:20.276 --> 0:01:37.636
<v Speaker 1>is on background. I'm Michael Lewis. In order to understand

0:01:37.716 --> 0:01:39.956
<v Speaker 1>the mess that Sam Bankmanfreed is in, I need to

0:01:39.996 --> 0:01:42.596
<v Speaker 1>know a lot more about the world of campaign finance

0:01:42.676 --> 0:01:47.596
<v Speaker 1>law that world's changed in the last decade. In twenty ten,

0:01:47.636 --> 0:01:50.316
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court made a controversial ruling in a case

0:01:50.396 --> 0:01:54.836
<v Speaker 1>called Citizens United. Basically, the ruling said the corporations and

0:01:54.876 --> 0:01:56.836
<v Speaker 1>other groups can spend as much money as they want

0:01:56.876 --> 0:02:00.836
<v Speaker 1>to on elections. Citizens United also spawned the creation of

0:02:00.916 --> 0:02:05.796
<v Speaker 1>powerful political action committees called super PACs and so called

0:02:06.396 --> 0:02:11.556
<v Speaker 1>dart money nonprofits that don't disclose their donors. It's a

0:02:11.596 --> 0:02:16.076
<v Speaker 1>tangled web, and I need a guide. That's where Jordan

0:02:16.156 --> 0:02:19.836
<v Speaker 1>Libowitz comes in. He's communications director for the Center for

0:02:19.916 --> 0:02:24.436
<v Speaker 1>Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a campaign finance watchdog group.

0:02:25.436 --> 0:02:28.236
<v Speaker 1>When Sam Bankman Fried set up his own superpack, it

0:02:28.316 --> 0:02:30.996
<v Speaker 1>was called protect Our Future. It quickly became one of

0:02:30.996 --> 0:02:34.716
<v Speaker 1>the biggest political donors around, and Jordan Libowitz took notice.

0:02:35.636 --> 0:02:38.236
<v Speaker 1>He's been watching Sam bagman Freed even longer than I have.

0:02:40.796 --> 0:02:43.076
<v Speaker 1>When did he come on your radar screen? Like? When

0:02:43.116 --> 0:02:44.676
<v Speaker 1>did you first stop paying attention to him?

0:02:44.996 --> 0:02:52.036
<v Speaker 2>So there were articles midway through the twenty twenty cycle

0:02:52.636 --> 0:02:56.516
<v Speaker 2>about this new donor who no one had ever heard of,

0:02:57.516 --> 0:03:00.196
<v Speaker 2>spending huge amounts of money and pledging to be one

0:03:00.196 --> 0:03:04.956
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest donors in the election. Anytime someone is

0:03:04.996 --> 0:03:10.516
<v Speaker 2>spending huge amounts of money, that raises our eyebrows. But

0:03:10.596 --> 0:03:13.836
<v Speaker 2>crypto was still very very new to us. Then. We

0:03:13.876 --> 0:03:18.516
<v Speaker 2>didn't see crypto influence building for another couple of years.

0:03:20.156 --> 0:03:23.076
<v Speaker 2>But it was just here's this guy who got rich

0:03:23.236 --> 0:03:25.996
<v Speaker 2>and he's spending a lot of money. You know, it's

0:03:26.036 --> 0:03:30.676
<v Speaker 2>a name we recognize. It wasn't until FTX blew up

0:03:31.076 --> 0:03:33.396
<v Speaker 2>that we really started paying attention to him.

0:03:33.796 --> 0:03:36.756
<v Speaker 1>Do you notice any patterns in his giving? Like I'd

0:03:36.796 --> 0:03:39.596
<v Speaker 1>love to hear kind of what campaigns he specifically gave to,

0:03:39.716 --> 0:03:42.756
<v Speaker 1>but more generally, were there any patterns to the campaigns

0:03:42.796 --> 0:03:43.396
<v Speaker 1>he was giving to.

0:03:43.876 --> 0:03:49.516
<v Speaker 2>The first thing is that the giving was more ideological

0:03:49.596 --> 0:03:56.596
<v Speaker 2>than political. These are helping pro crypto candidates or ones

0:03:56.676 --> 0:04:00.756
<v Speaker 2>that could be beneficial to his business later on. The

0:04:00.836 --> 0:04:04.436
<v Speaker 2>second thing is he seemed to concentrate much more in primaries.

0:04:05.036 --> 0:04:08.316
<v Speaker 2>A lot of elections in this country, the general election

0:04:08.636 --> 0:04:13.396
<v Speaker 2>is not particularly competitive, thanks in part to gerrymandering or

0:04:13.436 --> 0:04:16.916
<v Speaker 2>to just the way states are. The actual election to

0:04:16.956 --> 0:04:20.436
<v Speaker 2>decide is the primary. So when we talk about him

0:04:20.556 --> 0:04:26.276
<v Speaker 2>as this massive democratic donor, most of his money was

0:04:26.316 --> 0:04:30.916
<v Speaker 2>going to influence democratic primaries that we know about as

0:04:30.916 --> 0:04:35.476
<v Speaker 2>opposed to helping Democrats be Republicans.

0:04:36.236 --> 0:04:39.956
<v Speaker 1>And in those primaries, what was he looking for in candidates?

0:04:40.876 --> 0:04:44.716
<v Speaker 2>So he had this idea of what the future should

0:04:44.756 --> 0:04:49.476
<v Speaker 2>look like. We know that regulation and laws around cryptocurrency

0:04:49.596 --> 0:04:53.556
<v Speaker 2>are coming. Who is going to be voting on that,

0:04:53.596 --> 0:04:57.596
<v Speaker 2>Who's going to be casting the deciding vote, finding people

0:04:57.716 --> 0:05:02.636
<v Speaker 2>who are likely to be friendly, and then supporting them

0:05:02.756 --> 0:05:05.396
<v Speaker 2>in primaries to make sure they are in Congress.

0:05:08.636 --> 0:05:11.956
<v Speaker 1>You have a of how much money he poured into this.

0:05:14.396 --> 0:05:20.476
<v Speaker 2>So the pack itself was twenty something million, I think

0:05:20.476 --> 0:05:23.796
<v Speaker 2>twenty three million, and then he I think he did

0:05:23.796 --> 0:05:27.756
<v Speaker 2>at least another ten million on top of that. But

0:05:27.876 --> 0:05:30.916
<v Speaker 2>then if he was also doing just as much through

0:05:31.196 --> 0:05:36.396
<v Speaker 2>dark money, we're talking about sixty seventy million, which puts

0:05:36.436 --> 0:05:40.956
<v Speaker 2>him easily in the top three, four or five biggest

0:05:40.956 --> 0:05:45.516
<v Speaker 2>spenders in the country, along with who names like George Soros,

0:05:45.916 --> 0:05:50.636
<v Speaker 2>Seon Adelson, the u Lines, the Kochs, those are the

0:05:50.716 --> 0:05:52.276
<v Speaker 2>kind of the big families of money.

0:05:52.596 --> 0:05:56.036
<v Speaker 1>So he was playing at that level. Yes, it's kind

0:05:56.036 --> 0:05:56.556
<v Speaker 1>of amazing.

0:05:57.596 --> 0:06:02.516
<v Speaker 2>What's really amazing is those other names I named decades

0:06:02.556 --> 0:06:06.916
<v Speaker 2>in politics and decades in political spending. He came out of.

0:06:06.876 --> 0:06:09.356
<v Speaker 1>Nowhere, Can we just back up a minute here, talk

0:06:09.436 --> 0:06:12.356
<v Speaker 1>me through all these campaign finance terms like dark money

0:06:12.396 --> 0:06:17.076
<v Speaker 1>and packs. I like a little campaign finance one oh one.

0:06:17.596 --> 0:06:23.036
<v Speaker 2>So normally when you're giving to campaigns, there's a limit

0:06:23.076 --> 0:06:26.796
<v Speaker 2>the FC sets the Federal Election Commission, and right now,

0:06:26.836 --> 0:06:30.356
<v Speaker 2>that's thirty three hundred dollars per election. If you're giving

0:06:30.396 --> 0:06:34.956
<v Speaker 2>to a candidate, more towards other organizations.

0:06:34.236 --> 0:06:35.996
<v Speaker 1>And where does that and where does that amount come from?

0:06:36.036 --> 0:06:39.156
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of arbitrary. Why can't I just give anything

0:06:39.156 --> 0:06:39.796
<v Speaker 1>I want?

0:06:40.356 --> 0:06:43.196
<v Speaker 2>So they set a fairly low limit, and then it's

0:06:43.236 --> 0:06:46.356
<v Speaker 2>index to inflation. So there's actually a big boost for

0:06:46.436 --> 0:06:49.556
<v Speaker 2>this cycle of I think four hundred dollars per election,

0:06:50.156 --> 0:06:54.116
<v Speaker 2>But generally it's to limit the idea of you being

0:06:54.156 --> 0:06:58.236
<v Speaker 2>able to just go out and buy an election. But

0:06:58.396 --> 0:07:04.396
<v Speaker 2>then we get these decisions starting with Citizens United and

0:07:04.756 --> 0:07:10.676
<v Speaker 2>Speech now versus the FFC, which essentially say book freedom

0:07:10.716 --> 0:07:16.676
<v Speaker 2>of speech prohibits the government from limiting how money can

0:07:16.716 --> 0:07:22.196
<v Speaker 2>be spent to influence elections and opened up corporations and

0:07:22.556 --> 0:07:27.156
<v Speaker 2>unions and nonprofits to give money or to spend money,

0:07:27.516 --> 0:07:30.636
<v Speaker 2>you have a put up collection committee or a pack

0:07:30.796 --> 0:07:33.236
<v Speaker 2>which has a higher limit, it's five thousand dollars a

0:07:33.316 --> 0:07:39.036
<v Speaker 2>year and has more regulations. Then you have what's now

0:07:39.116 --> 0:07:42.556
<v Speaker 2>known as a super pack, which you can give an

0:07:42.676 --> 0:07:48.716
<v Speaker 2>unlimited amount to with the two limits being that the

0:07:48.796 --> 0:07:52.596
<v Speaker 2>super pack can't give that money then directly to a candidate,

0:07:53.116 --> 0:07:56.516
<v Speaker 2>and it can't coordinate it spending with a candidate.

0:07:56.916 --> 0:08:00.836
<v Speaker 1>So there's still limits on direct giving by corporations and

0:08:00.876 --> 0:08:04.916
<v Speaker 1>individuals directly to the campaign exactly, but there's no limit

0:08:05.356 --> 0:08:07.596
<v Speaker 1>on doing whatever you want with money to help the

0:08:07.636 --> 0:08:09.356
<v Speaker 1>campaign without colluding it.

0:08:10.396 --> 0:08:14.756
<v Speaker 2>Right now, it's going to get murkier. After Citizens United

0:08:15.156 --> 0:08:20.196
<v Speaker 2>allowed nonprofit organizations to spend unlimited you have five oh

0:08:20.236 --> 0:08:24.996
<v Speaker 2>one c four groups which are known as social wealth organizations.

0:08:25.716 --> 0:08:28.636
<v Speaker 2>They're allowed to spend money on politics as long as

0:08:28.636 --> 0:08:30.916
<v Speaker 2>it's not their primary purpose, so as long as it's

0:08:30.996 --> 0:08:35.116
<v Speaker 2>less than fifty percent of their budget. Unlike all the

0:08:35.116 --> 0:08:38.476
<v Speaker 2>political groups are just named, they don't have to actually

0:08:38.516 --> 0:08:43.036
<v Speaker 2>disclose anything to the FEC. So the money coming in

0:08:43.556 --> 0:08:45.956
<v Speaker 2>is a complete mystery where it's from.

0:08:46.756 --> 0:08:49.396
<v Speaker 1>And it can do it can it do everything that

0:08:49.436 --> 0:08:52.236
<v Speaker 1>a super pac can do right exactly.

0:08:52.436 --> 0:08:53.556
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't have limits.

0:08:53.716 --> 0:08:56.156
<v Speaker 1>Sold Why would anybody have a superpack if they were

0:08:56.156 --> 0:08:58.676
<v Speaker 1>trying to disguise what they were doing exactly.

0:08:58.756 --> 0:09:00.836
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're not supposed to be disguiseding what you're doing.

0:09:02.476 --> 0:09:05.716
<v Speaker 2>All of this is done more or less with a

0:09:05.716 --> 0:09:09.396
<v Speaker 2>wink and a nudge. You don't say that I'm giving

0:09:09.436 --> 0:09:11.916
<v Speaker 2>you this money for the election, because that would make

0:09:11.956 --> 0:09:14.756
<v Speaker 2>it a political donation, and they can't take political donations.

0:09:15.076 --> 0:09:19.876
<v Speaker 2>What they can do is give money to politics. So

0:09:20.476 --> 0:09:24.596
<v Speaker 2>let's say I want to help your campaign for Senate

0:09:25.076 --> 0:09:27.396
<v Speaker 2>and I want to spend millions of dollars to do so.

0:09:28.516 --> 0:09:31.276
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to write a check for two million dollars

0:09:31.756 --> 0:09:34.476
<v Speaker 2>to a dark money group and tell them, you know

0:09:34.596 --> 0:09:36.996
<v Speaker 2>this is because I support your mission, go out into

0:09:37.156 --> 0:09:39.436
<v Speaker 2>what you want with it. They can then spend that

0:09:39.476 --> 0:09:42.436
<v Speaker 2>two million dollars on ads that will help you. But

0:09:42.556 --> 0:09:45.356
<v Speaker 2>as long as I am not saying, hey, I want

0:09:45.396 --> 0:09:49.316
<v Speaker 2>you to spend this money to help him, then we're

0:09:49.356 --> 0:09:51.276
<v Speaker 2>in the clear. And that's a problem.

0:09:51.836 --> 0:09:58.876
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So so since twenty ten, if I, if I billionaire,

0:09:59.516 --> 0:10:01.956
<v Speaker 1>want to go try to buy a Senate seat for

0:10:02.036 --> 0:10:06.836
<v Speaker 1>someone without any letting anybody know, without anybody able to

0:10:06.836 --> 0:10:12.116
<v Speaker 1>see my money, give it to you dark money group

0:10:12.956 --> 0:10:16.236
<v Speaker 1>with a wink and a NOD and you go and

0:10:16.276 --> 0:10:18.516
<v Speaker 1>buy as much litical ads or whatever as you as

0:10:18.516 --> 0:10:21.476
<v Speaker 1>you want with that, and nobody will know where your

0:10:21.556 --> 0:10:24.516
<v Speaker 1>money came from. That's good, right.

0:10:24.716 --> 0:10:27.716
<v Speaker 2>The five oh one C four group needs to disclose

0:10:27.756 --> 0:10:34.156
<v Speaker 2>its donors to the IRS, yep, But there's not a

0:10:34.756 --> 0:10:36.596
<v Speaker 2>there's not that overlap between the I R S and

0:10:37.716 --> 0:10:38.956
<v Speaker 2>the FC and.

0:10:38.916 --> 0:10:41.276
<v Speaker 1>The IRS not could disclose it publicly.

0:10:41.156 --> 0:10:46.516
<v Speaker 2>Right, And because you're just writing this check for general purposes,

0:10:47.076 --> 0:10:50.396
<v Speaker 2>you're in the clear. And it gets even more of

0:10:50.396 --> 0:10:54.316
<v Speaker 2>an issue in that to make a political donation, you

0:10:54.356 --> 0:10:57.076
<v Speaker 2>can't be a foreign national writing a check from another country,

0:10:57.716 --> 0:11:00.116
<v Speaker 2>but a dark money group can take that legally.

0:11:00.796 --> 0:11:03.476
<v Speaker 1>The Saudis could put a billion dollars into a dark

0:11:03.476 --> 0:11:06.116
<v Speaker 1>money fund and without as long as they didn't tell

0:11:06.156 --> 0:11:07.836
<v Speaker 1>them what to do with it, and the dark money

0:11:07.836 --> 0:11:08.956
<v Speaker 1>fund can go and buy election.

0:11:09.276 --> 0:11:12.676
<v Speaker 2>So they're not supposed to spend any foreign money on elections.

0:11:13.516 --> 0:11:14.556
<v Speaker 2>But could it be happening.

0:11:14.596 --> 0:11:18.436
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, that would be that. But that would be illegal, Oh,

0:11:18.556 --> 0:11:23.436
<v Speaker 3>incredibly illegal. Sure, But what's done legally is what's amazing.

0:11:23.836 --> 0:11:26.316
<v Speaker 3>I mean, my two thoughts now that you've explained this

0:11:26.356 --> 0:11:30.636
<v Speaker 3>to me that pop to mind is that one if

0:11:30.636 --> 0:11:33.076
<v Speaker 3>this is true that I can get the same results

0:11:33.196 --> 0:11:36.036
<v Speaker 3>from a dark money group as I can from a

0:11:36.036 --> 0:11:40.316
<v Speaker 3>superpack with my money. The only reason I'd go with

0:11:40.316 --> 0:11:42.556
<v Speaker 3>the superpack is if I wanted everybody to know that

0:11:42.596 --> 0:11:46.556
<v Speaker 3>I was giving the money exactly Otherwise I would and

0:11:46.596 --> 0:11:48.956
<v Speaker 3>maybe I would Maybe I'd want like the Senator who

0:11:49.036 --> 0:11:50.756
<v Speaker 3>I get elected to know it was my money.

0:11:51.036 --> 0:11:53.636
<v Speaker 1>So so, but it would be it would be positively

0:11:53.716 --> 0:11:56.396
<v Speaker 1>advertising the fact. But otherwise I just wouldn't do that.

0:11:56.876 --> 0:12:00.076
<v Speaker 1>I would go with this, this other entity. The second

0:12:00.076 --> 0:12:02.676
<v Speaker 1>thing that like this, this is this has bewildered me

0:12:02.716 --> 0:12:04.916
<v Speaker 1>for a long time since the citizens in the United

0:12:04.956 --> 0:12:10.676
<v Speaker 1>decision is given how easy it is to get money

0:12:10.716 --> 0:12:15.596
<v Speaker 1>into politics, unlimited sums of money into politics to influence

0:12:15.636 --> 0:12:19.956
<v Speaker 1>elections without anybody knowing where the money came from. It's

0:12:19.996 --> 0:12:23.916
<v Speaker 1>amazing how little money there is in politics. If you'd

0:12:24.036 --> 0:12:27.676
<v Speaker 1>told me in two thousand and five that these laws

0:12:27.716 --> 0:12:32.076
<v Speaker 1>we're going to change, i'd a thought in a presidential

0:12:32.116 --> 0:12:36.956
<v Speaker 1>election cycle, one hundred billion dollars would be spent on

0:12:37.116 --> 0:12:40.516
<v Speaker 1>Senate on congressional seats in the presidential election. But it's

0:12:40.556 --> 0:12:44.756
<v Speaker 1>nothing like that. Is that a weird reaction or do

0:12:44.796 --> 0:12:46.076
<v Speaker 1>you do you agree with that.

0:12:46.636 --> 0:12:51.676
<v Speaker 2>The big, big cost is TV ads. There's a limit

0:12:51.716 --> 0:12:55.236
<v Speaker 2>to the number of ads you can run, right, But

0:12:56.596 --> 0:13:01.596
<v Speaker 2>generally the very very rich do not necessarily want to

0:13:01.596 --> 0:13:03.276
<v Speaker 2>spend all their money on one election.

0:13:04.116 --> 0:13:06.596
<v Speaker 1>Right. So the limiting factor isn't the money. The limiting

0:13:06.676 --> 0:13:11.676
<v Speaker 1>factor is the effect that money can have. Given that

0:13:11.916 --> 0:13:18.916
<v Speaker 1>it's so easy to legally hide your campaign contributions and

0:13:18.996 --> 0:13:24.196
<v Speaker 1>give unlimited sums of money to help the candidates of

0:13:24.196 --> 0:13:27.156
<v Speaker 1>your choice, how is it even possible to break the

0:13:27.236 --> 0:13:29.556
<v Speaker 1>law or why would anybody break the law?

0:13:30.716 --> 0:13:36.676
<v Speaker 2>Sloppiness, It's very easy to hide these things and to

0:13:36.796 --> 0:13:42.316
<v Speaker 2>get away with it. You have a designated group that

0:13:43.116 --> 0:13:45.636
<v Speaker 2>is run by someone you know who is going to

0:13:45.636 --> 0:13:47.636
<v Speaker 2>spend the money the way you want it, and you

0:13:47.756 --> 0:13:51.796
<v Speaker 2>give them the money and they do it, and your

0:13:51.836 --> 0:13:55.396
<v Speaker 2>hands are clean. What you don't do is say the

0:13:55.476 --> 0:13:58.556
<v Speaker 2>quiet part out loud. You don't say I am doing

0:13:58.556 --> 0:14:00.876
<v Speaker 2>this and I am breaking the law.

0:14:03.716 --> 0:14:06.916
<v Speaker 1>I'm laughing, because, as we'll hear after the break, Sam

0:14:06.916 --> 0:14:09.916
<v Speaker 1>bagmanfree did say the quiet part out loud, of course

0:14:09.956 --> 0:14:23.076
<v Speaker 1>he did. On background. We'll be right back. I'm back

0:14:23.076 --> 0:14:26.476
<v Speaker 1>with Jordan Livewitz of the Center for Responsibility and Ethics

0:14:26.516 --> 0:14:30.636
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. All right, so let's talk about Sam Beckman Freed,

0:14:30.756 --> 0:14:33.596
<v Speaker 1>who is among the seven hundred and forty two things

0:14:33.596 --> 0:14:37.196
<v Speaker 1>he's accused of is making illegal campaign contributions. What do

0:14:37.276 --> 0:14:39.196
<v Speaker 1>we know about them? I actually, even though I've been

0:14:39.196 --> 0:14:41.876
<v Speaker 1>marinating in this world for eighteen months, I haven't paid

0:14:41.876 --> 0:14:44.636
<v Speaker 1>that much attention to his political life. So you're probably

0:14:44.676 --> 0:14:45.516
<v Speaker 1>going to educate me.

0:14:45.916 --> 0:14:51.196
<v Speaker 2>So there are actually two kinds of illegal political activity

0:14:51.676 --> 0:14:55.436
<v Speaker 2>with Sam Beakmanfried. So the first one is something called

0:14:55.756 --> 0:14:59.716
<v Speaker 2>contributions in the name of another. When you give money,

0:15:00.356 --> 0:15:03.916
<v Speaker 2>there's one really really important rule, and that is it

0:15:03.956 --> 0:15:08.876
<v Speaker 2>has to be your money. So what he is accused

0:15:08.876 --> 0:15:13.036
<v Speaker 2>of knowing is taking money that just people had put

0:15:13.076 --> 0:15:14.516
<v Speaker 2>in their accounts in the business.

0:15:14.636 --> 0:15:16.876
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's it's messy, and it looks like you

0:15:16.916 --> 0:15:20.236
<v Speaker 1>can accuse him of of using other people's money to

0:15:20.236 --> 0:15:24.116
<v Speaker 1>make campaign contributions. Does that happen? How often have you seen.

0:15:23.916 --> 0:15:27.556
<v Speaker 2>That, like taking money out of a business to do that.

0:15:27.636 --> 0:15:29.556
<v Speaker 2>There's pretty much effort. This was a new one for me.

0:15:30.916 --> 0:15:32.796
<v Speaker 1>So this is a new one. But I'm just this

0:15:32.836 --> 0:15:34.916
<v Speaker 1>is what about the general idea of like, I don't know,

0:15:35.036 --> 0:15:37.276
<v Speaker 1>rating your grandmother's bank account and stealing it and giving

0:15:37.316 --> 0:15:39.756
<v Speaker 1>you a politician. Does anybody as any has anybody ever

0:15:39.796 --> 0:15:42.276
<v Speaker 1>been put in jail for taking other people's money and

0:15:42.316 --> 0:15:43.396
<v Speaker 1>giving it to politicians.

0:15:43.876 --> 0:15:47.996
<v Speaker 2>So I remember there was one some years ago where

0:15:49.916 --> 0:15:52.596
<v Speaker 2>basically a guy used his wife's money and tried to

0:15:52.636 --> 0:15:55.996
<v Speaker 2>hide it so she wouldn't know, and he just admitted

0:15:56.036 --> 0:16:01.316
<v Speaker 2>it paid a fine. There's things like that, like contribution

0:16:01.396 --> 0:16:04.356
<v Speaker 2>in the name of another is sometimes you know, I'm

0:16:04.436 --> 0:16:08.596
<v Speaker 2>going to give a bunch of people money to make donations,

0:16:10.116 --> 0:16:12.356
<v Speaker 2>and then you know, all my family and then all

0:16:12.396 --> 0:16:15.316
<v Speaker 2>your family gave maximum donations, but it was really my

0:16:15.436 --> 0:16:18.036
<v Speaker 2>money to begin with. This is the opposite of that.

0:16:18.596 --> 0:16:21.356
<v Speaker 1>This is what you're saying is it's such a rare thing,

0:16:21.676 --> 0:16:26.036
<v Speaker 1>and probably because people never care enough about a politician

0:16:26.076 --> 0:16:27.756
<v Speaker 1>to steal money from others for them.

0:16:28.876 --> 0:16:31.516
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's definitely not something we see every day.

0:16:31.956 --> 0:16:33.316
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right.

0:16:33.956 --> 0:16:38.876
<v Speaker 2>So, he in an interview talked about how while he

0:16:38.916 --> 0:16:43.036
<v Speaker 2>had given thirty some odd million to Democrats, he gave

0:16:43.116 --> 0:16:47.916
<v Speaker 2>pretty much the same thing through dark money donations to Republicans.

0:16:48.756 --> 0:16:51.636
<v Speaker 2>To hide that he was giving Democrats and republicans, he

0:16:51.676 --> 0:16:54.556
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be seen just as the Democrat guy, but

0:16:54.636 --> 0:16:57.796
<v Speaker 2>he was doing these hidden dark money donations to hide

0:16:57.836 --> 0:17:00.676
<v Speaker 2>that was coming from him. And the two rules again

0:17:01.156 --> 0:17:06.276
<v Speaker 2>are that you can't do it explicitly tagged for the politics,

0:17:06.516 --> 0:17:09.716
<v Speaker 2>and you can't do it to hide the decay from you.

0:17:10.236 --> 0:17:12.716
<v Speaker 2>And he just went out and said that, yeah, I

0:17:12.756 --> 0:17:13.796
<v Speaker 2>did both of those things.

0:17:14.876 --> 0:17:16.996
<v Speaker 1>So his crime is confessing it.

0:17:18.116 --> 0:17:21.876
<v Speaker 2>The crime is doing it. But yes, he would have

0:17:21.916 --> 0:17:26.036
<v Speaker 2>gotten away with it hypothetically pretty easily. I mean, there's

0:17:26.036 --> 0:17:29.396
<v Speaker 2>a decent chance that it could come out in the

0:17:29.556 --> 0:17:36.596
<v Speaker 2>course for prosecution as we see where money went. But yeah,

0:17:36.916 --> 0:17:39.036
<v Speaker 2>essentially we would have not known about this kind of

0:17:39.076 --> 0:17:41.276
<v Speaker 2>thing if he did not say it to the press

0:17:41.316 --> 0:17:42.156
<v Speaker 2>that he was doing it.

0:17:42.836 --> 0:17:48.596
<v Speaker 1>How often do people go to jail for campaign finance contributions,

0:17:48.916 --> 0:17:53.196
<v Speaker 1>not taking campaign finance money and like using it for

0:17:53.316 --> 0:17:56.516
<v Speaker 1>other purposes, But how often do donors go to jail

0:17:56.596 --> 0:17:59.636
<v Speaker 1>for how they've given the money?

0:17:59.756 --> 0:18:03.876
<v Speaker 2>Very rarely. It's not something the DOJ tends to bring

0:18:04.076 --> 0:18:04.956
<v Speaker 2>just on its own.

0:18:06.156 --> 0:18:09.756
<v Speaker 1>They use it to season the dish, to make yeah,

0:18:10.116 --> 0:18:12.156
<v Speaker 1>just to make it look like there's more things this

0:18:12.196 --> 0:18:12.796
<v Speaker 1>person did.

0:18:13.476 --> 0:18:18.396
<v Speaker 2>The prosecutions we tend to see are usually for the

0:18:18.516 --> 0:18:22.436
<v Speaker 2>misuse of money after it's been given.

0:18:23.716 --> 0:18:36.396
<v Speaker 1>On background. We'll be right back. I'm back with Jordan Libowitz.

0:18:37.996 --> 0:18:40.556
<v Speaker 1>We're now in this situation where people running the bankruptcy

0:18:40.556 --> 0:18:44.876
<v Speaker 1>at FTX are making the case that you just made

0:18:44.876 --> 0:18:47.396
<v Speaker 1>a little earlier. The money he gave away wasn't his money,

0:18:47.436 --> 0:18:51.556
<v Speaker 1>it was the customer's money, and so the candidates who

0:18:51.596 --> 0:18:55.196
<v Speaker 1>receive this money need to give it back. And first,

0:18:55.196 --> 0:18:58.716
<v Speaker 1>have you ever seen that situation where campaign contributions get

0:18:58.756 --> 0:18:59.356
<v Speaker 1>clawed back?

0:19:00.196 --> 0:19:04.076
<v Speaker 2>So claude back is something we don't see very often

0:19:04.196 --> 0:19:06.596
<v Speaker 2>at all, but is a thing they's likely going to

0:19:06.596 --> 0:19:09.436
<v Speaker 2>happen in this case if it is in a legal

0:19:09.436 --> 0:19:14.116
<v Speaker 2>contribution and found to be one. I believe the VC

0:19:14.276 --> 0:19:16.836
<v Speaker 2>rules already have thirty days to give it back or

0:19:16.876 --> 0:19:18.596
<v Speaker 2>to try to get it to the original person.

0:19:18.876 --> 0:19:22.796
<v Speaker 1>So he could only give a few thousand dollars directly

0:19:22.836 --> 0:19:25.796
<v Speaker 1>to the candidate, right, So the big money was, you know,

0:19:25.916 --> 0:19:29.076
<v Speaker 1>in a dark money entity that the candidate theoretically had

0:19:29.116 --> 0:19:31.476
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with, that was helping the candidate without

0:19:31.516 --> 0:19:32.756
<v Speaker 1>the candidate knowing how.

0:19:33.356 --> 0:19:36.996
<v Speaker 2>Or to the packs or that gave funds to packs.

0:19:37.356 --> 0:19:40.236
<v Speaker 1>But those super packs presumably can like vanish overnight and

0:19:40.236 --> 0:19:44.436
<v Speaker 1>reappear as something else. I mean, those seems. It seems

0:19:44.476 --> 0:19:46.316
<v Speaker 1>to me like if I had a super pac that

0:19:46.356 --> 0:19:48.756
<v Speaker 1>had spent ten million dollars of Sam bankmun Freed's money

0:19:49.116 --> 0:19:51.156
<v Speaker 1>and it looked like I was going to now have

0:19:51.236 --> 0:19:53.356
<v Speaker 1>to give it back, I might just close the superpack.

0:19:54.036 --> 0:19:58.996
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is a real problem that we have. It's

0:19:59.076 --> 0:20:01.716
<v Speaker 2>kind of playing whack a mole that we will find.

0:20:03.316 --> 0:20:06.196
<v Speaker 2>We'll find a dark money group that has violated the law,

0:20:06.596 --> 0:20:10.116
<v Speaker 2>file a complaint, and then they've already you know, spend

0:20:10.116 --> 0:20:12.156
<v Speaker 2>all their money. They've shut down shop. They've said we

0:20:12.236 --> 0:20:14.876
<v Speaker 2>no longer exist, we are no longer an entity, and

0:20:14.916 --> 0:20:16.796
<v Speaker 2>they'll go start up another one in another state, do

0:20:16.836 --> 0:20:19.476
<v Speaker 2>it again. By the time you know, we can find them,

0:20:19.516 --> 0:20:21.716
<v Speaker 2>they've shut down, keep moving right.

0:20:22.036 --> 0:20:24.396
<v Speaker 1>So it seems it just seems highly unlikely to me

0:20:24.476 --> 0:20:25.676
<v Speaker 1>that this money is going to come.

0:20:25.516 --> 0:20:29.356
<v Speaker 2>Back if he gave it to I know, he made

0:20:29.396 --> 0:20:35.516
<v Speaker 2>major donations to the potal action committees that back Democrats

0:20:35.876 --> 0:20:39.636
<v Speaker 2>in the House and Senate. Yep, those are not going anywhere.

0:20:40.396 --> 0:20:43.156
<v Speaker 2>Those are not the fly by night organizations. Those are

0:20:43.316 --> 0:20:46.196
<v Speaker 2>the big players. So they're going to be on the hook.

0:20:46.876 --> 0:20:51.996
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's interesting. So they they're stuck right your organization crew, Yeah,

0:20:52.356 --> 0:20:56.516
<v Speaker 1>file an FEC complaint against SBF in late November. Can

0:20:56.556 --> 0:20:59.436
<v Speaker 1>you explain that, like why and what response you've gotten

0:20:59.476 --> 0:21:00.356
<v Speaker 1>and where it might lead.

0:21:01.116 --> 0:21:04.996
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, our complaint was about the dark money. That

0:21:05.116 --> 0:21:06.836
<v Speaker 2>he said that he had given this, that he had

0:21:06.876 --> 0:21:10.756
<v Speaker 2>directed it specifically for certain Bublicans, and that he did

0:21:10.796 --> 0:21:14.476
<v Speaker 2>it to hide his name, which is really silly.

0:21:14.476 --> 0:21:16.756
<v Speaker 1>If he's going to go tell everyone, tell everybody that

0:21:16.836 --> 0:21:20.036
<v Speaker 1>he's done it, why it doesn't really make it doesn't

0:21:20.036 --> 0:21:22.036
<v Speaker 1>really scan this crime.

0:21:23.636 --> 0:21:27.636
<v Speaker 2>Right, So we're asking the FEC to investigate. We haven't

0:21:27.636 --> 0:21:30.956
<v Speaker 2>really heard anything, but the FEC moves at glacial pace,

0:21:31.796 --> 0:21:34.156
<v Speaker 2>so we won't for a while. They have to investigate

0:21:34.196 --> 0:21:37.236
<v Speaker 2>it in their votes and they're more investigations, so it'll

0:21:37.276 --> 0:21:41.076
<v Speaker 2>take a while. But basically two things can come out

0:21:41.076 --> 0:21:44.756
<v Speaker 2>of it. One finds of some sort obviously will not

0:21:44.876 --> 0:21:47.396
<v Speaker 2>be to the level of, you know, the money he

0:21:47.476 --> 0:21:51.636
<v Speaker 2>was playing with, but also being able to see a

0:21:51.756 --> 0:21:54.916
<v Speaker 2>full accounting of how much money this was and where

0:21:54.916 --> 0:21:57.236
<v Speaker 2>it went. The way to fight dark money is to

0:21:57.236 --> 0:21:59.996
<v Speaker 2>bring it out into the open. The whole idea is

0:22:00.116 --> 0:22:04.316
<v Speaker 2>hiding it, so being able to say, hey, he actually

0:22:04.356 --> 0:22:07.716
<v Speaker 2>spent this much money through these groups to help these people.

0:22:08.676 --> 0:22:11.596
<v Speaker 2>It's about transparency and that's what we're working for here.

0:22:12.596 --> 0:22:14.196
<v Speaker 1>But it's not going to change the system.

0:22:14.436 --> 0:22:16.476
<v Speaker 2>No, we need Congress to change the system.

0:22:16.356 --> 0:22:18.556
<v Speaker 1>Because the system still is that the laws are still

0:22:18.596 --> 0:22:20.436
<v Speaker 1>in place to if you're just more a little more

0:22:20.436 --> 0:22:23.196
<v Speaker 1>clever about it, you do this and no one will

0:22:23.196 --> 0:22:25.836
<v Speaker 1>ever know. It's this interesting thing about the game, sort

0:22:25.876 --> 0:22:28.916
<v Speaker 1>of like what the game is now with dark money,

0:22:29.436 --> 0:22:32.476
<v Speaker 1>like who or let's assume that Democrats get as smart

0:22:32.956 --> 0:22:37.876
<v Speaker 1>at using it as Republicans. Okay, they're there now, so

0:22:38.716 --> 0:22:42.876
<v Speaker 1>but then it may become it may become something that

0:22:42.956 --> 0:22:45.836
<v Speaker 1>incumbents like more than challengers.

0:22:46.756 --> 0:22:50.276
<v Speaker 2>You know that that is the problem of having incumbents

0:22:50.316 --> 0:22:54.476
<v Speaker 2>be the ones who who rate the laws, because this

0:22:54.596 --> 0:22:56.276
<v Speaker 2>definitely benefits incumbents.

0:22:56.996 --> 0:22:57.276
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:22:57.596 --> 0:23:01.956
<v Speaker 2>What we're seeing a lot of bipartisan outrage is there's

0:23:01.996 --> 0:23:07.076
<v Speaker 2>been a lot of dark money campaigning around Supreme Court nominations,

0:23:08.796 --> 0:23:13.836
<v Speaker 2>and for the first time, when Biden announced his pick,

0:23:14.356 --> 0:23:17.196
<v Speaker 2>there was a dark money operation ready to back it,

0:23:18.716 --> 0:23:22.276
<v Speaker 2>and there were a lot of outrage Republicans. Now, there

0:23:22.356 --> 0:23:24.396
<v Speaker 2>was the same kind of thing on the other side

0:23:24.556 --> 0:23:29.796
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years earlier, but no one really likes

0:23:29.836 --> 0:23:33.076
<v Speaker 2>it when there are tens and hundreds of millions of

0:23:33.076 --> 0:23:36.636
<v Speaker 2>dollars being spent against what you want. Yeah, So the

0:23:36.676 --> 0:23:41.476
<v Speaker 2>hope is that, you know, we can find a happy

0:23:41.516 --> 0:23:46.236
<v Speaker 2>medium where enough members of Congress are just done with

0:23:46.276 --> 0:23:50.396
<v Speaker 2>this and want this influence out of politics.

0:23:50.876 --> 0:23:54.436
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how do you feel This is a very wily

0:23:54.556 --> 0:23:57.356
<v Speaker 1>minded question, but how do you feel about Sam Bangmin

0:23:57.396 --> 0:24:00.116
<v Speaker 1>free You've seen You've been sitting in this world of

0:24:00.396 --> 0:24:04.116
<v Speaker 1>people doing kind of nefarious things with dollars in politics.

0:24:05.756 --> 0:24:08.876
<v Speaker 1>Like on your outrage meter, what does he score?

0:24:09.356 --> 0:24:11.236
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I love him. I want them all to be

0:24:11.396 --> 0:24:14.836
<v Speaker 2>like him and be that sloppy and that outrageous that

0:24:14.996 --> 0:24:18.356
<v Speaker 2>everyone is angry at him and he just admits to things.

0:24:18.756 --> 0:24:22.916
<v Speaker 2>Please more, Sam Bankman freeze less people that are running

0:24:22.916 --> 0:24:28.956
<v Speaker 2>it through you know, complex webs of LLCs and five

0:24:28.996 --> 0:24:31.436
<v Speaker 2>oh one c four groups and just moving the money

0:24:31.476 --> 0:24:34.596
<v Speaker 2>between them in ways that it makes you know, you

0:24:34.636 --> 0:24:39.116
<v Speaker 2>need a forensic anthropologist to like figure out just where

0:24:39.116 --> 0:24:41.276
<v Speaker 2>the money is coming from and going to give me

0:24:41.356 --> 0:24:42.956
<v Speaker 2>a guy who's like, yeah, I'm spending a bunch of

0:24:42.996 --> 0:24:44.676
<v Speaker 2>money and I'm also doing some of it illegally.

0:24:45.956 --> 0:24:48.956
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of parodying the system.

0:24:49.716 --> 0:24:52.196
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's because the system as it exists is

0:24:52.356 --> 0:24:58.756
<v Speaker 2>fairly ridiculous. You know, he is the the he is

0:24:58.796 --> 0:25:04.516
<v Speaker 2>the political spender America deserves after putting this system into place.

0:25:04.916 --> 0:25:09.236
<v Speaker 2>But also because he's so outrageous, people get angry about.

0:25:09.676 --> 0:25:11.516
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we need people to get angry about

0:25:11.516 --> 0:25:14.236
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing. We want and need people to

0:25:14.276 --> 0:25:17.556
<v Speaker 2>be putting pressure to make change because it's not going

0:25:17.636 --> 0:25:22.196
<v Speaker 2>to happen without that. And if it takes some crypto

0:25:22.196 --> 0:25:25.316
<v Speaker 2>bros doing some ridiculous things to get us there, then

0:25:25.676 --> 0:25:26.716
<v Speaker 2>that's what gets us there.

0:25:26.916 --> 0:25:32.476
<v Speaker 1>So Sam Begman Freed making American great again, intentionally or unintentionally,

0:25:33.516 --> 0:25:37.476
<v Speaker 1>I'll thank him for you. I don't think he'd be

0:25:37.636 --> 0:25:43.396
<v Speaker 1>that appreciative. Jordan Libowitz is the communications director for the

0:25:43.436 --> 0:25:47.276
<v Speaker 1>Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Let's end today

0:25:47.316 --> 0:25:50.076
<v Speaker 1>by answering a question from one of our listeners. Here's

0:25:50.116 --> 0:25:55.636
<v Speaker 1>one from Reuven Learner. He writes, I've been a cryptocurrency

0:25:55.676 --> 0:25:58.276
<v Speaker 1>skeptic for a long time, but there are, as you've said,

0:25:58.396 --> 0:26:02.036
<v Speaker 1>real true believers have the FTX and other crypto collapses

0:26:02.076 --> 0:26:05.356
<v Speaker 1>led anyone to abandon their belief that it's good and practical,

0:26:05.836 --> 0:26:08.556
<v Speaker 1>not because they've lost their money necessarily, but because they

0:26:08.636 --> 0:26:10.916
<v Speaker 1>now see how how high the hurdles are to it working.

0:26:11.716 --> 0:26:14.316
<v Speaker 1>So in general, this is a funny it's a funny question.

0:26:14.636 --> 0:26:16.836
<v Speaker 1>In general, I have found in my life people don't

0:26:16.916 --> 0:26:21.036
<v Speaker 1>change their beliefs, that they do everything they can to

0:26:21.116 --> 0:26:23.636
<v Speaker 1>avoid changing their beliefs, and especially as when they're as

0:26:23.716 --> 0:26:28.156
<v Speaker 1>dug in as people are on crypto. That the crypto

0:26:28.156 --> 0:26:31.516
<v Speaker 1>people are all religionists. They're different religions. There's the Bitcoin

0:26:31.596 --> 0:26:34.276
<v Speaker 1>religion and the Ethereum religion and the Ripple religion and

0:26:34.316 --> 0:26:36.916
<v Speaker 1>all that, and they can be at war with each other.

0:26:37.156 --> 0:26:40.036
<v Speaker 1>But once they kind of have their position, you know,

0:26:40.316 --> 0:26:44.316
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to change. However, I'll give you a funny exception.

0:26:46.516 --> 0:26:49.756
<v Speaker 1>Several of the people who work for FTX and who

0:26:49.796 --> 0:26:52.956
<v Speaker 1>were true believers when it all blew up, have decided

0:26:52.956 --> 0:26:55.476
<v Speaker 1>that crypto is all bullshit, and they just they just

0:26:55.996 --> 0:26:59.836
<v Speaker 1>it's like some spell was broken. And I think maybe

0:27:00.196 --> 0:27:02.636
<v Speaker 1>it helps to lose all fifty million of the dollars

0:27:02.676 --> 0:27:07.276
<v Speaker 1>you thought you had. But something happened in them, and

0:27:07.396 --> 0:27:10.676
<v Speaker 1>it was quite noticeable. Anyway, I noticed it because I'm

0:27:10.676 --> 0:27:13.036
<v Speaker 1>so used to people never changing what they believe, so

0:27:13.716 --> 0:27:16.036
<v Speaker 1>there're three of them, so I know three people who've

0:27:16.076 --> 0:27:22.676
<v Speaker 1>changed their beliefs. Ruven has identified yet another error of

0:27:22.676 --> 0:27:24.596
<v Speaker 1>a mine, and here's what he has to say in

0:27:24.636 --> 0:27:29.956
<v Speaker 1>a PostScript. Please stop saying backslash in URLs. The slash

0:27:30.036 --> 0:27:33.276
<v Speaker 1>leaning to the right is a slash, but leaning left

0:27:33.716 --> 0:27:37.876
<v Speaker 1>is a backslash. I know I'm pedantic, so this isn't

0:27:37.876 --> 0:27:41.156
<v Speaker 1>my fault. This is the producer's fault. Yeah, I don't

0:27:41.156 --> 0:27:42.916
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm talking about, but they're supposed to stop

0:27:42.916 --> 0:27:44.396
<v Speaker 1>me when I don't know what I'm talking about, and

0:27:44.436 --> 0:27:47.316
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do it. So we will not do that again.

0:27:47.996 --> 0:27:50.236
<v Speaker 1>And it's easier to say slash. So you saved us

0:27:50.236 --> 0:27:52.756
<v Speaker 1>a syllable for the rest of our lives. Thank you,

0:27:52.836 --> 0:27:57.636
<v Speaker 1>Rubin on Background is hosted by me Michael Lewis and

0:27:57.676 --> 0:28:01.996
<v Speaker 1>produced by Catherine Girodeau and Lydia gene Kott. Our editor

0:28:02.116 --> 0:28:07.476
<v Speaker 1>is Julia Barton. Our engineer is Sarah Bruguerer. Thanks to

0:28:07.516 --> 0:28:11.236
<v Speaker 1>our SVP of production read a Cone, our show is

0:28:11.276 --> 0:28:15.516
<v Speaker 1>recorded by cofer Ruth at Berkeley Advanced Media Studios. Our

0:28:15.596 --> 0:28:18.996
<v Speaker 1>music was composed by Matthias Bossi and John Evans of

0:28:19.076 --> 0:28:23.756
<v Speaker 1>stell Wagonsymfonet. My old friend Nick Burtel composed our theme song.

0:28:24.876 --> 0:28:29.036
<v Speaker 1>On background is a production of Pushkin Industries. Don't forget

0:28:29.036 --> 0:28:32.756
<v Speaker 1>that we have a website atr podcast dot com in

0:28:32.756 --> 0:28:34.876
<v Speaker 1>case you want to send me a question or a complaint,

0:28:35.156 --> 0:28:37.556
<v Speaker 1>or anything at all. I'll read the questions, I won't

0:28:37.556 --> 0:28:42.476
<v Speaker 1>read the complaints. That's atr podcast dot com. To find

0:28:42.476 --> 0:28:47.396
<v Speaker 1>more Pushkin podcasts, listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:28:47.516 --> 0:28:50.396
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, And if you'd like

0:28:50.436 --> 0:28:54.156
<v Speaker 1>to listen ad free and learn about other exclusive offerings,

0:28:54.756 --> 0:28:57.116
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to sign up for a Pushkin Plus subscription

0:28:57.476 --> 0:29:01.956
<v Speaker 1>at pushkin dot fm, slash plus, or on our Apple

0:29:02.036 --> 0:29:03.836
<v Speaker 1>show page.

0:29:09.156 --> 0:29:09.196
<v Speaker 2>I