WEBVTT - What's Wright - LeBron & Nick meet up courtside, Lakers-Warriors preview + Final Four predictions

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in. We'll driving Nick Great Episode three point fifteen.

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>After a eventful and somewhat exhausting weekend from New York

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to Memphis to Vegas, landed back here yesterday morning. That's

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>why we were not able to be on the air Tuesday.

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Little programming note, however, a couple programming notes. Actually, let

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>me see if I can straighten this out a bit

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for you guys. There we go. That should be better.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>My apologies. Tomorrow morning. A bonus show to make up

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for Tuesday, talk Lakers, Warriors, Instant Reaction, anything that should

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>be up and live first thing in the morning, and

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're on the West Coast, probably while you're still sleeping,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so that'll come tomorrow Tuesday, our annual way too early

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL over Under show. Normally we would have done that

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this past Tuesday, however, we weren't on the air, and

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so our friends at DraftKings have released the full slate

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of NFL team win totals, so we will take our

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>first bite at that on Tuesday. However, we got to

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get right into it. I thought I knew where we'd

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be starting the show, given you know, the Internet over

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, But then the Internet over the last forty

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>eight hours, I was involved in a different piece of

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the internet. So that's in what missed the cut, But

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it didn't actually miss the cut. So here's what missed

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the cut. Demons. Great to see you, Tyreek Hills Stokes

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>trade rumors again, whatever he wants the attention. I love Tyreek,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but we know what's going on. Greatest player in Syracuse

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>basketball history, one of the greatest Olympians ever, one of

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the best pure scores of his era, a no doubt

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>first ballot Hall of Famer, Carmelo Anthony. And then there's

0:01:51.320 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this the headline from People magazine. Dude trap Vis Kelsey

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and his quote sports friend have beef. So I was

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>playing Demonse in a poker game in Vegas when this

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>got sent to me, and now it's everywhere on the internet,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and I cannot believe I need to address this. I mean,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's on People, it's on I think, that's Al Jazeera,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's on US Weekly. It's so I am so incredibly

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>oddly frustrated by this because I think it is so

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>recklessly unfair to Travis Kelcey. So let me reset exactly

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what happened, not restate, not clarified, because everything that I said,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Demanse was totally one hundred percent clear the recreation of

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>this in the headlines. I didn't misspeak, I didn't misrepresent

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>has but the headlines to me are so this is

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>what happened. So New Heights with Travis and Jason Kelsey

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>shouted me out after I invited myself on their show

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to be their salary cap expert. Right, that's that's what happened.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>And Travis said, I offten love Nick Wright, and I said,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>as an aside, I was like, you know, I actually

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't spoken a lot to Travis since he and Taylor

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>got together. With the timeline being I said, we don't

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>really talk during the seasons. We always, you know, we

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have a kind of annual event of being able to

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get together at the Chief's Super Bowl Parade, But two

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago at the parade was cut short by a

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>tragic shooting, and this year the parade was canceled by

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Eagles. So those two times we didn't talk.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And then the one off seat where that you know,

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>where normally there might be and again I Travis, I

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>am dear friends with Adam Lefko, who is an actual

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>dear friend of Travis's. They I think one was at

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the other's. Yeah, I think left I think Travis was

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>at left Goo's wedding. When the when Travis and Taylor

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>were in New York City for a Yankee game and

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>they did a live shot at Travis and Taylor, I'm like, Hey,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's Lefto and his wife sitting with them. They're dear friends.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.559
<v Speaker 1>Trav and I have a great relationship, but we don't

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hang out. We you know, I don't. We've never talked

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>on the phone, might text or DM occasionally, but I

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>leave him alone during the season and then the last

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>offseason he was the busiest man in the world. So

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what I said. So I said, yea, So this

0:04:54.160 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>being like represented so unfairly up to an including in

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>the Times of India that as if Travis has cut

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>off people in his life or gott in Hollywood. It's

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>just total horseshit.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I feel, like you said, I've been passing as well,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Like I remember when you said it, like I remember

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the tone and everything.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely a reach.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Listen, anyone, if I felt like I had

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>screwed up, I would apologize. But anyone that watched the

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>show or saw it got the exact right read of it.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Where I feel badly is I don't expect, certainly Taylor

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>or Tailor's people to watch the show. They're welcome to,

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and I don't expect Travis to watch this show. And

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's represented as if someone is trying to you'd

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be like like, oh, we used to be super close.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And then this guy like, that's not what it was

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at all, And so I got I know that this

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>was I think the producers when they first like brought

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it to my attention and pitched me on it. I

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>probably the tone of this was supposed to be this

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is hilarious, and it would be if I knew all

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the parties involved. Also we're on the exact same page.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But I just I do feel that it is a

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>level of fame. When I texted Wild's the People headline

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>after Daniel texts it to me, and I said, I

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>really think Taylor Swift might be the most famous person

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Like, I truly think she might be

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the most famous person in the world if just someone

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at my level whatever that is of notoriety having an

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>aside about her boyfriend friend and the last time we talked,

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>if that touch is enough if her fame gravity is

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>so great that People magazine and the Times of India

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>are like, this will get us some foot traffic on

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the website. It's incomprehensible that level of fame. And so

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe there maybe when you're that level of famous,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just used to things being so kind of out

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, misrepresented her out of whack, but it is

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that was an insane and an insane realization of the

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>reach that a true global icon has, of which Taylor

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Swift is. So there's the not even clarification, but the

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>true story. And then you got a question for me.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, do you think you're gonna start a rebranding now

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>in light of these events?

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Because I was called not my name but his sports friend.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>What's right with sports friend? Okay? I mean yeah, I

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the other thing. It's also a kind of

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>confusing headline because it would it would appear like if

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you just read the headline, it sounds like they're talking

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>about another professional athlete rather than me, because sports friend,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I would think that you're talking another professional athlete. So

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that was, you know, one kind of brush with the

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>media machine associated with the world's most famous people. Odd

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours because it was my second brush with

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that of the week and demons go ahead.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so over the weekend you saw Memphis and Lakers

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 2>face off. You happen to be court side. Bakers showed out,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>they got the dub. But the bigger piece of this

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 2>story was like what happened after the game.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're okay, yeah, we can play it if you're

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>just listening on YouTube, or if you're just listening to

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the podcast and not watching on YouTube. What you're seeing

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>right now is the like NBA cameras close up of

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and I dapping up after the game. And then

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorite part is your mom just standing there like

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>fixing her hair like that cut out the full video

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>which somebody got from the crowd, which includes the Lebron

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>hug to your mom, which is just one of the

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>coolest things you know ever. And also you know who

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought about when I saw that this video because

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this happened Saturday night and it all these videos came

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>out Sunday, you know what I mean. I didn't publish

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>any of these, I didn't amplify, but it somebody somebody

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>put out this far form video Sunday morning. And then

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the other videos came out and caught fire. I gotta

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you, and I know this is not what probably

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is smart podcasting. They're like, you're bearing the lead, but

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I what I thought about when Lebron

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>went in for the hug to your mom right after

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a hard fought basketball game and she reciprocated and gave

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>him the hug. I only thought about.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 3>You, thank you, thank you. Oh my god. Yes, yes,

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 3>I was litering.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>To Somebody brought this up at work and I was like,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>my mom would never hug me if I was in

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>that state.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Ever, go ahead, what do you know?

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. This isn't a hypothetical. We saw

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>it happen a hundred times. A hundred times Demonse had

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>an awesome either AU or high school basketball game, or

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>when we came out to San Diego and watched you

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>play in college and you had your career high twenty

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>nine or whatever.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>It was not a full like that.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a side one maybe.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe That's all I could think about was you. I

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh man, this is unbelievable, and it's so

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>funny that you said the same thing. Okay, So I

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what or how people and then I

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the actual game, even though no,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody cares about it right now? What

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are how people want me to say about this? Like

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I what did I say the other week? One of

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the benefits and this is not my quote, obviously one

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the benefits, and never lying is never having to

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>remember anything. I have never once ever misrepresented in over

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>or under exaggerating my relationship with Lebron. It's always been

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>well I should, I mean relationships of all, but it's

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the audience has kind of been on the journey. I

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>consider Maverick Lebron's right hand man and one of the

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>smartest business people I've ever met, a good good friend

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>because of my really and I have a something of

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a business and something of a personal relationship with Rich.

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Because of those relationships, I have a secondary relationship with

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Lebron where you know, the occasionally were in the same circle,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>very occasionally. It's happened a couple times, and so it was.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>I said on this show repeatedly when I knew we

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>were going to Memphis, and when I knew that I

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>had gotten, and when I knew I had gotten when

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I purchased the courtside seats that that interaction was certainly

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on the board. Now it was going to be one

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent conditional on the Lakers winning, because anybody that's

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>watched Lebron throughout his career knows if they win, he'll

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>he usually has a postgame interview, he'll linger a bit

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>on the court, and if he has friends or colleagues

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or whomever courtside other pro athletes, he'll stop by dap

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>them up. If they lose, it's straight to the locker room. Now,

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what didn't get caught was the pregame interaction when I

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was standing with John Morant's dad, T and Lebron came

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>over and said hello to both of us, and then

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he and Tea had a brief conversation. I don't know

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>what it was about. It was private, but I don't.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I was not as shocked by that as

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the audience was. The Internet, I should say,

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is where maybe my ego can get the

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>best of me. I was a little offended is too

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>strong of a word. I'll go nonplussed by the number

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of people who were asserting what a life changing event

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this this was for me or the oh Man finally,

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, after all those years of good pr finally

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>gets his acknowledgement. That's not what it is either, However,

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I do. I am a die hard sports fan. It

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is why I do what I do for my entire life.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>The NBA, up until really Mahomes got drafted, it was

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the NBA was a clear number one in my personal

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sports fandom, with the NFL a all by itself but

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a clear number two. The last half decade of the

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>NFL has kind of changed it to where now if

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm asked, I say, the NFL regular season is my favorite.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The NBA playoffs are my favorite. Like my favorite sport

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to watch over the course of the year is the NFL.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>My favorite two months of the year of the NBA playoffs.

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But with all that said, I for the majority of

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>my life my favorite sport in the world was the NBA.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>My favorite athlete ever is Lebron and so yeah, it's

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>super dope that he and I have even that level

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know if you want to call it

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>relationship whatever it is, mutual acknowledgment respect. I'd call it

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>mutual respect, Yeah, is how I would is the way

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I would put it. And I also think for him.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 3>It was.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Bent. It was good timing in that because of everything

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that he has been involved in in the last month,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a reminder to the audience. I don't I'm

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>not anti all an everyone in the media. Yeah, I'm

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, I'm not. I don't think

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that everybody. It's there's certain there's one person in particular,

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe a handful of unnamed but we know

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>who they are retired athletes in the media that I

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with. But otherwise, you know what I mean,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Like there can be a level of and the other

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>thing about Lebron's relationship with the media is if you

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>ever see any of his pregame interviews, which are almost

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>always done with the local media that covers the Lakers

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and then whatever team they're playing, he has seemingly real,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>not just cordial, but incredibly friendly relationships with a lot

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of those guys. Mike Trudell, who covers the Lakers. There

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>was the video of him giving Trudell a hard time

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because he was wearing I think a man you sweatshirt,

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and Lebron owned is a Liverpool guy because he either

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>owns or owned a piece of it. He had when

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>he was with the Calves. Maybe still a really good

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.479
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Ali Clifton will host road tripping with Channing

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Frye and Richard Jefferson. So I think that's all there.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so I knew once that clip, once the

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>first like far away clip came out, I knew this

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>was going to be something that in some capacity was

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be addressed. But I was probably not as

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>shocked by as everyone else. What I really was thrilled, though, Demons,

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>even though I knew you probably would take it personally

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>as you should have that Lebron who has met your

0:17:54.280 --> 0:18:01.239
<v Speaker 1>mother once before, recognized her the and you know, acknowledged her.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So that part, that part was pretty cool. And then

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we can get to the game.

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead to though, wait so wait or do you

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>want to get to the game or do we There's

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 2>actually one more piece of video that we have not shown.

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>It actually has audio. We're gonna show you guys.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on, no, no, no,

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is this the one? Is this the one your mom

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sent to the group, to our family group chat.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a little yeah, one hundred percent, it's a little

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 3>bit more up close.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So let me give all right, before we play this,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is this is borderline is the wrong word,

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's fine. But I also, if we're going to

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>play this, I want to I want to give the

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>full background here. So there were two guys and you

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>see it in the In fact, I don't know before

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>we do it, producers tell me, can we play the

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>vo close shot again? Because I want to give these

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>guys credit. So it was a father and son that

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>were sitting next to us courtside, and you see the

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>father has his phone out and he's trying to grab

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a picture with his son and Lebron. Uh, and it

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen. The child, no, not the small child. Black

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>guy with the blue hat and his son right next

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to you see that there, not the little little kid,

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>not the redhead. It's black father and son right next

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>to your mom. So that guy had his camera out

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>recording in case, you know what I mean, he was

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 1>able to get a picture with his son and Lebron.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He did didn't end up happening. I then asked him

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>because of the hug with your mom and Lebron, I

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, hey, can you send me that video later?

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? I think it'd be super

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>dope to have and so he said yes, And is

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that actually a pain for him? I think he had

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to send it me a drop boxer for so long.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So I want to shout him out because his name

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is shown Hornbuckle and his son is Tristan Hornbuckle. Uh

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and there on Instagram at shown Hornbuckle and at Tristant

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Hornbuckle too. But so this one is dope because there

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>is audio and because you hear what Lebron says to

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>your mom, So go ahead and play that, then we'll

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the game. So I don't know how well

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>that played on the podcast, but it is such pairing

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening on the podcast, it's worth going back

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube. Bron and I dapt I thing kind of

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>motion like, hey, there's there's my wife who again they've

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>met once before, and his total like disposition changes from

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the the what's the word kind of

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>like affirmative DAP to just like, oh, great to see you,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and then drops a hey their sweetheart as are a hug,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>which maybe led to you know what we were discussing earlier.

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So that was dope. That was what le see.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>The look on ye.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>That that was that was dope, and you're and now,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, your mom can send that to her grandmother,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>who's ninety one years old and the biggest Lebron fan

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world was.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Probably a little annoyed too.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>The oh yeah, yeah, absolutely, oh yeah, because well it

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter the there was Lakers thunder. Maybe this is

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>john because of what happened between Lebron and stephen A.

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>That there's I assume there's cameras on Lebron at all

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>times every game, but maybe it's like, you know, pre

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and postgame more now posts that because Lakers thunder in

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>LA the day after Thanksgiving, the exact same interaction that

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>happened this week between Lebron and I happened there at Staples,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>except it was longer, with a longer conversation, and there's

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>no video of it anywhere. And so but the reason

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I the reason I bring that up is that happened

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>about sixty feet from where your grandmother was sitting. She

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was in like row three, a section over, and then

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I walked back to the seats and she was not joking, adamant,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>why didn't you bring him over here?

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Well so yeah, so, but so that was that was

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that busy weekend, fun weekend, I.

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to talk about? Vegas?

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Went to Vegas to do some commentary for the World

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Poker Tours squid Hunt, which is coming out here in

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:33.959
<v Speaker 1>a few months, and while I was there lived a

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>poker player's dream, which is got invited into the big,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>big mixed game in Bobby's Room and Bobby's Room which

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is the world's most famous poker room inside the Belagio,

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and then ended up wrapping the World Poker Tour stuff

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:58.239
<v Speaker 1>in time on Tuesday to where the same guys who

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>were playing in that mixed game, we're playing the exact

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>same format on stream at the pokerhost studio at Aria

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and I played in it. And this is again I

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>know some of my poker stuff. You know, the audience

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't understand this. They really, if you're not a poker player,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>won't understand because the mixed games that we played were

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>just stick with me here for a second, but doogie

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but doucey drama, ha, deuce to seven, single draw, duce

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to seven, triple draw, uh big oh, and one other

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>one I can't even remember what it was. Ras. So

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what was so cool for me about that demanse,

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was the limits were two hundred four hundred.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But again it's a limit game. So like if you're

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>playing a two hundred four hundred no limit game, you're

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna not feel comfortable if you're not sitting with In

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the two hundred four hundred no limit holding cash games,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you probably need at least two hundred thousand dollars in

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>front of you to feel comfortable, and probably more. The

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>two hundred four hundred limit games, you could sit with

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>ten grand and feel comfortable, and twenty is plenty. So

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they just play very differently. Because no limit you can

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>bet any amount at any time. Limit games, if it's

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred four hundred, the most you can ever bet

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on a single one bet is four hundred dollars. Again,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that part doesn't matter, But here's I'm just giving you

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>guys the full context of it. Here's why it was

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so cool. Those games that I just described to you,

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>six of the seven as of Sunday night, I had

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>played in my poker career zero hands of never played

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>any of them. However, because I'm such a poker nerd

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:01.479
<v Speaker 1>and because I really care about learning the games, I

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have watched the best in the world play them on

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>stream hundreds of hours. So it was a real test

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>case of how much can like studying learning prepare you

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.959
<v Speaker 1>to actually do. Because normally someone first time they'd been

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>playing wouldn't be playing two hundred four hundredy'd be playing

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>three dollars, six dollars whatever. But I felt like, no,

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I know how to play all these games. And I

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, I think I played great. We'll see

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it when the stream comes out. I won money. I

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>like for the one percent listening Diard poker nerds that'll

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>get this. I got Pad's poker Patrick Lennard, who is

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the best poker players in the world, to

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>break an eight induced to seven triple draw with a

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>check Ray's bluff. That was the single best move anyone

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>at the table made all night. And it was and

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I made, you know, a few thousand dollars profit and

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>more than held my own. And so again, I think

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I made a ton of mistakes throughout the course of

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the night, but that was fine. It was my first

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>time doing it, but it was not a it was

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it was it went great. So that was that was

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>as thrilling as anything that happened this week, and playing

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.239
<v Speaker 1>in Bobby's room than playing with those guys. Shout out

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys that was in the game, David Baker.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the two time winner or one time winner of

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the Super Contest. And then one another thing. He's one

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>of the best NFL handicappers in the world. He won

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the Westgate Super Contest years ago. And he was in

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the game. Nacho Barbero was in the live game, not

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the streamed game. A bunch of guys. There were three

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>knicks at the table. Shout out to the other knicks.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was great. And so oh and the guy's whose

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>game it was Crazy Mike. It was the Crazy Mike mix.

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And so shout out to all those guys. It was awesome.

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I had such a great time. Okay, now thirty minutes

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>into the show to the actual basketball, go ahead.

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, do you want to you don't want to talk

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 2>about the game right the Memphis.

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>No, because we're gonna get to Memphis and later. Yep.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So Jokic has been cooking. He put up sixty

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 3>one against Minnesota the other day. It's his highest scoring

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 3>triple double.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>And to acknowledge he's the best basketball player he's ever

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>seen besides besides himself. Yeah, but the big story of

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>that game was Russ kind of choking there at the end.

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>He got the steals, smoked the layup, and then fouled

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the three point shooter at the end.

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And then last night smoked another layout Yeah with a

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>few minutes left, and they needed that. They lost to

0:28:55.320 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Spurs. So we'll get to Joker in a second.

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't take joy in being right on this,

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>But of course we were going. Anyone that has spent

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a season watching late stage Russell Westbrook play for teams

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>with championship aspirations, all of them knew, and all of

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>them thought it would be different for them until they

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>realize it's not. I was one of those people once.

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So here's the deal. Russell Westbrook over the last nearly

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>full decade has been totally unable to contribute to winning basketball,

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and four contenders have been like, we can change him,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and all four contenders were wrong. So he he leaves

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder and they pair him with James Harden for

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a Rockets team that thinks they can win the championship

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just a year and a half removed from winning sixty

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>five games and taking the Durant Warriors to a game

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>seven in the conference finals, and it of course goes terribly.

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>They divorce after one year. He's brutal in the playoffs,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and then he goes to the one place, the one

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>place that the Russell Westbrook experience made sense was Washington

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.479
<v Speaker 1>because Washington's like, hey, man, car keys are yours? We

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>would just love to win forty games, and Russ delivers

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>averages another triple doubles. It's all Russ all the time,

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>gets him into the playoffs, and then in those playoffs

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be like, oh, what did you do? In

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs? He averaged the triple double. In the playoffs,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>he shot thirty three percent from the floor and they

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>lost in five. Then the Lakers were like, we can

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>change him, and the Lakers missed the playoffs the one

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>year he's there in full, have to get off him

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and promptly make the conference finals without him. The Clippers,

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we can change him. And with the Clippers they're like, oh,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>he's better here. He's accepted his role, and in his

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one full season with the Clippers, they make the playoffs,

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and in those playoffs he plays nineteen minutes a game,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>averages six points on twenty six percent from the field,

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty three percent from three and they move off him,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and then the Nuggets, we can change him. It'll be

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>different here. And the playoffs are approaching, and you got

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a little sneak preview of what to expect. And again,

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I take no pleasure in this because I have such

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>respect for Russell's career and the way he approaches playing

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>hard at all times. What I do take a little

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>pleasure in is Nuggets fans who got a little chesty

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the year. Demon's a lot of like,

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>do a Twitter search for these three nouns Yokich, Lebron,

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Russ and see how many tweets pop up from November

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and December along the lines of, oh, why couldn't Lebron

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>get out of Russ? What Joker is?

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Why oh oh oh, you know, Russ got blamed for

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>everything in LA but put him with a guy like Joker,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and look, guys, this train is never late. It's never late.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Russ also has like lost a lot of his athleticism,

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's kind of like, oh, that's obvious

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 2>he's getting older. But like on that layup that he smoked,

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I was telling Daniel like a few years ago, Russell

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 2>was dunk in that.

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Man, I just yes, that's exactly right. By the way,

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's another time where the exact take you

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>gave was the exact take. And this is a compliment

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that Brew gave yesterday, oh, which is yeah, that that was.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It might have been wild one of them, but either way,

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it was that used to be a dunk and it's

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>not anymore here on this one. And so uh and

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 1>it there what it in life? What awesome is what

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>all what often is your greatest asset becomes your great liability.

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Russ going one speed at all times, Russ, you know,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>playing a certain way. Russ's relentlessness is what made him him,

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and now it's what makes him a total liability to

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>winning basketball. Also, by the way, that yeah, to winning basketball.

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's a disase it The Nuggets aren't deep enough

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to be able to just put them on ice. But man,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>oh man, like, I I don't know, I don't know

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 1>how you can put him in critical playoff games. And

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>here's the other piece of it. I thought of that sequence, Demanse,

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the missed layup was the least of the problems. Missed

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>layups happened. I thought it was a bigger problem that

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>after missing the layup in a one point double overtime

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>game with ten seconds left, he stood under the basket,

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>arms up, whining for a beat, which then allowed the

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Timberwolves to get the advantage. And obviously the worst part

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the play was not only did he foul a

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>three point shooter, he fouled a three point shooter demonse

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>on a fake contest. There was like there was that

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't one of those Oh man, I I almost

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>locked it and instead I hit him. No, I mean

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a fake contest. And then I don't know

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if you saw Rob Prez's video then when he's lead

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>even the court with the fan, yeah, I mean, buddy, like.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I feel the russ is. It's unfortunate. Man, Why do

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 2>you need the camera on the man's face for so

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 2>long when they make a mistake.

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's like the drama. I mean, that's how I mean.

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I get that.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like, this is a guy who messed up. But yeah,

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna stop chirping the fans. You you screw it up,

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and the fans are gonna.

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Right like now, listen if it comes out the fan,

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, dropped a slur then, of course whatever, but

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I but my feeling was it wasn't that.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 3>Going up there just off of Westbrick.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Westbrook, exactly exactly, And so like it's it's a

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>tough now, our resident Nuggets fan, Daniel, I still believe

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in Russ. Good luck with that man again Westbrook. This decade,

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this decade, guys, it's twenty twenty five, this decade in

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, thirty seven percent from the field, twenty seven

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>percent from three, three and a half turnovers a game

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in thirty one minutes. Can't win that way, you just can't.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And so rough Spot, I know you have some follow

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>ups here, go ahead.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, even with Russ, with Russ playing the way.

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 2>He is, could you still consider counting out the Denver

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Nuggets with Jokics being on the team.

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>No, So listen, that's the shame of it is Jokic

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>has one of the greatest games in NBA history and

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>it gets squandered. Now again, I I saw Luca last

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>year have a seventy three, ten and seven and then

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 1>all year long before or fifth in the standings and

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 1>be ineligible for MVP. So I'm not doing another MVP thing.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Shay's team might win seventy games, He's gonna win the

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>scoring title. He's were we are if we want a

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>retro act. Here's the deal, Nugget fans. If you make

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>up this petition, I'll sign it. If you would like

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to retroactively give last year's MVP to Luca so Joker

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>can win this year, I'm all for it. But last

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>year the argument against Luca was Jokers team has the

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>best record, even if he's averaging. You know, Jokers averaging

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>damn near. His numbers are great, even if they're not

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>quite as good as Luca's, but it's contributing to winning more.

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And last year Joker was the better defender than Luca.

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It's gotta be Joker and Luca in with four first

0:38:56.200 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>place votes. You can't then use all of your Joker

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>arguments from last year this year and not end up

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>with Shay. The logical consistency of the last two years,

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>voting will would either go Luca last year, Joker this year,

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>or Joker last year Shay this year. Joker already won

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>last year, so it's Shay's now. Is Joker the best

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>player in the league? Yes, is Joker the only person.

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is what Nuggets fans should take pride in.

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Is Joker the only person you could put on that

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets team and they would have any chance of winning

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the championship. Yes, he's the only guy in the league,

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and they do have a chance. Not a good chance,

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but they do have a chance. The standings are we

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to the standings later in the show. No,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:59.479
<v Speaker 1>So I'll do it here. Those two losses, however, because

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>they lost the last night, now they sat everyone. By

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, I should have put this out. Our friends

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings might have been annoyed me, but I should

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have put it out. I gave it to Hubbs yesterday

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>at one pm. The money line for the Spurs were

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>ten point dogs and they were plus three eighty on

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the money line, and I said to Hubbs, I was like,

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this line is acting like Joker is gonna play. I

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think he is. He's played fifty three minutes the

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>night before, like and Joker then got announced is out.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>The line dropped to damn near a pickham and the

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Spurs won. So shout out to anyone who sniped that,

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>because that, to me, I just couldn't be We knew

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Murray wasn't gonna be playing. I couldn't believe it.

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>But here's the standings implication. Denver's now the four again.

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Some time left, not a lot though, five games left

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Houston sitting at twenty seven losses the Lakers, and at

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this point in the season, guys just count losses. You

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>can make up wins, you can't make up losses, So

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>don't talk about games back any of that. Count the losses.

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:31.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what matters. Oklahoma City pretty comfortable with twelve losses, unbelievable.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Houston's at twenty seven and clinched their playoff spot last night.

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The Lakers are at twenty nine, the Nuggets are at thirty,

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors are at thirty one, Minnesota is at thirty two,

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and the two play in teams that are good the

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Clippers and grit well, I don't know if they're good,

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but that are above five hundred. The Clippers and Grizzlies

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are at thirty two. So Houston safe from the play

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>in barring well, no safe from the plane entirely because

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they clinched their division. That keep you safe from the plane,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure it does. But here's what I will

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:29.720
<v Speaker 1>say about Houston. Houston's next five or last final five Demanse, Thunder, Warriors, Clippers, Lakers, Nuggets.

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So anybody that has some doubts is Houston. Well it's

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all the teams they could play in Round one of

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, except for the Thunder obviously can't play them.

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean we're gonna find out over these

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>next five. The Lakers right now would give anything demonse

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to freeze the standings because well, yeah, Denver Golden State

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>play each other in Round one and the winner plays

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City. If you froze the standings, the Lakers side

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of the bracket would be Minnesota and then Houston or

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe the Clippers, like the Lakers would love

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that road. I don't know that they'll get it, but

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it would absolutely love that road. You too, the Daniel

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>asking if I would you know, like to face the

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>size of the Timberwolves. I again, the West is a

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>monster and there's no you know, no easy outs right

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>now except for Memphis. But they're you know, Memphis is

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna in my opinion, up the eight seed. So you're

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to get Memphis. And yeah, I

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>would take my chances. I don't want to face any

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of the I don't want to face Denver or Golden

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>State immediately, and I love the idea of being on

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the opposite side of OKC. Like again there. I think

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers can win the whole thing, but it doesn't

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>mean all paths are created equal. Here's I'll tell you

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>who Denver doesn't want to face. Denver be fine with

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors. I think they've beaten the Warriors nine straight games.

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Denver doesn't want to face Minnesota, who has now beating

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>them six games in a row, swept them this season,

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and then beat them game six and seven of the

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 1>playoffs last year.

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Would you give them beef? Doubt they if they were

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 2>in a series year taking Minnesota.

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I take it you have to pick Minnesota, all right?

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Those one six straight, they've won six straight against them.

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's talk Lakers Warriors.

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Steph is looking good. He's had a few

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 2>games back since his injury. The other day he dropped

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 2>fifty two. I had twelve three pointers. So the Warriors

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 2>are looking pretty good, which is bad for your Lakers,

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 2>who they played at night, and they could also be

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 2>potentially playing them in the playoffs. Ye, how do you

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 2>feel the Lakers got them? But they're coming off of

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of rest.

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think the Warriors are everyone's making this

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Warriors eighteen and two with Jimmy eighteen and five since

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the trade about Jimmy, it's about what it's Let Steph

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>go back to being Steph. Before the Jimmy trade was

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two a game. Since the Jimmy trade's at twenty

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:35.240
<v Speaker 1>eight a game. On better efficiency popped off for fifty

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>two the other night. I if you are getting close

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to prime Steph, you're a threat when you have And

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's also a reminder if you have one of the

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>greatest players of all time, you have an obligation to

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>always be all in. You can't throw seasons away because

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you might go another fifty years in your franchise and

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not have a player nearly as good as Steph Curry. Now,

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think both teams desperately need this game, which is

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what makes it so fascinating because of what I was

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>saying about the standings the Lakers. If the Lakers win

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:22.280
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, they have twenty nine losses, Golden

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>State has thirty two, and by the way, the Lakers

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have the tiebreaker over everyone beneath them in the standings,

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>every single team. So you would a win tonight for

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers essentially eliminates any concern of falling into the

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>play in And it doesn't lock up a top four seed,

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but it essentially does. And if for the Warriors, if

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they lose, they're at thirty two losses. Memphis and the

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Clippers have thirty two losses, they're the seven and the eight.

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's thirty two losses, they're at six. But the flip

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:04.720
<v Speaker 1>side of that applies as well. Golden State wins Demanse,

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers are at thirty losses, Golden State's at thirty one,

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and Golden State could potentially forget hitting in the play

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>in end up with home court in Round one. I

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers this year, it's one of the honest things. Ever,

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they are dominant against the Western Conference, So the Lakers

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Thunder have almost the same record against the West.

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Think about that. So the Thunder are thirty five and

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>eleven against the West, which means they are thirty five

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and eleven twenty nine and one. No, is that right?

0:47:57.280 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Twenty nine and one against the East. The Thunder twenty

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>nine and one against the East, thirty five and eleven

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>against the West. The Lakers are thirty two and thirteen

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>against the West, the second best record of the Thunder

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>by a mile in the Western Conference. Thirty two and

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>thirteen the Lakers are against the West, which means the

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>flip side to that is they are fourteen and sixteen

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>against the East.

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Role this year. Say it again, they're bad on the

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 3>road this year?

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Correct?

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Really?

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, so the Lakers have been an awesome home team,

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a bad road team. But you're West and East. You

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>pay you know, you play half your games against the

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:52.720
<v Speaker 1>East at home, half on the road. So the Lakers

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are at home. They need it. They're playing a good team.

0:48:56.920 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the Lakers. The tricky thing to the Lakekers

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is for when you look at their final five games,

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't do what you can do with most of

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the good teams, which is be like, oh, oh, and

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers don't have five left. Hold on, Lakers have

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.879
<v Speaker 1>seven left. That's right, because they have the fire games. Yeah,

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but regardless most teams you'd be like, oh, well, chalk

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>up a win against the Pelicans and Blazers. Lakers liable

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to lose to any bad team, but they also are

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>excellent against the good teams. Uh so I'm really excited

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to see the night it Also, it could be a

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:42.479
<v Speaker 1>playoff preview. If it is, I hope it's not Round one,

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:47.439
<v Speaker 1>not because the Lakers would have, you know, couldn't beat

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors. But I just don't want a guarantee that

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the two is out of there. And round one.

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>There is a team that I am certain is out

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of there and round one. It's the team I saw

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in person on Saturday. Go ahead, demanse.

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:06.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they've been struggling over the last few weeks.

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:11.280
<v Speaker 2>They've won two of their last ten games. The Grizzlies.

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Nine games left to go.

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 2>They fired their head coach, and now they're at risk

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 2>of falling into the play and Jahn Morant's holding up

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the finger guns. I think they're doing an investigation on

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 2>him right now. But yeah, let's talk about the state

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Grizzlies.

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so just literally a minute ago, Shams tweeted, let

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 1>me read it to you exactly. Uh sorry, hold on,

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:46.240
<v Speaker 1>NBA issued warnings but no further penalties to Grizzlies, Jamorant

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and Buddy healed along with the teams for the gestures.

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 1>League ruled the celebrations were not intended to be violent

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in nature, but inappropriate and should refrain. All right. I

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>want to make this clear. I don't care about the

0:50:57.280 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>gun part of this. That's a different discussion. The pantomiming

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>guns and the it that distracts from the point. Here's

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what I care about, demands any type of taunt or

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>celebration when there's ten seconds left in a game, your

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:20.280
<v Speaker 1>team needed that. You let the other team's guys score

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty and you just lost to continue a four game

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 1>losing streak, days after you fired your coach, and you're

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>being a goofball. That's what I care about there. I

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:37.839
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, I talked to Tea at the

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Grizzlies game. I like Josh Dad. I like him historically,

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I've liked John. John this offseason needs to decide who

0:51:51.560 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>do I want to be in this league? Because you've

0:51:56.400 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>gone from your numbers have gotten worse over each of

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the last four years, your health has gotten worse over

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>each of the last four years. Your team has gotten

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 1>worse over each of the last four years. You just

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>fired your coach and you're out here being a goofball,

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:18.880
<v Speaker 1>like and that was go ahead.

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So you're talking about John Ranty in the face of

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the league a year ago, correct, like maybe maybe a

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 2>little over a year.

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, gun stuff, but yes, of course. And and even

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>when the stupid gun stuff was happening, nobody questioned his

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>skill how good he was? Right, So like that's the nobody.

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Nobody was wondering how great he is. He's never got

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 1>better as a shooter. In fact, he maybe has gotten

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:56.760
<v Speaker 1>worse from three misses forty of the games with injury.

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't seem to take winning seriously, the hell's going on?

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five years old? And the to me, the most

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>notable piece of the entire incident between he and healed

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was the look on Steph Curry's face, because Steph Curry's

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>face was like a look of honestly, like a disappointed parent,

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like what are you doing? Like like, what what are

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you doing? The the reason I'm saying I'm not focused

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on the gun piece.

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Of it is.

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.720
<v Speaker 1>If the if the Grizzlies had just hit free throws

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to go up seven with ten seconds left and John

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>did that celebration, I would feel totally differently, which means

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I know. For me, it's not about the gun piece

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of it, and again gun in quotes finger guns like

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's about being ready to party when your team's falling apart.

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.840
<v Speaker 1>It's pro sports man, it's the playoff push. You just

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>fired your coach. You just it was four straight losses

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>against the four teams most likely to stand between you

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and a championship. They lost to the Thunder, then they

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Lakers, Then they lost to the Celtics,

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>then they lost to the Warriors, and you're being a goofball.

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 3>Like.

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't like it. I don't like it

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>at all. Finals are here, and the only thing for

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:49.319
<v Speaker 1>sure is it's the last time you're gonna have a

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>chance to bet on college basketball this season. It's been

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>an amazing ride to get here, an unprecedented run to

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this point, with four of the four best teams, including

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>four of the best teams in recent college basketball history,

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>getting there. Maybe there will finally be a shocking outcome,

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or maybe we're just going to keep seeing the best

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>show you why they're the best. More on that in

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a second. Get in on all the action, expected and

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>unexpected with DraftKings Sportsbook with live betting, exclusive content, promos

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and barlays. DraftKings is the ultimate college basketball destination four March.

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Ready to make your first bet, check out the matchups,

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and pick a team to win. It's that simple me personally.

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You guys know, I was in on Tennessee. It didn't

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>work out. Now we pivot. We got it, We pivot.

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Thus far, this has been a tournament where the best

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>team wins. The best team is Duke. I personally like

0:55:56.480 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Duke minus five and a half tonight at even money.

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not tonight this weekend. I also personally like Duke

0:56:05.320 --> 0:56:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to win the championship at even money. So Duke minus

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 1>five and a half in their game on Saturday at

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>even money, Duke plus one hundred to win the whole

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>thing at even money. Better late than never. It's what

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with now that Tennessee's gone. Lines and odds

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>subject to change first time. Here's something special just for

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you new DraftKings customers. Bet five dollars to get one

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:34.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets. Instantly bet the unexpected

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:38.399
<v Speaker 1>with DraftKings Sportsbook. Download the DraftKings sports Book GAFF and

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 1>use code right. That's code right for new customers wrighd

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to get one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets when

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings. Gambling problem

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>call one eight hundred. Gambler in New York call eight

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 1>seven to seven eight hope in why, or text hope

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in why, which is four six seven three six nine.

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>In Connecticut. Help is available for problem gambling. Call eight

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven, or

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas twenty one plus age

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario. Bonus betts

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot co

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>slash b ball. All right, demanse, let's rapid fire through

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of these if we can.

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers was seen working out with his new teammate

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 2>DK Metcalf in Pittsburgh.

0:57:51.640 --> 0:57:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Are you excited to see that Tatum next year? Nah?

0:57:55.320 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm kidding.

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't signed yet. What's going on with Aaron Rodgers?

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:02.680
<v Speaker 2>What's going on there? Guy's taking his time.

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why the Steelers. Here's the deal. I

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>understood why the Steelers were letting him dictate the terms

0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:14.040
<v Speaker 1>when he had a bunch of options. He could go

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to New York. Maybe Minnesota was interested. He's out of options.

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The Giants signed two quarterbacks, Minnesota's not signing him, Tennessee's

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:33.360
<v Speaker 1>drafting their quarterback. Pittsburgh, you're the Pittsburgh Steelers. Call Aaron's

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 1>agent and say, we need to know within the week

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:44.360
<v Speaker 1>or we're out. The leverage has shifted back to you.

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>He wants to play for you, So why hasn't he signed.

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>My guess is he doesn't want to either he doesn't

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:54.600
<v Speaker 1>want to be on the hook for the full off

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:58.520
<v Speaker 1>season program, or more accurately, he wants to be able

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to potentially pressure you into not spending your first round

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:06.000
<v Speaker 1>pick on a quarterback, be it Shador if he slips,

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or Jackson Dart if you love him and he thinks

0:59:09.080 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 1>if he hasn't signed yet but has made it clear,

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>oh I'm going to sign that. You guys won't draft

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback because it could upset it. Don't let him

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:22.680
<v Speaker 1>run things. He has nowhere else.

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 3>To go, and if they do draft a quarterback. What's

0:59:25.400 --> 0:59:25.960
<v Speaker 3>he gonna do.

0:59:28.000 --> 0:59:30.480
<v Speaker 1>If he if he hasn't signed yet, then maybe he

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>just won't sign. Okay, you know what I mean? Like

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe then he will you know, retire or wait for

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to see if there's an injury somewhere or whatever it is.

0:59:41.160 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But you can't let a guy who's never played for

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you and hasn't been in good for been good in

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 1>four years dictate your draft plans and your offseason plans.

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 1>The damn owner of the team came out yesterday and said, yeah,

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we thought it'd be done by now. I've never seen

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a team that has no history with a player when

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the player is not still awesome jump through these hoops.

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just baffling to me, all right.

1:00:09.760 --> 1:00:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Next, Jerry Jones still hasn't come to closing a deal

1:00:13.040 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>on Michael Parson's actually taking a shot at his agent

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>during the process. He said, the agent is not a

1:00:18.920 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>factor here or is something to worry about. And I

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>don't know his name, and so my point is, I'm

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>not trying to demean him in any way. But this

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>isn't about an agent. Why would Jerry Jones say something

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>of this sort.

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So here's the deal, and I actually think this is

1:00:37.720 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a real story, because there's only two possible truths here. Okay,

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>one truth is he forgot the agent's name or doesn't

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>know it, David mulla Getta. If that is the case,

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>David's not an obscure agent. He negotiated with Sean Watson deal.

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:12.439
<v Speaker 1>He negotiated Malik Hooker, who's a cowboy, his deal. If

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>your general manager does not know the agent's name for

1:01:19.400 --> 1:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>your best player, then it's time to take the car

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>keys away from him. And people are like, oh, well,

1:01:25.680 --> 1:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't He definitely knows his name. Okay, that's fine.

1:01:29.560 --> 1:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's door number two. Door number two is he does

1:01:33.120 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>know his name, and he's being unnecessarily and intentionally disrespectful

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and combative with someone you have to work with. That

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>ain't good either, you know what I mean. Like, either

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he's telling the truth and that's a problem, or he's

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just saying it to piss the guy off and that's dumb.

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Like there's there's no there's no win, there no win whatsoever.

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And it really Jerry Jones, for a long time was

1:02:12.560 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the best things that Cowboys had going for them.

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He has quickly become their single biggest impediment to winning,

1:02:21.320 --> 1:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and for a franchise with that history and a brand

1:02:24.880 --> 1:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of that caliber, it's just it's just unfathomable that they

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are the worst run team in the league, but right

1:02:33.800 --> 1:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>now they appear to be the worst run team in

1:02:36.520 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the league.

1:02:38.400 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's seem like a gay.

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it doesn't. It's just an Yeah. I

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly didn't seem like you know that we'd be going

1:02:49.600 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to the same parties. All right, let's do mock drafts.

1:02:53.000 --> 1:02:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Demonse, Uh so, yeah, you're one of the top mof

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>mock drafters last year. You haven't said too much about

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 2>it this year. Do you have a mock draft for

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the folks out there Monday?

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>First things, First, mock draft one point zero. I think

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I had the world's eighteenth most accurate mock draft last year.

1:03:14.280 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Wow, yeah, I remember eighteen. I didn't know that was the.

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Might have been twenty one, it was somewhere. It wasn't

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in the top fifteen, but it was in the top

1:03:23.960 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. I remember that. I'll have to look it up.

1:03:26.840 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Double digits.

1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was. There were I mean there were hundreds

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds done by media member Schrager crushed. Schrager had

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate. Uh so, yeah, Monday on the TV show,

1:03:41.000 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the first mock draft gets revealed.

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:46.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, all right, so yeah, Cooper Flags looked

1:03:46.040 --> 1:03:48.560
<v Speaker 2>like the real deal throughout the tournament and obviously throughout

1:03:48.560 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>his short college career.

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>He'll be eighteen when he hits the NBA. Do you

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>think that he's.

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Gonna be a real deal or he's going to be

1:03:55.840 --> 1:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>more of a bust or flame out?

1:03:57.760 --> 1:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously not a bust, but well, no.

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You can't say obviously. I mean, the only way you

1:04:02.320 --> 1:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>can be a bus is if you're a super high

1:04:04.040 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>draft pick, and the only be a super high draft

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>picks if people think you're gonna be awesome. But no,

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's good. I am not. So you guys know,

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, you know, watching a ton of college basketball

1:04:17.400 --> 1:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>during the regular season, and so I hadn't It's not

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that I hadn't seen Cooper Flag, but I had, you know,

1:04:24.560 --> 1:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not watched him as closely as the people who are

1:04:26.600 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>college basketball diehards. To me, he's been better than advertised.

1:04:32.360 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought his game against Arizona was spectacular, and you

1:04:37.080 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>guys just hurting the DraftKings read I'm in on Duke

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has just been. He's so far and

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>away the best player in college basketball. And here's the

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>crazy thing, Demonse, he doesn't turn nineteen until December, so

1:04:54.720 --> 1:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be the same age. He's gonna be the

1:04:57.000 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>age Lebron was when he came into the league. Like

1:05:01.000 --> 1:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he reclassified so he should be a high school senior.

1:05:04.760 --> 1:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>But he's a college freshman. He's tall, he's strong, shoots

1:05:08.920 --> 1:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it well enough good, IQ can defend. No, no, no, I

1:05:12.960 --> 1:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>now do I think he's gonna be like a super uperstar.

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>We gotta wait and see that. But he is the

1:05:18.800 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>no doubt obvious number one pick. All right, let's go

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to the final four. Before we get to the listener questions.

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh So Saturday, Florida and Auburn face off before Duke

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and Houston face off in the final four.

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any predictions for this?

1:05:34.880 --> 1:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd like Houston to win because I like Kelvin Samson

1:05:38.400 --> 1:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know we used to live there. But the

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>tournament has been chalk, and I am going to stick

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with chalk. Duke over Florida and then Duke wins it all.

1:05:50.320 --> 1:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>What is Duke Kevin? I think I've been hearing it

1:05:52.800 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 3>all week.

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I've not asked anybody when you say chalk the context

1:05:56.960 --> 1:05:59.880
<v Speaker 2>clues meaning that it's linear, like what is it?

1:06:00.240 --> 1:06:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Like? What does it mean?

1:06:01.040 --> 1:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Same favorites? Wind?

1:06:02.880 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, chalk means.

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It goes the way. I don't know, so a good

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I've always no, that's that you're thinking of?

1:06:12.560 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 3>What?

1:06:12.880 --> 1:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's got none to do with that. I I

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Let's find out together. Why Why is a

1:06:22.320 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite winning called chalk? Daniel says it's horse racing, but

1:06:28.560 --> 1:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to know the So here we go from

1:06:34.920 --> 1:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>vocabulary dot com. The history of chalk dates back to

1:06:39.680 --> 1:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the old days of horse racing, when bookmakers would set

1:06:42.880 --> 1:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the odds for each horse by riding them on a

1:06:45.200 --> 1:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>chalkboard at on track gambling stations. The odds would change

1:06:50.440 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>during the pre race betting period depending on the amount

1:06:52.920 --> 1:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>wagered on each horse, so the book makers would often

1:06:55.760 --> 1:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>need to erase the post odds and chalk up new

1:06:58.680 --> 1:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>ones uh before beginning of the race. The bookies at

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the track had to be skillful with the chalk to

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>keep their slate boards up to date with las ods.

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>In reporting on horse racing around the turn of the

1:07:10.480 --> 1:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, sports journalists often referred to bookmakers with such

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>flowery appellations as the lively Nights of the Chalk and blackboard,

1:07:21.000 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>or more simply knights of the chalk. Chalk gradually came

1:07:25.280 --> 1:07:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to stand for the bookmakers and their odds making through

1:07:29.480 --> 1:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the process through the process of matonomy, defined by the

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Visual Thesaurus as substituting the name of an attribute or

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>feature for the name of the thing itself. For instance,

1:07:45.240 --> 1:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a racing column in the October fifteenth, nineteen oh three

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic Constitution reported the first race. The chalk figures made

1:07:53.160 --> 1:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it look like five injuries and six favorites for the event.

1:07:57.240 --> 1:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Those who followed the odds put up by the bookmakers

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>could thus stay loyal to the chalk and bet on

1:08:03.840 --> 1:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the favored horses, or they could look for an entrant

1:08:06.840 --> 1:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>with long odds that could potentially get a bigger payout.

1:08:10.040 --> 1:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>A quote from April twenty seven to nineteen oh seven

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post encapsulates the ambivalence that betters felt toward the

1:08:17.720 --> 1:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>chalk of the bookies. Chalk scares many a turf speculator.

1:08:22.240 --> 1:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Let him pick a horse to win, and if he

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:26.479
<v Speaker 1>thinks he ought to be the favorites and the bookies

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>laid a big price against him. Nine times out of ten,

1:08:29.720 --> 1:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the horse won't be played.

1:08:32.960 --> 1:08:34.599
<v Speaker 3>All right, listeners, I made a mistake.

1:08:35.320 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm fascinated by this. Uh and all right, so

1:08:42.560 --> 1:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>now we know. So that's great, so that I respect

1:08:46.360 --> 1:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that you weren't afraid to ask the question. Um, and

1:08:51.000 --> 1:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I've always known what chalk meant. I didn't know it.

1:08:55.200 --> 1:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where it came from. So chalk just means all

1:08:58.080 --> 1:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the favorites winning. So when you're filling out a bracket,

1:09:01.640 --> 1:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>picking all one seats make the final four as a

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:07.639
<v Speaker 1>chalk bracket. It happened though this year, the first time

1:09:07.680 --> 1:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it happened since two thousand's fault. Yeah, let's see what

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>happens next year on it. All right, Let's do a

1:09:15.800 --> 1:09:17.639
<v Speaker 1>few listener questions before we get out of here.

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:20.479
<v Speaker 2>Logan, Nick, why do you still not have an NBA

1:09:20.560 --> 1:09:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Awards vote? What is the process in order to get

1:09:23.080 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a vote? And do you think you could get one

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>in the future. You seem like you'd be a pretty

1:09:26.800 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 2>good voter.

1:09:28.800 --> 1:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought, so, I don't know, And so

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:09:37.640 --> 1:09:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's your relationship with Lebron.

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't I don't know who the It's fine.

1:09:44.320 --> 1:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I really really wanted one a few years ago, and

1:09:49.080 --> 1:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I tried to get one and I didn't. I think

1:09:52.080 --> 1:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Perkins got it instead, and I it just is

1:09:57.640 --> 1:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what it is. So Zach Lowe gave his away, or

1:10:02.439 --> 1:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>gave his back. Shout out to Zach by the way

1:10:05.400 --> 1:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>for being back. Shout out to Simmons, congrats to him

1:10:09.200 --> 1:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for getting Zach with the ringer. Oh, speaking of awards voters,

1:10:15.760 --> 1:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>there there's a young woman who covers the Lakers who

1:10:19.640 --> 1:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I've never met, but she she asks Lebron some of

1:10:26.520 --> 1:10:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the most kind of the question she asked Lebron leads

1:10:31.800 --> 1:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to some of his best answers. She asked him a

1:10:35.000 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, if you guys saw the viral clip

1:10:37.640 --> 1:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of someone asking Lebron about why he's compared basketball to

1:10:43.479 --> 1:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>music or jazz, and then he went on a nice

1:10:46.640 --> 1:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>little soliloquy about how basketball is like listening to jazz

1:10:51.080 --> 1:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>or different music. And then just the other day, she

1:10:55.560 --> 1:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>asked him about why it was important for him to

1:10:58.680 --> 1:11:01.759
<v Speaker 1>bring back mine the game, and he gave a really

1:11:01.760 --> 1:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting answer. Her name, and I apologize if I'm mispronounced,

1:11:04.840 --> 1:11:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it is Claire Delone. She just tweeted she got an

1:11:08.479 --> 1:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Awards vote, So that's awesome. Like, those are people that

1:11:12.640 --> 1:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>are at games and watching games and really covering teams.

1:11:17.439 --> 1:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally cool with them having Awards votes. I listen.

1:11:21.439 --> 1:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't act like I'm not cool with other people.

1:11:24.800 --> 1:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I since they have expanded the pool to include people

1:11:31.360 --> 1:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that talk about the sport, commentators and stuff, I would

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>have liked to have gotten one. I don't have one.

1:11:36.720 --> 1:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, Bru's got one and Brew, you know, so

1:11:40.400 --> 1:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>first things first is covered. But Brew has one from

1:11:43.920 --> 1:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>back his days, you know, as a writer, and he's

1:11:46.439 --> 1:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>had one forever. All right, let's do a couple more.

1:11:50.040 --> 1:11:52.759
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Brandon, do you think we'll look back on Giannis

1:11:52.800 --> 1:11:55.200
<v Speaker 2>like we do Wilt, as in, how did someone so

1:11:55.320 --> 1:11:56.919
<v Speaker 2>dominant not win more titles?

1:11:57.439 --> 1:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, Joanna's got a long ways to go to we

1:12:00.240 --> 1:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>think of him as Wilt, But I do think Giannis,

1:12:04.200 --> 1:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dame's injury in the Buck's future, like Giannis's

1:12:07.960 --> 1:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>ability to compete for championships despite being one of three

1:12:10.720 --> 1:12:13.519
<v Speaker 1>best players in the league is very murky in the

1:12:13.560 --> 1:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>short term.

1:12:14.439 --> 1:12:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Next, Uh, Jacob Santa Cruz local here, Nick, what is

1:12:18.880 --> 1:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>your favorite food spot in Santa Cruz. Would you would

1:12:21.920 --> 1:12:24.120
<v Speaker 2>you love to try out a new spot. My suggestion

1:12:24.280 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to you is see bright DELI love your brother.

1:12:27.800 --> 1:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you, Jacob. I don't know much about Santa Cruz.

1:12:30.080 --> 1:12:32.479
<v Speaker 1>People have seen me wear the Santa Cruz hoodie. It's

1:12:32.560 --> 1:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>because Demands's sister, our older daughter. My older daughter goes

1:12:38.640 --> 1:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to U see Santa Cruz. But I you know, I've

1:12:41.120 --> 1:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>only been. I haven't spent a ton of time out there,

1:12:43.560 --> 1:12:45.519
<v Speaker 1>just you know, moving her into college, picking her up

1:12:45.560 --> 1:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. So I don't know, but I will

1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:49.719
<v Speaker 1>try seabright Delhi, all right? Last one?

1:12:50.160 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh bear if nick I was in New York City

1:12:52.200 --> 1:12:53.880
<v Speaker 2>a couple of weeks ago and I got to and

1:12:53.920 --> 1:12:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I got to stop by Trentage. Nice to see entrepreneurial

1:12:57.240 --> 1:12:58.479
<v Speaker 2>ship runs in the family.

1:12:58.960 --> 1:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, shout out to Trentage. Danielle Store is doing great.

1:13:04.320 --> 1:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Former home of this podcast. All right, great job, everybody.

1:13:07.960 --> 1:13:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get to TV again. Reminder we'll do a

1:13:10.560 --> 1:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>quick show tomorrow morning recapping Lakers Warriors. So set you know,

1:13:15.520 --> 1:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>subscribe like rate review. That really helps. By the way,

1:13:19.960 --> 1:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've looked demon say let me

1:13:21.640 --> 1:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>try to pull it up real quick quick. We are

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>approaching two. We're at one hundred and ninety four thousand

1:13:28.439 --> 1:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and change, so almost two hundred thousand subscribers. It'd be

1:13:31.920 --> 1:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>sick if we could somehow get to two hundred thousand,

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, early in the NBA playoffs and then maybe

1:13:37.439 --> 1:13:40.639
<v Speaker 1>pop a big number during a playoff reaction show. Add

1:13:40.680 --> 1:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>some subscribers, so subscribe on YouTube, iTunes, Spotify, all that stuff.

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>See you guys on TV in a few hours. What's right,