WEBVTT - FINAL NFL WEEK 2 Bets: Vikings-Bears, Packers-Jets and more

0:00:00.830 --> 0:00:05.330
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square, presented by Polymarket. We are part

0:00:05.350 --> 0:00:09.130
<v Speaker 1>of the Volume Podcast Network. This is the show that

0:00:09.150 --> 0:00:13.100
<v Speaker 1>makes the squares sharper and makes the wise guys pay attention.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.220
<v Speaker 1>I am Chad Millman. I am joined, as I am

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>every week, by my co-host, my companion, my compadre, my

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:24.460
<v Speaker 1>BFF professional better, Simon Hunter. Hello, Simon.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:26.940
<v Speaker 2>Chad, how we doing? Brother. Brother.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Before we came on the air, we already had 10

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>minutes of conversation about our minds are swirling because we

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.580
<v Speaker 1>have new ideas this morning about teams we like that

0:00:36.620 --> 0:00:40.340
<v Speaker 1>are popping up after consistent analysis and line moves and

0:00:40.380 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>feedback and all this kind of stuff. This is our

0:00:43.050 --> 0:00:46.870
<v Speaker 1>Sunday morning NFL week two show. Simon and I will

0:00:46.909 --> 0:00:50.630
<v Speaker 1>nail down our final five picks in our free sharp

0:00:50.650 --> 0:00:58.430
<v Speaker 1>or square $ 25, 000 pro football show. Pick'em contest, that's right.

0:00:58.530 --> 0:01:04.929
<v Speaker 1>The free Pick'em contest is open. Prize pool $ 25, 000 in cash.

0:01:04.970 --> 0:01:12.750
<v Speaker 1>Sign up right now at sharporsquare.thevolume.com. Compete against me and

0:01:12.810 --> 0:01:17.380
<v Speaker 1>Simon all season long. Top 10 finishers get paid. First

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>place gets $ 10, 000. It's totally free. Your lowest score will

0:01:22.060 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>get dropped after week five. Sign up now. You can

0:01:25.580 --> 0:01:29.179
<v Speaker 1>continue to sign up. For the next couple of weeks,

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because you will get that lowest score dropped, sharp or square.thevolume.com.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:43.530
<v Speaker 1>All right, Simon. Philadelphia, Tennessee. I bet this is seven.

0:01:43.830 --> 0:01:47.570
<v Speaker 1>It's seven and a half in our contest. I think

0:01:47.610 --> 0:01:49.530
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, sometimes the eyes don't lie.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.430
<v Speaker 1>The Titans are a terrible team. at every level. And

0:01:54.470 --> 0:01:57.970
<v Speaker 1>it's questionable right now if Cam Ward is a good quarterback,

0:01:58.610 --> 0:02:03.380
<v Speaker 1>especially against pressure rate. The Eagles have a chance to

0:02:03.420 --> 0:02:07.919
<v Speaker 1>play better on offense and can dominate on defense. I'm

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.030
<v Speaker 1>going to own it. I know like as a professional better,

0:02:12.090 --> 0:02:15.350
<v Speaker 1>you cannot say take the Eagles at a big number

0:02:15.490 --> 0:02:18.549
<v Speaker 1>on the road. I got no problem with it. I'll

0:02:18.669 --> 0:02:21.950
<v Speaker 1>own it. I'll eat it. It's mine. Let's put it in.

0:02:22.870 --> 0:02:26.410
<v Speaker 1>I got Simon. I got this. I got it. Eagles

0:02:26.450 --> 0:02:28.910
<v Speaker 1>minus seven and a half in the contest. Seven is

0:02:28.930 --> 0:02:29.550
<v Speaker 1>the number right now.

0:02:31.090 --> 0:02:31.230
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:31.290 --> 0:02:32.630
<v Speaker 2>I got other pro betters.

0:02:32.669 --> 0:02:35.329
<v Speaker 3>Call him up and just whisper, whispering horrible things to

0:02:35.370 --> 0:02:38.410
<v Speaker 3>me on the phone. Telling me I'm all just horrible

0:02:38.430 --> 0:02:41.450
<v Speaker 3>things about taking Tennessee. So, um, I told you, I

0:02:41.490 --> 0:02:44.210
<v Speaker 3>can't legally advise you to take Tennessee or I will

0:02:44.230 --> 0:02:46.930
<v Speaker 3>be fired from my job. So if we want to

0:02:46.950 --> 0:02:49.370
<v Speaker 3>take it, you know, I support it. I like this,

0:02:49.750 --> 0:02:52.870
<v Speaker 3>the spot for the Eagles. Um, It's just what we

0:02:52.889 --> 0:02:55.850
<v Speaker 3>talk about all the time, right? Sometimes it's too obvious.

0:02:55.889 --> 0:02:57.150
<v Speaker 3>And the public does win.

0:02:57.190 --> 0:02:59.049
<v Speaker 2>We talk all the time. The public does win. Tennessee

0:02:59.090 --> 0:02:59.829
<v Speaker 2>breaks all the trends.

0:02:59.870 --> 0:03:01.910
<v Speaker 3>I mean, last year, if you faded them every week,

0:03:02.530 --> 0:03:04.829
<v Speaker 3>I think you ended up at like 11-5 or whatever

0:03:04.850 --> 0:03:08.150
<v Speaker 3>it was in the season. So it's been profitable to

0:03:08.190 --> 0:03:11.750
<v Speaker 3>fade Tennessee. We both agree this is a nice matchup

0:03:11.770 --> 0:03:14.870
<v Speaker 3>for the Eagles. It's just at 7.5, it's a lot.

0:03:14.910 --> 0:03:16.870
<v Speaker 2>So, yes. It's a lot. If we win it, you

0:03:16.889 --> 0:03:17.829
<v Speaker 2>can victory lap it.

0:03:17.970 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>If we lose it, that's your cross to bear, my friend.

0:03:21.180 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah. I got no problem. You take an own

0:03:24.020 --> 0:03:25.329
<v Speaker 2>stainless one and own it.

0:03:25.910 --> 0:03:30.550
<v Speaker 1>I own it. I'll take it. New Orleans at Baltimore,

0:03:30.590 --> 0:03:32.829
<v Speaker 1>the number's eight and a half. It surprised me that

0:03:32.850 --> 0:03:36.050
<v Speaker 1>the number dropped during the week. You and I talked

0:03:36.070 --> 0:03:39.310
<v Speaker 1>about it on Tuesday. We both like New Orleans at

0:03:39.330 --> 0:03:41.970
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. We both bet it at eight

0:03:41.990 --> 0:03:44.170
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It came down to seven and a half.

0:03:44.670 --> 0:03:47.230
<v Speaker 1>Zay Flowers is out. I don't know if it's the

0:03:47.290 --> 0:03:49.710
<v Speaker 1>rain or the weather on the East Coast that is

0:03:49.750 --> 0:03:53.380
<v Speaker 1>potentially impacting this number. It's gone back up to eight

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.660
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It's eight and a half in the

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>contest now. Any insight into why you think it's moving

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.670
<v Speaker 1>back up or anything that would scare us from making

0:04:02.710 --> 0:04:03.130
<v Speaker 1>this play?

0:04:05.450 --> 0:04:08.430
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I could just see that if Olave is out

0:04:08.650 --> 0:04:12.340
<v Speaker 3>and Zay Flowers is out, I would assume Olave affects

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.220
<v Speaker 3>the Saints more than Zay Flowers being out affects the Ravens.

0:04:15.260 --> 0:04:18.289
<v Speaker 3>Like the Ravens, Lamar can turn anybody into a star

0:04:18.730 --> 0:04:19.789
<v Speaker 3>and make anyone look good.

0:04:19.870 --> 0:04:21.990
<v Speaker 2>We can't say the same for Shuck, right? Shuck needs

0:04:22.010 --> 0:04:22.529
<v Speaker 2>his weapons.

0:04:22.730 --> 0:04:25.050
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of it being out is a big deal,

0:04:25.110 --> 0:04:27.430
<v Speaker 3>probably a bigger deal for the Saints team. And like

0:04:27.450 --> 0:04:29.270
<v Speaker 3>you said, it is bad weather. I mean, we're here

0:04:29.290 --> 0:04:30.849
<v Speaker 3>on the East coast. It's supposed to rain and be

0:04:30.910 --> 0:04:33.090
<v Speaker 3>windy basically all day for a lot of these teams.

0:04:33.110 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>It's supposed to be sporadic. So yeah, if, if, if

0:04:37.390 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>this ends up being one of our five, the Saints, it's,

0:04:39.820 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 3>it's really us playing the number. We just, it's hard

0:04:43.460 --> 0:04:44.900
<v Speaker 3>to say the Ravens are eight and a half points

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.810
<v Speaker 3>better than the Saints team. The Saints team has shown

0:04:46.870 --> 0:04:49.130
<v Speaker 3>us time and time again, they find a way to

0:04:49.150 --> 0:04:54.010
<v Speaker 3>the back door. And my hesitation here is just, it's

0:04:54.050 --> 0:04:57.090
<v Speaker 3>a lot to ask the Saints team where we just

0:04:57.130 --> 0:05:01.580
<v Speaker 3>saw basically a Lions team look dead like that overtime stuff.

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>I know it's early in the year here, but you

0:05:03.779 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 3>can just tell these guys don't have their sea legs.

0:05:05.500 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean that, I mean the Lions, you can say, well,

0:05:07.460 --> 0:05:08.660
<v Speaker 3>their offense didn't look too bad.

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 2>They did though.

0:05:09.460 --> 0:05:13.180
<v Speaker 3>They slept walking that. So yeah, that's my hesitation with

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.580
<v Speaker 3>the Saints. They're coming off such an insanely physical game.

0:05:16.620 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>On the flip side, the Ravens had won their game

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.620
<v Speaker 3>midway through the third quarter. It's just two totally different teams.

0:05:22.660 --> 0:05:24.620
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see if it ends up one of our

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.380
<v Speaker 3>final fives. But, yeah, as we say right now, it's

0:05:26.430 --> 0:05:28.229
<v Speaker 3>not one of my bigger bets.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:35.590
<v Speaker 1>All right, it's time for our Polymarket closing time segment.

0:05:37.170 --> 0:05:43.729
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay is trading at 3.5. at the New York Jets.

0:05:45.230 --> 0:05:48.890
<v Speaker 1>I have said all week, I didn't want to play

0:05:48.910 --> 0:05:50.910
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. The number has moved from five and a

0:05:50.930 --> 0:05:52.409
<v Speaker 1>half down to three and a half. I didn't want

0:05:52.430 --> 0:05:54.940
<v Speaker 1>to play the Jets because I felt like last week

0:05:54.980 --> 0:05:58.580
<v Speaker 1>was peak Jets at the exact right time. The more

0:05:58.620 --> 0:06:00.780
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about this game, and then when I

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>woke up this morning, the more I liked Green Bay.

0:06:04.540 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And I was surprised when we started talking about these

0:06:07.900 --> 0:06:14.060
<v Speaker 1>games that you liked Green Green Bay as well. That's

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.660
<v Speaker 1>why I'm putting it on the docket here, why I'm

0:06:16.740 --> 0:06:21.469
<v Speaker 1>making it our closing time trade of the week presented

0:06:21.550 --> 0:06:26.589
<v Speaker 1>by Polymarket. Because the more I think about it, Green

0:06:26.610 --> 0:06:31.950
<v Speaker 1>Bay is desperate. Green Bay is great against man defense,

0:06:31.970 --> 0:06:35.450
<v Speaker 1>which the Jets want to play. Green Bay lost that

0:06:35.490 --> 0:06:38.630
<v Speaker 1>game because of three untimely penalties and then some turnovers

0:06:38.690 --> 0:06:41.619
<v Speaker 1>at the end when the Vikings were going all-out blitz.

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not impressed with the Jets beating up the

0:06:45.420 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Titans as much as I am with the Packers needing

0:06:49.500 --> 0:06:50.190
<v Speaker 1>to win this game.

0:06:52.190 --> 0:06:55.690
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's more to me about as well, it's not

0:06:55.730 --> 0:06:57.770
<v Speaker 3>trying to overreact too much to week one. We knew

0:06:57.810 --> 0:06:59.950
<v Speaker 3>the weaknesses of this Green Bay team coming into the season.

0:07:00.650 --> 0:07:02.620
<v Speaker 3>It just felt like this is a team that every

0:07:02.690 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>single thing possible went wrong. We talked about the refs,

0:07:06.980 --> 0:07:09.650
<v Speaker 3>the turnovers, everything like that. It all happened midway through

0:07:09.670 --> 0:07:12.290
<v Speaker 3>the third quarter and on. If you take that away,

0:07:12.890 --> 0:07:16.119
<v Speaker 3>they were pretty impressive that entire game. They played pretty well,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and I went back and watched the film, and it's

0:07:18.140 --> 0:07:21.460
<v Speaker 3>just like, okay, they're not as bad as I think

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.460
<v Speaker 3>the public thinks. I think they're exactly who we thought

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.860
<v Speaker 3>they were coming into the season, which is still a

0:07:25.900 --> 0:07:30.670
<v Speaker 3>better team than this Jets team. You're having the public

0:07:30.730 --> 0:07:32.710
<v Speaker 3>obviously overreact to that Jets team in the sense that

0:07:33.750 --> 0:07:35.910
<v Speaker 3>They think that they were going to be bad this season,

0:07:35.970 --> 0:07:38.540
<v Speaker 3>and they overachieved so much in that week one. I mean,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>winning by double digits with Geno Smith, I get it.

0:07:41.620 --> 0:07:43.540
<v Speaker 3>That should be an ultimate victory lap if you're a

0:07:43.540 --> 0:07:47.100
<v Speaker 3>Jets fan. But we're talking about really bad elements here.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.990
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about really bad weather, high winds in this matchup.

0:07:50.190 --> 0:07:52.650
<v Speaker 3>And as much as you want to say, well, at

0:07:52.670 --> 0:07:54.190
<v Speaker 3>least the Jets have the number one running back and

0:07:54.210 --> 0:07:57.370
<v Speaker 3>they have a strong run game, we've seen LeFleur– The

0:07:57.410 --> 0:07:59.620
<v Speaker 3>run game can work, right? Even with Lloyd, whoever it is,

0:07:59.650 --> 0:08:01.820
<v Speaker 3>the backup, just because Jordan Love's so good, they're always

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:03.540
<v Speaker 3>going to have two safeties back. They'll never have a

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.460
<v Speaker 3>stacked box, regardless of the running back isn't Green Bay.

0:08:06.500 --> 0:08:08.220
<v Speaker 3>So I don't think they're going to have problems moving

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.620
<v Speaker 3>the ball here Green Bay-wise. On the flip side, with Geno,

0:08:11.060 --> 0:08:12.780
<v Speaker 3>I have a lot of questions about him, especially this

0:08:12.820 --> 0:08:13.900
<v Speaker 3>fact that it's going to be bad weather.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.190
<v Speaker 2>So pretty telling here.

0:08:16.230 --> 0:08:18.890
<v Speaker 3>The line is a couple books have shifted to three

0:08:18.930 --> 0:08:21.090
<v Speaker 3>for the most part. This is stuck at minus three

0:08:21.110 --> 0:08:23.170
<v Speaker 3>and a half. So you can find the minus three,

0:08:23.210 --> 0:08:24.290
<v Speaker 3>do it for our contest.

0:08:24.830 --> 0:08:25.470
<v Speaker 2>We have no choice.

0:08:25.490 --> 0:08:26.610
<v Speaker 3>We have to take that minus three and a half,

0:08:26.770 --> 0:08:29.330
<v Speaker 3>which I don't mind. It's just we always prefer to

0:08:29.350 --> 0:08:30.630
<v Speaker 3>grab that three if it's possible.

0:08:31.130 --> 0:08:31.310
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:08:31.790 --> 0:08:32.070
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:08:33.030 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to tell you about the new prediction market

0:08:35.929 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>called Polymarket. It's the best way to trade in sports

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in the past. If you wanted action on the game,

0:08:41.580 --> 0:08:43.220
<v Speaker 1>you'd put some money in. And if your team was

0:08:43.260 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>doing well and you wanted to cash out, they'd lock

0:08:45.660 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the trade or take a huge fee. But Polymarket is

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a prediction market. It's a stock exchange for sports buying

0:08:51.820 --> 0:08:55.140
<v Speaker 1>in and selling out on your teams. When your team

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.780
<v Speaker 1>goes down to 20%, you can buy in and sell

0:08:57.820 --> 0:09:00.980
<v Speaker 1>it off at 40%. When they come back to double

0:09:01.020 --> 0:09:04.140
<v Speaker 1>your money, I've tried them all, and Polymarket is simply

0:09:04.179 --> 0:09:07.819
<v Speaker 1>the best prediction market. They're so confident. You'll never go

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.900
<v Speaker 1>back to the other guys. They're giving you a free

0:09:09.900 --> 0:09:15.449
<v Speaker 1>$ 50 on your first trade when you deposit just $ 10.

0:09:14.990 --> 0:09:17.990
<v Speaker 1>So download the Polymarket app today and use code SHARP

0:09:18.610 --> 0:09:21.270
<v Speaker 1>when you sign up. That's code SHARP to get $ 50

0:09:21.230 --> 0:09:27.699
<v Speaker 1>after you trade just $ 10 Chad's choice this week was

0:09:27.780 --> 0:09:32.900
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta as a plus two and a half point underdog

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.050
<v Speaker 1>at home against Carolina. But my caveat was wait until

0:09:37.070 --> 0:09:40.210
<v Speaker 1>this gets to three. We know Cooper Rush is now

0:09:40.270 --> 0:09:44.650
<v Speaker 1>playing a quarterback for Atlanta. This finally popped to three

0:09:45.530 --> 0:09:48.550
<v Speaker 1>yesterday afternoon, at least in the state of Connecticut. I

0:09:48.630 --> 0:09:50.750
<v Speaker 1>did bet it at three. It's been two and a

0:09:50.770 --> 0:09:53.630
<v Speaker 1>half in the contest. As we sit here Sunday morning,

0:09:55.490 --> 0:09:57.580
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel like this is one of my five favorite.

0:09:58.340 --> 0:10:00.689
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to line up games. that I feel much

0:10:00.730 --> 0:10:03.650
<v Speaker 1>more confident about. Tell me what you think.

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a game I probably was just following

0:10:08.980 --> 0:10:09.410
<v Speaker 2>you on it.

0:10:09.780 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 3>I bet Atlanta, but to make it one of our five,

0:10:12.460 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 3>it really would have been, honestly, one of your plays.

0:10:14.660 --> 0:10:16.719
<v Speaker 3>I told you, not that I don't have confidence in

0:10:16.740 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback position with Atlanta, but That's what's lacking. The

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:24.780
<v Speaker 3>most intriguing part here is simply the number. Why is

0:10:24.860 --> 0:10:29.140
<v Speaker 3>this not a 3-3.5? The amount of money the Panthers

0:10:29.179 --> 0:10:32.980
<v Speaker 3>have been taking here is just insane. It's all Panthers money.

0:10:33.020 --> 0:10:36.620
<v Speaker 3>It's just pros versus Joes. The pros are all over

0:10:36.660 --> 0:10:41.110
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta here just thinking they're a better team. You can't

0:10:41.179 --> 0:10:43.170
<v Speaker 3>not look at all those numbers from last year, especially

0:10:43.190 --> 0:10:45.750
<v Speaker 3>with Bryce. His best game of his career would come

0:10:45.770 --> 0:10:48.740
<v Speaker 3>against Atlanta. He tears up this Atlanta defense, Bryce Young.

0:10:48.780 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>So you said it. Carolina's defense is not anywhere near

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 3>as bad as they looked last week.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.590
<v Speaker 2>Can Robinson run all over them? Possibly.

0:10:56.610 --> 0:10:59.890
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Ben Johnson's laid out the blocking scheme. There

0:10:59.950 --> 0:11:03.170
<v Speaker 3>are major openings in the middle of the field for Carolina.

0:11:03.210 --> 0:11:05.790
<v Speaker 3>They just don't have the linebackers or the de-tackles to

0:11:05.830 --> 0:11:08.830
<v Speaker 3>really stop the run. So there is a path for

0:11:08.850 --> 0:11:11.010
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta here to not only cover this number but win.

0:11:11.710 --> 0:11:14.010
<v Speaker 3>I think we're both just a little lukewarm on it

0:11:14.030 --> 0:11:16.090
<v Speaker 3>where there's other teams, other quarterbacks who'd rather put our

0:11:16.110 --> 0:11:19.970
<v Speaker 3>money into Sunday morning here that take a position on Atlanta.

0:11:21.290 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Seattle visiting Arizona. Arizona is a four and a half

0:11:28.179 --> 0:11:33.660
<v Speaker 1>point underdog in the contest right now. That line has moved.

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.700
<v Speaker 1>It had opened at four and a half, got that down,

0:11:37.100 --> 0:11:40.109
<v Speaker 1>has come back up. We bet it early in the

0:11:40.150 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>week at four and a half. I I'm actually still

0:11:44.100 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty confident about this one. I like it that we're

0:11:46.900 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>getting it at the better number than, than where it

0:11:49.620 --> 0:11:52.420
<v Speaker 1>sort of had been as the week had gone on,

0:11:52.460 --> 0:11:54.459
<v Speaker 1>because right now it's four and a half in the contest.

0:11:57.300 --> 0:11:57.829
<v Speaker 2>That's fair.

0:11:58.090 --> 0:12:02.110
<v Speaker 3>My hesitation here, once again, is are we overrating Arizona

0:12:02.190 --> 0:12:05.449
<v Speaker 3>off one game where they looked incredible against the chargers?

0:12:05.550 --> 0:12:08.490
<v Speaker 2>And I gave you that Mike McDonald number. He's 13

0:12:08.490 --> 0:12:09.750
<v Speaker 2>right on the road.

0:12:09.770 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Um, Like, it's just– it's not profitable long-term for us

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.459
<v Speaker 3>taking this position, most likely, back in this Arizona team here.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 3>But I still think four and a half, that's a

0:12:21.500 --> 0:12:25.250
<v Speaker 3>lot of points against a backup quarterback. And Seattle, if

0:12:25.260 --> 0:12:27.429
<v Speaker 3>you're making this bet, you really are counting heavily on

0:12:27.450 --> 0:12:30.730
<v Speaker 3>their defense. I mean, obviously, it's one of the best

0:12:30.770 --> 0:12:34.309
<v Speaker 3>defenses in football. That front seven should give problems to Arizona.

0:12:34.330 --> 0:12:37.270
<v Speaker 3>You know, can Brissette get us out of that hole?

0:12:37.290 --> 0:12:38.939
<v Speaker 3>Because they're going to be in one in this game. Like,

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.470
<v Speaker 3>Seahawks are going to score points here. They're just– so

0:12:43.490 --> 0:12:46.650
<v Speaker 3>offensively talented. They have so many good weapons and it's

0:12:46.690 --> 0:12:47.550
<v Speaker 3>just Arizona.

0:12:47.570 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 2>That's their weakness. They have no one. I know they

0:12:49.980 --> 0:12:53.260
<v Speaker 2>look good against the chargers. That's not who Arizona is.

0:12:53.300 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>That was really more about, especially when back and watching

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.980
<v Speaker 3>Herbert had guys, he had, he had plays to make.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he played terrible. And, um, I just think

0:13:01.860 --> 0:13:02.589
<v Speaker 2>they're underprepared.

0:13:02.620 --> 0:13:05.330
<v Speaker 3>The chargers were obviously we, we see Arizona not being

0:13:05.950 --> 0:13:08.730
<v Speaker 3>underprepared this matchup. They'll be ready for it. It's just

0:13:08.790 --> 0:13:11.550
<v Speaker 3>a tall task to ask. So, um, a four and

0:13:11.570 --> 0:13:13.210
<v Speaker 3>a half chat. If this ends up being our last

0:13:13.309 --> 0:13:15.010
<v Speaker 3>one in, I have no issue with it. I was

0:13:15.030 --> 0:13:18.110
<v Speaker 3>just definitely way more confident in this game on Thursday.

0:13:18.290 --> 0:13:20.860
<v Speaker 3>And the more I dove into the film of this

0:13:20.929 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 3>Arizona team, it's like, yes, I think they're going to

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.339
<v Speaker 3>get theirs possibly in this matchup, but it's like their,

0:13:26.540 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>their offensive line terrifies me against this front seven of Seattle.

0:13:30.620 --> 0:13:33.790
<v Speaker 3>Like this is exact type of matchup. We seem to dominate.

0:13:33.809 --> 0:13:37.390
<v Speaker 3>I think even historically, um, Seattle has just owned Arizona

0:13:37.429 --> 0:13:40.690
<v Speaker 3>in this division. So, uh, very telling once again that

0:13:40.730 --> 0:13:44.370
<v Speaker 3>this is just all professionals are on arizona and the

0:13:44.410 --> 0:13:47.350
<v Speaker 3>whole public is lining up on seattle so another game

0:13:47.370 --> 0:13:48.650
<v Speaker 3>that's basically spread right down the.

0:13:48.630 --> 0:13:51.250
<v Speaker 1>Middle i will say i feel better about this game

0:13:51.270 --> 0:13:54.660
<v Speaker 1>than atlanta like to me atlanta is probably out uh

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.860
<v Speaker 1>whereas this game it it might be an on the

0:13:57.900 --> 0:14:00.020
<v Speaker 1>bubble game just because at the end of the day

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>you're betting drew lock on the road as a favorite

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.670
<v Speaker 1>like that's that to me like it's just we don't

0:14:06.710 --> 0:14:10.819
<v Speaker 1>have to bet on seattle because we would never bet

0:14:10.860 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on Drew Locke as a favorite on the road, but

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.420
<v Speaker 1>that is what you're betting against if you take Arizona

0:14:16.900 --> 0:14:22.940
<v Speaker 1>above anything else. The line is four at most books,

0:14:23.260 --> 0:14:25.100
<v Speaker 1>four and a half in the contest. So in this one,

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.380
<v Speaker 1>it's playing to our advantage. Indy at Kansas City, this

0:14:29.500 --> 0:14:32.580
<v Speaker 1>one came on strong on Thursday's show. We had been

0:14:32.620 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about it a little bit on Tuesday, and then

0:14:34.740 --> 0:14:39.530
<v Speaker 1>we got some feedback from... sharp calls, we had both

0:14:39.590 --> 0:14:42.050
<v Speaker 1>been doing a little more research on it, starting to

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.620
<v Speaker 1>like Indy a little bit more after getting more time

0:14:44.650 --> 0:14:47.340
<v Speaker 1>to look at the game, the Monday night game with

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.020
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, which we didn't have as much time on Tuesday.

0:14:50.100 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>We had more on Thursday. This line has gone in

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the Colts. It's moved from six and

0:14:56.780 --> 0:14:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a half to six at most books. It's five and

0:14:59.380 --> 0:15:02.740
<v Speaker 1>a half in the contest. Not getting the best of

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.300
<v Speaker 1>the number, opposite of what we're getting with Seattle. But

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I still like it.

0:15:10.190 --> 0:15:11.950
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I try not to harp too much on

0:15:11.970 --> 0:15:14.690
<v Speaker 3>the best number here just because we got burned plenty

0:15:14.710 --> 0:15:15.530
<v Speaker 3>of times in the past.

0:15:15.610 --> 0:15:16.090
<v Speaker 1>Totally.

0:15:16.490 --> 0:15:17.830
<v Speaker 2>Because we just didn't take the number.

0:15:18.350 --> 0:15:20.830
<v Speaker 3>And it's rare we actually just lose by half a

0:15:20.890 --> 0:15:23.730
<v Speaker 3>point because we didn't get the best. So here it's

0:15:23.770 --> 0:15:27.590
<v Speaker 3>just simply saying that this number is still inflated. This

0:15:27.630 --> 0:15:31.190
<v Speaker 3>number should still be closer to 3.5-3. The fact that

0:15:31.230 --> 0:15:34.870
<v Speaker 3>it's still ballooned up so much. I'm going to love India. Yes,

0:15:34.970 --> 0:15:36.990
<v Speaker 3>could they get rolled here and Daniel Jones is still

0:15:37.030 --> 0:15:37.470
<v Speaker 3>not ready?

0:15:37.530 --> 0:15:37.890
<v Speaker 2>Of course.

0:15:37.930 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 3>We saw last week he just didn't move like he

0:15:40.900 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>would before the injury last year, right in the pocket.

0:15:43.620 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>He just was not the same quarterback. But on the

0:15:46.100 --> 0:15:48.110
<v Speaker 3>flip side, he still made a bunch of really nice throws.

0:15:48.350 --> 0:15:50.230
<v Speaker 3>They still were able to run the ball against the Ravens.

0:15:50.290 --> 0:15:52.970
<v Speaker 3>It was just the Ravens came out and put up

0:15:53.090 --> 0:15:55.670
<v Speaker 3>whatever it was, 25-30 in the first half, and it

0:15:55.690 --> 0:15:59.900
<v Speaker 3>was just over in that game. So Chiefs, they always

0:15:59.920 --> 0:16:02.380
<v Speaker 3>find a way to win, but Pat rarely blows teams out.

0:16:02.420 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Now you're asking him to blow a team out back-to-back

0:16:04.380 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>weeks on a short week, let alone. So it just

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.930
<v Speaker 3>feels like a total– Setup game. Public will be hammering

0:16:10.950 --> 0:16:13.550
<v Speaker 3>this Chiefs team. They're all over it. Every money line,

0:16:13.630 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 3>every teaser, every guy I talk to is like, yeah.

0:16:16.300 --> 0:16:18.220
<v Speaker 3>Every Sunday night game, just like last week, every Sunday

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.940
<v Speaker 3>night bet was tied to Dallas. It's the same thing

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.780
<v Speaker 3>with the Chiefs. Everyone's parlays, teasers, everything's tied to this

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.620
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs game. Feels like the same thing we did with

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.180
<v Speaker 3>Colts and the Giants last week. Probably got a free

0:16:30.260 --> 0:16:32.590
<v Speaker 3>extra point, point and a half on the Giants last week.

0:16:33.170 --> 0:16:35.390
<v Speaker 3>Same here with the Colts. We're still getting a free

0:16:35.430 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 3>two points. We're still getting a five and a half, six. So, Um, yeah,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.619
<v Speaker 3>six and a half. If you could still get it

0:16:40.700 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>out there, no brainer, but for us five and a

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.660
<v Speaker 3>half for contest, I won't let that scare it off.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.020
<v Speaker 3>I just, I see this being a field goal game

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.940
<v Speaker 3>rather than a touchdown or a six point game.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.220
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh at new England. This was Simon says, I think

0:16:54.260 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we both believe that the Steelers offense, uh, by the way,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.710
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's a five and a half point underdog at new England. Uh,

0:17:00.950 --> 0:17:05.170
<v Speaker 1>I think we both believe that the Steelers offense was

0:17:05.270 --> 0:17:09.370
<v Speaker 1>better than the stats showed. And the defense was excellent.

0:17:10.190 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Four superior pass rushers in TJ Watt, Cam Hayward, Keanu Benton,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:21.460
<v Speaker 1>Alex Highsmith. No A.J. Brown for Drake May. The number

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is five and a half in the contest. The weather

0:17:26.580 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit tricky. To me, this is going

0:17:32.220 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to be, we're going to have probably three games to

0:17:35.500 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>choose our fifth. And this is one of those games

0:17:38.780 --> 0:17:41.369
<v Speaker 1>on a confidence level of some of the other games

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.250
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here. How are you ranking Pittsburgh?

0:17:46.730 --> 0:17:49.449
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I still, still love Pittsburgh. Still, still bet into it.

0:17:51.270 --> 0:17:53.150
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the same kind of boat here with Arizona

0:17:53.170 --> 0:17:56.530
<v Speaker 3>where it's like, we know one of these teams is

0:17:56.570 --> 0:17:59.010
<v Speaker 3>going to lose because it's just, we have the data

0:17:59.030 --> 0:18:01.710
<v Speaker 3>of these teams are of extended rest, especially in week

0:18:01.790 --> 0:18:05.030
<v Speaker 3>one coming into week two, how much they perform. My,

0:18:05.310 --> 0:18:08.370
<v Speaker 3>my view of this one is, I just think that's

0:18:08.390 --> 0:18:09.889
<v Speaker 3>a lot of time for a guy like Drake May

0:18:09.910 --> 0:18:11.790
<v Speaker 3>to sit on it and think about as a young

0:18:11.830 --> 0:18:14.190
<v Speaker 3>quarterback and look at the matchup.

0:18:15.130 --> 0:18:15.850
<v Speaker 2>This is a dream.

0:18:15.910 --> 0:18:18.100
<v Speaker 3>If you think about Pittsburgh, I mean, obviously it's bad

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.100
<v Speaker 3>that Joey Porter's out, but their front seven should give

0:18:21.180 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 3>just like Seattle did real problems to this Patriots team.

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.700
<v Speaker 2>And just look at the matchup.

0:18:26.740 --> 0:18:29.859
<v Speaker 3>If it is bad weather, that to me plays into

0:18:29.940 --> 0:18:32.580
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh where it's like Pittsburgh wants to be a sloppy

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of dirty type of game where Rodgers excels within

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.020
<v Speaker 3>those quick throws, those short passes, where he's weaknesses downfield.

0:18:39.820 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if it's bad rain, there won't be pushing

0:18:41.660 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the ball downfield regardless, which I think could help us

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 3>as well. So yeah, it's, it's, it's a tough game

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.370
<v Speaker 3>to really size up here. Cause it feels like this

0:18:49.420 --> 0:18:52.050
<v Speaker 3>line is still built on what the Patriots did last year.

0:18:52.810 --> 0:18:54.730
<v Speaker 2>And the general public doesn't trust Pittsburgh.

0:18:54.790 --> 0:18:58.010
<v Speaker 3>Like Pittsburgh just played so poorly here. So another game,

0:18:58.070 --> 0:19:00.050
<v Speaker 3>it feels like it's pros versus pros. Like the professionals

0:19:00.070 --> 0:19:02.050
<v Speaker 3>are all over Pittsburgh. The public is going to be

0:19:02.090 --> 0:19:04.369
<v Speaker 3>over New England, right? Extended rest. Like we talked about, it's,

0:19:05.470 --> 0:19:07.619
<v Speaker 3>a game you expect for able to bounce back, especially

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 3>after a loss.

0:19:08.100 --> 0:19:09.420
<v Speaker 2>I don't, I think Drake may in his.

0:19:09.380 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Career has after a loss is like 13 and a,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.060
<v Speaker 3>like he just, he bounced back really well in these

0:19:17.100 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 3>exact scenarios. So, um, yeah, we might be walking into

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>it here, but I just, I can't break away from it.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.060
<v Speaker 3>I love this Pittsburgh number. I think there's like one

0:19:25.100 --> 0:19:27.220
<v Speaker 3>or two books still at four and a half. So

0:19:28.020 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 3>if that's the only book in your state, sure.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:29.869
<v Speaker 2>Take it.

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.010
<v Speaker 3>But if not shop around, find the five and a half,

0:19:32.030 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 3>there's plenty out there. And, If we're lucky, maybe this

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.020
<v Speaker 3>touches six by kickoff. But, yeah, that would be the

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.770
<v Speaker 3>only reason we stay away from it. It's just– not

0:19:41.790 --> 0:19:43.510
<v Speaker 3>that it feels too easy, but it really does. I

0:19:43.530 --> 0:19:45.810
<v Speaker 3>just don't understand the number. It's just so ballooned up.

0:19:45.869 --> 0:19:48.250
<v Speaker 3>It's like, what, the Patriots are really about to blow

0:19:48.290 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 3>up Pittsburgh here? I just– view the Patriots being that

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:53.660
<v Speaker 3>good of a team. They just do not feel like

0:19:54.340 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 3>that great of a team, and especially the fact that

0:19:56.260 --> 0:19:58.950
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about where it's like, Henderson's not fully 100%. A.J.

0:19:58.940 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>'s not.

0:20:00.140 --> 0:20:02.950
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to play in this game. Those are,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 3>you could easily say, two or three of the biggest

0:20:05.820 --> 0:20:10.070
<v Speaker 3>weapons on the offense here outside of Drake May. So, yeah,

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:11.330
<v Speaker 3>interesting matchup here for sure.

0:20:11.900 --> 0:20:14.380
<v Speaker 1>Look from a big play perspective, it's a hundred percent

0:20:14.900 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>true that Travion Henderson and A.J. Brown are two of

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:23.340
<v Speaker 1>their biggest weapons. So that definitely, definitely becomes a factor,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.830
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it just feels like this is an inflated line.

0:20:26.770 --> 0:20:28.170
<v Speaker 1>As you were talking about it, I started to feel

0:20:28.210 --> 0:20:30.190
<v Speaker 1>more and more confident about putting it in the final five,

0:20:30.230 --> 0:20:32.149
<v Speaker 1>but let's get through two more games that started to

0:20:32.210 --> 0:20:35.330
<v Speaker 1>pop up on our radar. So as you were talking,

0:20:36.030 --> 0:20:37.770
<v Speaker 1>I think we started to get more and more confident

0:20:37.810 --> 0:20:40.290
<v Speaker 1>about Pittsburgh, but there's two more games we got to discuss.

0:20:40.780 --> 0:20:46.170
<v Speaker 1>including Jacksonville, Denver, I think we've been moving collectively more

0:20:46.190 --> 0:20:50.210
<v Speaker 1>and more towards the Jacksonville side. We obviously believe the

0:20:50.250 --> 0:20:56.090
<v Speaker 1>Broncos defense is going to get better. But I've become

0:20:56.350 --> 0:21:01.060
<v Speaker 1>a bigger and bigger fan of the Liam Cohn, Trevor

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:06.500
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence combination. And so it's a question of which regression

0:21:06.580 --> 0:21:08.260
<v Speaker 1>is going to be worse. Is it going to be

0:21:08.300 --> 0:21:11.209
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars coming down to earth after playing the Browns

0:21:11.250 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and now having to go into altitude against the Broncos

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.659
<v Speaker 1>or the Broncos getting back to being good tackling and

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>being the dominant defensive team after getting blown out and

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>coming off a short week in Kansas City. Very tricky one.

0:21:25.460 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I haven't bet it because I've been afraid to pull

0:21:27.940 --> 0:21:28.859
<v Speaker 1>the trigger on both sides.

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I still think Denver is going to bounce back, right?

0:21:32.770 --> 0:21:35.510
<v Speaker 3>That was the worst tackling performances we've ever seen. It

0:21:35.530 --> 0:21:39.300
<v Speaker 3>was just horrible defensive. We've all seen that. But even

0:21:39.380 --> 0:21:41.340
<v Speaker 3>if you take away– or even if you bring back

0:21:41.380 --> 0:21:43.700
<v Speaker 3>their tackling skills, right, even if they're that much better,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:48.860
<v Speaker 3>the wide receiving core for the Chiefs is so bad

0:21:49.460 --> 0:21:53.540
<v Speaker 3>compared to the Jaguars. Like, just on paper, there's no one–

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.500
<v Speaker 3>no one gets anywhere– no one gets any separation on

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots– I mean, on the Chiefs. That's their biggest issue. Now,

0:21:59.700 --> 0:22:02.310
<v Speaker 3>are we about to find out, was that a, you know,

0:22:02.990 --> 0:22:05.990
<v Speaker 3>Broncos stat? Was the Broncos the reason there was no separation?

0:22:06.150 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Or are the Chiefs offense– really that bad where i

0:22:08.630 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 3>look at this jaguars team it's like they barely played

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.580
<v Speaker 3>into the third quarter this is a well-rested team yeah

0:22:15.100 --> 0:22:17.980
<v Speaker 3>with a ton of talent offensively like my question here

0:22:18.020 --> 0:22:20.340
<v Speaker 3>is defensively right is are they gonna be able to

0:22:20.380 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 3>get stops with this jaguars team will they be able

0:22:22.780 --> 0:22:25.460
<v Speaker 3>to mess with bo nicks heck is bo nicks spaggot

0:22:25.500 --> 0:22:27.860
<v Speaker 3>got in his head first play i mean or third

0:22:27.900 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 3>play i should say that pick that set the tone

0:22:30.060 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 3>for the entire game bo looked rush he just didn't

0:22:32.500 --> 0:22:34.379
<v Speaker 3>look comfortable in like the quarterback he did last year

0:22:34.420 --> 0:22:36.830
<v Speaker 3>where he was just so good so confident especially in

0:22:36.869 --> 0:22:39.430
<v Speaker 3>the third and fourth quarter last year, that looked totally gone.

0:22:39.790 --> 0:22:42.149
<v Speaker 2>The pressure to me is all on Denver. I mean,

0:22:42.170 --> 0:22:44.689
<v Speaker 2>that guy Webb, he's got to be in hell right now.

0:22:44.830 --> 0:22:48.409
<v Speaker 3>Like, you know, Sean Payton was acting like he was

0:22:48.430 --> 0:22:50.380
<v Speaker 3>doing him a favor, letting him stay there and take

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>over coaching, taking over the offensive calling. Now there's just

0:22:54.260 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 3>all these whispers within the building of like, you know,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Sean wants it back. Sean's been impatient. That's all Sean

0:23:00.820 --> 0:23:02.550
<v Speaker 3>cares about. He wants to call the plays, blah, blah, blah.

0:23:02.570 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 3>And it's like, oh, my God, that's the last thing

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 3>you want is these two guys are already butting heads.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.060
<v Speaker 2>And right in the middle of it, we talk about

0:23:09.100 --> 0:23:11.139
<v Speaker 2>is Bo Nix. Like this guy is now.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.660
<v Speaker 3>In a weird position of, you know, if he starts 0-2,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the voices get much louder. So the more I look here, buddy,

0:23:21.140 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I think we're both in agreement. It's just it feels

0:23:24.180 --> 0:23:26.379
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of points, and maybe we're walking right

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.490
<v Speaker 3>into it. Because like we said, Denver, statistically, you should

0:23:29.510 --> 0:23:31.629
<v Speaker 3>just back them blindly at home in the first two

0:23:31.650 --> 0:23:32.470
<v Speaker 3>or three weeks of the season.

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Just teams in altitude tend to struggle.

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:36.780
<v Speaker 3>So yes, maybe we, we bite it here with the

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars in the second half, but just looking at this

0:23:39.619 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>line full game, it's like this, this feels very tempting

0:23:42.220 --> 0:23:43.810
<v Speaker 3>for us to add this one in as well, where

0:23:43.830 --> 0:23:46.369
<v Speaker 3>it's like, if you're making me pick them in Pittsburgh,

0:23:47.530 --> 0:23:50.250
<v Speaker 3>maybe I go with Pittsburgh cause it's more points, but man,

0:23:50.290 --> 0:23:52.810
<v Speaker 3>I got, it's so tempting. They're playing at the highest

0:23:52.830 --> 0:23:55.369
<v Speaker 3>level right now in football. And I think they're at

0:23:55.410 --> 0:23:57.470
<v Speaker 3>a nine and no streak right now in the regular season.

0:23:58.300 --> 0:24:00.780
<v Speaker 3>They've just been, Whatever they did last year, I know

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 3>they're into a Bud Saul, obviously, running to the Bills

0:24:03.020 --> 0:24:05.540
<v Speaker 3>last year and Josh Allen in the playoffs. But their

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 3>offense has put up numbers. Like, we're back at anything.

0:24:07.859 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 3>We're really back in this Jaguars offense. Our real question

0:24:10.020 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 3>here is, can their defense get the stops against what

0:24:13.100 --> 0:24:14.859
<v Speaker 3>we expect to be a high-powered offense in Denver?

0:24:15.900 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Last game, and then we've got to make a choice.

0:24:17.500 --> 0:24:20.460
<v Speaker 1>Washington at Dallas. And I'll be honest, I have no

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.870
<v Speaker 1>feel on this game. Dallas is a, I think, four-and-a-half-point

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.310
<v Speaker 1>favorite right now. I have no opinion on this game.

0:24:27.910 --> 0:24:30.540
<v Speaker 1>You brought it up. I don't have a read on it.

0:24:30.550 --> 0:24:33.650
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been thinking about it. Give me your thoughts.

0:24:34.470 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, another game where I don't think Washington is as

0:24:38.660 --> 0:24:41.340
<v Speaker 3>bad as people perceive. I do agree with a lot

0:24:41.380 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 3>of people that they did get very lucky in that

0:24:44.140 --> 0:24:45.700
<v Speaker 3>comeback against the Eagles. It just seemed like the Eagles'

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.540
<v Speaker 3>defense was just exhausted by that second half, and that's

0:24:48.580 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>when the comeback happened for Washington. I just look at

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.050
<v Speaker 3>this Dallas team. I know they fixed a lot of stuff,

0:24:55.090 --> 0:24:56.750
<v Speaker 3>and they will fix a lot of stuff. Their defense

0:24:56.770 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>will not look as bad as it did did against

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.060
<v Speaker 3>the giants but there are still some major holes the

0:25:02.100 --> 0:25:04.340
<v Speaker 3>biggest one is they don't have any type of guys

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.230
<v Speaker 3>dn wise or d tackle wise that can shut down

0:25:07.270 --> 0:25:10.230
<v Speaker 3>a mobile quarterback you saw that with jackson dart jackson

0:25:10.250 --> 0:25:12.750
<v Speaker 3>dart in the pocket was able to move whatever way

0:25:12.770 --> 0:25:15.510
<v Speaker 3>he wanted to get his guys open or find reads

0:25:15.530 --> 0:25:18.210
<v Speaker 3>he wanted to find guys jano daniels is that times

0:25:18.250 --> 0:25:21.010
<v Speaker 3>a thousand he's a much better inside the pocket mobile

0:25:21.050 --> 0:25:24.020
<v Speaker 3>quarterback and uh matchup wise it just feels like it

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.540
<v Speaker 3>falls right into his his lap exactly type of defense

0:25:26.580 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 3>he wants to face jane daniel so It's another game

0:25:29.220 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 3>where if you're betting Dallas, you're betting the history of Dak, right?

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Dak tends to blow out the NFC East. I think

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.580
<v Speaker 3>he's 12-1 at home against the spread as a favorite

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 3>of three points or more. Historically, I understand this is

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 3>a great spot to back Dallas. That's one reason if

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.420
<v Speaker 3>you want to talk me out of Washington here, but

0:25:45.790 --> 0:25:48.310
<v Speaker 3>just number-wise, four and a half is a great number.

0:25:48.450 --> 0:25:49.790
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple of books already at three and a

0:25:49.810 --> 0:25:53.010
<v Speaker 3>half here on Washington. It just seems like the professional

0:25:53.030 --> 0:25:54.369
<v Speaker 3>money like me is going to be coming here on

0:25:54.410 --> 0:25:57.130
<v Speaker 3>Washington this morning where Yeah, obviously the public will comment

0:25:57.150 --> 0:25:59.310
<v Speaker 3>on Dallas, right? You expect Dallas to bounce back, and

0:26:00.590 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that's another hesitation for me where it's like, you know,

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 3>we're obviously selling this Dallas team probably one of their

0:26:07.980 --> 0:26:08.820
<v Speaker 3>lowest points, right?

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:09.939
<v Speaker 2>They got embarrassed last week.

0:26:09.980 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I think they had two offensive possessions that entire second

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.859
<v Speaker 3>half against the Giants. So, yes, you expect them to

0:26:15.900 --> 0:26:20.220
<v Speaker 3>bounce back. Horrible week, but just looking at this Washington team,

0:26:20.260 --> 0:26:22.020
<v Speaker 3>I don't think– I thought they were going to be

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 3>bad this year. I think I predicted they'd be a

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.070
<v Speaker 3>lot worse than they were going to be. I just–

0:26:26.500 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, that offensive line is horrible as losing Tunsell was, right?

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 3>They're still graded at the bottom five offensive line. You

0:26:34.580 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 3>see a mobile quarterback like Jane Daniels can kind of

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 3>counter a lot of that. Like, he's just so talented. So, yeah,

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.020
<v Speaker 3>it's a tough choice here, Chad. The final guy we're

0:26:44.060 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 3>getting in here, it's going to be really tough to

0:26:45.220 --> 0:26:47.100
<v Speaker 3>figure out which one we're getting because I have a

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.219
<v Speaker 3>lot of these dogs I really like. I've been trying

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.290
<v Speaker 3>to find favorites, but it's been hard for me this week.

0:26:51.350 --> 0:26:54.869
<v Speaker 3>It's like there's no favorites I truly, truly love, but

0:26:54.890 --> 0:26:56.070
<v Speaker 3>I have a lot of dogs I really.

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.820
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I think Philadelphia is definitely getting in. I've

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:05.550
<v Speaker 1>claimed it. I own it. Done. Indy is definitely getting in.

0:27:08.590 --> 0:27:14.830
<v Speaker 1>So that's two. I think I would say let's put

0:27:14.869 --> 0:27:16.129
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay at three and a half in.

0:27:16.950 --> 0:27:17.909
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, put Green Bay in.

0:27:18.810 --> 0:27:25.340
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. And then you tell me. Do you feel

0:27:25.420 --> 0:27:34.930
<v Speaker 1>stronger about Washington, Arizona, Pittsburgh, or Jacksonville? I think those

0:27:34.990 --> 0:27:42.230
<v Speaker 1>are our four for the final two. I think Pittsburgh's

0:27:42.250 --> 0:27:42.870
<v Speaker 1>got to be in there.

0:27:43.450 --> 0:27:43.570
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:27:43.590 --> 0:27:44.650
<v Speaker 2>Let's go with Pittsburgh.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:28:00.129
<v Speaker 1>Then it comes down to Washington, Arizona. Or Jacksonville. We

0:28:00.150 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>can't do Jacksonville. I think we'd regret it that whole game.

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.340
<v Speaker 2>Okay. And I'll give you this stat one more time.

0:28:08.460 --> 0:28:11.899
<v Speaker 3>Small road underdogs, so a dog between plus one and

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.659
<v Speaker 3>plus six and a half, coming off a week one loss,

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.460
<v Speaker 3>are 26 and six against the spread since 2016. So

0:28:18.510 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 3>hitting at 81%. Those two teams this week. are the

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:24.580
<v Speaker 3>Colts and Washington.

0:28:25.900 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like Washington.

0:28:27.380 --> 0:28:28.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. All right.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.740
<v Speaker 3>That's a nice trend and nice spot for a team

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 3>that we think is just a little underrated still in Washington.

0:28:35.460 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:28:35.700 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So our final five are going to be Philadelphia minus

0:28:39.460 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. Indy plus five and a half.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:48.260
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay minus three and a half. Pittsburgh plus five

0:28:48.300 --> 0:28:53.740
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And Washington plus four and a half.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.940
<v Speaker 1>Those are the final five folks.

0:28:58.280 --> 0:28:58.610
<v Speaker 2>Woo.

0:28:58.900 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>All right. That's our show. We'll be back tonight, 7

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.910
<v Speaker 1>30 PM Eastern. That will be live on sharper square

0:29:06.930 --> 0:29:12.180
<v Speaker 1>YouTube with our NFL week two reactions. After the late

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>afternoon games wrap up, we'll get back to all the

0:29:15.740 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>misery of whatever happens during the day. This has been

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.420
<v Speaker 1>sharper square. presented by Polymarket, part of the Volume Podcast Network.

0:29:22.500 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Watch or listen on YouTube at Sharper Square. Like this video,

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.140
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the channel, download us on Spotify, Apple Pods,

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.890
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your pods, rate, review, subscribe, leave us

0:29:31.930 --> 0:29:34.430
<v Speaker 1>five stars, say whatever you want. Feedback is a gift.

0:29:34.470 --> 0:29:41.100
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget, sign up for the contest, sharporsquare.thevolume.com. Until tonight,

0:29:41.420 --> 0:29:42.300
<v Speaker 1>love you.

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.980
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely all alone and he

0:29:47.100 --> 0:29:51.570
<v Speaker 3>Trips, going to the end zone and ends up carrying

0:29:51.650 --> 0:29:52.690
<v Speaker 3>it as it is.