WEBVTT - Global IT Crash, RNC Recap,  Netflix Earnings

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 3>So you have a global it collapse, right, just really

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 3>putting a CrowdStrike front and center in that spotlight. Now,

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 3>CrowdStrike stock is only down by about nine percent, and

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I say that because it was down as much as

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent not too long ago. This is a dominant

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 3>supplier of software that protects businesses from ransomware attacks, and

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>it was really thrust into the spotlight as it struggled

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>to fix a faulty patch that led to cascading system

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>wide failures that just paralyzed the operations of clients ranging

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>from banks to global re tail giants to healthcare systems

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 3>today and then for everyone else social media, which I'm

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>sure was disastrous for influencers everywhere. Just a little history

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>here on CrowdStrike. Guys, we're going to talk to mandyp

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>saying more about what it means for the company, what

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 3>it means for revenue and earnings in addition to what

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>it means for their customers and do they wind up

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>switching gears at any point. But here's some of the

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>details and the history of CrowdStrike. It was founded by

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 3>former executives of antivirus pioneer McAfee, and it launched back

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twelve, and now it has grown into the

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 3>leading maker of a relatively new type of security software

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 3>that's considered among the best defenses against ransomware and other

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>hacking threats. It controls about eighteen percent of the eight

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 3>point six billion dollar global market for so called quote

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>modern endpoint protection software, just ahead of our rival Microsoft.

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>And this is all according to market research firm IDC.

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>So it is distinct from the older, more limited types

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 3>of security software. And traditional antivirus was pretty useful in

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>those early days of computing in the Internet, and this

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>is basically where CrowdStrike is at. That's kind of your

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 3>history of how CrowdStrike got to be so popular and

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 3>so big in this market. That stock still down by

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 3>about nine percent. Man Deep saying is joining us. He's

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>much more details than I do on this. Bloomberg Intelligence

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>senior technology industry analyst Mandy I guess my question is

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 3>is CrowdStrike going to lose a bowload of customers?

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so. I think right now we are

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 4>just learning that. Clearly this was something they shipped last night.

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 4>It was an outage because of the changes they made

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 4>to their software. So the good thing is it wasn't

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 4>a breach. I mean, the last thing you want is

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 4>a cybersecurity company getting breached themselves.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 5>So that's not the.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Case, right, So plus time, yes, yeah.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, But at the same time, the fact that this

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 4>happened at the scale at which it did, and look,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 4>there will be liabilities. I mean, there will be fines.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that I've heard GDPR findes because the outage

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 4>was pretty big, there was lost business. So clearly the

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 4>fallout from this would be, you know, it will impact

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 4>their free cash flow for this year and also delay

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>their deals. I mean, look, they are two weeks away

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 4>from closing this quarter. A lot of these deals are

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 4>signed at the very end of the quarter. I bet

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 4>you they're not happening now given the outage.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>So if I'm a customer, so I'm Delta, Yeah, what

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 3>do I say to CrowdStrike if I can't operate and

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I lose money for two days? Or I have to

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 3>shell out cash to help customers who are really mad

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>at me.

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so that's where you know.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>That's where the finds are going to come in.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 4>And look, Microsoft also is involved here, so it's not

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 4>just Crowdstrike's fault. The fact that this happened at the

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Windows operating system level, you have to ask yourself, could

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft has done something here in terms of preventing that

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 4>sort of a change where the system would not book?

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Microsoft is the operating system layer, and anytime

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>you change things at the operating system layer, it's like

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>all your critical systems will be down. So the fact that,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 4>and that's the broader point here is if you have

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 4>an agent based solution where you're installing something at the

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 4>operating system layer, who's liable for that? Is it the

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 4>operating system vendor or is it the software vendor? And

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 4>that's where I think, I mean, everyone is saying, oh,

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>they rolled back the changes, the outage is over, there

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 4>will be a fallout in terms of who is paying

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the fines, and more than the fines for the lost business,

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 4>there's somebody who is liable here, and it's CrowdStrike and

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 4>probably Microsoft.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>So can you just explain it done that downy for me.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Even more so, CrowdStrike says, hey, guys, I got a

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 3>software updated. Microsoft's like cool, and then they press go

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 3>what should they have done instead?

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this should have been tested one hundred times

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 4>before you roll something like that out.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Then they test it, they find the bugs, they fix it.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 4>There's a whole software industry just for testing changes. That's

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 4>why cloud software it's great because you deploy it for

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 4>all your customers with the click off a button. But

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 4>that's your risk. I mean, when people used to do

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 4>things in the on prem world, you had to ship

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 4>a disk, the disc had to be installed it and look,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 4>not everyone would have done it overnight. In this case,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 4>all the customers got the change overnight and they were

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 4>affected overnight. And some of them are running all machines.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 4>So even though crowd strikes says that they rolled back

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 4>the update and it's going to automatically fix things, well,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.119
<v Speaker 4>some people are running Windows two thousand, so it doesn't

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 4>roll back that way because those people have to take

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 4>some different steps compared to the ones that are running

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 4>the latest version of Windows where it can be rolled

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 4>back easily.

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Really caught my eye is there is report that someone

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>has issued a paper ticket in handwriting to get on

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 3>a plane. I was like, oh, this is real now to.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Get rid of systems are down.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, So I know you're not going to give

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 3>stock prices, but just looking at CrowdStrike down nine percent,

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 3>it was down twenty percent. What kind of hit to

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>the stock price is reasonable that we should really be

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 3>looking at.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look, we don't know the extent of liability

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 4>they have in this case. Depending on that, I think

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent is warranted. And some of their competitors are

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 4>up Sentinel one Palo Alto Networks, So endpoint security is

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 4>primarily four vendors. CrowdStrike is the leading one Sentinel Palo Alto.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.559
<v Speaker 4>And there's a company, vis Security, that Google is looking

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 4>to buy. There were rumors about that last week. Well

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 4>guess what that validates? Why Google, a cloud player, is

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 4>looking to buy a cybersecurity provider. So clearly, given it's

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 4>a four kind of company race here, CrowdStrike fallout means

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 4>the others stand to benefit here.

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>What else are you looking at right now? I mean,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 3>I know this occupied most of your morning, but now

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>we seem to be resuming somewhat as is operations with

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>some question marks, But what else is on your mind

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 3>right now? After this week? Or you've seen what I

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 3>think the Nasdaq, the S and P, and the Nasdaq

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred seeing its worst week since April? What do

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>you think?

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean? Look, we got the print from Netflix last

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 4>night at TSMC ASML, they all reported results and AI

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 4>spends still continues to be robust. So with Google reporting

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 4>next week, I think you may see a pretty strong

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 4>print going by what happened this week, even though the

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 4>market was down and everyone is raising concerns around valuation

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 4>and just you know, the market risk. But I mean

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 4>AI spend is still what's driving the market, and you

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 4>want to see how Google does next week.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>When you say the AI spend part, how do we

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>know about the monetization of it on the end user?

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Because that's going to be where the investment continues, right,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Like you're going to invest a bowtload of money now, great,

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 3>but then you actually have to make money off of

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>it to then keep spending money on it. When does

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>that start to come into play?

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, so I think you will see that in Google's

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 4>result as well. They have launched their Gemini offering that's

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 4>part of their Google One bundle, Microsoft has a GitHub copilot.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 4>They all run cloud businesses where they are deploying these workloads,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 4>the AI workloads. And look, the biggest driver of this

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 4>is how big is the GPT five and GPT six

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 4>going to be. If the models that are being trained

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 4>are going to be much larger, ten twenty times larger,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 4>you need more compute. And if the companies are spending

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 4>the capex to train these models, that means they are

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 4>in it. I mean, these companies are the biggest spenders

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 4>on capex, Your Microsoft, Google, Amazon. If they continue that path,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 4>they're telling you that we believe in it. And if

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 4>one of these vendors blinks first, that's the big risk.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Who says, Okay, I'm pausing spending on training cloud models

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 4>now because we don't see the ROI we haven't seen

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 4>that yet.

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 5>Everyone is going big.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And then to your point, like there is a no

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 3>first mover advantage to not doing that right, Like Google's

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 3>not gonna want to do it first, Amazon not gonna

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 3>want to do it first, Like who does that first?

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>And when that happens, So is there a possibility that

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 3>they'll just keep spending because of that?

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Even if like there is fear pressure because and right

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>now the GPUs are still supply constraints. So nobody wants

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 4>to say, oh, I'm not raising my capex and I

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 4>have enough of these GPUs because there are still a

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>hot commodity. Well, time will tell, if you know, the

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 4>market kind of stabilizes, their the supply demand equation gets better,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 4>and that's when you will see market reaction. But until

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 4>that time, what TSMC told us, yeah, is they're still

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 4>supply constrained. They have more demand to make those leading

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>at chips, and so that's why I think the ai

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:52.359
<v Speaker 4>story continues.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. They said also that that supply and demand imbalance

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to last what until twenty twenty six.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, well, I mean and couple that with the

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 4>geopolitical risk. You know what's going on with the election situation,

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the former Trump, former President Trump saying he doesn't believe

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 4>in Taiwan. So that's a chill point. If something happens

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 4>to Taiwan and the relationships changes, then TSMC is not

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 4>spending capex on expanding their capacity. Well, everyone wants TSMC

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 4>to expand capacity, so that's a big risk in itself.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>It's TSMC is not expanding capacity of their notes amazing.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 3>You look really excited, by the way. I definitely heard

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Man Deep tag about this it thing and he was

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a little giddy. There's like something really interesting going on here. Mandy,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 3>thanks a lot, really appreciate it. Thanks for the hustle.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Man Deep saying, Bloomberg Intelligence senior technology industry analyst, amazing stuff.

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Cannot wait for Google next week. That's going to be

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>really great as well.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business You can all so listen

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 3>Well, Alex Deal. Paulsweenis off today. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>We bring you all the top news in business, finance,

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>economics through our lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence analysts. They

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 3>covered two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries worldwide.

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 3>The next top story of the morning, aside from CrowdStrike

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and what's happening there, is what's happening in DC with

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 3>President Biden. So the reports earlier from NBC said that

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Biden's family is starting to discuss his exit plan from

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 3>the race. Shortly after that, the White House came out

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>and said that that NBC report was wrong, but the

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>clock is still ticking towards the DNC. Oh and by

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the way, the RNC just wrapped up last night with

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 3>a ninety three minute speech from former President Donald Trump.

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to Nathan Dean. He's Bloomberg Intelligence, a senior.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Let me get your title right, senior policy analyst joining

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>us from there. Hey, Nathan, there's a lot to kind

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 3>of get through right now. But before we kiss everything

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 3>off here, let's just go to what's happening in DC

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and the White House. What is your take on the

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Biden campaign?

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 7>So, you know, it really sounds like the pressure. I mean, look,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 7>I don't think he needs to be me to know

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 7>that the pressure is on the White House right now

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 7>and specifically on President of Biden to you know, make

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 7>the decision to step aside. You know, we've seen reporting

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 7>from Bloomberg News all throughout the week that not only

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 7>do your you know, his general allies in Congress, but

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 7>also you know, statements from you know, or the lack

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 7>of statements from President Obama for example. But what we

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 7>should note is the prediction right markets as of right

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 7>now are fifty seven to twenty one in terms of

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 7>Kamala Harris. Look again, these are prediction markets. To take

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 7>it if you will. But we've put out a whole

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 7>host of notes on the terminal this morning on healthcare, taxes, banks, evs,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 7>and TMTs, And the crust of the matter is is

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 7>that if President Biden were to drop out of the

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 7>race this weekend, and similarly, like Kamala Harris comes in

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 7>the vice president to replace him, most of the policies

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 7>are a status quo. There's really not a lot of

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 7>difference between Kamala Harris and Joe Biden when it comes

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 7>to policies. And so just in terms of trying to

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 7>figure out the certainty in which sectors are being impacted,

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 7>I think it just be a continuation of the same factor.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So based on that, then what would be the big

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 3>changes with President Trump? I mean, ninety three minutes last

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 3>night we learned a ton tariffs and taxes.

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 7>Is that what we're looking at exactly? So I would

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 7>say tariffs and taxes are the top two. In fact,

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 7>our chief equity strategist Gina Martin Adams put out a

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 7>note specifically about that this morning, talking about what does

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 7>that mean for markets in terms of taxes. If you

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 7>go back to the twenty seventeen tax cuts and you

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 7>do something very similar to that, you get a slight

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 7>tailwind pushing earnings a little bit better in that if

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 7>you get the tariffs, well, there's a lot of uncertainty there.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 7>So but I would say in terms of people thinking

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 7>about how President Trump would implement this, it's almost short

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 7>term versus long term. Short term tariffs. The power of

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 7>the presidency is a lot more powerful when it comes

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 7>to trade in tariffs. So look for that to be

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 7>one of the first actions that the president would do

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 7>if he were to win in say the first quarter

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 7>of next year. The tax reform debate, however, goes through

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty five. Remember that's when the individual tax cuts expire.

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 7>So we have to see a the makeup of Congress,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 7>and b we're going to see a lot of debate

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 7>over what the tax issue is. So if you're trying

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 7>to model this out from a you know, timing perspective,

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 7>trade and tariff's number one tax is number two.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and also, you know what it actually does to

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the equity market is a whole different story. Can you

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 3>talk to me a little bit about energy policies. So

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 3>clearly it's a drill baby drill situation for President Trump.

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 3>On the flip side, though, the more you drill baby drill,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the lower oil prices can go, which is not always

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 3>happiness for oil companies and built drill baby drill.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, if funny enough.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 7>I was on a chat last night with some of

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 7>our energy analysts when he mentioned drill BA to b drill,

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 7>and a lot of the feedback I got from Bi's

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 7>energy team was, look, there's a lot of policy things

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 7>that President Biden can do, but also just remember the

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 7>markets are moving in a certain way. Solar and win

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 7>and renewable technology is continuing to get cheaper, and so

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, there are policies that we'll see on the

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 7>energy side that certainly could make it easier for drill

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 7>built drill.

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I know it's tough, right, it's hard.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's certainly going to be policies to coming

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 7>from the White House. But also remember is this policy

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 7>a regulation or is it an executive order or is

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 7>it legislation? And so I think that even though you know,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm not an energy analyst, but at least, you know

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 7>our group chat last night, a lot of our energy

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 7>analysts think that solar renewables are here to stay.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 3>What about EV's Again the contradiction of Elon Musk contributing

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 3>heavily to a super pac that's going to support Donald Trump.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>But then yesterday it seemed like when he was speaking,

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 3>he was like, subsidies for EV's bye bye.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 7>You know, I got that question from a client just

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 7>this morning. You know, you know, President Trump last night

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 7>essentially in a paraphrasing here said I dislike electric vehicles,

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 7>and you know, we're going to do away with the

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 7>electric vehicle tax credit that's part of the Inflation Reduction Act. Now,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 7>they could certainly do this as part of that tax

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 7>reform debate that I mentioned to, and President Trump could

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 7>use executive orders to adjust that EV mandate if he

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 7>so chooses. But then he got Elon Musk saying I'm

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 7>going to spend forty five million dollars a month to

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 7>support President Trump in his presidency. So I think what

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 7>I would happen here, what the EV tax credit is

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 7>probably this is not going to be a day one issue.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 7>If President Trump were to win, let the issue fester

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 7>for a little bit. Let's see if Elon Musk tries

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 7>to get into the White House and starts whispering the

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 7>President's ear, and then we'll see in maybe in the

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 7>second quarter, how.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately they want to move forward with this. So it's

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly keep in mind.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 7>But also I think the ev automakers also are just

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 7>saying there's a lot of demand here, whether that tax

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 7>credits with us or not, right, and.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Really we're still revolving around tariffs and taxes, So there

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 3>is that the priority all right here, Nathan, we really

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 3>appreciate it. Nathan Dean joins us from Bloomberg Intelligence, a

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 3>senior policy analysts. Let's go right to Milwaukee here with

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Emory Hordern, a chief political correspondent to anchor of a

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg surveillance Henry. Last night I felt like a very

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 3>historic event. I mean, ninety three minute speech, sweeping speech.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Can you just give me some on the ground color

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>as to what it's like having been there and being

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>in Milwaukee.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 6>It was a ninety three minute speech. A lot of

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 6>attendees were feeling it at some point in the end.

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 6>Some of them may want to beat the traffic, but

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 6>they were leaving towards the end.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 5>There. It was really the beginning part of the speech.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 6>That you felt it in the room, very silent, very somber.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 6>Foreign President United States explaining in detail what he experienced

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 6>Saturday evening.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 5>When there was attempt on his life, and he.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 6>Said, it's too painful to talk about, so he's never

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 6>going to talk about this again. And he was saying

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 6>how he's thanks to God that he's still alive, and

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 6>that was really the tone he was trying to set.

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 6>And then he talked about uniting the country, not the

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 6>Republican Party, uniting the country. He said, what is the

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 6>point of having half the country?

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 5>I want a victory of the entire country.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 6>But then the speech went on, you heard similar tropes

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 6>that you'd hear from a Trump rally, and he veered

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 6>off script a number of times, which basically meandered in

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 6>and out, and which is why we ended up with

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 6>a ninety three minute speech. Not sure how this would

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 6>land exactly with the individuals back home. If it's slice

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 6>and dice, obviously people are going to want to hear

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 6>about that assassination attempt and potentially see a different side

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 6>of the former president, even though he talked about a

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 6>lot of things that categorically will were false and similar

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 6>to some of the.

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 5>Rhetoric that unnerves some independence. But in the room it

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 5>was electric. These individuals.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 6>There are ones that already are motivated to go out

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 6>and vote for Trump, but these individuals were so excited

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 6>to be there. And we should note leading up to

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 6>it was a really a event, a machismo event. You

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 6>had Hull Colgan come out ripping his shirt open, calling

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 6>Trump his hero, and you also had Kid Rock. It

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 6>was the nostalgia of the eighties and the nineties really

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 6>leading up to the former president to make this historic

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 6>speech third third time he has been nominated by this

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 6>Republican Party.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Whole Colgan, I feel like at the end of the

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 3>shirt ripping it kind of got caught there. But your

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 3>point is well taken in terms of the unity theme.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that the beginning of the speech was very

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>much focused on that. How did that evolve throughout those

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 3>ninety three minutes?

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 6>Well went back to the same president Chump that we

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 6>know and we see and hear on in campaign rallies.

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 6>He mentioned Biden only once. He did want to talk

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 6>about the current administration. Potentially that was strategic because of

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 6>course those news as you were just discussing that President

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Biden might step aside and his family is discussing this

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 6>with him, what an exit plan could look like. According

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 6>to NBC News, we do see a lot of pressure

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 6>mounching on the sitting president going into the weekend.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 5>So he said the current administration.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 6>He's mentioned Biden's names once and said, oops, I'm not

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 6>going to do that again. But he went after what

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 6>he called he called it crazy Nancy Pelosi. So he

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 6>had some of these similar attacks that we've seen, false

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 6>falsehoods about a stolen election.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 5>He mentioned had an elector somebody's been quite fixated on

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 5>for a number of weeks now in some of his rallies.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 5>So in the beginning, there was.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 6>This show of he I wanted to project unity, he

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 6>wanted to talk about this life threatening event. He literally

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 6>dodged a bullet, But then he quickly moved into the

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 6>Trump that we've known over the course of his political career.

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Emory, we really appreciate it. Thank you so much.

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I know it's been a terribly long week, but thank

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 3>you so much for joining US Amrie Hardern, a chief

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 3>political correspondent and co anker of Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch US Live

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on AFO, Cardplay and broud

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch US live on YouTube.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 3>So Netflix stock is now up by about six tens

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 3>of one percent. The highlights that added over eight million

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 3>customers in the second quarter. I had topped expectations in

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 3>every region around the world, and that included two point

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 3>eight million new customers in the Asia Pacific region. Plus

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 3>They're less expensive plan with ads accounted for almost half

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 3>of new sign ups last quarter. The one quest question, though,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 3>was a cautious forecast. What was up with the third

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>quarter outlook? Keetheramanganathan is Boomberg Intelligence analyst on US media

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 3>and she joined US now from Princeton, New Jersey. Git

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>what happened for them Q three outlook?

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 8>Yes, so thanks alex So. The revenue guidance obviously came

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 8>in a little bit softer than what the street was expecting.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 8>Street was looking at about fifteen percent revenue growth in

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 8>third quarter, they're guiding to about you know, thirteen point

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 8>nine percent. And I think really what investors are grappling

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 8>with at this point we've seen kind of the stock

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 8>bounce around a lot post earnings is because we're not

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 8>sure whether the three Q guidance. Obviously they did guide

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 8>to a moderation of subscriber growth. So just remember in

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 8>the past four quarters. Obviously they crushed it in the

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 8>second quarter with eight million subscriber ads, but in the

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 8>past four quarters alone, Netflix has gained something like forty

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 8>million subscribers. Wow, that is absolutely massive, And so I

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 8>guess the question now is, of course we're going to

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 8>see a moderation in subs but for the third quarter.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, is this just kind of them being conservative

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 8>from a guidance standpoint, or is this, you know, kind

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 8>of an inflection to a much more slower, mature growth profile.

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's what you know, investors are trying

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 8>to parse out and digest.

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, like the law of large numbers, when are

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 3>we going to learn the answer to that question?

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 8>So you know, there are obviously a lot of different

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 8>data points that investors track, search trends, you know, third

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 8>party data, downloads, as it looks right now, it seems that,

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, all of the trends are still pointing to

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 8>pretty good subscriber momentum. One of the things that you know,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 8>we typically look at is how is the content pipeline

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 8>shaping up? And the content pipeline seems stronger than ever.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 8>You know, you have multiple hit shows that are coming

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 8>to the platform in the third quarter, you know, whether

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 8>that's Cobra Kai this week or you know, Umbrella Academy

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 8>or Night Agent or Emily Embarrass So you know, they

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 8>have all of their hit shows kind of coming in.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 8>They have a steady cadence of all of those titles

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 8>kind of releasing, so content should do pretty well for them.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 8>And then remember they're also licensing a whole bunch of

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 8>different content programs from you know, so many of the

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 8>other media companies. So I don't think content will be

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 8>a problem. The only issue that we need to kind

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 8>of factor in alex is that it was third quarter

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 8>of last year when they kind of kicked both the

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 8>password sharing crackdown as well as the ad tier into

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 8>high gear. And so we're kind of lapping that when

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 8>we you know, come to this third quarter, and so

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 8>that's kind of I think what they're saying, you know,

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 8>please expect kind of that moderation and subscriber ads because

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 8>most of that low hanging fruit has been already taken.

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, So then you're also coming up against a little

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 3>bit of tough comps in terms of the adzel part.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean that accounted for almost half of the new

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.239
<v Speaker 3>signups last quarter. Are advertisers paying up for that kind

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 3>of exposure or not quite yet?

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Not quite yet. So one thing that they did point

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 8>to was obviously the advertising portion of the business is

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 8>I think going to be the biggest growth driver in

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 8>the long term, but there is some short term pain

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 8>to be experienced before we kind of see those long

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 8>term gains. And the short term pain is that they

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 8>need to invest in their technology. So they need to

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 8>invest both in their programming and their technology. On the

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 8>programming side, we've seen them make multiple investments, and those

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 8>investments are really in different kind of genres, genres that

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 8>appeal to live that kind of cater to that live

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 8>audience aspect. So you know, whether it's the hot dog

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 8>eating contest or whether it was you know, the roast

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 8>of Tom Brady, or you know, a boxing match that's

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.479
<v Speaker 8>coming up with Mike Tyson or even the NFL Christmas Games.

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 8>All of that are you know, content investments, and all

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 8>of those makes sense from an advertising perspective, but they

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 8>also need to make tech investments. Remember, they are that

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 8>they are the first to the game in streaming, but

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 8>they are the last to the game and advertising, and

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 8>so it's obviously going to take some time for them

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 8>to kind of play catch up. So it's only been

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 8>about fifteen to eighteen months since they kind of have

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 8>this advertising business started up, and it's you know, it's

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 8>taking longer than expected because they don't necessarily have the technology.

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 8>Technology that you know, Disney and Amazon and everybody else

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 8>has taken tens of years to build and already have

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 8>like a huge advantage over Netflix.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 3>So right, but the Netflix has their content. So it's

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 3>like exactly chicken or an egg situation. A good point there, though,

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Can anyone catch Netflix in terms of content at this point?

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 8>Not really? And you know this is where kind of

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 8>the whole content flywheel and everything, you know, the brand,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 8>the subscriber base, I mean, it's success breeds success at

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 8>this point because you have a subscriber base of two

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 8>hundred and eighty million. Netflix has very much become the

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 8>default option when it comes to you know, entertainment or

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to video entertainment programming, and so all

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 8>of these other media companies, I mean, they're already struggling.

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 8>They have a host of their own problems. They're finding

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 8>out that one way to kind of alleviate some of

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 8>their pressures is to actually sell programming to Netflix, and

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 8>so they're kind of almost feeding the beast here, you know,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 8>the whole Netflix content flywheel. And so Netflix is really,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 8>I think in that is consolidating. It's kind of streaming dominance.

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 8>So content absolutely they lead by a wide, wide margin.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Before we let you go Warner Brothers Discovery, there's some

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 3>rumors here of a potential split between the studio and

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 3>streaming assets away from its linear TV assets. Is that real?

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 3>What would that look like? What do you think?

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, there are rumors, you know, I think they could

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 8>be real, just because I think management is extremely frustrated

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 8>with the way that the stock has performed. It's been

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 8>two years since the Warner Brothers merger happened with Discovery Communications,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 8>and this was really all about scale and kind of

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 8>piecing together these businesses, both of which are were in

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 8>secular decline, but obviously that merger has not done well

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 8>at all, and I think this is kind of an

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 8>admission of that. Part of it is because they have

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 8>over forty billion dollars in debt. Part of it is

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 8>because Ebita has been constantly declining. You know, when the

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 8>merger happened, they promised fourteen billion dollars. This year, we're

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 8>going to be at probably nine point seven billion. So

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 8>obviously the Star price has kind of reflected that seventy

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 8>percent down since the merger was first announced, so you know,

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 8>they are obviously looking to some ways to kind of

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 8>boost that. I don't think it's feasible though, And I

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 8>say that because eighty five percent of the cash flow

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 8>is actually tied to the linear network business. So you

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 8>have the linear network business, which isn't decline but which

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 8>is producing majority of the cash. You have the studio

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 8>and the streaming assets, which are you know, the kind

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 8>of the future and you know, the sexy assets, but

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 8>they produce no cash at all. They are completely dependent

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 8>on the linear TV network business to sustain them. So

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, it's going to be a little hard

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 8>to execute, but we'll have to wait and watch this.

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 8>Just a lot of noise right now with Warner Brothers

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.239
<v Speaker 8>and kind of the NBA talks and whether they're going

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 8>to match Amazon's NBA deal. So a lot going on

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 8>for that company.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Right and there's still sort of we're recovering still from

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the Hollywood strikes from last year, and that's still kind

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 3>of filtering through as well. Gita, thank you so much,

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate the analysis. Eether Manganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence joining us

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 3>on Netflix as well as that potential breakup for Warner

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Brothers Discovery.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to some earnings here, because America Express came

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>out with earnings earlier. That stock is down almost four percent,

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the company is saying, and it's planning to increase spending

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 3>on marketing, even as billing growth on companies credit cards

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 3>slowed in the second quarter. Ben Elliott is Boomberg Intelligence,

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Consumer Finance analyst is joining us for this What was

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>your takeaway on Amex's quarter.

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think that the price action you're seeing today

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is because just the bar was set pretty high going

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>into this quarter, and they didn't necessarily outperform. But I

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the metrics are moving in a

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>big good direction. They're still spending, still growing twice the

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>rate of GDP, and AMX is still the envy of

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the industry. They have the best customers and they're the

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>most likely to sort of outperform in any kind of downturn.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think the outlook still looks good. I think

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>people might have been a little upset that guidance was

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>re rated higher, but it's really just for a one

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>time charged our one time game, and so you know,

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there was no great outperformance, but the core business is

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>still very solid.

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Talk about their premium card business, like, are people still

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>willing to fork over a boatload of money per year

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 3>for these premium fancy cards.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's actually incredible. For twenty four quarters now they

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are a double digit gain in their card fees, right,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>so people are clamoring to pay Amex for the privilege

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of being the best customer out there. On the market.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It's really kind of an incredible place for them to be.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Who, like, who was doing it? Is it older people?

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Is it the young kids?

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Who's doing it?

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's the young kids. Most of the growth

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is in gen Z and millennial sort of a middle

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>growth tiers is in gen X and growth in the

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>plus the demo is slowing down.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 3>So what happens in a slowdown then? So that's kind

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 3>of the setup for AMX. If we do get a

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 3>slow down, where does it leave AMEX If they're exposed

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 3>to people that have more money? Is it okay?

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? So, as we saw in the FED stress test

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the past month, in a severe downturn, MX is one

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of the few banks that's still going to turn a profit.

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>They have an incredibly low loss rate and their customers

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is extremely resilient, and you know, you have to think

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>back to AMEX is driven primarily by spending. Eighty percent

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of their revenue is from people swiping the car and

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>paying the gigantic seven hundred dollars fee for their platinum

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>every year, and so they're not as relying on loans,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and the loans that they do make are incredibly high quality.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so fair enough so they do more tight underwriting,

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. To your point, the best of their peers

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 3>in the Federal Reserves annual stress test. What is this

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 3>bode then for the other guys like a Visa.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Visa doesn't take credit risk, right, so they're

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>more driven by just the total sort of retail spending

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>volume out there. So they're a little bit I think

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>more GDP plus growth, and Amex is rated just a

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit above GDP right now because they're relying on

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of one tranch whereas Visa and MasterCard are kind

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of exposed more to the aggregate.

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Then why is amex a stock down four percent? Is

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 3>this just straight up like an expectations game.

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think they missed a little bit on

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the top line number. But if you if you think

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>about it from an operating leverage perspective, their expenses were

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit more than that, so they still

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have positive operating leverage. They're trading at a huge premium

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to peers, like a fifty to sixty percent premium. I

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're they're pushing twenty times earnings, whereas most of

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>their peers are a ten x. So everybody has been

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, MX has been the pre recession play

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for several quarters now, and so we get the soft landing,

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the recession doesn't happen, then maybe that valuation is maybe

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a little two premium.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Interesting Also, the company in the quarter pursued like its

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 3>consumer focus on travel and leisure. They it bought Talk

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 3>for four hundred million dollars from squarespace. What does Talk

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 3>do for AMX?

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so every every sort of incremental bolt on acquisition

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is helpful as sustaining travel and entertainment. That's a really

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of a high margin part of their business. They

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>typically negotiate swipe seas that are are really premium in

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that in that segment. So for every dollar that someone

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>spends on you know, a premium for a legacy airline carrier,

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 1>MX is getting, you know, more than they would at

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>someone's like swiping out a sort of a retail point

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of sale. So like, you know, any sort of incremental

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>gain they can make there is positive. But that's a

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>segment of their business that's flowing down faster than other

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>parts of the business. So you might see them sort

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of pivot more towards dining and goods and services and

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of some of the more, you know, the less

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>discretionary spending that might be more resilient in the downturn.

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Fair Enough, before I let you go, I do want

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 3>to get your take on Discover Capital one. So Discover

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 3>is selling itself to Capital one. What what's your outlook

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 3>for how this acquisition goes?

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the acquisition, you know, from a fundamental perspective,

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is on track. Discovers doing everything they need to do.

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>They're managing well to the sale. They're they're ticking all

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the boxes that regulators are asking of them. The real

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>question mark out there is what does a Biden DOJ

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have to say about the deal? And we'll find out

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>later in the year. But then there's kind of a

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>big question mark here, which is will Biden be in

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House come the January when the deal closes

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>or it's lated to close, And so Trump win could

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of knock out any opposition that the DJ might have.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 3>What does a Capital one look like with Discover?

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's going to be really interesting. They plan to

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>transition almost two hundred billion dollars in credit card loan

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>volume onto the Discover network, So that still makes them

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of a distant fourth player. But I think you're

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>going to find it much more competitive with their larger

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>peers like these a MasterCard and Amex. And I think

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be it's going to be interesting. It's

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going to change the competitive layout in ways that I

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>think are not yet really well understood, and it could

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>be good for consumers.

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:46.800
<v Speaker 3>All Right, we really appreciate it, Ben Ben Elliott a

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence consumer finance analysts.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and rout

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business and also listen live on

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just say

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 3>To Alex Steel false. We needs off today. This is

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We are broadcasting to you live from

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 3>the Interactive Broker Studio right here in Midtown Manhattan. We

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 3>cover all the top news in business and politics and

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 3>economics and finance. There are a lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence folks.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 3>They cover two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>industries worldwide. We also take you out of Bloomberg Intelligence

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 3>sometimes to get the read on the overall market. And

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 3>this time we go to Ken Leon. He's director of

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 3>equity research at Cfrray Research and he joins us now

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 3>for Netflix, so he can pretty much talk about anything.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 3>But this time we're talking about Netflix. You know, I

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 3>look at a chart on the last kind of twenty

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 3>four hours in Netflix, investors cannot make up their mind

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 3>what they want to do with the stock, Like now

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 3>it's down by one percent?

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 9>Why so this is great to be here Netflix. We

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 9>have a buy in a seven hundred and twenty five target.

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 9>Reiterated that with our published note last night after the call.

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 9>So for Netflix, it's the second time two quarters in

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 9>a row where there's always a little blemish here. And

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 9>it was really the guidance for Q three for revenue

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 9>just very right below the consensus target. But when you

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 9>look at the full year outlook for Netflix and twenty

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 9>twenty five, but for even twenty four, they reiterated a

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 9>target of six billion of free cash flow and fourteen

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 9>to sixteen percent revenue growth that underscores along with operating

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 9>margins in the second quarter that widened from twenty two

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 9>percent a year ago to twenty seven percent, showing we

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 9>believe a growth stock with solid top line growth and

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 9>increased profitability, unlike all its peers.

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So is it just like either they're going to

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 3>come into tough comps in the third quarter because that's

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 3>when they sort of cracked on a password sharing or

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 3>is just a law of large numbers.

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 9>I think this is a solid, high quality growth company.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 9>You know, there was a lot of sell off this

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 9>week with the Max seven and other issues. Netflix is

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 9>a high valuation metric that we still think supports the

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 9>outlook in a seven twenty five target twelve months out.

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 9>So I think particularly portfolio managers are thinking is the

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 9>fundamentals there to support the high valuation. We think the

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 9>answer is yes. In my career over four decades, I

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 9>have never seen an industry so disruptive, which is movies

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 9>and entertainment where you have a dominant get it right

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 9>business model with Netflix and everyone else is losing money

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 9>and trying to figure out what is their future in

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 9>the new world of technology.

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Why is it so hard for Disney Warner Brothers Discovery

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Paramount to make a dent when it comes to Netflix.

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 9>It's a great question, you know. Part of it is

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 9>it's always difficult to transition from legacy to new platforms

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 9>such as streaming. Second, it requires having talent on board

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 9>to do all the hard, dirty work day by day

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 9>of building an intelligent platform that gets the opportunity for

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 9>global reach and customer personalization.

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that the streamer I mean, like the

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers and Disney and everything, at some point do

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 3>they wind up becoming more solid enemies or will they

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 3>always be frenemies either? Running out in a Boomberg Intelligence

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 3>pointed out that now they're they're getting their content on Netflix,

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 3>so they're kind of you know, I mean, like our

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 3>streaming network isn't going to be as good, but we

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 3>want our content out there. Now we're going to go

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and give it to Netflix. That just seems very odd.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So the world has changed, and it's really two

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 9>tiers of players, the new big players or YouTube or

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 9>Amazon Prime Video, Netflix and everyone else is trying to

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 9>figure out, particularly on streaming, how can we play possibly partnering, bundling.

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 9>But it's a position of weakness, you know, it's you know,

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 9>very hard for these companies for content to keep subscribers.

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 9>Think about this that if you're investing or thinking about

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 9>wireless or cable TV and it's good days. You had

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 9>very low customer churn. None of these companies published monthly

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 9>or annualized customer churns.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so what does that? So what does that tell you?

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 9>It tells you it's a very vulnerable business. You have

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 9>to have engaging content, you have to have a lot

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 9>of it. You need an intelligent platform in each country

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 9>because cultures are different for personalization. So do we think that, yeah,

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 9>Bobeiger Disney Reports will talk about getting to what I

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 9>just said. You know, so you know Netflix is there

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 9>and you know Disney's trying to catch up.

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 3>So at some point do the likes of Disney like

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 3>pull back capital? Does Warner brother Paramount pull back capital?

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 9>So the area that there's always this yan yang between

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 9>content and distribution and where you have the more durable,

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 9>recurring growth areas for many of these companies is in

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 9>content for film or TV general entertainment. And what's stacked

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 9>right above that is live sporting events. It's not distribution

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 9>for these companies.

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 3>Do when you pivot from live sporting events and they're

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 3>on Netflix or Amazon Prime instead of say CBS, do

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 3>they do advertisers pay the same Are they making the

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 3>same amount of money or is it still sort of

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 3>a model that needs to be proven.

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, advertisers have done two things in the last ten years.

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 9>They've shifted enormous money for social media, whether it be Meta,

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 9>whether it be Google with YouTube, et cetera. So what's

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 9>left for traditional advertising on TV? It's smaller and it's

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.879
<v Speaker 9>being shifted to live sports the only one. It's kind

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 9>of interesting here we have a whole and the stock

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 9>is up from like thirty two to thirty seven. In

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 9>Spox they're only live sports and news.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 3>What do you think we're going to hear when we

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 3>move forward? In terms of Netflix talking about that ad

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 3>supported tier.

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 9>Though, well, what they're releasing they said, sequentially Q one,

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 9>the Q one they had thirty percent growth in the

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 9>ad pay plans. It's a lower rate and advertising revenue

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 9>directly from the advertising sponsors. No one, Nope, they're not

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 9>reporting it. It is reported by the other legacy media

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 9>companies though, good question, gotcha?

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 3>All right? So Netflix still by seven twenty five?

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 9>Netflix is Netflix still winner and they're going to continue

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 9>to gain share there we go.

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 3>As long as they keep doing Bridgerton, We're good. Hey, Ken,

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 3>thanks lot, really appreciate it. Have a great weekend. Thanks

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.240
<v Speaker 3>for joining Kenley on, Director of Equity Research at CFRA.

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Joining us on Netflix.

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 2>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, b

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 2>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 2>always on the Bloomberg terminal