WEBVTT - Joan Solotar on Private Equity Funds (Podcast)

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Mesters in Business with Very Results on Bluebird Radio.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>This week, on the podcast, I have an extra special guest,

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Joan Solitar. She's the global head of Private Wealth Solutions

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at private investment giant black Stone. They run about six

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars in assets. The Private Wealth Solution Group

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>runs over a hundred billion dollars and man, this is

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>name it. If you're interested in any sort of alternative investment,

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>from private equity to real estate, to non traded rates

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to debt and credit, you're gonna find this to be

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating. Joan has had really an amazing career from

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>from research uh to she helped bring black Stone public.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>She's just got a tremendous background and is incredibly knowledgeable

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about the space. I only suggests listening to this twice

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of stuff goes by quickly with no

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>further ado. My conversation with Joan Solotar. This is Master's

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in Business with Very Renaults on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>guest this week is Joan Solotar. She is Blackstone's global

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>head of Private Wealth Solutions. She has been named one

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of the hundred most Influential Women in Finance several years running.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>Black Stone is the world's largest alternative asset manager, with

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>six four billion in assets. Jones Department, the Private Wealth

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Solution manages over a hundred billion dollars in assets. Before

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>joining black Stone in two thousand and seven, Miss Solotar

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>was head of equity research at Bank America Securities and

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a highly ranked institutional investor All Star. Joan Solotar, Welcome

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg. Thank you, thanks for having me my pleasure. So,

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk a little bit about your career. You

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>were at Credit Swiss and uh D l J as

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a highly ranked analyst. What what did you cover? What

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>was your space? I covered financial services pretty much anything

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>non bank uh so started in insurance and then wound

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>my way to you know, mortgage insurance companies. Eventually really

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>focused on the brokerage industry and asset management. Very interesting.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you end up at a Bank America Maryland Securities.

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>You were head of research there, correct that I know

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of folks from old Mother Meryl were

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>either strategists or in the research department. How did you

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 1>leap from there to Blackstone? So? When I was at

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>D l J, I worked on the firm's public offering.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We were spun out of Equitable and Tony James was

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>president of d LJ Very Senior credit Suites, and then

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>he went over to become president of Blackstone and called

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>me when they filed to go public to see if

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I would join to help them with that process and

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>run sharehold relations and strategy, which is what I did initially. So,

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>so how do you transition from shareholder relations to private

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>wealth solutions? So I I've held a few different roles

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at Blackstone. I'd say the common theme among them is

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that I've always worked across the entire firm and in

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>private wealth. I was asked to move in and and

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>really create a scale, global business, and so I took

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the skill set that I had around uh, being a

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>strategic thinker and being able to manage teams of people,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>which I did at UM at b of A, and

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>really applied that here the last six years. So you

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>were there pre I p O, two weeks pre IPO. Okay,

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so that counts a little bit a little. I was

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you what the difference was working at

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a private company versus a public company, but I don't

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>know how much that would apply you've mostly been at

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>public companies your whole career. Yes, well, d l J

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was subsidiary of Equitable, which was a subsidiary of Access,

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So until it yourself went public, didn't feel like that.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It felt very much UM in a lot of similar

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>ways to Blackstone, like a partnership, and even Blackstone when

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I first joined, you know, fewer than a thousand employees,

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it was, it felt like a partnership, still small, and

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>now it's considerably larger than than a thousand employees, isn't

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it correct? So probably not as big as many think,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're about a little more than three thousand employees globally.

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's quite a chunk. So black Stone has made

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a very large bet on the individual, focusing on one

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to five million dollar clients through investment advisors. Tell us

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the thinking behind that move, because

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think when most people think of of black Stone,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>they think big institutions, not individuals. So you have to

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>really go back in time, and I'll put my strategy

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pat back on UM. During the financial crisis, we were

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>thinking a lot about where money was coming from for

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>our funds, and we were very heavily dependent upon us

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>pension funds, who are still quite an important set of

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>clients for the firm, And at that time we made

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the decision to expand internationally, both Europe and Asia, and

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then also start to think about how we would approach

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>private wealth. Uh So we started distributing through the big

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>wire houses initially and really focused on qualified purchasers. Uh

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>so those five million and above who could invest in

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the traditional private equity funds UM. But more and more

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we were getting inquiries, well, how do we give access

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to good products, good service to more people. And for that,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>uh we began creating bespoke funds to address that market.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And these are accredited investors or not, and somewhat more

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated than UM the average investor. When I was preparing

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for this, I came across a Business Insider column that

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>described what you you said was your AHA moment that

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>totally changed your career. Tell us what was that moment

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe you're referring to. When I was at d

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>l J and one of the we call them principles

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like partners came into my office and said, Hey, you know,

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to this dinner tonight for Principles and and

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you really should be there, but you need to tell

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>people that becoming a principle is important to you. And

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that just never occurred to me. I just thought, like,

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you put your head down, you do a job, and

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>someone's like, oh, let's make let's make her a principle.

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure that often is the case, but it

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly isn't always the case. And so I went into

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the office of the head of research and just said,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I deserved to be principal for the following reasons.

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It is something that's very important to me. And I

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>was named a principle that year. So let's talk a

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit about black Stone. They've created a tremendous amount

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of wealth with their limited partners and employees as well

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as their shareholders. What do you have to do to

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead of the pack? This is a hyper competitive

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>space with billions and billions of dollars looking for an edge.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>What does Blacks don't have to do to keep its

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>leadership role. I think it's a great question. Uh. Steve

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Schwarzman often says that there's nothing patentable in finance, meaning

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the world can see what you're doing and

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they're app to copy it. If it's successful, so you

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have to keep moving and for our firm, that means

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>continuing to find new areas where we see great investment

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunities where others aren't as competitive, and that might mean

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we are, for example, the biggest real estate

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>investor in the world, so from a scale perspective, there

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>are transactions we can do that no one else can do.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And building that kind of scale in life sciences, in

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>direct lending, in private equity, which is a bit more competitive,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but again not at the scale that we're at, that's

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>been a huge advantage for us, especially in this environment.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Huh So, so you're running the Global Private Wealth Group,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>tell us about that role and what your responsibilities include.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's been just terrific to be involved in the

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>building of this business. So essentially we are running Private

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Wealth as an end to end business rather than a

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>sales organization. And what does that mean. It means everything

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>from product development on the front end, to providing education

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>for advisors and marketing material, using data analytics to better

0:09:55.200 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>focus our salespeople, and having a robust investors erviss team

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>on the back end and doing that globally, so serving

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>your clients. Uh In Japan with folks who are on

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground speaking Japanese and having websites in native language,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>which may sound obvious, but takes a lot of people,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of effort, and we've been able to continue

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to vault ahead of the competition. So you mentioned investors

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and clients, who are the clients tell us about a

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>typical PWS investor. So I'll divide the clients into really

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>three buckets. At the wealthiest end our family offices which

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>are often run like institutions with the chief investment officer, cetera,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but really want a single point of contact into all

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>the Blackstone offers. The next tronche would be qualified purchasers,

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so folks also very wealthy individuals with five million dollars

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or more, and they really are by SEC standards allowed

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to invest in anything. A big part of the market.

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It's what we call accredited in the US. It has

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>different names all over the world, but essentially investors with

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one to five million dollars who want and historically have

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not had access to great product. And we also do

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>serve investors who are below the million dollar level, but

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>not with that many products that are suitable for them,

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and and so one to five five plus. I tend

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to think of family offices as fifty plus, but I

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>know that number some people say, some people say hundred.

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you look at family offices? Typically we really

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't defined it that way, but I think you're fifty

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>million is probably a good place. So now an investor

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 1>has five or ten million dollars in a total portfolio,

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just spit bowling here. They have a million immunis,

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they have another six seven million in traditional, active and

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>passive funds, and they have a couple of million dollars

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>lying around that. They're looking for a little more non correlated,

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little alpha. How do you fill that gap

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for that client? Are you selling that through O I

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>A S or you're selling it direct? Tell us a

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what that um slug in that portfolio

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like. So we are absolutely partnering with R A

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>S and with advisers again around the world, whether they're

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in global banks, private banks, big wire houses, or independence. Uh.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, to you to your question about where

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>people are invested now and what they're looking for at

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment, historically you would say, oh, you know, our

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>clients are are really looking at portfolio that's sixty forty

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>something like that the traditional mix. And I would say today,

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>given the search for yield, which is very hard to

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>find everywhere in the world, the need for private credit

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is greater. Uh, given where market valuations are, private investing

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is more attractive because you have more control over the asset,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.599
<v Speaker 1>you're not subject to the whims, and we're not investing

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>in the market per se. We're choosing the neighborhoods we

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be in. So you know, I'm fortunate in

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that the performance of Blackstone funds across all the alternative

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>asset classes has been good over a long period of time,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So we have a lot of material to work with,

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and then we meet the individual needs. So it could

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be that your client, as an advisor, you know, want

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to put of her or his assets into alternatives and

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they want a diversified portfolio. We have a product that

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>matches that. Or they're earning you know, x percent three

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on the municipal Bomb portfolio. And we have other funds

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in real estate and credit that can return much more

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that are also floating rate, which gives them better inflation protection.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So some of what you're doing is a non correlated

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>substitute for traditional equity, Hey, equity prices are let's call

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it fully valued. Some people think it's gone beyond that um,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>although we seem to be having delightful earnings this quarter,

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>so maybe this market can grow into its valuation. But

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's one alternative. You reference yield and and what what

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>investors are looking for. If someone says, hey, I want

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a higher return, I'm willing to take a little more risk,

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but not I don't want to run into the same

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>problem we run into with subprime What sort of products

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>do you have for I'm gonna ap peel some of

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>my forty off to to something that is going to

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>do better than one point two percent that I'm getting

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on on my treasuries? What do those fixed income like

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>products look like? Are they structured notes? Are they real estate?

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about that, sure. Uh so.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, one fund right now that has a lot

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of traction is our non traded read, which invests in

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>high quality US real estate. Again, the same themes that

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we're investing in for the institutional fund and the same team. Importantly,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so areas like multi family housing where there's a supply

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>demand mismatch or logistics playing on a very long term

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>theme around e commerce, which is only accelerated during COVID.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about the credit side you mentioned. So,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a secular trend in private credit that really started

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in the financial crisis where banks no longer wanted to

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>hold onto risk and we're syndicating out. And it also

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>at that time became clear that they were less willing

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to lend to middle market companies. So originally what began

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as a middle market industry in private credit emerged, and

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we were certainly one of the leaders in that. But

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say today, because of the scale that we have,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we're actually able to lend to much larger companies. So

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an industry that has real secular tail winds in

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of the demand for private credit, and we're able

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with you know, large companies, complex transactions, unitron

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to take the whole deal, uh, And we've been able

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to create funds around that for individuals that deliver good returns.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>And importantly, we've been able to create structures that also

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>work outside of the US. And so both of these areas,

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's private real estate or private credit, have appeal

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>right now in the US, in Europe, in Latin America

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in Asia. Uh. And you know we're able to service

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>those folks because our businesses of scale on the private

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>wealth side and also of scale in terms of how

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>much we can invest. That's quite quite intriguing. Let's talk

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about E. S. G. Blackstone has said,

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>as the world's largest alternative asset manager, we are uniquely

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>positioned to make a positive impact through our investments. Tell

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about how you approach environmental, social,

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and governance impact investing. So we've really taken a holistic approach,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>both for our own company as well as the companies

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that we own inside our various funds. And to start

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>with the environmental even going back, you know, many years now,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we looked at efficiency around energy and water, etcetera. So

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you own hotels, thinking about what kind

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of light bulbs, where do you set the temperature? Things

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of that nature. Flushers on toilet's probably a little less sexy,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but actually important. And today we've made a commitment that

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for any property or a company that we control, we

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>will reduce emissions by at least fifteen percent um. You know,

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we we I don't know if you know, in one

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the folios we actually own uh Sty Town here

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>in New York, and we created the largest solar farm

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on any multi family housing development in the US. There,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's one example, uh And I would say around the

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>other areas when it comes to UM governance, and by

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that I assume you mean diversity on board director C

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>we have likewise a commitment there for at least thirty

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:40.239
<v Speaker 1>percent representation by women underrepresented groups, and again for our

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>own company as well as for our portfolio companies. So

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about PWS as it's called. Internally.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Your group runs over a hundred billion dollars. Tell us

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>about some of the attractive places that you're deploying capital today. Sure,

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>so we tend to be very thematic at Blackstones. A

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of research comes into play upfront. We figure out

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>where we have the most conviction, and then we're not

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>afraid to go all in. And importantly, if you think

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>about investing as pattern recognition, and you think about everything

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we own real estate companies, all different types all over

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's just a lot of information flow that

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>comes into play. So today areas off of themes, like

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the digitization of everything. So if you think

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>about our investment in Bumble or Ancestry was on that

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in e commerce. This has been a long running theme

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>through the firm over the last ten years. So that

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>informs not just what you invest in, but what you avoid.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So we we have not been investing in closed malls,

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>but we have been buying up warehouse assets, especially first

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>mile those that are closest to clients. Again, everywhere around

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the world housing there's a housing shortage, uh really in

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different regions, and and what just meaning

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that there hasn't been enough supply. And when you think

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about all of the delays caused by shutdowns due to COVID,

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just exasperated those or exaggerated those trends even more so.

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And um, when you have supply demand and balances, that's

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>usually pretty good for appreciation. We coming through the financial crisis,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>had created the largest single family housing you know, owned

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to rent company, and we're continuing to invest in those

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>types of assets. We really like life sciences. You mentioned uncorrelated.

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>That's an area that is uncorrelated, and we partner with

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>major pharmaceutical companies. We invest in their Phase three trials

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>which have very good high percentage UH chance of success.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Cloud computing, and there's a lot of different neighborhoods that

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>we like. And then I would say, also we like

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the industries that serve those. So once we find a

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>theme something like life sciences, were also then interested in

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 1>owning the real estate that's catering to life sciences companies.

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So the intellectual capital really moves through the firm, and

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>we're able to whether it's growth equity, private equity, real estate,

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>life sciences credit, run that all the way through. And

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so you would find over the firm's history and continuing today,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>our various different businesses may invest in a different part

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of the capital structure. Uh, they may invest in different companies,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're all focused on this idea of good neighborhoods. Huh.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So that that's very intriguing. I always have a hard

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>time drawing a bright line between what sounds a lot

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like private equity but looks a little bit like late

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>stage venture capital. I hear cloud and life sciences and

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>bumble and ancestry dot com. How does that distinction make

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>any difference to you, guys? Is it really just an

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>academic distinction or clearly you're not doing seed investing. We

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>understand that, but what is the difference between black Stone

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>private equity and very late stage venture investing. So, by

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and large, we have not been venture investors in the

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>way that you're thinking about, in part because the outcomes

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>are binary, and when we're making an investment, we always

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>try to think about protecting on the downside, and that's

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>quite difficult to do in a venture deal. So I'm

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>distinguishing that from growth equity because these are larger companies

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>where the entrepreneur doesn't want to seed control but is

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>attracted to what we can bring in helping her him

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really scale the business. So again I'll go back to

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>UH company like you know, Bumble or where we made

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>an investment in Totally and what is it we bring.

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>We have this massive portfolio of companies and properties that

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we can introduce them to. We have a data science

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>team of more than thirty people that we then deploy

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>right onto these companies. We have a suite of highly

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>talented former CEOs executives who partner with UH. Those CEOs,

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>who again are are often entrepreneurs who may have not

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>usually have not taken their company and built it into

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some major global institutions. So I would distinguish it in

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Uh, those aspects were coming in much later.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying this technology works or doesn't. It's already proven,

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and then we're bringing something to much greater scale. Right.

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I like the concept of Hey, if it's truly binary,

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>then that's much more like UM venture capital. If there's

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a range of potential outcomes with a very very low

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>possibility that the whole thing goes to zero, that's more

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>private equity that that. That's a really good framework for

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that UM. So let's let's stick with you mentioned the

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:55.479
<v Speaker 1>intellectual capital that moves around the firm. UM. We're kind

0:25:55.480 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of sort of reopening people little nervous around delta UM.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>How did you guys operate during the pandemic. I assume

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone was working from home, and what are your plans

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>going forward? How are you going to manage? Yeah, it

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>was certainly turbulent times. We acted very quickly. So one

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that UM launched literally the week that we shut

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>down in the US is John Gray, our president and CEO,

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>launched a global call for all employees, which still happens

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>every single week. And during that meeting, we hear about

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>macro government, what's happening in some of the portfolio companies,

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>new investments, and the basic trends. It was also just

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the best mechanism for everyone at the firm UH to

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>know what was going on, talk about COVID and really

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and we do that on Zoom so

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're present. And again this has now been going

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on since mid March of with my own team, I

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>made great efforts to stay connected. Again, we were all

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>on Zoom, not telephone, so you can actually see people.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I personally added many more meetings than I had previously,

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>regularly scheduled meetings with my sub teams, with the leaders

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of my business to make sure we were connected. And

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we also added in a lot of virtual events, you know,

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>whether they were virtual cocktail hours or lunches or breakfast

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we did hold. I my my children make fun of

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>me because I did the same cooking class like five

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>different times, so I can now make an excellent you know,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>pasta sauce um. But I think it was important not

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just to get the business done, to prosecute the business,

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, that's important, and serve your clients, but equally

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>important was to keep the team together, have everyone with

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>full information feel connected, even though we weren't physically in

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the same place, and then I didn't mention, but as

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>importantly was staying connected with our clients, and so we

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>immediately launched webinars conference calls about what we were seeing

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>from a macro level in our portfolio. Companies very transparent

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>about what was happening in the funds and just providing

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>advisors and clients with the most up to date information

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that we had, and I think they appreciated that. Huh.

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Quite quite interesting. So so within financial services, people like

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond at JP Morgan Chase Morgan, Stanley Goldman, Sachs

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a roll calling staff back to work. Other places are

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about a hybrid all going forward. You're in a

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of days a week, but it's not Monday to

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Friday nine to five. Have you, guys thought about what

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to do and have have you come out

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>with any decision yet publicly? Yes, So we have. The

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>investing teams have by and large been back full time

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>now for several months. For my team, I said we

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>would remain flexible through the summer and then we'll figure

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>out the cadence. But the vast majority of my team

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>comes in and there were several employees not surprisingly who

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>were quite nervous. But the firm invested a lot uh

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of creating our own testing mandatory testing, distancing

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tracing app that we have to keep open at all

0:29:55.920 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>times to make people feel safe in the environment that

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we were in. A number a number of big firms

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are mandating vaccines? Did you guys go that far? Also?

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It makes perfect sense to me, but I know you

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>can get pushed back from some quarters. So just this

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>week we told employees that if they're not vaccinated, they

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't come to the office, and if you're not in

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the office, your career is probably not fast track. I

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hope that everyone will decide to take the vaccine just

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for their own health. We have not said you can't

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>work at the firm um, but I think it's it's

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the interim. You can certainly do whatever you're doing remotely,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but you just you lose the connectivity. And to me,

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what you know, one of the great parts of my

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>job is actually being with the team, interacting, exchanging ideas.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's much harder to do when your box

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on someone's computer. So you referenced earlier the impact of

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>low rates where clients were previously allocating money to the

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>bond portion of a sixty forty portfolio. How are low

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>rates impacting everything today and what is black Stone doing

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>about it? So I think about the impact of low

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rates from two perspectives. One is how does it

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>affect an investor, an individual investor or an institutional investor,

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and how does it affect Blackstone investing in companies and properties.

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So on the former, it is much harder to reach

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>your goals, whether their retirement or sending your kids to college,

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>or even just saving for the next few years at home, whatever.

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>If interest rates are very low, you're earning nothing on

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>your bank account, You're earning very little from your simple

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bond portfolio, etcetera. So how do you create more wealth?

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And for that, individuals institutions have been seeking yield in

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>private credit, private real estate, as we mentioned, where you

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>could just get better returns where you can apply a

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of leverage, but you don't have to extend all

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the way out on the risk curve. To do that,

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be in highly levered funds, you

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be in the riskiest assets. And I'm

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>often asked like, do you like non traded reads? Do

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you like private credit, and I always say it's it's

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for me. It's really not the fund structure as much

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>as it is who is the investor putting the assets in.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's certainly not all created equally. So you

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want to be with a very high quality GP like

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>black Stone if you will, But you want to, you know,

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>really think about who you're entrusting your wealth or your

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>client's wealth with. As it relates to Blackstone. On the

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>investing side, I'll put credit aside for the moment. That

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>means that you can borrow at much better rates um

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know that certainly helps the return. But I

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>would say, really importantly, we always think about when we're underwriting,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what will the next buyer have to borrow at to

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>make it work. You don't want to get lulled into

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this false sense of complacency where you're like, oh, I

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>could borrow for nothing and therefore, wow, this looks really attractive. Uh.

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Kind of similar to what happened to people when you

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>think about, you know, the housing crisis, where they were

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>just taking on way too much debt. So you know,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's that toggle between yes, we can borrow at

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>very attract to rates but that doesn't mean that we

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>want to inflate the price of the assets that we're buying.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's really quite a balance, so not the

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>greater fool approach to investing it. You're looking for a

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>long time. So you mentioned equity richly valued and bond

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>rates at long time uh lows. When we look at

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>both asset classes, there each at all time highs. The

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>one exception seems to be commercial real estate is in

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>fact still at levels UM that are far below where

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we were during the pandemic. How attractive is commercial real estate?

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And we know Blackstone is a big investor in UM

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>individual homes, rent to own, etcetera. What about traditional commercial

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>real estate? So there too, you have to divide it

0:34:55.680 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>into sectors. So if you're talking about offices or example

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>today you would say, wow, like how could you invest

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in offices Actually not a big part of our portfolio,

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but with a pandemic and people working from home, and

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say you have to distinguish where you're investing

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and the type of offices. So on the lending side

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in real estate for us, you know we think about

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are these high end offices that are open plan that

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of amenities for tenants, those would be attractive.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>We look at office space for life sciences companies, UH,

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>for production studios because one of the big themes for

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>us is live streaming and how that's increasing. We look

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at where regionally we're investing. So if you use data

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and see you know where in which areas are the

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>greatest number of ads for were jobs? Where are young

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>people going? You can get a feel for housing trends,

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>office trends, and very importantly in real estate, because buildings

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>don't just pop out of the ground, you know what

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>supply is, and so you're always looking for supplied demand

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>imbalance and UH, we typically don't invest in new construction,

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we want to buy at a discount to

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>replacement value. And that's really the formula. It sounds simplistic,

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's supplied demand discount to replacement value. That is

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the mantra that Blackstone has stuck to everywhere in the

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>world since the early nineties. So I'm hearing two things.

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing data matters, and what you pay for an

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>investable asset is important. Yes, all right, that that makes

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense to me. Uh, tell us what

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>your clients are asking about today that you guys are

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not currently doing. What what's the next thing out there

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. We typically when we venture into a new area, Uh,

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's because we see an interesting investment opportunity, So we

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>never think about it in terms of how much money

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>can we raise. It's always how much money can we deploy.

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But to your question, increasingly investors are asking us about

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>E s G investing, and Uh, it started more so

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>outside of the US, in Europe in particular, but I

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>am increasingly asked about it in the US. And E

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>s G is something that's infused in all of our

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>funds and investments. It's not something that to date we've

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>really carved out as a product, but it's certainly something

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about. So that's kind of interesting because the

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>criticism has been E s G captures a huge amount

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of mind share, but only near as much capital as

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you would imagine. And when we do surveys of who's

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>going to inherit the baby boomers money, it's invariably women

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and younger people, and they're both much more enthusiastic about

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>E s G than the average investor. Is this something

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're really seeing start to change or is that

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>change still out there. So there are different elements to it.

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>One is that people are mindful of E s G,

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but they don't want to sacrifice on returns. So when

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you talk to foundations and endowments for example, very mindful

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>of E s G, but the responses usually that's why

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>we want to generate the greatest returns on the portfolio,

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>so that we can then distribute the money, you know,

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.399
<v Speaker 1>to those causes. And when it comes to individuals, by

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and large, it's the same. They want to support these

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>are topics that are important, but they don't want to

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 1>really detract tremendously from returns. I don't imagine Blackstone will

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>ever create a copycat or me too product Um. We

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>spend quite a lot of time at the front end

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what we'll go into any of our funds.

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think when we do launch something, uh, it

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>will be unique in the market. Interesting. So some people

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are quite worried about valuations, not just in the public market,

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's so much capital slashing around and it's found

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>its way into the private markets. How concerned are you

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>about valuations and and what sort of advice do you

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have for investors about that? So I am a warrior

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>by nature, and I worry when valuations are high. I

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>worry when they're low. And in my fourteen years at Blackstone,

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that I've really sat through a meeting

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>where anyone thought the kind of investing we do is easy.

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>There are always challenges, uh, and either you know, prices

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>are low but no one's selling, or prices are too high.

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the key is not to buy a market

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and to focus on the sectors that you like, the

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>companies where you think you can affect change. And this

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>is a key in private markets versus public So we

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>sign non disclosure agreements, we get inside information if you will,

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>we have six months or whatever the time period is

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to do full due diligence. We have our portfolio operations

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>team all over the company figuring out where we can

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>make improvements. And you know, when in the old days,

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>when those were industrial companies, was more about cost cutting.

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Today it's much more about leaning in on growth, connecting

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio companies to one another, making them more tech enable, etcetera.

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's really the of formula. You know, it's taking

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the company or the asset and applying either capital or

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>talent to it. Rather than relying on on the market.

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>If all you're doing is paying more than anyone else,

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a hard way to make money. To say the least.

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned fourteen years at black Stone. I remember the

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone I p O and I'm the pandemic has completely

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ruined my sense of time, because I never would have

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>guessed that was fourteen years, but that was two thousand

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and five. That's a long long It seems like a

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>long time ago. Um. One of the things I wanted

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask that I didn't get to before was the

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>liquidly or illiquidly premium. When someone puts money in a

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 1>black Stone funds, my assumption is they don't have access

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to that the way they would a regular publicly traded

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>stock for an extended period of time. What's the typical

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>lock up without penalty like for for your funds? And

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm also assume there's a wide range and there is

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>no one number. So for the typical private equity or

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>private real estate fund, uh, those are only accessible to

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>qualified purchasers or institutional investors, and you're locked up for

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the life of the fund very deliberately, which is seven

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>years typically or so. It's usually a ten year fund

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>varies a little bit, but you control the timing going

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in and you control the exit. So you never want

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in a position where you're forced to invest

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>quickly or you're ever forced to sell. So there is

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>no early redemption. The redemption happens as you start selling

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down companies or assets in that portfolio. Makes a lot

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:57.479
<v Speaker 1>of sense. So I want to circle back to your

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned you're a warrior. Everybody I know who worked

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in equity research is a giant warrior. They're like, what

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>did I miss? What's gonna ruin my investment thesis? How

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>has the world of equity research changed from your perspective?

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You got to see it from the public side, from

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the private side, and over a couple of decades of investing,

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about how research has changed. Yeah,

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it really has evolved. So in my earliest days, it was,

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we didn't even have excel um and

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there was, you know, no way to reach clients other

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>than meeting with them or or calling them or companies

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for that matter. Um And but you were really an advisor,

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not just two investors, but also to the companies that

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you covered, and that endured, Uh, most of my tenure.

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It was what I enjoyed the most, getting to know

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the management teams, understanding their strategies, working on you know,

0:43:56.800 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I worked on dozens of I P those UH secondary offerings,

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:06.839
<v Speaker 1>M and A transactions and there was nothing nefarious about it.

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I worked closely with the investment bankers to really help

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the companies figure out their strategy. That all changed, if

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you remember, UH Elliot Spitzer came in looked at research.

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>This was during the tech bubble and found that there

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>were conflicts of interest UH that maybe investors didn't know about,

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe they did, but really hived off equity research from

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 1>every other part of the business. And in many ways,

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it diminished um the value of the equity analysts.

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, by and large, who's folks who had

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 1>studied really probably knew these industries better than many of

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the management teams, if you will, working in them, because

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they had such a good feel for the competitive landscape

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>as well. And at the same time, you had the

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>proliferation of the hedge fund industry, so a lot of

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>research analysts went to the buy side, left the cell side.

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>You've had compression of commissions, etcetera, making cash equities a

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>less profitable business that it once was. And so, uh,

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>while I still know very many talented research analysts, I

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's unfortunate that what they're doing has been so restricted.

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Makes a lot of sense. What about social media has

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that disrupted cell side research? That is a good question.

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that social media has disrupted as much

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:52.439
<v Speaker 1>as information comes generally much more quickly than it ever did,

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and the expectation to have an immediate response. You know,

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>when I go back in time where you really really

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had the time to think through and crunch numbers and

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, form of an opinion. Today it's much harder,

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and like you know, with social media, to to your point,

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone's out there with a view, with an opinion. It

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>probably does make it much more challenging. So let me

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>switch up gears on you a little bit. I want

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about uh black Stone Woman's Initiative, which

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I know you're involved with. Tell us about that. So

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I was involved in the formation of it, and at

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the time that I joined black Stone, only about ten

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of the analysts, applications applicants were female, and about

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of the class was female, and so I was really

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>interested in how we can improve that. Uh, there was

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a perception that somehow, how private Equity Alternatives is in

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a great career for women. Not true, and so um,

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was trying to figure out what what

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we could do. So at the beginning, we really focused

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on educating young women, sophomores, juniors in college, inviting them in,

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>teaching them you know what you need to know, uh,

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>figuring out, you know, why they weren't applying, why we

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>weren't hiring more, and going to those solutions. Today it's

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 1>light years ahead of that. You know, between forty and

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of our classes female now. Yeah, so big

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:44.360
<v Speaker 1>improvement there, and a lot of focus on professional development

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and networking and really trying to find common derailers for

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>women and addressing those. So there's a quote of yours

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that I very much like because it's a philosophy that

0:47:57.280 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>could apply to a lot of different people. But I

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 1>like quote, get comfortable being uncomfortable. Explain what that means.

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It means that many women, especially young women, are comfortable

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>doing the things that they know well. And unless you're

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>willing to stretch, you're just never going to grow in

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>your career. You don't have to know it all on

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 1>day one, it's all learnable. You know, nothing that we're

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>doing in at least in the roles that I've had,

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is rocket science. So if you apply yourself, if you

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>ask questions, if you really want to learn it, you

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>can learn it. But you have to be willing to

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>push yourself a little bit and know that the first

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>time you do anything, whether it's you know, speaking in

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>front of a large group or presenting to senior people

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at the firm, whatever it is, it's not going to

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be as good as the hundredth time you do it.

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:05.319
<v Speaker 1>And that's okay. Is that a gender specific difference? And

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>my flavor of sexism is dudes are just reckless and

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we are. They are not smart enough to think I

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything about this, so I'm just gonna plow

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>ahead anyway. I get the sense that women tend to

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be a little more circumspect and thoughtful, or is that

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you know a stereotype and it's not accurate. So there

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 1>have been studies showing that, for example, um, women will

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>not raise their hands for the promotion unless they think

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they can tick off every single skill set, where as

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>men may have very few of those skills, but they

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 1>raise their hands, say I could do it. So that's

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely a gender difference. Hold my beer, that's a that's

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a dude thing. So this leads me right into tell

0:49:55.920 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>us about truth for our daughters. So my daughter, Lindsay

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 1>at the time was a freshman in college. She was

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a math major, so very few women already, you know,

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:15.279
<v Speaker 1>breaking barriers exactly, and some of her classes, although I

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 1>guess increasingly there are a lot of women majoring in

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>math now. And she had applied for leadership program and

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 1>called me in tears and said, I just got called

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:31.439
<v Speaker 1>for the third round and I'm not qualified. And I said,

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you're a freshman in college. What qualifications do you think

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you need? Um? But it really made me sit back

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and think, here is this daughter of mine who is

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 1>so capable, and she's showing all the insecurities that I,

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of course also had and that I've witnessed so many

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>other women had. So it it really caused me to

0:50:56.719 --> 0:51:00.439
<v Speaker 1>put pen to paper sort of a if I knew then,

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what I know him now? And um, and

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it was she she loved it. So it was it

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was and some of this some of the bullet points,

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty straightforward and and not a big surprise, but

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 1>some were giant surprises that when I when I read

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>through this, be ready for anything. That's good advice for

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody in finance. Be confident. I see the gender specific

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but um reasons for that. But but some of the suggestions, UM,

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.840
<v Speaker 1>speak twice as loudly as you think you need to.

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:39.879
<v Speaker 1>And I have a problem. I don't hear how loud

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I speak, so I speak too loud. Why is that

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>advice necessary for women to tell them you have to

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>speak loudly if you're a room full of people. So again,

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're generalizing, women tend to speak more softly and

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 1>therefore don't come across having as much conviction in their

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 1>ideas even if they do. Uh. And it really harkened

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>back to when I was in a room, uh filled

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a boardroom and I was presenting on something

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I actually knew a lot about, and so and said, oh,

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>can you speak up. I couldn't hear you, know, I

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hear you, And it just set me back, and

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought, this will never happen again. I also think

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>there is sometimes a tendency when someone is speaking softly

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.399
<v Speaker 1>for someone else in the conference room to just come

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:40.400
<v Speaker 1>right over the top, and you know, interrupt and that

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen when you're forceful. So it's one of the

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 1>basic things I tell any mentee I have, any women

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm meeting with, just speak loudly. Uh, make your

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>voice heard. Uh. You don't need to know it all

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:59.879
<v Speaker 1>on day one. Very straightforward. You have no idea where

0:52:59.880 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you career will lead. Very straightforward. Here's another one that

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>leapt out at me that I never would have thought of.

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Draw lines in the sand. Tell us what that means.

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So for me as a parent once I had kids,

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it was figuring out what I wouldn't give up. I

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>think there many women are conflicted. They feel awkward saying

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaving the office because I have to take my

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>child to the doctor, etcetera. And there were certain things

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I just wouldn't give up. I never missed a school

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 1>performance or play. I never missed a parent teacher conference.

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But was I able to go to the gym? Was

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I able to make it home for dinner every night? No,

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So figure out where your lines in the sand are.

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Although I will tell you after a year of work. Um.

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>My daughter was reflecting on those truths and she said,

0:53:58.080 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but as a for sere, I just

0:54:01.320 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have to put my head down work. I don't have

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 1>lines in the sand. So well, it's different when you're

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and single versus married with kids. Obviously the

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>obligations are different. Well, well, I found it to be

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, and um, I'm glad we got to talk

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 1>about a little bit. Let's I only have you for

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a limited amount of time. Let's jump to everybody's favorite questions,

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>starting with so, tell us what you were watching during lockdown?

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 1>What was your Amazon Prime or Netflix favorite shows? I

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know what this says about my emotional state. So

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I've definitely evolved a little more, you know, high brow

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>versus where I started, is what I'll say. Uh. So,

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, I was watching shows like Love Is Blind.

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, uh And my version of that, by

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, was The Gilmore Girls. In the beginning of Lockdown,

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I streamed the whole Gilmore Girls, which

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I should be embarrassed us to admit, but I'm not.

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And now it's evolved to something a little more sophisticated exactly.

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And then I enjoyed shows like ted Lasso and others.

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now I'm watching White Lotus on HBO literally teed

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 1>up for tonight. I hear it's hilarious. Is it as

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:25.280
<v Speaker 1>funny as everybody says it's Is it as funny sardonic? Yes? Okay,

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is what I would say. You probably won't like anyone

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on the show, right, which is usually a bad sign,

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Like people love succession, I hate everybody on that show.

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>When I never got past this second episode, I think

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you'll find I hear similarities, okay, where as something like

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Ship's Creek in the beginning, everybody is totally contemptible, but

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they all become lovable characters over time. So it's funny

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Ship's Creek. So so my two go twos

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>when I need to just relax and laugh. Stressful day.

0:56:01.800 --> 0:56:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Modern Family so good, so good. I could just watch

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>them over not right, and they're they're both. So I'm

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:10.479
<v Speaker 1>going to come back to Ship's Creek in a couple

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of years and rewatch it um because like the Nightcap

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:21.919
<v Speaker 1>is it has been these classic sitcoms like UM, thirty Rock,

0:56:22.239 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and Community. It's like a good way to um. Modern

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Family is terrific. And there's another one that you know.

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>It only lasted four seasons, but it's so good called

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Life and Pieces tells the story of a family, an

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 1>extended family. In each episode is three vignettes, one about

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the parents, one about the kids, one about the grandparents,

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're all into related. If you like modern family,

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>try that. It's like it's just a nice relaxing and

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>all the actors and actresses are great in it. It's

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just it's just a sort of show. Um. And I

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:09.279
<v Speaker 1>was like the last two Ships Creek that my wife

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:12.480
<v Speaker 1>had a drag me kicking and screaming because the first episode,

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:15.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody is just so contemptible. But if you give it

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a little breathing room, they grow out of it. Tell

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>us about your early mentors who helped to shape your career.

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>So I really had several. Unfortunately, I'm sure I'll be

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 1>leaving people out here because I really do feel like it.

0:57:33.080 --> 0:57:39.240
<v Speaker 1>It took a village. But my first mentor was David Cipher.

0:57:39.280 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>He was an insurance analyist. He was the number one

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:46.360
<v Speaker 1>ranked equity research analysts at First Boston. That's where I started. Uh,

0:57:46.360 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 1>he was not my first boss. I was working for

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>someone else and I was there one night at ten

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 1>o'clock at night, David had hosted a dinner for a

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>company I think it was Tokyo Marine and came back

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to the office. I was the only one still there,

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and so he said, I need you on my team. Literally.

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 1>That was our connection, and UM goes to show you

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 1>being in the office has as could have positive results.

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So another female thing here. You know, Historically I would

0:58:18.640 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have said I was lucky. Now I just say I'm fortunate.

0:58:21.600 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no goiness there. So we connected and I followed

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>him to d l J. But he really pushed me.

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>He was the one who, when I didn't feel ready,

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 1>had me go meet with portfolio managers and he used

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to say, like, you know all the numbers. You can

0:58:38.400 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 1>answer all their questions, you know. I So I credit

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>my career really to him and uh Tom Letty, who

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>ran the morning meeting at d l J. He's a

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wonderful person, but he was very tough and very tough

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on me, and I'm ever grateful to him for that.

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:00.760
<v Speaker 1>He would let me come in super early. I would

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>tell him what I was thinking of saying, and he

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would just say, that's not what you want to say,

0:59:04.880 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a in a pretty harsh tone. Um,

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>But it forced me to just get better and better

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:14.120
<v Speaker 1>at it. So those were the two early but you know,

0:59:14.200 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, even my time at Blackstone, I've

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot from just watching Steve and Tony and

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 1>John Byron ween Is on my team and um, you know,

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 1>just the collective experience and different style. So uh, you know,

0:59:34.840 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>from all of them, I would say, just thinking big

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 1>about building your business, and you know, not incrementally. My

0:59:43.280 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 1>team hears me say this at nausea. I did a

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred this year, so next year I'm going to do

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred of ten. No, I want to think about

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:52.440
<v Speaker 1>how big can this be and how do we get

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>there quickly? So that combination of you know, thinking big, impatience,

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>really focusing and just being a flex civil thinker and

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, an equity research you certainly go through different cycles.

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But at Blackstone I've really learned, uh to not say like, well,

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>when a happens, you do be or etcetera. It's really,

1:00:17.160 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>well a happened, But I don't know, maybe we should

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about X, Y and Z that no one

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>else has done. And so it's been expansive for me,

1:00:25.680 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Uh, tell us about some of your favorite

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>books and and what are you reading right now. So

1:00:32.000 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I just finished reading Hamnet, which I don't know if

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you've heard of it, but it's so it's fiction, but

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's based on Shakespeare's son Hamnet. Notice connection to Hamlet,

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>who died when he was eleven, and uh, and around

1:00:52.240 --> 1:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare's wife. The story itself is fictional because there's just

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>very little information on them, but it was beautifully written

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and fatacinating. Um. I often also am drawn to biographies,

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>either autobiographies or or others. So uh, the Einstein biography

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Jobs. I loved Phil Knight's book Shoe Dog. Um.

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>On audio, I listened to Ruth Bader Ginsburg Obama, and

1:01:24.040 --> 1:01:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I just love hearing one about for none of them,

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, was any of this easy? They all had

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>repeated failures, but also Einstein in particular. It was this

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>light bulb went on that here's the guy we all

1:01:38.920 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>call a genius. He was and um, we refer to

1:01:44.240 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>people who excelled in in all different subjects geniuses, but

1:01:47.560 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>he really excelled in one. He was nniacally focused on

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>one area. He didn't do well in chemistry. He needed

1:01:55.240 --> 1:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>language tutors. I just thought it was I never really

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>thought about that in that was that Walter Isaacson's book,

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>because I know he did the Steve Jobs book as well.

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And then I'd say the final category for me is

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>just something that's so beautifully written. So my favorite book

1:02:12.000 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of all time is Crossing to Safety and it's not

1:02:16.080 --> 1:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a big story, it's sort of a quiet story, but

1:02:19.480 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the use of language is just wonderful. There's an autobiography

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I read last summer by David McCullough on the right

1:02:28.040 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Brothers that if if you're an autobiography fan, I have

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>no interest in that particular genre of flying or it's

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>just so well done. And if you like autobio, if

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you like biographies, everything mccullo writes is coming away with

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>great recommendations. Well thank you. You know. That's the beauty

1:02:48.840 --> 1:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of where I sit is I get recommendations from some

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody each week, and you're getting the cherry picked versions

1:02:55.840 --> 1:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of that um our. Last two questions, what sort of

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a vice would you give to a recent college grad

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>who was interested in a career in either private equity

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or investing or finance. So this is the advice that

1:03:11.080 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I've given my own adult children, and and I give

1:03:15.320 --> 1:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to their friends and anyone I speak to um, which

1:03:19.720 --> 1:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is when choosing not a job, think about the skill

1:03:25.600 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>set that you want to acquire. Make sure you're going

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to a place where you could really learn, where you

1:03:32.440 --> 1:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a quality firm and you're gonna learn from

1:03:36.320 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>quality people. But most importantly, just about how you act,

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>how you present. You want to be the person that

1:03:43.640 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone says, I want her on my team. And what

1:03:46.520 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>does that mean. It means you're working hard, You're willing

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to put whatever it takes to get the job done.

1:03:54.280 --> 1:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You're focused on the details, you're reviewing everything you know.

1:03:59.680 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>What can your value be as a young person, and

1:04:04.360 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it's that you know no one's expecting you to have

1:04:07.160 --> 1:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the judgment of the partner. But whatever you're doing, just

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure it's as excellent as it can possibly be.

1:04:14.760 --> 1:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Good good advice. Our final question, tell us what you

1:04:18.080 --> 1:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>know about the world of investing today that you wish

1:04:20.880 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you knew thirty years or so, or go thirty years

1:04:25.360 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>ago or so when you were first getting started. So

1:04:29.720 --> 1:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>when I look back and I think about all of

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the market disruptions during my career, so starting in the

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>summer of eighty six, when I began shortly after that

1:04:41.480 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you had the stock market correction when five points seemed

1:04:45.280 --> 1:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like a day. That's can we call that a crash?

1:04:49.680 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That's more than a correction. That's true. That's true, that's

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a crash. And then you know the SNL crisis, interest

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>rate shock of nine for the tech bubble rise and

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>then deflation, the global financial crisis, disruption from a pandemic.

1:05:07.640 --> 1:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like, wow, floods every couple of years,

1:05:11.560 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>don't So in hindsight, it would have been wonderful to

1:05:16.480 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>know that we get these floods and that you have

1:05:19.560 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to be nimble and flexible, uh in your thinking and

1:05:25.360 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>anticipatory and understand that you have no idea what's coming

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>your way. Uh So I think the other thing is,

1:05:33.720 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>which maybe I did know but proved to be true.

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Finance is in my mind one of the most fascinating

1:05:42.120 --> 1:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>industries because I mean, think about what I just mentioned

1:05:45.720 --> 1:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of the the derivative impacts of that and

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>inputs from that. I mean, you have to be thinking

1:05:55.640 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>about not just an industry, but what is happening on

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory front, geo politically, secular trends. You know, we

1:06:06.680 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the Internet disrupting retail. You know in

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, the late nineties. Now it took a while

1:06:16.560 --> 1:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to to really um disrupt. But for someone who is

1:06:22.840 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>intellectually curious, there is just so much going on. Huh.

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Quite fascinating. UM. Joan, thank you for being so generous

1:06:32.240 --> 1:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>with your time. We have been speaking with Joan Solitar.

1:06:35.880 --> 1:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>She is the global head of Private Wealth Solutions for

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Investing Giant black Stone. If you enjoyed this conversation, well

1:06:45.560 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>check out all of our previous interviews. You can find

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>them at iTunes, Spotify, wherever finer podcasts are sold. We

1:06:54.640 --> 1:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>love your comments, feedback and suggestions right to us at

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>m IB podcast at Blomberg dot net. Give us a

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>review at Apple itunesh You can sign up for my

1:07:05.800 --> 1:07:09.439
<v Speaker 1>daily reading list at rid Halts dot com. Check out

1:07:09.480 --> 1:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>my weekly column on Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion. Follow

1:07:13.560 --> 1:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at rit Halts. I would be remiss

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank the crack staff that helps

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>put these conversations together each week. Paris Wald is my producer,

1:07:25.400 --> 1:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Attica val Bron is my project manager. Tim Harrow is

1:07:29.160 --> 1:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>my audio engineer. Michael Batnick is my head of research.

1:07:33.480 --> 1:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ridholts. You've been listening to Masters in Business

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio