WEBVTT - Surveillance: Earnings Move Stocks, Not Washington, Doll Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast named Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Leye. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg YEA

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>our top story about day for some of the President's men,

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>His former personal lawyer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to a

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>legal campaign finance charges, all but naming Trump as having

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ordered him to do it. Moments later, the president's former

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>campaign chairman, Paul Manifold was convicted on eight counts of

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>tax and bank fraud charges. Joining us from Capitol Hill

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is bloombergs Kevin so really our chief Washington correspondent. Good

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>morning to you, Kevin. On a busy day for Washington

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>d see what has changed for the president. Well, there's

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>an increasing pressure, Jonathan from Democrats to avoid the abuse

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of pardoning power as it's being described. There's a legislation

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>in the Democratic controlled Attorney General's Office in New York

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that would close what they argue is a loophole for

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the president's to pardon someone like Paul Manaport. Democrats up

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill in the House and the Senate, urging

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to avoid the issue by by also joining them

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and avoiding having the President part of them. Books for

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the President's next twenty four hours, he's said to have

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>lunch with the Secretary of Defense and then have an

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>awarding of the Medal of Honor later this afternoon. The President,

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>while speaking last night in West Virginia, UH prior to

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that speech, criticized Paul Manafort. UH criticized UH Paul Manaford

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>UH in saying I'm sorry defendant Paul Manaport, but made

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>no mention of Michael Cohen. So far, we haven't had

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>really a fitial response from the President of the United

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>States apart from that rally and heading to that rally, Kevin,

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what's expected in Washington, d C. What comes next? Well,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>when I seek the Republicans, they they have echoed the

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>President in the sense that they've said that there is

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of collusion. Polls suggests that the base of

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party is still very much behind the President

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of UH agreeing and echoing him when they

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>say that the investigation of the witch hunt. In terms

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of what comes next, really it becomes whenever Bob Mueller

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>wraps up his investigation. And I spoke with several sources yesterday, Jonathan,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>who said to me that this is a win for

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the for the Special Council's investigation because of the court

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>documents that you've got In the intro, which is essentially

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen says he was instructed by the only candidate

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>he was working for at the time, Donald Trump, to

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>provide those touch money payments. Kevin Si really great to

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>cant show me this morning on a busy morning for

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Sirillian everyone in Washington, d C. Joining us now

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>from New York and place to say that. Kim Wallace

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>joins us now. You're as your group managing Die Rector.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>He served in President Obama's administration as Assistant Secretary for

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Legislative Affairs at the Treasury Department. Kim, it's always great

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to get your insights. So let's begin with an extreme question.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Does any of this as it stands incrementally impact the

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>odds of the president staying in the White House. Good morning, Jonathan.

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's premature to take these disparate acts, although

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>they are coming fast and furious, and extrapolate out that far.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I would say this that the president is under pressure.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>That's unique for presidency. Is not only multitasking on an

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>array of transformative policy agendas, he's also now got to

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>worry about a few different legal processes under way that's

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>going to tax this staff. That will tax obviously his

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>legal staff, but it will more importantly make more reticent

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to partisans on Capitol Hill to venture out on any

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>other policy excursion. So it's it's less whether or not,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in my view, whether or not impeachment is around the

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>corner more or whether or not Washington has become a

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>risk to market. Kim, do you just assume that Republicans,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, is in a general statement, will do nothing

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>until the election. We're seventy six days away, and even

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with the historic moment that we saw yesterday afternoon, and folks,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>for those of uliciting worldwide in Radio London, was extraordinary

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to see John Farrell the split screen on on television

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of the two trials going on at the same time,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just extraordinary. But within this, Kim, do the Republicans just

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>keep doing what they're doing, which is maybe living in

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>silence while they support the president? You know, time that

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>had been my working assumption up until yesterday. Seventy six

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>days is a long time, and it depends, in my view,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>GOP behavior going into the election depends on public opinion.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>If the polls that we start getting in you know,

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>five days, add on to the polls we've already seen

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>where the issue of correct option the president is in

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>double digit negatives net negatives. If that grows and worsens,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to make some of these thirty forty competitive races.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And the Republicans and am very nervous and likely they're

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>going to seek some distance from the White House. That

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was Greg Valier's legally thought was this is about public opinion,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>less about all the nuances and the Bellway stuff. Mr.

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Really so, so let me ask you another question, Kim.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Does any of this incrementally damaged Republicans mid term election prospects?

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, Jonathan, they weren't right going into this, and

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly this issue of corruption and the president's legal problems

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>have been long enough. It hasn't effected the basis support

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>for him. What will What will note retrospectively is whether

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>or not it hurt turnout in the base, whether that

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is what they're telling posters about their support for the

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>president doesn't show up on November seven when they actually

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the polls and vote for establishment

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who are different from the president. Can you brought

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>up the market? So I want to talk about them markets.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>We caught up with Bob Dollar new VNSA Management a

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit earlier, and he brought up two extremely imperfect parallels,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Nixon and Clinton, and both of those issues. And the

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>way those episodes unfolded for the financial markets is that

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with Nixon, markets went down and with Clinson markets went up.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And it was nothing really to do with any of

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the individuals or any of the episodes specifically. It was

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>about earnings and it was about growth and earnings and

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>growth weren't good in the seven season, they were good

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties. Isn't that really the story here, Kim?

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>How insulated markets will be is dependent on something else,

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>completely separate from Washington d C. I think that's true

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a large part. The fundamentals always matter most to the markets.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But going back to Bob's nineteen seventy three point, in

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>January of seventy three, the SMP cracked, that didn't regain

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>its nominal value of one or two for seven and

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a half years, and that's because wars, energy embargoes, other

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>supplied to problems and hyperinflation. So the problem with confidence

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the White House being cracked is that the funder

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>mentals have to go well for a long time to

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>restore confidence in the markets. Kim Wellas to your expertise

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with Treasury, where does Secretary Minution fit into this? He's been,

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to suggest, relatively quiet recently. Is he an

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>important player in the next seventies six days? The Secretary

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>might be tested in ways over the next seventy six

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>days that he hasn't been in the previous seven quarters. Tom,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I would it would seem to me that he would

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>want to remain quiet so as not to change his

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>behavior and therefore have markets notice that he's acting differently.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>But he's certainly going to be more circumspect than what

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to say, whether it's about the dollar or

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's about markets. Kim Wells, thank you so much

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with your raiser group this morning. Truly timely as as

0:07:47.960 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we all adjust what we saw to that question on

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington and the events of the last twenty four hours.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Our interview of the day Robert ray is with us,

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>which barely describes his work on any number of cases.

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>The attraction of Robert Ray Uh is the former Uh

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the head of the Office of Independent Council. This after

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Ken of Star and with Ken Starr is a number

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of cases he's been involved with. And all of this, Bob,

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>came out of your work at Washington in Lee Law School,

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>which to me is the most interesting law school in America.

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>You went from Princeton down the Shenandoah Valley until this

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>little little school, which is a jewel of law. What

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is Washington Lee. The history there in that law school

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>there tell you about the moment we witnessed yesterday. Well uniquely,

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington and Lee, of course came largely into existence and

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was furthered as the result of a gift by President Washington.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>It steeped in our history, so it travels all the

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>way back to the Revolution and before, and of course

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it um It is the place what was then Washington

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>College where Robert E. Lee went and became president of

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the college after the Appomattox and the end of the

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Civil War. So last night, near twelve midnight, Lawfare published

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>their long article and then they clear what happened yesterday

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>has never happened in the Washington and Lee Republic. Was

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 1>it that original what happened yesterday? It certainly was, um

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a significant moment. I'm not sure I would quite compare

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it to um that date in nineteen seventy four when

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a slew of the president's men, meaning Presidents Nixon's men

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>were Archibald Cox, you know, subject to to indictment. Um.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But having said that, I mean, obviously you can certainly criticize,

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and fair criticism, and the fact that the president during

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the campaign and thereafter surrounded himself with at least in

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>this instance, two very questionable figures, and it creates legal

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>problems obviously for the president as a result, at least

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in part of the but particularly the Michael Cohen play,

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not, you know, as has been now reported,

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>whether there's more to come with regard to further implicating

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the president in connection with an alleged campaign finance violation.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about Michael Cummin. He's effectively all but

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>named the president as having ordered him to commit a crime. Well,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd be careful about effectively. I mean he he was

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>directed by the candidate UH to make a payment. Whether

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you can turn that into the president knowingly and willfully

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>violated the campaign finance laws is at least in my judgment,

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>altogether another question. And you know, to put it in

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>layman's terms that you know, the jury is still out

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on that question. So the jury is still out Covins law.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>As you say, there could be some escalation risk embedded

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>into this episode because he's gone on MSNBC and said

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that Covin has knowledge of Russian conspiracy. Let's talk about

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>best practice. Then, how would you advise the president to

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>conduct himself over the coming months with this going on? Well,

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I I think I have said previously that I think

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the president's best strategy at this point is to ride

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing out to a conclusion. I think it does

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>raise the specter and the prospect of the significance of

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the midterm elections and whether or not the president would

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>face impeachment in the event that the House of Representatives

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>went to the Democrats, because they would have subpoena power,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's already some indication that leading figures in the

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party seemed to be hell bent and determined to

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>turn this into an impeachment proceeding query whether that really

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is where they want to go and whether or not

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance violations really if there's nothing more, and I

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>guess we still don't know yet because Bob Muller has

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>not concluded his instigation. But you know where this goes, obviously,

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is the sixty four thousand dollar questions. That basic question

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on violations of campaign finance rules before you are the

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States. Is that grants for impeachment? Well,

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously, at the end of the day, a political

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>judgment rather than a legal judgment. And it it is

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever the Congress of the United States decides. I mean,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.359
<v Speaker 1>they get to decide whether or not under the Constitution

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that would constitute high crimes and misdemeanors. If some people

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>would argue yes and some people would argue no, at

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, what is it. It's whatever

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Congress decides it is. But remember also, and this is

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that the lesson of history. If we go

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>back to the beginning, there have only been impeachment proceedings

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>twice against a president, the first Andrew Johnson and the

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>second Bill Clinton, neither of which were successful. What people

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>need to understand and remember is it is a partisan

0:12:54.600 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and political proceeding, but it requires under the constitution because

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a very high bar. The only way a president

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>can be removed and the result of an election overturned

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is if there is a conviction in the Senate, and

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>because it is required under the Constitution, that would be

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a two thirds majority. The only way that's ever going

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen is if the party in power deserts the

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>president and as a result of that, as was the

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>case with Richard niction Um since although he was never

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>impeached Um and removed from office, obviously he resigned before

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that happened. But the reason he resigned is because it

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>was a foregone conclusion that the Republican Party had abandoned him,

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, facts being stubbornd stubborn things, Um, they

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>came to the conclusion that, in fact, he was involved

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in a conspiracy to obstruct justice. You're just joining us

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>vert ray with this prosecutor? Is what is Wikipedia as

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>which barely describes as public service, including writing the actual

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>reports on Lewinsky, Madison, Guarantee, on Mrs Clinton, Bernard Um

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and others over the years. What does the media get

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong in their coverage? You are like Mr Mueller total business,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>total grizzled legal. It's a Now I assume it's a

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>word processor, but you've got a quill in your hand

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're writing it out these actual documents. What's the

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>media get wrong in its coverage? Well, there seems to

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be largely an overreaction to every single thing that comes out.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have to do that. Well, I guess

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean, I guess that's right. But I mean,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a dispassionate prosecutor asked the question just be caused.

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, Michael Cohen says that Donald Trump directed him

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to make a campaign contribution, begs the question about whether

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or not Donald Trump was knowingly in violation of the

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance laws. I mean, one you'd think about some

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>very relevant considerations, not the least of which is, Hello,

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen was Donald Trump's lawyer. Donald Trump has an

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>advice of counsel defense. I mean, you know, I assume

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>his defense is going to be Listen, I asked Michael

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Cohen to take care of this, but I never told

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen to violate the law. In any event, I'm

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not a lawyer. He is. I depend on his legal advice,

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and I depend and relied on the fact that he

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be engaged in a campaign finance violence points out

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is his farm on nuanced and complex, And I think

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>people appreciate just because Michael Cohen has committed a crime

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and it admitted he's committed a crime and said the

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>president was the person that ordered him to do whatever

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he has done, does not mean necessarily the president has

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>committed not the same thing as ordering him to commit

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a federal felony. So look, I don't know what the

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>conversations were. I think I would be surprised if the

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>conversations are what I guess the media seems to speculate automatically. Well,

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>she's not means he has the keys to the kingdom

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and he knows that Donald Grump is a felon that

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Bob Mower's office would already have known that. And if

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they already knew that and had that was surprising to

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>me that they would have a let go of the

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>prosecution by giving it to the Southern District of New

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>York and be um if if they had that information,

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>then why didn't they sign them up to a cooperation agreement?

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Which is not what happened yesterday in court so again,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't need to you know, spread uh,

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a big blanket of cold water over all

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of this. But I guess my point is is that

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of an overreaction to its significance. I'm

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's insignificant. It is significant. When two members

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of the president's inner circle have now been found guilty

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>or by a jury and or pleaded guilty to federal felonies.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not an insignificant development. One final question in your experience,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>how do these discussions change when it's about you're not

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be with your kids or your kids are

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>going to get involved? When families are drawn into this, Well,

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the other missing piece to all of this, in

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>addition to the overreaction. You know, there's a human story

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>here that gets completely lost. Tell us about that. Let

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>me tell let me tell you how it feels to

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be on the receiving end of the full weight and

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>authority of the United States government and the United State

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It's Justice Department zeroed in and targeted on your head

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to have you brought to justice. That is a a

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>harrowing moment. I used to say, I would never wish

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a special counsel or independent Council investigation on my worst

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>enemy because of the frightening power that is exercised in

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>order to hold people to justice. Now, you know, that's

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of this country is that we do hold

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>people accountable. But you know, taking a just a pause

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and a deep breath to reflect on how difficult that

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>must be. The one thing that will be that will

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>be true here that both Michael Cohen and Paul man

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Offort will face now quickly over the next several weeks,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>will be whether or not they've got anything further to give,

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>because if there's something there to give, it will be

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>gotten as the result of this pressure. You gotta leave

0:17:51.640 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it there, Robert Ray, thank you so much. Former Prosecutor John.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I want you to bring in our next esteem guests,

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to say that he and many

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>others need a massive and subtle victory lap for not

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one saying stay in the market, have courage, but in

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this great bull market, just time after time after time,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it's been extraordinary run, staying long and strong. Bubb Doll

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>moving asset management portfolio manager. He joins us. Now, well,

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up. It's a record run for the

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>bull market, depending on how you measure it. It's a

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>record high and yesterday's session and it's still the most

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>unloved bull market in history. Why Bob, Yes, there are

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so many skeptics on things, as you well know, and

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>bull markets love to climb those walls of worry. And

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the list of reasons to worry it is long and

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to be increasing. Oh, you knows the economy running

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>out of eam, Is the bullmarket too old? Is the

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>president not going to be able to govern? And the

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>list goes on and on and on and in the meantime,

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the economy's left I checked really good and earnings are

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>even better, and that's what move stocks. Last year, the

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>most often question, the question I got was with Washington

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>d C such a mess? How can the stock market

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>be so good? And my response, as you answered your

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>own question, Washington d C does not move stocks. Earnings

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>move stocks. Yes, DC does things from a policy standpoint

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that can affect earnings over the long term. But but

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that earning story, the earning story right now

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good, and it's juced by a tax cut,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>juice by a tax cut, and you just wonder how

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>sustainable it is do you take some optimism by how

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>good top line growth is being Bob. Yes, we estimate

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>of the call it earnings growth from the first half

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year, about a third of it has come

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>from extraordinarily top top line growth, which means the US

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>economy is doing well in most pockets and outside the

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>U s well, It's fraid a little bit on the

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>edges is pretty good as well. And so the multinationals

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>have some revenue growth. Revenue growth is awesome. And you

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the tax bill. Thank goodness, all this political noises

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>coming after that tax bill is an effect, and that's

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus that we will enjoy no matter how these

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:25.239
<v Speaker 1>proceedings go. Where's your favorite sector? I mean, if if

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>we're if we're rich, I got to get in the market.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a sector generator. What's the sector I want to

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>be in? Right now? I will answer your question, but

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>let me put a theme on the table, Tom, if

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I might, that I think is even more important owning companies.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>As a US investor, they get most their earnings from

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>inside the US. Therefore, de emphasizing multinational earnings has had

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>major tales tail winds the text bill, relative economic and

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>earnest growth, the trade issue currency. All of them have

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>been supportive of that theme. So question where do you

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>find those names? A lot of healthcare names, insurers, etcetera,

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>tend to be more domestic. The retailers here's target with

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>another wonderful earnings report. The retailers mostly domestic industry. They're

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of places I would partner money. Where are

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you seeing with use of money right now? I mean,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we came out of this and there were

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>some real skeptics about investment and what was this going

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to be? A share buy back and dividend growth? What's

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the actual numbers that you calculate with Nvine every day?

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So so we're looking at h We're looking at earnings

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>growth peaking, but earnings still being strong. I mean a

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people earnings growth peaked. There for the stock

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>market's got to have trouble. No, no, no, no no.

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>If we go from plus twenty five to minus two, yeah,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the stock market have trouble. We're going from plus twenty

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>five to plus eight team plus twenty. What are they

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>doing with the cash. They're taking the cash and reinvest

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in their business. Capital expenditures up fifteen depending what's hereies

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at and yes they're buying backstock, and yes

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>they're raising dividends. Because cash flow is so strong they

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>can do all the above, and M and A buying

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the company down the street. There are lots of great

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>usay cash when this is strong. And if we go

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to William Priest and free cash flow in use of cash,

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>shareholder yield, what's my yield on the market January one?

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at use of cash plus

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>cash dividends, what is it? Four or five in one?

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Four to five is our guests um. But dividends are

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>moving up because of the cash flow. Share buy backs

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>have increased, but as the percentage of the capitalization not

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>as much. Thank goodness, corporate CEOs are more optimistic on

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>their business and more willing to reinvest. So we'll take

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a dividend increase or a share buy back in a

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>company that's net free cash flow positive, but we much

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>prefer reinvest in your business. Show me you're investing, your

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>improve your return on equity, where turn on assets, returning investment,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and your growthery. Bob, you and I talked about this before.

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the yield curve. Two stands is just

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>broken down today two new cycle tights. So the spread

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>between the two you and the tenure and the treasury

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>market around about twenty two basis points. We dropped below

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that very briefly in today's session. How do you communicate

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to clients that they shouldn't worry yet, because historically, when

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve narrows, it is because the economy is

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>doing well, earnings are doing the well, and the fit

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is normalizing. Right, it's usually a period when stocks do

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily well. The yield curve began to narrow, of note

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about a year ago, and if I sold stocks based

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>on that, I've been made a mistake. The yellow light

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go on for me until the yield curve actually inverts.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And yellow doesn't mean I run, It just SEMs I

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of green flags, and I would add

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>one yellow flag in the mix of all the good

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>things I look at. So watch it carefully. It's it's

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>not a positive for the stock market, but not yet.

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>An if you know Bob, you know what I've known

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>each other for years, explained to those younger how original

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this cycle is and how you can stay invested because

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>John Farrell and I are positive. On Friday, there will

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be gloom, essays Galore. Yes, there will be um. I

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.239
<v Speaker 1>guess to keep it simple, Tom, if you told if

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you dropped me on the planet and told me that

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>real GDP in the US was three, the nominal GDP

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US was five, the unemployment rate was below four,

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and wager rate inflation was two points something, I'd say, Wow,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>either you're lying to me or this is an unbelievable

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>city circus. What I gotta stop the show, folks. What

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Mr Doll just said there is so important, John just

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's incredibly important to take all the noise away that

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we all live with. Like A C. Mullon and Juventus.

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You take the noise away, the noise and Bob Bob

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>nails it, Bob Dove. We've also got to say thank

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you to you, Bob, thank you for joining the show today.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Call us when you go negative, portfolio manager, We'll be

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>talking to Bob long before it turns negative. John, We've

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>got to do a surveilling's correction. Phil saves the day

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>with Mark McCormick of TD Securities looking for Capital's maple leafs.

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>In January. Uh, it's the Scotia Arena. Scotia wait a

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>second way, Scotia Bank is you is you pulled me

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>out on air about calling at the stadium the garden.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the garden, garden. But is it the garden or not?

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It will always be the maple leaf it is. It

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Montreal Forum, right, the maple leaf garden. Maple

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>leaf garden. But it's sponsored now by Scotia. Bas is

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the most complex correction it is. This is what that's

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars are involved. It's not even a correction.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't they do this in Chicago. They don't. They don't.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's it's the house of Stanma. Someone

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.719
<v Speaker 1>email you annoyed? Phil was annoyed? Yeah, Phil, something an

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>email also annoyed? Is Diane Swank Chicago. No, no, come on,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Diane Swank knows how sad I am. And we covered

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it a few weeks ago on the passing Diane of

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the giant of a Chicago black Hawk, Stan Makeita. He

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>meant a lot to the city of Chicago, didn't he?

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>He absolutely did. In fact, you know, I'm not a

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>huge hockey fanel though I come from Detroit originally, as

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they can imagine the hockey there as well. But one

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of my colleagues a very long time ago, and all

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>my Mac equipment played a hockey puck and I called

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>him up and I said, you know it's still there

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as my screen saver is the hockey stick with the

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>hockey puck. And he laughed and he said, that's just

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because you just don't know how to remove it. Because

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Chicago. Particularly Stanmakeita with his contribute to the

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>deaf community across Illinois in America, Diane Swark, we're looking

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at an economy that is buoyant. John and Ivor to

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>interview after interview today, saying it is about the economy.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Where are we migrating to a three percent run rate

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 1>or will it be lower? Well, we'll see I think

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>close to three percent in the second half the year.

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll move down a bit as we move into one

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the big hurdles out there is some of the

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>data that's coming out today and to see what's going

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on with housing. Housing has been a disappointment. We don't

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>want it to be the coal the canary in the

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>coal mine. It has been a laggered We've seen a

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of foreign investment pull out of some of the

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>major cities, which may be an opportunity for millennials trying

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy and unable to get to some of the

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>price points that we've been seeing out there. But it

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is something that's been a rocky road is the housing market.

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>That said, we still have momentum going into The other

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>question is what's going to happen on the trade front.

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen some cooling of heads on the escalation of

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>trade traiffs. We hope that continues. That's very, very important

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>because uncertainty regarding terrorists has already taken a toll on

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>some plants and retailers, warehouses, and transportation industry plans in

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of their twenty nineteen spend budgets on what they

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>want to invest in the U. S. Economy. And at

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment, as you point out that the fundamentals of

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Economy are really rather strong, and they're

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>set to say strong at least through the end of

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, the politics is becoming much more complex. And

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering how you think about the politics right now.

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>What is the channel that the politics can feed through

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and infect the strength of this U. S. Economy? Do

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you think there is one? Certainly there is. I mean,

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>politics is policy, the politics of uncertainty. That's one of

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that we're grappling with right now. I think

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy um is very robust. We're getting an extra

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>boost from fiscal steamers. We may have to pay for

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that later on, in fact, they think we will. But

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I never begrudge us a great economy or a better economy,

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that we have to embrace. What I

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>worry about is the uncertainty surrounding what comes next, un

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>certainty about where policy will go, who will make the

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions about policy, how those decisions will be executed. All

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of those things do play into long term plans by companies.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And we're also short term oriented in terms of what

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>happens quarter to quarter. But over the longer term, we

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>have a world in which we've seen many populist leaders rise.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>People look at Venezuela today, a true mass with a

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>populist leader, and those leaders tend to think the invisible

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>hand in the market belongs to them, and they choose

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers. And the more that we see leaders,

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>whether it be in the developed or the developing world,

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>pick winners and losers in an economy, it undermines efficiency

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and undermines those bets we have to make going forward, right, Diane,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to get to our next section is Jackson All will

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.479
<v Speaker 1>have value this year. Jackson All always has value. I

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>love Jackson Hall. I don't have to regoing there this year, um,

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's an amazing place. It's one of

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the few places where you see academics, you see policymakers

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and the press altogether, and the opinions that go around

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and the thought that comes out of that kind of

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>unique sort of mingling of thought is really important, just

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on the trails and things like that. This year, I

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>think the most important thing is actually to make less

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 1>news than more news. J Powell, as we know, is

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of feeling little pressure right now, and now we

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have to get him. He's gonna he's going to justify

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a rate high in September and later for one in December.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>This is classic. We're gonna come back with Diane Swank

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of Grant Thornton John. I love it. Now. It's live

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>or dead checks at all. Are you upset you're not

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>going this year? I'm always upset. Is exactly as Dr

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Swank said. The idea, the idea that you just calm

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>down and mingle is, I've had some treasured moments, Michael.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going to catch out with mine. I believe we will. Dan,

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Dan swank with us today with

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Grant Thornton and fiery discussion there on too many themes

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. What's some wonderful folks about what Mr

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Rubinstein is doing with peer to peer. It's not just

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>easy lay up conversations right now anything. For example with

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook of Apple, well, you know what, it's one

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>big victory lap and that is not the case of

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>your guests this week. I was amazed, David looking at

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>United Airlines stock the terrific performance over the last decade.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And yet for Mr Muni has Oscar mullions. This has

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>been a fractious era, hasn't it. It's been difficult for

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>him for a couple of reasons. When he first took

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>over the job, within a month he had a heart attack.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>He then had a heart transplant at the age of

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty two. So he's a vegan, a marathon runner, and

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden he has a heart attack, and

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>not only a heart attack, a heart transplant. A week

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>after the transplant he's back at work and uh, so

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>he had to overcome that, but he also had the

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>challenges of of of people being dragged off. Someone being

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>dragged off the airline. You'll probably remember that, and that

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was a very unfortunate incident that they now apologized for

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and corrected your procedures. And also they had some animals

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>die on on board and they corrected procedures for that.

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So um, he's but the stock has done well, and

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as you know, all airlines have done reasonable, but United's

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>done particularly now. And I think Oscar is a really,

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>really good manager. He came from a complicated environment. He

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of eight children, grew up in southern California,

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>was a long haired hippie um surfer by his own description,

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>got into Harvard but didn't think he would fit in

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there in state at USC and the Pepperdine Law School eventually,

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and then worked his way up at CSX and other places.

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But then when an emergency of arose at United Airlines,

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>say came in as a board member to be the CEO,

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and he had his health challenges. David, I can't wait

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear this interview. I'm particularly interested, uh in what

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Mr Mineo's view on support animals is sort of this

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>trend where everybody and their mom is bringing a peacock

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on board to sit next to them and provide them comfort.

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you say about that? Yes, he describes what

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he describes how um many people are used to the

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>idea of bring a support animal on who might be

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a dog, and some have brought on other animals, and

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>one person brought on a peacock, which is hard to

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>see how that supports you. But the one that he

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>describes is probably the stroller brook. The camel's back is

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>an emotional support animal had to have its own emotional

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>support animal on the plane. So the person brought on

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it an emotional support animal, and that animal had its

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>own emotional support animal. At that point they realized they

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>had a change of rule. This is amazing, you know,

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And just so everybody knows, I've never done this stunt.

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>That Bill loves to travel. But the problem is Bloomberg

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>has me back Lisa in deep economy on United Airlines

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and that Bill will only go up with Rubinstein in

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>first class. Well, I love that. I love the idea

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>of that. I mean, I guess, David, I haven't you know,

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I've never actually seen an emotional support animal need its

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>own emotional support animal. But I guess it's in a

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>growing problem in our country. Yeah, well, I mean I've

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>heard of actually animals being put on prozac. Actually, Um,

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I knew of a couple who's dog was somewhat depressed

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and they put the dog on prozac. So it's a

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>logical stuff to have Sie here to something. You're Maine,

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, David, I'm really curious to know, I mean,

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>going forward, what the big challenges are for him? And uh,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 1>did he talk at all about what he's doing going

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>forward or has he done? Is he just enjoying the

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sweet life? Well, the challenges that all airlines have is

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that they they really depend on the price of oil

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>being a big factor. And airlines have made a lot

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of money in recent years because of oil sent them

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>low and therefore gas prices and low. As oil prices

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>come up, it's going to be more challenging. It's interesting

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to think about this, all the things that airlines do

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to get you to go on their planes. Um, you know,

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Miles the bologist that you give you a mologe, clubs

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of nice lounges, they might give you better food. In

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the end. The only thing that really matters, he says,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>is price and availability of time or which. All the

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>other things are nice, but in the end, price is

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing, and then you your availability. So

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>price is going to be a factor for all these

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>airlines because the soil prices go up, they don't have

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the ability to really cost that much. It's a bit

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of a challenge, David. I've got to ask this question

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of historic import and I say this folks with exceptional

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>interests in the fact that Mr Rubinstein one in two

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>years beyond Watergate, served as Chief council for the United

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>States Senate Judiciary Committees Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments. David, that

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>means you and I have a collective memory of other

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>challenges for the nations. Simply, Attorney Rubinstein, your thoughts on

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>what this nation observed yesterday afternoon. Well, it was a

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>surprise to many people that both of these events happen

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Um as we learned from Watergate

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>other complicated things in our country's history. It's hard to

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>make a judgment on day one if that's what you

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen on day one doesn't actually

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>happen on you know, through thirty days out or sixty

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>days out, so I wouldn't pre judge what's going to happen,

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's clearly uh an episode of a teaching moment

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>for younger people who haven't lived through these kind of things.

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>And I just wouldn't rush the judgment about what's going

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen, but it's clearly something that will have an

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.439
<v Speaker 1>impact on the way our government operates. I just don't

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>know what the outcome will be, and I hope it

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>will be the best for everybody. Well, David, can you

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>connect the dots from Washington, d C? To Wall Street?

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Given your experience in Carlisle and and as as a

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>long time investor, you know, how when does it sort

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to filter down to the economics of this country? Well,

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>why does this become more than just Washington d C. Noise?

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>As long as the stock market isn't pretty good shape,

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>As long as the economy is growing at the pace

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it is, I don't think you're going to see big

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>political problems in Washington, d C. Um if the stock

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>market would go down, the economy goes into a slower

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 1>growth or even low growth no growth mode, then you'll

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>see the politicians in Washington, I think doing different things

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but right now, the economy is pretty good and we're

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>growing in a bigger clip than people expected. So I

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just don't think you see it right now. But you know,

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think things will change if if the economy falls before

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the let's say, the November elections, they don't have some

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>impact and elections, but the economy is as good as

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it is now, I'm not sure they'll have the impact

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the events of Yes, you have the impact that that

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a weak economy would have. David, then bring us forward

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to what that generation would be doing in Washington now,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think of the Great ab of Connecticut. I mean,

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>they were. It was a different Capitol Hill during Watergate

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and after Watergate, wasn't it. Yes? And then when I

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>worked in Capitol Hill in the late mid seventies, Democrats

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans did talk to each other, and Democrats and

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans did work to get legislation together. Um, there have

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>been some signs of progress in that regard, though lately,

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 1>as you probably know, the appropriations process seems to be working.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had a full set of appropriations bills passed

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in the regular order for about fifteen years or so.

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Now it looks as if Congress might actually pass all

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the appropriation bills on time. That would be good. I

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>started a program a few years ago, very modest and

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>impact probably on what I'm talking about. Democrats and Republicans together.

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I host a dinner on Capitol Hill once a month

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and bringing in a great American story and like Darris

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Karrent's Goodwinner, David McCullough interviewed them in front of members

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, and members of Congress used that as a

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 1>way to socialize people from the opposite party. And they

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>tell me that today they are they never get a

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>chance to talk to you from the opposite party because

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this situation is not very good for that now. And

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this has no press there and no media, there's no fundraising.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of different things are being done in Washington,

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing the parties together. Hopefully we'll be able

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a more bipartisan approach in future years. David Rubinstein,

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today from his

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:31.320
<v Speaker 1>travels in Switzerland. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.