WEBVTT - OpenAI Drops Exclusivity Deal with Microsoft

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and Va Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft and open Ai have agreed to drop exclusivity rights

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 3>on AI models, opening the doors for rivals to make

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>new deals. Plus China blocks metas two billion dollar deal

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 3>for AI startup Manners and a surprise move that unwinds

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>a controversial deal. And Elon Musk and Sam Altman head

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>to court with the Tesla CEO alleging that the open

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Ai founder abandoned its founding mission. Let's get to our

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 3>top story of the day, and this is an interesting one.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft shares are now basically flat, but when youws hit

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 3>that they had ended their exclusivity packs with open Ai

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>to stop was down four percent in pre market. Amazon

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 3>shares shot off on the logic it would benefit all

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 3>of that has been undone. It is a complicated story.

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergs Brody Ford joins us on set in San Francisco.

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>The bits that are new are there are changes in

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the structure of the agreement between Microsoft and open Ai.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's start there.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>What do we need to know what can open Ai

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 3>now do that it couldn't do twenty four hours ago.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 4>So the big headline of what has changed is that

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 4>the OAI models for a long time were exclusive on

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft Azure, and that was really kind of the last

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 4>bit of exclusivity in this storied partnership that helped us

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 4>share in the AI era that now is kind of

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 4>going away. And so this is meaningful for open ai

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>because they're in a world where compute is constrained. They

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>need as much as they can get, and they want

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 4>to be able to distribute their products onto all the

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 4>major platforms.

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft still gets access to the models through twenty thirty two,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>it's just open Ai can sell them and make them

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 3>available in other places. So you and I were talking

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>before the show, who benefits or Amazon in the first

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>instance where it shares jump in pre market. Now I

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>think they're lower again. But that's the idea. This is

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 3>hot on the heels of a deal between open Ai

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and AWS, which I think was in January, maybe February.

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in recent months, you know, OAI and AWS have

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 4>been working together to distribute on that platform, which is

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 4>still the leading cloud infrastructure platform. Microsoft reportedly was not

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 4>super happy about that.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 5>We have to.

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 4>Imagine the changes today are downstream of those discussions, or

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 4>at least discussions like that. And what Microsoft gets in

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 4>a return here is that they're no longer paying a

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 4>revenue share.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Effectively they're saying, look, you can go and hang out

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 4>with other people, but I'm not going to pay you

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 4>to do it.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 3>So this is really interesting and again complicated. Basically, Microsoft

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>was paying open ai a revenue share from revenues where

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>it used open ais technology in some form, right. But

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>the bit that's hard to understand is open ai is

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 3>still a customer of Microsoft. They basically pay them for

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 3>various reasons. Open ai pays Microsoft, and at the same time,

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft is the biggest investor in open ai.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Explain me it's.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, because it all stems from that original partnership with

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft and OI were for a long time folks saw

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 4>as OI was almost a part of Microsoft. Right, So

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft gets access to these OI models everybody else has

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 4>to pay for, but they just get to access them

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 4>for free at least for the next couple of years.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloemos Brodie Ford again two red headlines from the report.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Markets have behaved very strange, and we'll get more on

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>that later in the program. That's turned to matter. China

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>has blocked the social media giant's two billion dollar acquisition

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of AI startup Mannus. The country's National Development and Reform

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Commission ordered the cancelation of the deal, stating it was

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>prohibiting the foreign investment in accordance with laws and regulations.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Without further elaborating here with more, Bloombergs Executive editor for

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Asia Tech Peter Elstrom, again another complicated story. Let's start

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 3>with the what we need to know. This is a

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>body in China unwinding at what we thought was a

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>done deal.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, this was a surprise, as you alluded to earlier.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 6>The NDRC jumped in today. It was only a one

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 6>sentence announcement that they made. They didn't name Meta. They

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 6>just said that this foreign deal with Manus had to

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 6>be undone.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 2>So what the.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 6>DRC is doing here is they're trying to reverse a

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 6>deal that was announced in December. The reason is that

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 6>Manus's founders originally started the company when they were in

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 6>mainland China. They decided to move to Singapore in the

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 6>middle of last year. They declared themselves a Singapore company.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 6>They did set up shop there legally, and so when

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 6>they cut the deal with Meta, Meta and Manus agreed

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 6>to the deal and they did not get explicit regulatory

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 6>approval from Beijing. But there were people inside of China

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 6>who were saying that this was essentially losing critical AI

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:07.679
<v Speaker 6>technology to our biggest geopolitical rival in the United States,

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 6>in Meta in particular, So they wanted some sort of

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 6>pressure put to this, and we wrote a story last

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 6>week about how regulars now are pressing other AI companies

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 6>not to take money from US investors in particular. Now

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 6>it's not clear whether China is going to be able

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 6>to force Meta to undo this deal. These two companies

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 6>have been operating together quite closely already. Metayee Manus employees

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 6>have gone into the Meta offices. The executives are cooperating.

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 6>All the investors in Manus have already gotten paid, They

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 6>have their checks at this point, so it's not clear

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 6>how they can underwin this.

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 3>There's a technicality that Manis would say it was headquartered

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 3>in Singapore, but it shows that China has reach if

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 3>there's an origin within country. The political dimension is that

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>President Trump in just a few weeks time will visit

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Jijing Pay and speak was Jijing Pay relationship as a

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 3>negotiation has had chips semikindizers at the heart of it.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>What about software? What about AI and what we expect

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 3>to be a negotiation there.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, as you allude to, the technology transfer between the

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 6>two countries has been a very significant deal. China would

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 6>like more access to Nvidia chips in particular that are

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 6>used to train some of these more advanced models. At

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 6>the same time, Beijing has decided that they do need

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 6>to develop their own semiconductor industry. It's not clear how

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 6>big of a strategic priority this deal is going to

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 6>be for the Trump administration. We've reached out to them

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 6>for comment on this. They haven't weighed in so far.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 6>It's not clear that that's that big of a deal.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 6>Meta of course, is kind of playing catch up against

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Alphabit and Microsoft, as you were alluding to earlier Open Ai,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 6>so it's not one of the leading players in AI

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 6>right now. But this deal was designed to get them

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 6>back into the race. So we'll see whether Washington picks

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 6>up the ball here and decides to make this a

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 6>priority in those negotiations. Would be a bit of a surprise.

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 3>Metas said in its own statement that they did the

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 3>deal in compliance for applicable laws and that they expect

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 3>a resolution.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>But didn't say any more than that.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom, who leads our coverage of Asia tech,

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much saying with AI models and another

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>story out of China, China's deep Seek is aggressively rolling

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 3>out low cost plans for its newly released flagship model,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 3>intensifying competition in the country's AI sector. The company's offering

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 3>developers a seventy five percent discount on its deep Seat

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 3>V four pro model and as cut fees for input

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 3>cachet hits to one tenth of previous pricing. The moves

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>expected to heighten competitive pressures across the industry and could

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 3>reignize a price driven race to the bottom. Here is

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>another story that broke this morning. Shares of Qualcomm are

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>now down one percent. They had jumped fourteen percent in

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>the pre market. The company initially surged eight percent of

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the open after a closely watched industry analyst suggested the

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>chip maker was working with Open.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>AI on a smartphone.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Here with the details, Bloomberg's equities reporter Rhyan VLASLCA this

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>was about an analyst who posted a report on x

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>and the market reacted, what are the details?

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, good morning, thanks for having me.

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 7>So this is a very closely followed and highly respected analyst,

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 7>and it really excited investors because Qualcomm right now is

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 7>going through pretty uncertain times. It has been pretty strongly

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 7>pressured this year the shares in large part because of

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 7>the rise in memory prices, prices from memory related chips,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 7>which is having a negative impact on consumer electronics, especially

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 7>its handset chips. So it's facing that kind of weaker backdrop.

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 7>And at the same time, this has been a longer

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 7>term story, but Apple is developing more of its own

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 7>modem chips in house, developing more of its own internal hardware.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 7>That has been a major problem for Qualcomm, which used

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 7>to count Apple as a major, major customer. So the

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 7>prospect that they would get a new big customer in

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 7>the form of open AI, a new market, a new

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 7>smartphone market, is obviously very exciting for investors. But I

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 7>guess it's maybe a little bit too far out there.

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 7>It's too hard to price what this would really mean

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 7>as far as revenue or anything else like that goes.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 7>So we did see the stop the stock pulled back

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 7>after a pretty pronounced initial game.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 3>We're sharing that right now, qual comes down eight tens

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 3>of a percent. The analyst we're talking about is Ming

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 3>chi Quo of TF International Securities, And you know, the

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 3>basics of it are. We know open Ai is planning

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 3>some kind of device. We don't know much more than that.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 3>We know from January they were trying to establish us

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 3>supply chain. Qualcom is the biggest maker of smartphone processes.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 3>What else is there to discuss, Ryan, I mean, that's

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the extent of our knowledge at this point.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly.

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 7>And the report did say that mass production will begin

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty eight, so again two years out. How

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 7>do you begin to price something like that or factor

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 7>it into a share price very hard to do, especially

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 7>with so few details out there. We did reach out

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 7>to all the companies involved, so far we haven't heard back,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 7>so a lot of the stuff remains sort of speculative.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 7>But like I said, right now, people are very focused

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 7>on the memory situation and how Qualcom is going to

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 7>navigate that. It does report as results I believe wednesday afternoon,

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 7>so that's going to be a very closely watched report

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 7>this week. You know, less in focus and some of

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 7>the other megacaps, but certainly a notable one to come out,

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 7>and I think maybe people are hoping that we'll get

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 7>a little bit more clarity on the situation.

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Then Lumo's rhym Vesavaca, thank you very much. Now coming out,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 3>we're going to speak with Tim Alcuriy, UBS analysts and

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 3>global cohead of AI. You just had the trio top stories. Well,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 3>this is a guy who can react to all three

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>of them.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, three big technology stories driving markets. The first, Microsoft

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 3>is down seven tens for percent. It has ended and

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 3>broken its exclusivity packs with open Ai, Meta has had

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 3>its deal with manas Ai and agentic ai platform blocked

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 3>by regulators in China. That stock is up six tents

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>one percent. And then the one that I don't think

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 3>any of us really saw coming. Qualcom is now down

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 3>about a percentage point eight tens of percent in the

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 3>pre market. It was up fourteen percent in the open

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 3>It was up eight percent all on an analyst report

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that it is working with open ai as the silicon

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 3>provider on a future device, and that is all we know.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Tim Hercury Ubs semi and Semi. Caab Anlyst, also UBS's

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 3>global co head of AI is with us and I'm

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>extremely grateful to have you on a daylight today, Tim.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 3>The basics of what we know is that there are

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>talks right between open Ai Qualcom Media Tech was also

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 3>named Qualcom is the biggest maker of smartphone processors. And

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the stock went sick and then quickly fell away. Your

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 3>interpretation of the headlines, Yeah, look.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 8>I mean we haven't commented on this deal in particular,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 8>but you know what I would say is that, you know,

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 8>Quacom has had a server, you know, effort now for

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 8>a while, and it makes sense that they're going to

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 8>be a player in an agetic world and and and

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 8>you know certainly, you know, certainly they have a big effort,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 8>and and you know, the thing I would say about

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 8>open Ai would be open ai tends to do a

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 8>lot of deals with a lot of different companies, and

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 8>so I typically put a little bit of a discount

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 8>factor on, you know, any deal they could signed with

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 8>open Ai, because they're doing deals with you know, virtually everybody.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Tim.

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 3>When I think about my use of an AI tool,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I spend a lot of time at my desk Obviously

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I access that any given tool through a browser on desktop,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 3>but most of the time it's on this thing, right,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>the smartphone is the form factor by which I engage

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 3>with AI in my daily life. In your research, is

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>that the direction of travel that you see?

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean we do. We think that you know,

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 8>engagement with AI is going to be across of multitude

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 8>of different platforms and a multitude of different devices, including

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, smartphones obviously, so you know, Qualcom.

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 9>Is going to have a play here.

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 8>Quacomm is has a you know, a very very strong

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 8>edge franchise, and they will.

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 9>Be a player.

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 8>I think the issue with Qualcom, of course, is that

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 8>seventy percent of the operating profit today comes from phones,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 8>and and you had mentioned in the you Know show

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 8>previously the the you know situation with Apple, and we've

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 8>talked about that where once Apple doesn't need their motive anymore,

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 8>I don't think Apple is going to pay them a

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 8>license either, and so there's there's more angles to this

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 8>Apple story. So I think you're going to have to

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 8>get through this period before we can then look ahead

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 8>to Qualcomm being a player in a gentic world.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I just want to update our audience on Bloomberg Tech

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 3>that Intel went to the market for the investment investment

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 3>grade bond market this morning. They want some help financing

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 3>what they're building out in Ireland. But it was an

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 3>astonishing news week for Intel last week as well. Where

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 3>do you see Intel in its evolution in its turnaround?

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Under Litboutan.

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, we've been talking for some time now

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 8>about being more optimistic about their foundry business and about

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 8>how they're turning around manufacturing. And I think that there's

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 8>a lot of different customers that are potentially very interested

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 8>in doing a deal with Intel on the foundry side,

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 8>and I think you're going to hear more about that

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 8>this fall. You know, we've talked about many, many different customers.

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 8>So I think they are turning things around from a

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 8>manufacturing point of view. They have a lot of you know,

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 8>very good packaging IP to offer to these customers. I

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 8>think the issue is their product roadmap. That that's kind

0:14:59.920 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 8>of where I've been really stuck for now. I think

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 8>because of the gentic the server CPU market's growing so

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 8>much that that's what people are getting excited about from

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 8>a stock point of view. So I would just you know,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 8>my caution really is on the product side, I think

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 8>that they're turning things around. I think in foundry, the

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, turnaround will come a little faster than it

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 8>comes on the product business.

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Tim we ended Friday show with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 3>or socks up for an eighteenth straight day eighteen sessions,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>its longest winning streak on record. We're giving some of

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that back this morning. A nineteenth day would have been interesting,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure, but Intel was a big part of that story.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>What else was driving investor sentiment around semiconductors that put

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 3>us on that historic streak. Yeah.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:56.119
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think there's been a resurgence in the realization

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 8>that the analog sector, for one, is not I was

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 8>pretty bullish on that sector into earnings, uh you know

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 8>t I came out and gave you know, pretty good guidance.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 8>I think that customers are seeing the you know, capacity

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 8>constraints get closer and closer to them, you know, customers

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 8>in the industrial world, and so I think that customers

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 8>pretty much across the board are beginning to think that

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 8>they are going to have to start to build some

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 8>inventories to protect against all of this. And that was

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 8>one of the things that fueled this you know, rally

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 8>last week was when you know, t I came out

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 8>and basically guided you know, gave pretty good guidance and

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 8>pretty good commentary, and I think you're going to hear

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 8>more of that, So that was a big driver. I

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 8>think also, you know, I've been builtished on semiicap equipment.

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 8>I think you know you're going to hear more of

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 8>that this week from you KLA and from some others, uh,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, upping guidance there. There's just just so much

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 8>capacity that has to get built out over the next

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 8>three years. So you know, I think it's a myriad

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 8>of things driving the sector right now.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 3>We we didn't even have time to talk about terrified

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 3>and whether you're and the team are modeling that in

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>as well, but we will now next time. Tim i

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Caurier of UBS, really great to have you on the program.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Now.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, it's a huge week for tech earnings and

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 3>two of the biggest names are slashing jobs. AI spending

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 3>is surging, headcount is shrinking. What's really going on we'll

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 3>discuss that next. This is Bloomberg Tech and Wednesday, two

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 3>of the biggest names in tech step up to report earnings.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Meta and Microsoft, and they do it under a cloud

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 3>of contradiction. Just days ago, both companies signal cuts that

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>could touch as many as twenty three thousand rolls, combined

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>meta planning to slash about ten percent of its workforce.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft offering buyouts on a scale it's never attempted before.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, both are.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Spending at record levels, pouring billions into AI data centers

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 3>and chasing the next wave of growth. Here discussed attention

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Franklin ladders see the platform just sees massive flow

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 3>of data right It's an HR platform and analytics platform

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>that sees the world through numbers. And that's why I

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 3>love having you on the program. I just outlined the

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 3>story two of the biggest companies in this country, in

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the world cutting levels that we've not seen, but spending

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot. Is that the trade off that companies are

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 3>managing right now.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 10>We're seeing this across the board. It's a trend in

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 10>tech ed and it is really important right now that

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 10>we look at people and their performance and not just

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 10>what they're doing with tokens or what they're doing with AI.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 10>It's very interesting right now how you see leaders that

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 10>are investing in severance and not necessarily the skills. It's

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 10>a transformation in tech and we need to have leaders

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 10>with the courage to take people from here to there.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, job cuts and roles being eliminated is not pleasant, right,

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, And if anyone from Meta or Microsoft is watching,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, reach out tell us what your experience has been.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 3>You said on performance is so interesting. So what the

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 3>managers are measuring this in revenue per employee or output

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 3>per employee to make that decision.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 10>You see a lot you see revenue per employee. You

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 10>also see token maxing as a trend.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Right they stay in age?

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, yes, right, but ask yourselves like, would you look

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 10>at the person at your company that sends the most

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 10>email as the most productive. It's a new thing that

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 10>we can use to measure. It's not necessarily the correlation

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 10>to performance. And what we need to do is help

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 10>people get from where we are today to where we're

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 10>going to with AI.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 3>You know a lot of people would look at the

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 3>overall size of a Microsoft or a Meta and say,

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, well, ten thousand roles or eight thousand roles

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>is or isn't a lot to anyone's point of view,

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>from the payroll perspective. Does cutting that level really free

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 3>up capital? Does it take the pressure off the finance teams?

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 10>It doesn't really relieve the pressure. And it also deeply

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 10>impacts culture. Whether it's one person or a thousand people

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 10>or ten thousand, it is a human and people care

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 10>about what happens to other humans.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>So there's a real.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 10>Cost on the spreadsheet. There's also a real cultural cost

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 10>to what it means to lay off people.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 3>I always try and look deeper, what's the underlying story.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I remember when you and I were talking kind of

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>more immediately after the pandemic, the idea was to undo

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 3>pandemic era exuberance and hiring. Now it's you know, it's

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 3>about the AI era, right and freeing up for capex.

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 3>But what those two things have in common is when

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 3>you see waves of layoffs to that level that really

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 3>experienced people in there, sometimes they go and found companies

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of their own.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 10>No, it's what we're seeing right now is a big

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 10>transformation in tech, and it's not just for the companies.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 10>It's also for the people with the careers. They've spent years,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 10>decades even working on refining their craft and what it

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 10>means to be told to change overnight. It's like me

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 10>telling you be in Europe in an hour unless you

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 10>know how to teleport, not possible, but you can get

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 10>there in a day. And so everybody's looking right now,

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 10>how do I transform? How do I evolve with AI?

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 10>And it's something that's the responsibility of leaders and also

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 10>people to take it into theirselves to learn as well.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 3>I also want to make the distinction Meta is doing cuts,

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft is doing what I used to call in the

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 3>UK voluntary redundancies, but buyouts here in America.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Is there is there.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Something to learn from that distinction or it's just a

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 3>different means to the same end.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 10>It's still an investment in severance and not in the

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 10>skills in your people. And that's the big difference. And

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 10>so the more that we can invest in how we

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 10>train people, how we get them from point A to

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 10>point B, the better that we will all be, because

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 10>it's a short term gain on the spreadsheet, but a

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 10>long term loss in the knowledge that you have in

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 10>the workforce.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Franklin, the lattis, it's great to have you back

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Tech and we are just at the start

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>of what is a big week in earnings. Now coming

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>up Elon Musk and Sam Oltman, and we'll face off

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>in an Oakland court this week in a battle that

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 3>could determine the future of open ai.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is going to be a big one and we're

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 2>going to look at it right now.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>This is a market that's being driven by newsflow. It's

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of a situation where there have been so many

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 3>headlines through the morning, everyone needed a moment to make

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 3>sense of it. I would linger for a second on

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index or socks. We just talked about

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 3>it with Tim akuriy from UBS on Friday. We ended

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the show by saying that that index was up for

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>an eighteenth straight day, a record. We're giving some of

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 3>that back. We're off by two percent. Also, what we

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 3>used to say was our risk asset of choice Bitcoin,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 3>It's seventy six six hundred US dollars for token. Also,

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess we're saying this is a risk off environment.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 3>That's what the world looks like. We're only halfway through

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the program. It is halftime and this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Our top story open ai

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 3>has broken free from its exclusivity packs with Microsoft. Microsoft's

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 3>down four tenths of a percent when this story broke,

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 3>two red headlines on the terminal. Microsoft fell four percent

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 3>and then it came back. Everyone's assessing what this means.

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 3>But basically open ai is free to distribute and sell

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>its models with other cloud providers, and that is the

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 3>reaction from Bloomberg Intelligence. A lot of focus on Amazon

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 3>and AWS. Our colleague Anna Ragrana Bi he kind of

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 3>leads the coverage for Hyperscalers, is saying that this amended

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 3>partnership is going to be a net positive enter prize

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 3>AI adoption, but more broadly for AWS, something he's been

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 3>writing about all year. And of course open ai did

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 3>that deal. Amazon jumps in the pre market. It's now

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of given up some of the menum Let's sad

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 3>to another open ai story. One of the biggest feuds

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 3>in tech heads to court today. Elon Musk claims open

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 3>ai abandon its founding mission as a nonprofit. He's suing

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 3>the company, two of its co founders, Sam Altman and

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Greg Brockman, and Microsoft. Musk is seeking up to one

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty four billion dollars in damages that he

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 3>says should go to open AI's charitable arm. If he wins,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 3>let's bring in Bloomberg's AI editor Seth Figereman. We should

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 3>note that there was a developing story at the end

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 3>of last week when Musk actually dropped a number of

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the claims that he was making. So let's start there.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 3>We go to court today this jury selection. What are

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 3>the claims that Musk is sticking with.

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, this is a years long saga that's

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 12>really culminating in the court case this week. And at

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 12>the heart of it, Elon is alleging that Altman and

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 12>other leaders that Operanie effectively tried to enrich themselves by

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 12>pursuing a for profit push at Obanie, which was originally

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 12>founded by Musk, Alman and a group of others as

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 12>a nonprofit research organization. And he's claiming that he has

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 12>effectually been defrauded as part of that, and he is

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 12>asking for or up to one hundred and thirty four

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 12>billion dollars in damages. But in some ways, even more

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 12>crucially than the amount of money he's asking for are

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 12>some of the remedies for that, which range from seeking

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 12>to have Altman pushed out as CEO and his other

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 12>official positions at the company and also trying to unwind

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 12>the for profit conversion that was completed early last year.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 3>We were just showing some of those that the dudes testify.

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a pretty blockbuster list. And who's who, right, Sam

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Altman is going to testify Elon Musk himself, Miramradi formerly

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 3>open aicto now of Thinking Machines, Microsoft CEO Sati and Nadella.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 3>There is some historical beef here which you should explain

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the relationship between Musk and Altman plays out on social media. Musk,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 3>of course, is also the founder and leader of a

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 3>rival frontier lab XAI.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 12>That's right, yeah, I mean these were two close colleagues

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 12>for a time who were instrumental on the founding of

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 12>Opening I more than a decade ago. Elion in some

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 12>ways as very much the benefactor of the organization in

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 12>its early days. Sam has previously said that he considered

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 12>as Elon must to be a hero of his. But

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 12>there was a falling out within the first few years

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 12>of the company's launch, seemingly in OPENINGE Eye is telling

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 12>of it, because Elon Musk wanted more control, He wanted

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 12>it to operate as part of Tesla. He seemed to

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 12>want to be CEO of the organization himself. Altman and

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 12>others refrained from that and must ended up believing Opennie

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 12>around twenty eighteen. Since then, there's been a lot of

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 12>name calling on both sides, with Musk in particular loving

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 12>to call Sam Alman scam Altman, among other things. Elon

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 12>has also taken steps to undercut the organization, not just

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 12>through launching a rival company, but making a hostile big

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 12>as some might recall, to try to basically take over

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 12>the nonprofit that controls Openiey. This core case should be

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 12>understood in that larger fight.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg, Seth Magun, thank you very much.

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk through the legal claims that the jury will

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 3>be asked to weigh in more detail with Dorothy Lund,

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 3>professor of law at Columbia Law School, where she specializes

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 3>in corporate ownership, governance, securities regulation. Let's start with the

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 3>legal claims in the case. I mean, technically speaking, what

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 3>is it that Elon Musk is suing for and based

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 3>on what and hoping to achieve what?

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So, at this point there are only two claims

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 5>that remain a lot of others have been dropped or

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 5>dismissed and So the first is that Altman in open

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 5>ai violated a promise to Musk that open ai would

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 5>have a permanent charitable mission to develop safe open source

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 5>AI technology for the public good and not private gain,

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 5>and this was violated when in twenty nineteen open ai

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 5>created a.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 9>For profit affiliate. So that's the first allegation.

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 5>In the second is that it's really related, is that

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 5>Altman and open eye received undeserved benefits such as Musk's investment,

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 5>because of these broken promises.

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Professor Lund, does it matter that this is a jury trial?

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, this is a jury trial, Yes, but the

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.239
<v Speaker 5>jury in this case is only being used as an

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 5>advisory to Judge Gondalas Rogers, so she actually doesn't have

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 5>to follow their opinion, although it will certainly give her

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 5>some cover if she does. And so today, you know,

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 5>we're starting jury selection and it's a really interesting process.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 5>And the law here, you know, it doesn't require that

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 5>jurors have never heard.

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 9>Of Elon Musk or they've never used open ai.

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.479
<v Speaker 5>But instead, you know, the goal will be defined people

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 5>that can put aside what they've heard they know about

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 5>these people, and to decide.

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 9>The case only on the evidence presented. In court.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 5>But you know, these are two very infamous figures, right,

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Musk and Altman. Musk has been aggressively moving companies to

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 5>Texas and out of California.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 9>It's been leaning hard into MAGA politics.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Altman isn't as well known, but he's had some recent

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 5>episodes suggesting he faces some real personality challenges as well,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, the recent multiv cocktail attack on his house.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think in general there's just growing uneasy

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 5>and skepticism about whether AI is going to visit its

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 5>dystopia in future on all of US and Employment Data Center,

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 5>environmental effects, power consumption. So you know, I think here

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be these The jury's views may be

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 5>colored on these specific views on each of these individuals

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 5>and also AI generally.

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Mister Altman is well known to regular viewers of this program,

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>but just in case, he's the CEO of Open AI,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 3>which is regarded probably as the most consequential AI lab

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 3>at this moment in time. But therein lies an interesting

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>point elon Musk also at the helm of XAI, which

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 3>is now owned by SpaceX, a company in which he

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 3>is CEO. Does that matter going into the case that

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 3>he leads a rival company to the one that Sam

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Altman now leads.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I mean, you know, it's very easy to view

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 5>this suit cynically because Musk is operating his own rival

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 5>AI company, and he's he's tried to partner with or

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 5>take over open Ai multiple times he's been spurned. So

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 5>I think absolutely there's a reason to be suspect about

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 5>his motives here, and even the judge in this case

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 5>has called this out, you know, in some pre trial motions.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 9>You can in fact.

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 5>See in his IPO letter for SpaceX that you know,

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 5>they disclose that Grock is going to benefit if this

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 5>suit is successful. So I think at the end of

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 5>the day, the judge and jury are going to have

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 5>to determine whether Musk is disingenuously using this lawsuit to

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 5>niqu app open ai and create more room for his

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 5>own for profit initiatives to thrive with less competition. And

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 5>this is essentially what open ai is, you know, put

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 5>pointing to in this litigation.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 3>So if we just have two minutes left here, but

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 3>the central issue is the nonprofits origin of open ai,

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 3>and within the world of AI, of course we have

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>public benefit corporation structures as well. Is there a chance

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 3>that this case sets precedent for the legal structure of

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 3>companies that operate that way.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So, I mean, you know, there's a lot to

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 5>say about this structure.

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 5>One of the arguments that Musk has made is that,

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 5>you know, if we're not careful here, this is going

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 5>to cause other nonprofits to.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 9>Follow the same path as open Ai.

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 5>They're going to make promises and then fall behind on them,

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 5>and whereas the other nonprofits kind of go and go

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 5>this way.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think this is ultimately a weak argument

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 9>for one.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 5>Open ai is not your typical startup, right, This is

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 5>a very unique company in business.

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 9>It's had a very unique sort of governance history.

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Each of its iterations has looked really different in interesting

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:18.479
<v Speaker 5>ways that we could spend far more than two minutes on.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 5>And you know, the other thing I think is important

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 5>to note in this conversation is that something that's true

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 5>of corporate law is that it's enabling. It allows businesses

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 5>to change their forms based on their unique business needs.

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 9>Right, and so you know, over time.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, the argument that open ai has made is

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 5>that we started off as a nonprofit, but this is

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 5>a really capital and tons of business and we just

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 5>needed more money in order to continue to pursue our

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 5>mission and develop this technology.

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 9>And this is why we made these changes.

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 5>And this is all sort of consistent with our initial

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 5>goals and the promises that were made upfront.

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 9>And so again I think.

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 5>That this is this is something you would expect from organizations,

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 5>that they change their business form over time, and you

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't necessarily want to deter that either.

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Dorothy Lund, professor at Columbia Law School. Again, the Open

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 3>AI must trial jury selection starts today in Oakland, Thank

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 3>you very much. Coming up, we're going to speak with

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg about

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 3>strengthening the US tech supply chain. Big focus on chips

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and silicon. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 6>We were the jip capital of the world, and now

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 6>you know Intel.

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 9>And now they're coming back. All the jip companies are

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 9>coming back.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to one of our top stories today.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 3>China has blocked Meta's two billion dollar acquisition of AI

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 3>startup Manus, effectively unwinding a deal that we thought was done.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a clear move by Beijing to keep advanced AI

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 3>technology from flowing to the US. Just weeks before the

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 3>expected Trump Gee meeting. Joining us on the show today

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 3>under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg, who's

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 3>been shaping the US strategy on exactly this kind of thing,

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 3>economic and technology competition.

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 2>This is about state craft.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, we are going to talk a lot about

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 3>silicon you know that's been a big focus for you.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 3>But this moved by China and one of its regulatory

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 3>bodies to block this deal. How do you interpret that

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 3>as a strategy and state craft on China's side.

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's great to be here and great to be

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 11>with the Bloomberg team. So I think this is just

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 11>the latest example of how China's economic diplomacy branded itself

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.800
<v Speaker 11>to the rest of the world as being all about connectivity,

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 11>and in fact it's really been about coercion and practice.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 11>What we have done at the State Department is built

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 11>an economic security coalition with fourteen countries called Paksliga. In January,

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:00.919
<v Speaker 11>I gave a speech at HUDD and that really laid

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 11>out the blueprint. And last week we announced a forward

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 11>deployed industrial base with our partner, or our oldest ally

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 11>in Asia, the Philippines, which really is the beginning of

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 11>the build and we're incredibly excited to get to hit

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 11>the ground running.

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 3>When we talk about China and from a policy standpoint,

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 3>in this program, we talk about Belton Road the initiative.

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 2>How is pack Silica different.

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Why is the strategy through pack Silica a better form

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 3>of state craft.

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so we are obviously building this effort with the

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 11>benefit of having been able to study what China has

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 11>done through the Belton Road Initiative for the past twenty

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 11>five years. And the easiest way to understand the Belton

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 11>Road Initiative is it was China's attempt to build government

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 11>owned roads and government operated bridges and railways with state

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 11>owned enterprises. The Chinese government has done this entirely in house.

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 11>We have a totally different model. We believe America's superpower

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 11>is the power of its private companies and its ability

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 11>to build products that delight and enchant billions of users

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 11>around the world, and so we decided to partner with

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 11>the private sector to really roll out platforms. The Forward

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 11>Deployed Industrial Base is our first major rollout that will

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 11>be a platform for American companies in partnership with a

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 11>strong sovereign partner in the Philippines. And ultimately the framework

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 11>that we adopted is a framework where both the US

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 11>and the Philippines have skin in the game and share

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 11>in the upside of success. And it's that kind of

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 11>positive sum approach that we hope to bring to all

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 11>of our partnerships.

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>Just discuss the Philippines a little bit more.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Is a case study beyond its geographic position on the map.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Why is that an important partner? I guess if you

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 3>looked at it through an economic lens, or through a.

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 11>Trade lens or a supply chain lens, well, we're very

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 11>excited to partner with the Philippines because it's our oldest

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 11>ally in Asia, is a defense treaty. Ally, it's also

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 11>a kind that has very rich manufacturing capabilities, and so

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 11>ultimately that kindness.

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Is the potential, the forward looking bit, the forward looking bit.

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 11>But they already today have a very deep manufacturing sector.

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 11>And so the values alignment, combined with the complementary industrial capabilities,

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 11>we thought, provide the Philippines with a very compelling value

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 11>proposition as a first test bed for the forward deployed

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 11>industrial base as well as for American companies and for

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 11>Filipino workers. So we're thrilled to be partnering with them,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 11>and we think American companies will be very excited to

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 11>go there.

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Under Secretary, this is the first opportunity we've had to

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 3>speak I think since CES in January actually, but of

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 3>course in between, we've had the conflict in Iran, the

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 3>war in Iran, and we spend a lot of time

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 3>on this program talking about the impact to chip supply

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 3>chains because of helium, for example, key stabilizer in the

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 3>chip manufacturing process.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Has that had an impact in the world.

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 3>That you were doing, you know, some of those golf

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 3>partners a key to what you're trying to do.

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, let me just say that we, obviously, you know,

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 11>have made a very conscious decision to really double down

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 11>on our partnerships with the Golf we have. We work

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 11>with them incredibly closely.

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I hosted the us.

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 11>U AAI working group in Washington with my colleagues from

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 11>the Office of Science and Technology at the White House

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 11>as well as the Commerce Department. Ultimately, one of the

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 11>big takeaways from an economic diplomacy standpoint of the Iran

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 11>crisis is really just the importance of de risking single

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:41.479
<v Speaker 11>points of failure. Right now, we have a concentration risk

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 11>across our supply chains, whether it's logistics, whether it's actuators,

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 11>whether it's rare earth magnets that remains unacceptably high. And ultimately,

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 11>that really is the genesis of what pack silica is

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 11>meant to address.

0:38:55.040 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 3>When the President meets Swushijingping, what's on the table a

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 3>point of negotiation or interest both sides may well change.

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 3>We spend a lot of time with you and other

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 3>colleagues and government talking about the idea of whether China

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 3>should or should not have access to leading edge chips.

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 3>But there's a software component to this as well. If

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 3>we take the Mannus case study, do you expect the

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 3>President to bring that up and use the competence of

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Chinese AI companies on the software side as a point

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 3>of discussion or we just focused on chips.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I expect the President to.

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 11>Really walk into that room with maximum leverage and decision space.

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 11>His national security strategy made abundantly clear that America will

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 11>secure the inputs it vitally needs for its supply chains,

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 11>and ultimately President Trump has reshaped American economic diplomacy the

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 11>way only.

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 2>An executive could.

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 11>And it is really thanks to his leadership that this

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 11>historic arrangement and partnership with the Philippines was made passable.

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Jacob Helberg, us Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs, back

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Tech and what has been an astonishing start

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 3>to twenty twenty six now coming up. It's a sixteen

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar test for the tech market this week. Those

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 3>are the names at the heart of it. This is

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech. Time for talking tech. First start Meta is

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 3>reaching for the stars to fuel its AI ambitions. The

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 3>tech giant reserved up to one gigawa of power from

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 3>startup Overview Energy, which plans to beam solar rays from

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 3>orbit back to Earth.

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Meta said it.

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Hopes to secure uninterrupted energy for its massive data centers

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 3>by twenty thirty plus. A former Tokyo Electron engineer has

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 3>been sentenced to ten years in jail for stealing TSMC's

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 3>proprietary data. Taiwan is on high alert for technology leaks.

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 3>The hefty prison term for the former engineer reflects the

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 3>government's efforts to guard its world class semiconductor industry. Former

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Deepmine researcher and AlphaGo mastermind David Silver has raised one

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:17.919
<v Speaker 3>point one billion dollars for his new startup ineffable intelligence

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 3>at a five point one billion dollar valuation. With backing

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 3>from Sequoia, Nvidia, and Google, the Silver's moving beyond large

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>language models to focus on reinforcement learning and robotics. Okay,

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a sixteen trillion dollar tests for the market rally.

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 3>With the Magnificent Seven projected to grow profits by nineteen percent,

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the stakes could not be higher. Bluembe'skarmen Rhinikey joins us

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to break down it is a make or break week

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 3>for the S and P five hundred, the mag seven.

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 3>We can frame it in any aggregate you like, but

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 3>we have big earnings Wednesday.

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 2>We have big earnings Thursday. What are you watching for?

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's really going to be a flurry of excitement.

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.360
<v Speaker 13>Especially Wednesday after the bell we get four of the

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 13>biggest hyper scalers reporting, that's Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta Platforms.

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 13>These companies are the biggest in the S and P

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 13>five hundred. They've helped drive a lot of this rallied

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 13>that's gone back to record highs that we've seen in April,

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 13>and so these earnings are so important for the entire

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 13>market and really what investors are going to be looking

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:23.280
<v Speaker 13>for is this balance between high capital expenditures on artificial

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 13>intelligence infrastructure going forward and the return on that investment.

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 13>So the group that we're getting this week, they're expected

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 13>to spend more than six hundred and forty billion in

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty six on capital expenditures. That's up from more

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.279
<v Speaker 13>than four hundred billion this year. So this is a

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 13>huge jump in the amount of money these companies are spending,

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 13>and investors are going to be watching for what the

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 13>return on that investment is.

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 3>We've become accustomed to watching the capital expenditures numbers, it's

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 3>been several quarters now. But if we put that to

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 3>one side, what else is it that investors are looking for?

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.280
<v Speaker 3>A guess across the forum Wednesday.

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So there are a few line items that are

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 13>going to be really important. One is cash flow, free

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 13>cash flow, and there are some interesting facts to kind

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 13>of dive into here. So for Amazon, for example, free

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:12.319
<v Speaker 13>clash flow is expected to be negative this quarter and

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 13>potentially the widest sense twenty twenty two when what was

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 13>happening then is that the company was investing a lot

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 13>in warehouses to meet sort of demand that had been

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 13>fueled by the pandemic. So that's something investors are going

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:28.439
<v Speaker 13>to be watching really closely. Meta's first quarter free cash

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 13>flow is also expected to be the smallest in nearly

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 13>four years. And then on the flip side with some

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 13>of the other companies, including Amazon and Alphabet cloud sales,

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 13>so how those cloud businesses are doing is going to

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 13>be extremely important. Investors really want to see growth here.

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 13>It's you know, proof for you know, the AI trend

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:48.760
<v Speaker 13>going forward.

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 3>We didn't get to Apple, but that's on Thursday, so

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm giving us a breather. We can do it later

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 3>in the week. But that was a great summary of

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 3>what's to come. Calmen, Rhinicky, thank you, and that does

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.359
<v Speaker 3>it for this edition of Blueberg Tech. So many news

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 3>headlines that were driving tech markets this morning. Recap on

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 3>the podcast. You know where to find it on the

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify and

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 3>iHeart this is Bloomberg.