WEBVTT - From Impossible Burgers to Fake Steak

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:25.316
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Let's talk about meat. It's delicious, very satisfying to

0:00:25.396 --> 0:00:30.396
<v Speaker 1>cook and to eat, smells incredible on the grill. But

0:00:31.556 --> 0:00:35.596
<v Speaker 1>at this moment in history, billions of human beings eating

0:00:35.676 --> 0:00:39.356
<v Speaker 1>all that delicious meat has become something of a problem.

0:00:39.436 --> 0:00:42.836
<v Speaker 1>Raising livestock and growing food for them to eat takes

0:00:42.956 --> 0:00:45.596
<v Speaker 1>up a huge amount of the earth, an area the

0:00:45.636 --> 0:00:48.956
<v Speaker 1>size of the Americas, from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego

0:00:49.276 --> 0:00:52.796
<v Speaker 1>in all, and the animals themselves make climate change worse.

0:00:53.236 --> 0:00:57.676
<v Speaker 1>Cows methane, you know that story. These facts, though, are

0:00:57.756 --> 0:01:00.756
<v Speaker 1>not going to be enough to change the way billions

0:01:00.756 --> 0:01:04.796
<v Speaker 1>of people eat. Meat. Just taste too good, Our relationship

0:01:04.876 --> 0:01:07.876
<v Speaker 1>with it is too deep. But what if we could

0:01:07.956 --> 0:01:11.076
<v Speaker 1>nudge people not with facts or guilt trips, but with

0:01:11.156 --> 0:01:19.476
<v Speaker 1>something delicious. I'm Jacob Goldstein. This is what's your problem.

0:01:19.516 --> 0:01:23.276
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is Pat Brown, the founder of Impossible Foods.

0:01:23.756 --> 0:01:28.036
<v Speaker 1>Pat's problem is this, how can you make meat without animals?

0:01:29.196 --> 0:01:32.716
<v Speaker 1>Pat founded Impossible Foods in twenty eleven. Since then, the

0:01:32.756 --> 0:01:36.836
<v Speaker 1>company has received roughly two billion dollars in investment. Burger

0:01:36.916 --> 0:01:39.836
<v Speaker 1>King now sells the Impossible Whopper. You can buy Impossible

0:01:39.876 --> 0:01:43.316
<v Speaker 1>Burger patties and chicken like nuggets at the grocery store.

0:01:43.716 --> 0:01:46.716
<v Speaker 1>But Pat doesn't come from a business background, or even

0:01:46.796 --> 0:01:49.276
<v Speaker 1>really a food background. He got an m d and

0:01:49.356 --> 0:01:52.196
<v Speaker 1>a PhD and worked for decades as a professor of

0:01:52.236 --> 0:01:56.916
<v Speaker 1>biochemistry at Stanford. I had my dream job. I had

0:01:56.956 --> 0:02:01.356
<v Speaker 1>awesome colleagues, awesome students, a great intellectual environment, all the

0:02:01.396 --> 0:02:05.396
<v Speaker 1>funding I needed. I had no intention of leaving it.

0:02:06.916 --> 0:02:11.276
<v Speaker 1>And my research was into something completely related food, so biomedical,

0:02:12.236 --> 0:02:16.756
<v Speaker 1>very basic biomedical research. Essentially, I had zero interests in

0:02:16.796 --> 0:02:19.876
<v Speaker 1>the business world. And about ten years ago I had

0:02:19.916 --> 0:02:21.796
<v Speaker 1>a little extra time, and I challenged myself to find

0:02:21.796 --> 0:02:24.316
<v Speaker 1>the most important problem in the world that I might

0:02:24.356 --> 0:02:27.756
<v Speaker 1>be able to contribute to solving. And so step one

0:02:27.796 --> 0:02:29.516
<v Speaker 1>was figuring out what is that problem? And it was

0:02:29.556 --> 0:02:32.236
<v Speaker 1>pretty apparent to me at the time that the two

0:02:32.276 --> 0:02:35.236
<v Speaker 1>most urgent threats the future of humanity were number one,

0:02:35.316 --> 0:02:38.596
<v Speaker 1>ob used to pretty much everyone, global heating by anthropogenic

0:02:38.676 --> 0:02:43.916
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gasses and climate change climate change, and less well

0:02:43.956 --> 0:02:47.476
<v Speaker 1>known but actually probably more important and more urgent threat

0:02:47.996 --> 0:02:51.436
<v Speaker 1>is the precipitous, ongoing collapse of global biodiversity. That was

0:02:51.676 --> 0:02:53.036
<v Speaker 1>what I was going to take on. And then the

0:02:53.036 --> 0:02:55.236
<v Speaker 1>second step was figuring out, oh, it's a lot. That's

0:02:55.276 --> 0:02:58.116
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You're going to take out the two biggest

0:02:58.116 --> 0:03:02.076
<v Speaker 1>problems of the world. Okay, keep going, why not? Why not? Fair?

0:03:02.436 --> 0:03:05.396
<v Speaker 1>So then the second step was to figure out what

0:03:05.676 --> 0:03:08.116
<v Speaker 1>would be a path to a solution, and that started

0:03:08.116 --> 0:03:15.236
<v Speaker 1>with recognizing that the fastest, surest solution to both problems

0:03:15.876 --> 0:03:18.116
<v Speaker 1>is to eliminate the user of animals to produce food.

0:03:18.156 --> 0:03:20.956
<v Speaker 1>I think I know the answer, but just briefly, why

0:03:21.316 --> 0:03:24.676
<v Speaker 1>is raising animals to eat really bad for both climate

0:03:24.716 --> 0:03:29.196
<v Speaker 1>change and biodiversity? For climate change, obviously it's an ongoing

0:03:29.236 --> 0:03:32.876
<v Speaker 1>source of greenhouse gases, but more importantly is the opportunity cost.

0:03:33.116 --> 0:03:35.636
<v Speaker 1>So cows burp up a lot of methane. That's really bad.

0:03:35.876 --> 0:03:38.156
<v Speaker 1>And you're saying the second thing is if we weren't

0:03:38.236 --> 0:03:40.356
<v Speaker 1>using all this land to raise cattle, we could grow

0:03:40.396 --> 0:03:42.476
<v Speaker 1>new plants. I mean, is that the other piece of it?

0:03:42.516 --> 0:03:46.196
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, the two greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide,

0:03:46.596 --> 0:03:49.476
<v Speaker 1>the biggest source of which is livestock, biggest anthropogetic source

0:03:49.516 --> 0:03:52.516
<v Speaker 1>of livestock. And then the land footprint of animal agriculture

0:03:53.276 --> 0:03:55.956
<v Speaker 1>is more than eighty percent, probably about eighty five percent

0:03:55.956 --> 0:03:58.516
<v Speaker 1>of the entire land footprint of humanity. Okay, it occupies

0:03:58.516 --> 0:04:00.956
<v Speaker 1>about forty five percent of the ice free surface of Earth.

0:04:01.516 --> 0:04:03.676
<v Speaker 1>All of that land used to hold a lot of

0:04:03.716 --> 0:04:07.916
<v Speaker 1>biomass in forests and prairies and savannahs and so forth.

0:04:08.436 --> 0:04:12.836
<v Speaker 1>That was eliminated when they got transformed into annual crops

0:04:12.916 --> 0:04:16.116
<v Speaker 1>and pasture land. Okay, and the annual crops are largely

0:04:16.116 --> 0:04:19.276
<v Speaker 1>going to feed livestock, right, yes, yes, yes, so you

0:04:19.396 --> 0:04:22.516
<v Speaker 1>got the big problem. Now, you just got to decide

0:04:22.516 --> 0:04:24.556
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to solve the two biggest problems

0:04:24.556 --> 0:04:28.436
<v Speaker 1>facing humanity? Right? Well, the nice thing about was the

0:04:28.516 --> 0:04:32.236
<v Speaker 1>solution was the same in both cases. It was to

0:04:32.916 --> 0:04:35.676
<v Speaker 1>eliminate the use of animals as a food technology. You're

0:04:35.676 --> 0:04:37.756
<v Speaker 1>not going to solve the problem by telling people what

0:04:37.796 --> 0:04:40.116
<v Speaker 1>to eat. You're not going to solve the problem by

0:04:40.156 --> 0:04:45.196
<v Speaker 1>asking governments to you know, make animal our culture illegal. Yeah.

0:04:45.236 --> 0:04:48.876
<v Speaker 1>So the problem isn't that people love meat, it's that

0:04:48.956 --> 0:04:53.196
<v Speaker 1>we're using the wrong technology to produce That seems like

0:04:53.276 --> 0:04:56.796
<v Speaker 1>the big insight, right like, that seems like a real

0:04:56.876 --> 0:04:59.596
<v Speaker 1>shift from what I've heard before. Right Like, people have

0:04:59.676 --> 0:05:03.036
<v Speaker 1>been arguing for decades longer in some cases, that it's

0:05:03.076 --> 0:05:07.276
<v Speaker 1>wrong to eat meat even before climate change was a

0:05:07.356 --> 0:05:11.076
<v Speaker 1>known issue. But the idea that you're going to change

0:05:11.116 --> 0:05:13.716
<v Speaker 1>people's behavior not by telling them that they're wrong to

0:05:13.796 --> 0:05:15.316
<v Speaker 1>be doing what they're doing or that it's bad, but

0:05:15.356 --> 0:05:18.716
<v Speaker 1>by giving them a better option. That seems like your

0:05:18.836 --> 0:05:23.476
<v Speaker 1>big insight. Well that was the critical thing that caused

0:05:23.476 --> 0:05:28.076
<v Speaker 1>me to leave my job and found impossible foods. Because

0:05:28.156 --> 0:05:31.476
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get a grant for that, you're

0:05:31.476 --> 0:05:34.796
<v Speaker 1>not going to get university funding for that. But fortunately

0:05:35.156 --> 0:05:38.316
<v Speaker 1>you can get investment because there's a big investment proposition.

0:05:38.636 --> 0:05:43.196
<v Speaker 1>If you can develop better technology to replace animals in

0:05:43.196 --> 0:05:47.316
<v Speaker 1>the food system by producing products that consumers value more, okay,

0:05:47.756 --> 0:05:50.476
<v Speaker 1>you can capture a market that today is worth two

0:05:50.596 --> 0:05:54.636
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars globally. And the thing about it is that

0:05:54.636 --> 0:05:56.316
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think, oh, that's such a big

0:05:56.316 --> 0:05:58.636
<v Speaker 1>how could you possibly do that, Like it's such a

0:05:58.716 --> 0:06:01.876
<v Speaker 1>part of the world. You know, animals, livestock, and you know,

0:06:01.916 --> 0:06:04.196
<v Speaker 1>you could have said that about horses one hundred years ago,

0:06:04.596 --> 0:06:06.116
<v Speaker 1>and the horse was much more a part of the

0:06:06.156 --> 0:06:10.156
<v Speaker 1>family than a cow. You know, essentially every every household

0:06:09.956 --> 0:06:13.516
<v Speaker 1>had had a horse. But in less than two decades,

0:06:13.596 --> 0:06:17.436
<v Speaker 1>basically it went down to essentially zero, and the horses

0:06:17.436 --> 0:06:22.076
<v Speaker 1>were a hobby and not a motive transportation. So better technology,

0:06:22.676 --> 0:06:25.596
<v Speaker 1>if it does a better job of delivering what consumers value,

0:06:25.956 --> 0:06:30.116
<v Speaker 1>can sweepingly replace an old technology very fast, much faster

0:06:30.196 --> 0:06:33.316
<v Speaker 1>than people ever expect. Okay, so that's that's like the

0:06:33.356 --> 0:06:35.876
<v Speaker 1>big picture behind the company. I want to talk in

0:06:35.916 --> 0:06:38.596
<v Speaker 1>a little more detail. In particular, I want to talk

0:06:38.596 --> 0:06:43.516
<v Speaker 1>about this molecule called hem hem as in hemoglobin, like

0:06:43.556 --> 0:06:45.676
<v Speaker 1>what we have in our blood. It's also in a

0:06:45.676 --> 0:06:49.796
<v Speaker 1>protein called soy leg hemoglobin. And I guess that protein,

0:06:49.836 --> 0:06:52.836
<v Speaker 1>if I understand right, is a key reason your burgers

0:06:52.876 --> 0:06:56.356
<v Speaker 1>are way more meady than the like old school veggie

0:06:56.356 --> 0:06:58.636
<v Speaker 1>burgers that I grew up with. So tell me about

0:06:58.756 --> 0:07:01.956
<v Speaker 1>hem and soy leg hemoglobin. I would say it was

0:07:02.036 --> 0:07:04.076
<v Speaker 1>the first thing that we really put a lot of

0:07:04.116 --> 0:07:09.796
<v Speaker 1>effort into because we didn't know, nor did anyone, why

0:07:09.996 --> 0:07:14.276
<v Speaker 1>doesn't beat taste like meat and unlike anything from the

0:07:14.316 --> 0:07:17.036
<v Speaker 1>plant world. So we had to figure that one out.

0:07:17.196 --> 0:07:21.676
<v Speaker 1>And one of the striking characteristics of meat in general

0:07:22.396 --> 0:07:24.596
<v Speaker 1>is that it behaves like an active chemical system. It

0:07:24.676 --> 0:07:28.916
<v Speaker 1>starts out with one flavor profile, which is relatively not

0:07:29.076 --> 0:07:32.516
<v Speaker 1>very strong, mostly bloody kind of and when you cook

0:07:32.556 --> 0:07:35.916
<v Speaker 1>it in a matter of minutes, it completely transforms and

0:07:35.996 --> 0:07:40.476
<v Speaker 1>in the process it produces this explosion of aromas that

0:07:40.596 --> 0:07:43.836
<v Speaker 1>weren't there at the beginning. Okay, that's why a barbecue

0:07:43.876 --> 0:07:47.636
<v Speaker 1>smells so good, right exactly. And you will notice that

0:07:47.716 --> 0:07:49.756
<v Speaker 1>you don't you don't get any similar behavior if you

0:07:50.036 --> 0:07:56.516
<v Speaker 1>barbecue broccoli, okay. And so meat has this distinct behavior

0:07:56.516 --> 0:07:59.876
<v Speaker 1>word behaves like a really kind of explosive chemical system.

0:08:00.716 --> 0:08:06.116
<v Speaker 1>And because meat, unlike plants, like hundreds of thousand times

0:08:06.236 --> 0:08:08.556
<v Speaker 1>higher levels of heam and HEAM is one of the

0:08:08.596 --> 0:08:12.236
<v Speaker 1>best biological catalys is known. So how do we get

0:08:12.276 --> 0:08:15.236
<v Speaker 1>to soil like hemoglobin? So we needed a plant source

0:08:15.556 --> 0:08:18.916
<v Speaker 1>of heme at scale. This this is known in botany

0:08:19.396 --> 0:08:24.116
<v Speaker 1>that legums, that plants that fix nitrogen. They take atmospheric

0:08:24.196 --> 0:08:28.996
<v Speaker 1>nitrogen and turn it into a monitarne into fertilizer. They

0:08:29.036 --> 0:08:31.116
<v Speaker 1>have the structure called a root nodule that does that

0:08:31.236 --> 0:08:36.436
<v Speaker 1>little trick. And the root nodule contains very high concentrations

0:08:36.556 --> 0:08:40.756
<v Speaker 1>of a hem protein called leg hemoglobin. Okay, okay, And

0:08:40.956 --> 0:08:44.756
<v Speaker 1>leg hemoglobin presumably is like it's like hemoglobin like in animals,

0:08:44.756 --> 0:08:48.036
<v Speaker 1>but from a legum. Is that what leg hemoglobin means exactly.

0:08:48.076 --> 0:08:51.596
<v Speaker 1>You figured it out. It's actually structurally extremely similar, like

0:08:52.036 --> 0:08:54.356
<v Speaker 1>you would pick it out in a lineup as being

0:08:54.396 --> 0:08:58.516
<v Speaker 1>identical to myoglobin, which is the hem protein and muscle tissue.

0:08:58.596 --> 0:09:01.236
<v Speaker 1>So if you're looking to make meat from plants, that

0:09:01.436 --> 0:09:05.236
<v Speaker 1>is a very promising protein. Is a correctical to protein.

0:09:05.276 --> 0:09:07.516
<v Speaker 1>By the way, sorry remedial questions. So like hemoglobin is

0:09:07.556 --> 0:09:11.716
<v Speaker 1>a protein, I celic that the amount of leg hemoglobin

0:09:12.316 --> 0:09:17.756
<v Speaker 1>in the roots of the US soybean crop would be

0:09:17.876 --> 0:09:20.156
<v Speaker 1>enough to match all the hem and all the meat

0:09:20.676 --> 0:09:23.996
<v Speaker 1>consumed in the US. Okay, okay, good news. So it

0:09:24.076 --> 0:09:26.396
<v Speaker 1>seemed like, oh, bingo, that's how we'll do it. Well,

0:09:26.796 --> 0:09:30.316
<v Speaker 1>we'll just harvest the root nodules from soybean something that

0:09:30.356 --> 0:09:34.356
<v Speaker 1>nobody was bothering to harvest. That's amazing. They're growing it anyways,

0:09:34.356 --> 0:09:37.076
<v Speaker 1>and they're just getting rid of it right perfect. So,

0:09:37.316 --> 0:09:42.116
<v Speaker 1>for the first year or so, our primary effort was

0:09:42.196 --> 0:09:43.996
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to go a scale source of a

0:09:44.076 --> 0:09:48.676
<v Speaker 1>hem protein okay, and in particular soyle hemoglobin, in particular

0:09:48.716 --> 0:09:52.636
<v Speaker 1>soilake hemoglobin, because it was the only plant source of

0:09:52.756 --> 0:09:56.276
<v Speaker 1>a hem protein that was a sufficient scale anyway, So

0:09:57.676 --> 0:10:01.276
<v Speaker 1>we spent a lot of time in fields of soybeans

0:10:02.476 --> 0:10:05.236
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to harvest the root nodules. There are

0:10:05.236 --> 0:10:08.356
<v Speaker 1>some ludicrous videos of the contraptions we built for that.

0:10:09.196 --> 0:10:12.876
<v Speaker 1>Give me an example, you say ludicrous video and contraption.

0:10:12.916 --> 0:10:15.396
<v Speaker 1>One of the first things we did was we went

0:10:15.436 --> 0:10:19.116
<v Speaker 1>to a soybean farm that was owned by the cousin

0:10:19.276 --> 0:10:25.876
<v Speaker 1>of our chief businessperson in Minnesota and harvested a couple

0:10:25.876 --> 0:10:28.996
<v Speaker 1>of acres of soybeans, dug them up with a potato digger,

0:10:29.436 --> 0:10:30.956
<v Speaker 1>and then we had to figure out how to separate

0:10:30.996 --> 0:10:34.436
<v Speaker 1>these nodules, which are like two millimeters in diameter attached

0:10:34.436 --> 0:10:37.476
<v Speaker 1>to these fragile threads of roots, and they're buried in dirt,

0:10:37.836 --> 0:10:41.276
<v Speaker 1>so we could isolate it while we built a contraption

0:10:41.436 --> 0:10:45.556
<v Speaker 1>out of sheets of plywood and then the bottoms of

0:10:45.676 --> 0:10:49.876
<v Speaker 1>Janitor brooms, you know those rectangular rooms. And then we've

0:10:50.116 --> 0:10:53.476
<v Speaker 1>brought along a street sweeper that has this big spinning

0:10:53.556 --> 0:11:00.316
<v Speaker 1>room so that that broom would cross with the Janter brooms.

0:11:00.796 --> 0:11:04.836
<v Speaker 1>And then I was doing a lot of this shoving

0:11:05.396 --> 0:11:10.796
<v Speaker 1>these soybean roots under this wheat streeper so that the

0:11:10.836 --> 0:11:14.116
<v Speaker 1>spinning thing could rip the nodules off from the rest

0:11:14.116 --> 0:11:19.476
<v Speaker 1>of the plant. Did it work? Did it work? It worked? Okay,

0:11:19.716 --> 0:11:23.196
<v Speaker 1>But here's the problem. Okay, when we looked at the

0:11:23.396 --> 0:11:26.716
<v Speaker 1>entirety of it, after six months or more of trying

0:11:26.756 --> 0:11:30.436
<v Speaker 1>this approach, we realized that the cost and complexity of

0:11:31.596 --> 0:11:33.436
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of the dirt and all the other crap

0:11:33.476 --> 0:11:36.876
<v Speaker 1>from the root nodules made it. Basically the economics didn't

0:11:36.876 --> 0:11:39.276
<v Speaker 1>look like they were going to scale. So, but meanwhile

0:11:39.316 --> 0:11:41.036
<v Speaker 1>we got enough of the soil people who are willing

0:11:41.116 --> 0:11:44.036
<v Speaker 1>to prove that this is the magic ingredient for meat flavors.

0:11:44.076 --> 0:11:45.996
<v Speaker 1>Then the question was, Okay, we need another way to

0:11:46.076 --> 0:11:50.316
<v Speaker 1>get this to scale. So we knew just from the

0:11:50.356 --> 0:11:54.236
<v Speaker 1>economics of producing proteins by fermentation and so forth, that

0:11:54.396 --> 0:11:58.876
<v Speaker 1>that was potentially doable. Producing proteins by fermentation, that's a

0:11:58.876 --> 0:12:02.156
<v Speaker 1>whole other thing that doesn't actually involve soybeans or dirt

0:12:02.276 --> 0:12:04.516
<v Speaker 1>or anything. Right. Yeah, So this has done a lot.

0:12:04.556 --> 0:12:07.196
<v Speaker 1>You know, most of the enzymes that are in your detergents,

0:12:08.276 --> 0:12:10.516
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the enzymes they're using breadmaking and stuff

0:12:10.516 --> 0:12:14.316
<v Speaker 1>like that are produced by microorganisms that have been engineered

0:12:14.356 --> 0:12:18.596
<v Speaker 1>with the genes that encode those those proteins and so forth.

0:12:18.596 --> 0:12:23.036
<v Speaker 1>This has been going on for decades, so that technology

0:12:23.156 --> 0:12:26.276
<v Speaker 1>is reasonably mature in its own right, and so we

0:12:26.276 --> 0:12:28.356
<v Speaker 1>could project the economics of it and seem like this

0:12:28.396 --> 0:12:30.876
<v Speaker 1>would be scalable and doable and so forth. So just

0:12:30.916 --> 0:12:32.956
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, you decide that instead of trying to

0:12:32.956 --> 0:12:36.876
<v Speaker 1>get soileg hemoglobin out of the roots of soybeans, you're

0:12:36.876 --> 0:12:39.516
<v Speaker 1>going to take the gene that produces soi leg hemoglobin,

0:12:40.036 --> 0:12:43.676
<v Speaker 1>put it into yeast and grow the soileg hemoglobin in

0:12:43.676 --> 0:12:47.836
<v Speaker 1>a vat. You're going to cut out the soybean middleman. Yes, exactly, exactly, Okay,

0:12:47.996 --> 0:12:49.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean it comes to mind, like why not just

0:12:49.956 --> 0:12:52.036
<v Speaker 1>do the one that's in a cow? Right? It is

0:12:52.036 --> 0:12:54.436
<v Speaker 1>that a dumb question? No, it's not at all dumb question,

0:12:54.516 --> 0:12:56.916
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually one of the ones that we looked

0:12:56.916 --> 0:12:59.516
<v Speaker 1>at was bovi and myoglobin, which is the one that's

0:12:59.516 --> 0:13:03.156
<v Speaker 1>in a cow. But we also looked at similar heame

0:13:03.196 --> 0:13:06.996
<v Speaker 1>proteins from everything from paramecium to barley and the end

0:13:07.036 --> 0:13:09.516
<v Speaker 1>we looked at three dollsand different heame proteins, and just

0:13:09.676 --> 0:13:13.956
<v Speaker 1>by random chance, the best performing one was soilo hemoglobin.

0:13:14.316 --> 0:13:17.756
<v Speaker 1>Best performing meaning it just made the tastiest burger, stayed

0:13:17.796 --> 0:13:20.436
<v Speaker 1>fresh the longest, was the best behaved in terms of

0:13:20.516 --> 0:13:22.956
<v Speaker 1>expressing in yeast, in terms of being able to be

0:13:23.036 --> 0:13:28.236
<v Speaker 1>isolated efficiently, in terms of not turning brown, sound up,

0:13:28.236 --> 0:13:33.396
<v Speaker 1>putting the planting then code soil hemoglobin into yeast, do

0:13:33.476 --> 0:13:35.996
<v Speaker 1>you know? And so they were able to produce it

0:13:40.476 --> 0:13:44.356
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. Impossible burgers are still way more expensive

0:13:44.516 --> 0:13:46.996
<v Speaker 1>than beef burgers. What's it going to take for the

0:13:47.036 --> 0:13:50.276
<v Speaker 1>price to come down? Also, when will I be able

0:13:50.276 --> 0:14:02.436
<v Speaker 1>to order an impossible steak? That's the end of the ads.

0:14:02.876 --> 0:14:05.796
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going back to the show. Let's talk briefly

0:14:05.916 --> 0:14:09.676
<v Speaker 1>about oh, health and safety. I like that you're not

0:14:09.796 --> 0:14:12.196
<v Speaker 1>trying to make like a super healthy burger, right. I

0:14:12.276 --> 0:14:14.196
<v Speaker 1>like that you're trying to make a burger that's like

0:14:14.196 --> 0:14:16.436
<v Speaker 1>a burger, and a burger is not that healthy? Right?

0:14:16.796 --> 0:14:18.436
<v Speaker 1>First of all, is that a fair way to think

0:14:18.436 --> 0:14:20.076
<v Speaker 1>about it? Like you're not trying to make health food,

0:14:20.076 --> 0:14:22.116
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to make something that is delicious, like meat

0:14:22.196 --> 0:14:25.436
<v Speaker 1>is delicious, but without an animal. It's almost fair. But

0:14:27.316 --> 0:14:28.916
<v Speaker 1>I want to do better than almost sure. I want

0:14:28.916 --> 0:14:30.876
<v Speaker 1>to get to face. We want to make something that

0:14:31.476 --> 0:14:35.516
<v Speaker 1>delivers what meat consumers want, which is above all, a

0:14:35.596 --> 0:14:39.836
<v Speaker 1>delicious eating experience, and we can't compromise on that, but

0:14:40.316 --> 0:14:42.956
<v Speaker 1>we have the opportunity to make it healthier than the

0:14:42.996 --> 0:14:47.636
<v Speaker 1>cow version, Okay. And one of our core principles has

0:14:47.636 --> 0:14:51.396
<v Speaker 1>always been We're never going to sell a product that

0:14:51.516 --> 0:14:54.916
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe, based on the evidence, is healthier than

0:14:54.956 --> 0:15:00.356
<v Speaker 1>what it replaces. Not healthier than a salad, but healthier

0:15:00.396 --> 0:15:02.956
<v Speaker 1>than a burger made from a cow, or a chicken

0:15:03.036 --> 0:15:07.276
<v Speaker 1>nugget made from a chicken, or whatever product it's intended

0:15:07.316 --> 0:15:11.156
<v Speaker 1>to replace. So we are very conscientious about health and nutrition,

0:15:11.836 --> 0:15:15.036
<v Speaker 1>but within the context of a product that consumers actually

0:15:15.076 --> 0:15:19.316
<v Speaker 1>want to buy in place of specific animal products. Right.

0:15:19.356 --> 0:15:22.316
<v Speaker 1>Your target customer is not a vegetarian, right, It's a

0:15:22.316 --> 0:15:24.556
<v Speaker 1>person who eats burgers, and you want that person to

0:15:24.596 --> 0:15:27.476
<v Speaker 1>buy an impossible foods burger because they like it better,

0:15:27.636 --> 0:15:29.836
<v Speaker 1>not because they feel bad about cows or climate change

0:15:29.916 --> 0:15:34.076
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Right, Yeah, exactly. You know. The problem that

0:15:34.196 --> 0:15:37.836
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to solve is that this industry is supported

0:15:37.876 --> 0:15:40.556
<v Speaker 1>by people who love meat, Okay, and for us to

0:15:40.636 --> 0:15:44.796
<v Speaker 1>compete them out of existence, we have to give them

0:15:44.836 --> 0:15:47.516
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they want and do it better than the animal,

0:15:48.196 --> 0:15:51.876
<v Speaker 1>and we're not interested in serving vegetarians. Perfectly, I love

0:15:51.956 --> 0:15:54.756
<v Speaker 1>vegetarians and vegans as much as the next guy. Okay,

0:15:55.396 --> 0:15:59.076
<v Speaker 1>I'm vegan, my wife is vegan, no offense, but we

0:15:59.116 --> 0:16:02.356
<v Speaker 1>don't accomplish anything by making better meat for vegans. One

0:16:02.356 --> 0:16:08.276
<v Speaker 1>other thing on health and safety is, well, just that

0:16:08.356 --> 0:16:11.196
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing is novel. Right. I'm interested in it

0:16:11.236 --> 0:16:13.956
<v Speaker 1>because you are out on the technological frontier trying to

0:16:13.956 --> 0:16:16.676
<v Speaker 1>solve what is clearly a very large problem. At the

0:16:16.756 --> 0:16:20.876
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, it seems to me there's a

0:16:20.996 --> 0:16:23.596
<v Speaker 1>kind of common sense in eating things that people have

0:16:23.636 --> 0:16:27.796
<v Speaker 1>eaten for a long time and being cautious about new

0:16:28.116 --> 0:16:30.756
<v Speaker 1>kinds of foods, not new mixtures of old foods, but

0:16:30.796 --> 0:16:34.796
<v Speaker 1>actually new kinds of foods. And I think of, say, margarine, right,

0:16:34.836 --> 0:16:38.676
<v Speaker 1>which was introduced as a healthier alternative to butter and proved.

0:16:38.716 --> 0:16:40.116
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say at this point to

0:16:40.156 --> 0:16:43.396
<v Speaker 1>be less healthy than butter. Help me not worry. Convince

0:16:43.476 --> 0:16:46.196
<v Speaker 1>me that impossible burgers are not margarine. So if you

0:16:46.236 --> 0:16:50.916
<v Speaker 1>look at our product, okay, there's nothing at them like

0:16:50.996 --> 0:16:55.236
<v Speaker 1>your level that isn't an abundant part of the human diet. Humans,

0:16:55.316 --> 0:17:00.796
<v Speaker 1>for example, consume thousands of different heam proteins every single

0:17:00.876 --> 0:17:05.396
<v Speaker 1>day in their normal diet, because every plant has hundreds

0:17:05.396 --> 0:17:08.996
<v Speaker 1>of hem proteins, all the meats have their own different

0:17:09.156 --> 0:17:12.196
<v Speaker 1>heam proteins, and so forth. The other ingredients in our

0:17:12.236 --> 0:17:15.196
<v Speaker 1>product are all things that have been part of the

0:17:15.276 --> 0:17:19.916
<v Speaker 1>human diet for decades, if not centuries, okay, and most

0:17:19.916 --> 0:17:22.556
<v Speaker 1>of them have been really really well studied in terms

0:17:22.596 --> 0:17:27.996
<v Speaker 1>of their nutrition and health properties. When will an impossible

0:17:27.996 --> 0:17:31.116
<v Speaker 1>burger be cheaper than a beef burger, Well, the definite

0:17:31.116 --> 0:17:35.676
<v Speaker 1>answer is eventually, because producing it requires one twenty fifth

0:17:35.676 --> 0:17:37.436
<v Speaker 1>the land, at tenth the water, less than a tenth

0:17:37.436 --> 0:17:41.236
<v Speaker 1>the fertilizer, and agrochemicals, less farm labor growing plants, no

0:17:41.396 --> 0:17:44.356
<v Speaker 1>farm labor, imagine the animals, and our production process is

0:17:44.396 --> 0:17:47.636
<v Speaker 1>much more labor efficient, and yet it's more expensive now

0:17:47.756 --> 0:17:50.156
<v Speaker 1>in spite of all that. But the point is, the

0:17:50.396 --> 0:17:55.356
<v Speaker 1>fundamental economics of the technology are vastly, vastly better. Again,

0:17:55.476 --> 0:17:58.236
<v Speaker 1>all the inputs, all the costly inputs of agriculture are

0:17:58.636 --> 0:18:01.516
<v Speaker 1>much much less, like not just a little less. But

0:18:01.636 --> 0:18:05.716
<v Speaker 1>the difference is that the incumbent industry already has all

0:18:05.796 --> 0:18:10.436
<v Speaker 1>its infrastructure in a place doesn't have to introduce a

0:18:10.476 --> 0:18:14.836
<v Speaker 1>new project product that consumers can't imagine and haven't heard of. Yeah,

0:18:15.076 --> 0:18:18.676
<v Speaker 1>and we are building all our everything about our business

0:18:19.076 --> 0:18:23.116
<v Speaker 1>from scratch, which means we have to be investing in

0:18:23.236 --> 0:18:27.916
<v Speaker 1>that continually making investments. And we're not nearly at their scale,

0:18:28.196 --> 0:18:32.036
<v Speaker 1>but as emtotically at scale. It's no contest. So look,

0:18:32.396 --> 0:18:35.036
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan of impossible burghers. I grilled them for

0:18:35.156 --> 0:18:37.556
<v Speaker 1>my family last night. True story. The impossible Whopper is

0:18:37.596 --> 0:18:39.556
<v Speaker 1>our go to road trip food. I'm not a vegetarian,

0:18:39.636 --> 0:18:41.756
<v Speaker 1>but some people in my family are, and I'm happy

0:18:41.796 --> 0:18:45.956
<v Speaker 1>to not eat beef. So what's next? And in particular,

0:18:46.076 --> 0:18:47.956
<v Speaker 1>I would love for you to tell me the story

0:18:47.996 --> 0:18:51.276
<v Speaker 1>of something you haven't cracked yet, whether it's steak or

0:18:51.516 --> 0:18:54.596
<v Speaker 1>chicken breast. I mean, those things seem way harder than

0:18:54.756 --> 0:18:59.156
<v Speaker 1>ground meat. Is there something some problem you haven't solved

0:18:59.236 --> 0:19:01.276
<v Speaker 1>yet that you can just tell me about sort of

0:19:01.356 --> 0:19:04.116
<v Speaker 1>how you're trying to do it? What hasn't worked when

0:19:04.396 --> 0:19:07.076
<v Speaker 1>we started out, Okay, we took on a problem that

0:19:07.156 --> 0:19:10.236
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know how to solve. Right. We believed it

0:19:10.476 --> 0:19:14.596
<v Speaker 1>was solvable based on not fantasy but understanding the biochemistry.

0:19:14.636 --> 0:19:16.276
<v Speaker 1>But we didn't know how. We had to figure it out,

0:19:16.916 --> 0:19:19.596
<v Speaker 1>and every new product, if it's not already on the market,

0:19:19.956 --> 0:19:22.596
<v Speaker 1>we're still figuring it out. And we have very high standards.

0:19:22.636 --> 0:19:25.876
<v Speaker 1>So we've had a lot of products that you know what,

0:19:26.036 --> 0:19:28.796
<v Speaker 1>have been successful in the market well before we launch them.

0:19:29.276 --> 0:19:32.316
<v Speaker 1>But we want to launch products only if we believe

0:19:32.356 --> 0:19:36.076
<v Speaker 1>they can successfully compete against the best animal products on

0:19:36.116 --> 0:19:39.596
<v Speaker 1>the market. So we're working on hull cuts like you

0:19:39.676 --> 0:19:43.236
<v Speaker 1>could say steak and chicken breast, and that seems so

0:19:43.476 --> 0:19:46.236
<v Speaker 1>much harder, is it? It's harder in a different way.

0:19:46.556 --> 0:19:48.676
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to kind of start from square one? No,

0:19:48.796 --> 0:19:51.396
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to start again because because first of all,

0:19:51.596 --> 0:19:54.916
<v Speaker 1>we've already figured out the fundamentals of the flavor chemistry.

0:19:55.116 --> 0:19:58.396
<v Speaker 1>So the different thing about hull cuts they have the

0:19:58.556 --> 0:20:01.996
<v Speaker 1>same kind of components, but they have anatomy okay, and

0:20:02.196 --> 0:20:06.036
<v Speaker 1>they have a different texture and cooking behavior you know

0:20:06.276 --> 0:20:09.916
<v Speaker 1>related to that. Yeah, but we understand and it pretty well.

0:20:10.556 --> 0:20:13.676
<v Speaker 1>We're making great progress. Let's just say, um, but I

0:20:13.756 --> 0:20:16.196
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say anything more anyway. The point is, yes,

0:20:16.316 --> 0:20:18.636
<v Speaker 1>it's a harder problem. It's not I would say a

0:20:18.716 --> 0:20:22.996
<v Speaker 1>step function harder. It's just it's just got additional sort

0:20:23.036 --> 0:20:26.916
<v Speaker 1>of technical engineering challenges that we have to figure out.

0:20:27.196 --> 0:20:29.476
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be saying it if I wasn't highly confident

0:20:30.116 --> 0:20:32.716
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have something to launch the world

0:20:32.796 --> 0:20:34.836
<v Speaker 1>within the next, say, couple of years. What are you

0:20:34.916 --> 0:20:37.316
<v Speaker 1>going to launch? And by when more or less, we

0:20:37.476 --> 0:20:42.236
<v Speaker 1>certainly expect to be launching a great steak product and

0:20:42.476 --> 0:20:45.596
<v Speaker 1>other hole cuts you can think of as like pork

0:20:45.716 --> 0:20:51.316
<v Speaker 1>tenderloin or chicken breast or like great pieces of meat

0:20:51.436 --> 0:20:55.316
<v Speaker 1>years pieces of meat that have that have the anatomy,

0:20:55.436 --> 0:20:58.156
<v Speaker 1>if you know what I mean. Yeah, Yeah, within a

0:20:58.196 --> 0:21:00.796
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, meaning like twenty twenty four ish. You know,

0:21:01.036 --> 0:21:03.876
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna I'm not gonna make promises here, but

0:21:03.956 --> 0:21:11.996
<v Speaker 1>I would say pretty high confidence. Yes, Impossible Foods has

0:21:12.156 --> 0:21:16.036
<v Speaker 1>made a profoundly better veggie burger, but the company still

0:21:16.076 --> 0:21:18.276
<v Speaker 1>has a ways to go to solve that big problem

0:21:18.396 --> 0:21:22.476
<v Speaker 1>slash dream of really making meat without animals, which is

0:21:22.516 --> 0:21:25.556
<v Speaker 1>an absurdly big, hard problem that lots of companies are

0:21:25.596 --> 0:21:29.596
<v Speaker 1>working on. We'll have more about that next week, including

0:21:29.636 --> 0:21:32.356
<v Speaker 1>both some of the struggles the industry has been going

0:21:32.436 --> 0:21:35.516
<v Speaker 1>through lately and also more on what may be coming

0:21:35.756 --> 0:21:38.396
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years. But before we go to day,

0:21:38.916 --> 0:21:48.716
<v Speaker 1>we'll do the lightning round. That's in a minute. Okay,

0:21:48.796 --> 0:21:50.956
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the show. We're gonna close with

0:21:50.996 --> 0:21:56.196
<v Speaker 1>the lightning round. What's the most overrated vegetable? That's interesting?

0:21:57.396 --> 0:22:00.876
<v Speaker 1>I think the sweet potnia. I'm gonna get some haymail

0:22:00.916 --> 0:22:03.396
<v Speaker 1>on that one. But sweet potato, Heymail's good, Hey mail.

0:22:03.676 --> 0:22:07.836
<v Speaker 1>What's the most underrated vegetable? That's really tough fun. Oh

0:22:07.916 --> 0:22:11.076
<v Speaker 1>maybe Brussels spread. Okay, they've made a comeback. It's a

0:22:11.196 --> 0:22:14.316
<v Speaker 1>divisive one. They've made a comeback. Yeah, they're hip, They're

0:22:14.436 --> 0:22:17.356
<v Speaker 1>it vegetable. I'm a fan. If everything goes well, what's

0:22:17.356 --> 0:22:21.516
<v Speaker 1>a problem you'll be trying to solve in say, five years. Oh, actually,

0:22:21.596 --> 0:22:24.356
<v Speaker 1>that's a very good question. So and impossible foods. What

0:22:24.516 --> 0:22:30.516
<v Speaker 1>we're doing is using market competition to reduce the economic

0:22:30.636 --> 0:22:34.956
<v Speaker 1>incentive for covering land with cows and crops to feed

0:22:34.996 --> 0:22:39.516
<v Speaker 1>pigs and chickens and stuff like that. Right. The next step, though,

0:22:39.796 --> 0:22:42.156
<v Speaker 1>is what to do with that land and how to

0:22:42.236 --> 0:22:45.196
<v Speaker 1>make the most of the opportunity. Okay, here's another question.

0:22:45.676 --> 0:22:48.156
<v Speaker 1>There are other companies trying to do what you do.

0:22:48.436 --> 0:22:50.476
<v Speaker 1>Beyond meat is a big one. There's lots of others.

0:22:51.036 --> 0:22:54.636
<v Speaker 1>You are clearly driven by mission, right, I believe that

0:22:54.716 --> 0:22:56.356
<v Speaker 1>you are not in this to get rich or whatever.

0:22:56.476 --> 0:23:00.596
<v Speaker 1>So does it matter to you whether Impossible Food winds

0:23:00.716 --> 0:23:04.716
<v Speaker 1>or some other company makes incredible technology that makes meat obsolete? Like,

0:23:04.836 --> 0:23:07.276
<v Speaker 1>does that matter to who wins? Not? Really? No, I

0:23:07.316 --> 0:23:09.436
<v Speaker 1>mean it matters to me a little bit. Now that

0:23:09.476 --> 0:23:11.396
<v Speaker 1>I have the company. There are people who you know,

0:23:11.596 --> 0:23:14.956
<v Speaker 1>depend on it for their jobs. But basically, even the

0:23:15.116 --> 0:23:17.636
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of our business, the best thing that

0:23:17.756 --> 0:23:22.076
<v Speaker 1>could happen with other companies is for them to make

0:23:22.876 --> 0:23:27.556
<v Speaker 1>better products. Okay, because the biggest obstacle to you know,

0:23:27.756 --> 0:23:31.636
<v Speaker 1>our growth and traction and so forth is there's a

0:23:31.876 --> 0:23:35.996
<v Speaker 1>very strong preconceived notion that any purported meat product that's

0:23:36.036 --> 0:23:41.476
<v Speaker 1>made from plants is going to suck and making more

0:23:41.596 --> 0:23:45.356
<v Speaker 1>products that reinforce that notion only hurts us. So I

0:23:45.436 --> 0:23:48.436
<v Speaker 1>would love to see any any plant based company, any

0:23:48.476 --> 0:23:50.636
<v Speaker 1>company that's trying to replace animals in the food system,

0:23:50.676 --> 0:23:52.996
<v Speaker 1>however they're doing it as far as I'm concerned as

0:23:52.996 --> 0:23:56.636
<v Speaker 1>an ally, and I sincerely wish them the best success.

0:24:02.476 --> 0:24:05.716
<v Speaker 1>Pat Brown is the founder of Impossible Foods. He's currently

0:24:05.796 --> 0:24:08.156
<v Speaker 1>on leave from the company, scheduled to return in March.

0:24:08.516 --> 0:24:11.196
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with m last year. Next week, we'll have

0:24:11.316 --> 0:24:14.076
<v Speaker 1>more on the future of fake meat, including a company

0:24:14.156 --> 0:24:17.276
<v Speaker 1>trying to grow meat from animal cells. Which do you

0:24:17.356 --> 0:24:19.676
<v Speaker 1>even call it fake meat anymore? If it's made from

0:24:19.676 --> 0:24:24.116
<v Speaker 1>animal cells? Truly, I don't know. Today's show was produced

0:24:24.156 --> 0:24:27.076
<v Speaker 1>by Edith Russolo, edited by Robert Smith and Sarah Knicks,

0:24:27.316 --> 0:24:31.196
<v Speaker 1>and engineered by Amanda k Wong. I'm Jacob Goldstein. You

0:24:31.316 --> 0:24:34.196
<v Speaker 1>can find us on Twitter I'm at Jacob Goldstein, or

0:24:34.236 --> 0:24:37.516
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at problem at pushkin dot fm.

0:24:37.916 --> 0:24:40.156
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week with another episode of What's

0:24:40.196 --> 0:24:40.676
<v Speaker 1>Your Problem.