WEBVTT - Trump Government Muddies Economics With Politics: Alan Blinder

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. He

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>has been at Princeton since the early nineteen seventies. Alan

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Blinder is an economist. He's a former vice chair of

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve. He is currently the Gordon Renschler Memorial

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Economics at Princeton University, and he is the

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>author of a new book is that It is entitled

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Advice and Dissent Why America's Suffers When Economics and Politics Collide.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Alan Blinder, thank you very much for being with us.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump right into which you describe. You

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have an interesting phrase in the book. I believe it's

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a new world have you And I'm wondering if

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you could sort of describe where you came up with that,

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe just also tell us how do you define

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>political logic? All right, let me try to do those uh,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>The phrase was at the end of an anecdote that

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I was relating from when I, way back in the

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>nineties migrated temporarily from the academic world to the political

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>world and experienced at the table with Bill Clinton, who

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>was then President elect, my first photo op. If you're

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>an academic, you don't do a lot of photo ops.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you don't do any But if you're a politician,

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you do. And Bill Clinton, as the photographers rushed in,

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>said to me, um Alan, You're now supposed to say

0:01:54.720 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing and look profound. And I retorted, as funny, because

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of my previous jobs, I was supposed to say profound

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>things that look like nothing. Uh So it was indeed

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a new world for me. Um Your question about political

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>logic goes to a number of things that informal logic,

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>or what I call in the book Aristotelian logic, kind

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of things we teach in universities are very different. I'll

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>give you an example that's really arithmetic, which is a

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>form of logic. If you take a policy, and by

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, many details of trade policies and tax policies

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are like this. That gives a very large um gift

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to a relatively small number of people and uh and

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>also disadvantages, but by small amounts, many, many millions of people.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Economic logic would likely say that's a bad idea. You

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>added up over the millions of people, and that's a

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. Political logic says, this is a great idea

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because the millions of people that lose, you know, I

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>make up a number two dollars a year are not

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>going to notice it that I won't understand that even

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>if they do, two dollars does not move them to

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>political action. But if other people are gaining millions, that will.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Professor Blinder, I'm struck by an implicit assumption in this

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that you shouldn't mix economics and politics. Um, are

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we really worse than we ever have been before? Because

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this has always been the issue, from the foundation of

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, in the U. S. Treasury Department, it

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>has always been the issue. I think we're worse than

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ever before, and presumably this is a temporary condition because

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump's general rejection of expertise in every domain.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>This is not just the economics that he does this

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and I can't remember another I don't think we ever

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>had another president that had that kind of atitude towards expertise,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which is not to say, and this is your point, really,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that they've always followed the advice of expert technicians. No,

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they haven't. In fact, more often than not they rejected it.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's okay, because, um, we live in a democracy

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and we elect politicians, not technocrats to make decisions. Yeah,

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Professor Blinder. One area of the government that typically has

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>tried to remain at least the veneer of being somewhat

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>independent from the sort of political regime is the Federal Reserve.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of vacancies on the Federal Reserve.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>One that has got garnered some attention is the rumor

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that John Williams will be the next New York Fed

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>president selection. I'm wondering what is your feeling about that,

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and just generally about sort of the composition of the

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Fed right now. Yeah. So, uh, you know, there there

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has been a clamor for some time for diversity, and

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm very sympathetic to that. I think other things that well,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it's better to have diversity. Um, we had a woman

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>chairman of the Faith, which was great, and she was

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a great chair of the Fed, Janet Ellen. I think

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>John Williams is an excellent selection for the presidency of

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the New York Fed. That's not, by the way, a

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>political appointment, unlike the governor. Know you mentioned the vacancies.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>There lots of vacancies exists on the Board of Governors,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and for that we need nominees from President Trump that

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>get confirmed by the Senate. John Williams at the New

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>York Fed or any of the bank presidents of the

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve federal reserve banks are not political appointees. Why do

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you what do you want people to take away from

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the book Advice and dissent. Yeah, it's a good question.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd like people to take away the stark contrast between

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the advice that's given by a lot of economists, and

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of course it's not all the same, although I do

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>emphasize in the book there's a lot more agreement among

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>economists and people commonly think, and the way that it

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is ignored or distorted or so on by politicians. I

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want people thinking that I believe that technocrats should

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>be making all these decisions. I don't. But what I

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>think we could do a better job of is, like

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I used the phrase in the book, moving the needle

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit away from where it is now, where

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>decisions are just so so political with very little technocratic

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>input that actually matters, and just move it a bit

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>away from that. I think we could get better economic

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>policies if we did that. Do you get the sense

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that sort of career government workers are still head down

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>doing their job making the country run, or do you

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>think that the current administration has changed that aspect of government.

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they are there with their heads found. Who

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have there john some of them hiding under their dead

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the storm to pass. But here's the thing. Uh,

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>let's druk sharp contrast between our system and say, the

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>British system. In the British system, a new government comes in,

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the minister gets replaced, everybody else stays on the job.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>In our system, the political appointees come in and they

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>take about the five top levels of the bureaucracy over

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the technocrats start below that. The these uh

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>people that Steve Mannon called the deep state. Uh, except

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that the State Department, which has been almost denuded, it

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>seems a lot of the deep state people are still

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>there and they're trying to ride out this storm. The

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>e p A is another place where they're having a

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>very very hard uh, very very hard time. But so

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the cabinet member that changes. It's quite

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a few people, uh, in any in any cabinet department.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Alan Blinder, thank you so much for being with us.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>He is the Gordon Renchler Memorial Professor of Economics at

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Princeton University, also former FED Vice chair uh and he

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>has a new book, Advice and Dissent, Why America Suffers

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>when Economics and Politics collide. Sinclair Broadcast Group is the

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest US broadcaster. It is trying to tie up loose

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ends as the FEC decides whether it can buy Tribune Media,

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>and now it's generating a new controversy. Here to tell

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>us more about that, I'm so happy to bring in

0:08:54.360 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's Holman, who covers all things related to wages, salaries, compensation,

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>personnel issues. Jordan's just, first of all, can you set

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the stage. What is the controversy here with Sinclair? So

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, uh, the Sinclair anchors across the country

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they were giving, you know, a blanket speech. I was saying,

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we decry false news and dead spend put together a

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>video of all these anchors saying the same words, and

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>some people in the media and people watching felt like

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>it was a shot at the integrity of the news media. Okay,

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>so why is this now causing some angst among the

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>nearly two hundred stations that Sinclair runs. So a lot

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the journalists I spoke to who work at Sinclair,

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't like that their company was in the spotlight

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in that negative way, that it looked like they were

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>talking negatively about other media companies. And so the question

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>started to come up, well, why don't you just quit?

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you leave and go somewhere else? And people

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>said that in their contract they would have to pay

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>up to their annual compensate shin if they wanted to

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>leave before their contract was over, which is a steep

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>price if they broke their contracts. Yeah, so that's that's

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>my question. I mean, is this normal to have, say,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a two year contract, especially in broadcast, uh, that has

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a penalty should you choose to quit. So on broadcast,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is normal to have a contract that you ask someone

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to stay two or three years. But what's not normal

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that some lawyers said who I spoke to, is that

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you have the steep penalty that you have to give

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>your compensation if you leave beforehand, and that if it

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>usually applies to orang air talent, but at Sinclair, some

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>people who never appeared on TV had to sign that

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>clause and maybe just also offer up what the response

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>was from Sinclair and the various UH maybe TV stations

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or broadcast networks that you were able to contact in

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>regards to the story. So Sinclair's vice president of news

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>he sent out a memo to all the employees UH

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday on Monday, saying that critics were ubsite at their

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just is and to have the anchors read this false

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>news statement but that context was missing and perspective was

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>missing missing, and that employees would be proud of where

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they work. Sinclair hasn't directly um spoken to Bloomberg about it,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but some employees still didn't feel like that was enough. Okay,

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to be very clear, the lines that we're talking about

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>here are the sharing of biased and false news has

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>become all too common on social media. Some members of

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, you know, there are a lot

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of people who probably believe this, and you know, you

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>might even have some journalists who do feel like this

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is the case who work for Sinclair. Why is this different, right,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Why is this different from just a number of people

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>saying something sort of decrying and ambiguous, uh sort of concept. Well,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>when you go back to the idea of what's the

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>context around Sinclair, they are the largest broadcaster in the US.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>They reached about thirty eight percent of households in the US.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So when they're you know, broadcasting this to all markets

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>across the country, some people don't agree with that, you know,

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>they it seems like you're taking shots within the industry. Well,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but this is this is the key question. Is it

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the content of what that said? Or is it the

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that journalists who are supposed to be coming at

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>something from a sort of impartial perspective or given a

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>script to read. I mean, how unusual is that aspect

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of this, Right, It's definitely something you don't see every day.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think that video really resonated when it

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was like all these journalists from all these differ cities

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are saying the exact same thing. So it kind of

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>seems like, well, we're Sinclair saying we're being impartial and

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we're the real journalists. But they're still providing a script

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't always add up. And so you know, the

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>journalist I spoke to at Sinclair said that that rubbed

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.239
<v Speaker 1>them wrong. They did not like that, and that they

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>even if they wanted away out, it just seemed too expensive. Um,

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a case right now, former employee who works in

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Florida who suit the or who got sued by the

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>company for leaving early, for breaking his contract act. And

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>now he's facing that in court and he has a

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and assistant. Expensive process to want to leave if

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to. And and also just to add to this, uh,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Sinclair is described as the country's largest broadcaster right it

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.719
<v Speaker 1>has about it has a hundred and ninety three television stations,

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and it is seeking to purchase Tribune Media for three

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>point nine billion dollars and regulators are looking over that

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>potential acquisition because of any trust concerns. Right, Yeah, it

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>would make it even huger broadcaster, reaching even more Americans.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But President Trump supports that. Yes, So yesterday, um, he

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>tweeted that Sinclair was a far superior network compared to

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>NBC or CNN, and so he did definitely you know,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>throw his hat behind like them as a broadcast institution. Well,

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is a story that's going to keep

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on developing, and we thank you very much for sharing

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it with us and giving us this detail. Jordan's Holman

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg News about Sinclair employees uh AS, saying that

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>contracts make it too expensive for them to quit the company.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>One area that we really need to address is in Britain.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>We are dealing with less than a year now before

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Brexit day countdown has begun. There are some crucial issues

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to be decided. It's unclear whether there is much progress

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>being made on them. Here to join us is Baroness

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Helena Kennedy, a Labor Party member of the House of Lords,

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>coming to us here in our eleven three studios in

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>New York, even though she's normally based in London. Thank

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here. I want to want

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask about momentum, because I think in

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the US, for example, a lot of times when you

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Brexit, people's eyes glaze over. Oh, that's still going

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on again. Aren't they just going to come to some

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of resolution and everything's going to move on the

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>way it was. Do you think that people are not

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>paying enough attention to the potential ramifications of what's going

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to have to happen in the next year. It's taken

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a long time to get to this point. I mean,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we've wasted such a lot of time, um really dealing

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with the complexity which people hadn't fully understood. And so

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that slowly there is a realization actually economically

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of peace and Ireland, in terms of the

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>immigration issues, that actually this is not going to be

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the solution to many of the problems that people felt

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>very strongly about. And so I think that that's slowly

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>filtering through, but it's getting late in the day further

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to be any kind of real comeback on that. I mean,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we've the deadline now is October. We've been told by

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>our the negotiators in Europe. Um I met with Barnier,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who is leading the European Union negotiations. Um I met

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with him a month ago and he said October is

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the deadline because it has to go in front of

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>all the European and the European Parliament has to go

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in front of our parliament. To October is a deadline

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for exactly what this Brexit deal would look like. What

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the deal would look like and so and so we've

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>really got a very small window of time in which

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to nail this down. And that's the real anxiety, because

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>already there's been an agreement which is causing a lot

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of unhappiness, which is the transition deal, a recognition that

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.239
<v Speaker 1>by March of next year, a year from now exactly,

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we will not be in a place to actually say

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it's done and dusted. There has to be we will not.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be a period of transition which will

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not end until December two thousand and twenty. And during

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that period things will carry on much the same as

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they are as a lot of people who are saying,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but we voted to leave, we thought it was going

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a pretty swift deal and we'd get out

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and start treading with the rest of the world on

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>our own, not with the rest of Europe and uh,

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's not going to be happening. And it's become

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>clear because for example, business does not want to drop

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff cliff age, and so they want to transition.

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And there was a lot of pressure being put on government,

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>by by business and by the city to say, look,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to have serious transition, slow, slowly, safely surely,

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>rather than somehow dropping off the edge and not knowing

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>where we're going. Uncertainty, of course is bad for business,

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's bad for everybody and bad for individuals inside

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>our society too. Baroness Kennedy, if if Brexit and the

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>referendum process, uh, we're to have appeared before blind justice.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know why I'm mentioning this because maybe you

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>can offer people a little bit of your personal background.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think would be revealed about the actual

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>referendum process and what people knew at the time of

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the referendum and what we are learning now about potential

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>foreign interference uh in the referendum to leave or stay

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>inside the European Union. Well, it is interesting. I mean,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the problem with with a referendum is always that the

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>question is simple, do you want to stay in Europe?

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to get out? And for many

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>people the answer to that is actually more complicated. I'd

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like to leave these aspects of it and I don't

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>want to leave those aspects of it or um. And

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>so for many people it was the answer was much

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>more nuanced than just saying out or in um. And

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>so that's the problem always with our referendum um the

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that we now know that there's a real likelihood,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a real possibility that there was interference, and that Cambridge

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Analytica that possibly the Russian Russian money, that there was

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>interference in different ways in the outcomes and the ways

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in which people were influenced to making that decision. I'm

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>not sure that if you said to many of the

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>people now, would you have changed your vote, that they

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>would say that they would have done. The people like

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that they made it on their own beliefs

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and they were not deeply influenced by the opinions of

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>others or the ways in which they were receiving information.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know whether that would make the difference.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>But what people are realizing is that economically it's not

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be it's not going to be the day

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>in the country that they were given to understand the story,

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the lie in fact, and it was a lie was

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>told where where buses traveled through our cities with the

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>message on the side saying in every week, fifty million

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>pounds more will be spent on the national health service

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>if we're out of Europe, because instead of paying money

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>into the contributory schemes of Europe. We will have this

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>money available to spend on the national health service. In fact,

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>when it was hammered down, it wasn't true that that

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that piece of information was a completely phony and if

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about fake news, where that was seriously fake news.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So and people are realizing that the economic story is

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to be so good. And already people are

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling the pinch. They're feeling that the pound in their

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>pocket is not worth as much. There's been a devaluation.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>There's a sense in which they're they're realizing that food

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to become much more expensive. Um. There's also

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a worry that a certainly food coming from Europe

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>because of we won't have the benefits of the of

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the Single market or of the Customs Union where we

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>don't pay customs duties. There's also the an issue I

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>have to see it about the United States is that

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we had imagined that there would be great deals to

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be done with the United States for us alone, because

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we are special, we have a special relationship with you guys,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you're our cousins and so and people are now suddenly

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>getting a bit worried because they're hearing your president talking

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about in much more protectionist terms and about the possibility

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of tarrifsms on. So they're much more worried about what

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>will that look like and will we get the deals

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with you or China or India that we imagined, and

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>will they follow fast on our leaving Europe or will

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it take a hell of a long time before it

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>happens with Within Parliament, when you have private conversations with, say,

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Brexit hardliners, do you get the sense that any of

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>them are softening their position at all? Not at all.

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The hardliners are not shifting one jot, but a lot

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the people that the room mainers are very on

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Conservative ventures. The remainders have the problem that they

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a loyalty they feel settling in the House of Lords.

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Many of the people who were appointed huge numbers are

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>appointed by David Cameron, many of them remainers like David

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Cameron himself. UM, But they do feel a loyalty to

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>party and I think that the it would only be

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>if they really feel that the deal, the ultimate deal

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is is catastrophic UM, that they will they will vote

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>against because there will be a debate in Parliament in

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>October when the crunge comes, and then there's the issue

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of Labor and what will Labor's position be, which has

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>also been constructive. Ambiguity was how it was being described,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, saying that they're not happy with the way

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that the negotiations are going, that they would want to

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have much greater and closer connection to Europe in the

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in the you know, as we go forward. Um but

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but Corbin has been very clear in saying that he's

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>not in favor of staying in the Single Market. So

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>may and of course that the vast majority of politicians

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>in Labor do to stay. So it's all rather macy

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. So where we're going, I still don't know.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we look to you to help us

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>understand what's come back and give you the inside skinny.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it and we look forward to it. Baroness

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Helena Kennedy, Labor Party member of the House of Lords,

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are joining us here in our eleven three oh studios.

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Markets. I'm pim Fox my co

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>host Lisa abram Witz. This is Bloomberg. In other news,

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Astronomers using the Hubble space telescope found the farthest star

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>ever observed, a bright dot nine billion light years away.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to go home and talk about this

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with Anyone who owns a home in Manhattan should be

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>watching this figure. The number of sales plunged the most

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>since the recession. What does this mean for the road forward?

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now? Jonathan Miller, President and chief executive officer

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of Miller Samuel in New York. Jonathan explained, how concern

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>should people be about this? Well, I think it's less

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>about concern and more just about awareness. The reason why

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw the sales volume drop, there's really twofold one

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is we've seen a real drop in UM the closings

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of what I call legacy contracts UH New Development. That's

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>all those super luxury buildings that contracts are signed several

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>years ago that UH had could close until the buildings

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are completed, and those have largely UM. The buildings have

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>largely been completed, so we've seen a real fall off

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in their closing volume. And that's skewed top level prices

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>down for the market. And also UH contributed to part

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of this decline in sales. The other big part UH,

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think probably two thirds of that UH is

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>really related to the uncertainty. And you know the word

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>location three times is the trite real estate uh phrase

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of our lives. Uh. Really, now, it's uncertainty and and

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's really has to do with the federal tax

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>law and its impact on high cost housing markets. It's

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not that the actual items in the tax law are

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>impacting the market, to call the slow slowdown, it's essentially

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty of it is causing participants to take a

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer to make decisions. So you know, overall

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>prices actually trended up, uh if you remove UM the

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>new development component to it. So it's really a market

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>where uh, you know, I think we're looking at over

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the next year, buyers and sellers are going to dance

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>around what the new equilibrium is between them and UM,

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're probably going to see some software prices going forward. Jonathan,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Then what do you say whenever you hear people respond

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to the question about state and local tax deductions for

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>property tax in that cap of ten thousand and basically

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it gets waved off as not relevant to the actual

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>transaction in a high cost area such as New York

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>or even in places like California. Do you believe it.

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, not at all. I think it absolutely has

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>an impact. I think the reason why it was waved

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>off is there was this idea that that those additional

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>costs would be offset by a tax cut. Um. But

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people, when they have a collection of assets,

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to be willing to overpay for one asset

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>while saving on another. Um. They really look at each

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>asset individually, and I think, um, you know, there's also

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hyperbole about this, but I think the

0:25:55.680 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>general rule of thumb is the higher the property rice generally,

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the higher the impact of the new tax all will

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>be on the property. But it really comes down to

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the individual tax situations of the of you know, of

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the homeowner more than ever before. Well, this you raise

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a really good point. I think a lot of people

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>dismissed the effects of the tax law on sort of

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage deduction being kepped at rather than a million

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars as not having that big of an effect. What

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>about that piece of it? Does that have an effect?

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Or is this mostly just the overlap between state and

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>federal taxes? I think sault Satan local taxes is the

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>deduction is much more important to focus on than the

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>mortgage interest deduction. Uh that I think is has less

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of much less of an impact, if any, It's much

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>more about all the deductions. The way to look at

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the way I look at it, is that

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this is really the process of the federal government extracting

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>itself them the home ownership promotion business. And they're hoping

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that by doubling standard deductions for single and married will

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>provide um, you know, some offset to this and and

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and that is certainly true. It just becomes more problematic

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as you shift into higher cross housing markets, which are

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>generally on the East and West coast. Jonathan, give you

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds. Maintenance fees and the percentage of taxes

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that are included in maintenance fees. Is that going to

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>go up? I think. I think the reduction of of

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the lack of ability to deduct those um is going

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to make maintenance feel a lot more expensive than it

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>currently is. I want to thank you very much, Jonathan Millery,

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 1>President and the chief executive officer of Miller Samuel, offering

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>some insight into the Manhattan home market. Thanks for listening

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one.

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide on

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio