WEBVTT - Episode 43: What have they done?

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi, and welcome back to Bloomberg Benchmark, a show about

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the global economy. It's Friday June. I'm Daniel Moss, Executive

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>editor for Global Economics at Bloomberg and New York, and

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined on the line from London by my colleague

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Gordon. Paul is responsible for Western European central banks,

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the news on the central banks. So Paul, what kind

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of night have you had? A long one, for certain,

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I was in at about four o'clock in the morning.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I got up about four o'clock morning to get out

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the hotel and head over to the office and severally

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>bemused handful of people on the street at that time.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>A little later on, my colleague was down at Canary Wharf,

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously a big financial district in London, and there people

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>were looking at their phones, looking at the headlines. There

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of swearing, i can tell you, and

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the muse face. And there's a good

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>reason for that, because these are the people who have

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>been hit most of all. Initially, the markets have been plunging,

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>as you're aware, and it is the bankers he may

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.919
<v Speaker 1>well be fearing for their jobs in some areas following

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a brexcept and Britain's vote to leave the EU wasn't

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>really even that close, was it. Well, in the end,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much cent so no, nowhere near as close as

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the opinion polls had been in the run

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>up to the vote, and nowhere near as close. Quite

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the reverse in fact of what the first opinion poll

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>said once the polls closed yesterday. So a lot of

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>people went to bed last night thinking, right, the Leave

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>campaign has lost, Remain will win, And when they got

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>up this morning they found it was a very different story.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>And the country is not just divided on whether to

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>stay or whether to go. The results and where the

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>results have come from indicate a nation divided economically some

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty stark ways. Talk about that, yes, I mean one

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the key divisions that you seen is on age.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>The young have been supporters and the elderly much less.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So There's been division on wealth as well, the wealthier

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>people have wanted to stay and the poorer have not.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And also geographically, with the North in many cases voting

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>out and the South and particularly London voting in the

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>other exceptions there are though, that Scotland and Northern Ireland

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>voted to stay, and that does make the question of

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the UK that union three year old union also gets

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>called into question. So speaking of London, it is one

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the great cities of the world. It is by

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>far the most populous region of the country. When you

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the Starbucks around the corner from our office

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for a red Eye with an extra shot, do you

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>expect to see people with their head in their hands?

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, what have we done? Well, I'll tell

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you there's a good point to remember is that when

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you do go to your local Starbucks, the person serving

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you may well not be British. They may well have

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>come from one of the Southern European countries or one

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Eastern European countries. One person I spoke to

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier this morning, he asked me if I knew what

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the result was, and I told him where it was headed,

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that Leave was winning. He said that's good, and I said, well,

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>why is that? And he said that's going to be

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>good for the Southern European economies. All I could say

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there was, don't be so sure at the point they're

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being that, we don't yet know quite what ramifications of

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this are going to be on a global scale. It's

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fairly clear what they're going to be, at least in

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the medium term on a national scale, but globally not

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>so much. We'll get back to the barista in a second,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's emblematic of something that we do

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>need to discuss. But first of all, under the immediate stuff,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>now you're responsible for Western European central banks, the biggest

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of which is the ECB, which in itself is a

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>product of the EU and was seen at the time

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of its establishment in the late nineties as a just

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a really natural thing, like dirt. We're more closely integrated.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a central bank that institution. Yes, well, there

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>were plenty of calls you'll remember yourself at the time,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, look, this doesn't actually make a lot of

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sense to have a monitory union when you don't have

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a proper fiscal union. But the push was there too

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>deep in European integration, and Monsher Union was seen as

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>one way of doing that. There is now some strain.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>There has been a lot of strain within the EU

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>area for quite some time. What may happen now is

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that because of the success of the lead campaign in

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the UK, you get stronger calls for anti euro parties

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in countries like Spain, countries like Italy, and that makes

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the European central banks job far harder, and the European

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank is struggling. That undermines the khesive myths of

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the European Union in the eyes of some people. Wouldn't

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it be ironic if it was Britain, which never really

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to join the euro system over which the ECB presides,

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was the thing that not the e c B the greatest,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>not Portugal, not Greece, not Italy, not Spain. That's entirely feasible.

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The ECB has was quite slow, i have to say,

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to respond today getting a state with out well behind

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan and

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the other banks that were open at that time.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been it had some tense discussions, we understand, and

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that has highlighted some of the struggles within the European

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank that you are made up in nineteen countries,

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen central bank governors all with a slightly different

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>views there. But ultimately this is quite a strain on

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the European central banks ability to operate. And you're right,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's coming from a non new country Britain. This lead

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>vote is being characterized, at least in part as a

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>rejection of the liberal economic establishment, which has by and

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>large flourished since nineteen and the idea here was again

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>seemingly inexorable, seemingly inevitable, free flow of goods, services, capital,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and people. And the European Central Bank is about as

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>polyglot as you can get. The Bank think of England

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>is headed by a Canadian and you and me, Paul,

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>were products of that system. Now I first met you

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>when you were in Hong Kong. You were born in Britain,

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and your wife is from where and you now live

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in Frankfort, right. My wife is German, and my children,

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>who knows where they come from. They were born in

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. They live in Germany, but they've got British

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>grandparents and great grandparents. So there is this generation coming

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>through that has an international feel to it, but it's

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>not really the majority of the population. And that's really

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>key for European politicians to think about Netlork. Not everybody

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>benefits from globalization, or if they are benefiting from globalization,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't realize it. They feel that they're suffering somehow.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>That others are benefiting more, and that's what's caused this backlash.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>That's dangerous for the European Union, for the European project,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous for the as you know, the supposedly inexorable

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>rise towards globalism, which is not really inexorable. It's been

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a sort of been a lot of politicians sort of haggling,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>sorting out deals between themselves, and there have been has

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>been a jump start, start and stop progress over more

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>than more than a hundred years. So I was not

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>born in the United States. I was born in Australia.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I've lived and worked around the world thanks to our employer,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. My son was born in the UK, my

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>daughter was born here. Our colleagues, our producer Magnus born

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in Sweden. Our colleague Alec, who does a lot to

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>make the podcasts get to air, lived for many, many

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>years in Hong Kong. I mean, are we being rejected here?

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Is our model of the economy and the way we

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>see ourselves when we travel, when we buy things, when

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we think about our aspirations for the future, we being rejected.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a great question, and I don't suppose we have

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that. At this point. Again, this is

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>something politicians going to have to sit back and think about,

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>what are the economic benefits and how are those benefits

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>being distributed, and if they're not being distributed fairly, you

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>do get a political backlash, the political backlast that we've

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>been seeing, and that may make the whole model as

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>as you say, rejected, and that would be rather worrisome

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for our generation. But not everybody sees it that way.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So the barista you mentioned in Starbucks, he or she

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to go home tomorrow. What's going to happen

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for the next couple of years. This is going to

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>be a rather sort of torturous back and forth process,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but they will have to leave correct well. Interestingly, there

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was a survey done amongst the German investors that concluded

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>only yesterday and of those respondents said they did not

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think of Brexit would ultimately result in the UK leaving

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the EUN and that goes against everything that the politicians

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the British debate have said. But

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I did hear the argument made again today that maybe

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the European Union will come back with such a generous

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>offer that Britain rethinks its stance. The most likely outcome, though,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is s over the next two years, the British exit

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>from the EU is negotiated without Britain taking partners negotiations,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a deal is struck by which it has some kind

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of links to the EU. What they are remains completely

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>unknown at the moment. There are models Norway as one,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland is another, but they may not be suitable for

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and that means two years of quite a

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of uncertainty. The global economy just can't seem to

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>find blue water at the moment, can it. You're right,

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you have this issue where you've got the rise of

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>nations like China for a while, you have the rise

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>of nations like Brazil, which is obviously going through a

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>very tough time at the moment. And when you get

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>those rapid periods of economic growth amongst sizeable or becomes

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>sizable economies and then they slow down, there are international repercussions,

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and again you've got that anger amongst some groups of

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>people built up as they've seen their manufacturing jobs outsourced

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in their view, and now things are slowing down and

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not really in a position to benefit one way

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or the other. And we could be in for some

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>years of fairly tough times on a global scale, just

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>when it looks like the global economy has dodged a bullet,

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, in January, there are all sorts of dire

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>predictions about China and the market tumult that accompanied and

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that abated, and we moved forward. People thought Greece would

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>blow up the euroregion. Okay, we survived that, We moved forward,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and I guess we'll struggle along or drift along with

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>global growth somewhere around two or three percent. But that's

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not great, Paul, is it? It's not great. There are

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>many arguments out there that say that this may be

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the way it remains for a long while. The arguments

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes sent on the demographics. There's just a relatively large

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>supply of labor, which keeps prices down and keeps productivity low.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>There is, of course, the techno pessimism argument, which says

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>that inventions from eighteen seventy through nine seventy were one off,

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be repeated. That gave a vast

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>boost to growth in the developed world and ultimately the

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, and they can't be repeated. So

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>those arguments come in. If you do want to see

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>growth pick up, You've got to find some kind of

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a source, something which is going to push us along,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and clearly, by its very nature that's as yet unknown

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and as shocking as it is. The central banks have

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>made it known that they have prepared for this event,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>even though it wasn't the result they wanted. Let's talk

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about the person that's really in the hot seat. Bank

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of England Governor Mark Karney himself a product of the

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>free flow of global goods, services, capital and people. Yes,

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>he is part of the free flow people from Canada

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to the UK, and he's quite a few people. During

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this whole Brexit debate, the Bank of England has put

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>out a numerous statements pointing to the downside risks of

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a Brexit, and some have taken that as seeing the

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England intervening in a political debate instead of

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>staying out of it. To the Mark Karney's defense has

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 1>been that nobody knows his personal view, that these were

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>all economic statements of probability which may or may not

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>come to fruition now we're seeing them being tested. But

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly the market slump was something that was predicted. The

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>drop in the pound it was something that was predicted,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but because he is identified with that, with the remain stance,

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>through no fault of his own, he would say there's

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a question mark over his future. Now Now, Governor Carney

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>made a televised address in addition to the statement that

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England put out, and if I'm interpreting

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>it that correctly, the first line of defense is liquidity operations.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Just throw as much liquidity at British lenders as possible,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and the second line monetary policy, well will get to

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>that in a few weeks. Is that the right interpretation,

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It might be he wasn't quite that specific, certainly on

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity, there's no doubt about that. The Bank of

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>England has two fifty billion pounds which it can throw

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>at banks should they need it. Banks can also access

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>swap clients with major banks around the world, including the FED,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the e CV, the Bank of Japan, the Swiss national banks,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and liquidity really shouldn't be an issue here. The key thing,

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>as you say, is what happens next if there needs

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to be some kind of response to deal with the economy,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's difficult one to say. The slump in the

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>pound could push up inflation, which reduces the room for

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England to cut interest rates if it

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to do so. But rates are at zero point

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>five the ECB as rates zero. It shows you can

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>take them that low, and some economists have said that's

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>precisely what the Bank of England is going to have

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. And does Governor Carnee have some work to

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of repairing relations with the out camp?

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Who now, of course are the in camp? Depends who's

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to deal with I guess I mean

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, of course, we still have the pre

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>existing government. David Cameron will step down. It remains to

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be seeing what happens with the rest of his colleagues,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but their positions are obviously not very strong. Whoever is

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>coming in is at least initially almost certainly going to

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with Mark Kearney, and Mark Conny is

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going to have to handle that quite sensitively. He probably

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>has the skill to do so. Questions whether he chooses to,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and that remains to be seen. Well, we better let

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>you go and get that red eye with an extra shot.

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But first I'm just wondering when you come home to

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Frankfort tonight and you walk in the door and you

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>see your polyglot family, What on earth are you going

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to say to them? Sorry, honey, we shrunk the union. Seriously.

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I did text my wife to say, you know, she

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>asked how things were going, and I said, it's madness

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, and she replied, it's sadness. And that's

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the response I'm going to get when I go home. Well, Paul,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us. Benchmark will be back next week

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and until then, you can find us on the Bloomberg

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Terminal and Bloomberg dot com, as well as on iTunes,

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>pocket Cast, and Stitcher. While you're there, take a minute

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to rate and review the show so more listeners can

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>find us. You can talk to and follow us on

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Dan almost DC and Paul you are p

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Gordon sixty six on Twitter. See you next week. M. M.