WEBVTT - Why the Price of Gold Reflects a Long-Term Shift

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Merendalks Money, the podcasting which people who know

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the markets explain the markets.

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm maren' unset web.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>This week I'm speaking with John Reid, the World Gold

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Council's senior market strategist for Europe and Asia. John has

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>over thirty five years experience in the gold industry. He's

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>worked for mining companies, he's worked for investment banks, he's

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>been a gold strategist, and he's worked as an asset

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>manager as a portfolio manager. So fair to say, if

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone knows gold, it's probably John. And the precious metal,

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>as you know, is really moving. It is up well

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>over twenty percent since the beginning of the year. It

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is smashed through the five thousand dollars an ounce level

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for the first time this week. There is a lot

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>going on, so we are hoping John will put the

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>rally into some context and maybe give us some insight

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>into where gold will go next, which of course is

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>actually the only thing we really want to know.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>John. Welcome to Merrin Dogs Money.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, Merily.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's start at the beginning. Just answer for me

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the basic question, what an earth is going on? What

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>started this massive bill? Rarely and why is it going

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so far so fast.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's interesting because that goal's been running pretty strongly

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 3>now for over three years, but the reasons why it's

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>been going up have been changing. I mean, I think

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 3>it started off by central banks dramatically increasing the amount

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 3>of gold that they were purchasing following the Russian invasion

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>of Ukraine, and the reason for that, I think was

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>the sanctions that were placed upon the Central Bank of Russia.

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 3>It really made many central banks around the world think, hmm,

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 3>am I really happy having such a large proportion of

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 3>our foreign exchange reserves invested in the Western financial system,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>which can be sanctioned at the stroke of a pen.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 3>That was the first trigger I think for this move.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 3>We then saw tremendous investment buying in gold coming from

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>emerging markets and even from time to time strong jewelry

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 3>demand as well. So emerging market economic strength was the

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 3>second wave I think behind the move higher and gold,

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>and then from well last year was about Western investors

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>getting onto the bandwagon a bit late, to be honest,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 3>but joining the bandwagon and buying gold largely in reaction

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.119
<v Speaker 3>to what's been coming out of the United States, whether

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>it's economic policy, whether it's interest rate cuts or whether

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 3>it's pronouncements from President Trump and his administration.

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so three constantly moving reasons.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And the central banks are still buying, right, so that

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>demand is still there, still coming.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>They're still buying, and they're bought just a little bit

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>less last year than they have done for the previous

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>three years. So there's still an important component of the

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 3>move higher and gold. But they're not the only story

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>in town. And that's something I like to say upfront,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>because the number of people that say to me, oh, well,

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>central banks are buying gold, we should buy gold too,

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>It's like, yes, but it's not as simple as that.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>There are other factors too.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's a bit of a backstop to the price,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 2>very much.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So, and probably one of the reasons why the goal

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>price doesn't go down very much when it does correct,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 3>because you know, when it like this year, for example,

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the goal price has gone up very rapidly. I don't know,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 3>but I doubt central banks have been driving the price higher.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>But I'm sure that they're sitting below the market waiting

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 3>to step in on any correction, and that prevents the

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 3>price from falling like it usually would have done. When

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 3>people take profits.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And if it is true as many people say that

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Chinese Central Bank continues to build its gold

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>reserves in the anticipation of conceivably launching a gold back

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>currency at some point, there will be a way to go.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Look, that's one of the theories about why China has

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 3>stepped up its goal purchases. It's a gold back currency.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 3>I see the arguments about backing a currency is sometimes misunderstood.

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 3>The only reason you back a currency as an out

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of weakness, not out of strength. If you think about

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>all the countries in the world that have backed that currency,

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and Zimbabwe is a great example, they back it with

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>a dollar every now and again, then the peg fails.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 3>They've tried to back it with gold and then that

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>peg fails. It's always done because you're in a weak position.

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>And China's many things, but I don't think it's in

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>a particularly weak position. Where I think the logic of

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>a gold back currency could come in is something that

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>might be used for trade within countries that don't want

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>to depend upon the dollar. And look, China's a massive

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>current account surplus country, so that would mean China would

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 3>get more gold through settling this these this crossbook border trades.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 3>So again it's not clear that China's buying gold for

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 3>this purpose. It is one of the potential reasons it

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 3>could be.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, okay, so let's leave central banks. Then we

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>accept that they're buying for a variety of reasons, but

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly geopolitical instability, independence from the dollar, all these things,

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and that they will continue to buy it to a

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>certain level emerging markets.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean that demand continues.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>As long as there is good GDP growth in emerging markets,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you will see demand for gold as a savings product effectively.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 3>That's true, but also sometimes when other savings and investment

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 3>choices are less attractive. And I think the story in

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 3>China has been the weakness in the property market, which

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you've spoken about many times over the last

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>few years. Traditionally, Chinese savers and investors buy real estate,

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 3>they buy apartments. That's their saving and investments vehicle of choice.

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>But probably price has been going down now for what

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 3>two three years, so that's taken away, you know, the

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 3>backstop of where a Chinese saver would put their money.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Now there are other alternatives, of course, but gold is

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 3>benefiting I think enormously from this, and that's been very

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 3>much a story of the last few years.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's interesting.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we often talk about demographics on this program,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and one of the reasons why the Chinese property markets

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>can continually in a state of gradual decline is because

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of the rapidly falling household formation numbers and that we

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>saw recently these very low number of births in China.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's a strong suggestion that household formation will continue

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to fall in China, and therefore the property market will

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to languish, and therefore it seems likely that savings

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>will continue to shift into other.

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Products, not the golds of products, but do you know

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>what I mean?

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It will continue to be a savings product of choice

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in China and possibly other parts of the emerging world,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>where of course populations are also statical falling.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And look, that's a really interesting point as well,

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>because I've spoken about investment for gold in China, but

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>historically jewelry demand has been a bigger component. And if

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 3>I think about demographics, demographics worry me in the long

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 3>term for jewelry demand in China.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, for the regions that.

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 3>You've pointed out in India, but much later. India is

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 3>in the middle of a demographic dividend at the moment

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>that lasts until about twenty forty. If you look at

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 3>the structure the pyramid of the population in India, it's

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>very young, much much younger than China. It's now that

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the largest country in the world in terms

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 3>of population. It's the second largest gold consumer. They love gold,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 3>and if I look at all the marriages coming down

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the line, I'm very confident about media and long term

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 3>jewelry demand out of India, irrespective of the price in China.

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>As I say, it's really important that investment demand continues

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>to grow and continues to gain market share there because

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 3>of the demographic challenges.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, right, Let's move on then to the third and

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's really been pushing the price recently, which

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is West of the investors suddenly getting in on the game.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>What did they notice.

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Did Western investors suddenly start listening to this podcast, or

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>did they notice the price going up and suddenly get

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>fomo or is it the genuine reaction to geopolitical change?

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I think all of the above, and I think your

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>podcast has been highly influential. But seriously, I think about

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>the drivers behind Western investment demand. It's been very much

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>concerns about the US dollar, about what's happening with monetary

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>policy in the States as interest rates get cut, and

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 3>then what's going to happen with FED independence in the

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>medium term. If we get to a situation where the

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>US economy runs hot, so we get strong economic growth,

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 3>but inflation interest rates too low, that can get nasty

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 3>really quickly. And I think that that's one of the

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>things that's attracted Western investors towards gold. And I think

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the second thing is FOMO. As you say, this is

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 3>to a large extent, a momentum trade. At the moment,

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we advocate that investors have a sensible allocation

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to gold in their portfolio. It's a strategic asset for

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 3>the long term. We don't do that because we expect

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>gold prices to go up sixty five percent in one

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 3>year or twenty percent in one month. There's no doubt

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>that investors have jumped on the bandwagon to a degree,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>although not to the degree that they have in silver,

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>which is, to be frank quite crazy what's going on there.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>But yes, there's an element of short term speculation in

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the gold market. As well, and that's that's been Western

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 3>investors that could deploy an awful lot of capital at

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 3>a very short space of time. We've seen that to

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 3>a degree over the last nine months.

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, well, we'll come back to sil related because

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's ridiculous and kind of exciting and also fascinating

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and definitely a momentum tride for now.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 2>But let's talk about where gold might go.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're at we're at the point in this cycle

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>where everyone who didn't think gold was going to do

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>this is suddenly trying to catch up. And you've got

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the strategists and investment banks or raising their targets for

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this year always going to go to five thousand, Oh,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>whop's missed that?

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Six thousand, Oh, I don't know, maybe seven thousand, And.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got the people saying, well, well, we'll hit

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand before you know it, etc. And of course,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>even if that were to happened, it's not going to

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be a smooth past. We know there's always always fairly

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>significant draw downs in im momentum markets like this, but

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what how do you figure out.

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>What the right price is or where it should be?

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's so many different methods of attempting to value

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>gold something without a cash flow and therefore impossible to value.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>You can look at it as a percentage of the

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>value of the US dock market, for example. So we

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>now see it running at what fifty percent of the

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>value of the US dock market is the total market

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>capitalization of the gold above ground, So you can look

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at it like that, and at the moment.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 2>It's been way higher in the past.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, the US market is you

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>could argue significantly if we're valued at the moment, so

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that changes the way that ratio works. And then I

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was very taken by George Cooper at Aquatile. He has

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>got this gold dinner, a gold dinner at the Savoy

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>grill ratio right and back in nineteen seventy one, he says,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you could get hang on, I think three dinners at

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Savoy for an ounce of gold. Now you can

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 1>get fourteen dinners at the Savoy for an ounce of gold.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Maybe gold is cheap, you know what I mean.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>There are so many different ways of trying to value gold,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but basically it's impossible, right.

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 3>It's it doesn't fit into conventional valuation frameworks. As you say,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't produce a yield or a dividend, so you

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 3>can't do a discounted cash flow on it. We've spent

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of time in the last probably the last

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>seven or eight years, but in particular, trying to come

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>up with different ways to think about gold valuation, and

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 3>particularly from a long term perspective. So if you're an

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 3>asset allocator, you know, you could make assumptions and think, Okay,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 3>what is my bond portfolio going to give me, I

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 3>don't know, three four percent? Well, what are equity is

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 3>going to give me? Maybe six seven percent over the

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 3>long term? And what about gold? And it's like not sure.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>So the work that we've done, and it's all available,

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 3>by the way, on our website goldhub dot com under

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 3>the tools section, we've put together something which we call

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 3>glitter very good at acronyms in our shop. So gold's

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 3>expected long term return and what that works on is

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 3>it thinks about the structure of the gold market. So

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 3>all the gold that's ever been mined, who owns it,

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>who's buying it, who's bought it, and what are the

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 3>drivers of that demand and what the conclusion that we

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 3>come to is in the long term, you should be

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 3>expecting gold to deliver US inflation plus about two to

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 3>three percent per annum, so somethink in line with nominal GDP.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Now that's very different from the sort of returns that

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 3>we've seen over the last few years. So nineteen percent,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty six percent, sixty five percent, and then twenty percent

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>year to day. So one of the questions that we

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 3>face a lot internally is like, well, if you think

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the long term returns are going to be in that

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 3>order of magnitude of four to five percent, assuming US

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 3>inflation is two maybe a bit more of US inflation's

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 3>a bit higher, what do you do after gold has

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 3>gone up so as much as this, And what I

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 3>say to people under those circumstances is, look, gold has

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 3>had a long track record of benefiting your portfolio through

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 3>diversification and returns and helping prevent you against bad things happening.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 3>It is impossible, like everything else, to forecast where it's

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 3>going in the short term. I mean, we're at I

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 3>think one hundred and three all time highs now in

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>gold since the beginning of twenty twenty four. If you'd

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>have bought gold at any time in twenty twenty four,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five, you're up so in Otherwise, just because

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>gold's at an all time high doesn't mean that it

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>can't go up any higher. But what I do say

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 3>to people is you shouldn't expect the sort of returns

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 3>that you've seen over the last three or four years

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 3>to continue. Don't buy gold expecting it to deliver fifty

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 3>percent per annum. It's much more likely to deliver over

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 3>the long term five or six percent. Now in terms

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty six, what's the likelihood going forward? What

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>we said but the start of the year is that

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the drivers of gold last year,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the reasons people were buying gold,

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and I've listed some of them before, looks pretty certain

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to continue. We're going to see more

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 3>policy announcements out of the United States which are likely

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 3>to rattle the markets from time to time. So why

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't people keep buying gold under those circumstances?

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, I mean, a dollar is weakening, But let

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>me take you back to what you said about US inflation.

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Surely one of the reasons why the why gold is

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>going up so much is the assumption that US inflation

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>will at least in the medium term, be very significantly

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>higher than two percent a year.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Potentially, in that case you can expect better returns. But

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>if you think of US inflation plus two to three

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 3>percent over the long term, maybe if inflation's five percent,

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 3>which would be historically very high over the long term,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 3>you're still only getting seven or eight percent return in gold.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you said earlier that everyone should have a sensible

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>allocation to gold.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? Is that five percent, that two,

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>ten percent, fifteen percent?

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 3>What is it sure? And I guess the starting point

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 3>is it depends what else is in your portfolio. If

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>you have a very risky portfolio of all equities, or

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe all NASDAK equities, or maybe NASDAK equities plus some crypto,

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the risky of the portfolio you've got, the higher. The

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 3>ideal allocation to gold is based on work we've done

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 3>looking in the UK, the US, Europe, pretty much every

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 3>major country in the world, looking at historic returns of

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>gold and other the assets that are available for people

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to buy. You get to put an ideal or an

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>optimal allocation somewhere between four and maybe just over ten percent.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Now four percent allocation would be if you had a

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 3>very heavy bond or fixed income portfolio, and the sort

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 3>of ten twelve percent would be of you're much more

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 3>riskier than that sort of like sixty forty or seventy

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty in portfolio terms. So that's the sort of allocation

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>that we've suggested is sensible or would have been sensible

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 3>for people in the past. Now, obviously those sorts of

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 3>calculations are done on the basis that what's happened in

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the past will continue in the future. And you know

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the risk disclaimer that you get at the bottom of

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 3>every financial product. You know, just because it's happened in

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the past doesn't mean that happened in the future. So

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 3>start to think about where we are now. Equities, as

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, particularly US equities where most people have most

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>of their equity exposure, are quite expensive. Think about the

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>outlook for government bonds. We've just come out of a

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>forty year bullmarket for bonds that arded in nineteen eighty

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and probably ended in twenty twenty one. We're probably not

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 3>going to see the same sort of returns that we've

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 3>seen in government bonds as we've seen in the past.

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's before you start thinking about government deficits and debts.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 3>So maybe that historic five to ten percent allocation for

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 3>gold is looking a bit low, and indeed, I think

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 3>that's probably where the potential for gold to continue to

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 3>prosper is going to come from. There was an article

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 3>produced last year by Morgan Stanley's chief investment officer that said,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the sixty forty portfolio is dead. The idea of having

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent of your assets in equities and forty percent

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>of your assets in bonds is dead. The new portfolio

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>should be sixty twenty twenty, sixty percent inequities, twenty percent

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 3>of government bonds, twenty percent in gold. And that really

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 3>excited us because, first of all, we'd never suggested such

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 3>a high potential allocation to gold, but it comes. But

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the reason that Morgan Stanley have been highlighting this is

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 3>something we recognized a few years ago and published on,

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 3>and that's the breakdown of the negative correlation between equity

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>markets and bond markets. That's what the whole sixty to

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 3>forty portfolio was based on. Buy your equities, hedge yourself

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 3>with bonds. When equities do poorly, bonds will probably do well.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 3>But that's not happening as reliably as it used to. Therefore,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 3>think about other alternatives that tend to do well when

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 3>equities do badly. And indeed that's what's been happening in

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the last few years, and you know, and that's why

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 3>gold is such a good inclusion. So coming back to

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 3>your argument before about about valuation and gold, and we

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 3>don't look at the US stock market on its own,

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 3>and we certainly don't look at the total stock of

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 3>gold out there in comparison. We look at the stock

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 3>of investment gold and lords how much what is the

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>total value of the investment gold out there that people

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 3>have bought, bars and coins and ETFs and everything else.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 3>And then we look at the market capitalization of the world,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 3>both equities and bonds. Now, last time we looked at

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 3>that number, it was about one and a half percent.

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Gold's up a lot since then. Other stuff's moved to

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 3>it's probably about two and a half percent now. So

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 3>you can see where the potential is for more investment

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 3>to come into gold. Even if you get up to

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the lower end of the historical recommended allocation that's five percent.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 3>If you think about the higher end of it, of

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the historical allocation that's ten percent, And if you listen

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 3>to Morgan Stanley, maybe it should be closer to twenty.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot more room for investors to diversify

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 3>into gold, particularly if they don't trust the outlook for

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 3>government bonds. And I don't know about you, but one

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 3>of the things that's been frustrating me tremendously in a

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 3>post pandemic world is the fact that governments are running

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 3>such large budget deficits in comparatively good economic times, and

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the stock of debt seems to be rising inexorably.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So effectively, gold is becoming the new safe haven asset

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people. So it replaces in the

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>old days, your safe haven with treasuries or other government bonds.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>You bought these, that was your safe haven and something

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>went wrong, you knew you had those as your backup.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But in this new environment, with these incredibly high levels

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of debt that we get increasingly concerned might not be

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>server's long term gold becomes your new safe haven asset.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>And you can see that in the performance as well. Historically,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 3>when the US equity market had a really bad down day,

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the US dollar would tend to strengthen as people were

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 3>putting money into the dollar. Now because the US equity market.

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 3>When it does have these corrections, it's often because of

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 3>something that's coming out of Washington. The dollar tends to

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 3>weaken as well, so you're getting hit in both ways.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So bonds aren't your safe have. The US dollar isn't

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 3>the safe haven that it was, and gold's benefiting at

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>their expense to a degree.

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, and it's also it's part of a of a

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>shift in general away from investors thinking to themselves digital

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>assets or the answer, software assets are the answer, and

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>beginning to think, actually, physical assets are the answer. And

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this environment so it's not just about gold, as we've discussed,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about that. It's about silver,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's about other industrial metals. It's about stuff manufacturing, about factories,

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about physical commodities. So as part of that general mind

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>shift as well, isn't it.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 3>I think it is. I'm a little bit cautious about

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 3>some of these industrial metals, by which talking particularly copper,

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 3>but arguably silver as well. A lot of the gains

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>that we're seeing in silver are touted on the basis

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 3>of its industrial uses, but the global economy isn't growing

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>that quickly at the moment, and my experience in covering

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 3>commodities for many years now is industrial users of metals

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 3>are very good at reducing the amount that they use

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 3>when the price goes up a lot. You know, even copper.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Copper prices have gone up a lot in the last

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 3>couple of decades. There's a lot less copper used in

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 3>water piping than they used to be. For example, now

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of plastic used even in this even

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>in some places they're using it for they're using aluminium

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 3>for electrical conductivity, although not in the UK. But the

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 3>cure for high prices and commodity markets is high prices

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 3>because substitution comes in.

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Although interestingly, can I just go pick you up on

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it briefly?

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it in the past when they said the solicient

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>high prices and commodity markets is high prices, part of

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what they meant was not so much substitution. They meant

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>that supply would rise significantly because everyone would say, oh,

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>look cop has gone up, I'll just go dig myself

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>another copper mine.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>And of course you can't do that anymore. You can't

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>do that.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 3>You can easily.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you've got a very long timeframe. Planning is going

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to take you significantly longer than it used to. So

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't have a new copper mine up and running

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen months. Is going to take you ten years,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, whatever it is. So it's a very different

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>supply environment and that has to make a difference, doesn't it.

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 3>It does, and I think it does for metals where

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 3>you don't have a pool of potential recycling to come

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 3>back to the market. And in the case of copper,

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>there's lots of recycling that takes place. If you, you know,

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>knocked down a building, they take out the copper wires

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 3>and they send that off and get recycled and it

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>turns up in another building somewhere else in electricity or piping. Fine,

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 3>but there's not a potential flood of copper to come

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 3>back to the market on the recycling side. There is, however,

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 3>in silver, and that's something I think that that some

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 3>of the silver fanatics have been missing, is the fact

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 3>that pretty much every silver refinery in the western world

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 3>is closed to accepting new scrap at the moment because

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 3>it's full. So we're seeing these these announcements coming from

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 3>the refineries or the scrap collectors saying we're going to

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 3>close down for a week or two, because you know,

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 3>we can't get this stuff refined at the moment. There

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 3>is so much silver coming back to the market. Now,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying that that means the price is going

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 3>to go down, but it does mean that there's a

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of a lot of Granny silverware which is being

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 3>sold into these high prices at the moment, a lot

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 3>of US coins because you know the coinage system in

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 3>the US prior to the seventies, you know, silver dollars,

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 3>silver quarters, silver nickels, or at least containing decent quantities

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 3>of it. So that stuff is coming back at such

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 3>a speed that the refineries can't cope with. At the moment,

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 3>they will process it, it will come to the market.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 3>There is supply being brought to the market by higher prices,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 3>as you suggest, So do you.

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels to me like you're suggesting that silver might

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>be well into the mania phase.

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Look, there's no doubt that we are seeing enormous retail

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>demand for silver in various ways, whether it's via investment products,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 3>whether it's by physical silver. In China, I was talking

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 3>to one of my colleagues, Rajr. Who's head of China Research,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 3>and he was saying that in Shenzen, which is one

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 3>of the centers of the precious metals market in China,

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 3>they're moving silver around on these trolleys so much so

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 3>that the roads are getting destroyed because of the weight

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 3>of silver that's being shipped around as people are trying

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 3>to get their hands on physical silver to invest. So, yeah,

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 3>there's no doubt there's tremendous investment demand for silver at

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the moment. But if you look at historically at the

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 3>performing of all precious metals, to be frank, you do

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 3>get these phases when people buy them with great enthusiasm,

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 3>expecting the prices to go up forever and then there's

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>a correction. And we don't give investment revice, we don't

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 3>make short term forecast, but let's put it this way.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the silver price with disbelief at the

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 3>moment and waiting at least for a decent correction. Not

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 3>saying it's over, but wow, you know, one hundred and

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 3>ten dollars an ounce.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got so excited on this podcast and it

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 1>went through fifty.

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, fifty was the Yeah, fifty was the previous all

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 3>time high back to nineteen eighty. Absolutely, so it was

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 3>a big number to go through, but then again, so's

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, I mean I.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Think we kind of stopped being excited after seventy and

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>started just being mildly incredulism, wishing that we held more

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>minus silver, you know, small silver miners and all that,

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>which brings me back to the thing that we're going

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to get lots of questions on, which is when you

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about having a five to ten percent allocation to gold,

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>do we mean actual physical gold or do we mean

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a mix of gold in your hand, hidden in your basement?

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Gold ETFs and perhaps gold miners as well.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Where are here? What does it mean?

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 3>The work we've done has been on gold, gold in

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 3>all its different forms, but not gold mining companies or

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 3>exploration companies. And there are merits to investing in gold miners.

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Just look at the performance that they delivered last year

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and massively outperforming the gold price. But there are risks.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 3>Think how many mines have been have I think how

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 3>many minds have been taken away by governments or where

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 3>taxes have suddenly been increased. So there's lots of additional

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 3>risks positive and negative investing in gold miners. So we

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 3>don't make We don't do much studies on that, but

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, as I say, at the right time, and

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 3>generally speaking, when the gold price is going up faster

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 3>than their costs, gold mining companies also with mining companies,

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>can increase more than the underlying metal. So that's what's

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 3>happened last year. So in terms of gold itself, you

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 3>can buy gold or get exposure to gold in a

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 3>number of ways. You can go and buy physical gold,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 3>you'll have to pay a premium over the spot goal price.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 3>That premium, when the market's quite hot, which it is

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, could be five, maybe ten percent premium

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 3>over the goal price, and when you come to sell

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it back, you might only get the goal price or

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe a slight discount. So there's a big bid ask

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 3>spread in owning physical gold potentially, So that's something to

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 3>bear in mind.

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say that, you know a lot

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of people hold gold for armageddon reasons, right, and I

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have my gold because everything's going to go horribly wrong.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>The world's going to collapse.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a massive cyber attack and the

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>stock markets will collapse, everything will be gone, etc. And

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you are that kind of gold buyer, there's really

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>only one way to hold gold, and that.

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Is physical, actual physical gold hidden in your house.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think a lot of people are holding their

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>gold for is insurance for very bad things. But if

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the very bad things they have in their mind happen,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>their ETF will be of no use to them in

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the immediate exactly.

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 3>And it's when I worked at an investment bank and

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 3>we would see the flows coming through and you could

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 3>see in which way people were buying gold. You could

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 3>see the motivations behind them because you didn't have to

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 3>tell you you could understand what they were doing. Consider

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 3>the bid ask spread or the premium that you're paying

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 3>for physical gold as part of the insurance policy you're

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>having to pay for this armorgain. If, however, you don't

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 3>think the financial system is going to collapse, if you

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 3>don't think that there's going to be a huge run

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 3>on banks, then maybe you're interested in buying gold via

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 3>financial product and you can buy futures, you could buy

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 3>gold certificates, you could do derivatives with banks, etc. Or

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 3>you go sort of a halfway house in between the two,

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 3>which is buying a goal backed ETF which is listed

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 3>on the stock market around the world, different ETFs, different

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 3>stock markets, and this gives you the financial performance of

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 3>gold in as close a way as to owning the

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 3>physical yourself without having to pay that premium, without having

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 3>to worry about holding it at home and thinking about

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 3>insurance and theft, etc. So there's a number of different ways,

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 3>and again it depends why you're buying gold. There's lots

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 3>of reasons to do so. We generally speak to investors

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 3>and think about portfolios, and you've got a portfolio, you're

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 3>probably thinking that the financial system isn't going to collapse,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 3>and in that way, some sort of exposure of ron

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 3>ETF or another financial product is probably the best way

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 3>to think about it.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 2>If you got gold buried in your garden, John m.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Couldn't possibly tell you. I do know a story about

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 3>a hedge fund guy I bumped into again when I

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 3>worked at UBS, and this was in the early two thousands,

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 3>when gold has started to go up again. He said,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I've got fifteen hundred kruegerands buried in my ranch, but

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember where I put them. So every spring

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>I go out there with my metal detector trying to

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 3>work out where they are. So even burying gold in

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 3>your garden is not without risks. Either the gophers have

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 3>got it, or maybe a robber's got it, or you

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 3>can forget where it is.

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, that'll be very exciting for future archaeologists, won't it.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>One day somebody will find that and we'll probably everyone

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>forgets where they buried their stuff.

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like pretty much everyone has that.

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't find my jewelry story, and it as I've

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>been founded that bottom of some Yeah, everyone has that story. Okay,

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you about a couple more things,

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And the first is an idea of my colleague John's.

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a piec the other day about how one

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that gold is rising so fast at

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment, it's a sentiment thing.

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Of course it was a sentiment thing. But gold used

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to be considered to be.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>A right wing metal, and now it's more of a

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>left wing metal, a more of a hedge against trump Ism,

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a hedge against political change in the US. So you know,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're anti Trump, you can buy gold to hedge

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the weakness in the dollar that results from his policies.

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So that John wrote about there, I encourage everyone to

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>go and read his amusing column on it. But there

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is that sense, isn't there the sort of sentiment shift

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that is bringing a wider audience to gold.

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And it's interesting if you look at the physical

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 3>gold demand, so demand for coins and small investment bars

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 3>the one market that really hasn't taken off to the

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>same degree as the United States, and it's something that

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 3>we were anticipating actually because we've seen it before. You're

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 3>right that many physical buyers of gold in the United

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 3>States tend to be Republicans. They tend to buy gold

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 3>as well as guns and ammunition actually during democratic presidencies

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 3>because they're worried that the US is going to hell

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 3>and they'll be unable to buy guns and ammunition soon

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 3>because they'll all we banned. And during a Republican leadership

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 3>or Apublican government, everything's going to be fine. So they

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 3>don't need to buy guns because they can get them,

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 3>and they don't need to buy gold because everything's wonderful

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 3>in America. So you're right in a way, I think that,

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>and John is right here is that it is a

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 3>bit of a right wing metal. It's a bit of

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 3>a male metal as well, certainly in the West, and

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a bit of an older metal emerging markets. Of course,

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>it's very different to you if you speak. When I

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 3>go to India and speak to groups of investors there,

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I sometimes do presentations only to Indian women, high net

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 3>worth individuals and their own right and talk to them

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 3>about why everything they think that they think about gold

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.719
<v Speaker 3>is wrong because they hone it's jewelry. Should be considering

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 3>it as an investment asset as well.

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>But don't they consider jewelry to be an investment asset.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 2>They should carry a wealth.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 3>It is how you carry a wealth, and when it

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 3>becomes seriously rich, you don't have enough gold. So you

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 3>can't physically own enough jewelry to diversify your portfolio effectively.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>So you should think about financial exposure to gold as well.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Always fun talking to Indian women about gold. They know

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 3>far more about it than I do.

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fascinating. I think we have a reasonably high female audience. So, ladies,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that your bracelets aren't.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Enough exactly, okay, John.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Now a lot of the listeners to this podcast will

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 2>have been buying gold. They will have a lot of gold.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>They may now have too much gold.

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you've been holding it a while, it's

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>now probably going to be thirty thirty five percent of

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio. Of you've been holding a long time, it

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was going to feel tough to sell, right. You can

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>see that price moving up and up and up. But

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know in your heart it's time to top

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>size at least to diversify some of that away from gold.

0:31:57.720 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you manage that?

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I said of people is and this question

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 3>has come up a lot, and twenty thirty percent is

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 3>actually low compared to some of the questions that I get.

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I bunt into one guy at a reception the other week.

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 3>He said, you know, you know put lots of my

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>pension into gold and silver a few years ago and

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 3>it's done really well. And I said to him, well, look,

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 3>think about the reasons why you own gold. Think about

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 3>it from the perspective as a diversifier, As a strategic asset.

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 3>You always want to hold a certain proportion of it.

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 3>And if you thought maybe you wanted to put in

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 3>ten or fifteen percent of it and it's now worth

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 3>forty five percent, then you know, think about reducing that perhaps,

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 3>think about are the better reasons to own gold than

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 3>there were when I put in fifteen percent of it

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 3>back in the day, and maybe there are, but there's

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 3>probably not forty five or fifty percent allocation. And he

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.479
<v Speaker 3>said to me, oh, I've got eighty percent. I said, well,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 3>to be frank, yeah quite. By the way, this was

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 3>if you had eighty percent, it's probably more like ninety

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 3>now because this was a few months ago, you know.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think the point there is is that gold

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 3>has a role in a portfolio. It shouldn't be your

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 3>entire portfolio. Then you are just basically betting your farm

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>on one asset class. And you know that, as we

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 3>all do, the best way to invest is to have

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 3>an appropriately diversified portfolio, and then you know, you flex

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 3>those weights a bit. But with the performance that gold

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 3>has had, and particularly the outperformance that gold and silver

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 3>have had of other assets in the last eighteen months

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>or so, there's nothing wrong with reducing exposure a bit.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you have no gold at all, you should

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>buy itself.

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 3>We believe every portfolio will benefit in the long term

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 3>from having an appropriate amount of gold in your portfolio.

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't mean to say that you buy gold at

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 3>fifty two hundred and fifty dollars an ounce and it's

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 3>guaranteed to go up because it's not. But every portfolio

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 3>that we've looked at would have benefited past tense from

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 3>having gold in that portfolio over the last five, ten, twenty,

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 3>or since nineteen seventy one when we came off the

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 3>gold standard.

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>John listen, Okay, here comes a difficult question. You ready,

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>how does bitcoin fit into all this? I mean you

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>will remember not that long ago we had to put

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>up on this podcast with and as people telling us

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin was digital gold, and then of course we

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>got our kicks by calling gold physical. Yeah.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Have you get your laugh somewhere right now? Bitcoin and

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 2>gold are clearly not the same thing.

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It is clearly not digital gold. It is not moving

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the same way. These are different things.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 2>What's going on?

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? So first of all, i work for the World

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Gold Council, so I'm not going to say anything whether

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I think you should own bitcoin or not. Fine, that's

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 3>not my job. But what I would say is they

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 3>are different and as you've pointed out, they move in

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 3>different ways. So I got really irritated with bitcoin being

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 3>described as gold two point zero because it isn't. Bitcoin

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 3>and other digital assets are. As one of my friends,

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Charlie Morris would say, they are tech stocks effectively, or

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 3>at least they perform like tech stocks. If you've had

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 3>if you've added bitcoin to your portfolio, you've increased your

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 3>effective equity exposure. And in fact, what you've really done

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 3>is you've increased your effective tech exposure more. That's fine,

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 3>that could be a great decision. Bitcoin's done very well

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 3>over the last ten years. But it doesn't behave in

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the same way as gold. It won't diversify your portfolio.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 3>It will increase the risk of that portfolio. Now again,

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 3>no reason why you shouldn't own it, but do recognize

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 3>that you've added risk to your portfolio. If you've added

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 3>risk to your portfolio, what should you do diversify more?

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 3>What should you consider as a potential diversify gold?

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Have bitcoin by gold?

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I suppose that the other problem with bitcoin, I suppose

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with all cryptocurrencies, one way or another, is that there

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>are so many substitutes.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean and with silver, as you say there may substitutes.

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Gold really doesn't have a substitute. It does gold and

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin can be substituted in many, many ways.

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Sure, there may be finite numbers of bitcoins, but there

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 3>are not finite number of cryptocurrencies. And yes, silver is

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a substitute for gold. It's a bit

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 3>of a substitute for gold and jewelry. It's a bit

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 3>of a substitute for gold in investment, particularly when the

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 3>silver price is moving like it is. But in the end,

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 3>gold is a much much bigger market than silver and

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 3>always will be in my opinion.

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Amazing, John, Thank you so much, Thank.

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 3>You very much, Maren, great conversation.

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to this week's maryn Talks Money.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>If you like our show, rate review and subscribe by

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>ever you listen to podcasts and keep sending questions or

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>comments and merror money at Bloomberg dot net. You can

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>also follow me and John on Twitter or x I'm

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>at Mary Nurse w and John is John Underscore Stepic.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>This episode was hosted by Me Maren zumzep Web. It

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Samersadi and Moses and sound designed by

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Blake Labels and special thanks to John Read