WEBVTT - NO LIMIT, Some AI… Poker’s Documentary-Gate

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:27.684
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to risky business show about making better decisions.

0:00:27.764 --> 0:00:29.404
<v Speaker 1>I'm Maria Kannakova.

0:00:29.004 --> 0:00:30.764
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nathaniel Silver.

0:00:32.884 --> 0:00:34.844
<v Speaker 1>You just can't leave it alone. You can't just mean

0:00:34.924 --> 0:00:38.084
<v Speaker 1>Nate Silver. I'm gonna call you Nathaniel. This entire show

0:00:38.244 --> 0:00:39.724
<v Speaker 1>just watched you go to.

0:00:40.244 --> 0:00:44.524
<v Speaker 3>Spend a litle time in Florida and there, Nate, n

0:00:44.564 --> 0:00:48.644
<v Speaker 3>Ate is very often Nae if you have like for

0:00:48.724 --> 0:00:52.604
<v Speaker 3>an example, Aver, so you know, Nathaniel might be might

0:00:52.644 --> 0:00:54.404
<v Speaker 3>be needed in the mix a little bit here.

0:00:55.404 --> 0:00:59.564
<v Speaker 1>All right, Nate, let's uh, let's get going today on

0:00:59.644 --> 0:01:02.204
<v Speaker 1>the show. We have some poker drama.

0:01:02.484 --> 0:01:02.684
<v Speaker 3>Nate.

0:01:02.724 --> 0:01:07.044
<v Speaker 1>We haven't oh sorry, Nathaniel, we haven't. We haven't done

0:01:07.084 --> 0:01:09.804
<v Speaker 1>poker drama for a while. But this is poker drama

0:01:09.844 --> 0:01:13.804
<v Speaker 1>that's squarely in the intersection of the poker world and

0:01:14.084 --> 0:01:16.884
<v Speaker 1>the non poker world. And that as a writer as

0:01:16.884 --> 0:01:20.724
<v Speaker 1>a creator, really grabbed me and I'm guessing grabbed you

0:01:20.884 --> 0:01:24.164
<v Speaker 1>as well. And it has to do with the No

0:01:24.604 --> 0:01:28.244
<v Speaker 1>Limit documentary series that was released a few weeks ago.

0:01:28.564 --> 0:01:30.724
<v Speaker 1>But no, dear listeners, you will not be able to

0:01:30.764 --> 0:01:33.444
<v Speaker 1>find it anywhere because it has since been scrubbed from

0:01:33.564 --> 0:01:36.884
<v Speaker 1>the internet. So Nate, do you want me to give

0:01:36.924 --> 0:01:38.884
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a rundown for.

0:01:40.324 --> 0:01:40.884
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:01:40.924 --> 0:01:44.924
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, first of all, this was a documentary

0:01:45.524 --> 0:01:50.164
<v Speaker 1>that was created by a collaboration between Gigi Poker, which

0:01:50.204 --> 0:01:53.204
<v Speaker 1>owns the World Series of Poker, and Artisans on Fire,

0:01:53.324 --> 0:02:01.364
<v Speaker 1>specifically Dustin Ayanotti, who followed last year players during the

0:02:01.924 --> 0:02:08.164
<v Speaker 1>inaugural twenty five thousand dollars Super Main event in the Bahamas,

0:02:08.524 --> 0:02:12.324
<v Speaker 1>which was the just ever guarantee in poker history. Lots

0:02:12.364 --> 0:02:16.444
<v Speaker 1>of compelling storylines. I mean, it was a huge, huge event.

0:02:16.524 --> 0:02:20.724
<v Speaker 1>I definitely remember seeing it from Afar. I was in

0:02:20.844 --> 0:02:22.804
<v Speaker 1>Vegas at the time. I did not play in it,

0:02:23.124 --> 0:02:26.484
<v Speaker 1>but being like wow, like holy shit, this is huge.

0:02:26.724 --> 0:02:30.804
<v Speaker 1>So Dustin I Andatti followed players around. According to their

0:02:30.844 --> 0:02:36.044
<v Speaker 1>original release, they had over six hundred and fifty hours

0:02:36.124 --> 0:02:40.284
<v Speaker 1>of behind the scenes footage from the event. Six hundred

0:02:40.284 --> 0:02:43.444
<v Speaker 1>and fifty hours, Nate. That is a lot of hours,

0:02:43.684 --> 0:02:48.524
<v Speaker 1>and it was edited down to eight thirty minute episodes.

0:02:49.044 --> 0:02:52.484
<v Speaker 1>Six of them had been released by last week when

0:02:52.644 --> 0:02:56.084
<v Speaker 1>it came out. And I say it came out because

0:02:56.124 --> 0:03:01.284
<v Speaker 1>there was no you know, there were no intimations or

0:03:01.324 --> 0:03:03.604
<v Speaker 1>signs that this was the case. But one of the

0:03:03.684 --> 0:03:08.044
<v Speaker 1>main characters. Alan Keating had watched one of the episodes

0:03:08.084 --> 0:03:10.484
<v Speaker 1>where he appeared and was like, hey, I didn't say

0:03:10.524 --> 0:03:14.444
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, like what is actually going on? And he

0:03:14.644 --> 0:03:18.204
<v Speaker 1>called out the documentary on Twitter and was like, hey, guys,

0:03:18.244 --> 0:03:23.084
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Dustin admitted that he had used AI

0:03:23.204 --> 0:03:29.524
<v Speaker 1>to advance the narrative and put words in Keating's mouth

0:03:29.564 --> 0:03:33.084
<v Speaker 1>that Keating never actually said. By the way, both Keating's

0:03:33.084 --> 0:03:36.564
<v Speaker 1>original call out and Ionatti's Mia Coolpa have since been

0:03:36.564 --> 0:03:39.404
<v Speaker 1>taken off. Anyway, long story short, he said, oh, but

0:03:39.444 --> 0:03:41.924
<v Speaker 1>this is the only time I used it, Like, not

0:03:42.084 --> 0:03:44.724
<v Speaker 1>really a big deal. Then there was another Keating who's

0:03:44.764 --> 0:03:47.764
<v Speaker 1>not at all related, Alex Keating, who's like, actually, wait no,

0:03:47.844 --> 0:03:51.284
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to raise my hand to because also you know,

0:03:51.724 --> 0:03:55.364
<v Speaker 1>I see it in my stuff. Anyway, documentary has been

0:03:55.404 --> 0:03:59.844
<v Speaker 1>taken off. WSP apologizes and says that they are going

0:03:59.884 --> 0:04:04.684
<v Speaker 1>to re edit everything and that's kind of that's where

0:04:04.684 --> 0:04:07.684
<v Speaker 1>we stand right now. I have some very strong feelings

0:04:07.724 --> 0:04:10.244
<v Speaker 1>on this that go far beyond this the poker world,

0:04:11.044 --> 0:04:13.524
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you do too. I'll let you start

0:04:13.564 --> 0:04:15.964
<v Speaker 1>since I've kind of been hogging the mic with the

0:04:16.004 --> 0:04:16.964
<v Speaker 1>background of the drama.

0:04:17.044 --> 0:04:18.404
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Oh, it was a one off thing.

0:04:18.444 --> 0:04:22.764
<v Speaker 3>It's like when people are like accused of handsiness or

0:04:22.804 --> 0:04:23.644
<v Speaker 3>sexual harassment.

0:04:23.684 --> 0:04:25.884
<v Speaker 2>Right, usually not a usually not a one off thing.

0:04:25.924 --> 0:04:31.084
<v Speaker 3>It's usually a chronic behavior where you don't recognize a

0:04:31.444 --> 0:04:34.284
<v Speaker 3>boundary of permission. Yeah, by the way, if you ever

0:04:34.324 --> 0:04:36.724
<v Speaker 3>interview me for some shit like this, I hate watching

0:04:36.724 --> 0:04:38.644
<v Speaker 3>myself on TV, so you could probably.

0:04:38.724 --> 0:04:39.844
<v Speaker 2>Just make me say whatever.

0:04:39.884 --> 0:04:40.084
<v Speaker 3>I mean.

0:04:40.564 --> 0:04:41.884
<v Speaker 2>You're too lazy to ever check it.

0:04:43.724 --> 0:04:45.724
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny that you said that. I was actually

0:04:46.004 --> 0:04:48.604
<v Speaker 1>talking with my husband about this, and I was like,

0:04:48.684 --> 0:04:50.564
<v Speaker 1>I would lose my shit if this happened to me,

0:04:50.604 --> 0:04:54.004
<v Speaker 1>because I think both of us have appeared in dozens

0:04:54.044 --> 0:04:56.324
<v Speaker 1>of documentaries, like I don't even know how many, but

0:04:56.364 --> 0:04:59.204
<v Speaker 1>I never watch myself back, and I don't actually think

0:04:59.204 --> 0:05:02.964
<v Speaker 1>that Keating watched himself back until somebody quoted him back

0:05:03.004 --> 0:05:06.124
<v Speaker 1>to him and he was like, wait, I never said that,

0:05:06.284 --> 0:05:07.964
<v Speaker 1>and then he watched Now.

0:05:07.964 --> 0:05:12.404
<v Speaker 3>Look, in all seriousness, I am reluctant to give any

0:05:12.444 --> 0:05:17.684
<v Speaker 3>interviews for something that can be edited, even fairly or

0:05:17.724 --> 0:05:18.804
<v Speaker 3>relatively fairly.

0:05:18.924 --> 0:05:20.244
<v Speaker 2>Right, if you're you know, if you're.

0:05:21.724 --> 0:05:25.244
<v Speaker 3>Tapping an hour with me and you're gonna clip five

0:05:25.284 --> 0:05:27.764
<v Speaker 3>minutes out of it, or maybe fifteen seconds out of it, right,

0:05:27.804 --> 0:05:30.484
<v Speaker 3>Like that makes me very nervous, right, yeah, you know,

0:05:30.604 --> 0:05:32.244
<v Speaker 3>and I kind of feel like, and this is kind

0:05:32.244 --> 0:05:35.604
<v Speaker 3>of advice to people in general. I'm sure we have

0:05:35.644 --> 0:05:38.804
<v Speaker 3>a lot of influential listeners. Is like, yeah, you should

0:05:38.884 --> 0:05:42.404
<v Speaker 3>understand kind of like what the journalist's motivation is. If

0:05:42.404 --> 0:05:45.004
<v Speaker 3>the story's about you and your kind of primary character,

0:05:45.044 --> 0:05:47.004
<v Speaker 3>that's one thing. If you're kind of invited in to

0:05:47.044 --> 0:05:49.204
<v Speaker 3>provide like color commentary, then yeah, I.

0:05:49.604 --> 0:05:50.604
<v Speaker 2>Would be a little bit wary.

0:05:50.644 --> 0:05:53.204
<v Speaker 3>But look, I think there are a couple of things

0:05:53.244 --> 0:05:56.924
<v Speaker 3>going on here right, Like one is like a lack

0:05:57.044 --> 0:06:03.724
<v Speaker 3>of recognition of what like good journalism or even journalism.

0:06:03.284 --> 0:06:05.604
<v Speaker 2>Good or not really is So, what's the guy's name,

0:06:05.644 --> 0:06:06.684
<v Speaker 2>like Ianetti.

0:06:06.364 --> 0:06:11.924
<v Speaker 1>Some Dustin, Ionotti, Ionatti. Yeah, he I apologize if I'm

0:06:11.924 --> 0:06:13.564
<v Speaker 1>mispronouncing it, and it's whatever.

0:06:13.604 --> 0:06:14.884
<v Speaker 2>It's a it's an American eye.

0:06:15.444 --> 0:06:18.044
<v Speaker 3>You go with Dustin, we get to pronounce the you know,

0:06:18.044 --> 0:06:20.164
<v Speaker 3>if you're like Dante or something, then maybe you can

0:06:20.244 --> 0:06:21.004
<v Speaker 3>italian ify it.

0:06:21.084 --> 0:06:23.644
<v Speaker 2>Whatever. Dustin, we get to pick how to pronounce your

0:06:23.684 --> 0:06:24.084
<v Speaker 2>last name.

0:06:24.124 --> 0:06:28.804
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, Dustin, you're giving up your anyway. But

0:06:28.964 --> 0:06:34.524
<v Speaker 3>mister Dustin posted a lot of not pretentious, but a

0:06:34.524 --> 0:06:39.044
<v Speaker 3>lot of very long tweets on X where he's like,

0:06:39.444 --> 0:06:43.364
<v Speaker 3>you know, poker is losing mind share to chess and

0:06:43.724 --> 0:06:46.924
<v Speaker 3>f one and all these other things that should be

0:06:46.964 --> 0:06:50.764
<v Speaker 3>comprolled to poker, and we do much worse. And there

0:06:50.804 --> 0:06:51.964
<v Speaker 3>are a lot of reasons for this, but one of

0:06:51.964 --> 0:06:54.524
<v Speaker 3>the reasons is that we're not We're not good enough

0:06:54.524 --> 0:07:00.884
<v Speaker 3>at like storytelling and narrative, right, which, Okay, I think

0:07:00.924 --> 0:07:03.124
<v Speaker 3>people some people might say, well, okay, is it used

0:07:03.164 --> 0:07:06.764
<v Speaker 3>okay to use chatchpt to do like a little copy

0:07:06.804 --> 0:07:10.084
<v Speaker 3>of it on your on your script. Sure, I would

0:07:10.124 --> 0:07:13.004
<v Speaker 3>think it's totally fine. Right, Is it usefull to use

0:07:13.044 --> 0:07:17.124
<v Speaker 3>AI tools to clean up literal visual defects? I mean,

0:07:17.124 --> 0:07:19.644
<v Speaker 3>I think sure, it's probably fine. When you are attributing

0:07:19.684 --> 0:07:24.124
<v Speaker 3>though a quote to some person, then you're not allowed

0:07:24.124 --> 0:07:24.444
<v Speaker 3>to do that.

0:07:24.484 --> 0:07:27.124
<v Speaker 2>It's like a basic journalism thing. It's also weird.

0:07:27.364 --> 0:07:29.444
<v Speaker 3>It's also just weird because like, you tape all this

0:07:29.484 --> 0:07:33.964
<v Speaker 3>footage and like, yep, can you really not make the story.

0:07:33.844 --> 0:07:37.484
<v Speaker 1>It's two hundred and fifty hours. I just keep saying

0:07:37.524 --> 0:07:39.884
<v Speaker 1>that because it is mind boggling to me that you

0:07:39.884 --> 0:07:43.124
<v Speaker 1>would have that much footage and say that for the

0:07:43.284 --> 0:07:46.564
<v Speaker 1>sake of narrative, you needed to create something that you

0:07:46.564 --> 0:07:47.004
<v Speaker 1>didn't have.

0:07:47.244 --> 0:07:49.444
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's kind of it's kind of lazy, you know

0:07:49.484 --> 0:07:52.324
<v Speaker 3>what I mean, Like that in all that footage you

0:07:52.404 --> 0:07:53.324
<v Speaker 3>can't find.

0:07:54.644 --> 0:07:55.044
<v Speaker 2>The quote.

0:07:55.044 --> 0:08:01.604
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, yeah, sometimes when when you're writing, you're like, boy,

0:08:02.524 --> 0:08:06.724
<v Speaker 3>I wish the subject had said that, right. Well, you

0:08:06.764 --> 0:08:08.244
<v Speaker 3>can do though, if you're a writer.

0:08:08.764 --> 0:08:10.884
<v Speaker 2>You can actually say it in your own voice.

0:08:10.924 --> 0:08:12.884
<v Speaker 3>You're like, that's a good idea, right, or you can

0:08:13.044 --> 0:08:16.444
<v Speaker 3>or or they are like legitimate ways to paraphraate. Well,

0:08:16.444 --> 0:08:21.284
<v Speaker 3>you know, sometimes if someone like jumping around the meaning

0:08:21.324 --> 0:08:23.764
<v Speaker 3>of something, then I mean, this is a little bit

0:08:23.764 --> 0:08:27.044
<v Speaker 3>of a fine art. The BBC got in trouble recently

0:08:27.164 --> 0:08:31.004
<v Speaker 3>for like splicing together two stippets of a Trump speech

0:08:31.044 --> 0:08:35.044
<v Speaker 3>on January sixth that were like thirty minutes apart or

0:08:35.044 --> 0:08:37.044
<v Speaker 3>something and made it seem like He's like.

0:08:38.044 --> 0:08:40.524
<v Speaker 2>Go attack the capitol right now.

0:08:40.604 --> 0:08:42.844
<v Speaker 3>Right, it was kind of like we need to go

0:08:42.924 --> 0:08:44.724
<v Speaker 3>to the capitol blah blah blah, half an hour.

0:08:44.684 --> 0:08:45.244
<v Speaker 2>Blah blah blah.

0:08:45.244 --> 0:08:47.764
<v Speaker 3>He was long winded and go march there right now,

0:08:47.804 --> 0:08:51.564
<v Speaker 3>and like okay, like that clearly was taken out of context,

0:08:51.644 --> 0:08:54.604
<v Speaker 3>right like yeah, like I don't know when you use

0:08:54.604 --> 0:08:56.684
<v Speaker 3>like the ellipses anyway, I'm getting like weird journalism stuff.

0:08:56.684 --> 0:08:58.524
<v Speaker 1>The point is it, like no, but you know what,

0:08:58.884 --> 0:09:02.484
<v Speaker 1>this weird journalism stuff is actually important because it's been

0:09:02.524 --> 0:09:04.924
<v Speaker 1>around for a very long time, and there are standards

0:09:04.964 --> 0:09:08.004
<v Speaker 1>for a reason. For instance, the New Yorker and I

0:09:08.044 --> 0:09:11.444
<v Speaker 1>think most magazines actually that I've ever written for do

0:09:11.604 --> 0:09:16.724
<v Speaker 1>not actually allow you to allow sources to look through

0:09:16.724 --> 0:09:20.724
<v Speaker 1>their quotes before you publish, right, Like that's because you're

0:09:21.284 --> 0:09:23.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't want someone to be like, well,

0:09:23.364 --> 0:09:25.564
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't actually want you know, to be

0:09:25.684 --> 0:09:27.964
<v Speaker 1>quoted saying this, Like you're on the record. You give

0:09:27.964 --> 0:09:31.084
<v Speaker 1>the interview, like that's it, but you record, right, You

0:09:31.124 --> 0:09:34.804
<v Speaker 1>have recordings, you have notes, you have all this stuff.

0:09:34.844 --> 0:09:37.484
<v Speaker 1>You give all of that to fact checkers who actually

0:09:37.564 --> 0:09:40.844
<v Speaker 1>go through and make sure that this all happened and

0:09:40.884 --> 0:09:44.604
<v Speaker 1>this all exists. The reason that we do this is

0:09:44.644 --> 0:09:49.124
<v Speaker 1>that in the past there have been egregious malpractice issues

0:09:49.484 --> 0:09:54.484
<v Speaker 1>with journalists who made shit up right and who actually

0:09:54.524 --> 0:09:58.084
<v Speaker 1>did craft the perfect characters or the perfect stories because

0:09:58.124 --> 0:10:02.724
<v Speaker 1>it suited their story whatever they were trying to tell,

0:10:02.964 --> 0:10:05.404
<v Speaker 1>and some of them got away with it. So at

0:10:05.444 --> 0:10:08.924
<v Speaker 1>The New Yorker, someone who absolutely broke my heart was

0:10:09.004 --> 0:10:12.164
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Mitchell, who died before I don't know if he

0:10:12.204 --> 0:10:13.964
<v Speaker 1>died before I was born, but you know, this is

0:10:14.004 --> 0:10:18.284
<v Speaker 1>a different era of New Yorker journalism, and Joseph Mitchell

0:10:18.364 --> 0:10:21.764
<v Speaker 1>was someone I had really really looked up to as

0:10:21.844 --> 0:10:25.444
<v Speaker 1>like a cub writer because his stories were just filled

0:10:25.444 --> 0:10:28.644
<v Speaker 1>with these amazing characters, these amazing quotes, these amazing scenes,

0:10:28.644 --> 0:10:31.084
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, wow, I wish I could do that. Right,

0:10:31.484 --> 0:10:34.844
<v Speaker 1>he writes nonfiction that's like fiction. He finds all of

0:10:34.884 --> 0:10:37.804
<v Speaker 1>these amazing things and he brings you there, and it

0:10:37.844 --> 0:10:41.884
<v Speaker 1>turns out his nonfiction was fiction. So as it turns

0:10:41.924 --> 0:10:45.164
<v Speaker 1>out he actually did exactly what you were suggesting that

0:10:45.244 --> 0:10:47.404
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, I wish this quote existed. I'm just

0:10:47.444 --> 0:10:49.444
<v Speaker 1>going to make it up and I'm going to create

0:10:49.484 --> 0:10:52.724
<v Speaker 1>a composite character based on the reporting I did, who

0:10:52.804 --> 0:10:54.964
<v Speaker 1>says all of these things that are very convenient for

0:10:55.004 --> 0:10:57.444
<v Speaker 1>me to say. Now. Like I said, different era, at

0:10:57.444 --> 0:11:01.044
<v Speaker 1>different time, the vaunted fact checking department did not work

0:11:01.084 --> 0:11:04.124
<v Speaker 1>the way that it does today. It slipped through, and

0:11:04.404 --> 0:11:06.244
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it broke my heart because it sets

0:11:06.284 --> 0:11:10.604
<v Speaker 1>you to an absolutely unattainable standard. I was looking at

0:11:10.644 --> 0:11:13.444
<v Speaker 1>this like, oh, this is what journalism is. No, this

0:11:13.564 --> 0:11:16.884
<v Speaker 1>is what fiction is. And the reason it was so clean,

0:11:17.284 --> 0:11:20.444
<v Speaker 1>with you know, all the bows beautifully tied, is because

0:11:20.524 --> 0:11:23.604
<v Speaker 1>it was fiction. Now he's a beautiful writer. But he's

0:11:23.644 --> 0:11:27.044
<v Speaker 1>a novelist, right, He's a fabulist. He is not actually

0:11:27.404 --> 0:11:32.164
<v Speaker 1>someone who is a journalist. And the reason I felt

0:11:32.204 --> 0:11:35.684
<v Speaker 1>betrayed was because he wasn't saying this is inspired by

0:11:35.764 --> 0:11:39.244
<v Speaker 1>He was portraying it as this is literally what happened,

0:11:39.284 --> 0:11:41.724
<v Speaker 1>and these are literally the people I talk to. When

0:11:41.804 --> 0:11:45.924
<v Speaker 1>you are a documentary filmmaker, you are saying I am

0:11:46.004 --> 0:11:49.164
<v Speaker 1>a documentarian, and we're not talking about someone like Ken Burns, right,

0:11:49.204 --> 0:11:51.484
<v Speaker 1>who's doing a historic documentary about people who are no

0:11:51.564 --> 0:11:54.764
<v Speaker 1>longer alive, and you have historic recreations, et cetera, et cetera.

0:11:55.404 --> 0:11:58.244
<v Speaker 1>What you're trying to be you know, true to the characters.

0:11:58.324 --> 0:12:00.844
<v Speaker 1>But you know John Adams and alive. Sorry so we

0:12:00.884 --> 0:12:03.524
<v Speaker 1>can't go and interview him. But when you're doing a

0:12:03.564 --> 0:12:07.164
<v Speaker 1>documentary in the modern era, in real time where you're

0:12:07.204 --> 0:12:10.644
<v Speaker 1>following people around, and you are saying, I am creating

0:12:10.684 --> 0:12:13.964
<v Speaker 1>a real experience, and I am showing you the unvarnished truth,

0:12:14.364 --> 0:12:17.924
<v Speaker 1>and then you use AI however, you use it without

0:12:17.924 --> 0:12:21.364
<v Speaker 1>telling anyone that you're using it, without asking people is

0:12:21.364 --> 0:12:23.324
<v Speaker 1>it okay to use it? There are just so many

0:12:23.364 --> 0:12:27.524
<v Speaker 1>issues here that I think are going to become more

0:12:27.604 --> 0:12:32.004
<v Speaker 1>and more important to deal with as AI becomes more prevalent. Right,

0:12:32.244 --> 0:12:35.164
<v Speaker 1>but this is something that's existed in journalism long, long

0:12:35.244 --> 0:12:36.084
<v Speaker 1>long before AI.

0:12:36.244 --> 0:12:38.404
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's like Jonah Lair. I mean, look, I would

0:12:38.404 --> 0:12:40.444
<v Speaker 3>see as a kissing cousin of this at least is

0:12:40.444 --> 0:12:45.804
<v Speaker 3>also the data fraud scandals in yes, academic absolutely which

0:12:45.884 --> 0:12:48.644
<v Speaker 3>often kind of found was like Jonah Lair, who is

0:12:48.724 --> 0:12:51.564
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Glass. Jason Blair was another or maybe young but

0:12:51.644 --> 0:12:54.724
<v Speaker 3>like but where like, yeah, it makes a narrative a

0:12:54.764 --> 0:12:58.724
<v Speaker 3>little bit too meet and perfect, right, And maybe I

0:12:58.764 --> 0:13:02.724
<v Speaker 3>have like a more general critique of like journalism where like,

0:13:02.764 --> 0:13:05.804
<v Speaker 3>you know, whenever I hear the word storytelling as it

0:13:05.844 --> 0:13:08.444
<v Speaker 3>pertains journalism, I get a little bit nervous, right, because

0:13:08.484 --> 0:13:13.084
<v Speaker 3>I think that often involves, at least over simplification. It

0:13:13.164 --> 0:13:17.924
<v Speaker 3>often involves you know, turning characters into like good and evil,

0:13:18.044 --> 0:13:22.364
<v Speaker 3>sometimes caricatures a little bit. And look, I think I

0:13:22.404 --> 0:13:24.884
<v Speaker 3>mean in Marie, the books that we write take a

0:13:24.924 --> 0:13:28.004
<v Speaker 3>long time and involve a lot of research, right, you know,

0:13:28.084 --> 0:13:30.844
<v Speaker 3>to me, it's also laziness kind of thing, right, where

0:13:30.884 --> 0:13:32.444
<v Speaker 3>like you should be able if you know, I talked

0:13:32.444 --> 0:13:34.644
<v Speaker 3>to two hundred people from my book, I should be

0:13:34.644 --> 0:13:38.484
<v Speaker 3>able to find and I can also consult source material,

0:13:38.484 --> 0:13:40.284
<v Speaker 3>I can read other books, right, Like, if I can't

0:13:40.324 --> 0:13:45.204
<v Speaker 3>find interesting stories out of those two hundred interviews, yeah,

0:13:45.204 --> 0:13:47.284
<v Speaker 3>then okay, that's a problem.

0:13:47.564 --> 0:13:49.564
<v Speaker 2>It's a problem. I mean, what's weird about this world?

0:13:49.604 --> 0:13:54.564
<v Speaker 3>Shirts poke video is like the quotes from uh Keating

0:13:55.084 --> 0:13:58.084
<v Speaker 3>are like similar to things that he would say.

0:13:57.884 --> 0:13:59.404
<v Speaker 2>And they're not really advancing them there.

0:13:59.484 --> 0:14:01.604
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's just no, it was just it was

0:14:01.684 --> 0:14:04.524
<v Speaker 1>just it was very Yeah, I don't understand. But by

0:14:04.604 --> 0:14:08.124
<v Speaker 1>the way, for listeners, just a bit of context. You

0:14:08.164 --> 0:14:11.044
<v Speaker 1>threw a lot of names out. Jonah Lair was a

0:14:11.124 --> 0:14:14.404
<v Speaker 1>journalist with The New Yorker as well, and he was

0:14:14.564 --> 0:14:19.804
<v Speaker 1>fired for just major issues of fabrication. The reason he

0:14:19.924 --> 0:14:25.244
<v Speaker 1>was caught was inventing a quote by Bob Dylan, right,

0:14:25.444 --> 0:14:27.964
<v Speaker 1>the one person who you would never invent a quote

0:14:28.004 --> 0:14:31.004
<v Speaker 1>from because the fans Bob Dylan fans man, first of all,

0:14:31.044 --> 0:14:34.364
<v Speaker 1>Bob Dylan's still alive. Secondly, Bob Dylan fans, they have

0:14:34.444 --> 0:14:37.964
<v Speaker 1>gone through every single word that man has ever said

0:14:37.964 --> 0:14:41.604
<v Speaker 1>with a fine tooth com and believe me, immediately when

0:14:41.604 --> 0:14:44.284
<v Speaker 1>this quote came out, people were like, oh my god,

0:14:44.444 --> 0:14:46.644
<v Speaker 1>when did he say this? It's such a beautiful quote

0:14:46.644 --> 0:14:49.524
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of creativity. Never said it right, but

0:14:49.564 --> 0:14:51.644
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was very convenient. So that was yeah,

0:14:51.724 --> 0:14:55.644
<v Speaker 1>that was jonah Laire And I think your similarity the

0:14:55.644 --> 0:14:59.924
<v Speaker 1>similarity with data fabrication is if you're a scientist who

0:15:00.004 --> 0:15:03.124
<v Speaker 1>has kind of a hypothesis in mind and the data

0:15:03.204 --> 0:15:06.564
<v Speaker 1>almost fit, you know, it can be very tempting to

0:15:06.604 --> 0:15:08.764
<v Speaker 1>be like, let's set massage this a little bit, right,

0:15:09.124 --> 0:15:12.884
<v Speaker 1>let's take out these data points, let's control for this variable.

0:15:12.924 --> 0:15:16.204
<v Speaker 1>P hacking right, Like that PA hacking is the nice

0:15:16.764 --> 0:15:19.964
<v Speaker 1>version of it where you don't actually fabricate anything, but

0:15:20.124 --> 0:15:23.204
<v Speaker 1>you start controlling for random things so that your P

0:15:23.404 --> 0:15:26.604
<v Speaker 1>value becomes significant, so that you hit that significant point

0:15:26.804 --> 0:15:30.164
<v Speaker 1>five thresholder and you're like, ha, I told you. But

0:15:30.204 --> 0:15:33.364
<v Speaker 1>then when asked like, hey, why did you control for this?

0:15:33.564 --> 0:15:35.644
<v Speaker 1>Like why did you control for that? Like is there

0:15:35.644 --> 0:15:40.004
<v Speaker 1>any a priori reason or hypothesis. Oftentimes the answer is like, well,

0:15:40.084 --> 0:15:43.284
<v Speaker 1>because it became significant only then, So that's kind of

0:15:43.284 --> 0:15:45.644
<v Speaker 1>the benign version. And the less benign version is when

0:15:45.684 --> 0:15:50.044
<v Speaker 1>you literally create data points or take away data points,

0:15:50.404 --> 0:15:54.364
<v Speaker 1>or fabricate data out of out of thin air, which

0:15:54.404 --> 0:15:58.804
<v Speaker 1>happened with allegedly happened with Dan Arieli and Francesca Gino

0:15:59.484 --> 0:16:02.524
<v Speaker 1>in some of those studies that are being investigated as

0:16:02.524 --> 0:16:02.924
<v Speaker 1>we speak.

0:16:09.404 --> 0:16:10.884
<v Speaker 2>I'll be right back after this break.

0:16:17.124 --> 0:16:19.164
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you get different rationales for this, right. Sometimes it's

0:16:19.204 --> 0:16:24.244
<v Speaker 3>kind of this like post modern Oh, everybody's doing it.

0:16:24.244 --> 0:16:26.644
<v Speaker 2>It's all a game for power and influence. Right.

0:16:26.924 --> 0:16:29.484
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes it can have like more of an ideological basis,

0:16:29.524 --> 0:16:30.844
<v Speaker 3>like you know what, we're on the right side of

0:16:30.884 --> 0:16:35.924
<v Speaker 3>things and the other chide embellishes and cheats and so like.

0:16:37.204 --> 0:16:39.084
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, you can play plenty of examples

0:16:39.444 --> 0:16:41.284
<v Speaker 3>of Democrats doing this, but like one that comes to

0:16:41.324 --> 0:16:45.204
<v Speaker 3>mind is jd Vance, the vice presidential nominee in the

0:16:45.204 --> 0:16:49.764
<v Speaker 3>campaign last year, was like, Yeah, these media narratives I'm paraphrasing, this.

0:16:49.724 --> 0:16:51.364
<v Speaker 2>Is not direct quote.

0:16:52.644 --> 0:16:55.724
<v Speaker 3>These media narratives about Haitian immigrants and dogs and cats

0:16:55.764 --> 0:16:59.924
<v Speaker 3>might be a little bit exaggerated. However, democrats lie about

0:17:00.684 --> 0:17:03.524
<v Speaker 3>shit like this all the time, and we need something

0:17:03.564 --> 0:17:05.044
<v Speaker 3>to grab them me to use attention. It was kind

0:17:05.084 --> 0:17:06.604
<v Speaker 3>of like a masscof moment where he's like a little

0:17:06.644 --> 0:17:10.444
<v Speaker 3>bit more honest about that, and and you know, you

0:17:10.484 --> 0:17:13.204
<v Speaker 3>see that kind of thing happen all the.

0:17:13.644 --> 0:17:18.244
<v Speaker 2>Time, right, I mean I don't know.

0:17:18.284 --> 0:17:20.124
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, and there's a difference again between

0:17:20.204 --> 0:17:24.884
<v Speaker 3>like lies and exaggerations. I mean, some of the during

0:17:24.884 --> 0:17:27.924
<v Speaker 3>the racial recogning, I think, you know, the behavior of

0:17:27.924 --> 0:17:31.284
<v Speaker 3>certain people was exaggerated very much. I mean, there's lots

0:17:31.284 --> 0:17:34.724
<v Speaker 3>of misinformation out there. Still, there's a lot of information

0:17:34.724 --> 0:17:37.444
<v Speaker 3>about like there's a big controversy on Twitter about like

0:17:37.644 --> 0:17:40.964
<v Speaker 3>AI data centers and how much water they use. I

0:17:40.964 --> 0:17:45.604
<v Speaker 3>mean there's a lot of but like, but it's also

0:17:45.724 --> 0:17:50.924
<v Speaker 3>sometimes like a lack of like formal training. Right, if

0:17:50.924 --> 0:17:53.084
<v Speaker 3>people kind of get into, like I guess more and

0:17:53.164 --> 0:17:56.404
<v Speaker 3>more people that kind of get into like content creation

0:17:56.724 --> 0:17:59.924
<v Speaker 3>don't kind of I don't know if it's actually empirically true, Right,

0:18:00.124 --> 0:18:02.284
<v Speaker 3>I imagine a fewer them kind of go to school

0:18:02.404 --> 0:18:06.124
<v Speaker 3>for journalism or whatnot. Right, they can kind of go

0:18:06.324 --> 0:18:09.484
<v Speaker 3>like viral in their own ways potentially.

0:18:09.124 --> 0:18:10.164
<v Speaker 2>And.

0:18:11.204 --> 0:18:14.124
<v Speaker 3>You know, Yeah, when I was kind of the editor

0:18:14.164 --> 0:18:15.804
<v Speaker 3>in chief of five thirty eight, which is partly a

0:18:15.804 --> 0:18:18.124
<v Speaker 3>ceremonial title, but you did kind of notice difference. We

0:18:18.204 --> 0:18:21.844
<v Speaker 3>mostly did hire people that were like, had a background

0:18:21.844 --> 0:18:25.684
<v Speaker 3>in kind of capital jay journalism, and I think that

0:18:25.844 --> 0:18:27.204
<v Speaker 3>helped with this kind of thing at least.

0:18:27.684 --> 0:18:30.764
<v Speaker 1>Sure. Yeah, well, you know, I think you're making a

0:18:30.804 --> 0:18:33.804
<v Speaker 1>really important point in that, you know, we are living

0:18:33.884 --> 0:18:38.444
<v Speaker 1>at a time where it's it can be really difficult

0:18:38.484 --> 0:18:41.124
<v Speaker 1>to discern, you know, what's the truth and what isn't right,

0:18:41.204 --> 0:18:44.164
<v Speaker 1>where like the lines are so fungible, like there's so

0:18:44.324 --> 0:18:48.284
<v Speaker 1>much misinformation on every side, and it's true in politics

0:18:48.324 --> 0:18:52.524
<v Speaker 1>and and everything, that it feels like when you then

0:18:52.724 --> 0:18:57.004
<v Speaker 1>intentionally do it right, like you're you're just muddying already

0:18:57.044 --> 0:19:00.884
<v Speaker 1>muddy waters. And to me, it's all, you know, as

0:19:01.004 --> 0:19:03.284
<v Speaker 1>as our listeners know, I'm working on a book about cheating,

0:19:03.604 --> 0:19:05.964
<v Speaker 1>and it's all kind of these you know, forms of

0:19:06.564 --> 0:19:10.644
<v Speaker 1>kind of cheating with what your profession is supposed to do. Unless,

0:19:10.764 --> 0:19:14.284
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I don't actually necessarily have a problem

0:19:14.324 --> 0:19:18.644
<v Speaker 1>with using AI if you say, like how you're doing it,

0:19:18.884 --> 0:19:21.364
<v Speaker 1>if you ask people for permission, if you kind of

0:19:21.364 --> 0:19:24.444
<v Speaker 1>explain what you're going to be doing if you disclose it, right,

0:19:24.524 --> 0:19:27.564
<v Speaker 1>if you say, like, hey, like this some of this

0:19:27.644 --> 0:19:31.564
<v Speaker 1>has been generated with the help of AI for narrative clarity, right,

0:19:31.644 --> 0:19:35.444
<v Speaker 1>like whatever it is, I personally wouldn't do that, but like,

0:19:35.684 --> 0:19:38.324
<v Speaker 1>at least do that and at least kind of have

0:19:38.444 --> 0:19:42.164
<v Speaker 1>the decency to ask permission from the people who you

0:19:42.324 --> 0:19:46.284
<v Speaker 1>are interviewing, right to say, like, is it okay if

0:19:46.284 --> 0:19:48.844
<v Speaker 1>we if we edit you in this way? Is it

0:19:48.884 --> 0:19:54.244
<v Speaker 1>okay if we use AI to kind of to move

0:19:54.404 --> 0:19:57.564
<v Speaker 1>forward the narrative. I don't even remember what the wording is.

0:19:57.884 --> 0:20:01.244
<v Speaker 1>But you have to ask for permission. Nay, I'm sure

0:20:01.244 --> 0:20:05.644
<v Speaker 1>that before you do documentaries like like I do, you

0:20:05.684 --> 0:20:08.724
<v Speaker 1>go through an appearance release form right where you actually

0:20:08.764 --> 0:20:11.404
<v Speaker 1>have to got all these things and sign it. I

0:20:11.644 --> 0:20:15.884
<v Speaker 1>read that shit, and I actually read it really carefully,

0:20:15.924 --> 0:20:18.684
<v Speaker 1>and I make changes, and I make changes that say

0:20:18.684 --> 0:20:21.044
<v Speaker 1>that no, like, actually, you can't edit this way. No,

0:20:21.324 --> 0:20:24.364
<v Speaker 1>I don't consent to the use this way. No, you

0:20:24.444 --> 0:20:26.844
<v Speaker 1>must ask my permission if you're doing this or that

0:20:27.284 --> 0:20:29.564
<v Speaker 1>all of these things. And I've had times when I've

0:20:29.604 --> 0:20:34.004
<v Speaker 1>walked away when I haven't appeared in projects because they

0:20:34.044 --> 0:20:38.124
<v Speaker 1>weren't okay with my edits. And I had one particular

0:20:38.244 --> 0:20:41.524
<v Speaker 1>time last year that was really frustrating because it was

0:20:41.524 --> 0:20:45.164
<v Speaker 1>for this huge Canadian show and we spent multiple hours

0:20:45.564 --> 0:20:47.644
<v Speaker 1>filming and it was all this stuff, and then they

0:20:47.644 --> 0:20:50.724
<v Speaker 1>gave me, like almost as an afterthought, this absolutely batshit

0:20:50.844 --> 0:20:54.324
<v Speaker 1>crazy release that I then edited the crap out of

0:20:54.484 --> 0:20:57.244
<v Speaker 1>and we couldn't come to an agreement. So it was

0:20:57.524 --> 0:20:59.324
<v Speaker 1>they had spent tons of money, right, they had flown

0:20:59.324 --> 0:21:02.284
<v Speaker 1>out a whole crew, rented at a hotel room like,

0:21:02.364 --> 0:21:05.324
<v Speaker 1>done all this stuff with me. I had spent all

0:21:05.364 --> 0:21:08.164
<v Speaker 1>this time, you know, it was a day gone out

0:21:08.204 --> 0:21:09.604
<v Speaker 1>of my life. And I was like, you know what,

0:21:09.724 --> 0:21:12.044
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sorry, you're not going to be using this

0:21:12.204 --> 0:21:16.284
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not comfortable with the liberties that you may

0:21:16.444 --> 0:21:19.164
<v Speaker 1>or may not take. Right. Maybe they it would have

0:21:19.204 --> 0:21:22.084
<v Speaker 1>been unedited, but the things that I was agreeing to,

0:21:22.244 --> 0:21:24.724
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I am not okay with that. I

0:21:24.804 --> 0:21:26.924
<v Speaker 1>want to know exactly how the things. And it was

0:21:26.924 --> 0:21:30.084
<v Speaker 1>political too, right, it was about Trump, so Nate, you know,

0:21:30.204 --> 0:21:32.924
<v Speaker 1>like that kind of stuff. You just have to be

0:21:33.004 --> 0:21:35.684
<v Speaker 1>so careful that people are not going to be using

0:21:35.724 --> 0:21:38.324
<v Speaker 1>it out of context, juxtaposing it with images or with

0:21:38.444 --> 0:21:42.444
<v Speaker 1>things that make it seem different from your intention that

0:21:42.484 --> 0:21:45.244
<v Speaker 1>they remain true to kind of what you said and

0:21:45.684 --> 0:21:47.804
<v Speaker 1>how you intended it to be perceived.

0:21:48.404 --> 0:21:52.124
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, anything, This is very inside baseball. Anything involving traditional

0:21:52.204 --> 0:21:57.244
<v Speaker 3>produced television or video or film, right, is like quite

0:21:57.404 --> 0:22:00.244
<v Speaker 3>labor intensive relative to the amount of time that the

0:22:00.284 --> 0:22:03.124
<v Speaker 3>eventual and product uses up, including what they able to

0:22:03.164 --> 0:22:05.764
<v Speaker 3>shoot a lot, a lot a lot of footage with

0:22:05.844 --> 0:22:07.924
<v Speaker 3>you and you got to go to some studio, and

0:22:07.964 --> 0:22:11.204
<v Speaker 3>it just usually it always takes there's multiple takes. It

0:22:11.324 --> 0:22:16.724
<v Speaker 3>just always takes longer to produce good taped television than

0:22:16.764 --> 0:22:19.324
<v Speaker 3>you might think, right, which is kind of why I'm

0:22:19.364 --> 0:22:20.724
<v Speaker 3>I'll go on a podcast, you know what I mean.

0:22:20.724 --> 0:22:23.524
<v Speaker 3>I don't have to like retake things. We very occasionally

0:22:23.564 --> 0:22:25.724
<v Speaker 3>retake things because we stumble on our words and stuff, Maria.

0:22:25.764 --> 0:22:26.884
<v Speaker 2>But like, look a.

0:22:26.804 --> 0:22:30.124
<v Speaker 3>Lot of times when there's bad behavior, people say, well,

0:22:30.164 --> 0:22:32.604
<v Speaker 3>what about this other thing that's also bad, and it's like, okay.

0:22:33.084 --> 0:22:37.004
<v Speaker 3>We can debate about how much of an ethical sin

0:22:37.764 --> 0:22:41.284
<v Speaker 3>is it to quote somebody out of context, or how

0:22:41.364 --> 0:22:44.204
<v Speaker 3>much of a sin is it to let's say, you

0:22:44.204 --> 0:22:47.604
<v Speaker 3>give a long interview to documentary and they take fifteen

0:22:47.604 --> 0:22:49.324
<v Speaker 3>seconds out of that it's meant to portray you in

0:22:49.364 --> 0:22:51.484
<v Speaker 3>a bad light out of the three hour interview for

0:22:51.524 --> 0:22:52.524
<v Speaker 3>whatever grudge that they have.

0:22:52.724 --> 0:22:53.444
<v Speaker 2>Right, we can.

0:22:53.364 --> 0:22:57.004
<v Speaker 3>Debate is that unethical? Is it tantamount to like a

0:22:57.084 --> 0:22:57.964
<v Speaker 3>journalistic sin?

0:22:58.244 --> 0:22:58.444
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:22:58.644 --> 0:23:01.404
<v Speaker 3>And I might say more than most people that it

0:23:01.444 --> 0:23:05.484
<v Speaker 3>is actually right. However, the things that are clearly journalistic

0:23:05.524 --> 0:23:08.444
<v Speaker 3>sins we should not absolve because of the EDU case.

0:23:08.484 --> 0:23:10.364
<v Speaker 2>This is not an edge case, right, This is not

0:23:10.684 --> 0:23:11.364
<v Speaker 2>this is this.

0:23:11.284 --> 0:23:15.124
<v Speaker 1>Is not an edge case. And I hate the excuse that, oh, well,

0:23:15.164 --> 0:23:17.924
<v Speaker 1>it's not that much in the grand context of things. Right,

0:23:18.284 --> 0:23:20.804
<v Speaker 1>it's only a little, it's only a few lines here,

0:23:20.924 --> 0:23:23.684
<v Speaker 1>it's only it's not all the players, it's only no

0:23:23.884 --> 0:23:27.204
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't make it more okay, Right, Like I

0:23:27.244 --> 0:23:30.964
<v Speaker 1>only fabricated this one quote in my article, Natee. The

0:23:30.964 --> 0:23:33.604
<v Speaker 1>rest of it is from well almost certainly, No, I

0:23:33.644 --> 0:23:36.844
<v Speaker 1>only I only fabricated that one data point to make

0:23:36.884 --> 0:23:38.324
<v Speaker 1>it all max, which.

0:23:38.164 --> 0:23:39.324
<v Speaker 2>Is almost certainly.

0:23:40.524 --> 0:23:44.444
<v Speaker 3>Like why would you like, yes, you know, yeah, I

0:23:44.444 --> 0:23:46.404
<v Speaker 3>mean if you're like, oh, I have this one annoying

0:23:46.444 --> 0:23:49.444
<v Speaker 3>thing that like it's going to take extra time, but

0:23:49.484 --> 0:23:51.244
<v Speaker 3>in order to do that, I have to like cheat

0:23:51.364 --> 0:23:53.164
<v Speaker 3>and like, you know, just so it's just so it

0:23:53.324 --> 0:23:55.644
<v Speaker 3>was also like it it's also kind of arrogant to

0:23:55.724 --> 0:23:58.164
<v Speaker 3>think that I believe this guy, by the way, isn't

0:23:58.164 --> 0:24:00.364
<v Speaker 3>he like the video producer for Alan Keating too?

0:24:01.284 --> 0:24:03.964
<v Speaker 1>He is? Yeah, that's the weird thing. So this guy

0:24:03.964 --> 0:24:07.364
<v Speaker 1>who actually blew the whistle is someone who employed this

0:24:07.444 --> 0:24:12.524
<v Speaker 1>company to run his is YouTube channel and so had

0:24:12.524 --> 0:24:16.844
<v Speaker 1>been working with them for about a year. So that's honestly,

0:24:16.924 --> 0:24:19.004
<v Speaker 1>like to me, that's even that makes it even worse,

0:24:19.164 --> 0:24:24.444
<v Speaker 1>Like Nate, imagine like one of our producers on Risky Business, right,

0:24:24.524 --> 0:24:26.364
<v Speaker 1>we've been working with them, and all of a sudden

0:24:26.364 --> 0:24:30.284
<v Speaker 1>we find out that they just ai generated an episode

0:24:30.324 --> 0:24:34.004
<v Speaker 1>for us without asking us, Like that would that would

0:24:34.044 --> 0:24:37.684
<v Speaker 1>make it worse if they actually then said like, hey,

0:24:38.524 --> 0:24:40.924
<v Speaker 1>but we've been working together for multiple years now, so

0:24:41.004 --> 0:24:44.364
<v Speaker 1>we have a great working relationship. So it's okay, Like

0:24:44.524 --> 0:24:46.804
<v Speaker 1>we and we remain true. We know Nate and Maria.

0:24:46.844 --> 0:24:48.644
<v Speaker 1>We've worked with them for so long that we know

0:24:48.844 --> 0:24:51.044
<v Speaker 1>what their thoughts are and where their minds are, and

0:24:51.084 --> 0:24:54.124
<v Speaker 1>so we promised that this episode was true to their

0:24:54.204 --> 0:24:57.324
<v Speaker 1>spirit unless we both die in a fatal accident, which

0:24:57.364 --> 0:24:58.444
<v Speaker 1>I hope doesn't happen.

0:24:58.724 --> 0:24:59.404
<v Speaker 2>I hope, there's.

0:24:59.324 --> 0:25:03.684
<v Speaker 3>Never imagine let's I mean, now there's these things, these

0:25:03.684 --> 0:25:09.764
<v Speaker 3>fucking AI companions like your dead fucking husband, yeah.

0:25:08.644 --> 0:25:10.484
<v Speaker 2>Child or stuff animal.

0:25:11.484 --> 0:25:16.884
<v Speaker 1>By the way, producers, producers just like just to just

0:25:16.924 --> 0:25:20.364
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you understand, it's still not okay

0:25:20.404 --> 0:25:23.804
<v Speaker 1>if we die tragically, just do an episode yourself.

0:25:23.844 --> 0:25:24.124
<v Speaker 2>You can.

0:25:24.444 --> 0:25:28.324
<v Speaker 1>You can introduce yourself as hosts and and talk about

0:25:28.684 --> 0:25:31.084
<v Speaker 1>you know what pain pains in the asses we were

0:25:31.124 --> 0:25:33.644
<v Speaker 1>to work with while we were still alive, and do

0:25:33.764 --> 0:25:37.124
<v Speaker 1>a nice episode without our own voices. Yeah, it's just

0:25:37.524 --> 0:25:39.484
<v Speaker 1>you know that in some ways makes it even worse

0:25:39.564 --> 0:25:44.764
<v Speaker 1>because they're betraying an existing relationship, right, there's a level

0:25:44.764 --> 0:25:47.004
<v Speaker 1>of trust there where like, if it's someone I've worked

0:25:47.044 --> 0:25:49.044
<v Speaker 1>with a lot, I would trust that they wouldn't do

0:25:49.084 --> 0:25:51.764
<v Speaker 1>that to me, right, that they would actually respect what

0:25:51.844 --> 0:25:53.684
<v Speaker 1>I said, how I said it, et cetera, et cetera.

0:25:53.964 --> 0:25:56.844
<v Speaker 1>To have someone it's almost it's worse to have it

0:25:56.884 --> 0:25:58.844
<v Speaker 1>be someone I've worked with than to have it be

0:25:58.964 --> 0:26:01.244
<v Speaker 1>someone that I'm working with for the first time. So

0:26:01.364 --> 0:26:04.724
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually think that that absolves them in any way.

0:26:05.164 --> 0:26:08.764
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it was actually a very interesting impulse

0:26:08.844 --> 0:26:14.644
<v Speaker 1>on Allan Keating's part two air this on Twitter as

0:26:14.684 --> 0:26:18.444
<v Speaker 1>opposed to going directly to the producer behind the scenes,

0:26:18.764 --> 0:26:20.564
<v Speaker 1>because if he had gone behind the scenes, I don't

0:26:20.604 --> 0:26:23.124
<v Speaker 1>think any of probably this would not have come out.

0:26:23.284 --> 0:26:26.324
<v Speaker 1>But I think that he clearly felt betrayed, right, Like,

0:26:26.364 --> 0:26:29.724
<v Speaker 1>that's a very public way of doing it. And then

0:26:30.084 --> 0:26:32.604
<v Speaker 1>the original apology. I don't remember what his response to

0:26:32.644 --> 0:26:34.244
<v Speaker 1>it was, but it was like, are you kidding me?

0:26:34.444 --> 0:26:38.244
<v Speaker 1>Like the snow like that's not an apology. Yeah, apparently

0:26:38.324 --> 0:26:42.524
<v Speaker 1>he said that the apology does not deserve a response,

0:26:42.564 --> 0:26:45.444
<v Speaker 1>and you know why, So he was pissed, right, So

0:26:45.524 --> 0:26:47.404
<v Speaker 1>this is a way to take it to the public form.

0:26:47.724 --> 0:26:49.404
<v Speaker 1>I'm not actually sure why he took it down.

0:26:49.484 --> 0:26:52.884
<v Speaker 3>These guys who are like very promotion e They're like, oh,

0:26:53.044 --> 0:26:54.724
<v Speaker 3>y'all help promote your shit, and you're like, yeah, this

0:26:54.804 --> 0:26:58.884
<v Speaker 3>guy seems a little cringe. But maybe I need some

0:26:59.004 --> 0:27:01.844
<v Speaker 3>cringe help, right, Maybe need some cringe help who will

0:27:02.244 --> 0:27:04.724
<v Speaker 3>boost my social media channels and blah blah blah. I mean,

0:27:05.164 --> 0:27:07.084
<v Speaker 3>how much poker content do you watch?

0:27:08.724 --> 0:27:13.684
<v Speaker 1>I watch poker content in the form of like instructional videos, right,

0:27:14.084 --> 0:27:17.444
<v Speaker 1>Like I will watch run it once videos, I will

0:27:17.564 --> 0:27:23.044
<v Speaker 1>watch the course that Isaac Caxton and you know, Nick

0:27:23.084 --> 0:27:27.844
<v Speaker 1>Petrangelo and Dan Divores put out for gto lab I

0:27:27.924 --> 0:27:30.044
<v Speaker 1>will watch kind of some of the videos that like

0:27:30.084 --> 0:27:34.124
<v Speaker 1>gto Wizard does. I usually watch poker content to learn,

0:27:34.324 --> 0:27:37.284
<v Speaker 1>and I don't usually watch kind of the dramatic what's

0:27:37.324 --> 0:27:41.044
<v Speaker 1>happening in the world of poker content. I did watch

0:27:42.124 --> 0:27:46.044
<v Speaker 1>the first episode of this documentary. I ended up watching

0:27:46.084 --> 0:27:50.084
<v Speaker 1>it on two time speed because it was really I'm sorry.

0:27:50.684 --> 0:27:52.764
<v Speaker 1>Even before I knew about the AI, I was not

0:27:52.964 --> 0:27:57.524
<v Speaker 1>enjoying it. I found it quite boring. I don't usually

0:27:57.564 --> 0:27:59.844
<v Speaker 1>like to say I didn't say this at all publicly

0:27:59.884 --> 0:28:02.164
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't. I don't like to say anything negative

0:28:02.204 --> 0:28:05.284
<v Speaker 1>about content that might bring more people, you know, into

0:28:05.284 --> 0:28:08.244
<v Speaker 1>poker or whatnot. Like it's not like there was anything

0:28:08.284 --> 0:28:09.804
<v Speaker 1>bad about it. I just didn't really I think it

0:28:09.844 --> 0:28:12.964
<v Speaker 1>was good. But now that we know that it was

0:28:13.004 --> 0:28:17.684
<v Speaker 1>boring while taking these liberties with with people's uh speech,

0:28:17.804 --> 0:28:21.524
<v Speaker 1>now I feel perfectly entitled to say that after one episode,

0:28:21.604 --> 0:28:23.604
<v Speaker 1>I did not think it was good and I never

0:28:23.724 --> 0:28:28.644
<v Speaker 1>watch video on more than one X speed. I actually

0:28:28.644 --> 0:28:31.804
<v Speaker 1>am someone who listens in real time. I do not

0:28:31.924 --> 0:28:35.124
<v Speaker 1>speech it up. I spoke up that tells you something.

0:28:36.804 --> 0:28:38.844
<v Speaker 2>I'm a you know, I'm a good one point too.

0:28:38.844 --> 0:28:41.764
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Listen, you gotta be careful with the

0:28:41.844 --> 0:28:43.204
<v Speaker 3>one point two one point three in the show.

0:28:43.244 --> 0:28:44.964
<v Speaker 2>I'm a pretty a pretty fast talker.

0:28:45.044 --> 0:28:48.724
<v Speaker 3>You can't apply your generic one point two's and one

0:28:48.724 --> 0:28:51.884
<v Speaker 3>point two fives and one point threes to risky business.

0:28:51.924 --> 0:28:53.364
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you. I'm telling you that much.

0:28:54.844 --> 0:28:57.404
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's this perpetual debate in the kind of poker

0:28:57.444 --> 0:29:00.644
<v Speaker 3>media world about like content that's made for pros versus

0:29:00.724 --> 0:29:02.884
<v Speaker 3>content that's made for for.

0:29:02.964 --> 0:29:04.764
<v Speaker 2>New players rec players.

0:29:04.884 --> 0:29:05.044
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:29:05.284 --> 0:29:07.484
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think I probably agree with a critique that, like,

0:29:08.724 --> 0:29:13.684
<v Speaker 3>too much of this content is too pro driven. Right,

0:29:15.764 --> 0:29:21.484
<v Speaker 3>the content has shifted more toward heigh stakes cash games

0:29:21.524 --> 0:29:24.164
<v Speaker 3>stream cash games because like you get a little bit

0:29:24.164 --> 0:29:25.724
<v Speaker 3>more personality in there.

0:29:25.884 --> 0:29:27.044
<v Speaker 2>I mean, all the.

0:29:26.964 --> 0:29:28.884
<v Speaker 3>Critics are like partly true. Like one critique is that

0:29:29.044 --> 0:29:34.204
<v Speaker 3>like before computers and solvers, there was more variety in

0:29:34.284 --> 0:29:39.644
<v Speaker 3>how people played, and so you have more personalities and

0:29:39.684 --> 0:29:41.004
<v Speaker 3>more different playing styles.

0:29:41.124 --> 0:29:44.724
<v Speaker 2>Right, I think that's basically true. Right. I think now

0:29:44.844 --> 0:29:50.204
<v Speaker 2>that like with a theoretically unsound.

0:29:51.444 --> 0:29:53.844
<v Speaker 3>But good poker sense kind of skill set, I mean,

0:29:53.924 --> 0:29:56.644
<v Speaker 3>like this Rocky might have that, frankly right, which is

0:29:56.644 --> 0:29:59.404
<v Speaker 3>part of why he was instantly inducted into the Hall

0:29:59.444 --> 0:29:59.844
<v Speaker 3>of Fame.

0:30:00.564 --> 0:30:03.444
<v Speaker 1>And for people who don't remember, Mike Musraki is the

0:30:03.484 --> 0:30:08.044
<v Speaker 1>winner of the World Series of Poker main event this year,

0:30:08.244 --> 0:30:13.004
<v Speaker 1>the Grinder, and he also won the Players Championship, and yes,

0:30:13.124 --> 0:30:16.604
<v Speaker 1>was immediately inducted into the Hall of Fame after unprecedented

0:30:16.644 --> 0:30:17.644
<v Speaker 1>no one's ever done that before.

0:30:17.684 --> 0:30:22.124
<v Speaker 3>Pretty good, pretty good summer, I would say, But in general,

0:30:22.244 --> 0:30:27.044
<v Speaker 3>you've had a shift away from like mainstream broadcast stuff toward.

0:30:27.324 --> 0:30:29.324
<v Speaker 2>Like poker Go. And you know, I like poker Go,

0:30:29.444 --> 0:30:30.444
<v Speaker 2>I like their tournaments.

0:30:30.924 --> 0:30:36.324
<v Speaker 3>However, that's a subscription service targeted toward people like you

0:30:36.404 --> 0:30:39.324
<v Speaker 3>and me that are either proker junkies or have some

0:30:39.364 --> 0:30:43.324
<v Speaker 3>professional or adjacent to professional interests in the game. Ye

0:30:45.204 --> 0:30:48.884
<v Speaker 3>you know the large field WPT and World Series of

0:30:48.884 --> 0:30:52.124
<v Speaker 3>Poker tournaments right where like you have a big four

0:30:52.244 --> 0:30:54.844
<v Speaker 3>or five day event and then you narrow that down

0:30:55.004 --> 0:30:58.484
<v Speaker 3>to a small handful of players, a few of which

0:30:58.604 --> 0:31:01.724
<v Speaker 3>you just by luck of the draw, have good stories,

0:31:01.884 --> 0:31:04.084
<v Speaker 3>right Like is is the main evouent of the World

0:31:04.164 --> 0:31:06.724
<v Speaker 3>Series even on like linear TV anymore like a little

0:31:06.724 --> 0:31:07.004
<v Speaker 3>bit on.

0:31:06.964 --> 0:31:11.044
<v Speaker 1>CDs, right yeah, it is. It is after the fact,

0:31:11.164 --> 0:31:15.284
<v Speaker 1>so not so during the event. You have live streams

0:31:15.764 --> 0:31:19.764
<v Speaker 1>and then those are edited down to I believe thirty

0:31:19.844 --> 0:31:24.964
<v Speaker 1>minute kind of broadcasts that are more made for TV,

0:31:25.364 --> 0:31:29.204
<v Speaker 1>and so there are kind of there's limited uh, limited

0:31:29.244 --> 0:31:34.204
<v Speaker 1>coverage after the fact where you have new announcers, sometimes

0:31:34.964 --> 0:31:38.844
<v Speaker 1>new announcers, sometimes the same announcing team, where they actually

0:31:39.324 --> 0:31:44.484
<v Speaker 1>kind of do new coverage, new kind of new soundtracks

0:31:44.684 --> 0:31:48.844
<v Speaker 1>and make it into more of a polished final product

0:31:48.924 --> 0:31:51.644
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to, you know, let's watch all of these

0:31:51.684 --> 0:31:55.404
<v Speaker 1>hands hand by hand so that it looks more dramatic, right,

0:31:55.484 --> 0:31:58.244
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I totally respect that. I think if

0:31:58.284 --> 0:32:01.964
<v Speaker 1>you're going for a wide TV audience, poker can be

0:32:02.004 --> 0:32:04.804
<v Speaker 1>so boring day right, Like you you can sometimes be

0:32:05.444 --> 0:32:06.364
<v Speaker 1>like sitting and for.

0:32:06.444 --> 0:32:10.804
<v Speaker 3>Us like work, oh yeah, I'm gonna be in Vegas,

0:32:10.844 --> 0:32:11.804
<v Speaker 3>but mostly playing poker.

0:32:11.884 --> 0:32:14.964
<v Speaker 2>They're like, can I come watch you? I'm like, yeah,

0:32:15.124 --> 0:32:20.484
<v Speaker 2>exactly can. It would be table be boring as.

0:32:20.364 --> 0:32:23.524
<v Speaker 1>Fuck, right, even at the final table. You know, I

0:32:23.564 --> 0:32:26.804
<v Speaker 1>actually always encourage people like it's nice to have people

0:32:26.924 --> 0:32:28.884
<v Speaker 1>on your rail, which are you know, the people who

0:32:28.924 --> 0:32:32.044
<v Speaker 1>are watching. But I would never force someone I love

0:32:32.164 --> 0:32:35.204
<v Speaker 1>to come on the rail and watch because you can't

0:32:35.244 --> 0:32:38.204
<v Speaker 1>see the cards. It's much more interesting to watch the

0:32:38.244 --> 0:32:41.324
<v Speaker 1>stream on a screen where you can see what people

0:32:41.364 --> 0:32:44.444
<v Speaker 1>have and you can follow along when you're there live,

0:32:44.884 --> 0:32:48.644
<v Speaker 1>like all you see are the all in confrontations or

0:32:48.764 --> 0:32:51.164
<v Speaker 1>when you know a hand goes to showdown. You don't

0:32:51.204 --> 0:32:55.684
<v Speaker 1>see the cards otherwise, But even if you're watching on screen,

0:32:56.004 --> 0:32:59.044
<v Speaker 1>it can be quite boring because there are so many

0:32:59.044 --> 0:33:04.964
<v Speaker 1>different things happening. So I understand the desire to bring

0:33:05.044 --> 0:33:08.564
<v Speaker 1>people to you know, to craft narratives, to have drama,

0:33:08.844 --> 0:33:10.804
<v Speaker 1>to bring people to the game in a way that

0:33:10.924 --> 0:33:17.804
<v Speaker 1>makes them excited about poker. But you know, how did people,

0:33:18.164 --> 0:33:21.444
<v Speaker 1>you know, craft narratives that make people excited about chess

0:33:21.564 --> 0:33:25.364
<v Speaker 1>or or Formula one or whatever it is. It's by

0:33:25.484 --> 0:33:29.044
<v Speaker 1>being a good storyteller, finding the stories, finding the people

0:33:29.404 --> 0:33:32.444
<v Speaker 1>using the material that you have, rather than kind of

0:33:32.804 --> 0:33:35.844
<v Speaker 1>taking liberty and creating material on your own. So just

0:33:35.844 --> 0:33:40.644
<v Speaker 1>to kind of bring this full circle, I think that you,

0:33:42.124 --> 0:33:44.444
<v Speaker 1>by the way, like we would be doing this. I

0:33:44.444 --> 0:33:48.084
<v Speaker 1>think we'd be having this conversation even if this documentary

0:33:48.364 --> 0:33:51.724
<v Speaker 1>had just smashed everything in the sense that people were like,

0:33:51.764 --> 0:33:54.044
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, this is phenomenal this is so good,

0:33:54.364 --> 0:33:56.844
<v Speaker 1>and it had just like through the roof viewership, which

0:33:56.924 --> 0:33:59.924
<v Speaker 1>it did not. Someone took a screenshot of the number

0:33:59.924 --> 0:34:03.044
<v Speaker 1>of views of each episode before they were taken off

0:34:03.084 --> 0:34:05.124
<v Speaker 1>of YouTube, and it was like, I think it was

0:34:05.244 --> 0:34:08.844
<v Speaker 1>like twenty thou thirty, Like it was not big numbers, right, Like,

0:34:08.924 --> 0:34:12.164
<v Speaker 1>it was much worse than a lot of the great

0:34:12.284 --> 0:34:16.204
<v Speaker 1>poker content creators who actually have, you know, many more views.

0:34:16.244 --> 0:34:18.644
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest one had like forty thousand views

0:34:18.724 --> 0:34:21.364
<v Speaker 1>or something, and with every episode, it just like it

0:34:21.724 --> 0:34:26.284
<v Speaker 1>went down. And so if it had been huge and

0:34:26.684 --> 0:34:30.564
<v Speaker 1>hugely kind of successful with millions of views, this would have,

0:34:30.724 --> 0:34:33.644
<v Speaker 1>I think, in some ways been even more of an issue,

0:34:33.844 --> 0:34:35.684
<v Speaker 1>right like that you had to create that, you had

0:34:35.724 --> 0:34:38.724
<v Speaker 1>to lie that, you had to make shit up to

0:34:38.764 --> 0:34:42.244
<v Speaker 1>bring in an audience. But now like you did that

0:34:42.444 --> 0:34:45.684
<v Speaker 1>and and it was boring, right Like, you did that,

0:34:45.884 --> 0:34:48.204
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't do anything new. You did that, and

0:34:48.324 --> 0:34:52.484
<v Speaker 1>you didn't actually craft drama bring people in, like, you know,

0:34:52.564 --> 0:34:56.524
<v Speaker 1>come create something that made people excited about the game

0:34:56.804 --> 0:35:00.804
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't already somebody who loved the game, right And

0:35:00.964 --> 0:35:05.044
<v Speaker 1>so I think that that that's sort of beside the point,

0:35:05.964 --> 0:35:09.084
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it's also it's absolutely not an excuse.

0:35:09.524 --> 0:35:13.404
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, the more people, like if you're writing

0:35:13.444 --> 0:35:15.724
<v Speaker 1>for an audience of one, Right, like if I had

0:35:15.764 --> 0:35:18.684
<v Speaker 1>a private newsletter that was like on a private thing,

0:35:18.724 --> 0:35:20.964
<v Speaker 1>and I used AI to try to experiment and do

0:35:21.044 --> 0:35:23.284
<v Speaker 1>things that I didn't really have to do, Like I

0:35:23.324 --> 0:35:26.164
<v Speaker 1>don't have to tell anyone, Right, I'm my own audience. Right,

0:35:26.164 --> 0:35:28.684
<v Speaker 1>I can just do I can just do whatever and

0:35:28.724 --> 0:35:32.124
<v Speaker 1>like play around. But if I have as my audience grows,

0:35:32.164 --> 0:35:35.204
<v Speaker 1>then I start having a responsibility to other people to

0:35:35.404 --> 0:35:39.444
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of uphold some sort of standards. And so

0:35:39.764 --> 0:35:42.884
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, like the bigger the success, the more

0:35:43.004 --> 0:35:47.524
<v Speaker 1>responsibility you have to your subjects, to your audience, to

0:35:47.564 --> 0:35:51.204
<v Speaker 1>the sport. Right, you have a responsibility to poker. Why

0:35:51.324 --> 0:35:53.884
<v Speaker 1>is it nate that every single time we talk about poker,

0:35:54.204 --> 0:35:56.604
<v Speaker 1>unless you or I have won something and there's like

0:35:56.684 --> 0:35:59.284
<v Speaker 1>fun news that way, it's almost always some sort of

0:35:59.324 --> 0:36:03.564
<v Speaker 1>a scandal, Right, It's something it's something negative, like why

0:36:03.604 --> 0:36:06.404
<v Speaker 1>don't we actually try to do things the right way

0:36:06.444 --> 0:36:09.244
<v Speaker 1>to bring people into the game for the right reasons.

0:36:16.764 --> 0:36:17.884
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back right after this.

0:36:25.284 --> 0:36:29.004
<v Speaker 3>One problem is that there's a shipload of variants you

0:36:29.044 --> 0:36:30.764
<v Speaker 3>know what I mean, Like, what's the chance this year

0:36:30.844 --> 0:36:35.404
<v Speaker 3>is an exception that the main event of the World

0:36:35.444 --> 0:36:38.524
<v Speaker 3>Series of Hooker will be won by somebody that like.

0:36:40.444 --> 0:36:42.124
<v Speaker 2>Even you or I had both.

0:36:41.964 --> 0:36:45.044
<v Speaker 3>Heard of, let's say, in events of the tournament, right,

0:36:45.284 --> 0:36:48.004
<v Speaker 3>like right, and we probably know a lot of people,

0:36:48.004 --> 0:36:50.084
<v Speaker 3>and I do think there are large edges to like

0:36:50.204 --> 0:36:53.724
<v Speaker 3>the pros and the main event, right, but like, yep, yeah,

0:36:53.844 --> 0:36:55.244
<v Speaker 3>by the way, some of the names that one.

0:36:55.164 --> 0:36:57.564
<v Speaker 2>Eth it now our household names. I would not have

0:36:57.604 --> 0:36:58.044
<v Speaker 2>known that name.

0:36:58.084 --> 0:37:01.364
<v Speaker 3>I'd be like, that guy look like some fucking Norwegian player, right,

0:37:01.364 --> 0:37:03.124
<v Speaker 3>but like I wouldn't know that fucking person.

0:37:03.564 --> 0:37:07.284
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I love Espen. We're very friendly now. But

0:37:07.524 --> 0:37:09.804
<v Speaker 1>prior to Espen winning the main event of the world

0:37:09.844 --> 0:37:11.804
<v Speaker 1>here as of poker, I had no idea who he was.

0:37:12.124 --> 0:37:19.124
<v Speaker 1>He's a lovely, lovely human, great guy. But yeah, yeah,

0:37:20.884 --> 0:37:23.964
<v Speaker 1>but but if you but if you actually I actually

0:37:23.964 --> 0:37:26.724
<v Speaker 1>have done this. I've gone back like ten years and

0:37:26.804 --> 0:37:29.964
<v Speaker 1>started looking at the winners' names. I don't know most

0:37:30.004 --> 0:37:33.524
<v Speaker 1>of them, right, they were probably players who people knew

0:37:33.564 --> 0:37:35.084
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and like, if you were.

0:37:35.484 --> 0:37:38.644
<v Speaker 2>You're still and I'm trying to the banners.

0:37:39.204 --> 0:37:43.764
<v Speaker 1>Ryan, I know, Ryan and I know Martin, but but

0:37:43.844 --> 0:37:45.404
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of players who I'm like, I've

0:37:45.484 --> 0:37:49.284
<v Speaker 1>just I literally have never heard this name before, which

0:37:49.364 --> 0:37:51.924
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, yes, there is a lot of variance.

0:37:51.924 --> 0:37:54.684
<v Speaker 1>But there is drama. There are all these stories, and

0:37:54.924 --> 0:37:58.724
<v Speaker 1>there is I mean, there is good material here, right,

0:37:58.804 --> 0:38:02.564
<v Speaker 1>Like you actually, you absolutely can make something that's compelling,

0:38:03.004 --> 0:38:06.284
<v Speaker 1>and I would, I mean, you know, that's a hill

0:38:06.284 --> 0:38:08.844
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to die on. Like you can make compelling

0:38:08.924 --> 0:38:13.244
<v Speaker 1>television and out of poker and people have and you know,

0:38:13.364 --> 0:38:16.444
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like the high stakes shows of the

0:38:16.484 --> 0:38:20.604
<v Speaker 1>past that had a huge viewership. But there are fictionalized

0:38:20.604 --> 0:38:24.684
<v Speaker 1>accounts like there are there are documentaries, there's reality TV.

0:38:24.764 --> 0:38:27.404
<v Speaker 1>By the way, these are all different things, right if

0:38:27.444 --> 0:38:30.324
<v Speaker 1>you're making a reality TV show, like okay, that's script,

0:38:30.644 --> 0:38:33.804
<v Speaker 1>that's not a documentary series, you already know it's going

0:38:33.844 --> 0:38:38.884
<v Speaker 1>to be used differently. But you can make a compelling documentary.

0:38:39.004 --> 0:38:42.084
<v Speaker 1>There are human stories, there's human drama. You just have

0:38:42.164 --> 0:38:44.564
<v Speaker 1>to be a good filmmaker. You just have to be

0:38:44.604 --> 0:38:47.084
<v Speaker 1>able to find those threads. Two journalists can go to

0:38:47.124 --> 0:38:49.724
<v Speaker 1>the exact same assignment, right and write a story like

0:38:50.084 --> 0:38:53.004
<v Speaker 1>have the same assignment, write this story, and one can

0:38:53.204 --> 0:38:56.244
<v Speaker 1>craft a Pulitzer Prize winning masterpiece, on the other like

0:38:56.604 --> 0:38:59.324
<v Speaker 1>just a boring piece of who knows what, like on

0:38:59.404 --> 0:39:02.604
<v Speaker 1>the exact like even talking to the same people, because

0:39:02.644 --> 0:39:05.124
<v Speaker 1>somebody can see the story, can see the vision, knows

0:39:05.124 --> 0:39:07.284
<v Speaker 1>how to kind of make it into something great, and

0:39:07.324 --> 0:39:10.644
<v Speaker 1>the other one doesn't. And that's what I Oftentimes people

0:39:11.004 --> 0:39:12.964
<v Speaker 1>like when they find out what I'm working on, They're like, oh,

0:39:13.004 --> 0:39:15.644
<v Speaker 1>aren't you afraid that someone else is going to steal

0:39:15.724 --> 0:39:17.364
<v Speaker 1>that idea and write the same thing. I'm like, no,

0:39:17.404 --> 0:39:18.684
<v Speaker 1>because no one else is going to write it the

0:39:18.724 --> 0:39:21.684
<v Speaker 1>way I do, right, Like every everyone like.

0:39:21.244 --> 0:39:22.044
<v Speaker 2>Probably like this person.

0:39:23.804 --> 0:39:26.524
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, yeah, but they they suck. They suck, right,

0:39:27.044 --> 0:39:29.644
<v Speaker 3>not everybody. Sometimes they suck. And I'm like, I don't

0:39:29.644 --> 0:39:31.644
<v Speaker 3>know if I can care they suck. Their upside is

0:39:31.724 --> 0:39:35.364
<v Speaker 3>cat But yes, it's hard. It's hard to plant around

0:39:35.404 --> 0:39:40.044
<v Speaker 3>like this content when like your stars are are usually

0:39:40.044 --> 0:39:42.044
<v Speaker 3>not going to win, right. I mean, this year's World

0:39:42.084 --> 0:39:45.324
<v Speaker 3>Series mainavment had like way way wait, it was like

0:39:45.364 --> 0:39:48.964
<v Speaker 3>the ninety eighth percentile interesting character.

0:39:49.044 --> 0:39:51.284
<v Speaker 1>This is very true. So do you know what you do? Nate?

0:39:51.364 --> 0:39:54.684
<v Speaker 1>In that case, you tape six hundred and fifty hours

0:39:54.724 --> 0:39:58.484
<v Speaker 1>of content. You follow all of these different storylines and

0:39:58.524 --> 0:40:00.724
<v Speaker 1>you don't know which ones are going to end up

0:40:00.844 --> 0:40:03.164
<v Speaker 1>being the prominent ones and the ones you want to use,

0:40:03.524 --> 0:40:07.284
<v Speaker 1>and then you actually make something that's good and compelling

0:40:07.684 --> 0:40:10.004
<v Speaker 1>out of it. So let's I mean, I would like

0:40:10.044 --> 0:40:12.244
<v Speaker 1>to issue at the end of the show, I don't

0:40:12.284 --> 0:40:16.284
<v Speaker 1>like to issue a challenge to creators, not just in poker,

0:40:16.444 --> 0:40:19.924
<v Speaker 1>to always just be here, like, do better be good,

0:40:20.604 --> 0:40:22.764
<v Speaker 1>use you know, use whatever tools you need to use,

0:40:22.844 --> 0:40:26.804
<v Speaker 1>but be honest, do not cheat, Do not be lazy.

0:40:26.844 --> 0:40:29.924
<v Speaker 1>You cannot tell good stories if you're being lazy. Nate,

0:40:29.964 --> 0:40:32.844
<v Speaker 1>You've said the word lazy multiple times in this episode,

0:40:32.844 --> 0:40:35.884
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly what it is. It's intellectual laziness. It's

0:40:35.964 --> 0:40:40.004
<v Speaker 1>just it's just laziness all around. So don't be lazy.

0:40:40.084 --> 0:40:42.404
<v Speaker 1>Actually find the good stories. And yes, in poker, it

0:40:42.444 --> 0:40:45.484
<v Speaker 1>is hard, right, It's not like Formula one where if

0:40:45.524 --> 0:40:49.244
<v Speaker 1>you follow the best drivers, you'll probably be following the winner. Like,

0:40:49.804 --> 0:40:52.524
<v Speaker 1>but but if you cast a wide net you can

0:40:52.564 --> 0:40:55.844
<v Speaker 1>still figure it out. You can make it happen. Do it, like,

0:40:55.964 --> 0:40:57.804
<v Speaker 1>let's create something good and.

0:40:57.884 --> 0:41:01.244
<v Speaker 3>You the passage of time, right, you know, shooting six

0:41:01.324 --> 0:41:03.404
<v Speaker 3>hundred hours of footage at like one tournament won't give

0:41:03.404 --> 0:41:07.364
<v Speaker 3>you the passage of time for like narrative arcs and

0:41:07.444 --> 0:41:11.124
<v Speaker 3>people's lives get better and worse, And hooker does created

0:41:11.164 --> 0:41:12.444
<v Speaker 3>share dramatic moments.

0:41:12.484 --> 0:41:16.124
<v Speaker 1>Maria, Yes, it does indeed. So that is our take

0:41:16.244 --> 0:41:26.564
<v Speaker 1>on documentary Gate twenty twenty five. Let us know what

0:41:26.604 --> 0:41:28.564
<v Speaker 1>you think of the show. Reach out to us at

0:41:28.644 --> 0:41:33.484
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business at pushkin dot FM. Risky Business is hosted

0:41:33.524 --> 0:41:36.004
<v Speaker 1>by me Maria Kanakova and by.

0:41:35.884 --> 0:41:36.764
<v Speaker 2>Me Nate Silver.

0:41:37.404 --> 0:41:41.044
<v Speaker 3>The show was a cool production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:41:41.124 --> 0:41:44.444
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by Isaac Carter. Our associate producer

0:41:44.524 --> 0:41:48.284
<v Speaker 3>is Sonya gerwit Lydia, Jeane Kott and Daphney Chen are

0:41:48.284 --> 0:41:51.524
<v Speaker 3>our editors, and our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:41:52.004 --> 0:41:53.324
<v Speaker 2>Mixing by Sarah Bruguer.

0:41:54.564 --> 0:41:56.804
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:41:56.804 --> 0:41:59.484
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:41:59.604 --> 0:42:01.404
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:42:01.444 --> 0:42:03.604
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.