WEBVTT - Just Keep Buying

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Baltunis.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You've been on this book reading binge, Eric ever since

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you published your book, and we have an author here today,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>who would you bring us? Yeah? When I published my book,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>there's always a cold books like below that says people

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>who bought this like this one, you know that thing,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and this one is always there. And it's somebody I

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>know from um Riddholtz and it's Nick Julie and his

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>book is called just Keep Buying, which is somehow I

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>feel linked to the book I wrote, which was I mean,

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no way Jack Bogel would disagree with this premise.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And what I liked about it is it's very practical.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good book. It explains why you want

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to invest, how to invest in. It splits between savings

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and investing, and savings actually is important as well. It's

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.639
<v Speaker 1>half the battle, and I just it's really laid out

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>very well. I like some of the anecdotes, and I

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>also think I've come My theory is that we're an

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in an investor Enlightenment era and the first phase was

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just to get the friction out of the way. Low costs,

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>index funds. The second phase of this era is behavior,

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of behavior in here. You know,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>once you understand why you're investing, how it works, what

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>to use, it's very easy to behave. If you don't

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>know any of that, your emotions take get the best

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of you. So I think that's a big part of

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this book as well. And um, but this year is

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a crazy year for the market, So I think it's

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a good it's an interesting title just keep buying for

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this year. Maybe it's even more important title this year.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I thought we'd be cool to dig into

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this um and get kind of practical. So joining us

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on trillions this time we've got Nick Mjuli, who's the

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>chief operating officer and data scientists that Ridholt's wealth management

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this time on trillions. Just keep buying, Nick, Welcome to Trillians.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys harving me on. Okay, So three word tie

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I said a few times already, just keep buying. Uh,

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what else do I need to know? Because that's what

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing, man, I'm just I just keep buying. What what?

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>What could you possibly feel in a book other than

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>those three words? I mean, that's it's saying if I

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>can only give you three words, there's are the three

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>words I can give you, right, there's the three words

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I would give you, but um to expand on that.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It's the you know, continual purchase of a diverse set

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of income producing assets, if I could give you a sentence.

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>But then beyond that, the books not just about dollar

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>cost averaging. Obvious. Some people just like, oh, that's obviously,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna read it. Like, no, there's a lot

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>more to it. There's a lot pieces of savings about

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>personal finance, things like how do I save for a house?

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, am I saving enough for retirement? How much

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>should I say for retirement? You know, why should I invest?

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You know? What should I think about market volatility? Et cetera?

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>All those types of things. Okay, so I said your

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>job title chief operating officer and data scientists. What did Barry,

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>who's a frequent guest, What did Barry say when you

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>were like, Hey, I'm gonna write this book. Uh he was.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I kind of just told him after I was already

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>writing it actually, Like it's like I said, get a proval.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hey, I was like, yeah, I'm writing

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a book. Barry's like, Okay, great. Yeah, He's like, you

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>put out enough stuff now, I think you can probably

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>come up with something like Okay, cool, thanks appreciate that Berry.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and I did, basically, But no, he's he's

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>always been supportive. I mean, I love Barry. I'm obviously,

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just because he's like one of my bosses,

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but because you know, Barry is just a great guy

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to be around. And you know, I believe in the

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>vision that we're building there. So yeah, um, just how

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>did you get the title? I love there's a little

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>anecdote in here, and I love that you were able

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to find this title through something you saw. Can you

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>go through that story how the title came to you? Yeah,

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 1>So there's this so Casey and I said, it's like

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a YouTuber And you guys may have heard of him

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>used to. I think I don't know if he YouTube

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as much now as he used to be used to

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like a daily vlog. And he was in New York

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>City and he had a he had a video called

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>three words to get to three million subs right, And

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there's another YouTuber named Roman Atwood and gave him this advice.

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He said, if you want to get to you want

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to really grow your audience. You know, I'm just gonna

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>give you three three words of advice. Just keep uploading.

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And so his that was his mantra every day and

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>need upload a video every day, and need to upload

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a video. He kept doing it, and Casey and I

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sitting now was like one of the biggest YouTube wars ever. UM.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And actually I used that. UM. I remember hearing that

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>right around the same time. I was doing some analysis

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on the stock market and I realized, like, wait, just

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>keep up, just keep buying. It kind of fits. It's

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a it's a catchier way of saying dollar cost average

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>becahen you say dollar cost averaging, people's eyes glaze over.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a catchier way and actually is

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a more aggressive investment allocation approach. And really this actually

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that intro chapter kind of came from a blog post

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I wrote literally, you know, uh, five years to the

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>day before the book came out. It was just by

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>chance that happened. As origin the book supposed to go

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on earlier, but due to supply chain stuff, we had

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to push it a couple two months. In the paper

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Short had the great paper Short once that was sorted out,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>though I realize, like, oh my gosh, that's weird. Like

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>literally five years to the day before the book came out,

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like that was when I wrote the blog post just

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>keep Buying, which is arguably my first post that really

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like went did well for me as a blogger,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>right when I didn't really have an audience and kind

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>of kind of blew up a little bit relative to

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to my audience at the time. People, Yeah, went from

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve people like fifty people. I was like, wow, this

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is got here. You've dropped a phrase their dollar cost averaging.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Break that down because that's not something that we've really

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ever talked about on the on the podcast. But so

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the issue I have an issue with this word because

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>there's two different definitions out there, and if you're not careful,

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll use both of them without realizing it. So the

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional definition, which Benjamin Graham I think came up with,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>was just buying over time. Right, So, if you have

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a four wing K, you're making contributions every two weeks

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>every month whatever that's considered dollar cost averaging. You're investing

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you get the money. That's what it's about.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>There's another definition, this is a definition I do not like,

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and I try not to use this definition, which is,

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>let's say you just got an inheritance of a hundred

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars and you slowly kind of average that into

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the market, so you don't put it on. You don't

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>buy not worth of stocks. Now, now you don't lump

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>some you you Dollar cost averaging is what they would say.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I do not like that definition. I do not use

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that term. I don't use dollar cost averaging for that

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>term because I think it's so confusing. You can see,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>those are very different things. Buying as soon as you

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have the money, even in small increments is very different

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>than taking a large amount of money and slowly averaging in.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And they're very different strategies. And that second strategy, the

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>averaging in UM, is subpar across the board. I've tested

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it every way to Sunday and it just does not

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>outperform relates to lottery winnings. Also that that term is

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>just for most normal people. It's it sounds financial and

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>it's boring. Yeah, for some reason, dollar cost averaging, but

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it is powerful UM. Let's you broke this book

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>down into two parts. The first half is on savings.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>And I like the way at the beginning he's like, look,

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if if you have enough money saved, just go to

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the second part. I won't be offended. Um. Yeah, I

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which the second part is investing, which is investing. Yeah,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but here's a line in here that sounds it stuck

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>out to me. It almost sounds harsh, but it's true,

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which is saving is for the poor and investing is

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for the rich. Um. And you go to explain that,

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but I guess, just talk about what that means. You know,

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're have if you're young, or don't make a

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, investing might not be as uh the

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>ticket you think it is early on, And I guess

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just explain that that dynamic there. I just think that,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we can just do this with a simple example.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>The issue was just like investing is on that impactful

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>when you don't have that much money invested, for example,

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And I the story I tell in the first chapter.

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I was twenty three years old, I had a thousand

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars to my name. I was analyzing my investments every

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>way possible. I was like, you know, oh, what should

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I have five percent bonds? Ten percent bonds? I was

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>neurotic basically. But the end of the day, I only

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>had a thousand dollars invested, even if I got a

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>ten percent return on my portfolio, which is like a

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>good year. You know, what is that a hundred bucks?

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I was at the same time, I was going

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>out with my friends in San Francisco and blowing that

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars on dinner, drinks, you know, uber home whatever.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it was very easy to blow that hundred dollars.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So you can see that my investment returns didn't really matter,

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but my spending in a given day mattered a lot more, right,

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not not saying that tell you not to

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>go out with your friends, And that's not the point

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of that. The point of that story is to say,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>when you don't have a lot of money to invest,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter. We should be focusing on is

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>your career and how much you can save. And then

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>once you have some money saved up and ready to

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>invest or you've invested already. That's where let that lever

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>matters more so. It's about it's about just like where

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you focus your attention and where you kind of get

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest return for your use of time. And so

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I think for when I say savings for the poor

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>investings for the rich, I mean that on a absolute

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and a relative sense, Like I wouldn't consider myself a

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>poor person. As a twenty two year old living in

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, I was not poor, but I was poor

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>relative to my future self. And that's kind of how

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I want you to think about it, Not like I

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was an abject poverty. I'm not trying to say that

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at all, um, but just think about that, like whether

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're poor on absolute level or on a relative level

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to your future self. That's how I want you to

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>think about that problem and how you make decisions. First

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of all, I just love that simplicity of that breakdown, right,

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't invest until you save, you can't save

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>until you actually figure out how to make more money,

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and and actually you know, be diligent in your savings,

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and there is sort of that that transition between your

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>younger self and an older self that might be able

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to to get there, but you still have to figure

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>out a way to start investing. Right. And so I'm

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>curious in the book, like how do you write about

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>turning that corner and going from somebody who might not

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>be able to save to actually being able to like invest,

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>because I think that that's there's a huge financial literacy

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>component there where people are just intimidated not in the market,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>not in the market, and speaking very broad terms, because

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the last year has been insane and a lot of

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>people did get in and bought high and have witnessed

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the carnage. But how do you talk to how do

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>you talk talk to people in general about that switch

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to becoming investors. I mean, I think the main thing

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is obviously you're right once you have some money to invest,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I think actually, if I had written this book

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in tween, I think that question would have been a

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more it had been a lot more difficult to

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>answer because they're you know, investing wasn't as forefront as

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it is now due to Robin Hood. It just became like, yeah,

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody's armchair. Everyone kind of knows. I think not everyone.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course there's still people that don't. There

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are people unbanked, all that stuff, but I think most

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>people have heard of Robin would have heard of things.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>So the issue isn't with robin Hood. It's what you're

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>buying on robin Hood, right, It's like you can buy

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>e t s, you can buy all the stuff that

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, people would say is prudent

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>investment management. So it's not the tools necessarily, it's just

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>how you're using them. So I would say it's like, oh,

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>most you will probably hurt of robin Hood, like, oh,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have your robin Hood account and instead of buying things

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like GameStop, maybe you buy something like I don't want

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to give a ticker out, but just a index fund

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of something. Okay, I did not say that. I can

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>say I can't recommend tickers, but I don't. I don't

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's a great ticker. Let's I'll say I can't.

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't recommend it or deny it. But that's all

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say is like tickers out there for broad

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>based index funds that you can buy that are very

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>good and very cheap. Right, And so that's an example.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Eric just gave an example of one of them that

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you can choose from. So yeah, I agree, I mean

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood does they are motivated to get you to

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>trade more with the confetti dropping and that it's like

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a casino mindset there. But you're right, you can get

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff there. People just tend to go to Robin

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to do other things. But I like the idea of

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>the focusing on saving and your income ability when you're young,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>because it's also a motivating factor. There was a sort

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>of get rich quick easy way with the Robin hood

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>game stop thing that was a big thing. And by

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>saying well, look, you should really focus on your earning

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you can control that early on, is a good message.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Now when it comes to retirement savings, you have this

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>really interesting UM case stud or experiment they did which

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I love this. Listen to this um Individuals who saw

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the older versions of themselves right through an age progressed

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>rendering like you know when you digitally aid yourself on

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that app, they allocated about two percent more of their

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>pay on average to retirement versus people who didn't see

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>such photos. I explain that, and I might use that.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I might put a picture of my seven year old

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>self up on my mirror. You know how Rocky had

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that picture of club laying up there. I might. I

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>might put my seven year old self up there, just

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to give myself a little extra motivation. Do you have

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>an old picture of yourself around? No? No, I do not.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I do not use that because I mean, there's actually

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>other research in that in that chapter where I talked

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about they asked that asked a bunch of people. You

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>know what motivates people to say? They found like, is

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it like a vacation? Is your children? All this stuff

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>besides emergencies, which people do want to say for once

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that's out of the way, once your emergency funds done,

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that motivates people to save is themselves. Actually,

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>so really like, if you want to say for your future,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to be selfish. And so I think that

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of using that face app or would have

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to see an old version of yourself is you realize

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be an old person. You want to

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>take care of that old person. So that's what investing

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to do. Right, You're supposed to be replacing

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>your income when you can no longer or don't want

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to work anymore, and you replace that income with your

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>investment income. Right, it's the kind of the whole idea there.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And so be selfish. It's okay to be selfish in

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that case, isn't that so true? Like you know, there

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>was I've read a book. I think it might have

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>been um think and grow rich. Forget it was. You

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>put something up where you see it every day. Like

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>when I wrote my book, had a whiteboard where I

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>just clock time that I've spent writing, and that thing

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in my face every day. I'm telling you it really

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>just putting something up there to motivate you. I think

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it really it's interesting. I'm not surprised that works, um,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but I would. I'm kind of curious to see an

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>old version of Joel. I mean he already looks seven. Yeah.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Remember remember my brother sees me. He's like, hey, you're

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>coldest sex in your forehead? Are looking really strong? Power alleys?

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, So Nick, let's talk a little bit more

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>about the dusting aside. Because once you're in the market

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and you you have that exposure, it's common sense just

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to keep buying. So what what added value do have

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.599
<v Speaker 1>for us? For those of us who are active participants

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and are already doing what the title of your book suggests.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you know, if it for some

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>people that it's easy to do, yeah, just keep doing

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. I think the the issue is like

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>that's not easy for everyone, Like, especially in a year

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>like this where we have high inflation, there's geopolitical risk.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, even bonds are declining by a large amount,

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>so even things that were considered safe or not as

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>safe as they were. Um, so there's a lot of

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>things like that going on, where like we have acid declines,

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>high inflation, and people are worried. So in those cases,

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like just keep buying. It's it's much harder to do it.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And so, like I know, people a lot of people

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>joked like, of course this book will come out at

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of a bolt marker. I just keep buying

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at the top. But actually by the time it came out,

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in April of this year, like the market

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>was down, like pretty good timing. Yeah, yeah, so it's

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like I actually wrote it more for a bear market

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>than the bowl market. And so that's my favorite chapter

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the books, chapter seventeen, which is about like how

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to think about buying during a market crash, which is

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a much much different. I have a different framework for

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at that because I think it's the only way

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to really kind of get through these dark times. We'll

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>walk us through that because like we are we are

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there or so it feels like, yeah, well I would

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>say this is a more minor of mark. I mean

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that happened much more regularly. I think what I'm talking

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about is a much worse crash. But either way, like

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is the same. Yeah. Yeah, So for example, I'll give

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you the math and what happened in COVID nineteen in March.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So at the time, I think at the bottom, we

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>were down thirty three percent going into that Monday, which

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is March, and so being down roughly thirty you know,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this is just simple math. To get back to even

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to go up fifty percent. And I'll just

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>run the numbers for you. Let's say you know Indexes

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>at hundred goes down to sixty six. To from sixty

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>six back to a hundred, you have to go up

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>roughly thirty three, which is half of six six fifty

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>percent gain, right, And so you just do that math.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>The larger the decline, the bigger they gain to get

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>back to even. So now once you know that, right,

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just simple math. Once you know that, you can

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of back out. You can say, okay, how

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>long do I think the markets don't take to recover?

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You come up with a fair estimate. You know, you

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>can ask other people as well, and then you can

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>back out the markets expected return from this point back

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to the high. Right, And so at the time I think,

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I asked Twitter, and you know the media answers two

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to three years. So if we're down fifty percent, Remember

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>this is not exact math. You have to do compounding,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just gonna make this linear. So let's say

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, divided by two, that would be

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>about tent a year. Divided by three, you're looking at

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighteen percent a year, like annualized returns to get

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>back to the Like, those are great returns, Like who

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to buy it? Then? Like, when you look

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>at it from that perspective, you're like, wait, this is

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge deal, right, Like if I buy right now,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be You're gonna give me seventeen percent returns

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to get back to even, like just to get back

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to even, Like that's amazing. And so of course there's

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>always the case where it takes longer. But my point is,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're getting those seventent anialize returns to get

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>back to even. That's a huge return. And that's why

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when you reframe it, you're like, wow, Like why wouldn't

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I be buying right now? It's clearly a bargain. And

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>what actually happened within six months here at all time

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>highs and it was like a hundred and six percent

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>annualized return or something so absolutely absurd what happened? No one,

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think expected that, not even even as optimistic as

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I was. I thought I was gonna take like maybe

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>two years to recover. But that's kind of how I

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>look at it. So right now, if we're down what

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>our fourteen percent, and that's not a big enough amount

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>for me to like, you know, think about all we

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>can do the math. Okay, what is it to get

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>back to even maybe fifteen percent? Let's say it takes

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>two years, you're still looking at like what seven percent

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>returns roughly, So like that's like an average year, right

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if you were by right now, you're basically gonna expect

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>average returns if it takes two years to get back

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to a high. So that's not bad, right considering all else.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So as you're talking and you talked about people, Oh,

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of course this book comes out after a little market,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like there's this this the Bears on Twitter there, I

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can see this title kind of just pissing them off

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a little like, oh, you're just easy. The FED was there,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>YadA YadA, or the be the best one. Now do Japan.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>That's when everybody puts out charts of like how great

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>stocks are overtime, like, well, now do Japan, because Japan

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>has done nothing right. In your book, you pointed out

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>since the market has been basically flat, what would you

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>say to somebody who's like, what if we are Japan

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for the next thirty years. I mean, that's, of course

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it's plausible. No one knows if that's going to happen

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>or not. But I I addressed this in that chapter.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.239
<v Speaker 1>In chapter seventeen, I address this. I say, let's say

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd put a dollar to the Japanese stock market every

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>day starting and yes, there are times when you're underwater,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you look because your dollar cost average and

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>you're buying over time, it's very different. You're saying this,

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the market has done nothing for thirty years. That's true

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>if you put in a lump sum right at the peak,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But how many people are investing like that? Maybe there's

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese businessman that sold his business and eight said, oh,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried, and then someone commits okay, you just

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>put it all on the market, and then he puts

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent of Japanese equities and eight nine. Okay,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think about how crazy it is does that and then

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is yeah, that person underwater. But how many investors put

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>all of their wealth into one asset, one purchase, one time.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's very rare. So I'm saying if you had been

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>owning other asset classes you've been if if you're a

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Japanese mister, you're diversified all those things, that would have

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>completely changed the conclusion. So I the saying that Japanese

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>market has done nothing for thirty years. That's using snap

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, snapshot judgments, and really you're really kind of

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>cherry I think I agree it's correct, but also at

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the same time, it's cherry picked. If you're buying over time.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>The Japanese market has not done nothing for thirty years.

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>That hasn't been great, don't get me wrong, but it's

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not zero. And I think that's the takeaway here. And

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I will say, you know, um, this kind of reminds me. Obviously,

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I just spent two years in plan at Bogel and

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he was not a fan of international investing. Or he

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>just said you don't need it because US has enough

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>overseas um connection that you're going to get some of

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>that anyway. And in addition, a lot of American companies

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to be really the drivers across the world, the Apples,

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft, etcetera. So I guess, do you even need

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>international and is this just keep buying? Actually, obviously now

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>do Japan wouldn't it will now do. Europe isn't going

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to be as applicable because the companies in America tend

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to be really massive leaders relative to other companies in

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the world. I mean, that's that looks true now. But

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, so from two thousand ten to twenty nine,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you want to look at it, like the US clearly

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>outperformed international, emerging whatever. But look at the decade before,

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>look at two thousands thousand nine. I mean it's a

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>very different story. Emerging crushed the US. So I'm not

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that's going to happen again. We don't know the future,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but to only bet on American companies, I don't necessarily

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>agree with that because I think things can mean revert,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>things can change, and so while the US is on top, now,

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>who knows what's going to happen. And I think the

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>best example of this is imagine a Russian investor, you know,

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of two right, they're like, oh, look,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I most of my stuff in Russia. Russia's great, all

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this the market drops a month. Now, I don't think

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen in the United States. We would

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have much bigger problems than our investment portfolios. But my

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>point is someone who's not diversified out of their domestic

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>market is probably going to see some sort of pain

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>at some point. And so I'm willing to take a

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit of under performance now by owning international stocks,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>if that means in periods where the US is struggling,

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I have a little bit more of you know, outperformance

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>relative to the US market. So I'm curious just to

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>bring it back to sort of the here and now,

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you think changed in how you wrote the

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>book or what you put in the book if it

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>was before time, before times book like before the pandemic,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>versus what actually wrote? What what changed during COVID that

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you brought into the book. I don't actually think the

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>best thing that helped the book for COVID was that

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we had the COVID crash. That was something I could

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>just use. Hey, it's in everyone's memory. It's otherwise to

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about, Like like myself, I was, you know, eighteen

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>years old. I was, you know, entering college at the time.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I didn't have a job, I didn't have to

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>worry about income. I literally started school in oh eight,

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so I remember like starting, you know, going my first

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>week of class right before classes started, and I remember

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.719
<v Speaker 1>like seeing the market drop and everything. In economics one

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on one was really popular at the time because of that.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>But I think like because it was so old, it

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in recent memory, but because we had that crash,

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it really helped the book. I could talk about something

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that's really recent. Everyone everyone investing now remembers that, right,

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 1>It's unless you're like sixteen and you kind of just

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>started investing like today, like everyone remembers COVID and kind

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of the effects that had. So I think that's what

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>helped the book. Other outside of that, I haven't changed much.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>The only thing if I could have re you know,

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>re written the book or done something differently, I think

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I would have emphasized inflation a little bit more because

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to realize at the time. Remember all my

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>data is to the end of inflation was lower and

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was going lower in twenty I'm like, I talked about inflation.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I do discussed in the book, but I didn't realize

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I had no clue that, Okay, by the time this

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>thing comes out, which is going to be you know,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half later after writing and everything,

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that the inflation data was going to come in termines,

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be all over the house. Yeah, I didn't.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea that was going to happen. And

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.959
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people like, he doesn't even discuss inflation, like,

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>look at the data I had coming into this, like

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>inflation was going lower when I had the data, I'm

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like finishing this up, like inflation was not. You read

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the comments so well, of course you got read comment.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>What would you what would you be saying or how

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>do you respond to that? That's that's a that's a

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>double edged sword. Yeah, we can get into that. But

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>how would you how would you respond and what would

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you have put in? How would you have expanded your

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>your inflation wisdom. I just would have included more inflation

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff like I've done analyzes since I've just been a

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more folks on inflation. It's just because like you know,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time, like you know, we haven't had it really,

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean since the really seventies eighties last time we

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>had and so we haven't had such a long time.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I could talk about it, but it's like people like,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>why did you spend so much time talking about something

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really happen anymore. And it's not that I

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>never expect inflation to happen ever again, but I address it.

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I just would have put more emphasis on because people

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>would have cared more, they would have thinken, they would

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have thought that, um, you know, I had, you know,

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>thought through it more. And so that was the only

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>thing I just didn't know that was gonna happen because

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>people are I mean, everything is recently by, so inflation

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is crushing everything. And I'm not talking on inflation learning

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to think I'm an idiot and I'm gonna and I'll admit, like, yeah,

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>I didn't try to write a ton about it. So

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of the only thing I think I

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>could have. It's just hard to anticipate the future. I

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>had no idea We're gonna see a percent inflation. I

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>was completely shocked by that, you know, so, yeah, I

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I think everybody was. Um. You know, you have

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a section here where you talk about in the investing

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>part about income producing assets, and this is clearly in

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bogel buffet mindset. You want to invest in things

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that produce income. Right, makes sense, money that works for you.

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>The crypto crowd, obviously you don't have cryptosn't here. You

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>have stocks, bonds, investment, property, reads, farmland, and small businesses.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:58.239
<v Speaker 1>No crypto. Um, this was this is a big debate. Right,

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Crypto doesn't produce anything. You are basically hoping somebody buys

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it from you from more than you pay. That's pretty

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>much the deal. The crypto crowd. Sometimes they'll go after

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five index fund, and I don't understand that.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is an interesting gap. I wonder how

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>many young people actually understand the difference between an income

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>producing asset and and one that doesn't like crypto, because

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>it does seem the young crowd the message in the

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>narrative of crypto it seems even more seductive and interesting

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to them than the message of a boring SMP five

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>index fund. Yeah, I mean, what's the question is, do

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know do you want to do something fun or

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>do you want to get rich? I mean that's kind

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>another question. And like I have like one of the

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>most boring asset allocations out there, but it's working right,

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's like that's the key. Now. I'm not saying

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not to own any crypto. I actually own some crypto.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But like I say, incomptucing acts your portfolio, the other

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ten percent is safe for things like crypto, gold, art wine.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I go through the you know, uh, through the gamut

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of those type of assets. I'm not saying they don't

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hold any place in a portfolio. I just keep them

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>as a smaller proportion of my portfolio. That was my point.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I was in a debate with somebody from that world

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, you guys should just pitch yourself

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>as a compliment to the boring vanilla. Let us be

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>some exciting hot sauce to your boring meal rather than

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>your meal sucks. Yeah. Yeah, I agree, but that's not

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to gain you followers to think like, oh,

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we're in bed with the traditional finance. Yeah we're you know,

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we were in with the old world. Like, no, you

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>want to sound like you're against that old world. There's

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a new world World World. It just has it more.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's more appeal to do that. But I mean the

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>rational approach is like, no, there is a place for crypto.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I believe that, you know, people should generally get

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>off zero. I don't think everyone should be at zero

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>on crypto. But at the same time, I don't think

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you should have anything more than five percent. Even then

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot because how volatile it is. That's so

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I have two percent and I even then, like, you know,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>some people wouldn't be comfortable with that, so I'd say,

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>like just put a very very small percentage and kind

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of just wait and let's wait and see what happens

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>with this thing. So so just keep buying. Related question,

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what should you not buy? And that's a very personal question.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>That's like whatever you can't sleep at night with. That's it,

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I can't. There's certain assets I won't buy, Like

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't generally buy gold, But don't think that I

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>should say that no one should buy gold. I think

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for certain people there's definitely cases to be made for gold.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I think gold is more of a trade than a

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>long term hold. There's just I mean, there's a period

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of you know, twenties something years of negative real return

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on gold, and it's really tough to kind of hold

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that for me, So you know, I can't. It's hard

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>for me to hold an Aska for twenty years and

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>see it go absolutely nowhere. You know, there are exceptions

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to that. Maybe I could do that with you know,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>equities and an emerging market or something, but for like

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>something like gold, where there's no intrinsic cash flows, no income,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really tough for me to believe like, oh, the

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>story is gonna flip and everything's gonna be okay. You know.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why it's tough for This is an

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>ETF podcast. We've got a long time and we have

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not talked about et F specifically. What are you gonna

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna ask? Sure, Yeah, I'll go there.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, this is definitely sort of I think a

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of in your book, you say I like index

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>funds and ETF. You basically are flat out he you know,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>just Um says what he does and you don't have

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to do that. You know, you can go active. I'm

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not trying to be overly rigid with this,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but Um, in the book I wrote I write a

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>little section about behavior, and I think the index fund

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of a cheap index fund or on

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ETF that traps tracks the broad market for three or

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>four basis points is one of the most underrated UM

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>contributors to good behavior because you read this book and

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I wonder how this would all play out

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>if there was no such thing as a cheap index

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fund and all you had was like a eight basis

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>point blend manager versus a small cap growth manager. UM,

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 1>it's a little harder to behave sometimes, especially if that

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>manager starts under performing. And I think that mess people

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>up in the eighties and nineties a little bit because

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>their fun all of a sudden was underperforming. They panic

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and just keep buying. Is a lot easier when you

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>know you're locking into that market beta and there's a

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>nice resignation to that. So I guess i'd like to

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on the impact that just having a

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>near free beta exposure product has done for this concept.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the main takeaway here is like that, you know,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>passive vehicles have benefited investors because as they're cheap and

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's easy to stick with them, and more importantly,

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like the default choice now, right, Like if you

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>if you talk to anyone says, yeah, the default is

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like you buy a passive index from like the Spire

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or something, and so every deviation from that and this

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this kind of goes back to what we're discussing with

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the crypto people and why don't why don't they just

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>okay with like saying, hey, you know, we can be

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a compliment to you guys, because no, it's an identity argument,

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of active investors it's an identity

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a passive person. I'm I'm not. I don't

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>want to be average, even though it puts through the

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>eighth percentil we can put that aside from it. But

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be average. I'm gonna pick my

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>own stocks and I'm gonna set my own destiny, and

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>there's all that kind of piece to it. I think

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what passive has done is saying, like, here's the default option.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And so when the market declines, it's not your fault.

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You didn't make a bad decision, that's just the market

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>rights outside of your control. Right. It's like a hurricane

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>came financial hurricane. There's nothing you can do but once

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you start deviating from you know, market cap passive way

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to portfolios. That's when you're making active choices, and that's

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>when you start to get in your head of like,

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>oh man, maybe I shouldn't have only went in on

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks, or maybe I shouldn't have, you know, went

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>in on these biotechs or whatever it is, or energy

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>stocks or so that's the whole point. I think. Another

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>big so this is identity, and so what passive has

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>done it has removed the identity piece from investing, which

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>allows you to kind of not worry about That's why

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I went markets down twenty Even when the market was down,

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't panicking. I really wasn't like, oh my gosh,

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>my my portfolio is like I'm not going to be

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>using that money for a long time. This is going

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It will recover eventually. It might take a

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, but that's the nature of the world

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and we've gotta we'll roll with the punches. And it

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>recovered way more quickly than I expected, right, But that's

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of the idea, is that you're going to see

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this stuff happen. You're going to see more crashes, We're

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna see I almost guarantee my lifetime we'll see a

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>ten year period of sp is you know, has not

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>performed as you know, flat or below where it was

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>ten years prior. Yeah, I don't know, but I do

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think there it is nice to have that resignation that

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got, I've got a great deal. There's no reason

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to shift to switch it around because if let's say

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that market cap it wasn't it was an active fund

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's underperforming that I think that's that makes you

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think should I be in something else? And then you

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>jump ship go there, and I think there's a resignation.

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>What am I gonna do? I'm I gonna just I'm

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna switch all these investments every two years, screw it um.

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And that is I think when we talk with Gino

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Martin Adams last two weeks ago, that she talked about capitulation,

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I don't think those investors are ever

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>going to compitulate. The passive people are really strong. They're

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the strong hands. They are not the weekends that people say.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think once that you haven't here, which is

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fascinating is the best performing four percent of companies explained

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the net gain for the entire U S stock market.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Since so if you pick those four percent, I mean

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>your love and life, But which four I mean which

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>four percent? So I think that's another one is you

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>get your your hands on everything and you get those

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at least you know you lock in those four percent.

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't get all of it though. Um, this this

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is why I embarrassed E. S G a little bit

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because the on the four percent includes x on Mobile, Apple, Microsoft,

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>General Electric, IBM, etcetera. E. S G. What do you

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think of this? Like this is you wouldn't get x

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>on you probably you know, so there are an tesla

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is now not in the SMP S G. Um, Is that,

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in your eyes just another active active management in disguise

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>or do you really think this is a better way

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to invest in your just keep buying premise? I mean

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I think what the industry is gonna

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>eventually move towards something like, you know, a direct indexing

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or someone we'd call custom indexing where you get to

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>pick and choose kind of based on your personal beliefs.

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I understand why people would do that. At

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. The counter argument is, okay, well,

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing these E s G type moves. What

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if all the companies you don't buy end up outperforming

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>because no one else is buying them. So in theory,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you're under allocating capital for some reason relatives of the

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>market portfolio. So someone else is gonna overallocate and they're

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna outperform you. And so the question is do you

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>want to take that money and grow it to as

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>much as possible and then donate to cause you care about,

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, or do you want to just not invest

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in the underlying companies? And those are the two ways

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you can do it, and I think they're both valid.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's a question of some people like, oh, I

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give my money to a gun manufacturer.

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's not technically going to them. But in

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>theory they could buy backstock, they can sell stock, and

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so the equity could be used for that purpose. So yeah,

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't have a great answer there, but

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna see this area evolved as like

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of custom indexing comes in, where people are gonna

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to allow their choices to be dictated in

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>their pols. So I will say customer indexing embarrassed on it.

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll just get on the record. I think anything you

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to dislodge the three basis point in X fund

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has it to it's a very tall hill to climb.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I think for very wealthy individuals it might work, or

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hardcore hippie s G types, But that's not E s

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>G investing because a lot of these companies that you

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>would think in your perception are not good, like Xon,

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they actually score pretty well on E s G scores.

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Um It, perception of people. People's perception is not really

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the same as an E s G scoring system. Um

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but I agree with you. At least it's customed to

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>your liking. I just think in ten years, if that

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>custom portfolio and it performs, you're gonna have a seller's

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>buyer's remorse. Um Plus. I just think dislodging three basis

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>point beta is just people love that stuff, man. I mean,

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like such a good deal. So but anyway,

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I debated this with Josh and Michael vat Nick on

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>an episode of The Compounding Friends Van Wants to Listen to.

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We had a nice, long, lengthy debate on direct index

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>thing We've gotta get, Uh, we have to do an

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>episode on that soon, Joel, that's gonna be a good

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>one out of two lists. Okay, so earlier he said

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't recommend a ticker, but that doesn't mean that

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't ask you for your favorite et F ticker um,

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a question that we always ask. I guess, okay,

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if I have to, my favorite is v O of

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Woo. Of course. My dad, my dad is this

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>funny thing. He says, I'm hedging my my video exposure

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with s p y And I'm like, I was like,

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't hand. I was like, what is Like, I

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that was possible. I know, it's just wait

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a second, my head hurts. He says, I'm hedging my

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>vieoo exposure with sp y. Right, it's like that that's

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>basically like issue we're hedging. Yeah, it's it was a

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>joke more than anything. Yeah, he's like, oh, I just

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>hedged my viewo with us. Yeah, like you're all in, Yeah,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say to yeah, of course. Yeah. He's just

0:32:58.040 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>he's on the just did he do? Does he do? That?

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Is a year ord you get that from him? No,

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>he does it because you know I obviously wrote about

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, but he like edits my blogs every week

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he reads, Yeah, you didn't edit the book. We actually

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>got a professional, but he's edited a lot of the

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>posts on the material that went in there, roughly half

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of its old material. Halfs knew I would say. So

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say I felt like when I read this,

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I was sitting with rid holes advisors and almost like

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>getting some of the secret sauce on how you talk

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to clients. Is that is that fair? I mean a

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of the ideas that you know I have and

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they have are very s already aligned already. That's why

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it works so well. I didn't have to come in

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and like rethink everything. Oh I don't agree with this,

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm saying we're not a hund percent line on everything,

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.239
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the core ideas are there, and

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like that's we would agree on on a lot of

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the stuff there, doesn't Does that mean we agree on everything? No,

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there are certain things where we may not agree perfectly

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on um and I and I've I've gone back and

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>forth on some of these things, you know, whether that

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>means stuff like trend following, whether it's how we allocate

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the crypto all sorts of stuff like that where I can.

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think our firms do anything incorrect or bad

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. But where we may not be

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred percent agreement, that's fine. Like not everyone agrees.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Like for example, I have a whole chapter on don't

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>buy individual stocks, right, and I know they're people in

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>my UM at my firm that own individual stocks, not

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the it's not the bulk of their money. It's a

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>small percentage, but still it's like something that I generally

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>don't do. And once again, you know, that's kind of

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>how I think about. It's like, let's think about the

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>overall picture and are we do we agree on the

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>core tenants and we do, and then so that's where

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like that, that's because we generally agree

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of Like if someone goes to red

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Holtz and they're sitting down, you kind of go over like, well,

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say, first let's look at that. You know, you've

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>got to go over that. What depends where they are, right,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're if you're seventy five years old

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and retired, saving he's not gonna out. It's oh, you

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have a huge nestake. Let's figure out how to protect that.

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's once again the ideas here can be applied generally.

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I kind of agree with what you're saying.

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So Nick Majuli, thanks for joining us and Trillians. Appreciate, appreciate,

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>thank thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com,

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcast, Spotify, and wherever else you'd like to listen.

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at Joel Webber Show. He's at Eric Faltunas. This episode

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of Trillions is produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levie is

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the head of Bloomberg podcast Fibers. M m m m

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>hm hm