Speaker 1: Welcome in is Verdict with Center, Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson
Speaker 1: with you, and again, welcome to so many of you
Speaker 1: that are listening to this podcast, maybe for the first time,
Speaker 1: after the launch of our syndicated radio show on the weekends.
Speaker 1: We are so happy to be have you with us
Speaker 1: here and to be with you guys three days a
Speaker 1: week on this podcast.
Speaker 2: So if you are new, make.
Speaker 1: Sure you hit that subscribe or that auto download button
Speaker 1: right now so you do not miss an episode. And
Speaker 1: if you're around this weekend, check your local news talk
Speaker 1: station and find Verdict on the weekend there as do
Speaker 1: we do this new syndicated radio show Center. We've got
Speaker 1: a lot to talk about today. On today's show, We've
Speaker 1: got four different big stories, and we're going to be
Speaker 1: going rapid fire.
Speaker 3: Well we are. We're going to move through a lot.
Speaker 3: And I got to say, as you noted, this past
Speaker 3: weekend was our debut on radio, and we ended up
Speaker 3: being on more than one hundred stations. At first we
Speaker 3: thought it was going to be eighty four. We had
Speaker 3: over one hundred stations that took up the podcast aired
Speaker 3: it across the country. We were in markets all over
Speaker 3: the country. We're in some of the biggest markets in
Speaker 3: the nation. And I got to say that's really a
Speaker 3: credit to the incredible listeners of Verdict that we're trying
Speaker 3: to talk about the big issues that are facing the
Speaker 3: country and to debut on more than one hundred stations.
Speaker 3: Our first weekend is really strong. We're glad to be
Speaker 3: doing it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it really was a blast.
Speaker 1: I gotta say the most fun part center was getting
Speaker 1: you into radio timing, because I had to get you
Speaker 1: in this like, hey, we got eight minutes and we
Speaker 1: go to break even if we're still talking. That was
Speaker 1: really fun for me to watch you, like, oh wow,
Speaker 1: we really do have break times now.
Speaker 2: That was new for you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I've gotten spoiled with the podcast where you can
Speaker 3: talk about an issue, you can address it as deep
Speaker 3: as you want. If you've got five minutes of content
Speaker 3: on it, you talk five minutes. If you've got forty
Speaker 3: minutes of content, you talk forty. The podcast format is nice,
Speaker 3: but now our Friday pod will be more rigidly timed
Speaker 3: because radio you got to fit into slots. So today's pod,
Speaker 3: which is a pure pod, it's not going to be
Speaker 3: a radio pod. We've got four topics we're going to
Speaker 3: address number one, the border. The numbers from the border
Speaker 3: are astonishing. Under Donald Trump ending catch and release, illegal
Speaker 3: border crossings have dropped, not ninety percent, not ninety five percent,
Speaker 3: not even ninety nine percent. They have dropped ninety nine
Speaker 3: point nine nine percent. It is staggering. It is stunning.
Speaker 3: We're going to explain everything that has happened on that second,
Speaker 3: the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case called
Speaker 3: Mahmoud versus Taylor that the fundamental question is do parents
Speaker 3: have a right to opt out of radical transgender ideology
Speaker 3: being taught to their kids. I think the Supreme Court
Speaker 3: is going to rule yes, parents do have that right.
Speaker 3: But it's a fundamental case about the rights of parents
Speaker 3: to say, we want to protect our children, particularly our
Speaker 3: young children. Kindergartener's, first, second third graders who in Maryland
Speaker 3: that they were in docrenading with radical left wing transgender ideology.
Speaker 3: Number three, Elizabeth Warren did a podcast. Now that was
Speaker 3: a mistake. Listen. If you are a left wing communist
Speaker 3: nutbag who doesn't like to tell the truth, a podcast
Speaker 3: is really bad format for you because in a podcast,
Speaker 3: people can actually ask questions, they can press you and
Speaker 3: Elizabeth Warren had truly a train wreck interview on a
Speaker 3: podcast where she was called out for brazenly lying to
Speaker 3: the American people about Joe Biden's mental acuity. We're gonna
Speaker 3: break that down. And finally, in the state of Minnesota,
Speaker 3: there's a state employee who repeatedly vandalized Tesla's caused over
Speaker 3: twenty thousand dollars in damage, and the woke George Sorowsda
Speaker 3: gave him a slap on the wrist and let him go.
Speaker 3: It is outrageous. We're gonna break that down as well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a really important story, in one you do
Speaker 1: not want to mess I want to tell you real
Speaker 1: quick about the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. As
Speaker 1: you know, unfortunately, Israel is still under attack. Missile fire
Speaker 1: has resumed from Israel's enemies, and terrorists are there who
Speaker 1: seek utter death and destruction of the Jewish people. Now
Speaker 1: Here in America, we really can't imagine what it's like
Speaker 1: to live in constant fear like this, But for the
Speaker 1: people of Israel, it's all very real, and it's every
Speaker 1: single day. And that's why I'm asking you to join
Speaker 1: me and show the people of Israel that you will
Speaker 1: help protect them in this time of attack and uncertainty.
Speaker 1: And one of the best ways to do this is
Speaker 1: by giving to the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
Speaker 1: Your gift today helps provide security essentials like bomb shelters,
Speaker 1: flat jackets, and bulletproof vests. It also provides for armored
Speaker 1: security vehicles, armored ambulances, and so much more. There's no
Speaker 1: better time to give than right now, during the Passover holiday,
Speaker 1: when we celebrate Israel's historic deliver rants and birth as
Speaker 1: a nation. So give a special Passover gift today and
Speaker 1: help protect the people of Israel. You can do this
Speaker 1: by calling eight a eight four eight eight IFCJ. That's
Speaker 1: eight eight eight four eight eight if CJ. Or you
Speaker 1: can go online to support IFCJ dot org. That's one word,
Speaker 1: support IFCJ dot org. Senator, let's start with that big
Speaker 1: story Number one. These numbers are incredible. Under the Trump
Speaker 1: catch and release has dropped by ninety nine point nine percent.
Speaker 1: That is not a typo. Those are the real numbers
Speaker 1: coming out under this Trump administration.
Speaker 3: Man, you actually overstated it. It's not ninety nine point nine,
Speaker 3: it's ninety nine point nine nine. Uh, it is even greater.
Speaker 3: And I'm gonna tell you two numbers, two numbers that
Speaker 3: tell the story, and it will take your breath away.
Speaker 3: One hundred and eighty nine thousand, six hundred and four
Speaker 3: and twenty Now what are those numbers. One hundred and
Speaker 3: eighty nine thousand, six hundred four is the number of
Speaker 3: illegal immigrants that border patrol agents caught and then immediately
Speaker 3: released in the Biden administration in the month of December
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, when the border invasion was the very worst.
Speaker 3: On hundred and eighty nine thousand, six hundred four. Do
Speaker 3: you know how many illegal immigrants were caught and released
Speaker 3: in the US in February of.
Speaker 2: This I'm very excited to hear this number.
Speaker 3: By the way, twenty wow, not one hundred and eighty
Speaker 3: nine thousand, six hundred four twenty and that is one
Speaker 3: one hundredth of one percent. That is a staggering, staggering number.
Speaker 3: And I got to say on this podcast, you and
Speaker 3: I talked about and we laid out that the border
Speaker 3: would shut down, the border would be secured, and I said,
Speaker 3: I said last year before the election, it's not going
Speaker 3: to take a year, it's not going to take six months.
Speaker 3: It is going to be done in months or even
Speaker 3: weeks or even days. And why is that? You might say, well,
Speaker 3: wait a second, We're three months into the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: They haven't built a new wall, they haven't hired a
Speaker 3: bunch of new border patrol agents. How did it change?
Speaker 3: And understand, the single biggest determinant of securing the border
Speaker 3: is one very simple policy question. What happens when you
Speaker 3: apprehend an illegal immigrant? And if the answer is, you
Speaker 3: put them on a plane and you fly them back
Speaker 3: to the country they came from. Just about everyone that
Speaker 3: comes here illegally they show up with a cell phone.
Speaker 3: And when you do that, they pick up the phone,
Speaker 3: they call their friends and family back home, and they say,
Speaker 3: don't come. If you come, they're going to catch you
Speaker 3: and they're going to send you back. So don't waste
Speaker 3: the time and money and go through the horrific physical
Speaker 3: and sexual abuse and the inhumane treatment of human traffickers.
Speaker 3: Don't come because they're sending you back. And so it's instantaneous.
Speaker 3: Once you implement the policy of we will send you back,
Speaker 3: people stop coming. But the flip side is true under
Speaker 3: Joe Biden the Democrats, when people got apprehended and Biden
Speaker 3: let him go. Those same illegal immigrants had cell phones,
Speaker 3: and they picked up the phone and they called their
Speaker 3: friends and family and they said, come come on up,
Speaker 3: because if you show up, you get to stay. And
Speaker 3: so on January twentieth, Donald Trump changed the policy and said,
Speaker 3: if someone comes, we are no longer going to let
Speaker 3: them stay. We're not going to release them. We're going
Speaker 3: to send them home. And the drop ninety nine point
Speaker 3: nine to nine percent. My single favorite line from the
Speaker 3: State of the Union that Trump gave earlier this year
Speaker 3: was a year ago, Joe Biden stood in front of
Speaker 3: the American people and said Congress needed to pass a
Speaker 3: new law before he could secure the border. Turns out
Speaker 3: we didn't need new legislation, we just needed a new president.
Speaker 2: Bought on about it.
Speaker 1: And that's the part I think that's so incredible is
Speaker 1: this shows you just how deliberate it was by Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: by the Democrats to make sure that this was a
Speaker 1: conscientious plan. It wasn't an accident. Yes, it's something that
Speaker 1: you and I talked about here.
Speaker 3: It was not a nat.
Speaker 1: Deliberate It was deliberate to change the United States of
Speaker 1: America forever.
Speaker 3: And it was deliberate, even though they knew that they
Speaker 3: were releasing people who were criminals, who were murderers, who
Speaker 3: were rapists, who were child molesters, who were terrorists. They
Speaker 3: released vast numbers of violent criminals into this country. And
Speaker 3: they did it knowing full well Americans would be murdered,
Speaker 3: knowing full well women would be raped, children would be raped,
Speaker 3: there would be horrific crimes, and the Democrats were willing
Speaker 3: to let people die.
Speaker 4: Why.
Speaker 3: I mean, I've had people ask me all the time,
Speaker 3: why would they do this? Why would they allow an
Speaker 3: invasion of our country like this? And the only answer
Speaker 3: that makes any modicum of sense is the Democrats viewed
Speaker 3: every illegalalien as a future Democrat voter, and they prioritized power,
Speaker 3: staying in power. They're remaining in power above the lives
Speaker 3: of you and your family. They were willing to let
Speaker 3: Americans be murdered, be raped, children be horribly brutalized if
Speaker 3: it meant Democrats stayed in power. That is cynical attle level.
Speaker 3: It's very hard to think of another parallel in modern
Speaker 3: times to that.
Speaker 1: Which, by the way, you look at what you're talking
Speaker 1: about with the cenecal so let's move to then part
Speaker 1: two of this now, which is House Democrats have arrived
Speaker 1: in El Salvador to push for Abriga Garcia's return. A
Speaker 1: guy that is a very clearly MS thirteen gang member,
Speaker 1: not because I say so, not because you say so, Center,
Speaker 1: but because two courts have said so, as well as
Speaker 1: federal authorities as well as his country of origin.
Speaker 3: Well, look, Chris van Holland, the Democrat senator from Maryland,
Speaker 3: went down to El Salvador, had this meeting with this
Speaker 3: illegal immigrant where he sat there at the table looking
Speaker 3: googly eyed. He frankly looked like a teenage boy with
Speaker 3: acne staring at the pretty girl with pigtails and braces
Speaker 3: he was. The level of love he had was bizarre.
Speaker 3: I tweeted out, I said, find someone who looks at
Speaker 3: you the way Democrat senators look at illegal alien gang
Speaker 3: members that are in MS thirteen like it is weird.
Speaker 3: And it's even weirder. The Democrats have decided this is
Speaker 3: who they are as a party. So this week after
Speaker 3: Chris van Holland, we saw lots of House members going
Speaker 3: down to El Salvador, going, oh, I want to meet
Speaker 3: with a gang member too, because you know, that's what
Speaker 3: Democrats do. It's amazing and it's sad, and it's a
Speaker 3: sign of just how out of touch congression Democrats are
Speaker 3: with ordinary Americans.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it really is.
Speaker 1: And this comes on the heels of a new report
Speaker 1: out that these Soros funded groups were behind the Democrats
Speaker 1: plan all along to decriminalize illegal immigration. Apparently, several non
Speaker 1: government organizations NGOs, funded in part by Alex and George
Speaker 1: Soros's Open Society Foundations, they convinced Democrats to adopt a
Speaker 1: platform as a party that sought to quote, decriminalize illegal
Speaker 1: immigration to the United States despite its unpopulated with Americans,
Speaker 1: because they understood that you can change a country by
Speaker 1: flooding it with millions and millions of new prospective citizens.
Speaker 3: The Democrat Party their number one priority is power, and
Speaker 3: they prioritize staying in power over your life, your family, safety,
Speaker 3: your community. They prioritize it over fairness of your daughter
Speaker 3: competing in sports. They prioritize it over your family's well being,
Speaker 3: even as they cause rampant inflation. It's why the election
Speaker 3: was such a route, because they were so focused on
Speaker 3: staying in power that they implemented policies that were unbelievably harmful,
Speaker 3: and I got to say, this is something I've talked
Speaker 3: with President Trump about. In some ways, I am grateful
Speaker 3: that President Trump did not serve back to back consecutive terms,
Speaker 3: because if he had served a second term immediately after
Speaker 3: the twenty sixteen term, he would have come in in
Speaker 3: a close contested election. It would have been it would
Speaker 3: have been ugly, and he would have been able to
Speaker 3: accomplish a fraction of what he's accomplishing now. A big
Speaker 3: part of the reason Trump is accomplishing so much now
Speaker 3: is that Joe Biden the Democrats did such a horrible
Speaker 3: job that people are ready to change. This was a
Speaker 3: change election with a mandate that, frankly, if Trump had
Speaker 3: come in in twenty twenty, you would not have had
Speaker 3: the same kind of mandate that we have in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four. So I'm not grateful for the horrific damage
Speaker 3: that was done to the country for four years, but
Speaker 3: I am grateful that Trump this second term came in
Speaker 3: with a much greater mandate and the American people much
Speaker 3: more eager for fundamental change because they saw just how
Speaker 3: disastrous these left wing policies.
Speaker 1: Are, which brings us to topic number two and that
Speaker 1: deals with the Supreme Court is now hearing arguments about
Speaker 1: the issue of parents protecting their kids from gender ideology
Speaker 1: and public schools. This is another agenda item of the
Speaker 1: radical left trying to take over not only your parental right,
Speaker 1: saying that your kids are really not yours, the government
Speaker 1: owns your children, but they can indoctrinate them on radical
Speaker 1: gender ideology issues in the schools. And now this is
Speaker 1: headed to the Supreme Court.
Speaker 3: So the Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in
Speaker 3: a case called Ma Mood versus Taylor. And in Mamod
Speaker 3: versus Taylor, the question is do parents have a right
Speaker 3: number one to be notified of sexually explicit gender ideology
Speaker 3: lessons in public schools and number two to opt their
Speaker 3: children out for religious reasons. And this came out of
Speaker 3: Montgomery County, Maryland, and where they're giving children as young
Speaker 3: as four years old books that have discussed quote intersex flags, drag, queens, underwear, leathers,
Speaker 3: zipper xoxo. I don't even know what that means. The
Speaker 3: Montgomery County Public School system has over fifty thousand elementary students.
Speaker 3: It's the largest school system in Maryland. One of the
Speaker 3: largest in the country, and the school system there insisted
Speaker 3: that parents have zero rights to opt out of these
Speaker 3: radical lessons and look to be clear that there's a
Speaker 3: wide range of parents who, for religious reasons or other reasons,
Speaker 3: don't want their kids to hear this garbage. And they
Speaker 3: could be Christians, they could be Muslims, they could be Jews,
Speaker 3: they could be Protestants or Catholics. But across the range
Speaker 3: of faith, there are a lot of faiths who actually
Speaker 3: believe there's a difference between boys and girls. By the way,
Speaker 3: there are people who even are not religious, who are
Speaker 3: basically not idiots and know that there is a difference
Speaker 3: between boys and girls. And the extreme view of the
Speaker 3: school district was you have no right, you have no
Speaker 3: right to know about it, and you have no right
Speaker 3: to opt in. And so they adopted an initiative entitled
Speaker 3: quote Building Community with LGBTQ plus affirming picture books. And understand,
Speaker 3: this is not high school students. We're talking preschool, kindergarten, first, second,
Speaker 3: third grade little kids and teachers have been given a
Speaker 3: quota of these books to use in the classroom and
Speaker 3: are supposed to have the lessons quote embedded throughout and.
Speaker 2: Parents.
Speaker 3: So, for example, one of the books in the curriculum
Speaker 3: resources was a book entitled Pride Puppy, which had illustrated
Speaker 3: pictures of men in drag furries and words such as
Speaker 3: queer and intersectional. There's another book called Born Ready, a
Speaker 3: story about a five year old girl named Penelope who
Speaker 3: decides that she is really a he. And by the way,
Speaker 3: you know what the reaction of the school district, the
Speaker 3: reaction of the radical leftist was to parents who said, look,
Speaker 3: this is contrary to my faith. Don't teach this garbage
Speaker 3: to my kids. They said, go private. If you don't
Speaker 3: like what we're teaching, go to a private school. We're
Speaker 3: going to force this ideology on you. And it's an
Speaker 3: example of the incredible intolerance of the left that look, understand,
Speaker 3: the plaintiffs in this case are not saying ban the books.
Speaker 3: They're not saying don't teach this to the kids. They're saying,
Speaker 3: let me know, and let me say, you know what,
Speaker 3: I don't want my kid to hear this garbage. You
Speaker 3: can teach it to other kids if their parents are
Speaker 3: okay with it, but don't force it on my kid.
Speaker 3: I think the plaineffs are going to win in this case.
Speaker 3: I think they're going to hold the rights of parents
Speaker 3: to say, you have an ability to reject this extreme,
Speaker 3: extreme ideology being forced on your kids.
Speaker 1: Well, in the White House, by the way, getting in
Speaker 1: on this as well, Carolin Levitt, the White House may
Speaker 1: acquear where the White House stands on this.
Speaker 2: Here's what she said.
Speaker 5: And then on the Supreme Court, I know the Court
Speaker 5: is hearing a case dealing with who don't want their
Speaker 5: kids having to read gener ideology books in schools? Can
Speaker 5: you comment on that case and what the Trump administration
Speaker 5: hopes to see come from that.
Speaker 6: Sure, we hope the Supreme Court will do the right thing,
Speaker 6: and the President has been very clear he stands on
Speaker 6: the side of parental rights and he believes strongly that
Speaker 6: parents should have a greater say in their children's education
Speaker 6: and the content if you will, that children are being
Speaker 6: exposed to in our public school system.
Speaker 1: I mean pretty clear there, They're all in. This is
Speaker 1: about parents, parental rights and the parents being able to
Speaker 1: protect and decide what they're going to teach their kids
Speaker 1: and when they're going to teach, especially when it comes
Speaker 1: to things like this. But your tax hours should not
Speaker 1: be going to these types of books to indoctrinate your kids.
Speaker 1: Do you feel centered, because I genuinely feel this for
Speaker 1: the first time in a long time, that we're starting
Speaker 1: to see in the pendulum swing now in a very
Speaker 1: big way back towards I think insanity, and parents are
Speaker 1: now getting involved. We witness this in the last administration
Speaker 1: where they started fighting back once they realized it was
Speaker 1: having their kids in schools and seeing what was happening
Speaker 1: with COVID and learning and disc learning and parents that
Speaker 1: were being labeled domestic terrorists for showing up at school
Speaker 1: board meetings. There does seem to be now a real
Speaker 1: focus on parents getting back involved, and that is a blessing,
Speaker 1: I think, in disguise out of all this radical stuff
Speaker 1: that Left has been doing.
Speaker 3: Absolutely it is you know, one of the books that
Speaker 3: was being taught to children in these Maryland preschools and first, second,
Speaker 3: third grade classes. It is a book that is entitled
Speaker 3: What Are Your Words? And What Are Your Words? It's
Speaker 3: a picture book and so it has little cartoon drawings
Speaker 3: and there's a picture of a little boy who says,
Speaker 3: sometimes I just use one set of pronouns. Sometimes I
Speaker 3: change my pronouns, sometimes I use all the pronouns I
Speaker 3: can think of. So the first picture is a little
Speaker 3: boy and he's wearing a skirt, a flowered skirt, because
Speaker 3: of course that's what little boys wear. The second picture,
Speaker 3: where he sometimes I change my pronouns, he's wearing jeans
Speaker 3: and a light blue shirt with a cloud on it,
Speaker 3: because there I guess he's calling himself a boy. And
Speaker 3: then the last picture he uses all the pronouns he can.
Speaker 3: And then the next page, I want to read you
Speaker 3: the words on it. My pronouns are like the weather,
Speaker 3: they change depending on how I feel. And then this
Speaker 3: little boy is smiling with joy and he says, and
Speaker 3: that's okay because they're my words. This is telling four
Speaker 3: year olds. You wake up in the morning and you
Speaker 3: think you're a boy, you're a boy.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: If at noon you think you're a girl, you're a girl.
Speaker 3: And at three, I don't know, you think you're a cat.
Speaker 3: You're a cat. Like this is nuts, this is loopy,
Speaker 3: and say it reminds me. We've discussed on this podcast
Speaker 3: the Florida law that Ron de Santa signed into law
Speaker 3: that was pejoratively called by the media that don't say
Speaker 3: gay law. It actually said don't teach sexually explicit things
Speaker 3: to little children, to children in preschool, kindergarten, first, second,
Speaker 3: and third grade. By the way, fourth graders, you can
Speaker 3: get into kinky s and m You can get into
Speaker 3: any crazy stuff you want. But it was Florida saying,
Speaker 3: look at least third grade and below, let's leave the
Speaker 3: sex out of the classroom. And I get to say,
Speaker 3: my kids are now no longer in elementary school, but
Speaker 3: I don't want any teacher teaching young children about sex,
Speaker 3: whether straight sex or gay sex, or any other kind like.
Speaker 3: It is bizarre that the left is willing and wants
Speaker 3: to indoctrinate four year olds that gender doesn't exist. As
Speaker 3: I read from this book, my pronouns are like the weather,
Speaker 3: They change depending on how I feel. That is the
Speaker 3: ideology of the radical left at its complete nonsense.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it really is.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you about Patriot Mobile. You've heard
Speaker 1: me talk about Patriot Mobile for a while now, and
Speaker 1: you probably already know that for years they've stood in
Speaker 1: the gap for every American that believes freedom is actually
Speaker 1: worth fighting for. Well, let me tell you if they're
Speaker 1: the real deal. And so let me ask you this question.
Speaker 1: Have you switched to Patriot Mobile. Yet, do you know
Speaker 1: that every time you make a phone call, every time
Speaker 1: you send a text, you're actually fighting for your First
Speaker 1: and your Second Amendment rights, the rights of unborn children.
Speaker 1: And every time you pay a bill to your cell
Speaker 1: phone provider, are you making a difference standing up for
Speaker 1: our wounded warriors, our veterans, and for conservative organizations. Well
Speaker 1: here's the thing. If the answer is no, then it's
Speaker 1: time for you to switch to Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: If you're worried about coverage, don't be because Patriot Mobile
Speaker 1: is one of the few cell phone service providers that
Speaker 1: actually operate on all three of the major networks. Meaning,
Speaker 1: if you've got great coverage now, you're gonna keep greape coverage,
Speaker 1: but you're gonna get rid of that radical left agenda
Speaker 1: that Big Mobile has. The fact is, if you've got
Speaker 1: a cell phone in this country today, you can get
Speaker 1: exceptional or even better service with Patriot Mobile. And that's
Speaker 1: why they offer a coverage guarantee that others don't. Or
Speaker 1: maybe you haven't joined Patriot Mobile because you think making
Speaker 1: the switch is just hard or painful, Well I'm here
Speaker 1: to tell you I've done it. It's not In fact,
Speaker 1: it's easy now in twenty five. There's no need to
Speaker 1: spend hours in a retail store waiting your turn. You
Speaker 1: simply call Patriot Mobiles one hundred percent US based team
Speaker 1: from the comfort of your home or office.
Speaker 2: And they'll take care of the rest.
Speaker 1: Plus, Patriot Mobile's contract buyout program covers up to five
Speaker 1: hundred dollars per device, and you get to keep your
Speaker 1: same number, keep your same cell phone, or treat yourself
Speaker 1: to an upgrade.
Speaker 2: So what are you waiting for?
Speaker 1: Join Patriot Mobile today and make a difference with every
Speaker 1: bill you pay, with every phone call you made, with
Speaker 1: every text you said, you'll be supporting faith, family, and freedom.
Speaker 1: So here's the number nine seven to two Patriot. That's
Speaker 1: nine seven to two Patriot. Use the promo code Verdict,
Speaker 1: and you're gonna get a free month of service. You
Speaker 1: can also go online to Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict.
Speaker 1: That's Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict or nine seven to two Patriot.
Speaker 1: All right, so let's move on real quick to Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren and May, oh my, is it nice to see
Speaker 1: people like Elizabeth be called out for what they were
Speaker 1: part of. I think it's gonna go down in history
Speaker 1: as one of the biggest cover ups in political history,
Speaker 1: certainly in my lifetime, the hiding center of Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: mental decline, and now she's being called out for being
Speaker 1: a part of it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I want to take this segment to talk
Speaker 3: about the importance podcasts and that that may seem a
Speaker 3: little self serving given what you and I are doing
Speaker 3: right now, but the podcast format, long form interviews.
Speaker 7: Look.
Speaker 3: One of the critical differences in the twenty twenty four
Speaker 3: election is Donald Trump went on podcast where he would
Speaker 3: he would let Joe Rogan, he'd let other podcast hosts
Speaker 3: question him for hours on end about any topic under
Speaker 3: the sun. And Kamala Harris was terrified to do that.
Speaker 3: She wouldn't do that because in a long form interview,
Speaker 3: it's very hard to lie, Like if you have a
Speaker 3: host who's willing to call you to account, lying over
Speaker 3: an extended period of time is difficult. Now, Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 3: appeared on a podcast called Talk Easy with Sam Fragoso. Now,
Speaker 3: I'm not familiar with Sam Fragoso.
Speaker 1: You're a listener. I'm shocked by that. I thought you
Speaker 1: were like a subscriber and everything.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: Fox News describes him as a left leaning host, and
Speaker 3: I will say he may be a left leaning host,
Speaker 3: but I want to commend him. Sam Fragoso did a
Speaker 3: great job in this interview of calling out Elizabeth Warren's
Speaker 3: blatant mendacity and all right, don't take my word for it.
Speaker 3: Just give a listen. This is only sixty two seconds.
Speaker 3: Listen to this interview, and Elizabeth Warren gets in deep,
Speaker 3: deep trouble because she's lying, and she gets caught lying.
Speaker 3: Give a listen.
Speaker 7: Do you regret saying that President Biden had a mental acuity,
Speaker 7: He had a sharpness to him. You said that up
Speaker 7: until July of last year, I said what I believed
Speaker 7: to be true, and you think he was as sharp
Speaker 7: as you.
Speaker 4: I said I had not seen decline, and I hadn't
Speaker 4: at that point.
Speaker 7: You did not see any decline from twenty twenty four
Speaker 7: Joe Biden to twenty twenty one Joe Biden.
Speaker 4: When I said that, you know what the thing is? Heap. Look,
Speaker 4: he was sharp, he was on his feet. I saw
Speaker 4: him live event, had meetings with him a couple of times.
Speaker 7: Senator on his feet is not praise. He can speak
Speaker 7: in sentences is not praise.
Speaker 4: Fair enough, fair enough, Look it is the question is
Speaker 4: what are we gonna do now?
Speaker 7: Okay?
Speaker 1: I love the bail out there. Well, the question is
Speaker 1: what are we gonna do now? And this liberal hosts like, okay,
Speaker 1: I mean they're in shambles, and will I will give
Speaker 1: this host a lot of credit. At least he spoke
Speaker 1: truth to power there, like you guys are just straight
Speaker 1: up lying and covering up. And now you want us
Speaker 1: to help you rebuild the party that you just destroyed
Speaker 1: by not being honest with us about the last candidate
Speaker 1: being incapacitated. Oh oh, by the way, happened to be
Speaker 1: the president of the United States of America.
Speaker 3: And by the way, I gotta say, you heard the audio.
Speaker 3: It's actually worth going online and watching the video because
Speaker 3: when he asks was he as sharp as you?
Speaker 7: Like?
Speaker 3: Her expression she like almost laughed and she's can't say yes,
Speaker 3: and she's just trapped. She's like, no, no, I said
Speaker 3: what I believed. He's like, no, you didn't. You were lying.
Speaker 3: And I love his point on his feet, that's your
Speaker 3: praise for the president. He could stand up. That's not
Speaker 3: being sharp and engage that he is able to stand
Speaker 3: And I got to say it's interesting online one person.
Speaker 3: Will mcavoyd tweeted, case in point, faking it doesn't work anymore.
Speaker 3: Warren can't do long form because long form demands authenticity
Speaker 3: and she has none. And then Tyler Winklevoss, the bitcoin
Speaker 3: investor who was one of the people who initially was
Speaker 3: involved in starting Facebook, and if you remember the movie
Speaker 3: The Social Network, he and his twin accused Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker 3: stealing Facebook from them. Whole back and forth. Anyway, Tyler
Speaker 3: Winklevoss tweeted the following quote. Long form also demands truth.
Speaker 3: Liars usually can't handle one or two basic follow up questions.
Speaker 3: That's why confirmed liar Elizabeth Warren gets cooked here. And
Speaker 3: that's why the Democrat Party is so broken right now.
Speaker 3: They have a truth problem. And that is a simple
Speaker 3: it's actually it's a testament to podcasts that that look,
Speaker 3: you get on, you engage, you have a real conversation,
Speaker 3: and if you're used to a six minute hit where
Speaker 3: you can spin and and be dishonest, that is a
Speaker 3: very difficult thing to do in a podcast where you
Speaker 3: have a host who pushes you, and the corporate media
Speaker 3: doesn't do that. And it's so here's what I tweeted today,
Speaker 3: I said, watch this. Democrats now routinely lie and the
Speaker 3: corporate media almost never calls them out for it, and
Speaker 3: yet one podcaster can effortless, effortlessly unmask it in sixty
Speaker 3: two seconds.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's incredible, which, by the way, also brings us
Speaker 1: to another issue real quick, and that is I still
Speaker 1: can't believe this. There's a guy that went viral, a
Speaker 1: Minnesota state employee who apparently caused about twenty thousand or
Speaker 1: over twenty thousand damages to Tesla's I'm gonna say that,
Speaker 1: make it.
Speaker 2: Clear, plural, not one, but multiple.
Speaker 1: It has now led to a woke liberal district attorney saying, Nah,
Speaker 1: we don't really want to hold this guy accountable. Let's
Speaker 1: keep the lawlessness up. As long as it's against conservatives
Speaker 1: and Elon Musk and Tesla owners. We're fine with that.
Speaker 1: No big deal. You're good man. We're gonna let you
Speaker 1: basically go on home.
Speaker 3: Well, there is a suspected vandal. He's thirty three years old.
Speaker 3: He is a government Employee's name is Dylan Brian Adams,
Speaker 3: and he was allegedly spotted keing multiple Tesla vehicles, stripping
Speaker 3: their paint off while walking his dog around the city,
Speaker 3: and he caused over twenty thousand dollars in damage, vandalizing
Speaker 3: half a dozen teslas. So he was doing this over
Speaker 3: and over and over again. And by the way, if
Speaker 3: this guy did this, he's dumb as a stump. Because
Speaker 3: tesla's all have cameras on them that video the person,
Speaker 3: any person who walks up to them, so he's doing
Speaker 3: it on camera. Because leftists number one, they're utter hypocrites.
Speaker 3: So they're claimed to care about the Green New Deal
Speaker 3: or complete lies because they've decided now to attack electric cars.
Speaker 3: Why because they hate Elon Musk. And understand, they hate
Speaker 3: Elon Musk not just because he's now supporting Trump, not
Speaker 3: just because he's now cutting the government. They hate Elon
Speaker 3: Musk because he's a heretic. This is religion and and
Speaker 3: and the woke leftist cultural Marxist religion five years ago
Speaker 3: lionized Elon Musk and they view him as someone who
Speaker 3: has betrayed the faith. And so this angry government employee,
Speaker 3: who as far as I know, has not lost his
Speaker 3: job despite being a brazen criminal, uh was caught keying
Speaker 3: and and vandalizing six different teslas, and unfortunately the the
Speaker 3: Hennemount County District Attorney is a woman named Mary Moriarty,
Speaker 3: who is a left wing George Soros DA and she
Speaker 3: decided that that that that they're not going to uh
Speaker 3: go go after her. Uh that that that that they're
Speaker 3: they're not going to charge him, uh and it is unfortunate.
Speaker 3: So the chief of police, Minneapolis Police Chief Brianohera, said
Speaker 3: that the damage in each case is the equivalent of
Speaker 3: a felony. And the chief said in a scathing statement
Speaker 3: on Monday, this is from The New York Post, that
Speaker 3: Moriarty's decision not to bring charges is frustrating for his
Speaker 3: officers in the public. And here's what the police chief said.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 3: The Minneapolis Police Department did its job. It identified and
Speaker 3: investigated a crime trend, identified and arrested a suspect, and
Speaker 3: presented the case file to the Henneman County District the
Speaker 3: Keneman County Attorney's Office for consideration of charges. The case
Speaker 3: impacted at least six different victims and totaled over twenty
Speaker 3: thousand dollars in damage. Any frustration related to the charging
Speaker 3: decision of the Henneman County attorneys should be directed solely
Speaker 3: at her office. Our investigators are always frustrated when the
Speaker 3: cases they poured their hearts into are declined. In my experience,
Speaker 3: the victims in these cases often feel the same. That's
Speaker 3: the chief of police and the sad reality it is
Speaker 3: that for leftists today, for elected Democrats, they are now
Speaker 3: openly embracing domestic terrorism. They are now openly We played
Speaker 3: on this podcast before Chuck Schumer refused to condemn people
Speaker 3: firebombing Tesla dealerships, people throwing molotov cocktails at Testa dealerships,
Speaker 3: people firing guns into Tested dealerships. Somebody's going to be killed.
Speaker 3: I don't want that to happen. I pray it does
Speaker 3: not happen. But this escalating violence is going to lead
Speaker 3: to a loss of life. And the Democrats are celebrating it.
Speaker 3: And now the left wing DA's are saying, hey, you've
Speaker 3: vandalized cars, and we decide we don't like the person
Speaker 3: who owns the company that built the car. Well, tough luck, sorry, Ben,
Speaker 3: We're gonna scratch up your car, we're gonna keep it.
Speaker 3: We're gonna do thousand dollars of damage and nothing you
Speaker 3: can do about it. Because we the Democrats, support domestic terrorism.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're absolutely right.
Speaker 1: And there's also that just scary psychological aspect of it.
Speaker 1: If you know your DA won't go after people that
Speaker 1: are going after your car, is it going to make
Speaker 1: you more or less likely to buy a tesla? That's
Speaker 1: part of the financial warfare against Elon Musk.
Speaker 3: And by the way, what's the DA going to do
Speaker 3: if they commit violence against you? What's the DA gonna
Speaker 3: do if they commit violence against you?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Like, if this radical leftist is able to vandalize a tesla,
Speaker 3: how about if he walks up and punches the owner
Speaker 3: of the tesla in the face. Yeah, do you have
Speaker 3: any confidence that this left wing nutcase DA is going
Speaker 3: to charge the radical with punching someone in the face.
Speaker 3: Their view is, Hey, if you're punching a tesla owner
Speaker 3: in the face, that's an admirable act of resistance. It
Speaker 3: is lawless. And let me be clear, I disagree with
Speaker 3: the political views of Marxists and communists and leftists, but
Speaker 3: I passionately oppose violence against them. And if anyone engaged
Speaker 3: in violence against a leftist, I would support prosecuting them
Speaker 3: and sending them to jail. Violence is never acceptable. And
Speaker 3: you know what, the Democrats can't say that because they
Speaker 3: support they refuse to condemn the violence against their political
Speaker 3: opponents because it is part of their ideology. And we
Speaker 3: saw that tragically during the Black Lives Matter and Antifa
Speaker 3: riots across the country, where Kamala Harris most strikingly raised
Speaker 3: money to bail out of jail radical Antifa terrorists who
Speaker 3: committed crimes of violence in Minneapolis, same city. Because the
Speaker 3: Democrat Party is a party that supports violence in pursuit
Speaker 3: of their remaining in power.
Speaker 1: Yeah, at Bingo, don't forget. We did this show Monday,
Speaker 1: Wednesday and Friday. Hit that subscribe or auto download button
Speaker 1: wherever you're listening to this podcast so you don't miss
Speaker 1: an episode. Also, check out that video of the Center
Speaker 1: was talking about on his uh on his X profile.
Speaker 1: You can grab that and look at it. It truly
Speaker 1: is amazing. Watch as well in the Center and I
Speaker 1: will see you back here in a couple of days.