WEBVTT - Selects: The Manson Family Murders Part 2

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Chuck here back. I'm still in my spooky

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>mood from two weeks ago because I'm introducing this episode

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>from January thirty at twenty eighteen. It's a follow up

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to two weeks ago about the Manson Family. It's called

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>The Manson Family Murders Part Two. What happens? Will Charlie

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>get away with it?

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I doubt it.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Josh Clark, There's Charles w Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Rowland over there, and this is Stuff you Should Know

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 3>about the Manson Family Part two.

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right if you're listening to this one first and

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong, so no need to recap. Just

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>go listen to part one and we'll pick up with

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles Wide Album, which was a very big deal

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in how this figure's in great great album. Obviously as

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a Beatles fan, I know you're not super into them,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but I love the White Album arguably their weirdest album,

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and it spoke to Charles Manson for sure, because he

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>really became pretty obsessed with it and diving into deconstructing

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the album. It's a very dense long album anyway, and

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to it. So it's no wonder that

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Charles Manson, with a head fallow acid, would think that

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles are speaking to him.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, and he definitely did so.

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>He apparently had a history already of deconstructing Beatles lyrics,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>but before he was deconstructing lyrics, so like Sergent Pepper's

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.919
<v Speaker 3>Lonely Hearts Club Band, which compared to the White Album,

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 3>is decidedly upbeat and positive, right, So while he was

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>in prison, he was super into the Beatles. When he

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>gets out, the Beatles released the White Album, he's already

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 3>obsessed with, but now he's on tons and tons of acid.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>The White Album is kind of a downer compared to

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Sergeant Pepper's and the fact that it's speaking to Charlis

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Manson like really made things turn dark, it seems like,

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 3>as far as him and the people in his orbit

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>are concerned.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so they're hanging out, they're lighting bonfires, they're doing drugs,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they're listening to Charles Manson stomp around with his tiny

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>feet in his redneck voice talking about Helter Skelter, which

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is a great, great Beatles song and basically sort of

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of renamed his vision for this race war and

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>impending apocalypse Helter Skelter. He kind of stole that from

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles, as Bono would later go on.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 3>To say, yeah, he stole from the Beatles, but he

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 3>also took it again as like a message that the

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Beatles were sending him aside that he needed to prepare

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 3>his family for this because they were the chosen ones

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>basically who should weigh out the race riot in Death Valley.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 3>So there's this whole idea that the all of the

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 3>Tate LaBianca murders took place to further this idea of

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Helter Skelter to strike strike the match that would set

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 3>it off to get things going right. And this idea

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 3>apparently is the creation of the prosecutor in the case,

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>a guy named Vincent Bugliosi, who wrote a book called

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Helter Skelter, like a six hundred page book. Basically this

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the definitive true crime book on the Manson family and

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the Manson family murders. And so most of the most

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 3>of what we said in Part one and most of

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 3>what everybody knows about the Manson family murders are come

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>through this lens that was established by Vincent Bugliosi, who

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 3>is the lead prosecutor in the case, was privy to

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>tons of information, to confessions, to interviews, under questioning, to

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 3>all this stuff. But he's the one who pieced together

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>the idea that the Manson family committed these murders to

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>start helter skelter.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 2>That was his whole jam.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I mean some of the Manson family corroborated, cooberated.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's in there somewhere corroborated. That's a dark time with

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that word corroborated, corroborated. I don't have to say it much, luckily,

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not in a life of crime. No, but

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>some of them back that up and saying that, you know,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at one point he wanted them to throw a wallet

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of a victim in a black neighborhood so that people

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>would think it was, you know, black panthers that did this. Yeah,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's some evidence that that was probably the case.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>If you talk though to Manson and you or if

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 3>you've listened to some of the stuff he says. Some

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 3>of these ext nations because over the years people have said,

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>what about this part, what about this part? And have

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>basically presented him with every aspect of the whole case

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>against him. You know, a lot of the stuff he

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>has no explanation for nothing good. But that wallet is

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 3>a sterling example of where it becomes obvious that.

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Wait, we're basically hearing.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 3>One point of view about this, and we've never that's

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 3>all we've ever heard. Which if you're doing any kind

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>of reporting, which you and I are not, but if

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>you were inclined to do any kind of reporting, you

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 3>never want to just stick to just one source. And

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 3>with the Manson family case, it's basically one source, and

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>it's Vinsive Bugliosi, the prosecutor. But Manson explains it as

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>he told I think it was Linda Kasabian to just

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>get rid of that wallet, that he wasn't in a

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 3>predominantly black neighborhood, and that he told her to get

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 3>rid of the wallet because it was hot, and she

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>hid the wallet actually in the tank of a toilet

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 3>in a women's bathroom in a gas station, which is

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>hardly where you'd put it if you wanted a black

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 3>person defined it to use the credit cards inside and

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 3>to tip off the cops that a black person was

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 3>behind the Tate La Bianca murders. So when you when

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 3>you kind of dive into stuff like that, you see

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>that there actually are two competing explanations in some aspects

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 3>of this case.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I think Kasabian herself said that too, though,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't she.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 3>The thing is that if you are if you look

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 3>at Charles Manson, right, I know that's.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing is.

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a terrible realization when you're like, actually, I'm wait

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 3>a minute, I understand what Charles Manson is saying.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>The with with stuff like that when you look at

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the testimony, These were people who were on trial for

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 3>murder who had every incentive to go along with the

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>lead prosecutor's theory that it was all Charles Manson's fault.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 2>They could have maybe immunity.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 3>They could have they could have charges dropped against them

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 3>that by saying yes, this is the case, or having

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>their testimony jibe with what Vincent Bugliosi's case was, they

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>had an incentive to do that.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Whether Charles Manson is right or correct or lying.

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>From an objective perspective, the people on Charlfer murder had

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>an incentive to agree with Vincent Bugliosi all right.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So the way they got caught was actually pretty interesting.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Unrelated to these murders. Police raided Spawn Ranch because it

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>was sort of became known that the people were living

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>there that were out on these creepy crawls doing these crimes,

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and so that's why they were originally fingered, as they

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>say in the biz. And they went there and they

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>rated Spawn Ranch and a lot of the family were

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>arrested at that time for like car theft and burglary

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. They were released on its technicality and then

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>went to Death Valley to that weird ranch. If you

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>ever been to Death Valley, it's not a place you

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>want to hang out. No, it's not, especially in the summertime.

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Is that where Joshua Tree is? No, that's it Joshua Tree,

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>But that's not in Death Valley.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>No, those are two different places.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>But is it close by? There is the same type

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>of terrain kind of thing.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I've been to both.

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Are they similar?

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean Joshua Tree is the desert for sure,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but it is very lovely. Like I don't remember much

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>about Death Valley that was. I think it was not

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>very hospitable for me.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 2>It's appropriately named.

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so okay, And of course now people

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to say Death Valley's the best, you know

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about, heavy sweater, so they go to

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Death Valley. Then there were a bunch of raids at

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Death Valley camp between October tenth and twelfth of

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty nine, and eventually they ended up rounding up

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the people responsible for these murders without knowing that they

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>were responsible for these murders, so they were in jail

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of luckily already in jail when they sort of

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 1>decided they could pin, will not pin like legitimately pin

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>these murders on these people.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>So this being the second time, there's something that I've

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>ran across in research, Chuck that it never gets talked about,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>but is I think really significant. At both of those raids,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 3>the Spawn Ranch raid and the Death Valley rate, the

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:38.359
<v Speaker 3>state took children from this, Like there were kids, babies, toddlers,

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>little kids running around growing up like at the Spawn

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Ranch end at the Barker Ranch, which is extraordinarily troubling,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 3>and some of them have been are thought to have

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>possibly been Charles Manson's kids, like he may have had.

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 3>There's just so much free love going on, and so

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>many pregnancies that were the results was free love. It

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 3>was difficult to say whose kid was whose, but it's

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>they think that it's possible at least one or two

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 3>of those kids was Charles Manson's kids, and they were

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>taken by the state and later adopted by people. But

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>it's like, you know, it's one thing to think of

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of hippies just out in the desert taking acid,

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 3>just being idiots, you know, and then eventually turning dark

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 3>and murderous. But the idea that there were kids around

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 3>at any part of this is really I find it

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 3>very troubling.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. I mean, I mean, all those cults

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>had kids roaming around. They just weren't murderous cults, you know.

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So Susan Atkins, for her part, she agreed to testify

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>initially against Charles Manson to avoid the death sentence, which

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for a few years more was still a thing in California.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think in nineteen seventy two they reversed that, but

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at the time the death sentence was a threat at

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the time of the crimes, so she had a grand

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>jury testimony. It basically led to Manson being arranged for

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.359
<v Speaker 1>these murders. In December sixty nine, she recanted that testimony

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and the deal was revoked by the prosecutors. It was

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of too late at that point. Linda Kasabian, who

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you might remember was I thinks that getaway driver and

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>then the one who would not knock on the right

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>apartment door to kill the actor, so she'd actually didn't

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>commit any murders at all, was not in any of

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the houses. She was granted immunity for testifying, and I

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>think she was the only one granted immunity.

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, although I think, yeah, they just took the death

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 3>penalty off, like you said, for Susan Atkins. And I

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 3>don't know if you said this or not, but Susan

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Atkins is the reason the case broke open eventually, when

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 3>they'd rounded up all of the Manson family and had

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 3>him in jail for the death Valley raids for you know,

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 3>burglary and theft and stuff like that. The way that

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 3>they found out that the Manson family was responsible for

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 3>the Tate LaBianca murders was Susan Atkins bragging about it

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 3>and a couple of her cell mates going and telling

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 3>the cops and that's originally how the case began against

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the Manson family. That's how the authorities originally found out

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>big mouth.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess so.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's take a break and we'll come

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>back and talk a little bit about one of the weirdest,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>most sensational trials in American history right after this.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Chuck, So, on December eleventh, nineteen sixty nine,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Charles Manson, who the public had just been acquainted with,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I think just in the last few months, was finally

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 3>arraigned for the murders of the Tate Labiyonca murders. And

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that did they get him for his role

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 3>in the Hyndman murder at.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That point, I'm not actually sure about that.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 3>Definitely the Tate Labyonca murders, which was plenty enough.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And he.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 3>It's it's it's kind of an understatement to say that

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 3>he did not offer any public contrition.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 2>He actually went the opposite way.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, he was well. The whole trial was chaos,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and he he incited chaos at every turn to make

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it just a circus and was quite successful at doing so.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Initially wanted to represent himself and did for a little

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>while but the judge denied that, Judge William Keane and said,

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to work with a lawyer because of the

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're just making this into a circus. Basically,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we need this to stay on track. And he actually

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was successful, though Manson was getting Judge Keene oustered as

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>judge and Judge Charles Older eventually would oversee the trial.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I read a twenty thirteen interview with Manson,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 3>and the thing that seemed to still get him the

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>most was that he was denied the ability to represent

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 3>himself in court, like he felt like he never got

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to have his saying court and that was that was

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the thing that got him more than anything else, not

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 3>being locked up for his whole life or anything like that.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 3>It was that he didn't get to open his big

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 3>mouth in court as much as he wanted to.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we could go over some of these

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>things that happened in court that led to this circus atmosphere.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, if you want to see it yourself,

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 3>there's a pretty good dramatic recreation in the movie Helter

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Skelter that was based on Mugliosi's book.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, nothing better than dramatic recreations. Yeah, lots of yelly

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and screaming, lots of shouting and cursing, lots of disrespect

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to the judge and the American flag. They threw a

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>copy of the Constitution in the garbage. At one point,

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>very famously, Charles Manson carved an X into his forehead,

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>which later became a swastika, saying that he was exed

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the world. And then his family members would

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>do the same, and they would shave their heads and

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>generally just try and disrupt things at every turn.

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, And they did. I mean, they were quite successful.

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>But the trial kept going on and on, right, I

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 3>think it was. It went on for a couple of years,

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 3>based on news articles I was reading about it. So

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 3>it turns out, though that Richard Nixon supposedly had the

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 3>most disruptive effect on the trial by saying while the

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 3>trial was going on, quote, here's a man who was

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 3>guilty directly or indirectly of eight murders without reason. He

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 3>was the sitting US president commenting saying that this guy

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 3>was guilty of a trial that was going on, which is,

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>you just don't do that. It doesn't matter what the

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>case is, not for any compassion for Charles Manson or

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 3>anything like that. But just because even on the other side,

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>you could have blown the case and and he legitimately

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 3>could have created a mistrial there. Yeah, just because the

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 3>President said something and everyone reported on it.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine that happening today.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I totally can't.

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>It was a very Trumpian move. So we talked. I

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think we covered the helter Skelter thing enough, don't you.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>We did.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 3>But I think there's a there's a big thing that

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>all this hinges on. Is that there the prosecution said,

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>and you said earlier you even had a quote from

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Tex Watson that Charles Manson told him to go and

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 3>just destroy the people in that house, gruesome as you can.

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 3>And the prosecution said that that Charles Manson was trying

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 3>to spark the Helter Skelter race war that he believed

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>was going to happen. Manson's whole thing was this here,

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 3>This is Charles manson since explanation for what happened and

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 3>why he's innocent. He said, Yeah, I believed in Helter Skelter. Yes,

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I believe there's a race war coming. I talked about

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 3>it at night around bombfires with everybody on acid. I

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>also talked about death of the ego and all sorts

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>of other stuff. And if you ask me, what happened

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 3>was my friends just took things and went it, took

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 3>it too literally and went too far, and that it

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 3>all hinged on this Bobby Bousselay thing, right, And even

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 3>before that, there lots of Papa thing. So Tex Watson

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 3>rips off Bernard, lots of Papa Crow and he's got

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 3>a problem with lots of Papa who wants to kill

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 3>him now, and Manson goes over there to help Tex

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Watson solve this problem by shooting, shooting lots of Papa.

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 3>So now as far as Manson and Text are concerned,

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Tex owes Watson a debt, any kind of debt, well

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Manson's or Text owns Manson a debt. Now, Manson's friend

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Bousilla, who is one of his tightest family members,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 3>gets arrested for murder, the murder of Gary Hinman, and

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Manson says, well, you know, I mean you should do

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>something to help my brother Bobby Bousola, And you know,

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Tex says, well what should I do? And apparently Manson

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>flew off the handle and said, don't ask me what

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 3>you should do, you know what you should do.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And that was that.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>And the next thing, Manson knows Watson and cren Winkle

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and Atkins are over at the at the Tate residence,

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 3>carving up Sharon Tate and the rest of the people

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 3>in the house. He didn't say anything about going to

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>kill anybody. He didn't direct him anywhere, he didn't say

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 3>anything like that. He just said they took what all

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the other stuff that he'd said too far, and that

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 3>really what they were doing was trying to cover up

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 3>cover for Bobby Boussola to get him out of prison.

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 3>That's Manson's explanation for the whole thing.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, and for the part well, I guess we

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.239
<v Speaker 1>should go ahead and say that that all of these

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>people went to prison, and Susan Atkins, Patricia Crenwinkle, Leslie

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Van Houghton, they all were, you know, still so under

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>his spell that they were fully ready and did take

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the blame for these killings. But when it comes to parole,

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it was in January nineteen seventy one that they were

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all convicted on all accounts murder conspiracy to commit murder.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But years later, as parole hearings would come up for

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>all these women and Tex Watson and Manson himself the

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>reason why they were continually denied, even like Tex Watson

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>became a born again Christian and you know, supposedly turned

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>his life around, but they none of them would would

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>take responsibility. All these years later, they would all still

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>say that it was Manson was Manson. And from what

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I understand, a big part of getting your parole approved

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is to finally take full responsibility for what you had done,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and none of them would do it, and they were

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>all all denied over the years. Susan Atkins eventually died

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>of brain cancer in two thousand and nine, and then

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just a few days ago, well, Leslie van Houghton in

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>September of last year was actually recommended for parole in

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>just a few days ago as of this recording, the

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Governor of California, Jerry Brown, denied that, oh really, and said,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>now she still isn't taking responsibility. And I think these

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 1>cases are just so loaded still that it would be

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>really tough even though parole was recommended for the governor

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to approve that, you know, So we'll see, they're gonna

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently they're going to keep pursuing that and I'm not

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>sure what the next steps are, but they're going to

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fight that ruling by Jerry Brown and we'll see where

0:20:59.800 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that go.

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 3>So so I think then Patricia Creenwinkle is still in prison.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think now that Susan Atkins died, she is

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the longest serving female inmate in California prison system.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Oh, and we should say too that Squeaky From

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>tried to kill Nixon. That's where she gained later fame.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>That was Ford.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh what I say, Nixon? Yeah, yeah, Gerald Ford. And

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>she's she's out of prison. She she lives in upstate

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>New York and I think the last I've seen of

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>her was someone took her picture in a Walmart parking

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>lot and she like smacked the camera down.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 3>So she she's an interesting case. Squeaky From was out.

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 3>She wasn't indicted for any of the murders or any

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 3>role in the murders, but she was a number She

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 3>was the number two person to join the Manson family. Remember, Yeah,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and she still to this day refuses to denounce Manson.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 3>It's still very much all about Charles Manson, and just

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 3>as much as she was before. And she went to

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm not sure what she was doing with

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 3>a gun and Gerald Ford, but she aimed a gun

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 3>at Jerald Ford. It was the gun wasn't loaded, but

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 3>it still had the effect of sending her to prison

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 3>for decades for an assassination attempt on the president.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised she ever got out.

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 3>I am too, but she was paroled eventually, but she

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 3>still she's still never denounced Charles Manson. All of the

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 3>other ones denounced Manson. She's the only one who has it.

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 3>And supposedly one time she escaped in the eighties because

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 3>she heard that Charles Manson was sick, so she broke

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 3>her way out of prison to try to get to him.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she was a Manson family member who tried to

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>kill the president and escaped from prison and they she

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>earned parole.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, hard to believe, but I think it's like you said,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 3>I think those the case that Tate la Bianca murders

0:22:55.160 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 3>were so politically charged and so loaded that the like

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 3>it's just didn't they just weren't going to get out

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the people who actually committed the murders.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, Manson had an interesting time in prison too.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>He had a guy trying and kill him by lighting

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>him on fire at one point in like I think

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>like twenty percent of his body was badly burned. And

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he had a string of relationships with people from penpals,

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>which will kind of cover at the end to a

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>woman that he did he actually marry that woman.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 3>She was in that twenty thirteen article that I was reading,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know if they got married.

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Man, we should do I don't know what we would

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>call it, but an episode on generally women who who

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>marry serial killers.

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 3>We totally should in prison, Let's do that, But first,

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>let's take a break.

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 2>How about that.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's do it.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Okay, Chuck, we're back. We're talking about So Manson's

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 3>in prison for a while there. This is just mind

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 3>blowing to me. For a good decade. He enjoyed, Actually,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 3>more than that, he enjoyed the limelight. He could get

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 3>interviewed by huge names like you said, Diane Sawyer, Charlie Rose,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Heeraldo Rivera very famously did an interview with Charles Manson

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>where apparently Manson you were saying how much poise Diane

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Sawyer showed during her interview.

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Supposedly Manson just owned Heraldo during that interview.

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>I just totally took control of the whole thing. But

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the these were things that were televised like on national

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 3>National news, and these these people were giving these networks

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 3>were giving Charles Manson a platform to talk about himself,

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>to talk about his philosophy, to show the world how

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 3>crazy he was. Oh yes, to keep him in the public,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 3>in the public eye and the public mind. Until finally

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 3>after the Diane Sawyer interview there, they not only pulled

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the plug on his interviews, they said for there, you

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 3>couldn't televise interviews with any inmates from in California because

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of Charles Manson basically. So it's just really strange to me,

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 3>especially these days looking back, that he had a platform

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 3>for so long to stay that boogeyman. You know that

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 3>that just scared the be Jesus out of America.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think those last like whatever, like twenty three,

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years in prison with no limelight was that

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>had to have been like the darkest time of his

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>life because you know, he wanted he clearly wanted to

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>be a singing star, and in a weird way, he

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up kind of getting what he wanted because some

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of his music ended up being recorded by you know,

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the Guns and Roses and the Lemonheads, and he became

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this kind of weird u cult figure and not as

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in Jim James cult oh like movie My Morning Jacket

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Jim Jones, but like, yeah, like a cult figure and

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>revered by some people weirdly. It just is so strange

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that people would look at him that way, you know.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 3>So one person who revered him later on in life

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>was a woman I believe he named Star, And she

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 3>moved from her parents' house in Mississippi out to California

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 3>to be just down the street from where Manson was held.

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 3>And this is she was the woman who was posed

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>to marry him, and she.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Was a follower of his.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 3>She said she didn't care anything about nineteen sixty nine.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 3>He so Manson later in life became really interested in

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 3>preserving the environment. He came up with a thing called

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Atwa air trees water.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember the last air.

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah air again, that would be awaa right.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 2>So she became very interested in him.

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 3>For his ecological stance, right, And she moved out to

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 3>be close to him and would visit him on weekends

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 3>and they became very close, and I guess to kind

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 3>of demonstrate to the world that he still had it.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I still got it world, he.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Asked her to carve an X in her forehead and

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>she did so. She was also big time into collecting

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 3>and selling Manson memorabilia, and Ed points out in this article.

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 3>I think he's referring to her that the whole marriage

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 3>thing may have been a ploy to get at Manson memorabilia,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 3>but I don't believe that's the case at all. So

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 3>she actually ran a website and still does called mansondirect

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.719
<v Speaker 3>dot com, and it's like up to date, So I

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 3>think she had not abandoned him after some big, big

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 3>score with memorabilia like she seems to have been the

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 3>real deal follower, like an early Manson family girl reincarnated.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Weird. So there were a bunch of other I

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>saw an article whether at least ten other weird deaths

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>related to the Manson family that some people say could

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have been them or maybe not looked into a few

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. That was his original or at least this

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>guy was originally going to represent Manson is an attorney

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>named Ron Hughes. He ended up representing Think Leslie van Houghton. Yeah,

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but she he disappeared while on a There was a

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ten day recess in the trial. So he goes camping

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>with another couple and the couple left and he's like,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stay on here in the woods. He was

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>never seen again, so that was a little weird. They

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>never found a body or anything.

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it wasn't they even though he was

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 3>one of their defense attorneys. They had a huge grudge

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 3>against him because, like you said earlier, Van Houghton, Krenwinkle,

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 3>and Atkins were all or not Atkins, I can't remember

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>who the third one was. We're all going to incriminate themselves.

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 3>So as Leslie Van Houghton's defense attorney, he said, I'm

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 3>not he rested after the prosecution wrested. He never presented

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 3>a defense, Yeah, because he knew that they were going

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 3>to incriminate themselves and he refused to take part in it.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 3>So they had a grudge against him.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's possible.

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Possibly there was a spawn ranch worker that disappeared and

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he they were actually convicted. Some other family members of

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>his murdered. His name was Shorty Shae Donald. Shorty say,

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there was this one dude Joel Pew who was married

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to Sandra Good who was a member, and he he

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was found dead in his London hotel. He had It

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was ruled a suicide, but his wrist had been slashed

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and his throat was slashed twice and there was something

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>written in blood on the mirror that was erased. You know,

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 1>it was one of these shoddy jobs I think by

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the London cops. But some say it said Jack and Jill.

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Other people say they don't remember what it said. But

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that was definitely one of those that was like, hmm,

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>could he have been killed?

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And Manson family member, Yeah, well the list goes on.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 3>One of those Manson family members who was convicted of

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 3>killing Shorty Shay had made a couple of trips to

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the UK while Joel Pugh was there. So there's even

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 3>there's even more. There's it's definitely weird that he died

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 3>like that. Yeah, you know, having your throat slashed in

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a London hotel, it's weird no matter what.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And so like we said, you know, you said at

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, it was definitely the end of the peace

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>love movement and sort of put a pin on the

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what people thought about what a lot of people thought

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>about the counterculture, and like this is these are the hippies.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not peace and love. They can murder people on drugs,

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is what acid can do to you. So

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that was mainstream media. You had other alternative media or

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>places like Rolling Stone that was still a pretty young

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>magazine that would would not say things like that, would

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>not kind of buy into the mainstream media portrayal, but

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it captured and still captures a lot of people's imagination.

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was a part of the zeitgeist, but

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it just endured for decades after, you know for sure.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 3>And Rolling Stone actually did a tremendous amount of reporting

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 3>on Charles Manson that was really good at the time.

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 3>That twenty thirteen article I read was really good. That

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 3>was from Rolling Stone. You can get into a Manson

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 3>rabbit hole just going onto Rolling Stone's website.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>And that.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 3>The twenty thirteen article I read chuck that the author,

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I think he kind of summed up Charles Manson better

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 3>than I've seen it anywhere else. But he said this,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 3>he said, sometimes he can be so transparent, which makes

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 3>him look like nothing more than a goofy klutzy small

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 3>timer who made some bad decisions that led to more

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 3>bad decisions that led to murder, and who then got

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>caught up in an ambitious DA's dream about a mastermind

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 3>saying golly with demonic visions of world domination. Some crook,

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 3>some outlaw, some gangster, some desperado, probably the worst ever, but.

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>In the end a tiny redneck.

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean that definitely falls in there too.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So as far as these kids go, it's kind

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of hard to get good information because I read a

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different things. But from what I can tell,

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he had three sons, for sure. Yeah, one with Candy

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Stevens named Charles Luther Manson, one with Mary Brunner named

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Valentine or Valentine Michael Manson. Those two guys are impossible

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to find anything on. I'm sure they have probably changed

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>their names. There was a Charles Manson Junior who killed

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>himself in the I think early nineties.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, ninety three.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And then there's this dude. Did you see this Matthew

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Roberts guy.

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I ran across his name, but I don't know anything

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 2>about him.

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, he claims too that his mother said, you know what,

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Charles Manson was your dad? We had sex in an

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>orgy in samon Go in the late sixties, and I

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that he is probably your father, although given that

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's an orgy, you know, those things go.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 3>So that is the last does the last thing you

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 3>ever want to hear your mom tell you that whole story. Yeah,

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the whole story from beginning to end. It's just bad

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 3>news for you, the kid.

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so just look this guy up. And if he

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like Charles Manson incarnate, then I don't know

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what to say. But the dude looks exactly like him.

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's the deal though, As he ended up, he tried

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.479
<v Speaker 1>to get DNA from the prison, tried to smuggle it out,

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>but it got contaminated, the test didn't work. He ended

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>up taking a DNA test to match with who we

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>know was Charles manson junior son, a dude named Jason Freeman,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>who was you know, the grandson of Charles Manson, and

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>there was no match there. But Matthew Roberts says, well,

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't prove anything, because we ever see in the

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>DNA match from Freeman and Manson. See he's still claiming

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to be his son, and I mean, the guy looks

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so much like him. It's a little creepy, So it's

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to not say, you know, why would his mom

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>make up the story? The guy happens to look just

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>like him, but who knows. And in the end, his

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>will and supposedly his estate is worth money. I don't

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>know how much, but they say, you know, there could

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of dough there. And right now there's

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a legal battle going on between Jason Freeman, who is

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the grandson, and then this pen pal that Manson had

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for like decades named Michael Channels, who he scribbled out

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a will to this guy. And he's saying, hey, look,

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he wrote this will. He wants me to have this money.

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Freeman saying it's mine. For their part, they're both

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>saying what they want to do. His body's on ice

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>still is they want to they both want to scatter

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>his ashes just where no one knows. So there it

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't become like some weird trying. Yeah, but uh, the

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ongoing legal battle for his will, we'll see what happens there.

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 3>So and that Star lady weighed in saying if anybody

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 3>who says he has a will is lying, that he

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 3>purposefully said that he was not going to leave a will, right,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.760
<v Speaker 3>But it would just it would be just like Charles

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 3>Manson to scribble off a will, deny that he ever

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 3>did it, and just leave a big mess behind afterwards,

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, yeah, just one more mess for everybody to

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:24.439
<v Speaker 3>sort out.

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 2>So strange, so strange, and said absolutely.

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>In the sixties there was some I know he talked

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about the uh god, who is that one cult that

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>saw the documentary with Father Zod or whatever? Hm m

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I man, that was a crazy documentary. I mean, just

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that whole time was so so strange.

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 2>It really was.

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Is people looking for something to belong to or something

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 3>some meaning that wasn't their parents meaning, you know, yeah, yeah,

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 3>well all right, Chuck, they found it. By the way

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 3>they found it. They all became stockbrokers in the eighties.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 3>If you want to know more about the Manson family, well,

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>like I said, there's rabbit holes all over the internet.

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 3>And in the meantime, you can also read this great

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 3>article by EDG. Grabanowski by typing the words Manson family

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 3>and the search bar at house Stuff Works. And like

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 3>I said, it'll bring up this great Grabster article. And

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 3>while I said that it's time for listening now, I'm.

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Gonna call this Confederate monuments, well not Confederate monuments, but

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>removal of monuments follow up.

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Nice.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So we got a lot of great email about that podcast.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many of those you read, but

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, people roundly said we did a good, fair

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>take on this tricky subject.

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I saw that too, which always.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Makes me feel good and a shout out. This is

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not from her, but one of the people who wrote

0:37:56.120 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>in was an artist named Kara Kara Walker who just

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>look up her work. She is amazing. She's I think

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the second youngest person ever received a MacArthur Genius Grant

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and she does He's great. She does a lot of

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff and a lot of mediums. But what she's known

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>for I think of these room sized silhouette like black

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>cutout silhouettes depicting statements on race and gender and civil rights.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And she's just like a rock star in the New

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>York arts scene. And she went to my high school.

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I saw that.

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Did not know that. She introduced herself. She graduated two

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>years ahead of me at Ridan, So I wrote back

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to her and just told her how proud I was

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>to be an alum.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Nice.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So, anyway, go check out Carl Walker's work. That's a mouthful,

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it is, but this is from someone else. Hey, guys,

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for the podcast. I'm a big fan,

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>especially enjoyed the Public Monument episode. I'm writing to clarify

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>small point about the Georgia state flag that Chuck discussed

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in that episode. I got this thing wrong, by the way.

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You pointed out that Georgia, like some other former Confederate states,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>included the familiar Confederate battle flag with the ex pattern

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in its state flag from fifty six to two thousand

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and one. However, that flag is not the Stars and Bars.

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>The Stars and Bars was the official national flag of

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Confederacy and is the flag after which the current

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Georgia flag is patterned. It turns out that the flag

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Georgia use till nineteen fifty six was modeled after the

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>national Confederate flag, and the state switched to the Confederate

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>battle flag in fifty six. In other words, while the

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>most familiar Confederate flag was removed in two thousand and one,

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it was replaced with another one.

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 2>That's so Georgia.

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought we did the right thing. No, so I

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 1>thought you guys wuld be interested. By the way, Mississippi

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is the only state that still uses the Confederate battle

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>flag and its official state flag. Keep up the great work.

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I don't have a name on this one.

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks a lot, I don't have a name on

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 3>this one. That was some good info. We appreciate that.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 3>And Chuck, that was big of you to say, Hey,

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I got it wrong, I got it wrong.

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 2>That's all right, man, that's all right.

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 3>If you want to write in to tell us we

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 3>got something wrong, lay it on us.

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 2>That's fine. You can send us all including Jerry an.

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Email to Stuff podcast at HowStuffWorks dot com and has

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 3>always joined us at our home on the web. Stuff

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Youshould Know dot com.

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.