WEBVTT - We Are All Scientists

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and my name is Trulie Douglas.

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>We just finished recording an episode titled how to Think

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Like a Child, and now we're breaking into this idea

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that we are all scientists. And you're probably wondering, why

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't you guys hitting this information right now? Um, And

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly we've touched on some of these topics before in

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the past, and it's because we're hitting the road with

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>this act. Uh. One week from now the time we're

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>recording it, we're gonna be at the E four conference

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Excellence in Elementary Engineering in the Twin Cities, and we're

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna give a keynote when we're gonna talk about this

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>idea that we are all scientists, because we're gonna be

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>talking to elementary school teachers who are who want to

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>engage with children and and get them excited about science

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and engineering, and there's often this false idea that it's

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>something alien to them, where it's kind of like, let's

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>let's give some children into a room and let's teach

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>them to love sardines and broccoli. You know, let's let's

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 1>get them excited about asparagus. But no, it's it's it's

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>something that they already have in them, and it's it's

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's ultimately more about about connecting with the inner scientists

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that is in all of us. Right, we're gonna make

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the case today that science is not a part of us,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it is actually intrinsic to our nature. And I will

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>say that having worked on this podcast, I feel like, uh,

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting to look at science as something that

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is innate rather than, as I've mentioned before, looking through

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the windows of science, because I feel like this podcast

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.639
<v Speaker 1>has really informed my worldview on how it's not apart

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>from us, how every gesture, word, thought can be pinned

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>back to what you know. We've often talked about the

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>magic of reality, and when I say the magic of reality,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.559
<v Speaker 1>it's this idea that a single celled organism created an

0:01:54.640 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>unbroken lineage extending fourth and time four billion years until

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we are sitting here before you guys, recording our voices.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>To me. That is amazing and it all points back

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that science has helped frame our understanding

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of how we came to be in this world. Um,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as why things are the way that they are. So,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed in the previous podcast about being like

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a child, one of the big things here is that

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>as as we get older and as we become adults,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we take on all these different world views. We take

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>on all these preconceived notions of how what the world

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>is and how it works, about who we are, how

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>do we fit into the world, What is our group,

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>what is our society? Who are the others? What laws

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are in place that we're obeying, What laws are in

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>place that we are neglecting, What laws are in place

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that the other guys and gals out there should be obeying,

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but are not. All these complex, illusory ideas. We end

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>up building this this fortress of ideas through which we

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>try to understand the world around us. And we use

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of labels, right like you begin to understand

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>yourself as you're growing up, right and you people say

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're good at X, Y or z, and then

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a liberal, you're a conservative, You're you're in the model,

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>You're you're creative or number minded, you're you're very sensible.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>You know. We end up taking on all these labels,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>pinning them to our jacket and and that's who we

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>are and that's what the world is now. But I

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>would argue that in addition to what other label or

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the many labels that we can put on ourselves, we

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are all inherently engineers. Right. Okay, Now, think you're probably

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like kind of know what you're talking about. I don't

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>use blueprints, or maybe I do use blueprints, but I

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>don't build things times. Yeah, but now think about your

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>childhood and think about treehouses or building something. You don't

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have to build a treehouse, It could be at all

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the things that if you're a lego person like I was,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.839
<v Speaker 1>and I am not an engineer, I have to check

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>things two or three times when I do simple calculations

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>with a Google calculator. You know, I'm that type of person.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm more of a liberal arts person. But as a child,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I had the out of legos and had build everything

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>under the sun. You know, I'd see a helicopter, I'd

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have to build that helicopter. Then I have to crash

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the helicopter because we shut down by another one. That

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was the evil helicopter. But then I would build another one,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it would be maybe I'd build build a

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>building or a tank. I mean so even as as

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a child playing with blocks, or even if we're not

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>playing with actual physical blocks, we're building things. We're building stories,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we're building ideas, we're engineering something. When we're engaging in play, well,

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you're also learning how the world works, how gravity works, right,

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't stack those blocks in a way

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that can support weight, then whatever you're creating is going

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to fall or just not work out. So every kid

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to build a giant tower, but you quickly learned

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that you've got to You've got to figure out how

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the base is gonna work. You gotta build a broader

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>base to make the tower go up all the way.

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise it's just gonna be blocks falling over and making

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a loud no. Yeah, I see that. I've seen this

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>so many times with kids, and kids can, by the way,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>with legos, and I know everybody knows this, but really

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they can create some of the most uh some of

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the coolest, most innovative buildings I've ever seen, because they

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>will take these risks and put things where they're not

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>really supposed to go. But then again they figure out

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>how things are weighted. So again we don't think about it,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but this is really the mind of an engineer at play.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, kids are also born Euclideans. So

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>when I say kids are this, that also means that

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we are Euclideans. And when I say Euclideans, I mean

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that we use geometric clues to navigate the world. Because

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you have bottom line, we are born into a world

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of numerous fixed and movable objects. We live in a

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in a world of space and time. As a creature,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're a human and you're listening to this,

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this applies to you. If you're if you're a cat

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to this, or a dog, this applies

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to you though in kudos for understanding the English language podcast.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>But you have to engage in this world that is physical,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that has space, that has time, that has physical laws

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>governing what goes on. So part of our our evolutionary

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>advantage is our ability to understand in that world to

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>interact with and to do that we have to have

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of numbers, since a certain understanding of

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how physics work more or less inborn. We've discussed in

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the past their concepts such as say teleportation, you try

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and you try and sell a kid on the idea

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that teleportation exists. They're not gonna believe it because they

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>already have it in them in their selves. They're inborn

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this disbelief in the in the idea that could even

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be possible, because it doesn't conform to reality. To believe

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in something like that, you have to painstakingly build this

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>fortress of ideas and beliefs as an adult, and then

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you can make the impossible seem plausible. Right, Because even

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>little babies know about object permanence, meaning that I could

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have two cups. In one cup, I could deposit two

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>cookies in another cup, I could pretend to be depositing cookies,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>same motions and everything. They will always want them one

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with the actual cookies in it. They understand that that

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is mimicking, that that is not object permanence. Uh. In addition,

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>kids using geometric clues, they're more likely to use the

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>length of walls in a room to remember where toys hidden.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is true of kids even at ages three

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and four, when they can name the color of the

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>wall um to orient themselves, they still navigate rooms by

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>length references. I also see this with my daughter at

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>play with puzzles. You know. She she will be four

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in January, and she loves to put together puzzles using

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>solely the shape. Now she can read and she can

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>use the colors to try to piece together the clues

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of how they fit together. But always in this drives

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>me crazy because to me, I'm oriented in the other

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>way where I'm like, hey, that says that that's part

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the North Carolina for the for the map um

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>she will always try to see how it fits together.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is really interesting. Kids that play with puzzles

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>between the ages of two inform perform significantly better and

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>spatial tests by ages five and six. And again this

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is this idea that they can mentally transform shapes, and

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this turns out to be a really big predictor of

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>abilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. What we call stem.

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Another inborn ability that kids have that adults forget and

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>then have to relearn is Bayesian logic. Beaesian logic is

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a branch of probability theory that allows one to model

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty about the world and outcomes of interest in that

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>world related to common sense knowledge and observational evidence. So

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a concept that plays heavily into statistical evaluation

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of things such as ongoing elections, etcetera, any kind of

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>situation where there's a there's a certain a group of

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>chaos or unpredictability. It's also something that is key to

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>our creation of aiyes of artificial intelligence, because we want

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to create something that thinks intelligently and can analyze the

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>world and create believable recommendations on what's going to happen.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're using Baisian logic to create the machines will

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>solve the problems of the future. But Baisian logic is

0:08:59.920 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>already present in children. Experiments have shown that when a

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>child looks at the world, they're able to weigh the

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>observational data in the statistical data that they have observed

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is free of the conflicting judgments

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that adult humans bring to the table. Yeah, I mean

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>much like looking at a puzzle and seeing what fits

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and what doesn't. Bayesian logic necessitates that children use a

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>pattern of co variation. Co variation meaning correlated variation of

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>two or more variables. And we talked about this blicket

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>machine in the last podcast How to Think Like a Child,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and this blicket machine is something that is lit up

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>when you place an object on it. This object can

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be vary shape, sizes, colors, and kids will again use

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this co variation correlated variation of two or more variables

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to realize that if they do this, then this happens.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>If you do that, then that happens. Now, by the way,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>these objects aren't static, meaning that you know, it's not

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just the red squares that make the machine go. You know,

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it could be the orange squares that have blue dots

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on them, or the triangle and so on and so forth.

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So they are taking in a lot of data and

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out, you know, like the three types

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of shapes that are this color and this configuration stacked

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>on top will make this machine go. That's actually pretty sophisticated.

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And as we mentioned last time in our podcast and

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>how to Think Like a Child, kids are actually better

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in this exercise and figure out how certain toys work

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on the blicket machine. Then adults are, which brings us

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to mathematics. And this is a big one. As adults,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so many of us, myself included, throw any kind of

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>thing mathematical at us being and figuring out how to

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>split a bill at a dinner party or trying to

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>figure out I've got it down now, but for a

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>while there, I didn't even understand how to properly figured

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>tip before I figured out just generally that bad at math,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and so we often fall into this idea that that

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we're born bad at math and then we just simply

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>fail to learn it. And certainly there's a whole case

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to be made about what needs to be done to

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to engage children and the age students so more thoroughly

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in mathematics. I do want to mention too, that there

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is no gender difference in abilities in science and math.

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And this has been something of subject that comes up

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>again and again. But if you want more information on it,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>check out Elizabeth Spelky spe l k E and her

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>debate with Stephen Pinker on this point and the thirty

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>odd years of research into child development in which she

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>makes the case that this does not exist. This is

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>some cultural garbage that we tend to heap on kids,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>because again, we all have to interact with the same world.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>We're all organisms that have all the equipment to interact

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>with that world, and part of that is a number sense. Okay,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so our brains naturally extract numbers from the surrounding environment

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that we identify colors. All right,

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we call it number cents, and our brains come fully

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>equipped with it from birth. In fact, studies even show

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that while infants have no graphs of human number system,

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it doesn't know what five is, doesn't

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>know what ten is, but they can tell the difference

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>between five and ten on a on a non numerical

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>level because they can tell identify change in quantity. Show

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a kid five cookies and a kid ten cookies, and

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they will know the difference they have. There is an

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>inborn math that governs that that kind of quantity differential. Yeah,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they are essentially born accountants. And you will see this

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>with babies who can estimate quantities and distinguish between more

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and less. For instance, and an experiment in which babies

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>were shown an a ray of four dots and then

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>an a ray of twelve dots, it turns out that

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they will pay attention to the four dots sequence when

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>four sounds are played, okay, correlating that, and they will

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>gaze at the twelve dots when the twelve sounds are played,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>even when the sounds are manipulated in terms of the

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>note length. Kids still no babies still know that twelve

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>noted song has to do with the twelve dots and

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that four noted song has to do with the four dot. Yeah,

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we can even drag in your own imaging research into it,

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and we found that when you when you look at

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>an infant's brain, when they're say, looking at the five

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>cookie tin cookie difference, they're actually engaging in logarithmic counting, alright,

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>counting based on integral increases in physical quantity. And this

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is so apparently this is something that we move away

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>from as we get older, this logarithmic thinking, because we

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think in different modes of mathematics. But again, route to

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the baby, route to children is this logarithmic thinking. So

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we end up taking on human number systems. But the

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is, again, the human number systems are even this

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is not something that's coming from the outside. It's it's

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>something that's coming from within. At some point in our

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>ancient past, prehistoric humans begin to develop a means of

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>augmenting their natural number sense, all right, they started counting

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on their fingers and toes, and that's why so many

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>numerical systems depend on groups of five, ten, or twenty,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So based ten or decimal system stem from the use

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of both hands, while base twenty or vegicial systems are

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>based on the use of fingers and toes. Yeah, these

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>vegicimal systems, I think are really interesting. Larger numbers are

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>simply multiples of ten, right, because that would be a

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>base of ten system. For example, ten tens make and

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we're so used to our base ten system that it

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>may seem like the only possibility. But the green Landic

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>number system has a base of twenty and others have

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a base of five, and of all the number systems

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>ever invented, five, ten, and twenty are the most common.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, if you doubt that mathematics is something that

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is inherent to you, all you have to do is

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>split down at your fingers. In fact, in Greenland, the

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>word for seven, which is pronounced our punick marluk translate

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, translates as second hand to okay,

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So you put one hand up and then two fingers

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.359
<v Speaker 1>from from the next hand, and then thirteen is translated

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>as first foot three, meaning both of your hands plus

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>your first foot three toes. So again our digits are fingers.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Just even think about the terminology have been the gold

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>standard for how we itemize the world around us. All right,

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break on that note, and

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, we're gonna shift a little outside

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of the mathematical understanding the world and we're gonna get

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>into a little something called storytelling, because, believe it or not,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>storytelling is science before we move on to storyteller. So

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that's just reminded as you were talking in that sponsortive

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>message about mathematics and certain truths that they hold, and

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about the Fibonacci numbers, which is that

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sequence of numbers, the golden ratio that we see again

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and again in nature. Yeah, it's like in a snail shell,

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it's in some cauliflower. You see this mathematical truth making

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it self evident just throughout the world and then in

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the cosmos and on your body, right, because even the

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ratio between your hand, the length of your hand and

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the length of your arm, and the length of your

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>arms to the height of your body, or even the

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>space between your eyes and your nose in your mouth,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>these are all predicated on the golden ratio. So again,

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>inherent within the blueprint our numbers. Yeah, we haven't. A

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>past episode we did about mathematics, we asked a question,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is mathematics a human discovery or human invention? Where we

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>really go into the philosophical deep end about this, because

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really fascinating question. Again, mathematics, as we've discussed, is

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>something that comes from within. But is it something that

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is purely a human creation based on what is inside us?

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Or is it something that really permeates every aspect of

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe? Right? Is it the tail wagging the dog? Yeah,

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really really mind blowing stuff. But we're moving a

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>little beyond mathematics at this point and we're getting into

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>something called storytelling. Storytelling is of course, is old as

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>human language. The idea that we can set down and

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we can tell a narrative, that we can talk about

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this character and what they did. Are these people and

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>what they did, what challenge they overcame, how they came

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>from point A to point B, And we naturally engage

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in it because the stories are linear. They have beginnings,

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>they have metals, and they have ends, much like our lives,

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>much exactly like our lives and exactly like our our

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>experience of the world around us, so we naturally engage

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>with stories well, and within this, I think about the

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>neo cortex as part of our brains that was locked

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on is pretty much an upgrade, uh to the human brain.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Scream ice cream style, swirled up high. It changed everything

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>because no longer did we have just our reptilian brain,

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which was really concerned or is concerned with basic survival

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>instincts like fear. But with the neo cortex, you have

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>something that can manage so many different sophisticated, complex elements

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of life of modern life, from parenting to higher cognitive

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>functions like number systems and the prietal loop which which

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>governs these number systems, and abstraction. So when I think

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>about number systems, I think about abstractions because really that's

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what they are. And uh, these obstractions are stories, and

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>these stories really are data. We're taking data, we're organizing it,

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're making it into a pattern that makes sense

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to us that can help explain our world. So when

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you think about storytelling, you don't normally think about it

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>is involving science, but really you're you're talking about some

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of the same basic principles at play. So again, storytelling

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>us how we see the world. I mean, on a

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>very basic level. I've talked about this before, and this

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>is where especially adults get in get into trouble. And no,

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean even in an early age, you're you're engaging

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in your ego. You're creating a story about the world

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in which you are the central character. And uh, you know,

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>so everyone's life unless you can you can force yourself

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to think beyond it. After a while, it becomes this

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this very limited novel with this one character engaging with

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>other people with their surroundings, with various successes and disasters

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that that line the road to death and elegant and

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>then an uplifting way of putting it. But I mean,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what kind of what comes when you when you

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>end up viewing the world that way. But we end

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>up viewing the world that way. So telling other stories

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>ends up being this interesting way of tweaking that worldview

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>um in a way that can be both good and bad.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a book called Tell the Wind, Connect, Persuade, and

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Triumph with the Hidden Power of Story by a film executive,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Peter Goober, and he makes this argument that the stories

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>function as trojan horses. All Right, we all know the

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>idea of the trojan horse, right, So you have you

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>have the city of Troy. The opposing army wants to

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>get inside that besieged city. So how do you do it.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>You give him a gift, a fabulous wooden horse hitting away,

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and that horse's belly happens to be a small group

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of soldiers, and after after the lights go off, after

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the sun goes down, they're going to creep out of

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the belly of that horse, unlock the gates, and let

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the army in. So the idea here

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>is that. And we've discussed this about the power of

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>storytelling before. You know, when when you have a story

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that contains a different idea, a different way of seeing

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the world, it can kind of virally infect our worldview

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and we end up trusting an idea more if it's

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>presented to us in the form of a story, which

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is why you see we've we've talked about the importance

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of sitcom's You're Just in popular history, um or or

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>or novels as well. When you engage a new cultural

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>idea in the form of a narrative, we're more likely

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to take it in to eat it than we are

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>if someone says, hey, here's the way you should maybe

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>view the world. Why don't you do this? And then

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna double down. They're gonna say, no, no,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not the way I view the world at all.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Presenting a story, however, that's the spoonful of sugar on

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the medicine. Yeah, but I would I would actually argue

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that every single scientific paper that's ever been published has

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a trojan horse of sorts in the narrative. In other words,

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>something that happens that's a surprise that turns our assumptions

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>on its head, right, because because you've got to have

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>conflict and story for to be good. Nobody wants to

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>read a story about, hey, there's this person they marry

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and everything happened the way it needed to happen. It was.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you need some sort of conflict where suddenly

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>something doesn't happen, there's a fall from grace, or there's

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a conflict that had or some sort of of enemy

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that has to be overcome. I mean, that's the stuff

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of great narrative. No one wants to read three long

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>books about Bilbo setting at home, drinking tea and crumpets.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>This is true. This is true. Something has to happen,

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>change has to occur in order for the reader to

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>better understand him or herself in the greater world around them. Right,

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And this I think if you look at it, pretty

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>much every publication of a paper, there's going to be

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>something within it, even if it's something like in a

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.239
<v Speaker 1>paper that ended up in Ignoble, right, which we did

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of podcasts. There's always a story. Like there's

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the story of the guy that said, hey, there's a

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>dead duck outside my window, and then another duck came

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and started copulating with that dead duck and he had

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of it. So there's the study. There's

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the story there's a man and getting in encountering a

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>mystery in the world, well something to overcome and have

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to solve it, having to an analyze it and learning

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>something from it. Right. So that's what the basis of

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>storytelling is about. You don't want learn. You generally, when

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you engage with a story, you want a character that's

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>going to learn and grow, or on the optic, you

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>want a character maybe that doesn't learn and grow, but

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's still part and partial to who that person

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is and getting even know that. So I'm actually thinking

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about the paper that was published by the kids. We

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on how to Think like a Child

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh blato, who did the ted talk about it?

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And those kids were trying to find out whether or

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not humans and insects had things in common in terms

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of the way that they think, the way that they forage,

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>that they organized. Is it possible that insects could have

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>as complex thought processes as humans? And this was the

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>story they were after, and they got their trojan horse

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>because they found out that these bees were forging in

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ways that we had never known before, that that were

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>really nuanced. You changed the conditions and they could adapt,

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and again you have a story about how a we're

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not that far from from the rest of the natural world.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>In other words, a lot of the blueprint of who

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we are comes from everything around us. Right that there's

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there's something intrinsic to bees that is intrinsic to us,

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and so you get this idea of how the natural

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>world orders itself. But also that kids can think critically.

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the other part of this story that has to

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>do with us published paper that kids can see through

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the mind of a scientist and in fact do so

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>every day it is again something that is not apart

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>from them. It is underscoring this idea that we are

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all inherently scientists. Robert Cowitch Coast of Radio Lab a

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>great science podcast that we listen to it and I

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think a number of our listeners listened to as well.

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>He gave a great keynote a few years back on

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the importance of storytelling to the scientific community, which is

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>really really great talk, really inspiring tall whether you stand

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on the inside or outside of a scientific institution, because

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>he was he was very much going with this idea

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of storytelling is a trojan horse. His whole thing was,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're a scientist and you're engaging with with people

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and someone asks you what you do, which, what are

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you studying? What are you what's your research consisting of?

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't blow them off, Don't just say I you wouldn't

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>understand it. Try and explain it to and trying to

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>explain it as a story, because narrative is powerful. And

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>if you if the scientists are not telling a story

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense, if they're not telling a story about

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>how the world works, then there are gonna be other

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>competing stories out there, stories that stem from myth stories

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that stem from religious or spiritual views of the world,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>stories that stem from just complete Internet generated quackery. We've

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>all received emails like that about how Mars is going

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to be as big as the moon and the night sky,

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and other such nonsense, about how Satanist in your area

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to kidnap your cat on haw Halloween. The

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>list goes on and on. But all the quack ideas

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, they already have narratives, and some of these

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>these idea as are old. We've been telling some of

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>these stories since the beginning of human history, and so

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>science has to compete with those. So we need science

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that tells stories. We need to engage with students and

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with adults, people of all ages with a science that

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is wrapped inherentive. Yeah, and because you know, we we've

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about how in the past, the human storytelling has

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>really revolved around mysticism, and we've defined ourselves in these

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in these ways. We think about mysticism more as the

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>creative expression now, but there's still a bit of that,

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>But that cannot be said for everyone in the world. Yeah,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's still in the cultural fabrics. So um,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if we can begin to understand ourselves in

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>these different terms as these Euclidean space explorers, and looking

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>down at our fingers and realizing that we have ordered

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>an entire world around digits numbers. Again, we can begin

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand that this is not something in a separate

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>from us. Yeah, we're born scientists, and that's something we

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>need to cultivate, we need to nurture, and we don't

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>need to learn to be something other than a scientist

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as we grow. All right, Well, on that note, let's

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>call over the robit and get a little bit of

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. All right, this one comes to us from Pedro.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Pedro writes and says, Hey, Julian Robert, I'm a truck driver.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>We have a number of those, so always nice to

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>hear from the truckers out there. I'm a truck driver

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and recently started to listen to your awesome podcast. I

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>literally have listened to most of your podcast to date

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in about a week. Wow. Anyhow, I finally got home

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to write to you guys and share a

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>little story that popped into mind when I heard the

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Gigantism episode Julie mentioned on the topic of hissing cockroaches

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that she thought there might be flying cock roaches. Yes,

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in Puerto Rico and in my native town,

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Vega Baja. As a team, I moved to a more

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>isolated part of town, near a farm close to the

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>tree line of a jungle like part of the island. Uh.

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>It was in the twilight hours and my father and

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I were standing on our porch when something hit me

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in the face, more like slapped me. My father kidded

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that it was a bat, which freaked freaked me out enough,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But when we turned on a few lights, I was

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>surprised by a whole bunch of huge, disgusting flying cockroaches.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Not one of the selling points of my wonderful island anyway.

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I love the podcast, and I'm only disappointed in the

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>fact that I'm almost up to date on him. All Right,

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's saying that these cockroaches are hitting cockroaches with wings. Yeah,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what he's saying, Okay, because I know about palmettos,

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and those suckers can get big even here in Georgia. Yeah.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Put the hissing cockroach three or more inches with wings

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>hissing at you as it comes in the lands in

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>your ear cannut unless there was a kid out there

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the shadows with a slingshot just pelting the porch

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with these things, but I doubt it. Alright, Alright, something

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to add to uh to the nightmares? Well, um, you

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can certainly add to our nightmares and you can add

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to the listeners nightmares by by connecting with us, sharing

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>your stories about your scientific understanding of the world and

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>how you engage in science and if you're a teacher,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear your thoughts on engaging students in science.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on Facebook and you can find

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>us on tumbler. We are stuff to Blow your Mind

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>on both of those and you can also seek us

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>out on Twitter, where our handle is blow the Mind

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can drop us a line at blow the

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Mind at discovery dot com for more on this and

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics. Is it how Stuff Works dot

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>com