WEBVTT - Calling Bullshit with Jill Louise Busby

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:25.076
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:25.116 --> 0:00:28.676
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:29.236 --> 0:00:34.356
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. Today's conversation on Deep Background grew out

0:00:34.396 --> 0:00:37.756
<v Speaker 1>of an extraordinary new book that I read as part

0:00:37.796 --> 0:00:40.436
<v Speaker 1>of a project of working my way through a whole

0:00:40.556 --> 0:00:44.676
<v Speaker 1>pile of recent books of memoirs and non fiction essays.

0:00:45.436 --> 0:00:49.676
<v Speaker 1>The book is called Unfollow Me Essays on Complicity, and

0:00:49.796 --> 0:00:55.156
<v Speaker 1>it's by a remarkable intellectual called Jill Louise Buzby. Jill

0:00:55.436 --> 0:00:59.116
<v Speaker 1>had worked for years in the nonprofit sector focusing on

0:00:59.276 --> 0:01:05.156
<v Speaker 1>diversity and inclusion when she uploaded a short and powerful

0:01:05.396 --> 0:01:10.076
<v Speaker 1>video in which she called out white liberal progressives and

0:01:10.316 --> 0:01:14.956
<v Speaker 1>the corporate nonprofit machine in which she had been a participant.

0:01:15.956 --> 0:01:18.876
<v Speaker 1>The video went viral, and it helped turn her into

0:01:18.956 --> 0:01:22.836
<v Speaker 1>an Instagram influencer using the screen name Jill is Black.

0:01:23.396 --> 0:01:26.596
<v Speaker 1>In the years that followed, Jill became a widely recognized

0:01:26.676 --> 0:01:32.636
<v Speaker 1>figure on social media, commenting on issues of race and identity.

0:01:32.756 --> 0:01:35.596
<v Speaker 1>In the book, what Jill does is she turns the

0:01:35.716 --> 0:01:41.156
<v Speaker 1>very same sharp knife of her incisive analysis and criticism

0:01:41.196 --> 0:01:46.436
<v Speaker 1>onto herself. The result is a book of searing honesty

0:01:46.716 --> 0:01:52.036
<v Speaker 1>and genuine self reflection about the phenomena of power, identity,

0:01:52.116 --> 0:01:55.236
<v Speaker 1>and race that are occurring in real time today and

0:01:55.356 --> 0:01:58.516
<v Speaker 1>what happens when, through her own success, she starts to

0:01:58.516 --> 0:02:02.356
<v Speaker 1>confront the possibilities of a role of power in an

0:02:02.396 --> 0:02:06.796
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure that she has been deeply committed to criticizing. I'm

0:02:06.836 --> 0:02:10.156
<v Speaker 1>thrilled that Jill agreed to come onto deep background to

0:02:10.196 --> 0:02:13.236
<v Speaker 1>talk about this amazing book, and I know you're going

0:02:13.276 --> 0:02:19.956
<v Speaker 1>to love this conversation as much as I did. Jill,

0:02:20.036 --> 0:02:22.636
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here, and thank you

0:02:22.676 --> 0:02:28.116
<v Speaker 1>for your amazing book, unfollow Me Essays on Complicity, which

0:02:28.116 --> 0:02:30.316
<v Speaker 1>I just had a chance to read. I know it

0:02:30.396 --> 0:02:33.236
<v Speaker 1>just came out and it blew me away. Thank you.

0:02:33.956 --> 0:02:37.036
<v Speaker 1>I want to start by saying something that I felt

0:02:37.116 --> 0:02:40.756
<v Speaker 1>very strongly on reading the book, and that is you

0:02:40.796 --> 0:02:46.156
<v Speaker 1>have an uncanny and exquisitely honed talent for calling bullshit.

0:02:48.236 --> 0:02:52.436
<v Speaker 1>My mother would be so proud. It's definitely a family trait.

0:02:52.596 --> 0:02:55.956
<v Speaker 1>My mother growing up, she could handle almost everything except

0:02:55.996 --> 0:02:59.556
<v Speaker 1>for bullshit, so I knew that that wasn't allowed. One

0:02:59.556 --> 0:03:01.116
<v Speaker 1>of the things I want to try to do in

0:03:01.116 --> 0:03:04.516
<v Speaker 1>this interview is convey to listeners who might not have

0:03:04.516 --> 0:03:06.636
<v Speaker 1>had a chance to read the book yet, and who

0:03:06.716 --> 0:03:09.116
<v Speaker 1>might or might not have known about your online work

0:03:09.236 --> 0:03:13.596
<v Speaker 1>before the book, the layering that's in this amazing book.

0:03:14.276 --> 0:03:16.516
<v Speaker 1>And you know in the book there's this kind of

0:03:16.556 --> 0:03:22.076
<v Speaker 1>subtle process where you start calling bullshit on white people

0:03:22.196 --> 0:03:27.716
<v Speaker 1>with the dear white people mode, then you gradually start

0:03:27.796 --> 0:03:31.636
<v Speaker 1>calling bullshit on black people with the dear Black people mode. Right,

0:03:32.316 --> 0:03:34.796
<v Speaker 1>And then at some point we got to the third level,

0:03:35.156 --> 0:03:37.796
<v Speaker 1>which is in some ways the most fascinating, where you

0:03:37.836 --> 0:03:41.236
<v Speaker 1>start calling bullshit on yourself. Yes, talk a little bit

0:03:41.276 --> 0:03:45.596
<v Speaker 1>about what the experience was like for you intellectually when

0:03:45.636 --> 0:03:50.516
<v Speaker 1>you were discovering that your capacity to call bullshit drew

0:03:50.556 --> 0:03:55.596
<v Speaker 1>an audience. Right. I always think that people want more

0:03:55.636 --> 0:03:58.276
<v Speaker 1>honesty then they say, I think it makes them feel

0:03:58.316 --> 0:04:00.556
<v Speaker 1>seen in a way that is intimate. And I think

0:04:00.556 --> 0:04:03.036
<v Speaker 1>there was intimacy that I had with my audience and

0:04:03.076 --> 0:04:06.076
<v Speaker 1>trust that was built very quickly because all I really

0:04:06.076 --> 0:04:08.556
<v Speaker 1>had to do was stay consistent with saying things that

0:04:08.596 --> 0:04:12.036
<v Speaker 1>they weren't hearing elsewhere. And I think that's still something

0:04:12.116 --> 0:04:16.436
<v Speaker 1>that I get to do. It's not about intellect, I subjective.

0:04:16.476 --> 0:04:19.436
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that really means anymore. What I

0:04:19.476 --> 0:04:22.476
<v Speaker 1>do promise is that I'm going to always be doing

0:04:22.516 --> 0:04:25.236
<v Speaker 1>the work of being honest about how I actually feel.

0:04:25.316 --> 0:04:28.316
<v Speaker 1>So I was already doing it personally with my family

0:04:28.396 --> 0:04:30.356
<v Speaker 1>or with myself. It was interesting to me and I

0:04:30.396 --> 0:04:33.156
<v Speaker 1>was very curious about myself. But then really all that

0:04:33.196 --> 0:04:35.476
<v Speaker 1>happened was I began to say it in public, and

0:04:35.556 --> 0:04:38.356
<v Speaker 1>especially as we become again more scripted and people are

0:04:38.396 --> 0:04:41.436
<v Speaker 1>scared to be themselves online. I think, you know, the

0:04:41.436 --> 0:04:43.796
<v Speaker 1>messages that I get now are like, oh, thanks for

0:04:43.836 --> 0:04:47.756
<v Speaker 1>saying the stuff that we're all thinking, and well, that

0:04:47.876 --> 0:04:50.956
<v Speaker 1>means that there is something that is happening where people

0:04:50.956 --> 0:04:52.996
<v Speaker 1>are thinking things and they are scared to show up

0:04:53.036 --> 0:04:55.076
<v Speaker 1>as themselves. And I don't think that's going to push

0:04:55.156 --> 0:04:58.596
<v Speaker 1>us towards more honesty and diversity and inclusion or anti

0:04:58.716 --> 0:05:01.796
<v Speaker 1>racism work to say, Oh, I know what to say now,

0:05:02.156 --> 0:05:06.196
<v Speaker 1>but did we really fix anything with all of these words,

0:05:06.196 --> 0:05:10.076
<v Speaker 1>all of this rhetoric. To me, No, and especially in

0:05:10.076 --> 0:05:11.996
<v Speaker 1>the style in which I was doing it, which was

0:05:12.076 --> 0:05:16.036
<v Speaker 1>one minute monologuing around. You know, I didn't really react

0:05:16.076 --> 0:05:18.516
<v Speaker 1>to headlines because that felt like it was going to

0:05:18.636 --> 0:05:22.716
<v Speaker 1>date my material. So I wasn't doing that. But I

0:05:22.996 --> 0:05:24.996
<v Speaker 1>just I got tired of it, and I started answering

0:05:25.036 --> 0:05:27.356
<v Speaker 1>my own questions, such as, if I were a white

0:05:27.356 --> 0:05:31.356
<v Speaker 1>liberal person and a scary and chaotic society where I

0:05:31.356 --> 0:05:33.436
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like I have a lot of control outside

0:05:33.476 --> 0:05:36.196
<v Speaker 1>of my identity and the idea of privilege, would I

0:05:36.236 --> 0:05:40.316
<v Speaker 1>give that up? Would I genuinely give that up? I mean,

0:05:40.396 --> 0:05:42.916
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I see people of all identities not

0:05:42.996 --> 0:05:45.596
<v Speaker 1>giving up what they have all the time, including me,

0:05:45.796 --> 0:05:48.436
<v Speaker 1>And we were entertaining this conversation that we didn't understand

0:05:48.516 --> 0:05:50.996
<v Speaker 1>how white people could go and do all of these things,

0:05:51.076 --> 0:05:52.876
<v Speaker 1>but we do them all the time. I pick up

0:05:52.916 --> 0:05:55.116
<v Speaker 1>my phone. I don't know who that affects. I ordered

0:05:55.116 --> 0:05:57.516
<v Speaker 1>from this company. I try not to think about. We

0:05:57.796 --> 0:06:00.676
<v Speaker 1>were all doing this. So eventually it felt silly to

0:06:00.676 --> 0:06:02.836
<v Speaker 1>single out. It could be true, but it felt silly

0:06:02.836 --> 0:06:04.796
<v Speaker 1>in the work that I was doing to keep singling

0:06:04.796 --> 0:06:09.116
<v Speaker 1>out when I was doing some of the same things

0:06:09.196 --> 0:06:11.876
<v Speaker 1>without the same level of power history. Sure, but I

0:06:12.276 --> 0:06:15.676
<v Speaker 1>understood what we were doing, which is trying to be safe,

0:06:15.836 --> 0:06:20.076
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid being the other group of people. You

0:06:20.076 --> 0:06:21.396
<v Speaker 1>can say that you want to help them, but you

0:06:21.436 --> 0:06:24.156
<v Speaker 1>never want to be them, right, and in fact, to

0:06:24.196 --> 0:06:26.116
<v Speaker 1>say you want to help somebody is to self define

0:06:26.156 --> 0:06:28.796
<v Speaker 1>as not that right to exactly. You know, one of

0:06:28.836 --> 0:06:33.396
<v Speaker 1>the things that kind I found inspiring and that I

0:06:33.396 --> 0:06:36.316
<v Speaker 1>have myself struggled with is and you just mentioned privilege,

0:06:36.316 --> 0:06:37.596
<v Speaker 1>which is what put it into my mind. And I

0:06:37.636 --> 0:06:39.276
<v Speaker 1>also was thinking this when I was reading your book.

0:06:39.916 --> 0:06:45.476
<v Speaker 1>The formulation check your privilege often translates into acknowledge your privilege.

0:06:46.076 --> 0:06:48.076
<v Speaker 1>And I happen to be someone who's had a lot

0:06:48.076 --> 0:06:50.956
<v Speaker 1>of privilege in my life on pretty much every possible dimension,

0:06:51.636 --> 0:06:55.236
<v Speaker 1>and I have noticed that when I acknowledge and speak

0:06:55.276 --> 0:06:58.716
<v Speaker 1>about those facts, it sounds like to me, at least,

0:06:59.276 --> 0:07:03.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm doubling down on reinforcing my privilege. Like I do

0:07:03.156 --> 0:07:06.796
<v Speaker 1>it because there's a value in being honest about these things.

0:07:06.956 --> 0:07:08.916
<v Speaker 1>And that was the part which I found inspiring. You know,

0:07:08.916 --> 0:07:11.436
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of view of like, just say the truth regardless,

0:07:11.676 --> 0:07:14.396
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes if you say a truth in the context

0:07:14.436 --> 0:07:16.436
<v Speaker 1>where people want you to say, it actually a little bit,

0:07:17.276 --> 0:07:20.036
<v Speaker 1>and then you listen to yourself, you can realize I'm

0:07:20.036 --> 0:07:22.436
<v Speaker 1>actually doing the exact opposite of what the whole check

0:07:22.436 --> 0:07:24.676
<v Speaker 1>your privilege is supposed to do, because in principle, it's

0:07:24.716 --> 0:07:28.996
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be somewhat equalizing, and in fact, I experience

0:07:29.036 --> 0:07:30.636
<v Speaker 1>it is having the opposite effect, Like I think I'm

0:07:30.636 --> 0:07:34.676
<v Speaker 1>making myself less equal. When I start, you know, listening

0:07:34.716 --> 0:07:37.636
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which I've been fortunate in privilege, I start,

0:07:37.916 --> 0:07:40.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Wow, that guy really sounds horrible, Like he

0:07:40.756 --> 0:07:42.316
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he's really trying to like beat it into

0:07:42.396 --> 0:07:45.876
<v Speaker 1>your head. Yeah. I said recently that it feels like

0:07:45.876 --> 0:07:48.836
<v Speaker 1>its own status symbol, like I do this, and I

0:07:48.876 --> 0:07:50.956
<v Speaker 1>do this, and I have a lot of privilege, and like,

0:07:51.036 --> 0:07:53.996
<v Speaker 1>the more you say it, the more you're kind of emphasizing,

0:07:54.396 --> 0:07:57.676
<v Speaker 1>let see what I got that you don't have. Yeah,

0:07:57.796 --> 0:08:01.156
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. It's not a phrase that I used.

0:08:01.196 --> 0:08:03.596
<v Speaker 1>And even our idea of using privilege is the way

0:08:03.636 --> 0:08:05.756
<v Speaker 1>that we solve this is silly because we know that

0:08:05.796 --> 0:08:08.156
<v Speaker 1>in a few years we're throwing this away. It's going

0:08:08.236 --> 0:08:09.876
<v Speaker 1>to be the next thing that we say, Oh wait,

0:08:09.916 --> 0:08:12.596
<v Speaker 1>actually privilege was a problematic word, and so we'll move

0:08:12.596 --> 0:08:14.636
<v Speaker 1>on to this one. It's it's an evolution, and we

0:08:14.676 --> 0:08:17.356
<v Speaker 1>want the words and the ideas to fix everything right

0:08:17.356 --> 0:08:19.756
<v Speaker 1>now so that we can really go back to our privilege.

0:08:19.796 --> 0:08:22.036
<v Speaker 1>So I try not to get too deeply invested in

0:08:22.076 --> 0:08:24.836
<v Speaker 1>the language that we're using, stating what you are is

0:08:24.876 --> 0:08:28.276
<v Speaker 1>not working on it even when I do it. When

0:08:28.276 --> 0:08:32.436
<v Speaker 1>you started writing the book and you hit on at

0:08:32.516 --> 0:08:34.836
<v Speaker 1>some point presumably in the writing process, that you were

0:08:34.836 --> 0:08:37.356
<v Speaker 1>going to do to yourself as it were what you

0:08:37.436 --> 0:08:39.516
<v Speaker 1>had done onto others. Yes, you know that's in some

0:08:39.556 --> 0:08:42.596
<v Speaker 1>way what this book is an exercise in. You've mentioned

0:08:42.596 --> 0:08:44.676
<v Speaker 1>a few times that you thought of it as engaging

0:08:44.716 --> 0:08:46.996
<v Speaker 1>with the ego. I've also heard you say this in

0:08:46.996 --> 0:08:48.916
<v Speaker 1>a few other interviews that you've given that I've listened to.

0:08:49.556 --> 0:08:52.756
<v Speaker 1>You've referred to the online persona, the Jilli's Black persona

0:08:52.796 --> 0:08:55.196
<v Speaker 1>as having a lot of quote unquote ego in it.

0:08:55.196 --> 0:08:59.156
<v Speaker 1>Your word, and it made me wonder, do you mean

0:08:59.156 --> 0:09:01.436
<v Speaker 1>to hint sort of that the persona in the book

0:09:01.516 --> 0:09:04.316
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the super ego, you know? And then

0:09:04.596 --> 0:09:06.476
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where the it fits into this exactly,

0:09:06.636 --> 0:09:09.116
<v Speaker 1>but you know it is playing a big role because

0:09:09.436 --> 0:09:12.076
<v Speaker 1>the way that the your persona in a way was

0:09:12.116 --> 0:09:14.916
<v Speaker 1>able to succeed just by saying stuff that everyone thinks

0:09:14.916 --> 0:09:16.796
<v Speaker 1>that no one says. And that's what it is all about, right,

0:09:16.836 --> 0:09:19.396
<v Speaker 1>It is all about doing the thing that you kind

0:09:19.396 --> 0:09:21.516
<v Speaker 1>of want to do. That everyone's telling you not to

0:09:21.556 --> 0:09:23.636
<v Speaker 1>do and then you just do it and it works.

0:09:23.796 --> 0:09:26.716
<v Speaker 1>So I was wondering if any of that was in play,

0:09:26.756 --> 0:09:30.676
<v Speaker 1>that kind of psychoanalytic troika was in play, or whether

0:09:30.956 --> 0:09:32.916
<v Speaker 1>you were using you go in a different, maybe more

0:09:32.996 --> 0:09:36.876
<v Speaker 1>vernacular way. I am using it in a more vernacular way.

0:09:36.916 --> 0:09:38.716
<v Speaker 1>But I think the way that you've described it as

0:09:38.716 --> 0:09:42.076
<v Speaker 1>also true. I think it's not just what I was saying.

0:09:42.116 --> 0:09:43.436
<v Speaker 1>I think it was also the way that I was

0:09:43.436 --> 0:09:48.036
<v Speaker 1>saying it, which was self righteously, which was doing it,

0:09:48.316 --> 0:09:50.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a way that the drama that I

0:09:50.276 --> 0:09:52.916
<v Speaker 1>had taken for many years allowed me to do it.

0:09:52.996 --> 0:09:57.716
<v Speaker 1>There was I was sort of I mean, I knew

0:09:57.876 --> 0:10:01.156
<v Speaker 1>that it could work, you know. So it's not like

0:10:01.196 --> 0:10:03.196
<v Speaker 1>I just fell into it and I hoped that it

0:10:03.276 --> 0:10:06.676
<v Speaker 1>would because I'm so noble. I also felt like if

0:10:06.756 --> 0:10:09.436
<v Speaker 1>I were at that time smart enough to get this

0:10:09.476 --> 0:10:12.436
<v Speaker 1>stuff out, it would be so universal that everybody would

0:10:12.436 --> 0:10:15.956
<v Speaker 1>love it. That also wasn't true. But yeah, the super

0:10:16.036 --> 0:10:19.156
<v Speaker 1>ego there, setting out to write this book and doing

0:10:19.316 --> 0:10:22.036
<v Speaker 1>unto myself is as I was doing on others, is

0:10:22.036 --> 0:10:24.836
<v Speaker 1>a great description of it. And I don't I don't

0:10:24.836 --> 0:10:27.836
<v Speaker 1>know that I need to label it anything other than

0:10:28.036 --> 0:10:31.076
<v Speaker 1>the attempt to do that that seems beautiful enough for me.

0:10:31.636 --> 0:10:34.676
<v Speaker 1>Why does nobody do this? I mean, why does nobody

0:10:35.116 --> 0:10:39.476
<v Speaker 1>do unto themselves what they do unto others. It's so

0:10:39.676 --> 0:10:44.596
<v Speaker 1>powerful and it's so honest, and it must, in some

0:10:44.676 --> 0:10:49.676
<v Speaker 1>ways feel like incredibly liberating, self liberating. Is it just

0:10:49.676 --> 0:10:52.636
<v Speaker 1>that we're all scared of what will happen of, you know,

0:10:52.716 --> 0:10:56.316
<v Speaker 1>like laying ourselves bear? What enabled you to do it?

0:10:57.676 --> 0:11:01.116
<v Speaker 1>What enabled me to do it was an accountability from

0:11:01.276 --> 0:11:05.356
<v Speaker 1>people that I trusted, who saw me as unhappy and

0:11:05.356 --> 0:11:08.196
<v Speaker 1>we're willing to disagree with me. People that I really

0:11:08.236 --> 0:11:11.436
<v Speaker 1>cared about, like my mother, who eventually was like, how

0:11:11.476 --> 0:11:13.676
<v Speaker 1>do you feel saying all of the stuff about white

0:11:13.716 --> 0:11:16.796
<v Speaker 1>people online? And you know, and of course it comes

0:11:16.836 --> 0:11:20.356
<v Speaker 1>with like blocking people, ignoring people, telling them all all

0:11:20.396 --> 0:11:26.676
<v Speaker 1>of the things that go along with social media. It's again,

0:11:27.876 --> 0:11:31.996
<v Speaker 1>I just I got exhausted, you know, and I couldn't

0:11:31.996 --> 0:11:35.556
<v Speaker 1>be myself, which is also exhausting. So I was hiding

0:11:36.116 --> 0:11:39.636
<v Speaker 1>all of this other stuff about myself, identity wise, maybe

0:11:39.676 --> 0:11:42.596
<v Speaker 1>even privilege wise, things that were really happening in the

0:11:42.676 --> 0:11:44.956
<v Speaker 1>rooms that I described. I was hiding all of it,

0:11:45.156 --> 0:11:48.916
<v Speaker 1>and that is very tiring, and so I derive a

0:11:48.916 --> 0:11:52.436
<v Speaker 1>lot of pleasure from getting to finally say, Okay, here's

0:11:52.476 --> 0:11:55.196
<v Speaker 1>what was going on behind the scene. So it's not

0:11:55.276 --> 0:11:58.596
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't come with benefits. But I also I

0:11:58.636 --> 0:12:00.356
<v Speaker 1>don't think that most people have to I think we're

0:12:00.356 --> 0:12:03.996
<v Speaker 1>fine with the persona, so you know, all right, maybe

0:12:03.996 --> 0:12:05.956
<v Speaker 1>it's it's waiting for somebody to go first. And I

0:12:05.956 --> 0:12:08.196
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm the first one to do this kind

0:12:08.236 --> 0:12:11.476
<v Speaker 1>of work. I think I'm amongst the first to do

0:12:11.516 --> 0:12:14.036
<v Speaker 1>it from the position that I held on the Internet.

0:12:14.676 --> 0:12:17.076
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about blocking, which I've heard

0:12:17.076 --> 0:12:19.996
<v Speaker 1>you referred to just now and other times. And I

0:12:20.076 --> 0:12:22.516
<v Speaker 1>was actually listening to in preparation for our conversation, I

0:12:22.556 --> 0:12:24.556
<v Speaker 1>was listening to a podcast interview that you had given,

0:12:24.996 --> 0:12:28.236
<v Speaker 1>and you talked about how you had a tendency, you know,

0:12:28.276 --> 0:12:32.156
<v Speaker 1>if someone was questioning what you were doing, you blocked them,

0:12:32.156 --> 0:12:35.356
<v Speaker 1>and it made me immediately want to ask you. Blocking

0:12:35.436 --> 0:12:37.516
<v Speaker 1>is like some new thing, right, it's a product of

0:12:37.556 --> 0:12:40.636
<v Speaker 1>social media. Before social media, we didn't have even the

0:12:40.676 --> 0:12:44.516
<v Speaker 1>concept really of blocking in this way. Is there a

0:12:44.556 --> 0:12:48.316
<v Speaker 1>special pleasure, human pleasure in the act of blocking, Like

0:12:48.356 --> 0:12:49.796
<v Speaker 1>did we like, do we need a German word to

0:12:50.036 --> 0:12:52.916
<v Speaker 1>describe that you need human pleasure? I think we always

0:12:52.996 --> 0:12:55.836
<v Speaker 1>need a German word to describe anything, first of all.

0:12:55.876 --> 0:13:00.276
<v Speaker 1>But I'd only blocked in the beginning. It was what

0:13:00.396 --> 0:13:03.556
<v Speaker 1>people did, and I did what people did, but I

0:13:03.596 --> 0:13:06.316
<v Speaker 1>didn't get enough pleasure out of that because then they

0:13:06.316 --> 0:13:09.956
<v Speaker 1>were gone. So eventually what I like to do is engage.

0:13:10.076 --> 0:13:13.356
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to screenshot it for my audience. So that

0:13:13.476 --> 0:13:16.476
<v Speaker 1>was step two, which was a lot of fun. Then

0:13:16.516 --> 0:13:19.916
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hey, chill, this is ridiculous and why

0:13:19.956 --> 0:13:21.916
<v Speaker 1>are you doing this and who are you performing for?

0:13:22.196 --> 0:13:25.996
<v Speaker 1>And so then I started engaging in the direct messages

0:13:26.116 --> 0:13:29.676
<v Speaker 1>with people. Again I derived pleasure from that also because

0:13:29.716 --> 0:13:31.956
<v Speaker 1>I got to use my brain to figure out why

0:13:31.956 --> 0:13:35.876
<v Speaker 1>they were the way that they were. So, you know, blocking, Yeah,

0:13:35.916 --> 0:13:39.916
<v Speaker 1>it's new, and these days I find it to be

0:13:39.996 --> 0:13:43.476
<v Speaker 1>very performative because people don't block in silence. They tell

0:13:43.596 --> 0:13:46.396
<v Speaker 1>us that they're going to do it, or they warn

0:13:46.636 --> 0:13:48.876
<v Speaker 1>us that they will. You know, I've seen a lot

0:13:48.916 --> 0:13:51.436
<v Speaker 1>of things go online where here's an example of who

0:13:51.516 --> 0:13:53.956
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be. Don't be this guy because

0:13:53.956 --> 0:13:56.516
<v Speaker 1>I told him off and then I blocked him. So

0:13:56.796 --> 0:13:58.796
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seems pretty performative, and I think it's

0:13:58.796 --> 0:14:00.796
<v Speaker 1>something we wish that we could do in real life.

0:14:00.796 --> 0:14:02.476
<v Speaker 1>But we only wish that we could do it in

0:14:02.476 --> 0:14:05.636
<v Speaker 1>real life because we've been doing it on social media. Probably,

0:14:05.756 --> 0:14:08.196
<v Speaker 1>But you've just say super suggestive, and it's something I've

0:14:08.196 --> 0:14:13.476
<v Speaker 1>actually wondered about. Whether our impulse to block people in

0:14:13.596 --> 0:14:17.996
<v Speaker 1>other formats in life might be derivative of the technology

0:14:18.036 --> 0:14:20.756
<v Speaker 1>in a way, right, Like, until arguably, until you could

0:14:21.316 --> 0:14:26.516
<v Speaker 1>block somebody as a technological matter, yes, you wouldn't think

0:14:26.676 --> 0:14:30.716
<v Speaker 1>of trying to block them at a that's a grander level.

0:14:30.876 --> 0:14:32.756
<v Speaker 1>You might think other things, I want to boycott them,

0:14:32.956 --> 0:14:34.636
<v Speaker 1>or you know, I don't want to ever hear their

0:14:34.716 --> 0:14:37.076
<v Speaker 1>names again. But then I wonder if you think that

0:14:37.116 --> 0:14:40.596
<v Speaker 1>there is some connection between our impulse collective impulse it's

0:14:40.636 --> 0:14:43.196
<v Speaker 1>right left center, it's everybody to sort of, you know,

0:14:43.276 --> 0:14:45.356
<v Speaker 1>silence people who are different from from we are in

0:14:45.396 --> 0:14:51.356
<v Speaker 1>this moment, and the actually technological capacity to block somebody,

0:14:51.396 --> 0:14:54.116
<v Speaker 1>Like did the person who invented the blocking button actually

0:14:54.156 --> 0:14:56.036
<v Speaker 1>have a bigger social impact than the person who invented

0:14:56.036 --> 0:14:59.436
<v Speaker 1>the like button? Oh? Great, I can't answer this question,

0:14:59.436 --> 0:15:01.956
<v Speaker 1>but I hope that you find a guest who can't

0:15:01.996 --> 0:15:05.876
<v Speaker 1>because I'm going to be listening. It seems impactful, and

0:15:05.956 --> 0:15:08.676
<v Speaker 1>of course you know it's hard to remove it from

0:15:08.756 --> 0:15:11.836
<v Speaker 1>cancer culture or whatever we're calling it today. That feels

0:15:11.876 --> 0:15:15.636
<v Speaker 1>better for us, but I think that it does feel

0:15:16.276 --> 0:15:20.276
<v Speaker 1>increasingly more threatening that we can block people in this way.

0:15:20.436 --> 0:15:22.876
<v Speaker 1>And I will not say threatening in my identities or

0:15:22.956 --> 0:15:25.596
<v Speaker 1>the society and how I'm treated. I just mean me

0:15:25.756 --> 0:15:27.876
<v Speaker 1>the human who showed up to this planet to do

0:15:27.956 --> 0:15:29.836
<v Speaker 1>some work and is now like, do I get to

0:15:29.916 --> 0:15:32.436
<v Speaker 1>do that within the confines of these rules of the

0:15:32.436 --> 0:15:36.276
<v Speaker 1>inorganic society? And I think we all have that human desire.

0:15:36.356 --> 0:15:38.756
<v Speaker 1>So when people say they're scared of cancel culture, maybe

0:15:38.756 --> 0:15:41.316
<v Speaker 1>we should get more specific and say, do I get

0:15:41.356 --> 0:15:43.276
<v Speaker 1>to be a full human here as long as this

0:15:43.636 --> 0:15:45.676
<v Speaker 1>thing exists? Not to say that I didn't make a

0:15:45.716 --> 0:15:47.796
<v Speaker 1>mistake or do something wrong, but do I get to recover,

0:15:47.916 --> 0:15:52.476
<v Speaker 1>bounce back? Do I continue having, you know, a human experience?

0:15:52.996 --> 0:15:55.516
<v Speaker 1>Do I get to learn? I don't know. So it

0:15:55.556 --> 0:16:09.596
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be intensifying. We'll be right back. One

0:16:09.636 --> 0:16:12.156
<v Speaker 1>of the phrases, Jill, that you use a lot that

0:16:12.196 --> 0:16:15.036
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in is being in the rooms or

0:16:15.036 --> 0:16:17.556
<v Speaker 1>in these rooms. And actually, the first time I heard

0:16:17.596 --> 0:16:19.916
<v Speaker 1>you say it, I was like, huh, Like, isn't that

0:16:19.956 --> 0:16:23.196
<v Speaker 1>an AA phrase? You know, the A people talk about

0:16:23.236 --> 0:16:24.876
<v Speaker 1>the rooms as sort of you know, the places where

0:16:24.876 --> 0:16:27.516
<v Speaker 1>the conversation happens. You're not using it that way. You're

0:16:27.556 --> 0:16:30.036
<v Speaker 1>more using it in the like lin Manuel Miranda, you

0:16:30.036 --> 0:16:33.196
<v Speaker 1>know the room where it happens kind of a space

0:16:33.756 --> 0:16:37.836
<v Speaker 1>where certain elites have a certain kind of conversation and

0:16:37.996 --> 0:16:42.156
<v Speaker 1>engage in a certain kind of social performance with each other. First,

0:16:42.196 --> 0:16:43.676
<v Speaker 1>I guess I want to know if I am hearing

0:16:43.756 --> 0:16:46.676
<v Speaker 1>you correctly when you use that formulation, and then I'm

0:16:46.756 --> 0:16:51.516
<v Speaker 1>really curious about why that is a subject of interest

0:16:51.556 --> 0:16:53.716
<v Speaker 1>to you you. It's a subject of total fascination to me

0:16:53.756 --> 0:16:55.556
<v Speaker 1>and it always has been, although I've never used that

0:16:55.596 --> 0:16:58.356
<v Speaker 1>particular phrase for it. It's sort of why this podcast

0:16:58.436 --> 0:17:00.516
<v Speaker 1>is called Deep Background, because I was interested in trying

0:17:00.556 --> 0:17:03.516
<v Speaker 1>to ask people about what happens in spaces of power

0:17:04.076 --> 0:17:07.636
<v Speaker 1>where the general public isn't allowed in, and then asking

0:17:07.676 --> 0:17:10.116
<v Speaker 1>people to say something about what's going on behind there.

0:17:10.636 --> 0:17:12.236
<v Speaker 1>But I want to know sort of am I getting you,

0:17:12.276 --> 0:17:14.876
<v Speaker 1>and also why you're so interested in that. Then we

0:17:14.876 --> 0:17:18.076
<v Speaker 1>can talk about what happens in the rooms. Yes, you

0:17:18.116 --> 0:17:21.596
<v Speaker 1>are getting me. However, you and I go into different rooms,

0:17:21.596 --> 0:17:25.636
<v Speaker 1>and we go into them differently. So as a black

0:17:25.756 --> 0:17:27.836
<v Speaker 1>queer woman going into the room, I have a lot

0:17:27.916 --> 0:17:30.756
<v Speaker 1>more on the line than you do, and my conversations

0:17:30.756 --> 0:17:33.356
<v Speaker 1>are different because I should know better. And the truth

0:17:33.516 --> 0:17:36.396
<v Speaker 1>is is if your group got to the place where

0:17:36.396 --> 0:17:38.196
<v Speaker 1>you keep saying you hope they get you wouldn't be

0:17:38.196 --> 0:17:40.436
<v Speaker 1>in the room anymore. And I don't see anybody giving

0:17:40.476 --> 0:17:45.996
<v Speaker 1>up any money, any vacations, any magazine covers anything, any homes.

0:17:46.036 --> 0:17:48.316
<v Speaker 1>But you should know better because you're part of the

0:17:48.356 --> 0:17:52.596
<v Speaker 1>group that you're saying is experiencing the greatest harm that's

0:17:52.596 --> 0:17:56.116
<v Speaker 1>out there. And so the steaks aren't as high, you know,

0:17:56.156 --> 0:17:59.196
<v Speaker 1>But if you had those steaks on your shoulders going

0:17:59.236 --> 0:18:01.756
<v Speaker 1>into the room, how could you ever forget It's not

0:18:01.836 --> 0:18:07.156
<v Speaker 1>just you know, toasting with whoever else is there. But

0:18:07.516 --> 0:18:10.596
<v Speaker 1>I do see that there is a conflict. There is

0:18:10.676 --> 0:18:12.636
<v Speaker 1>some kind of conflict, and we at least need to

0:18:12.676 --> 0:18:14.996
<v Speaker 1>talk about the conflict of But how could you be

0:18:15.116 --> 0:18:19.356
<v Speaker 1>you without them? So what I hear you saying, and

0:18:19.356 --> 0:18:22.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated by this and I'm learning a lot from it,

0:18:22.516 --> 0:18:28.036
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it imposes an incredibly high standard on yourself

0:18:28.356 --> 0:18:32.356
<v Speaker 1>and anyone else who would say, look, because of who

0:18:32.436 --> 0:18:34.796
<v Speaker 1>I am, I am supposed to be, and I am

0:18:34.796 --> 0:18:40.916
<v Speaker 1>profoundly aware of the demand for equality, the problematics of privilege. Right.

0:18:40.956 --> 0:18:42.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the room, as you're saying, as a black

0:18:42.476 --> 0:18:46.596
<v Speaker 1>queer woman. And yet if I really took that seriously,

0:18:46.596 --> 0:18:48.796
<v Speaker 1>there would be no rooms. Right, And I hear you

0:18:48.876 --> 0:18:50.716
<v Speaker 1>loud and clear and as a kind of calling bullshit.

0:18:50.716 --> 0:18:54.956
<v Speaker 1>It's incredibly powerful. But it also imposes, by implication, like

0:18:54.996 --> 0:19:00.276
<v Speaker 1>a higher standard on the intersectional representative person that it

0:19:00.356 --> 0:19:04.076
<v Speaker 1>imposes on anybody else. But I'm talking about the people

0:19:04.076 --> 0:19:06.076
<v Speaker 1>who are like me. Is it a high standard? I

0:19:06.076 --> 0:19:08.276
<v Speaker 1>do have a high standard now in my real life.

0:19:08.276 --> 0:19:11.156
<v Speaker 1>What I'm going to say is I just wish we

0:19:11.156 --> 0:19:13.476
<v Speaker 1>would say the truth if you want to be in there.

0:19:13.516 --> 0:19:16.156
<v Speaker 1>Because I wrote the book. I wrote the book, I

0:19:16.156 --> 0:19:19.436
<v Speaker 1>wrote the book proposal, I have an editor and agent.

0:19:19.636 --> 0:19:21.756
<v Speaker 1>All of that. I'm trying to sell it right now.

0:19:21.756 --> 0:19:25.036
<v Speaker 1>So all of that is me. Okay, that is happening

0:19:25.036 --> 0:19:27.396
<v Speaker 1>to me. I'm doing this interview right now. This to me,

0:19:27.876 --> 0:19:29.876
<v Speaker 1>I thought of that before I said I want to evolue.

0:19:30.036 --> 0:19:32.516
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, now I'm clearly part of the

0:19:32.596 --> 0:19:34.916
<v Speaker 1>system too. And I was like, all right, well that's true.

0:19:34.916 --> 0:19:37.796
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to avoid that, right, that would be bullshit.

0:19:37.956 --> 0:19:39.796
<v Speaker 1>But I think what I'm seeing is I find that

0:19:39.836 --> 0:19:42.996
<v Speaker 1>it's dangerous for us to not say that this is

0:19:43.036 --> 0:19:46.316
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, because then it imposes the higher standard on

0:19:46.596 --> 0:19:49.436
<v Speaker 1>people where it's like, oh, but keep lying and saying

0:19:49.436 --> 0:19:51.516
<v Speaker 1>that we're this moral and this nobel whatever, And I'm

0:19:51.556 --> 0:19:54.596
<v Speaker 1>looking to free people from the idea that you aren't

0:19:54.916 --> 0:19:57.316
<v Speaker 1>more complex than this, that it's just like we're going

0:19:57.396 --> 0:19:59.356
<v Speaker 1>to save the world. And also I'm in this room

0:19:59.356 --> 0:20:01.916
<v Speaker 1>just so lie about it. I just don't want you

0:20:01.956 --> 0:20:04.916
<v Speaker 1>to lie about it, because then we keep trying for

0:20:05.036 --> 0:20:08.596
<v Speaker 1>something that doesn't really exist as opposed to something that does.

0:20:09.196 --> 0:20:12.236
<v Speaker 1>Will be complicit. You will, if you want these things here,

0:20:12.236 --> 0:20:14.316
<v Speaker 1>you will be complicit. What does that look like for you?

0:20:14.516 --> 0:20:16.836
<v Speaker 1>It's the same as starting this off by saying I

0:20:16.916 --> 0:20:19.756
<v Speaker 1>engage with a million things every day that make me

0:20:19.996 --> 0:20:22.436
<v Speaker 1>just as complicit as anybody else. But if I get

0:20:22.716 --> 0:20:25.436
<v Speaker 1>a get out of jail free card for myself based

0:20:25.476 --> 0:20:27.996
<v Speaker 1>on identities, when I know that I know better that

0:20:28.036 --> 0:20:30.076
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. If you're just giving that to

0:20:30.076 --> 0:20:32.156
<v Speaker 1>me because you feel sorry that I have identities that

0:20:32.196 --> 0:20:35.396
<v Speaker 1>are harmed in again, inorganic society, then don't give it

0:20:35.396 --> 0:20:37.276
<v Speaker 1>to me at all. I am a human being. I

0:20:37.316 --> 0:20:41.036
<v Speaker 1>have enough intellect to say, oh, I'm being indulgent, or

0:20:41.036 --> 0:20:43.516
<v Speaker 1>oh I don't care about anybody else. So it's like

0:20:44.076 --> 0:20:46.356
<v Speaker 1>I do know better sometimes, and I trust that other

0:20:46.356 --> 0:20:48.756
<v Speaker 1>people know better more than they're saying, because I'm also

0:20:48.836 --> 0:20:51.676
<v Speaker 1>having those private conversations with them. You can go and

0:20:52.116 --> 0:20:55.276
<v Speaker 1>talk about this person who doesn't agree with you politically,

0:20:55.796 --> 0:20:59.396
<v Speaker 1>but you don't agree with you politically, so you know,

0:20:59.516 --> 0:21:01.636
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a self righteousness that I practice

0:21:01.676 --> 0:21:05.796
<v Speaker 1>online that yes, I am trying to remedy in society

0:21:05.796 --> 0:21:08.276
<v Speaker 1>because I contribute it to that. And so this first

0:21:08.276 --> 0:21:11.756
<v Speaker 1>book is really undoing part of what I have done,

0:21:11.876 --> 0:21:15.036
<v Speaker 1>which is create a harder world for people to be

0:21:15.116 --> 0:21:19.156
<v Speaker 1>honest about what they feel and think. There's a chapter

0:21:19.236 --> 0:21:22.916
<v Speaker 1>in the book which walks through like a DM based

0:21:22.916 --> 0:21:26.076
<v Speaker 1>conversation that you have with someone who's self presenting as

0:21:26.076 --> 0:21:30.836
<v Speaker 1>a proud boy so a white supremacist, and not only

0:21:30.836 --> 0:21:33.876
<v Speaker 1>do you give us an account of the conversation, you're like,

0:21:34.036 --> 0:21:38.636
<v Speaker 1>totally empathetically engaged with him, and you make some degree

0:21:38.636 --> 0:21:43.396
<v Speaker 1>of humanizing progress in which somehow it seems as though

0:21:43.396 --> 0:21:46.676
<v Speaker 1>it's at least possible that the two of you are

0:21:47.356 --> 0:21:51.196
<v Speaker 1>having some form of communication. Yet it also connects up

0:21:51.236 --> 0:21:54.236
<v Speaker 1>to this question of is it okay to be empathetic

0:21:54.236 --> 0:21:58.996
<v Speaker 1>to people who, at least by their persona, are reprehensible

0:21:59.196 --> 0:22:04.956
<v Speaker 1>and repugnant? Reprehensible or repugnant. Wow, when you have to

0:22:04.956 --> 0:22:08.316
<v Speaker 1>come back from that, that is really really hard. Yeah,

0:22:08.436 --> 0:22:13.716
<v Speaker 1>I am aligned with people that are reprehensible and repugnant.

0:22:14.796 --> 0:22:19.716
<v Speaker 1>So we find out about people that we believed in

0:22:20.396 --> 0:22:23.556
<v Speaker 1>every day now and we thought we were aligned with them,

0:22:23.556 --> 0:22:26.236
<v Speaker 1>and then they do this big, horrible thing and suddenly

0:22:26.276 --> 0:22:29.236
<v Speaker 1>we have to act like we were never in agreement

0:22:29.276 --> 0:22:30.996
<v Speaker 1>with it, where we never knew who they were, and

0:22:31.396 --> 0:22:34.876
<v Speaker 1>that's not working either. The truth of the matter is

0:22:34.956 --> 0:22:37.876
<v Speaker 1>is we had a conversation. It is a civil conversation.

0:22:38.596 --> 0:22:41.156
<v Speaker 1>In the chapter, by saying nope doesn't mean you can

0:22:41.196 --> 0:22:43.916
<v Speaker 1>do it all the time with everybody, or that I

0:22:43.956 --> 0:22:46.676
<v Speaker 1>have some special skill with this person the things that

0:22:46.716 --> 0:22:50.276
<v Speaker 1>are said to me reprehensible and repugnant. Sure, and he

0:22:50.356 --> 0:22:53.076
<v Speaker 1>believed them, and I believe what I believe, and there's

0:22:53.116 --> 0:22:56.516
<v Speaker 1>some stuff that I've believed that has been pretty horrible,

0:22:56.676 --> 0:22:59.996
<v Speaker 1>not as extreme, definitely, And well, I guess it's not

0:23:00.036 --> 0:23:03.636
<v Speaker 1>my job to say is dangerous, but I've believed things,

0:23:03.676 --> 0:23:05.836
<v Speaker 1>and I don't understand why we keep talking to people

0:23:05.876 --> 0:23:11.236
<v Speaker 1>who believe what they believe, Like he's going off of

0:23:11.276 --> 0:23:14.756
<v Speaker 1>his own belief system, and so all I can really

0:23:14.796 --> 0:23:16.796
<v Speaker 1>do is talk to him in a way where I

0:23:16.876 --> 0:23:20.676
<v Speaker 1>gain information. I'm obsessed with this idea of how one

0:23:20.716 --> 0:23:24.196
<v Speaker 1>talks to people who really really believe something when that

0:23:24.236 --> 0:23:27.676
<v Speaker 1>thing is wrong on some dimension, you know, factually wrong,

0:23:27.876 --> 0:23:29.556
<v Speaker 1>then how do you get people to not think of

0:23:29.596 --> 0:23:33.956
<v Speaker 1>the thing is factually wrong, morally or ethically wrong, even

0:23:34.036 --> 0:23:36.596
<v Speaker 1>esthetically wrong, like someone just has terrible taste in something

0:23:36.596 --> 0:23:38.836
<v Speaker 1>and you want to talk them out of it. And

0:23:38.876 --> 0:23:42.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally obsessed with this question. And I always say

0:23:42.796 --> 0:23:44.356
<v Speaker 1>when people ask me, like, well, how do you try

0:23:44.356 --> 0:23:45.716
<v Speaker 1>to do that? And I do try to do it,

0:23:46.156 --> 0:23:48.716
<v Speaker 1>I always say, well, I start by trying to figure

0:23:48.756 --> 0:23:52.276
<v Speaker 1>out what that person believes his or her big picture

0:23:52.396 --> 0:23:56.156
<v Speaker 1>values are, and then try to suggest that it maybe

0:23:56.156 --> 0:23:58.276
<v Speaker 1>would be more consistent with their beliefs or values to

0:23:58.356 --> 0:24:00.876
<v Speaker 1>think some other thing. And I think the whole thing

0:24:00.996 --> 0:24:03.636
<v Speaker 1>is like trying on clothes, you know, in a mall

0:24:03.756 --> 0:24:05.596
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, back when people did that, right,

0:24:05.636 --> 0:24:07.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, all you can ever really do is try

0:24:07.276 --> 0:24:09.636
<v Speaker 1>on a garment and say to a person, hey, try

0:24:09.636 --> 0:24:11.436
<v Speaker 1>this on, look in the marri and see if you

0:24:11.516 --> 0:24:15.636
<v Speaker 1>like who you are in this garment. And if you do, hey, man,

0:24:15.876 --> 0:24:18.236
<v Speaker 1>you might want to buy it. And if not, fair

0:24:18.356 --> 0:24:21.516
<v Speaker 1>enough like walk away. And I have this, I guess

0:24:21.596 --> 0:24:25.076
<v Speaker 1>naive fantasy that by doing that sometimes you can get

0:24:25.116 --> 0:24:28.956
<v Speaker 1>people to re examine. And I have the feeling that

0:24:29.036 --> 0:24:30.956
<v Speaker 1>if I ask you that you would say, yeah, that's

0:24:30.956 --> 0:24:33.756
<v Speaker 1>really that's very naive or that's not like the right

0:24:33.756 --> 0:24:36.596
<v Speaker 1>way to go about it. But maybe I'm misreading that

0:24:36.796 --> 0:24:39.756
<v Speaker 1>the way you related to your own conversation in that chapter.

0:24:40.796 --> 0:24:42.836
<v Speaker 1>I actually do have genuine hope, and that it's just

0:24:42.876 --> 0:24:48.476
<v Speaker 1>scary to say, I feel like I am, you know,

0:24:48.796 --> 0:24:51.316
<v Speaker 1>saying something that could get me canceled to say that

0:24:51.356 --> 0:24:54.196
<v Speaker 1>I have hope almost in a group of people, but

0:24:54.276 --> 0:24:58.516
<v Speaker 1>I do. That's the genuine answer, is that I felt

0:24:59.076 --> 0:25:02.396
<v Speaker 1>better even though he was saying things that I imagined

0:25:02.476 --> 0:25:06.716
<v Speaker 1>he would say to me that we're terrible. I still

0:25:06.716 --> 0:25:09.596
<v Speaker 1>felt better afterwards. First of all, I had a firsthand count.

0:25:09.636 --> 0:25:12.716
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in the book, I say that we

0:25:12.756 --> 0:25:15.476
<v Speaker 1>sort of thank each other after this, and we're very

0:25:15.516 --> 0:25:19.636
<v Speaker 1>like polite with each other. And I see some hope

0:25:19.636 --> 0:25:22.716
<v Speaker 1>in it. I see some hope in that because I've changed.

0:25:23.596 --> 0:25:25.436
<v Speaker 1>I've changed that I have to believe in that for

0:25:25.476 --> 0:25:28.036
<v Speaker 1>someone else or else, I think that I'm bigger than

0:25:28.116 --> 0:25:30.556
<v Speaker 1>someone else, or that I have more awareness than someone else,

0:25:30.596 --> 0:25:32.276
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's true, or else I'm setting

0:25:32.276 --> 0:25:34.756
<v Speaker 1>myself up for another ego battle. But if I change,

0:25:34.796 --> 0:25:37.236
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, he can, and I can change from that

0:25:37.276 --> 0:25:39.916
<v Speaker 1>conversation too. I can learn to talk to people differently.

0:25:39.996 --> 0:25:43.076
<v Speaker 1>So it was reciprocal and we both got something. And

0:25:43.156 --> 0:25:45.756
<v Speaker 1>maybe we don't get the nice shiny bow on it

0:25:45.796 --> 0:25:47.476
<v Speaker 1>that people would like to say that we got we

0:25:47.596 --> 0:25:51.596
<v Speaker 1>solved racism, but we got something, and these days, why not.

0:25:52.156 --> 0:25:55.316
<v Speaker 1>It's getting so out of control you might as well try.

0:25:55.516 --> 0:25:57.196
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of this is that I

0:25:57.276 --> 0:26:00.356
<v Speaker 1>might as well try while I'm here because the other

0:26:00.436 --> 0:26:04.716
<v Speaker 1>isn't working. Being negative about everything that I see out there,

0:26:04.716 --> 0:26:08.276
<v Speaker 1>calling everything problematic, or saying that everybody is evil except

0:26:08.276 --> 0:26:11.356
<v Speaker 1>for me, seems like I think I live a really big, important,

0:26:11.396 --> 0:26:14.396
<v Speaker 1>magic life, and I don't. I think I'm here with

0:26:14.436 --> 0:26:16.956
<v Speaker 1>other people who are in all of their own stuff

0:26:16.996 --> 0:26:18.436
<v Speaker 1>and all of their own trauma, and all of their

0:26:18.476 --> 0:26:20.556
<v Speaker 1>own belief systems, and we're doing it together, whether we

0:26:20.596 --> 0:26:23.156
<v Speaker 1>like it or not. I absolutely have that hope. It

0:26:23.276 --> 0:26:27.436
<v Speaker 1>is scary, but I'd like to have it anyway. I

0:26:27.436 --> 0:26:29.636
<v Speaker 1>find that profoundly moving. In at the same time that

0:26:29.676 --> 0:26:31.236
<v Speaker 1>I say that, I'm afraid that if I say it's

0:26:31.236 --> 0:26:34.356
<v Speaker 1>profoundly moving, like I screw it up for you. I

0:26:34.396 --> 0:26:40.356
<v Speaker 1>want to close by asking you about so far what

0:26:40.396 --> 0:26:44.876
<v Speaker 1>you've experienced as the downsides of honesty relative to the

0:26:44.956 --> 0:26:48.556
<v Speaker 1>upsides you write in the book about being aware that

0:26:48.596 --> 0:26:50.396
<v Speaker 1>there could be a lot of downsides to talking in

0:26:50.436 --> 0:26:53.036
<v Speaker 1>the honest way that you're doing it now. Book's been

0:26:53.036 --> 0:26:56.396
<v Speaker 1>out for a bit more than a month. Seems to

0:26:56.436 --> 0:26:59.676
<v Speaker 1>be in my world, at least the people who read

0:26:59.716 --> 0:27:02.596
<v Speaker 1>it love it and are really interested in it. Have

0:27:02.756 --> 0:27:05.756
<v Speaker 1>you been experiencing any of the downsides of this kind

0:27:05.756 --> 0:27:09.396
<v Speaker 1>of honesty yet or is it sort of like its

0:27:09.436 --> 0:27:12.796
<v Speaker 1>own reward to be honest like this so far it's

0:27:12.836 --> 0:27:16.596
<v Speaker 1>its own reward. I think that the people who don't

0:27:16.636 --> 0:27:18.876
<v Speaker 1>love it I expected wouldn't love it, and so that

0:27:18.956 --> 0:27:21.796
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me. But for the most part, it's

0:27:21.836 --> 0:27:24.836
<v Speaker 1>been well received. At least the people who are reaching

0:27:24.836 --> 0:27:28.476
<v Speaker 1>out to me have received it well. And yeah, that

0:27:28.556 --> 0:27:31.236
<v Speaker 1>gives me some hope. First of all, I finally get

0:27:31.436 --> 0:27:36.236
<v Speaker 1>to go out into the world with vulnerability, like the

0:27:36.276 --> 0:27:38.436
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability that's present in this book. That's new for me.

0:27:39.276 --> 0:27:42.636
<v Speaker 1>I've been hiding behind us smug persona for a very

0:27:42.676 --> 0:27:46.716
<v Speaker 1>long time, and now I feel very exposed in a way.

0:27:46.756 --> 0:27:48.716
<v Speaker 1>That is a relief. But also when I meet people

0:27:48.996 --> 0:27:50.956
<v Speaker 1>and we connect around this book, it feels like a

0:27:50.996 --> 0:27:53.756
<v Speaker 1>real connection. It doesn't feel like that same thing where

0:27:53.756 --> 0:27:57.036
<v Speaker 1>we believe the same six things and now you love me. No,

0:27:57.196 --> 0:28:01.036
<v Speaker 1>it feels like we're connecting around something deeper. It's been

0:28:01.116 --> 0:28:03.796
<v Speaker 1>kind of amazing, actually better than I thought it would

0:28:03.796 --> 0:28:07.236
<v Speaker 1>have gone. And so I guess that's the part of

0:28:07.276 --> 0:28:08.996
<v Speaker 1>the book that I got wrong is all of my

0:28:09.156 --> 0:28:11.196
<v Speaker 1>I doubt that it was going to be such a

0:28:12.436 --> 0:28:14.676
<v Speaker 1>I don't know something that turned people against me, and

0:28:15.036 --> 0:28:17.316
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't true, and so I would say, well great

0:28:17.476 --> 0:28:21.156
<v Speaker 1>to everybody else. I think that this could bring us

0:28:21.196 --> 0:28:24.076
<v Speaker 1>closer or whatever your honesty is, I think there's the

0:28:24.156 --> 0:28:26.316
<v Speaker 1>chance that could bring you closer to people, not further away.

0:28:26.356 --> 0:28:28.436
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't believe that going in. So that's a

0:28:28.556 --> 0:28:32.916
<v Speaker 1>huge lesson for me. Some humility in like, no, what

0:28:32.956 --> 0:28:36.516
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is also not so big, and you know

0:28:36.716 --> 0:28:39.156
<v Speaker 1>knew that it's going to create the splash you thought

0:28:39.196 --> 0:28:42.196
<v Speaker 1>it would either maybe it'll be just a soft sort

0:28:42.236 --> 0:28:45.436
<v Speaker 1>of hug of a book. So yeah, I feel very hopeful.

0:28:46.316 --> 0:28:49.156
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for writing a book that is unflinchingly honest.

0:28:49.436 --> 0:28:51.716
<v Speaker 1>And if it is a soft hug of a book,

0:28:51.716 --> 0:28:53.556
<v Speaker 1>it's a soft hug from someone who knows how to

0:28:53.596 --> 0:28:55.836
<v Speaker 1>call bullshit. But I really want to I want to

0:28:55.876 --> 0:28:58.476
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I want to recommend the book to listeners.

0:28:58.516 --> 0:29:02.156
<v Speaker 1>De Louis buzbys unfollow me Essays on Complicity, which is

0:29:02.996 --> 0:29:05.116
<v Speaker 1>the most honest book that you will read this year,

0:29:05.596 --> 0:29:08.636
<v Speaker 1>and I think of genuine value to all of us

0:29:08.756 --> 0:29:11.556
<v Speaker 1>in a moment where little self reflection can go a

0:29:11.596 --> 0:29:13.516
<v Speaker 1>long way. Thank you very much, and I hope when

0:29:13.556 --> 0:29:17.476
<v Speaker 1>you have your ethic of Postcomplicity ready book form or otherwise,

0:29:17.476 --> 0:29:18.916
<v Speaker 1>you'll come back and we can talk more about it.

0:29:18.996 --> 0:29:21.796
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it and thank you for reading and sharing

0:29:21.796 --> 0:29:35.036
<v Speaker 1>this book. We'll be right back. As I listened to

0:29:35.116 --> 0:29:39.356
<v Speaker 1>Jill Louise Busby, I had the constant feeling that you

0:29:39.436 --> 0:29:43.516
<v Speaker 1>get when you're listening to a genuine intellectual working out

0:29:43.596 --> 0:29:47.716
<v Speaker 1>a very complex set of issues. In Jill's case, the

0:29:47.876 --> 0:29:51.716
<v Speaker 1>format in which she's been working on fundamental questions of

0:29:51.796 --> 0:29:58.196
<v Speaker 1>human connection, honesty, authenticity, race, and bullshit is the format

0:29:58.276 --> 0:30:02.636
<v Speaker 1>of our contemporary lives, the world of diversity and inclusion,

0:30:02.956 --> 0:30:06.476
<v Speaker 1>the persona that we produce on social media, and now

0:30:06.716 --> 0:30:10.796
<v Speaker 1>the literary reflection on all of that, complete with calling

0:30:10.876 --> 0:30:15.836
<v Speaker 1>attention to the honesties and dishonesties of the self. In

0:30:15.876 --> 0:30:18.956
<v Speaker 1>a way, almost all great essayists all the way back

0:30:18.956 --> 0:30:23.556
<v Speaker 1>to Montaigne have been interested in exactly this phenomenon. Where

0:30:23.756 --> 0:30:27.236
<v Speaker 1>is the truth as I depict it about myself? Where

0:30:27.356 --> 0:30:29.356
<v Speaker 1>is the truth as I try to depict it with

0:30:29.436 --> 0:30:32.156
<v Speaker 1>reference to the rest of the world. What Jill is

0:30:32.196 --> 0:30:37.956
<v Speaker 1>profoundly adding to that frame is her searing willingness to

0:30:38.116 --> 0:30:42.236
<v Speaker 1>be honest and to call bullshit on every institutional actor

0:30:42.356 --> 0:30:45.716
<v Speaker 1>in our current world who is trying to make sense

0:30:45.716 --> 0:30:48.236
<v Speaker 1>of things and, at least in principle, to make the

0:30:48.276 --> 0:30:53.196
<v Speaker 1>world a better place. Her standard is high, so high

0:30:53.236 --> 0:30:55.996
<v Speaker 1>that I could certainly never survive it, and so high

0:30:56.076 --> 0:30:59.516
<v Speaker 1>that she herself, subjecting herself to that level of scrutiny,

0:30:59.876 --> 0:31:04.596
<v Speaker 1>finds herself wanting as well. And yet from this analysis

0:31:04.956 --> 0:31:07.516
<v Speaker 1>comes not a throw your hands up in the air

0:31:07.556 --> 0:31:13.116
<v Speaker 1>and give up, but rather a radically reformulated possibility of

0:31:13.156 --> 0:31:18.596
<v Speaker 1>communication and connection and something that Jill herself was not

0:31:18.716 --> 0:31:22.716
<v Speaker 1>afraid to call hope. All of that in a moment.

0:31:22.756 --> 0:31:26.956
<v Speaker 1>Where As Jill herself suggests, just saying that you might

0:31:26.996 --> 0:31:31.116
<v Speaker 1>be hopeful is itself an invitation for somebody to be

0:31:31.476 --> 0:31:35.236
<v Speaker 1>very frustrated with you. They say that every society gets

0:31:35.236 --> 0:31:38.276
<v Speaker 1>the government that it deserves, well, it may also be

0:31:38.316 --> 0:31:41.596
<v Speaker 1>true that every historical moment gets the intellectual life that

0:31:41.636 --> 0:31:45.756
<v Speaker 1>it deserves. Measured by that criterion, I don't always think

0:31:45.796 --> 0:31:48.596
<v Speaker 1>that our current era is doing that well, but hearing

0:31:48.716 --> 0:31:54.196
<v Speaker 1>Jill gives me some hope. Genuine thinkers with genuinely remarkable

0:31:54.276 --> 0:31:57.796
<v Speaker 1>ideas have the capacity to shape the way we are

0:31:57.796 --> 0:32:00.876
<v Speaker 1>thinking about some of the hard problems that face us.

0:32:00.916 --> 0:32:05.716
<v Speaker 1>All until the next time I speak to you, breathe deep, think,

0:32:05.756 --> 0:32:09.276
<v Speaker 1>deep thoughts, and if it gives you some hope, have

0:32:09.316 --> 0:32:13.516
<v Speaker 1>a little fun. If you're a regular listener, you know

0:32:13.716 --> 0:32:17.196
<v Speaker 1>I love communicating with you here on Deep Background. I

0:32:17.236 --> 0:32:20.636
<v Speaker 1>also really want that communication to run both ways. I

0:32:20.716 --> 0:32:22.756
<v Speaker 1>want to know what you think are the most important

0:32:22.796 --> 0:32:25.636
<v Speaker 1>stories of the moment and what kinds of guests you

0:32:25.636 --> 0:32:28.516
<v Speaker 1>think you would be useful to hear from. More So,

0:32:28.556 --> 0:32:32.076
<v Speaker 1>I'm opening a new channel of communication. To access it,

0:32:32.396 --> 0:32:35.676
<v Speaker 1>just go to my website Noah Dashfelman dot com. You

0:32:35.716 --> 0:32:38.556
<v Speaker 1>can sign up from my newsletter and you can tell

0:32:38.596 --> 0:32:41.836
<v Speaker 1>me exactly what's on your mind, something that would be

0:32:41.916 --> 0:32:45.396
<v Speaker 1>really valuable to me and I hope to you too.

0:32:46.916 --> 0:32:50.036
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our

0:32:50.076 --> 0:32:53.676
<v Speaker 1>producer is mo La Board, our engineer is Bentaladay, and

0:32:53.756 --> 0:32:58.636
<v Speaker 1>our showrunner is Sophie Crane mckibbn. Editorial support from noahm Osband.

0:32:59.156 --> 0:33:03.316
<v Speaker 1>Theme music by Luis Garat at Pushkin. Thanks to Mia Lobell,

0:33:03.596 --> 0:33:08.316
<v Speaker 1>Julia Barton, Lydia Jane Cott, Heather Faine, Carlie mcgliori, Maggie

0:33:08.316 --> 0:33:12.076
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Xandler, and Jacob Weisberg. You can find me on

0:33:12.116 --> 0:33:15.116
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Noah R. Feldman. I also write a column

0:33:15.116 --> 0:33:17.916
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion, which you can find at bloomberg dot

0:33:17.916 --> 0:33:22.756
<v Speaker 1>com slash Feldman. To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts,

0:33:22.956 --> 0:33:26.916
<v Speaker 1>go to bloomberg dot com slash podcasts and if you

0:33:26.956 --> 0:33:29.516
<v Speaker 1>liked what you've heard today, please write a review or

0:33:29.556 --> 0:33:32.396
<v Speaker 1>tell a friend. This is deep background