WEBVTT - Markets, Streaming, And Crypto (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. A lot for the

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>markets to digest here right in the teeth of earning season.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>We've got the ECB meeting tomorrow, the FED. We're gonna

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>get at something in July, I believe, is the dates

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of lots for this market to digest. To take a

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>step back and put it on into perspective, Luca Paolini,

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>chief strategist for pick Ta Asset Management based in London.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>He joins us, Luca, as we stand back here and

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>start to really get into the teeth of this earning season.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect to hear from companies? What are

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you looking for? What are you kind of paying attention

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to during these earnest conference calls that we're all listening to.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>What morning everyone, Well, I think you know the we

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>tend to focus a lot on what company is gonna

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the consumer, I think we should actually

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.199
<v Speaker 1>look at investment because investment normally is the real driver

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>would really create a recession. So I think from the

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer we know pretty much the fundamentals. We know what

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>can go right, what can wrong. I think the real

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for me the question mark and what I want to

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>know if companies are holding back on investment, if they

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are reduced in accounts, and I think in this especially

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>discerning season, we actually expectations are quite low. I want

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to see the guidance and when I see companies telling

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>us we are company enough or not company enough to

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>basically expand, to increase basically to two to hire people,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's for me, would be the focus because I

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>think on the consumer we pretty much know the story.

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think for on investments it's being very strong. And

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is to me is the key things

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to watch, not so much the residence or not of

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. Are I haven't seen evidence that companies are

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>holding path, that they're waiting to make that decision. And

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on the on the fringe, certainly on the West Coast,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>starting to reduce at least the pace of hiring or

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>even cut back on headcount. Well we've seen obviously apple

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>in the data. When you look at for example, capital

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>good orders, I seen an outcome high. What is what

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>has happened though that investment expectations or plans have been

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>cut significantly, So again there is this kind of the

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>data still looks very, very solid. I think, though I

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>can see at the margin um some significant potentially reduction investment.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But again that's where that's why I'm waiting for companies

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to tell us, because I think it's clear that momentum

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is lowing. But it's also clear that you know, you

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want to basically get rid of people, and it's

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so difficult then to rehire them. So I think it's

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>very important for me to have a sense if companies

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are confident enough and and I think that's the key point.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Looka here at Bloomberg, we really take a global view.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Our audience takes a global view. We have important day

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>from the European Central Bank tomorrow. What are you looking for? UM?

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the European Central Bank as this incredible ability

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to disappoint UM. In the past two occasion when they

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>create in July we had a recession. I think this

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>time they'll have no other choice. I don't think that

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate, I I think it's more like, to

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>be honest, for me, it's more likely to be fifty

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>bus this point, because I think they want to send

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the message that they have in prestion under control, and

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same time they want to send a signal

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're there to help the terriphery. So probably that

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a compromise that will emerge from from the council.

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five or fifty bus point, I think it's pretty

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>much the same. I don't think it would change anything.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think also they're they're forced to take action,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the Europe pretty much a parity inflation

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>going through the roof, I think that to take action,

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it's going to be a huge

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>market mover. I don't think that would make a big, big, big,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>big difference for markets, to be honest with you. We

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>saw the euro at least rally back through a dollar

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>up to one oh three, one or two. Right now,

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Um does that kind of hold or do you see

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>continued dollar strength here? I mean I'm looking across the spectrum.

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Right one, we're back up to the pound. Um still

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>one thirty eight for the end, so still incredible weakness there.

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But does does d x Y continue to rise? But

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I I do believe that the dollar is very very

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>close to a major peak, secretical and and and also strategic.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But you need, though, I think, to two things. What

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>clear indication that you have inflation of peak. I think

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it does, but this is not the view of everyone.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And second one we need to see a clear reacceleration

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>in China, where the evidence is also not for people,

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is strong. So I do believe, and you'll be surprised

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>at what I'm saying, is that the currency which has

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>them what upside here is the end, the end, because

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the end that's been effectively killed by what but interest

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>rate expectations going up everywhere else apart from Japan. And

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and if the reason if the global economies leaps into

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>recession the interest really differential, we go actually in favor

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of Japan. And given that the expectation are solo and

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>evaluations were attractive, I think and all sounds strange that

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese end could be the big surprise in the

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>next three to six months for the year. I think

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>there are too many risks in terms of the war

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine, d C be Italy I think it's probably

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit too early to be bullish on

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Europe. Look at real quick at thirty seconds happened

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. It's been a brutal first half of the year.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Any opportunities there, Yes, there are, There are in some

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets like Brazil. I think also in some parts

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of the of the credit market. Corporate depth, especially in

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>the US, Triple A names saved names, good yelds. I

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>think still solid in a way, solely fundamental. Yeah, we

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>start to see some values again, especially in the US

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and some parts of YEM, but we stay away from Europe.

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, Luca, great stuff. Always appreciate getting your perspective.

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Luca Paolini, chief strategist for picked A Asset Management. He

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is based in London. Why does everyone hate rats so much?

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Are they worse than squirrels or chipmunks? Yes? What did

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you say? Did you say poop? Yeah? I don't think

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you can say that. No, I'm not sure, but we'll check.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Ken Fell. You says, maybe that's okay, okay. Our director,

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>our global director, Ken Fellow says, you can, but let's not.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's not. Let's know that's a brutal story, all right,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jarrett, thank you so much. Here are we got

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a Federal Reserve meeting coming up, said July. I think

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the big one, Jennifer Leasy, and your economist, managing

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>director of Demo Capital Markets joins us. Jennifer, I mean

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we're in the midst of earning season. That's kind of

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>got investors intention here. Um, but again, we know that

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the real focus is on this Federal Reserve as we

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>think about inflation, as we think about recession. What do

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you expect from our federal reserve? Good morning? And by

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, just on one funn'l know what you're saying earlier,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>how about raccoons? Yes, for the FT, I mean so

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Federal Reserve, I mean we so we expect

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a seventy five basis point Ray hike, Um, jesus next

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we call already, UM. I don't think um a lot

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of people anymore are thinking about a risk of a

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred basis point move, just given that we've seen the

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>softer data lately. UM. In terms of what he the

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed Area is going to say, I think he's I

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>would expect him to soften his um, his his points

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about the economy. I mean, last time we heard from

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>him was that was in Centrup, Portugal, and he was

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about how the US economy was in strong shape

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and well positioned to withstand tighter monetary policy. And I

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>still think that second point is probably still valid. But

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have again seen some weakening, you know,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for example in the housing market, some slightly softer you

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>know UM retail sales data last week, and those are

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the pieces of data that Governor Waller was what was

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about referring to in terms of what he was

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>going to how he was going to vote next week.

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think centified basis points is probably the base

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>case UM right now, and maybe soft softening is too

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on the economy. By the way, I

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have a bet with Critty Gupta um dinner of her

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>choice that inflation has peaked. I think it. I think

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>nine point one percent was the high rating for cp I.

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think I'm at risk of losing that bet? Boy?

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I hope it is UM. But I think over the

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>next few months the the yar year comfortables might get

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a little tougher UM. But I think for the July

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>CPI UM report probably gonna see it pulled back, probably

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>probably below the nine percent level, just given that gas

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>prices to have. You know, we had some relief on

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the on that front at least, but again, broader measures,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean broader measures in terms of the core measures

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>are still quite elevated as well. So I don't know

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>if they have completely hit the peak. But we've been

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>saying Q three and I think I've been saying September ish,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sort of waffling on that front, but you

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm really hoping that n would be the peak. Jennifer,

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of this U S dollar? I mean,

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the highest if you look at the d X

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Y and next the highest and almost twenty years kind

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of thing they almos put that into perspective and kind

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of how you think things may play out. Don't afford.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It's got a lot of it still has a lot

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of tail winds behind it, just given you know how

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>aggressive the FED is planning is still planning to be,

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, um raising rates expeditiously, and then when you're

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at it versus you know, for example, the euro

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>even though you know everyone's expecting or we are all

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>expecting the easy of you to do something tomorrow, you know,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>as your last guest said, you know, they have a

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>habit of disappointing. Um. You know, this is probably a

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity for them to prove everybody wrong. But if

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't, you know, we could see you know, the

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>euro dip below parody again. Um, the pound. Also, it

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>is getting a little bit of a tailwind this morning,

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time it also has a lot

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>of headwinds facing it with potentially eleven percent inflation coming up,

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and of course you know, much slower growth in the

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>second half with inflation so high. So I think because

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of that, just us all broadly, I think still has

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>some life left in it. By the way, there are

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>many words we cannot use on radio to describe the

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>European situation this winter. How much trouble is that economy

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in It's uh, that's one reach one area that I'm

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about, just because of that huge heavy reliance

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>for too long, um on Russian energy. And even though

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they are now finally trying to rid themselves of that

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>reliance by cutting cutting their their their dependents by two

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thirds by the end of the year. You know, I

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>would consume you say, good luck with that trying to

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>build all those lergy terminals when you're still having a

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>big shortage of supplies and of labor. Um. But this

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is the one point in time in my life I

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>will say that maybe it's a good thing that there's

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>uh climate change um and global warming because hopefully the

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>winter will not be really really bad and you know,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>and so the gas usage will not be as high

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know as the worst case scenario. But you know,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this is one area that that for sure, I'm quite

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. Thirty seconds left gen Um, what's your recession

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of expectation? Is it above the US? For the US? Yeah, um,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit over Um. We actually have a

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>negative sign pencilion for the early next year. Um. Maybe

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>not you know your traditional um two quarters in a

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>row of negative growth, but certainly much flower growth, almost

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like a growth recession, as we have unemployment taking up

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit as well towards the end of this

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>year and next. All right, Jennifer Lee, thank you so much.

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate getting your thoughts here. Jennifer Lee, Senior

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Economist and Managing director bemo Accoumpital Markets. Again the ECB

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>meeting tomorrow, Bloomberg surveillance will be all over that in

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>your early morning coverage you can rushed to short there

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and then of course we will definitely overcover the ECB.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>We love the e c B. Well, Christine looks some

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of us love it. Yeah, some of us love it.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But again, certainly for European listeners and viewers, a big,

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>big meeting tomorrow will certainly have all that. Looking at Netflix,

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I reported some numbers last night. I think the takeaway

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was it could have been worse. Um. Looking at the stock,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the good news is it's up four percent today. The

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>bad news is down on a year to date basis.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's break it all down with Mark Douglas, President CEO

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of Mountain. Mountain is an advertising software company enabling brands

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to drive measurable conversions, revenue and site visits. So Mark

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>owned by owned by Ryan Reynolds, acquired Ryan Reynolds Creative Agency. Okay,

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>so Mark, how do we say this? I guess not

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>owned by but you got together with Ryan Reynolds. Yeah,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Ryan um chief creative officer or a Mountain. So he

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Um has made a lot of movies and I didn't

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>want to do some other things, and he and I

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>teamed up and he worked in Mountain working with a

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of our customers and obviously it's business strategy. So

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's see I said it wrong. I said Mountain was

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>owned by Ryan Reynolds. Actually Mountain bought Ryan Reynolds exactly

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly the work maximum method, Yeah, maximum effort. I'm kidding,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, Mark, So again Netflix numbers last You know,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the tide has changed here. It's not, you know, grow

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>at a breakneck speed kind of thing. They're trying to

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>adjust to a new world order in terms of a

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more competition that maybe the easy growth in terms

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of subscriber growth is is done. What did you take

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>away from their results last night? Well, I think the

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing to take away is they still are twice

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as large as any of the competitors in terms of

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>number of subscribers. So the number of subscribers is clearly slowed.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Netflix people are are responding. Actually I think

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>a bit more to how quickly they're responding, announcing the

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ads business, announcing um new ways of doing passwords sharing

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that that generate revenues for them. And so I think

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that's the big too, that overshadow that there's still been

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>some subscriber losses in the quarter. And I think you'll

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to see that there's some growth in the stock

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as people see them acting decisively. Okay, Mark, how about

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this advertising opportunity for Netflix? Um a lot of analysts

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Walsherter saying this could be a big deal

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the new source of revenue. How do

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Yeah, absolutely so. I think the

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here is it can be as potentially as large

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as Netflix's current revenues. So they have as much as

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of all viewing a TV has tone on Netflix. So

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just a huge amount of user engagement people watching

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>shows on Netflix that they can potentially monitor size. Now,

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some challenges. All that content wasn't acquired by

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Netflix with advertising in mind, so they have to potentially

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>get rights to do ads on that content. They have

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to like find places to do it. But there's also

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of opportunity because they have no legacy advertising business,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to have thirty second TV ads. They

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>can choose any format with any content over time, and

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the revenue potential is at least as large

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>as Netflix is right now in terms of their their size.

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>What happened in this market yesterday I was at the

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto UM convention, and obviously crypto has been pooh pooed

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the incredible crash of bitcoin, but they all said, hey,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it's nothing compared to Netflix. You know,

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has done much worse than than bitcoin, which I

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thought was a silly comparison, but um, it does show

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you just how much I guess froth was in streaming.

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it all across streaming or was it just net Flix? Well,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I mean frost it's been I think it's

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong term. You have to look at it.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That Netflix lead of revolution. They completely changed the relationship

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>between consumers and entertainment, you know, allowing on demand viewing,

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>allowing you to get you know, an entire season the

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>shows all at once, and so that innovation I don't

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think is I wouldn't perceive that as frosty. I would

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>consider it that the market was crashing and Netflix announcement

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're having some subscriber losses, and you know, everyone reacted,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think obviously they have challenges. This is not

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be easy to transition into having an ad

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>supported price point for them, But I think the potential

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>there is clear, and so I think Potentially people overreacted

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the sell off and Netflix stock, and

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know how the not the price declines in the

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>last quarter and you and you're starting to see that turnaround. Mark,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about as we step back and

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the streaming business? Everybody and the

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>brothers got a streaming service now, and they're all it

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're all named plus. Um, how does this

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shake out? I mean, are we going to have three players?

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Five players? Ten players? Are more? Well, there is a

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of consolvation. I mean if you look at like Netflix, Disney,

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Discovery Networks, NBC Universal, I think you're looking at like

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>five companies or essentially half of the entertainment markets for

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for you know, and television viewing at home. So there's

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>already somewhat of a consolidation. I think you'll see that continue. Um.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:50.719
<v Speaker 1>In the advertising space, actually, the brand advertising market is

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not really growing that quickly, so you're looking at somewhat

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of a market share war. In other words, you know,

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>when Netflix comes to this market with TV ads and

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Disney comes in the market with Disney Plus, it's not

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like Procter and Gamble is going to allocate more budgets

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>for TV ads. So it's a bit of a market

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>share war actually. So the opportunity is to expand the

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>number of television advertisers to basically go beyond just these

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>biggest advertisers or else it is going to be a

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a fight and um, so they have to

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of do both things. They have to get into

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that market with the biggest advertisers, and they have to

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 1>innovate with Microsoft in case case of Netflix and Disney,

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, with their Hulu division, um, in terms of

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>to essentially expand the market, or else everyone's going to

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be fighting over the you know, the same pool of dollars.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>All right. So Mark Disney just came out a couple

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of days ago with an announcement they secured nine billion

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>dollars in advertising commitments during its Upfront ad sales event,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>which happens kind of Mark May of every year. Uh,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they're saying streaming played a big part of that. How

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>do you what are your takeaways there? Well? I think

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, I know they love to announce up front,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>but I don't see upfront as a concept lasting for

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>many more years. The concept what's that? But the the

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is is that upfronts were created because you have,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, a certain number of advertisers that are looking

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>for the same shows that the same group of consumers

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>are watching, and so they could get people to bid

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>against each other to get that. But when you look

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>at streaming, you know, you don't target basic, you don't

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>care about the show. You care about who's the consumer

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to reach, and so you don't really need

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the upfronts in the same way. So I think, to me,

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we've reached peak upfront like that, like the parties on

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on going to be on the dep line, I don't

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>think this is the any I think we've reached peak

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>up front. But the industry overall will grow because the

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>upfront models of fifty year old business model that is

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>due for a change, and I think of change is

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>going to our car. Yeah, it's some good stories, Matt

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>from some of these upfront parties. All right, that's Mark Douglas,

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>President CEO of Mountain getting the latest on Netflix again.

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a mixed report last night, but the you know,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>still talking about what is a growing streaming industry. Let's

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>check out with Mike mcblown, senior commodity strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's one of Matt one of those of the

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>cool kids that during the pandemic relocated from the Northeast

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>down to Miami. And he's always, you know, boasting and

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>talking a big game when we're freezing up here in

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>January and February. Mike Howard things down in Miami in July.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It's funny I came south. I can cool off in

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the summer. You guys are getting heat waves now, that's right.

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Wait are you here? I just saw you here yesterday.

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I was yesterday, but I had to come back to

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the rough digs here in Miami. It's it's tough, but

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got to do it. So do we

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have what do we have going on here in Bitcoin? Well,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the big macro pictures. Bitcoin is one of

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bull parks in history that just had its

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest steepest discount to its Hunter week moving average ever.

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>That was just a few days ago. And then you

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>look over the other one of the biggest bear markets

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>in history, crude oil had its steepest premium to its

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Hunter weak movement average ever and that was just a

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>few months ago. And I think what we're doing is

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>getting that reversion process now. So since we had that

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy five bases point hike which was last month, we're

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna get one next week. Bitcoin is up about

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>ten and crude oil is down about ten percent. To me,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what's going to continue to happen partly because of

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the macro the micro and the key thing

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I think to worry about it for a bitcoin is

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>only if we get another big plunge in the stock market,

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin might drop. But it seems to be in the

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>process that coming out ahead. And I think that really

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>showed us last Thursday. Remember we had that bounce in

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. Bitcoin did it first. It's like Mattisman

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>point out point in a lot. It's just a great

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>leading indicator at the moment. Still is so you tied

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>oil and gold together? Are they well in this year?

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's one thing I've enjoyed it. At a few

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>conference people asked me why are you writing so much

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>about Krudel. It's one of the most significant as people

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>would say standard deviation moves versus the hunter week movement

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>average ever in crudef futures and bitcoin, when I'm just

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>seen as a normal discount in a bowl market, but

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to row open Krudel. So let's remember the

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year, the FED was gonna hike twenty

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>five basis points at every meeting, and then we had

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this massive spike in commandities led by Crudeil. Now they're

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>hiking seventy five basis points at two meetings in a row.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are taking up the sledge hammer on markets.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They are it's a sledgehammer, and it's okay the stock

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>market sponsor, that's great, but I think they're going to

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>just keep tightens. The stock market gives up, and Bitcoin

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think has had you know, it's pretty good bear market,

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's had the normal nuances you'd see in a

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in a you know, Nath and Technology were seeing that

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the leaves of some of the bankruptcies and stuff. But

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it's probably more likely just to come out ahead. It's

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this question of timing and Valtilly, what was your takeaway yesterday?

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw you at the Bloomberg Crypto conference in I

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>guess what do you call? It's not Midtown anymore. It's

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like the Grammercy Park area district in any case, Um,

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what was your takeaway there? We saw some big names

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Um talking Jack Millers, I spoke with Sam Bankman, Freed

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Matt Levine, UM, Michael nova Grad spoke with

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Shonali Basket. What was your takeaway? Very similar Matt to

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what I took away from the SALT conference in Bahamas

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as lost the people in the space realized that this

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>has got a little bit a bit overdone, in a

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit bubblicious, and we're personal bursting the bubble and

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>out of that, so many people are so positive about

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the new technology, what it's gonna do, where it's gonna go.

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And that was my takeaway from UM from Sam Bankman, Freed,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Nova Grant said, I really like telling you, yes I

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was wrong, but moving on, this is a pretty significant technology.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>And also on my panel, you know where are we

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a year from now when we get past this period

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of we all remember from the dot com bubble. A

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>year from now, we've built a better system and it's

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>about appreciation. Wow, So you were talking to us, but

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you're still a bull You're still But I wonder when

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you get when you step out of crypto bubbles, isn't

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it hard to keep being bullish after a drop from

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty whatever to well let's put it in context. We've

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>dropped about twenty five trillion dollars from global equity is

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>based on Bloomberg metrics, and we lost about a billion

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a trillion in cryptos. I mean now, right now, cryptos

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>are a rounding error compared to what's happened in the macro.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>We've had the biggest draw down in the in the

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in the bond commodity, in the bond future, which is

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>why I started in trading pits in the eighties. Ever,

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and well it's since nineteen seventy seven, so the markets.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is part of the and cryptos are part of

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that macro. But the thing is, is the fastest horse

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the race where is it five or ten years

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>from now? So here's my bottom line in bitcoin. I

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>fully expect this twenty thousand level is going to be

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like five thousand was the last beer market, and it's

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of time it gets two hundred thousand.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Something has to change in the demand and adoption because

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the supplies declining, that has the prices have to go up,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's going to change. I think

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to see more dip by ever, like

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>do you ever go out to dinner with people who

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't involved in crypto, or like hang out with someone

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>who's been burned and doesn't want to go back into

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a heart doctor? Maybe he has lost

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>money on like Mike Novgress mentioned, well, a lot of

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>people got over their skis the way I look at

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line for cryptos. If you're running and say

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred newness of any acid, you don't have one

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>or two of those units in crypto, you're at greater

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>risk than not doing it. And to me, that narrative

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a smaller part of the bell curve

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe five years ago. Every day that goes by, it's

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>an increasing nuance in the space. Realize, okay, I gotta

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>get into space. I'm willing to buy dips in crypto.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It's got the highest spade. And if if the market

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>goes up bitcoinsrob we're gonna go up the most cryptos.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Where will and where is it five ten years from now?

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Do we really think the will going digital is not

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going to adapt this global digital collateral? And then you

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the theory, it's really the bottom line for

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>n f T S tokenization, which is the key thing

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on of my panel there's nothing to stop the tokenization

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of assets. Regulation will push back, but it's a matter

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of time. And the most widely trade to cryptos on

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the planet. The number one is the dollar. Key think

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember it's a token dis version over the dollar.

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, folks, everybody's out there. It's got a Bloomber

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>turmal in front of them. B I Space, c O,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>M D GO. That's the commodities dashboard run by Mike mcglowa,

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. It's got it all the soft commodities, the

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hard commodities, all this crypto stuff is the place to go. Well,

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll know if we had a peak. Do we have

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a peak in inflation at least on the material side,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, it's very close. In terms of commodities. Commodities

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are plunge. You look at copper down in the year.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the most extreme versus a hundred week moving on

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>average since the christ since Lehman collapsed. So if copper

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>is pointing out that we're heading for a major deflationary perry,

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>services is probably the problem. Right at least that's what

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I heard Tom Keen saying this morning that services could

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to rise in price. So all right, I could

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>lose my bet with Critty. Alright, Mike mcglogan down in Miami,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>sweating it out with the masses, but probably no worse

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>than here in New York City. I mean, I mean,

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>try go down and so it was quite hot yesterday. Alright.

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcglowan, Senior Commodity Strategies bloom Intelligence. Again. That uh

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>ticker B I, SPACE, c O, M D GO is

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>all of the commodity research coming out of Bloomberg Research,

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and Mike has covered everything over his several decade career.

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>The hard commodity is the soft commodities energy. Uh. And

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>now he's really established himself, as you know, within Bloomberg

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence and within I think the industry itself, one of

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the leading research voices for all things scriptose. We appreciate

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>getting some time from him. Thanks for listening to the

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Put on

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.